<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-12-3503-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Structural changes of CAST soot during a thermal–optical measurement
protocol</article-title><alt-title>Structural changes of CAST soot during a thermal–optical measurement
protocol</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Structural changes of CAST soot during a thermal--optical measurement
protocol}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{T.~Haller et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Haller</surname><given-names>Theresa</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Rentenberger</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Meyer</surname><given-names>Jannik C.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Felgitsch</surname><given-names>Laura</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Grothe</surname><given-names>Hinrich</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2715-1429</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hitzenberger</surname><given-names>Regina</given-names></name>
          <email>regina.hitzenberger@univie.ac.at</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Vienna, 1090, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Institute of Materials Chemistry, TU Wien, Vienna, 1060, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Regina Hitzenberger (regina.hitzenberger@univie.ac.at)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>2</day><month>July</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>3503</fpage><lpage>3519</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>8</day><month>January</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>11</day><month>February</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>7</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>9</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Theresa Haller et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e132">Thermal–optical measurement techniques are widely used to classify
carbonaceous material. The results of different methods for total carbon are comparable but can vary by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for elemental carbon. One
major cause of variation is the formation of pyrolyzed carbon during the
heating process which occurs mainly in samples with a high amount of brown
carbon (BrC). In this study the structural changes of two different CAST (combustion aerosol standard) aerosol samples caused by the heating procedure in a thermal–optical
instrument were investigated with UV–VIS and Raman spectroscopy, the
integrating-sphere technique (IS) and transmission electron microscopy. All
analysis techniques showed significant structural changes for BrC-rich
samples at the highest temperature level (870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in helium. The
structure of the heated BrC-rich sample resembles the structure of an
unheated BrC-poor sample. Heating the BrC-rich sample to 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increases the graphitic domain size within the material from 1.6 to 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Although the Raman spectra unambiguously show this increase in ordering only
at the highest temperature step, UV–VIS and IS analyses show a continuous
change in the optical properties also at lower temperatures. The sample with
a negligible amount of BrC, however, did not show any significant structural
changes during the whole heating procedure.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e186">Carbonaceous material contributes a large amount to atmospheric aerosols
from 20 % of alpine PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> up to 40 % of urban PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pöschl, 2005)
and up to 50 % in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Yttri et al., 2007). Major sources include
incomplete combustion of fossil and biogenic fuels, emission of primary
particles by the biosphere, and gas-to-particle conversion of precursor gases
emitted by the biosphere or anthropogenic activities (IPCC, 2013; Després
et al., 2012; Zhu et al., 2018; McNeill, 2017). Carbon-containing aerosols
influence the global radiation balance due to their optical properties and
their capability to act as cloud condensation nuclei and ice-nucleating
particles. In particular, black carbon (BC) has an important effect on
radiative forcing as it has the strongest light absorption of all aerosol
components (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006; IPCC, 2013). Carbonaceous material has
also been found to cause various deleterious health effects (Highwood and Kinnersley, 2006; Anderson et al., 2012; Mesquita et al., 2017; EEA, 2017; Partanen
et al., 2018; Rohr and McDonald, 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e216">Depending on its origin carbonaceous material ranges from agglomerations of
primary spherical particles with a graphitic-like internal structure to
non-ordered organic material. While primary carbonaceous particles produced
under well-defined combustion conditions are rather homogeneous,
real-atmosphere carbonaceous particles are internal mixtures of different
carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous materials of various origins (e.g., Okada
and Hitzenberger, 2001; Zhang et al., 2014; Ye et al., 2018; IPCC, 2013;
Deboudt et al., 2010; Pratt and Prather, 2010; Bondy et al., 2018; Adachi et
al., 2010; Adachi and Buseck, 2013; China et al., 2013; Cappa et al., 2012). As
carbonaceous aerosol material plays such an important role and is so
diverse, the correct determination of carbonaceous fractions in the aerosol
is essential. However, this endeavor is not trivial because<?pagebreak page3504?> measurement
techniques are influenced not only by the properties of the material itself,
but also by the non-carbonaceous materials associated with the particles and
their mixing state.</p>
      <p id="d1e219">During the past decades, numerous methods were developed, and intercomparison
studies of different methods applied to both laboratory-generated and
ambient aerosol were performed, which showed similarities and discrepancies
of the results of different methods depending on sources and aerosol
constituents (see, e.g., the overviews given by Watson et al., 2005;
Venkatachari et al., 2006; Müller et al., 2004).</p>
      <p id="d1e222">Analysis techniques can be grouped broadly into optical techniques, which
utilize light absorption and its wavelength dependence, and thermal
techniques, which separate the material based on its thermal properties.
Another distinction can be made between filter-based techniques and
techniques that analyze airborne particles in situ, such as photoacoustic
spectrometry (e.g., Arnott et al., 1999; Moosmüller et al., 1998) and the
SP2 instrument (e.g., Stephens et al., 2003; Schwartz et al., 2006). Usually,
the term black carbon (BC) is used for the carbonaceous fraction with high
light absorption in the whole visible wavelength range, and brown carbon
(BrC) is used for the carbonaceous fraction with a pronounced wavelength-dependent
absorption with high absorption in the blue and weak absorption in the red
part of the spectrum (Petzold et al., 2013). Thermal techniques separate
carbonaceous material into organic carbon (OC, thermally unstable) and
elemental carbon (EC, thermally refractory). The latter oxidizes in air at
temperatures above 600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Andreae and Gelencsér, 2006) and
does not evaporate in the absence of oxygen below fairly high temperatures
(the definitions range from 550 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Bond and Bergstrom, 2006; to
700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Chow et al., 2004). EC and BC are often loosely used as
synonymous, as both are strongly light absorbing, although the terms are not
the same since EC is defined by thermal and BC by optical properties of the
material (Buseck et al., 2014; Petzold et al., 2013). The comparability of
BC and/or EC values measured with different techniques depends on the
composition of the aerosol and the measurement method (Cheng et al., 2012;
Cavalli et al., 2010). Optically determined BrC is a subfraction of
thermally determined OC and originates mainly from combustion of biomass or
biofuels (Mayol-Bracero, 2002; Hoffer et al., 2006; Schmidl et al.,
2008; Park et al., 2018; Fan et al., 2016; Park and Yu, 2016; Sun et al.,
2017). The thermal and optical behavior of carbonaceous material is caused
by its internal structure (i.e., chemical composition, ordering and bonding
types). As outlined by Pöschl (2005) there is no sharp boundary between
the thermally unstable OC and EC but a continuous transition from organic
carbon to elemental carbon in terms of structure as well as of thermal and
optical properties: the higher the degree of graphitization, the higher
the thermal stability and the broader the wavelength range of light
absorption are.</p>
      <p id="d1e262">In order to account for pyrolyzation of OC during the heating process used
in the thermal techniques, thermal–optical techniques were developed. In
these techniques the sample is heated stepwise first in an inert He
atmosphere to a maximum temperature, which depends on the measurement
protocol (see below), and then oxygen is added to the carrier gas and the sample
is further heated. The amount of carbon leaving the filter at each
temperature step is detected. The darkening of the sample due to pyrolysis
is traced by monitoring a transmission/reflection laser signal. After the
addition of oxygen both the originally present EC and the pyrolyzed carbon
(PC) are oxidized during the successive heating steps. All carbon leaving
the filter until the laser signal has reached its original value is assumed
to originate from PC and is attributed to the OC fraction in the subsequent
evaluation.</p>
      <p id="d1e265">The crucial assumption for this laser correction is that either PC has the
same molecular structure as the original EC or that PC burns off completely
before EC is oxidized. None of these conditions is fulfilled, as was shown
by Yu and Yang (2002), who found that in many cases the light absorption
coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the two fractions is not the same at least at the
wavelength used in their thermal–optical instrument (680 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Moreover, the
value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of PC is not constant even during a single thermal
analysis. This uncertainty in accounting for PC leads to uncertainties in
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> split, which is the subject of numerous instrument intercomparison
studies (see, e.g., the overview given by Cavalli et al., 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e302">Different thermal–optical measurement protocols vary in height and duration
of the individual temperature steps, particularly in the maximum temperature
of the inert (He) mode – maximum temperatures between 580 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(IMPROVE A, Chow et al., 2004) and 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (NIOSH870, Panteliadis
et al., 2015; Birch and Cary, 1996). This leads to different charring
behaviors of OC. As a consequence the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> split varies with the
temperature protocol, while the total carbon (TC, i.e., the sum of OC; EC;
and, if present, carbonate carbon) values usually are quite comparable.
Different thermal methods agree within 5 %–15 % in the amount of TC but
vary up to 44 % for EC (Reisinger et al., 2008; Cavalli et al., 2010; Yu
and Yang, 2002; Cheng et al., 2012; Hitzenberger et al., 2006; Panteliadis
et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e341">The largest discrepancies between thermal–optical methods applied to
atmospheric samples occur in the presence of appreciable amounts of BrC
(e.g., Wonaschütz et al., 2009; Reisinger et al., 2008). Kim et al. (2015)
compared OC and EC values obtained with two different thermal–optical
protocols (NIOSH and EUSAAR) for laboratory-generated soot from propane
combustion (produced by a miniCAST burner). For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
the differences of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between both methods were below 15 %. For lower
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios when significant amounts of BrC (measured with an optical
method) were present, larger differences (30 %) are noticeable.</p>
      <p id="d1e390">Besides the presence of BrC, metal salts were also found to affect the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
split in thermal–optical methods by enhancing the charring of OC and/or by
reducing the oxidation temperature of EC (Wang et al., 2010; Bladt et al.,
2014).</p>
      <?pagebreak page3505?><p id="d1e405">The aim of the present study was to shed more light on the processes which
lead to the discrepancies between measurement methods using different
thermal–optical protocols. The formation of PC during thermal–optical
measurements is not yet fully understood. The purpose was to investigate the
structural changes of carbonaceous aerosol samples occurring during
pyrolysis. In order to exclude the effects of other, non-carbonaceous
material on the charring process, the structure of two different types of
laboratory-generated soot – one with a high tendency to form PC and one
with a negligible tendency to form PC – was analyzed in different stages of
pyrolyzation in order to obtain more information about the internal
structure of PC and its differences or analogies to the structure of EC. A
thermal–optical EC–OC analyzer (Sunset Instruments Inc.; see description
below) was used not only for the analysis of these soot samples but also as
a means for sample preparation in order to obtain pyrolyzed samples from
each heating step that had been exposed to the same atmospheres, heating
rates and temperature plateaus as during the thermal–optical analysis. This
approach permits an investigation of the structural changes of the material
as they occur during the thermal–optical heating procedure. Although
charring of organic material has also been observed in SP2 measurements
(Sedlacek et al., 2018), the present study is focussed on the processes
occurring in filter samples.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Properties of soot</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Structure of soot</title>
      <p id="d1e423">The general term soot is usually used for particulate products of incomplete
combustion or pyrolysis of fossil fuels or organic materials (Andreae and
Gelencsér, 2006; Pöschl, 2005; Bond and Bergstrom, 2006).</p>
      <p id="d1e426">The structure of soot depends on the fuel and on the combustion conditions.
Soot produced under oxygen-rich combustion conditions and high temperatures
consists of agglomerated primary particles with sizes between 10 and 30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Sadezky et al., 2005). The primary particles consist of onion-like
turbostratically ordered graphitic layers. The graphitic domains typically
include 3–4 graphene layers and have an extent of about 3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with interlayer
distances of about 3.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Å</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Sadezky et al., 2005), which is larger than the
interlayer distance of an ideal graphitic lattice (3.35 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Å</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) because of
the turbostratic arrangement. The atoms in graphitic-like material are bound
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> bonds, which form conjugated systems and hence long-range
orbitals. As the optical gap is small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for disordered
graphitic layers; Robertson and O'Reilly, 1987), light from a broad spectral
range is absorbed (Bond and Bergstrom, 2006; Chhowalla et al., 1997).</p>
      <p id="d1e487">In contrast to this highly ordered type of soot, the molecular structure of
BrC, which is formed under oxygen-poor and low-temperature combustion
conditions, is similar to that of polycyclic hydrocarbons (PAH) or humic-like substances (HULIS) (Graber and Rudich, 2006; Sun et al., 2007). Due to
the smaller expansion of the molecular orbitals there is a larger optical
gap between the filled valence band and the unfilled conduction band, which
leads to a decreasing absorption efficiency towards the long-wave part of
the visible spectrum (Bond, 2001; Kim et al., 2015; Andreae and
Gelencsér, 2006).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>CAST soot</title>
      <p id="d1e498">For the present study, a combustion aerosol standard burner (type miniCAST) was used to produce differently structured soot by varying the combustion conditions. A detailed description
of the miniCAST burner is given below. Different fuel-to-air ratios in the
flame lead to different compositions and structures of the produced
particles. According to Kim et al. (2015) and Mamakos et al. (2013) the
particles obtained under oxygen-rich settings are comparable to diesel
exhaust aerosols. They show a high EC fraction and form relatively large
fractal agglomerates with mobility diameters between 70 and 130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
are composed of small (25–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) spherical primary particles (Kim et al.,
2015). Under oxygen-poor combustion conditions, spherical particles with
sizes in the range 10–60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a low EC fraction (Kim et al., 2015) are
formed. While soot from biomass burning contains also ionic components such
as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> which could lead to catalysis effects in
the thermal–optical analysis (Ichikawa and Naito, 2017; Wang et al., 2010),
these compounds are negligible in soot produced by the CAST burner since
only pure propane and air contribute to the combustion.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Basics of Raman spectroscopy of soot</title>
      <p id="d1e637">Raman scattering has been used for the structural investigation of soot for
several years (Rosen and Novakov, 1978; Sadezky et al., 2005; Ferrari and
Robertson, 2000; Schmid et al., 2011; Knauer et al., 2009; Ivleva et al.,
2007a, b). It is sensitive to different C–C bonding types (e.g.,
graphitic structures) in a material (Sadezky et al., 2005) and depends on
the ordering of sp<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> sites (Ferrari and Robertson, 2000).</p>
      <p id="d1e649">Ideal graphite shows a single peak at a Raman shift of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1580</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (G peak or graphitic peak), which is related to the ideal
hexagonal environment in the extended graphene layers (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry).
For nonideal graphite, an additional peak at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (D peak or defect peak) appears, which is due to impurities and/or smaller
graphene layers and the thus increased number of layer edges. Due to the
missing neighbor atoms at these edges, the symmetry of the C–C vibration is
reduced to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. When the ordering in the material decreases – which is
the case in soot – the two formerly sharp peaks broaden and overlap (see
also Figs. 5 and 6) as a consequence of more than two overlapping Raman
bands. To separate the contributions of the bands, different authors suggest
different curve-fitting methods with up to<?pagebreak page3506?> five signals with either Gaussian
or Lorentzian shape (Dippel et al., 1999; Jawhari et al., 1995; Sze et al.,
2001; Cuesta et al., 1994). A comparison study performed by Sadezky et al. (2005) found that a five-curve fit with four Lorentzian and one Gaussian
curves represents most of their spectra best. The curve shapes, band
positions and related vibration modes are listed in Table 1.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e732">Band positions and line shapes for the five fitting curves of soot
Raman spectra (Sadezky et al., 2005).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Band</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Shape</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Position</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Vibration mode</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lorentzian</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1360</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Disordered graphitic lattice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry), graphene layer edges</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lorentzian</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1620</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Disordered graphitic lattice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry), surface graphene layers</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Gaussian</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1500</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Amorphous carbon</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lorentzian</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1180</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Disordered graphitic lattice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry), polyenes, ionic impurities</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lorentzian</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1580</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Ideal graphitic lattice (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> symmetry)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1009">The ratio of the intensities of the D and G peak (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) can be
linked to the crystallite size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) within the investigated material
(Ferrari and Robertson, 2000; Tuinstra and Koenig, 1970). Ferrari and
Robertson (2000) propose an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with increasing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this regime <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is proportional to the probability to find 6-fold aromatic rings in the
cluster (Ferrari and Robertson, 2000). For larger crystallite sizes
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreases with increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Tuinstra and Koenig,
1970). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shows a maximum at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> but has a
broad transition regime between the increasing and decreasing branch.
Zickler et al. (2006) compare the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of Raman spectra of
charcoal obtained from spruce wood with the crystallite sizes obtained from
X-ray diffraction and confirm the proposal of Ferrari and Robertson
experimentally. Based on these findings, several authors (Commodo et al.,
2016; Ess et al., 2016; Ivleva et al., 2007a, b) use increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">G</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratios as criteria to detect an increasing degree of ordering in soot.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Experimental setup</title>
      <p id="d1e1228">For the production of well-defined combustion soot, a combustion aerosol
standard soot generator (type miniCAST 5201C Jing-CAST Technologies,
<uri>http://www.sootgenerator.com</uri>, last access: 7 June 2019) was used. In this burner, soot is produced in a
propane and air co-flow diffusion flame which was quenched with nitrogen
directly after the combustion zone in order to prevent further combustion
processes. The particle flow is subsequently diluted with air. The burning
conditions were varied by setting different air-to-fuel ratios to produce
differently structured soot.</p>
      <p id="d1e1234">Prior to this study, samples were obtained for a variety of air-to-fuel
ratios and analyzed for BC and BrC with the integrating-sphere technique
(IS; see below). Based on these experiments, two different combustion
conditions were chosen here to produce two types of soot: one representing a
BrC-rich sample (“brown”) and the other a BrC-poor sample (“black”)
(Table 2). The samples have a completely different morphology, as is shown
below in Figs. 9 and 10.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1240">CAST burning conditions used for the black and the brown
sample. The dilution air refers to the CAST internal dilution.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CAST burning conditions</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Black</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Brown</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Propane</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mL</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Oxidation air</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.04 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Nitrogen</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dilution air</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Quench gas (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.275</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.397</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1495">For sampling, quartz fiber filters (Pall Tissuquartz 2500 QAT-UP, 47 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were
used. The filters had been prebaked at 450 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for an hour and
stored for at least 24 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in a water-vapor-saturated atmosphere before
sampling to prevent adsorption of volatile organic substances during
handling (Jankowski et al., 2008). The loaded filters were stored at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> except during analysis and further sample preparation (see
below). The setup of the sampling system is shown in Fig. 1.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1550">Setup of the sampling. Soot produced by the CAST generator is
first diluted within the generator. The sample flow is drawn from the exit
line of the CAST generator and further diluted with filtered air (dilution
flow regulated with a needle valve and measured with a rotameter). Aerosol
is sampled in parallel on filters placed in two identical filter holders.
Total flow in the sampling line is regulated by a critical orifice (12.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1576">Part of the exhaust stream of the miniCAST was diverted and drawn through
two parallel filters placed in identical holders. The total flow in this
sampling line was controlled by a critical orifice (12.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The aerosol
flow was diluted with 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> air filtered with a HEPA (high-efficiency particulate air) filter, except for
samples to be analyzed with UV–VIS spectroscopy, where the flow had to be
diluted with 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">L</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> air to prevent too-dark filter deposits. The dilution
air was regulated with a needle valve and measured with a rotameter. For
each of the following measurement techniques (UV–VIS, Raman spectroscopy,
IS, TEM) a set of eight 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> filter punches was taken from the
filters. For the preparation of the heated samples, the EC–OC analyzer
(see description
below) was programmed according to the NIOSH870 protocol
and used as an oven. Each filter punch was inserted into the analyzer and
underwent part of the NIOSH870 heating procedure, from the beginning to one
of the first eight prescribed temperature levels (see Table 2). At that
point the automated heating procedure was interrupted and the oven cooled
down to below 75 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Helium. Then the punches where removed from
the instrument and transferred directly into Petri dishes. The dishes were
closed with Parafilm strips and stored at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> until the further
measurements. This procedure was performed for four sets of filter punches
to be analyzed with the different techniques.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Analysis techniques</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Thermal–optical measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1691">For the analysis of the filter samples and the heating of the samples a
dual-optics EC–OC analyzer (Sunset Instruments Inc.) was used. In the first
heating steps, the samples are heated in helium. In the second part of the
analysis the samples are exposed to an oxidizing atmosphere consisting of
2 % oxygen and 98 % helium. Reflectance and transmittance signals of
laser light (635 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are used to monitor the darkening of the sample caused
by pyrolysis during heating in the inert atmosphere. In this study, the
NIOSH870 protocol was used. Temperature steps and residence times are listed
in Table 3.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1705">Temperature steps and residence times for the NIOSH870 protocol
(Panteliadis et al., 2015; Birch and Cary, 1996).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Carrier</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Residence</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">gas</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">time (s)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">He</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">310</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">He</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">475</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">He</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">615</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">He</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">870</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">90</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">550</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">625</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">700</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">775</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">850</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">870</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">120</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1972">The NIOSH870 protocol was chosen here to investigate the structural changes
of soot during pyrolysis, because of the strong charring occurring in the He
mode at the high temperatures. The EUSAAR2 protocol (Cavalli et al., 2010),
which is now used widely in the EU (Brown et al., 2017), minimizes charring and is therefore less
suitable for the investigation of PC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Integrating sphere (IS)</title>
      <p id="d1e1983">BC and BrC (often taken together as light-absorbing carbon, LAC) of the
original and the heated samples were analyzed<?pagebreak page3507?> with an extension of the
original integrating-sphere technique (described, e.g., by Hitzenberger and
Tohno, 2001). In this technique, a sample (e.g., a filter punch) is immersed
in a liquid and introduced into the center of an integrating sphere
illuminated with diffuse light. In our study, a 15.24 cm (6 in.) integrating sphere
(Labsphere, Inc.) coated internally with a nearly ideally diffusely
reflective (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">99</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) material (Spectraflect<sup>™</sup>) was
used. Samples were immersed in a mixture of 10 % isopropanol, 40 %
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 50 % acetone in PE vials. Enhanced absorption caused by a
possible coating effect is reduced: soluble coatings are removed from the
particles and the effect of insoluble coatings is reduced because of the low
relative refractive index of these coatings compared to the liquid
(Hitzenberger and Tohno, 2001). In the extended technique (Wonaschütz et
al., 2009) the sphere is illuminated with a halogen light source equipped
with three interference filters (450, 550 and 650 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the wavelength-dependent light signal is recorded with a photodiode. The contributions of
BC and BrC to the absorption signal are separated in an iterative procedure
using calibration curves obtained with a proxy for BC (Elftex 124, Cabot
Corp.) and a proxy for BrC (humic acid sodium salt, Acros Organics, no. 68131044).</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3508?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Raman spectroscopy</title>
      <p id="d1e2029">In this study a confocal Raman microscope (Horiba Jobin Yvon LabRAM 800HR)
was used. The Raman microscope was equipped with a 632.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> HeNe laser
(maximum output <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mW</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and a charge-coupled device (CCD) camera (Peltier cooled at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The laser beam was focused on the sample with a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
magnification objective (CF Plan, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>/0.35, WD 20.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Nikon). The spectra
were calibrated with the Rayleigh line at 0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the silicon peak
at 521 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The laser power was reduced to 10 % for analyzing black
samples and 25 % for brown samples to prevent thermal destruction of the
material. All instrument settings (grating 300 lines per mm, 3–4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
resolution; confocal hole 1000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; acquisition time 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with 30
accumulations) were chosen after a set of test measurements to provide the
best signal-to-noise ratio for the analysis. As the samples burned off
partially at the 775 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature step in the EC–OC analyzer,
the Raman spectra were recorded only for the first seven temperature steps.</p>
      <p id="d1e2182">The spectra were recorded in the range from 200 to 2000 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at four measurement points at three positions for each sample to account
for possible variations within a filter sample. The averaged spectra for
each filter were analyzed using OriginPro2016, which has built-in functions
for baseline correction. Baselines were fitted with a B-spline function
based on approximately 20 anchor points. After subtraction of the baseline,
the spectra were fitted with five curves (four Lorentzian, one Gaussian; see
Table 1). As initial values for the fit, the band positions obtained by
Sadezky et al. (2005) and listed above (Table 1) were used. The standard
deviations of the mean spectra were used in the fitting software as
weighting of the fit.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>TEM – transmission electron microscopy</title>
      <p id="d1e2207">A 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">kV</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> transmission electron microscope (TEM) Philips CM200 equipped with a
Gatan<sup>™</sup> Orius CCD camera was used to analyze the nanostructure of the
original and the heated samples. Single filter fibers were separated from
the samples and placed onto holey carbon films or between copper grids to
facilitate studying freestanding soot particles. High-resolution microscopic
images and diffraction patterns of particles deposited at the lateral edges
of the fibers were taken. Intensity profiles of the diffraction patterns
were obtained by both azimuthal integration along rings and background
correction using PASAD-tools (Gammer et al., 2010). For comparison a
simulated profile of graphite was calculated with JEMS software (Stadelmann,
2004).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>UV–VIS spectroscopy</title>
      <p id="d1e2230">A LAMBDA 750 UV–VIS spectrometer (PerkinElmer, Waltham, Massachusetts, US),
equipped with a tungsten and a deuterium lamp, was used to measure the
diffuse reflectance of the samples. Reflectance measurements were carried
out from 800 to 200 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with an interval of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. At 319.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the instrument
switches from the tungsten (visible) to the deuterium (UV) lamp. For the
measurement the original and heated samples were put into quartz vials
without any liquid. The diffusely reflected light from the filter punches
was collected with a 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> integrating sphere and detected with a
photomultiplier. Absorbance spectra where calculated with the Kubelka–Munk
equation (Kubelka and Munk, 1931) from the measured reflectance spectra.
Although the Kubelka–Munk theory was developed originally for powder
samples, its applicability to aerosol filter samples was shown by Aryal et
al. (2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e2265">Absorbance spectra were calculated from the measured reflection signals
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the Kubelka–Munk function:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M132" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>K–M</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where K–M(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is proportional to the absorbance, assuming infinite
sample thickness. The spectra were corrected for background signals obtained
from three filter blanks.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Thermal–optical analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e2361">In the thermal–optical analysis most of the carbon of the black sample
evolves in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> phase. Throughout the successive heating steps,
the laser reflectance signal remains relatively constant until EC oxidizes
(Fig. 2). On the other hand, most of the carbon of the brown sample
evolves in the He phase (Fig. 3). The laser reflectance signal decreases
during the first three temperature steps, indicating a pyrolysis of the
organic material. The signal starts to increase slightly at the last
temperature step (870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in He and increases rapidly at
625 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is added, indicating the combustion of
initial EC and/or pyrolyzed OC (PC). The laser signal reaches its initial
value at the end of the 700 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature step; therefore
approximately half of the carbon signal in the oxidizing atmosphere is
assigned to OC following the normal procedure of the thermal–optical
analysis method. Results from EC and OC measurements are summarized in Table 3. Figures 2 and 3 show full thermograms of a black and a brown
sample.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2430">Thermogram of the black sample. The blue line is the temperature
measured at the position of the sample, the red line the laser reflectance
signal and the green line the signal of the flame ionization detector (FID),
which is proportional to the amount of carbon leaving the filter. The split
point was set at the point where the laser signal reached its initial value.
The FID signal before the split point (broken line) is assigned to OC and
after the split point to EC. The dotted line separates the inert and
oxidizing phases.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2441">Thermogram of the brown sample. The blue line is the temperature
measured at the position of the sample, the red line the laser reflectance
signal and the green line the signal of the flame ionization detector (FID),
which is proportional to the amount of carbon leaving the filter. The split
point was set at the point where the laser signal reached its initial value.
The FID signal before the split point (broken line) is assigned to OC and
after the split point to EC. The dotted line separates the inert and
oxidizing phases.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Black and brown carbon</title>
      <p id="d1e2458">Figure 4 shows the change in BC and BrC during the thermal–optical analysis.
The changing BC content of the sample is qualitatively consistent with the
interpretation of the laser signal in the thermal–optical analysis: BC in
the black sample decreases somewhat during the whole analysis cycle,
while BrC is below the detection limit for each temperature step.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2463">Change in BC and BrC measured with the IS method during heating
according to the NOSH870 protocol measurement for the black and the
brown sample. BC brown and BrC brown refer to the amount of BC and
BrC of the brown sample; BC black refers to the amount of BC of the
black sample. BrC of the black sample is below detection limit for
the original and the heated samples, respectively. The error bars indicate
deviations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %. Laboratory intern test measurements gave
variations in this range for filter samples measured in the integrating
sphere.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page3509?><p id="d1e2482">For the brown sample, BrC decreases continuously during the whole He
mode, while BC increases over the He mode up until 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (He) and
decreases in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mode. These findings confirm that BC is built
during the thermal–optical analysis of an organic-carbon-containing sample.</p>
      <p id="d1e2515">Table 4 summarizes the composition of the original brown and black
samples regarding their EC, OC, BC and BrC content: the black sample
consists mainly of EC or BC with a negligible amount of BrC. On the
contrary, the brown sample contains only about 10 % EC or BC and
approximately 90 % BrC.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Raman spectra</title>
      <p id="d1e2526">The change in the Raman spectra due to the heating process in the
thermal–optical instrument is shown in Figs. 5 and 6. For a better
comparison the spectra are normalized to the maximum of the G peak. While
the maxima of the D and G peak do not change for the black sample, the
spectra of the brown sample show a relative increase in the D peak for
samples heated at 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in He. The peak does not increase
continuously over the whole heating process, which indicates a significant
structural change especially at this temperature step. Following the
interpretation of Ferrari and Robertson (2000) and its application to soot
samples by Commodo et al. (2016), Ess et al. (2016) and Ivleva et al. (2007a, b), this increase in the D peak indicates an increased amount of
polyaromatic rings in the sample which can be associated with a higher
degree of ordering.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2544">Results of thermal–optical and integrating-sphere measurements.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Thermal–optical</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Integrating</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">measurement</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">sphere method</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">EC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BC</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LAC</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Black</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.99</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Brown</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.11</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2643">Raman spectra of the original and the heated brown sample. The
black and red solid lines represent the original sample and the sample
heated to 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in He, where a significant structural change
occurs. The mean spectra are smoothed and normalized to the maximum of the
G peak. The shaded areas represent the standard deviations of the mean
spectra.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2667">Raman spectra of the original and the heated black sample. The
black and red solid lines represent the original sample and the sample
heated to 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in He. In contrast to the spectra of the
brown sample, no significant change in the D-peak height due to heating
is visible here. The mean spectra are smoothed and normalized to the maximum
of the G peak. The shaded areas represent the standard deviations of the
mean spectra.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2688">For a better comparison, the spectra of the black and brown original
samples and samples heated to 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in He are shown in Fig. 7.
The D peak of the brown heated sample<?pagebreak page3510?> reaches nearly the height of the D peak of the black original and heated samples.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2705">Comparison of the Raman spectra of the original and heated
(870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> He) samples for the brown and the black sample. The
D peak of the spectrum of the brown sample reaches the height of the
D peak of the black sample when the sample is heated to 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
He.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2740">Five-curve fits of the original and heated (870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> He)
spectra using the band positions and curve shapes of Sadezky et al. (2005).
The black lines are the measured intensities, the green lines the five
fitting curves (D1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–D4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and G<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the red lines the
fitted spectra. The fitted curves of the black sample are similar before
and after heating, while the D1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and D4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of the brown
sample change.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2807">Figure 8 shows the five-curve fits of these four spectra. All fits were
performed on the smoothed and averaged versions of the spectra. It is
obvious that there is no significant change in the five peaks between the
original and heated black sample. However, the spectra of the brown
sample show a significant change at the D4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> peak (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the D1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> peak (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1350</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), when the
sample is heated to 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in He: while the D4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> peak (which
is related to C=C double bonds, Sadezky et al., 2005) decreases, the
D1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> peak (related to graphene layer edges, Sadezky et al., 2005)
increases. This implies that the material in the heated sample contains
fewer C=C double bonds and more graphene layer edges compared to the
original brown sample.</p>
      <p id="d1e2908">Possible explanations could be a decomposition and evolution of molecules
with C=C bonds (e.g., polyenes) and a coincident fragmentation of
preexisting graphene layers or a transformation of molecules with C=C
bonds into new small graphene layers. Both scenarios would lead to a higher
amount of graphene layer edges (and an increased D1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> peak) and a
lower amount of C=C bonds (and a decreased D4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">fit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> peak).</p>
      <p id="d1e2929">TEM images (see below) show that the ordering in the brown sample
increases when it is heated to 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in He. The UV–VIS spectra
(see below) show a decreasing absorption coefficient which requires a growth
instead of a fragmentation of the conjugated orbitals in the material. Both
findings are more consistent with the second process.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3511?><sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <label>5.4</label><title>TEM – transmission electron microscopy</title>
      <p id="d1e2952">The TEM images of the black and brown samples show entirely
different morphologies. The soot in the black sample consists of
agglomerates of spherical primary particles with diameters of about 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Fig. 9). The primary particles show an onion-like graphitic structure as it
is also reported by Sadezky et al. (2005) and Kim et al. (2015). From the
TEM images of the brown sample an ordered internal structure is not
visible. The particles seem to consist of an oily substance (described as
“condensed organic species” by Moore et al., 2014) which adheres well to
the filter fibers (Fig. 10). However, analysis of the electron diffraction
patterns indicates a small degree of ordering (see below).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2965">TEM images of the black original sample with two different
magnifications. The black sample consists of agglomerates of spherical
primary particles. The higher magnification shows an onion-like structure of
the single spheres as reported by Sadezky et al. (2005) and Kim et al. (2015).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f09.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e2976">TEM images of the brown original sample taken at two different
magnifications. The brown sample consists of unstructured droplets. The
disordered structure is visible in the right image.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f10.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2986">After heating to 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> under helium atmosphere, the black
sample shows the same graphitic-like structure as the original black
sample. However, the brown heated (870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> He) sample seems to
have a more ordered internal structure in the form of layers than its
original version as indicated by stronger noticeable local fringe-like
contrast (Fig. 11).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e3015">TEM images of the black <bold>(a)</bold> and brown <bold>(b)</bold> heated
(870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> He) samples taken at high magnifications.
An increased ordering of the heated brown sample can be discerned, while
the structure of the black heated sample does not change visibly in
comparison to the original sample.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f11.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3042">The electron diffraction patterns (Fig. 12) of both heated and original
samples show rings with maxima at 2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (A), 4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (B) and
8.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (C). The positions of the rings are very similar to those of
simulated graphite with randomly oriented small graphitic domains (cf. inset
in Fig. 13). Therefore we conclude that the ring A at 2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be related to the layer distance of graphite and the ring B at 4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
the (100) or (101) planes of graphite. All rings appear in the diffraction
patterns of both the black and the brown samples in Fig. 12, but they
are broader for the brown original sample. The latter result is
demonstrated more clearly in the intensity profiles calculated by azimuthal
integration along rings (Fig. 13) and indicates that the brown original
sample is less ordered than the black sample. This finding is also
consistent with the Raman spectra and the real-space TEM images. Based on
the comparison of the positions and profiles of the experimental peaks to
the simulated ones, it is concluded that all samples contain small
graphitic-like atomic arrangements. The tendency of the maximum A to larger
diffraction vectors by thermal treatment of the brown sample refers to a
slight reduction of the distance of graphitic layers by heating resembling
that of the black one.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e3117">Electron diffraction patterns of black and brown samples;
original and heated. A, B and C indicate the ring maxima at 2.8, 4.9 and 8.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e3143">Intensity profiles of diffraction patterns taken from the black
and brown original sample and the brown heated (870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> He) sample.
The intensities of all three samples were normalized to the peak intensity
at 4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The image in the right corner shows the simulation for a
graphitic material with small and randomly oriented graphitic clusters.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e3180">FWHM of the 4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> maximum of electron diffraction of the
original and heated samples for selected temperatures. The FWHM of the
brown sample decreases during the heating process and reaches values
near the FWHM of the black sample after heating at 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
He.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page3512?><p id="d1e3215">The quantitative evaluation of the peak width by the full width at half
maximum (FWHM) is displayed for the different samples in Fig. 14. In the
case of the brown sample the FWHM of ring B decreases by 30 % as a
consequence of heating. This result can be interpreted as an increase in the
coherently scattering domain size (Fultz and Howe, 2001) and an increased
degree of structural order during heating. This interpretation holds also
for the other peaks; for example, the FWHM value of peak A at 2.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> changes
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.54</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.45</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by heating up to
870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. 13 and 14).</p>
      <p id="d1e3282">Based on these FWHM values and using the Scherrer equation (Fultz et al.,
2001) the size of the coherently scattering domains (in the direction
perpendicular to the (002) layers) changes from about 1.6 to 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as a
consequence of heating. On the other hand, the FWHM of the black sample
does not change and neither does the internal structure of the material
(Figs. 13 and 14). Black original and heated samples were found to have
coherently scattering domains with sizes of about 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from which we
conclude a slight difference in the structural ordering between the
black and the brown heated sample. The changes in the graphitic
domain size of the brown sample during heating confirm the findings of the
Raman measurements but the temperature dependence is still different. As
shown in Fig. 14 the FWHM of the brown sample decreases already at
temperatures below 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is in contrast to the Raman
spectra, where a sudden change in the shape of the curves occurs at
870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in He. The cause for this difference is not completely
clear. A possible explanation might be a reorientation and alignment of
existing clusters and layers and therefore an increase in the size of
coherently scattering domains at temperatures below 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
would not necessarily change the Raman signal since the structure within the
clusters can be kept unchanged and the existing clusters would only rotate,
rearrange and align.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS5">
  <label>5.5</label><title>UV–VIS spectroscopy</title>
      <p id="d1e3346">Figure 15 shows the wavelength dependence of light absorption by the
brown and black original and heated samples. The wavelength
dependence of the brown sample changes during the heating process. The
absorption spectra for the black<?pagebreak page3513?> heated and original samples, however,
do not change significantly, particularly not in one distinct direction. The
spectrum of the brown original sample has a strong wavelength
dependence, but during the heating process this spectrum changes and becomes
more and more similar to the spectra of the black samples.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15"><?xmltex \currentcnt{15}?><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p id="d1e3351">UV–VIS spectra for the black and brown heated and original samples. The spectra are normalized at 800 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
better comparison. The wavelength dependence does not change significantly
during the thermal–optical heating process for the black sample, while
the wavelength dependence decreases continuously for the brown sample.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3368">The wavelength dependence of the absorption was fitted using the Ångström
power law:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M193" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the incident intensity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the reflected intensity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the Ångström exponent, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> the wavelength and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> a constant. Figure 16 shows the absorption spectra for the brown original and heated
samples with the spectrum for the black original sample for comparison.
The Ångström exponents of the respective curves are given in the figure.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16"><?xmltex \currentcnt{16}?><label>Figure 16</label><caption><p id="d1e3448">UV–VIS spectra for the brown original and heated samples and
corresponding Ångström exponents. The dashed red line shows the spectrum of
the black original sample for comparison.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/3503/2019/amt-12-3503-2019-f16.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3457">The spectrum of the original brown sample starts with an Ångström
exponent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. During the heating process the wavelength
dependence decreases and reaches values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after
the heating step of 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in He, which is even lower than the
Ångström exponent for the black original sample (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e3514">The low Ångström exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the sample heated to 775 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> might suffer from measurement uncertainties. At this heating
stage, most of the absorbing material has already been burned off the filter
and the K–M absorption signals are already very small.</p>
      <p id="d1e3550">This decrease in the Ångström exponent for the brown sample indicates an
increase in BC, which is consistent with the findings of the IS
measurements. At the heating stage of 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in He and after this
stage, the Ångström exponent is even lower than for the black original
sample.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3514?><p id="d1e3565">Absorption Ångström exponents depend on both the refractive index and on the
size of the absorbing particles (Bohren and Huffman, 1998). Absorption by
small particles (in the Rayleigh regime) has a stronger wavelength
dependence than that by larger particles in the Mie scattering size range.
The observed behavior of the Ångström exponents could be caused by the
different sizes and shapes of the particles of the black sample compared
to particles in the brown sample. As we saw from the TEM images, the
particles of the black sample consist of agglomerates of spherical
primary particles with diameters of about 20 nm, whereas the particles in the
brown sample are larger than these primary particles. This large size
difference is not substantially changed due to heating.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3515?><sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d1e3577">From the various analyses a change in structure of the brown sample
during thermal analysis can be clearly seen. For the black sample which
consists of agglomerates of spherules with graphitic-like structure no such
change occurs. These findings are supported by all analysis techniques
employed here (UV–VIS measurements, Raman spectroscopy, TEM and IS). The
interpretation of the data of the brown sample, however, is quite
complex and in some cases more than one interpretation might be possible.
The Raman spectra show that the structure of the brown sample changes
significantly at 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the He atmosphere. According to Ferrari
and Robertson (2000) the relative increase in the D peak in the spectra
indicates an increase in clustered aromatic rings in the material. Also the
five-curve fits of the spectra suggest that new small graphitic layers could
be formed during the 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> heating step. The TEM measurements
confirm the increase in ordering in the brown sample since the FWHM of
the electron diffraction maxima, e.g., at 4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, decreases when the
sample is heated. Consequently, an increase in domain size from 1.6 to 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be estimated for the original and heated brown sample,
respectively. The FWHM, i.e., the level of ordering and the domain size,
stays nearly constant over the subsequent cooling and reheating process in
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> atmosphere. Although the FWHM value,
the coherently scattering domain size and the layer distance at
870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reach nearly the same values as those of the black
sample, slight structural differences of the brown and black sample
are still present and can be, for example, related to the more perfect stacking of
graphene-like layers in the black sample.</p>
      <p id="d1e3656">Likewise, the wavelength dependence of the UV–VIS spectra of the brown
sample resembles the wavelength dependence of the black sample when the
sample is heated to 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in He. The Ångström exponent stays
constant during the subsequent heating steps in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">He</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3688">So all of the applied analysis techniques agree that the structure of the
brown sample resembles more or less the structure of the black
sample when the sample is heated to 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in He. All techniques
also show that the structure does not change further during the subsequent
heating steps.</p>
      <p id="d1e3703">For the last temperature step in the Helium phase (870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) the
results of the different measurement techniques applied in this study are
consistent among themselves. However, the findings for samples heated at
lower temperatures are somewhat contradictory: while the Raman spectra
change suddenly at 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in He and do not change significantly
during the preceding temperature steps (highest temperature 615 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
in He), the decrease in the wavelength dependence and the darkening (i.e.,
the laser signal in the EC–OC analyzer) occur during the whole heating
process. The change in the FWHM of the 4.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the electron
diffraction maximum and the formation of BC also occur continuously.</p>
      <p id="d1e3757">It is not unambiguously clear how the structural change proceeds during the
first three heating steps. The optical measurement techniques suggest a
continuous change, as the optical signals change continuously. The electron
diffraction patterns also imply a continuous change. On the other hand, the
Raman spectra clearly show that Raman sensitive structures do not change
significantly during the first three heating steps, which indicates that no
new graphene layers (i.e., a clustering of aromatics) are built. But the
weakening of the wavelength dependence indicates a decrease in the optical
band gap in the material, which might be due to an increasing size of
polyaromatic and graphene-like structures, i.e., larger conjugated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> molecular orbitals.</p>
      <p id="d1e3767">Oxygen and hydrogen can leave the sample at temperatures above
250 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in He (Petzold et al., 2013; Chow et al., 2004). The free
bonds could be incorporated in the remaining molecule and form conjugated
double bonds and increase aromaticity, which would lead to the observed
change in the UV–VIS spectra. Also oxygenated groups at the edges of the
molecules have effects on the optical behavior: a decrease in oxygen leads
to a darkening of the substance, i.e., weaker wavelength dependence. Both of
these changes would explain the optical behavior of the sample but would
not significantly affect the Raman spectra of soot.</p>
      <p id="d1e3782">Even though it is not unambiguously clear which differences in the
structures lead to the conflicting results, our findings indicate that
different physical–chemical processes occur at the lower temperatures in
comparison to the 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (He) step. This is consistent with the
findings of Yu and Yang (2002), who showed that the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of PC
in some cases is not constant during a single thermal analysis.</p>
      <p id="d1e3804">Overall we conclude that the most significant and at the same time
irreversible structural change of the pyrolyzed organic material in our
samples happens at 870 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in He in the measurement protocol used
here and that new graphene-like layers are built. We can only speculate,
however, on the causes of the continuous darkening of the sample during the
lower-temperature steps.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3823">Data can be accessed by contacting the corresponding author.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3829">TH performed the conceptualization of the experimental setup, all measurements except
TEM, the evaluation and interpretation of data and the preparation of the manuscript. CR performed the TEM measurements and wrote the TEM section. JCM contributed to discussions and provided input for TEM measurements.
LF provided cooperation regarding UV–VIS measurements and wrote part of the
UV–VIS methods section.
HG contributed to discussions, provided input for the Raman and UV–VIS measurements, and acquired funding.
RH performed the conceptualization, supervised, contributed to discussions, and provided extensive input
to the text.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <?pagebreak page3516?><p id="d1e3835">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3841">This work was supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), grant P26040. The integrating-sphere
technique was developed within the grant H-85/92
Hochschuljubiläumstiftung der Stadt Wien. We thank Karin Wieland for the
valuable advice for the Raman measurements.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3846">This research has been supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (grant no. P26040).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3852">This paper was edited by Pierre Herckes and reviewed by Darrel Baumgardner and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Adachi, K. and Buseck, P. R.: Changes of ns-soot mixing states and shapes in
an urban area during CalNex, J. Geophys. Res., 9, 3723–3730, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50321" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50321</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Adachi, K., Chung, S. H., and Buseck, P. R.: Shapes of soot aerosol particles
and implications for their effects on climate, J. Geophys. Res., D15,
6469, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012868" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012868</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Anderson, J. O., Thundiyil, J. G., and Stolbach, A.: Clearing the air. A
review of the effects of particulate matter air pollution on human health, J.
Med. Toxicol., 2, 166–175, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-011-0203-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s13181-011-0203-1</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3131–3148, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Arnott, W. P., Moosmüller, H., Fred Rogers, C., Jin, T., and Bruch, R.:
Photoacoustic spectrometer for measuring light absorption by aerosol.
Instrument description, Atmos. Environ., 17, 2845–2852, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00361-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00361-6</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Aryal, R., Terman, P., and Voss, K. J.: Comparison of Two Filter-Based
Reflectance Methods to Measure the Light Absorption by Atmospheric Aerosols,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 4, 923–929, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00131.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00131.1</ext-link>,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Birch, M. E. and Cary, R. A.: Elemental Carbon-Based Method for Monitoring
Occupational Exposures to Particulate Diesel Exhaust, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 3, 221–241, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829608965393" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829608965393</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Bladt, H., Ivleva, N. P., and Niessner, R.: Internally mixed multicomponent
soot. Impact of different salts on soot structure and thermo-chemical
properties, J. Aerosol Sci., 70, 26–35, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.11.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.11.007</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles, Wiley, New York, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C.: Spectral dependence of visible light absorption by carbonaceous
particles emitted from coal combustion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 4075–4078,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001GL013652</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light Absorption by Carbonaceous
Particles. An Investigative Review, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 1,
27–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500421521</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Bondy, A. L., Bonanno, D., Moffet, R. C., Wang, B., Laskin, A., and Ault, A. P.: The diverse chemical mixing state of aerosol particles in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12595–12612, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12595-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-12595-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Brown, R. J. C., Beccaceci, S., Butterfield, D. M., Quincey, P. G., Harris,
P. M., Maggos, T., Panteliadis, P., John, A., Jedynska, A., Kuhlbusch, T. A.
J., Putaud, J.-P., and Karanasiou, A.: Standardisation of a European
measurement method for organic carbon and elemental carbon in ambient air.
Results of the field trial campaign and the determination of a measurement
uncertainty and working range, Environ. Sci.-Pro. Imp., 10,
1249–1259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EM00261K" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/C7EM00261K</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Gelencsér, A., Tompa, É., and Pósfai,
M.: Ns-Soot. A Material-Based Term for Strongly Light-Absorbing Carbonaceous
Particles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 7, 777–788, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.919374" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2014.919374</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Cappa, C. D., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P.,
Worsnop, D. R., Bates, T. S., Cross, E. S., Davidovits, P., Hakala, J.,
Hayden, K. L., Jobson, B. T., Kolesar, K. R., Lack, D. A., Lerner, B. M.,
Li, S.-M., Mellon, D., Nuaaman, I., Olfert, J. S., Petäjä, T.,
Quinn, P. K., Song, C., Subramanian, R., Williams, E. J., and Zaveri, R. A.:
Radiative absorption enhancements due to the mixing state of atmospheric
black carbon, Science, 6098, 1078–1081, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1223447</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Cavalli, F., Viana, M., Yttri, K. E., Genberg, J., and Putaud, J.-P.: Toward a standardised thermal-optical protocol for measuring atmospheric organic and elemental carbon: the EUSAAR protocol, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 79–89, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-79-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-3-79-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, Y., Duan, F.-K., He, K.-B., Du, Z.-Y., Zheng, M., and Ma, Y.-L.:
Intercomparison of thermal-optical method with different temperature
protocols. Implications from source samples and solvent extraction,
Atmos. Environ., 453–462, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.066</ext-link>,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Chhowalla, M., Robertson, J., Chen, C. W., Silva, S. R. P., Davis, C. A.,
Amaratunga, G. A. J., and Milne, W. I.: Influence of ion energy and substrate
temperature on the optical and electronic properties of tetrahedral
amorphous carbon (ta-C) films, J. Appl. Phys., 1, 139–145,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.364000" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.364000</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>China, S., Mazzoleni, C., Gorkowski, K., Aiken, A. C., and Dubey, M. K.:
Morphology and mixing state of individual freshly emitted wildfire
carbonaceous particles, Nat. Commun., 4, 2122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms3122</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Chen, L.-W. A., Arnott, W. P., Moosmüller,
H., and Fung, K.: Equivalence of Elemental Carbon by Thermal/Optical
Reflectance and Transmittance with Different Temperature Protocols, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 16, 4414–4422, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es034936u" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es034936u</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Commodo, M., de Falco, G., Larciprete, R., D'Anna, A., and Minutolo, P.: On
the hydrophilic/hydrophobic character of carbonaceous nanoparticles formed
in laminar premixed flames, Exp. Therm. Fl. Sci., 73, 56–63,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.09.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.09.005</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page3517?><ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>Cuesta, A., Dhamelincourt, P., Laureyns, J., Martínez-Alonso, A., and
Tascón, J. M. D.: Raman microprobe studies on carbon materials, Carbon, 8,
1523–1532, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(94)90148-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0008-6223(94)90148-1</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>Deboudt, K., Flament, P., Choël, M., Gloter, A., Sobanska, S., and
Colliex, C.: Mixing state of aerosols and direct observation of carbonaceous
and marine coatings on African dust by individual particle analysis, J. Geophys. Res., D24, 833, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013921" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD013921</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>Després, V., Huffman, J. A., Burrows, S. M., Hoose, C., Safatov, A.,
Buryak, G., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Elbert, W., Andreae, M., Pöschl,
U., and Jaenicke, R.: Primary biological aerosol particles in the atmosphere.
A review, Tellus B, 1, 15598, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Dippel, B., Jander, H., and Heintzenberg, J.: NIR FT Raman spectroscopic
study of flame soot, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 20, 4707–4712, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/a904529e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/a904529e</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
EEA: Air Quality in Europe – 2017 Report, EAA report, Copenhagen, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Ess, M. N., Ferry, D., Kireeva, E. D., Niessner, R., Ouf, F.-X., and Ivleva,
N. P.: In situ Raman microspectroscopic analysis of soot samples with
different organic carbon content. Structural changes during heating, Carbon, 105,
572–585, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.056" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.056</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Fan, X., Wei, S., Zhu, M., Song, J., and Peng, P.: Comprehensive characterization of humic-like substances in smoke PM2.5 emitted from the combustion of biomass materials and fossil fuels, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13321–13340, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13321-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-13321-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>Ferrari, A. C. and Robertson, J.: Interpretation of Raman spectra of
disordered and amorphous carbon, Phys. Rev. B, 20, 14095–14107, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.14095" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevB.61.14095</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Fultz, B. and Howe, J. M.: Transmission electron microscopy and
diffractometry of materials, Physics and astronomy online
library, Springer, Berlin, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Gammer, C., Mangler, C., Rentenberger, C., and Karnthaler, H. P.:
Quantitative local profile analysis of nanomaterials by electron
diffraction, Scripta Materialia, 3, 312–315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.019</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Graber, E. R. and Rudich, Y.: Atmospheric HULIS: How humic-like are they? A comprehensive and critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 729–753, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-729-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Highwood, E. J. and Kinnersley, R. P.: When smoke gets in our eyes. The
multiple impacts of atmospheric black carbon on climate, air quality and
health, Environ. Int., 4, 560–566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.12.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2005.12.003</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Hitzenberger, R. and Tohno, S.: Comparison of black carbon (BC) aerosols in
two urban areas – concentrations and size distributions, Atmos.
Environ., 12, 2153–2167, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00480-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00480-5</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Hitzenberger, R., Petzold, A., Bauer, H., Ctyroky, P., Pouresmaeil, P.,
Laskus, L., and Puxbaum, H.: Intercomparison of Thermal and Optical
Measurement Methods for Elemental Carbon and Black Carbon at an Urban
Location, Environ. Sci. Technol., 20, 6377–6383, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es051228v" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es051228v</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Hoffer, A., Gelencsér, A., Blazsó, M., Guyon, P., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Diel and seasonal variations in the chemical composition of biomass burning aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3505–3515, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3505-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-3505-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Ichikawa, Y. and Naito, S.: Chemical Compositions of Primary PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Derived
from Biomass Burning Emissions, Ajae, 11, 79–95, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2017.11.2.079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5572/ajae.2017.11.2.079</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Clouds and
Aerosols. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen,
S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M.,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Ivleva, N. P., McKeon, U., Niessner, R., and Pöschl, U.: Raman
Microspectroscopic Analysis of Size-Resolved Atmospheric Aerosol Particle
Samples Collected with an ELPI. Soot, Humic-Like Substances, and Inorganic
Compounds, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 7, 655–671, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701376391" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820701376391</ext-link>, 2007a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Ivleva, N. P., Messerer, A., Yang, X., Niessner, R., and Pöschl, U.:
Raman Microspectroscopic Analysis of Changes in the Chemical Structure and
Reactivity of Soot in a Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment Model System, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 10, 3702–3707, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0612448" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0612448</ext-link>, 2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Jankowski, N., Schmidl, C., Marr, I. L., Bauer, H., and Puxbaum, H.:
Comparison of methods for the quantification of carbonate carbon in
atmospheric PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> aerosol samples, Atmos. Environ., 34, 8055–8064,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.012</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Jawhari, T., Roid, A., and Casado, J.: Raman spectroscopic characterization
of some commercially available carbon black materials, Carbon, 11,
1561–1565, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(95)00117-V" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0008-6223(95)00117-V</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Kim, J., Bauer, H., Dobovičnik, T., Hitzenberger, R., Lottin, D., Ferry,
D., and Petzold, A.: Assessing Optical Properties and Refractive Index of
Combustion Aerosol Particles Through Combined Experimental and Modeling
Studies, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 5, 340–350, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1020996" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2015.1020996</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Knauer, M., Schuster, M. E., Su, D., Schlögl, R., Niessner, R., and
Ivleva, N. P.: Soot Structure and Reactivity Analysis by Raman
Microspectroscopy, Temperature-Programmed Oxidation, and High-Resolution
Transmission Electron Microscopy, J. Phys. Chem. A, 50, 13871–13880, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp905639d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/jp905639d</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Kubelka, P. and Munk, F.: Ein Beitrag zur Optik der Farbanstriche,
Zeitschrift für Technische Physik, 12, 593–601, 1931.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Mamakos, A., Khalek, I., Giannelli, R., and Spears, M.: Characterization of
Combustion Aerosol Produced by a Mini-CAST and Treated in a Catalytic
Stripper, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 8, 927–936, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.802762" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2013.802762</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Mayol-Bracero, O. L.: Water-soluble organic compounds in biomass burning
aerosols over Amazonia 2. Apportionment of the chemical composition and
importance of the polyacidic fraction, J. Geophys. Res., D20, 995, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000522" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000522</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>McNeill, V. F.: Atmospheric Aerosols. Clouds, Chemistry, and Climate, Annu.
Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng., 1, 427–444, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101538" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101538</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Mesquita, S. R., van Drooge, B. L., Dall'Osto, M., Grimalt, J. O., Barata,
C., Vieira, N., Guimarães, L., and Piña, B.: Toxic<?pagebreak page3518?> potential of
organic constituents of submicron particulate matter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in an urban road
site (Barcelona), Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 18, 15406–15415, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9201-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11356-017-9201-4</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Moore, R. H., Ziemba, L. D., Dutcher, D., Beyersdorf, A. J., Chan, K.,
Crumeyrolle, S., Raymond, T. M., Thornhill, K. L., Winstead, E. L., and
Anderson, B. E.: Mapping the Operation of the Miniature Combustion Aerosol
Standard (Mini-CAST) Soot Generator, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 5,
467–479, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.890694" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2014.890694</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Moosmüller, H., Arnott, W. P., Rogers, C. F., Chow, J. C., Frazier, C.
A., Sherman, L. E., and Dietrich, D. L.: Photoacoustic and filter
measurements related to aerosol light absorption during the Northern Front
Range Air Quality Study (Colorado 1996/1997), J. Geophys. Res., D21,
28149–28157, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02618" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD02618</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Müller, K., Spindler, G., Maenhaut, W., Hitzenberger, R., Wieprecht, W.,
Baltensperger, U., and ten Brink, H.: INTERCOMP2000, a campaign to assess the
comparability of methods in use in Europe for measuring aerosol composition,
Atmos. Environ., 38, 6459–6466, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.031</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Okada, K. and Hitzenberger, R. M.: Mixing properties of individual
submicrometer aerosol particles in Vienna, Atmos. Environ., 32,
5617–5628, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00126-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00126-1</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Panteliadis, P., Hafkenscheid, T., Cary, B., Diapouli, E., Fischer, A., Favez, O., Quincey, P., Viana, M., Hitzenberger, R., Vecchi, R., Saraga, D., Sciare, J., Jaffrezo, J. L., John, A., Schwarz, J., Giannoni, M., Novak, J., Karanasiou, A., Fermo, P., and Maenhaut, W.: ECOC comparison exercise with identical thermal protocols after temperature offset correction – instrument diagnostics by in-depth evaluation of operational parameters, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 779–792, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-779-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-779-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Park, S. S. and Yu, J.: Chemical and light absorption properties of
humic-like substances from biomass burning emissions under controlled
combustion experiments, Atmos. Environ., 136, 114–122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.022</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Park, S., Son, S.-C., and Lee, S.: Characterization, sources, and light
absorption of fine organic aerosols during summer and winter at an urban
site, Atmos. Res., 213, 370–380, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.06.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.06.017</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Partanen, A.-I., Landry, J.-S., and Matthews, H. D.: Climate and health
implications of future aerosol emission scenarios, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 024028,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa511" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/aaa511</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U., Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Recommendations for reporting “black carbon” measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8365–8379, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Pöschl, U.: Atmospheric Aerosols. Composition, Transformation, Climate
and Health Effects, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 46, 7520–7540, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/anie.200501122</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Pratt, K. A. and Prather, K. A.: Aircraft measurements of vertical profiles
of aerosol mixing states, J. Geophys. Res., D11, 3131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013150" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013150</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Reisinger, P., Wonaschütz, A., Hitzenberger, R., Petzold, A., Bauer, H.,
Jankowski, N., Puxbaum, H., Chi, X., and Maenhaut, W.: Intercomparison of
Measurement Techniques for Black or Elemental Carbon Under Urban Background
Conditions in Wintertime. Influence of Biomass Combustion, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 3, 884–889, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0715041" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es0715041</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Robertson, J. and O'Reilly, E. P.: Electronic and atomic structure of amorphous carbon, Phys. Rev. B, 6, 2946–2957, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.35.2946" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1103/PhysRevB.35.2946</ext-link>, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Rohr, A. and McDonald, J.: Health effects of carbon-containing particulate
matter. Focus on sources and recent research program results, Crit.
Rev. Toxicol., 2, 97–137, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2015.1107024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3109/10408444.2015.1107024</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Rosen, H. and Novakov, T.: Identification of primary particulate carbon and
sulfate species by Raman spectroscopy, Atmos. Environ., 12,
923–927, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(78)90031-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0004-6981(78)90031-8</ext-link>, 1978.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Sadezky, A., Muckenhuber, H., Grothe, H., Niessner, R., and Pöschl, U.:
Raman microspectroscopy of soot and related carbonaceous materials. Spectral
analysis and structural information, Carbon, 8, 1731–1742, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Schmid, J., Grob, B., Niessner, R., and Ivleva, N. P.: Multiwavelength Raman
Microspectroscopy for Rapid Prediction of Soot Oxidation Reactivity, Anal.
Chem., 4, 1173–1179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac102939w" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac102939w</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Schmidl, C., Bauer, H., Dattler, A., Hitzenberger, R., Weissenboeck, G.,
Marr, I. L., and Puxbaum, H.: Chemical characterisation of particle emissions
from burning leaves, Atmos. Environ., 40, 9070–9079, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.010</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Fahey, D. W., Thomson, D. S., Watts, L. A.,
Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Darbeheshti, M., Baumgardner, D. G., Kok, G.
L., Chung, S. H., Schulz, M., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A., Kärcher, B.,
Slowik, J. G., Rosenlof, K. H., Thompson, T. L., Langford, A. O.,
Loewenstein, M., and Aikin, K. C.: Single-particle measurements of
midlatitude black carbon and light-scattering aerosols from the boundary
layer to the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., D16, 2845, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007076</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Sedlacek, A. J., Onasch, T. B., Nichman, L., Lewis, E. R., Davidovits, P.,
Freedman, A., and Williams, L.: Formation of refractory black carbon by
SP2-induced charring of organic aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 12,
1345–1350, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1531107" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2018.1531107</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Stadelmann, P.: Java Electron Microscopy Software JEMS, available at:
<uri>https://cime.epfl.ch/</uri> (last access: 7 June 2019), 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Stephens, M., Turner, N., and Sandberg, J.: Particle identification by
laser-induced incandescence in a solid-state laser cavity, Appl. Optics, 19,
3726, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.003726" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.42.003726</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Sun, H., Biedermann, L., and Bond, T. C.: Color of brown carbon. A model for
ultraviolet and visible light absorption by organic carbon aerosol, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 17, 3131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029797" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GL029797</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Sun, J., Zhi, G., Hitzenberger, R., Chen, Y., Tian, C., Zhang, Y., Feng, Y., Cheng, M., Zhang, Y., Cai, J., Chen, F., Qiu, Y., Jiang, Z., Li, J., Zhang, G., and Mo, Y.: Emission factors and light absorption properties of brown carbon from household<?pagebreak page3519?> coal combustion in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4769–4780, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4769-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-4769-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Sze, S. K., Siddique, N., Sloan, J. J., and Escribano, R.: Raman
spectroscopic characterization of carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos.
Environ., 3, 561–568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00325-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00325-3</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Tuinstra, F. and Koenig, J. L.: Raman Spectrum of Graphite, J.
Chem. Phys., 3, 1126–1130, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1674108" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.1674108</ext-link>, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Venkatachari, P., Zhou, L., Hopke, P. K., Schwab, J. J., Demerjian, K. L.,
Weimer, S., Hogrefe, O., Felton, D., and Rattigan, O.: An Intercomparison of
Measurement Methods for Carbonaceous Aerosol in the Ambient Air in New York
City, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40, 788–795, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500380289" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500380289</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Wang, Y., Chung, A., and Paulson, S. E.: The effect of metal salts on quantification of elemental and organic carbon in diesel exhaust particles using thermal-optical evolved gas analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11447–11457, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11447-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-11447-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, J. G., Chow, J. C., and Chen, L. W. A.: Summary of Organic and
Elemental Carbon/Black Carbon Analysis Methods and Intercomparisons,
Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 5, 65–102, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>Wonaschütz, A., Hitzenberger, R., Bauer, H., Pouresmaeil, P., Klatzer,
B., Caseiro, A., and Puxbaum, H.: Application of the Integrating Sphere
Method to Separate the Contributions of Brown and Black Carbon in
Atmospheric Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1141–1146, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es8008503" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es8008503</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>Ye, Q., Gu, P., Li, H. Z., Robinson, E. S., Lipsky, E., Kaltsonoudis, C., Lee, A. K. Y., Apte, J. S., Robinson, A. L., Sullivan, R. C., Presto, A. A., and Donahue, N. M.: Spatial Variability of Sources and Mixing State of Atmospheric Particles in a Metropolitan Area, Environ. Sci. Technol., 12, 6807–6815, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.est.8b01011</ext-link>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>Yttri, K. E., Aas, W., Bjerke, A., Cape, J. N., Cavalli, F., Ceburnis, D., Dye, C., Emblico, L., Facchini, M. C., Forster, C., Hanssen, J. E., Hansson, H. C., Jennings, S. G., Maenhaut, W., Putaud, J. P., and Tørseth, K.: Elemental and organic carbon in PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: a one year measurement campaign within the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme EMEP, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5711–5725, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5711-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5711-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>Yu, J. Z., Xu, J., and Yang, H.: Charring Characteristics of Atmospheric
Organic Particulate Matter in Thermal Analysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36,
754–761, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es015540q" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es015540q</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, G., Bi, X., He, J., Chen, D., Lo Chan, Y., Xie, G., Wang, X., Sheng, G., Fu, J., and Zhou, Z.: Variation of secondary coatings associated with elemental carbon by single particle analysis, Atmos. Environ., 92, 162–170, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.018</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>Zhu, Y., Huang, L., Li, J., Ying, Q., Zhang, H., Liu, X., Liao, H., Li, N.,
Liu, Z., Mao, Y., Fang, H., and Hu, J.: Sources of particulate matter in
China. Insights from source apportionment studies published in 1987–2017,
Environ. Int., 115, 343–357, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.037" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.037</ext-link>,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>Zickler, G. A., Smarsly, B., Gierlinger, N., Peterlik, H., and Paris, O.: A
reconsideration of the relationship between the crystallite size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
carbons determined by X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy, Carbon, 44,
3239–3246, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.029</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Structural changes of CAST soot during a thermal–optical measurement protocol</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Thermal–optical measurement techniques are widely used to classify
carbonaceous material. The results of different methods for total carbon are comparable but can vary by  &gt; 44&thinsp;% for elemental carbon. One
major cause of variation is the formation of pyrolyzed carbon during the
heating process which occurs mainly in samples with a high amount of brown
carbon (BrC). In this study the structural changes of two different CAST (combustion aerosol standard) aerosol samples caused by the heating procedure in a thermal–optical
instrument were investigated with UV–VIS and Raman spectroscopy, the
integrating-sphere technique (IS) and transmission electron microscopy. All
analysis techniques showed significant structural changes for BrC-rich
samples at the highest temperature level (870&thinsp;°C) in helium. The
structure of the heated BrC-rich sample resembles the structure of an
unheated BrC-poor sample. Heating the BrC-rich sample to 870&thinsp;°C
increases the graphitic domain size within the material from 1.6 to 2&thinsp;nm.
Although the Raman spectra unambiguously show this increase in ordering only
at the highest temperature step, UV–VIS and IS analyses show a continuous
change in the optical properties also at lower temperatures. The sample with
a negligible amount of BrC, however, did not show any significant structural
changes during the whole heating procedure.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Adachi, K. and Buseck, P. R.: Changes of ns-soot mixing states and shapes in
an urban area during CalNex, J. Geophys. Res., 9, 3723–3730, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50321" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50321</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Adachi, K., Chung, S. H., and Buseck, P. R.: Shapes of soot aerosol particles
and implications for their effects on climate, J. Geophys. Res., D15,
6469, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012868" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012868</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Anderson, J. O., Thundiyil, J. G., and Stolbach, A.: Clearing the air. A
review of the effects of particulate matter air pollution on human health, J.
Med. Toxicol., 2, 166–175, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-011-0203-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-011-0203-1</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Andreae, M. O. and Gelencsér, A.: Black carbon or brown carbon? The nature of light-absorbing carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3131–3148, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3131-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Arnott, W. P., Moosmüller, H., Fred Rogers, C., Jin, T., and Bruch, R.:
Photoacoustic spectrometer for measuring light absorption by aerosol.
Instrument description, Atmos. Environ., 17, 2845–2852, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00361-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00361-6</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Aryal, R., Terman, P., and Voss, K. J.: Comparison of Two Filter-Based
Reflectance Methods to Measure the Light Absorption by Atmospheric Aerosols,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 4, 923–929, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00131.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00131.1</a>,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Birch, M. E. and Cary, R. A.: Elemental Carbon-Based Method for Monitoring
Occupational Exposures to Particulate Diesel Exhaust, Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 3, 221–241, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829608965393" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829608965393</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Bladt, H., Ivleva, N. P., and Niessner, R.: Internally mixed multicomponent
soot. Impact of different salts on soot structure and thermo-chemical
properties, J. Aerosol Sci., 70, 26–35, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.11.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2013.11.007</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Bohren, C. F. and Huffman, D. R.: Absorption and Scattering of Light by Small Particles, Wiley, New York, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C.: Spectral dependence of visible light absorption by carbonaceous
particles emitted from coal combustion, Geophys. Res. Lett., 21, 4075–4078,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013652" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013652</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light Absorption by Carbonaceous
Particles. An Investigative Review, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 1,
27–67, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bondy, A. L., Bonanno, D., Moffet, R. C., Wang, B., Laskin, A., and Ault, A. P.: The diverse chemical mixing state of aerosol particles in the southeastern United States, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 12595–12612, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12595-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-12595-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Brown, R. J. C., Beccaceci, S., Butterfield, D. M., Quincey, P. G., Harris,
P. M., Maggos, T., Panteliadis, P., John, A., Jedynska, A., Kuhlbusch, T. A.
J., Putaud, J.-P., and Karanasiou, A.: Standardisation of a European
measurement method for organic carbon and elemental carbon in ambient air.
Results of the field trial campaign and the determination of a measurement
uncertainty and working range, Environ. Sci.-Pro. Imp., 10,
1249–1259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EM00261K" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/C7EM00261K</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Buseck, P. R., Adachi, K., Gelencsér, A., Tompa, É., and Pósfai,
M.: Ns-Soot. A Material-Based Term for Strongly Light-Absorbing Carbonaceous
Particles, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 7, 777–788, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.919374" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.919374</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Cappa, C. D., Onasch, T. B., Massoli, P.,
Worsnop, D. R., Bates, T. S., Cross, E. S., Davidovits, P., Hakala, J.,
Hayden, K. L., Jobson, B. T., Kolesar, K. R., Lack, D. A., Lerner, B. M.,
Li, S.-M., Mellon, D., Nuaaman, I., Olfert, J. S., Petäjä, T.,
Quinn, P. K., Song, C., Subramanian, R., Williams, E. J., and Zaveri, R. A.:
Radiative absorption enhancements due to the mixing state of atmospheric
black carbon, Science, 6098, 1078–1081, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1223447</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Cavalli, F., Viana, M., Yttri, K. E., Genberg, J., and Putaud, J.-P.: Toward a standardised thermal-optical protocol for measuring atmospheric organic and elemental carbon: the EUSAAR protocol, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 79–89, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-79-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-79-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, Y., Duan, F.-K., He, K.-B., Du, Z.-Y., Zheng, M., and Ma, Y.-L.:
Intercomparison of thermal-optical method with different temperature
protocols. Implications from source samples and solvent extraction,
Atmos. Environ., 453–462, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.066</a>,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Chhowalla, M., Robertson, J., Chen, C. W., Silva, S. R. P., Davis, C. A.,
Amaratunga, G. A. J., and Milne, W. I.: Influence of ion energy and substrate
temperature on the optical and electronic properties of tetrahedral
amorphous carbon (ta-C) films, J. Appl. Phys., 1, 139–145,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.364000" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.364000</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
China, S., Mazzoleni, C., Gorkowski, K., Aiken, A. C., and Dubey, M. K.:
Morphology and mixing state of individual freshly emitted wildfire
carbonaceous particles, Nat. Commun., 4, 2122, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3122</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Chow, J. C., Watson, J. G., Chen, L.-W. A., Arnott, W. P., Moosmüller,
H., and Fung, K.: Equivalence of Elemental Carbon by Thermal/Optical
Reflectance and Transmittance with Different Temperature Protocols, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 16, 4414–4422, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es034936u" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es034936u</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Commodo, M., de Falco, G., Larciprete, R., D'Anna, A., and Minutolo, P.: On
the hydrophilic/hydrophobic character of carbonaceous nanoparticles formed
in laminar premixed flames, Exp. Therm. Fl. Sci., 73, 56–63,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.09.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2015.09.005</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Cuesta, A., Dhamelincourt, P., Laureyns, J., Martínez-Alonso, A., and
Tascón, J. M. D.: Raman microprobe studies on carbon materials, Carbon, 8,
1523–1532, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(94)90148-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(94)90148-1</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Deboudt, K., Flament, P., Choël, M., Gloter, A., Sobanska, S., and
Colliex, C.: Mixing state of aerosols and direct observation of carbonaceous
and marine coatings on African dust by individual particle analysis, J. Geophys. Res., D24, 833, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013921" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD013921</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Després, V., Huffman, J. A., Burrows, S. M., Hoose, C., Safatov, A.,
Buryak, G., Fröhlich-Nowoisky, J., Elbert, W., Andreae, M., Pöschl,
U., and Jaenicke, R.: Primary biological aerosol particles in the atmosphere.
A review, Tellus B, 1, 15598, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.15598</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Dippel, B., Jander, H., and Heintzenberg, J.: NIR FT Raman spectroscopic
study of flame soot, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 20, 4707–4712, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/a904529e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/a904529e</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
EEA: Air Quality in Europe – 2017 Report, EAA report, Copenhagen, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Ess, M. N., Ferry, D., Kireeva, E. D., Niessner, R., Ouf, F.-X., and Ivleva,
N. P.: In situ Raman microspectroscopic analysis of soot samples with
different organic carbon content. Structural changes during heating, Carbon, 105,
572–585, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.056" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2016.04.056</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Fan, X., Wei, S., Zhu, M., Song, J., and Peng, P.: Comprehensive characterization of humic-like substances in smoke PM2.5 emitted from the combustion of biomass materials and fossil fuels, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13321–13340, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13321-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13321-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Ferrari, A. C. and Robertson, J.: Interpretation of Raman spectra of
disordered and amorphous carbon, Phys. Rev. B, 20, 14095–14107, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.14095" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.61.14095</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Fultz, B. and Howe, J. M.: Transmission electron microscopy and
diffractometry of materials, Physics and astronomy online
library, Springer, Berlin, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Gammer, C., Mangler, C., Rentenberger, C., and Karnthaler, H. P.:
Quantitative local profile analysis of nanomaterials by electron
diffraction, Scripta Materialia, 3, 312–315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2010.04.019</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Graber, E. R. and Rudich, Y.: Atmospheric HULIS: How humic-like are they? A comprehensive and critical review, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 729–753, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-729-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Highwood, E. J. and Kinnersley, R. P.: When smoke gets in our eyes. The
multiple impacts of atmospheric black carbon on climate, air quality and
health, Environ. Int., 4, 560–566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.12.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.12.003</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hitzenberger, R. and Tohno, S.: Comparison of black carbon (BC) aerosols in
two urban areas – concentrations and size distributions, Atmos.
Environ., 12, 2153–2167, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00480-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00480-5</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Hitzenberger, R., Petzold, A., Bauer, H., Ctyroky, P., Pouresmaeil, P.,
Laskus, L., and Puxbaum, H.: Intercomparison of Thermal and Optical
Measurement Methods for Elemental Carbon and Black Carbon at an Urban
Location, Environ. Sci. Technol., 20, 6377–6383, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es051228v" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es051228v</a>,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hoffer, A., Gelencsér, A., Blazsó, M., Guyon, P., Artaxo, P., and Andreae, M. O.: Diel and seasonal variations in the chemical composition of biomass burning aerosol, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 3505–3515, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3505-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-3505-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Ichikawa, Y. and Naito, S.: Chemical Compositions of Primary PM<sub>2.5</sub> Derived
from Biomass Burning Emissions, Ajae, 11, 79–95, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2017.11.2.079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2017.11.2.079</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC: Clouds and
Aerosols. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of
Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, edited by: Stocker, T. F., Qin, D., Plattner, G.-K., Tignor, M., Allen,
S. K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., and Midgley, P. M.,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Ivleva, N. P., McKeon, U., Niessner, R., and Pöschl, U.: Raman
Microspectroscopic Analysis of Size-Resolved Atmospheric Aerosol Particle
Samples Collected with an ELPI. Soot, Humic-Like Substances, and Inorganic
Compounds, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 7, 655–671, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701376391" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820701376391</a>, 2007a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Ivleva, N. P., Messerer, A., Yang, X., Niessner, R., and Pöschl, U.:
Raman Microspectroscopic Analysis of Changes in the Chemical Structure and
Reactivity of Soot in a Diesel Exhaust Aftertreatment Model System, Environ.
Sci. Technol., 10, 3702–3707, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0612448" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0612448</a>, 2007b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Jankowski, N., Schmidl, C., Marr, I. L., Bauer, H., and Puxbaum, H.:
Comparison of methods for the quantification of carbonate carbon in
atmospheric PM<sub>10</sub> aerosol samples, Atmos. Environ., 34, 8055–8064,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.06.012</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Jawhari, T., Roid, A., and Casado, J.: Raman spectroscopic characterization
of some commercially available carbon black materials, Carbon, 11,
1561–1565, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(95)00117-V" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(95)00117-V</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Kim, J., Bauer, H., Dobovičnik, T., Hitzenberger, R., Lottin, D., Ferry,
D., and Petzold, A.: Assessing Optical Properties and Refractive Index of
Combustion Aerosol Particles Through Combined Experimental and Modeling
Studies, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 5, 340–350, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1020996" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2015.1020996</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Knauer, M., Schuster, M. E., Su, D., Schlögl, R., Niessner, R., and
Ivleva, N. P.: Soot Structure and Reactivity Analysis by Raman
Microspectroscopy, Temperature-Programmed Oxidation, and High-Resolution
Transmission Electron Microscopy, J. Phys. Chem. A, 50, 13871–13880, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/jp905639d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/jp905639d</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Kubelka, P. and Munk, F.: Ein Beitrag zur Optik der Farbanstriche,
Zeitschrift für Technische Physik, 12, 593–601, 1931.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Mamakos, A., Khalek, I., Giannelli, R., and Spears, M.: Characterization of
Combustion Aerosol Produced by a Mini-CAST and Treated in a Catalytic
Stripper, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 8, 927–936, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.802762" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.802762</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Mayol-Bracero, O. L.: Water-soluble organic compounds in biomass burning
aerosols over Amazonia 2. Apportionment of the chemical composition and
importance of the polyacidic fraction, J. Geophys. Res., D20, 995, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000522" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000522</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
McNeill, V. F.: Atmospheric Aerosols. Clouds, Chemistry, and Climate, Annu.
Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng., 1, 427–444, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101538" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-060816-101538</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Mesquita, S. R., van Drooge, B. L., Dall'Osto, M., Grimalt, J. O., Barata,
C., Vieira, N., Guimarães, L., and Piña, B.: Toxic potential of
organic constituents of submicron particulate matter (PM<sub>1</sub>) in an urban road
site (Barcelona), Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 18, 15406–15415, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9201-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9201-4</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Moore, R. H., Ziemba, L. D., Dutcher, D., Beyersdorf, A. J., Chan, K.,
Crumeyrolle, S., Raymond, T. M., Thornhill, K. L., Winstead, E. L., and
Anderson, B. E.: Mapping the Operation of the Miniature Combustion Aerosol
Standard (Mini-CAST) Soot Generator, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 5,
467–479, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.890694" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2014.890694</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Moosmüller, H., Arnott, W. P., Rogers, C. F., Chow, J. C., Frazier, C.
A., Sherman, L. E., and Dietrich, D. L.: Photoacoustic and filter
measurements related to aerosol light absorption during the Northern Front
Range Air Quality Study (Colorado 1996/1997), J. Geophys. Res., D21,
28149–28157, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02618" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD02618</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Müller, K., Spindler, G., Maenhaut, W., Hitzenberger, R., Wieprecht, W.,
Baltensperger, U., and ten Brink, H.: INTERCOMP2000, a campaign to assess the
comparability of methods in use in Europe for measuring aerosol composition,
Atmos. Environ., 38, 6459–6466, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.031</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Okada, K. and Hitzenberger, R. M.: Mixing properties of individual
submicrometer aerosol particles in Vienna, Atmos. Environ., 32,
5617–5628, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00126-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(01)00126-1</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Panteliadis, P., Hafkenscheid, T., Cary, B., Diapouli, E., Fischer, A., Favez, O., Quincey, P., Viana, M., Hitzenberger, R., Vecchi, R., Saraga, D., Sciare, J., Jaffrezo, J. L., John, A., Schwarz, J., Giannoni, M., Novak, J., Karanasiou, A., Fermo, P., and Maenhaut, W.: ECOC comparison exercise with identical thermal protocols after temperature offset correction – instrument diagnostics by in-depth evaluation of operational parameters, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 779–792, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-779-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-779-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Park, S. S. and Yu, J.: Chemical and light absorption properties of
humic-like substances from biomass burning emissions under controlled
combustion experiments, Atmos. Environ., 136, 114–122, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.04.022</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Park, S., Son, S.-C., and Lee, S.: Characterization, sources, and light
absorption of fine organic aerosols during summer and winter at an urban
site, Atmos. Res., 213, 370–380, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.06.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.06.017</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Partanen, A.-I., Landry, J.-S., and Matthews, H. D.: Climate and health
implications of future aerosol emission scenarios, Environ. Res. Lett., 13, 024028,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa511" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa511</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Petzold, A., Ogren, J. A., Fiebig, M., Laj, P., Li, S.-M., Baltensperger, U., Holzer-Popp, T., Kinne, S., Pappalardo, G., Sugimoto, N., Wehrli, C., Wiedensohler, A., and Zhang, X.-Y.: Recommendations for reporting “black carbon” measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 8365–8379, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-8365-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Pöschl, U.: Atmospheric Aerosols. Composition, Transformation, Climate
and Health Effects, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 46, 7520–7540, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200501122</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Pratt, K. A. and Prather, K. A.: Aircraft measurements of vertical profiles
of aerosol mixing states, J. Geophys. Res., D11, 3131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013150" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013150</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Reisinger, P., Wonaschütz, A., Hitzenberger, R., Petzold, A., Bauer, H.,
Jankowski, N., Puxbaum, H., Chi, X., and Maenhaut, W.: Intercomparison of
Measurement Techniques for Black or Elemental Carbon Under Urban Background
Conditions in Wintertime. Influence of Biomass Combustion, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 3, 884–889, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es0715041" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es0715041</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Robertson, J. and O'Reilly, E. P.: Electronic and atomic structure of amorphous carbon, Phys. Rev. B, 6, 2946–2957, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.35.2946" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.35.2946</a>, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Rohr, A. and McDonald, J.: Health effects of carbon-containing particulate
matter. Focus on sources and recent research program results, Crit.
Rev. Toxicol., 2, 97–137, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2015.1107024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3109/10408444.2015.1107024</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Rosen, H. and Novakov, T.: Identification of primary particulate carbon and
sulfate species by Raman spectroscopy, Atmos. Environ., 12,
923–927, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(78)90031-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(78)90031-8</a>, 1978.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Sadezky, A., Muckenhuber, H., Grothe, H., Niessner, R., and Pöschl, U.:
Raman microspectroscopy of soot and related carbonaceous materials. Spectral
analysis and structural information, Carbon, 8, 1731–1742, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.018</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Schmid, J., Grob, B., Niessner, R., and Ivleva, N. P.: Multiwavelength Raman
Microspectroscopy for Rapid Prediction of Soot Oxidation Reactivity, Anal.
Chem., 4, 1173–1179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/ac102939w" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/ac102939w</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Schmidl, C., Bauer, H., Dattler, A., Hitzenberger, R., Weissenboeck, G.,
Marr, I. L., and Puxbaum, H.: Chemical characterisation of particle emissions
from burning leaves, Atmos. Environ., 40, 9070–9079, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.010</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Schwarz, J. P., Gao, R. S., Fahey, D. W., Thomson, D. S., Watts, L. A.,
Wilson, J. C., Reeves, J. M., Darbeheshti, M., Baumgardner, D. G., Kok, G.
L., Chung, S. H., Schulz, M., Hendricks, J., Lauer, A., Kärcher, B.,
Slowik, J. G., Rosenlof, K. H., Thompson, T. L., Langford, A. O.,
Loewenstein, M., and Aikin, K. C.: Single-particle measurements of
midlatitude black carbon and light-scattering aerosols from the boundary
layer to the lower stratosphere, J. Geophys. Res., D16, 2845, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007076</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Sedlacek, A. J., Onasch, T. B., Nichman, L., Lewis, E. R., Davidovits, P.,
Freedman, A., and Williams, L.: Formation of refractory black carbon by
SP2-induced charring of organic aerosol, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 12,
1345–1350, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1531107" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1531107</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Stadelmann, P.: Java Electron Microscopy Software JEMS, available at:
<a href="https://cime.epfl.ch/" target="_blank">https://cime.epfl.ch/</a> (last access: 7 June 2019), 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Stephens, M., Turner, N., and Sandberg, J.: Particle identification by
laser-induced incandescence in a solid-state laser cavity, Appl. Optics, 19,
3726, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.003726" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.42.003726</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, H., Biedermann, L., and Bond, T. C.: Color of brown carbon. A model for
ultraviolet and visible light absorption by organic carbon aerosol, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 17, 3131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029797" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL029797</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, J., Zhi, G., Hitzenberger, R., Chen, Y., Tian, C., Zhang, Y., Feng, Y., Cheng, M., Zhang, Y., Cai, J., Chen, F., Qiu, Y., Jiang, Z., Li, J., Zhang, G., and Mo, Y.: Emission factors and light absorption properties of brown carbon from household coal combustion in China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 4769–4780, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4769-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-4769-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Sze, S. K., Siddique, N., Sloan, J. J., and Escribano, R.: Raman
spectroscopic characterization of carbonaceous aerosols, Atmos.
Environ., 3, 561–568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00325-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00325-3</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Tuinstra, F. and Koenig, J. L.: Raman Spectrum of Graphite, J.
Chem. Phys., 3, 1126–1130, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1674108" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1674108</a>, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Venkatachari, P., Zhou, L., Hopke, P. K., Schwab, J. J., Demerjian, K. L.,
Weimer, S., Hogrefe, O., Felton, D., and Rattigan, O.: An Intercomparison of
Measurement Methods for Carbonaceous Aerosol in the Ambient Air in New York
City, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 40, 788–795, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500380289" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500380289</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Y., Chung, A., and Paulson, S. E.: The effect of metal salts on quantification of elemental and organic carbon in diesel exhaust particles using thermal-optical evolved gas analysis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 11447–11457, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11447-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-11447-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Watson, J. G., Chow, J. C., and Chen, L. W. A.: Summary of Organic and
Elemental Carbon/Black Carbon Analysis Methods and Intercomparisons,
Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 5, 65–102, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Wonaschütz, A., Hitzenberger, R., Bauer, H., Pouresmaeil, P., Klatzer,
B., Caseiro, A., and Puxbaum, H.: Application of the Integrating Sphere
Method to Separate the Contributions of Brown and Black Carbon in
Atmospheric Aerosols, Environ. Sci. Technol., 43, 1141–1146, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es8008503" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es8008503</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Ye, Q., Gu, P., Li, H. Z., Robinson, E. S., Lipsky, E., Kaltsonoudis, C., Lee, A. K. Y., Apte, J. S., Robinson, A. L., Sullivan, R. C., Presto, A. A., and Donahue, N. M.: Spatial Variability of Sources and Mixing State of Atmospheric Particles in a Metropolitan Area, Environ. Sci. Technol., 12, 6807–6815, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b01011</a>, 2018.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Yttri, K. E., Aas, W., Bjerke, A., Cape, J. N., Cavalli, F., Ceburnis, D., Dye, C., Emblico, L., Facchini, M. C., Forster, C., Hanssen, J. E., Hansson, H. C., Jennings, S. G., Maenhaut, W., Putaud, J. P., and Tørseth, K.: Elemental and organic carbon in PM<sub>10</sub>: a one year measurement campaign within the European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme EMEP, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5711–5725, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5711-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5711-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, J. Z., Xu, J., and Yang, H.: Charring Characteristics of Atmospheric
Organic Particulate Matter in Thermal Analysis, Environ. Sci. Technol., 36,
754–761, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es015540q" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es015540q</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, G., Bi, X., He, J., Chen, D., Lo Chan, Y., Xie, G., Wang, X., Sheng, G., Fu, J., and Zhou, Z.: Variation of secondary coatings associated with elemental carbon by single particle analysis, Atmos. Environ., 92, 162–170, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.04.018</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Zhu, Y., Huang, L., Li, J., Ying, Q., Zhang, H., Liu, X., Liao, H., Li, N.,
Liu, Z., Mao, Y., Fang, H., and Hu, J.: Sources of particulate matter in
China. Insights from source apportionment studies published in 1987–2017,
Environ. Int., 115, 343–357, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.037" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2018.03.037</a>,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Zickler, G. A., Smarsly, B., Gierlinger, N., Peterlik, H., and Paris, O.: A
reconsideration of the relationship between the crystallite size <i>L</i><sub>a</sub> of
carbons determined by X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy, Carbon, 44,
3239–3246, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.029</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
