<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-11-5461-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>First fully diurnal fog and low cloud satellite detection reveals life cycle in the Namib</article-title><alt-title>Fully diurnal FLC detection</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Fully diurnal FLC detection}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{H. Andersen and J. Cermak}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Andersen</surname><given-names>Hendrik</given-names></name>
          <email>hendrik.andersen@kit.edu</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2983-8838</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Cermak</surname><given-names>Jan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4240-595X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Meteorology and Climate Research, Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Institute of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Karlsruhe, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Hendrik Andersen (hendrik.andersen@kit.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>5</day><month>October</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>11</volume>
      <issue>10</issue>
      <fpage>5461</fpage><lpage>5470</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>June</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>10</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/5461/2018/amt-11-5461-2018.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/5461/2018/amt-11-5461-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/5461/2018/amt-11-5461-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/5461/2018/amt-11-5461-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e95">Fog and low clouds (FLCs) are a typical feature along the southwestern African
coast, especially in the central Namib, where fog constitutes a valuable
resource of water for many ecosystems. In this study, a novel algorithm is presented to
detect FLCs over land from geostationary satellite data using only infrared
observations. The algorithm is the first of its kind as it is
stationary in time and thus able to reveal a detailed view of the diurnal
and spatial patterns of FLCs in the Namib region. A validation against net
radiation measurements from a station network in the central Namib reveals a
high overall accuracy with a probability of detection of 94 %, a false-alarm rate of 12 % and an overall correctness of classification of 97 %.
The average timing and persistence of FLCs seem to depend on the distance to
the coast, suggesting that the region is dominated by advection-driven FLCs.
While the algorithm is applied to study Namib-region fog and low clouds, it
is designed to be transferable to other regions and can be used to retrieve
long-term data sets.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e105">Fog is commonly perceived as a hazardous weather situation that can impact
traffic systems as well as the economy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.1"/>. In arid
environments like the Namib desert, fog can act as a critical source of water
that enables life for diverse species and helps to sustain ecosystems
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx37 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx34 bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.2"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. As such, knowledge on the exact
occurrence and spatiotemporal patterns of fog holds potential, ranging from
socioeconomic benefits to a better understanding of fog processes and
fog-driven ecosystems.</p>
      <p id="d1e116">As previous studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.3"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>
have shown, geostationary satellites have the potential to draw a
spatiotemporally coherent picture of the occurrence of fog and low clouds
(FLCs). However, information on FLCs from satellites is typically inferred
using separate daytime <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> and night-time <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.5"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref> algorithms,
disrupting our view of fog development at a critical time of its life cycle,
as typically, shortwave radiative heating starts the dissipation of fog
shortly after sunrise <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx42" id="paren.6"/>. This
break in retrieval techniques has thus limited the applicability of
satellite-based FLC observations for the analysis of entire fog life cycles.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="text.7"/> have developed an approach to continuously monitor fog from
a geostationary satellite platform; however, their algorithm essentially
consisted of three different modes, day, dusk/dawn and night, and cannot be
described as stationary in time. While, for visualization purposes, 24 h
false-color image products may be used in case studies, these images are not
well suited for quantitative analyses. The overarching goal of this study is
thus to develop and validate a single, diurnally stable satellite retrieval
of FLCs over land to enable the exploration of currently untapped potentials
of satellite-based analyses of FLCs.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5462?><p id="d1e140">Past satellite retrieval algorithms of FLCs have typically consisted of a
sequential application of a number of spectral tests on the basis of
individual pixels in the initial classification and a subsequent merging of
FLC pixels to entities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.8"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. Using only
spectral information, FLCs can be detected using a combination of brightness
temperatures in the middle infrared (MIR) and thermal infrared (TIR)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.9"/>. As during daytime, the MIR has a solar
component, separate daytime and night-time retrievals are needed. A stable
and fully diurnal retrieval of FLCs would thus have to solely rely on
observations in the TIR. However, as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.10"/> state, a purely
TIR-based detection of FLCs is not possible, as the brightness temperatures of
FLCs and land surfaces are too similar.</p>
      <p id="d1e154">In the realm of image analysis and machine vision, the spatial context of a
pixel is often exploited for its classification <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.11"/>. In
recent times, the utilization of contextual information has become more
frequent in environmental remote-sensing techniques <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.12"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. For FLCs, distinct spatial patterns that vary over time
are to be expected due to the inversion-limited homogeneous cloud top and the
coherent movement of FLC patches over the Earth surface. The guiding
hypothesis of this study is as follows.</p>
      <p id="d1e166">By a combination of spectral tests and contextual information, FLCs can be
robustly detected using only satellite observations in the thermal infrared
and enable new insights into the diurnal patterns of FLCs and their spatial
variability.</p>
      <p id="d1e169">In this study, FLCs are detected along the southwestern African coast with a
specific focus on the central Namib desert, where fog is an important part of
local ecosystems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.13"/>. Knowledge on the
spatiotemporal occurrence of Namib-region fog is incomplete
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.14"/>, and while it is commonly tied to the quasi-persistent
stratiform clouds in the southeastern Atlantic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.15"/>, the processes that lead to the formation of fog are still
controversially discussed, as recently, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.16"/> found indications of
frequent water from freshwater sources in fog and related this to
radiatively driven fog formation.</p>
      <p id="d1e184">The data used and the novel FLC detection technique are described in Sect. 2, and a statistical evaluation of the algorithm is given in Sect. 3.
Spatiotemporal patterns of fog and low clouds in the Namib are presented in
Sect. 4, and conclusions and an outlook are given in Sect. 5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Data and approach</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Geostationary satellite observations</title>
      <p id="d1e198">The main data basis for this study are observations from the most recent
Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (SEVIRI) on board the Meteosat
Second Generation (MSG, in this case Meteosat 11) satellite platform. While
the SEVIRI instrument's measurements cover a spectral range from 0.6 to
13.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m with 11 channels (plus a high-resolution visible channel),
here, only the calibrated brightness temperatures from four channels in the
TIR are used (8.7, 10.8, 12.0 and 13.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m). The SEVIRI instrument
features a repeat rate of 15 min (96 hemispheric scans per day), at a
spatial resolution of 3 km at nadir <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.17"/>. The data used in
this study cover the period from 2015 to 2017 in the region from
13.5 to 35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and from 10 to 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, considering only regions
over land.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Algorithm design</title>
      <p id="d1e242">The FLC-detection algorithm has two parts: (1) an initial classification and
(2) a contextual plausibility control of detected FLC pixels. The initial
classification of a given scene is designed as a decision tree, with
sequential application of (a) simple spectral thresholds as shown in Table 1
and, (b) if none of the spectral tests are true, the application of a
structural image test. Sequential spectral testing stops once a class is
determined, and the following tests are not carried out. The additional
contextual plausibility control is only tested for FLC pixels. It should be
noted that the algorithm presented here does not differentiate between ground
fog and low-level clouds.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p id="d1e248">The thresholds used for different channels and channel combinations
in this study with the outcome of the initial classification. Threshold
values were determined by systematic visual analysis of SEVIRI scenes and
values found in literature <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.18"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Channel/combination</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Criterion</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Determined class</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12.0–8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High cloud</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12.0–8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Surface</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">12.0–8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Surface</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">276</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High cloud</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">10.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">293</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Surface</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13.4–8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Surface</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">13.4–8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">High cloud</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e484">The discrimination of low-level liquid-water and higher-level ice clouds with
satellite observations is comparatively easy, especially in the Namib region
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.19"/>. In this study, high clouds are identified based on the
brightness temperature at 10.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m as a proxy for cloud-top temperature,
and the difference in 8.7 and 12.0 or 13.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m brightness
temperatures is an indication of ice clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.20"/>. To avoid
subpixel effects of higher-level cloud edges that may lead to false FLC
retrievals, the surrounding pixels of detected high clouds are also
classified as difficult.</p>
      <p id="d1e507">After the identification of high clouds, low clouds and land surfaces need to
be discriminated. As already indicated in the introduction, the separation of
FLCs and land surfaces is much more difficult in the thermal infrared than in
other wavelength regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.21"/>. While land surfaces can be
distinguished from FLCs with the described spectral tests in some regions,
frequently this is not the case (cf. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>). In order to
robustly separate land surfaces from FLCs, additional contextual information
is needed. In this case, the brightness temperature difference between
12.0 and 8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m of each scene is compared to two composites. The
composites are constructed on the basis of long-term 12.0–8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
observations and are intended to represent land-surface structures in
cloud-free conditions. The underlying assumption for the construction of the
composites is that clouds typically have lower values in the channel
difference of 12.0–8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m than land surfaces <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.22"/>.
The two composites are built as follows:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e542">A monthly composite is created by using the monthly maximum
12.0–8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m value at each SEVIRI time slot. Of these 96 monthly
time-slot maxima, the median value is used at each pixel. Monthly composites
comprise seasonal variations in land surface properties but may in some
cases be prone to cloud contamination in cloudy months at cloudy locations.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e553">Thus, an annual composite is constructed by taking the median of all monthly
composites for each pixel. This way, potential local, seasonally occurring
cloud contaminations within the monthly composites can be eliminated.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e557">For the separation of land surfaces and FLCs, each scene
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a) is compared to these composites (e.g.,
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b) by computing a structural similarity index (SSIM
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="altparen.23"/>, Python implementation of scikit-image
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="altparen.24"/>) between the scene and the composites. The SSIM
consists of comparisons of luminance (averages), contrast (standard
deviations of zero-centered anomalies) and structure (correlation of
normalized values) of two images. In the context of this work, the SSIM
compares a moving window of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-pixel image sections of a given scene with
the corresponding image sections of each of the composites
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c). The moving window is optimized to be as small as
possible and still be useful for comparing local structures. A high SSIM (in
this case <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) gives an indication that the pixel is clear as
illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>c. The size of the moving window, as
well as the threshold for the SSIM were optimized empirically. The comparison
of Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>d and e shows the effect of
introducing the SSIM test in the algorithm. It should be noted that the
applicability of the SSIM is only given if (a) the composite is indeed cloud-free and (b) the composite exhibits sufficient spatial heterogeneity in the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pixel window. Consequently, this technique is only applicable over land
and not ocean surfaces (no clear, stable spatial structures in the TIR). To
ensure this, two quality flags are empirically derived from the composites:
pixels are flagged when (a) the coefficient of variation of the 96 monthly
time-slot maxima exceeds 0.3, indicating cloud contamination, and (b) when the
standard deviation within a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pixel window of the monthly composite is
lower than 0.1, indicating insufficient spatial heterogeneity in the specific
window of the composite.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e625"><bold>(a)</bold> An exemplary scene (13 January 2016, 05:00 UTC) in the
channel combination 12.0–8.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m is compared to <bold>(b)</bold> the
monthly composite of January 2016 resulting in <bold>(c)</bold> the structural
similarity of the scene with the composite. <bold>(d)</bold> Illustration of the
classification results relying on spectral tests only and
<bold>(e)</bold> including the SSIM test. Quality flags are not applied in this
example.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/5461/2018/amt-11-5461-2018-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e655">A situation in which this approach may fail is at higher-level cloud edges.
These pixels can be have a similar spectral signature to FLCs and can pass the
SSIM test, as the partly overlying high cloud reduces the similarity with the
composites. To avoid such misclassifications, a contextual plausibility
control of the detected FLC pixels is conducted after the initial
classification. The plausibility of an accurate FLC detection is estimated by
analyzing neighboring pixels. Pixel classifications are changed to
“difficult”, if at least five of their eight directly neighboring pixels
are classified as either high cloud or surface due to the SSIM test. As
changing a pixel classification to the class difficult affects the
result of the plausibility control in the direct pixel neighborhood, the
plausibility control is iteratively repeated for all FLC pixels until no
further changes are possible. After the first iteration, the control
mechanism is changed slightly, so that pixels are classified as
difficult if more than six (instead of five) directly neighboring
pixels are classified as either high cloud, surface due to the SSIM test or
difficult to account for potential control-inherent classification
changes.</p>
      <p id="d1e658">The introduction of the SSIM test leads to relative independence of the
algorithm from strict thresholds for the separation of FLCs and land surfaces.
As the monthly and annual composites used for the SSIM test are directly
derived from the satellite observations, the algorithm self-adjusts to
the specific characteristics of the data, likely leading to a weaker
sensitivity to sensor degradation or platform changes. The technique might
thus hold potential for the observation of climatic changes in FLC
occurrence. The conceptual design of the algorithm is thought to be
applicable to other regions, as long as a valid composite can be constructed
from satellite infrared observations.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page5463?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Validation approach</title>
      <p id="d1e667">For the validation of the satellite-derived FLC product, three years
(2015–2017) of net radiation measurements from FogNet stations in the
central Namib are used. The FogNet station network comprises 11 automated
meteorological stations that are aligned in two transects (N–S from
22.97 to 23.92<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and W–E from
14.46 to 15.31<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) as illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a. The stations were installed as part of the Southern African Science
Service Centre for Climate Change and Adaptive Land Management (SASSCAL)
initiative and offer valuable meteorological measurements in this remote
region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.25"/>. Of the 11 stations, 9 conduct net radiation
measurements every minute using the Kipp &amp; Zonen NR-Lite net radiometer.
Station measurements are averaged between the start of two SEVIRI time slots
to fit its 15 min temporal resolution. The temporal averaging is also
intended to mediate the effects of the different spatial resolutions,
similarly to the approach in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.26"/>, as borders of advective FLCs may be
better captured.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e698"><bold>(a)</bold> Locations of the FogNet stations; definitions of abbreviations
(station names) are listed in the appendix. Red markers indicate the
stations used for validation in this study. <bold>(b)</bold> Exemplary time
series of net radiation measurements at Vogelfederberg (VF). Highlighted in
red are situations for which the satellite algorithm has detected FLCs.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/5461/2018/amt-11-5461-2018-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page5464?><p id="d1e712">For validation purposes night-time (solar zenith angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
measurements of net radiation are used to infer the presence of low-level
clouds at the stations. At night, upwelling thermal radiation typically far
exceeds downwelling radiation in clear conditions, whereas fog or low clouds
increase downwelling radiation, leading to a nearly balanced net radiation at
ground level (only situations with negative net radiation measurements are
used). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b illustrates an exemplary 5-day time series
of net radiation measurements at Vogelfederberg (VF) and the retrieved
occurrence of FLCs from co-located satellite observations. At night, the time
of the FLC occurrence coincides with an abrupt change in net radiation at ground
level, from the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to being nearly
balanced out at 0 W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. As such, the distribution of night-time net
radiation measurements is bound to be bimodal, which is also found in measurements
(cf. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a). Due to the bimodal nature of the net
radiation measurements, a threshold can be defined at the local minimum of
its smoothed histogram (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33 bib1.bibx20" id="altparen.27"/>, Python
implementation of scikit-image <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="altparen.28"/>) of the aggregated
station measurements to separate clear and FLC situations and create a
ground truth data set. It should be noted that the distributions of
clear and FLC situations are not completely separated, and that as such the
validation cannot be expected to be perfect.</p>
      <p id="d1e788">The evaluation of the satellite-derived FLC product was performed using a set
of confusion matrix tests, as is typically done <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx15" id="paren.29"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>. By comparing the binary (FLC yes or no) information from the
satellite product with the ground truth in a 2-by-2 contingency table, each
satellite observation can be identified as either a hit, false alarm, miss or correct negative. The sum of the four equals
the sample size used for the validation. The following statistical measures
are computed to evaluate the FLC product: probability of detection (POD –
fraction of ground truth FLCs that are correctly detected), percent correct (PC
– fraction of overall correct classifications), false-alarm rate<?pagebreak page5465?> (FAR –
fraction of detected FLCs that are false alarms), bias score (BS – measure of
bias in the classification, overestimation: BS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1, underestimation: BS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1),
critical success index (CSI – overall measure of the correctness), and the
Heidke skill score (HSS – fractional improvement of the classification over a
random classification). The equations for the statistical evaluation measures
are given in the appendix.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Validation of the algorithm</title>
      <p id="d1e817">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a summarizes validation results qualitatively
and quantitatively. The red histogram line shows the bimodal distribution of
the aggregated night-time net radiation measurements at the nine FogNet
stations for the period of 2015–2017 (excluding high cloud and
difficult observations), whereas the blue line represents the same
station measurements, filtered for satellite-detected FLC situations. High
clouds and difficult situations (grey line) are excluded from the
validation as they cannot be clearly separated from clear or FLC
situations with surface net radiation measurements. It is apparent that most
of the ground-truth FLC situations are captured by the satellite product (POD
of 0.94), with only a few false alarms (FAR of 0.12). The product features a
high accuracy (PC of 0.97) with only a marginal positive bias (BS of 1.01).
This leads to an overall high quality of the classification as expressed by a
CSI of 0.83 and a HSS of 0.89. All in all, the validation is based on 325 836
co-located observations. As illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b,
there is relatively little variation in the validation results between the
different FogNet stations. The most inland station Garnet Koppie (GK) accounts
for all outliers in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b and has the highest false-alarm rate. Here, FLC occurrence frequency is thus overestimated, leading to
lower overall skill. This can be attributed to the rarity of the FLC occurrence
in this region (cf. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a), where a single, random
misclassification has a higher relative impact. The overall accuracy of the
product is considerably higher than current state-of-the-art algorithms for
Europe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx30" id="paren.30"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, probably in part due
to the more complex and diverse terrain and cloud structures that have to be
discriminated there, and comparable to the SEVIRI-based FLC product for this
region by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.31"/>. However, the algorithm in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.32"/> is
tailored to two specific times of the day and includes satellite observations
in the visible and near-infrared spectrum. These comparisons with validation
results from other studies are of an indicative nature, as differences
could also be caused by the reference data used as ground truth or different
periods considered.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e842"><bold>(a)</bold> The aggregated validation of the satellite-derived FLC
product at all stations of the time period of 2015–2017, <bold>(b)</bold> the
variability of validation measures across the used FogNet stations. The
median is represented in boxes by the red horizontal line; the boxes show the
interquartile range, the whiskers expand the boxes by up to 1.5 interquartile
ranges. The station GK accounts for all outliers.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/5461/2018/amt-11-5461-2018-f03.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e856">It should be noted that the comparison of station-level net radiation
measurements with a binary satellite product is certainly not perfect. Two
potential sources of error may specifically affect the validation results:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e861">A large difference in spatial resolution of the two observations exists.
While station measurements are temporally averaged with the intent of
approximating spatial variation within the area covered by a SEVIRI pixel
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.33"><named-content content-type="pre">as in</named-content></xref>, the difference in field of view cannot be
neglected. The difference in spatial resolution is expected to randomly lead
to erroneous comparisons in both ways and thus not markedly affect the
validation results. This may explain the overestimation of the FLC occurrence
frequency at GK, as the effect of this small random error on the validation
measures scales inversely with FLC occurrence.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e870">Net radiation measurements are binarized in order to create a “ground
truth”, even though the two modes of the distribution are not perfectly
separated. For measurements close to the threshold value, an accurate
discrimination of “FLC” and “not FLC” is not possible. This is likely
to artificially impair validation results and is manifested in a higher
frequency of false alarms and misses for situations for which net radiation
measurements are close to the threshold value.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e873">In addition to the validation described here, considerable effort has gone
into the systematic evaluation of classifications of individual scenes as
illustrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. In light of these arguments, the
validation results give confidence in the skill of the novel algorithm and
the derived FLC product, which is well suited for the purpose of
characterizing the spatial and temporal patterns of FLCs in the Namib desert.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Spatiotemporal patterns of fog and low clouds in the Namib</title>
      <p id="d1e884">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a shows the average FLC occurrence frequency in the
study area over the study period. FLCs most frequently occur in the plane
regions along the coastline (cf. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>c). Three core
regions of the FLC occurrence can be identified in the Angolan parts of the Namib
at around 16–17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, in a region stretching from Walvis Bay at
23<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S northwards to about 18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and at Alexander Bay at around
28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. The patterns closely resemble those found by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.34"/>
and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.35"/> qualitatively and quantitatively. As illustrated by
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b, in some regions a reliable retrieval of FLCs is
often not possible. This can be related to frequent occurrences of high
clouds in the tropical northern parts of the study area, too little spatial
variance in the clear-sky composites, e.g., in the region of the Etendeka
flood basalts at 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and 14<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.36"/>, or where the
monthly composites were not stationary in time in some northeastern parts of
the study area.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e960"><bold>(a)</bold> Average relative frequency of occurrence of FLCs along
the southwestern African coast during the period 2015–2017.
<bold>(b)</bold> Number of observations where the retrieval of FLCs is possible
(i.e., no high clouds and no composite-related quality flags).
<bold>(c)</bold> Digital elevation model of the study area.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/5461/2018/amt-11-5461-2018-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e977">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> illustrates the average diurnal cycle of FLCs
at all FogNet stations as retrieved from the satellite. It is apparent that at
stations close to the coast (purple-blue lines), FLCs occur much more
frequently than further inland. The general diurnal behavior of FLCs is
similar at all stations, with a distinct peak of the FLC occurrence at night
between<?pagebreak page5466?> 03:30 UTC with 9 % relative occurrence frequency of FLCs at Garnet
Koppie (GK) and 06:15 UTC with 64 % at SW, and typically a fairly fast
dissipation shortly after sunrise. However, distinct features of the diurnal
cycle of FLCs can be identified at some stations. At the station Saltworks
(SW), located directly at the coastline (cf. Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>), FLCs
tend to start to occur in the early afternoon, several hours before other
stations are overcast. This could potentially be related to local land–sea
winds that transport FLCs from the ocean over land during this time. In
general, a time lag exists at the average start of the diurnal cycle, as well
as in the time of the diurnal maximum occurrence frequency that seems to be
dependent on the longitudinal position of the stations, which approximates
their distance to the coastline. This time lag is indicative of a region that
is generally dominated by FLCs that form at the coast or over the ocean and
is then advected inland, as described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="text.37"/>,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.38"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.39"/>, contrasting more recent findings
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.40"/>. As FLCs are advected inland, locations close to the
coastline are overcast first. At the coast, FLCs not only occur earlier in
the day but typically also persists longer than further inland, where FLCs
tend to start dissipating before sunrise. The dissipation rate (negative
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> FLS occurrence <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> time in the morning hours) at inland
stations is considerably lower than closer to the coast, which can probably
be attributed to stronger solar irradiance later in the day. It should be
noted that the figure represents highly aggregated information on the average
diurnal cycle of FLCs and does not preclude other formation or dissipation
processes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e1021">Average diurnal cycle of the FLC occurrence at FogNet stations. Lines
are colored by the longitudinal rank of each specific station, with coastal
stations in dark colors and stations further inland in brighter colors. Every
other line is dashed with the only purpose of helping their visual
discrimination.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/11/5461/2018/amt-11-5461-2018-f05.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1030">As a detailed statistical analysis of the full life cycle of FLCs and their
seasonal behavior is not within the scope of this paper, this example is
intended to illustrate the potential of the novel algorithm for the analysis
of spatiotemporal patterns of fog and low clouds over land.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page5467?><sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions and outlook</title>
      <p id="d1e1040">The central aim of this study was to develop the first thermal-infrared-only
and thereby diurnally stable satellite retrieval of fog and low clouds. The
algorithm design uses a combination of spectral tests and contextual
information in order to retrieve FLCs. A structural similarity index
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.41"/> is computed, comparing each satellite scene with cloud-free
composites to discriminate between land surfaces and FLCs. The novel algorithm
is thereby relatively independent from exact spectral thresholds and thus has
the potential to be easily applied to other regions and to generate climate
data sets. An operational deployment is possible with small adjustments in
algorithm design and holds potential for the prediction of FLC dissipation.
In the future, the value of the derived FLC product may be further enhanced
with a retrieval of cloud-base altitudes for the separation of low-level
clouds from ground fog.</p>
      <p id="d1e1046">The algorithm was applied to detect spatial and temporal patterns of
Namib-region FLCs and was validated against net radiation measurements at the
FogNet station network located in the central Namib region. The algorithm
shows good overall detection accuracy, with a few false alarms and a small
positive bias, and relatively little station-to-station variation. FLCs most
frequently occur close to the southwestern African coastline, with Walvis Bay
among the core regions, confirming findings from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="text.42"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.43"/>. The diurnal cycle of FLCs is described for the locations
of the FogNet stations. Marked differences in the timing of the FLC occurrence
and temporal persistence are found. The time lag of the FLC occurrence from the
coast to inland regions may be attributed to the advection of FLCs from the
coast inland, a typical feature of the region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx31" id="paren.44"/>. FLCs persist longer in coastal regions than further inland and
but then dissipates more rapidly after sunrise.</p>
      <p id="d1e1058">The study shows the potential of the diurnal FLC algorithm to study fog and
low-cloud patterns, processes and life cycles. Future research efforts should
focus on coherently mapping diurnal characteristics of FLCs; further
understanding fog formation processes, specifically considering knowledge on
the factors that drive low-level clouds in the southeastern Atlantic
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.45"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.,</named-content></xref>, and
potentially detecting changes in FLC occurrence. This may best be achieved by
combining the satellite retrievals with numerical modeling and ground-based
observations, and will be undertaken within the ongoing research project
Namib Fog Life Cycle Analysis (NaFoLiCA).</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability">

      <p id="d1e1070">Code and data are available on request.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><app-group>

<?pagebreak page5468?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>Equations of statistical validation measures</title>
      <p id="d1e1082"><disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math id="M49" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">POD</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PC</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FAR</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CSI</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BS</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HSS</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of hits, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of false alarms, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of misses and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of
correct negatives.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <title>Abbreviations of FogNet stations</title>
      <p id="d1e1331"><table-wrap id="Taba" position="anchor"><oasis:table><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><bold>Definition</bold></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><bold>Abbreviation</bold></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Aussinanis</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AU</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coastal Met</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CM</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Conception Water</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Garnet Koppie</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GK</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Gobabeb Met</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GB</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kleinberg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">KB</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Marble Koppie</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MK</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Saltworks</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sophies Hoogte</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SH</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station 8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">S8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vogelfederberg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">VF</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap></p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e1461">HA had the conceptual idea
for the algorithm, developed the method and wrote the software, obtained and
analyzed the data sets, conducted the original research and wrote the
manuscript. JC contributed to method design, manuscript preparation
and the interpretation of findings.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e1467">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e1473">This article is part of the special issue “New observations and
related modeling studies of the aerosol-cloud-climate system in the
southeastern Atlantic and southern Africa regions (ACP/AMT inter-journal SI)”.
It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1479">Funding for this study was provided by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)
in the project Namib Fog Life Cycle Analysis (NaFoLiCA), CE 163/7-1. The
authors would like to thank the Gobabeb Research and Training Centre for
access to the station measurements and gratefully acknowledge the Gobabeb
maintenance team, Folke Olesen and Frank Göttsche for their efforts in the
field. We thank Roland Vogt (University of Basel) for providing the FogNet
data and Mary Seely for her contributions in the development of FogNet. The
authors also thank Julia Fuchs, Frank Göttsche, Folke Olesen, Roland
Stirnberg and Roland Vogt for helpful discussions, as well as two anonymous
reviewers for their valuable comments.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
The article processing charges for this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication  were covered by a Research <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Centre of the Helmholtz Association.
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: Joshua Schwarz<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Adebiyi et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Adebiyi, A. A., Zuidema, P., and Sciences, A.: Low cloud cover sensitivity to
biomass-burning aerosols and meteorology over the southeast Atlantic,
J. Climate, 2, 4329–4346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0406.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0406.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Andersen and Cermak(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Andersen, H. and Cermak, J.: How thermodynamic environments control
stratocumulus microphysics and interactions with aerosols, Environ.
Res. Lett., 10, 24004, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/024004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/024004</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Andersen et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Andersen, H., Cermak, J., Fuchs, J., Knutti, R., and Lohmann, U.:
Understanding the drivers of marine liquid-water cloud occurrence and
properties with global observations using neural networks, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 17, 9535–9546, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9535-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-9535-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Az{\'{u}}a-Bustos et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Azúa-Bustos et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Azúa-Bustos, A., González-Silva, C., Mancilla, R. A., Salas, L.,
Gómez-Silva, B., McKay, C. P., and Vicuña, R.: Hypolithic
Cyanobacteria Supported Mainly by Fog in the Coastal Range of the Atacama
Desert, Microb. Ecol., 61, 568–581, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9784-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00248-010-9784-5</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Bauer et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Bauer, K., Neben, S., Schreckenberger, B., Emmermann, R., Hinz, K., Fechner,
N., Gohl, K., Schulze, A., Trumbull, R. B., and Weber, K.: Deep structure of
the Namibia continental margin as derived from integrated geophysical
studies, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 25829,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900227" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JB900227</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bendix et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Bendix, J., Thies, B., Nauß, T., and Cermak, J.: A feasibility study of
daytime fog and low stratus detection with TERRA/AQUA-MODIS over land,
Meteorol. Appl., 13, 111, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482706002180" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/S1350482706002180</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Bian et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Bian, J., Li, A., Liu, Q., and Huang, C.: Cloud and snow discrimination for
CCD images of HJ-1A/B constellation based on spectral signature and
spatio-temporal context, Remote Sensing, 8, 31, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8010031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs8010031</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Cermak(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Cermak, J.: Low clouds and fog along the South-Western African coast –
Satellite-based retrieval and spatial patterns, Atmos. Res., 116,
15–21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.02.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.02.012</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Cermak and Bendix(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Cermak, J. and Bendix, J.: Dynamical Nighttime Fog/Low Stratus Detection Based
on Meteosat SEVIRI Data: A Feasibility Study, Pure  Appl. Geophys.,
164, 1179–1192, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-007-0213-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00024-007-0213-8</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Cermak and Bendix(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Cermak, J. and Bendix, J.: A novel approach to fog/low stratus detection using
Meteosat 8 data, Atmos. Res., 87, 279–292,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.11.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.11.009</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Cermak and Bendix(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Cermak, J. and Bendix, J.: Detecting ground fog from space – a
microphysics-based approach, Int. J. Remote Sens., 32,
3345–3371, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161003747505" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431161003747505</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Cermak and Knutti(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Cermak, J. and Knutti, R.: Beijing Olympics as an Aerosol Field Experiment,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L10806, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038572" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009GL038572</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Ebner et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Ebner, M., Miranda, T., and Roth-Nebelsick, A.: Efficient fog harvesting by
Stipagrostis sabulicola (Namib dune bushman grass), J. Arid Environ., 75, 524–531, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.01.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.01.004</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Eckardt et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Eckardt, F., Soderberg, K., Coop, L., Muller, A., Vickery, K., Grandin, R.,
Jack, C., Kapalanga, T., and Henschel, J.: The nature of moisture at
Gobabeb, in the central Namib Desert, J. Arid Environ., 93,
7–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.01.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.01.011</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Egli et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Egli, S., Thies, B., Drönner, J., Cermak, J., and Bendix, J.: A 10 year
fog and low stratus climatology for Europe based on Meteosat Second
Generation data, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143,
530–541, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2941" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.2941</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Egli et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Egli, S., Thies, B., and Bendix, J.: A Hybrid Approach for Fog Retrieval Based
on a Combination of Satellite and Ground Truth Data, Remote Sensing, 10, 628,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040628" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs10040628</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Ellrod(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Ellrod, G. P.: Advances in the Detection and Analysis of Fog at Night Using
GOES Multispectral Infrared Imagery, Weather Forecast., 10, 606–619,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1995)010&lt;0606:AITDAA&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0434(1995)010&lt;0606:AITDAA&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Fuchs et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Fuchs, J., Cermak, J., Andersen, H., Hollmann, R., and Schwarz, K.: On the
Influence of Air Mass Origin on Low-Cloud Properties in the Southeast
Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 11076–11091,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027184" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD027184</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5470?><ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Fuchs et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Fuchs, J., Cermak, J., and Andersen, H.: Building a cloud in the Southeast
Atlantic: Understanding low-cloud controls based on satellite observations
with machine learning, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-593" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2018-593</ext-link>, in review, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Glasbey(1993)</label><mixed-citation>Glasbey, C. A.: An Analysis of Histogram-Based Thresholding Algorithms,
CVGIP-Graph. Model. Im., 55, 532–537,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1006/cgip.1993.1040" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1006/cgip.1993.1040</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Guls and Bendix(1996)</label><mixed-citation>Guls, I. and Bendix, J.: Fog detection and fog mapping using low cost
Meteosat-WEFAX transmission, Meteorol. Appl., 3, 179–187,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/met.5060030208" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/met.5060030208</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Haeffelin et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Haeffelin, M., Bergot, T., Elias, T., Tardif, R., Carrer, D., Chazette, P.,
Colomb, M., Drobinski, P., Dupont, E., Dupont, J. C., Gomes, L.,
Musson-Genon, L., Pietras, C., Plana-Fattori, A., Protat, A., Rangognio, J.,
Raut, J. C., Rémy, S., Richard, D., Sciare, J., and Zhang, X.:
PARISFOG: Shedding new light on fog physical processes, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 767–783, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2671.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009BAMS2671.1</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Henschel and Seely(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Henschel, J. and Seely, M.: Ecophysiology of atmospheric moisture in the Namib
Desert, Atmos. Res., 87, 362–368,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.11.015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.11.015</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Kaseke et al.(2017a)</label><mixed-citation>Kaseke, K. F., Tian, C., Wang, L., Seely, M., Vogt, R., Wassenaar, T., and
Mushi, R.: Fog Spatial Distributions over the Central Namib Desert – An
Isotope Approach, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 18,  1–13,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.01.0062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2017.01.0062</ext-link>,
2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Kaseke et al.(2017b)</label><mixed-citation>Kaseke, K. F., Wang, L., and Seely, M. K.: Nonrainfall water origins and
formation mechanisms, Sci. Adv., 3, e1603131,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1603131" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/sciadv.1603131</ext-link>,
2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Kim et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Kim, M., Lee, J., and Im, J.: Deep learning-based monitoring of overshooting
cloud tops from geostationary satellite data, Gisci. Remote Sens.,
55, 1–30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2018.1457201" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/15481603.2018.1457201</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Lancaster et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Lancaster, J., Lancaster, N., and Seely, M. K.: Climate of the central Namib
desert, Madoqua, 14, 5–61, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Lee et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Lee, J. R., Chung, C. Y., and Ou, M. L.: Fog detection using geostationary
satellite data: Temporally continuous algorithm, Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 113–122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-011-0002-2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13143-011-0002-2</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>McHugh et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>McHugh, T. A., Morrissey, E. M., Reed, S. C., Hungate, B. A., and Schwartz, E.:
Water from air: An overlooked source of moisture in arid and semiarid
regions, Sci. Rep., 5, 1–6, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13767" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep13767</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Nilo et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Nilo, S., Romano, F., Cermak, J., Cimini, D., Ricciardelli, E., Cersosimo, A.,
Di Paola, F., Gallucci, D., Gentile, S., Geraldi, E., Larosa, S., Ripepi,
E., and Viggiano, M.: Fog Detection Based on Meteosat Second
Generation-Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager High Resolution
Visible Channel, Remote Sensing, 10, 541, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs10040541</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Olivier(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Olivier, J.: Spatial distribution of fog in the Namib, J. Arid
Environ., 29, 129–138, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(05)80084-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0140-1963(05)80084-9</ext-link>,
1995.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Olivier and Stockton(1989)</label><mixed-citation>Olivier, J. and Stockton, P. L.: The influence of upwelling extent upon fog
incidence at Lüderitz, southern Africa, Int.
J. Climatol., 9, 69–75, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370090106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/joc.3370090106</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Prewitt and Mendelsohn(1966)</label><mixed-citation>Prewitt, J. M. S. and Mendelsohn, M. L.: The Analysis of Cell Images*, Ann.
NY Acad. Sci., 128, 1035–1053,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb11715.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb11715.x</ext-link>,
1966.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Roth-Nebelsick et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Roth-Nebelsick, A., Ebner, M., Miranda, T., Gottschalk, V., Voigt, D., Gorb,
S., Stegmaier, T., Sarsour, J., Linke, M., and Konrad, W.: Leaf surface
structures enable the endemic Namib desert grass Stipagrostis sabulicola to
irrigate itself with fog water, J. R. Soc. Interface, 9, 1965–74, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0847" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsif.2011.0847</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Schmetz et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Schmetz, J., Pili, P., Tjemkes, S., Just, D., Kerkmann, J., Rota, S., and
Ratier, A.: An Introduction to Meteosat Second Generation (MSG), B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 977–992,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083&lt;0977:AITMSG&gt;2.3.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083&lt;0977:AITMSG&gt;2.3.CO;2</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Seely(1979)</label><mixed-citation>Seely, M. K.: Irregular fog as a water source for desert dune beetles,
Oecologia, 42, 213–227, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344858" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/BF00344858</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Shanyengana(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Shanyengana, E.: Exploring fog as a supplementary water source in Namibia,
Atmos. Res., 64, 251–259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(02)00096-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0169-8095(02)00096-0</ext-link>,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Strabala et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>Strabala, K. I., Ackerman, S. A., and Menzel, W. P.: Cloud Properties inferred
from 8–12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m Data, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 33, 212–229, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033&lt;0212:CPIFD&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033&lt;0212:CPIFD&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,
1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Tardif and Rasmussen(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Tardif, R. and Rasmussen, R. M.: Event-based climatology and typology of fog
in the New York City region, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol.,
46, 1141–1168, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2516.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAM2516.1</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Toussaint(1978)</label><mixed-citation>Toussaint, G. T.: The use of context in pattern recognition, Pattern
Recogn., 10, 189–204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(78)90027-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0031-3203(78)90027-4</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>van der Walt et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>van der Walt, S., Schönberger, J. L., Nunez-Iglesias, J., Boulogne, F.,
Warner, J. D., Yager, N., Gouillart, E., and Yu, T.: scikit-image: image
processing in Python, PeerJ, 2, e453, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.453" ext-link-type="DOI">10.7717/peerj.453</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{W{\ae}rsted et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Wærsted et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>Wærsted, E. G., Haeffelin, M., Dupont, J.-C., Delanoë, J., and
Dubuisson, P.: Radiation in fog: quantification of the impact on fog liquid
water based on ground-based remote sensing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
10811–10835, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10811-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-10811-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Wang et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., and Simoncelli, E. P.: Wavelets for
Image Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural
similarity, IEEE T. Image Process., 13, 600–612,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TIP.2003.819861</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Zhu and Woodcock(2012)</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, Z. and Woodcock, C. E.: Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in
Landsat imagery, Remote Sens. Environ., 118, 83–94,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.028</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>First fully diurnal fog and low cloud satellite detection reveals life cycle in the Namib</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Fog and low clouds (FLCs) are a typical feature along the southwestern African
coast, especially in the central Namib, where fog constitutes a valuable
resource of water for many ecosystems. In this study, a novel algorithm is presented to
detect FLCs over land from geostationary satellite data using only infrared
observations. The algorithm is the first of its kind as it is
stationary in time and thus able to reveal a detailed view of the diurnal
and spatial patterns of FLCs in the Namib region. A validation against net
radiation measurements from a station network in the central Namib reveals a
high overall accuracy with a probability of detection of 94&thinsp;%, a false-alarm rate of 12&thinsp;% and an overall correctness of classification of 97&thinsp;%.
The average timing and persistence of FLCs seem to depend on the distance to
the coast, suggesting that the region is dominated by advection-driven FLCs.
While the algorithm is applied to study Namib-region fog and low clouds, it
is designed to be transferable to other regions and can be used to retrieve
long-term data sets.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Adebiyi et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Adebiyi, A. A., Zuidema, P., and Sciences, A.: Low cloud cover sensitivity to
biomass-burning aerosols and meteorology over the southeast Atlantic,
J. Climate, 2, 4329–4346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0406.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-17-0406.1</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Andersen and Cermak(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Andersen, H. and Cermak, J.: How thermodynamic environments control
stratocumulus microphysics and interactions with aerosols, Environ.
Res. Lett., 10, 24004, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/024004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/2/024004</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Andersen et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Andersen, H., Cermak, J., Fuchs, J., Knutti, R., and Lohmann, U.:
Understanding the drivers of marine liquid-water cloud occurrence and
properties with global observations using neural networks, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 17, 9535–9546, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9535-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9535-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Azúa-Bustos et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Azúa-Bustos, A., González-Silva, C., Mancilla, R. A., Salas, L.,
Gómez-Silva, B., McKay, C. P., and Vicuña, R.: Hypolithic
Cyanobacteria Supported Mainly by Fog in the Coastal Range of the Atacama
Desert, Microb. Ecol., 61, 568–581, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9784-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-010-9784-5</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Bauer et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Bauer, K., Neben, S., Schreckenberger, B., Emmermann, R., Hinz, K., Fechner,
N., Gohl, K., Schulze, A., Trumbull, R. B., and Weber, K.: Deep structure of
the Namibia continental margin as derived from integrated geophysical
studies, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 25829,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900227" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JB900227</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Bendix et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Bendix, J., Thies, B., Nauß, T., and Cermak, J.: A feasibility study of
daytime fog and low stratus detection with TERRA/AQUA-MODIS over land,
Meteorol. Appl., 13, 111, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482706002180" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/S1350482706002180</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bian et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Bian, J., Li, A., Liu, Q., and Huang, C.: Cloud and snow discrimination for
CCD images of HJ-1A/B constellation based on spectral signature and
spatio-temporal context, Remote Sensing, 8, 31, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8010031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8010031</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Cermak(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Cermak, J.: Low clouds and fog along the South-Western African coast –
Satellite-based retrieval and spatial patterns, Atmos. Res., 116,
15–21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.02.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.02.012</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Cermak and Bendix(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Cermak, J. and Bendix, J.: Dynamical Nighttime Fog/Low Stratus Detection Based
on Meteosat SEVIRI Data: A Feasibility Study, Pure  Appl. Geophys.,
164, 1179–1192, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-007-0213-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-007-0213-8</a>,
2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Cermak and Bendix(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Cermak, J. and Bendix, J.: A novel approach to fog/low stratus detection using
Meteosat 8 data, Atmos. Res., 87, 279–292,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.11.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.11.009</a>,
2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Cermak and Bendix(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Cermak, J. and Bendix, J.: Detecting ground fog from space – a
microphysics-based approach, Int. J. Remote Sens., 32,
3345–3371, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161003747505" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161003747505</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Cermak and Knutti(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Cermak, J. and Knutti, R.: Beijing Olympics as an Aerosol Field Experiment,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L10806, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038572" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL038572</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Ebner et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Ebner, M., Miranda, T., and Roth-Nebelsick, A.: Efficient fog harvesting by
Stipagrostis sabulicola (Namib dune bushman grass), J. Arid Environ., 75, 524–531, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.01.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2011.01.004</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Eckardt et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Eckardt, F., Soderberg, K., Coop, L., Muller, A., Vickery, K., Grandin, R.,
Jack, C., Kapalanga, T., and Henschel, J.: The nature of moisture at
Gobabeb, in the central Namib Desert, J. Arid Environ., 93,
7–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.01.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2012.01.011</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Egli et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Egli, S., Thies, B., Drönner, J., Cermak, J., and Bendix, J.: A 10 year
fog and low stratus climatology for Europe based on Meteosat Second
Generation data, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 143,
530–541, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2941" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2941</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Egli et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Egli, S., Thies, B., and Bendix, J.: A Hybrid Approach for Fog Retrieval Based
on a Combination of Satellite and Ground Truth Data, Remote Sensing, 10, 628,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040628" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040628</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Ellrod(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Ellrod, G. P.: Advances in the Detection and Analysis of Fog at Night Using
GOES Multispectral Infrared Imagery, Weather Forecast., 10, 606–619,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1995)010&lt;0606:AITDAA&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1995)010&lt;0606:AITDAA&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Fuchs et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Fuchs, J., Cermak, J., Andersen, H., Hollmann, R., and Schwarz, K.: On the
Influence of Air Mass Origin on Low-Cloud Properties in the Southeast
Atlantic, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 11076–11091,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027184" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD027184</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Fuchs et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Fuchs, J., Cermak, J., and Andersen, H.: Building a cloud in the Southeast
Atlantic: Understanding low-cloud controls based on satellite observations
with machine learning, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-593" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2018-593</a>, in review, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Glasbey(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Glasbey, C. A.: An Analysis of Histogram-Based Thresholding Algorithms,
CVGIP-Graph. Model. Im., 55, 532–537,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1006/cgip.1993.1040" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1006/cgip.1993.1040</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Guls and Bendix(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Guls, I. and Bendix, J.: Fog detection and fog mapping using low cost
Meteosat-WEFAX transmission, Meteorol. Appl., 3, 179–187,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/met.5060030208" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/met.5060030208</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Haeffelin et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Haeffelin, M., Bergot, T., Elias, T., Tardif, R., Carrer, D., Chazette, P.,
Colomb, M., Drobinski, P., Dupont, E., Dupont, J. C., Gomes, L.,
Musson-Genon, L., Pietras, C., Plana-Fattori, A., Protat, A., Rangognio, J.,
Raut, J. C., Rémy, S., Richard, D., Sciare, J., and Zhang, X.:
PARISFOG: Shedding new light on fog physical processes, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 767–783, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2671.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009BAMS2671.1</a>,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Henschel and Seely(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Henschel, J. and Seely, M.: Ecophysiology of atmospheric moisture in the Namib
Desert, Atmos. Res., 87, 362–368,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.11.015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2007.11.015</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Kaseke et al.(2017a)</label><mixed-citation>
Kaseke, K. F., Tian, C., Wang, L., Seely, M., Vogt, R., Wassenaar, T., and
Mushi, R.: Fog Spatial Distributions over the Central Namib Desert – An
Isotope Approach, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 18,  1–13,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.01.0062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2017.01.0062</a>,
2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Kaseke et al.(2017b)</label><mixed-citation>
Kaseke, K. F., Wang, L., and Seely, M. K.: Nonrainfall water origins and
formation mechanisms, Sci. Adv., 3, e1603131,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1603131" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1603131</a>,
2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Kim et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, M., Lee, J., and Im, J.: Deep learning-based monitoring of overshooting
cloud tops from geostationary satellite data, Gisci. Remote Sens.,
55, 1–30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2018.1457201" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2018.1457201</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Lancaster et al.(1984)</label><mixed-citation>
Lancaster, J., Lancaster, N., and Seely, M. K.: Climate of the central Namib
desert, Madoqua, 14, 5–61, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Lee et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, J. R., Chung, C. Y., and Ou, M. L.: Fog detection using geostationary
satellite data: Temporally continuous algorithm, Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci., 47, 113–122, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-011-0002-2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-011-0002-2</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>McHugh et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
McHugh, T. A., Morrissey, E. M., Reed, S. C., Hungate, B. A., and Schwartz, E.:
Water from air: An overlooked source of moisture in arid and semiarid
regions, Sci. Rep., 5, 1–6, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13767" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13767</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Nilo et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Nilo, S., Romano, F., Cermak, J., Cimini, D., Ricciardelli, E., Cersosimo, A.,
Di Paola, F., Gallucci, D., Gentile, S., Geraldi, E., Larosa, S., Ripepi,
E., and Viggiano, M.: Fog Detection Based on Meteosat Second
Generation-Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager High Resolution
Visible Channel, Remote Sensing, 10, 541, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040541" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040541</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Olivier(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Olivier, J.: Spatial distribution of fog in the Namib, J. Arid
Environ., 29, 129–138, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(05)80084-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(05)80084-9</a>,
1995.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Olivier and Stockton(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Olivier, J. and Stockton, P. L.: The influence of upwelling extent upon fog
incidence at Lüderitz, southern Africa, Int.
J. Climatol., 9, 69–75, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370090106" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3370090106</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Prewitt and Mendelsohn(1966)</label><mixed-citation>
Prewitt, J. M. S. and Mendelsohn, M. L.: The Analysis of Cell Images*, Ann.
NY Acad. Sci., 128, 1035–1053,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb11715.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1965.tb11715.x</a>,
1966.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Roth-Nebelsick et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Roth-Nebelsick, A., Ebner, M., Miranda, T., Gottschalk, V., Voigt, D., Gorb,
S., Stegmaier, T., Sarsour, J., Linke, M., and Konrad, W.: Leaf surface
structures enable the endemic Namib desert grass Stipagrostis sabulicola to
irrigate itself with fog water, J. R. Soc. Interface, 9, 1965–74, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0847" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2011.0847</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Schmetz et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Schmetz, J., Pili, P., Tjemkes, S., Just, D., Kerkmann, J., Rota, S., and
Ratier, A.: An Introduction to Meteosat Second Generation (MSG), B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 977–992,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083&lt;0977:AITMSG&gt;2.3.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(2002)083&lt;0977:AITMSG&gt;2.3.CO;2</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Seely(1979)</label><mixed-citation>
Seely, M. K.: Irregular fog as a water source for desert dune beetles,
Oecologia, 42, 213–227, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344858" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00344858</a>, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Shanyengana(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Shanyengana, E.: Exploring fog as a supplementary water source in Namibia,
Atmos. Res., 64, 251–259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(02)00096-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-8095(02)00096-0</a>,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Strabala et al.(1994)</label><mixed-citation>
Strabala, K. I., Ackerman, S. A., and Menzel, W. P.: Cloud Properties inferred
from 8–12&thinsp;µm Data, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol., 33, 212–229, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033&lt;0212:CPIFD&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1994)033&lt;0212:CPIFD&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>,
1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Tardif and Rasmussen(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Tardif, R. and Rasmussen, R. M.: Event-based climatology and typology of fog
in the New York City region, J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol.,
46, 1141–1168, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2516.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2516.1</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Toussaint(1978)</label><mixed-citation>
Toussaint, G. T.: The use of context in pattern recognition, Pattern
Recogn., 10, 189–204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(78)90027-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(78)90027-4</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>van der Walt et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
van der Walt, S., Schönberger, J. L., Nunez-Iglesias, J., Boulogne, F.,
Warner, J. D., Yager, N., Gouillart, E., and Yu, T.: scikit-image: image
processing in Python, PeerJ, 2, e453, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.453" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.453</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Wærsted et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Wærsted, E. G., Haeffelin, M., Dupont, J.-C., Delanoë, J., and
Dubuisson, P.: Radiation in fog: quantification of the impact on fog liquid
water based on ground-based remote sensing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
10811–10835, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10811-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10811-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Wang et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., and Simoncelli, E. P.: Wavelets for
Image Image quality assessment: From error visibility to structural
similarity, IEEE T. Image Process., 13, 600–612,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TIP.2003.819861</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Zhu and Woodcock(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, Z. and Woodcock, C. E.: Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in
Landsat imagery, Remote Sens. Environ., 118, 83–94,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.028</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
