<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-11-195-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Online differentiation of mineral phase in aerosol particles<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> by ion
formation mechanism using a LAAP-TOF<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> single-particle mass spectrometer</article-title><alt-title>Online differentiation of mineral phase</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Online differentiation of mineral phase}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{N.~A.~Marsden et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Marsden</surname><given-names>Nicholas A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6242-929X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Flynn</surname><given-names>Michael J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Allan</surname><given-names>James D.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6492-4876</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Coe</surname><given-names>Hugh</given-names></name>
          <email>hugh.coe@manchester.ac.uk</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Earth and Environmental Science, University of
Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Manchester, M13
9PL, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Hugh Coe (hugh.coe@manchester.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>11</day><month>January</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>11</volume>
      <issue>1</issue>
      <fpage>195</fpage><lpage>213</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>March</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>14</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13</day><month>November</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>July</month><year>2017</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2018 Nicholas A. Marsden et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2018</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e117">Mineralogy of silicate mineral dust has a strong influence on
climate and ecosystems due to variation in physiochemical
properties that result from differences in composition and crystal
structure (mineral phase). Traditional offline methods of analysing
mineral phase are labour intensive and the temporal resolution of
the data is much longer than many atmospheric processes. Single-particle mass spectrometry (SPMS) is an established technique for
the online size-resolved measurement of particle composition by
laser desorption ionisation (LDI) followed by time-of-flight mass
spectrometry (TOF-MS). Although non-quantitative, the technique is
able to identify the presence of silicate minerals in airborne dust
particles from markers of alkali metals and silicate molecular ions
in the mass spectra. However, the differentiation of mineral phase
in silicate particles by traditional mass spectral peak area
measurements is not possible. This is because instrument function
and matrix effects in the ionisation process result in variations in
instrument response that are greater than the differences in
composition between common mineral phases.</p>
    <p id="d1e120">In this study, we introduce a novel technique that enables the
differentiation of mineral phase in silicate mineral particles by
ion formation mechanism measured from subtle changes in ion arrival
times at the TOF-MS detector. Using a combination of peak area and
peak centroid measurements, we show that the arrangement of the
interstitial alkali metals in the crystal structure, an important
property in silicate mineralogy, influences the ion arrival times of
elemental and molecular ion species in the negative ion mass
spectra. A classification scheme is presented that allowed for the
differentiation of illite–smectite, kaolinite and feldspar minerals
on a single-particle basis. Online analysis of mineral dust aerosol
generated from clay mineral standards produced mineral fractions
that are in agreement with bulk measurements reported by traditional
XRD (X-ray diffraction) analysis.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e132">Aerosol has a strong environmental impact by affecting climate,
atmospheric processes, ecosystems, human health and
visibility. Airborne mineral dust, which accounts for a large fraction
of the global aerosol burden (Cakmur et al., 2006), influences climate
by direct radiative perturbation (Tegen and Lacis, 1996; Balkanski et al., 2007;
Nousiainen et al., 2009), affecting cloud
properties (Rosenfeld et al., 2001; DeMott, 2003) and atmospheric
chemistry (Usher et al., 2003). In addition, mineral dust provides the land and ocean
with nutrients (Duce and Tindale, 1991; Jickells and
Spokes, 2001), causes damage to human health through the inhalation of
fine particulate matter (Prospero et al., 2008; Samoli et al., 2011; Prospero and
Mayol-Bracero, 2013) and causes disruption to
transport and economy with intense episodes of reduced visibility
(Prospero, 1999; Goudie and Middleton, 2006).</p>
      <p id="d1e135">Ambient measurements of mineral dust composition are important for
validation of global dust cycle models and their incorporation into
atmospheric models (Claquin et al., 1999; Nickovic et al., 2012;
Perlwitz et al., 2015). Differentiation of the mineral phase is
particularly useful for the provenance of transported dust because
distinct mass fraction ratios of mineral types, such as calcite
content and illite<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>kaolinite<?pagebreak page196?> ratio, can be used as signatures of
potential source area (PSA) (Caquineau et al., 2002; Scheuvens et al.,
2013). The role of mineral dust particles in atmospheric processes
is a function of its physical and chemical properties which can be
influenced by source and transport processes (Formenti et al.,
2011). The importance of chemical and mineralogical composition has
been highlighted. Optical modelling of mineral dust aerosol has found
that the radiative effects are very sensitive to iron-oxide–clay-mineral aggregates (Sokolik and Toon, 1999; Lafon et al., 2006), and
in a radiative closure experiment McConnell et al. (2010) found that
accurate representation of aggregates of illite and kaolinite clay
minerals with hematite or goethite (iron oxide minerals) were required
but the mineralogical combination had to be assumed due to the
inability of traditional X-ray diffraction techniques to accurately
resolve the mineralogy on sparsely populated filter samples collected
during airborne measurements.</p>
      <p id="d1e145">Laboratory experiments have found a strong mineralogical dependence on
the onset temperature of ice nucleation with respect to
supersaturation, which has implications for modelling cold and
mixed-phase clouds (Zimmerman, 2008; Connolly,
2009). For example, Atkinson et al. (2013) demonstrated that from
a collection of common minerals, K-feldspar particles were the most
efficient INP in the immersion mode using a cold stage
apparatus. Current climate models rely on simple parameterisation of
INP number concentrations using properties such as surface area
(Niemand et al., 2012) or particle size (DeMott et al., 2010, 2015),
which assume all mineral dust behave in the same way regardless of
chemical or mineralogical composition.</p>
      <p id="d1e148">In the field of atmospheric science, mineral dust is often collected
in small volumes on microporous filters which are then analysed
offline by a variety of elemental, mineralogical and isotopic
techniques. Typical techniques for elemental analysis include
environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), which reveals
information on particle morphology, coupled with energy dispersive
X-ray spectroscopy (EDS; e.g. Reid et al., 2003; Young et al., 2016)
or transition electron microscopy (TEM; e.g. Kandler et al., 2007)
for elemental analysis on a particle-by-particle basis. While
elemental composition is strongly correlated to mineralogical
composition, the quantitation required to differentiate common
silicate mineral phase in the bulk sample is rarely achieved. X-ray
diffraction (XRD) is the established technique used to identify major
mineral phases in many disciplines. However, this approach is
considered semi-quantitative and is subject to comparatively large
errors, particularly when dealing with clay minerals in the fine
fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Moore and Reynolds, 1997) that require the preparation of textured samples. In addition, the XRD
signal results only from the crystalline fraction so that the
amorphous material is not counted, leading to a discrepancy with the
total dust mass (Formenti et al., 2008).  The limit of detection of
XRD analysis means a mass loading of at least 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
aerosol dust is typically required (Caquineau et al., 1997), making
it unsuitable for the measurement of mineral dust particles with low
number concentrations.</p>
      <p id="d1e182">Online measurements of aerosol properties are highly desirable
because changes in properties can be linked to atmospheric processes
and artefacts associated with offline particle collection can be
avoided. Single-particle mass spectrometry (SPMS) is an online
measurement technique that obtains size-resolved composition of
individual particles using laser desorption ionisation (LDI). In SPMS,
aerosol is directly introduced into the instrument via an inlet and
a high-powered laser is used to ablate and ionise refractory and
non-refractory particles in a particle beam. Ions produced in a low
vacuum source by the LDI process are analysed by time-of-flight mass
spectrometry (TOF-MS). However, the composition measurement is
considered non-quantitative on a single-particle basis due to
variation in instrument function and particle matrix effects that
influence the ion formation process (Hinz and Spengler, 2007; Murphy,
2007; Zhou et al., 2007). The origin of this matrix effect is not well
understood, but systematic variation of ion signals in simple
analogues of atmospheric aerosol suggests that ionisation potential,
electron affinity and plume density are important factors (Reinard and
Johnston, 2008).</p>
      <p id="d1e185">Numerous studies of atmospheric aerosol using SPMS have identified
a distinct silicate mineral class of particles in ambient aerosol
(Middlebrook, 2003; Sullivan et al., 2007; Dall'Osto et al., 2010)
and in ice residues extracted from mixed-phase clouds (Kamphus et al., 2010; Baustian
et al., 2012; Worringen et al., 2015; Schmidt et al., 2016). Whilst this has proven useful in the investigation of
internal and external mixing states of ambient aerosol population,
identification of mineral types within the silicate class has remained
elusive with SMPS because natural variation in composition between
mineral phases is often smaller than the particle-to-particle
variations in ion distribution recorded in the mass spectra due to
instrument function and particle matrix effects.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e191">Summary of the dust samples used in this study (n/a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> not applicable).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Principal mineral</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Structure type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Subtype</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Origin</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">BSG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Borosilicate glass</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Amorphous</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Duke Standards</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Elftex124</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Carbon black</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sheet graphite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Cabot</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ortho1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Orthoclase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Framework silicate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Feldspar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Geo Supplies</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Plag1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Plagioclase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Framework silicate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Feldspar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Geo Supplies</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KGa-1b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kaolinite (low defect)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sheet silicate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer clay</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CMS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KGa-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kaolinite (high defect)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sheet silicate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer clay</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CMS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">STx-1b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ca-montmorillonite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sheet silicate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer clay</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CMS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SWy-3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Na-montmorillonite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sheet silicate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer clay</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CMS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IMt-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Illite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sheet silicate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer clay</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CMS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ISCz-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Illite–smectite mix</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sheet silicate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mixed-layer clay</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">CMS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Illite NX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Illite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Sheet silicate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Layer clay</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>M Nottenkamper</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e513">Ion formation processes in LDI can be studied by measuring initial ion
velocities which are calculated by comparing the ion arrival time at
the TOF-MS detector of certain ion species after systematic variation
in ion focussing (e.g Spengler and Kirsch, 2003; Vera
et al., 2005). In this paper we compare ion arrival times of key
marker ions in a variety of crystal structures in otherwise chemically
similar particle types. Using a laser ablation aerosol particle
time-of-flight (LAAP-TOF) single-particle mass spectrometer (Aeromegt
GmbH), we demonstrate that systematic variation in ion arrival times
in laboratory-generated nominally pure mineral samples can be related
to the ion formation mechanism and crystal structure of single
particles. A method for the online differentiation of mineral phase
in clay mineral standards is presented using a spectral peak centroid as
a measure of average ion arrival time in addition to traditional peak
area analysis. The application of the method to analyse ambient dust
particles will be presented in a future publication.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page197?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Dust samples</title>
      <p id="d1e531">Laboratory studies of the physiochemical properties of mineral dust
require an appropriate sample material that is representative and
relevant to atmospheric processes. Field studies show that most dust
in the atmosphere is dominated by varying quantities of quartz,
K-feldspar, plagioclase, calcite, hematite, kaolinite and the
illite–smectite group of clay minerals (Kaufman et al., 2005; Kandler et al., 2007, 2009, 2011; Formenti et al., 2008; Jeong,
2008; Kaufmann et al., 2016). At a single-particle level, particle size dependence is
observed with an abundance of quartz and feldspar grains in the coarse
fraction and a fine fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) dominated by clay
minerals. Detailed studies on Asian and
Saharan dust have revealed complex internal structures of individual
particles in terms of mineralogy and morphology. TEM analysis of
sliced particles revealed that the most common sub-5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
particle type was clay-rich agglomerate, dominated by nano-thin
platelets of illite–smectite series clay minerals (ISCM) with
submicron grains of iron (hydr)oxides (goethite and hematite) commonly
dispersed throughout the particles (Jeong and
Nousiainen, 2014; Jeong et al., 2016).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e567">Structural formulae of source clays from the Clay Minerals Society
calculated from elemental analysis (Mermut and Cano, 2001).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">X-ion</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Y-ion</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Tetra</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Anion</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KGa-1b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.86</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">III</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Tr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.83</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KGa-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Tr</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Tr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.66</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">III</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Tr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.00</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">STx-1b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.41</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">III</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Tr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.00</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SWy-3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.01</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">III</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.98</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IMt-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.37</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.01</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">III</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">II</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.43</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Tr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.08</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ISCz-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.39</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">III</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ti</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Tr</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mtext>Tr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.19</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.81</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1235">Minerological impurities in CMS clay as determined by X-ray
diffraction.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col8" align="center">Impurities (wt%) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Quartz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Kaolinite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">K-feldspar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Plagioclase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Other</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Total</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KGa_1b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Dickite 4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Chipera and Bish (2001)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KGa-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Dickite 4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Chipera and Bish (2001)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PF1–1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">11.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Vogt et al. (2002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">STx-1b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">33.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Vogt et al. (2002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SWy-3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ND</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Pyroxene 5.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">12.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Vogt et al. (2002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IMt-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">10.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Vogt et al. (2002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ISCz-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Chlorite 1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">8.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Vogt et al. (2002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1489">In our laboratory study of silicate dust, clay mineral samples were
chosen because they represent the most atmospherically relevant
material in the size range of the LAAP-TOF transmission
(0.5–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Samples of feldspar were compared to these
clay samples because of the potential importance of K-feldspar as ice
nuclei (Atkinson et al., 2013). In addition to aluminosilicates,
2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> borosilicate glass spheres were used as an example
of an amorphous silicate structure that contains abundant alkali and
earth alkali metals that are not chemically bonded into a crystal
structure. Carbon black (CB) (Elftex 124, Cabot Corp) was used as an
example of a non-silicate particle that has a well-characterised
molecular structure. A summary of the samples used in this study is
provided in Table 1.</p>
      <p id="d1e1512">CB is distinct from the material commonly referred to
as black carbon (BC) (Watson and Valberg, 2001; Long et al., 2013). CB
has a characteristic particle morphology that consists of spherical
primary particles fused into aciniform (grape-like) aggregates which
cluster into larger-sized agglomerates. The primary particles are
typically 10–500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in diameter and are composed of imperfect
graphitic layers that are concentrically arranged around a growth
centre (Rivin, 1986). The spaces between the graphitic layers often
accommodate cations such as potassium and sodium. Elftex 124 is
a flame-soot-derived CB product comprised of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % carbon
(Wonaschütz et al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e1533">Clay minerals have a sheet silicate structure in which silicate
tetrahedra are 2-dimensionally polymerised to form structural layers
that are separated by interlayer cations. The capacity of a clay
mineral to accommodate interstitial cations (X-ions) in the interlayer
spacing of a clay mineral is related to the layer charge of the
structural layer. The structural layers of clay minerals are composed
of alternating tetrahedral and octahedral sheets in which the layer
charge is created by isomorphous substitution of lower valency
ions. Substitution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions in the
tetrahedra produces a tetrahedral charge, while substitution of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the octohedra (Y-ions) produces
an octahedral charge. The composition of clay minerals is not fixed but
is determined by the varying degrees of cation replacement in the
structural unit and interstitial complex. For example, the nominal
chemical formula of illite is stated in the form
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
express the variability in composition that can exist within the
illite member of the clay mineral group.</p>
      <p id="d1e1651">Source clays from the Clay Minerals Society (CMS) have been the subject
of chemical, physical and thermodynamic analysis and therefore very
well characterised. Average elemental composition of Si, Al, Fe(II),
Fe(III), Mg, Ti, Mn, P, Ca, Na, K and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the bulk sample
is available (Mermut and Cano, 2001) and enables the construction of
the precise structural formula. The structural formulae for the source
clay samples used in this study are given in a format<?pagebreak page198?> that shows the
average composition of the X-ions, Y-ions and tetrahedral layer in
Table 2.</p>
      <p id="d1e1667">Kaolinite (samples KGa-1b and KGa-2) has a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer structure in
which each layer contains one tetrahedral layer and one octahedral
layer. Kaolinite has no overall layer charge and hence a very low
X-ion content. The remaining samples consist of the so-called <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
layer clays in which one octahedral layer is sandwiched between two
tetrahedral layers. The layer charge created by this <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer
structure is balanced by a certain quantity of X-ions. Illite-rich
samples (IMT-2, ISCz-1) are characterised by very high quantities of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the montmorillonite clays (STx-1b, SWy-3) are
characterised by relatively high levels of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1743">Naturally occurring rock is rarely monomineralic. Mineralogical
impurities in source clays have been previously quantified by X-ray
diffraction analysis (Table 3) for the bulk sample (Chipera and Bish,
2001) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction (Vogt et al., 2002). For
example, in natural environments montmorillonite is diagenetically
altered to illite in the presence of K-feldspar (Garrels, 1984) so
that clays often consist of fine interlayers of these two clay
minerals. Sample ISCz-1 is an example of a clay that consists of
microscopic interlayers of illite and smectite clay minerals
(ISCM). Recently, Broadley et al. (2012) suggested illite NX
(B<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>M Nottenkamper, Munich, Germany) as a suitable representation
of ambient mineral dust sampled at remote locations and it has been
used in numerous ice nucleation studies (Hiranuma et al.,
2015). Illite NX is a clay-rich nanopowder that contains significant
mineralogical impurities. XRD analysis has shown significant variation
in the impurity content that may represent significant batch
differences in mineralogy (Table 4).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1777">Minerological impurities in illite NX as determined by X-ray
diffraction. ND stands for not detected.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col7" align="center">Impurities (wt%) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Quartz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Kaolinite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">K-feldspar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Plagioclase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Other</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Total</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Manufacturer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">ND</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ND</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">ND</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">14</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hiranuma (2015)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"> 14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ND</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Calcite 3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">30</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Broadley et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ND</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">24</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Friedrich et al. (2008)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Phlogopite 7.8, Anhydrite 1.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1946">In framework silicates such as feldspar, the silicate structure is
formed from 3-dimensionally polymerised silicate tetrahedral. In
contrast to the interlayer cation structure of clay minerals, a low-valence cation is held in an interstitial cavity that balances the
charge deficit created by substitution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the tetrahedral. Unlike clay minerals, the
interstitial cations are fixed and not exchangeable during normal
diagenetic processes. Most naturally occurring feldspars are not
homogenous but contain separate potassium-rich and sodium-rich phases.
Specimens of orthoclase (K-feldspar) and plagioclase were purchased
from Geo Supplies Ltd, and analysed by XRF analysis to determine the
average elemental composition. The average structural formula of the
samples was then calculated from the relative proportions of the metal
oxides (Table 5).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Table 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1980">Structural formulae of feldspar sample calculated from XRF
analysis.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Interstitial X-ion</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tetra</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Anion</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Orthoclase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.95</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.02</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Plagioclase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.83</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.17</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Experimental set-up</title>
      <p id="d1e2140">Mineral dust aerosol was sampled by the LAAP-TOF after dry dispersion
of powder in a home-made dust tower and transmission of the extracted
aerosol through a centrifugal particle mass analyser (CPMA)
(Cambustion, Ltd) (Olfert and Collings, 2005). Source clays, illite
NX, borosilicate glass beads and CB were supplied in powder form or
loose aggregate that was easily broken down into powder by gentle
abrasion with a pestle and mortar. The feldspar samples were supplied
as a large crystal that had to be reduced to powder in a timor mill
prior to injection into the dust tower.</p>
      <?pagebreak page199?><p id="d1e2143">Powdered mineral dust was loaded into a modified sample vial and
injected into the dust tower inlet using a short burst of compressed
air from an air duster can. The mixing and suspension of mineral dust
particles was achieved by turbulent flow, controlled with an
adjustable flow of dried, filtered and oil-free compressed air
(produced on site using a compressor) introduced into the bottom of the
tower (Fig. 1). Aerosol was drawn out of the dust
tower through the CPMA using a pumped sampling line throttled to
a suitable flow rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) using a needle
valve. The flow was divided between the pumped line and the LAAP-TOF
inlet (sampling at 0.078 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) using a “Y piece”.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2192">Schematic representation of the experimental set-up.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2202">The experiment was operated in two modes. In polydisperse mode, the
CPMA was inactive, so the mass distribution of the aerosol
analysed by the LAAP-TOF was determined by the transmission efficiency
of the aerodynamic lens. In monodisperse mode, the CPMA was used in
static mode so that only the selected particle mass was transferred to
the LAAP-TOF.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>LAAP-TOF single-particle mass spectrometer</title>
      <p id="d1e2213">The LAAP-TOF used in this study is a modified version of the
commercially available single-particle mass spectrometer manufactured
by AeroMegt (GmbH) that features a modified optical detection system
as described in detail by Marsden et al. (2016). Briefly, particle-laden air enters the instrument via an aerodynamic lens inlet (Liu
et al., 1995) which produces a narrow but divergent particle beam
along the instrument axis. A pulsed excimer laser interacts with
a particle in the low-pressure source region towards the back of the
instrument (Fig. 2). An optical particle detection stage located
within the source region is used for temporal alignment of the
excimer laser pulse with the presence of a particle in the ion
source. The option to measure aerodynamic particle size using an
additional optical particle detection stage located upstream of the
instrument axis was not used in this study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2218">Schematic of the LAAP-TOF.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2227">The version of the instrument used in this study features an
aerodynamic lens inlet (model LP2.5 Aeromegt GmbH) for transmission of
particles approximately 0.07–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in diameter that is
similar in design to the high-pressure lens (HPL) described by
Williams et al. (2013).  Divergence of the particle beam is size and
shape dependent (Jayne et al., 2000), resulting in a morphological
dependence on the fraction of particles that reaches the ionisation
region (Huffman et al., 2005), an effect that is particularly
important for<?pagebreak page200?> measurements of irregularly shaped platy mineral in
polydisperse dust.</p>
      <p id="d1e2241">Laser desorption ionisation takes place in a high vacuum (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mbar</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) region some 230 mm from the aerodynamic lens
exit, where particles interact with a 8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pulse of
193 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> radiation that is fired co-axial but counter-propagate
to the particle beam. The ablation laser, an ArF excimer (model EX5,
GAM Laser Inc.), can be requested to produce 2–12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mJ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per
pulse via a setting in the software. The peak laser power actually
encountered by a particle is unknown as the particle will transect the
laser pulse at an unknown position in its profile due to particle
divergence and temporal alignment. Consequently, particle-to-particle
variations in the peak power and effective pulse duration can reduce
the reproducibility of the measurement. A previous study with this
instrument configuration has shown a sampling efficiency for ambient
mineral dust of approximately 0.01 with a particle-size-dependent
optical detection bias that favours the detection of particles with
a mode of around 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in diameter (Marsden et al.,
2016). Sampling efficiency is important in SPMS as it influences the
particle-counting statistics of an aerosol population and can
introduce a bias of compositional measurement towards a particular
particle type (Zelenyuk et al., 2009).</p>
      <p id="d1e2316">The TOF-MS used in the LAAP-TOF is a bipolar reflectron TOF analyser
(BTOF, Tofwerks AG) for the simultaneous measurement of positive and
negative ions.  Ion arrival times at the multichannel plate (MCP)
detectors, one for each ion mode, are recorded by a dual channel 14bit
analogue to digital converter (model ADQ214, SP Devices) with a bin
width of 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The ADQ clock is triggered by a signal that
is synchronous with the firing of the ablation laser so that each
spectrum represents the ions formed by a single-particle ablation
event. The configuration of the extraction optics in the LAAP-TOF is
unusual in that the first extraction lenses of the LAAP-TOF ion optics
are grounded so that the evolution of the ion plume takes place in
a field-free region and only ions with the correct ion trajectories
are extracted for analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Mass spectral peak analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e2335">The aim of the peak analysis is to evaluate how composition and
crystal structure of the particles affect ion arrival times at the
multichannel plate (MCP) detector by comparing the spectral
characteristics of the samples of mineral dusts of known
mineralogy. TOF-MS analysers focus a certain elemental or molecular ion
species into a discrete packet of ions with arrival times at the
detector that are represented by a Gaussian probability density function
(PDF), which is represented as a spectral peak in the data. The average
ion arrival time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the ion packet at the detector is described
by the peak centroid, while the peak width (FWHM) describes the
distribution around this average.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
      <p id="d1e2346">Peak centroid and peak width were extracted from the raw spectra using
a peak-fitting algorithm. Peak fitting within the spectra was
problematic because of spectrum-to-spectrum variations in peak
position, peak shape and interference from neighbouring peaks. To
reduce the influence of these effects, a multipeak-fitting procedure
(Multipeak fit v2, igor v6.36) was performed on a portion of the mass
spectrum which contained the peak of interest. Peak-fitting parameters
were set so that interfering signals were identified as separate peaks
without comprising the integrity of the peak of interest. In most
cases, the peak of interest was a well-defined Gaussian shape that was
sufficiently separated from its neighbour, such as the example of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecular ion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Fig. 3a.
Occasionally, especially in illite-rich clay mineral samples, the
molecular ion peak was much broader (Fig. 3b) therefore a number of
data smooths were required to ensure satisfactory peak definition was
obtained. A third peak morphology, featuring multiple modes was also
encountered in illite-rich clays samples that required careful
consideration. Using a suitable peak-fitting parameters (Number of
Smooths 5, Number Fraction 0.1), the multimodal peak in Fig. 3c was
resolved into two peaks whose peak centres were approximately
1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Da</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) apart. Note that further resolution of
this multimodal peak using a fewer data smooths resulted in peaks that
were separated by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Da</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Fig. 3d), which
is an improbable solution in data that primary consists of singly
charged ions. Consequently, peak-fitting parameters were chosen that
ensured peak centroid spacing of integer values (in mass) were
produced from all fitting. The origin of the multimodal peak
morphology will be discussed in more detail in the results section.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2423">Peak fitting of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecular ion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>76) and its neighbour at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>77. <bold>(a)</bold> Well-resolved
Gaussian peaks with a peak centroid spacing of 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<bold>(b)</bold> peak broadening observed in illite-rich material,
<bold>(c)</bold> multimodal peaks resolved into two peaks with
approximately 50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spacing and <bold>(d)</bold> the same
multimodal peak resolved into peaks with centroid spacing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by reducing the number of times data was smoothed to 2. Fitting
parameters used were number of smoothes 5, Min fraction was 0.1 unless
stated otherwise.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page201?><p id="d1e2532">Prior to analysing the mineral dust samples, the ion optics were tuned
for maximum resolution and symmetrical peak shape across the mass
range for positive and negative ions using 700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diameter PSL
particles. The effect of particle type on ion arrival times was
initially evaluated by comparing mass-scale calibrations obtained from
selected samples. Calibration coefficients were calculated for each
sample type by fitting the first order approximation of the time of
flight equation (Eq. 1) to the averaged peak centroid of three ion
species. For the silicate, the same ion species were chosen in
positive and negative ion modes for each sample. Changes in average
arrival times of a certain ion species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), apparent as a peak
centroid shift (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with respect to previously defined
position, were examined in more detail by comparing the peak centroid
with a nominal mass-scale calibration and comparing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
with other ion species from within the spectrum (i.e. from the same
ionisation event).
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M102" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:msqrt><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">M</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Tuning and calibration</title>
      <p id="d1e2622">Spectral resolution of the peaks in positive and negative spectra for
PSL were typically 300 and 600 (FWHM at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 36) respectively, with
unit mass resolution easily achieved over the mass range
10–100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Da</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The optimum tune settings for the positive ion
optics differed somewhat from those of the negative ion optics despite
their identical geometry, indicating significant differences in the
translational energies of the positive and negative ions produced in
the same particle ionisation event.</p>
      <p id="d1e2645">Typical mass spectra of feldspar mineral dust (Fig. 4a) show elemental
ions of alkali metals in positive ion mode and molecular fragment ions
of silicate at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>76 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
in negative ion mode, which is in agreement with the mineral dust
spectra observed by Gallavardin et al., 2008a, who used a similar
193 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> excimer laser at approximately
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Detector saturation was apparent on
several positive ion peaks when Channel 1 signal amplifier line to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used (Fig. 4a, top). To avoid peak saturation,
the Channel 2 signal amplifier with a greater attenuation was used for
the subsequent peak analysis. The effect of changing the signal
amplifier on the spectra is demonstrated in the typical mass spectra
examples in Fig. 4. Detector saturation occurs at 1200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
signal strength for the peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 27, 39 and 44 with the signal
Channel 1. Saturation is avoided with signal Channel 2 but comes at
the expense of poor signal-to-noise ratio of ion species such as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 12) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CaO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 56). Note the
relative signal height between ion species is altered when the signal
channel is changed, highlighting insufficient dynamic range of the ion
detection system.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2828">Example spectra of <bold>(a)</bold> 700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> PSL and
(left column) and <bold>(b)</bold> orthoclase feldspar (right
column). The dynamic range of the data is demonstrated by changing
the positive ion signal line from Channel 1 (top spectra) to
Channel 2 (middle spectra). Negative ion spectra are also shown
(bottom spectra).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2852">Mass-scale calibration over a limited mass range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 23–56) was
possible in positive ion mode due to the limited number of peaks that
were universally available in all spectra, whereas a mass-scale
calibration with a wider mass range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 16–76) was possible in
negative ion mode. Calibration coefficients obtained for PSL, Carbon
black, K-feldspar and borosilicate glass are shown in Table 6. Note
the increase in the intercept value for the K-feldspar and
borosilicate glass samples, indicating an overall shift in the ion
arrival times compared to the PSL.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Table 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2882">Mass calibration coefficients calculated from the mode peak
position (TOF) of three ion species for each samples in each ion mode. The
ions species used are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>36 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>48, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>24, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>72
in PSL and carbon black mass spectra and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>39, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>76 in K-feldspar mass spectra. Positive ion
calibration of the borosilicate glass was not possible with the peaks
selected. Calibration points are expressed in 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bin
widths (n/a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>  not applicable).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pos)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pos)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Neg)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Neg)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PSL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8.415</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">371.026</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.953</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">400.708</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Carbon black</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">16.1504</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">369.608</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.816</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">400.732</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Feldspar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28.882</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">367.335</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.601</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">400.073</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Borosilicate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">34.125</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">397.435</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page202?><p id="d1e3145">The average peak position and peak width (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 SD) of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> positive ion species and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> negative ion
species in the K-feldspar, illite IMt-2 and borosilicate glass samples
are displayed in Fig. 5. In positive ion mode, the peak position is
often <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Da</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the K-feldspar calibrated mass
position in all sample types. In negative ion mode, the average
position of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
significantly larger for the illite IMt-2 than for K-feldspar or
borosilicate glass. In addition to the peak analysis, average peak
centroid and peak width are important for the creation of stick
spectra used in routine cluster analysis techniques. The data-processing software provides an additional facility with which to apply a unique
3-parameter fit calibration to each spectrum. However, for this
calibration to be successful, the peak of interest must be located
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Da</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the average mass position, which is not the
case in a significant number of peaks in mineral dust spectra.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e3288">The mean mass-scale position and mass-scale width of
three positive ion species and three negative ion species in silicate
mineral particles.  Measurement is with respect to the K-feldspar
calibration. Error bars are 2 SDs of the mean calculated from 800
spectra per sample.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3297">The mass-scale dependence of the peak position shift suggests that the
differences in calibrations do not arise from a simple linear shift in
ion arrival times for all ion species in the mass spectra. This is
further demonstrated by examining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to the
negative ion calibration for borosilicate glass (Fig. 6). Carbon black
has a clear mass dependence with respect to this
calibration. Kaolinite does not have a strong mass dependence but is
affected by a large kink in the mass scale between the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecular ions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 60 and 76 respectively), which
is apparent with all the silicate minerals analysed.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3355">Shift in ion arrival times (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mtext>(i)</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with
respect to a nominal negative ion calibration with borosilicate
glass. The mean and two SDs of the mean were calculated from 800
spectra per sample type.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Relative shift of elemental and molecular ion TOF</title>
      <p id="d1e3385">In this section we explore the relationship between the ion arrival
times of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> elemental ion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecular ion (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) within
discrete ionisation events. In the case of borosilicate glass, an
amorphous silicate material, a scatter plot of arrival times measured
in individual mass spectra display an approximately linear
distribution of data points with a gradient of 1 (Fig. 7a), indicating
that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
contrast, the non-silicate carbon black, a similar plot of elemental
vs. molecular carbon ions measured from C at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ion at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60 gives a linear
distribution of ion arrival times with a gradient of 0.35, indicating
that generally <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3546">Ion arrival times (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of elemental ions compared to
molecular ion species in negative ion mode. Each point represents
a single-particle measurement: <bold>(a)</bold> 2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
borosilicate glass spheres and polydisperse carbon
black, <bold>(b)</bold> polydisperse orthoclase feldspar and illite
IMt-2 and <bold>(c)</bold> polydisperse illite NX and mass selected
illite nx particle with the CPMA.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018-f07.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3590">Similar distributions of ion arrival times can be observed with the
LDI of crystalline silicate mineral dust. The framework silicate
orthoclase feldspar has a distribution of ion arrival times that is
similar to the distribution of the borosilicate glass but is narrower
(Fig. 7b), whereas illite IMt-2, a sheet silicate, has a large mode
that is similar to the carbon black,<?pagebreak page203?> with an additional mode of
particles that is more similar to the borosilicate glass. The silicate
mineral sample with the most variation in ion arrival times is the
illite NX for which several distinct modes are apparent (Fig. 7c). The
multimodal nature of this distribution was still apparent after the
particles were mass selected with the CPMA before analysis with the
LAAP-TOF. The ion arrival time distribution of mass selected
350 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> illite NX particle shows a smaller variation of up to
20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas mass-selected 700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> illite NX particles
have a distribution comparable to the polydisperse analysis.</p>
      <?pagebreak page204?><p id="d1e3618">In order to directly compare the ion arrival time distributions of
different silicate minerals, the shift in arrival time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">i</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) was calculated for each spectrum with respect to
a set point on the timescale.  For silicate-containing particles,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were
calculated with respect to the point at which the mode distributions
converge on the scatter plots at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4010.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8722.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which we
will call the convergence point. The relative difference in the ion
arrival times of the elemental and molecular ions in negative ion mode
can then be expressed as a ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) for each particle analysed.
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M186" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Histograms of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values measured from the peak analysis in
silicate mineral mass spectra are shown in Fig. 8. Potassium-rich clay
minerals illite NX and illite IMt-2 (Fig. 8b) have a distinct mode
around 0.3–0.5, which is aligned with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio derived from the peak analysis of carbon
black. Other distinct modes can be seen in the illite IMt-2 sample at
0.79 and in the illite NX sample at 0.83 and 1.10, which are more similar
to the distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values measured for borosilicate
glass. (Fig. 8a) The smectite and montmorillonite clays have modes in
the distribution that range from 0.4 to 0.86 and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layer clay
kaolinite has the largest mode at 0.93 (Fig. 8c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3814">Histograms of the ion arrival times shift ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
the elemental ion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the molecular ion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
<bold>(a)</bold> Borosilicate glass and carbon black (carbon black
calculated from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio). <bold>(b)</bold> Potassium-rich illite containing samples
and <bold>(c)</bold> Na- and Ca-rich samples of montmorillonite and
kaolinite.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>The effect of laser power setting</title>
      <p id="d1e3900">The laser power setting is an important parameter in SPMS because, along
with the size of the focal point and pulse duration, the amount of
energy contained in each pulse defines the peak power density that
occurs in the ionisation region. Differences in power density have
been shown to affect the mass spectral patterns produced. For example,
Reents and Schabel (2001) found that variation in peak power density,
achieved by varying the 193 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> laser power setting, resulted
in variations in the sodium fraction reported in the mass spectra of
NaCl. The effect of different laser power settings on the distribution
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for kaolinite sample KGa-1b and illite NX is shown in
Fig. 9. For the kaolinite-rich sample, increasing the pulse energy
results in a narrowing of the distribution. The effect on the illite
rich sample is somewhat different, in that increasing the pulse energy
has the effect of increasing the number of particles in the mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3933">Histograms of the ion arrival times shift ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of
the elemental ion <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the molecular ion
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with different laser pulse energy
settings. <bold>(a)</bold> Kaolinite sample KGa-1b and <bold>(b)</bold>
illite NX.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018-f09.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page205?><p id="d1e3981">An explanation for this behaviour may be found in the hit-rate
efficiency, defined as the number of spectra acquired divided by the
number of particles detected (Table 7). The hit rate for illite NX was
more than double that of KGa-1b at 4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mJ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition, hit
rate was much more sensitive to energy setting with KGa-1b than with
illite NX. Increasing the laser energy from 2.8 to 7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mJ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per
pulse resulted in a hit-rate increase of 42 % for the KGa-1b
sample. Species-dependent hit rates are associated with the power
density threshold required to initiate the ablation/ionisation
process, which is related to the lattice energy and absorbing
properties of the material at 193 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Thomson et al.,
1997). It is therefore reasonable to assume that the increase in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fraction in illite NX at 7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mJ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per pulse is partly
due to the presence of a material with a high-power density threshold
such as kaolinite. The increase in the hit rate with KGa-1b at
7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mJ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was in a large part due to the acquisition of spectra
showing a purer form of kaolinite as indicated by the titanium content
(Table 7). It is not known if the titanium was present in these
particles as a structural cation, therefore altering the crystal
structure, or as free titanium impurity.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Table 7</label><caption><p id="d1e4041">The effect of the excimer pulse energy setting on the
particle hit rate with illite NX and kaolinite sample KGa-1b. The
number of particles that are low (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % peak area) and high (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % peak area) in titanium are given for the KGa-1b sample. The
titanium content in the mass spectra was calculated from the combined
peak area of the Ti<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 48) and Ti<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 64) and
the total positive ion signal (n/a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> not applicable).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Excimer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Particles detected</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Spectra acquired</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Hit rate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Ti <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Ti <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Illite NX</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mJ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1901</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.26</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">n/a</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mJ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2106</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">n/a</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mJ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1825</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">n/a</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">n/a</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KGa-b1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mJ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">794</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">764</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mJ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">994</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">908</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mJ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7200</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1397</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">673</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">724</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>The role of the interstitial complex</title>
      <p id="d1e4384">The main physiochemical difference between clay minerals is the nature
of the interstitial X-ion that is accommodated between the silicate
structural layers. For the source clays, the relative proportion of
low-valence interstitial cations (X-ion) present in the structure is
discernible from the structural formulae provided by the Clay Mineral
Society (Table 2).  These ion proportions are listed alongside the
literature values for interlayer charge and value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
principal mode derived from this study in Table 8. There is some
negative correlation between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the layer charge, with the
exception of the calcium-rich montmorillonite STx-1. In calcium-rich
montmorillonite, the layer charge is balanced by abundant divalent
ions of calcium, which have a first ionisation energy
(589.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) that is higher than the aluminium
(577.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the silicate structural layer. In
contrast, SWy-1, ISCz-1 and IMt-2 samples have a layer charge that is
principally balanced by sodium and potassium ions that have first
ionisation energies that are lower than any component in the silicate
structural layer (495.8 and 418.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Table 8</label><caption><p id="d1e4455">Measured values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the interlayer charge and cation
ratios from structural formulae derived from elemental analysis (Tr is trace). Reference material is from the Clay Minerals Society.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Interlayer   charge</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="left">Interstitial cation (X-ion) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mode <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ca</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Na</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KGa-1b</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">KGa-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.16</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Tr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Tr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">STx-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.27</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.79</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">SWy-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.55</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.32</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.47</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ISCz-1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.95</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.37</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IMt-2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.06</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.33</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e4692">A comparison of the interstitial X-ion content derived from elemental
analysis and the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value for clay minerals and feldspars
is given in Fig. 10. The combined sodium and potassium content
derived from the calculated structural formulae for source clays is
plotted against the mode value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> derived from the peak
analysis. For clay samples that exhibit multimodal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
distributions, only the lowest principal mode is represented in the
data. Relatively high levels of sodium and potassium result in a low
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value for these modes. For feldspars, the cation content is
measured from the positive ion mass spectra and plotted against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
on a single-particle basis for orthoclase and plagioclase in Fig. 10a
and b. In contrast, higher sodium and potassium content
in feldspars result in high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values. The influence of the
calcium ion on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value in plagioclase feldspar is
demonstrated in the colour function in plot Fig. 10b. When
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios are high, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This has
similar response to the kaolinite sample, which is depleted in
interstitial X-ions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e4781">Peak shift ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with respect to the combined sodium
and potassium content. Clay mineral standards are the mode value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> against the cation content in the structural formula derived
from elemental analysis of the bulk samples. Error bars are the 25
and 75 percentiles. Feldspar and illite NX cation
content is measured from the positive ion mass spectral peak
areas. <bold>(a)</bold> Polydisperse and mass selected 700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
orthoclase feldspar particles and <bold>(b)</bold> plagioclase feldspar
with the CaO content (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 56) highlighted.<bold>(c)</bold> The
representative clay mineral sample illite NX with the width of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecular ion highlighted in the colour function.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018-f10.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4845">Mass selecting 700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fg</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> orthoclase particles with the CPMA
produces a similar distribution to polydisperse particles, suggesting
there is not particle size effect to the distribution. The low
recorded potassium and sodium content in some feldspar particles may
be a result of the crushing of the sample as this is known to cause
collapse of the interstitial cavity (Garcia-guinea and Correcher,
2000) so that feldspar particles with low cation content may not be
representative of naturally occurring feldspar.</p>
      <p id="d1e4856">Distinctive clusters of data points are apparent in the illite NX
sample when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is plotted against alkali metal content derived
from single-particle mass spectra (Fig. 10c). The concentration of
particles in the region <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.2 are clearly distinguishable
from particles in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1.0 region by the content of low-valence potassium and sodium ions. These clusters of data points
occupy similar areas of the plot to kaolinite and feldspars. The large cluster of particles with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
congruent with the principal mode in the Imt-2 and ISCz-1 samples and is
also characterised by relatively large peak width values. Multimodal
peak shapes, as described in Sect. 2.4,
mainly occur with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.64 in the illite NX sample but were never
observed for feldspar with peak widths of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecular
ion that were always <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Broad (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ns</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
multimodal spectral peak morphologies were attributed to aggregated or
mixed particles in which the ion formation process is not uniform.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Single-particle differentiation of clay mineral standards</title>
      <p id="d1e4967">The dependence of the ion arrival times on the nature of the cations
in the interstitial complex gives rise to the possibility of using
these measurements to classify the mineralogical contents of mineral
dust samples on a single-particle basis. Using published XRD analysis
data as a guide, the classification scheme outlined in Table 9 was
used to quantify the particle number concentrations of mineral types
in the clay-rich mineral samples illite NX, IMt-2 and ISCz-1
(Fig. 11). The first class of particles is defined as the group of
particles with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which only appear in samples rich in
illite clays. This class is attributed to illite–smectite clay
minerals (ISCM) because in natural clay samples, illite occurs in fine
interlayers with smectite clays. The second class is particularly
well developed in the illite NX and IMt-2 samples and is defined by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and high potassium and sodium content that is typical of
the orthoclase (K-feldspar) sample. The exception is particles within
this group that exhibit broad multimodal peak morphology which are
placed in a separate class of mixed particles (class 5). Kaolinite
(class 3) has, by definition, very low potassium and sodium content
and is also defined by high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> measured in the pure form of the
mineral (KGa-1b above). The fourth mineral class assigns particles
with intermediate values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and relatively low potassium and
sodium content to montmorillonite or Na-feldspar (plagioclase) because
of the difficulty in distinguishing between these two minerals with
the peak analysis. In cases in which the peak analysis was unable to
produce a result,<?pagebreak page206?> mainly due to failure of the peak fitting, were
allocated to a non-classified particle class. Examples of raw mass
spectra of each particle class are presented in the Supplement (S2)
alongside example spectra for all other mineral samples used in this
study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e5010">Mineral-phase classification of illite NX, IMt-2 and ISCz-1
clay reference samples using a combined peak position shift and
traditional peak area classification scheme. Single-particle
measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SiO</mml:mtext><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) vs.
the combined potassium and sodium content are shown in the top
panel <bold>(a)</bold>. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> reports the
particle number fractions determined by the peak analysis
classification method (grey bars), and bulk mass fractions of
minerals reported by XRD analysis of illite NX from Hiranuma
et al. (2015), and IMt-2 and ISCz-1 from Vogt (2002) (red bars).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=284.527559pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018-f11.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Table 9</label><caption><p id="d1e5061">Single-particle mineral-phase classification scheme based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, combined potassium and sodium content, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecular ion peak
width.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Class</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mineral phase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">K <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Na peak area</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Peak width</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">ISCM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">K-feldspars</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Kaolinite</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.885</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Montmorillonite/plagioclase</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.64–0.885</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mixed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Not classified (NC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e5354">The differentiation of mineral phase by this classification method has
some broad agreement with the XRD analysis. The relative particle
number fraction of ISCM between the three samples is in agreement with
the relative mass concentration of illite derived from XRD; i.e. ISCz-1
is the most illite-rich followed by IMt-2 and illite NX. A greater
fraction of feldspar and kaolinite is also measured for illite NX than
for the other samples in agreement with XRD analysis. The main
difference in the mineral fraction reported by XRD analysis and this
peak analysis technique is the relative fraction of ISCM minerals with
non-ISCM mineral classes. The differences may arise from comparing
a number-counting technique with a mass fraction, and from hit-rate
bias in the LAAP-TOF measurement which may discriminate against
certain particle types as discussed in Sect. 3.3 above. In addition,
the XRD analysis technique does not report the fraction
of amorphous material and the degree of homogeneity in the bulk samples is not well
characterised and may result in sample-to-sample
differences in the composition of a clay mineral standard.</p>
      <p id="d1e5357">The relatively poor resolution of the mineral differentiation makes
the identification of the exact mineral phase difficult. Whilst the
plots of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. K <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Na content (Fig. 11, top panels) produce
distinct particle clusters for illite NX and IMt-2, the corresponding
plot for ISCz-1 is much less differentiated. It is not clear if this
occurs because of the poor resolution of the method or because the
natural variation in composition of the latter sample.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Relative shift of positive and negative ions</title>
      <p id="d1e5382">The ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is plotted
against <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
in Fig. 12. In this plot, the distribution of data points for
borosilicate glass and orthoclase feldspar suggests a positive
correlation between these ratios, with the trends in the distributions
converging towards a point at which the magnitude of shift of all species
is equal. In illite IMt-2 the ISCM mineral fraction, identified as
class 1 in the classification scheme, does not show a correlation
between positive alkali metals ion and negative silicate molecular ion
arrival times, which may indicate a decoupling of the positive and
negative ion formation process.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e5442">Relative ion arrival times in positive ion with respect to
relative ion arrival times in negative ion. Borosilicate glass and
orthoclase feldspar polydisperse particles and the ISCM fraction
(class 1) of illite IMt-2.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=179.252362pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/195/2018/amt-11-195-2018-f12.pdf"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\vspace{-3mm}}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <?pagebreak page208?><p id="d1e5462">In TOF-MS the principal limitations in resolving the power of an
instrument are attributed to the differences in initial ion velocity
distribution (energy focussing) and differences in the initial
starting positions (space focussing); it is not easy to decouple these
effects (Guilhaus, 1995). In addition, ion formation time, ion
trajectory through the ion optics, and temporal jitter of the timing
electronics all contribute to differences in arrival times of
a certain ion species at the TOF-MS detector. It is not possible to
empirically derive the starting position, initial ion velocity or ion
formation times from the ion arrival times alone. However, the
relative differences in ion arrival times may hold clues to the nature
of the ion formation mechanism even if the actual ion velocities and
ion formation times are not quantified.</p>
      <p id="d1e5465">Ion arrival times have been studied with the Matrix-Assisted Laser
Desorption Ionisation (MALDI) technique, in which the sample is presented
on a sample plate. With this method of sample introduction, initial ion
velocity distributions are considered to be the primary cause of mass
spectral peak broadening (Colby et al., 1994) because the sample
position is fixed, reducing the effects of space
focussing. A measurement of initial kinetic energy of ions with MALDI
indicated that the initial velocities of the matrix and analyte ions
are identical, suggesting that the analyte molecule is entrained into
an expanding molecular jet of matrix ions and neutrals (Beavis and
Chait, 1991; Pan and Cotter, 1992). In contrast, Spengler and
Kirsch (2003) observed a mass-dependent initial ion velocity that
could result from thermal ionisation or a charge transfer and
cluster decay ionisation mechanism.</p>
      <p id="d1e5468">In the case of SPMS, where the initial starting position is not fixed
(due to particle beam divergence), space focussing is considered to be
as important as energy focussing on causing differences in ion
arrival times.  However, with the field-free extraction featured in
the LAAP-TOF, space focussing is reduced to a simple difference in the
time it takes an ion to enter the extraction optics, which is likely
to be small compared to the effects of different ion velocities. In
addition, ion species dependence of the shift in ion arrival times
recorded in the mass spectra indicate that the shot-to-shot
differences in average flight times of the ions is not a result of
a temporal offset of the firing of the excimer laser and/or starting
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> timing device as this would affect all ion
species equally. This reasoning leaves changes in initial ion velocity
and ion formation time as the primary candidates for the cause of the
peaks shifting and peak broadening observed. Changes in ion formation
time will include differences in the timing of the initial
particle–laser interaction due to particle trajectory and the
properties of the material as well as the timing of ion species
formation after the ablation process has commenced.  The equal shift
in ion arrival times of elemental and molecular ions observed with
borosilicate glass suggests an equal addition to the scalar ion
velocity and/or ion formation time, which can only be explained by
shot to shot differences in ion formation time and initial ion
velocities in a molecular jet. In contrast, the mass dependence to the
negative ion peak shift for CB suggests a mass-dependent velocity
difference, which suggests thermal ionisation or a charge transfer and
cluster decay ionisation mechanism.</p>
      <p id="d1e5485">It is reasonable that decay of the crystal lattice would be a factor
in the ablation of mineral particles whose crystalline mineral
structures have a typical lattice energy of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kJ</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Jenkins et al., 2002), which far exceeds
the energy available to a typical particle in a single-laser
pulse. Crystalline mineral structures could impose ion species
dependence onto the lattice decay and ion entrainment, such as that
observed when comparing the average peak positions of the mineral dust
with respect to the amorphous glass calibration. In clay minerals, the
exchangeable interstitial cations<?pagebreak page209?> that are in a weakly bonded layer
provide an energy sink for the laser energy and could be desorbed
before the negatively changed tetrahedral and octahedral layers which
then disintegrate by lattice decay. In this scenario, the effective
decoupling of the positive and negative ion formation, as suggested
in the comparison of positive and negative ion arrival times
(Fig. 12), may result from differences in ion formation time and
initial velocities of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ions
species. This process is not possible in feldspar mineral whose
silicate structure must be broken in order to release the interstitial
cation so that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ion species
coexist in the ion plume, producing equal ion velocities due to
columbic forces and collisions. The provenance of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
elemental ion in the negative ion spectra is a source of uncertainty
in the interpretation of a lattice decay mechanism. In pure feldspars,
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ion must be derived from the silica tetrahedra, but
in clay minerals interstitial OH molecules or absorbed water in the
particles are additional sources of oxygen. The presence of water may
be of significance as it is known to affect the ionisation process in
LDI (Neubauer et al., 1998) and warrants further investigation.</p>
      <p id="d1e5587">The weak interaction of the interstitial complex with the silicate
tetrahedra controls the stability of minerals in natural rock-forming
processes (Hawthorne, 2015) and would appear to have an influence on
relative ion arrival times in SPMS. The influence of the interstitial
potassium and sodium ion content on the relative arrival times of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species forms the basis of our
classification of mineral phase. Measurement of the potassium and
sodium content by peak area analysis is a potential source of
uncertainty in the measurement due to particle matrix effects and the
insufficient dynamic range of the TOF-MS detector. In addition, the
amount of energy encountered by particles due to instrument function
and laser power setting could be an important consideration for the
accuracy and reproducibility of the analysis. The influence of the laser
power setting on the hit rate for kaolinite and illite demonstrate the
potential for number fraction bias in the classification. Using the
highest laser power setting would not be desirable for ambient
sampling because of excessive fragmentation of non-silicate material
such as internally and externally mixed organic material. One could
also postulate that the same initial ion velocities would be reached
by all ions if enough pulse energy is available to overcome the
constraints of the lattice energy regardless of the crystal structure.
In this study we found that 4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mJ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pulse<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> was a suitable
laser setting for differentiating particles types in illite NX.</p>
      <p id="d1e5634">The differentiation of mineral phases in this study was demonstrated
with clay mineral standards with a well-characterised composition. The
classification system was defined using the mineralogical composition
from XRD analysis as a guide. Because of the huge variety in mineral
phase that occurs in nature and the potential for phase mixing
within a single particle, the identification of specific mineral
phases is expected to be more difficult in complex natural samples
such as desert dust, especially if XRD analysis of mineralogy is not
available for reference. Even so, the distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values is
expected to provide an insight into the composition of clay-sized
fraction of a dust sample even if the exact mineral phase is not
clearly identified. Analysis of the mineralogy of transported Saharan
dust measured at Praia, Cape Verde during the ICE-D campaign
(August 2015) is presented in a separate publication (Marsden et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e5644">Further work is required in development of this method. The tuning of
the ion optics is of particular importance in determining the flight
times of ions with respect to initial ion velocity. Modelling of the
ion trajectories in a software package such as SIMION (Scientific
Instrument Services, Inc.) may provide optimised tuning that further
exploits the differences in ion focussing that arise from differences
in particle composition. The transferability of the method to other
LAAP-TOF instruments will also likely depend on the tuning of the ion
optics. Tuning parameters used for this study are provided in the
Supplement (S1). Establishing the role of fixed instrument design
features will indicate how transferable this method is to other
designs of single-particle mass spectrometers. For example, when extracting using an electric field one would expect an increased plume
density and therefore an increase in space-charge effects and
collisions as the ion plume is not free to expand in all
directions. In addition, an orthogonal geometry of the excimer laser
with the particle beam is likely to produce less variation in the
position and timing in which a particle encounters the threshold power
density for LDI compared to the co-axial geometry used in the
LAAP-TOF.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e5656">A novel technique has been
presented that uses peak centroid measurement in addition to
peak areas that describe the mass spectral characteristics arising from
the LDI of single particles of silicate mineral dust. To our knowledge, this is the first time that the
properties of a material have been described by the relative changes
in the ion arrival times of an ion species at a TOF-MS
detector. Examination of the spectral patterns from dust samples
reveals spectrum to spectrum variation in the relative peak position
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molecular ion with respect to the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> elemental ion that occurs in distinct modes. A comparison
of these modes with the borosilicate glass and carbon black suggests
that the mode preference is a result of particle crystal structure and
elemental composition, the properties that define mineral phase.</p>
      <p id="d1e5683">Analysis of clay mineral standards and nominally pure feldspars
suggest that the relative shift of the elemental and molecular ions is
a function of the quantity and co-ordination of potassium and sodium
cations in the interstitial complex. It is proposed that the mineral
phase of the particle matrix influences the ion formation mechanism
and produces variations in initial ion velocity and ion formation
timing during<?pagebreak page210?> the LDI of single particles. These effects are enhanced
by the co-axial geometry of the excimer laser with the particle beam
and are preserved in the field-free extraction regime in the TOF-MS
implemented in the LAAP-TOF. This may represent an important step in
the understanding of how LDI proceeds in SPMS.</p>
      <p id="d1e5686">Analysis of multimineralic clay mineral standards reveals
a multimodal pattern in ion arrival times. A scheme that classifies
single particles has been defined on the basis of the alkali metal
peak areas and the relative difference in the shift in the ion arrival
times of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> species with respect
to a calibration, a parameter we call <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Application of the
scheme to clay mineral standards results in the single-particle
differentiation of illite–smectite clay mineral (ISCM), feldspars and
kaolinite that is in agreement with bulk mineralogy reported in
semi-quantitative XRD analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e5720">The nature of the interstitial complex and its effect on crystal
structure can be extremely varied even within a single grain or
crystal so that complete reproducibility would not be expected from
any single-particle measurement of a natural mineral dust sample. In
circumstances in which the actual mineral phase cannot be determined,
it is still expected that the ion arrival time ratios will be a useful
parameter in describing differences in physiochemical properties of
silicate particles. This represents an important step forward in the
study of atmospheric processes for which single-particle mineral phase is
important.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e5727">All laboratory acquired data presented in this
manuscript are available by request from the corresponding author (hugh.coe@manchester.ac.uk).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e5730">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-195-2018-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-195-2018-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e5739">The experiment was designed and performed by NM
with the support of MF. The data analysis was developed and
performed by NM. The manuscript was prepared by NM with contributions
from HC and JA.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e5745">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5751">This work was supported by a PhD studentship awarded to Nicholas A. Marsden by
the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC M113463J). We would
like to thank Alison Pawley, Kate Brodie and Merren Jones for their
support in selecting representative mineral samples.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Pierre Herckes<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Atkinson, J. D., Murray, B. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Whale, T. F., Baustian, K. J., Carslaw, K. S., Dobbie, S., O'Sullivan, D., and Malkin, T. L.: The importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase clouds, Nature, 498, 355–358, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12278" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nature12278</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Claquin, T., and Guibert, S.: Reevaluation
of mineral aerosol radiative forcings suggests a better agreement with
satellite and AERONET data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 81–95,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-81-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-81-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Baustian, K. J., Cziczo, D. J., Wise, M. E., Pratt, K. A.,
Kulkarni, G., Hallar, A. G., and Tolbert, M. A.: Importance of aerosol composition, mixing state,
and morphology for heterogeneous ice nucleation: a combined field and laboratory approach, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D06217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016784" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016784</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Beavis, R. C. and Chait, B. T.: Velocity distributions of intact high mass polypeptide molecule ions produced by matrix assisted laser desorption, Chem. Phys. Lett., 181, 479–484, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(91)90384-L" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0009-2614(91)90384-L</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Broadley, S. L., Murray, B. J., Herbert, R. J., Atkinson, J. D., Dobbie, S., Malkin, T. L., Condliffe, E., and Neve, L.: Immersion mode heterogeneous ice nucleation by an illite rich powder representative of atmospheric mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 287–307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-287-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-287-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Cakmur, R. V., Miller, R. L., Perlwitz, J., Geogdzhayev, I. V., Ginoux, P., Koch, D., Kohfeld, K. E., Tegen, I., and Zender, C. S.: Constraining the magnitude of the global dust cycle by minimizing the difference between a model and observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, 1–24, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005791" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD005791</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Caquineau, S., Magonthier, M.-C., Gaudichet, A., and Gomes, L.: An improved procedure for the X-ray diffraction analysis of low-mass atmospheric dust samples, Eur. J. Mineral., 9, 157–166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1127/ejm/9/1/0157" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1127/ejm/9/1/0157</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Caquineau, S., Gaudichet, A., Gomes, L., and Legrand, M.: Mineralogy of Saharan
dust transported over northwestern tropical Atlantic Ocean in relation to source
regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 4251, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD000247</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chipera, S. J. and Bish, D. L.: Baseline studies of the clay minerals society source clays: powder X-ray diffraction analyses, Clay. Clay Miner., 49, 398–409, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2001.0490511" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1346/CCMN.2001.0490511</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Claquin, T., Schulz, M., and Balkanski, Y. J.: Modeling the mineralogy of atmospheric dust sources, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 22243, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900416" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900416</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Colby, S. M., King, T. B., and Reilly, J. P.: Improving the resolution of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry by exploiting the correlation between ion position and velocity, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 8, 865–868, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Connolly, P. J., Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Saathoff, H., Burgess, R.,
Choularton, T., and Gallagher, M.: Studies of heterogeneous freezing by three
different desert dust samples, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2805–2824,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2805-2009, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page211?><ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Dall'Osto, M., Harrison, R. M., Highwood, E. J., O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Querol, X., and Achterberg, E. P.: Variation of the mixing state of Saharan dust particles with atmospheric transport, Atmos. Environ., 44, 3135–3146, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.030</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J.: African dust aerosols as atmospheric ice nuclei, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1732, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017410" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL017410</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J., Prenni, a J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D., Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0910818107</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., McMeeking, G. R., Sullivan, R. C., Petters, M. D., Tobo, Y., Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Snider, J. R., Wang, Z., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Integrating laboratory and field data to quantify the immersion freezing ice nucleation activity of mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 393–409, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-393-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-393-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Duce, R. A. and Tindale, N. W.: Atmospheric transport of iron and its deposition in the ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., 36, 1715–1726, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1991.36.8.1715" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4319/lo.1991.36.8.1715</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Formenti, P., Rajot, J. L., Desboeufs, K., Caquineau, S., Chevaillier, S., Nava, S., Gaudichet, A., Journet, E., Triquet, S., Alfaro, S., Chiari, M., Haywood, J., Coe, H., and Highwood, E.: Regional variability of the composition of mineral dust from western Africa: results from the AMMA SOP0/DABEX and DODO field campaigns, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009903" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009903</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Formenti, P., Schütz, L., Balkanski, Y., Desboeufs, K., Ebert, M., Kandler, K., Petzold, A., Scheuvens, D., Weinbruch, S., and Zhang, D.: Recent progress in understanding physical and chemical properties of African and Asian mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8231–8256, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8231-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8231-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Friedrich, F., Steudel, A., and Weidler, P. G.: Change of the re- fractive
index of illite particles by reduction of the Fe con- tent of the octahedral
sheet, Clay. Clay Miner., 56, 505–510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2008.0560503" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1346/CCMN.2008.0560503</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Gallavardin, S., Lohmann, U., and Cziczo, D.: Analysis and differentiation of mineral dust by single particle laser mass spectrometry, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 274, 56–63, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2008.04.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijms.2008.04.031</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Garcia-guinea, J. and Correcher, V.: Luminescence spectra of alkali feldspars: influence of crushing on the ultraviolet emission band, Spectrosc. Lett., 33, 103–113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00387010009350062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/00387010009350062</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Garrels, R. M.: Montmorillonite/Illite stability diagrams, Clay. Clay Miner., 32, 161–166, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1984.0320301" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1346/CCMN.1984.0320301</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Goudie, A. S. and Middleton, N. J.: Desert Dust in the Global System, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Guilhaus, M.: Principles and instrumentation in time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Physical and instrumental concepts, J. Mass Spectrom., 30, 1519–1532, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.1190301102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jms.1190301102</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Hawthorne, F. C.: Toward theoretical mineralogy?: A bond-topological approach, Am. Mineral., 100, 696–713, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2015-5114" ext-link-type="DOI">10.2138/am-2015-5114</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hinz, K. and Spengler, B.: Instrumentation, data evaluation and
quantification in on-line aerosol mass spectrometry, J. Mass
Spectrom., 42, 843–860, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.1262" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jms.1262</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hiranuma, N., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Bingemer, H., Budke, C., Curtius, J., Danielczok, A., Diehl, K., Dreischmeier, K., Ebert, M., Frank, F., Hoffmann, N., Kandler, K., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Leisner, T., Möhler, O., Nillius, B., Peckhaus, A., Rose, D., Weinbruch, S., Wex, H., Boose, Y., DeMott, P. J., Hader, J. D., Hill, T. C. J., Kanji, Z. A., Kulkarni, G., Levin, E. J. T., McCluskey, C. S., Murakami, M., Murray, B. J., Niedermeier, D., Petters, M. D., O'Sullivan, D., Saito, A., Schill, G. P., Tajiri, T., Tolbert, M. A., Welti, A., Whale, T. F., Wright, T. P., and Yamashita, K.: A comprehensive laboratory study on the immersion freezing behavior of illite NX particles: a comparison of 17 ice nucleation measurement techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2489–2518, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Huffman, J. A., Jayne, J. T., Drewnick, F., Aiken, A. C., Onasch, T., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Design, modeling, optimization, and experimental tests of a particle beam width probe for the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 1143–1163, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500423782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500423782</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. a., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an aerosol mass spectrometer for size and composition analysis of submicron particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 49–70, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868200410840</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Jenkins, H. D. B., Tudela, D., and Glasser, L.: Lattice potential energy estimation for complex ionic salts from density measurements, Inorg. Chem., 41, 2364–2367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ic011216k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ic011216k</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Jeong, G. Y.: Bulk and single-particle mineralogy of Asian dust and a comparison with its source soils, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008606" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008606</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Jeong, G. Y. and Nousiainen, T.: TEM analysis of the internal structures and mineralogy of
Asian dust particles and the implications for optical modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7233–7254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7233-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7233-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Jeong, G. Y., Park, M. Y., Kandler, K., Nousiainen, T., and Kemppinen,
O.: Mineralogical properties and internal structures of individual
fine particles of Saharan dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12397–12410,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12397-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-12397-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Jickells, T. and Spokes, L.: Atmospheric iron inputs into the ocean, in: The Biochemistry of Iron
in Seawater, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 85–121, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Kamphus, M., Ettner-Mahl, M., Klimach, T., Drewnick, F., Keller, L., Cziczo, D. J., Mertes, S., Borrmann, S., and Curtius, J.: Chemical composition of ambient aerosol, ice residues and cloud droplet residues in mixed-phase clouds: single particle analysis during the Cloud and Aerosol Characterization Experiment (CLACE 6), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8077–8095, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8077-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8077-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kandler, K., Benker, N., Bundke, U., Cuevas, E., Ebert, M., Knippertz, P., Rodríguez, S., Schütz, L., and Weinbruch, S.: Chemical composition and complex refractive index of Saharan Mineral Dust at Izaña, Tenerife (Spain) derived by electron microscopy, Atmos. Environ., 41, 8058–8074, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.047</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Kandler, K., Schütz, L., Deutscher, C., Ebert, M., Hofmann, H., Jäckel, S., Jaenicke, R., Knippertz, P., Lieke, K., Massling, A., Petzold, A., Schladitz, A., Weinzierl, B., Wiedensohler, A., Zorn, S., and Weinbruch, S.: Size distribution, mass<?pagebreak page212?> concentration, chemical and mineralogical composition and derived optical parameters of the boundary layer aerosol at Tinfou, Morocco, during SAMUM 2006, Tellus B, 61, 32–50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00385.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00385.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Kandler, K., Lieke, K., Benker, N., Emmel, C., Küpper, M., Müller-Ebert, D., Ebert, M., Scheuvens, D., Schladitz, A., Schütz, L., and Weinbruch, S.: Electron microscopy of particles collected at Praia, Cape Verde, during the Saharan Mineral Dust Experiment: particle chemistry, shape, mixing state and complex refractive index, Tellus B, 63, 475–496, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00550.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00550.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Kaufman, Y. J., Koren, I., Remer, L. A., Tanré, D., Ginoux, P., and Fan, S.: Dust transport and deposition observed from the Terra-Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) spacecraft over the Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004436" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD004436</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Kaufmann, L., Marcolli, C., Hofer, J., Pinti, V., Hoyle, C. R., and Peter, T.: Ice nucleation efficiency of natural dust samples in the immersion mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11177–11206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11177-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-11177-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Lafon, S., Sokolik, I. N., Rajot, J. L., Caquincau, S., and Gaudichet, A.: Characterization of iron oxides in mineral dust aerosols: implications for light absorption, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, 1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD007016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD007016</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Liu, P., Ziemann, P. J., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.:
Generating particle beams of controlled dimensions and divergence: I. theory of particle motion in aerodynamic lenses and nozzle expansions, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 22, 293–313, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829408959748" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829408959748</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Long, C. M., Nascarella, M. A., and Valberg, P. A.: Carbon black vs. black carbon and other airborne materials containing elemental carbon: physical and chemical distinctions, Environ. Pollut., 181, 271–286, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.009</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Marsden, N., Flynn, M. J., Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., and Coe, H.:
Evaluating the influence of laser wavelength and detection stage
geometry on optical detection efficiency in a  single-particle mass
spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 6051–6068,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6051-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-6051-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>McConnell, C. L., Formenti, P., Highwood, E. J., and Harrison, M. A. J.: Using aircraft measurements to determine the refractive index of Saharan dust during the DODO Experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3081–3098, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3081-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3081-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Mermut, A. R. and Cano, A. F.: Baseline studies of the clay mineral society source clays: chemical analyses of major elements, Clay. Clay Miner., 49, 381–386, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Middlebrook, A. M.: A comparison of particle mass spectrometers during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8424, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000660" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000660</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, D. M. and Reynolds, R. C.: X-Ray diffraction and the identification and analysis of clay minerals, 2nd Ed., Oxford Univ. Press. Oxford, New York, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M.: The design of single particle laser mass spectrometers, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 150–165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/mas.20113</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Neubauer, K. R., Johnston, M. V., and Wexler, A. S.: Humidity effects on the mass spectra of single aerosol particles, Atmos. Environ., 32, 2521–2529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00005-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00005-3</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Nickovic, S., Vukovic, A., Vujadinovic, M., Djurdjevic, V., and Pejanovic, G.: Technical Note: High-resolution mineralogical database of dust-productive soils for atmospheric dust modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 845–855, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-845-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-845-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Hoose, C., Connolly, P., Klein, H., Bingemer, H., DeMott, P., Skrotzki, J., and Leisner, T.: A particle-surface-area-based parameterization of immersion freezing on desert dust particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3077–3092, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Nousiainen, T., Zubko, E., Niemi, J. V., Kupiainen, K., Lehtinen, M., Muinonen, K., and Videen, G.: Single-scattering modeling of thin, birefringent mineral-dust flakes using the discrete-dipole approximation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011564" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011564</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Olfert, J. S. and Collings, N.: New method for particle mass classification – the Couette centrifugal particle mass analyzer, J. Aerosol Sci., 36, 1338–1352, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.03.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.03.006</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Pan, Y. and Cotter, R. J.: Measurement of initial translational energies of peptide
ions in laser desorption ionization mass-spectrometry, Org. Mass Spectrom., 27, 3–8, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Perlwitz, J. P., Pérez García-Pando, C., and Miller, R. L.: Predicting the mineral composition of dust aerosols – Part 1: Representing key processes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11593–11627, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11593-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11593-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Prospero, J. M.: Long-range transport of mineral dust in the global atmosphere: impact of African dust on the environment of the southeastern United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 3396–3403, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.7.3396" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.96.7.3396</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Prospero, J. M. and Mayol-Bracero, O. L.: Understanding the transport and impact of African dust on the Caribbean Basin, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1329–1337, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00142.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00142.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Prospero, J. M., Blades, E., Naidu, R., Mathison, G., Thani, H., and Lavoie, M. C.: Relationship between African dust carried in the Atlantic trade winds and surges in pediatric asthma attendances in the Caribbean, Int. J. Biometeorol., 52, 823–832, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-008-0176-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00484-008-0176-1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Reents, W. D. and Schabel, M. J.: Measurement of individual particle atomic composition by aerosol mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 73, 5403–5414, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac010436c" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac010436c</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Reid, J. S., Jonsson, H. H., Maring, H. B., Smirnov, A., Savoie, D. L., Cliff, S. S., Reid, E. A., Livingston, J. M., Meier, M. M., Dubovik, O., and Tsay, S. C.: Comparison of size and morphological measurements of coarse mode dust particles from Africa, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8593, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002485" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002485</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Reinard, M. S. and Johnston, M. V: Ion formation mechanism in laser
desorption ionization of individual nanoparticles., J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectr., 19, 389–399, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2007.11.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jasms.2007.11.017</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Rivin, D.: Carbon Black, in: Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 101–158, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page213?><ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Rosenfeld, D., Rudich, Y., and Lahav, R.: Desert dust suppressing precipitation: a possible desertification feedback loop, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 5975–80, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.101122798" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.101122798</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Samoli, E., Nastos, P. T., Paliatsos, A. G., Katsouyanni, K., and Priftis, K. N.: Acute effects of air pollution on pediatric asthma exacerbation: evidence of association and effect modification, Environ. Res., 111, 418–424, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.01.014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envres.2011.01.014</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Scheuvens, D., Schütz, L., Kandler, K., Ebert, M., and Weinbruch, S.: Bulk composition of northern African dust and its source sediments – a compilation, Earth-Sci. Rev., 116, 170–194, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.08.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.08.005</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Schmidt, S., Schneider, J., Klimach, T., Mertes, S., Schenk, L. P.,
Kupiszewski, P., Curtius, J., and Borrmann, S.: Online single particle
analysis of ice particle residuals from mountain-top mixed-phase
clouds using laboratory derived particle type assignment,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 575–594, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-575-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-575-2017</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Sokolik, I. N. and Toon, O. B.: Incorporation of mineralogical composition into models of the radiative properties of mineral aerosol from UV to IR wavelengths, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 9423–9444, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD200048" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1998JD200048</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Spengler, B. and Kirsch, D.: On the formation of initial ion velocities in matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization: virtual desorption time as an additional parameter describing ion ejection dynamics, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 226, 71–83, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-3806(02)00974-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1387-3806(02)00974-0</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Sullivan, R. C., Guazzotti, S. A., Sodeman, D. A., and Prather, K. A.: Direct observations of the atmospheric processing of Asian mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1213–1236, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1213-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1213-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Tegen, I. and Lacis, A. A.: Modeling of particle size distribution and its influence on the radiative properties of mineral dust aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 19237–19244, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd03610" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/95jd03610</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Thomson, D. S., Middlebrook, A. M., and Murphy, D. M.: Thresholds for laser-induced ion formation from aerosols in a vacuum using ultraviolet and vacuum-ultraviolet laser wavelengths, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 26, 544–559, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829708965452" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829708965452</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Usher, C. R., Michel, A. E., and Grassian, V. H.: Reactions on mineral dust., Chem. Rev., 103, 4883–4939, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020657y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/cr020657y</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Vera, C. C., Trimborn, A., Hinz, K.-P., and Spengler, B.: Initial velocity distributions of ions generated by in-flight laser desorption/ionization of individual polystyrene latex microparticles as studied by the delayed ion extraction method, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 19, 133–146, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1753" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/rcm.1753</ext-link>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Vogt, C., Lauterjung, J., and Fischer, R.: Investigation of the clay fraction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the clay minerals society reference clays, Clay. Clay Miner., 50, 388–400, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Watson, A. Y. and Valberg, P. A.: Carbon Black and soot: two different substances, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 62, 218–228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15298660108984625" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/15298660108984625</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Williams, L. R., Gonzalez, L. A., Peck, J., Trimborn, D., McInnis, J., Farrar, M. R., Moore, K. D., Jayne, J. T., Robinson, W. A., Lewis, D. K., Onasch, T. B., Canagaratna, M. R., Trimborn, A., Timko, M. T., Magoon, G., Deng, R., Tang, D., de la Rosa Blanco, E., Prévôt, A. S. H., Smith, K. A., and Worsnop, D. R.: Characterization of an aerodynamic lens for transmitting particles greater than 1 micrometer in diameter into the Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3271–3280, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3271-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-3271-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Wonaschütz, A., Hitzenberger, R., Bauer, H., Klatzer, B., Caseiro, A.,
and Puxbaum, H.: Application of the Integrating Sphere Method to
Separate the Contributions of Brown and Black Carbon in Atmospheric
Aerosols Application of the Integrating Sphere Method to Separate the
Contributions of Brown and Black Carbon in Atmospheric
Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1141–1146, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Worringen, A., Kandler, K., Benker, N., Dirsch, T., Mertes, S., Schenk, L., Kästner, U., Frank, F., Nillius, B., Bundke, U., Rose, D., Curtius, J., Kupiszewski, P., Weingartner, E., Vochezer, P., Schneider, J., Schmidt, S., Weinbruch, S., and Ebert, M.: Single-particle characterization of ice-nucleating particles and ice particle residuals sampled by three different techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4161–4178, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4161-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-4161-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Young, G., Jones, H. M., Darbyshire, E., Baustian, K. J., McQuaid, J. B., Bower, K. N., Connolly, P. J., Gallagher, M. W., and Choularton, T. W.: Size-segregated compositional analysis of aerosol particles collected in the European Arctic during the ACCACIA campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4063–4079, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4063-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4063-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Zelenyuk, A., Yang, J., Imre, D., and Choi, E.: Achieving size independent hit-rate in single particle mass spectrometry, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 305–310, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802637915" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820802637915</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, L., Park, K., Milchberg, H. M., and Zachariah, M. R.: Understanding the interaction of an intense laser pulse with nanoparticles: application to the quantification of single particle mass spectrometry, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 818–827, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701484955" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820701484955</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Zimmermann, F., Weinbruch, S., Schütz, L., Hofmann, H., Ebert, M., Kandler, K., and Worringen,
A.: Ice nucleation properties of the most abundant mineral dust phases,
J. Geophys. Res., 113, D23204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010655" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010655</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Online differentiation of mineral phase in aerosol particles by ion formation mechanism using a LAAP-TOF single-particle mass spectrometer</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Mineralogy of silicate mineral dust has a strong influence on
climate and ecosystems due to variation in physiochemical
properties that result from differences in composition and crystal
structure (mineral phase). Traditional offline methods of analysing
mineral phase are labour intensive and the temporal resolution of
the data is much longer than many atmospheric processes. Single-particle mass spectrometry (SPMS) is an established technique for
the online size-resolved measurement of particle composition by
laser desorption ionisation (LDI) followed by time-of-flight mass
spectrometry (TOF-MS). Although non-quantitative, the technique is
able to identify the presence of silicate minerals in airborne dust
particles from markers of alkali metals and silicate molecular ions
in the mass spectra. However, the differentiation of mineral phase
in silicate particles by traditional mass spectral peak area
measurements is not possible. This is because instrument function
and matrix effects in the ionisation process result in variations in
instrument response that are greater than the differences in
composition between common mineral phases.</p><p>In this study, we introduce a novel technique that enables the
differentiation of mineral phase in silicate mineral particles by
ion formation mechanism measured from subtle changes in ion arrival
times at the TOF-MS detector. Using a combination of peak area and
peak centroid measurements, we show that the arrangement of the
interstitial alkali metals in the crystal structure, an important
property in silicate mineralogy, influences the ion arrival times of
elemental and molecular ion species in the negative ion mass
spectra. A classification scheme is presented that allowed for the
differentiation of illite–smectite, kaolinite and feldspar minerals
on a single-particle basis. Online analysis of mineral dust aerosol
generated from clay mineral standards produced mineral fractions
that are in agreement with bulk measurements reported by traditional
XRD (X-ray diffraction) analysis.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Atkinson, J. D., Murray, B. J., Woodhouse, M. T., Whale, T. F., Baustian, K. J., Carslaw, K. S., Dobbie, S., O'Sullivan, D., and Malkin, T. L.: The importance of feldspar for ice nucleation by mineral dust in mixed-phase clouds, Nature, 498, 355–358, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12278" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12278</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Balkanski, Y., Schulz, M., Claquin, T., and Guibert, S.: Reevaluation
of mineral aerosol radiative forcings suggests a better agreement with
satellite and AERONET data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 81–95,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-81-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-81-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Baustian, K. J., Cziczo, D. J., Wise, M. E., Pratt, K. A.,
Kulkarni, G., Hallar, A. G., and Tolbert, M. A.: Importance of aerosol composition, mixing state,
and morphology for heterogeneous ice nucleation: a combined field and laboratory approach, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D06217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016784" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016784</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Beavis, R. C. and Chait, B. T.: Velocity distributions of intact high mass polypeptide molecule ions produced by matrix assisted laser desorption, Chem. Phys. Lett., 181, 479–484, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(91)90384-L" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(91)90384-L</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Broadley, S. L., Murray, B. J., Herbert, R. J., Atkinson, J. D., Dobbie, S., Malkin, T. L., Condliffe, E., and Neve, L.: Immersion mode heterogeneous ice nucleation by an illite rich powder representative of atmospheric mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 287–307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-287-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-287-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Cakmur, R. V., Miller, R. L., Perlwitz, J., Geogdzhayev, I. V., Ginoux, P., Koch, D., Kohfeld, K. E., Tegen, I., and Zender, C. S.: Constraining the magnitude of the global dust cycle by minimizing the difference between a model and observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, 1–24, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005791" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD005791</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Caquineau, S., Magonthier, M.-C., Gaudichet, A., and Gomes, L.: An improved procedure for the X-ray diffraction analysis of low-mass atmospheric dust samples, Eur. J. Mineral., 9, 157–166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1127/ejm/9/1/0157" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1127/ejm/9/1/0157</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Caquineau, S., Gaudichet, A., Gomes, L., and Legrand, M.: Mineralogy of Saharan
dust transported over northwestern tropical Atlantic Ocean in relation to source
regions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, 4251, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000247" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD000247</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Chipera, S. J. and Bish, D. L.: Baseline studies of the clay minerals society source clays: powder X-ray diffraction analyses, Clay. Clay Miner., 49, 398–409, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2001.0490511" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2001.0490511</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Claquin, T., Schulz, M., and Balkanski, Y. J.: Modeling the mineralogy of atmospheric dust sources, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 22243, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900416" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900416</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Colby, S. M., King, T. B., and Reilly, J. P.: Improving the resolution of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry by exploiting the correlation between ion position and velocity, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 8, 865–868, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Connolly, P. J., Möhler, O., Field, P. R., Saathoff, H., Burgess, R.,
Choularton, T., and Gallagher, M.: Studies of heterogeneous freezing by three
different desert dust samples, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 2805–2824,
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-2805-2009, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Dall'Osto, M., Harrison, R. M., Highwood, E. J., O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D., Querol, X., and Achterberg, E. P.: Variation of the mixing state of Saharan dust particles with atmospheric transport, Atmos. Environ., 44, 3135–3146, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.05.030</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P. J.: African dust aerosols as atmospheric ice nuclei, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1732, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017410" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL017410</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P. J., Prenni, a J., Liu, X., Kreidenweis, S. M., Petters, M. D., Twohy, C. H., Richardson, M. S., Eidhammer, T., and Rogers, D. C.: Predicting global atmospheric ice nuclei distributions and their impacts on climate, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 11217–11222, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0910818107</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
DeMott, P. J., Prenni, A. J., McMeeking, G. R., Sullivan, R. C., Petters, M. D., Tobo, Y., Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Snider, J. R., Wang, Z., and Kreidenweis, S. M.: Integrating laboratory and field data to quantify the immersion freezing ice nucleation activity of mineral dust particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 393–409, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-393-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-393-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Duce, R. A. and Tindale, N. W.: Atmospheric transport of iron and its deposition in the ocean, Limnol. Oceanogr., 36, 1715–1726, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1991.36.8.1715" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4319/lo.1991.36.8.1715</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Formenti, P., Rajot, J. L., Desboeufs, K., Caquineau, S., Chevaillier, S., Nava, S., Gaudichet, A., Journet, E., Triquet, S., Alfaro, S., Chiari, M., Haywood, J., Coe, H., and Highwood, E.: Regional variability of the composition of mineral dust from western Africa: results from the AMMA SOP0/DABEX and DODO field campaigns, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009903" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009903</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Formenti, P., Schütz, L., Balkanski, Y., Desboeufs, K., Ebert, M., Kandler, K., Petzold, A., Scheuvens, D., Weinbruch, S., and Zhang, D.: Recent progress in understanding physical and chemical properties of African and Asian mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8231–8256, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8231-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8231-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Friedrich, F., Steudel, A., and Weidler, P. G.: Change of the re- fractive
index of illite particles by reduction of the Fe con- tent of the octahedral
sheet, Clay. Clay Miner., 56, 505–510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2008.0560503" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.2008.0560503</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Gallavardin, S., Lohmann, U., and Cziczo, D.: Analysis and differentiation of mineral dust by single particle laser mass spectrometry, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 274, 56–63, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2008.04.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2008.04.031</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia-guinea, J. and Correcher, V.: Luminescence spectra of alkali feldspars: influence of crushing on the ultraviolet emission band, Spectrosc. Lett., 33, 103–113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00387010009350062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/00387010009350062</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Garrels, R. M.: Montmorillonite/Illite stability diagrams, Clay. Clay Miner., 32, 161–166, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1984.0320301" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1346/CCMN.1984.0320301</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Goudie, A. S. and Middleton, N. J.: Desert Dust in the Global System, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Guilhaus, M.: Principles and instrumentation in time-of-flight mass spectrometry, Physical and instrumental concepts, J. Mass Spectrom., 30, 1519–1532, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.1190301102" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.1190301102</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Hawthorne, F. C.: Toward theoretical mineralogy?: A bond-topological approach, Am. Mineral., 100, 696–713, <a href="https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2015-5114" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2015-5114</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hinz, K. and Spengler, B.: Instrumentation, data evaluation and
quantification in on-line aerosol mass spectrometry, J. Mass
Spectrom., 42, 843–860, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.1262" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jms.1262</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Hiranuma, N., Augustin-Bauditz, S., Bingemer, H., Budke, C., Curtius, J., Danielczok, A., Diehl, K., Dreischmeier, K., Ebert, M., Frank, F., Hoffmann, N., Kandler, K., Kiselev, A., Koop, T., Leisner, T., Möhler, O., Nillius, B., Peckhaus, A., Rose, D., Weinbruch, S., Wex, H., Boose, Y., DeMott, P. J., Hader, J. D., Hill, T. C. J., Kanji, Z. A., Kulkarni, G., Levin, E. J. T., McCluskey, C. S., Murakami, M., Murray, B. J., Niedermeier, D., Petters, M. D., O'Sullivan, D., Saito, A., Schill, G. P., Tajiri, T., Tolbert, M. A., Welti, A., Whale, T. F., Wright, T. P., and Yamashita, K.: A comprehensive laboratory study on the immersion freezing behavior of illite NX particles: a comparison of 17 ice nucleation measurement techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 2489–2518, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-2489-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Huffman, J. A., Jayne, J. T., Drewnick, F., Aiken, A. C., Onasch, T., Worsnop, D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Design, modeling, optimization, and experimental tests of a particle beam width probe for the aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 1143–1163, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500423782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500423782</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. a., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an aerosol mass spectrometer for size and composition analysis of submicron particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 49–70, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Jenkins, H. D. B., Tudela, D., and Glasser, L.: Lattice potential energy estimation for complex ionic salts from density measurements, Inorg. Chem., 41, 2364–2367, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ic011216k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ic011216k</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Jeong, G. Y.: Bulk and single-particle mineralogy of Asian dust and a comparison with its source soils, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008606" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008606</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Jeong, G. Y. and Nousiainen, T.: TEM analysis of the internal structures and mineralogy of
Asian dust particles and the implications for optical modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7233–7254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7233-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7233-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Jeong, G. Y., Park, M. Y., Kandler, K., Nousiainen, T., and Kemppinen,
O.: Mineralogical properties and internal structures of individual
fine particles of Saharan dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 12397–12410,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12397-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-12397-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Jickells, T. and Spokes, L.: Atmospheric iron inputs into the ocean, in: The Biochemistry of Iron
in Seawater, Wiley, Chichester, UK, 85–121, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Kamphus, M., Ettner-Mahl, M., Klimach, T., Drewnick, F., Keller, L., Cziczo, D. J., Mertes, S., Borrmann, S., and Curtius, J.: Chemical composition of ambient aerosol, ice residues and cloud droplet residues in mixed-phase clouds: single particle analysis during the Cloud and Aerosol Characterization Experiment (CLACE 6), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 8077–8095, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8077-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8077-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kandler, K., Benker, N., Bundke, U., Cuevas, E., Ebert, M., Knippertz, P., Rodríguez, S., Schütz, L., and Weinbruch, S.: Chemical composition and complex refractive index of Saharan Mineral Dust at Izaña, Tenerife (Spain) derived by electron microscopy, Atmos. Environ., 41, 8058–8074, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.047" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.06.047</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kandler, K., Schütz, L., Deutscher, C., Ebert, M., Hofmann, H., Jäckel, S., Jaenicke, R., Knippertz, P., Lieke, K., Massling, A., Petzold, A., Schladitz, A., Weinzierl, B., Wiedensohler, A., Zorn, S., and Weinbruch, S.: Size distribution, mass concentration, chemical and mineralogical composition and derived optical parameters of the boundary layer aerosol at Tinfou, Morocco, during SAMUM 2006, Tellus B, 61, 32–50, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00385.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00385.x</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kandler, K., Lieke, K., Benker, N., Emmel, C., Küpper, M., Müller-Ebert, D., Ebert, M., Scheuvens, D., Schladitz, A., Schütz, L., and Weinbruch, S.: Electron microscopy of particles collected at Praia, Cape Verde, during the Saharan Mineral Dust Experiment: particle chemistry, shape, mixing state and complex refractive index, Tellus B, 63, 475–496, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00550.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00550.x</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kaufman, Y. J., Koren, I., Remer, L. A., Tanré, D., Ginoux, P., and Fan, S.: Dust transport and deposition observed from the Terra-Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) spacecraft over the Atlantic Ocean, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110, 1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004436" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004436</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kaufmann, L., Marcolli, C., Hofer, J., Pinti, V., Hoyle, C. R., and Peter, T.: Ice nucleation efficiency of natural dust samples in the immersion mode, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 11177–11206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11177-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-11177-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Lafon, S., Sokolik, I. N., Rajot, J. L., Caquincau, S., and Gaudichet, A.: Characterization of iron oxides in mineral dust aerosols: implications for light absorption, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, 1–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD007016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD007016</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, P., Ziemann, P. J., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.:
Generating particle beams of controlled dimensions and divergence: I. theory of particle motion in aerodynamic lenses and nozzle expansions, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 22, 293–313, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829408959748" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829408959748</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Long, C. M., Nascarella, M. A., and Valberg, P. A.: Carbon black vs. black carbon and other airborne materials containing elemental carbon: physical and chemical distinctions, Environ. Pollut., 181, 271–286, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.009</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Marsden, N., Flynn, M. J., Taylor, J. W., Allan, J. D., and Coe, H.:
Evaluating the influence of laser wavelength and detection stage
geometry on optical detection efficiency in a  single-particle mass
spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 6051–6068,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6051-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6051-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
McConnell, C. L., Formenti, P., Highwood, E. J., and Harrison, M. A. J.: Using aircraft measurements to determine the refractive index of Saharan dust during the DODO Experiments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3081–3098, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3081-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3081-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Mermut, A. R. and Cano, A. F.: Baseline studies of the clay mineral society source clays: chemical analyses of major elements, Clay. Clay Miner., 49, 381–386, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Middlebrook, A. M.: A comparison of particle mass spectrometers during the 1999 Atlanta Supersite Project, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 8424, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000660" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000660</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, D. M. and Reynolds, R. C.: X-Ray diffraction and the identification and analysis of clay minerals, 2nd Ed., Oxford Univ. Press. Oxford, New York, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M.: The design of single particle laser mass spectrometers, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 150–165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/mas.20113</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Neubauer, K. R., Johnston, M. V., and Wexler, A. S.: Humidity effects on the mass spectra of single aerosol particles, Atmos. Environ., 32, 2521–2529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00005-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00005-3</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Nickovic, S., Vukovic, A., Vujadinovic, M., Djurdjevic, V., and Pejanovic, G.: Technical Note: High-resolution mineralogical database of dust-productive soils for atmospheric dust modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 845–855, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-845-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-845-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Niemand, M., Möhler, O., Vogel, B., Vogel, H., Hoose, C., Connolly, P., Klein, H., Bingemer, H., DeMott, P., Skrotzki, J., and Leisner, T.: A particle-surface-area-based parameterization of immersion freezing on desert dust particles, J. Atmos. Sci., 69, 3077–3092, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-11-0249.1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Nousiainen, T., Zubko, E., Niemi, J. V., Kupiainen, K., Lehtinen, M., Muinonen, K., and Videen, G.: Single-scattering modeling of thin, birefringent mineral-dust flakes using the discrete-dipole approximation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011564" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011564</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Olfert, J. S. and Collings, N.: New method for particle mass classification – the Couette centrifugal particle mass analyzer, J. Aerosol Sci., 36, 1338–1352, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.03.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2005.03.006</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Pan, Y. and Cotter, R. J.: Measurement of initial translational energies of peptide
ions in laser desorption ionization mass-spectrometry, Org. Mass Spectrom., 27, 3–8, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Perlwitz, J. P., Pérez García-Pando, C., and Miller, R. L.: Predicting the mineral composition of dust aerosols – Part 1: Representing key processes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 11593–11627, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11593-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11593-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Prospero, J. M.: Long-range transport of mineral dust in the global atmosphere: impact of African dust on the environment of the southeastern United States, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96, 3396–3403, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.7.3396" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.7.3396</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Prospero, J. M. and Mayol-Bracero, O. L.: Understanding the transport and impact of African dust on the Caribbean Basin, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1329–1337, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00142.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00142.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Prospero, J. M., Blades, E., Naidu, R., Mathison, G., Thani, H., and Lavoie, M. C.: Relationship between African dust carried in the Atlantic trade winds and surges in pediatric asthma attendances in the Caribbean, Int. J. Biometeorol., 52, 823–832, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-008-0176-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-008-0176-1</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Reents, W. D. and Schabel, M. J.: Measurement of individual particle atomic composition by aerosol mass spectrometry, Anal. Chem., 73, 5403–5414, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac010436c" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac010436c</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Reid, J. S., Jonsson, H. H., Maring, H. B., Smirnov, A., Savoie, D. L., Cliff, S. S., Reid, E. A., Livingston, J. M., Meier, M. M., Dubovik, O., and Tsay, S. C.: Comparison of size and morphological measurements of coarse mode dust particles from Africa, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8593, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002485" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002485</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Reinard, M. S. and Johnston, M. V: Ion formation mechanism in laser
desorption ionization of individual nanoparticles., J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectr., 19, 389–399, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2007.11.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2007.11.017</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Rivin, D.: Carbon Black, in: Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 101–158, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenfeld, D., Rudich, Y., and Lahav, R.: Desert dust suppressing precipitation: a possible desertification feedback loop, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 5975–80, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.101122798" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.101122798</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Samoli, E., Nastos, P. T., Paliatsos, A. G., Katsouyanni, K., and Priftis, K. N.: Acute effects of air pollution on pediatric asthma exacerbation: evidence of association and effect modification, Environ. Res., 111, 418–424, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.01.014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2011.01.014</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Scheuvens, D., Schütz, L., Kandler, K., Ebert, M., and Weinbruch, S.: Bulk composition of northern African dust and its source sediments – a compilation, Earth-Sci. Rev., 116, 170–194, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.08.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2012.08.005</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidt, S., Schneider, J., Klimach, T., Mertes, S., Schenk, L. P.,
Kupiszewski, P., Curtius, J., and Borrmann, S.: Online single particle
analysis of ice particle residuals from mountain-top mixed-phase
clouds using laboratory derived particle type assignment,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 575–594, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-575-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-575-2017</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Sokolik, I. N. and Toon, O. B.: Incorporation of mineralogical composition into models of the radiative properties of mineral aerosol from UV to IR wavelengths, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 9423–9444, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD200048" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1998JD200048</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Spengler, B. and Kirsch, D.: On the formation of initial ion velocities in matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization: virtual desorption time as an additional parameter describing ion ejection dynamics, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 226, 71–83, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-3806(02)00974-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1387-3806(02)00974-0</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Sullivan, R. C., Guazzotti, S. A., Sodeman, D. A., and Prather, K. A.: Direct observations of the atmospheric processing of Asian mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 1213–1236, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1213-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1213-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Tegen, I. and Lacis, A. A.: Modeling of particle size distribution and its influence on the radiative properties of mineral dust aerosol, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101, 19237–19244, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd03610" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/95jd03610</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Thomson, D. S., Middlebrook, A. M., and Murphy, D. M.: Thresholds for laser-induced ion formation from aerosols in a vacuum using ultraviolet and vacuum-ultraviolet laser wavelengths, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 26, 544–559, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829708965452" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829708965452</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Usher, C. R., Michel, A. E., and Grassian, V. H.: Reactions on mineral dust., Chem. Rev., 103, 4883–4939, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020657y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/cr020657y</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Vera, C. C., Trimborn, A., Hinz, K.-P., and Spengler, B.: Initial velocity distributions of ions generated by in-flight laser desorption/ionization of individual polystyrene latex microparticles as studied by the delayed ion extraction method, Rapid Commun. Mass Sp., 19, 133–146, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1753" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.1753</a>, 2005.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Vogt, C., Lauterjung, J., and Fischer, R.: Investigation of the clay fraction ( &lt; 2µm) of the clay minerals society reference clays, Clay. Clay Miner., 50, 388–400, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, A. Y. and Valberg, P. A.: Carbon Black and soot: two different substances, Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., 62, 218–228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15298660108984625" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/15298660108984625</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, L. R., Gonzalez, L. A., Peck, J., Trimborn, D., McInnis, J., Farrar, M. R., Moore, K. D., Jayne, J. T., Robinson, W. A., Lewis, D. K., Onasch, T. B., Canagaratna, M. R., Trimborn, A., Timko, M. T., Magoon, G., Deng, R., Tang, D., de la Rosa Blanco, E., Prévôt, A. S. H., Smith, K. A., and Worsnop, D. R.: Characterization of an aerodynamic lens for transmitting particles greater than 1 micrometer in diameter into the Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3271–3280, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3271-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3271-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Wonaschütz, A., Hitzenberger, R., Bauer, H., Klatzer, B., Caseiro, A.,
and Puxbaum, H.: Application of the Integrating Sphere Method to
Separate the Contributions of Brown and Black Carbon in Atmospheric
Aerosols Application of the Integrating Sphere Method to Separate the
Contributions of Brown and Black Carbon in Atmospheric
Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1141–1146, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Worringen, A., Kandler, K., Benker, N., Dirsch, T., Mertes, S., Schenk, L., Kästner, U., Frank, F., Nillius, B., Bundke, U., Rose, D., Curtius, J., Kupiszewski, P., Weingartner, E., Vochezer, P., Schneider, J., Schmidt, S., Weinbruch, S., and Ebert, M.: Single-particle characterization of ice-nucleating particles and ice particle residuals sampled by three different techniques, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 4161–4178, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4161-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-4161-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Young, G., Jones, H. M., Darbyshire, E., Baustian, K. J., McQuaid, J. B., Bower, K. N., Connolly, P. J., Gallagher, M. W., and Choularton, T. W.: Size-segregated compositional analysis of aerosol particles collected in the European Arctic during the ACCACIA campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4063–4079, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4063-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4063-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Zelenyuk, A., Yang, J., Imre, D., and Choi, E.: Achieving size independent hit-rate in single particle mass spectrometry, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 305–310, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802637915" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802637915</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, L., Park, K., Milchberg, H. M., and Zachariah, M. R.: Understanding the interaction of an intense laser pulse with nanoparticles: application to the quantification of single particle mass spectrometry, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 41, 818–827, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701484955" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701484955</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Zimmermann, F., Weinbruch, S., Schütz, L., Hofmann, H., Ebert, M., Kandler, K., and Worringen,
A.: Ice nucleation properties of the most abundant mineral dust phases,
J. Geophys. Res., 113, D23204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010655" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010655</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
