<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-11-4617-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Effects of temperature, pressure, and carrier gases on the performance of an
aerosol particle mass analyser</article-title><alt-title>Effects of temperature, pressure, and carrier gases</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Effects of temperature, pressure, and carrier gases}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{T.-C. Hsiao et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff3">
          <name><surname>Hsiao</surname><given-names>Ta-Chih</given-names></name>
          <email>tchsiao@gmail.com</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4103-6272</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Young</surname><given-names>Li-Hao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Tai</surname><given-names>Yu-Chun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chang</surname><given-names>Po-Kai</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Taiwan
University, Taipei, 10673, Taiwan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Department of Occupational Safety and Health, China Medical
University, Taichung, 40402, Taiwan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Graduate Institute of Environmental Engineering, National Central
University, Taoyuan, 32001, Taiwan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Ta-Chih Hsiao (tchsiao@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>9</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>11</volume>
      <issue>8</issue>
      <fpage>4617</fpage><lpage>4626</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>December</month><year>2017</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>April</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>25</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>13</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4617/2018/amt-11-4617-2018.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4617/2018/amt-11-4617-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4617/2018/amt-11-4617-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4617/2018/amt-11-4617-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e121">Effective density is a crucial parameter used to predict
the transport behaviour and fate of particles in the atmosphere, and to
measure instruments used ultimately in the human respiratory tract
(Ristimäki et al., 2002). The aerosol particle mass analyser (APM) was
first proposed by Ehara et al. (1996) and is used to determine the effective
density of aerosol particles. A compact design (Kanomax APM-3601) was
subsequently developed by Tajima et al. (2013). Recently, a growing number
of field studies have reported application of the APM, and experimental
schemes using the differential mobility analyser alongside the APM have been
adopted extensively. However, environmental conditions such as ambient
pressure and temperature vary with the experimental location, and this could
affect the performance of the APM. Gas viscosity and Cunningham slip factors
are parameters associated with temperature and pressure and are included in
the APM's classification performance parameter: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this study,
the effects of temperature and pressure were analysed through theoretical
calculation, and the influence of varying carrier gas was experimentally
evaluated. The transfer function and APM operational region were further
calculated and discussed to examine their applicability. Based on the
theoretical analysis of the APM's operational region, the mass detection
limits are changed with the properties of carrier gases under a chosen
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value. Moreover, the detection limit can be lowered when the
pressure is reduced, which implies that performance may be affected during
field study. In experimental evaluation, air, oxygen, and carbon dioxide
were selected to atomize aerosols in the laboratory with the aim of
evaluating the effect of gas viscosity on the APM's performance. Using
monodisperse polystyrene latex (PSL) spheres with nominal diameters of 50
and 100 nm, the classification performance of the APM was slightly varied
with carrier gases, while the classification accuracy was consistently
within 10 %.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e145">To determine the adverse health effects of inhalable particles, the lung
regional deposition fraction must be investigated  (Chuang et al., 2016;
Haddrell et al., 2015). The lung regional deposition fraction is closely
associated with the density and morphology of submicron particles that can
be derived from their mass measurement  (Broday and Rosenzweig, 2011;
Salma et al., 2002; Shi et al., 2015). Therefore, mass distribution and
particle density play pivotal roles in the study of associated health
effects. However, obtaining measurements of the morphology or density of
aerosol particles in the environment is not easy  (Bau et al., 2014;
DeCarlo et al., 2004), and particles in an ambient environment are generally
irregular and nonspherical. In this regard,  Liu et al. (2013)
demonstrated that the morphological parameter of a fractal soot particle,
namely the fractal dimension (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),  could affect the particle's radiative
properties. In addition, according to theoretical calculations,
He et al. (2015) reported that aged soot
aggregates with partially encapsulated or externally attached structures
have weaker absorption properties than do fresh soot aggregates.</p>
      <p id="d1e159">Nevertheless, theoretical simulations and experimental studies on the
effects of aerosols on human health and the atmosphere all require certain
assumptions regarding<?pagebreak page4618?> particle morphology or density to be made to enable
the conversion of number concentration to mass concentration or volume
concentration   (Hand and Kreidenweis, 2002). To experimentally
retrieve the density of submicron-to-nanometre-sized particles, a
differential mobility analyser (DMA) system coupled with a low-pressure
impactor was developed to measure the aerodynamic sizes of particles of
known electric mobility size. By further assuming that the particles were
all spherical, the “effective” or “apparent” density was derived
(Kelly and McMurry, 1992; Schleicher et al., 1995; Skillas et al., 1998).
A similar system combining a scanning mobility particle sizer and electrical
low-pressure impactor in parallel was reported and applied to study diesel
particulate matter and ambient aerosols (Maricq et al., 2000; Ristimäki
et al., 2002; Symonds et al., 2007; Van Gulijk et al., 2004; Virtanen et al.,
2004). Furthermore, Ehara et al. (1996) developed the aerosol particle mass
analyser (APM), which is an aerosol instrument that classifies particle mass
by balancing the centrifugal force and electrostatic force. Based on an
identical classification mechanism but utilizing a different rotating scheme
to create centrifugal force, the Couette centrifugal particle mass analyser
is another commercially available instrument. With such advances in aerosol
instrumentation, McMurray et al. (2002) proposed using the APM to directly
measure the mass of monodispersed particles classified by a DMA (tandem
DMA–APM system) instead of using an impactor to probe the particle
aerodynamic size. This DMA–APM scheme is capable of revealing the density or
mass distribution of targeted aerosol particles in real time. Throughout the
past decades, this scheme has also been adopted extensively to determine the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of aerosol aggregates
(Lall et al., 2008; McMurry et al., 2002; Park et al., 2003,
2004a, b; Scheckman et al., 2009) and atmospheric aerosols
(Kuwata and Kondo, 2009; Kuwata et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e173">A growing number of APM experiments are being conducted in outdoor
environments in relation to the dual interest in human health and climate
change (Leskinen et al., 2014; Rissler et al., 2014). However, when
experiments are conducted in the field, environmental conditions such as
temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and pressure (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) vary spatially and temporally,
particularly at high-altitude sites. The viscosity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and mean free path <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msqrt><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of ambient air change
continuously (Kulkarni et al., 2011), thereby influencing the performance and
range of detection limits (classifiable region) for the APM. Therefore, in
this study, air, oxygen, and carbon dioxide were selected as carrier gases to
experimentally evaluate the effect of gas viscosity and the mean free path on
the performance of the APM, including the classifiable region and detection
limits. On the other hand, argon would be required as the carrier gas if the
APM were used as an aerosol particle classifier coupled with inductively
coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS; in a similar manner to the
DMA–ICP-MS system) (Myojo et al., 2002). Therefore, the effects of changing
the carrier gas in the APM's transfer function require investigation. In this
regard, the experimental and simulated transfer functions for the APM
operated for various carrier gases were explored and are compared in this
paper. The results provide a valuable insight into the performance of the APM
when operated under various conditions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Operational theory</title>
      <p id="d1e348">The APM was first proposed by Ehara et al. (1996), and a compact version was
recently developed by Tajima et al. (2013). The instrument consists of two
electrodes, namely coaxial and rotating cylindrical electrodes, between which
a narrow annular space is created for mass classification (classification
zone). When the APM is initialized, the inner and outer electrodes rotate at
the same speed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) to generate centrifugal force, and a high voltage
is applied to the inner electrode to create a “counter” electrostatic
force. The governing equations of particle movements in radial and axial
directions inside the classification zone are expressed as follows (Ehara et
al., 1996):

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M10" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>q</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>(in  a  radial  direction),</mml:mtext><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close="}" open="{"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>(in  an  axial  direction),</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Particles are then classified based on the balance between the centrifugal
force and counter electrostatic force, and only particles with a designated
mass-to-charge ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) pass through the classification zone. The
mass-to-charge ratio for particles that remain in the central line
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) within the classification zone is defined as the
“critical” <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; Eq. (4). Based on this definition, the
classified particle mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), rotation speed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and voltage
applied (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) are linearly correlated on a log scale, as shown in Eq. (5):

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M18" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">log</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Tajima et al. (2011, 2013) depicted the classifiable
region for the APM by using a log–log mass-versus-rotation-speed plot.
However, because of the physical limits of the operational voltage and
rotation speed of the APM, a parallelogram of potential classifiable regions
was reported.</p>
      <p id="d1e751">The transfer function (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is generally used to characterize the
classification performance of the DMA, and by defining the penetration
probability of particles under a designed condition, the transfer function is
employed to evaluate the performance of the APM. The nondiffusive transfer
function for the APM (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be indexed by the
penetration at the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the resolution
parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Tajima et al., 2013); <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
maximum height of the transfer function, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be estimated
theoretically as follows:

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M26" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>tanh⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="" open="/"><mml:mphantom style="vphantom"><mml:mpadded style="vphantom" width="0pt"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mpadded></mml:mphantom></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          Both parameters are closely related to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is<?pagebreak page4619?> the
major dimensionless performance parameter defined by Ehara et al. (1996) for
APM operation. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a strong function of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M30" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be interpreted as the ratio of the timescale for
axial and radial particle movements in the classification zone. When the
value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is larger, the APM has a superior
classification resolution. Generally, the axial traversal timescale (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="/" close=""><mml:mphantom style="vphantom"><mml:mpadded style="vphantom" width="0pt"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mpadded></mml:mphantom></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">υ</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is considered constant because
the aerosol flow rate is fixed when the instrument is operated. Thus, the
classification performance can be improved by decreasing the radial traversal
timescale (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="/" close=""><mml:mphantom style="vphantom"><mml:mpadded style="vphantom" width="0pt"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mpadded></mml:mphantom></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). A shorter
radial traversal time enables easier removal of incompetent particles by
deposition onto the electrodes, which denotes lower penetration possibility
for particles with a mass-to-charge ratio other than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In other
words, the transfer function is narrower, or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is smaller, for a
larger value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which suggests a higher classifying
resolution. However, the trade-off for operating the APM at a larger
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is that the maximum penetration of the transfer function
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is lower. Tajima et al. (2011) recommended that the APM
be operated at a constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (with a fixed
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) within the range of 0.25 to 0.5 when the aerosol flow
rate is 0.3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1380">For a constant value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a unique curve in the log–log
mass-versus-rotation-speed plot can be determined iteratively through
Eq. (8), and this intercepts the APM classifiable region. This
constant-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curve generally acts as the lower boundary for
the APM classifiable region. As observed in Eq. (8), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
a function of the APM rotation speed (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and depends on particle mass
and density with respect to relaxation time (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
closely related to gas viscosity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the Cunningham slip factor
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). At a given <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for
classifying particles with a certain mass decreases with an increasing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>). For air, oxygen,
argon, and carbon dioxide, limited variations in the values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> are observed, and their constant-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> curves are closely clustered. By contrast, the long mean free
paths of low-molecular-weight gases such as hydrogen and helium can lead to a
relatively high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>. Consequently, when the APM is
operated with hydrogen and helium, the classifiable mass range needs to be
extended to a much lower detection limit without sacrificing the resolution
or modifying the APM hardware (Fig. 1). However, an implicit problem is that
the breakdown voltages of inert gases are generally approximately 1 order
of magnitude lower than that of air (Schmid et al., 2002) (values of
gas-specific parameters and the corresponding detection limits are listed in
Table 1).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p id="d1e1551">Operational region of APM.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4617/2018/amt-11-4617-2018-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1564">Properties of gases at normal temperature and pressure (Kulkarni et
al., 2011) and corresponding APM detection limits at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="9">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gas</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ℓ</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Min. mass</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Max. mass</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(g mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(Kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(K)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N s m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fg)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> fg)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">44.010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.842</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">220.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.673</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">43.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">53.3–1316.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">8.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Air</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28.966</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.205</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">110.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">18.203</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">47.5–1448.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">5.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.331</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">116.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">20.229</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">69.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">51.8–1524.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">7.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.9</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">39.948</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.661</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">141.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">22.292</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">69.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">56.4–1608.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">9.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">2.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.090</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">66.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.799</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">123</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">13.6–921.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">He</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.003</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.166</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">73.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">19.571</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">192</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">19.5–1365.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">1.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e1579">* <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detection limits were calculated assuming that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2053">The expression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> can be further rewritten to
reveal the effects of temperature, pressure, and the carrier gas species as
Eq. (9):

              <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M79" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="" open="/"><mml:mphantom style="vphantom"><mml:mpadded width="0pt" style="vphantom"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mpadded></mml:mphantom></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="" open="/"><mml:mphantom style="vphantom"><mml:mpadded width="0pt" style="vphantom"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mpadded></mml:mphantom></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="" open="/"><mml:mphantom style="vphantom"><mml:mpadded width="0pt" style="vphantom"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mpadded></mml:mphantom></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mfenced close="" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mfenced open="" close="]"><mml:mfenced open="" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="/" close=""><mml:mphantom style="vphantom"><mml:mpadded style="vphantom" width="0pt"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>l</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mpadded></mml:mphantom></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.142</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.558</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.999</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Allen and
Raabe, 1985). As shown in Fig. 2, compared to pressure,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> is somewhat invariant with temperature; when the
temperature changes from 273 to 318 K, the difference of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> for all gas species is less than 6 %. However,
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> for 100 nm particles increases by 42 %
when the air pressure decreases to 65 kPa (Fig. 3); therefore, when
operating the APM at high-altitude sites, the detection limits need to be
lowered or the resolution needs to be improved. By contrast, based on the
analytical predictions, Eq. (4) is unaffected by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula>,
and the classification accuracy remains unchanged.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p id="d1e2533"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio for various
temperatures and pressures.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4617/2018/amt-11-4617-2018-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page4620?><sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Experimental method</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p id="d1e2564">Pressure effect on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-to-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio for various
carrier gases.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4617/2018/amt-11-4617-2018-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e2593">Experimental DMA–APM system.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4617/2018/amt-11-4617-2018-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2602">Figure 4 depicts the experimental evaluation system. The particles were
generated by an aerosol atomizer (TSI, Model 3076) and dehumidified by two
desiccant dyers connected in series to remove excess water content. To
experimentally evaluate the classification accuracy, 50 and 100 nm
polystyrene latex (PSL) spheres certified by the National Institute of Standards
and Technology (Thermo Fisher Scientific, cat. no. 3050A and 3100A) were used
here. The mean diameters of the size distributions of the 50 and 100 nm PSL
given by the manufacturers are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm,
respectively. These PSL
particles were classified using the DMA (TSI 3081) and then delivered to the
APM (Kanomax model II-3601) to determine particle mass. The overall aerosol
flow rate of the DMA–APM system was controlled by the downstream CPC
(condensation particle counter, TSI 3022A) and fixed at 0.3 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
To optimize the size of the classification resolution, the sheath flow rate
of the DMA was set at 3.0 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition to air, carbon dioxide
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and oxygen (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with purity levels of 99.99 %
were supplied as carrier gases. Before conducting measurements, the selected
gas was used to purge all apparatus for at least 5 min to ensure that no
residual contaminant gases remained, and the flow rates of the DMA's sheath
flow and aerosol flow were calibrated using a volumetric flow meter (Gilian
Gilibrator 2, Sensidyne, St. Petersburg, FL, USA). Because the DMA–APM was
used to investigate the effects of carrier gases on the APM's performance, it
was necessary to first study the sizing accuracy of the DMA for various
carrier gases. The results showed that the differences between the measured
modal diameters and nominal sizes of 50 and 100 nm certified PSL particles
were within 6 % for air, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, no
significant effects of gas species on DMA sizing accuracy were observed,
which was consistent with the findings of Schmid et al. (2002).</p>
      <p id="d1e2699">The classifying accuracy of aerosol instruments under various conditions is
generally characterized by a normalized indicator relative to a known
reference (Karg et al., 1992;<?pagebreak page4621?> Marlow et al., 1976; Ogren, 1980; Schmid et
al., 2002). The normalized mass-to-charge ratio
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used in the present
study to analyse the APM's performance at a constant rotation speed
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and constant sizing resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) operation. For the
constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> operation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.24 and 0.45 were chosen
for both 50 and 100 nm PSL spheres. The operation of DMA–APM is identical to
Kuwata and Kondo (2009) and  Kuwata et al. (2011), in
which the DMA selects particles with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> charge and predetermined mobility
diameters and then subjects them to the APM. Subsequently, the APM was set to
scan across a range of voltage (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), while the number concentration
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the passing particles was measured by a CPC. The peak of
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution was subsequently inspected to determine
the particle mass (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2815">The APM's stepping <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrum was converted to the transfer
function and compared with the simulated transfer function. The transfer function
is a kernel function used to theoretically evaluate the concentration of
downstream particles and is critical for evaluating the performance of the
APM (Ehara et al., 1996; Emery, 2005; Tajima et al., 2013). In the present
study, two computer programs, namely the TRANSFER program and SIM_APM
program (developed by the National Institute of Advanced Science and
Technology (AIST) of Japan) were utilized to theoretically evaluate the
operational performance of the APM (Tajima et al., 2011, 2013). The TRANSFER program calculated the theoretical APM transfer function
at a fixed rotation speed and voltage, and the SIM_APM program simulated
particle distribution at the APM outlet based on the known particle
distribution at the APM inlet (the size distribution was classified by the
front DMA). Both simulated results were compared with experimental APM
measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Constant $\lambda$}?><title>Constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e2854">For the case of constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> operation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is expressed as Eq. (10), where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is mainly a function of the voltage applied to the APM
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), Cunningham slip correction factor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and gas viscosity
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>):

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M118" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gas</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="/" close=""><mml:mphantom style="vphantom"><mml:mpadded width="0pt" style="vphantom"><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gas</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mpadded></mml:mphantom></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">gas</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="" open="/"><mml:mphantom style="vphantom"><mml:mpadded width="0pt" style="vphantom"><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mpadded></mml:mphantom></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">air</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          To consider the various properties of the gas species, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was adjusted
to enable <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to be fixed at approximately 0.24 and 0.45 for 50 nm
PSL particles, as shown in Table 2. The results revealed that particle mass
was generally underestimated for cases where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used as a
carrier gas. In particular, underestimation was 23–25 % for a 50 nm
PSL sphere. By contrast, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used as the carrier gas, an
overestimation of mass measurements was observed, with an error within 9 %.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" orientation="landscape"><caption><p id="d1e3071">Normalized particle mass-to-charge ratio of 50 nm PSL spheres for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, air, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.45.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="13">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PSL size</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gas</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col8" align="center" colsep="1">Nominal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col9" nameend="col13" align="center">Nominal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Exp.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Rotation speed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Peak voltage</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Mass</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Exp.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Rotation speed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Peak voltage</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Mass</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">[rpm]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">[Kg]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">[rpm]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">[<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">[Kg]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.239</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10 117</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">9.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.59</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.744</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.411</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">13 268</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">17.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.79</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.775</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Air</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.68</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.244</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9509</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">11.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.419</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">12 471</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">19.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.000</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.248</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9955</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">13.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.080</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.427</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">13 056</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">23.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.14</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.090</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">100<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.230</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6333</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">39.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.966</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.460</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">8956</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">79.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">0.985</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Air</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.56</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.252</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6387</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">41.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.000</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.504</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9033</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">81.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.000</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.250</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6610</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">47.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.44</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.062</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.499</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">9348</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">94.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.43</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">1.076</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e3108"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The theoretical particle mass of a 50 nm PSL sphere is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg
(assuming a density of 1050 Kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The theoretical particle mass of a 100 nm PSL sphere is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg (assuming a density of 1050 Kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3985">As reported by Lall et al. (2009, 2008), the particle
concentration measured as a function of APM voltage is wider than the APM
transfer function even though the particle can be considered as
“monodisperse” in size. This is mainly due the spread in calibration
particle sizes or the transfer function of the DMA. To further eliminate the
spread propagated from DMA classification, the transfer function of the APM
was calculated using software developed by the AIST of Japan. The transfer
function predicted (hereafter referred to as “predicted
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>”) based on the known size distribution of the DMA
outlet (convoluted with the known size distribution classified by DMA) is
indicated by the blue line in Fig. 6, and the theoretical transfer function
(hereafter referred to as “theoretical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ω</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">APM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>”) at a fixed
optimal experimental peak voltage is indicated by a thinner green line.
Experimental data points are indicated by the dotted symbol in Fig. 6. It
should be noted that, according to the work done by Kuwata (2015), even when
the resolution of the DMA–APM system appears to be controlled by the APM,
the particle classification by the DMA–APM at a certain operating condition
still could be regulated by both DMA and APM.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e4013">APM experimental transfer function of 50 and 100 nm PSL spheres
for various carrier gases.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4617/2018/amt-11-4617-2018-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4024">APM transfer function of 50 nm PSL spheres for various carrier
gases with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.43.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4617/2018/amt-11-4617-2018-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4045">The APM resolution defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is used as an indicator
to evaluate the classification performance. The resolution is recommended to
be between 0.5 and 1.2 when interpreted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Emery,
2005; Tajima et al., 2011). However, in this study, the values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were 0.43 and 0.44 for 50 and
100 nm PSL spheres, respectively. Furthermore, the experimental optimal
voltage in the case of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was consistently lower than the
theoretical voltage after convolution with the classified size distribution,
and in the case of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> it was slightly higher than the theoretical voltage.
As shown in Table 1, the viscosity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was lower than that of
air, whereas the viscosity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was higher than that of air. These
findings exhibit qualitative agreement with observations of under- or
overestimations of PSL spheres. Therefore, we suspect that the fluid field
in the APM classification zone is influenced by gas-specific properties such
as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. A further numerical simulation of the flow field was
performed using COMSOL Multiphysics 4.3a. Using the flow velocity of air as a
reference, the velocity differences in an angular direction at the APM's
classification zone under various <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω<?pagebreak page4623?></mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are plotted in Fig. 7. The
velocity was generally lower in the classification zone of the APM when
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was used as the carrier gas, and an increase in the distinct
differences between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and air with an increase in the rotation
speed was observed. Therefore, a lower viscosity and higher gas density
likely intensify the shear force required to create rotating flow inside the
APM. Because of the lower rotating flow velocity, significant deviations were
observed in the measured results under normal conditions in the case of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; this phenomenon is intensified with higher values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and is more significant for small particles, which are even more prone to
influence from the flow field.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4219">Computational fluid dynamic–simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flow fields of APM at various rotation speeds. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/4617/2018/amt-11-4617-2018-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Constant $\omega$}?><title>Constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e4263">According to Kuwata's theoretical analysis of transfer function and
resolution of the DMA–APM system, the common operation of constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> could not maintain the transfer function because of the range
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> passing the DMA (Kuwata, 2015). In such a case, the transfer
function may not be symmetric, and the transfer function is narrower for
larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> because of the dependence of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. It was then
concluded that the operation of constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and varying <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, on the
other hand, could better maintain the DMA–APM resolution because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be constant under constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. However, this ideal operation
protocol is less employed for the DMA–APM system, mainly due to the practical
impediment of quickly and accurately scanning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over a range.
Therefore, the common constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> operation is investigated here.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p id="d1e4374">Normalized particle mass-to-charge ratio of 100 nm PSL spheres for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, air, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is fixed at 6375.5 rpm).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">100 nm PSL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Peak voltage [<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mass [Kg]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">39.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.79</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.860</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Air, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">45.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.73</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.000</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">48.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.16</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.064</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page4624?><p id="d1e4602">As shown in Table 3, when determining the particle mass for 100 nm PSL
spheres, respective differences of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 % are observed when
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are used as carrier gases in the APM. However,
in Eq. (4), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is independent of gas properties, and thus
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or the peak voltage of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrum should
remain unchanged if identical values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are applied in the APM
for various carrier gases. The current experimental results demonstrate
that the classification ability of APM is dependent on the carrier gas and
influenced by gas viscosity. There could be changes in the flow field within
the APM when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are used, and radial acceleration
may not be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as used in Eq. (4). Therefore, to
determine the exact centrifugal force for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, further research is
required to investigate the velocity profile of particles in an angular
direction. In addition, when comparing air and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, a broader
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> spectrum with weaker penetration was observed for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; this could be attributed to the higher diffusivity resulting
from the lower gas viscosity of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Stokes–Einstein equation:
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="/" close=""><mml:mphantom style="vphantom"><mml:mpadded width="0pt" style="vphantom"><mml:msub><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mpadded></mml:mphantom></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Based on the results,
on-site calibration of the APM's classification performance is strongly
recommended.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e4854">In this study, the effects of temperature (“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” hereafter), pressure
(“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” hereafter), and gas viscosity (“<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” hereafter) on the
performance of the APM were evaluated analytically and experimentally. The
analytical results revealed that the APM's detection limit can be lowered
simply by increasing the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> / <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio without modifying the
hardware of the APM or its classifying resolution. Under a constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the use of a low-molecular-weight carrier gas such
as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or He can lower the mass detection limit to approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fg. Similarly, a reduction in operating <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> lowers the detection
limit or improves the resolution. Under these circumstances, the effects of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> on the APM's detection limit are relatively minor.</p>
      <?pagebreak page4625?><p id="d1e4960">Our experimental results under constant <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values reveal
that the use of a carrier gas other than air reduces accuracy. Specifically,
a carrier gas with a lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> than air such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yields an
underestimation of mass, whereas one with a higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> such as
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yields an overestimation. A subsequent flow field simulation
revealed variations in flow velocity in an angular direction at the APM's
inlet and outlet when air and other carrier gases were used. The flow
velocity decreased with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> but increased with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Thus, the
effects of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are expected to affect the APM's performance, and changes in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, density, and diffusivity in the carrier gas likely alter the radial
acceleration of flow in the APM; however, further research is recommended for
these aspects.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e5046">Data are available upon request by contacting the corresponding author.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e5052">TCH and LHY designed the research; YCT and PKC
performed the research and analysed the data; and TCH, LHY and YCT wrote the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e5058">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e5064">The authors are grateful for the financial support provided by the National
Science Council, Taiwan (NSC102-2221-E-008-004-MY3). The manuscript was
edited by Wallace Academic Editing.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by:
Mingjin Tang <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: three anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, M. D. and Raabe, O. G.: Slip Correction Measurements of Spherical
Solid Aerosol Particles in an Improved Millikan Apparatus, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 4, 269–286, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bau, S., Bémer, D., Grippari, F., Appert-Collin, J.-C., and Thomas, D.:
Determining the effective density of airborne nanoparticles using multiple
charging correction in a tandem DMA/ELPI setup, J. Nanopart. Res., 16, 1–13,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Broday, D. M. and Rosenzweig, R.: Deposition of fractal-like soot aggregates
in the human respiratory tract, J. Aerosol Sci., 42, 372–386, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Chuang, H.-C., Hsiao, T.-C., Wang, S.-H., Tsay, S.-C., and Lin, N.-H.:
Characterization of Particulate Matter Profiling and Alveolar Deposition from
Biomass Burning in Northern Thailand: The 7-SEAS Study, Aerosol Air Qual.
Res., 16, 2581–2602, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility
and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory, Aerosol Sci. Technol.,
38, 1185–1205, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Ehara, K., Hagwood, C., and Coakley, K. J.: Novel method to classify aerosol
particles according to their mass-to-charge ratio—Aerosol particle mass
analyser, J. Aerosol Sci., 27, 217–234, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Emery, M.: Theoretical Analysis of Data from DMA-APM System, Masters Thesis, University of
Minnesota, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Haddrell, A. E., Davies, J. F., and Reid, J. P.: Dynamics of Particle Size
on Inhalation of Environmental Aerosol and Impact on Deposition Fraction,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 14512–14521, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01930" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.5b01930</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A New Method for Retrieving Particle
Refractive Index and Effective Density from Aerosol Size Distribution Data,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 36, 1012–1026, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>He, C., Liou, K.-N., Takano, Y., Zhang, R., Levy Zamora, M., Yang, P., Li,
Q., and Leung, L. R.: Variation of the radiative properties during black
carbon aging: theoretical and experimental intercomparison, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 11967–11980, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11967-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11967-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Karg, E., Dua, S. K., and Ferron, G. A.: Performance of a differential
mobility analyzer at different gas compositions, J. Aerosol Sci., 23,
Supplement 1, 389–392, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Kelly, W. P. and McMurry, P. H.: Measurement of Particle Density by Inertial
Classification of Differential Mobility Analyzer–Generated Monodisperse
Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 17, 199–212, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Kulkarni, P., Baron, P. A., and Willeke, K.: Aerosol measurement:
principles, techniques, and applications, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M.: Particle Classification by the Tandem Differential Mobility
Analyzer–Particle Mass Analyzer System, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 49, 508–520,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M. and Kondo, Y.: Measurements of particle masses of inorganic salt
particles for calibration of cloud condensation nuclei counters, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 5921–5932, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5921-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5921-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M., Zorn, S. R., and Martin, S. T.: Using elemental ratios to
predict the density of organic material composed of carbon, hydrogen, and
oxygen, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 787–794, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Lall, A. A., Rong, W., Mädler, L., and Friedlander, S. K.: Nanoparticle
aggregate volume determination by electrical mobility analysis: Test of
idealized aggregate theory using aerosol particle mass analyzer measurements,
J. Aerosol Sci., 39, 403–417, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Lall, A. A., Ma, X., Guha, S., Mulholland, G. W., and Zachariah, M. R.:
Online Nanoparticle Mass Measurement by Combined Aerosol Particle Mass
Analyzer and Differential Mobility Analyzer: Comparison of Theory and
Measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 1075–1083, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Leskinen, J., Ihalainen, M., Torvela, T., Kortelainen, M., Lamberg, H.,
Tiitta, P., Jakobi, G., Grigonyte, J., Joutsensaari, J., Sippula, O.,
Tissari, J., Virtanen, A., Zimmermann, R., and Jokiniemi, J.: Effective
Density and Morphology of Particles Emitted from Small-Scale Combustion of
Various Wood Fuels, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 13298–13306, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Liu, F., Wong, C., Snelling, D. R., and Smallwood, G. J.: Investigation of
Absorption and Scattering Properties of Soot Aggregates of Different Fractal
Dimension at 532 nm Using RDG and GMM, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 47, 1393–1405,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Maricq, M. M., Podsiadlik, D. H., and Chase, R. E.: Size Distributions of
Motor Vehicle Exhaust PM: A Comparison Between ELPI and SMPS Measurements,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 239–260, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4626?><ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Marlow, W. H., Reist, P. C., and Dwiggins, G. A.: Aspects of the performance
of the electrical aerosol analyzer under nonideal conditions, J. Aerosol
Sci., 7, 457–462, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>McMurry, P. H., Wang, X., Park, K., and Ehara, K.: The Relationship between
Mass and Mobility for Atmospheric Particles: A New Technique for Measuring
Particle Density, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 36, 227–238, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Myojo, T., Takaya, M., and Ono-Ogasawara, M.: DMA as a Gas Converter from
Aerosol to “Argonsol” for Real-Time Chemical Analysis Using ICP-MS, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 36, 76–83, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ogren, J. A.: On the operation of the electrical aerosol analyzer at reduced
pressures, J. Aerosol Sci., 11, 427–434, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Park, K., Cao, F., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.: Relationship
between Particle Mass and Mobility for Diesel Exhaust Particles, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 37, 577–583, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Park, K., Kittelson, D., Zachariah, M., and McMurry, P.: Measurement of
Inherent Material Density of Nanoparticle Agglomerates, J. Nanopart. Res., 6,
267–272, 2004a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Park, K., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.: Structural Properties of
Diesel Exhaust Particles Measured by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM):
Relationships to Particle Mass and Mobility, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38,
881–889, 2004b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Rissler, J., Nordin, E. Z., Eriksson, A. C., Nilsson, P. T., Frosch, M.,
Sporre, M. K., Wierzbicka, A., Svenningsson, B., Löndahl, J., Messing, M.
E., Sjogren, S., Hemmingsen, J. G., Loft, S., Pagels, J. H., and Swietlicki,
E.: Effective Density and Mixing State of Aerosol Particles in a Near-Traffic
Urban Environment, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 6300–6308, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Ristimäki, J., Virtanen, A., Marjamäki, M., Rostedt, A., and
Keskinen, J.: On-line measurement of size distribution and effective density
of submicron aerosol particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 33, 1541–1557, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Salma, I., Balásházy, I., Winkler-Heil, R., Hofmann, W., and
Záray, G.: Effect of particle mass size distribution on the deposition of
aerosols in the human respiratory system, J. Aerosol Sci., 33, 119–132,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Scheckman, J. H., McMurry, P. H., and Pratsinis, S. E.: Rapid
Characterization of Agglomerate Aerosols by In Situ Mass-Mobility
Measurements, Langmuir, 25, 8248–8254, 2009.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Schleicher, B., Künzel, S., and Burtscher, H.: Insitu measurement of
size and density of submicron aerosol particles, J. Appl. Phys., 78,
4416–4422, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Schmid, O., Trueblood, M. B., Gregg, N., Hagen, D. E., and Whitefield, P.
D.: Sizing of Aerosol in Gases Other Than Air Using a Differential Mobility
Analyzer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 36, 351–360, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Shi, Y., Ji, Y., Sun, H., Hui, F., Hu, J., Wu, Y., Fang, J., Lin, H., Wang,
J., and Duan, H.: Nanoscale characterization of PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> airborne
pollutants reveals high adhesiveness and aggregation capability of soot
particles, Sci. Rep.-UK, 5, 1123,2 <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep1123</ext-link>,  2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Skillas, G., Künzel, S., Burtscher, H., Baltensperger, U., and Siegmann,
K.: High fractal-like dimension of diesel soot agglomerates, J. Aerosol Sci.,
29, 411–419, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Symonds, J. P. R., Reavell, K. S. J., Olfert, J. S., Campbell, B. W., and
Swift, S. J.: Diesel soot mass calculation in real-time with a differential
mobility spectrometer, J. Aerosol Sci., 38, 52–68, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Tajima, N., Fukushima, N., Ehara, K., and Sakurai, H.: Mass Range and
Optimized Operation of the Aerosol Particle Mass Analyzer, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 45, 196–214, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Tajima, N., Sakurai, H., Fukushima, N., and Ehara, K.: Design Considerations
and Performance Evaluation of a Compact Aerosol Particle Mass Analyzer,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 47, 1152–1162, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Van Gulijk, C., Marijnissen, J. C. M., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J. A., and
Schmidt-Ott, A.: Measuring diesel soot with a scanning mobility particle
sizer and an electrical low-pressure impactor: performance assessment with a
model for fractal-like agglomerates, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 633–655, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Virtanen, A., Ristimäki, J., and Keskinen, J.: Method for Measuring
Effective Density and Fractal Dimension of Aerosol Agglomerates, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 38, 437–446, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Effects of temperature, pressure, and carrier gases on the performance of an aerosol particle mass analyser</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Effective density is a crucial parameter used to predict
the transport behaviour and fate of particles in the atmosphere, and to
measure instruments used ultimately in the human respiratory tract
(Ristimäki et al., 2002). The aerosol particle mass analyser (APM) was
first proposed by Ehara et al. (1996) and is used to determine the effective
density of aerosol particles. A compact design (Kanomax APM-3601) was
subsequently developed by Tajima et al. (2013). Recently, a growing number
of field studies have reported application of the APM, and experimental
schemes using the differential mobility analyser alongside the APM have been
adopted extensively. However, environmental conditions such as ambient
pressure and temperature vary with the experimental location, and this could
affect the performance of the APM. Gas viscosity and Cunningham slip factors
are parameters associated with temperature and pressure and are included in
the APM's classification performance parameter: <i>λ</i>. In this study,
the effects of temperature and pressure were analysed through theoretical
calculation, and the influence of varying carrier gas was experimentally
evaluated. The transfer function and APM operational region were further
calculated and discussed to examine their applicability. Based on the
theoretical analysis of the APM's operational region, the mass detection
limits are changed with the properties of carrier gases under a chosen
<i>λ</i> value. Moreover, the detection limit can be lowered when the
pressure is reduced, which implies that performance may be affected during
field study. In experimental evaluation, air, oxygen, and carbon dioxide
were selected to atomize aerosols in the laboratory with the aim of
evaluating the effect of gas viscosity on the APM's performance. Using
monodisperse polystyrene latex (PSL) spheres with nominal diameters of 50
and 100&thinsp;nm, the classification performance of the APM was slightly varied
with carrier gases, while the classification accuracy was consistently
within 10&thinsp;%.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, M. D. and Raabe, O. G.: Slip Correction Measurements of Spherical
Solid Aerosol Particles in an Improved Millikan Apparatus, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 4, 269–286, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bau, S., Bémer, D., Grippari, F., Appert-Collin, J.-C., and Thomas, D.:
Determining the effective density of airborne nanoparticles using multiple
charging correction in a tandem DMA/ELPI setup, J. Nanopart. Res., 16, 1–13,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Broday, D. M. and Rosenzweig, R.: Deposition of fractal-like soot aggregates
in the human respiratory tract, J. Aerosol Sci., 42, 372–386, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Chuang, H.-C., Hsiao, T.-C., Wang, S.-H., Tsay, S.-C., and Lin, N.-H.:
Characterization of Particulate Matter Profiling and Alveolar Deposition from
Biomass Burning in Northern Thailand: The 7-SEAS Study, Aerosol Air Qual.
Res., 16, 2581–2602, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Slowik, J. G., Worsnop, D. R., Davidovits, P., and Jimenez,
J. L.: Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility
and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory, Aerosol Sci. Technol.,
38, 1185–1205, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Ehara, K., Hagwood, C., and Coakley, K. J.: Novel method to classify aerosol
particles according to their mass-to-charge ratio—Aerosol particle mass
analyser, J. Aerosol Sci., 27, 217–234, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Emery, M.: Theoretical Analysis of Data from DMA-APM System, Masters Thesis, University of
Minnesota, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Haddrell, A. E., Davies, J. F., and Reid, J. P.: Dynamics of Particle Size
on Inhalation of Environmental Aerosol and Impact on Deposition Fraction,
Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 14512–14521, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01930" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01930</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Hand, J. L. and Kreidenweis, S. M.: A New Method for Retrieving Particle
Refractive Index and Effective Density from Aerosol Size Distribution Data,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 36, 1012–1026, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
He, C., Liou, K.-N., Takano, Y., Zhang, R., Levy Zamora, M., Yang, P., Li,
Q., and Leung, L. R.: Variation of the radiative properties during black
carbon aging: theoretical and experimental intercomparison, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 11967–11980, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11967-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11967-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Karg, E., Dua, S. K., and Ferron, G. A.: Performance of a differential
mobility analyzer at different gas compositions, J. Aerosol Sci., 23,
Supplement 1, 389–392, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Kelly, W. P. and McMurry, P. H.: Measurement of Particle Density by Inertial
Classification of Differential Mobility Analyzer–Generated Monodisperse
Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 17, 199–212, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Kulkarni, P., Baron, P. A., and Willeke, K.: Aerosol measurement:
principles, techniques, and applications, John Wiley &amp; Sons, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M.: Particle Classification by the Tandem Differential Mobility
Analyzer–Particle Mass Analyzer System, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 49, 508–520,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Kuwata, M. and Kondo, Y.: Measurements of particle masses of inorganic salt
particles for calibration of cloud condensation nuclei counters, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 5921–5932, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5921-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5921-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M., Zorn, S. R., and Martin, S. T.: Using elemental ratios to
predict the density of organic material composed of carbon, hydrogen, and
oxygen, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 787–794, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Lall, A. A., Rong, W., Mädler, L., and Friedlander, S. K.: Nanoparticle
aggregate volume determination by electrical mobility analysis: Test of
idealized aggregate theory using aerosol particle mass analyzer measurements,
J. Aerosol Sci., 39, 403–417, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Lall, A. A., Ma, X., Guha, S., Mulholland, G. W., and Zachariah, M. R.:
Online Nanoparticle Mass Measurement by Combined Aerosol Particle Mass
Analyzer and Differential Mobility Analyzer: Comparison of Theory and
Measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 1075–1083, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Leskinen, J., Ihalainen, M., Torvela, T., Kortelainen, M., Lamberg, H.,
Tiitta, P., Jakobi, G., Grigonyte, J., Joutsensaari, J., Sippula, O.,
Tissari, J., Virtanen, A., Zimmermann, R., and Jokiniemi, J.: Effective
Density and Morphology of Particles Emitted from Small-Scale Combustion of
Various Wood Fuels, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 13298–13306, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Liu, F., Wong, C., Snelling, D. R., and Smallwood, G. J.: Investigation of
Absorption and Scattering Properties of Soot Aggregates of Different Fractal
Dimension at 532&thinsp;nm Using RDG and GMM, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 47, 1393–1405,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Maricq, M. M., Podsiadlik, D. H., and Chase, R. E.: Size Distributions of
Motor Vehicle Exhaust PM: A Comparison Between ELPI and SMPS Measurements,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 239–260, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Marlow, W. H., Reist, P. C., and Dwiggins, G. A.: Aspects of the performance
of the electrical aerosol analyzer under nonideal conditions, J. Aerosol
Sci., 7, 457–462, 1976.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>McMurry, P. H., Wang, X., Park, K., and Ehara, K.: The Relationship between
Mass and Mobility for Atmospheric Particles: A New Technique for Measuring
Particle Density, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 36, 227–238, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Myojo, T., Takaya, M., and Ono-Ogasawara, M.: DMA as a Gas Converter from
Aerosol to “Argonsol” for Real-Time Chemical Analysis Using ICP-MS, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 36, 76–83, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Ogren, J. A.: On the operation of the electrical aerosol analyzer at reduced
pressures, J. Aerosol Sci., 11, 427–434, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Park, K., Cao, F., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.: Relationship
between Particle Mass and Mobility for Diesel Exhaust Particles, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 37, 577–583, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Park, K., Kittelson, D., Zachariah, M., and McMurry, P.: Measurement of
Inherent Material Density of Nanoparticle Agglomerates, J. Nanopart. Res., 6,
267–272, 2004a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Park, K., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.: Structural Properties of
Diesel Exhaust Particles Measured by Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM):
Relationships to Particle Mass and Mobility, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38,
881–889, 2004b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Rissler, J., Nordin, E. Z., Eriksson, A. C., Nilsson, P. T., Frosch, M.,
Sporre, M. K., Wierzbicka, A., Svenningsson, B., Löndahl, J., Messing, M.
E., Sjogren, S., Hemmingsen, J. G., Loft, S., Pagels, J. H., and Swietlicki,
E.: Effective Density and Mixing State of Aerosol Particles in a Near-Traffic
Urban Environment, Environ. Sci. Technol., 48, 6300–6308, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Ristimäki, J., Virtanen, A., Marjamäki, M., Rostedt, A., and
Keskinen, J.: On-line measurement of size distribution and effective density
of submicron aerosol particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 33, 1541–1557, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Salma, I., Balásházy, I., Winkler-Heil, R., Hofmann, W., and
Záray, G.: Effect of particle mass size distribution on the deposition of
aerosols in the human respiratory system, J. Aerosol Sci., 33, 119–132,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Scheckman, J. H., McMurry, P. H., and Pratsinis, S. E.: Rapid
Characterization of Agglomerate Aerosols by In Situ Mass-Mobility
Measurements, Langmuir, 25, 8248–8254, 2009.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Schleicher, B., Künzel, S., and Burtscher, H.: Insitu measurement of
size and density of submicron aerosol particles, J. Appl. Phys., 78,
4416–4422, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Schmid, O., Trueblood, M. B., Gregg, N., Hagen, D. E., and Whitefield, P.
D.: Sizing of Aerosol in Gases Other Than Air Using a Differential Mobility
Analyzer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 36, 351–360, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Shi, Y., Ji, Y., Sun, H., Hui, F., Hu, J., Wu, Y., Fang, J., Lin, H., Wang,
J., and Duan, H.: Nanoscale characterization of PM<sub>2.5</sub> airborne
pollutants reveals high adhesiveness and aggregation capability of soot
particles, Sci. Rep.-UK, 5, 1123,2 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep1123</a>,  2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Skillas, G., Künzel, S., Burtscher, H., Baltensperger, U., and Siegmann,
K.: High fractal-like dimension of diesel soot agglomerates, J. Aerosol Sci.,
29, 411–419, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Symonds, J. P. R., Reavell, K. S. J., Olfert, J. S., Campbell, B. W., and
Swift, S. J.: Diesel soot mass calculation in real-time with a differential
mobility spectrometer, J. Aerosol Sci., 38, 52–68, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Tajima, N., Fukushima, N., Ehara, K., and Sakurai, H.: Mass Range and
Optimized Operation of the Aerosol Particle Mass Analyzer, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 45, 196–214, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Tajima, N., Sakurai, H., Fukushima, N., and Ehara, K.: Design Considerations
and Performance Evaluation of a Compact Aerosol Particle Mass Analyzer,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 47, 1152–1162, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Van Gulijk, C., Marijnissen, J. C. M., Makkee, M., Moulijn, J. A., and
Schmidt-Ott, A.: Measuring diesel soot with a scanning mobility particle
sizer and an electrical low-pressure impactor: performance assessment with a
model for fractal-like agglomerates, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 633–655, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Virtanen, A., Ristimäki, J., and Keskinen, J.: Method for Measuring
Effective Density and Fractal Dimension of Aerosol Agglomerates, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 38, 437–446, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
