<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-10-4895-2017</article-id><title-group><article-title>Variability of the Brunt–Väisälä frequency at the OH* layer
height</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Variability of the Brunt--V\"{a}is\"{a}l\"{a} frequency}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.~W\"{u}st et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wüst</surname><given-names>Sabine</given-names></name>
          <email>sabine.wuest@dlr.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0359-4946</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Bittner</surname><given-names>Michael</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Yee</surname><given-names>Jeng-Hwa</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Mlynczak</surname><given-names>Martin G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Russell III</surname><given-names>James M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4835-7696</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Deutsches Fernerkundungsdatenzentrum (DFD), Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-
und Raumfahrt (DLR), Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institut für Physik, Universität Augsburg, Augsburg,
Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Applied Physics Laboratory, The Johns Hopkins University, Laurel,
Maryland, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, Virginia, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Center for Atmospheric Sciences, Hampton, Virginia, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Sabine Wüst (sabine.wuest@dlr.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>14</day><month>December</month><year>2017</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>10</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>4895</fpage><lpage>4903</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>19</day><month>June</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>13</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>26</day><month>September</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>1</day><month>October</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/4895/2017/amt-10-4895-2017.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/4895/2017/amt-10-4895-2017.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/4895/2017/amt-10-4895-2017.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/4895/2017/amt-10-4895-2017.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e142">In and near the Alpine region, the most dense subnetwork of
identical NDMC (Network for the Detection of Mesospheric Change,
<uri>https://www.wdc.dlr.de/ndmc/</uri>) instruments can be found: five stations are equipped
with OH* spectrometers which deliver a time series of mesopause temperature
for each cloudless or only partially cloudy night. These measurements are
suitable for the derivation of the density of gravity wave potential energy,
provided that the Brunt–Väisälä frequency is known.</p>
    <p id="d1e148">However, OH* spectrometers do not deliver vertically resolved temperature
information, which is necessary for the calculation of the
Brunt–Väisälä frequency. Co-located measurements or
climatological values are needed.</p>
    <p id="d1e151">We use 14 years of satellite-based temperature data (TIMED-SABER,
2002–2015) to investigate the inter- and intra-annual variability of the
Brunt–Väisälä frequency at the OH* layer height between
43.93–48.09<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and 5.71–12.95<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E and provide a
climatology.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e179">The Brunt–Väisälä frequency (BV frequency) is an important
parameter in gravity wave theory. It is not only the highest possible
frequency for gravity waves, it is also necessary when calculating different
gravity wave parameters such as the density of wave potential energy
averaged over a specific time period (e.g. Wüst et al., 2016)
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M3" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the BV frequency,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the acceleration due to gravity,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the temperature, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> the mean squared normalized temperature fluctuation,
i.e. the mean squared temperature fluctuation relative to the background
temperature. It is calculated as follows:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M8" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        with the normalized temperature fluctuation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at time step <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
time steps in total.</p>
      <p id="d1e379">Energy and momentum are transported by gravity waves over large distances.
Through interactions with other dynamical processes in the atmosphere (such
as planetary waves, tides, other gravity waves), they can strongly influence
atmospheric dynamics and are therefore regarded as an essential mechanism
within atmospheric layer coupling. Case studies (e.g. Lu et al., 2009, 2015) based on lidar data (in the stratosphere and mesosphere) show that the
amount of potential energy is not constant with height and that the relation
of potential and kinetic energy also varies depending on height. Tsuda et al. (2000), for example, report that kinetic energy density dominates potential
energy density (per unit mass) by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 2 in the stratosphere
based on GPS radio occultation data. Placke et al. (2013) use lidar data and
show a minor deviation at mesopause heights from the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is
expected following linear gravity wave theory.</p>
      <p id="d1e406">Also the BV frequency is not constant with height since it varies with the
temperature and its vertical gradient as the following formula shows (e.g.
Andrews, 2000):
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M14" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dry adiabatic lapse rate defined as the
vertical adiabatic temperature decrease with a value of 9.8 K km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
formula refers to the angular BV frequency. Even if not explicitly mentioned
in the following, the term BV frequency always denotes the angular value.</p>
      <p id="d1e489">Many measurement techniques suitable for the investigation of gravity waves
provide vertical temperature profiles; this allows the direct calculation of
the BV frequency and the density of wave potential energy (see e.g. Kramer
et al., 2015; Mzé et al., 2014; Rauthe et al., 2008, to mention just a
few). For OH* observation techniques, the situation is different: OH*
spectrometers deliver information about temperature, also
horizontally resolved – if operated in a scanning mode (see e.g. Wachter et
al., 2015) – but vertically averaged over the OH* layer. OH* imaging systems
provide brightness maps (e.g. Sedlak et al., 2016, and Hannawald et al., 2016, who address a small part of the sky and Garcia et al., 1997, who
operate an all-sky system); they do not provide temperature information for
the majority of instruments. This is only possible when using narrow-band
filters (see Pautet et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e493">In order to deduce the density of wave potential energy from OH*
spectrometer measurements, one needs to rely on temperature climatologies or
complementary measurements for the derivation of the BV frequency. While the
latter might be of higher accuracy in most cases, lack of coincidence in
either time or space of the complementary measurement with the passage of a
wave could result in unrepresentative BV values (see Wendt et al., 2013, for
the quantification of typical temperature differences due to mistime and
misdistance).</p>
      <p id="d1e496">In our preceding publication Wüst et al. (2016), we used TIMED-SABER
(Thermosphere Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics Dynamics, Sounding of the
Atmosphere using Broadband Emission Radiometry) measurements for this
purpose with the focus on three mid-European and one northern-European
NDMC (Network for the Detection of Mesospheric Change,
<uri>https://www.wdc.dlr.de/ndmc/</uri>) station. The BV (angular) frequency derived for the
OH* layer height for the midlatitude station Haute-Provence
(43.93<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 5.71<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, OHP), France, is 0.022 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(yearly average) with a standard deviation of 0.002 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> showing a
minimum in winter and a maximum in summer. With a yearly mean of
0.021 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and the same standard deviation as for OHP, it is slightly
lower for the high-latitude station ALOMAR (69.28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
16.01<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Norway. For measurements at the Urbana Atmospheric
Observatory (40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 88<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), United States of America,
over a 6-month period from January through June 1991, Bills and Gardner
(1993) report a BV period <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> near 90 km height of 5.2 min (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.020 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the winter months and 4.3 min (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.024 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during spring and early summer. She et al. (1991) compute
a BV frequency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.9 min) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.29</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.6 min) averaged between
86 and 100 km for two nightly measurements in 1990 at Fort Collins
(40.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 105<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), United States of America.</p>
      <p id="d1e745">Error propagation shows that an error of 10 % in the BV frequency leads to
an error of 20 % in the density of wave potential energy <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M40" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mtable class="array" columnalign="center"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hspace*{5mm}}?><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">pot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Since at least to our knowledge a temperature sounding satellite addressing
the mesosphere is not planned for the time after TIMED-SABER and in situ
measurements are rare and not available at every NDMC station, a climatology
of the BV frequency is therefore very valuable for our purposes. Of course,
gravity waves themselves influence the BV frequency, too. However, due to
the thickness of the OH* layer, small-scale variations cancel out (see e.g.
Wüst et al., 2016). Furthermore, we plan to use this climatology for the
calculation of the <italic>nightly averaged</italic> gravity wave potential
energy density based on NDMC measurements. So, the spatial averaging is
accompanied by a temporal one which motivates the use of a climatology in
this case.</p>
      <p id="d1e928">In the Alps and the vicinity of the Alps, there are five NDMC stations:
Oberpfaffenhofen (48.09<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 11.28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), the observatory
Hohenpeißenberg (47.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 11.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), the
Environmental Research Station Schneefernerhaus (47.42<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
10.98<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Germany, and the observatories Haute Provence
(43.93<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 5.71<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), France, and Sonnblick
(47.05<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 12.95<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Austria. This is the most dense
subnetwork of NDMC stations. Therefore, we use vertical SABER profiles of
the OH volume emission rate (VER, see Sect. 2) in order to retrieve height
and full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the OH* layer for this geographical
region. This information is necessary to calculate the BV frequency weighted
for the OH* layer (in the following denoted as OH*-equivalent BV frequency)
based on vertical temperature profiles of SABER (Sect. 3). We describe
seasonal variations of the three parameters, height and FWHM of the
OH* layer as well as OH*-equivalent BV frequency, discuss the results, and
provide a climatology of the yearly course of the OH*-equivalent BV
frequency (Sect. 4).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data and analysis</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Data</title>
      <p id="d1e1034">The TIMED satellite was launched on 7 December 2001 and the on-board
limb sounder SABER soon started to deliver vertical profiles of kinetic
temperature on a routine basis from approximately 10 km to more than 100 km
altitude with a vertical resolution of about 2 km (Mertens et al., 2004;
Mlynczak, 1997). The high vertical resolution is suitable for the
investigation of gravity wave activity. About 1200 temperature profiles are
available per day. The latitudinal coverage on a given day extends from
about 52<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude in one hemisphere to 83<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the other
(Russell et al., 1999). Due to 180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yaw manoeuvres of the TIMED
satellite this viewing geometry alternates once every 60 days (Russell et
al., 1999). An overview of the large number of SABER publications is
available at <uri>http://saber.gats-inc.com/publications.php</uri>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1067">SABER temperatures are determined from measurements of infrared emission
from carbon dioxide in the 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m spectral interval. A comprehensive
forward radiance model incorporating dozens of vibration–rotation bands of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, including isotopic and hot bands, and solving the full set of
coupled radiative transfer equations under non-local thermodynamic equilibrium (LTE), is the basis for the
SABER temperature retrievals. One of the main challenges in estimating
kinetic temperature values from the CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> brightness temperatures in the
mesosphere and upper levels is certainly non-LTE conditions (NLTE), i.e.
conditions that depart from local thermodynamic equilibrium. NLTE algorithms
for kinetic temperature were employed in the SABER temperature retrieval
from version 1.03 on (Lopez-Puertas et al., 2004; Mertens et al., 2004,
2008). Comparisons with reference data sets generally confirm good quality
of SABER temperatures (Remsberg et al., 2008).</p>
      <p id="d1e1095">We use TIMED-SABER temperature and OH-B channel data (volume emission rates,
VERs) in its latest version (2.0) for the years 2002 to 2015. It was
downloaded from the SABER home page (<uri>http://saber.gats-inc.com/</uri>). The OH-B channel
covers the wavelength range from 1.56 to 1.72 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, which includes mostly
the OH (4–2) and OH (5–3) vibrational transition bands. The mean height
difference of the OH (4–2) and OH (3–1) emission, which is addressed by the
OH* spectrometers at the Alpine NDMC stations mentioned above, is
approximately 500 m (von Savigny et al., 2012) and therefore negligible
compared to the FWHM.</p>
      <p id="d1e1108">According to Noll et al. (2016) and references therein, the total
uncertainties for single temperature profiles are about 5 K at 90 km height
including systematic uncertainties of ca. 3 K.</p>
      <p id="d1e1112">As mentioned above, we focus on NDMC stations in or near the Alps.
Therefore, we use TIMED-SABER data between 43.93–48.09<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and
5.71–12.95<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. Since the OH* spectrometers allow only
measurements during night, we additionally require SABER measurements
between 17:00 UTC and 05:00 UTC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e1139">The squared BV frequency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated for each SABER height
level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between 70 and 100 km altitude where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> height levels exist in this
height range. Information about the OH* layer is determined from TIMED-SABER
OH-VER profiles. We obtain the maximum VER (in the following denoted as
OH* layer height) and the FWHM from the SABER data file which are then used
for the calculation of the Gaussian-weighted squared BV frequency
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. The assumption of a
Gaussian-shaped OH* layer is certainly simplified. In most cases, the
OH* layer follows a slightly asymmetric form with a positive skewness. That
means the centroid height is a little bit higher (for example, ca. 0.7 km
averaged over the first half of the year 2004) than the height of the
maximum VER. Due to these small differences and the averaging which is
applied afterwards to the Gaussian-weighted squared BV frequency, this
simplified approach can be justified.</p>
      <p id="d1e1200">In the following, the Gaussian-weighted squared BV frequency is referred to
as squared OH*-equivalent BV frequency
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M64" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.2}{9.2}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">︸</mml:mo></mml:munder><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">f</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the vector of Gaussian weights for a mean equal to the maximum VER
and a standard deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as it is related to the FWHM by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M67" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FWHM</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          This was also the approach presented and discussed in Wüst et al. (2016, 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e1398">It is also possible to first calculate the Gaussian-weighted temperature and
its gradient over the OH* layer and to use these values afterwards for
deriving a squared BV frequency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The latter can be slightly different from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula>. Assuming for example that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> is
negative and constant, then height levels of lower temperature have a
disproportionally higher BV frequency compared to height levels of higher
temperature. Averaging over the whole height range leads to a lower BV
frequency compared to the case of averaging temperature and its gradient
first and calculating the BV frequency afterwards. Since gravity waves
modulate the temperature, they also influence the BV frequency. If one
calculates the BV frequency for each height level separately and averages
afterwards, as we do, one takes these gravity-wave-induced fluctuations into
account but only according to the OH* layer height and thickness.</p>
      <p id="d1e1483">With the selection criteria mentioned above, the number of data sets per
year ranges between 509 (for the year 2002) and 590 (for the year 2011)
although a matching profile is not available for every day.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e1493">The yearly means of the three parameters, OH* layer height, FWHM, and
OH*-equivalent BV frequency, show nearly no variations for the years
2002–2015 (black line in Fig. 1a–c). They reach ca. 86.5 and
7.5 km for the OH* layer height and the FWHM, and 0.023 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
OH*-equivalent BV frequency.</p>
      <p id="d1e1508">However, the yearly means of these parameters are accompanied by varying
standard deviations (grey bars in Fig. 1a–c), which range between
approximately 2 % for the OH* layer height, 10 % for the OH*-equivalent
Brunt–Väisälä frequency, and 20–30 % for the FWHM. They are
due to characteristic intra-annual variations of the parameters.</p>
      <p id="d1e1511">The yearly course of the OH* layer height averaged over the years 2002–2015
varies between ca. 85 and 87.5 km (thick line in Fig. 2a). The minimum
is reached for the days of the year (DoY) 1–10 (January) and 320–366
(November–December), the maximum around DoY 90 and 220 (March–April and
August). The mean FWHM has a minimum between 6 and 6.5 km around DoY 180,
and maxima at 9, 8, and 8 km approximately for DoY 40 (February), 110
(April), and 285 (October), respectively (thick line in Fig. 2b). The mean
OH*-equivalent BV frequency ranges between 0.021 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for DoY 40
(February) and 0.026 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for DoY 185 (July), approximately (Fig. 2c,
thick line). The coloured lines in Fig. 2a–c refer to the individual
years and show 30-point running means.</p>
      <p id="d1e1538">So, one can say the following: the intra-annual variability dominates the inter-annual one
by far. This provides the possibility of giving an analytic description for
the OH*-equivalent BV frequency, which is identical for every year. The
yearly course of the BV frequency is dominated by a minimum at the beginning
of the year and a maximum in the middle of the year looking quite symmetric
(see Fig. 2c), which suggests the use of a spectral analysis. Therefore,
we apply harmonic analysis (all-step approach) to the daily mean data
(diamonds in Fig. 3). The harmonic analysis provides amplitude, phase, and
period of the oscillations which explain the data variability best (see
Bittner et al., 1994, or Wüst and Bittner, 2006, for further information
about the method). When searching for three oscillations, the annual,
semi-annual, and ter-annual mode are found (information about amplitude and
phases are given in Table 1). The annual mode dominates the other two modes
by a factor of 2–3. The semi-annual and the ter-annual mode are approximately of
the same amplitude. The superposition of these three sinusoidals (solid line
in Fig. 3) explains ca. 74 % of the data variability. The data deviate
16 % at maximum from this curve; 84.4 and 97.8 % of the data are
located in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 % interval (dashed lines in
Fig. 3) around the curve.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e1558">The yearly means of the height of the maximal OH-VER (denoted as
OH* height, see <bold>a</bold>), the FWHM <bold>(b)</bold>, and the OH*-equivalent BV
frequency <bold>(c)</bold> are nearly constant from 2002 to 2015 (black curve) but
show comparatively large standard deviations (grey bars) for each year.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/4895/2017/amt-10-4895-2017-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1576">The superposition of only two oscillations explains 71 % of the data
variability. If one searches for four sinusoidals, an additional
60-day oscillation with an amplitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is found.
This is less than half of the amplitudes of the semi-annual and the ter-annual
modes. This 60-day oscillation is probably not a geophysical period but may
result instead from the local time sampling of the satellite or the fact
that it performs a yaw manoeuvre once every 60 days (rotating through
180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) to keep SABER viewing away from the sun. Therefore, we
propose to use three sinusoidals with the parameters mentioned in Table 1 to
approximate the yearly course of the OH*-equivalent BV frequency with an
uncertainty interval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 % to include ca.
84 or 98 % of the data.</p>
      <p id="d1e1632">As mentioned above, the total uncertainties for single SABER temperature
profiles are about 5 K at 90 km height with systematic uncertainties of ca.
3 K. Since we calculate a mean of the OH*-equivalent BV frequency for every
DoY using data of 14 years and approximate these values by a superposition
of harmonic oscillations, we argue that we only have to pay attention to
systematic uncertainties. Assuming that the systematic uncertainties
change only slightly from one height step to the next one, then they mainly
influence the absolute temperature value but not the temperature gradient.
Assuming a “true” temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>K and a measured
temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">203</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>K, then the difference between the “true”
squared BV frequency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the measured one <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M86" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hspace{5mm}}?><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          For the (non-squared) BV frequency, the difference is ca. 0.75 %. That
means an uncertainty of ca. 3 K in temperature leads to a relative
uncertainty of ca. 1.5 % (0.75 %) in the (non-)squared BV frequency.
This is negligible when using the superposition of the annual, semi-annual,
and ter-annual mode with an uncertainty interval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 % for the approximation of the OH*-equivalent BV frequency.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p id="d1e1928">Period, amplitude, and phase of the three oscillations which explain
the variability of the daily OH*-equivalent BV frequency values (averaged
over all years) best. They oscillate around a constant value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
OH*-equivalent BV frequency [s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>] can be estimated by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DoY</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Due to leap years, the total number of days for
one year is set to 366, which means 1 March is DoY 61 for every year.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.89}[.89]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">“Annual”</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">“Semi-annual”</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">“Ter-annual”</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">oscillation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">oscillation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">oscillation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Period <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [d]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">364.7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">182.4</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">121.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Amplitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi>A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.19</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.07</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.05</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Phase <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">φ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> [rad]</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.70</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.69</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.36</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e2184">OH* height <bold>(a)</bold>, FWHM <bold>(b)</bold>, and OH*-equivalent BV
frequency <bold>(c)</bold> show characteristic variations during the year (coloured
lines: 30-point running means of the daily mean values with mirrored edge
points for the beginning of 2002 and the end of 2015). The values of the
individual years deviate most from the mean over all years (black line)
during winter and especially at the beginning of the year. This might be due
to enhanced atmospheric dynamics which is for example represented by
stratospheric warming events and its effects on the mesopause.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/4895/2017/amt-10-4895-2017-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e2205">The superposition of the annual, semi-annual, and ter-annual oscillation
(solid line) explains ca. 74 % of the variability of the daily
OH*-equivalent BV frequency values averaged over all years (diamonds).
97.8 % of the data are located in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 % interval (dashed lines)
around the curve.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/4895/2017/amt-10-4895-2017-f03.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2221">A larger effect is caused by the height dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, which also
influences <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. According to Wüst et al. (2017), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at
mesopause height (in the following denoted with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, hd for
height-dependent) still reaches more than 97 % compared to its surface
value. Following CIRA-86, the temperature gradient at the mesopause ranges
between ca. 1.4 and 2.9 K km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. 4). The straightforward
calculation according to

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M105" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        shows that squared BV frequency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">hd</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is ca. 7 % lower compared to
the case of constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2381">The dependence of the BV frequency on temperature and its vertical gradient
causes the variability during the year. Due to the meridional circulation,
the mesopause temperature is high in winter and low in summer. Since the
inverse temperature is needed for the calculation of the BV frequency, the
latter becomes low in winter and high in summer. This behaviour has been
reported previously by Bills and Gardner (1993) and Wüst et al. (2016).
Figure 5 of Wüst et al. (2016) shows the OH*-equivalent BV frequency for
the years 2012/2013 above the station OHP based on TIMED-SABER and CIRA data.
In contrast to the approach presented here, the OH* height and its FWHM are
kept constant (86.2 and 7.9 km calculated for July 2012 to June 2013)
there. Nevertheless, the SABER-based OH*-equivalent BV frequency is
systematically higher than the one based on CIRA (0.019–0.022 s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
regardless of the calculation method employed here or in Wüst et al. (2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e2399">The OH*-emission height (and in some instances the FWHM of the OH* layer)
was already investigated on a case study basis about 30–40 years ago mostly
relying on rocket-borne or lidar measurements (Good, 1976; von Zahn et al.,
1987; Baker and Stair, 1988). The investigation of the OH* layer on a
multi-year data basis started with the launch of WINDII (Wind Imaging
Interferometer) on board UARS (Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite) in
September 1991. Due to the latitudinal range of 42<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in one
hemisphere to 72<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the other alternating every 36 days (e.g.
Shepherd et al., 2006), publications using this data set, like for example
Zhang and Shepherd (1999), focus on the tropics and low midlatitudes and
are thus not suitable for a comparison with our results.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e2422">The temperature gradient based on CIRA-86 data for 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N
between 83 and 90 km height is negative during the whole year. The steepest
gradient is reached in March and September (ca. 20 K/7 km); it differs
least from zero in summer (June–July, ca. 10 K/7 km). The temperature
values are offset by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 K per month for all months except January.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/10/4895/2017/amt-10-4895-2017-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2448">For SCIAMACHY (SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric
CHartographY) on board ENVISAT (ENVironmental SATellite), von Savigny
(2015) published a mean OH (3–1) emission altitude for 40–50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N
of 85.9 km (January 2003–December 2011, see his Table 3). Due to the
latitudinal coverage of SCIAMACHY, these values refer to September–March.
For these months and the addressed latitudinal range
(43.93–48.09<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), the emission altitude of the SABER OH-B channel
presented in our Fig. 2a (thick line) reaches 84.5–87.5 km and shows
reasonable agreement with a mean value of ca. 86 km. In contrast to our
analysis, von Savigny (2015) refers to the centroid altitude, while we show
the altitude of maximum VER. These values differ if the OH-VER profile is
asymmetric. Furthermore, remaining tidal effects due to different overpass
times of both satellites and vertical shifts between the different
Meinel bands may also play a role. So, considering these possible sources of
inconsistencies, the agreement is even quite good.</p>
      <p id="d1e2469">As stated by Shepherd et al. (2006), the OH excitation mechanism is driven
by atomic oxygen which is produced at higher altitudes. All processes which
lead to vertical transport of atomic-oxygen-rich or atomic-oxygen-poor air from above or
below influence the OH production: when atomic-oxygen-rich air is brought
down, the VER increases but the peak emission height decreases and vice
versa. This relationship can be used for inferring the OH* height from
ground-based measurements alone (Liu and Shepherd, 2006; Mulligan et al.,
2009). Liu and Shepherd (2006) show that the OH-VER profiles are also
broadened when the OH-VER peak descends. This fits qualitatively to the
yearly development of the FWHM and OH* height (see Fig. 2a and b).</p>
      <p id="d1e2472">The latter seems to descend between 2002 and 2015. If one calculates the
mean error of the yearly mean OH* height, which is the standard deviation
(grey bars in Fig. 2a) divided by the square root of the number of data
points used per year (between 509 and 590, see Sect. 2.2), the result
reaches ca. 0.07 km (standard deviation of 1.5 km divided by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">509</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In Fig. 2a, the OH* height descends ca. 0.25 km in 14 years (ca.
0.02 km year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which is significant within the error bars. This value lies in
the same range as the ones derived by Bremer and Peters (2008) for
low-frequency reflection heights (ca. 80–83 km) and by Teiser and von
Savigny (2017) for the OH(3–1) centroid altitude based on SCIAMACHY
measurements. Unfortunately, the SCIAMACHY results refer to latitudes
between 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; higher northern latitudes are
not covered. Bremer and Peters (2008) investigated the annual means of the
low-frequency reflection heights measured at a constant solar angle with
midpoint of the transmission path at 50.71<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and
6.61<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E between 1959 and 2006. After elimination of the solar
and geomagnetically induced signal, the authors deduce a trend of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.032 km year<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the development of the OH*-equivalent BV frequency, this
is currently not of importance: at least between 2007 and 2015, the
OH*-equivalent BV frequency stayed constant (Fig. 1c). For the
integration of a possible long-term development, it is therefore too early.
However, it shows that this question needs to be revisited in a couple of
years.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and outlook</title>
      <p id="d1e2560">We investigate the OH* layer height, FWHM, and OH*-equivalent BV frequency
based on 14 years of TIMED-SABER data for 43.93–48.09<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and
5.71–12.95<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E.</p>
      <p id="d1e2581">Their annual means reach ca. 86.5 km, 7.5 km, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and are nearly stable during 2002–2015. The
characteristic intra-annual variations of the parameters lead to standard
deviations of approximately 2 % for the OH* layer height, 10 % for the
OH*-equivalent BV frequency, and 20–30 % for the FWHM.</p>
      <p id="d1e2614">Since the intra-annual variability dominates the inter-annual one by far, we
can provide an analytic description for the mean OH*-equivalent BV frequency,
which is identical for every year. The superposition of an annual,
semi-annual, and ter-annual oscillation explains ca. 74 % of the data
variability. Ca. 85 or 98 % of the data are located in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 % or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 % interval around the mean curve.</p>
      <p id="d1e2631">Similar investigations are planned for other NDMC stations in order to
facilitate the estimation of the nightly mean density of wave potential
energy independent of co-located measurements which deliver vertical
temperature profiles.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e2640">The SABER data are available at the  SABER homepage <uri>http://saber.gats-inc.com/data.php</uri>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e2649">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2655">The work of Sabine Wüst was funded by the Bavarian State Ministry for
the Environment and Consumer Protection (VAO project LUDWIG, project number
TUS01 UFS-67093).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication  were covered by a Research <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Centre of the Helmholtz Association.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Sheila Kirkwood<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: Christian von Savigny and one anonymous referee</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andrews, D. G.: An introduction to atmospheric physics, Cambridge University
Press, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, D. J. and Stair Jr., A. T.: Rocket measurements of the altitude
distributions of the hydroxyl airglow, Phys. Scr., 37, 611–622, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bills, R. E. and Gardner, C. S.: Lidar observations of the mesopause region
temperature structure at Urbana, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 1011–1021, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD02167" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92JD02167</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bittner, M., Offermann, D., Bugaeva, I. V., Kokin, G. A., Koshelkov, J. P.,
Krivolutsky, A., Tarasenko, D. A., Gil-Ojeda, M., Hauchecorne, A.,
Lübken,
F.-J., de la Morena, B. A., Mourier, A., Nakane, H., Oyama, K. I., Schmidlin,
F. J., Soule, I., Thomas, L., and Tsuda, T.: Long period/large scale
oscillations of temperature during the DYANA campaign, J. Atmos. Terr.
Phys., 56, 1675–1700, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bremer, J. and Peters, D.: Influence of stratospheric ozone changes on
long-term trends in the meso- and lower thermosphere, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr.
Phys., 70, 1473–1481, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Committee on Space Research; NASA National Space Science Data Center: COSPAR
International Reference Atmosphere (CIRA-86): Global Climatology of
Atmospheric Parameters, NCAS British Atmospheric Data Centre, 7 March
2017, available at: <uri>http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/4996e5b2f53ce0b1f2072adadaeda262</uri>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, F. J., Taylor, M. J., and Kelley, M. C.: Two-dimensional spectral
analysis of mesospheric airglow image data, Appl. Opt., 36, 7374–7358,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Good, R. E.: Determination of atomic oxygen density from rocket borne
measurement of hydroxyl airglow, Planet. Space Sci., 24, 389–395, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Hannawald, P., Schmidt, C., Wüst, S., and Bittner, M.: A fast SWIR imager
for observations of transient features in OH airglow, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9,
1461–1472, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1461-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-1461-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Kramer, R., Wüst, S., Schmidt, C., and Bittner, M.: Gravity wave
characteristics in the middle atmosphere during the CESAR campaign at Palma
de Mallorca in 2011/2012: Impact of extratropical cyclones and cold fronts,
J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 128, 8–23, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.03.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2015.03.001</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Liu, G. and Shepherd, G. G.: An empirical model for the altitude of the OH
nightglow emission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L09805,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025297" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL025297</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>López-Puertas, M., Garcia-Comas, M., Funke, B., Picard, R. H., Winick, J.
R., Wintersteiner, P. P., Mlynczak, M. G., Mertens, C. J., Russell III, J.
M., and Gordley, L. L.: Evidence for an OH (v) excitation mechanism of
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> 4.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m nighttime emission from SABER/TIMED measurements, J.
Geophys. Res., 109, D09307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004383" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004383</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Lu, X., Liu, A. Z., Swenson, G. R., Li, T., Leblanc, T., and McDermid, I. S.:
Gravity wave propagation and dissipation from the stratosphere to the lower
thermosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D11101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010112" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010112</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Lu, X., Chu, X., Fong, W., Chen, C., Yu, Z., Roberts, B. R., and McDonald, A.
J.: Vertical evolution of potential energy density and vertical wave number
spectrum of Antarctic gravity waves from 35 to 105 km at McMurdo
(77.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 166.7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
2719–2737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022751" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022751</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Mertens, C. J., Schmidlin, F. J., Goldberg, R. A., Remsberg, E. E., Pesnell,
W. D., Russell III, J. M., Mlynczak, M. G., López-Puertas, M.,
Wintersteiner, P. P., Picard, R. H., Winick, J. R., and Gordley, L. L.: SABER
observations of mesospheric temperatures and comparisons with falling sphere
measurements taken during the 2002 summer MaCWAVE campaign, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 31, L03105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018605" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL018605</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Mertens, C. J., Fernandez, J. R., Xu, X., Evans, D. S., Mlynczak, M. G., and
Russell III, J. M.: A new source of auroral infrared emission observed by
TIMED/SABER, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, 17–20, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Mlynczak, M. G.: Energetics of the mesosphere and lower thermosphere and the
SABER experiment, Adv. Space Res. 20, 1177–1183,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00769-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00769-2</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Mulligan, F. J., Dyrland, M. E., Sigernes, F., and Deehr, C. S.: Inferring
hydroxyl layer peak heights from ground-based measurements of OH(6-2) band
integrated emission rate at Longyearbyen (78<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 16<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E),
Ann. Geophys., 27, 4197–4205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-4197-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-27-4197-2009</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Mzé, N., Hauchecorne, A., Keckhut, P., and Thétis, M.: Vertical
distribution of gravity wave potential energy from long-term Rayleigh lidar
data at a northern middle latitude site, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 12069–12083,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022035</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Noll, S., Kausch, W., Kimeswenger, S., Unterguggenberger, S., and Jones, A.
M.: Comparison of VLT/X-shooter OH and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> rotational temperatures with
consideration of TIMED/SABER emission and temperature profiles, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 16, 5021–5042, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5021-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5021-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Pautet, P.-D., Taylor, M., Pendleton, W., Zhao, Y., Yuan, T., Esplin, R., and
McLain, D.: Advanced mesospheric temperature mapper for high-latitude airglow
studies, Appl. Opt., 53, 5934–5943, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Placke, M., Hoffmann, P., Gerding, M., Becker, E., and Rapp, M.: Testing
linear gravity wave theory with simultaneous wind and temperature data from
the mesosphere, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 93, 57–69,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2012.11.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2012.11.012</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Rauthe, M., Gerding, M., and Lübken, F.-J.: Seasonal changes in gravity
wave activity measured by lidars at mid-latitudes, J. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
13741–13773, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6775-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-6775-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Remsberg, E. E., Marshall, B. T., Garcia-Comas, M., Krueger, D.,
Lingenfelser, G. S., Martin-Torres, J., Mlynczak, M. G., Russell III, J. M.,
Smith, A. K., Zhao, Y., Brown, C., Gordley, L. L., Lopez-Gonzalez, M. J.,
Lopez-Puertas, M., She, C.-Y., Taylor, M. J., and Thompson, R. E.: Assessment
of the quality of the Version 1.07 temperature versus pressure profiles of
the middle atmosphere from TIMED/SABER, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D17101,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010013</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Russell III, J. M., Mlynczak, M. G., Gordley, L. L., Tansock Jr., J. J., and
Esplin, R. W.: Overview of the SABER experiment and preliminary calibration
results, Proc. SPIE 3756, Optical Spectroscopic Tech. Instrum, Atmos. Space
Res. III, 277–288, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1117/12.366382" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1117/12.366382</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Sedlak, R., Hannawald, P., Schmidt, C., Wüst, S., and Bittner, M.:
High-resolution observations of small-scale gravity waves and turbulence
features in the OH airglow layer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5955–5963,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5955-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-5955-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>She, C. Y., Yu, J. R., Huang, J. W., Nagasawa, C., and Gardner, C. S.: Na
temperature lidar measurements of gravity wave perturbations of wind, density
and temperature in the mesopause region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 1329–1331,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91GL01517" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91GL01517</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Shepherd, G. G., Cho, Y.-M., Liu, G., Shepherd, M. G., and Roble, R. G.:
Airglow variability in the context of the global mesospheric circulation, J.
Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 68, 2000–2011, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2006.06.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2006.06.006</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Teiser G. and von Savigny, C.: Variability of OH(3-1) and OH(6-2) emission
altitude and volume emission rate from 2003 to 2011, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr.
Phys., 161, 28–42, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Tsuda, T., Nishida, M., Rocken, C. H., and Ware, R. H.: A global morphology
of gravity wave activity in the stratosphere revealed by the GPS occultation
data (GPS/MET), J. Geophys. Res., 105, 7257–7273, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD901005</ext-link>,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>von Savigny, C.: Variability of OH(3-1) emission altitude from 2003 to 2011:
Long-term stability and universality of the emission rate-altitude
relationship, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 127, 120–128,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.02.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2015.02.001</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>von Savigny, C., McDade, I. C., Eichmann, K.-U., and Burrows, J. P.: On the
dependence of the OH* Meinel emission altitude on vibrational level:
SCIAMACHY observations and model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
8813–8828, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8813-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-8813-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
von Zahn, U., Fricke, K. H., Gerndt, R., and Blix, T.: Mesospheric
temperatures and the OH layer height as derived from ground-based lidar and
OH* spectrometry, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 49, 863–869, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Wachter, P., Schmidt, C., Wüst, S., and Bittner, M.: Spatial gravity wave
characteristics obtained from multiple OH(3-1) airglow temperature time
series, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 135, 192–201,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.11.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2015.11.008</ext-link>, 2015</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Wendt, V., Wüst, S., Mlynczak, M. G., Russell III, J. M., Yee, J.-H., and
Bittner, M.: Impact of atmospheric variability on validation of
satellite-based temperature measurements, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 102,
252–260, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.05.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2013.05.022</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Wüst, S. and Bittner, M.: Non-linear resonant wave-wave interaction
(triad): Case studies based on rocket data and first application to satellite
data, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 68, 959–976,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.11.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2005.11.011</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Wüst, S., Wendt, V., Schmidt, C., Lichtenstern, S., Bittner, M., Yee,
J.-H., Mlynczak, M. G., and Russell III, J. M.: Derivation of gravity wave
potential energy density from NDMC measurements, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys.,
138, 32–46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.12.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2015.12.003</ext-link>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Wüst, S., Schmidt, C., Bittner, M., Price, C., Silber, I., Yee, J.-H.,
Mlynczak, M. G., and Russell III, J. M.: First ground-based observations of
mesopause temperatures above the Eastern-Mediterranean Part II:
OH*-climatology and gravity wave activity, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 155,
104–111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.01.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jastp.2017.01.003</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, S. P. and Shepherd, G.: The influence of the diurnal tide on the O(1S)
and OH emission rates observed by WINDII on UARS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26,
529–532, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Variability of the Brunt–Väisälä frequency at the OH* layer height</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">In and near the Alpine region, the most dense subnetwork of
identical NDMC (Network for the Detection of Mesospheric Change,
<a href="https://www.wdc.dlr.de/ndmc/" target="_blank">https://www.wdc.dlr.de/ndmc/</a>) instruments can be found: five stations are equipped
with OH* spectrometers which deliver a time series of mesopause temperature
for each cloudless or only partially cloudy night. These measurements are
suitable for the derivation of the density of gravity wave potential energy,
provided that the Brunt–Väisälä frequency is known.</p><p class="p">However, OH* spectrometers do not deliver vertically resolved temperature
information, which is necessary for the calculation of the
Brunt–Väisälä frequency. Co-located measurements or
climatological values are needed.</p><p class="p">We use 14 years of satellite-based temperature data (TIMED-SABER,
2002–2015) to investigate the inter- and intra-annual variability of the
Brunt–Väisälä frequency at the OH* layer height between
43.93–48.09° N and 5.71–12.95° E and provide a
climatology.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andrews, D. G.: An introduction to atmospheric physics, Cambridge University
Press, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Baker, D. J. and Stair Jr., A. T.: Rocket measurements of the altitude
distributions of the hydroxyl airglow, Phys. Scr., 37, 611–622, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bills, R. E. and Gardner, C. S.: Lidar observations of the mesopause region
temperature structure at Urbana, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 1011–1021, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD02167" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD02167</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bittner, M., Offermann, D., Bugaeva, I. V., Kokin, G. A., Koshelkov, J. P.,
Krivolutsky, A., Tarasenko, D. A., Gil-Ojeda, M., Hauchecorne, A.,
Lübken,
F.-J., de la Morena, B. A., Mourier, A., Nakane, H., Oyama, K. I., Schmidlin,
F. J., Soule, I., Thomas, L., and Tsuda, T.: Long period/large scale
oscillations of temperature during the DYANA campaign, J. Atmos. Terr.
Phys., 56, 1675–1700, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bremer, J. and Peters, D.: Influence of stratospheric ozone changes on
long-term trends in the meso- and lower thermosphere, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr.
Phys., 70, 1473–1481, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Committee on Space Research; NASA National Space Science Data Center: COSPAR
International Reference Atmosphere (CIRA-86): Global Climatology of
Atmospheric Parameters, NCAS British Atmospheric Data Centre, 7 March
2017, available at: <a href="http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/4996e5b2f53ce0b1f2072adadaeda262" target="_blank">http://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/4996e5b2f53ce0b1f2072adadaeda262</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia, F. J., Taylor, M. J., and Kelley, M. C.: Two-dimensional spectral
analysis of mesospheric airglow image data, Appl. Opt., 36, 7374–7358,
1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Good, R. E.: Determination of atomic oxygen density from rocket borne
measurement of hydroxyl airglow, Planet. Space Sci., 24, 389–395, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Hannawald, P., Schmidt, C., Wüst, S., and Bittner, M.: A fast SWIR imager
for observations of transient features in OH airglow, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9,
1461–1472, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1461-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1461-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Kramer, R., Wüst, S., Schmidt, C., and Bittner, M.: Gravity wave
characteristics in the middle atmosphere during the CESAR campaign at Palma
de Mallorca in 2011/2012: Impact of extratropical cyclones and cold fronts,
J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 128, 8–23, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.03.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.03.001</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, G. and Shepherd, G. G.: An empirical model for the altitude of the OH
nightglow emission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L09805,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025297" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025297</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
López-Puertas, M., Garcia-Comas, M., Funke, B., Picard, R. H., Winick, J.
R., Wintersteiner, P. P., Mlynczak, M. G., Mertens, C. J., Russell III, J.
M., and Gordley, L. L.: Evidence for an OH (v) excitation mechanism of
CO<sub>2</sub> 4.3 µm nighttime emission from SABER/TIMED measurements, J.
Geophys. Res., 109, D09307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004383" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004383</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, X., Liu, A. Z., Swenson, G. R., Li, T., Leblanc, T., and McDermid, I. S.:
Gravity wave propagation and dissipation from the stratosphere to the lower
thermosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D11101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010112" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010112</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Lu, X., Chu, X., Fong, W., Chen, C., Yu, Z., Roberts, B. R., and McDonald, A.
J.: Vertical evolution of potential energy density and vertical wave number
spectrum of Antarctic gravity waves from 35 to 105 km at McMurdo
(77.8° S, 166.7° E), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
2719–2737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022751" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022751</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Mertens, C. J., Schmidlin, F. J., Goldberg, R. A., Remsberg, E. E., Pesnell,
W. D., Russell III, J. M., Mlynczak, M. G., López-Puertas, M.,
Wintersteiner, P. P., Picard, R. H., Winick, J. R., and Gordley, L. L.: SABER
observations of mesospheric temperatures and comparisons with falling sphere
measurements taken during the 2002 summer MaCWAVE campaign, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 31, L03105, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018605" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018605</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Mertens, C. J., Fernandez, J. R., Xu, X., Evans, D. S., Mlynczak, M. G., and
Russell III, J. M.: A new source of auroral infrared emission observed by
TIMED/SABER, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, 17–20, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Mlynczak, M. G.: Energetics of the mesosphere and lower thermosphere and the
SABER experiment, Adv. Space Res. 20, 1177–1183,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00769-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(97)00769-2</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Mulligan, F. J., Dyrland, M. E., Sigernes, F., and Deehr, C. S.: Inferring
hydroxyl layer peak heights from ground-based measurements of OH(6-2) band
integrated emission rate at Longyearbyen (78° N, 16° E),
Ann. Geophys., 27, 4197–4205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-4197-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-4197-2009</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Mzé, N., Hauchecorne, A., Keckhut, P., and Thétis, M.: Vertical
distribution of gravity wave potential energy from long-term Rayleigh lidar
data at a northern middle latitude site, J. Geophys. Res., 119, 12069–12083,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022035</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Noll, S., Kausch, W., Kimeswenger, S., Unterguggenberger, S., and Jones, A.
M.: Comparison of VLT/X-shooter OH and O<sub>2</sub> rotational temperatures with
consideration of TIMED/SABER emission and temperature profiles, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 16, 5021–5042, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5021-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5021-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Pautet, P.-D., Taylor, M., Pendleton, W., Zhao, Y., Yuan, T., Esplin, R., and
McLain, D.: Advanced mesospheric temperature mapper for high-latitude airglow
studies, Appl. Opt., 53, 5934–5943, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Placke, M., Hoffmann, P., Gerding, M., Becker, E., and Rapp, M.: Testing
linear gravity wave theory with simultaneous wind and temperature data from
the mesosphere, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys. 93, 57–69,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2012.11.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2012.11.012</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Rauthe, M., Gerding, M., and Lübken, F.-J.: Seasonal changes in gravity
wave activity measured by lidars at mid-latitudes, J. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
13741–13773, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6775-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6775-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Remsberg, E. E., Marshall, B. T., Garcia-Comas, M., Krueger, D.,
Lingenfelser, G. S., Martin-Torres, J., Mlynczak, M. G., Russell III, J. M.,
Smith, A. K., Zhao, Y., Brown, C., Gordley, L. L., Lopez-Gonzalez, M. J.,
Lopez-Puertas, M., She, C.-Y., Taylor, M. J., and Thompson, R. E.: Assessment
of the quality of the Version 1.07 temperature versus pressure profiles of
the middle atmosphere from TIMED/SABER, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D17101,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010013</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Russell III, J. M., Mlynczak, M. G., Gordley, L. L., Tansock Jr., J. J., and
Esplin, R. W.: Overview of the SABER experiment and preliminary calibration
results, Proc. SPIE 3756, Optical Spectroscopic Tech. Instrum, Atmos. Space
Res. III, 277–288, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1117/12.366382" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1117/12.366382</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Sedlak, R., Hannawald, P., Schmidt, C., Wüst, S., and Bittner, M.:
High-resolution observations of small-scale gravity waves and turbulence
features in the OH airglow layer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 5955–5963,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5955-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-5955-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
She, C. Y., Yu, J. R., Huang, J. W., Nagasawa, C., and Gardner, C. S.: Na
temperature lidar measurements of gravity wave perturbations of wind, density
and temperature in the mesopause region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 18, 1329–1331,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91GL01517" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/91GL01517</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Shepherd, G. G., Cho, Y.-M., Liu, G., Shepherd, M. G., and Roble, R. G.:
Airglow variability in the context of the global mesospheric circulation, J.
Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 68, 2000–2011, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2006.06.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2006.06.006</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Teiser G. and von Savigny, C.: Variability of OH(3-1) and OH(6-2) emission
altitude and volume emission rate from 2003 to 2011, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr.
Phys., 161, 28–42, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Tsuda, T., Nishida, M., Rocken, C. H., and Ware, R. H.: A global morphology
of gravity wave activity in the stratosphere revealed by the GPS occultation
data (GPS/MET), J. Geophys. Res., 105, 7257–7273, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD901005</a>,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
von Savigny, C.: Variability of OH(3-1) emission altitude from 2003 to 2011:
Long-term stability and universality of the emission rate-altitude
relationship, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 127, 120–128,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.02.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.02.001</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
von Savigny, C., McDade, I. C., Eichmann, K.-U., and Burrows, J. P.: On the
dependence of the OH* Meinel emission altitude on vibrational level:
SCIAMACHY observations and model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12,
8813–8828, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8813-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-8813-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
von Zahn, U., Fricke, K. H., Gerndt, R., and Blix, T.: Mesospheric
temperatures and the OH layer height as derived from ground-based lidar and
OH* spectrometry, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 49, 863–869, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Wachter, P., Schmidt, C., Wüst, S., and Bittner, M.: Spatial gravity wave
characteristics obtained from multiple OH(3-1) airglow temperature time
series, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 135, 192–201,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.11.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.11.008</a>, 2015
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Wendt, V., Wüst, S., Mlynczak, M. G., Russell III, J. M., Yee, J.-H., and
Bittner, M.: Impact of atmospheric variability on validation of
satellite-based temperature measurements, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 102,
252–260, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.05.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2013.05.022</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Wüst, S. and Bittner, M.: Non-linear resonant wave-wave interaction
(triad): Case studies based on rocket data and first application to satellite
data, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 68, 959–976,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.11.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2005.11.011</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Wüst, S., Wendt, V., Schmidt, C., Lichtenstern, S., Bittner, M., Yee,
J.-H., Mlynczak, M. G., and Russell III, J. M.: Derivation of gravity wave
potential energy density from NDMC measurements, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys.,
138, 32–46, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.12.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2015.12.003</a>, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Wüst, S., Schmidt, C., Bittner, M., Price, C., Silber, I., Yee, J.-H.,
Mlynczak, M. G., and Russell III, J. M.: First ground-based observations of
mesopause temperatures above the Eastern-Mediterranean Part II:
OH*-climatology and gravity wave activity, J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys., 155,
104–111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.01.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2017.01.003</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, S. P. and Shepherd, G.: The influence of the diurnal tide on the O(1S)
and OH emission rates observed by WINDII on UARS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 26,
529–532, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
