<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-12-1029-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{9mm}}?>An improved total and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  column<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> retrieval for GOME-2</article-title><alt-title>Improved total and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column retrieval for GOME-2</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Improved total and tropospheric {$\chem{NO_{2}}$} column retrieval for GOME-2}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S. Liu et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Song</given-names></name>
          <email>Song.Liu@dlr.de</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Valks</surname><given-names>Pieter</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Pinardi</surname><given-names>Gaia</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5428-916X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>De Smedt</surname><given-names>Isabelle</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3541-7725</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Yu</surname><given-names>Huan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Beirle</surname><given-names>Steffen</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7196-0901</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Richter</surname><given-names>Andreas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3339-212X</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR), Institut für Methodik der Fernerkundung (IMF), <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB), Brussels, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, Mainz, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Institute of Environmental Physics (IUP-UB), University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Song Liu (Song.Liu@dlr.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>18</day><month>February</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>1029</fpage><lpage>1057</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>16</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>14</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e182">An improved algorithm for
the retrieval of total and tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
columns from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment-2 (GOME-2) is presented.
The refined retrieval will be implemented in a future version of the GOME
Data Processor (GDP) as used by the EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility
on Atmospheric Composition and UV Radiation (AC-SAF). The first main
improvement is the application of an extended 425–497 nm wavelength fitting
window in the differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) retrieval
of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant column density, based on which initial total
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns are computed using stratospheric air mass factors (AMFs).
Updated absorption cross sections and a linear offset correction are used for
the large fitting window. An improved slit function treatment is applied to
compensate for both long-term and in-orbit drift of the GOME-2 slit function.
Compared to the current operational (GDP 4.8) dataset, the use of these new
features increases the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and reduces the slant column error
by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. In addition, the bias between GOME-2A and GOME-2B
measurements is largely reduced by adopting a new level 1b data version in
the DOAS retrieval. The retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns show good
consistency with the Quality Assurance for Essential Climate Variables
(QA4ECV) retrieval with a good overall quality. Second, the STRatospheric
Estimation Algorithm from Mainz (STREAM), which was originally developed for
the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) instrument, was optimised
for GOME-2 measurements to determine the stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column
density. Applied to synthetic GOME-2 data, the estimated stratospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from STREAM shows good agreement with the a priori truth.
An improved latitudinal correction is introduced in STREAM to reduce the
biases over the subtropics. Applied to <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>GOME-2<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> measurements, STREAM
largely reduces the overestimation of stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns over
polluted regions in the GDP 4.8 dataset. Third, the calculation of AMF
applies an updated box-air-mass factor (box-AMF) look-up table (LUT)
calculated using the latest version 2.7 of the Vector-LInearized Discrete
Ordinate Radiative Transfer (VLIDORT) model with an increased number of
reference points and vertical layers, a new GOME-2 surface albedo
climatology, and improved a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles obtained from the
TM5-MP chemistry transport model. A large effect (mainly enhancement in
summer and reduction in winter) on the retrieved tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
columns by more than 10 % is found over polluted regions. To evaluate the
GOME-2 tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns, an end-to-end validation is
performed using ground-based multiple-axis DOAS (MAXDOAS) measurements. The
validation is illustrated for six stations covering urban, suburban, and
background situations. Compared to the GDP 4.8 product, the new dataset
presents improved agreement with the MAXDOAS measurements for all the
stations.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<?pagebreak page1030?><sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e365">Nitrogen dioxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is an important trace gas in the Earth's
atmosphere. In the stratosphere, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is strongly related to halogen
compound reactions and ozone destruction <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx92" id="paren.1"/>. In
the troposphere, nitrogen oxides
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) serve as a precursor of zone
in the presence of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and of secondary aerosol
through gas-to-particle conversion <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx91" id="paren.2"/>. As a
prominent air pollutant affecting human health and ecosystems, large amounts
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are produced in the boundary layer by industrial processes,
power generation, transportation, and biomass burning over polluted hot
spots. For instance, a strong growth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the past 2 decades has caused severe air pollution problems for China, with the largest
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns in 2011; since then, cleaner techniques and stricter
controlling have been applied to reduce the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx86 bib1.bibx104 bib1.bibx63" id="paren.3"/>. An increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations due to economic growth is also found over India,
with a peak in 2012 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.4"/>. Despite the decrease in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in Europe, around half of European
Union member states still exceed the air quality standards, mainly caused by diesel
car emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.5"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e498"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column measurements have been provided by satellite instruments,
e.g. Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.6"/>,
SCanning Imaging Absorption SpectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY
(SCIAMACHY) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.7"/>, Ozone Monitoring Instrument
(OMI) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx60" id="paren.8"/>, and Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment-2
(GOME-2) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14 bib1.bibx74" id="paren.9"/>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations will
be continued by the new generation instruments with high spatial resolution
such as TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx106" id="paren.10"><named-content content-type="pre">launched in
October 2017;</named-content></xref> and by geostationary missions such as
Sentinel-4 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.11"/>. The GOME-2 instrument, which is
the main focus of this study, is included on a series of MetOp satellites as
part of the EUMETSAT Polar System (EPS). The first GOME-2 was launched in
October 2006 aboard the <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>MetOp-A<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> satellite, and a second GOME-2 was launched
in September 2012 aboard MetOp-B. The consistent long-term dataset will be
further extended by the third GOME-2 on the upcoming MetOp-C platform (to be
launched in September 2018). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements from GOME-2 have been
widely used to characterise the distribution, evolution, or transport of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx118" id="paren.12"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, to
estimate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx72 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.13"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>,
and to interpret VOC levels, ozone variation, or anthropogenic aerosol
loading
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx110 bib1.bibx90 bib1.bibx79" id="paren.14"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p id="d1e596">The GOME-2 total and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> products are generated using
the GOME Data Processor (GDP) algorithm at the German Aerospace Center (DLR).
The retrieval algorithm has been first described by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="text.15"/> as implemented in the GDP version 4.4 and was
later updated to the current operational version 4.8 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="paren.16"/>.
The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval for GOME-2 follows a classical three-step scheme.</p>
      <p id="d1e627">First, the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns (namely the concentration
integrated along the effective light path from the sun through the atmosphere
to the instrument) are derived using the differential optical absorption
spectroscopy (DOAS) method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx83" id="paren.17"/>. The DOAS technique
is a least-squares method fitting the molecular absorption cross sections to
the measured GOME-2 sun-normalised radiances provided by the EUMETSAT's
processing facility. The fit is applied on the data within a fitting window
optimised for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As analysed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.18"/> and in
the Quality Assurance for Essential Climate Variables (QA4ECV;
<uri>http://www.qa4ecv.eu</uri>) project, extension of the fitting window for
GOME-2 increases the signal-to-noise ratio and hence improves the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
slant column error. The total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns depend on the viewing
geometry and also on parameters such as surface albedo and the presence of
clouds and aerosol loads. They are therefore converted to initial total
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical columns through division by a stratospheric air mass
factor.</p>
      <p id="d1e696">Second, the stratospheric contribution is estimated and separated from the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns (referred to as “stratosphere–troposphere
separation”). The GDP 4.8 algorithm applies a modified reference sector
method, which uses measurements over clean regions to estimate the
stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns based on the assumptions of longitudinally
invariable stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layers and of negligible tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> abundance over the clean areas. The modified reference sector
method defines a global pollution mask to remove potentially polluted regions
and applies an interpolation over the unmasked areas to derive the
stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns. As a result of using a fixed pollution
mask, the modified reference sector method in GDP 4.8 has larger
uncertainties over polluted areas, because limited amount of information over
continents is used. To overcome the shortcomings, the STRatospheric
Estimation Algorithm from Mainz (STREAM) method
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.19"/> has been developed for the TROPOMI instrument and
was also successfully applied on GOME, SCIAMACHY, OMI, and GOME-2
measurements. Also belonging to the modified reference sector method, STREAM
defines not a fixed pollution mask but rather weighting factors for each observation
to determine its contribution to the stratospheric estimation.</p>
      <p id="d1e758">Third, the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical columns are calculated from the
tropospheric slant columns by an air mass factor (AMF) calculation, which
contributes the largest uncertainty to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval, particularly over polluted regions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.20"/>. The AMFs are
determined with a radiative transfer model (RTM) and stored in a look-up
table (LUT) requiring ancillary information such as surface albedo, vertical
shape of the a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile, clouds, and aerosols. Improvements
in the RTM and LUT interpolation scheme, the ancillary parameters, and the
cloud and<?pagebreak page1031?> aerosol correction approach have been reported for the OMI instrument
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx105 bib1.bibx53 bib1.bibx107 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.21"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>,
which in principle are beneficial for similar satellite instruments like
GOME-2.</p>
      <p id="d1e802">In this paper, a new algorithm to retrieve the total and tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the GOME-2 instruments is described, which includes
improvements in each of the three algorithm steps introduced above. The improved
algorithm will be implemented in the next version of GDP (referred to as GDP 
4.9 hereafter). We briefly introduce the GOME-2 instrument
(Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>) and the current operational (GDP 4.8) total and
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval algorithm (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>).
We present the improvements to the DOAS slant column retrieval
(Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>), the stratosphere–troposphere separation
(Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>), and the AMF calculation (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/>).
Finally, we show an end-to-end validation of the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
dataset using ground-based multiple-axis DOAS (MAXDOAS) datasets with
different pollution conditions (Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S7"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Instrument and measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e857">GOME-2 is a nadir-scanning UV–VIS spectrometer aboard the MetOp-A and MetOp-B
satellites (referred to as GOME-2A and GOME-2B throughout this study) with a
satellite repeating cycle of 29 days and an equator crossing time of 19:30
local time (LT) (descending node). The GOME-2 instrument measures the Earth's
backscattered radiance and extraterrestrial solar irradiance in the spectral
range between 240 and 790 nm. The morning measurements from GOME-2 provide a
better understanding of the diurnal variations of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns in
combination with afternoon observations from for example the OMI, and TROPOMI
instruments (13:30 LT). The default swath width of GOME-2 is 1920 km,
enabling a global coverage in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> days. The default ground pixel size
is 80 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km in the forward scan, which remains almost constant
over the full swath width. In a tandem operation of MetOp-A and MetOp-B from
July 2013 onwards, a decreased swath of 960 km and an increased spatial
resolution of 40 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km are employed by GOME-2A. See
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.22"/> for more details on instrument design and performance.</p>
      <p id="d1e904">The operational GOME-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product is provided by DLR in the
framework of EUMETSAT's Satellite Application Facility on Atmospheric
Composition Monitoring (AC-SAF). The product processing chain starts with the
level 0 to 1b processing within the core ground segment at EUMETSAT in
Darmstadt (Germany), where the raw instrument (level 0) data are converted
into geolocated and calibrated (level 1b) (ir)radiances by the GOME-2 Product
Processing Facility (PPF). The level 1b (ir)radiances are disseminated
through the EUMETCast system to the AC-SAF processing facility at DLR in
Oberpfaffenhofen (Germany) and further processed using the Universal
Processor for UV/VIS Atmospheric Spectrometers (UPAS) system. Broadcasted via
EUMETCast, WMO GTS, and the Internet, the resulting level 2
near-real-time total column products including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns can be
received by user communities 2 h after sensing. Offline and reprocessed
GOME-2 level 2 and consolidated products are also provided within 1 day by
DLR, which can be ordered via FTP server and the EUMETSAT Data Centre
(<uri>https://acsaf.org/</uri>, last access: 1 February 2019).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Total and tropospheric {$\protect\chem{NO_{2}}$} retrieval for GDP~4.8}?><title>Total and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval for GDP 4.8</title>
      <p id="d1e950">The first main step of the retrieval algorithm is the DOAS technique, which
is applied to determine the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns from the
(ir)radiance spectra measured by the instrument. Based on the Beer–Lambert
law, the DOAS fit is a least-squares inversion to isolate the trace gas
absorption from the background processes, e.g. extinction resulting from
scattering on molecules and aerosols, with a background polynomial
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M60" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">offset</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        The measurement-based term is defined as the natural logarithm of the
measured earthshine radiance spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> divided by the daily solar
irradiance spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The intensity offset correction
offset<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which describes the additional contributions such as stray
light in the spectrometer to the measured intensity, is modelled using a zero-order polynomial with the polynomial coefficient as the fitting parameter. The
spectral effect from the absorption of species <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined by the
fitted slant column density <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and associated absorption cross section
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. An additional term with the Ring scaling factor
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the Ring reference spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> describes
the filling-in effect of Fraunhofer lines by rotational Raman scattering (the
so-called Ring effect). The GDP 4.8 algorithm adopts a wavelength range of
425–450 nm to ensure prominent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption structures and
controllable interferences from other absorbing species, e.g. water vapour
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), ozone (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and oxygen dimer
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> gives an overview of the DOAS settings for
the current operational GDP 4.8 algorithm, the improved version 4.9 algorithm
(see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>), and the algorithm used in the QA4ECV
product (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS5"/>).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e1253">Main settings of GOME-2 DOAS retrieval of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns discussed in this study.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GDP 4.8,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GDP 4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">QA4ECV, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73" id="text.23"/>;</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99 bib1.bibx100" id="text.24"/>
                </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(this work)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.25"/>
                </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wavelength range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">425–450 nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">425–497 nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">405–465 nm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cross sections</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 240 K, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 220 K, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 220 K, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ring</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Ring, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">liq</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Eta,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ring, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">liq</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Zeta, resolution correction</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Polynomial degree</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Intensity offset</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Constant</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Linear</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Constant</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Slit function</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Preflight</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Stretched preflight</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Preflight</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page1032?><p id="d1e1619">The second component in the retrieval is the calculation of initial total
vertical column densities <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">init</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using a stratospheric AMF
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) conversion:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M95" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">init</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Given the small optical thickness of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
determined as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M98" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">b</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the box-air-mass factors (box-AMFs) in layer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the
altitude-dependent sub-columns from a stratospheric a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profiles climatology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.26"/>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a correction
coefficient to account for the temperature dependency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cross
section <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx76" id="paren.27"/>. The calculation of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">init</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> assumes negligible tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and hence uses
only the stratospheric a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles to derive AMF. The
box-AMFs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are derived using the multilayered multiple scattering
LInearized Discrete Ordinate Radiative Transfer (LIDORT) RTM
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx93" id="paren.28"/> and stored in a LUT as a function of various
model inputs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold-italic">b</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, including GOME-2 viewing geometry, surface pressure,
and surface albedo. The surface albedo is described by the Lambertian
equivalent reflectivity (LER). The surface LER climatology used in the
GDP 4.8 algorithm is derived from combined TOMS–GOME measurements
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.29"/> for the years 1979–1993 with a spatial resolution
of 1.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> long. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> lat.</p>
      <p id="d1e1903">In the presence of clouds, the calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> adopts the
independent pixel approximation based on GOME-2 cloud parameters:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M114" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cloud</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">clear</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being the cloud radiance fraction, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cloud</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
the cloudy-sky stratospheric AMF, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">clear</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the
clear-sky stratospheric AMF. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cloud</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">clear</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are derived with Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>)
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cloud</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mainly relying on the cloud pressure
and the cloud albedo. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value is derived from the cloud fraction
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M123" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cloud</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">clear</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cloud</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cloud</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the radiance for a cloudy scene and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">clear</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a clear scene. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cloud</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">clear</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are calculated using LIDORT, depending mostly on the
GOME-2 viewing geometry, surface albedo, and cloud albedo. From GOME-2,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined with the Optical Cloud Recognition Algorithm
(OCRA) by separating a spectral scene into cloudy contribution and cloud-free
background, and the cloud pressure and the cloud albedo are derived using the
Retrieval Of Cloud Information using Neural Networks (ROCINN) algorithm by
comparing simulated and measured radiance in and near the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A band
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx65 bib1.bibx66" id="paren.30"/>. Applied in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval
in GDP 4.8, the latest version 3.0 of the OCRA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.31"/> applies a
degradation correction on the GOME-2 level 1 measurements as well as
corrections for viewing angle and latitudinal dependencies. A new cloud-free
background is constructed from 6 years of GOME-2A measurements from the
years 2008–2013. The updated OCRA also includes an improved detection and
removal of sun glint that affects most of the GOME-2 orbits. Version 3.0
of ROCINN <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx68" id="paren.32"/> applies a forward RTM calculation
using updated surface albedo climatology and spectroscopic data as well as a
new inversion scheme based on Tikhonov regularisation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx96 bib1.bibx25" id="paren.33"/>. The computation time of
ROCINN is optimised with a smart sampling method <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx67" id="paren.34"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2207">The next retrieval step is the separation of stratospheric and tropospheric
components from the initial vertical total columns, namely the
stratosphere–troposphere separation. Since no direct stratospheric
measurements are available for GOME-2, a spatial filtering algorithm is
applied to estimate the stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns in GDP 4.8. The
spatial filtering algorithm belongs to the modified reference sector method,
which uses total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns over clean regions to approximate the
stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns based on the assumption of longitudinally
invariable stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> layers and of negligible tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> abundance over the clean areas. The spatial filtering algorithm
uses a pollution mask to filter the potentially polluted areas (tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns larger than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), followed
by a low-pass filtering (with a zonal 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> boxcar filter) on the
initial total columns of the unmasked areas, and afterwards a removal of a
tropospheric background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) from
the derived stratospheric columns.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1033?><p id="d1e2346">Finally, the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be
computed as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M145" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the stratospheric AMF in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the tropospheric AMF, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the tropospheric residues (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">init</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined using Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) and
(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>) with tropospheric a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles. The
calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relies on the same model parameters as of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but the dependency on the parameters like surface albedo
and cloud properties as well as on the a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles is much
stronger. The GDP 4.8 adopts the tropospheric a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles
from a run of the global chemistry transport model MOZART version 2
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.35"/> with anthropogenic emissions from the EDGAR2.0
inventory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx77" id="paren.36"/> for the early 1990s. The monthly
average vertical profiles are calculated from MOZART-2 data from the year
1997 for the overpass time of GOME-2 (09:30 LT) with a resolution of 1.875<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> long <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.875<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> lat.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Improved DOAS slant column retrieval</title>
      <p id="d1e2569">A larger 425–497 nm wavelength fitting window for the DOAS method
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="paren.37"/> is implemented in the GDP 4.9 to retrieve the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns, which improves the signal-to-noise ratio by
including more <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption structures. Compared to the extended
405–465 nm range, as employed by the QA4ECV GOME-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product and
used in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval for OMI instrument
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx101" id="paren.38"/>, the 425–497 nm fitting window has
stronger sensitivity to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns in the boundary layer because the
importance of scattering decreases with wavelength <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx85" id="paren.39"/>. In
this study, the slant columns are derived using QDOAS software developed at
the Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy (BIRA-IASB)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.40"/><fn id="Ch1.Footn1"><p id="d1e2639">Note that the derived slant columns are
scaled by geometric AMFs to correct for the angular dependencies of GOME-2
measurements in this section.</p></fn>. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> summarises the new
settings of the GDP 4.9 algorithm.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Absorption cross sections</title>
      <p id="d1e2650">In the fitting window optimised for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval, the DOAS fit
includes species with strong and unique absorption structures and describes
their spectral effect using absorption cross sections from literature. In our
GDP 4.9 algorithm, the absorption cross sections of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are updated mainly
with newly released datasets as
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2721"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption at 220 K from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="text.41"/>;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2738"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption at 228 K from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.42"/>;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2755"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">vap</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption at 293 K from HITEMP
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx88" id="paren.43"/>, rescaled as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56" id="text.44"/>;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2785"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption at 293 K from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx95" id="text.45"/>.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e2801">In addition, to compensate for the larger spectral interference from liquid
water (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">liq</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">liq</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="paren.46"/> is included to reduce systematic errors above
ocean for the wider wavelength range. Two additional GOME-2 polarisation key
data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.47"/> are included to correct for remaining
polarisation correction problems, particularly for GOME-2B:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2855"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">liq</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption at 297 K from
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx84" id="text.48"/>, smoothed as in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="text.49"/>;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e2885">Eta and Zeta
from GOME-2 calibration key data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.50"/>.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e2891">It is worth noting that our improved DOAS retrieval in the GDP 4.9 adopts a
decreased temperature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cross section (220 instead of 240 K in
GDP 4.8; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx100" id="altparen.51"/>) for a consistency with other <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrievals from GOME-2, OMI, and TROPOMI
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx73 bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx101 bib1.bibx102" id="paren.52"/>,
with a minor effect on the fit quality (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) from the two
temperatures. Changing the temperature of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cross section from 240
to 220 K reduces the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–9 %,
but this temperature dependency is corrected in the AMF and vertical column
calculation (see Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e2967">The spectral signature of sand absorption has been investigated by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx87" id="text.53"/> for GOME-2 data, but it is not applied here
because of the potential interference with the broadband liquid water
structure <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx80" id="paren.54"/>, which might lead to non-physical results
over the ocean.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Intensity offset correction</title>
      <p id="d1e2982">Besides the radiances backscattered by the Earth's atmosphere, a number of
both natural (i.e. the Ring effect) and instrumental (e.g. stray light in the
spectrometer and change of detector's dark current) sources contribute to an
additional “offset” to the scattering intensity. To correct for this drift,
an intensity offset correction with a linear wavelength dependency (i.e.
polynomial degree of 1) is applied for the large fitting window in this
study. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> illustrates the effect of using a linear
intensity offset correction for the large fitting window on 3 March 2008. The
use of a linear offset correction increases the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns by up to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (17 %) and decreases the fitting
residues (retrieval root mean square, rms) by up to 30 %. Larger differences are found
at the eastern scans (eastern part of GOME-2 swath), possibly suggesting
instrumental issues specific to GOME-2. For the retrieval rms, stronger
improvements are mainly located above ocean, arguably from the compensation
of inelastic vibrational Raman scattering in water bodies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx109" id="paren.55"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3027">Difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns (slant
columns scaled by geometric AMFs) <bold>(a)</bold> and retrieval rms <bold>(b)</bold>
estimated with and without a linear intensity offset correction for GOME-2A
on 3 March 2008.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3053">The intensity offset can also be fitted using only the constant term, as
employed by the GDP 4.8 algorithm (with 425–450 nm wavelength window) and
as recommended by the QA4ECV algorithm (with 405–465 nm). Compared to the
use of the linear intensity offset correction, the application of a constant term
on our retrieval shows a decrease in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns by up to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (17 %) and an increase in the
retrieval rms by up to 14 %, which implies the necessity of using a
linear intensity offset correction for the large 425–497 nm wavelength
range.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1034?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>GOME-2 slit function treatment</title>
      <p id="d1e3098">An accurate treatment of the instrumental slit function is essential for the
wavelength calibration and the convolution of high-resolution laboratory
cross sections. In spite of a generally good spectral stability of GOME-2 in
orbit, the width of GOME-2 slit function has been changing on both long and
short timescales <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.56"/>, which needs to be accounted for in
the DOAS analysis. In this study, an improved treatment of GOME-2 slit
function in the DOAS fit is achieved by calculating effective slit functions
from <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>GOME-2<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> irradiance measurements to correct for the long-term variations
(see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1"/>) and by including an additional
cross section in the DOAS fit to correct for the short-term variations (see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS2"/>).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Long-term variations</title>
      <p id="d1e3117">To analyse the long-term variations of the GOME-2 instrumental slit function
and the impact on our retrieval, effective slit functions are derived by
convolving a high-resolution reference solar spectrum
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.57"/> with a stretched preflight GOME-2 slit function
and aligning to the GOME-2 daily irradiance measurements with stretch factors
as fit parameters. The effective slit functions are calculated in 13
sub-windows covering the full fitting window (425–497 nm).
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> displays the long-term evolution of
the fitted GOME-2 slit function width (full width at half maximum, FWHM)
calculated from the stretch factors. The GOME-2 slit function has narrowed
after the launch by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for GOME-2A and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for GOME-2B
at 451 nm, in agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.58"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.59"/>,
and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="text.60"/>. For GOME-2A, visible discontinuities of the slit
function width are related to the in-orbit instrument operations, including
an apparent anomaly in September 2009 when a major throughput test was
performed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.61"/>. After the throughput test, the narrowing
of the slit function slowed down. For GOME-2B, stronger seasonal fluctuations
of the FWHM are found. The seasonal and long-term variations in the GOME-2
slit function are caused by changing temperatures of the optical bench due to
the seasonal variation in solar heating and the lack of thermal stability of
the optical bench, respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx74" id="paren.62"/>. Although the
variations are only a few percent, the effect on the DOAS retrieval is
significant. Compared to the application of the preflight slit function, the
use of a stretched slit function improves the calibration residuals by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for both GOME-2A and GOME-2B (not shown).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3173">Temporal evolution of the fitted slit function FWHM for GOME-2A
(<bold>a</bold>, January 2007–December 2016) and GOME-2B (<bold>b</bold>,
December 2012–December 2016.)</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3188">In previous studies, slit functions have also been fitted using various
Gaussian shapes. For instance, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.63"/> have derived effective
GOME-2 slit functions for formaldehyde retrieval using an asymmetric Gaussian
with its width and shape as fit parameters. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval, the
use of effective slit functions with an asymmetric Gaussian leads to similar
results as using a preflight slit function. In addition,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="text.64"/> have proposed a slit function
parameterisation using a super Gaussian, which is proved to quickly and
robustly describe the slit function changes for satellite instrument OMI or
TROPOMI. In the case of GOME-2, the super Gaussian obtains nearly identical
results as the asymmetric Gaussian and is therefore not applied in here.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>In-orbit variations</title>
      <?pagebreak page1035?><p id="d1e3214">To correct for the in-orbit variations of GOME-2 slit function, a
“resolution correction function” <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.65"/> is included as an
additional cross section in the DOAS fit (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). The
cross section is derived by dividing a high-resolution solar spectrum
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.66"/> convolved with a stretched preflight GOME-2 slit
function (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1"/>) by itself but convolved
with a slightly modified slit function.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows an example of the fit
coefficients and the influence on our DOAS retrieval on 1 February 2013. As
shown in the left panel, the slit function width increases along the orbit by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) for GOME-2A (see
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="altparen.67"/>, Fig. 8 therein) and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) for GOME-2B (a fit coefficient of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to a change in the slit function width of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm). This in-orbit broadening of the slit function is
caused by the increasing temperature of the instrument along the orbit.
Taking into account the in-orbit broadening in the DOAS fit decreases the
retrieval rms by up to 5 % for GOME-2A and up to 12 % for GOME-2B in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>b.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e3336">Changes of GOME-2 slit function
width along orbit 32 636 on 1 February 2013 <bold>(a)</bold> and the impact on
the retrieval rms error <bold>(b)</bold>. Red lines provide the boxcar average
for GOME-2A (dotted) and GOME-2B (solid). A fit coefficient of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to a change in the slit function width of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm <bold>(a)</bold>.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f03.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>GOME-2 level 1b data</title>
      <p id="d1e3400">As described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/>, the level 0 to 1b processing by the
PPF at EUMETSAT calculates the geolocation and calibration parameters and
produces the calibrated level 1b (ir)radiances. Due to the incomplete removal
of Xe-line contamination in the GOME-2B calibration key data (calibration
key data are taken during the on-ground campaign and required as an input to
the level 0 to 1b processing), artefacts at wavelengths larger than 460 nm
have been reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.68"/> for GOME-2B irradiances. Mainly
focusing on the cleaning of contamination in the GOME-2B calibration
key data, a new 6.1 version of the GOME-2 level 0 to 1b processor has been
activated from 25 June 2015 onwards <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.69"/>. To study the
impact of the new level 1b data on our GDP 4.9 algorithm using the
425–497 nm fitting window, the retrieval is analysed using both the new
6.1 version (testing dataset provided by EUMETSAT for March 2015) and the
previous version 6.0 data for the same period. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>
presents a comparison of the retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns over the Pacific
for GOME-2A and GOME-2B. The application of the version 6.1 level 1b data
slightly reduces the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–11 %) for GOME-2A.
A larger effect is observed for GOME-2B with a decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
columns by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–23 %)
and a reduction of rms error by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–33 % (not shown). The stronger
decrease of GOME-2B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns leads to a better consistency between
the datasets from GOME-2A and GOME-2B with an overall bias reduced from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p id="d1e3612">Monthly zonal average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns
(slant columns scaled by geometric AMFs) for GOME-2A (green) and GOME-2B
(brown) using the new PPF 6.1 (dotted) and PPF 6.0 (solid) data in March 2015
over the Pacific (160–180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <title>Comparison to QA4ECV data</title>
      <p id="d1e3647">The quality of the GDP 4.9 retrieval is evaluated using the GOME-2
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dataset from QA4ECV, which is a project aiming at quality-assured
satellite products using a retrieval algorithm harmonised for GOME,
SCIAMACHY, OMI and GOME-2. The GOME-2A <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from QA4ECV
(version 1.1) for the years 2007–2015 have shown an improved quality over
previous datasets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx117" id="paren.70"/>. Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> gives an
overview of the DOAS settings used in the QA4ECV project.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> shows a comparison of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns
over the Pacific from the GDP 4.8 algorithm, the GDP 4.9 algorithm, and the
QA4ECV data for February 2007. For comparison, only ground pixels with a solar
zenith angle smaller than 80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are considered. The GDP 4.8 dataset has
been adjusted using a 220 K <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="paren.71"/> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
cross section to remove the influence of temperature dependency of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cross section (see discussion in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS1"/>). Compared to
the GDP 4.8 dataset, the improved DOAS retrieval in GDP 4.9 increases the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (up to
27 %). Compared to the QA4ECV product, a good overall consistency is
found with the GDP 4.9 dataset at all latitudes considering the different
DOAS settings such as fitting window, offset correction, and slit function
characterisation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p id="d1e3775">Comparisons of monthly zonal average
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns (slant columns scaled by geometric AMFs) from the
operational GDP 4.8 product (but retrieved using a 220 K <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
cross section from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx103" id="altparen.72"/>) (brown), the improved GDP 4.9
algorithm (green), and the QA4ECV dataset (blue) over the Pacific
(160–180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) in February 2007 for GOME-2A.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=221.931496pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1036?><p id="d1e3818">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/> presents the time series of calculated
slant column errors from the three datasets, following a statistical method
to analyse the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant column uncertainty for GOME-2
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="paren.73"><named-content content-type="post">Sect. 6.1 therein</named-content></xref>. The slant column errors,
calculated as variations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements within small boxes
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over the tropical Pacific
(20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>S–20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 160–180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), increase for all the
three datasets as a result of instrument degradation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx74" id="paren.74"/> until the major throughput test in
September 2009 (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1"/>) and stabilise
afterwards. Mainly driven by the use of a wider fitting window with stronger
absorptions, the smallest slant column errors are found by the GDP 4.9 algorithm,
e.g. 23.8 % smaller than from the GDP 4.8 and 13.5 % smaller than
from the QA4ECV dataset in February 2007, with an increasing difference with
time for the QA4ECV dataset (27.9 % in December 2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p id="d1e3905">Temporal evolution of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
slant column errors from the operational GDP 4.8 product (brown,
January 2007–December 2016), the improved GDP 4.9 algorithm (green,
January 2007–December 2016), and the QA4ECV dataset (blue,
February 2007–December 2015) for GOME-2A, using deviations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
slant columns from box (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) mean values over the
tropical Pacific (20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 160–180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>New stratosphere–troposphere separation</title>
      <?pagebreak page1037?><p id="d1e3989">The calculation of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> requires an estimation and
removal of the stratospheric contribution to the initial total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
columns. In our GDP 4.9 retrieval, the stratosphere–troposphere separation
algorithm STREAM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.75"/> has been adapted to GOME-2
measurements. Belonging to the modified reference sector method, STREAM uses
initial total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns with negligible tropospheric contribution,
i.e. unpolluted measurements at remote areas and cloudy measurements at
medium altitudes, to derive the stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns. Based on a
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> climatology and the GOME-2 cloud product, STREAM
calculates weighting factors for each satellite pixel to define the
contribution of initial total columns to the stratospheric estimation;
potentially polluted pixels are weighted low instead of being totally masked
out in the GDP 4.8 spatial filtering method, cloudy observations at medium
altitudes are given higher weights because they directly provide the
stratospheric information, and the weights are further adjusted in a second
iteration if pixels suffer from large biases in the tropospheric residues.
Depending on these weighting factors, stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fields are
derived by weighted convolution on the daily initial total columns using
convolution kernels. The convolution kernels are wider at lower latitudes due
to the longitudinal homogeneity assumption of stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
narrower at higher latitudes to reflect the stronger natural variations. To
remove the biases in the weighted convolution resulting from the large
latitudinal gradients, a latitudinal correction is applied on the initial
total columns: the latitudinal dependencies of initial total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
calculated over the clean Pacific, removed from the initial total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
before weighted convolution, and added back to the estimated stratospheric
columns afterwards. However, we found that longitudinal variations of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration resulted in biases in the latitudinal correction
and hence in the stratospheric estimation. For the adaptation of STREAM to
GOME-2 measurements, the performance of STREAM is analysed using synthetic
GOME-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS1"/>), and an
improved latitudinal correction is applied (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5.SS2"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4124">Synthetic initial total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns
<bold>(a, b)</bold>, a priori stratospheric columns from C-IFS <bold>(c, d)</bold>,
and estimated stratospheric columns from STREAM <bold>(e, f)</bold> on 5 February
<bold>(a, c, e)</bold> and 5 August <bold>(b, d, f)</bold> 2009.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>Performance of STREAM</title>
      <p id="d1e4165">To test the performance of STREAM for GOME-2, simulated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fields
from the C-IFS-CB05-BASCOE (referred to as C-IFS throughout this work)
experiment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.76"/> are applied. The C-IFS model is a combination
of tropospheric chemistry module in the Integrated Forecast System (IFS, with
current version based on the Carbon Bond chemistry scheme, CB05) of the
European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and stratospheric
chemistry from the Belgian Assimilation System for Chemical ObsErvations
(BASCOE) system. Based on 1 year of C-IFS data (2009) at a resolution of
0.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> long. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.75<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> lat., synthetic initial total
columns <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">init</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are calculated as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M267" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">init</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          (see Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>). Modelled <inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns <inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are based on
the total vertical columns <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from C-IFS with interpolation
to match the GOME-2 centre pixel coordinate and measurement time. Total AMFs
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">total</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and stratospheric AMFs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are derived
using Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>)–(<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E5"/>) with surface properties
and cloud information from GOME-2 orbital data and with C-IFS a priori
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles for the whole atmosphere and between the tropopause
(defined by a latitude-dependent parameterisation with the tropopause height
ranging from 270 hPa for arctic to 92 hPa for tropics) and the top of the
atmosphere, respectively. The performance of STREAM is evaluated by applying
the synthetic initial total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns and comparing the estimated
stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns with the a priori truth (stratospheric
fields from C-IFS integrated between the tropopause and the top of the
atmosphere).</p>
      <?pagebreak page1038?><p id="d1e4358">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> displays the synthetic initial total columns
from C-IFS, the modelled stratospheric columns, and the estimated
stratospheric columns from STREAM on 5 February and 5 August 2009. The result
from STREAM presents an overall smooth stratospheric pattern with a strong
latitudinal and seasonal dependency resulting from photochemical changes and
dynamical variabilities. Because the stratospheric values over polluted
regions are taken from the clean measurements at the same latitude, the
stratospheric and tropospheric contribution over polluted regions is well
separated by STREAM, especially in the Northern Hemisphere. Due to the
latitude-dependent definition of convolution kernels, STREAM conserves the
longitudinal gradients of stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at low latitudes and
identifies certain strong stratospheric variations at high latitudes, e.g.
in the polar vortex on 5 February. However, smaller structures in the
synthetic initial total columns, for instance, resulting from the diurnal
variation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across an orbital swath, are aliased into the
troposphere by STREAM due to the use of convolution kernels.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4387">Difference in the stratospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns estimated from STREAM and modelled by C-IFS on 5
February <bold>(a)</bold> and 5 August <bold>(b)</bold> 2009. Panels <bold>(c)</bold> and
<bold>(d)</bold> show STREAM with improved latitudinal correction.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1039?><p id="d1e4419">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a, b shows the differences in estimated
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>e, f) and a priori (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c,
d) stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Overall, the stratospheric columns estimated
from STREAM show good agreement with the modelled truth with a slight
overestimation, e.g. by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over low
latitudes for both days. Larger differences are found at higher latitudes,
especially in winter, e.g. by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> over
eastern Europe and over the North Pacific (west of Canada) on 5 February. The
strong longitudinal variations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over these regions in the a
priori truth (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>c, d) can not be completely captured
by STREAM (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>e, f), which is a general limitation of
the modified reference sector method. Note that these larger differences are
reduced to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in monthly averages (not
shown). The found deviations are in agreement with the uncertainty estimates
in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.77"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Improved latitudinal correction</title>
      <p id="d1e4551">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a, b, larger differences are noticeable
over the subtropical regions in winter for both days, primarily related to
the latitudinal correction used in STREAM. As described in the previous
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>, the latitudinal correction is applied by determining the
latitudinal dependencies of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the clean Pacific,
removing the latitudinal dependencies before convolution and adding it back
to the estimated stratospheric columns. However, longitudinal variations of
total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for instance, enhanced total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns over the
Pacific (compared to the Atlantic Ocean) at 15–30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N on 5 February
2009 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>a), introduce biases in the stratospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns. Therefore, an improved latitudinal correction is
introduced to reduce the biases over the subtropics. The new latitudinal
correction determines the latitudinal dependencies of total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based
on clean measurements in the whole latitude band (the median of lowest
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns for each 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude band).
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c, d shows the difference for the estimated
stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the improved latitudinal correction. For both
days, the application of the new latitudinal correction in STREAM largely
removes the biases over the subtropics in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a,
b.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4663">GOME-2 initial total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
columns <bold>(a, b)</bold> and stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns retrieved from
the improved STREAM algorithm <bold>(c, d)</bold> and from the spatial filtering
method used in GDP 4.8 <bold>(e, f)</bold>, measured by GOME-2A in February
<bold>(a, c, e)</bold> and August <bold>(b, d, f)</bold> 2009.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f09.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4710">Applying the improved STREAM on GOME-2 data, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/> presents
the initial total columns from GOME-2 and the stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
calculated with STREAM and with the spatial filtering method used in the
GDP 4.8 algorithm (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/>) in February and August
2009. For both months, the results calculated with STREAM and with the
spatial filtering method show similar global structures. Since the spatial
filtering method applies a fixed pollution mask to remove the potentially
polluted regions (tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> larger than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), moderately polluted pixels with
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> still
contribute to the stratospheric estimation. Therefore, enhanced stratospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by more than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is found over
polluted regions, e.g. the Middle East, China, central Africa, southern Africa,
and Australia in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>e, f. This overestimation is largely
removed by STREAM in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>c, d.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e4843">Main settings of AMF calculation method and input data discussed in
this study.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GDP 4.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GDP 4.9 (this work)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">RTM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">LIDORT v2.2+</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">VLIDORT v2.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface albedo</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">TOMS–GOME LER, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.78"/></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">GOME-2 Min-LER v2.1, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="text.79"/></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A priori profile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monthly MOZART-2 (1.875<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.875<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Daily TM5-MP (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page1041?><sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Improvements to {$\protect\chem{NO_{2}}$} AMF calculation}?><title>Improvements to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AMF calculation</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1">
  <title>RTM</title>
      <p id="d1e4981">As summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>, updated box-AMFs are calculated using
the linearised vector code VLIDORT <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx94" id="paren.80"/> version 2.7.
VLIDORT applies the discrete ordinates method to generate simulated intensity
and analytic intensity derivatives with respect to atmospheric and surface
parameters (i.e. weighting functions). Box-AMFs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see
Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) are determined as

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M315" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> being the simulated top-of-atmosphere radiance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the
absorption optical thickness of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at layer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and term
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile weighting function. Compared to the scalar
(intensity-only) LIDORT code, VLIDORT provides more realistic modelling
results with a treatment of light polarisation, which affects the
tropospheric AMFs by up to 4 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e5211">The box-AMFs <inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each layer are calculated for the midpoint wavelength
of fitting window, i.e. 461 nm in our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval, which is
representative of the window-averaged box-AMFs. Compared to the tropospheric
AMFs at 440 nm (midpoint wavelength in GDP 4.8), the ones calculated at
461 nm are higher by up to 10 % for polluted situations, due to the
wavelength dependency of Rayleigh scattering, in agreement with
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.81"/> (see Fig. 7 therein). Note that the uncertainty
related to the wavelength dependency of the AMF is much smaller than the
uncertainties introduced by surface albedo, a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile,
cloud, and aerosol (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6.SS4"/>).</p>
      <p id="d1e5252">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value is calculated with the RTM and stored in a LUT as a function of GOME-2
viewing geometry, surface pressure, and surface albedo. Compared to the LUT
used in the GDP 4.8, a new LUT is calculated with an increased number of
reference points, e.g. for surface pressure (from 10 to 16) and for surface
albedo (from 10 to 14), as well as vertical layers (from 24 to 60) to reduce
the interpolation error <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.82"/>, leading to differences
in tropospheric AMFs by up to 2 %.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS2">
  <title>Surface albedo</title>
      <p id="d1e5275">Surface albedo is an important parameter for an accurate retrieval of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns and cloud properties. The sensitivity of backscattered
radiance to the boundary layer <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is strongly related to the surface
albedo, especially over polluted areas. In the GDP 4.9, the surface LER
climatology based on TOMS–GOME data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.83"/> has been
replaced by one based on GOME-2 observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="paren.84"/>.
Using the degradation-corrected GOME-2 level 1 measurements, the GOME-2
surface LER is derived by matching the measurements in a pure Rayleigh
scattering atmosphere without clouds. Compared to the TOMS–GOME LER
climatology, the GOME-2 surface LER (version 2.1) dataset takes advantage of
newer observations for 2007–2013, an increased spatial resolution of
1.0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> long. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lat. for standard grid cells and
0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> long. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lat. at coastlines
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx97" id="paren.85"/>, and an improved treatment of cloud contaminated
cells over the ocean.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5368">Map of surface LER data for 440 nm in February based
on GOME-2 observations for 2007–2013 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="paren.86"/> <bold>(a)</bold>
and TOMS–GOME data for 1979–1993 <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5386">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> shows the surface LER data from the GOME-2 and TOMS–GOME
observations for 440 nm in February. A good overall consistency is found
between the two LER datasets, particularly over the ocean. Larger
differences are found over certain snow or ice areas, like Russia and
southern Canada, which can be attributed to changes in snow or ice cover
during the different measurement periods of the two LER datasets. Increased
spatial resolution for the GOME-2 LER version 2.1 dataset enables a better
representation of surface features for the land–sea boundaries, e.g. coasts
around western Europe and eastern China. Improvements in the GOME-2 LER
algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="paren.87"/> decreases the surface LER values over
regions with persistent clouds, e.g. the North Atlantic Ocean and the North
Pacific Ocean at middle latitudes. Systematic differences in the LER
climatologies are also caused by the different overpass time, observing
geometry, and radiometric calibration of the instruments.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p id="d1e5397">Difference in tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns for clear-sky
conditions (cloud radiance fraction smaller than 0.5) for February 2008
retrieved using the GOME-2 surface LER climatology version 2.1 and the LER
climatology based on TOMS–GOME data at 440 nm.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5417">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> illustrates the influence of the updated surface LER
at 440 nm on the retrieved tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns in February
2008. The difference over the ocean is very small. Larger effects are noticed
primarily under polluted conditions with positive differences, e.g. over
parts of central Europe, Russia, or USA, and negative values, e.g. over parts
of South Africa, India, or China. The differences in the retrieved
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns are consistent with the changes in the
surface LER. For example, the GOME-2 surface LER over central Europe is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.012</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> smaller than TOMS–GOME data, and a lower sensitivity to
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is therefore assumed in the AMF calculation. This
results in a decrease in the AMF and hence an increase in the retrieved
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %). Vice versa, an increase of the surface LER values by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.018</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the Yangtze River region in eastern China leads to a
reduction of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %).</p>
      <p id="d1e5571">As described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6.SS1"/>, the AMFs are calculated for 461 nm in
the GDP 4.9 (425–497 nm wavelength window) instead of 440 nm in the
GDP 4.8 (with 425–450 nm wavelength window), and therefore the corresponding
surface LER values of 463 nm are used. The surface LER values at 463 nm
are higher by up to 0.02 over desert areas and lower by up to 0.02 over the
ocean and the snow or ice areas, which result in differences of up to 5 %
in the calculated AMFs.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1042?><p id="d1e5576">The surface LER climatology from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.88"/> derived from OMI
measurements for 2004–2007 has been widely used in satellite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrievals <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx2 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.89"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. An important advantage of using the GOME-2 LER climatology
with respect to the OMI LER dataset in our retrieval is the consistency with
the GOME-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations, considering the illumination conditions,
observation geometry, and instrumental characteristics. Another advantage of
the GOME-2 LER climatology is the use of more recent observations to reduce
the errors introduced by ignoring the interannual variability of surface
albedo, which are possibly large for varying snow and ice situations.
Possible corrections for the surface albedo from a climatology include the
use of external information about the actual snow and ice conditions, e.g.
from the Near-real-time Ice and Snow Extent (NISE) dataset <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx75" id="paren.90"/>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS3">
  <title>A priori vertical profiles</title>
      <p id="d1e5619">The retrieved tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns are sensitive to changes in
the relative vertical distribution of the a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
(i.e. profile shape). Increasing the spatial and/or temporal resolution of
the a priori profiles have shown to produce a more accurate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrieval
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx89 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx71 bib1.bibx76 bib1.bibx57" id="paren.91"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.
To improve the tropospheric AMF calculation, daily a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profiles are obtained with a resolution of
1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> long. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lat. from the chemical transport model
TM5-MP <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx114" id="paren.92"/>. The TM5-MP profiles have
been used in several studies to derive AMFs and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
columns
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx102 bib1.bibx64 bib1.bibx7" id="paren.93"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5716">Examples of a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles for
Brussels <bold>(a, b)</bold> and Guangzhou <bold>(c, d)</bold> on a given day in
February <bold>(a, c)</bold> and August <bold>(b, d)</bold> 2009. Monthly profiles
are shown for MOZART-2 (green), and daily profiles on the given days are
shown for TM5-MP (brown) together with the monthly average profiles
calculated for TM5-MP (blue). The tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns retrieved
using each a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile are also given.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5771">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/> shows the TM5-MP and MOZART-2 a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profiles for two pollution hot spots located in Brussels (Belgium, lat. 50.9,
long. 4.4) and Guangzhou (China; lat. 23.1, long. 113.3) on 1 day in February
and August 2009 as examples. Monthly profiles are shown for MOZART-2, and
profiles for the given days are shown for TM5-MP. Large differences between
the a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile shapes from TM5-MP and MOZART-2 are found
for both cities. These differences are the result of the different chemical
mechanism, transport scheme, and emission inventory employed by the model,
the different spatial resolution, and the use of daily vs. monthly profiles.
In TM5-MP, the use of an updated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from the
MACCity inventory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.94"/> produces more realistic
profiles. Improvement in the spatial resolution gives a more accurate
description of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient and transport. The use of daily
profiles provides a better description of the temporal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variation,
especially for regions dominated by emission and transport like Brussels and
Guangzhou.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e5838">Difference in tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
columns for clear-sky conditions (cloud radiance fraction smaller than 0.5)
retrieved using daily TM5-MP and monthly MOZART-2 a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profiles for February <bold>(a)</bold> and August <bold>(b)</bold> 2009. Red circles
indicate locations in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1043?><p id="d1e5877">In Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>, the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns retrieved for
the individual days using TM5-MP and MOZART-2 a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles
are also reported. Taking Brussels on 11 February 2009
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>a) as an example, the smaller boundary layer
concentration modelled by TM5-MP (less steep profile shape) leads to an
increase in the tropospheric AMF and hence a decrease in the retrieved
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(19.7 %). Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/> presents a comparison of the
monthly averaged tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns retrieved using daily
TM5-MP and monthly MOZART-2 a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles in February and
August 2009. The application of the daily TM5-MP a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profiles affects the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns by more than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mostly over polluted regions with enhanced
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the boundary layer, e.g. with an increase of tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over parts of China, India, and South Africa and a decrease over
parts of the eastern US, Europe, and Japan.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1044?><p id="d1e6035">To analyse the effect of using daily vs. monthly profiles, the tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns are also retrieved using the monthly average TM5-MP
profiles, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>. Differences in the profile
shape of daily and monthly profiles are mainly related to the variations in
the meteorology. In agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx76" id="text.95"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="text.96"/>, the use of monthly profiles changes the
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns by up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
depending on the wind speed and wind direction, in particular for regions
affected by transport (not shown). For the example of Brussels on
11 February 2009 (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>a), the use of monthly profiles
increases the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (4.7 %). A comprehensive analyse of the
effect of using a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles from different chemistry
transport models on the retrieved tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will be described
in a subsequent paper.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS4">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Examples of GOME-2 tropospheric {$\protect\chem{NO_{2}}$}}?><title>Examples of GOME-2 tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e6170">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/> shows the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from the
improved GDP 4.9 algorithm for February and August averaged for the year
2007–2016. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/> shows the difference in tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from the GDP 4.9 and GDP 4.8 product. The tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns increase globally by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the improved DOAS slant column
fitting and increase further by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> around
moderately polluted regions benefitting from the use
of new stratosphere–troposphere separation algorithm STREAM. A stronger
change by more than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is found mainly over
polluted continents as a result of the improvements to the AMF calculation,
primarily the surface albedo (which also affects the snow or ice area, e.g.
southern Canada and northeastern Europe) and/or the a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profiles (which also affect the polluted ocean, e.g. shipping lanes in
southeastern Asia).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6301">Monthly average tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns
from GDP 4.9 for clear-sky conditions (cloud radiance fraction smaller than
0.5), measured by GOME-2A in February <bold>(a)</bold> and August <bold>(b)</bold>
2007–2016.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6329">Difference in tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns
from GDP 4.9 and GDP 4.8 for clear-sky conditions (cloud radiance fraction
smaller than 0.5) in February <bold>(a)</bold> and August <bold>(b)</bold> 2007–2016
for GOME-2A.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6356">Over central northern Europe, the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns are
reduced by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for GDP 4.9 in winter and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in summer. A larger number of negative
values in GDP 4.8, possibly related to the overestimated stratospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> around polar vortex areas, is largely corrected in GDP 4.9 by
improving the stratosphere–troposphere separation algorithm. Over eastern
China and eastern US, the seasonal variation is consistent between GDP 4.8
and 4.9, with reduced values in winter (by more than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and enlarged values in summer (by more
than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for eastern China and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for eastern US) for GDP 4.9 due to the
combined impact of the algorithm changes, mainly the AMF calculation. Over
India and its surrounding areas, a systematic increase in tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for GDP 4.9
benefits from the use of STREAM.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS5">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Uncertainty estimates for GOME-2 total and tropospheric {$\protect\chem{NO_{2}}$}}?><title>Uncertainty estimates for GOME-2 total and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e6562">The uncertainty in our GDP 4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated from the average slant column
error using a statistical method described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS5"/>. The
uncertainty in the GOME-2 stratospheric columns is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for polluted conditions based on
the daily synthetic GOME-2 data and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for monthly averages. The uncertainty in the GDP 4.9 AMF calculation is
likely reduced, considering the improved surface albedo climatology and a
priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles, which are the main causes of AMF structural
uncertainty <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="paren.97"/>. In addition, the AMF uncertainty
is substantially driven by the cloud parameters and the aerosol correction
approach.</p>
      <p id="d1e6686">The largest cloud-related uncertainty in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval is introduced
by the surface albedo–cloud fraction error correlation, as analysed by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.98"/> for OMI using the OMCLD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud product,
which requires a surface albedo climatology as input in the cloud fraction
retrieval. But this uncertainty is likely smaller for OCRA and ROCINN cloud
algorithms, since the surface albedo is treated differently in OCRA's cloud
fraction calculation. Retrieved by separating a spectral scene into cloudy
contribution and cloud-free background, the cloud fraction from OCRA is
affected by surface albedo through the cloud-free map construction with a
larger impact over bright surfaces like snow or ice cover, particularly
during snowfall (higher background) or melting (lower background), which has
been corrected by interpolating towards a daily value between two monthly
cloud-free maps in OCRA <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx69" id="paren.99"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e6717">The uncertainty introduced by aerosol in GDP 4.9 is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for high
aerosol loading, in agreement with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.100"/>. With direct
impact on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AMF calculation<?pagebreak page1045?> and indirect impact via cloud
parameter retrieval, the aerosol effect has been considered for OMI
implicitly through the cloud correction
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.101"/> or explicitly with additional
aerosol information for regional studies
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx62 bib1.bibx54 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx19" id="paren.102"/>,
leading to an increase or decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AMF by up to 40 %
depending on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution and aerosol properties and
distribution. Since aerosol is highly variable in space and time due to the
dependency on emission sources, transports, and atmospheric processes
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.103"/>, explicit aerosol correction will be applied in
our AMF calculation when reliable observations or model outputs of aerosol
optical properties and vertical distributions are available. To conclude, the
uncertainty in the AMF calculation is estimated to be in the
10 %–45 % range for polluted conditions, leading to a total
uncertainty in the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns likely in the range of
30 %–70 %.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{End-to-end GOME-2 {$\protect\chem{NO_{2}}$} validation}?><title>End-to-end GOME-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> validation</title>
      <p id="d1e6806">The validation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data derived from the GOME-2 GDP algorithm is
part of the validation activities done at BIRA-IASB in the AC-SAF context
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.104"/>. An end-to-end validation approach is usually
performed for each main release and summarised in validation reports that can
be found on AC-SAF validation website
(<uri>http://cdop.aeronomie.be/validation/valid-reports</uri>, last access: 1
February 2019). This includes several steps, such as
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6828">the DOAS analysis results, cloud property
retrievals, and AMF evaluations by confrontation of GOME-2 retrievals to
other established satellite retrievals and AMF evaluations;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e6832">the
stratospheric reference evaluation by comparison with correlative
observations from ground-based zenith-looking DOAS spectrometers and from
other nadir-looking satellites; and</p></list-item><list-item>
      <?pagebreak page1046?><p id="d1e6836">the tropospheric and total
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column data evaluation by comparison with correlative
observations from ground-based MAXDOAS and direct-sun spectrometers
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx81" id="paren.105"/>.</p></list-item></list>
In this paper, we focus on the last point: the validation of tropospheric
data with BIRA-IASB ground-based MAXDOAS data. The MAXDOAS instruments
collect scattered sky light in a series of line-of-sight angular directions
extending from the horizon to the zenith. High sensitivity towards absorbers
near the surface is obtained for the smallest elevation angles, while
measurements at higher elevations provide information on the rest of the
column. This technique allows the determination of vertically resolved
abundances of atmospheric trace species in lowermost troposphere
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx111 bib1.bibx115 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.106"/>. Here
the bePRO retrieval code
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx39 bib1.bibx108" id="paren.107"/> is used to
retrieve tropospheric columns and low tropospheric profiles (up to 3.5 km
with about 2 to 3 degrees of freedom).</p>
      <p id="d1e6861">As summarised in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>, a set of MAXDOAS
stations (Beijing, Bujumbura, Observatoire de Haute-Provence (OHP), Réunion,
Uccle, and Xianghe) is providing interesting test cases for GOME-2
sensitivity to tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Indeed Beijing and Uccle are typical
urban stations, Xianghe is a suburban station (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km from Beijing),
Bujumbura and Réunion are small cities in remote regions, and OHP is largely
rural but occasionally influenced by polluted air masses transported from
neighbouring cities. These different station types are important in the
validation context as it is generally expected that urban stations are
underestimated by the satellite data, due to the averaging of a local source
over a pixel size (80 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 km and 40 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 km for GOME-2) larger than
the horizontal sensitivity of the ground-based measurements which is about
a few to tens of kilometres <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48 bib1.bibx112 bib1.bibx78" id="paren.108"/>.
In this context, MAXDOAS data are already better than in situ measurements
with an extended horizontal and vertical sensitivity, more similar to the
satellite sensitivity, but differences in sampling and sensitivity still
remain and explain part of the biases highlighted by validation exercises.
Several validation studies show a significant underestimation of tropospheric
trace gases, such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from satellite observations over regions
with strong spatial gradients in tropospheric pollution
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx116 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx113 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.109"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.
Other possible explanations
include the uncertainties in the applied satellite retrieval assumptions,
such as the choices of surface albedo, a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles, or
cloud and aerosol treatment
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx61 bib1.bibx62" id="paren.110"/>.
The best agreement is generally obtained in the case of
suburban and remote stations, but difficulties may arise when small local
sources are present in a remote location, such as Réunion island or Bujumbura
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.111"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e6941">An overview of BIRA-IASB MAXDOAS
datasets used in this study.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MAXDOAS station</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Period</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Position</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Description</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beijing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6/2008–4/2009</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lat. 39.98, long. 116.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">urban polluted site in China</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bujumbura</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12/2013–11/2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lat. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.38, long. 29.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">urban site in Burundi</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OHP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3/2007–11/2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lat. 43.94, long. 5.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">background site in southern France</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Réunion</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4/2016–11/2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lat. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21, long. 55.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">urban site in Réunion island</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Uccle</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4/2011–11/2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lat. 51, long. 4.36</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">urban polluted site in Belgium with a miniDOAS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Xianghe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3/2010–11/2016</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Lat. 39.75, long. 116.96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">suburban polluted site in China</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7087">Daily <bold>(a)</bold> and monthly mean
<bold>(b)</bold> time series and scatter plots of GOME-2A and MAXDOAS tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns (mean value of all the pixels within 50 km around
Xianghe).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f16.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F17" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7115">Daily (grey dots) and monthly mean (back
dots) absolute and relative GOME-2A and MAXDOAS time series differences for
the Xianghe station. The histogram of the daily differences is also given,
with the mean and median difference, and the total time-series absolute and
relative monthly differences are given outside the panels.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f17.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F18" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7126">Absolute and relative differences of
GOME-2A and MAXDOAS tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns. The time series
presents the monthly mean differences for GDP 4.8 (black) and GDP 4.9 (red).
The total mean difference values and standard deviations are given, as well
as the yearly values. The histogram presents the daily differences over the
whole time series for the two products (grey for GDP 4.8 and red for
GDP 4.9).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1029/2019/amt-12-1029-2019-f18.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e7146">The same methodology as in the GDP 4.8 validation report
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="paren.112"/> is used for the validation of this improved GDP 4.9
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dataset; the satellite data are filtered for clouds
(cloud radiance fraction smaller than 0.5), and the mean value of all the
valid pixels within 50 km of the stations is compared to the ground-based
value. The original ground-based MAXDOAS data usually retrieve <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
columns all day long every 20 to 30 min, and these values are linearly
interpolated to the GOME-2 overpass time (09:30 LT) if original data exist
within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 h.</p>
      <p id="d1e7181">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/> shows an example of the time series and scatter
plot of the daily and monthly mean comparison between GDP 4.9 tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns and ground-based MAXDOAS measurements in Xianghe,
including the statistical information on the number of points, correlation
coefficient, slope, and intercept of orthogonal regression analysis.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/> presents the daily and monthly mean
absolute and relative differences of GDP 4.9 and ground-based measurements.
As can be seen in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/>,
the seasonal variation in the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns is similarly
captured by both observation systems, with differences on average within
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (median difference of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Larger differences are observed on
some days and months, particularly in winter when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and aerosol
loadings are large. A relatively compact scatter is found, with a correlation
coefficient of 0.91 and a slope of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the orthogonal
regression fit. These results are qualitatively similar to those obtained in
previous validation exercises
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16 bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx116 bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx113 bib1.bibx26 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.113"/>.
Similar figures for GDP 4.8 can be found on the AC-SAF validation website
(<uri>http://cdop.aeronomie.be/validation/valid-results</uri>, last access: 1
February 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e7301">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/> reports the monthly mean absolute and
relative differences for both GDP 4.8 and GDP 4.9 for Xianghe station. The
daily differences are also reported through the histogram panel, where the
reduction in the spread of the daily comparison points is clearly visible for
GDP 4.9. The reduction of the bias, which is smaller and more stable in time,
is seen in the absolute and relative monthly mean bias time series. A total
of 3 years show a standard deviation of the monthly biases larger for GDP 4.9 than
for GDP 4.8 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 % instead of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 % in 2010, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12 %
instead of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 % in 2013, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>41 % instead of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27 %
in 2014) but with a strongly reduced mean bias (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4 % instead of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>20 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8 % instead of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>34 %, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 % instead of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44 %).</p>
      <p id="d1e7392">Similar figures as Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/>
for all the stations are gathered in Figs. S1 to S4 in the Supplement, and
all the statistics are summarised in Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/> and
<xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/> for GOME-2A and GOME-2B, respectively. Figures S1
and S2 in the Supplement present the time series and scatter plots for
GDP 4.9, while Figs. S3 and S4 in the Supplement present the<?pagebreak page1047?> differences for
both GDP 4.9 and GDP 4.8 comparisons. As discussed in
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx82" id="text.114"/>, for background stations (here Bujumbura,
Réunion, and OHP), the mean bias is considered the best indicator of the
validation results, due to the relatively small variability in the measured
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In urban (Beijing and Uccle) and suburban (Xianghe) situations,
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variability is large enough and in this case, the correlation
coefficient is a good indication of the linearity or coherence of the
satellite and ground-based dataset, although a larger difference in terms of
slope (closer to 0.5 than to 1 for urban cases) and mean bias can be expected
because satellite measurements (and especially GOME-2 80 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 km
and 40 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 km pixels) smooth out the local <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hot
spots. This can be seen, e.g. in the cases of Beijing and Xianghe for GOME-2A
(see Fig. S1a in the Supplement and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>,
respectively), where very high correlations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.91, respectively)
are obtained from GDP 4.9, showing the very consistent behaviour of both
datasets for small and large <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns, while their slopes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and 0.72, respectively) show almost a factor of 2 difference, with a smaller
slope in the Beijing case, where the MAXDOAS instrument is in the city centre
and thus much more subject to local emission smeared out by the GOME-2 large
pixel. This last effect is also seen through the bias values
(RD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>47 % and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.8 %, respectively) that are strongly
reduced when moving the MAXDOAS outside the city in a suburban location like
Xianghe. A slope of 0.47 (similar to the 0.4 of Beijing) is also obtained in
Uccle, another urban site, where the MAXDOAS is affected by local emissions.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1048?><p id="d1e7513">In remote cases such as OHP, Bujumbura, or Réunion island, as discussed
above, the variation of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns is small and the statistical
analysis on the regression is not very representative of the situation, with
a cloud of points giving small slopes and low correlation coefficients (see
e.g. Fig. S1b–d in the Supplement and Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/> for
GOME-2A). In those cases, GOME-2 is lower than the ground-based
measurements, with sometimes almost no seasonal variation,
e.g. Bujumbura and Réunion, and in other cases, like OHP, some of the
daily peaks are captured by GOME-2 (as days in the winter of 2014 and 2015),
and the seasonal patterns and the orders of magnitude of both datasets are
similar. In these cases, it is best to look at the absolute biases (as
relative biases are large due to the division with small ground-based
columns), as presented in e.g. Fig. S3b–d and
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>. Mean absolute differences for GDP 4.9 are
about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Bujumbura,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for OHP, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Réunion, which are all smaller
than their respective GDP 4.8 values. The daily differences presented in the
histograms of those figures also show reduced spread of GDP 4.9 comparisons
when superposed to the GDP 4.8 results. Similar differences are also found
for GOME-2B.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1049?><p id="d1e7610">To conclude, although the Xianghe case presented in
Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/> to <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F18"/> is the best case
(due to its suburban location and its long time series), better seasonal
agreement between GDP 4.9 and MAXDOAS data is found for urban and suburban
cases like Beijing, Uccle, and Xianghe, compared to results with GDP 4.8. In
remote locations such as OHP, which is occasionally influenced by polluted
air masses transported from neighbouring cities, the comparison is also
meaningful (e.g. with a mean bias reduced from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45 % for GDP 4.8 to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 % for GDP 4.9 for GOME-2A), while cases such as Bujumbura and
Réunion are quite challenging for satellite validation, with specific local
conditions (Bujumbura is in a valley on the side of Lake Tanganyika,
while the MAXDOAS at Réunion is in St-Denis, on the coast of the 65 km long
and 50 km wide island in the Indian Ocean, containing a mountain massif with
summits above 2740 m a.s.l.). In both cases the MAXDOAS instrument is
located in small cities surrounded by specific orography, difficult for
satellite retrievals and challenging for validation. The absolute and
relative differences show, however, a clear improvement for all the stations
when comparing to GDP 4.8 results for both daily and monthly mean biases. The
daily biases and spreads are all reduced.</p>
      <p id="d1e7631">To summarise, the impact of the improvement of the algorithm (as seen in
Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/> and in
Figs. S3 and S4 in the Supplement) leads to a decrease of the relative
differences in urban conditions such as in Beijing or Uccle
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for GDP 4.8 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for GDP 4.9 for GOME-2A
and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>54 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 % for GOME-2B. In suburban conditions such
as in Xianghe, the differences go from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>30 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 % for GOME-2A
and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 % for GOME-2B. In remote (difficult) cases
such as in Bujumbura or Réunion, the differences go from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">89</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for GOME-2A and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">74</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %
for GOME-2B, while in background cases such as in OHP, the differences
decrease from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>45 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 % for GOME-2A and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>42 % to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 % for GOME-2B. The differences in numbers for GOME-2A and GOME-2B
are due to the different time-series lengths of both comparisons (e.g.
March 2010–November 2016 for GOME-2A and December 2012–November 2016 for
GOME-2B in Xianghe), the different sampling of the atmosphere by GOME-2A and
GOME-2B (slight time delay between both overpasses and reduced swath pixels
for GOME-2A since July 2013), and the impact of the decreasing quality of the
satellite in time, i.e. the GOME-2A degradation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23 bib1.bibx74" id="paren.115"/>. This lead, e.g. for Xianghe, to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 % bias and 0.49 slope for GOME-2B compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>6 % and 0.72
for GOME-2A for GDP 4.9.</p>
      <p id="d1e7848">These comparisons results aim at showing how the final GDP 4.9 product is
improved compared to its predecessor, and not to summarise the improvements
of each of the changes discussed in previous sections. In addition, the
specific validation method could be improved or at least better characterised
(including results uncertainties), by, e.g. changing the colocation method
(averaging the MAXDOAS within 1 h of the satellite overpass or selecting the
closest satellite pixel, or only considering the pixels containing the
station, etc.), but this is out of the scope of the present paper that wants
to compare to standard validation results performed routinely on GDP  4.8
(and publicly available at
<uri>http://cdop.aeronomie.be/validation/valid-results</uri>, last access: 1
February 2019).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e7858">Averaged absolute differences (AD,
SAT-GB in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), relative differences (RD, (SAT-GB)/GB
in %), standard deviation (SD), correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
regression parameters (slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mi>S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and intercept <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the orthogonal
regression for the monthly means GOME-2A tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product
when comparing to MAXDOAS data. Values for GDP 4.9 (this study) are given and
the values for GDP 4.8 are reported in brackets for comparison. Results for
both the original comparisons and the smoothed comparisons (smo.) are
reported.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.88}[.88]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SD (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); RD (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Regression parameters</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beijing</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>47 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.94 (0.95)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beijing (smo.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>37 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.94 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.43</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bujumbura</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>76 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">89</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n/a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.29</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n/a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.012</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bujumbura (smo.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>62 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">84</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">n/a (0.51)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">n/a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.18</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OHP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Réunion</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>64 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Réunion (smo.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>31 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">77</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.15 (0.28)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Uccle</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>43 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.82 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.83</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Uccle (smo.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>34 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.28</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Xianghe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.8 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.91 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.86</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.72</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Xianghe (smo.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.92 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e7914">n/a denotes values that are not applicable.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e9370">Same as Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/> but for GOME-2B product.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.88}[.88]?><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AD</mml:mi><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SD</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); RD (%)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Regression parameters</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bujumbura</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>74 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">87</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.76</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bujumbura (smo.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M599" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M600" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>57 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M601" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">81</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.28 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M602" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M603" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M604" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M605" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OHP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M606" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M607" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M608" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M609" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M610" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.11</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M611" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M612" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Réunion</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M613" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M614" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>47 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M615" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.56 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M616" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M617" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M618" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.36</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M619" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Réunion (smo.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M620" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; 6.7 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M621" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.78 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M622" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M623" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M624" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M625" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.004</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Uccle</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M626" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M627" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M628" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.71 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M629" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M630" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M631" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.47</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M632" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Uccle (smo.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M633" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M634" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M635" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">56</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M636" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.73</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M637" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M638" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.13</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.09</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M639" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.52</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Xianghe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M640" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M641" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.2 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M642" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.87 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M643" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.84</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M644" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M645" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.66</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M646" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Xianghe (smo.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M647" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M648" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M649" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn><mml:mo>;</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.89 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M650" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M651" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M652" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M653" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e10647">For most stations, in addition of the tropospheric columns, MAXDOAS retrieved
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M654" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles can also be exploited with satellite column averaging
kernels (AKs) to further investigate the impact of the satellite a priori
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M655" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles in the comparison differences
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.116"/>. The satellite AK describes the vertical
sensitivity of measurements to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M656" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and relates the
MAXDOAS profiles to satellite column measurements by calculating the
“smoothed MAXDOAS columns” as

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M657" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAXDOAS</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">smoothed</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AK</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAXDOAS</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        The smoothed MAXDOAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M658" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns <inline-formula><mml:math id="M659" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAXDOAS</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">smoothed</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are
derived for each day by convolving the layer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M660" display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)-dependent daily profile
(interpolated to the satellite overpass time) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M661" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MAXDOAS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> expressed
in partial columns with the satellite column averaging kernel
AK<inline-formula><mml:math id="M662" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e10789">The comparisons of satellite and smoothed MAXDOAS columns for the different
stations are reported in the supplement (Figs. S5 and S6 in the Supplement)
and Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/>. The
different impact of MAXDOAS smoothing on the 2 GDP products results from the
different AKs as parameters like surface albedo or a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M663" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profiles used in both satellite retrievals are quite different (see
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/>). In general, the use of smoothing reduces the MAXDOAS
columns and thus reduces both the daily and monthly differences of satellite
and MAXDOAS columns. When the average kernels are used to remove the
contribution of a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M664" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile shape, as seen in
Tables <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/> and <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T5"/> and in
Figs. S5 and S6 in the Supplement, the relative differences in urban
conditions such as in Beijing or Uccle decrease from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M665" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for
GDP 4.8 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M666" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37</mml:mn><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for GDP 4.9 for GOME-2A and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M667" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>56 % to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M668" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>29 % for GOME-2B. The differences go from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M669" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>32 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M670" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13 %
for GOME-2A and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M671" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M672" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>11 % for GOME-2B for suburban
conditions such as in Xianghe and go from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M673" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>77 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M674" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>31 % for
GOME-2A and from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M675" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>64 % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M676" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>7 % for GOME-2B for remote conditions
such as in Réunion.</p>
      <p id="d1e10937">The results obtained here are coherent with other validation exercises at
different stations and with other satellite products, where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M677" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
levels are underestimated by the satellite sensors, e.g. with differences of
5 % to 25 % over China
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx70 bib1.bibx116 bib1.bibx113 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.117"/>,
mostly explained by the relatively low sensitivity of space-borne
measurements near the surface, the gradient-smoothing effect, and the aerosol
shielding effect. These effects are often inherent to the different
measurements types or the specific conditions of the validation sites (as
seen for the different results for Beijing and Xianghe sites in this
paper), but also to the remaining impact of structural uncertainties
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.118"/>, such as the impact of the choices of
the a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M678" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles and/or the albedo database assumed for the
satellite AMF calculations (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S6"/>).
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx64" id="text.119"/> estimated, e.g. the AMF structural uncertainty
to be on average 42 % over polluted<?pagebreak page1050?> regions and 31 % over unpolluted
regions, mostly driven by substantial differences in the a priori trace gas
profiles, surface albedo and cloud parameters used to represent the state of
the atmosphere. However, the differences in Bujumbura are still of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M679" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>62 %, because of the peculiar condition with the MAXDOAS being in a
valley, close to Lake Tanganyika, which always leads to a higher surface
pressure for the satellite pixels due to the information coming from the a
priori model. This is leading to large representation errors and
uncertainties in the comparisons <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="paren.120"/> that
needs to be investigated in more details.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S8" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e10990"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M680" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns retrieved from measurements of the GOME-2 aboard the
MetOp-A and MetOp-B platforms have been successfully applied in many studies.
The abundance of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M681" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is retrieved from the narrow band absorption
structures of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M682" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the backscattered and reflected radiation in the
visible spectral region. The current operational retrieval algorithm
(GDP 4.8) for total and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M683" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from GOME-2 was first
introduced by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx99" id="text.121"/>, and an improved algorithm
(GDP 4.9) is described in this paper.</p>
      <p id="d1e11039">To calculate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M684" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns, a larger 425–497 nm wavelength
fitting window is used in the DOAS fit to increase the signal-to-noise ratio.
Absorption cross sections are updated and a linear intensity offset
correction is applied. The long-term and in-orbit variations of GOME-2 slit
function are corrected by deriving effective slit functions with a stretched
preflight GOME-2 slit function and by including a resolution correction
function as a pseudo absorber cross section in the DOAS fit, respectively.
Compared to the GDP 4.8 algorithm, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M685" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from GDP 4.9 are
higher by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M686" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M687" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M688" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (up to 27 %) and the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M689" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant column noise is lower by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M690" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. In addition, the
effect of using a new version (6.1) of the GOME-2 level 1b data has been
analysed in our <inline-formula><mml:math id="M691" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithm. The application of new GOME-2 level 1b
data largely reduces the offset between GOME-2A and GOME-2B <inline-formula><mml:math id="M692" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
columns by removing calibration artefacts in the GOME-2B irradiances (due to
Xe-line contaminations in the calibration key data). Compared to the GOME-2
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M693" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product from the QA4ECV project, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M694" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from
GDP 4.9 show good consistency and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M695" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant column noise is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M696" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %–28 % smaller, indicating a good overall quality of the
improved DOAS retrieval.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1051?><p id="d1e11186">The stratosphere–troposphere separation algorithm STREAM, which was designed
for TROPOMI, was optimised for GOME-2 instrument. Compared to the spatial
filtering method used in the GDP 4.8, STREAM provides an improved treatment
of polluted and cloudy pixels by defining weighting factors for each
measurement depending on polluted situation and cloudy information. For the
adaption to GOME-2 measurements, the performance of STREAM is analysed by
applying it to synthetic GOME-2 data and by comparing the difference between
estimated and original stratospheric fields. Applied to synthetic GOME-2 data
calculated by a RTM using C-IFS model data, the estimated stratospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M697" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from STREAM show good consistency with the a priori
truth. A slight overestimation by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M698" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M699" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M700" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
is found over lower latitudes, and larger differences of up to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M701" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M702" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are found at higher latitudes. To
reduce the biases over the subtropical regions in winter, an improved
latitudinal correction is used in STREAM. Applied to GOME-2 measurements, the
updated STREAM successfully separates the stratospheric and tropospheric
contribution over polluted regions, especially in the Northern Hemisphere.
Compared to the current method in the GDP 4.8, the use of STREAM slightly
decreases the stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M703" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns by
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M704" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M705" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in general and largely reduces the
overestimation over polluted areas.</p>
      <p id="d1e11298">To improve the calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M706" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> AMF, a new box-AMF LUT was
generated using the latest version of the VLIDORT RTM with an increased
number of reference points and vertical layers to reduce interpolation
errors. The new GOME-2 surface LER climatology <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx98" id="paren.122"/>
used in this study is derived with a high resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M707" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> long. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M708" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lat. (0.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M709" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> long. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M710" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lat. at
coastlines) and an improved LER algorithm based on observations for
2007–2013. Daily a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M711" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles, obtained from the chemistry
transport model TM5-MP, capture the short-term variability in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M712" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
fields with a resolution of 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M713" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> long. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M714" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M715" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> lat. A large impact
on the retrieved tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M716" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns (more than 10 %) is
found over polluted areas.</p>
      <p id="d1e11426">The uncertainty in our GDP 4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M717" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M718" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M719" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, calculated from the average slant column
error using a statistical method described in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4.SS5"/>. The
uncertainty in the GOME-2 stratospheric columns is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M720" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M721" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M722" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for polluted conditions based on
the daily synthetic GOME-2 data and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M723" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M724" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M725" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for monthly averages. The
uncertainty in the tropospheric AMFs is estimated to be in the
10 %–45 % range, considering the use of updated box-AMF LUT and
improved surface albedo climatology and a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M726" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles,
resulting in a total uncertainty in the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M727" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns
likely in the range of 30 %–70 % for polluted conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e11558">An end-to-end validation of the improved GOME-2 GDP 4.9 dataset was performed
by comparing the <?xmltex \hack{\mbox\bgroup}?>GOME-2<?xmltex \hack{\egroup}?> tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M728" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns with BIRA-IASB
ground-based MAXDOAS measurements. The validation was illustrated for
different MAXDOAS stations (Beijing, Bujumbura, OHP, Réunion, Uccle, and
Xianghe) covering urban, suburban, and background situations. Taking Xianghe
station as an example, the GDP 4.9 dataset shows a similar seasonal variation
in the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M729" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns as the MAXDOAS measurements with a
relative difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M730" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.8 % (i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M731" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M732" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
in absolute) and a correlation coefficient of 0.91 for GOME-2A, indicating
good agreement. The Xianghe site, by its suburban nature, is the best site
for validation. At the other sites, mean biases range from (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M733" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>47 %;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M734" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M735" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for Beijing, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M736" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>76 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M737" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>74 %;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M738" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M739" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M740" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M741" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for Bujumbura, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M742" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>25 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M743" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17 %;
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M744" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M745" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M746" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M747" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for OHP, (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M748" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>64 %, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M749" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>47 %; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M750" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M751" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M752" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M753" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for Réunion, and (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M754" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>43 %,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M755" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>40 %; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M756" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M757" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M758" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M759" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for Uccle. Réunion and Bujumbura are
difficult sites for validation, due to their valley and mountain nature, while
urban sites Beijing and Uccle show similar relative results. A smaller
absolute bias is found at the rural OHP station. Compared to the current
operational GDP 4.8 product, the GDP 4.9 dataset is a significant
improvement. Although GOME-2 measurements are still underestimating the
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M760" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns with respect to the ground data, the
absolute and relative differences with the different MAXDOAS stations are
smaller, both for the original comparisons and for the comparisons with the
smoothed MAXDOAS columns.</p>
      <p id="d1e11933">In the future, the AMF calculation will be further improved, since
uncertainty in AMF is one dominating source of errors in the tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M761" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval, especially over polluted areas. The surface
bidirectional reflectance distribution function (BRDF) effect will be
included using a direction-dependent LER climatology from GOME-2
(L. Gijsbert Tilstra, personal communication, 2018) to describe the angular
distribution of the surface reflectance. Aerosol properties will be
considered explicitly in the RTM calculation using ground-based aerosol
observations from, e.g. MAXDOAS instruments, Mie scattering lidars, or sun
photometers operated by the AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET). A priori
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M762" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles from different global and regional models will help to
analyse the effect of spatial resolution, temporal resolution, and emissions
on the tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M763" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval for GOME-2. Furthermore, the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M764" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithm will be adapted to measurements from the TROPOMI
instrument with a spatial resolution as high as 7 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M765" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e11994">The current
operational (GDP 4.8) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M766" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data from GOME-2 can be ordered via the FTP server and
the EUMETSAT Data Centre (https://acsaf.org/, last access: 1 February 2019).
The improved (GDP 4.9) dataset is currently available upon request.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><?pagebreak page1052?><p id="d1e12009">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1029-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1029-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e12018">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e12024">This work is funded by the DLR-DAAD Research Fellowships 2015 (57186656)
programme with reference number 91585186 and is undertaken in the framework
of the EUMETSAT AC-SAF project. We acknowledge the Belgian Science Policy
Office (BELSPO) supporting part of this work through the PRODEX project
B-ACSAF. We thank EUMETSAT for the ground segment interfacing work and for
the provision of GOME-2 level 1 products. We thank the UPAS team for the
development work on the UPAS system at DLR. We are thankful to
Rüdiger Lang (EUMETSAT) for providing the GOME-2 level 1b testing data,
Vincent Huijnen (KNMI) for providing the C-IFS model data, Gijsbert Tilstra
(KNMI) for discussions on surface albedo, and Henk Eskes (KNMI) for creating
the TM5-MP a priori <inline-formula><mml:math id="M767" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles. We acknowledge the free use of
GOME-2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M768" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column data from the QA4ECV project available at
<uri>http://www.qa4ecv.eu</uri>. We also acknowledge the free use of the GOME-2
surface LER database created by KNMI and provided through the AC-SAF of
EUMETSAT.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> The article processing charges for
this open-access <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> publication were covered by a Research
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Centre of
the Helmholtz Association.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: Jun Wang
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Reviewed by: Kai Yang and one anonymous referee</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Azam et~al.(2015)Azam, Richter, Weber, No{\"{e}}, and
Burrows}}?><label>Azam et al.(2015)Azam, Richter, Weber, Noë, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Azam, F., Richter, A., Weber, M., Noë, S., and Burrows, J.: GOME-2 on
MetOp-B Follow-on analysis of GOME2 in orbit degradation, Tech. rep.,
EUM/CO/09/4600000696/RM, Final Report, IUP University of Bremen, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Barkley et al.(2013)Barkley, Smedt, Van Roozendael, Kurosu, Chance,
Arneth, Hagberg, Guenther, Paulot, Marais et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Barkley, M. P., Smedt, I. D., Van Roozendael, M., Kurosu, T. P., Chance, K.,
Arneth, A., Hagberg, D., Guenther, A., Paulot, F., Marais, E., and Mao, J.:
Top-down isoprene emissions over tropical South America inferred from
SCIAMACHY and OMI formaldehyde columns, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
6849–6868, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Beirle et~al.(2016)Beirle, H{\"{o}}rmann, J{\"{o}}ckel, Liu, Penning~de
Vries, Pozzer, Sihler, Valks, and Wagner}}?><label>Beirle et al.(2016)Beirle, Hörmann, Jöckel, Liu, Penning de
Vries, Pozzer, Sihler, Valks, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>Beirle, S., Hörmann, C., Jöckel, P., Liu, S., Penning de Vries, M.,
Pozzer, A., Sihler, H., Valks, P., and Wagner, T.: The STRatospheric
Estimation Algorithm from Mainz (STREAM): estimating stratospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M769" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from nadir-viewing satellites by weighted convolution, Atmos.
Meas. Tech., 9, 2753–2779, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2753-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-2753-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Beirle et al.(2017)Beirle, Lampel, Lerot, Sihler, and
Wagner</label><mixed-citation>Beirle, S., Lampel, J., Lerot, C., Sihler, H., and Wagner, T.: Parameterizing
the instrumental spectral response function and its changes by a
super-Gaussian and its derivatives, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 581–598,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-581-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-581-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Boersma et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Boersma, K., Bucsela, E., Brinksma, E., and Gleason, J.: OMI algorithm
theoretical basis document: OMI trace gas algorithms, vol. 4, edited by:
Chance, K., Rep. ATBD-OMI, p. 19, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Boersma et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>Boersma, K., Eskes, H., and Brinksma, E.: Error analysis for tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M770" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrieval from space, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003962" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003962</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Boersma et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Richter, A., De Smedt, I., Lorente, A., Beirle,
S., van Geffen, J. H. G. M., Zara, M., Peters, E., Van Roozendael, M.,
Wagner, T., Maasakkers, J. D., van der A, R. J., Nightingale, J., De Rudder,
A., Irie, H., Pinardi, G., Lambert, J.-C., and Compernolle, S. C.: Improving
algorithms and uncertainty estimates for satellite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M771" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals:
results from the quality assurance for the essential climate variables
(QA4ECV) project, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6651–6678,
doi:10.5194/amt-11-6651-2018, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Boersma et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Dirksen, R. J., van der A, R. J., Veefkind, J.
P., Stammes, P., Huijnen, V., Kleipool, Q. L., Sneep, M., Claas, J.,
Leitão, J., Richter, A., Zhou, Y., and Brunner, D.: An improved
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M772" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column retrieval algorithm for the Ozone Monitoring
Instrument, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1905–1928,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Boersma et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Vinken, G. C. M., and Eskes, H. J.: Representativeness errors
in comparing chemistry transport and chemistry climate models with satellite
UV-Vis tropospheric column retrievals, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 875–898,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-875-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-875-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Bovensmann et al.(1999)Bovensmann, Burrows, Buchwitz, Frerick,
Rozanov, Chance, and Goede</label><mixed-citation>
Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Rozanov, V., Chance,
K., and Goede, A.: SCIAMACHY: Mission objectives and measurement modes, J.
Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Brion et al.(1998)Brion, Chakir, Charbonnier, Daumont, Parisse, and
Malicet</label><mixed-citation>
Brion, J., Chakir, A., Charbonnier, J., Daumont, D., Parisse, C., and Malicet,
J.: Absorption spectra measurements for the ozone molecule in the 350–830 nm
region, J. Atmos. Chem., 30, 291–299, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Bucsela et al.(2013)Bucsela, Krotkov, Celarier, Lamsal, Swartz,
Bhartia, Boersma, Veefkind, Gleason, and Pickering</label><mixed-citation>Bucsela, E. J., Krotkov, N. A., Celarier, E. A., Lamsal, L. N., Swartz, W.
H., Bhartia, P. K., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P., Gleason, J. F., and
Pickering, K. E.: A new stratospheric and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M773" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval
algorithm for nadir-viewing satellite instruments: applications to OMI,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2607–2626, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013</ext-link>,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Burrows et~al.(1999)Burrows, Weber, Buchwitz, Rozanov,
Ladst{\"{a}}tter-Wei{\ss}enmayer, Richter, DeBeek, Hoogen, Bramstedt, Eichmann
et~al.}}?><label>Burrows et al.(1999)Burrows, Weber, Buchwitz, Rozanov,
Ladstätter-Weißenmayer, Richter, DeBeek, Hoogen, Bramstedt, Eichmann
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Burrows, J. P., Weber, M., Buchwitz, M., Rozanov, V.,
Ladstätter-Weißenmayer, A., Richter, A., DeBeek, R., Hoogen, R.,
Bramstedt, K., Eichmann, K.-U., Eisinger, M., and Perner, D.: The global
ozone monitoring
experiment (GOME): Mission concept and first scientific results, J. Atmos.
Sci., 56, 151–175, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Callies et al.(2000)Callies, Corpaccioli, Eisinger, Hahne, and
Lefebvre</label><mixed-citation>
Callies, J., Corpaccioli, E., Eisinger, M., Hahne, A., and Lefebvre, A.:
GOME-2-Metop's second-generation sensor for operational ozone monitoring, ESA
bulletin, 102, 28–36, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Castellanos et al.(2015)Castellanos, Boersma, Torres, and
De Haan</label><mixed-citation>Castellanos, P., Boersma, K. F., Torres, O., and de Haan, J. F.: OMI
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M774" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> air mass factors over South America: effects of
biomass burning aerosols, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3831–3849,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3831-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-3831-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Celarier et al.(2008)Celarier, Brinksma, Gleason, Veefkind, Cede,
Herman, Ionov, Goutail, Pommereau, Lambert et al.</label><mixed-citation>Celarier, E. A., Brinksma, E. J., Gleason, J. F., Veefkind, J. P., Cede, A.,
Herman, J. R., Ionov, D., Goutail, F., Pommereau, J.-P., Lambert, J.-C., van
Roozendael, M., Pinardi, G., Wittrock, F., Schönhardt, A., Richter, A.,
Ibrahim, O. W., Wagner, T., Bojkov, B., Mount, G., Spinei, E., Chen, C. M.,
Pongetti, T. J., Sander, S. P., Bucsela, E. J., Wenig, M. O., Swart, D. P.
J., Volten, H., Kroon, M., and Levelt, P. F.: Validation of Ozone<?pagebreak page1053?> Monitoring
Instrument nitrogen dioxide columns, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 113,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008908" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008908</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Chance and Kurucz(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Chance, K. and Kurucz, R.: An improved high-resolution solar reference spectrum
for earth's atmosphere measurements in the ultraviolet, visible, and near
infrared, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 111, 1289–1295, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Chen et al.(2009)Chen, Zhou, Beirle, Chen, and
Wagner</label><mixed-citation>Chen, D., Zhou, B., Beirle, S., Chen, L. M., and Wagner, T.: Tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M775" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column densities deduced from zenith-sky DOAS measurements in
Shanghai, China, and their application to satellite validation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 3641–3662, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3641-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-3641-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Chimot et al.(2018)Chimot, Veefkind, de Haan, Stammes, and
Levelt</label><mixed-citation>Chimot, J., Veefkind, J. P., de Haan, J. F., Stammes, P., and Levelt, P. F.:
Minimizing aerosol effects on the OMI tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M776" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval –
An improved use of the 477 nm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M777" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M778" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> band and an estimation
of the aerosol correction uncertainty, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss.,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2018-247" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2018-247</ext-link>, in review, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cl{\'{e}}mer et~al.(2010)Cl{\'{e}}mer, Van~Roozendael, Fayt, Hendrick,
Hermans, Pinardi, Spurr, Wang, and De~Mazi{\`{e}}re}}?><label>Clémer et al.(2010)Clémer, Van Roozendael, Fayt, Hendrick,
Hermans, Pinardi, Spurr, Wang, and De Mazière</label><mixed-citation>Clémer, K., Van Roozendael, M., Fayt, C., Hendrick, F., Hermans, C.,
Pinardi, G., Spurr, R., Wang, P., and De Mazière, M.: Multiple wavelength
retrieval of tropospheric aerosol optical properties from MAXDOAS
measurements in Beijing, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 863–878,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-863-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-863-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Danckaert et al.(2015)Danckaert, Fayt, Van Roozendael, De Smedt,
Letocart, Merlaud, and Pinardi</label><mixed-citation>Danckaert, T., Fayt, C., Van Roozendael, M., De Smedt, I., Letocart, V.,
Merlaud, A., and Pinardi, G.: QDOAS software user manual 2.109, IASB/BIRA,
Uccle, Belgium, available at: <uri>http://uvvis.aeronomie.be/software/QDOAS</uri>
(last access: 19 September 2015), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{De~Smedt et~al.(2012)De~Smedt, Van~Roozendael, Stavrakou, M{\"{u}}ller,
Lerot, Theys, Valks, Hao, and Van Der~A}}?><label>De Smedt et al.(2012)De Smedt, Van Roozendael, Stavrakou, Müller,
Lerot, Theys, Valks, Hao, and Van Der A</label><mixed-citation>De Smedt, I., Van Roozendael, M., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Lerot, C.,
Theys, N., Valks, P., Hao, N., and van der A, R.: Improved retrieval of
global tropospheric formaldehyde columns from GOME-2/MetOp-A addressing noise
reduction and instrumental degradation issues, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5,
2933–2949, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2933-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-2933-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Dikty et~al.(2011)Dikty, Richter, Weber, No{\"{e}}l, Bovensmann,
Wittrock, and Burrows}}?><label>Dikty et al.(2011)Dikty, Richter, Weber, Noël, Bovensmann,
Wittrock, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Dikty, S., Richter, A., Weber, M., Noël, S., Bovensmann, H., Wittrock, F.,
and Burrows, J.: GOME-2 on MetOp-A Support for Analysis of GOME-2 In-Orbit
Degradation and Impacts on Level 2 Data Products–Final Report, Tech. rep.,
ITT 09/10000262, IUP University of Bremen, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Ding et al.(2017)Ding, Miyazaki, Mijling, Kurokawa, Cho,
Janssens-Maenhout, Zhang, Liu, Levelt et al.</label><mixed-citation>Ding, J., Miyazaki, K., van der A, R. J., Mijling, B., Kurokawa, J.-I., Cho,
S., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Zhang, Q., Liu, F., and Levelt, P. F.:
Intercomparison of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M779" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission inventories over East
Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10125–10141,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10125-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-10125-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Doicu et al.(2010)Doicu, Trautmann, and
Schreier</label><mixed-citation>
Doicu, A., Trautmann, T., and Schreier, F.: Numerical regularization for
atmospheric inverse problems, Springer Science &amp; Business Media, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Drosoglou et al.(2017)Drosoglou, Bais, Zyrichidou, Kouremeti,
Poupkou, Liora, Giannaros, Koukouli, Balis, and
Melas</label><mixed-citation>Drosoglou, T., Bais, A. F., Zyrichidou, I., Kouremeti, N., Poupkou, A.,
Liora, N., Giannaros, C., Koukouli, M. E., Balis, D., and Melas, D.:
Comparisons of ground-based tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M780" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> MAX-DOAS measurements to
satellite observations with the aid of an air quality model over the
Thessaloniki area, Greece, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5829–5849,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5829-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-5829-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Drosoglou et al.(2018)Drosoglou, Koukouli, Kouremeti, Bais,
Zyrichidou, Balis, Xu, Li et al.</label><mixed-citation>Drosoglou, T., Koukouli, M. E., Kouremeti, N., Bais, A. F., Zyrichidou, I.,
Balis, D., van der A, R. J., Xu, J., and Li, A.: MAX-DOAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M781" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observations
over Guangzhou, China; ground-based and satellite comparisons, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 11, 2239–2255, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2239-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-2239-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Eskes and Boersma(2003)</label><mixed-citation>Eskes, H. J. and Boersma, K. F.: Averaging kernels for DOAS total-column
satellite retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1285–1291,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1285-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-1285-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>EUMETSAT(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
EUMETSAT: GOME-2 Products Guide, Tech. rep., Ref.: EUM/OPSEPS/MAN/07/0445,
Issue: v2D, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>EUMETSAT(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
EUMETSAT: GOME-2/Metop-A Level 1B Product Validation Report No. 5: Status at
Reprocessing, Tech. rep., EUM/OPS/EPS/REP/09/0619, v1F, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>EUMETSAT(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
EUMETSAT: GOME-2 Newsletter Archive, Tech. rep., EUM/OPS-EPS/TEN/09/0552, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>European Commission(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
European Commission: The EU Environmental Implementation Review: Common
challenges and how to combine efforts to deliver better results, Tech. rep.,
Ref.: SWD(2017)33-60 fina, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gielen et~al.(2017)Gielen, Hendrick, Pinardi, De~Smedt, Fayt,
Hermans, Stavrakou, Bauwens, M\"{u}ller, Ndenzako, Nzohabonayo, Akimana,
Niyonzima, Van~Roozendael, and De~Mazi\`{e}re}}?><label>Gielen et al.(2017)Gielen, Hendrick, Pinardi, De Smedt, Fayt,
Hermans, Stavrakou, Bauwens, Müller, Ndenzako, Nzohabonayo, Akimana,
Niyonzima, Van Roozendael, and De Mazière</label><mixed-citation>Gielen, C., Hendrick, F., Pinardi, G., De Smedt, I., Fayt, C., Hermans, C.,
Stavrakou, T., Bauwens, M., Müller, J.-F., Ndenzako, E., Nzohabonayo, P.,
Akimana, R., Niyonzima, S., Van Roozendael, M., and De Mazière, M.:
Characterisation of Central-African aerosol and trace-gas emissions based on
MAX-DOAS measurements and model simulations over Bujumbura, Burundi, Atmos.
Chem. Phys. Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-1104" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2016-1104</ext-link>, in review, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Granier et al.(2011)Granier, Bessagnet, Bond, D'Angiola, van
Der Gon, Frost, Heil, Kaiser, Kinne, Klimont et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Granier, C., Bessagnet, B., Bond, T., D'Angiola, A., van Der Gon, H. D.,
Frost, G. J., Heil, A., Kaiser, J. W., Kinne, S., Klimont, Z., Kloster, S.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Liousse, C., Masui, T., Meleux, F., Mieville, A., Ohara, T.,
Raut, J.-C., Riahi, K., Schultz, M. G., Smith, S. J., Thompson, A., van
Aardenne, J., van der Werf, G. R., and van Vuuren, D. P.:
Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at
global and regional scales during the 1980–2010 period, Clim. Change,
109, p. 163, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Gu et al.(2014)Gu, Wang, Smeltzer, and Boersma</label><mixed-citation>Gu, D., Wang, Y., Smeltzer, C., and Boersma, K. F.: Anthropogenic emissions of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M782" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over China: Reconciling the difference of inverse modeling results using
GOME-2 and OMI measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 7732–7740,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Hassinen et al.(2016)Hassinen, Balis, Bauer, Begoin, Delcloo,
Eleftheratos, Garcia, Granville, Grossi, Hao et al.</label><mixed-citation>Hassinen, S., Balis, D., Bauer, H., Begoin, M., Delcloo, A., Eleftheratos,
K., Gimeno Garcia, S., Granville, J., Grossi, M., Hao, N., Hedelt, P.,
Hendrick, F., Hess, M., Heue, K.-P., Hovila, J., Jønch-Sørensen, H.,
Kalakoski, N., Kauppi, A., Kiemle, S., Kins, L., Koukouli, M. E.,
Kujanpää, J., Lambert, J.-C., Lang, R., Lerot, C., Loyola, D.,
Pedergnana, M., Pinardi, G., Romahn, F., van Roozendael, M., Lutz, R., De
Smedt, I., Stammes, P., Steinbrecht, W., Tamminen, J., Theys, N., Tilstra, L.
G., Tuinder, O. N. E., Valks, P., Zerefos, C., Zimmer, W., and Zyrichidou,
I.: Overview of the O3M SAF GOME-2 operational atmospheric composition and UV
radiation data products and data availability, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9,
383–407, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-383-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-383-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Heckel et al.(2005)Heckel, Richter, Tarsu, Wittrock, Hak, Pundt,
Junkermann, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Heckel, A., Richter, A., Tarsu, T., Wittrock, F., Hak, C., Pundt, I.,
Junkermann, W., and Burrows, J. P.: MAX-DOAS measurements of formaldehyde in
the Po-Valley, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 909–918,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-909-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-909-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Heckel et al.(2011)Heckel, Kim, Frost, Richter, Trainer, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Heckel, A., Kim, S.-W., Frost, G. J., Richter, A., Trainer, M., and Burrows,
J. P.: Influence of low spatial resolution a priori data on tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M783" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> satellite retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1805–1820,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1805-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1805-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1054?><ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hendrick et~al.(2014)Hendrick, M{\"{u}}ller, Cl{\'{e}}mer, Wang,
Mazi{\`{e}}re, Fayt, Gielen, Hermans, Ma, Pinardi et~al.}}?><label>Hendrick et al.(2014)Hendrick, Müller, Clémer, Wang,
Mazière, Fayt, Gielen, Hermans, Ma, Pinardi et al.</label><mixed-citation>Hendrick, F., Müller, J.-F., Clémer, K., Wang, P., De Maziére, M.,
Fayt, C., Gielen, C., Hermans, C., Ma, J. Z., Pinardi, G., Stavrakou, T.,
Vlemmix, T., and Van Roozendael, M.: Four years of ground-based MAX-DOAS
observations of HONO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M784" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Beijing area, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 765–781, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-765-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-765-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Hilboll et al.(2013)Hilboll, Richter, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Hilboll, A., Richter, A., and Burrows, J. P.: Long-term changes of
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M785" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over megacities derived from multiple satellite
instruments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4145–4169,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4145-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4145-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Hilboll et al.(2017)Hilboll, Richter, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Hilboll, A., Richter, A., and Burrows, J. P.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M786" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pollution over India
observed from space – the impact of rapid economic growth, and a recent
decline, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-2017-101</ext-link>,
in review, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Holben et al.(1991)Holben, Eck, and Fraser</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B., Eck, T., and Fraser, R.: Temporal and spatial variability of
aerosol optical depth in the Sahel region in relation to vegetation remote
sensing, Int. J. Remote Sens., 12, 1147–1163, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{H{\"{o}}nninger et~al.(2004)H{\"{o}}nninger, Friedeburg, and
Platt}}?><label>Hönninger et al.(2004)Hönninger, Friedeburg, and
Platt</label><mixed-citation>Hönninger, G., von Friedeburg, C., and Platt, U.: Multi axis differential
optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 231–254,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-231-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-231-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Horowitz et al.(2003)Horowitz, Walters, Mauzerall, Emmons, Rasch,
Granier, Tie, Lamarque, Schultz, Tyndall et al.</label><mixed-citation>Horowitz, L. W., Walters, S., Mauzerall, D. L., Emmons, L. K., Rasch, P. J.,
Granier, C., Tie, X., Lamarque, J.-F., Schultz, M. G., Tyndall, G. S.,
Orlando, J. J., and Brasseur, G. P.: A global simulation of tropospheric
ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2,
J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 108, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002853" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002853</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Huijnen et al.(2010)Huijnen, Williams, Weele, Noije, Krol, Dentener,
Segers, Houweling, Peters, Laat et al.</label><mixed-citation>Huijnen, V., Williams, J., van Weele, M., van Noije, T., Krol, M., Dentener,
F., Segers, A., Houweling, S., Peters, W., de Laat, J., Boersma, F.,
Bergamaschi, P., van Velthoven, P., Le Sager, P., Eskes, H., Alkemade, F.,
Scheele, R., Nédélec, P., and Pätz, H.-W.: The global chemistry
transport model TM5: description and evaluation of the tropospheric chemistry
version 3.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 445–473,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-445-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-3-445-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Huijnen et al.(2016)Huijnen, Flemming, Chabrillat, Errera,
Christophe, Blechschmidt, Richter, and Eskes</label><mixed-citation>Huijnen, V., Flemming, J., Chabrillat, S., Errera, Q., Christophe, Y.,
Blechschmidt, A.-M., Richter, A., and Eskes, H.: C-IFS-CB05-BASCOE:
stratospheric chemistry in the Integrated Forecasting System of ECMWF,
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3071–3091, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3071-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-3071-2016</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ingmann et~al.(2012)Ingmann, Veihelmann, Langen, Lamarre, Stark, and
Courr{\`{e}}ges-Lacoste}}?><label>Ingmann et al.(2012)Ingmann, Veihelmann, Langen, Lamarre, Stark, and
Courrèges-Lacoste</label><mixed-citation>
Ingmann, P., Veihelmann, B., Langen, J., Lamarre, D., Stark, H., and
Courrèges-Lacoste, G. B.: Requirements for the GMES Atmosphere Service
and ESA's implementation concept: Sentinels-4/-5 and-5p, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 58–69, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Irie et al.(2011)Irie, Takashima, Kanaya, Boersma, Gast, Wittrock,
Brunner, Zhou, and Roozendael</label><mixed-citation>Irie, H., Takashima, H., Kanaya, Y., Boersma, K. F., Gast, L., Wittrock, F.,
Brunner, D., Zhou, Y., and Van Roozendael, M.: Eight-component retrievals
from ground-based MAX-DOAS observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1027–1044,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1027-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1027-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Irie et al.(2012)Irie, Boersma, Kanaya, Takashima, Pan, and
Wang</label><mixed-citation>Irie, H., Boersma, K. F., Kanaya, Y., Takashima, H., Pan, X., and Wang, Z.
F.: Quantitative bias estimates for tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M787" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns
retrieved from SCIAMACHY, OMI, and GOME-2 using a common standard for East
Asia, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 2403–2411,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2403-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-2403-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Kanaya et al.(2014)Kanaya, Irie, Takashima, Iwabuchi, Akimoto, Sudo,
Gu, Chong, Kim, Lee et al.</label><mixed-citation>Kanaya, Y., Irie, H., Takashima, H., Iwabuchi, H., Akimoto, H., Sudo, K., Gu,
M., Chong, J., Kim, Y. J., Lee, H., Li, A., Si, F., Xu, J., Xie, P.-H., Liu,
W.-Q., Dzhola, A., Postylyakov, O., Ivanov, V., Grechko, E., Terpugova, S.,
and Panchenko, M.: Long-term MAX-DOAS network observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M788" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Russia and Asia (MADRAS) during the period 2007–2012: instrumentation,
elucidation of climatology, and comparisons with OMI satellite observations
and global model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7909–7927,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7909-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7909-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Kleipool et al.(2008)Kleipool, Dobber, de Haan, and
Levelt</label><mixed-citation>Kleipool, Q., Dobber, M., de Haan, J., and Levelt, P.: Earth surface
reflectance climatology from 3 years of OMI data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010290" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010290</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Kramer et al.(2008)Kramer, Leigh, Remedios, and
Monks</label><mixed-citation>Kramer, L. J., Leigh, R. J., Remedios, J. J., and Monks, P. S.: Comparison of
OMI and ground-based in situ and MAX-DOAS measurements of tropospheric
nitrogen dioxide in an urban area, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009168" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009168</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Krotkov et al.(2017)Krotkov, Lamsal, Celarier, Swartz, Marchenko,
Bucsela, Chan, Wenig, and Zara</label><mixed-citation>Krotkov, N. A., Lamsal, L. N., Celarier, E. A., Swartz, W. H., Marchenko, S.
V., Bucsela, E. J., Chan, K. L., Wenig, M., and Zara, M.: The version 3 OMI
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M789" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard product, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3133–3149,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3133-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-3133-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Kuhlmann et al.(2015)Kuhlmann, Lam, Cheung, Hartl, Fung, Chan, and
Wenig</label><mixed-citation>Kuhlmann, G., Lam, Y. F., Cheung, H. M., Hartl, A., Fung, J. C. H., Chan, P.
W., and Wenig, M. O.: Development of a custom OMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M790" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data product for
evaluating biases in a regional chemistry transport model, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 5627–5644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5627-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-5627-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lambert et~al.(1999)Lambert, Granville, Van~Roozendael, Sarkissian,
Goutail, M{\"{u}}ller, Pommereau, and Russell~III}}?><label>Lambert et al.(1999)Lambert, Granville, Van Roozendael, Sarkissian,
Goutail, Müller, Pommereau, and Russell III</label><mixed-citation>Lambert, J., Granville, J., Van Roozendael, M., Sarkissian, A., Goutail, F.,
Müller, J., Pommereau, J., and Russell III, J.: A climatology of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M791" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
profile for improved air mass factors for ground-based vertical column
measurements, in: Proceedings of the 5th European Symposium Strat. Ozone,
Saint Jean de Luz, p. 703, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lampel et~al.(2015)Lampel, P{\"{o}}hler, Tschritter, Frie{\ss}, and
Platt}}?><label>Lampel et al.(2015)Lampel, Pöhler, Tschritter, Frieß, and
Platt</label><mixed-citation>Lampel, J., Pöhler, D., Tschritter, J., Frieß, U., and Platt, U.: On the
relative absorption strengths of water vapour in the blue wavelength range,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4329–4346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4329-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-4329-2015</ext-link>,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Laughner et al.(2016)Laughner, Zare, and Cohen</label><mixed-citation>Laughner, J. L., Zare, A., and Cohen, R. C.: Effects of daily meteorology on
the interpretation of space-based remote sensing of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M792" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 16, 15247–15264, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15247-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-15247-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Laughner et al.(2018)Laughner, Zhu, and Cohen</label><mixed-citation>Laughner, J. L., Zhu, Q., and Cohen, R. C.: The Berkeley High Resolution
Tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M793" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 2069–2095,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2069-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-10-2069-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Leit{\~{a}}o et~al.(2010)Leit{\~{a}}o, Richter, Vrekoussis, Kokhanovsky,
Zhang, Beekmann, and Burrows}}?><label>Leitão et al.(2010)Leitão, Richter, Vrekoussis, Kokhanovsky,
Zhang, Beekmann, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Leitão, J., Richter, A., Vrekoussis, M., Kokhanovsky, A., Zhang, Q. J.,
Beekmann, M., and Burrows, J. P.: On the improvement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M794" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> satellite
retrievals – aerosol impact on the airmass factors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3,
475–493, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-475-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-475-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Levelt et al.(2006)Levelt, Van den Oord, Dobber, Malkki, Visser,
de Vries, Stammes, Lundell, and Saari</label><mixed-citation>
Levelt, P., Van den Oord, G., Dobber, M., Malkki, A., Visser, H., de Vries, J.,
Stammes, P., Lundell, J., and Saari, H.: The Ozone Monitoring Instrument,
IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44, 1093–1101, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx61"><label>Lin et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>Lin, J.-T., Martin, R. V., Boersma, K. F., Sneep, M., Stammes, P., Spurr, R.,
Wang, P., Van Roozendael, M., Clémer, K., and Irie, H.: Retrieving
tropospheric nitrogen dioxide from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: effects
of aerosols, surface reflectance anisotropy, and vertical profile of nitrogen
dioxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1441–1461,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1441-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1441-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx62"><label>Lin et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Lin, J.-T., Liu, M.-Y., Xin, J.-Y., Boersma, K. F., Spurr, R., Martin, R.,
and Zhang, Q.: Influence of aerosols and surface reflectance on satellite
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M795" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval: seasonal and spatial characteristics and implications
for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M796" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission constraints, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
11217–11241, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11217-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-11217-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1055?><ref id="bib1.bibx63"><label>Liu et al.(2017)Liu, Beirle, Zhang, Zheng, Tong, He
et al.</label><mixed-citation>Liu, F., Beirle, S., Zhang, Q., van der A, R. J., Zheng, B., Tong, D., and
He, K.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M797" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emission trends over Chinese cities estimated
from OMI observations during 2005 to 2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
9261–9275, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9261-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-9261-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx64"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lorente et~al.(2017)Lorente, Boersma, Yu, D{\"{o}}rner, Hilboll,
Richter, Liu, Lamsal, Barkley, De~Smedt et~al.}}?><label>Lorente et al.(2017)Lorente, Boersma, Yu, Dörner, Hilboll,
Richter, Liu, Lamsal, Barkley, De Smedt et al.</label><mixed-citation>Lorente, A., Folkert Boersma, K., Yu, H., Dörner, S., Hilboll, A., Richter,
A., Liu, M., Lamsal, L. N., Barkley, M., De Smedt, I., Van Roozendael, M.,
Wang, Y., Wagner, T., Beirle, S., Lin, J.-T., Krotkov, N., Stammes, P., Wang,
P., Eskes, H. J., and Krol, M.: Structural uncertainty in air mass factor
calculation for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M798" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO satellite retrievals, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 10, 759–782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-759-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-759-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx65"><label>Loyola et al.(2007)Loyola, Thomas, Livschitz, Ruppert, Albert, and
Hollmann</label><mixed-citation>
Loyola, D., Thomas, W., Livschitz, Y., Ruppert, T., Albert, P., and Hollmann,
R.: Cloud properties derived from GOME/ERS-2 backscatter data for trace gas
retrieval, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 45, 2747–2758, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx66"><label>Loyola et al.(2011)Loyola, Koukouli, Valks, Balis, Hao,
Van Roozendael, Spurr, Zimmer, Kiemle, Lerot et al.</label><mixed-citation>Loyola, D., Koukouli, M., Valks, P., Balis, D., Hao, N., Van Roozendael, M.,
Spurr, R., Zimmer, W., Kiemle, S., Lerot, C., et al.: The GOME-2 total column
ozone product: Retrieval algorithm and ground-based validation, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014675" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014675</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx67"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Loyola et~al.(2016)Loyola, Pedergnana, and
Garc{\'{\i}}a}}?><label>Loyola et al.(2016)Loyola, Pedergnana, and
García</label><mixed-citation>
Loyola, D. G., Pedergnana, M., and García, S. G.: Smart sampling and
incremental function learning for very large high dimensional data, Neural
Networks, 78, 75–87, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx68"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Loyola et~al.(2018)Loyola, Garc{\'{\i}}a, Lutz, Argyrouli, Romahn,
Spurr, Pedergnana, Doicu, Garc{\'{\i}}a, and
Sch{\"{u}}ssler}}?><label>Loyola et al.(2018)Loyola, García, Lutz, Argyrouli, Romahn,
Spurr, Pedergnana, Doicu, García, and
Schüssler</label><mixed-citation>Loyola, D. G., Gimeno García, S., Lutz, R., Argyrouli, A., Romahn, F., Spurr,
R. J. D., Pedergnana, M., Doicu, A., Molina García, V., and Schüssler,
O.: The operational cloud retrieval algorithms from TROPOMI on board
Sentinel-5 Precursor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 409–427,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-409-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-409-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx69"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Lutz et~al.(2016)Lutz, Loyola, Gimeno~Garc{\'{\i}}a, and
Romahn}}?><label>Lutz et al.(2016)Lutz, Loyola, Gimeno García, and
Romahn</label><mixed-citation>Lutz, R., Loyola, D., Gimeno García, S., and Romahn, F.: OCRA radiometric
cloud fractions for GOME-2 on MetOp-A/B, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2357–2379,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2357-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-2357-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx70"><label>Ma et al.(2013)Ma, Beirle, Jin, Shaiganfar, Yan, and
Wagner</label><mixed-citation>Ma, J. Z., Beirle, S., Jin, J. L., Shaiganfar, R., Yan, P., and Wagner, T.:
Tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M799" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical column densities over Beijing: results of the first
three years of ground-based MAX-DOAS measurements (2008–2011) and satellite
validation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1547–1567,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1547-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-1547-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx71"><label>McLinden et al.(2014)McLinden, Fioletov, Boersma, Kharol, Krotkov,
Lamsal, Makar, Martin, Veefkind, and Yang</label><mixed-citation>McLinden, C. A., Fioletov, V., Boersma, K. F., Kharol, S. K., Krotkov, N.,
Lamsal, L., Makar, P. A., Martin, R. V., Veefkind, J. P., and Yang, K.:
Improved satellite retrievals of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M800" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M801" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over the
Canadian oil sands and comparisons with surface measurements, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 3637–3656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3637-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-3637-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx72"><label>Miyazaki et al.(2017)Miyazaki, Eskes, Sudo, Boersma, Bowman, and
Kanaya</label><mixed-citation>Miyazaki, K., Eskes, H., Sudo, K., Boersma, K. F., Bowman, K., and Kanaya,
Y.: Decadal changes in global surface <inline-formula><mml:math id="M802" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions from multi-constituent
satellite data assimilation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 807–837,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-807-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-807-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx73"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{M{\"{u}}ller et~al.(2016)M{\"{u}}ller, Kharbouche, Gobron, Scanlon,
Govaerts, Danne, Schultz, Lattanzio, Peters, De~Smedt, Beirle, Lorente,
Coheur, George, Wagner, Hilboll, Richter, Van~Roozendael, and
Boersma}}?><label>Müller et al.(2016)Müller, Kharbouche, Gobron, Scanlon,
Govaerts, Danne, Schultz, Lattanzio, Peters, De Smedt, Beirle, Lorente,
Coheur, George, Wagner, Hilboll, Richter, Van Roozendael, and
Boersma</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, J.-P., Kharbouche, S., Gobron, N., Scanlon, T., Govaerts, Y.,
Danne, O., Schultz, J., Lattanzio, A., Peters, E., De Smedt, I., Beirle, S.,
Lorente, A., Coheur, P., George, M., Wagner, T., Hilboll, A., Richter, A.,
Van Roozendael, M., and Boersma, K.: Recommendations (scientific) on best
practices for retrievals for Land and Atmosphere ECVs, Tech. rep.,
Deliverable 4.2 – version 1.0, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx74"><label>Munro et al.(2016)Munro, Lang, Klaes, Poli, Retscher, Lindstrot,
Huckle, Lacan, Grzegorski, Holdak et al.</label><mixed-citation>Munro, R., Lang, R., Klaes, D., Poli, G., Retscher, C., Lindstrot, R.,
Huckle, R., Lacan, A., Grzegorski, M., Holdak, A., Kokhanovsky, A.,
Livschitz, J., and Eisinger, M.: The GOME-2 instrument on the Metop series of
satellites: instrument design, calibration, and level 1 data processing – an
overview, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1279–1301,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1279-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-1279-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx75"><label>Nolin et al.(2005)Nolin, Armstrong, and Maslanik</label><mixed-citation>
Nolin, A., Armstrong, R., and Maslanik, J.: Near real-time SSM/I EASE-grid
daily global ice concentration and snow extent, Digital Media, National Snow
and Ice Data Center, Boulder, CO, USA, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx76"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{N{\"{u}}{\ss} et~al.(2006)N{\"{u}}{\ss}, Richter, Valks, and
Burrows}}?><label>Nüß et al.(2006)Nüß, Richter, Valks, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Nüß, H., Richter, A., Valks, P., and Burrows, J.: Improvement of the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M803" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> total column retrieval for GOME-2, O3M SAF Visiting Scientist Activity,
Final Report, IUP University of Bremen, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx77"><label>Olivier et al.(1996)Olivier, Bouwman, Berdowski, Veldt, Bloos,
Visschedijk, Zandveld, Haverlag et al.</label><mixed-citation>Olivier, J. G., Bouwman, A., Berdowski, J., Veldt, C., Bloos, J.,
Visschedijk, A., Zandveld, P., and Haverlag, J.: Description of EDGAR Version
2.0: A set of global emission inventories of greenhouse gases and
ozone-depleting substances for all anthropogenic and most natural sources on
a per country basis and on 1 degree <inline-formula><mml:math id="M804" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 degree grid, RIVM report no.
771060 002/TNO-MEP report no. R96/119,
<uri>https://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/771060002.pdf</uri> (last access: 1
February 2019), 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx78"><label>Ortega et al.(2015)Ortega, Koenig, Sinreich, Thomson, and
Volkamer</label><mixed-citation>Ortega, I., Koenig, T., Sinreich, R., Thomson, D., and Volkamer, R.: The CU
2-D-MAX-DOAS instrument – Part 1: Retrieval of 3-D distributions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M805" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
azimuth-dependent OVOC ratios, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2371–2395,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2371-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-2371-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx79"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Penning~de Vries et~al.(2015)Penning~de Vries, Beirle, H{\"{o}}rmann,
Kaiser, Stammes, Tilstra, and Wagner}}?><label>Penning de Vries et al.(2015)Penning de Vries, Beirle, Hörmann,
Kaiser, Stammes, Tilstra, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>Penning de Vries, M. J. M., Beirle, S., Hörmann, C., Kaiser, J. W., Stammes,
P., Tilstra, L. G., Tuinder, O. N. E., and Wagner, T.: A global aerosol
classification algorithm incorporating multiple satellite data sets of
aerosol and trace gas abundances, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10597–10618,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10597-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10597-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx80"><label>Peters et al.(2014)Peters, Wittrock, Richter, Alvarado, Rozanov, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Peters, E., Wittrock, F., Richter, A., Alvarado, L. M. A., Rozanov, V. V.,
and Burrows, J. P.: Liquid water absorption and scattering effects in DOAS
retrievals over oceans, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4203–4221,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4203-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-4203-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx81"><label>Pinardi et al.(2014)Pinardi, Van Roozendael, Lambert, Granville,
Hendrick, Tack, Yu, Cede, Kanaya, Irie et al.</label><mixed-citation>Pinardi, G., Van Roozendael, M., Lambert, J.-C., Granville, J., Hendrick, F.,
Tack, F., Yu, H., Cede, A., Kanaya, Y., Irie, I., Goutail, F., Pommereau,
J.-P., Pazmino, A., Wittrock, F., Richter, A., Wagner, T., Gu, M., Remmers,
J., Friess, U., Vlemmix, T., Piters, A., Hao, N., Tiefengraber, M., Herman,
J., Abuhassan, N., Bais, A., Kouremeti, N., Hovila, J., Holla, R., Chong, J.,
Postylyakov, O., and Ma, J.: GOME-2 total and
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M806" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> validation based on zenith-sky, direct-sun and multi-axis
DOAS network observations, in: Proc. of the 2014 EUMETSAT Meteorological
Satellite Conference, Geneva, Swizerland, 22–26 September 2014, EUMETSAT, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx82"><label>Pinardi et al.(2015)Pinardi, Lambert, Granville, Yu, De Smedt, van
Roozendael, and Valks</label><mixed-citation>Pinardi, G., Lambert, J.-C., Granville, J., Yu, H., De Smedt, I., van
Roozendael, M., and Valks, P.: O3M-SAF validation report, Tech. rep.,
SAF/O3M/IASB/VR/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M807" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/TN-IASB-GOME2-O3MSAF-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M808" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-2015, 1/1, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx83"><label>Platt and Stutz(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Platt, U. and Stutz, J.: Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy,
Springer, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx84"><label>Pope and Fry(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Pope, R. M. and Fry, E. S.: Absorption spectrum (380–700 nm) of pure water.
II. Integrating cavity measurements, Appl. Opt., 36, 8710–8723, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx85"><label>Richter and verification team(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Richter, A. and verification team: S5P/TROPOMI Science Verification
Report, Tech. rep., S5P-IUP-L2-ScVR-RP issue 2.1, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1056?><ref id="bib1.bibx86"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Richter et~al.(2005)Richter, Burrows, N{\"{u}}{\ss}, Granier, and
Niemeier}}?><label>Richter et al.(2005)Richter, Burrows, Nüß, Granier, and
Niemeier</label><mixed-citation>
Richter, A., Burrows, J. P., Nüß, H., Granier, C., and Niemeier, U.:
Increase in tropospheric nitrogen dioxide over China observed from space,
Nature, 437, p. 129, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx87"><label>Richter et al.(2011)Richter, Begoin, Hilboll, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Richter, A., Begoin, M., Hilboll, A., and Burrows, J. P.: An improved
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M809" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval for the GOME-2 satellite instrument, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 4, 1147–1159, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1147-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1147-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx88"><label>Rothman et al.(2010)Rothman, Gordon, Barber, Dothe, Gamache, Goldman,
Perevalov, Tashkun, and Tennyson</label><mixed-citation>
Rothman, L., Gordon, I., Barber, R., Dothe, H., Gamache, R., Goldman, A.,
Perevalov, V., Tashkun, S., and Tennyson, J.: HITEMP, the high-temperature
molecular spectroscopic database, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra.,
111, 2139–2150, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx89"><label>Russell et al.(2011)Russell, Perring, Valin, Bucsela, Browne,
Wooldridge, and Cohen</label><mixed-citation>Russell, A. R., Perring, A. E., Valin, L. C., Bucsela, E. J., Browne, E. C.,
Wooldridge, P. J., and Cohen, R. C.: A high spatial resolution retrieval of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M810" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column densities from OMI: method and evaluation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 8543–8554, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8543-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8543-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx90"><label>Safieddine et al.(2013)Safieddine, Clerbaux, George, Hadji-Lazaro,
Hurtmans, Coheur, Wespes, Loyola, Valks, and
Hao</label><mixed-citation>Safieddine, S., Clerbaux, C., George, M., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans, D.,
Coheur, P.-F., Wespes, C., Loyola, D., Valks, P., and Hao, N.: Tropospheric
ozone and nitrogen dioxide measurements in urban and rural regions as seen by
IASI and GOME-2, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 10555–10566,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50669" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50669</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx91"><label>Seinfeld et al.(1998)Seinfeld, Pandis, and
Noone</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S., and Noone, K.: Atmospheric chemistry and
physics: from air pollution to climate change, Wiley, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx92"><label>Solomon(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S.: Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history,
Rev. Geophys., 37, 275–316, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx93"><label>Spurr et al.(2001)Spurr, Kurosu, and Chance</label><mixed-citation>
Spurr, R., Kurosu, T., and Chance, K.: A linearized discrete ordinate radiative
transfer model for atmospheric remote-sensing retrieval,
J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 68, 689–735, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx94"><label>Spurr(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Spurr, R. J.: VLIDORT: A linearized pseudo-spherical vector discrete ordinate
radiative transfer code for forward model and retrieval studies in multilayer
multiple scattering media, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 102,
316–342, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx95"><label>Thalman and Volkamer(2013)</label><mixed-citation>Thalman, R. and Volkamer, R.: Temperature dependent absorption cross-sections
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M811" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M812" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> collision pairs between 340 and 630 nm and at atmospherically
relevant pressure, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 15371–15381, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx96"><label>Tikhonov and Arsenin(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
Tikhonov, A. and Arsenin, V.: Solutions of ill-posed problems, V. H. Winston
&amp; Sons, Washington, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx97"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tilstra et~al.(2017{\natexlab{a}})Tilstra, Tuinder, and
Stammes}}?><label>Tilstra et al.(2017a)Tilstra, Tuinder, and
Stammes</label><mixed-citation>
Tilstra, L., Tuinder, O., and Stammes, P.: GOME-2 surface LER product –
Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, Tech. rep., KNMI Report
O3MSAF/KNMI/ATBD/003, Issue 2.2, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx98"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tilstra et~al.(2017{\natexlab{b}})Tilstra, Wang, and
Stammes}}?><label>Tilstra et al.(2017b)Tilstra, Wang, and
Stammes</label><mixed-citation>
Tilstra, L., Wang, P., and Stammes, P.: Surface reflectivity climatologies from
UV to NIR determined from Earth observations by GOME-2 and SCIAMACHY,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 4084–4111, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx99"><label>Valks et al.(2011)Valks, Pinardi, Richter, Lambert, Hao, Loyola,
Van Roozendael, and Emmadi</label><mixed-citation>Valks, P., Pinardi, G., Richter, A., Lambert, J.-C., Hao, N., Loyola, D., Van
Roozendael, M., and Emmadi, S.: Operational total and tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M813" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column retrieval for GOME-2, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1491–1514,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1491-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1491-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx100"><label>Valks et al.(2017)Valks, Loyola, Hao, Hedelt, Slijkhuis, Grossi,
Begoin, Gimeno Garcia, and Lutz</label><mixed-citation>Valks, P., Loyola, D., Hao, N., Hedelt, P., Slijkhuis, S., Grossi, M., Begoin,
M., Gimeno Garcia, S., and Lutz, R.: Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document for
GOME-2 Total Column Products of Ozone, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M814" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, BrO, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M815" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M816" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCHO and Cloud
Properties (GDP 4.8 for AC SAF OTO and NTO), Tech. rep., SAF/AC/DLR/ATBD/01,
Iss./Rev.: 3/A/2, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx101"><label>van Geffen et al.(2015)van Geffen, Boersma, Van Roozendael, Hendrick,
Mahieu, De Smedt, Sneep, and Veefkind</label><mixed-citation>van Geffen, J. H. G. M., Boersma, K. F., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F.,
Mahieu, E., De Smedt, I., Sneep, M., and Veefkind, J. P.: Improved spectral
fitting of nitrogen dioxide from OMI in the 405–465 nm window, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 8, 1685–1699, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1685-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-1685-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx102"><label>van Geffen et al.(2016)van Geffen, Boersma, Eskes, Maasakkers, and
Veefkind</label><mixed-citation>van Geffen, J., Boersma, K., Eskes, H., Maasakkers, J., and Veefkind, J.:
TROPOMI ATBD of the total and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M817" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data products, Tech. rep.,
S5P-KNMI-L2-0005-RP issue 1.0.0. KNMI, De Bilt, the Netherlands, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx103"><label>Vandaele et al.(2002)Vandaele, Hermans, Fally, Carleer, Colin,
Merienne, Jenouvrier, and Coquart</label><mixed-citation>Vandaele, A. C., Hermans, C., Fally, S., Carleer, M., Colin, R., Merienne,
M.-F., Jenouvrier, A., and Coquart, B.: High-resolution Fourier transform
measurement of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M818" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> visible and near-infrared absorption cross sections:
Temperature and pressure effects, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000971" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000971</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx104"><label>van der A et al.(2017)van der A, Ding, Koukouli, Liu, Li, Mao, Theys
et al.</label><mixed-citation>van der A, R. J., Mijling, B., Ding, J., Koukouli, M. E., Liu, F., Li, Q.,
Mao, H., and Theys, N.: Cleaning up the air: effectiveness of air quality
policy for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M819" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M820" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in China, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 17, 1775–1789, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1775-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-1775-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx105"><label>Vasilkov et al.(2017)Vasilkov, Qin, Krotkov, Lamsal, Spurr, Haffner,
Joiner, Eun-Su, and Marchenko</label><mixed-citation>Vasilkov, A., Qin, W., Krotkov, N., Lamsal, L., Spurr, R., Haffner, D.,
Joiner, J., Yang, E.-S., and Marchenko, S.: Accounting for the effects of
surface BRDF on satellite cloud and trace-gas retrievals: a new approach
based on geometry-dependent Lambertian equivalent reflectivity applied to OMI
algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 333–349,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-333-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-333-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx106"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Veefkind et~al.(2012)Veefkind, Aben, McMullan, F{\"{o}}rster, De~Vries,
Otter, Claas, Eskes, De~Haan, Kleipool et~al.}}?><label>Veefkind et al.(2012)Veefkind, Aben, McMullan, Förster, De Vries,
Otter, Claas, Eskes, De Haan, Kleipool et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Veefkind, J., Aben, I., McMullan, K., Förster, H., De Vries, J., Otter, G.,
Claas, J., Eskes, H., De Haan, J., Kleipool, Q., van Weele, M., Hasekamp, O.,
Hoogeveen, R., Landgraf, J., Snel, R., Tol, P., Ingmann, P., Voors, R.,
Kruizinga, B., Vink, R., Visser, H., and Levelt, P.: TROPOMI on the ESA
Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the
atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer
applications, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 70–83, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx107"><label>Veefkind et al.(2016)Veefkind, De Haan, Sneep, and
Levelt</label><mixed-citation>Veefkind, J. P., de Haan, J. F., Sneep, M., and Levelt, P. F.: Improvements
to the OMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M821" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M822" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> operational cloud algorithm and comparisons
with ground-based radar–lidar observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9,
6035–6049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6035-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-6035-2016</ext-link>, 2016. .</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx108"><label>Vlemmix et al.(2015)Vlemmix, Hendrick, Pinardi, De Smedt, Fayt,
Hermans, Piters, Wang, Levelt, and Van Roozendael</label><mixed-citation>Vlemmix, T., Hendrick, F., Pinardi, G., De Smedt, I., Fayt, C., Hermans, C.,
Piters, A., Wang, P., Levelt, P., and Van Roozendael, M.: MAX-DOAS
observations of aerosols, formaldehyde and nitrogen dioxide in the Beijing
area: comparison of two profile retrieval approaches, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8,
941–963, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-941-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-941-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx109"><label>Vountas et al.(2003)Vountas, Richter, Wittrock, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Vountas, M., Richter, A., Wittrock, F., and Burrows, J. P.: Inelastic
scattering in ocean water and its impact on trace gas retrievals from
satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1365–1375,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1365-2003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-3-1365-2003</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx110"><label>Vrekoussis et al.(2010)Vrekoussis, Wittrock, Richter, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Vrekoussis, M., Wittrock, F., Richter, A., and Burrows, J. P.: GOME-2
observations of oxygenated VOCs: what can we learn from the ratio glyoxal to
formaldehyde on a global scale?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10145–10160,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10145-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-10145-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx111"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wagner et~al.(2004)Wagner, Dix, Friedeburg, Frie{\ss}, Sanghavi,
Sinreich, and Platt}}?><label>Wagner et al.(2004)Wagner, Dix, Friedeburg, Frieß, Sanghavi,
Sinreich, and Platt</label><mixed-citation>Wagner, T., Dix, B. V., Friedeburg, C. V., Frieß, U., Sanghavi, S.,
Sinreich, R., and Platt, U.: MAX-DOAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M823" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements: A new technique to
derive information on atmospheric aerosols – Principles and information
content, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004904" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004904</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1057?><ref id="bib1.bibx112"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Wagner et~al.(2011)Wagner, Beirle, Brauers, Deutschmann, Frie{\ss},
Hak, Halla, Heue, Junkermann, Li et~al.}}?><label>Wagner et al.(2011)Wagner, Beirle, Brauers, Deutschmann, Frieß,
Hak, Halla, Heue, Junkermann, Li et al.</label><mixed-citation>Wagner, T., Beirle, S., Brauers, T., Deutschmann, T., Frieß, U., Hak, C.,
Halla, J. D., Heue, K. P., Junkermann, W., Li, X., Platt, U., and
Pundt-Gruber, I.: Inversion of tropospheric profiles of aerosol extinction
and HCHO and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M824" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios from MAX-DOAS observations in Milano
during the summer of 2003 and comparison with independent data sets, Atmos.
Meas. Tech., 4, 2685–2715, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2685-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-2685-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx113"><label>Wang et al.(2017)Wang, Beirle, Lampel, Koukouli, De Smedt, Theys,
Ang, Wu, Xie, Liu et al.</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Beirle, S., Lampel, J., Koukouli, M., De Smedt, I., Theys, N., Li,
A., Wu, D., Xie, P., Liu, C., Van Roozendael, M., Stavrakou, T., Müller,
J.-F., and Wagner, T.: Validation of OMI, GOME-2A and GOME-2B tropospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M825" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M826" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO products using MAX-DOAS observations from
2011 to 2014 in Wuxi, China: investigation of the effects of priori profiles
and aerosols on the satellite products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5007–5033,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5007-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-5007-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx114"><label>Williams et al.(2017)Williams, Boersma, Le Sager, and
Verstraeten</label><mixed-citation>Williams, J. E., Boersma, K. F., Le Sager, P., and Verstraeten, W. W.: The
high-resolution version of TM5-MP for optimized satellite retrievals:
description and validation, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 721–750,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-721-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-721-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx115"><label>Wittrock et al.(2004)Wittrock, Oetjen, Richter, Fietkau, Medeke,
Rozanov, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Wittrock, F., Oetjen, H., Richter,
A., Fietkau, S., Medeke, T., Rozanov, A., and Burrows, J. P.: MAX-DOAS
measurements of atmospheric trace gases in Ny-Ålesund – Radiative
transfer studies and their application, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 955–966,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-955-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-955-2004</ext-link>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx116"><label>Wu et al.(2013)Wu, Xie, Li, Chan, Hartl, Wang, Si, Zeng, Qin, Xu
et al.</label><mixed-citation>Wu, F. C., Xie, P. H., Li, A., Chan, K. L., Hartl, A., Wang, Y., Si, F. Q.,
Zeng, Y., Qin, M., Xu, J., Liu, J. G., Liu, W. Q., and Wenig, M.:
Observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M827" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M828" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by mobile DOAS in the Guangzhou eastern area
during the Asian Games 2010, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2277–2292,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2277-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-2277-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx117"><label>Zara et al.(2018)Zara, Boersma, De Smedt, Richter, Peters,
Van Geffen, Beirle, Wagner, Van Roozendael, Marchenko, Lamsal, and
Eskes</label><mixed-citation>Zara, M., Boersma, K. F., De Smedt, I., Richter, A., Peters, E., van Geffen,
J. H. G. M., Beirle, S., Wagner, T., Van Roozendael, M., Marchenko, S.,
Lamsal, L. N., and Eskes, H. J.: Improved slant column density retrieval of
nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde for OMI and GOME-2A from QA4ECV:
intercomparison, uncertainty characterisation, and trends, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 11, 4033–4058, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4033-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-4033-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx118"><label>Zien et al.(2014)Zien, Richter, Hilboll, Blechschmidt, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Zien, A. W., Richter, A., Hilboll, A., Blechschmidt, A.-M., and Burrows, J.
P.: Systematic analysis of tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M829" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> long-range transport events
detected in GOME-2 satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7367–7396,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7367-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7367-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>An improved total and tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub>  column retrieval for GOME-2</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>An improved algorithm for
the retrieval of total and tropospheric nitrogen dioxide (NO<sub>2</sub>)
columns from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment-2 (GOME-2) is presented.
The refined retrieval will be implemented in a future version of the GOME
Data Processor (GDP) as used by the EUMETSAT Satellite Application Facility
on Atmospheric Composition and UV Radiation (AC-SAF). The first main
improvement is the application of an extended 425–497&thinsp;nm wavelength fitting
window in the differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) retrieval
of the NO<sub>2</sub> slant column density, based on which initial total
NO<sub>2</sub> columns are computed using stratospheric air mass factors (AMFs).
Updated absorption cross sections and a linear offset correction are used for
the large fitting window. An improved slit function treatment is applied to
compensate for both long-term and in-orbit drift of the GOME-2 slit function.
Compared to the current operational (GDP 4.8) dataset, the use of these new
features increases the NO<sub>2</sub> columns by
 ∼ 1–3×10<sup>14</sup>&thinsp;molec&thinsp;cm<sup>2</sup> and reduces the slant column error
by  ∼ 24&thinsp;%. In addition, the bias between GOME-2A and GOME-2B
measurements is largely reduced by adopting a new level 1b data version in
the DOAS retrieval. The retrieved NO<sub>2</sub> slant columns show good
consistency with the Quality Assurance for Essential Climate Variables
(QA4ECV) retrieval with a good overall quality. Second, the STRatospheric
Estimation Algorithm from Mainz (STREAM), which was originally developed for
the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) instrument, was optimised
for GOME-2 measurements to determine the stratospheric NO<sub>2</sub> column
density. Applied to synthetic GOME-2 data, the estimated stratospheric
NO<sub>2</sub> columns from STREAM shows good agreement with the a priori truth.
An improved latitudinal correction is introduced in STREAM to reduce the
biases over the subtropics. Applied to <span style="" class="text">GOME-2</span> measurements, STREAM
largely reduces the overestimation of stratospheric NO<sub>2</sub> columns over
polluted regions in the GDP 4.8 dataset. Third, the calculation of AMF
applies an updated box-air-mass factor (box-AMF) look-up table (LUT)
calculated using the latest version 2.7 of the Vector-LInearized Discrete
Ordinate Radiative Transfer (VLIDORT) model with an increased number of
reference points and vertical layers, a new GOME-2 surface albedo
climatology, and improved a priori NO<sub>2</sub> profiles obtained from the
TM5-MP chemistry transport model. A large effect (mainly enhancement in
summer and reduction in winter) on the retrieved tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub>
columns by more than 10&thinsp;% is found over polluted regions. To evaluate the
GOME-2 tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> columns, an end-to-end validation is
performed using ground-based multiple-axis DOAS (MAXDOAS) measurements. The
validation is illustrated for six stations covering urban, suburban, and
background situations. Compared to the GDP 4.8 product, the new dataset
presents improved agreement with the MAXDOAS measurements for all the
stations.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Azam et al.(2015)Azam, Richter, Weber, Noë, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Azam, F., Richter, A., Weber, M., Noë, S., and Burrows, J.: GOME-2 on
MetOp-B Follow-on analysis of GOME2 in orbit degradation, Tech. rep.,
EUM/CO/09/4600000696/RM, Final Report, IUP University of Bremen, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Barkley et al.(2013)Barkley, Smedt, Van Roozendael, Kurosu, Chance,
Arneth, Hagberg, Guenther, Paulot, Marais et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Barkley, M. P., Smedt, I. D., Van Roozendael, M., Kurosu, T. P., Chance, K.,
Arneth, A., Hagberg, D., Guenther, A., Paulot, F., Marais, E., and Mao, J.:
Top-down isoprene emissions over tropical South America inferred from
SCIAMACHY and OMI formaldehyde columns, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
6849–6868, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Beirle et al.(2016)Beirle, Hörmann, Jöckel, Liu, Penning de
Vries, Pozzer, Sihler, Valks, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>
Beirle, S., Hörmann, C., Jöckel, P., Liu, S., Penning de Vries, M.,
Pozzer, A., Sihler, H., Valks, P., and Wagner, T.: The STRatospheric
Estimation Algorithm from Mainz (STREAM): estimating stratospheric
NO<sub>2</sub> from nadir-viewing satellites by weighted convolution, Atmos.
Meas. Tech., 9, 2753–2779, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2753-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2753-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Beirle et al.(2017)Beirle, Lampel, Lerot, Sihler, and
Wagner</label><mixed-citation>
Beirle, S., Lampel, J., Lerot, C., Sihler, H., and Wagner, T.: Parameterizing
the instrumental spectral response function and its changes by a
super-Gaussian and its derivatives, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 581–598,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-581-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-581-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Boersma et al.(2002)</label><mixed-citation>
Boersma, K., Bucsela, E., Brinksma, E., and Gleason, J.: OMI algorithm
theoretical basis document: OMI trace gas algorithms, vol. 4, edited by:
Chance, K., Rep. ATBD-OMI, p. 19, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Boersma et al.(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Boersma, K., Eskes, H., and Brinksma, E.: Error analysis for tropospheric
NO<sub>2</sub>
retrieval from space, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003962" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003962</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Boersma et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Richter, A., De Smedt, I., Lorente, A., Beirle,
S., van Geffen, J. H. G. M., Zara, M., Peters, E., Van Roozendael, M.,
Wagner, T., Maasakkers, J. D., van der A, R. J., Nightingale, J., De Rudder,
A., Irie, H., Pinardi, G., Lambert, J.-C., and Compernolle, S. C.: Improving
algorithms and uncertainty estimates for satellite NO<sub>2</sub> retrievals:
results from the quality assurance for the essential climate variables
(QA4ECV) project, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 6651–6678,
doi:10.5194/amt-11-6651-2018, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Boersma et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Dirksen, R. J., van der A, R. J., Veefkind, J.
P., Stammes, P., Huijnen, V., Kleipool, Q. L., Sneep, M., Claas, J.,
Leitão, J., Richter, A., Zhou, Y., and Brunner, D.: An improved
tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> column retrieval algorithm for the Ozone Monitoring
Instrument, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1905–1928,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Boersma et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Boersma, K. F., Vinken, G. C. M., and Eskes, H. J.: Representativeness errors
in comparing chemistry transport and chemistry climate models with satellite
UV-Vis tropospheric column retrievals, Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 875–898,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-875-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-875-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Bovensmann et al.(1999)Bovensmann, Burrows, Buchwitz, Frerick,
Rozanov, Chance, and Goede</label><mixed-citation>
Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Rozanov, V., Chance,
K., and Goede, A.: SCIAMACHY: Mission objectives and measurement modes, J.
Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Brion et al.(1998)Brion, Chakir, Charbonnier, Daumont, Parisse, and
Malicet</label><mixed-citation>
Brion, J., Chakir, A., Charbonnier, J., Daumont, D., Parisse, C., and Malicet,
J.: Absorption spectra measurements for the ozone molecule in the 350–830&thinsp;nm
region, J. Atmos. Chem., 30, 291–299, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Bucsela et al.(2013)Bucsela, Krotkov, Celarier, Lamsal, Swartz,
Bhartia, Boersma, Veefkind, Gleason, and Pickering</label><mixed-citation>
Bucsela, E. J., Krotkov, N. A., Celarier, E. A., Lamsal, L. N., Swartz, W.
H., Bhartia, P. K., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P., Gleason, J. F., and
Pickering, K. E.: A new stratospheric and tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> retrieval
algorithm for nadir-viewing satellite instruments: applications to OMI,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2607–2626, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013</a>,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Burrows et al.(1999)Burrows, Weber, Buchwitz, Rozanov,
Ladstätter-Weißenmayer, Richter, DeBeek, Hoogen, Bramstedt, Eichmann
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Burrows, J. P., Weber, M., Buchwitz, M., Rozanov, V.,
Ladstätter-Weißenmayer, A., Richter, A., DeBeek, R., Hoogen, R.,
Bramstedt, K., Eichmann, K.-U., Eisinger, M., and Perner, D.: The global
ozone monitoring
experiment (GOME): Mission concept and first scientific results, J. Atmos.
Sci., 56, 151–175, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Callies et al.(2000)Callies, Corpaccioli, Eisinger, Hahne, and
Lefebvre</label><mixed-citation>
Callies, J., Corpaccioli, E., Eisinger, M., Hahne, A., and Lefebvre, A.:
GOME-2-Metop's second-generation sensor for operational ozone monitoring, ESA
bulletin, 102, 28–36, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Castellanos et al.(2015)Castellanos, Boersma, Torres, and
De Haan</label><mixed-citation>
Castellanos, P., Boersma, K. F., Torres, O., and de Haan, J. F.: OMI
tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> air mass factors over South America: effects of
biomass burning aerosols, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 3831–3849,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3831-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-3831-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Celarier et al.(2008)Celarier, Brinksma, Gleason, Veefkind, Cede,
Herman, Ionov, Goutail, Pommereau, Lambert et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Celarier, E. A., Brinksma, E. J., Gleason, J. F., Veefkind, J. P., Cede, A.,
Herman, J. R., Ionov, D., Goutail, F., Pommereau, J.-P., Lambert, J.-C., van
Roozendael, M., Pinardi, G., Wittrock, F., Schönhardt, A., Richter, A.,
Ibrahim, O. W., Wagner, T., Bojkov, B., Mount, G., Spinei, E., Chen, C. M.,
Pongetti, T. J., Sander, S. P., Bucsela, E. J., Wenig, M. O., Swart, D. P.
J., Volten, H., Kroon, M., and Levelt, P. F.: Validation of Ozone Monitoring
Instrument nitrogen dioxide columns, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 113,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008908" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008908</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Chance and Kurucz(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Chance, K. and Kurucz, R.: An improved high-resolution solar reference spectrum
for earth's atmosphere measurements in the ultraviolet, visible, and near
infrared, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 111, 1289–1295, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Chen et al.(2009)Chen, Zhou, Beirle, Chen, and
Wagner</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, D., Zhou, B., Beirle, S., Chen, L. M., and Wagner, T.: Tropospheric
NO<sub>2</sub> column densities deduced from zenith-sky DOAS measurements in
Shanghai, China, and their application to satellite validation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 9, 3641–3662, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3641-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-3641-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Chimot et al.(2018)Chimot, Veefkind, de Haan, Stammes, and
Levelt</label><mixed-citation>
Chimot, J., Veefkind, J. P., de Haan, J. F., Stammes, P., and Levelt, P. F.:
Minimizing aerosol effects on the OMI tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> retrieval –
An improved use of the 477&thinsp;nm O<sub>2</sub>–O<sub>2</sub> band and an estimation
of the aerosol correction uncertainty, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss.,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2018-247" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2018-247</a>, in review, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Clémer et al.(2010)Clémer, Van Roozendael, Fayt, Hendrick,
Hermans, Pinardi, Spurr, Wang, and De Mazière</label><mixed-citation>
Clémer, K., Van Roozendael, M., Fayt, C., Hendrick, F., Hermans, C.,
Pinardi, G., Spurr, R., Wang, P., and De Mazière, M.: Multiple wavelength
retrieval of tropospheric aerosol optical properties from MAXDOAS
measurements in Beijing, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 863–878,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-863-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-863-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Danckaert et al.(2015)Danckaert, Fayt, Van Roozendael, De Smedt,
Letocart, Merlaud, and Pinardi</label><mixed-citation>
Danckaert, T., Fayt, C., Van Roozendael, M., De Smedt, I., Letocart, V.,
Merlaud, A., and Pinardi, G.: QDOAS software user manual 2.109, IASB/BIRA,
Uccle, Belgium, available at: <a href="http://uvvis.aeronomie.be/software/QDOAS" target="_blank">http://uvvis.aeronomie.be/software/QDOAS</a>
(last access: 19 September 2015), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>De Smedt et al.(2012)De Smedt, Van Roozendael, Stavrakou, Müller,
Lerot, Theys, Valks, Hao, and Van Der A</label><mixed-citation>
De Smedt, I., Van Roozendael, M., Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Lerot, C.,
Theys, N., Valks, P., Hao, N., and van der A, R.: Improved retrieval of
global tropospheric formaldehyde columns from GOME-2/MetOp-A addressing noise
reduction and instrumental degradation issues, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5,
2933–2949, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2933-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2933-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Dikty et al.(2011)Dikty, Richter, Weber, Noël, Bovensmann,
Wittrock, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Dikty, S., Richter, A., Weber, M., Noël, S., Bovensmann, H., Wittrock, F.,
and Burrows, J.: GOME-2 on MetOp-A Support for Analysis of GOME-2 In-Orbit
Degradation and Impacts on Level 2 Data Products–Final Report, Tech. rep.,
ITT 09/10000262, IUP University of Bremen, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Ding et al.(2017)Ding, Miyazaki, Mijling, Kurokawa, Cho,
Janssens-Maenhout, Zhang, Liu, Levelt et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Ding, J., Miyazaki, K., van der A, R. J., Mijling, B., Kurokawa, J.-I., Cho,
S., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Zhang, Q., Liu, F., and Levelt, P. F.:
Intercomparison of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emission inventories over East
Asia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 10125–10141,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10125-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-10125-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Doicu et al.(2010)Doicu, Trautmann, and
Schreier</label><mixed-citation>
Doicu, A., Trautmann, T., and Schreier, F.: Numerical regularization for
atmospheric inverse problems, Springer Science &amp; Business Media, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Drosoglou et al.(2017)Drosoglou, Bais, Zyrichidou, Kouremeti,
Poupkou, Liora, Giannaros, Koukouli, Balis, and
Melas</label><mixed-citation>
Drosoglou, T., Bais, A. F., Zyrichidou, I., Kouremeti, N., Poupkou, A.,
Liora, N., Giannaros, C., Koukouli, M. E., Balis, D., and Melas, D.:
Comparisons of ground-based tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> MAX-DOAS measurements to
satellite observations with the aid of an air quality model over the
Thessaloniki area, Greece, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5829–5849,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5829-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5829-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Drosoglou et al.(2018)Drosoglou, Koukouli, Kouremeti, Bais,
Zyrichidou, Balis, Xu, Li et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Drosoglou, T., Koukouli, M. E., Kouremeti, N., Bais, A. F., Zyrichidou, I.,
Balis, D., van der A, R. J., Xu, J., and Li, A.: MAX-DOAS NO<sub>2</sub> observations
over Guangzhou, China; ground-based and satellite comparisons, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 11, 2239–2255, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2239-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2239-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Eskes and Boersma(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Eskes, H. J. and Boersma, K. F.: Averaging kernels for DOAS total-column
satellite retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1285–1291,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1285-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1285-2003</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>EUMETSAT(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
EUMETSAT: GOME-2 Products Guide, Tech. rep., Ref.: EUM/OPSEPS/MAN/07/0445,
Issue: v2D, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>EUMETSAT(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
EUMETSAT: GOME-2/Metop-A Level 1B Product Validation Report No. 5: Status at
Reprocessing, Tech. rep., EUM/OPS/EPS/REP/09/0619, v1F, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>EUMETSAT(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
EUMETSAT: GOME-2 Newsletter Archive, Tech. rep., EUM/OPS-EPS/TEN/09/0552, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>European Commission(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
European Commission: The EU Environmental Implementation Review: Common
challenges and how to combine efforts to deliver better results, Tech. rep.,
Ref.: SWD(2017)33-60 fina, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Gielen et al.(2017)Gielen, Hendrick, Pinardi, De Smedt, Fayt,
Hermans, Stavrakou, Bauwens, Müller, Ndenzako, Nzohabonayo, Akimana,
Niyonzima, Van Roozendael, and De Mazière</label><mixed-citation>
Gielen, C., Hendrick, F., Pinardi, G., De Smedt, I., Fayt, C., Hermans, C.,
Stavrakou, T., Bauwens, M., Müller, J.-F., Ndenzako, E., Nzohabonayo, P.,
Akimana, R., Niyonzima, S., Van Roozendael, M., and De Mazière, M.:
Characterisation of Central-African aerosol and trace-gas emissions based on
MAX-DOAS measurements and model simulations over Bujumbura, Burundi, Atmos.
Chem. Phys. Discuss., <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-1104" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2016-1104</a>, in review, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Granier et al.(2011)Granier, Bessagnet, Bond, D'Angiola, van
Der Gon, Frost, Heil, Kaiser, Kinne, Klimont et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Granier, C., Bessagnet, B., Bond, T., D'Angiola, A., van Der Gon, H. D.,
Frost, G. J., Heil, A., Kaiser, J. W., Kinne, S., Klimont, Z., Kloster, S.,
Lamarque, J.-F., Liousse, C., Masui, T., Meleux, F., Mieville, A., Ohara, T.,
Raut, J.-C., Riahi, K., Schultz, M. G., Smith, S. J., Thompson, A., van
Aardenne, J., van der Werf, G. R., and van Vuuren, D. P.:
Evolution of anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of air pollutants at
global and regional scales during the 1980–2010 period, Clim. Change,
109, p. 163, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Gu et al.(2014)Gu, Wang, Smeltzer, and Boersma</label><mixed-citation>
Gu, D., Wang, Y., Smeltzer, C., and Boersma, K. F.: Anthropogenic emissions of
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> over China: Reconciling the difference of inverse modeling results using
GOME-2 and OMI measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 119, 7732–7740,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Hassinen et al.(2016)Hassinen, Balis, Bauer, Begoin, Delcloo,
Eleftheratos, Garcia, Granville, Grossi, Hao et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Hassinen, S., Balis, D., Bauer, H., Begoin, M., Delcloo, A., Eleftheratos,
K., Gimeno Garcia, S., Granville, J., Grossi, M., Hao, N., Hedelt, P.,
Hendrick, F., Hess, M., Heue, K.-P., Hovila, J., Jønch-Sørensen, H.,
Kalakoski, N., Kauppi, A., Kiemle, S., Kins, L., Koukouli, M. E.,
Kujanpää, J., Lambert, J.-C., Lang, R., Lerot, C., Loyola, D.,
Pedergnana, M., Pinardi, G., Romahn, F., van Roozendael, M., Lutz, R., De
Smedt, I., Stammes, P., Steinbrecht, W., Tamminen, J., Theys, N., Tilstra, L.
G., Tuinder, O. N. E., Valks, P., Zerefos, C., Zimmer, W., and Zyrichidou,
I.: Overview of the O3M SAF GOME-2 operational atmospheric composition and UV
radiation data products and data availability, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9,
383–407, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-383-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-383-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Heckel et al.(2005)Heckel, Richter, Tarsu, Wittrock, Hak, Pundt,
Junkermann, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Heckel, A., Richter, A., Tarsu, T., Wittrock, F., Hak, C., Pundt, I.,
Junkermann, W., and Burrows, J. P.: MAX-DOAS measurements of formaldehyde in
the Po-Valley, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 909–918,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-909-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-909-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Heckel et al.(2011)Heckel, Kim, Frost, Richter, Trainer, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Heckel, A., Kim, S.-W., Frost, G. J., Richter, A., Trainer, M., and Burrows,
J. P.: Influence of low spatial resolution a priori data on tropospheric
NO<sub>2</sub> satellite retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1805–1820,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1805-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1805-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Hendrick et al.(2014)Hendrick, Müller, Clémer, Wang,
Mazière, Fayt, Gielen, Hermans, Ma, Pinardi et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Hendrick, F., Müller, J.-F., Clémer, K., Wang, P., De Maziére, M.,
Fayt, C., Gielen, C., Hermans, C., Ma, J. Z., Pinardi, G., Stavrakou, T.,
Vlemmix, T., and Van Roozendael, M.: Four years of ground-based MAX-DOAS
observations of HONO and NO<sub>2</sub> in the Beijing area, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
14, 765–781, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-765-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-765-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Hilboll et al.(2013)Hilboll, Richter, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Hilboll, A., Richter, A., and Burrows, J. P.: Long-term changes of
tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> over megacities derived from multiple satellite
instruments, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4145–4169,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4145-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4145-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Hilboll et al.(2017)Hilboll, Richter, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Hilboll, A., Richter, A., and Burrows, J. P.: NO<sub>2</sub> pollution over India
observed from space – the impact of rapid economic growth, and a recent
decline, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss., <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2017-101</a>,
in review, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Holben et al.(1991)Holben, Eck, and Fraser</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B., Eck, T., and Fraser, R.: Temporal and spatial variability of
aerosol optical depth in the Sahel region in relation to vegetation remote
sensing, Int. J. Remote Sens., 12, 1147–1163, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Hönninger et al.(2004)Hönninger, Friedeburg, and
Platt</label><mixed-citation>
Hönninger, G., von Friedeburg, C., and Platt, U.: Multi axis differential
optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 231–254,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-231-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-231-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Horowitz et al.(2003)Horowitz, Walters, Mauzerall, Emmons, Rasch,
Granier, Tie, Lamarque, Schultz, Tyndall et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Horowitz, L. W., Walters, S., Mauzerall, D. L., Emmons, L. K., Rasch, P. J.,
Granier, C., Tie, X., Lamarque, J.-F., Schultz, M. G., Tyndall, G. S.,
Orlando, J. J., and Brasseur, G. P.: A global simulation of tropospheric
ozone and related tracers: Description and evaluation of MOZART, version 2,
J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 108, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002853" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002853</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Huijnen et al.(2010)Huijnen, Williams, Weele, Noije, Krol, Dentener,
Segers, Houweling, Peters, Laat et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Huijnen, V., Williams, J., van Weele, M., van Noije, T., Krol, M., Dentener,
F., Segers, A., Houweling, S., Peters, W., de Laat, J., Boersma, F.,
Bergamaschi, P., van Velthoven, P., Le Sager, P., Eskes, H., Alkemade, F.,
Scheele, R., Nédélec, P., and Pätz, H.-W.: The global chemistry
transport model TM5: description and evaluation of the tropospheric chemistry
version 3.0, Geosci. Model Dev., 3, 445–473,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-445-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-3-445-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Huijnen et al.(2016)Huijnen, Flemming, Chabrillat, Errera,
Christophe, Blechschmidt, Richter, and Eskes</label><mixed-citation>
Huijnen, V., Flemming, J., Chabrillat, S., Errera, Q., Christophe, Y.,
Blechschmidt, A.-M., Richter, A., and Eskes, H.: C-IFS-CB05-BASCOE:
stratospheric chemistry in the Integrated Forecasting System of ECMWF,
Geosci. Model Dev., 9, 3071–3091, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3071-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3071-2016</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Ingmann et al.(2012)Ingmann, Veihelmann, Langen, Lamarre, Stark, and
Courrèges-Lacoste</label><mixed-citation>
Ingmann, P., Veihelmann, B., Langen, J., Lamarre, D., Stark, H., and
Courrèges-Lacoste, G. B.: Requirements for the GMES Atmosphere Service
and ESA's implementation concept: Sentinels-4/-5 and-5p, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 58–69, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Irie et al.(2011)Irie, Takashima, Kanaya, Boersma, Gast, Wittrock,
Brunner, Zhou, and Roozendael</label><mixed-citation>
Irie, H., Takashima, H., Kanaya, Y., Boersma, K. F., Gast, L., Wittrock, F.,
Brunner, D., Zhou, Y., and Van Roozendael, M.: Eight-component retrievals
from ground-based MAX-DOAS observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1027–1044,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1027-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1027-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Irie et al.(2012)Irie, Boersma, Kanaya, Takashima, Pan, and
Wang</label><mixed-citation>
Irie, H., Boersma, K. F., Kanaya, Y., Takashima, H., Pan, X., and Wang, Z.
F.: Quantitative bias estimates for tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> columns
retrieved from SCIAMACHY, OMI, and GOME-2 using a common standard for East
Asia, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 2403–2411,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2403-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2403-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Kanaya et al.(2014)Kanaya, Irie, Takashima, Iwabuchi, Akimoto, Sudo,
Gu, Chong, Kim, Lee et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Kanaya, Y., Irie, H., Takashima, H., Iwabuchi, H., Akimoto, H., Sudo, K., Gu,
M., Chong, J., Kim, Y. J., Lee, H., Li, A., Si, F., Xu, J., Xie, P.-H., Liu,
W.-Q., Dzhola, A., Postylyakov, O., Ivanov, V., Grechko, E., Terpugova, S.,
and Panchenko, M.: Long-term MAX-DOAS network observations of NO<sub>2</sub> in
Russia and Asia (MADRAS) during the period 2007–2012: instrumentation,
elucidation of climatology, and comparisons with OMI satellite observations
and global model simulations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7909–7927,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7909-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7909-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Kleipool et al.(2008)Kleipool, Dobber, de Haan, and
Levelt</label><mixed-citation>
Kleipool, Q., Dobber, M., de Haan, J., and Levelt, P.: Earth surface
reflectance climatology from 3 years of OMI data, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010290" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010290</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Kramer et al.(2008)Kramer, Leigh, Remedios, and
Monks</label><mixed-citation>
Kramer, L. J., Leigh, R. J., Remedios, J. J., and Monks, P. S.: Comparison of
OMI and ground-based in situ and MAX-DOAS measurements of tropospheric
nitrogen dioxide in an urban area, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009168" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009168</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Krotkov et al.(2017)Krotkov, Lamsal, Celarier, Swartz, Marchenko,
Bucsela, Chan, Wenig, and Zara</label><mixed-citation>
Krotkov, N. A., Lamsal, L. N., Celarier, E. A., Swartz, W. H., Marchenko, S.
V., Bucsela, E. J., Chan, K. L., Wenig, M., and Zara, M.: The version 3 OMI
NO<sub>2</sub> standard product, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 3133–3149,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3133-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-3133-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Kuhlmann et al.(2015)Kuhlmann, Lam, Cheung, Hartl, Fung, Chan, and
Wenig</label><mixed-citation>
Kuhlmann, G., Lam, Y. F., Cheung, H. M., Hartl, A., Fung, J. C. H., Chan, P.
W., and Wenig, M. O.: Development of a custom OMI NO<sub>2</sub> data product for
evaluating biases in a regional chemistry transport model, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 15, 5627–5644, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5627-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5627-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Lambert et al.(1999)Lambert, Granville, Van Roozendael, Sarkissian,
Goutail, Müller, Pommereau, and Russell III</label><mixed-citation>
Lambert, J., Granville, J., Van Roozendael, M., Sarkissian, A., Goutail, F.,
Müller, J., Pommereau, J., and Russell III, J.: A climatology of NO<sub>2</sub>
profile for improved air mass factors for ground-based vertical column
measurements, in: Proceedings of the 5th European Symposium Strat. Ozone,
Saint Jean de Luz, p. 703, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Lampel et al.(2015)Lampel, Pöhler, Tschritter, Frieß, and
Platt</label><mixed-citation>
Lampel, J., Pöhler, D., Tschritter, J., Frieß, U., and Platt, U.: On the
relative absorption strengths of water vapour in the blue wavelength range,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 4329–4346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4329-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4329-2015</a>,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Laughner et al.(2016)Laughner, Zare, and Cohen</label><mixed-citation>
Laughner, J. L., Zare, A., and Cohen, R. C.: Effects of daily meteorology on
the interpretation of space-based remote sensing of NO<sub>2</sub>, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 16, 15247–15264, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15247-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-15247-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Laughner et al.(2018)Laughner, Zhu, and Cohen</label><mixed-citation>
Laughner, J. L., Zhu, Q., and Cohen, R. C.: The Berkeley High Resolution
Tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> product, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 2069–2095,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2069-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2069-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Leitão et al.(2010)Leitão, Richter, Vrekoussis, Kokhanovsky,
Zhang, Beekmann, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Leitão, J., Richter, A., Vrekoussis, M., Kokhanovsky, A., Zhang, Q. J.,
Beekmann, M., and Burrows, J. P.: On the improvement of NO<sub>2</sub> satellite
retrievals – aerosol impact on the airmass factors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3,
475–493, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-475-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-475-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>Levelt et al.(2006)Levelt, Van den Oord, Dobber, Malkki, Visser,
de Vries, Stammes, Lundell, and Saari</label><mixed-citation>
Levelt, P., Van den Oord, G., Dobber, M., Malkki, A., Visser, H., de Vries, J.,
Stammes, P., Lundell, J., and Saari, H.: The Ozone Monitoring Instrument,
IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44, 1093–1101, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>Lin et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, J.-T., Martin, R. V., Boersma, K. F., Sneep, M., Stammes, P., Spurr, R.,
Wang, P., Van Roozendael, M., Clémer, K., and Irie, H.: Retrieving
tropospheric nitrogen dioxide from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: effects
of aerosols, surface reflectance anisotropy, and vertical profile of nitrogen
dioxide, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1441–1461,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1441-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1441-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>Lin et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Lin, J.-T., Liu, M.-Y., Xin, J.-Y., Boersma, K. F., Spurr, R., Martin, R.,
and Zhang, Q.: Influence of aerosols and surface reflectance on satellite
NO<sub>2</sub> retrieval: seasonal and spatial characteristics and implications
for NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emission constraints, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
11217–11241, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11217-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-11217-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>Liu et al.(2017)Liu, Beirle, Zhang, Zheng, Tong, He
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, F., Beirle, S., Zhang, Q., van der A, R. J., Zheng, B., Tong, D., and
He, K.: NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emission trends over Chinese cities estimated
from OMI observations during 2005 to 2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
9261–9275, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9261-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-9261-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>Lorente et al.(2017)Lorente, Boersma, Yu, Dörner, Hilboll,
Richter, Liu, Lamsal, Barkley, De Smedt et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Lorente, A., Folkert Boersma, K., Yu, H., Dörner, S., Hilboll, A., Richter,
A., Liu, M., Lamsal, L. N., Barkley, M., De Smedt, I., Van Roozendael, M.,
Wang, Y., Wagner, T., Beirle, S., Lin, J.-T., Krotkov, N., Stammes, P., Wang,
P., Eskes, H. J., and Krol, M.: Structural uncertainty in air mass factor
calculation for NO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO satellite retrievals, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 10, 759–782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-759-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-759-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>Loyola et al.(2007)Loyola, Thomas, Livschitz, Ruppert, Albert, and
Hollmann</label><mixed-citation>
Loyola, D., Thomas, W., Livschitz, Y., Ruppert, T., Albert, P., and Hollmann,
R.: Cloud properties derived from GOME/ERS-2 backscatter data for trace gas
retrieval, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 45, 2747–2758, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>Loyola et al.(2011)Loyola, Koukouli, Valks, Balis, Hao,
Van Roozendael, Spurr, Zimmer, Kiemle, Lerot et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Loyola, D., Koukouli, M., Valks, P., Balis, D., Hao, N., Van Roozendael, M.,
Spurr, R., Zimmer, W., Kiemle, S., Lerot, C., et al.: The GOME-2 total column
ozone product: Retrieval algorithm and ground-based validation, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014675" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014675</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>Loyola et al.(2016)Loyola, Pedergnana, and
García</label><mixed-citation>
Loyola, D. G., Pedergnana, M., and García, S. G.: Smart sampling and
incremental function learning for very large high dimensional data, Neural
Networks, 78, 75–87, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>Loyola et al.(2018)Loyola, García, Lutz, Argyrouli, Romahn,
Spurr, Pedergnana, Doicu, García, and
Schüssler</label><mixed-citation>
Loyola, D. G., Gimeno García, S., Lutz, R., Argyrouli, A., Romahn, F., Spurr,
R. J. D., Pedergnana, M., Doicu, A., Molina García, V., and Schüssler,
O.: The operational cloud retrieval algorithms from TROPOMI on board
Sentinel-5 Precursor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 409–427,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-409-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-409-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>Lutz et al.(2016)Lutz, Loyola, Gimeno García, and
Romahn</label><mixed-citation>
Lutz, R., Loyola, D., Gimeno García, S., and Romahn, F.: OCRA radiometric
cloud fractions for GOME-2 on MetOp-A/B, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 2357–2379,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2357-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-2357-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>Ma et al.(2013)Ma, Beirle, Jin, Shaiganfar, Yan, and
Wagner</label><mixed-citation>
Ma, J. Z., Beirle, S., Jin, J. L., Shaiganfar, R., Yan, P., and Wagner, T.:
Tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> vertical column densities over Beijing: results of the first
three years of ground-based MAX-DOAS measurements (2008–2011) and satellite
validation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1547–1567,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1547-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1547-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>McLinden et al.(2014)McLinden, Fioletov, Boersma, Kharol, Krotkov,
Lamsal, Makar, Martin, Veefkind, and Yang</label><mixed-citation>
McLinden, C. A., Fioletov, V., Boersma, K. F., Kharol, S. K., Krotkov, N.,
Lamsal, L., Makar, P. A., Martin, R. V., Veefkind, J. P., and Yang, K.:
Improved satellite retrievals of NO<sub>2</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub> over the
Canadian oil sands and comparisons with surface measurements, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 14, 3637–3656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3637-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-3637-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>Miyazaki et al.(2017)Miyazaki, Eskes, Sudo, Boersma, Bowman, and
Kanaya</label><mixed-citation>
Miyazaki, K., Eskes, H., Sudo, K., Boersma, K. F., Bowman, K., and Kanaya,
Y.: Decadal changes in global surface NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions from multi-constituent
satellite data assimilation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 807–837,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-807-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-807-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>Müller et al.(2016)Müller, Kharbouche, Gobron, Scanlon,
Govaerts, Danne, Schultz, Lattanzio, Peters, De Smedt, Beirle, Lorente,
Coheur, George, Wagner, Hilboll, Richter, Van Roozendael, and
Boersma</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, J.-P., Kharbouche, S., Gobron, N., Scanlon, T., Govaerts, Y.,
Danne, O., Schultz, J., Lattanzio, A., Peters, E., De Smedt, I., Beirle, S.,
Lorente, A., Coheur, P., George, M., Wagner, T., Hilboll, A., Richter, A.,
Van Roozendael, M., and Boersma, K.: Recommendations (scientific) on best
practices for retrievals for Land and Atmosphere ECVs, Tech. rep.,
Deliverable 4.2 – version 1.0, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>Munro et al.(2016)Munro, Lang, Klaes, Poli, Retscher, Lindstrot,
Huckle, Lacan, Grzegorski, Holdak et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Munro, R., Lang, R., Klaes, D., Poli, G., Retscher, C., Lindstrot, R.,
Huckle, R., Lacan, A., Grzegorski, M., Holdak, A., Kokhanovsky, A.,
Livschitz, J., and Eisinger, M.: The GOME-2 instrument on the Metop series of
satellites: instrument design, calibration, and level 1 data processing – an
overview, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1279–1301,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1279-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1279-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>Nolin et al.(2005)Nolin, Armstrong, and Maslanik</label><mixed-citation>
Nolin, A., Armstrong, R., and Maslanik, J.: Near real-time SSM/I EASE-grid
daily global ice concentration and snow extent, Digital Media, National Snow
and Ice Data Center, Boulder, CO, USA, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>Nüß et al.(2006)Nüß, Richter, Valks, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Nüß, H., Richter, A., Valks, P., and Burrows, J.: Improvement of the
NO<sub>2</sub> total column retrieval for GOME-2, O3M SAF Visiting Scientist Activity,
Final Report, IUP University of Bremen, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>Olivier et al.(1996)Olivier, Bouwman, Berdowski, Veldt, Bloos,
Visschedijk, Zandveld, Haverlag et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Olivier, J. G., Bouwman, A., Berdowski, J., Veldt, C., Bloos, J.,
Visschedijk, A., Zandveld, P., and Haverlag, J.: Description of EDGAR Version
2.0: A set of global emission inventories of greenhouse gases and
ozone-depleting substances for all anthropogenic and most natural sources on
a per country basis and on 1 degree&thinsp; × &thinsp;1 degree grid, RIVM report no.
771060 002/TNO-MEP report no. R96/119,
<a href="https://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/771060002.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.rivm.nl/bibliotheek/rapporten/771060002.pdf</a> (last access: 1
February 2019), 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>Ortega et al.(2015)Ortega, Koenig, Sinreich, Thomson, and
Volkamer</label><mixed-citation>
Ortega, I., Koenig, T., Sinreich, R., Thomson, D., and Volkamer, R.: The CU
2-D-MAX-DOAS instrument – Part 1: Retrieval of 3-D distributions of NO<sub>2</sub> and
azimuth-dependent OVOC ratios, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2371–2395,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2371-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2371-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>Penning de Vries et al.(2015)Penning de Vries, Beirle, Hörmann,
Kaiser, Stammes, Tilstra, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>
Penning de Vries, M. J. M., Beirle, S., Hörmann, C., Kaiser, J. W., Stammes,
P., Tilstra, L. G., Tuinder, O. N. E., and Wagner, T.: A global aerosol
classification algorithm incorporating multiple satellite data sets of
aerosol and trace gas abundances, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10597–10618,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10597-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10597-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>Peters et al.(2014)Peters, Wittrock, Richter, Alvarado, Rozanov, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Peters, E., Wittrock, F., Richter, A., Alvarado, L. M. A., Rozanov, V. V.,
and Burrows, J. P.: Liquid water absorption and scattering effects in DOAS
retrievals over oceans, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4203–4221,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4203-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4203-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>Pinardi et al.(2014)Pinardi, Van Roozendael, Lambert, Granville,
Hendrick, Tack, Yu, Cede, Kanaya, Irie et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Pinardi, G., Van Roozendael, M., Lambert, J.-C., Granville, J., Hendrick, F.,
Tack, F., Yu, H., Cede, A., Kanaya, Y., Irie, I., Goutail, F., Pommereau,
J.-P., Pazmino, A., Wittrock, F., Richter, A., Wagner, T., Gu, M., Remmers,
J., Friess, U., Vlemmix, T., Piters, A., Hao, N., Tiefengraber, M., Herman,
J., Abuhassan, N., Bais, A., Kouremeti, N., Hovila, J., Holla, R., Chong, J.,
Postylyakov, O., and Ma, J.: GOME-2 total and
tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> validation based on zenith-sky, direct-sun and multi-axis
DOAS network observations, in: Proc. of the 2014 EUMETSAT Meteorological
Satellite Conference, Geneva, Swizerland, 22–26 September 2014, EUMETSAT, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>Pinardi et al.(2015)Pinardi, Lambert, Granville, Yu, De Smedt, van
Roozendael, and Valks</label><mixed-citation>
Pinardi, G., Lambert, J.-C., Granville, J., Yu, H., De Smedt, I., van
Roozendael, M., and Valks, P.: O3M-SAF validation report, Tech. rep.,
SAF/O3M/IASB/VR/NO<sub>2</sub>/TN-IASB-GOME2-O3MSAF-NO<sub>2</sub>-2015, 1/1, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>Platt and Stutz(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Platt, U. and Stutz, J.: Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy,
Springer, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>Pope and Fry(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Pope, R. M. and Fry, E. S.: Absorption spectrum (380–700&thinsp;nm) of pure water.
II. Integrating cavity measurements, Appl. Opt., 36, 8710–8723, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>Richter and verification team(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Richter, A. and verification team: S5P/TROPOMI Science Verification
Report, Tech. rep., S5P-IUP-L2-ScVR-RP issue 2.1, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>Richter et al.(2005)Richter, Burrows, Nüß, Granier, and
Niemeier</label><mixed-citation>
Richter, A., Burrows, J. P., Nüß, H., Granier, C., and Niemeier, U.:
Increase in tropospheric nitrogen dioxide over China observed from space,
Nature, 437, p. 129, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>Richter et al.(2011)Richter, Begoin, Hilboll, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Richter, A., Begoin, M., Hilboll, A., and Burrows, J. P.: An improved
NO<sub>2</sub> retrieval for the GOME-2 satellite instrument, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 4, 1147–1159, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1147-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1147-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>Rothman et al.(2010)Rothman, Gordon, Barber, Dothe, Gamache, Goldman,
Perevalov, Tashkun, and Tennyson</label><mixed-citation>
Rothman, L., Gordon, I., Barber, R., Dothe, H., Gamache, R., Goldman, A.,
Perevalov, V., Tashkun, S., and Tennyson, J.: HITEMP, the high-temperature
molecular spectroscopic database, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra.,
111, 2139–2150, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>Russell et al.(2011)Russell, Perring, Valin, Bucsela, Browne,
Wooldridge, and Cohen</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, A. R., Perring, A. E., Valin, L. C., Bucsela, E. J., Browne, E. C.,
Wooldridge, P. J., and Cohen, R. C.: A high spatial resolution retrieval of
NO<sub>2</sub> column densities from OMI: method and evaluation, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 11, 8543–8554, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8543-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8543-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>Safieddine et al.(2013)Safieddine, Clerbaux, George, Hadji-Lazaro,
Hurtmans, Coheur, Wespes, Loyola, Valks, and
Hao</label><mixed-citation>
Safieddine, S., Clerbaux, C., George, M., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans, D.,
Coheur, P.-F., Wespes, C., Loyola, D., Valks, P., and Hao, N.: Tropospheric
ozone and nitrogen dioxide measurements in urban and rural regions as seen by
IASI and GOME-2, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 10555–10566,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50669" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50669</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>Seinfeld et al.(1998)Seinfeld, Pandis, and
Noone</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H., Pandis, S., and Noone, K.: Atmospheric chemistry and
physics: from air pollution to climate change, Wiley, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>Solomon(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S.: Stratospheric ozone depletion: A review of concepts and history,
Rev. Geophys., 37, 275–316, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>Spurr et al.(2001)Spurr, Kurosu, and Chance</label><mixed-citation>
Spurr, R., Kurosu, T., and Chance, K.: A linearized discrete ordinate radiative
transfer model for atmospheric remote-sensing retrieval,
J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 68, 689–735, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>Spurr(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Spurr, R. J.: VLIDORT: A linearized pseudo-spherical vector discrete ordinate
radiative transfer code for forward model and retrieval studies in multilayer
multiple scattering media, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 102,
316–342, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>Thalman and Volkamer(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Thalman, R. and Volkamer, R.: Temperature dependent absorption cross-sections
of O<sub>2</sub>–O<sub>2</sub> collision pairs between 340 and 630&thinsp;nm and at atmospherically
relevant pressure, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 15, 15371–15381, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>Tikhonov and Arsenin(1977)</label><mixed-citation>
Tikhonov, A. and Arsenin, V.: Solutions of ill-posed problems, V. H. Winston
&amp; Sons, Washington, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>Tilstra et al.(2017a)Tilstra, Tuinder, and
Stammes</label><mixed-citation>
Tilstra, L., Tuinder, O., and Stammes, P.: GOME-2 surface LER product –
Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, Tech. rep., KNMI Report
O3MSAF/KNMI/ATBD/003, Issue 2.2, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>Tilstra et al.(2017b)Tilstra, Wang, and
Stammes</label><mixed-citation>
Tilstra, L., Wang, P., and Stammes, P.: Surface reflectivity climatologies from
UV to NIR determined from Earth observations by GOME-2 and SCIAMACHY,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 4084–4111, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>Valks et al.(2011)Valks, Pinardi, Richter, Lambert, Hao, Loyola,
Van Roozendael, and Emmadi</label><mixed-citation>
Valks, P., Pinardi, G., Richter, A., Lambert, J.-C., Hao, N., Loyola, D., Van
Roozendael, M., and Emmadi, S.: Operational total and tropospheric
NO<sub>2</sub> column retrieval for GOME-2, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1491–1514,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1491-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1491-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>Valks et al.(2017)Valks, Loyola, Hao, Hedelt, Slijkhuis, Grossi,
Begoin, Gimeno Garcia, and Lutz</label><mixed-citation>
Valks, P., Loyola, D., Hao, N., Hedelt, P., Slijkhuis, S., Grossi, M., Begoin,
M., Gimeno Garcia, S., and Lutz, R.: Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document for
GOME-2 Total Column Products of Ozone, NO<sub>2</sub>, BrO, SO<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>O, HCHO and Cloud
Properties (GDP 4.8 for AC SAF OTO and NTO), Tech. rep., SAF/AC/DLR/ATBD/01,
Iss./Rev.: 3/A/2, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>van Geffen et al.(2015)van Geffen, Boersma, Van Roozendael, Hendrick,
Mahieu, De Smedt, Sneep, and Veefkind</label><mixed-citation>
van Geffen, J. H. G. M., Boersma, K. F., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F.,
Mahieu, E., De Smedt, I., Sneep, M., and Veefkind, J. P.: Improved spectral
fitting of nitrogen dioxide from OMI in the 405–465&thinsp;nm window, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 8, 1685–1699, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1685-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1685-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>van Geffen et al.(2016)van Geffen, Boersma, Eskes, Maasakkers, and
Veefkind</label><mixed-citation>
van Geffen, J., Boersma, K., Eskes, H., Maasakkers, J., and Veefkind, J.:
TROPOMI ATBD of the total and tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> data products, Tech. rep.,
S5P-KNMI-L2-0005-RP issue 1.0.0. KNMI, De Bilt, the Netherlands, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>Vandaele et al.(2002)Vandaele, Hermans, Fally, Carleer, Colin,
Merienne, Jenouvrier, and Coquart</label><mixed-citation>
Vandaele, A. C., Hermans, C., Fally, S., Carleer, M., Colin, R., Merienne,
M.-F., Jenouvrier, A., and Coquart, B.: High-resolution Fourier transform
measurement of the NO<sub>2</sub> visible and near-infrared absorption cross sections:
Temperature and pressure effects, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000971" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000971</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>van der A et al.(2017)van der A, Ding, Koukouli, Liu, Li, Mao, Theys
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
van der A, R. J., Mijling, B., Ding, J., Koukouli, M. E., Liu, F., Li, Q.,
Mao, H., and Theys, N.: Cleaning up the air: effectiveness of air quality
policy for SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions in China, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 17, 1775–1789, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1775-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1775-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>Vasilkov et al.(2017)Vasilkov, Qin, Krotkov, Lamsal, Spurr, Haffner,
Joiner, Eun-Su, and Marchenko</label><mixed-citation>
Vasilkov, A., Qin, W., Krotkov, N., Lamsal, L., Spurr, R., Haffner, D.,
Joiner, J., Yang, E.-S., and Marchenko, S.: Accounting for the effects of
surface BRDF on satellite cloud and trace-gas retrievals: a new approach
based on geometry-dependent Lambertian equivalent reflectivity applied to OMI
algorithms, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 333–349,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-333-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-333-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>Veefkind et al.(2012)Veefkind, Aben, McMullan, Förster, De Vries,
Otter, Claas, Eskes, De Haan, Kleipool et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Veefkind, J., Aben, I., McMullan, K., Förster, H., De Vries, J., Otter, G.,
Claas, J., Eskes, H., De Haan, J., Kleipool, Q., van Weele, M., Hasekamp, O.,
Hoogeveen, R., Landgraf, J., Snel, R., Tol, P., Ingmann, P., Voors, R.,
Kruizinga, B., Vink, R., Visser, H., and Levelt, P.: TROPOMI on the ESA
Sentinel-5 Precursor: A GMES mission for global observations of the
atmospheric composition for climate, air quality and ozone layer
applications, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 70–83, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>Veefkind et al.(2016)Veefkind, De Haan, Sneep, and
Levelt</label><mixed-citation>
Veefkind, J. P., de Haan, J. F., Sneep, M., and Levelt, P. F.: Improvements
to the OMI O<sub>2</sub>–O<sub>2</sub> operational cloud algorithm and comparisons
with ground-based radar–lidar observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9,
6035–6049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6035-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6035-2016</a>, 2016. .
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>Vlemmix et al.(2015)Vlemmix, Hendrick, Pinardi, De Smedt, Fayt,
Hermans, Piters, Wang, Levelt, and Van Roozendael</label><mixed-citation>
Vlemmix, T., Hendrick, F., Pinardi, G., De Smedt, I., Fayt, C., Hermans, C.,
Piters, A., Wang, P., Levelt, P., and Van Roozendael, M.: MAX-DOAS
observations of aerosols, formaldehyde and nitrogen dioxide in the Beijing
area: comparison of two profile retrieval approaches, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8,
941–963, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-941-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-941-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib109"><label>Vountas et al.(2003)Vountas, Richter, Wittrock, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Vountas, M., Richter, A., Wittrock, F., and Burrows, J. P.: Inelastic
scattering in ocean water and its impact on trace gas retrievals from
satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1365–1375,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1365-2003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1365-2003</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib110"><label>Vrekoussis et al.(2010)Vrekoussis, Wittrock, Richter, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Vrekoussis, M., Wittrock, F., Richter, A., and Burrows, J. P.: GOME-2
observations of oxygenated VOCs: what can we learn from the ratio glyoxal to
formaldehyde on a global scale?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 10145–10160,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10145-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-10145-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib111"><label>Wagner et al.(2004)Wagner, Dix, Friedeburg, Frieß, Sanghavi,
Sinreich, and Platt</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, T., Dix, B. V., Friedeburg, C. V., Frieß, U., Sanghavi, S.,
Sinreich, R., and Platt, U.: MAX-DOAS O<sub>4</sub> measurements: A new technique to
derive information on atmospheric aerosols – Principles and information
content, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004904" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004904</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib112"><label>Wagner et al.(2011)Wagner, Beirle, Brauers, Deutschmann, Frieß,
Hak, Halla, Heue, Junkermann, Li et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, T., Beirle, S., Brauers, T., Deutschmann, T., Frieß, U., Hak, C.,
Halla, J. D., Heue, K. P., Junkermann, W., Li, X., Platt, U., and
Pundt-Gruber, I.: Inversion of tropospheric profiles of aerosol extinction
and HCHO and NO<sub>2</sub> mixing ratios from MAX-DOAS observations in Milano
during the summer of 2003 and comparison with independent data sets, Atmos.
Meas. Tech., 4, 2685–2715, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2685-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2685-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib113"><label>Wang et al.(2017)Wang, Beirle, Lampel, Koukouli, De Smedt, Theys,
Ang, Wu, Xie, Liu et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Beirle, S., Lampel, J., Koukouli, M., De Smedt, I., Theys, N., Li,
A., Wu, D., Xie, P., Liu, C., Van Roozendael, M., Stavrakou, T., Müller,
J.-F., and Wagner, T.: Validation of OMI, GOME-2A and GOME-2B tropospheric
NO<sub>2</sub>, SO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO products using MAX-DOAS observations from
2011 to 2014 in Wuxi, China: investigation of the effects of priori profiles
and aerosols on the satellite products, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 5007–5033,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5007-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-5007-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib114"><label>Williams et al.(2017)Williams, Boersma, Le Sager, and
Verstraeten</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, J. E., Boersma, K. F., Le Sager, P., and Verstraeten, W. W.: The
high-resolution version of TM5-MP for optimized satellite retrievals:
description and validation, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 721–750,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-721-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-721-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib115"><label>Wittrock et al.(2004)Wittrock, Oetjen, Richter, Fietkau, Medeke,
Rozanov, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation> Wittrock, F., Oetjen, H., Richter,
A., Fietkau, S., Medeke, T., Rozanov, A., and Burrows, J. P.: MAX-DOAS
measurements of atmospheric trace gases in Ny-Ålesund – Radiative
transfer studies and their application, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 955–966,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-955-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-955-2004</a>, 2004.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib116"><label>Wu et al.(2013)Wu, Xie, Li, Chan, Hartl, Wang, Si, Zeng, Qin, Xu
et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, F. C., Xie, P. H., Li, A., Chan, K. L., Hartl, A., Wang, Y., Si, F. Q.,
Zeng, Y., Qin, M., Xu, J., Liu, J. G., Liu, W. Q., and Wenig, M.:
Observations of SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> by mobile DOAS in the Guangzhou eastern area
during the Asian Games 2010, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2277–2292,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2277-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2277-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib117"><label>Zara et al.(2018)Zara, Boersma, De Smedt, Richter, Peters,
Van Geffen, Beirle, Wagner, Van Roozendael, Marchenko, Lamsal, and
Eskes</label><mixed-citation>
Zara, M., Boersma, K. F., De Smedt, I., Richter, A., Peters, E., van Geffen,
J. H. G. M., Beirle, S., Wagner, T., Van Roozendael, M., Marchenko, S.,
Lamsal, L. N., and Eskes, H. J.: Improved slant column density retrieval of
nitrogen dioxide and formaldehyde for OMI and GOME-2A from QA4ECV:
intercomparison, uncertainty characterisation, and trends, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 11, 4033–4058, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4033-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-4033-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib118"><label>Zien et al.(2014)Zien, Richter, Hilboll, Blechschmidt, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Zien, A. W., Richter, A., Hilboll, A., Blechschmidt, A.-M., and Burrows, J.
P.: Systematic analysis of tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> long-range transport events
detected in GOME-2 satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7367–7396,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7367-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7367-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
