<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-12-1913-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Radiometric calibration of a non-imaging airborne spectrometer to measure
the Greenland ice sheet surface</article-title><alt-title>Airborne spectrometry of the Greenland ice sheet</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Airborne spectrometry of the Greenland ice sheet}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{C.~J. Crawford et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Crawford</surname><given-names>Christopher J.</given-names></name>
          <email>cjcrawford@usgs.gov</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7145-0709</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>van den Bosch</surname><given-names>Jeannette</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Brunt</surname><given-names>Kelly M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff6 aff7">
          <name><surname>Hom</surname><given-names>Milton G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5 aff6 aff8">
          <name><surname>Cooper</surname><given-names>John W.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Harding</surname><given-names>David J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff8">
          <name><surname>Butler</surname><given-names>James J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff9">
          <name><surname>Dabney</surname><given-names>Philip W.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Neumann</surname><given-names>Thomas A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6926-937X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff10">
          <name><surname>Cleckner</surname><given-names>Craig S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Markus</surname><given-names>Thorsten</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Arctic Slope Regional Corporation Federal InuTeq, contractor to the
U.S. Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science Center,
Science and Applications Branch, 47914 252nd Street, Sioux Falls, SD, 57198, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland,
5825 University Research Court #4001,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> College Park, MD 20704, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Cryospheric Sciences Laboratory (Code 615), NASA Goddard Space Flight
Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Air Force Research Laboratory, Battlespace Surveillance Innovation
Branch, Kirtland Air Force Base,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> NM 87117, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Science Systems and Applications Inc., 10210 Greenbelt Road #600,
Landham, MD 20706, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Biospheric Sciences Laboratory (Code 618), NASA Goddard Space Flight
Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> MD 20771, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Biospheric Optics Laboratory (Code 618), NASA Goddard Space Flight
Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> MD 20771, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>Radiometric Calibration Laboratory (Code 618), NASA Goddard Space
Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Laser Remote Sensing Laboratory (Code 694), NASA Goddard Space Flight
Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>Research Services Division (Code D1), NASA Langley Research Center, 1
NASA Drive, Hampton, VI 23666, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Christopher J. Crawford (cjcrawford@usgs.gov)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>26</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>1913</fpage><lpage>1933</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>28</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day><month>February</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Christopher J. Crawford et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e244">Methods to radiometrically calibrate a non-imaging airborne
visible-to-shortwave infrared (VSWIR) spectrometer to measure the Greenland
ice sheet surface are presented. Airborne VSWIR measurement performance for
bright Greenland ice and dark bare rock/soil targets is compared against the
MODerate resolution atmospheric TRANsmission (MODTRAN<sup>®</sup>)
radiative transfer code (version 6.0), and a coincident Landsat 8
Operational Land Imager (OLI) acquisition on 29 July 2015 during an
in-flight radiometric calibration experiment. Airborne remote sensing
flights were carried out in northwestern Greenland in preparation for the
Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite 2 (ICESat-2) laser altimeter
mission. A total of nine science flights were conducted over the Greenland ice sheet,
sea ice, and open-ocean water. The campaign's primary purpose was to
correlate green laser pulse penetration into snow and ice with
spectroscopic-derived surface properties. An experimental airborne
instrument configuration that included a nadir-viewing (looking downward at
the surface) non-imaging Analytical Spectral Devices (ASD) Inc. spectrometer
that measured upwelling VSWIR (0.35 to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) spectral radiance
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">W</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sr</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the two-color Slope Imaging
Multi-polarization Photon-Counting Lidar's (SIMPL) ground instantaneous
field of view, and a zenith-viewing (looking upward at the sky) ASD
spectrometer that measured VSWIR spectral irradiance
(W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> nm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was flown. National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) traceable radiometric calibration procedures for
laboratory, in-flight, and field<?pagebreak page1914?> environments are described in detail to
achieve a targeted VSWIR measurement requirement of within 5 % to support
calibration/validation efforts and remote sensing algorithm development. Our
MODTRAN predictions for the 29 July flight line over dark and bright targets
indicate that the airborne nadir-viewing spectrometer spectral radiance
measurement uncertainty was between 0.6 % and 4.7 % for VSWIR wavelengths
(0.4 to 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) with atmospheric transmittance greater than 80 %.
MODTRAN predictions for Landsat 8 OLI relative spectral response functions
suggest that OLI is measuring 6 % to 16 % more top-of-atmosphere (TOA)
spectral radiance from the Greenland ice sheet surface than was predicted
using apparent reflectance spectra from the nadir-viewing spectrometer.
While more investigation is required to convert airborne VSWIR spectral
radiance into atmospherically corrected airborne surface reflectance, it is
expected that airborne science flight data products will contribute to
spectroscopic determination of Greenland ice sheet surface optical
properties to improve understanding of their potential influence on ICESat-2
measurements.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e335">Calibrated spectral radiance measurements from multispectral and imaging
spectrometer instruments are a baseline requirement for producing
geophysical data products that can be used to study Earth's land, ice,
water, and atmospheric environments (Green, 1998; Green et al., 2006; King
et al., 1996; Schaepman-Strub et al., 2006; Thome, 2001; Vane et al., 1993).
Optical instrument calibration is based on a traceable radiance standard
determined by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in
the United States, for example, where radiance measurements are collected
from a stable illumination source in a controlled laboratory environment
(Chrien et al., 1990; Schaepman and Dangel, 2000; Strobl et al.,
1997; Tansock et al., 2015; Parr and Datla, 2001). Using
this stable NIST-traceable source, periodic assessments of an optical instrument's response
are made to monitor its long-term repeatability, mechanical functionality,
and responsivity to variable light intensities. While radiometric
calibration is fundamental to spectral instrument data acquisition, this is
especially critical for missions bound for deployments in polar regions
because the range of measured snow, ice, and liquid water surfaces spans the
entire solar spectrum dynamic range. For airborne missions, precise and
accurate pre-flight, in-flight, and post-flight calibration procedures are
therefore of paramount importance to achieve targeted instrument stability
and measurement requirements. Commitment to characterize instrumentation,
instrument foreoptics, and supporting aircraft hardware during pre- and
post-airborne mission timelines helps to produce remote sensing measurements
in which uncertainty has been quantified and fully calibrated data products
are available to support algorithm development and remote sensing science
applications.</p>
      <p id="d1e338">In this paper, we describe NIST-traceable laboratory, in-flight, and field
radiometric calibration procedures necessary to obtain science-quality
measurements from a visible-to-shortwave infrared (VSWIR) non-imaging
airborne spectrometer. We used the MODerate resolution atmospheric
TRANsmission (MODTRAN<sup>®</sup>) code version 6.0
(Berk et al., 2005) to assess the measurement
performance of the airborne nadir-viewing spectrometer over bright Greenland
ice and dark bare rock/soil targets during a 29 July 2015 in-flight
radiometric calibration experiment. Prior to this Greenland campaign,
MODTRAN's capability, usefulness, and performance with regard to Arctic and
Greenland ice sheet airborne remote sensing science remained largely
unrealized. Thus, application of MODTRAN radiative transfer in this paper to
evaluate VSWIR remote sensing measurement performance is both forward
thinking and advances atmospheric measurements and modeling for the Arctic
region in particular. Two non-imaging airborne spectrometers were flown as a
part of the Slope Imaging Multi-polarization Photon-Counting Lidar
(SIMPL)/Advanced Visible Infrared Imaging Spectrometer-Next Generation
(AVIRIS-NG) 2015 airborne campaign to northwest Greenland in July and August 2015 (Brunt et al., 2015). The nadir-viewing spectrometer's
objective was to acquire non-imaging profile measurements of snow, ice, and
liquid water radiance, and the zenith-viewing spectrometer's objective was
to characterize sky conditions during nine science flights. Non-imaging
profile measurements are defined as along-track radiance spectra of the
surface directly below the aircraft within the airborne spectrometer's
instantaneous field of view (IFOV). The campaign was conducted in support of
the Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite 2 (ICESat-2) mission launched on
15 September 2018. ICESat-2, a follow-on laser altimeter mission to ICESat
(Schutz et al., 2005; Zwally, 2002), will continue
measurements of ice sheet elevation and change, sea ice thickness, ocean
surface height, land topography, vegetation height and structure, and
atmospheric clouds and aerosols. The Geoscience Laser Altimeter System
(GLAS) (Abshire et al., 2005) on the ICESat mission used a
traditional single-beam, near-infrared (NIR) (1064 nm),
analog waveform method for the surface altimetry measurements. The Advanced
Topographic Laser Altimeter System (ATLAS) (Abdalati and Zwally,
2010; Markus et al., 2017) on ICESat-2 will use a more efficient measurement
producing multiple beams using a green (532 nm) micropulse, photon-counting
approach.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1915?><p id="d1e344">In order to prepare for the ICESat-2 mission, the Greenland campaign was
conducted to better understand how ATLAS will represent the height,
roughness, and topography of snow and ice surfaces to determine the spatial
extent, and potentially the depth, of meltwater on the ice sheet and sea
ice surface. Four instruments were flown, two of which included non-imaging
airborne spectrometers. While the dual non-imaging airborne spectrometer
integration was considered experimental to the Greenland campaign's overall
mission objective, this calibrated instrument configuration did provide a
low-cost airborne payload because of its size, weight, and power to support
ICESat-2's efforts to characterize green laser pulse penetration into snow
and ice based on the known reliability to retrieve information on surface
contaminants, grain size, and liquid water from VSWIR spectra. Furthermore,
the radiometric calibration and traceability of VSWIR measurements acquired
by the nadir-viewing spectrometer during airborne remote sensing flights
reflect a unique contribution to Arctic and Greenland ice sheet remote
sensing science by establishing standard calibration/validation practices
for future airborne polar region campaigns.</p>
      <p id="d1e347">The non-imaging airborne spectrometers and SIMPL (Dabney et al., 2010; Harding et al.,
2011) were flown together on a National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
Langley Research Center King Air (hereinafter UC-12B). SIMPL uses a micropulse,
photon-counting, multi-beam measurement like that of ATLAS but provides added information
about light scattering by using co-aligned green and NIR laser pulses and a measure of
pulse depolarization. AVIRIS-NG (Hamlin et al., 2010) was flown on a King Air (C-12)
operated by Dynamic Aviation. Snow radiative transfer modeling (Aoki et al., 2000; Bohren
and Barkstrom, 1974; Libois et al., 2013, 2014; Painter and Dozier, 2004a; Picard et al.,
2009; Warren, 1982; Wiscombe and Warren, 1980; Kokhanovsky and Zege, 2004) and VSWIR
spectroscopy studies have shown that optical snow surface reflectivity is most sensitive
to concentrations of light-absorbing particles (e.g., dust, soot, and black carbon
containments) at visible wavelengths (Aoki et al., 2000; Dozier et al., 2009; Painter et
al., 2007, 2009, 2013; Warren, 2013; Warren and Wiscombe, 1980), whereas effective snow
surface grain size is a measure of melt state, which can be quantified by exploiting the
position, depth and shape of spectral absorption by liquid water within near-infrared
wavelengths (Clark and Roush, 1984; Dang et al., 2016; Dozier and Painter, 2004; Gardner
and Sharp, 2010; Green et al., 2006; Libois et al., 2013, 2014; Nolin and Dozier, 2000;
Painter et al., 1998, 2009; Warren et al., 2006; Wiscombe and Warren, 1980).</p>
      <p id="d1e351">Because the ATLAS green laser pulses may penetrate into snow and ice, to a
significant depth to cause surface height measurements to be biased low, the
primary objective of the SIMPL/AVIRIS-NG 2015 Greenland campaign was to
obtain the necessary remote sensing measurements to enable the ICESat-2
project to determine if green light depth of penetration, measured by SIMPL,
is correlated with surface grain size, contaminant, and/or wetness properties
determined using VSWIR spectra. A comparison of green laser pulse shape
broadening caused by volume scattering in snow, ice, and liquid water, as
compared to NIR pulses that only undergo surface scattering, provides the
measurement of penetration depth. If that depth is correlated with any
particular surface property, changes in those properties seasonally and/or
interannually could potentially cause bias in rates of ice sheet elevation
change from ICESat-2 retrievals. The nadir-viewing spectrometer optical head
was mounted inside SIMPL and their IFOVs were aligned to ensure the
spectroscopic and altimetry profile measurements were coincident, observing
the same surface location at the same time through the same atmospheric
column. AVIRIS-NG followed the SIMPL flight path at a higher altitude and
trailing by about 15 min. Flying with AVIRIS-NG was important because
its estimations of grain size, contaminant concentrations, and wetness are
relatively mature and by imaging a swath, it provides information about the
spatial variability of these surface properties.</p>
      <p id="d1e354">The non-imaging airborne spectrometer integration on the UC-12B included a
nadir-viewing spectrometer measuring upwelling spectral radiance
(W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> sr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> nm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, where sr is the FOV full angle), and a
zenith-viewing spectrometer measuring downwelling spectral irradiance
(W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> nm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). We predicted spectral radiance for the
nadir-viewing spectrometer over bright Greenland ice and dark bare rock/soil
targets using MODTRAN to determine whether airborne measurement performance
was within the targeted 5 % requirement. MODTRAN inputs included a
sub-Arctic summer (geographical–seasonal) model, Navy maritime aerosol
profile, top-of-atmosphere (TOA) solar irradiance spectrum, CIMEL Sun
photometer atmospheric measurements of aerosol optical depth and columnar water vapor
as part of the AErosol RObotic Network (AERONET) (Holben et al., 1998),
nadir-viewing spectrometer spectral response functions, and line-of-sight (LOS)
geometries. For the MODTRAN-predicted measurement comparison, we selected
flight segments from the 29 July in-flight radiometric calibration
experiment that was intended to optimize the nadir-viewing spectrometer's
visible–near-infrared (VNIR) integration time and shortwave infrared (SWIR)
gains across the full solar spectrum dynamic range. Along the northern
portion of the UC-12B 29 July flight line over the Greenland ice sheet
interior, the Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager (OLI) acquired a coincident
multispectral image.</p>
      <p id="d1e417">We exploited this Landsat 8 OLI image acquisition by predicting TOA spectral
radiance for OLI using identical MODTRAN parameterization as constructed for
the nadir-viewing spectrometer. Because Landsat is a well-regarded standard
for optical satellite remote sensing calibration/validation
(Markham and Helder, 2012), we felt it was
important to evaluate the nadir-viewing spectrometer's bright Greenland ice
measurement performance along with Landsat 8 OLI as an additional comparison
step. Landsat's capabilities to measure polar regions since the launch of
Landsat 8 in February 2013 have been unprecedented because of onboard
instrument performance and changes to its long-term acquisition plan that
include imaging of all sunlit land and nearshore coastal regions greater
than 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> solar elevation. Imaging higher latitudes and polar ice
sheets in solar-reflected wavelengths is complicated by low solar
illumination angles, surface bidirectional reflectance distribution function
(BRDF)<?pagebreak page1916?> effects (Aoki et al., 2000; Hudson et al., 2006), and persistent
cloudiness with cloud shadows cast on the ice sheet (Choi and
Bindschadler, 2004; Hudson and Warren, 2007). Yet, because Landsat's orbital
tracks converge at the poles, swath imaging side lap results in much higher
temporal imaging frequency than tropical and middle latitude regions. Up
until this Greenland campaign, Landsat 8 OLI's capability to measure
Greenland ice sheet upwelling radiance had not been fully assessed, because
for the first time in the Landsat mission's measurement history, Landsat 8
OLI does not saturate over homogenous bright targets at high latitudes due
to substantially improved radiometry over prior instruments. Therefore, an
important outcome of this paper is our ability to establish Landsat 8 OLI's
radiometric performance over Greenland by comparing to MODTRAN-predicted
upwelling radiance using the nadir-viewing airborne spectrometer's ice sheet
apparent reflectance as the reference spectra.</p>
      <p id="d1e429">The specific objectives of this paper are to (1) describe the non-imaging airborne
spectrometer integration and NIST-traceable radiometric calibration procedures for
pre-flight, in-flight, and post-flight time frames; (2) describe the equations necessary
to calculate the nadir-viewing spectrometer ground IFOV footprint; (3) characterize
downwelling spectral irradiance measurements to screen for cloud-contaminated data to
support atmospheric compensation modeling for clear-sky observational conditions; and
(4) compare the nadir-viewing spectrometer's measurement performance over bright
Greenland ice and dark bare rock/soil targets against MODTRAN and a coincident Landsat 8
OLI image acquisition.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Non-imaging airborne spectrometry</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>VSWIR spectrometer description</title>
      <p id="d1e443">The non-imaging spectrometers belong to the Earth Sciences Division (Code
610) at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC). The nadir-viewing
spectrometer is a full-range ASD FieldSpec Pro instrument maintained by the
Code 618 Optics Laboratory. The zenith-viewing spectrometer is a full-range
ASD FieldSpec 3 instrument maintained by the Code 618 Radiometric
Calibration Laboratory (RCL). Both instruments have a VNIR detector (i.e., 350–1000 nm wavelength) with a silicon (Si) photodiode
array and two SWIR detectors (i.e., SWIR1 1001–1800
and SWIR2 1801–2500 nm wavelengths) that are thermoelectrically cooled
indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs) photodiodes. The spectral resolutions of VNIR and SWIR detectors are 3
and 10 nm, respectively. An order-sorting filter is applied to sample to
a resolution of 1 nm.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>VSWIR spectrometer integration with SIMPL</title>
      <p id="d1e452">Both spectrometers were mounted and secured on aluminium racks within the
UC-12B fuselage. The nadir-viewing spectrometer 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> foreoptic was
mounted and secured within the SIMPL housing centered over a flat BK7
optical window. The fiber-optic cable was connected to the nadir-viewing
spectrometer, and a parallel port cable was used to communicate with the
instrument control laptop. The zenith-viewing spectrometer remote cosine
receptor was mounted on top of the aircraft in an external enclosure with a
flat BK7 optical window. A remote cosine receptor is a diffuser foreoptic
that transmits incoming irradiance from an 180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> hemispherical view.
The enclosure, referred to hereinafter as the “OrangeCan”, was mounted in a
zenith position and bolted and sealed to the aircraft roof to maintain cabin
pressure during flight. The fiber-optic cable was connected to the
zenith-viewing spectrometer through a small communication port, and an Ethernet
cable was used to communicate with the instrument control laptop.</p>
      <p id="d1e473">The IFOV alignment between SIMPL and the nadir-viewing spectrometer
1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> foreoptic was confirmed using a ground test procedure in an
aircraft hangar with low light conditions. The SIMPL downward-directed laser
beams were turned to a horizontal path and directed at a white reference
target. The SIMPL laser transmitter produces four laser beams that are
distributed perpendicular to the aircraft flight direction. The locations of
the four visible green laser spots on the target were identified. The center
of the nadir-viewing spectrometer FOV was determined by translating a white
light source across the target, with its pointing direction parallel to the
laser beams. The FOV center position was established by real-time
observation of the spectrometer's peak response to the light source. At the
nominal flight altitude of 2500 m above ground level (m a.g.l.), the
1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> foreoptic IFOV produces a 44 m diameter ground sampling
footprint. The SIMPL 0.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> spread of the beams and 0.007<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
beam divergence produces 0.3 m diameter ground spots distributed 20 m
cross-track. We determined that the beams are located at the trailing edge
of the nadir-viewing spectrometer's IFOV with the footprints displaced
approximately 10 m to the right of the IFOV center.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e514">Laboratory calibration of the nadir-viewing spectrometer using the
NIST-traceable source. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the linear test result using
a least-square fit between the NIST-traceable-source two-lamp dark level
output and the 50 % increase described in the text for the 0.35 to
2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m wavelength range. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows the output (two-lamp dark level) from the NIST-traceable source during the nadir-viewing
spectrometer repeatability checks. Panel <bold>(c)</bold> summarizes the
nadir-viewing spectrometer's stability by wavelength over a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-year period.
The dotted line signifies the achieved stability requirement.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019-f01.jpg"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>VSWIR spectrometer measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e556">Instrument control laptops for both spectrometers required manual operation
to initialize the appropriate instrument control software. The spectroscopic
measurement interval for both nadir- and zenith-viewing spectrometers was set
to 1 s (i.e., fastest programmable measurement time), and the
integration time for the VNIR detector and gain setting for SWIR1 and SWIR2
detectors remained fixed for all nine science flights that included a dark
current subtraction during each flight. The scan time for SWIR1 and SWIR2
detectors is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">220</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ms; thus, the total time between
measurements included the VNIR integration time, SWIR1 and SWIR1 scan time,
and file save time. The VSWIR measurements were time tagged and recorded at a
temporal integration interval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> s and an
along-track length scale of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1917?><p id="d1e589">Nadir- and zenith-viewing measurements during each flight were stored as
16 bit raw digital counts for the 0.35 to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m VSWIR spectral
range. Raw counts from both spectrometers were converted to upwelling
spectral radiance and downwelling spectral irradiance using calibration
coefficients. Parabolic corrections were applied to splice together VNIR,
SWIR1, and SWIR2 measurements from each detector. Each upwelling spectral
radiance and downwelling spectral irradiance measurement had a Universal
Time Coordinated (UTC) timestamp that was synchronized with Applanix GPS
time and geolocation during flight.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>VSWIR spectrometer radiometric calibration</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Pre-flight laboratory calibration procedures</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Nadir-viewing spectrometer</title>
      <p id="d1e617">The nadir-viewing spectrometer linearity and repeatability tests were
conducted using a NIST-traceable source in NASA's Goddard Space Flight
Center Code 618 Optics Laboratory. The NIST-traceable source in this paper
is defined as lamps plus integrating sphere. To check the spectrometer's
linearity, the baseline response for the VNIR detector integration time and
the SWIR1/2 detector gains was optimized to the NIST-traceable-source
two-lamp dark level output radiance. Next, the VNIR integration time and
SWIR1/2 gains were increased by 50 % to mimic an increase in the two-lamp
dark level output radiance. Figure 1a shows the linearity test result for
the nadir-viewing spectrometer. Bare-fiber (25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> IFOV) measurements
were captured from the NIST-traceable-source output where the fiber-optic
tip was centered in front of the integrating sphere aperture. To assess the
spectrometer's repeatability over time, bare-fiber NIST-traceable-source
measurements were periodically captured using identical procedures as the
linearity test (Fig. 1b). The nadir-viewing spectrometer's stability was
determined to be less than 2 % for VNIR, SWIR1, and SWIR2 detectors for
pre- and post-flight time frames (Fig. 1c). Spectral calibration of the
nadir-viewing spectrometer's VNIR and SWIR1/2 detectors is routinely
conducted using mercury and argon signatures with a resulting wavelength
precision of better than 2 % of the 1 nm sampling resolution.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Zenith-viewing spectrometer</title>
      <p id="d1e635">The zenith-viewing spectrometer linearity test was conducted using the same
procedures as the nadir-viewing spectrometer (Fig. 2a). Prior to aircraft
integration, ASD Inc. conducted routine instrument maintenance and spectral
calibration checks on the zenith-viewing spectrometer. The zenith-viewing
spectrometer was determined to be stable, with a wavelength precision of
better than 2 % of the 1 nm<?pagebreak page1918?> sampling resolution. Although longer-term
information on zenith-viewing spectrometer repeatability was unavailable, a
cross-calibration between nadir- and zenith-viewing spectrometer bare-fiber
NIST-traceable-source output radiance indicated that the
between-spectrometer response difference was within 2 % for wavelengths between
0.5 and 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m (Fig. 2b and c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e648">Laboratory cross-calibration of the nadir- and zenith-viewing
spectrometers using the NIST-traceable source. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the
zenith-viewing spectrometer linearity test result, and panel
<bold>(b)</bold> shows the cross-calibration using the NIST-traceable-source
output. Panel <bold>(c)</bold> summarizes the difference in response between
nadir- and zenith-viewing spectrometers relative to the achieved stability
requirement (dotted lines).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019-f02.jpg"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS3">
  <title>Optical window transmission and measurement requirements</title>
      <p id="d1e672">Optical window light transmittance is wavelength dependent. The BK7 optical
window, procured from Esco Optics, was mounted in the OrangeCan right above
the remote cosine receptor optic. We measured BK7 window transmittance using
the nadir-viewing spectrometer and the NIST-traceable source. The optical
window was mounted and centered in front of the integrating sphere aperture.
The spectrometer fiber-optic tip was mounted and placed in front of the
optical window. We captured NIST-traceable-source measurements at the top,
right, bottom, left, and center window positions to fully assess
transmission. We averaged optical window measurements and compared with
window-free NIST-traceable-source radiance to derive wavelength-dependent
radiance loss due to window transmissivity (Fig. 3a and b). The
nadir-viewing spectrometer BK7 optical window for the UC-12B aircraft was procured
from Cosmo Optics Inc. Transmittance for this optical window was determined
to be greater than 90 % for wavelengths between 0.34 and 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m per
manufacture material specifications. Because of a compressed timeline during
aircraft instrument integration for this airborne mission, we were unable to
transport the laboratory NIST-traceable source to measure the transmittance
of the UC-12B BK7 optical window. Based on this experience, aircraft optical
window measurements should be acquired prior to and/or during aircraft
instrument integration as a standard practice.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e685">A measure of light transmission through the BK7 optical window
mounted within the OrangeCan. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the NIST-traceable-source
output with and without the optical window. Panel
<bold>(b)</bold> summarizes wavelength-dependent radiance loss due to window
transmissivity.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019-f03.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e700">Based on the optical window transmission specifications and measurements
described above, these uncertainties provided a baseline for upwelling
(downwelling) spectral radiance (irradiance) requirements because the
stability of both nadir- and zenith-viewing spectrometers was determined to
be less than 2 % and more certain than optical window transmission
uncertainties. Upwelling spectral radiance measurement uncertainty for
wavelengths between 0.4 and 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m was determined to be within
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (total uncertainty of 10 % or less) for the nadir-viewing
spectrometer looking through the BK7 optical window procured from Cosmo
Optics Inc. Downwelling spectral irradiance measurement uncertainty for
wavelengths between 0.4 and 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m was determined to be within
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (total uncertainty of 8 % or less) for the zenith-viewing
spectrometer based on laboratory measurements shown in Fig. 3b and looking
through the OrangeCan BK7 optical window procured from Esco Optics. For both
nadir- and zenith-viewing spectrometers, measurement uncertainty for
wavelengths between 2.0 and 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m was between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %,
and primarily attributable to radiance loss due to optical window
transmissivity. We chose not to correct for optical window transmission
because the laboratory uncertainties were within the targeted measurement
requirement.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>In-flight calibration procedures</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Nadir-viewing spectrometer</title>
      <p id="d1e780">The 29 July flight over the Greenland ice sheet interior was used for an
in-flight radiometric calibration of the nadir-viewing spectrometer. The
range of measured snow, ice, and liquid water surfaces during this
calibration flight covered the full-reflected solar spectrum dynamic range
from bright Greenland ice with coarse snow grains, to darker bare rock/soil,
to dark open-ocean water. The in-flight radiance calibration was designed to
optimize the VNIR detector integration time and SWIR1/2 detector gain
settings. We chose to optimize the nadir-viewing spectrometer over interior
Greenland ice with a probable dry snow layer while under near-clear-sky
solar illumination conditions to avoid spectral radiance saturation when
flying across strong snow, ice, and liquid water surface gradients. This
in-flight radiometric calibration allowed us to constrain the upper limits
of upwelling spectral radiance over bright Greenland ice within the LOS,
while recovering as much low-radiance signal as possible over dark land and
ocean targets under similar atmospheric and solar illumination conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e783">Even though the nadir-viewing spectrometer was mounted with a nadir IFOV and
the UC-12B was in a stable horizontal position during flight, we note two
specific in-flight caveats that are inherent to airborne measurements.
First, in-flight inclination can subtly impact the nadir-viewing geometry in
that it can be difficult to determine exactly how short-term atmospheric
turbulence and/or aircraft positional change influences the BRDF of the
measured surface anisotropy within the IFOV. The SIMPL instrument aboard the
UC-12B recorded inclination during flight and could be used to constrain
this measurement artifact in a post-processing mode. We determined this to
not be significant relative to the spectral radiance measurement requirement
discussed in Sect. 3.1.3.</p>
      <p id="d1e786">Second, snow and ice surfaces have an anisotropic signature dominated by
forward scattering (Aoki et al., 2000; Leshkevich and Deering,
1990; Painter and Dozier, 2004b; Schaepman-Strub et al., 2006) and can also
be highly specular during melt (Leshkevich and Deering,
1990; Mullen and Warren, 1988). If the aircraft heading (azimuth) is
generally perpendicular to the direct path solar principal plane, then
airborne-measured snow and ice radiances will be minimally affected by the
angular scattering bias. However, if the aircraft heading is parallel or
near parallel to the solar principal plane, then either a BRDF correction
must be applied or caution must be exerted prior to interpreting<?pagebreak page1919?> measured
radiances. Flying underneath homogenous cloud layers results in an isotropic
assumption where surface scattering is not dependent on direction
(Hudson and Warren, 2007).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Zenith-viewing spectrometer</title>
      <p id="d1e795">In-flight radiometric calibration of the zenith-viewing spectrometer was
also conducted during the 29 July flight. Direct and diffuse sky irradiance
can be highly variable along a given flight line and can span clear-sky to
white-sky conditions with single and/or multi-layered cloud layers. In this
near-polar geography and seasonal period of snow and ice melt with expansive
open water, low solar illumination angles, and large energy fluxes between
the surface and lower atmosphere result in dynamically changing measurement
conditions over relatively short spatiotemporal scales. During the 29 July
flight, the zenith-viewing spectrometer VNIR detector integration time and
SWIR1/2 detector gain settings were optimized to avoid irradiance saturation
when flying above, in between, and below cloud layers. Collecting zenith
spectral irradiance during flight allowed for characterization of sky
conditions to screen for flight data contaminated by clouds as well as
additional measurement information to support atmospheric compensation
modeling. Flying in an atmosphere with broken cloud cover presents
challenging observational conditions to assess VSWIR spectrometer
measurement performance because the solar irradiance light field changes
quickly. Diffuse scattering contributions from<?pagebreak page1920?> complex cloud geometries can
either increase upwelling radiance over bright, highly reflective snow and
ice surfaces, or can decrease upwelling radiance from shadowing. Our
interest in measuring solar irradiance was to identify flight line segments
where we could assume clear-sky illumination conditions within the nadir-viewing spectrometer's LOS.</p>
      <p id="d1e798">During instrument integration into the UC-12B aircraft, it became evident
that the zenith OrangeCan design on the top of the aircraft would exclude
directly transmitted spectral irradiance at low illumination angles. During
the 29 July flight, it was verified that the remote cosine receptor optic
did not receive directly transmitted spectral irradiance as would be the
case at incident angles during all nine science flights. Based on this
spectral irradiance measurement limitation, we removed the OrangeCan from
the top of the UC-12B aircraft while on the Thule Air Base tarmac once the
aircraft returned from its daily flight line. Removing the OrangeCan from
the top of the aircraft enabled the flight team to quantify its impact on
direct and diffuse spectral irradiance measurements. This problem is
addressed in Sect. 3.3.2 and 3.3.3.</p>
      <p id="d1e801">In addition to the OrangeCan's impact on in-flight measured spectral
irradiance, we note another observational caveat that is tied to the
imperfect cosine response of the remote cosine receptor. Horizontal
positional change of the UC-12B resulting from atmospheric turbulence and/or
pitch, yaw, and roll maneuvers would result in a hemispherical spectral
irradiance measurement bias, especially for the directly transmitted
irradiance. Under clear-sky or white-sky conditions, it may be possible to
assess how horizontal changes in the UC-12B aircraft influenced in-flight
spectral irradiance measurements in a post-processing mode. We deemed this
to be negligible relative to the spectral irradiance measurement requirement
because directly transmitted irradiance was excluded. Even though aircraft
altitude was relatively stable during flight, we note that changes in
aircraft altitude did impact measured spectral irradiance by changing the
solar zenith angle of illumination. Nevertheless, the zenith position of the
OrangeCan was only intended as a point of reference for sky conditions
during flight.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Post-flight laboratory and field calibration procedures</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Nadir-viewing spectrometer IFOV characterization</title>
      <p id="d1e816">A NIST-traceable source in NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center Code 618 RCL
clean room was used to measure the nadir-viewing spectrometer 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
foreoptic point spread function (PSF). A sliding optical rail in millimeter
increments was mounted on a laboratory table parallel to the integrating
sphere aperture. The 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> foreoptic was mounted and aligned on the
sliding optical rail at a distance of 101.5 cm from the 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
aperture to the integrating sphere aperture. Sliding from left to right in
parallel (i.e., equivalent to cross-track vignetting; Chrien et
al., 1990) to the integrating sphere aperture, radiance measurements were
captured in 1 mm increments. The measurement technique involved starting in
an occulted left position, sliding the 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> aperture across the
integrating sphere output to measure the width of the 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> radiance
response, and then finishing in an occulted right position (Fig. 4a and
b). Using Eq. (1), PSF in-IFOV and near-IFOV scale factors (sf) can be
computed:

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M39" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">in</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IFOV</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSFsf</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">near</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IFOV</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSFsf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aperture</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">width</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hspace{5mm}}?><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">integrating</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sphere</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aperture</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">width</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">in</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IFOV</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSFsf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> excludes left and right edge aperture measurements
(to the nearest millimeter), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">near</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IFOV</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSFsf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> includes left and right edge
aperture measurements (to the nearest millimeter). The 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> aperture width
excluding edges was measured at 26.5 cm, and the 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> aperture width
including edges was measured 26.9 cm. The integrating sphere aperture width
is 25 cm. Using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">in</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IFOV</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSFsf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 cm and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">near</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IFOV</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSFsf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.9 cm,
the ground sampling footprint for the nadir-viewing spectrometer can be
approximated with Eq. (2):

                  <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M48" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IFOV</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ground</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">in</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IFOV</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSFsf</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>or</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">near</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IFOV</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSFsf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><?xmltex \hack{\hspace{5mm}}?><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SIMPL</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Altitude</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AGL</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

              where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IFOV</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ground</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is in meters,  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">in</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IFOV</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSFsf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">near</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">IFOV</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PSFsf</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is in meters
(converted from centimeters), and SIMPL Altitude<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AGL</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is the distance from the
sensor to the surface in meters.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1143">Laboratory characterization of the nadir-viewing 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
foreoptic lens point spread function and IFOV using the NIST-traceable-source
output. Results from green <bold>(a)</bold> and NIR <bold>(b)</bold> wavelengths at
which SIMPL operates were used to summarize in-IFOV (thick black line within
the dotted line boundaries) and near-IFOV widths (grey regions within the
dotted lines).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <title>Zenith-viewing spectrometer remote cosine receptor
characterization</title>
      <p id="d1e1173">The zenith hemispherical irradiance response for the remote cosine receptor
optic was measured in NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center Code 618 RCL clean
room using a 1000 W NIST-traceable point source in dark conditions.
Reflective stray light from any surface other than the point source in the
clean room was blocked off with additional dark materials. The point source
was mounted on a laboratory table directly behind a rectangular-shaped bevel
to constrain illumination rays. The remote cosine receptor optic was secured
to a rotating mount with an angular resolution of 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Point-source irradiance measurements were captured with the remote cosine receptor
optic placed inside the OrangeCan with the BK7 optical window as well as
without the OrangeCan. This procedure was intended to repeat spectral
irradiance measurements collected during the airborne mission, and to
quantify the OrangeCan's impact on the zenith hemispherical irradiance
measurements in a controlled laboratory environment.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1187">Laboratory characterization of the zenith-viewing remote cosine
receptor optic using a NIST-traceable point source. Green <bold>(a)</bold> and
NIR <bold>(b)</bold> wavelengths at which SIMPL operates were used to summarize
the OrangeCan's impact on the remote cosine receptor optic IFOV and measured
irradiance.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019-f05.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1921?><p id="d1e1202">Point-source irradiance measurements for the remote cosine receptor optic
without OrangeCan obstruction were captured in 5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> angular
increments from 0 to 180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. OrangeCan remote cosine
receptor measurements were captured in 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> angular increments from
0 to 180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The OrangeCan's impact on the remote cosine
receptor response is shown in Fig. 5a and b. We determined that the IFOV
of the OrangeCan remote cosine receptor optic mounted in a zenith position
on top of the aircraft was 102<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (to the nearest degree). Thus, for
solar zenith angles lower than 51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the directly transmitted
component of spectral irradiance was not received by the zenith-viewing
spectrometer remote cosine receptor optic during either the calibration
flight or the nine science flights.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS3">
  <title>Remote cosine receptor field experiment</title>
      <p id="d1e1266">The objective of the remote cosine receptor field experiment was to
determine how the spectral irradiance measurements collected in a zenith
position with the OrangeCan's 102<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> FOV could be useful for
characterizing sky conditions during each flight. On 15 December 2015, we
conducted a verification experiment on the roof of Building 33 at NASA
Goddard Space Flight Center. The exact roof location was adjacent to the
AERONET calibration site (<uri>https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri>, last access: 13 July 2016, 38.99250<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
76.83983<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) and provided an unobstructed hemispherical IFOV. We used both
spectrometers deployed during the airborne mission to coincidentally collect
hemispherical-sky and OrangeCan-sky remote cosine receptor measurements
mounted on level tripods side by side at a temporal sampling frequency of 1 s.</p>
      <p id="d1e1299">Given the known limitation that the OrangeCan remote cosine receptor optic
could not receive the directly transmitted component of spectral irradiance
at solar zenith angles lower than 51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, we wanted to mimic the
solar illumination geometry and both direct and diffuse-sky conditions under
plausible measurement scenarios during the airborne flights. Thus,<?pagebreak page1922?> four
hemispherical-sky illumination scenarios were evaluated: (1) direct
clear sky and diffuse clear sky; (2) direct clear sky and diffuse cloud sky;
(3) direct cloud sky and diffuse clear sky; and (4) direct cloud sky and
diffuse cloud sky. Direct cloud sky indicates when clouds are fully
obstructing the direct path. Both hemispherical-sky and OrangeCan-sky remote
cosine receptor measurements were collected during the temporal window of
04:00 to 10:00 UTC. We monitored variable solar
illumination conditions and periodically photographed direct and diffuse-sky
scenes to complement remote cosine receptor measurements. We selected
hemispherical-sky and OrangeCan-sky remote cosine receptor measurements for
each illumination scenario described above. The raw counts were converted to
spectral irradiance using calibration coefficients. The coincident (within 1 min) hemispherical-sky and OrangeCan-sky remote cosine receptor
measurements accompanying each photographed scenario were summarized using
averaging.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1313">Remote cosine receptor field experiment results from
15 December 2015. Four separate solar illumination scenarios are represented
with coincident hemispherical-sky and OrangeCan-sky spectral irradiance
measurements. Average spectral irradiance for each scenario was calculated
using 1 s measurement sampling for local time and solar zenith angle
(SZA) shown. Solar illumination conditions along the directly transmitted
path and zenith diffuse-sky are shown on the right with photographs. Note:
the amount of irradiance is dependent on the temporal proximity to solar
noon, which on 15 December 2015 was 11:51 EST.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019-f06.jpg"/>

          </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1325">Example zenith remote cosine receptor irradiance measurements for a
29 July flight segment. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows zenith irradiance
measurements from 0.4 to 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The black lines indicate
variability in instantaneous in-flight irradiance for a 5 min flight
segment. The thick red line signifies the baseline minimum irradiance
received, a condition that represents diffuse clear sky to near-clear sky as
verified with Fig. 6 results. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows zenith-integrated
irradiance (i.e., sum function) from 0.4 to 1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m for the same
5 min flight segment. The thick black line indicates temporal variance in
zenith-integrated irradiance, a measure of sky conditions above the UC-12B
aircraft. The dotted line signifies the computed mode (most frequently
occurring condition) of zenith-integrated irradiance, an indicator of sky
condition stability. The red line serves as the minimum zenith-integrated
irradiance baseline. Using the temporal variance in zenith-integrated
irradiance, the mode value, and the minimum value, variable sky conditions
during flight can be classified and the nadir-viewing spectrometer
measurements can be filtered for cloud contamination.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e1356">Our hemispherical-sky/OrangeCan-sky remote cosine receptor comparison shown
in Fig. 6 indicates that the OrangeCan-sky spectral irradiance
measurements from airborne flights can be exploited to characterize diffuse
sky conditions, whether clouds or clear sky. Our analysis of sky condition
scenarios indicates that when clouds are passing above the zenith-mounted
OrangeCan, the remote cosine receptor spectral irradiance response increases
appreciably when compared to the diffuse clear-sky response. Our
interpretation of this spectral irradiance response is that clouds are
diffusing light directly above (whether on ground or in flight) where
photons undergo multiple scattering within and between single and/or
multi-layered cloud strata. In the absence of the directly transmitted
component of spectral irradiance, the diffuse OrangeCan-sky response can be
used only to characterize zenith sky conditions during each flight (Fig. 7a and b). At a minimum, zenith-measured
sky conditions from the zenith-viewing spectrometer during flight can inform appropriate selection of
clear-sky airborne measurements from the nadir-viewing spectrometer.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Airborne spectrometer measurement performance</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Radiative transfer methodology</title>
      <p id="d1e1372">For comparison of model-predicted and airborne-measured radiance, a surface
reflectance spectrum coincident with the time of the aircraft overflight is
required as an input to MODTRAN (Green et al., 1993, 1998; Slater et al., 1987; Thome, 2001; Thompson et al., 2015). This surface
reflectance spectrum is combined with real-time atmospheric measurements,
namely aerosol optical depth and columnar water vapor, to parameterize
MODTRAN-predicted radiance for the airborne spectrometer. Another technique
is to model apparent airborne surface reflectance using radiative transfer
and then rescale to ground reflectance using an empirical line correction
(Gao et al., 1993; Moran et al., 2001; Smith and Milton, 1999). For the
SIMPL/AVIRIS-NG 2015 Greenland campaign, no ground or ship campaign occurred
over the Greenland ice sheet or sea ice, which were the primary measurement
targets of interest. Logistical challenges and cost prevented ground
deployment on the Greenland ice sheet or ship deployment on the open ocean
for purposes of acquiring in situ ground measurements. However, on 14 August 2015, a calibration/validation experiment was conducted on the tarmac at
Thule Air Base where both UC-12B and Dynamic Aviation aircraft carrying the
non-imaging airborne spectrometers and AVIRIS-NG flew near simultaneously,
acquiring measurements over dark asphalt. Our initial focus in this paper is
to document the traceable radiometric calibration methods for deployment of
the airborne spectrometers aboard the UC-12B aircraft, and to assess the
nadir-viewing spectrometer's measurement performance over bright and dark
Greenland targets during the in-flight radiometric calibration experiment.
We plan to compare the nadir-viewing spectrometer's measurement performance
against AVIRIS-NG for the Thule Air Base calibration/validation experiment
but reserve that effort for future investigation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e1377">The 29 July flight line showing bright and dark target MODTRAN
comparison segments for the nadir-viewing spectrometer. Panel
<bold>(a)</bold> shows a MODIS Aqua image (false color SWIR, NIR, green
composite) with the UC-12B flight line (grey line). Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows
a Landsat 8 OLI image (false color SWIR, NIR, green composite) with the
bright Greenland ice target flight segment (black line within the black
dotted circle). Panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows a Landsat 8 OLI image (false color
SWIR, NIR, green composite) with the dark bare rock/soil target flight
segment (black line within the white dotted circle). Panel <bold>(d)</bold> shows
a UC-12B high-resolution visible camera image (true color red, green, and blue
composite) frame of the dark bare rock/soil target flight segment. Note:
high-resolution visible camera images were acquired over Greenland ice during the
campaign science flights.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019-f08.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1398">Given our ground campaign constraints, we developed an alternative
comparison method to assess measurement performance based on MODTRAN along
with a coincident Landsat 8 OLI image acquisition. This alternative method
involved selecting two independent flight line segments over homogenous
bright Greenland ice (Fig. 8a and b) and dark bare rock/soil (Fig. 8c
and d) targets using both high-resolution camera images and the Landsat 8
OLI images. As an additional check for these dark and bright target
segments, we used the zenith-viewing irradiance measurements to confirm that
variance in measured nadir-viewing spectrometer radiance was not
contaminated by broken cloud cover during these flight segments. To reduce
uncertainty in MODTRAN predictions, knowledge about the surface reflectance
is required to partition light scattering and absorption within the
spectrometer's LOS. As described above, we did not measure ground
reflectance during the in-flight radiometric calibration experiment. Thus,
our alternative was to use airborne apparent reflectance from the
nadir-viewing spectrometer as an input to MODTRAN (Fig. 9).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e1404">Apparent reflectance spectra for bright and dark absolute in-flight
targets measured with the nadir-viewing spectrometer.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1413">Airborne spectrometer-measured radiances include atmospheric path radiances
due to Rayleigh and aerosol scattering and surface-reflected solar
radiances. Because we did not measure ground reflectance, the airborne
nadir-viewing radiances for the bare rock/soil and Greenland ice (dark and bright)
targets were converted to apparent reflectance (e.g., Tanré et al.,
1990; Gao et al., 1993) to compare MODTRAN-predicted radiances with
airborne-measured radiances. The definition of apparent reflectance can be
described as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M67" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{9.5}{9.5}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the solar zenith angle, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the solar
azimuth angle, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the sensor zenith angle, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the sensor azimuth
angle, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wavelength, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the radiance measured at the sensor,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the<?pagebreak page1923?> solar flux at the top of the atmosphere when the solar zenith
angle is equal to zero, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the cosine of the solar zenith
angle.</p>
      <p id="d1e1599">Using the formulation of Tanré et al. (1990), the apparent reflectance
at the sensor is defined as the reflectivity of the atmosphere and surface
system <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which can be approximately expressed by

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M77" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mfenced open="" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the path reflectance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is downward
scattering transmittance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is upward scattering transmittance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
spherical albedo of the atmosphere, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the total gaseous
transmittance in the Sun-surface-sensor path. Assumptions made regarding Eq. (4) include Lambertian surfaces and negligible adjacency effects.</p>
      <p id="d1e1862">The first term in the bracket, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, represents the contribution
from atmospheric scattering to the measured apparent reflectance. The second
term in the bracket, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, represents
the contribution from surface reflection to the measured apparent
reflectance. The term <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> contains the absorption bands of all
atmospheric gases affecting the wavelength range from 0.4 to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m
(i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
CO).</p>
      <p id="d1e2009">The atmospheric scattering and gaseous absorption processes are treated as
two independent processes in Eq. (4). The coupling effects are considered
small in regions where the atmospheric gaseous absorptions are weak and in
regions where the scattering effects are small; therefore, the coupling
effects between the two processes are neglected as the scattering and
absorption processes occur simultaneously in the real atmosphere.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1924?><p id="d1e2012">Solving Eq. (4) for the desired quantity, surface reflectance (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and
simplifying the notations for relevant quantities gives
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M95" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>s</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          MODTRAN is used to simulate the atmospheric quantities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">atm</mml:mi><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">u</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Assuming a horizontal Lambertian surface,
the reflectance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, can then be retrieve from the measured radiance,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">obs</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, using Eqs. (3) and (5).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Airborne prediction with MODTRAN</title>
      <p id="d1e2185">Water vapor and aerosols are the two most important attenuation factors
affecting downward and upward atmospheric transmittance of spectral radiance
along the directly transmitted path and LOS. The nadir-viewing radiances
were compared against MODTRAN6-predicted (Berk et al., 2017)
spectral radiances for both the bright and dark targets. Predicting spectral
radiance for bright and dark targets along the 29 July flight line required
atmospheric aerosol and columnar water vapor measurements from a variety of
sources. The northwestern portion of the Greenland ice sheet is quite remote,
with sparse ground instrumentation to parameterize MODTRAN, especially
towards the Greenland interior. On the coast at the Thule Air Base, there is
an AERONET site with a CIMEL maintained by NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.
The CIMEL measurements provided spectral aerosol optical depth, aerosol
extinction coefficients, and columnar water vapor (Giles et al., 2019) as
the source of atmospheric information. We also used carbon dioxide and water
vapor measurements from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) and MODerate
resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) Terra and Aqua instruments.</p>
      <p id="d1e2188">MODTRAN has four core model components, i.e., (1) a geographical and
seasonal atmosphere model, (2) radiation transport of aerosol and clouds,
(3) LOS geometry, and (4) spectral range and resolution, that are required
to model atmospheric conditions (Berk et al., 2016). The
following options were selected: the sub-Arctic summer model atmosphere;
correlated-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> algorithm to initialize radiation transport at a spectral
resolution of 0.1 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; the Kurucz 2005 TOA solar irradiance reference
spectrum (Kurucz, 2005); the Navy maritime aerosol model weighted for
stronger coastal than continental influence; and meteorological range based
on the CIMEL-retrieved aerosol extinction coefficient at 550 nm. Other
parameters included ozone and carbon dioxide concentrations along with
columnar water vapor content (g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) from atmospheric measurements on
29 July described above.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e2224">Gaussian spectral response functions for the airborne nadir-viewing
spectrometer. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the VNIR detector spectral response,
and panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows the SWIR1/2 detector spectral response. Note:
FWHM refers to full-width half-maximum response to a filter value of 1.0 on
the center wavelength.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019-f10.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2239">The LOS geometry was determined using the UC-12B aircraft flight altitude
(based on the navigation file), an observer zenith angle of 180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
the ground altitude was extracted from the Greenland Ice Mapping Project
(GIMP) digital elevation model (Howat et al.,
2014). The Julian day and in-flight start time for data acquisition was used
to initialize the solar illumination geometry parameters that included
observer latitude and solar zenith angle. Finally, we convolved MODTRAN
output radiances into VSWIR channels using a Gaussian full-width half-maximum (FWHM) filter centered on 1 nm wavelengths from 0.35 to 2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The spectral response functions for the nadir-viewing spectrometer VNIR
and SWIR detectors are shown in Fig. 10a and b.</p>
<?pagebreak page1925?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Dark and bright target predictions</title>
      <p id="d1e2265">MODTRAN assumes the atmosphere to be horizontally homogeneous – at some
point the assumption starts to break down. Regarding water vapor, we can
quantify that breaking point with the geodetic distance from the Thule Air
Base CIMEL to the dark and bright targets. Each target presented a different
set of challenges during the comparison process. Along Greenland's ice
margin, glacial moraines and bedrock are composed of rock and soil mixtures
commonly lacking surface homogeneity. Fortunately, the dark target location
is only 54.22 km from the Thule Air Base CIMEL. The water vapor and aerosol
retrievals coincident with the time of the airborne measurement acquisition
were used to parameterize MODTRAN. However, the atmospheric conditions
prevailing over the bright Greenland ice target were even more challenging
to model due to the geodetic distance of 150.35 km from the Thule Air Base
CIMEL. While the CIMEL-retrieved aerosol loadings appeared to be indicative
of the Greenland ice target, the water vapor was not. Additionally, for
satellite image data, it can be difficult to partition aerosol scattering
from bright snow and ice surface scattering<?pagebreak page1926?> because atmospheric aerosols
have relatively low reflectance by comparison (Istomina et al., 2011), and
therefore we did not attempt to use satellite aerosol retrievals.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e2270">The airborne nadir-viewing spectrometer's measurement sensitivities to
columnar water vapor for bright Greenland ice <bold>(a)</bold> and dark bare
rock/soil <bold>(b)</bold> targets. A variety of satellite columnar water vapor
data products were evaluated for the bright Greenland ice target due to the
remoteness of the flight line segment and its proximity to the Thule Air Base
CIMEL.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2285">We did not consider applying a nonlinear least-squares spectral fitting
algorithm of the water vapor absorption features of the VSWIR bright
Greenland ice radiance spectra as we are in the process of validating the
nadir-viewing spectrometer; instead, we chose well-calibrated satellite
sensor retrievals for a scientific, transparent approach. Water vapor is an
initial atmospheric condition that can be spatially variable across coastal
to inland gradients, particularly during the Greenland summertime melt
period when surface-to-atmosphere latent heat fluxes are strong. Thus, we
opted to exploit a range of water vapor measurements (Table 1) over the
Greenland interior to evaluate MODTRAN's sensitivities to critical
absorption features (Fig. 11a and b). At 67<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, the spatial
footprint of the 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> gridded daily MODIS L3 Aqua
water vapor product (Platnick et al., 2015) is
approximately 44 km spatial resolution. The “low mean” appeared to best fit
our data.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2326">Input satellite and AERONET water vapor products for MODTRAN
predictions of bright Greenland ice for the nadir-viewing spectrometer.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Observing system</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Retrieval name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Product</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Temporal</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Spatial</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Distance<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">resolution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(km)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MODIS Aqua</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Atmospheric_Water_Vapor_Low</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">V006, MYD08_D3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Daily</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">44.61</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MODIS Aqua</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Atmospheric_Water_Vapor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">V006, MYD08_D3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Daily</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">44.61</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MODIS Terra</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Atmospheric_Water_Vapor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">V006, MOD08_D3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Daily</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">44.61</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">AIRS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Atmospheric_Water_Vapor</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">V006, AIRS3STD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12 h</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.3 km</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">24.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Thule AB CIMEL</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Water</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Version 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">&lt; Hourly</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Point-based</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">156.35</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2329"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Refers to distance to bright Greenland ice target.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <title>Landsat 8 OLI prediction with MODTRAN</title>
      <p id="d1e2601">As described earlier in the paper, Landsat 8 OLI's orbital tracks converge
towards the poles, and for northwestern Greenland, that results in
considerable imaging swath side lap during the sunlit summer season. On 29 July, a coincident image for World Reference System-2 (WRS-2) Path 26 Row
05 was acquired over the Greenland ice sheet interior during the UC-12B
flight. We identified the overlapping region where the bright Greenland ice
target flight segment intersected with the Landsat 8 OLI Collection 1 image
data (available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5066/F71835S6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5066/F71835S6</ext-link>). Using the UC-12B
Applanix data and aircraft navigation information, we identified the closest
Landsat 8 OLI pixels that corresponded to the nadir-viewing VSWIR spectra
along the bright Greenland ice flight segment. Using the bright Greenland
ice MODTRAN parameterization for the nadir-viewing spectrometer, we
predicted TOA spectral radiance for Landsat 8 OLI using solar illumination
geometry, swath LOS imaging geometry, relative spectral response functions,
and the bright Greenland ice apparent reflectance spectra. There was no
discernible cloud contamination for Landsat 8 OLI pixels. We rescaled
Landsat 8 OLI digital counts to TOA spectral radiance using radiance-based
calibration coefficients contained within the image metadata. Finally, we
compared MODTRAN-predicted Landsat 8 OLI TOA spectral radiances for the
bright Greenland ice target with observed Landsat 8 OLI TOA spectral
radiances. The comparison was based on the average radiance from 24 nadir-viewing VSWIR spectra and 24 Landsat 8 OLI pixels.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e2617">A method to radiometrically calibrate, deploy, and assess measurement
performance of a non-imaging airborne spectrometer to measure the Greenland
ice sheet surface has been presented. This NIST-traceable calibration
included traceable laboratory, in-flight, and field procedures to fully
characterize spectrometers, their foreoptics, and their measurements. The
nadir-viewing spectrometer's stability was determined to be within 2 %
using a NIST-traceable source, and well within the targeted 5 % spectral
radiance requirement for the airborne mission. The point spread function and
IFOV footprint of the nadir-viewing spectrometer's 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> foreoptic was
measured to enable direct comparison to SIMPL's green and NIR polarimetric
lidar measurements, AVIRIS-NG's VSWIR measurements, and other on-orbit
satellite measurements such as Landsat, for example. The 29 July in-flight
radiometric calibration experiment over Greenland bright and dark targets
proved to be invaluable for optimizing the nadir-viewing spectrometer's
measurement capabilities during the airborne campaign, as well as evaluating
in-flight measurement performance across the full solar spectrum dynamic
range using MODTRAN and atmospheric measurements from both ground and
satellite instruments. The main objective of measuring spectral irradiance
with a zenith-viewing spectrometer and remote cosine receptor optic was to
characterize in-flight sky conditions. Even though the zenith-mounted
OrangeCan on top of the UC-12B aircraft limited the hemispherical IFOV,
these measurements are useful for screening out cloud-contaminated flight
data that will expedite identification of clear-sky VSWIR data that can be
used to address airborne mission objectives.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e2631">The airborne nadir-viewing spectrometer's measurement performance
for bright and dark targets as compared against MODTRAN. Panel
<bold>(a)</bold> shows a comparison between predicted and measured radiance for
bright Greenland ice. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows a predicted verse measured
comparison for dark bare rock/soil. Panel <bold>(c)</bold> describes the percent
difference, i.e., percent difference <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (measured–predicted)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>predicted,
between predicted and measured nadir-viewing spectrometer radiance for bright
Greenland ice (blue line). The percent difference for the dark bare rock/soil
target is shown in panel <bold>(c)</bold>. The dotted and top thick black lines on
panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> signify the measurement requirement and
predicted atmospheric transmittance, respectively. The nadir-viewing
spectrometer's measurement performance beyond 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m is subject to
noise created by UC-12B BK-7 window transmission, and low to relatively low
SWIR radiances for both bright and dark targets.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019-f12.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1927?><p id="d1e2681">With no ground calibration/validation in situ measurements on the Greenland
ice sheet, or ship campaign on the open ocean, we had to develop an alternative
approach to compare the nadir-viewing spectrometer's measurement performance
against an atmospheric radiative transfer model. By identifying homogenous
bright Greenland ice and dark bare rock/soil flight segments on 29 July, we
were able to assess airborne measurement performance with MODTRAN over both
low- and high-radiance targets (e.g., Moran et al., 1995) under similar atmospheric and solar illumination conditions. We used
apparent airborne reflectance spectra for both bright and dark targets to
predict spectral radiance for the nadir-viewing spectrometer (Fig. 12a and
b), and then compared predictions with measured spectral radiance (e.g.,
Green, 2001; Slater et al., 1987; Thome, 2001; Vane et al., 1993). Our
MODTRAN predictions indicate that the nadir-viewing spectrometer VNIR and
SWIR1 detectors measured bright Greenland ice with an average uncertainty
between 2.5 % and 4.7 % for VSWIR wavelengths with greater than 80 %
atmospheric transmittance (Fig. 12c). For dark bare rock/soil, the
nadir-viewing spectrometer VNIR and SWIR1 detectors' measurement uncertainty was
between 0.6 % and 1.2 % on average (Fig. 12d). As stated earlier, UC-12B
optical window transmission beyond 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m was more uncertain and was
evident when evaluating the SWIR2 detector data. For bright Greenland ice
and dark bare rock/soil, the nadir-viewing spectrometer's measurement
uncertainty for the SWIR2 detector was on average 4.3 % and 19.7 %,
respectively (Fig. 12c and d).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e2695">MODTRAN-predicted radiance for coincident Landsat 8 OLI imaging of
the bright Greenland ice target using the nadir-viewing spectrometer apparent
reflectance spectrum. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the Landsat 8 OLI image
acquisition on 29 July 2015 with the bright Greenland ice target (black line
within the black circle) and the UC-12B flight line (grey line).
Panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows Landsat 8 OLI's visible, NIR, and SWIR1/2 relative
spectral response functions plotted over the bright Greenland ice target
apparent reflectance spectrum. Panel <bold>(c)</bold> is the comparison of
convolved predicted and measured Landsat 8 OLI radiance for the bright
Greenland ice target using the average of 24 airborne Greenland ice spectra
and the average of 24 closest Landsat pixels. The dotted lines indicate the
within 5 % measurement requirement for both Landsat 8 OLI (absolute
calibration) and the airborne nadir-viewing spectrometer (relative
calibration). Panel <bold>(d)</bold> is the percent difference (percent
difference <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> (measured–predicted)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>measured) between predicted and
measured Landsat 8 OLI radiance. Note: radiance for Landsat 8 OLI was not
predicted for the SWIR2 relative spectral response function based on UC-12B
BK-7 window transmission uncertainty beyond 2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/1913/2019/amt-12-1913-2019-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2739">MODTRAN predictions for assessing airborne spectrometer measurement performance are, in
part, dependent on the quality of the surface reflectance spectra and availability of
atmospheric measurements near the target measurement performance location. Fortunately,
for this airborne campaign, baseline atmospheric measurements were accessible via the
Thule Air Base CIMEL as part of AERONET. It is clear that spatial proximity to a CIMEL
matters in terms of in-flight atmospheric aerosols and columnar water vapor
concentrations because we observed less measurement uncertainty for the closer dark bare
rock/soil target when compared to the bright Greenland ice target much further away.
Interestingly, we found that the nadir-viewing VSWIR spectra for bright Greenland ice in
the interior were much more sensitive to columnar water vapor concentrations than
aerosols. This result caused us to evaluate the nadir-viewing spectrometer's measurement
sensitivities to a variety of input satellite atmospheric water vapor products. Narrowing
in on 0.94 and 1.13 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m water vapor absorption lines uncovered the spread in
satellite-retrieved daily atmospheric water vapor over the Greenland interior. We were
able to identify that the MODIS Aqua low mean atmospheric water vapor product is most
suitable to ingest when processing the UC-12B science flight data for MODTRAN-based
atmospheric compensation. The daily MODIS Aqua overpass times generally align well with
UC-12B flight times during airborne science flights. The MODIS Aqua low mean atmospheric
water vapor retrievals are designed to partition columnar water vapor concentrations
between the surface and 680 mbar (see details at
<uri>https://modis-atmosphere.gsfc.nasa.gov/documentation/collection-6.1</uri>, last access:
12 February 2018), which is within the atmosphere boundary layer.</p>
      <p id="d1e2753">As an additional airborne spectrometer performance comparison over the
Greenland ice sheet, we used a Landsat 8 OLI coincident image acquired
within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min of the UC-12B bright Greenland ice target
flight segment (Fig. 13a). We<?pagebreak page1928?> predicted Landsat 8 OLI TOA spectral
radiance using MODTRAN with the following parameters: solar illumination
geometry, OLI viewing geometry, the same atmospheric inputs used for the
airborne nadir-viewing spectrometer assessment, OLI relative spectral
response functions (Fig. 13b), and the apparent airborne reflectance
spectrum for bright Greenland ice (Fig. 13b). By comparing
MODTRAN-predicted and measured Landsat 8 OLI TOA spectral radiance (Fig. 13c), we found that Landsat 8 OLI is measuring between 6 % and 16 % more TOA
spectral radiance from the Greenland ice sheet with VNIR and SWIR1 spectral
bands than was predicted with the nadir-viewing spectrometer's apparent
airborne reflectance spectrum (Fig. 13d). It is important to note that
Landsat 8 OLI's pixel-level LOS imaging is highly accurate over Greenland
due to spacecraft geolocation (Storey et al., 2014), and
that we accounted for cross-track imaging effects in MODTRAN using NIR
spectral band LOS geometry.</p>
      <p id="d1e2766">Landsat 8 OLI is a well-characterized instrument on both pre- and post-launch timescales
with exceptional on-orbit performance since 2013 (Markham et al., 2014; Morfitt et al.,
2015). Routine onboard diffuser, lunar, and vicarious calibrations, over midlatitude
pseudo-invariant calibration sites in particular, are conducted to track OLI's instrument
performance and degradation while in orbit (Helder et al., 2010, 2013; Mishra et al.,
2014). We speculate that differences between predicted and measured Landsat 8 OLI TOA
spectral radiance over the Greenland ice sheet presented in this paper are possibly a
byproduct of both techniques used to derive OLI gain coefficients over midlatitude desert
sites with stable dry atmospheres, and VNIR differences between the Kurucz and Chance
Kurucz (ChKur) reference TOA solar irradiance spectrums (Chance and Spurr, 1997; Kurucz,
2005) used for airborne spectrometer and Landsat 8 OLI radiometric
calibration/validation. Nevertheless, more investigation is required, and looking ahead,
Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets need to receive expanded calibration/validation
consideration when characterizing and monitoring on-orbit satellite instrument
performance, as has been attempted for other Earth observing systems (Cao et al., 2010;
Six et al., 2004). The airborne method of calibration/validation presented here,
including the rigorous laboratory NIST-traceable radiometric calibration, is put forth as
an option to augment polar ice sheet calibration/validation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2769">Landsat 8 OLI's capabilities to measure Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets has advanced
since 2013 thanks to revisions in its higher latitude and polar image frequency
(Fahnestock et al., 2016). While Landsat 8 OLI measurements are providing new insights
and applications for polar ice sheet science, specifically superglacial lake and ice
velocity<?pagebreak page1929?> mapping (Alley et al., 2018; Gardner et al., 2018; Pope et al., 2016), results
from this study suggest that the Greenland ice sheet surface may be less reflective than
what is currently being measured by Landsat 8 OLI at TOA. Thus, Landsat 8 OLI
reflectance-based interpretations of ice sheet surface properties and change should
remain cautious until additional measurement validation is undertaken. We anticipate that
airborne VSWIR measurements acquired over Arctic and Antarctic domains, as demonstrated
during this airborne campaign, offer a cost-effective approach to validate
medium-resolution atmospherically corrected products from Landsat class instruments well
above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude while also supporting algorithm development to derive
higher-level information products on cryospheric surface properties and conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e2790">It has been suggested that optical remote sensing instruments must be able
to measure the ice sheet surface at an uncertainty of 2 % or less to
distinguish between the presence of light-absorbing constituents and other
factors controlling VSWIR ice sheet albedo (Warren,
2013). For airborne and on-orbit satellite instruments, this stringent of a
measurement requirement demands careful instrument radiometric calibration
and characterization and could remain difficult to achieve for polar
atmospheres because of atmospheric measurement uncertainty and the ability
to compensate for such effects. One strategy for future optical satellite
instrument design is to address aerosol and columnar water vapor effects
along with VSWIR surface retrieval uncertainties over polar regions by
requiring an expanded set of measurements in spectral regions where
atmospheric scattering and absorption dominate the VSWIR remote sensing
signal. Requiring these atmospheric measurements would offer the capability
to retrieve atmospheric parameters directly from the remote sensing
measurement itself, rather than ingesting ancillary<?pagebreak page1930?> data from other sources
with different spatial resolutions and temporal sampling frequencies.</p>
      <p id="d1e2794">This initial effort to describe and document the traceable laboratory
radiometric calibration and in-flight measurement performance of the
non-imaging airborne spectrometer configuration flown as part of the
SIMPL/AVIRIS-NG 2015 Greenland campaign indicates that the nadir-viewing
spectrometer was able to achieve its targeted VSWIR measurement requirement
for the airborne mission when compared against MODTRAN. Compared to
instruments with a spectral resolution greater than or equal to 10 nm, the 1 nm spectral resolution of these airborne VSWIR snow and ice measurements may
more effectively isolate the exact wavelength center where green light depth
of penetration and surface contaminants interact, and where the depth, area,
and asymmetry of near-infrared liquid water absorption can be inverted into
a measure of surface grain size while also detecting the presence of liquid
water. As a result, airborne VSWIR data products from UC-12B science
flights are of sufficient radiometric traceability and quality to evaluate
green laser pulse penetration into Greenland snow and ice, and to compare
with other VSWIR remote sensing measurements acquired during the airborne
mission time frame.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e2801">Raw, unprocessed airborne VSWIR data from the 29 July 2015 calibration flight are available upon request.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e2807">CJC was the non-imaging airborne VSWIR
spectrometer principal scientist. He was responsible for the calibration, acquisition,
processing, analysis, and interpretation of the airborne VSWIR measurements, and
analysis and interpretation of the Landsat 8 OLI data. He is the US Geological
Survey Landsat deputy project scientist and drafted this paper. JvdB
led the MODTRAN radiative transfer modeling and AERONET analysis, and contributed to manuscript
text. KMB was the airborne mission principal lead and project manager, is the NASA
ICESat-2 calibration/validation lead, and contributed to the manuscript text. MGH
was the lead optical engineer for laboratory calibration of the VSWIR spectrometer.
JWC was the lead optical engineer for the laboratory characterization of VSWIR
spectrometer optics. DJH was the SIMPL principal investigator and contributed
to manuscript text. JJB was the senior optical calibration scientist and provided
direction to the airborne VSWIR spectrometer principal scientist. PWD was the
SIMPL instrument scientist and directed the airborne VSWIR spectrometer integration with
SIMPL. CSC was the lead aircraft integration engineer. TAN is
the NASA ICESat-2 deputy project scientist, and TM is the NASA ICESat-2 project
scientist. TM and TAN provided direction and support for the airborne mission from the
NASA ICESat-2 project office.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e2813">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e2819">The ICESat-2 Project Science Office supported the SIMPL/AVIRIS-NG 2015
Greenland campaign and Christopher Crawford's radiometric calibration work
as part of a NASA Cooperative Agreement to the University of Maryland's
Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center. The MODTRAN and Landsat 8
components of this work were supported by a U.S. Geological Survey science
support services contract to the Arctic Slope Regional Corporation (ASRC)
Federal InuTeq as part of Christopher Crawford's USGS-NASA Landsat Science
Team research.</p><p id="d1e2821">We would like to extend our grateful thanks for the generous contributions
of the following people: NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Code 610 personnel
for providing the VSWIR spectrometers, instrument calibration, and optics
laboratory support resources; the SIMPL and AVIRIS-NG instrument teams and
the pilots and ground crews of UC-12B and Dynamic Aviation; Brent Holben and
the AERONET team at Goddard Space Flight Center for providing and processing
the Thule Air Base CIMEL measurements; Rose Dominguez at NASA Ames Research
Center for processing the UC-12B Applanix flight data; Robert O. Green at
the Jet Propulsion Laboratory for his recommendation to characterize the
1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> foreoptic point spread function for the nadir-viewing
spectrometer. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful and
constructive comments during manuscript preparation. Any use of trade, firm,
or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply
endorsement by the U.S. Government.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e2835">This paper was edited by Alexander Kokhanovsky and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abdalati, W. and Zwally, H. J.: The ICESat-2 laser altimetry mission,
Proc. IEEE, 98, 735–751, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Abshire, J. B., Sun, X., Riris, H., Sirota, J. M., McGarry, J. F., Palm, S.,
Yi, D., and Liiva, P.: Geoscience laser altimeter system (GLAS) on the
ICESat mission: on-orbit measurement performance, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
32, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL024028</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Alley, K. E., Scambos, T. A., Anderson, R. S., Rajaram, H., Pope, A., and
Haran, T. M.: Continent-wide estimates of Antarctic strain rates from
Landsat 8-derived velocity grids, J. Glaciol., 64, 321–332,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.23" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1017/jog.2018.23</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Aoki, T., Fukabori, M., Hachikubo, A., Tachibana, Y., and Nishio, F.:
Effects of snow physical parameters on spectral albedo and bidirectional
reflectance of snow surface, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 10219–10236,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd901122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999jd901122</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Berk, A., Anderson, G. P., Acharya, P. K., Bernstein, L. S., Muratov, L.,
Lee, J., Fox, M., Adler-Golden, S. M., Chetwynd, J. H., Hoke, M. L.,
Lockwood, R. B., Gardner, J. A., Cooley, T. W., Borel, C. C., and Lewis, P.
E.: MODTRAN 5: a reformulated atmospheric band model with auxiliary species
and practical multiple scattering options: update, SPIE Proceedings, 5806,
662–667, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Bohren, C. F. and Barkstrom, B. R.: Theory of optical-properties of snow,
J. Geophys. Res., 79, 4527–4535, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC079i030p04527" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JC079i030p04527</ext-link>,
1974.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Brunt, K. M., Neumann, T. A., and Markus, T.: SIMPL/AVIRIS-NG Greenland 2015
Flight Report, 17977, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, C. Y., Uprety, S., Xiong, J., Wu, A. S., Jing, P., Smith, D., Chander,
G., Fox, N., and Ungar, S.: Establishing the Antarctic Dome C community
reference standard site towards consistent measurements from Earth
observation satellites, Can. J. Remote Sens., 36, 498–513,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Chance, K. V. and Spurr, R. J. D.: Ring effect studies: Rayleigh
scattering, including molecular parameters for rotational Raman scattering,
and the Fraunhofer spectrum, Appl. Opt., 36, 5224–5230,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.36.005224" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.36.005224</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Choi, H. and Bindschadler, R.: Cloud detection in Landsat imagery of ice
sheets using shadow matching technique and automatic normalized difference
snow index threshold value decision, Remote Sens. Environ., 91, 237–242,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.03.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2004.03.007</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chrien, T. G., Green, R. O., and Eastwood, M. L.: Accuracy of the spectral
and radiometric laboratory calibration of the Airborne Visible/Infrared
Imaging Spectrometer, Proc. Imaging Spectroscopy of the Terrestrial Environment, SPIE, 1298, 37–49, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Clark, R. N. and Roush, T. L.: Reflectance spectroscopy: Quantitative
analysis techniques for remote sensing applications, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 89, 6329–6340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB089iB07p06329" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JB089iB07p06329</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Dabney, P., Harding, D., Abshire, J., Huss, T., Jodor, G., Machan, R.,
Marzouk, J., Rush, K., Seas, A., Shuman, C. A., Sun, X., Valett, S.,
Vasilyev, A., Yu, A., and Zheng, Y.: The slope imaging multi-polarization
photon-counting lidar: an advanced technology airborne laser altimeter,
Proceedings of the International Geoscience Remote Sensing Symposium, 25–30 July 2010, Honolulu, HI, USA,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Dang, C., Fu, Q., and Warren, S. G.: Effect of snow grain shape on snow
albedo, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 3573–3583, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-15-0276.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/jas-d-15-0276.1</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Dozier, J. and Painter, T. H.: Multispectral and hyperspectral remote
sensing of alpine snow properties, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 32,
465–494, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120404" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120404</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Dozier, J., Green, R. O., Nolin, A. W., and Painter, T. H.: Interpretation
of snow properties from imaging spectrometry, Remote Sens. Environ.,
113, 25–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.029</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Fahnestock, M., Scambos, T., Moon, T., Gardner, A., Haran, T., and Klinger,
M.: Rapid large-area mapping of ice flow using Landsat 8, Remote Sens.
Environ., 185, 84–94, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.11.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2015.11.023</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Gao, B. C., Heidebrecht, K. B., and Goetz, A. F. H.: Airbone imaging
spectrometry derivation of scaled surface reflectances from AVIRIS data,
Remote Sens. Environ., 44, 165–178,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(93)90014-O" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0034-4257(93)90014-O</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Gardner, A. S. and Sharp, M. J.: A review of snow and ice albedo and the
development of a new physically based broadband albedo parameterization, J.
Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 115, 15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jf001444" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jf001444</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Gardner, A. S., Moholdt, G., Scambos, T., Fahnstock, M., Ligtenberg, S., van
den Broeke, M., and Nilsson, J.: Increased West Antarctic and unchanged East
Antarctic ice discharge over the last 7 years, The Cryosphere, 12, 521–547,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-521-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-12-521-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Giles, D. M., Sinyuk, A., Sorokin, M. G., Schafer, J. S., Smirnov, A.,
Slutsker, I., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Lewis, J. R., Campbell, J. R.,
Welton, E. J., Korkin, S. V., and Lyapustin, A. I.: Advancements in the
Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated
near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for
Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech.,
12, 169–209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-169-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Green, R. O.: Spectral calibration requirement for Earth-looking imaging
spectrometers in the solar-reflected spectrum, Appl. Opt., 37, 683–690,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.37.000683" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.37.000683</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Green, R. O.: Atmospheric water vapor sensitivity and compensation
requirement for Earth-looking imaging spectrometers in the solar-reflected
spectrum, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 17443–17452,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900799" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000jd900799</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Green, R. O., Conel, J. E., Helmlinger, M., van den Bosch, J., Chovit, C.,
and Chrien, T.: Inflight calibration of AVIRIS in 1992 and 1993, Fourth
Annual JPL Airborne Geoscience Workshop, Pasadena, California, Publication
93-26, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Green, R. O., Eastwood, M. L., Sarture, C. M., Chrien, T. G., Aronsson, M.,
Chippendale, B. J., Faust, J. A., Pavri, B. E., Chovit, C. J., Solis, M.,
Olah, M. R., and Williams, O.: Imaging spectroscopy and the airborne
visible/Infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS), Remote Sens. Environ., 65,
227–248, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00064-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00064-9</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>Green, R. O., Painter, T. H., Roberts, D. A., and Dozier, J.: Measuring the
expressed abundance of the three phases of water with an imaging spectrometer
over melting snow, Water Resour. Res., 42, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004509" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005WR004509</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hamlin, L., Green, R., Mouroulis, P., Eastwood, M., McCubbin, I., Wilson, D.,
Randall, D., Dudik, M., and Paine, C.: Imaging spectrometer science
measurements for terrestrial ecology: AVIRIS and the Next Generation AVIRIS
characteristics and development status, NASA Earth Science Technology
Conference, 22 June 2010, Pasadena, CA, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Harding, D., Dabney, P., Valett, S., Yu, A., Vasilyev, A., and Kelly, A.:
Airborne polarimetric, two-color laser altimeter measurements of lake ice
cover: a pathfinder for NASA's ICESat-2 spaceflight mission, Proceedings of
the International Geoscience Remote Sensing Symposium, Vancover, Canada, 24–29 July 2011, Vancouver, Canada,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Helder, D. L., Basnet, B., and Morstad, D. L.: Optimized identification of
worldwide radiometric pseudo-invariant calibration sites, Can. J. Remote
Sens., 36, 527–539, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Helder, D., Thome, K. J., Mishra, N., Chander, G., Xiong, X. X., Angal, A.,
and Choi, T.: Absolute Radiometric Calibration of Landsat Using a Pseudo
Invariant Calibration Site, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 1360–1369,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2013.2243738" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/tgrs.2013.2243738</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanre, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer, A.,
Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F.,
Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A.: AERONET – A federated instrument network and
data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-4257(98)00031-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0034-4257(98)00031-5</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Howat, I. M., Negrete, A., and Smith, B. E.: The Greenland Ice Mapping
Project (GIMP) land classification and<?pagebreak page1932?> surface elevation data sets, The
Cryosphere, 8, 1509–1518, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1509-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-8-1509-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Hudson, S. R. and Warren, S. G.: An explanation for the effect of clouds over
snow on the top-of-atmosphere bidirectional reflectance, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, 11,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008541" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007jd008541</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Hudson, S. R., Warren, S. G., Brandt, R. E., Grenfell, T. C., and Six, D.:
Spectral bidirectional reflectance of Antarctic snow: Measurements and
parameterization, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, 19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007290" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006jd007290</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Istomina, L. G., von Hoyningen-Huene, W., Kokhanovsky, A. A., Schultz, E.,
and Burrows, J. P.: Remote sensing of aerosols over snow using infrared AATSR
observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1133–1145,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1133-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1133-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>King, M. D., Menzel, W. P., Grant, P. S., Myers, J. S., Arnold, G. T.,
Platnick, S. E., Gumley, L. E., Tsay, S.-C., Moeller, C. C., Fitzgerald, M.,
Brown, K. S., and Osterwisch, F. G.: Airborne scanning spectrometer for
remote sensing of cloud, aerosol, water vapor, and surface properties, J.
Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 13, 777–794,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013&lt;0777:ASSFRS&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013&lt;0777:ASSFRS&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Kokhanovsky, A. A. and Zege, E. P.: Scattering optics of snow, Appl. Opt.,
43, 1589–1602, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.43.001589" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.43.001589</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kurucz, R. L.: New atlases for solar flux, irradiance, central intensity,
and limb intensity, Memorie della Società Astronomica Italiana
Supplement, 8, 189, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Leshkevich, G. A. and Deering, D. W.: Diurnal patterns of the bi-directional
reflectance of fresh-water ice, Ann. Glaciol., 14, 153–157, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Libois, Q., Picard, G., France, J. L., Arnaud, L., Dumont, M., Carmagnola, C.
M., and King, M. D.: Influence of grain shape on light penetration in snow,
The Cryosphere, 7, 1803–1818, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1803-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-7-1803-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Libois, Q., Picard, G., Dumont, M., Arnaud, L., Sergent, C., Pougatch, E.,
Sudul, M., and Vial, D.: Experimental determination of the absorption
enhancement parameter of snow, J. Glaciol., 60, 714–724,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG14J015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3189/2014JoG14J015</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Markham, B. L. and Helder, D. L.: Forty-year calibrated record of
earth-reflected radiance from Landsat: A review, Remote Sens. Environ., 122,
30–40, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.06.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2011.06.026</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Markham, B., Barsi, J., Kvaran, G., Ong, L., Kaita, E., Biggar, S.,
Czapla-Myers, J., Mishra, N., and Helder, D.: Landsat-8 Operational Land
Imager radiometric calibration and stability, Remote Sens., 6, 12275–12308,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs61212275" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs61212275</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Markus, T., Neumann, T., Martino, A., Abdalati, W., Brunt, K., Csatho, B.,
Farrell, S., Fricker, H., Gardner, A., Harding, D., Jasinski, M., Kwok, R.,
Magruder, L., Lubin, D., Luthcke, S., Morison, J., Nelson, R.,
Neuenschwander, A., Palm, S., Popescu, S., Shum, C. K., Schutz, B. E., Smith,
B., Yang, Y. K., and Zwally, J.: The Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation
Satellite-2 (ICESat-2): Science requirements, concept, and implementation,
Remote Sens. Environ., 190, 260–273, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.029</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Mishra, N., Helder, D., Angal, A., Choi, J., and Xiong, X. X.: Absolute
calibration of optical satellite sensors using Libya 4 pseudo invariant
calibration site, Remote Sens., 6, 1327–1346, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6021327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs6021327</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Moran, M. S., Jackson, R. D., Clarke, T. R., Qi, J., Cabot, F., Thome, K. J.,
and Markha, B. L.: Reflectance factor retrieval from Landsat TM and SPOT HRV
data for bright and dark targets, Remote Sens. Environ., 52, 218–230,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(95)00035-Y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0034-4257(95)00035-Y</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Moran, M. S., Bryant, R., Thome, K., Ni, W., Nouvellon, Y., Gonzalez-Dugo, M.
P., Qi, J., and Clarke, T. R.: A refined empirical line approach for
reflectance factor retrieval from Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>, Remote
Sens. Environ., 78, 71–82, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00250-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00250-4</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Morfitt, R., Barsi, J., Levy, R., Markham, B., Micijevic, E., Ong, L.,
Scaramuzza, P., and Vanderwerff, K.: Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI)
Radiometric Performance On-Orbit, Remote Sens., 7, 2208–2237,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70202208" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs70202208</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Mullen, P. C. and Warren, S. G.: Theory of the optical properties of lake
ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 93, 8403–8414, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD093iD07p08403" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/JD093iD07p08403</ext-link>,
1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Nolin, A. W. and Dozier, J.: A hyperspectral method for remotely sensing the
grain size of snow, Remote Sens. Environ., 74, 207–216,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-4257(00)00111-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s0034-4257(00)00111-5</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H., Roberts, D. A., Green, R. O., and Dozier, J.: The effect of
grain size on spectral mixture analysis of snow-covered area from AVIRIS
data, Remote Sens. Environ., 65, 320–332, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00041-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00041-8</ext-link>,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H. and Dozier, J.: Measurements of the hemispherical-directional
reflectance of snow at fine spectral and angular resolution, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 109, D18115, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004458" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd004458</ext-link>, 2004a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H. and Dozier, J.: The effect of anisotropic reflectance on
imaging spectroscopy of snow properties, Remote Sens. Environ., 89, 409–422,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.09.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2003.09.007</ext-link>, 2004b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H., Barrett, A. P., Landry, C. C., Neff, J. C., Cassidy, M. P.,
Lawrence, C. R., McBride, K. E., and Farmer, G. L.: Impact of disturbed
desert soils on duration of mountain snow cover, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
6,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030284" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gl030284</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H., Rittger, K., McKenzie, C., Slaughter, P., Davis, R. E., and
Dozier, J.: Retrieval of subpixel snow covered area, grain size, and albedo
from MODIS, Remote Sens. Environ., 113, 868–879,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.001</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Painter, T. H., Seidel, F. C., Bryant, A. C., Skiles, S. M., and Rittger, K.:
Imaging spectroscopy of albedo and radiative forcing by light-absorbing
impurities in mountain snow, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 9511–9523,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50520" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50520</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Parr, A. C. and Datla, R. U.: NIST role in radiometric calibrations for
remote sensing programs at NASA, NOAA, DOE and DOD, in: Calibration and
Characterization of Satellite Sensors and Accuracy of Derived Physical
Parameters, edited by: Tsuchiya, K., Advances in Space Research-Series, 1,
Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam, 59–68, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Picard, G., Arnaud, L., Domine, F., and Fily, M.: Determining snow specific
surface area from near-infrared reflectance measurements: Numerical study of
the influence of grain shape, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 56, 10–17,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2008.10.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.coldregions.2008.10.001</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1933?><ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Platnick, S., Hubanks, P., Meyer, K., and King, M. D.: MODIS atmosphere L3 monthly
product (08_L3), NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD08_M3.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/MODIS/MYD08_M3.006</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Pope, A., Scambos, T. A., Moussavi, M., Tedesco, M., Willis, M., Shean, D.,
and Grigsby, S.: Estimating supraglacial lake depth in West Greenland using
Landsat 8 and comparison with other multispectral methods, The Cryosphere,
10, 15–27, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-15-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/tc-10-15-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Schaepman-Strub, G., Schaepman, M. E., Painter, T. H., Dangel, S., and
Martonchik, J. V.: Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing –
definitions and case studies, Remote Sens. Environ., 103, 27–42,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.002</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Schaepman, M. E. and Dangel, S.: Solid laboratory calibration on a nonimaging
spectroradiometer, Appl. Opt., 39, 3754–3764, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Schutz, B. E., Zwally, H. J., Shuman, C. A., Hancock, D., and DiMarzio, D.
P.: Overview of the ICESat mission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L21S01,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL024009</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Six, D., Fily, M., Alvain, S., Henry, P., and Benoist, J. P.: Surface
characterisation of the Dome Concordia area (Antarctica) as a potential
satellite calibration site, using Spot 4/Vegetation instrument, Remote Sens.
Environ., 89, 83–94, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.006</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Slater, P. N., Biggar, S. F., Holm, R. G., Jackson, R. D., Mao, Y., Moran, M.
S., Palmer, J. M., and Yuan, B.: Reflectance- and radiance-based methods for
the in-flight absolute calibration of multispectral sensors, Remote Sens.
Environ., 22, 11–37, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(87)90026-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0034-4257(87)90026-5</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Smith, G. M. and Milton, E. J.: The use of the empirical line method to
calibrate remotely sensed data to reflectance, Int. J. Remote Sens., 20,
2653–2662, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/014311699211994" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/014311699211994</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Storey, J., Choate, M., and Lee, K.: Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager
on-orbit geometric calibration and performance, Remote Sens., 6,
11127–11152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs61111127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs61111127</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Strobl, P., Mueller, A. A., Schlaepfer, D., and Schaepman, M. E.: Laboratory
calibration and inflight validation of the Digital Airborne Imaging
Spectrometer DAIS, Proc. Algorithms for Multispectral and Hyperspectral Imagery III, SPIE, 7915, 225–236, 1997.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Tanré, D., Deroo, C., Duhaut, P., Herman, M., Morcrette, J. J., Perbos,
J., and Deschamps, P. Y.: Description of a computer code to simulate the
satellite signal in the solar spectrum: the 5S code, Int. J. Remote Sens.,
11, 659–668, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Tansock, J., Bancroft, D., Butler, J., Cao, C., Datla, R., Hansen, S., Helder, D.,
Kacker, R., Latvakoski, H., Mlynczak, M., Murdock, T., Peterson, J., Pollock, D.,
Russell, R., Scott, D., Seamons, J., Stone, T., Thurgood, A., Williams, R., Xiong, X.,
and Yoon, H.: Guidelines for radiometric calibration of electro-optical instruments
for remote sensing, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and
Technology, HB 157, 1–145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.HB.157" ext-link-type="DOI">10.6028/NIST.HB.157</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Thome, K. J.: Absolute radiometric calibration of Landsat 7 ETM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> using the
reflectance-based method, Remote Sens. Environ., 78, 27–38,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00247-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00247-4</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Thompson, D. R., Gao, B.-C., Green, R. O., Roberts, D. A., Dennison, P. E.,
and Lundeen, S. R.: Atmospheric correction for global mapping spectroscopy:
ATREM advances for the HyspIRI preparatory campaign, Remote Sens. Environ.,
167, 64–77, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.02.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2015.02.010</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Vane, G., Green, R. O., Chrien, T. G., Enmark, H. T., Hansen, E. G., and
Porter, W. M.: Airbone imaging spectrometry the airborne visible/infrared
imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS), Remote Sens. Environ., 44, 127–143,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(93)90012-M" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0034-4257(93)90012-M</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Warren, S. G.: Optical-properties of snow, Rev. Geophys., 20, 67–89,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i001p00067" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/RG020i001p00067</ext-link>, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Warren, S. G.: Can black carbon in snow be detected by remote sensing?, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 779–786, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018476" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012jd018476</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Warren, S. G. and Wiscombe, W. J.: A model for the spectral albedo of snow,
II: Snow containing atmospheric aerosols, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 2734–2745,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037&lt;2734:amftsa&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037&lt;2734:amftsa&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Warren, S. G., Brandt, R. E., and Grenfell, T. C.: Visible and
near-ultraviolet absorption spectrum of ice from transmission of solar
radiation into snow, Appl. Opt., 45, 5320–5334, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.45.005320" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.45.005320</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Wiscombe, W. J. and Warren, S. G.: A model for the spectral albedo of snow,
1, pure snow, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 2712–2733,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037&lt;2712:amftsa&gt;2.0.co;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037&lt;2712:amftsa&gt;2.0.co;2</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Zwally, H. J.: ICESat's laser measurements of polar ice, atmosphere, ocean,
and land, J. Geodynam., 34, 405–445, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Radiometric calibration of a non-imaging airborne spectrometer to measure the Greenland ice sheet surface</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Methods to radiometrically calibrate a non-imaging airborne
visible-to-shortwave infrared (VSWIR) spectrometer to measure the Greenland
ice sheet surface are presented. Airborne VSWIR measurement performance for
bright Greenland ice and dark bare rock/soil targets is compared against the
MODerate resolution atmospheric TRANsmission (MODTRAN<span style="position:relative; bottom:0.5em; " class="text">®</span>)
radiative transfer code (version 6.0), and a coincident Landsat 8
Operational Land Imager (OLI) acquisition on 29 July 2015 during an
in-flight radiometric calibration experiment. Airborne remote sensing
flights were carried out in northwestern Greenland in preparation for the
Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation Satellite 2 (ICESat-2) laser altimeter
mission. A total of nine science flights were conducted over the Greenland ice sheet,
sea ice, and open-ocean water. The campaign's primary purpose was to
correlate green laser pulse penetration into snow and ice with
spectroscopic-derived surface properties. An experimental airborne
instrument configuration that included a nadir-viewing (looking downward at
the surface) non-imaging Analytical Spectral Devices (ASD) Inc. spectrometer
that measured upwelling VSWIR (0.35 to 2.5&thinsp;µm) spectral radiance
(W m<sup>−2</sup> sr<sup>−1</sup> µm<sup>−1</sup>) in the two-color Slope Imaging
Multi-polarization Photon-Counting Lidar's (SIMPL) ground instantaneous
field of view, and a zenith-viewing (looking upward at the sky) ASD
spectrometer that measured VSWIR spectral irradiance
(W&thinsp;m<sup>−2</sup>&thinsp;nm<sup>−1</sup>) was flown. National Institute of Standards and
Technology (NIST) traceable radiometric calibration procedures for
laboratory, in-flight, and field environments are described in detail to
achieve a targeted VSWIR measurement requirement of within 5&thinsp;% to support
calibration/validation efforts and remote sensing algorithm development. Our
MODTRAN predictions for the 29 July flight line over dark and bright targets
indicate that the airborne nadir-viewing spectrometer spectral radiance
measurement uncertainty was between 0.6&thinsp;% and 4.7&thinsp;% for VSWIR wavelengths
(0.4 to 2.0&thinsp;µm) with atmospheric transmittance greater than 80&thinsp;%.
MODTRAN predictions for Landsat 8 OLI relative spectral response functions
suggest that OLI is measuring 6&thinsp;% to 16&thinsp;% more top-of-atmosphere (TOA)
spectral radiance from the Greenland ice sheet surface than was predicted
using apparent reflectance spectra from the nadir-viewing spectrometer.
While more investigation is required to convert airborne VSWIR spectral
radiance into atmospherically corrected airborne surface reflectance, it is
expected that airborne science flight data products will contribute to
spectroscopic determination of Greenland ice sheet surface optical
properties to improve understanding of their potential influence on ICESat-2
measurements.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abdalati, W. and Zwally, H. J.: The ICESat-2 laser altimetry mission,
Proc. IEEE, 98, 735–751, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Abshire, J. B., Sun, X., Riris, H., Sirota, J. M., McGarry, J. F., Palm, S.,
Yi, D., and Liiva, P.: Geoscience laser altimeter system (GLAS) on the
ICESat mission: on-orbit measurement performance, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
32, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024028</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Alley, K. E., Scambos, T. A., Anderson, R. S., Rajaram, H., Pope, A., and
Haran, T. M.: Continent-wide estimates of Antarctic strain rates from
Landsat 8-derived velocity grids, J. Glaciol., 64, 321–332,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.23" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.23</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Aoki, T., Fukabori, M., Hachikubo, A., Tachibana, Y., and Nishio, F.:
Effects of snow physical parameters on spectral albedo and bidirectional
reflectance of snow surface, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 10219–10236,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd901122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999jd901122</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Berk, A., Anderson, G. P., Acharya, P. K., Bernstein, L. S., Muratov, L.,
Lee, J., Fox, M., Adler-Golden, S. M., Chetwynd, J. H., Hoke, M. L.,
Lockwood, R. B., Gardner, J. A., Cooley, T. W., Borel, C. C., and Lewis, P.
E.: MODTRAN 5: a reformulated atmospheric band model with auxiliary species
and practical multiple scattering options: update, SPIE Proceedings, 5806,
662–667, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bohren, C. F. and Barkstrom, B. R.: Theory of optical-properties of snow,
J. Geophys. Res., 79, 4527–4535, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JC079i030p04527" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JC079i030p04527</a>,
1974.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Brunt, K. M., Neumann, T. A., and Markus, T.: SIMPL/AVIRIS-NG Greenland 2015
Flight Report, 17977, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Cao, C. Y., Uprety, S., Xiong, J., Wu, A. S., Jing, P., Smith, D., Chander,
G., Fox, N., and Ungar, S.: Establishing the Antarctic Dome C community
reference standard site towards consistent measurements from Earth
observation satellites, Can. J. Remote Sens., 36, 498–513,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Chance, K. V. and Spurr, R. J. D.: Ring effect studies: Rayleigh
scattering, including molecular parameters for rotational Raman scattering,
and the Fraunhofer spectrum, Appl. Opt., 36, 5224–5230,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.36.005224" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.36.005224</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Choi, H. and Bindschadler, R.: Cloud detection in Landsat imagery of ice
sheets using shadow matching technique and automatic normalized difference
snow index threshold value decision, Remote Sens. Environ., 91, 237–242,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.03.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.03.007</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chrien, T. G., Green, R. O., and Eastwood, M. L.: Accuracy of the spectral
and radiometric laboratory calibration of the Airborne Visible/Infrared
Imaging Spectrometer, Proc. Imaging Spectroscopy of the Terrestrial Environment, SPIE, 1298, 37–49, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Clark, R. N. and Roush, T. L.: Reflectance spectroscopy: Quantitative
analysis techniques for remote sensing applications, J. Geophys.
Res.-Sol. Ea., 89, 6329–6340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JB089iB07p06329" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JB089iB07p06329</a>, 1984.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Dabney, P., Harding, D., Abshire, J., Huss, T., Jodor, G., Machan, R.,
Marzouk, J., Rush, K., Seas, A., Shuman, C. A., Sun, X., Valett, S.,
Vasilyev, A., Yu, A., and Zheng, Y.: The slope imaging multi-polarization
photon-counting lidar: an advanced technology airborne laser altimeter,
Proceedings of the International Geoscience Remote Sensing Symposium, 25–30 July 2010, Honolulu, HI, USA,
2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Dang, C., Fu, Q., and Warren, S. G.: Effect of snow grain shape on snow
albedo, J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 3573–3583, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-15-0276.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-15-0276.1</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Dozier, J. and Painter, T. H.: Multispectral and hyperspectral remote
sensing of alpine snow properties, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 32,
465–494, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120404" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120404</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Dozier, J., Green, R. O., Nolin, A. W., and Painter, T. H.: Interpretation
of snow properties from imaging spectrometry, Remote Sens. Environ.,
113, 25–37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2007.07.029</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Fahnestock, M., Scambos, T., Moon, T., Gardner, A., Haran, T., and Klinger,
M.: Rapid large-area mapping of ice flow using Landsat 8, Remote Sens.
Environ., 185, 84–94, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.11.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.11.023</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, B. C., Heidebrecht, K. B., and Goetz, A. F. H.: Airbone imaging
spectrometry derivation of scaled surface reflectances from AVIRIS data,
Remote Sens. Environ., 44, 165–178,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(93)90014-O" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(93)90014-O</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Gardner, A. S. and Sharp, M. J.: A review of snow and ice albedo and the
development of a new physically based broadband albedo parameterization, J.
Geophys. Res.-Earth Surf., 115, 15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jf001444" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jf001444</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Gardner, A. S., Moholdt, G., Scambos, T., Fahnstock, M., Ligtenberg, S., van
den Broeke, M., and Nilsson, J.: Increased West Antarctic and unchanged East
Antarctic ice discharge over the last 7 years, The Cryosphere, 12, 521–547,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-521-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-521-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Giles, D. M., Sinyuk, A., Sorokin, M. G., Schafer, J. S., Smirnov, A.,
Slutsker, I., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Lewis, J. R., Campbell, J. R.,
Welton, E. J., Korkin, S. V., and Lyapustin, A. I.: Advancements in the
Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated
near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for
Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech.,
12, 169–209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Green, R. O.: Spectral calibration requirement for Earth-looking imaging
spectrometers in the solar-reflected spectrum, Appl. Opt., 37, 683–690,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.37.000683" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.37.000683</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Green, R. O.: Atmospheric water vapor sensitivity and compensation
requirement for Earth-looking imaging spectrometers in the solar-reflected
spectrum, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 17443–17452,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900799" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900799</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Green, R. O., Conel, J. E., Helmlinger, M., van den Bosch, J., Chovit, C.,
and Chrien, T.: Inflight calibration of AVIRIS in 1992 and 1993, Fourth
Annual JPL Airborne Geoscience Workshop, Pasadena, California, Publication
93-26, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Green, R. O., Eastwood, M. L., Sarture, C. M., Chrien, T. G., Aronsson, M.,
Chippendale, B. J., Faust, J. A., Pavri, B. E., Chovit, C. J., Solis, M.,
Olah, M. R., and Williams, O.: Imaging spectroscopy and the airborne
visible/Infrared imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS), Remote Sens. Environ., 65,
227–248, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00064-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00064-9</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Green, R. O., Painter, T. H., Roberts, D. A., and Dozier, J.: Measuring the
expressed abundance of the three phases of water with an imaging spectrometer
over melting snow, Water Resour. Res., 42, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004509" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004509</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Hamlin, L., Green, R., Mouroulis, P., Eastwood, M., McCubbin, I., Wilson, D.,
Randall, D., Dudik, M., and Paine, C.: Imaging spectrometer science
measurements for terrestrial ecology: AVIRIS and the Next Generation AVIRIS
characteristics and development status, NASA Earth Science Technology
Conference, 22 June 2010, Pasadena, CA, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Harding, D., Dabney, P., Valett, S., Yu, A., Vasilyev, A., and Kelly, A.:
Airborne polarimetric, two-color laser altimeter measurements of lake ice
cover: a pathfinder for NASA's ICESat-2 spaceflight mission, Proceedings of
the International Geoscience Remote Sensing Symposium, Vancover, Canada, 24–29 July 2011, Vancouver, Canada,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Helder, D. L., Basnet, B., and Morstad, D. L.: Optimized identification of
worldwide radiometric pseudo-invariant calibration sites, Can. J. Remote
Sens., 36, 527–539, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Helder, D., Thome, K. J., Mishra, N., Chander, G., Xiong, X. X., Angal, A.,
and Choi, T.: Absolute Radiometric Calibration of Landsat Using a Pseudo
Invariant Calibration Site, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 1360–1369,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2013.2243738" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/tgrs.2013.2243738</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanre, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer, A.,
Vermote, E., Reagan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F.,
Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A.: AERONET – A federated instrument network and
data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-4257(98)00031-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-4257(98)00031-5</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Howat, I. M., Negrete, A., and Smith, B. E.: The Greenland Ice Mapping
Project (GIMP) land classification and surface elevation data sets, The
Cryosphere, 8, 1509–1518, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1509-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-8-1509-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hudson, S. R. and Warren, S. G.: An explanation for the effect of clouds over
snow on the top-of-atmosphere bidirectional reflectance, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, 11,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008541" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007jd008541</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hudson, S. R., Warren, S. G., Brandt, R. E., Grenfell, T. C., and Six, D.:
Spectral bidirectional reflectance of Antarctic snow: Measurements and
parameterization, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 111, 19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007290" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006jd007290</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Istomina, L. G., von Hoyningen-Huene, W., Kokhanovsky, A. A., Schultz, E.,
and Burrows, J. P.: Remote sensing of aerosols over snow using infrared AATSR
observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1133–1145,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1133-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1133-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
King, M. D., Menzel, W. P., Grant, P. S., Myers, J. S., Arnold, G. T.,
Platnick, S. E., Gumley, L. E., Tsay, S.-C., Moeller, C. C., Fitzgerald, M.,
Brown, K. S., and Osterwisch, F. G.: Airborne scanning spectrometer for
remote sensing of cloud, aerosol, water vapor, and surface properties, J.
Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 13, 777–794,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013&lt;0777:ASSFRS&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013&lt;0777:ASSFRS&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Kokhanovsky, A. A. and Zege, E. P.: Scattering optics of snow, Appl. Opt.,
43, 1589–1602, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.43.001589" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.43.001589</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Kurucz, R. L.: New atlases for solar flux, irradiance, central intensity,
and limb intensity, Memorie della Società Astronomica Italiana
Supplement, 8, 189, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Leshkevich, G. A. and Deering, D. W.: Diurnal patterns of the bi-directional
reflectance of fresh-water ice, Ann. Glaciol., 14, 153–157, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Libois, Q., Picard, G., France, J. L., Arnaud, L., Dumont, M., Carmagnola, C.
M., and King, M. D.: Influence of grain shape on light penetration in snow,
The Cryosphere, 7, 1803–1818, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1803-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1803-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Libois, Q., Picard, G., Dumont, M., Arnaud, L., Sergent, C., Pougatch, E.,
Sudul, M., and Vial, D.: Experimental determination of the absorption
enhancement parameter of snow, J. Glaciol., 60, 714–724,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG14J015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3189/2014JoG14J015</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Markham, B. L. and Helder, D. L.: Forty-year calibrated record of
earth-reflected radiance from Landsat: A review, Remote Sens. Environ., 122,
30–40, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.06.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.06.026</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Markham, B., Barsi, J., Kvaran, G., Ong, L., Kaita, E., Biggar, S.,
Czapla-Myers, J., Mishra, N., and Helder, D.: Landsat-8 Operational Land
Imager radiometric calibration and stability, Remote Sens., 6, 12275–12308,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs61212275" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs61212275</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Markus, T., Neumann, T., Martino, A., Abdalati, W., Brunt, K., Csatho, B.,
Farrell, S., Fricker, H., Gardner, A., Harding, D., Jasinski, M., Kwok, R.,
Magruder, L., Lubin, D., Luthcke, S., Morison, J., Nelson, R.,
Neuenschwander, A., Palm, S., Popescu, S., Shum, C. K., Schutz, B. E., Smith,
B., Yang, Y. K., and Zwally, J.: The Ice, Cloud, and land Elevation
Satellite-2 (ICESat-2): Science requirements, concept, and implementation,
Remote Sens. Environ., 190, 260–273, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.12.029</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Mishra, N., Helder, D., Angal, A., Choi, J., and Xiong, X. X.: Absolute
calibration of optical satellite sensors using Libya 4 pseudo invariant
calibration site, Remote Sens., 6, 1327–1346, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6021327" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs6021327</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Moran, M. S., Jackson, R. D., Clarke, T. R., Qi, J., Cabot, F., Thome, K. J.,
and Markha, B. L.: Reflectance factor retrieval from Landsat TM and SPOT HRV
data for bright and dark targets, Remote Sens. Environ., 52, 218–230,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(95)00035-Y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(95)00035-Y</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Moran, M. S., Bryant, R., Thome, K., Ni, W., Nouvellon, Y., Gonzalez-Dugo, M.
P., Qi, J., and Clarke, T. R.: A refined empirical line approach for
reflectance factor retrieval from Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+, Remote
Sens. Environ., 78, 71–82, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00250-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00250-4</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Morfitt, R., Barsi, J., Levy, R., Markham, B., Micijevic, E., Ong, L.,
Scaramuzza, P., and Vanderwerff, K.: Landsat-8 Operational Land Imager (OLI)
Radiometric Performance On-Orbit, Remote Sens., 7, 2208–2237,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70202208" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs70202208</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Mullen, P. C. and Warren, S. G.: Theory of the optical properties of lake
ice, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 93, 8403–8414, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/JD093iD07p08403" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/JD093iD07p08403</a>,
1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Nolin, A. W. and Dozier, J.: A hyperspectral method for remotely sensing the
grain size of snow, Remote Sens. Environ., 74, 207–216,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-4257(00)00111-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s0034-4257(00)00111-5</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Painter, T. H., Roberts, D. A., Green, R. O., and Dozier, J.: The effect of
grain size on spectral mixture analysis of snow-covered area from AVIRIS
data, Remote Sens. Environ., 65, 320–332, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00041-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00041-8</a>,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Painter, T. H. and Dozier, J.: Measurements of the hemispherical-directional
reflectance of snow at fine spectral and angular resolution, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 109, D18115, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004458" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd004458</a>, 2004a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Painter, T. H. and Dozier, J.: The effect of anisotropic reflectance on
imaging spectroscopy of snow properties, Remote Sens. Environ., 89, 409–422,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.09.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.09.007</a>, 2004b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Painter, T. H., Barrett, A. P., Landry, C. C., Neff, J. C., Cassidy, M. P.,
Lawrence, C. R., McBride, K. E., and Farmer, G. L.: Impact of disturbed
desert soils on duration of mountain snow cover, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34,
6,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030284" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030284</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Painter, T. H., Rittger, K., McKenzie, C., Slaughter, P., Davis, R. E., and
Dozier, J.: Retrieval of subpixel snow covered area, grain size, and albedo
from MODIS, Remote Sens. Environ., 113, 868–879,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.001</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Painter, T. H., Seidel, F. C., Bryant, A. C., Skiles, S. M., and Rittger, K.:
Imaging spectroscopy of albedo and radiative forcing by light-absorbing
impurities in mountain snow, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 9511–9523,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50520" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50520</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Parr, A. C. and Datla, R. U.: NIST role in radiometric calibrations for
remote sensing programs at NASA, NOAA, DOE and DOD, in: Calibration and
Characterization of Satellite Sensors and Accuracy of Derived Physical
Parameters, edited by: Tsuchiya, K., Advances in Space Research-Series, 1,
Elsevier Science Bv, Amsterdam, 59–68, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Picard, G., Arnaud, L., Domine, F., and Fily, M.: Determining snow specific
surface area from near-infrared reflectance measurements: Numerical study of
the influence of grain shape, Cold Reg. Sci. Technol., 56, 10–17,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2008.10.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2008.10.001</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Platnick, S., Hubanks, P., Meyer, K., and King, M. D.: MODIS atmosphere L3 monthly
product (08_L3), NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD08_M3.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD08_M3.006</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Pope, A., Scambos, T. A., Moussavi, M., Tedesco, M., Willis, M., Shean, D.,
and Grigsby, S.: Estimating supraglacial lake depth in West Greenland using
Landsat 8 and comparison with other multispectral methods, The Cryosphere,
10, 15–27, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-15-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-10-15-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Schaepman-Strub, G., Schaepman, M. E., Painter, T. H., Dangel, S., and
Martonchik, J. V.: Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing –
definitions and case studies, Remote Sens. Environ., 103, 27–42,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.002</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Schaepman, M. E. and Dangel, S.: Solid laboratory calibration on a nonimaging
spectroradiometer, Appl. Opt., 39, 3754–3764, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Schutz, B. E., Zwally, H. J., Shuman, C. A., Hancock, D., and DiMarzio, D.
P.: Overview of the ICESat mission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L21S01,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL024009</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Six, D., Fily, M., Alvain, S., Henry, P., and Benoist, J. P.: Surface
characterisation of the Dome Concordia area (Antarctica) as a potential
satellite calibration site, using Spot 4/Vegetation instrument, Remote Sens.
Environ., 89, 83–94, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.10.006</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Slater, P. N., Biggar, S. F., Holm, R. G., Jackson, R. D., Mao, Y., Moran, M.
S., Palmer, J. M., and Yuan, B.: Reflectance- and radiance-based methods for
the in-flight absolute calibration of multispectral sensors, Remote Sens.
Environ., 22, 11–37, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(87)90026-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(87)90026-5</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, G. M. and Milton, E. J.: The use of the empirical line method to
calibrate remotely sensed data to reflectance, Int. J. Remote Sens., 20,
2653–2662, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/014311699211994" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/014311699211994</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Storey, J., Choate, M., and Lee, K.: Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager
on-orbit geometric calibration and performance, Remote Sens., 6,
11127–11152, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs61111127" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs61111127</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Strobl, P., Mueller, A. A., Schlaepfer, D., and Schaepman, M. E.: Laboratory
calibration and inflight validation of the Digital Airborne Imaging
Spectrometer DAIS, Proc. Algorithms for Multispectral and Hyperspectral Imagery III, SPIE, 7915, 225–236, 1997.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Tanré, D., Deroo, C., Duhaut, P., Herman, M., Morcrette, J. J., Perbos,
J., and Deschamps, P. Y.: Description of a computer code to simulate the
satellite signal in the solar spectrum: the 5S code, Int. J. Remote Sens.,
11, 659–668, 1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Tansock, J., Bancroft, D., Butler, J., Cao, C., Datla, R., Hansen, S., Helder, D.,
Kacker, R., Latvakoski, H., Mlynczak, M., Murdock, T., Peterson, J., Pollock, D.,
Russell, R., Scott, D., Seamons, J., Stone, T., Thurgood, A., Williams, R., Xiong, X.,
and Yoon, H.: Guidelines for radiometric calibration of electro-optical instruments
for remote sensing, U.S. Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and
Technology, HB 157, 1–145, <a href="https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.HB.157" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.HB.157</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Thome, K. J.: Absolute radiometric calibration of Landsat 7 ETM+ using the
reflectance-based method, Remote Sens. Environ., 78, 27–38,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00247-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00247-4</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Thompson, D. R., Gao, B.-C., Green, R. O., Roberts, D. A., Dennison, P. E.,
and Lundeen, S. R.: Atmospheric correction for global mapping spectroscopy:
ATREM advances for the HyspIRI preparatory campaign, Remote Sens. Environ.,
167, 64–77, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.02.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.02.010</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Vane, G., Green, R. O., Chrien, T. G., Enmark, H. T., Hansen, E. G., and
Porter, W. M.: Airbone imaging spectrometry the airborne visible/infrared
imaging spectrometer (AVIRIS), Remote Sens. Environ., 44, 127–143,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(93)90012-M" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(93)90012-M</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Warren, S. G.: Optical-properties of snow, Rev. Geophys., 20, 67–89,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i001p00067" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/RG020i001p00067</a>, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Warren, S. G.: Can black carbon in snow be detected by remote sensing?, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 779–786, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018476" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd018476</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Warren, S. G. and Wiscombe, W. J.: A model for the spectral albedo of snow,
II: Snow containing atmospheric aerosols, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 2734–2745,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037&lt;2734:amftsa&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037&lt;2734:amftsa&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Warren, S. G., Brandt, R. E., and Grenfell, T. C.: Visible and
near-ultraviolet absorption spectrum of ice from transmission of solar
radiation into snow, Appl. Opt., 45, 5320–5334, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.45.005320" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.45.005320</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Wiscombe, W. J. and Warren, S. G.: A model for the spectral albedo of snow,
1, pure snow, J. Atmos. Sci., 37, 2712–2733,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037&lt;2712:amftsa&gt;2.0.co;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1980)037&lt;2712:amftsa&gt;2.0.co;2</a>, 1980.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Zwally, H. J.: ICESat's laser measurements of polar ice, atmosphere, ocean,
and land, J. Geodynam., 34, 405–445, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
