A new method for size-resolved chemical analysis of nucleation
mode aerosol particles (size range from
Aerosol particles play an important role in the earth's climate. They influence the radiative budget directly by scattering and absorbing solar radiation, and indirectly by changing cloud properties such as albedo and lifetime. In climate models, these interactions are still the largest source of uncertainty (Core Writing Team et al., 2007; Fuzzi et al., 2015). Aerosol particles also affect air quality and human health. Depending on their size and shape, they can protrude deep into the lungs (Kreyling et al., 2006) and even enter the bloodstream (Nel, 2005), causing problems such as ischemic stroke (Wellenius et al., 2012), premature mortality (Lelieveld et al., 2015) and many others (e.g., Pope and Dockery, 2006; Donaldson and Borm, 2006).
A large fraction of atmospheric aerosol particles originates from new
particle formation (Merikanto et al., 2009; Dunne et al., 2016). Several
major formation mechanisms have already been subject of intense research
(Hallquist et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2012; Kulmala et al., 2014; Kirkby et
al., 2016), yet various reaction pathways and processes remain unknown. The
newly formed particles need to grow to a certain size (
For the analysis of atmospherically relevant nucleation precursors, chemical ionization mass spectrometry is quite commonly used. Depending on the target analyte, the primary ion is chosen. Prominent examples include the proton transfer reaction technique using hydronium ions (Hansel et al., 1995; Graus et al., 2010; Breitenlechner et al., 2017), successfully targeting volatile organic compounds or negatively charged nitrate ions for the detection of sulfuric acid (Eisele and Tanner, 1993; Kürten et al., 2011; Jokinen et al., 2012), the class of extremely low volatile organic compounds (ELVOCs) (Ehn et al., 2014) and clusters of sulfuric acid and dimethylamine (Kürten et al., 2014).
Instruments capable of chemical analysis of sub-30 nm particles. For interpretation of the parameters, see the discussion Sect. 6.2, and for references to later work on the individual instruments, see the introduction Sect. 1.
Particles that have already grown to larger sizes are frequently analyzed by the well-established technologies of the aerosol mass spectrometer (AMS) (Jayne et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2011) and single particle mass spectrometry (Noble and Prather, 2000; Bzdek et al., 2012). The chemical composition of particles, however, changes with size, and obtaining detailed chemical information about smaller particles is very challenging as they have an extremely low mass.
To close the gap between the measurement of gas-phase and larger particles, a number of interesting techniques have emerged in the past few years. Only a few instruments are capable of analyzing sub-30 nm particles. They can be distinguished based on the following main criteria (see Table 1): (1) a discontinuous principle to enrich the analyte vs. continuous measurements, (2) size-resolved methods vs. integral sampling methods, (3) particle evaporation method, e.g., by thermal desorption or laser evaporation, and (4) ability to analyze gas and particle phase vs. only particle phase.
The nanoaerosol mass spectrometer (NAMS) (Wang et al., 2006) is a single particle mass spectrometer for small particles and uses a continuous principle. It consists of an aerodynamic lens, ion guide and quadrupole ion trap with laser evaporization. The Volatile Aerosol Component Analyzer (VACA) (Curtius et al., 1998; Arnold et al., 1998; Curtius and Arnold, 2001) is able to continuously measure sulfuric acid in sub-30 nm particles in aircraft plumes, where gas-phase concentrations are much lower than particle-phase concentrations. The thermal desorption chemical ionization mass spectrometer (TDCIMS) (Voisin et al., 2003; Smith et al., 2004; McMurry et al., 2009) is a size-resolved method collecting particles electrostatically and using thermal desorption to measure the particle-phase composition. It has provided important insights to several chemical systems including aerosol from marine environments (Lawler et al., 2014), and has even been able to perform size-resolved measurements for extremely small particle sizes of 8–10 nm (Smith et al., 2010). The aerosol mass spectrometer from Laitinen et al. (2009) precipitates particles on a platinum surface and emits them by laser ablation. It has been used for organic compounds in the size range of 10 to 50 nm (Laitinen et al., 2011). Two other size selective techniques using thermal desorption are the devices by Phares and Collier (2010) and the CaCHUP by Gonser and Held (2013). The Filter Inlet for Gases and AEROsols (FIGAERO) (Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2014) is a bulk-phase filter sampler using thermal desorption. Although it does not provide size-resolved information, it is able to measure both gas and particle phase and thus to investigate partitioning effects (Lopez-Hilfiker et al., 2015). A new technique for the discontinuous particle-phase analysis is the Electrostatical Precipitation Electrospray Mass Spectrometer (EP-ESI-MS) from He et al. (2015). Particles are charged and electrostatically collected. Thereafter, the material is brought to the gas phase and softly ionized at the same time by using the collection surface as an electrospray tip. The Droplet Assisted Inlet Ionization (DAII) (Horan et al., 2017) condenses water on particles and rapidly evaporates them in a heated inlet. It is a continuous method and has proven the ability to measure test particles as small as 13 nm. A more detailed discussion is given in Sect. 6.2.
In this study, we present our novel device for the online chemical analysis of nucleation and Aitken mode particles. The Thermal Desorption – Differential Mobility Analyzer (TD-DMA) is capable of measuring in a size-resolved and integral setting. It allows taking gas-phase measurements with the same mass spectrometer. As a mobile interface, it can be combined with different mass spectrometers or other real-time gas-phase analyzers.
Here, the instrument is described (Sect. 2), followed by a detailed characterization (Sect. 3) comprising the DMA unit's transmission efficiency, the particle collection efficiency, the filament temperature and the reproducibility of the evaporation process. The measurement procedure (Sect. 4) is specified, including determination of the background and an exemplary measurement of 15 nm particles. Lastly, the signal is quantified (Sect. 5) and the results are discussed (Sect. 6), closing with a short summary (Sect. 7).
The TD-DMA is designed for size-resolved chemical analysis of nanometer sized aerosol particles. The particles are charged, a specific size is selected and they are electrostatically collected on a filament. Subsequently, the sampled mass is evaporated in a clean carrier gas to be analyzed by a detector, e.g., a mass spectrometer. In this way, the particle phase is efficiently separated from the gas phase and the concentration is enhanced to meet the detection limit of the analyzer. The coupling between TD-DMA and detector allows for gas-phase measurements during particle sample collection periods. This enables an existing gas-phase analyzer to measure the particle phase as well without the requirements of cost and space for a second analyzer. Only a small fraction of the gas-phase measurement time is lost when it is interrupted by the short evaporation period for the particles. The chemical composition of gas and particle phase can be compared directly without the need to consider instrumental differences in, e.g., ionization and characteristics of the mass spectrometer, as would be the case when using two separate instruments. This modular concept allows obtaining a broad picture of both particle and gas-phase chemical composition and to observe the condensation, reactive uptake and partitioning of the analyzed substances.
Measurement setup of the TD-DMA with step
The TD-DMA is a stand-alone instrument that can be attached to any existing technique suitable for real-time chemical analysis of gas-phase compounds. In this case, individual compounds relevant for nucleation and early growth of atmospheric nanoaerosol particles should be measured. For this we used a chemical ionization atmospheric pressure interface time-of-flight (CI-APi-TOF) mass spectrometer with negative nitrate primary ions generated by a corona ion source (Kürten et al., 2011). This technique is specialized for the detection of sulfuric acid, amines and highly oxygenated organic molecules (HOMs) (Kürten et al., 2014; Simon et al., 2016; Kirkby et al., 2016), and calibrated for its internal transmission efficiency (Heinritzi et al., 2016) as well as for its detection efficiency regarding the sulfuric acid concentration (Kürten et al., 2012). For the gas-phase measurement, the removal of aerosol particles by, e.g., a filter is not required. As the inlet line and ion source are at the same temperature as the analyte aerosol, and the gas composition surrounding the particles is unchanged, the particles do not evaporate significantly on their way to the mass spectrometer and thus are not detected during gas-phase measurements. On the contrary, applying a particle filter would influence the gas-phase measurement negatively as a significant fraction of the gas-phase analyte, especially sulfuric acid or highly oxygenated organics of low volatility, would adsorb on the filter.
Before a more detailed technical description of the TD-DMA is given (Sect. 2.2), an overview of the measurement procedure shall be provided. The measurement procedure is discontinuous and is performed in two steps as follows: the first step is the collection of particles (see Fig. 1a). The analyte aerosol passes through a charger, where a charge equilibrium is established. A core sampling system, where the analyte is isokinetically sampled from the center of a larger tube, is used to reduce losses in the inlet line (e.g., Wimmer et al., 2015). The aerosol then enters the DMA unit of the TD-DMA. The gas phase of the analyte aerosol is removed by the pure nitrogen sheath gas, which is controlled in a non-recirculating way. Charged particles are attracted towards the central electrode and a well-defined size enters the selection slit. A platinum filament is placed inside the central electrode. It is only exposed to pure nitrogen from the sheath gas and samples the preselected particles by electrostatic precipitation. The position of the filament inside the central electrode implements the collection of particles directly after classification and thereby minimizes losses. While the sampling takes place, the mass spectrometer is used to measure the gas-phase chemical composition of the analyte aerosol through a separate sampling line. It is also possible to collect the whole size distribution by turning off the DMA's sheath flow (see also Sects. 4 and 6).
Once enough particle mass is collected on the filament, the second step begins (see Fig. 1b). The inlet line of the mass spectrometer is flushed with ultrapure nitrogen. Another outlet in the inlet line works as a virtual valve that flushes out the excess nitrogen added to the sampling line while maintaining a flow of air into the sampling line. This prevents contamination of the reservoir where the sample gas is taken from and also keeps the sample gas flow rate constant, which is important for chamber or flow tube experiments. The filament is then moved into the mass spectrometer's inlet line. An electrical current is sent through the filament, which is thereby heated. The sampled particles evaporate and the vapor is analyzed by the mass spectrometer.
The main part of the TD-DMA system is the in-house developed DMA unit, where
the particle size selection and collection takes place. The charger is a
soft X-ray diffusion charger (TSI 3088; Tigges et al.,
2015). A linear feedthrough (MDC vacuum, 152.4 mm maximum travel distance)
and a stepper motor are used to translate a ceramic rod with the collection
filament from its collection position to its evaporation position and back.
An in-house built electronic control unit allows the precise control of all
parameters, i.e., flow rates, valve positions, high voltages and the heating
current for the filament. In the collection mode, the unit supplies the DMA
central electrode and filament with the required positive high voltages via
safe high-voltage (SHV) connectors and cables. In the evaporation mode, the
filament is operated with a defined heating current that can be ramped as a
function of time to increase the evaporation temperature stepwise (up to
about 600
The DMA unit (see Fig. 2) is designed to collect a maximum amount of particulate mass for a defined diameter. Its characteristics are determined by the dimensions as well as the sheath and aerosol flow rates. The amount of collected particles is maximized when the transmission efficiency is high. Also, increasing the aerosol flow rate leads to an increase in collected mass for constant transmission efficiency. Therefore, we chose the maximum possible aerosol flow rate for the dimensions of the DMA unit, 3 standard liters per minute (slpm). As the overall number of selected particles is higher when the size resolution of the DMA is low, a low size resolution and thus low sheath flow rate is beneficial in this case. However, the size resolution still needs to be high enough to warrant size selection and at values of the sheath flow rate that are too low, the DMA will not work anymore. With a sheath flow of 5 slpm, as much particle mass as possible is collected while still allowing sufficient size selection. The DMA has a cylindrical geometry (Reischl et al., 1997; Chen et al., 1998) with a positive high voltage on the central electrode (1) and ground potential on the outer electrode. The DMA's inner radius is 15 mm, the outer radius is 20 mm and the classification length is 15 mm. The collection of particles on the filament takes place inside the central electrode (2). In this way, losses are minimized as the transfer lines are very short and the particles do not need to overcome an additional voltage step (from high voltage to ground potential) because they do not need to leave the DMA (Franchin et al., 2016). In order to position the filament, the central electrode has a through-hole in its center (3, 4) through which a ceramic rod is inserted. The rod carries two thick copper wires with a short piece of platinum wire spot-welded to both of their ends. The electrical resistance of the thin platinum wire is high compared to that of the remaining system. Thus, when a current is applied, a voltage drop occurs mainly across the filament. The deposited energy leads to heating and desorption of the particle material. Electronic relays suitable for high-voltage operation are used to disconnect the wires from the current source during collection mode; in this mode a third relay is used to apply a positive high voltage to the wires for electrostatic particle collection. While the opening in the first part (3, towards the linear feedthrough) of the central electrode is just large enough to center the ceramic rod while allowing for its axial movement, the through-hole in the second part (4, towards the DMA exit) is larger to allow moving the filament smoothly towards the sampling line of the mass spectrometer. The outlet is closed by a ball valve during collection mode and is only opened when the filament is positioned in the CI-APi-TOF sampling line. In this mode, all other valves connected to the DMA are closed to avoid gas leaking from the DMA into the sampling line or vice versa. The shape of the collection area (2) is an attempt to keep potential disturbances in the air flow small, while maximizing the distance between the filament and electrode to avoid flashovers and leakage currents due to the electric field. However, leakage currents could not be fully avoided (see Sect. 3.2).
Schematic quarter section of the DMA unit of the TD-DMA with (1) central electrode, (2) collection area, (3) inlet for the filament, (4) outlet for the filament, (5) sheath flow inlet, (6) sheath flow outlet, (7) tissue for laminarizing the sheath low, (8) selection area, (9) aerosol inlet, (10) aerosol outlet, (11) SHV supplies and (12) spacer plates. Conductive stainless steel parts are shown in blue, isolating PEEK parts in yellow.
The DMA sheath flow is distributed in azimuthal direction by introducing a
pressure drop at the inlet (5) and outlet (6) using a circular cavity and a
total of 16 small drilled holes. To achieve a laminar sheath flow, which is
crucial for accurate size selection, an evenly webbed tissue (7) is placed
20 mm upstream of the selection area (8). The aerosol flow is introduced
into the selection area through a narrow slit (9) with a design as
recommended by Chen et al. (1998). The aerosol outlet
(10) has to be at the side and cannot be on the central axis as this is used
for moving the filament to its evaporation position. In order to achieve an
evenly distributed sample and outlet flow over the whole cross section of
the inner part of the central electrode, a small slit introducing a pressure
drop and two outlet connectors (separated by 180
A positive high voltage is applied to the central electrode by two SHV
connectors (11) as this electrode is split into two parts. Small spacers
(12) allow changing the width of the aerosol inlet, the selection slit and
the outlet, respectively. These spacers proved to be helpful for finding
suitable distances for an appropriate transmission efficiency, resolution
and sizing accuracy when first testing the DMA design. The material of the
DMA is stainless steel for the conductive parts (blue) and PEEK
(polyether ether ketone) for the insulating parts (yellow), as these
materials are considered to be chemically inert to the substances present in
the aerosol sample. The full instrument (Fig. 10) measures 12 cm
In this section, the general performance of the TD-DMA is described based on characterization experiments in the laboratory. These measurements are used to derive the sizing accuracy, the DMA's resolution as well as its transmission and collection efficiency. Furthermore, application of defined amounts of sulfuric acid on the filament yields information on the detection limit of the TD-DMA in combination with the CI-APi-TOF and on the linearity between signal and collected mass.
Tandem DMA setup for the characterization of the TD-DMA's DMA unit.
Transmission efficiency of the TD-DMA for different diameters. The DMA unit is characterized in a tandem DMA setup.
The DMA unit is characterized in a tandem DMA setup (Fig. 3). Ammonium
nitrate particles are produced in a nebulizer followed by a diffusion dryer.
The particles are brought into charge equilibrium by using a soft X-ray
charger (TSI model 3088, Tigges et al., 2015). A first DMA
(Grimm Aerosol Technik GmbH model 55-100, Jiang et al., 2011)
then selects particles of a defined electrical mobility and thus
corresponding size (if all particles are singly charged, which is a valid
assumption for sub-30 nm particles). This quasi-monodisperse aerosol flow is
subsequently split into two flows. One flow enters the TD-DMA, after which a
CPC (TSI model 3776, Hermann et al., 2007) measures
the number concentration
The resolution
Summary of DMA performance parameters. The DMA is optimized for a coarse resolution and high transmission in order to collect a maximum amount of particle mass while still allowing size selection.
With a resolution of 1.19 and a transmission efficiency above 50 % at 15 nm particle size, the performance of the TD-DMA is suitable for atmospheric field studies and aerosol chamber investigations.
The same tandem DMA setup as in Sect. 3.1 is also used to characterize the collection efficiency of the filament as a function of the particle diameter. For these measurements, the first DMA and the TD-DMA are set to select the same particle size. The filament voltage is increased to the maximum possible value without influencing the voltage on the central electrode, which is also monitored continuously. Unfortunately, it is technically not possible to set the filament voltage high enough to collect 100 % of the particles for all tested particle sizes. The reason for this is most likely a leak current along the surface of the ceramic rod and thus a transfer of charge from filament to central electrode. Therefore, the filament voltage is set as high as possible with some margin to avoid an influence on the DMA high voltage.
The ratio of the two measured concentrations corrected with the DMA
transmission efficiency equals the fraction of particles that are not
collected on the filament. The collection efficiency is thus defined as
In order to evaporate the sample in front of the mass spectrometer, the
filament is heated. This is achieved by sending an electric current through
the wire. Due to the rather high resistance of the filament, power is
released and the filament temperature increases. Also, the platinum changes
its resistance (
Collection efficiency depending on the particle size. Due to the decreased electrical mobility, the required collection voltage increases with particle size, which currently limits the collection efficiency at larger sizes.
The control unit of the TD-DMA monitors the voltage
Sample mass calibration tests relate evaporated mass to mass spectrometer response. This method is used to test the evaporation method regarding its reproducibility and is required for the signal quantification (see Sect. 5.2) and determination of the detection limit. When installing the TD-DMA at the mass spectrometer, e.g., after transport, they are also used to find the optimum filament position in front of the mass spectrometers ion source.
For the sample mass calibration experiments, a defined amount of a test
substance is deposited on the filament and evaporated in front of the mass
spectrometer. In this case, a solution of sulfuric acid (
However, for measuring internally or externally mixed particles, it should
be noted that these consist of more than one substance; therefore, the
signals are spread over many
Figure 7a shows the typical shape of the signals resulting from the desorption process. It shows a sharp increase when a certain temperature is reached followed by an exponential decay reaching background levels within less than 30 s. This indicates that the substance desorbs from the filament within a narrow temperature range and that the temperature distribution of the filament is fairly homogeneous, otherwise the signal would be smeared out more strongly.
For signal analysis, the full spectrum is corrected with the relative
transmission efficiency (Heinritzi et al., 2016),
which takes into account that the detection efficiency inside the mass
spectrometer is a function of ion mass. The individual signals
Sample mass calibration with
Starting from a deposited mass of 0.03 ng, the data indicates very good
linearity, which is an important feature of the TD-DMA combined with a
CI-APi-TOF. Furthermore, we can now relate the mass spectrometer signal to a
sample mass. For the component used here, the conversion factor
For measuring a nucleation event, the following procedure is desirable: at the beginning of the event, the integral measurement mode is used to analyze the freshly nucleated, smallest particles. When the mode diameter of the particle size distribution reaches around 10 nm, several size-resolved measurements are performed. The sampling time is adjusted so that enough mass is collected for a given particle size and concentration in the aerosol sample. However, due to the minute mass contained in the nanoparticles, such a procedure is not always possible, especially for short or weak nucleation events. In the future, we thus aim to improve the sensitivity, as suggested in Sect. 6. For now, in case of short nucleation events or those with low concentrations, one can choose one size and sample for the whole event or use the integral mode. In either case, different kinds of background measurements are important and thus the different steps during a full measurement cycle are described in the following.
To verify measurements and to distinguish the signal arising from particles
from possible other sources, background measurements need to be taken
regularly.
Composition measurement of 15 nm particles generated from
dimethylamine, sulfur dioxide and ozone in presence of UV light.
The instrument was tested during the CLOUD10T campaign at the Cosmics
Leaving Outdoor Droplets (CLOUD) chamber at the European Organization for
Nuclear Research (CERN). CLOUD is a 26 m
Some substances seem to desorb at two different temperatures. This can
happen for two reasons: (1) the filament might be heated unevenly, but this
would also result in less pronounced peaks instead of two sharp peaks. (2) Different chemical species that do not possess the same evaporation
temperature, can result in the same product ions. In the example shown here,
it is not exactly clear whether sulfuric acid belongs to
dimethylamonium-bisulfate or dimethylamonium-sulfate, and what influence
potential contaminants such as ammonia can have on the evaporation
temperature (Lawler et al.,
2016). (3) The signal appearing first originates from desorption of the
molecule with this given mass to charge ratio, whereas the second appearance
could be due to the fragmentation of a larger molecule. Some amount of the
larger molecules seem to fragment and these fragments are then detected at
higher temperatures than expected for a desorption (see also Sect. 6). In
the chemical system of dimethylamine and sulfuric acid, one can also observe
the selectivity of the ionization by nitrate ions. Sulfuric acid, for
example, has a lower detection limit of
The collected mass on the filament is calculated in order to quantify the measured signals. Additionally, it is estimated before the measurement from the present particle size distribution and the selected particle diameter so that the collected particle mass exceeds the detection limit.
As a DMA cannot provide an absolute monodisperse aerosol (see Sect. 3.1),
the incoming number size distribution
The minimum mass concentration in the analyte aerosol where measurements
with the TD-DMA are possible, depends not only on size distribution and
selected size but also on sampling time and analyte aerosol composition. For
example, the lower limit for sulfuric acid particles with a sampling time of
2 h is 27 pg m
Particle mass collected by the TD-DMA per unit time when the
instrument is set to collect a certain diameter
The fraction of a substance in the aerosol sample shall be determined. Like this, the relative contribution of an individual substance or a group of substances (e.g., all organic compounds) to nucleation can be investigated, e.g., for the same size under different conditions or with increasing size under constant conditions.
The TD-DMA coupled to a gas-phase detectors inlet line.
The calculation requires the collected mass from Sect. 5.1 and the
conversion factor from the sample mass calibration in Sect. 3.4. The
fraction
The detection limit and sensitivity are a limit to the parameters particle
size, number concentration of the analyte aerosol, ionization efficiency,
complexity of the spectrum and time resolution. A major challenge is the
fact that small particles have an extremely low mass. For example, a
particle of half the diameter contains less mass by a factor of 8. In
addition, charging probability decreases with size. At 15 nm, the fraction
of singly negatively charged particles is less than 0.07 (Fuchs,
1963; Tigges et al., 2015) for the soft X-ray charger used
here. For an aerosol of multi component composition, it applies that the
more particle mass is collected, the more substances overcome the lower
detection limit and the more detailed the observed mass spectrum will be.
The TD-DMA is thus designed for high transmission at a coarse resolution. In
this way, a size selection is possible but still a sufficient amount of mass
is collected. In case of very low particle concentrations or when a high
time resolution is needed, it is also possible to sample all particle sizes
in an integral mode by turning off the sheath flow. The low mass
concentration of the particulate matter is also the reason why a
discontinuous system with consecutive collection and evaporation is chosen.
Conversely, the probability for multiple charging increases with
particle diameter, so that particles larger than the target size can
contaminate the sample. This can be corrected for when counting, but not in
the chemical analysis. Within the size range of 10 to 30 nm that the TD-DMA
is specialized for, multiple charging does not play a significant role. A
typical particle size selected with the TD-DMA is 15 nm. Doubly charged
particles of the same electrical mobility have a diameter of 21 nm
(Stolzenburg and McMurry, 2008; Hinds, 1999). Considering the
charging probabilities of the used soft X-ray charger
(Tigges et al., 2015), a fraction of
The soft X-ray charger was chosen for that reason and due to the fact that it does not change the chemistry much, compared to, e.g., a corona charger. Nevertheless, it would be beneficial to find a charger which offers a higher charging probability for small particles while still fulfilling the above criteria.
For optimizing the collection process, it would be beneficial to enhance the collection efficiency (see Sect. 3.2) also for larger sizes. Applying a larger collection voltage to the filament increases the collection efficiency, which is currently limited by leak currents occurring between filament and central electrode when the potential difference is too high. It is also a possibility to prepare the DMA for a higher flow of the analyte aerosol in order to collect more mass.
The exact position of the filament, in combination with the flow profiles at the place of evaporation, is crucial and optimization of these features has a high impact on the sensitivity. Also, the high temperature gradient when heating the filament releases the analyte in a very compact way, which benefits the lower detection limit. This method of direct heating ensures a homogeneous and precisely controlled temperature for the desorption of the substances. Currently we have a discrepancy between the TD-DMA's sample mass calibration and the gas-phase calibration of sulfuric acid (Kürten et al., 2012). This can be explained by losses in the transition from filament to mass spectrometer due to condensation on the mass spectrometer's inlet line. There have also been tests to evaporate the sample directly inside the ion source, but for the presently used ion source (Kürten et al., 2011) this was not expedient. Nevertheless, these losses are unsatisfactory and possibilities for further improvements are being investigated.
As discussed in Sect. 4.2, the filament material might be problematic in terms of influencing the analyte. Heating, especially from metallic surfaces, might lead to fragmentation or other chemical modification of the original molecules. We tested different filaments and saw that not only the material but also the way the wire is manufactured strongly influences this process and thus the suitability of the filament. Also, it was found that a careful heating procedure seems to reduce these effects. This was investigated by using the sample mass calibration method (see Sect. 3.4) with different substances and by careful examination of the spectra from nucleation events. Some fraction of the larger molecules (for example of the HOMs) seem to fragment and these fragments are then detected at higher temperatures than molecules that have the same elemental composition. A detailed analysis of this issue will be the subject of future studies. A complete degeneration of substances is hardly observed for the relevant temperature range, only very small peaks that might originate from such reactions are present in the spectra at higher temperatures. Nevertheless, it cannot be excluded that some material breaks up into substances that are not ionized by the negative nitrate CI-APi-TOF and are thus not visible in the spectra. By coating the filament with a thin layer of a chemically inert material, this could be reduced.
The ionization with negative nitrate primary ions is a selective technique. To target more substances like, e.g., amines and ammonia, different primary ions can be chosen (Lawler et al., 2016). To distinguish the aerosol sample from potential gas-phase adsorption, a sheath flow of pure nitrogen surrounds the filament in the size selective mode. In the integral mode, the filament is also exposed to the gas phase of the analyte and a gas-phase background measurement is advised (see Sect. 4.1).
Up to now, the TD-DMA has been used in chamber experiments with timed nucleation events, but it is also intended for field use in the future. Here, the size selective mode is especially useful because the larger background particles would otherwise dominate the mass concentration. Also, background measurements, as suggested in Sect. 4.1 (3) are not straightforward when chemical conditions change over time. To look further into the chemistry of aerosol growth, it will be interesting to perform measurements at a flow tube, where a steady state production of the analyte aerosol is possible. When not being limited by the time resolution or small number concentrations, one can analyze particles starting at small sizes with a high size resolution, which is variable in this method, and thus gain a very detailed picture of the growth process.
The new instrument TD-DMA shall be placed in the context of existing techniques for the online chemical analysis of sub-30 nm aerosol particles. When comparing the different nanoparticle instruments, one has to focus on a selection of criteria as the instruments strongly differ from one another and have their individual functional principles and thus strengths and weaknesses.
To give an overview regarding the functional principle of the devices (see Table 1), we introduced the following criteria: (1) continuous vs. discontinuous, (2) size-selective vs. non-size-selective, (3) how the particulate material is evaporated and (4) whether the gas phase can be measured simultaneously.
One of the most important criteria is the sensitivity of the instruments, but the question arises of which is the appropriate parameter to describe this. Especially the fact that the cited studies do not all refer to the same parameter when discussing the sensitivities of their instruments, makes a comparison difficult.
One option for a meaningful number is the minimum mass concentration of the
analyte aerosol (pg m
Apart from the sensitivity of a technique, other criteria are also relevant. An important example is in how far the aerosol components fragment when they are transferred to the gas phase, or in how far the instrument can detect semi stable reaction products from particle-phase reactions. These questions are not discussed in this short overview as it is beyond the scope of the present manuscript. Ultimately, it would be beneficial to have several instruments measure the same sub-30 nm aerosol particle population during an intercomparison campaign.
The TD-DMA is suitable for measuring nucleation and Aitken mode particles
and is successfully analyzing aerosol mass concentrations in the pg m
The advantages of the instrument are as follows: (a) the TD-DMA allows for size selection, thus the chemical composition of different particle sizes can be compared in order to determine the relative importance of different vapors for particle growth as a function of size. (b) An integral, non-size-selective mode of operation is possible in order to maximize the mass of collected particles. (c) The TD-DMA is a modular and compact unit that can in principle be used with different mass spectrometers or other gas analyzers. (d) During the particle collection process, the gas phase can be analyzed. For this reason, the same mass spectrometer can be used for particle as well as gas-phase measurements and both phases can be directly compared. With this instrument, the processes affecting particle composition and growth can be investigated in detail.
The research data can be accessed from
The instrument was mainly developed by ACW and AK, with major contributions from JC, AB, SB, CF, ME and JH. ACW, AB and SB carried out the measurements and analyzed the data. ACW wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the scientific discussion and commented on the manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
We thank the workshop team of our institute for manufacturing the components and for technical support. We appreciate the useful discussion with Jim Smith from University of California, Irvine, USA, and Alexander Vogel, Institute for Atmospheric and Environmental Science, Frankfurt, Germany. We also thank Jasmin Tröstl and Urs Baltensperger from Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland, for providing a nSMPS and the whole CLOUD team for support during the CLOUD10T measurement campaign.
This research was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (project “CLOUD-12” 01LK1222A and “CLOUD-16” 01LK1601A) as well as the EC Seventh Framework Programme (MC-ITN “CLOUD-TRAIN” 316662). Edited by: Johannes Schneider Reviewed by: two anonymous referees