<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \hack{\allowdisplaybreaks}?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-10-333-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Accounting for the effects of surface BRDF on satellite cloud and trace-gas retrievals:
a new approach based on geometry-dependent Lambertian equivalent
reflectivity applied to OMI algorithms</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Effects of surface BRDF on UV--vis cloud and trace-gas algorithms}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~Vasilkov et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Vasilkov</surname><given-names>Alexander</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Qin</surname><given-names>Wenhan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Krotkov</surname><given-names>Nickolay</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6170-6750</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Lamsal</surname><given-names>Lok</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Spurr</surname><given-names>Robert</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Haffner</surname><given-names>David</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1747-634X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Joiner</surname><given-names>Joanna</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-1020</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Yang</surname><given-names>Eun-Su</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Marchenko</surname><given-names>Sergey</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Science Systems and Applications Inc., Lanham, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>RT Solutions, Cambridge, MA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">A. Vasilkov (alexander.vasilkov@ssaihq.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>27</day><month>January</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>10</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>333</fpage><lpage>349</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>27</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Most satellite nadir ultraviolet and visible cloud, aerosol, and trace-gas
algorithms make use of climatological surface reflectivity databases. For
example, cloud and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument
(OMI) use monthly gridded surface reflectivity climatologies that do not
depend upon the observation geometry. In reality, reflection of incoming
direct and diffuse solar light from land or ocean surfaces is sensitive to
the sun–sensor geometry. This dependence is described by the bidirectional
reflectance distribution function (BRDF). To account for the BRDF, we propose
to use a new concept of geometry-dependent Lambertian equivalent reflectivity
(LER). Implementation within the existing OMI cloud and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval
infrastructure requires changes only to the input surface reflectivity
database. The geometry-dependent LER is calculated using a vector radiative
transfer model with high spatial resolution BRDF information from the
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) over land and the
Cox–Munk slope distribution over ocean with a contribution from
water-leaving radiance. We compare the geometry-dependent and climatological
LERs for two wavelengths, 354 and 466 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, that are used in OMI cloud
algorithms to derive cloud fractions. A detailed comparison of the cloud
fractions and pressures derived with climatological and geometry-dependent
LERs is carried out. Geometry-dependent LER and corresponding retrieved cloud
products are then used as inputs to our OMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithm. We find
that replacing the climatological OMI-based LERs with geometry-dependent LERs
can increase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical columns by up to 50 % in highly
polluted areas; the differences include both BRDF effects and biases between
the MODIS and OMI-based surface reflectance data sets. Only minor changes to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns (within 5 %) are found over unpolluted and overcast
areas.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Satellite ultraviolet and visible (UV–vis) nadir backscattered
sunlight trace-gas, aerosol, and cloud retrieval algorithms must accurately
estimate the reflection by the Earth's surface in order to produce high-quality data sets. Surface reflectivity climatologies used in most current
algorithms are typically gridded monthly Lambertian equivalent reflectivities
(LERs) that have been derived from satellite observations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx32" id="paren.1"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. These climatologies generally
have no dependence on the observation geometry. However, it is well known
that both ocean and land reflectivity depend upon viewing and illumination
geometry.</p>
      <p>Here, we give some basic definitions that have been used in the literature to
provide context to our problem and for clarity because sometimes different
definitions have been used for similar or the same quantities. This
dependence is described by the bidirectional reflectance distribution
function (BRDF), mathematically expressed as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M7" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BRDF</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the portion of total radiance reflected in
the direction defined by the vector <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the
illuminating irradiance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from the direction defined by the vector
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the radiance incident on the
surface from the direction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
angle between the normal to the surface and the direction of illuminating
light, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the element of the solid angle
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.2"/>. The reflected radiance
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated by integrating the product of BRDF and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over all directions of the incident radiation. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
provides a boundary condition at the surface for computations of the
top-of-atmosphere radiance. When the surface is illuminated by a parallel
beam of light, the integral over the solid angle of reflected light is

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M20" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BSA</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BRDF</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the zenith angle of reflected light (subscript
“r” is omitted in the remainder of the paper for simplicity) provides the
so-called black sky albedo (BSA) of the surface. Integration in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) is carried out over the solid angle of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
upper hemisphere. This equation is general, but it follows from
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) that the BRDF for a special case of a perfect Lambertian
surface is equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The frequently used dimensionless bidirectional reflectance factor (BRF) is
defined as “the ratio of the radiant flux reflected by a sample surface to
the radiant flux reflected into the identical beam geometry by an ideal
(lossless) and diffuse (Lambertian) standard surface, irradiated under the
same conditions as the sample surface” <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.3"/>. In general, the
relationship between BRF and BRDF for an arbitrary surface can be obtained
from Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) by using BRDF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for an ideal Lambertian
surface, i.e.,

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M25" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BRF</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Lam</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BRDF</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>BRF and BRDF are both inherent properties of the surface that do not depend
on the illumination conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.4"/>. While BRDF is a function
describing a surface for all possible illuminating and reflected directions,
the BRF refers to a specific illumination and observational geometry for a
given measurement. BRF from satellite observations can therefore differ
significantly for the same area over different days due to variations in
sun–satellite geometries. In other words, for a given surface BRDF is always
the same (neglecting seasonal changes), but BRF changes from day to day
depending on observational conditions.</p>
      <p>Many satellite UV–vis algorithms are based on the so-called mixed Lambert
equivalent reflectivity (MLER) model, first introduced by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.5"/>. For
example, the MLER concept is currently used in most trace-gas
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.6"/> and cloud <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.7"/> retrieval
algorithms for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), a Dutch–Finnish
UV–vis sensor <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.8"/> onboard the NASA Aura satellite. The MLER model
treats cloud and ground as horizontally homogeneous Lambertian surfaces and
mixes them using the independent pixel approximation (IPA). According to the
IPA, the measured top-of-atmosphere (TOA) radiance is a sum of the clear sky
and overcast subpixel radiances that are weighted with an effective cloud
fraction (ECF). The ECF is calculated by inverting

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M26" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ECF</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ECF</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        at a wavelength not substantially affected by rotational Raman scattering
(RRS) or atmospheric absorption, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measured TOA
radiance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the precomputed clear sky
(ground) and overcast (cloudy) subpixel TOA radiances, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the corresponding ground and cloud LERs, respectively.</p>
      <p>The MLER model typically assumes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.9"/> for a UV total column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
algorithm and independently derived by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.10"/> for use in
near-infrared <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band cloud pressure retrievals. The assumption of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effectively accounts for Rayleigh scattering in partially
cloudy scenes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx41" id="paren.11"/>. This approach also accounts for
scattering/absorption that occurs below a thin cloud. In this paper we also
assume <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the OMI cloud and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithms.</p>
      <p>The MLER model compensates for photon transport within a cloud by placing the
Lambertian surface somewhere in the middle of the cloud instead of at the top
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.12"/>. As clouds are vertically inhomogeneous, the pressure of
this surface corresponds not necessarily to the geometrical center of the
cloud but rather to the so-called optical centroid pressure (OCP)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx13" id="paren.13"/>. The cloud OCP can be thought of and
modeled as a reflectance-averaged pressure level reached by back-scattered
photons <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.14"/>. Cloud OCPs are the appropriate quantity for use in
trace-gas retrievals from satellite instruments
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.15"/>.</p>
      <p>In one of the early studies to explore the effects of surface BRDF on
satellite trace-gas retrievals, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.16"/> showed how various treatments of
surface reflectance, including BRDF, affect OMI tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrievals over Europe. Their study, which covered the months of July and
November, suggested that accounting for surface BRDF effects can change
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals by up to 20 % with the largest effects at high
view angles. Ignoring the surface BRDF can also introduce <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrieval errors that vary with land type <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.17"/>.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="text.18"/> studied the effect of using different surface albedo products
on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns and found that the impact of the surface albedo
can be up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 % for land. In an effort to improve <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrievals over China, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx20" id="text.19"/> revised the calculation of
tropospheric air mass factor (AMF) in the Dutch OMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (DOMINO)
product using improved information for cloud, aerosols, and BRDF from the
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS); they reported better
agreement with independent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations. Similarly,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.20"/> improved OMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard product <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.21"/>
for the Canadian oil sands region
using high-resolution MODIS retrievals. Our motivations for this work follow
from these studies that offered valuable insights into the effects of the
surface BRDF on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals. We continue in this line of
investigation by (1) examining in detail the BRDF effect on retrieved cloud
parameters that are important inputs for trace-gas retrievals including
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; (2) additionally investigating BRDF impact on cloud and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals over ocean; and (3) providing a computationally
efficient method of accounting for BRDF effects over both land and water that
can be incorporated into existing retrieval algorithms with minimal changes.</p>
      <p>To account for surface BRDF in the existing MLER cloud and trace-gas
algorithms, we introduce the concept of a geometry-dependent surface LER. The
geometry-dependent LER is derived from TOA radiance computed with Rayleigh
scattering and BRDF for the exact geometry of a satellite-based pixel. This
approach does not require any major changes to existing MLER trace-gas and
cloud algorithms. The main revision to the algorithms requires replacement of
the existing static LER climatologies with LERs calculated for specific
field-of-view (FOV) sun–satellite geometries. The geometry-dependent surface
LER approach can be applied to any current and future satellite algorithms
that use the MLER concept.</p>
      <p>The main goal of this paper is to document a new global surface reflectivity
product that will be publicly available and could be easily used within
several existing operational satellite trace-gas and cloud algorithms. We
implement the geometry-dependent LERs based on a MODIS BRDF product and use
these LERs within OMI cloud and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithms. Henceforth, when we
refer to geometry-dependent LERs, this refers to a MODIS-based data set. We
compare the cloud and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals based on the geometry-dependent
LER with the retrievals based on the climatological LER derived from TOMS and
OMI measurements. Henceforth, climatological LERs refer to products derived
from OMI and TOMS. The differences between those retrievals include both BRDF
effects and possible biases between the MODIS and other instrument (OMI and
TOMS) reflectance data sets. The existing operational algorithms make use of
climatological LER products. By comparing the products retrieved with the
geometry-dependent LER with those retrieved with the climatological LER, we
address a practical question of how large the differences in various
satellite products would be if the climatological LERs were replaced with the
geometry-dependent LERs.</p>
      <p>It should be noted that the MODIS BRDF product is derived from the
atmospherically corrected TOA reflectances (i.e., aerosol and Rayleigh
scattering effects are removed at the high spatial resolution of MODIS). In
contrast, the climatological LERs currently used in OMI algorithms, from
either the Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) or OMI, are derived by
correcting only for Rayleigh scattering and thus include aerosol effects
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx14" id="paren.22"><named-content content-type="pre">see details in</named-content></xref>. Therefore, the use of the
geometry-dependent LER product in trace-gas algorithms over heavily polluted
regions may also require an explicit account of aerosols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.23"/>. In
this study we do not consider aerosol effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Satellite data sets and radiative transfer model</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Vector Linearized
Discrete Ordinate Radiative Transfer (VLIDORT) code</title>
      <p>For all radiative transfer calculations, we use the VLIDORT code
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.24"/>. VLIDORT computes the Stokes vector in a plane-parallel
atmosphere with a non-Lambertian underlying surface. It has the ability to
deal with attenuation of solar and line-of-sight paths in a spherical
atmosphere, which is important for large solar zenith angles (SZA) and
viewing zenith angles (VZA). We account for polarization at the ocean surface
using a full Fresnel reflection matrix as suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.25"/>.
Unlike <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx20" id="text.26"/>, we use a vector code because neglecting
polarization can lead to considerable errors for modeling backscatter spectra
in UV–vis. This is particularly the case for modeling backscatter spectra
over the ocean where reflection of unpolarized light from the flat ocean
surface at the Brewster angle leads to perfect linear polarization
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.27"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>MODIS BRDF data set</title>
      <p>We use the MODIS gap-filled BRDF Collection 5 product MCD43GF
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.28"/>. The product is available online at
<uri>ftp://rsftp.eeos.umb.edu/data02/Gapfilled/</uri>. This product provides three
coefficients, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as a function of time and spatial coordinates for three
BRDF kernels: (1) isotropic, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">iso</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; (2) volumetric,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vol</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; and (3) geometric, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">geo</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The BRDF coefficients
are dynamic, i.e., 16-day averages for every 8 days of the year from 2003 to
present. They are provided for snow-free land and permanent ice at a high
spatial resolution (30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">arcsec</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). In this study we do not consider
temporary snow-covered areas. In principal, those areas can be treated with
the approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.29"/> that is based on the MODIS-derived albedo
product. Unlike <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.30"/>, we do not use MODIS data over coastal zones
and inland waters, because the MODIS kernel model is not applicable for water
surfaces. Instead of MODIS data, we apply our ocean model described in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/> to the coastal zones and inland waters.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>OMI data sets</title>
      <p>In this paper, we examine the BRDF effects on two OMI cloud algorithms, one
based on RRS in the UV and the other on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption at
477 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud algorithm developed by the
authors and used here is similar to an operational <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
cloud algorithm developed at the Royal Meteorological Institute of the
Netherlands (KNMI), known as OMCLDO2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.31"/>, but differs in a
few respects described below.</p>
      <p>Both the RRS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithms utilize the MLER concept.
We use 354 and 466 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in the RRS and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
algorithms, respectively, to compute ECF. It should be noted that the ECF
implicitly accounts for non-absorbing aerosols, treating them as clouds and
this increases cloud fraction. However, the increase of cloud fraction due to
the presence of aerosols cannot correctly reproduce an increase of diffuse
solar light at the surface caused by aerosol scattering. This may introduce
some error in the calculation of the clear-sky subpixel radiance because the
BRDF effect depends on a ratio of diffuse to direct solar light.</p>
      <p>The OMI RRS cloud algorithm is detailed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="text.32"/>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.33"/>, and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.34"/>. OCP is derived from the
high-frequency structure in the TOA reflectance caused by RRS in the
atmosphere. The OCP is retrieved by a minimum-variance technique that
spectrally fits the observed TOA reflectance within the spectral window of
345.5–354.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The RRS algorithm does not report the cloud OCP for
ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05 due to large retrieval errors at small values of ECF
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="paren.35"/>.</p>
      <p>Our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud algorithm retrieves OCP from OMI-derived
oxygen dimer slant column densities (SCDs) at 477 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Our algorithm
spectral fitting differs from KNMI's in that it utilizes
temperature-dependent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cross sections <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.36"/>
and incorporates a new fitting technique similar to that developed by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.37"/> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD retrieval. The fitting procedure
derives the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD using retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant column estimates from independent OMI algorithms. This is
an implementation choice that is designed to minimize potential errors due to
cross talk between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cross
sections during the fitting procedure.</p>
      <p>The OCP is estimated using the MLER method to compute the appropriate AMFs
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.38"/>. To solve for OCP, we invert

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M86" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SCD</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VCD</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OCP</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">VCD</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OCP</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where VCD is the vertical column density of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(VCD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD/AMF), AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are the
precomputed (at 477 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) clear sky (ground) and overcast (cloudy)
subpixel AMFs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the surface pressure, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the cloud radiance fraction (CRF) given
by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ECF</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Lookup tables
of the TOA radiances and AMFs were generated using VLIDORT. Temperature
profiles needed for computation of VCD and AMF are taken from the Global
Modeling Initiative (GMI) chemistry transport model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.39"/> driven by the
NASA GEOS-5 global data assimilation system <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.40"/>. Comparisons of the
retrieved OCPs with those from the operational KNMI OMI
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithm, OMCLDO2, have shown good agreement with a
correlation coefficient of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.99 for ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when identical
surface climatological LERs are used.</p>
      <p>The OMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spectral fitting algorithm (OMNO2A) currently uses
differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) to fit OMI-measured
spectra in the wavelength range of 405–465 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to estimate total
(stratospheric and tropospheric) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SCDs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.41"/>. The SCDs
are then converted to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> stratospheric and tropospheric VCDs using
pre-calculated AMFs: VCD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD/AMF <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx17" id="paren.42"/>. For fixed
(measured) SCD, the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> VCD is inversely proportional to
the AMF.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Basic approach</title>
      <p>In this section we describe our approach of generating the geometry-dependent
LER. First, we average all input data over a nominal OMI pixel. The input
data include MODIS-derived land BRDF kernel coefficients, land–water flags,
terrain heights from a digital elevation model, and chlorophyll values and
wind speed over water surfaces. Second, we compute the TOA radiance
accounting for surface BRDF. Third, we calculate the geometry-dependent LER
from the TOA radiance. Then we use this geometry-dependent LER in cloud and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithms to replace the climatological LERs.</p>
      <p>The BRDF over land is calculated using the Ross-Thick Li-Sparse (RTLS) kernel
model <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.43"/>:

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M107" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BRDF</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">iso</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vol</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vol</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">geo</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">geo</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where the coefficients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">iso</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vol</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">geo</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
come from MODIS data, the isotropic kernel, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">iso</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, describes the
Lambertian part of light reflection from the surface, the volumetric kernel,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vol</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, describes light reflection from a dense leaf canopy, and
the geometric kernel, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">geo</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, describes light reflection from a
sparse ensemble of surface objects casting shadows on the background assumed
to be Lambertian. The kernels are the only angle-dependent functions, the
expressions of which are given in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.44"/>. The BRDF coefficients are spatially
averaged over an actual satellite FOV and used to calculate TOA radiance for
its observation geometry.</p>
      <p>The BRDF coefficients depend on wavelength. For the present study we selected
two wavelengths in the UV and vis: 354 and 466 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. These wavelengths
are relatively free of atmospheric RRS and
trace-gas absorption. The BRDF coefficients at 466 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are directly
taken from the MCD43GF product at 470 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (MODIS Band 3 has a
wavelength range from 459 to 479 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and a center wavelength of
470 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) that is provided at a spatial resolution of 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">arcsec</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.45"/>. Because the MODIS product is not available at
354 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, we plan to adjust the 470 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> LERs to account for
potential spectral dependences. The adjustment applies the spectral ratio of
climatological OMI-derived LERs, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>354</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>470</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
similar to the approach of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.46"/>. In the paper we assume that the
BRDF coefficients are spectrally independent to focus on the surface BRDF
effects only. Using climatological data of Kleipool et al. (2008) we find
that this assumption can be valid for some areas; for example, the climatological
ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>354</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>470</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is close to unity (within
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 %) over the eastern part of North America. However, this is not
the case for arid and semiarid areas. We plan to release our
geometry-dependent LER product computed for wavelengths other than
470 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> using a spectral correction of the BRDF coefficients. This
spectral correction will be based on the ratio
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>354</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn>470</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from a critical analysis of
different existing data sets of climatological satellite-derived LERs.</p>
      <p>To calculate TOA radiance over water surfaces, we account for both light
specularly reflected from a rough water surface and diffuse light
backscattered by water bulk and transmitted through the water surface. We
neglect contributions from oceanic foam that can be significant for high wind
speeds. Reflection from the water surface is described by the Cox–Munk slope
distribution function <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.47"/>. We use an isotropic form of the Cox–Munk
distribution in which the facet–slope variance is independent of wind
direction. All computations use a wind speed of 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which is
close to the climatological mean.</p>
      <p>Diffuse light from the ocean is described by a Case 1 water model that has
chlorophyll concentration as a single input parameter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.48"/>. Our
Case 1 water model accounts for the anisotropic nature of light backscattered
by the ocean <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.49"/>. A spatial distribution of chlorophyll
concentration is taken from the monthly SeaWiFS climatology. The common
Case 1 water model developed for the vis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.50"/> was extended to the UV
using data from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx48" id="text.51"/>. To calculate water-leaving
radiance, we need to know the downwelling atmospheric transmittance at the
surface. The transmittance is obtained by calculating the total atmospheric
direct and diffuse downwelling flux at the surface. The diffuse contribution
in the transmittance will itself depend on the water-leaving radiance. To
calculate the atmospheric transmittance, we introduce in VLIDORT a module for
the iterative calculation of the transmittance, in which the first
computation is made for a black surface, and this is then used again as input to the
water-leaving contribution. This process is repeated until convergence of the
transmittance is achieved (two or three iterations are sufficient).</p>
      <p>To estimate LER over mixed surface types, we compute an area-weighted
radiance for uniform land and water contributions within an OMI FOV. The LER
for heterogeneous surface pixels is then calculated from this linear
combination of radiances. The high spatial resolution MCD43GF product
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.52"/> also supplies an eight-category land water classification
map at the same resolution as the BRDF parameters. We convert this map into a
binary land–water mask by merging all shorelines and ephemeral water into the
land category and classifying all other water subcategories simply as water.
We then compute the areal fraction of land and water for each OMI FOV. For
specification of the OMI pixel, we used the OMPIXCOR product that provides
coordinates of OMI pixel corners
(<uri>http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/uui/datasets/OMPIXCOR_V003/summary</uri>). We
used an option of overlapping pixels in the along-track direction
corresponding to 75 % energy in the along-track FOV. In this option the
edges of the FOV are aligned in the cross track direction but overlap in the
along-track direction.</p>
      <p>Given the computed TOA radiance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the LER is calculated by
inverting

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M129" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">comp</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is wavelength, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the VZA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the SZA,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the relative azimuth angle, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the LER, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the TOA
radiance calculated for a black surface, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total
(direct <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> diffuse) solar irradiance reaching the surface converted to the
ideal Lambertian reflected radiance (by dividing by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and then
multiplied by the transmittance of the reflected radiation between the
surface and TOA in the direction of a satellite instrument, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the diffuse flux reflectivity of the atmosphere for the
case of its isotropic illumination from below (Eq. 200 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="altparen.53"/>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="altparen.54"/>).
To speed up computations, we created lookup tables of the quantities <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for selected wavelengths.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>High spatial resolution MODIS-based LERs for the
Baltimore–Washington area of the United States for 17 (left) and 18 (right)
January 2005 computed with the original spatial resolution of
30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">arcsec</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> but for OMI observational geometries.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Averaging the BRDF coefficients over an OMI pixel may not be equivalent to
averaging the high-resolution surface LER over the OMI pixel. We carried out
a numerical experiment of calculations of TOA radiances using the
high-resolution BRDF coefficients and OMI geometries for the
Washington–Baltimore area of the United States (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). The TOA
radiances were converted into LERs using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>) and then the LERs
were averaged over OMI pixels. The resulting LERs were compared with that
calculated from the standard procedure of averaging the BRDF coefficients
first. We found that the mean LER difference was equal to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.75</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with a standard deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is quite
acceptable for our purposes.</p>
      <p>It should be noted that aerosols are not included in the computation of the
geometry-dependent LER. Scattering by aerosols in the atmosphere reduces the
BRDF effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.55"/>. Therefore, the use of the geometry-dependent
LER may result in overestimation of the BRDF effects. While non-absorbing
aerosols are implicitly accounted for in the cloud algorithms (see
Sect. 2.3.1), the aerosols directly affect the AMF, and thus trace-gas
retrievals.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> shows a data flow diagram that summarizes the
generation of the geometry-dependent LER for satellite instruments. The
diagram shows input data, all the steps of processing the data, and outputs.
The input data include MODIS-derived land BRDF kernel coefficients and
land–water flags, chlorophyll values, terrain heights from a digital
elevation model, and wind speed at a height of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. All the input
data are averaged over a nominal OMI pixel using the OMI pixel corner
information. The averaged input data, OMI pixel geometry, and atmospheric
profiles are used to compute the TOA radiance with VLIDORT. The
geometry-dependent LER is calculated from the TOA radiance using
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E7"/>) and a pre-computed lookup table of radiative transfer
parameters. Values of the geometry-dependent LER for each OMI pixel along
with ancillary data are written in an HDF5-EOS output file for every OMI orbit.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Data flow diagram of generating the geometry-dependent
LER.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f02.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> LERs computed at 466 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for OMI orbit 12414 of
14 November 2006 using MODIS-based BRDF with OMI geometry,
<bold>(b)</bold> OMI-based monthly climatology, and <bold>(c)</bold> their
difference: MODIS-based minus climatological LERs. Missing MODIS BRDF data
are shown in grey here and elsewhere.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f03.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Geometry-dependent LER</title>
      <p>Because reflection of incoming direct and diffuse solar light from
non-Lambertian surfaces depends on satellite observational geometry, the same
area observed at different geometries can have different LERs.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> shows the MODIS-based high spatial resolution LER over
the Baltimore–Washington area of the United States for 2 consecutive days
(17 and 18 January 2005) computed using the OMI observational geometry. The
SZA and VZA values are in the similar ranges for both days. However, there is
a large difference in the relative azimuth angle, which varies from around
63<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 17 January to about 118<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 18 January. Since the
land tends to have strong backward scattering, this explains the higher LER
for 18 January than that for 17 January. The differences, if not accounted
for, may produce errors in the trace-gas retrievals.</p>
      <p>A comparison of the computed geometry-dependent and climatological LERs at
466 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> for OMI orbit 12414 of
14 November 2006. The climatological LERs (monthly) are derived from OMI
observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.56"/>. In general, the eastern portion of the orbital
swath (that has a later Equator crossing time) has higher values of the LERs
than the western part. This is an effect of the OMI observational geometry
and BRDF increases in the backscattered direction over land. Over the US, the
western portion of the orbital swath has higher values of the LER than the
eastern portion. This is explained by the dominance of the difference in
climatological surface reflectances between the east and the west (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b) as compared with the BRDF increase due to the OMI
observational geometry.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows significant differences between the
geometry-dependent and climatological LERs for both land and ocean. Over
land, the climatological LERs are mostly higher than the geometry-dependent
LERs. This is presumably because the geometry-dependent LERs are derived from
atmospherically corrected MODIS radiances while the climatological LERs are
affected by residual aerosols. Moreover, climatological LERs are inherently
contaminated by clouds due to substantially larger sizes of OMI pixels as
compared with those of MODIS. This is particularly true for the Amazonian
region where clouds are persistent.</p>
      <p>Over ocean, the geometry-dependent LERs are systematically higher than the
climatological LERs in areas affected by sun glint and at large VZAs. This is
because the climatological LERs are based on the mode of LERs from a long
time series of observations over a given area; this minimizes the impact of
observations affected by sun glint and high values that occur at large VZAs.
The total ocean reflectance is comprised of three components: direct and
diffuse solar light reflected from the ocean surface and water-leaving light.
The fraction of each component strongly depends on geometry. Reflection of
direct solar light dominates in the sun-glint area. At the edges of the swath
the relative contribution of reflected diffuse light increases because the
sky radiance increases to the horizons and the reflection angle increases
thus the Fresnel reflection increases. The higher values of LER nearer to the
eastern part of the swath than at the western part are mostly due to sky
light reflected from the ocean surface. The angular distribution of the sky
radiance is not symmetric in the plane of satellite observations because the
sun is in the western part of the swath. The sky radiance is higher in the
eastern part of the swath, and it is reflected at higher angles than the
light from the western part. Additionally, the higher reflection angle
results in higher Fresnel reflection in the eastern part of the swath. This
is confirmed by our calculations of the view angle dependence of the
reflected light only, i.e., no water-leaving radiance included.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows the geometry-dependent LERs computed at 466 and
354 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and their differences for the same OMI orbit 12414 of
14 November 2006. Here, we assume that the BRDF coefficients over land are
spectrally independent. The LER differences over land are thus solely due to
the smoothing effect of enhanced Rayleigh scattering in UV that increases the
diffuse to direct incident irradiance ratio as compared with 466 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Over land, LER(354) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> LER(466), but the differences are relatively small
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.015</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>Over the ocean, the LER differences additionally result from the spectral
dependence of water-leaving radiance. Over the sunglint areas, the solar
light reflected from the ocean surface is significantly brighter at
466 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> than at 354 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, thus leading to higher LERs. Over areas
less affected by sunglint, LER(354) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> LER(466) in general due to higher
amounts of water-leaving radiance.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Similar to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> but showing geometry-dependent LERs
computed for <bold>(a)</bold> 466 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(b)</bold> 354 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<bold>(c)</bold> their difference: 466 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> minus 354 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> LER.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f04.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> RRS-retrieved ECF computed with geometry-dependent LERs
and <bold>(b)</bold> the difference between the ECFs computed with
geometry-dependent and climatological LERs for OMI orbit 12414 of 14 November
2006. ECF data correspond to LER shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f05.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Scatter plot of RRS-retrieved effective cloud fractions
(ECFs) computed with geometry-dependent LERs vs. climatological LERs, where the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line is in black; <bold>(b)</bold> similar but for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with linear fits; <bold>(c)</bold> the mean ECF difference (diamonds) and
standard deviation (error bars) as a function of ECF; <bold>(d)</bold> normalized
histograms of ECF for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Data are for OMI orbit 12414
of 14 November 2006.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f06.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> RRS-retrieved cloud optical centroid pressure (OCP)
computed with geometry-dependent LERs and <bold>(b)</bold> the difference between
the OCPs computed with geometry-dependent and climatological LERs for OMI
orbit 12414 of 14 November 2006.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison of RRS-retrieved OCPs computed with geometry-dependent
and climatological LERs for OMI orbit 12414 of 14 November 2006; data are for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(a)</bold> Scatter plot with regression lines;
<bold>(b)</bold> the mean OCP difference and the standard deviation;
<bold>(c)</bold> normalized histograms of OCP.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>It is interesting to note that the patterns of rivers and their tributaries
are evident in the LER maps of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> for both 354 and
466 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This effect is most pronounced when rivers are viewed from
the OMI measurement geometry that registers the reflectance signal of Fresnel
reflection from smooth river surfaces. It may be somewhat surprising that
this appears at OMI spatial resolution; we can explain the effect by
considering that while the LER from FOVs comprised of river areas and
surrounding land is weighted linearly by the areal fraction of each,
reflectance from the river surface is disproportionally high due to the
Fresnel reflection in sun-glint geometry. Outside of the regions where OMI
observes glint, the LER in the Amazon basin may still be higher than expected
due to the turbidity of some rivers in the Amazon floodplain that varies
seasonally.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>BRDF effects on the OMI cloud products</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>RRS algorithm</title>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows ECFs computed with geometry-dependent LERs and the
differences with respect to the climatological LERs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ECF) for OMI
orbit 12414 of 14 November 2006. The largest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ECFs (up to 0.05) take
place over the less cloudy Amazonian areas. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ECF is obviously lower
for cloudy areas due to the diminished effect of surface properties on TOA
radiance. The heavily cloudy areas are easily identified on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ECF
map.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a is a scatter plot of ECF retrieved with the
geometry-dependent LERs vs. ECF retrieved with climatological LERs for the
entire range of ECF. It shows that the scatter of data around the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line
diminishes with increasing ECF; i.e., the difference in ECFs decreases with
increasing ECF as expected. We next examine the most interesting range of ECF
for trace-gas retrievals, ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25, which corresponds to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.4–0.5. For this range, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b shows a scatter plot of the
ECFs retrieved with the geometry-dependent vs. climatological LERs and
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>c shows how <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ECF varies with ECF. Only data from
50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S to 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N are used in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> and all
subsequent similar figures. This latitude range excludes areas with snow for
which MODIS BRDF data are not available. On average, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ECF is small and
positive for the ocean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.02). Over land <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ECF is even lower
and ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.01 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.015 for ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25. The
standard deviation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ECF does not depend much on ECF. It is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 over ocean and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.015 over land. Even though <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ECF
is small on average, it can be as large as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.05 for individual FOVs,
which is quite substantial for the low ECF range. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>d shows
normalized histograms of ECFs for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The normalized
histograms of ECF retrieved with climatological LER and ECF retrieved with
BRDF are close to each other. This reflects small differences between the
ECFs on average.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> similarly shows OCPs retrieved with the geometry-dependent
LER and the differences with respect to those retrieved using the
climatological LERs (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OCP) for OMI orbit 12414. There are no obvious
geographical patterns in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OCP map. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OCP can be as large as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The OCP differences are particularly pronounced along
the edges of cloud systems. Spatial correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OCP
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ECF (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>) is not apparent. As may
be expected, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OCP decreases with increasing ECF. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> is
similar to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> but for OCP. On average, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OCP is small
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with standard deviation of up to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Pa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. As it can be seen from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c, changes of the
OCP histograms due to replacing the climatological LERs with the
geometry-dependent LERs are relatively small. This is a consequence of small
OCP differences on average.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{{$\chem{O_{2}}$}--{$\chem{O_{2}}$} algorithm}?><title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithm</title>
      <p>Spatial distributions of the effective cloud fraction and cloud pressure
retrieved from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are quite similar to those retrieved
from RRS (shown in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>). That is why we do not
show maps of ECF and OCP retrieved from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Here we show
comparisons of the cloud products retrieved from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
the geometry-dependent and climatological LERs for ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> is similar to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> but for ECF from the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithm. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.03 over land
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.01 over ocean. The histograms of ECF retrieved with
climatological LER and geometry-dependent LER (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>d) are similar
to that from the RRS cloud algorithm (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Scatter plot of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-retrieved ECFs
computed with geometry-dependent LERs vs. climatological LERs, where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line
is in black; <bold>(b)</bold> similar but for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
linear fits; <bold>(c)</bold> the mean ECF difference and the standard deviation;
<bold>(d)</bold> normalized histograms of ECF.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f09.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Scatter plot of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-retrieved OCPs
computed with geometry-dependent LERs vs. climatological LERs with linear
fits; data are for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(b)</bold> The mean ECF
difference (diamonds) and standard deviation (error bars) as a function of
ECF. <bold>(c)</bold> Normalized histograms of OCP.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f10.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-derived ECFs and OCPs computed
with geometry-dependent and climatological LERs; data are for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(a)</bold> The mean ECF difference and <bold>(b)</bold> OCP
difference (diamonds) and standard deviation (error bars) as a function of
ECF for 14 July 2006; <bold>(c)</bold> the mean ECF difference and
<bold>(d)</bold> OCP difference (diamonds) and standard deviation (error bars) as
a function of ECF for 14 November 2006.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f11.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> is similar to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> but for OCP from the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithm. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OCP has values up to
200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OCPs are significantly larger for the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithm as compared with RRS. On average,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OCP varies from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>80 hPa at ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at
ECF <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over land. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>OCP is noticeably lower over ocean. The
standard deviation, up to 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, is also higher than that from the
RRS cloud algorithm. The histograms of OCP retrieved from the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud algorithm (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>c) noticeably differ
from those retrieved from the RRS cloud algorithm (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c).
According to Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>c, lower altitude clouds (with
OCP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) are observed more frequently over the ocean than
over land. For high-altitude clouds (OCP <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) the situation
is reversed: they are observed more frequently over land than over the ocean.
Both patterns in the vertical distribution of clouds are much less pronounced
in the histograms of OCP retrieved from the RRS algorithm.</p>
      <p>The effect of replacing the climatological surface LERs with the
geometry-dependent LERs is much more pronounced for the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> OCP retrievals than for the RRS retrievals. This can
be explained by two physical factors. Firstly, the Rayleigh optical depth of
the atmosphere in the UV (the spectral window of the RRS cloud algorithm is
345–354 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is much higher than in the visible (the wavelength of
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> OCP retrieval is 477 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Higher
scattering in the UV leads to a larger fraction of diffuse light illuminating
the surface, which decreases BRDF effects. In the visible, the smoothing
effect of Rayleigh scattering is less than in the UV, thus resulting in larger
BRDF effects. Secondly, sensitivities of the OCP derived from RRS and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to surface reflectivity are different for the RRS and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithms. The light path of direct sunlight
reflected by the surface does not contribute to the RRS signal because there
is no Raman scattering involved. However, this direct light path does contribute
to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption. That is why the RRS algorithm is
generally less sensitive to the surface and to its BRDF. For high surface
reflectivity, the reflected direct solar light significantly contributes to
TOA radiance and therefore causes the OCP differences related to the absence of
RRS in direct solar light and the presence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
absorption in direct solar light. However, for low surface reflectivity, this
mechanism becomes less significant because the fraction of the reflected
direct solar light in the TOA radiance is smaller.</p>
      <p><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.57"/> compared ECFs and OCPs derived from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
absorption using the OMI operational algorithm and their own algorithm that
makes use of SCDs from the operational algorithm and a set of ancillary
parameters that includes MODIS BRDF. Their scatter plots of the operational
ECF and OCP retrievals vs. the new retrievals with BRDF shown in their Fig. 2
are qualitatively similar to ours.</p>
      <p>To make the numbers characterizing the ECF and OCP differences more
representative, we processed OMI data for 2 days of 14 November and 14 July
2006. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> shows the ECF and OCP differences as a function of
ECF for those 2 days. The ECF differences calculated for the entire day of
14 November 2006 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>c) are close to those calculated for orbit
12414 of that day (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b). The OCP differences over land
calculated for the entire day (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>d) are slightly lower than
those calculated for orbit 12414 of that day (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>b), while the
OCP differences over ocean for the entire day are quite close to those
calculated for one orbit. The ECF and OCP differences are similar for
different seasons. A small increase of the OCP differences in November may
not be statistically significant. The data in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> indicate that
the ECF and OCP differences obtained for OMI orbit 12414 are globally
representative.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{BRDF effects on the OMI {$\chem{NO_{2}}$} retrievals}?><title>BRDF effects on the OMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals</title>
      <p>We consider the BRDF effect on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AMFs only, because the
retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> amount is inversely proportional to the AMF. The
geometry-dependent LER approach provides an exact match of TOA radiances with
the full BRDF approach but not of the photon path lengths. This
simplification can lead to some biases in the calculation of AMFs and thus to
biases in the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical columns. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.58"/> have
estimated the biases. They compared the box AMFs and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical
columns calculated with the full BRDF with that calculated with black sky
albedo and white sky albedo. According to their data, maximum differences in
the box AMFs are up to 10 % at the surface and differences in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical columns are smaller than 12 %. We carried out
calculations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> scattering weights and AMFs with full BRDF
treatment and compared them with that calculated with the corresponding
geometry-dependent LER. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>a shows an example of the altitude
dependence of scattering weights calculated with the full BRDF treatment and
the geometry-dependent LER. It can be seen that the difference between the
scattering weights is small. An AMF difference for this case is 5.6 %.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>b shows a scatter plot of the full BRDF AMFs vs. the
geometry-dependent LER AMFs calculated for OMI measurements over the eastern
US for orbit 12414 of 14 November 2006. Differences in AMFs due to different
treatment of the surface are within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 % (at 95 % confidence
interval) and always less than 10 %.</p>
      <p>The tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AMF, AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, is calculated using
the MLER model with input cloud parameters from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
algorithm assuming a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical profile shapes (see
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M285" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OCP</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The effect of a surface reflectivity change, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of 0.01
on AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>. The Jacobian, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>J</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is always positive because larger surface reflectances
increase satellite sensitivity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption in the lowest
atmosphere. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mi>J</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and for unpolluted
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio profiles (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Scattering weights calculated for an OMI pixel with the
following observation angles: SZA = 53.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, VZA = 54.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and relative azimuth angle RAZ = 60.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(b)</bold> AMF calculated
with full BRDF vs. BRDF-derived LER for OMI measurements over the eastern US
on 14 November 2006. A regression line is shown in blue. The data are for
clear skies.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f12.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>An effect of replacing the climatological LERs with geometry-dependent LERs
on AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for OMI observational geometries and ground resolution
can be estimated from Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/> using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LER</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BRDF</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LER</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The effect is
largest over polluted regions in the eastern US, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is negative with values from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.03 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.02 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>),
LER <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.05, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 %. The BRDF effect reverses over water for glint geometries and
large viewing angles, but <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is large here and the effect on
AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is reduced (i.e., small Jacobian).</p>
      <p>To estimate the BRDF effect on AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> we need to account for the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> change as well. By differentiating Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>) and
assuming that AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are independent variables
and both depend on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we  get

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M313" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close="" open="["><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OCP</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="." close="]"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            The cloud AMF strongly depends on the OCP, since high clouds (low OCP) have a
shielding effect and low clouds (high OCP), aerosols, and fog can enhance
AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Assuming a negligible <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio above the
cloud OCP, we can neglect AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>) simplifies
to

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M317" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AMF</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Over land, replacing the climatological LERs with the geometry-dependent LERs
reduces the surface LER on average (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), leading
to smaller values of AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>). At the same time,
the mean ECF increases by 0.02 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>) and this produces even
larger increases in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Therefore both terms in the above equation are negative meaning that
switching to a geometry-dependent LER reduces AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> even more
over land. The effect is mixed over water, since both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can change signs for certain geometries. It should
be noted that we derived Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E9"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>) to
qualitatively illustrate the effect of changing surface reflectance on AMF in
cloudy conditions. The equations are not used to produce data in the figures
of Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>. The data in the figures are obtained numerically
using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E8"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> November mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles at three locations
in the eastern US from the NASA GMI model; <bold>(b)</bold> air mass factor (AMF)
change due to 0.01 change in surface reflectivity as a function of surface
reflectivity. Red: highly polluted profile; green: moderately polluted; blue:
unpolluted profile.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f13.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> OMI tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> air mass factor (AMF)
calculated using geometry-dependent MODIS-based LER; <bold>(b)</bold> percent
differences with respect to climatological LERs for OMI orbit 12414 on
14 November 2006.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Scatter diagrams of AMFs calculated using geometric-dependent
MODIS-based LER vs. OMI-based climatological LER for the orbit 12414 for
clear to moderately cloudy sky (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) including
<bold>(a)</bold> effects of BRDF only with clouds unchanged and <bold>(b)</bold> the
effects of both BRDF and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud parameters for land
(blue) and ocean (orange). Numbers in parentheses represent percent difference
at the 2nd and 98th percentile range. Percent difference in AMF with changes
in surface BRDF and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud parameters, sorting the data
by the difference with respect to <bold>(c)</bold> LER, <bold>(d)</bold> OCP, and
<bold>(e)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16"><caption><p>AMFs calculated with geometry-dependent MODIS-based LERs and
climatological OMI-based LERs over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> boxes in
eastern China (115–120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 36–41<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; triangle), eastern
US (75–80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 36–41<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; circle), and South America
(55–60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 20–25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S; plus sign) for clear to
moderately cloud skies <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Orbit 12414 of 14 November 2006
for data over America and orbit 12391 of 13 November 2006 for data over
China. AMF calculated with the MODIS-based LER includes the combined effects
of surface BRDF and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud parameters. Symbols are
color-coded by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Numbers in parentheses represent percent
differences at the 2nd and 98th percentile ranges.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/333/2017/amt-10-333-2017-f16.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/> shows that the calculated impact on AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
arising from replacing the climatological OMI-based LERs with
geometry-dependent LERs exhibits a strong spatial variation with smaller
effects over ocean, unpolluted, or cloudy areas. Over land, where the
geometry-dependent LER is generally lower than the climatological LER, use of
the BRDF data results in lower AMFs and higher tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> VCDs.
The effect is enhanced over polluted areas such as eastern US, where the
changes in AMF can reach up to 50 %. The effect is reduced for unpolluted
and overcast conditions and mixed over oceans, because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increases for sunglint and large VZA directions but decreases for other
directions.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/> compares the clear-sky AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated
using climatological and geometry-dependent LERs for OMI orbit 12414. The use
of geometry-dependent LERs generally leads to lower AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by up
to 29 % over land and 15 % over ocean. Differences in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud parameters resulting from the use of
geometry-dependent LERs add additional scatter, changing AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>42 to 5 % over land and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22 to 13 % over ocean.
AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> differences are large for low AMFs, driven by enhanced
differences in LER, OCP, or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To make the numbers
characterizing the AMF differences be more representative, we calculated the
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AMFs using the geometry-dependent LER and compared
them with those calculated with the climatological LER for 2 days:
14 November and 14 July 2006. The AMF differences arising from both replacing
the climatological LERs with the geometry-dependent LERs and changing the
cloud parameters exhibit strong spatial variations with smaller effects over
the ocean, unpolluted, or cloudy areas similar to Fig <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>. A global
analysis of the AMF differences shows that the AMF differences for OMI orbit
12414 are consistent with those for both days.</p>
      <p>Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/> illustrates how the use of geometry-dependent LER changes
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals over clean and polluted areas. Consistent with
previous studies by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19 bib1.bibx20" id="text.59"/>, AMFs are considerably lower with
geometry-dependent LERs. This suggests that the current operational
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> products based on climatological LERs could be underestimated by
up to 48 % over China. The eastern US exhibits similar but somewhat
smaller differences. Minor changes are expected over unpolluted and overcast
areas.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>We developed a new concept of geometry-dependent
surface LER and provided a means for computing it. Spatially averaged
high-resolution MODIS BRDFs are used for computation of the
geometry-dependent LER over land for OMI pixels. The Cox–Munk slope
distribution function and the Case 1 water-leaving radiance model are
utilized for computation of the geometry-dependent LER over ocean. This
method accounts for the geometrical dependence of LER within the existing
framework of MLER trace-gas and cloud algorithms with only minimal changes.
It is important to note that the geometry-dependent surface LER approach can
be applied to any current or future satellite algorithms that utilize MLER
trace-gas and cloud algorithms.</p>
      <p>We examined the effects of the geometry-dependent LER on OMI cloud and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithms. The effects on retrieved cloud parameters were
relatively small on average and diminish with increasing cloud fraction. Even
though the impact is small on average, it can be as large as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.05 for
the effective cloud fraction and 100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hPa</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the cloud optical
centroid pressure. It should be noted that the background aerosols are
included in the climatological LER; therefore, they are virtually accounted
for in the ECF derived using the LER climatology. The geometry-dependent LER
is calculated for aerosol-free conditions; thus the corresponding ECF should
have a bias. The BRDF effects were noticeably higher for the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithm that uses visible wavelengths as compared
with the RRS algorithm that utilizes a UV spectral range. This can be
explained by the stronger smoothing effect of Rayleigh scattering in the UV
as compared with the vis.</p>
      <p>We also find that replacing the climatological OMI-based LERs with
geometry-dependent LERs can increase the OMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical columns by
up to 50 % over highly polluted areas. Only minor changes to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
columns (within 5 %) are found over unpolluted and overcast areas. It
should be noted that the differences include both BRDF effects and biases
between the MODIS and OMI-based surface reflectance data sets.</p>
      <p>In the future, we plan to implement the use of geometry-dependent LERs in our
cloud and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> OMI algorithms. Along with the use of the
geometry-dependent LER product, we plan to explicitly include aerosols in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithm. Further evaluation of the results with OMI data is
ongoing. The proposed method of generating the geometry-dependent LERs is
computationally expensive. We plan to reduce computational cost by using a
neural network approach to replace VLIDORT calculations. We also plan to
investigate the use of a new surface BRDF product from the Multi-Angle
Implementation of Atmospheric Correction (MAIAC) algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.60"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>The MODIS gap-filled BRDF Collection 5 product MCD43GF used in this paper is
available at <uri>ftp://rsftp.eeos.umb.edu/data02/Gapfilled/</uri>. The OMI
Level 1 data used for calculations of the geometry-dependent LER are
available at <uri>https://aura.gesdisc.eosdis.nasa.gov/data/Aura_OMI_Level1/</uri>. The OMI
Level 2 Collection 3 data that include cloud, NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OMI pixel corner
products are available at <uri>https://aura.gesdisc.eosdis.nasa.gov/data/Aura_OMI_Level2/</uri>.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p>The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>Funding for this work was provided in part by the NASA through the Aura
science team program. We thank Pawan K. Bhartia for helpful discussions,
Ziauddin Ahmad for providing data for comparisons, Andrew Sayer for provision
of an updated ocean optics model used in the water-leaving supplement of the
VLIDORT code, and Crystel B. Schaaf for consultation on the use of the MODIS
BRDF product.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: F. Boersma <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Acarreta et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Acarreta, J. R., De Haan, J. F., and Stammes, P.: Cloud pressure retrieval
using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption band at 477 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>,
J. Geophys. Res., 109, D05204, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003915" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd003915</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Ahmad et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Ahmad, Z., Bhartia, P. K., and Krotkov, N.: Spectral properties of
backscattered UV radiation in cloudy atmospheres, J. Geophys. Res., 109,
D01201, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003395" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003395</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Boersma et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Dirksen, R. J., van der A, R. J., Veefkind,
J. P., Stammes, P., Huijnen, V., Kleipool, Q. L., Sneep, M., Claas, J.,
Leitã, J., Richter, A., Zhou, Y., and Brunner, D.: An improved
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column retrieval algorithm for the Ozone Monitoring
Instrument, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1905–1928, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Bucsela et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Bucsela, E. J., Krotkov, N. A., Celarier, E. A., Lamsal, L. N., Swartz,
W. H., Bhartia, P. K., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P., Gleason, J. F., and
Pickering, K. E.: A new stratospheric and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval
algorithm for nadir-viewing satellite instruments: applications to OMI,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2607–2626, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Chandrasekhar(1960)</label><mixed-citation>
Chandrasekhar S.: Radiative Transfer, Dover Publications, Inc., NY, 393 pp.,
1960.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Cox and Munk(1954)</label><mixed-citation>
Cox, C. and Munk, W.: Statistics of the sea surface derived from sun glitter,
J. Mar. Res., 13, 198–227, 1954.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Dave(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Dave, J. V.: Effect of aerosol on the estimation of total ozone in an
atmospheric column from the measurements of the ultraviolet radiance,
J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 899–911, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Herman and Celarier(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Herman, J. R. and Celarier, E.: Earth surface reflectivity climatology at 340
to 380 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from TOMS data, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 28003–28011, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Joiner and Vasilkov(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Joiner, J. and Vasilkov, A. P.: First Results from the OMI Rotational-Raman
Scattering Cloud Pressure Algorithm, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 44, 1272–1282,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Joiner et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Joiner, J., Vasilkov, A. P., Flittner, D. E., Gleason, J. F., and Bhartia,
P. K.: Retrieval of cloud chlorophyll content using Raman scattering in GOME
spectra, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D01109, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003698" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003698</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Joiner et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Joiner, J., Vasilkov, A. P., Yang, K., and Bhartia, P. K.: Observations over
hurricanes from the ozone monitoring instrument, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33,
L06807, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025592" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL025592</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Joiner et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Joiner, J., Schoeberl, M. R., Vasilkov, A. P., Oreopoulos, L., Platnick, S.,
Livesey, N. J., and Levelt, P. F.: Accurate satellite-derived estimates of
the tropospheric ozone impact on the global radiation budget, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 4447–4465, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4447-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-4447-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Joiner et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Joiner, J., Vasilkov, A. P., Gupta, P., Bhartia, P. K., Veefkind, P., Sneep,
M., de Haan, J., Polonsky, I., and Spurr, R.: Fast simulators for satellite
cloud optical centroid pressure retrievals; evaluation of OMI cloud
retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 529–545, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-529-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-529-2012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Kleipool et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Kleipool, Q. L., Dobber, M. R., de Haan, J. F., and Levelt, P. F.: Earth
surface reflectance climatology from 3 years of OMI data, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, D18308, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010290" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008jd010290</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Koelemeijer et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>Koelemeijer, R. B. A., Stammes, P., Hovenier, J. W., and de Haan, J. F.: A
fast method for retrieval of cloud parameters using oxygen A-band
measurements from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.,
106, 3475–3496, 2001.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Kuhlmann et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Kuhlmann, G., Lam, Y. F., Cheung, H. M., Hartl, A., Fung, J. C. H., Chan,
P. W., and Wenig, M. O.: Development of a custom OMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data product
for evaluating biases in a regional chemistry transport model, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 5627–5644, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5627-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5627-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Lamsal et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Lamsal, L. N., Krotkov, N. A., Celarier, E. A., Swartz, W. H., Pickering,
K. E., Bucsela, E. J., Gleason, J. F., Martin, R. V., Philip, S., Irie, H.,
Cede, A., Herman, J., Weinheimer, A., Szykman, J. J., and Knepp, T. N.:
Evaluation of OMI operational standard <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column retrievals using in
situ and surface-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
11587–11609, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11587-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-11587-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Levelt et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Levelt, P. F., van der Oord, G. H. J., Dobber, M. R., Malkki, A., Visser, H.,
de Vries, J., Stammes, P., Lundell, J. O. V., and Saari, H.: The ozone
monitoring instrument, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 44, 1093–1101, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Lin et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Lin, J.-T., Martin, R. V., Boersma, K. F., Sneep, M., Stammes, P., Spurr, R.,
Wang, P., Van Roozendael, M., Clémer, K., and Irie, H.: Retrieving
tropospheric nitrogen dioxide from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: effects
of aerosols, surface reflectance anisotropy, and vertical profile of nitrogen
dioxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1441–1461, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1441-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1441-2014</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Lin et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Lin, J.-T., Liu, M.-Y., Xin, J.-Y., Boersma, K. F., Spurr, R., Martin, R.,
and Zhang, Q.: Influence of aerosols and surface reflectance on satellite
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval: seasonal and spatial characteristics and implications
for NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission constraints, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11217–11241,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11217-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11217-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Lucht et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Lucht, W., Schaaf, C. B., and Strahler, A. H.: An algorithm for the retrieval
of albedo from space using semiempirical BRDF models, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote,
38, 977–998, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Lyapustin et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Lyapustin, A., Wang, Y., Laszlo, I., Hilker, T., Hall, F., Sellers, P.,
Tucker, J., and Korkin, S.: Multi-angle implementation of atmospheric
correction for MODIS (MAIAC). 3: Atmospheric correction, Rem. Sens. Environ.,
127, 385–393, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.09.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2012.09.002</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Marchenko et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Marchenko, S., Krotkov, N. A., Lamsal, L. N., Celarier, E. A., Swartz, W. H.,
and Bucsela, E. J.: Revising the slant column density retrieval of nitrogen
dioxide observed by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, J. Geophys. Res., 120,
5670–5692, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Martonchik et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Martonchik, J. V., Bruegge, C. J., and Strahler, A. H.: A review of
reflectance nomenclature used in remote sensing, Remote Sensing Reviews, 19,
9–20, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>McLinden et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>McLinden, C. A., Fioletov, V., Boersma, K. F., Kharol, S. K., Krotkov, N.,
Lamsal, L., Makar, P. A., Martin, R. V., Veefkind, J. P., and Yang, K.:
Improved satellite retrievals of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the
Canadian oil sands and comparisons with surface measurements, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 3637–3656, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3637-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3637-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Mishchenko and Travis(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Mishchenko, M. I. and Travis, L. D.: Satellite retrieval of aerosol
properties over the ocean using polarization as well as intensity of
reflected sunlight, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16989–17013,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96JD02425" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD02425</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Morel(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Morel, A.: Optical modeling of the upper ocean in relation to its
biogeneous matter content (Case I waters), J. Geophys. Res.,
93, 10749–10768, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Morel and Gentili(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Morel, A. and Gentili, B.: Didduse reflectance of oceanic water.
III. Implication of bidirectionality for the remote-sensing probe, Appl.
Optics, 35, 4850–4862, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Noguchi et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Noguchi, K., Richter, A., Rozanov, V., Rozanov, A., Burrows, J. P., Irie, H.,
and Kita, K.: Effect of surface BRDF of various land cover types on
geostationary observations of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Meas. Tech.,
7, 3497–3508, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3497-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-3497-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Nicodemus(1965)</label><mixed-citation>
Nicodemus, F.: Directional reflectance and emissivity of an opaque surface,
Appl. Optics, 4, 767–775, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>McPeters et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
McPeters, R., Bhartia, P. K., Krueger, A. J., Herman, J. R., Schlesinger,
B. M., Wellemeyer, C. G., Seftor, C. J., Jaross, G., Taylor, S. L., Swissler,
T., Torres, O., Labow, G., Byerly, W., and Cebula, R. P.: Nimbus-7 Total
Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) data products user's guide, NASA Reference
Publication 1384, 67 pp., 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Popp et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Popp, C., Wang, P., Brunner, D., Stammes, P., Zhou, Y., and Grzegorski, M.:
MERIS albedo climatology for FRESCO <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band cloud retrieval,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 463–483, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-463-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-463-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Rienecker et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Rienecker, M. M., Suarez, M. J., Gelaro, R., Todling, R., Bacmeister, J.,
Liu, E., Bosilovich, M. G., Schubert, S. D., Takacs, L., Kim, G.-K., Bloom,
S., Chen, J., Collins, D., Conaty, A., da Silva, A., Gu, W., Joiner, J.,
Koster, R. D., Lucchesi, R., Molod, A., Owens, T., Pawson, S., Pegion, P.,
Redder, C. R., Reichle, R., Robertson, F. R., Ruddick, A. G., Sienkiewicz,
M., and Woollen, J.: MERRA: NASA's Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for
Research and Applications, J. Climate, 24, 3624–3648,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Russell et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Russell, A. R., Perring, A. E., Valin, L. C., Bucsela, E. J., Browne, E. C.,
Wooldridge, P. J., and Cohen, R. C.: A high spatial resolution retrieval of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column densities from OMI: method and evaluation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 8543–8554, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8543-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8543-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Schaaf et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Schaaf, C. B., Gao, F., Strahler, A. H., Lucht, W., Li, X., Tsang, T.,
Strugnell, N. C., Zhang, X., Jin, Y., Muller, J.-P., Lewis, P., Barnsley, M.,
Hobson, P., Disney, M., Roberts, G., Dunderdale, M., Doll, C., d'Entremont,
R., Hu, B., Liang, S., and Privette, J. L.: First operational BRDF, albedo
and nadir reflectance products from MODIS, Remote Sens. Environ., 83,
135–148, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Schaaf et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Schaaf, C. L. B., Liu, J., Gao, F., and Strahler, A. H.: MODIS albedo and
reflectance anisotropy products from Aqua and Terra, in: Land Remote Sensing
and Global Environmental Change: NASA's Earth Observing System and the
Science of ASTER and MODIS, Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing
Series, Vol. 11, edited by: Ramachandran, B., Justice, C., and Abrams, M.,
Springer-Verlag, 873 pp., 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Schaepman-Strub et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Schaepman-Strub, G., Schaepman, M. E., Painter, T. H., Dangel, S., and
Martonchik, J. V.: Reflectance quantities in optical remote
sensing–definitions and case studies, Remote Sens. Environ., 103, 27–42,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Seftor et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Seftor, C. J., Taylor, S. L., Wellemeyer, C. G., and McPeters, R. D.: Effect
of Partially-Clouded Scenes on the Determination of Ozone, in: Ozone in the
Troposphere and Stratosphere, Part 1, Proceedings of the Quadrennial Ozone
Symposium, Charlottesville, USA, 1992, NASA Conference Publication 3266,
919–922, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Sneep et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Sneep, M., de Haan, J., Stammes, P., Wang, P., Vanbauce, C., Joiner, J.,
Vasilkov, A. P., and Levelt, P. F.: Three way comparison between OMI/Aura and
POLDER/PARASOL cloud pressure products, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15S23,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008694" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008694</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Spurr(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Spurr, R. J. D.: VLIDORT: a linearized pseudo-spherical vector discrete
ordinate radiative transfer code for forward model and retrieval studies in
multilayer multiple scattering media, J. Quant. Spectr. Ra., 102, 316–421,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Stammes et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Stammes, P., Sneep, M., de Haan, J. F., Veefkind, J. P., Wang, P., and
Levelt, P. F.: Effective cloud fractions from the Ozone Monitoring
Instrument: Theoretical framework and validation, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D16S38, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008820" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008820</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Strahan et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Strahan, S. E., Duncan, B. N., and Hoor, P.: Observationally derived
transport diagnostics for the lowermost stratosphere and their application to
the GMI chemistry and transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2435–2445,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2435-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-2435-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Thalman and Volkamer(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Thalman, R. and Volkamer, R.: Temperature dependent absorption cross-sections
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> collision pairs between 340 and 630 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and
at atmospherically relevant pressure, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15,
15371–15381, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3cp50968k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/c3cp50968k</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Vasilkov et al.(1990a)</label><mixed-citation>
Vasilkov, A. P., Kondranin, T. V., Krotkov, N. A., Lakhtanov, G. A., and
Churov, V. E.: Properties of the angular dependence of polarization for
upward radiation from the sea surface in the visible region of the spectrum,
Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 26, 397–401, 1990a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Vasilkov et al.(1990b)</label><mixed-citation>
Vasilkov, A. P., Kondranin, T. V., and Krotkov, N. A.: The effectiveness of
polarization measurements in passive remote sensing of the ocean in the
visible region of the spectrum, Sov. J. Remote Sens., 7, 886–899, 1990b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Vasilkov et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Vasilkov, A. P., Herman, J., Krotkov, N. A., Kahru, M., Mitchell, B. G., and
Hsu, C.: Problems in assessment of the UV penetration into natural waters
from space-based measurements, Opt. Eng., 41, 3019–3027, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Vasilkov et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Vasilkov, A. P., Joiner, J., Yang, K., and Bhartia, P. K.: Improving total
column ozone retrievals by using cloud pressures derived from Raman
scattering in the UV, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L20109,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020603" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL020603</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Vasilkov et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Vasilkov, A. P., Herman, J., Ahmad, Z., Kahru, M., and Mitchell, B. G.:
Assessment of the ultraviolet radiation field in ocean waters from
space-based measurements and full radiative-transfer calculations, Appl.
Optics, 44, 2863–2869, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Vasilkov et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Vasilkov, A. P., Joiner, J., Spurr, R., Bhartia, P. K., Levelt, P. F., and
Stephens, G.: Evaluation of the OMI cloud pressures derived from rotational
Raman scattering by comparisons with other satellite data and radiative
transfer simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15S19,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008689" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008689</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Yang et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Yang, E.-S., Vasilkov, A., Joiner, J., Marchenko, S., Krotkov, N., Haffner,
D., and Bhartia, P. K.: A new cloud pressure algorithm based on the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption band at 477 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, OMI Science Team
Meeting, de Bilt, The Netherlands, available at:
<uri>http://projects.knmi.nl/omi/documents/presentations/2015/ostm19/monday/Poster_Vasilkov.pdf</uri>,
last access: 18 January  2017, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Zhou et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, Y., Brunner, D., Spurr, R. J. D., Boersma, K. F., Sneep, M., Popp, C.,
and Buchmann, B.: Accounting for surface reflectance anisotropy in satellite
retrievals of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1185–1203,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1185-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-1185-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Accounting for the effects of surface BRDF on satellite cloud and trace-gas retrievals: a new approach based on geometry-dependent Lambertian equivalent reflectivity applied to OMI algorithms</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Most satellite nadir ultraviolet and visible cloud, aerosol, and trace-gas
algorithms make use of climatological surface reflectivity databases. For
example, cloud and NO<sub>2</sub> retrievals for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument
(OMI) use monthly gridded surface reflectivity climatologies that do not
depend upon the observation geometry. In reality, reflection of incoming
direct and diffuse solar light from land or ocean surfaces is sensitive to
the sun–sensor geometry. This dependence is described by the bidirectional
reflectance distribution function (BRDF). To account for the BRDF, we propose
to use a new concept of geometry-dependent Lambertian equivalent reflectivity
(LER). Implementation within the existing OMI cloud and NO<sub>2</sub> retrieval
infrastructure requires changes only to the input surface reflectivity
database. The geometry-dependent LER is calculated using a vector radiative
transfer model with high spatial resolution BRDF information from the
Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) over land and the
Cox–Munk slope distribution over ocean with a contribution from
water-leaving radiance. We compare the geometry-dependent and climatological
LERs for two wavelengths, 354 and 466 nm, that are used in OMI cloud
algorithms to derive cloud fractions. A detailed comparison of the cloud
fractions and pressures derived with climatological and geometry-dependent
LERs is carried out. Geometry-dependent LER and corresponding retrieved cloud
products are then used as inputs to our OMI NO<sub>2</sub> algorithm. We find
that replacing the climatological OMI-based LERs with geometry-dependent LERs
can increase NO<sub>2</sub> vertical columns by up to 50 % in highly
polluted areas; the differences include both BRDF effects and biases between
the MODIS and OMI-based surface reflectance data sets. Only minor changes to
NO<sub>2</sub> columns (within 5 %) are found over unpolluted and overcast
areas.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Acarreta et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Acarreta, J. R., De Haan, J. F., and Stammes, P.: Cloud pressure retrieval
using the O<sub>2</sub>–O<sub>2</sub> absorption band at 477 nm,
J. Geophys. Res., 109, D05204, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003915" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003jd003915</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Ahmad et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Ahmad, Z., Bhartia, P. K., and Krotkov, N.: Spectral properties of
backscattered UV radiation in cloudy atmospheres, J. Geophys. Res., 109,
D01201, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003395" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003JD003395</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Boersma et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Dirksen, R. J., van der A, R. J., Veefkind,
J. P., Stammes, P., Huijnen, V., Kleipool, Q. L., Sneep, M., Claas, J.,
Leitã, J., Richter, A., Zhou, Y., and Brunner, D.: An improved
tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> column retrieval algorithm for the Ozone Monitoring
Instrument, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1905–1928, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Bucsela et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Bucsela, E. J., Krotkov, N. A., Celarier, E. A., Lamsal, L. N., Swartz,
W. H., Bhartia, P. K., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P., Gleason, J. F., and
Pickering, K. E.: A new stratospheric and tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> retrieval
algorithm for nadir-viewing satellite instruments: applications to OMI,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2607–2626, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Chandrasekhar(1960)</label><mixed-citation>
Chandrasekhar S.: Radiative Transfer, Dover Publications, Inc., NY, 393 pp.,
1960.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Cox and Munk(1954)</label><mixed-citation>
Cox, C. and Munk, W.: Statistics of the sea surface derived from sun glitter,
J. Mar. Res., 13, 198–227, 1954.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Dave(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Dave, J. V.: Effect of aerosol on the estimation of total ozone in an
atmospheric column from the measurements of the ultraviolet radiance,
J. Atmos. Sci., 35, 899–911, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Herman and Celarier(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Herman, J. R. and Celarier, E.: Earth surface reflectivity climatology at 340
to 380 nm from TOMS data, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 28003–28011, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Joiner and Vasilkov(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Joiner, J. and Vasilkov, A. P.: First Results from the OMI Rotational-Raman
Scattering Cloud Pressure Algorithm, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 44, 1272–1282,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Joiner et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Joiner, J., Vasilkov, A. P., Flittner, D. E., Gleason, J. F., and Bhartia,
P. K.: Retrieval of cloud chlorophyll content using Raman scattering in GOME
spectra, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D01109, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003698" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2003JD003698</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Joiner et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Joiner, J., Vasilkov, A. P., Yang, K., and Bhartia, P. K.: Observations over
hurricanes from the ozone monitoring instrument, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33,
L06807, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025592" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2005GL025592</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Joiner et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Joiner, J., Schoeberl, M. R., Vasilkov, A. P., Oreopoulos, L., Platnick, S.,
Livesey, N. J., and Levelt, P. F.: Accurate satellite-derived estimates of
the tropospheric ozone impact on the global radiation budget, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 4447–4465, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-4447-2009" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-9-4447-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Joiner et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Joiner, J., Vasilkov, A. P., Gupta, P., Bhartia, P. K., Veefkind, P., Sneep,
M., de Haan, J., Polonsky, I., and Spurr, R.: Fast simulators for satellite
cloud optical centroid pressure retrievals; evaluation of OMI cloud
retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 529–545, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-529-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-5-529-2012</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Kleipool et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Kleipool, Q. L., Dobber, M. R., de Haan, J. F., and Levelt, P. F.: Earth
surface reflectance climatology from 3 years of OMI data, J. Geophys. Res.,
113, D18308, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008jd010290" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2008jd010290</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Koelemeijer et al.(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
Koelemeijer, R. B. A., Stammes, P., Hovenier, J. W., and de Haan, J. F.: A
fast method for retrieval of cloud parameters using oxygen A-band
measurements from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment, J. Geophys. Res.,
106, 3475–3496, 2001.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Kuhlmann et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Kuhlmann, G., Lam, Y. F., Cheung, H. M., Hartl, A., Fung, J. C. H., Chan,
P. W., and Wenig, M. O.: Development of a custom OMI NO<sub>2</sub> data product
for evaluating biases in a regional chemistry transport model, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 5627–5644, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5627-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-5627-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Lamsal et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Lamsal, L. N., Krotkov, N. A., Celarier, E. A., Swartz, W. H., Pickering,
K. E., Bucsela, E. J., Gleason, J. F., Martin, R. V., Philip, S., Irie, H.,
Cede, A., Herman, J., Weinheimer, A., Szykman, J. J., and Knepp, T. N.:
Evaluation of OMI operational standard NO<sub>2</sub> column retrievals using in
situ and surface-based NO<sub>2</sub> observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
11587–11609, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-11587-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-11587-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Levelt et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Levelt, P. F., van der Oord, G. H. J., Dobber, M. R., Malkki, A., Visser, H.,
de Vries, J., Stammes, P., Lundell, J. O. V., and Saari, H.: The ozone
monitoring instrument, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 44, 1093–1101, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Lin et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, J.-T., Martin, R. V., Boersma, K. F., Sneep, M., Stammes, P., Spurr, R.,
Wang, P., Van Roozendael, M., Clémer, K., and Irie, H.: Retrieving
tropospheric nitrogen dioxide from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: effects
of aerosols, surface reflectance anisotropy, and vertical profile of nitrogen
dioxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1441–1461, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1441-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-1441-2014</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Lin et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, J.-T., Liu, M.-Y., Xin, J.-Y., Boersma, K. F., Spurr, R., Martin, R.,
and Zhang, Q.: Influence of aerosols and surface reflectance on satellite
NO<sub>2</sub> retrieval: seasonal and spatial characteristics and implications
for NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emission constraints, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11217–11241,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11217-2015" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-15-11217-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Lucht et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Lucht, W., Schaaf, C. B., and Strahler, A. H.: An algorithm for the retrieval
of albedo from space using semiempirical BRDF models, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote,
38, 977–998, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Lyapustin et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Lyapustin, A., Wang, Y., Laszlo, I., Hilker, T., Hall, F., Sellers, P.,
Tucker, J., and Korkin, S.: Multi-angle implementation of atmospheric
correction for MODIS (MAIAC). 3: Atmospheric correction, Rem. Sens. Environ.,
127, 385–393, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.09.002" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.rse.2012.09.002</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Marchenko et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Marchenko, S., Krotkov, N. A., Lamsal, L. N., Celarier, E. A., Swartz, W. H.,
and Bucsela, E. J.: Revising the slant column density retrieval of nitrogen
dioxide observed by the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, J. Geophys. Res., 120,
5670–5692, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Martonchik et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Martonchik, J. V., Bruegge, C. J., and Strahler, A. H.: A review of
reflectance nomenclature used in remote sensing, Remote Sensing Reviews, 19,
9–20, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>McLinden et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
McLinden, C. A., Fioletov, V., Boersma, K. F., Kharol, S. K., Krotkov, N.,
Lamsal, L., Makar, P. A., Martin, R. V., Veefkind, J. P., and Yang, K.:
Improved satellite retrievals of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> over the
Canadian oil sands and comparisons with surface measurements, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 3637–3656, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3637-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-3637-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Mishchenko and Travis(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Mishchenko, M. I. and Travis, L. D.: Satellite retrieval of aerosol
properties over the ocean using polarization as well as intensity of
reflected sunlight, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 16989–17013,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96JD02425" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/96JD02425</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Morel(1988)</label><mixed-citation>
Morel, A.: Optical modeling of the upper ocean in relation to its
biogeneous matter content (Case I waters), J. Geophys. Res.,
93, 10749–10768, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Morel and Gentili(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Morel, A. and Gentili, B.: Didduse reflectance of oceanic water.
III. Implication of bidirectionality for the remote-sensing probe, Appl.
Optics, 35, 4850–4862, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Noguchi et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Noguchi, K., Richter, A., Rozanov, V., Rozanov, A., Burrows, J. P., Irie, H.,
and Kita, K.: Effect of surface BRDF of various land cover types on
geostationary observations of tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub>, Atmos. Meas. Tech.,
7, 3497–3508, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3497-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-7-3497-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Nicodemus(1965)</label><mixed-citation>
Nicodemus, F.: Directional reflectance and emissivity of an opaque surface,
Appl. Optics, 4, 767–775, 1965.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>McPeters et al.(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
McPeters, R., Bhartia, P. K., Krueger, A. J., Herman, J. R., Schlesinger,
B. M., Wellemeyer, C. G., Seftor, C. J., Jaross, G., Taylor, S. L., Swissler,
T., Torres, O., Labow, G., Byerly, W., and Cebula, R. P.: Nimbus-7 Total
Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) data products user's guide, NASA Reference
Publication 1384, 67 pp., 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Popp et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Popp, C., Wang, P., Brunner, D., Stammes, P., Zhou, Y., and Grzegorski, M.:
MERIS albedo climatology for FRESCO + O<sub>2</sub> A-band cloud retrieval,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 463–483, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-463-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-4-463-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Rienecker et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Rienecker, M. M., Suarez, M. J., Gelaro, R., Todling, R., Bacmeister, J.,
Liu, E., Bosilovich, M. G., Schubert, S. D., Takacs, L., Kim, G.-K., Bloom,
S., Chen, J., Collins, D., Conaty, A., da Silva, A., Gu, W., Joiner, J.,
Koster, R. D., Lucchesi, R., Molod, A., Owens, T., Pawson, S., Pegion, P.,
Redder, C. R., Reichle, R., Robertson, F. R., Ruddick, A. G., Sienkiewicz,
M., and Woollen, J.: MERRA: NASA's Modern-Era Retrospective Analysis for
Research and Applications, J. Climate, 24, 3624–3648,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1" target="_blank">doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Russell et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, A. R., Perring, A. E., Valin, L. C., Bucsela, E. J., Browne, E. C.,
Wooldridge, P. J., and Cohen, R. C.: A high spatial resolution retrieval of
NO<sub>2</sub> column densities from OMI: method and evaluation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 8543–8554, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8543-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-8543-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Schaaf et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Schaaf, C. B., Gao, F., Strahler, A. H., Lucht, W., Li, X., Tsang, T.,
Strugnell, N. C., Zhang, X., Jin, Y., Muller, J.-P., Lewis, P., Barnsley, M.,
Hobson, P., Disney, M., Roberts, G., Dunderdale, M., Doll, C., d'Entremont,
R., Hu, B., Liang, S., and Privette, J. L.: First operational BRDF, albedo
and nadir reflectance products from MODIS, Remote Sens. Environ., 83,
135–148, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Schaaf et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Schaaf, C. L. B., Liu, J., Gao, F., and Strahler, A. H.: MODIS albedo and
reflectance anisotropy products from Aqua and Terra, in: Land Remote Sensing
and Global Environmental Change: NASA's Earth Observing System and the
Science of ASTER and MODIS, Remote Sensing and Digital Image Processing
Series, Vol. 11, edited by: Ramachandran, B., Justice, C., and Abrams, M.,
Springer-Verlag, 873 pp., 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Schaepman-Strub et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Schaepman-Strub, G., Schaepman, M. E., Painter, T. H., Dangel, S., and
Martonchik, J. V.: Reflectance quantities in optical remote
sensing–definitions and case studies, Remote Sens. Environ., 103, 27–42,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Seftor et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Seftor, C. J., Taylor, S. L., Wellemeyer, C. G., and McPeters, R. D.: Effect
of Partially-Clouded Scenes on the Determination of Ozone, in: Ozone in the
Troposphere and Stratosphere, Part 1, Proceedings of the Quadrennial Ozone
Symposium, Charlottesville, USA, 1992, NASA Conference Publication 3266,
919–922, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Sneep et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Sneep, M., de Haan, J., Stammes, P., Wang, P., Vanbauce, C., Joiner, J.,
Vasilkov, A. P., and Levelt, P. F.: Three way comparison between OMI/Aura and
POLDER/PARASOL cloud pressure products, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15S23,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008694" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD008694</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Spurr(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Spurr, R. J. D.: VLIDORT: a linearized pseudo-spherical vector discrete
ordinate radiative transfer code for forward model and retrieval studies in
multilayer multiple scattering media, J. Quant. Spectr. Ra., 102, 316–421,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Stammes et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Stammes, P., Sneep, M., de Haan, J. F., Veefkind, J. P., Wang, P., and
Levelt, P. F.: Effective cloud fractions from the Ozone Monitoring
Instrument: Theoretical framework and validation, J. Geophys. Res., 113,
D16S38, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008820" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD008820</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Strahan et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Strahan, S. E., Duncan, B. N., and Hoor, P.: Observationally derived
transport diagnostics for the lowermost stratosphere and their application to
the GMI chemistry and transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2435–2445,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2435-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-2435-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Thalman and Volkamer(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Thalman, R. and Volkamer, R.: Temperature dependent absorption cross-sections
of O<sub>2</sub>–O<sub>2</sub> collision pairs between 340 and 630 nm and
at atmospherically relevant pressure, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15,
15371–15381, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c3cp50968k" target="_blank">doi:10.1039/c3cp50968k</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Vasilkov et al.(1990a)</label><mixed-citation>
Vasilkov, A. P., Kondranin, T. V., Krotkov, N. A., Lakhtanov, G. A., and
Churov, V. E.: Properties of the angular dependence of polarization for
upward radiation from the sea surface in the visible region of the spectrum,
Izvestiya, Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics, 26, 397–401, 1990a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Vasilkov et al.(1990b)</label><mixed-citation>
Vasilkov, A. P., Kondranin, T. V., and Krotkov, N. A.: The effectiveness of
polarization measurements in passive remote sensing of the ocean in the
visible region of the spectrum, Sov. J. Remote Sens., 7, 886–899, 1990b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Vasilkov et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Vasilkov, A. P., Herman, J., Krotkov, N. A., Kahru, M., Mitchell, B. G., and
Hsu, C.: Problems in assessment of the UV penetration into natural waters
from space-based measurements, Opt. Eng., 41, 3019–3027, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Vasilkov et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Vasilkov, A. P., Joiner, J., Yang, K., and Bhartia, P. K.: Improving total
column ozone retrievals by using cloud pressures derived from Raman
scattering in the UV, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L20109,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004GL020603" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004GL020603</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Vasilkov et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Vasilkov, A. P., Herman, J., Ahmad, Z., Kahru, M., and Mitchell, B. G.:
Assessment of the ultraviolet radiation field in ocean waters from
space-based measurements and full radiative-transfer calculations, Appl.
Optics, 44, 2863–2869, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Vasilkov et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Vasilkov, A. P., Joiner, J., Spurr, R., Bhartia, P. K., Levelt, P. F., and
Stephens, G.: Evaluation of the OMI cloud pressures derived from rotational
Raman scattering by comparisons with other satellite data and radiative
transfer simulations, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15S19,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008689" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2007JD008689</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Yang et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Yang, E.-S., Vasilkov, A., Joiner, J., Marchenko, S., Krotkov, N., Haffner,
D., and Bhartia, P. K.: A new cloud pressure algorithm based on the
O<sub>2</sub>–O<sub>2</sub> absorption band at 477 nm, OMI Science Team
Meeting, de Bilt, The Netherlands, available at:
<a href="http://projects.knmi.nl/omi/documents/presentations/2015/ostm19/monday/Poster_Vasilkov.pdf" target="_blank">http://projects.knmi.nl/omi/documents/presentations/2015/ostm19/monday/Poster_Vasilkov.pdf</a>,
last access: 18 January  2017, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Zhou et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, Y., Brunner, D., Spurr, R. J. D., Boersma, K. F., Sneep, M., Popp, C.,
and Buchmann, B.: Accounting for surface reflectance anisotropy in satellite
retrievals of tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub>, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 1185–1203,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-1185-2010" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-3-1185-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
