<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-12-5363-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Free-fall experiments of volcanic ash particles using a 2-D <?xmltex \hack{\break}?> video disdrometer</article-title><alt-title>Free-fall experiments of volcanic ash particles</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Free-fall experiments of volcanic ash particles}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S.-H.~Suh et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Suh</surname><given-names>Sung-Ho</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Maki</surname><given-names>Masayuki</given-names></name>
          <email>maki@gm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Iguchi</surname><given-names>Masato</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Dong-In</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Yamaji</surname><given-names>Akihiko</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Momotani</surname><given-names>Tatsuya</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Environmental Atmospheric Sciences, Pukyong National
University, Nam-gu, Busan, Republic of Korea</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Research and Education Center for Natural Hazards, Kagoshima
University, Korimoto, Kagoshima, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Sakurajima Volcano Research Center, Disaster Prevention Research
Institute, Kyoto University, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Sakurajima, Kagoshima, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Japan Weather Association, Higashi-Ikebukuro, Toshima, Tokyo, Japan</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Masayuki Maki (maki@gm.kagoshima-u.ac.jp)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>9</day><month>October</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>12</volume>
      <issue>10</issue>
      <fpage>5363</fpage><lpage>5379</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>4</day><month>March</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>15</day><month>April</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>11</day><month>August</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>19</day><month>August</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Sung-Ho Suh et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e150">Information of aerodynamic parameters of volcanic ash particles, such as
terminal velocity, axis ratio, and canting angle, are necessary for
quantitative ash-fall estimations with weather radar. In this study,
free-fall experiments of volcanic ash particles were accomplished using a
two-dimensional video disdrometer under controlled conditions.</p>
    <p id="d1e153">Samples containing a rotating symmetric axis were selected and divided into
five types according to shape and orientation: oblate spheroid with
horizontal rotating axis (OH), oblate spheroid with vertical axis (OV),
prolate spheroid with horizontal rotating axis (PH), prolate spheroid with
vertical rotating axis (PV), and sphere (Sp). The horizontally (OH and PH)
and vertically (OV and PV) oriented particles were present in proportions of
76 % and 22 %, and oblate and prolate spheroids were in proportions of
76 % and 24 %, respectively. The most common shape type was OH (57 %).</p>
    <p id="d1e156">The terminal velocities of OH, OV, PH, PV, and Sp were obtained analyzing
2-D video disdrometer data. The terminal velocities of PV were highest compared to those of
other particle types. The lowest terminal velocities were found in OH
particles. It is interesting that the terminal velocities for OH decreased
rapidly in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, corresponding to the
decrease in axis ratio (i.e., smaller the particle, the flatter the shape).
The axis ratios of all particle types except Sp were found to be converged
to 0.94 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm.</p>
    <p id="d1e187">The histogram of canting angles followed unimodal and bimodal distributions
with respect to horizontally and vertically oriented particles,
respectively. The mean values and the standard deviation of entire particle
shape types were close to 0 and 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively,
under calm atmospheric conditions.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e208">Volcanic eruptions are considered one of the most severe types of natural
phenomena and can lead to human casualties and property damage. Ash
consists of very fine-grained fragments, their volume-equivalent spherical particle
diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in mm) is generally smaller than 2 mm, and they are generally
dominated by broken glass shards rather than crystal and lithic fragments.
Wilson et al. (2012) give an overview of the ash's effects on critical
infrastructure, including from ash fall and acid rain. Hilman et al. (2012)
investigate the effect ash particles have on human health in the case of Sakurajima's
volcanic eruptions. More comprehensive descriptions of volcanic ash's
impacts on society are found in Sigurdsson et al. (2015) and Wilson et al. (2015). Following an eruption, fine airborne volcanic ash flows for several
tens of kilometers, which can cause major problems by increasing aviation
traffic (e.g., Bonadonna et al., 2012; Langmann et al., 2012); this was seen
after the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull volcano in Iceland during the
period 14–21 April 2010; see, e.g., Bonadonna et al. (2011). From the
viewpoint of volcanological hazard reduction, accurate description of
transport and deposition in a numerical forecasting model of volcanic ash
clouds is vitally important (Poulidis et al., 2017).</p>
      <?pagebreak page5364?><p id="d1e218"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Terminal fall velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of a particle is affected by its shape,
density, size, and atmospheric properties. Wilson and Huang (1979), Dellino
(2005), and Coltelli et al. (2008) introduced the influence of ash particle
shapes on its <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Haider and Levenspile (1989) and Ganser (1993)
analyzed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of volcanic ash particles on the drag coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
which is dependent on particle shape and atmospheric condition.
Transport and sedimentation of volcanic ash are complex processes, and the
residence time and fall velocity of ash is critically dependent on particle
size (Bonadonna et al., 1998), where, with respect to the latter, smaller
particles could be flowing in the atmosphere further from the vent.</p>
      <p id="d1e266">Aerodynamic properties are important for safe aviation and for studying the
effects of volcanic ash on climate change, since these parameters determine
the residence time of ash particles in the atmosphere (e.g., Folch et al.,
2009). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of particles varies widely due to their irregular shapes
and material components (e.g., Wilson, 1972; Harris and Rose, 1983;
Bonadonna et al., 2011; Maki et al., 2016). Bonadonna et al. (2011) analyzed
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of volcanic ash particles with various particle densities (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from 990 to 2738 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and Maki et al. (2016) summarized the
list of various <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationships suggested by previous studies.
Volcanic ash particles have a range of shapes, and this presents a major
challenge when analyzing their characteristics. Recently, the irregularity
of volcanic ash particles was analyzed in detail based on the features of
various regular particles, such as cubes, cylinders, and disks (Bagheri and
Bonadonna, 2016), using a computed tomography (CT) scanner (Dioguardi et
al., 2017; Garboczi and Bullard, 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e325">There are two approaches to studying these aerodynamic properties. The first
approach is theoretical, where a numerical simulation model is used to
calculate terminal velocities, drag force, and Reynolds number (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>);
examples of this approach can be found in Happel and Brenner (2012). The
second approach is related to experimental research, in which the
aforementioned relationships are determined experimentally. For instance,
Bagheri et al. (2013) and Bagheri and Bonadonna (2016) analyzed the
aerodynamic features of irregularly shaped ash particles from the free-fall
experiments. Dioguardi et al. (2018) suggested a new model of fluid drag for
irregularly shaped particles using previous research. Since the
aerodynamic feature depends on atmospheric condition and it can affect the
retrieval of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, it could be suggested that it can be analyzed through
the free-fall laboratory experiments for the following main reasons: (1) there is little chance to measure natural falling ash particles, (2) it could be
possible to control the size of ash particle in the free-fall experiments,
(3) and it could reduce the wind effect in the experiments.</p>
      <p id="d1e350">The present study applies the second approach (experimental research) to
clarify the physical characteristics of volcanic ash particles analyzing the
experimental data. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2
describes the free-fall experiments of ash particles and methods of
analysis, Sect. 3 presents the results of the free-fall experiments,
Sect. 4 is discussion, and Sect. 5 summarizes the results.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Two-dimensional (2-D) video disdrometer</title>
      <p id="d1e368">The 2-D video disdrometer (2DVD) was developed by Joanneum Research (Graz,
Austria) to detect single raindrop particles, and the instrument has been
modified to cover the errors caused by turbulence effects (Nešpor et
al., 2000). The device is able to observe the shape, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
of a single particle using optical light. The ability to analyze a single
particle is a significant advantage compared to other disdrometers, such as
the Joss–Waldvogel disdrometer (Joss and Waldvogel, 1967), the Precipitation
Occurrence Sensor System (Sheppard, 1990), and Parsivel (Löffler-Mang
and Joss, 2000). For instance, Parsivel considers a fixed measurement area
without any consideration of particle shape (e.g., Tokay et al., 2014),
while 2DVD observes particles by passing them through a 100 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
observation area consisting of two light sources, i.e., reflecting mirrors and
two cameras, with one camera set 6.2 mm above the other and collecting data with a
resolution of 630 pixels; this results in a pixel size of 0.2 mm at 55 kHz
(Kruger and Krajewski, 2002). Particles passing through the observation area
yield shape information according to the radiation intensity of the light
sources, which is helpful for calculation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of particles is calculated using the height difference between the
two cameras. Based on these advantages, the oscillation and particle shape
of raindrops can be analyzed by 2DVD (Thurai and Bringi, 2005). Böhm
(1989) analyzed the aerodynamic properties of an irregular hydrometeor and
Huang et al. (2010, 2015) used 2DVD to analyze the features of irregularly
shaped snow. There have been few previous aerodynamic analyses of volcanic
ash particles performed using 2DVD, which is able to detect and analyze
volcanic ash particles with a range of irregular shapes. Thus, 2DVD offers a
unique approach as a new observation strategy.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e426">Accumulated contoured images of volcanic ash particles, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
measured by a two-dimensional video disdrometer (2DVD).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Definition of particle shape type</title>
      <?pagebreak page5365?><p id="d1e450">Volcanic ash particles have various shapes that can be detected by 2DVD
(Fig. 1). In the case of raindrops, the drop size distribution (DSD) is dependent upon the break-up
and coalescence processes occurring via up and downdrafts, since the forces
of gravity and buoyancy can easily affect raindrop shapes (Rosenfeld and
Ulbrich, 2003). However, solid particles do not readily change shape when
falling without the influence of forces such as collision. It is thus
inferred that many particle shapes would be found in the atmosphere, and
that it would be possible to define and classify each particle shape type if
we were able to accurately detect a single particle. Thus, the range of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for solid particles would be expected to be wide compared to that
of raindrops, and various values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> would likely be
observed. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of a particle is defined as the ratio of
height to width for the observation direction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and its representative
value is calculated using the geometric means of the two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) detected by cameras 1 and 2, respectively (Eq. 1):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M31" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Height</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>Width</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e595">The difference in angle between the rotating symmetric axis and vertical
axis is defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The counter-clockwise (clockwise) movement of
the rotating symmetric axis has a positive (negative) value and the entire
range is 180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) with
0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as the center.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e644">Conceptual model of an <bold>(a)</bold> oblate and <bold>(b)</bold> prolate spheroid with
the same canting angle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>W</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the
apparent (true) width and height of the particle, respectively.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the apparent (true) axis ratio.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e722">It is necessary to consider the true axis ratio (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to
correctly define the particle shape (Fig. 2). The apparent axis ratio
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) considers the effect of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> but the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
does not. The 2-D coordinates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the particle shape with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are
defined as follows:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align"><mml:math id="M47" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where subscript A is the coordinate of the original data coordinate
considering the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and subscript T is the modified data coordinate.
The symbol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the length from the data point to the center and the
symbol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the degrees of data coordinates from the
positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis, which range between 0 and 180<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. In
this paper, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> stands for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for convenience.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5366?><p id="d1e946"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>An objective criterion for particle shape type was considered since particle
shapes can be highly diverse and irregular (e.g., Bagheri and Bonadonna,
2016; Dioguardi et al., 2017, 2018; Garboczi and Bullard, 2017). In the case of irregular particles, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can change
according to the observation direction; however, any criterion should be
able to define the particle shape types strictly and reliably. To solve this
problem, particles with a rotating symmetric axis were the main target of
the present study. Therefore, we considered oblate spheroid (O), prolate
spheroid (P), and sphere (Sp), which all have a rotating symmetric axes.
Among these particle types, the major axes of the oblate and prolate
spheroids could be horizontally (H) and vertically (V) oriented with respect
to the ground, respectively. Thus, the various particle shapes were divided
into five types as follows; oblate spheroid with
horizontal rotating axis (OH), oblate spheroid with vertical axis (OV), prolate spheroid with horizontal rotating axis (PH), prolate spheroid with
vertical rotating axis (PV), and Sp.</p>
      <p id="d1e957">To define these particle shape types, a strict definition of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is required, which can be calculated from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. As with the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, the two <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values are automatically calculated by 2DVD. In
the case where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is assumed to be 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the rotating
symmetric axis for OH and PV can be defined, since it is observed for any
observation direction parallel to the ground. However, in the case of OV and
PH particles, the rotating symmetric axis cannot be defined when the
observation direction is parallel. In the case where the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is not
0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all particle shape types would not change
when oscillation occurs in a direction orthogonal to the observation
direction, but it is difficult to estimate both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
when particle oscillation appears in a direction parallel to the observation
direction. The ability to restore the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relative
to this observation direction is limited, which is one of the main
disadvantages of the 2-D observation strategy.</p>
      <p id="d1e1073">Based on these facts, a major <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was selected based on the following
reasoning: (i) a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the observation direction with lower (higher)
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for OH (PV) is selected. (ii) In the case of OV (PH), for
which the rotating symmetric axis was observed for only one observation
direction, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was considered where the value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> had a higher
(lower) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than that of the other observation direction.
Therefore, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with a lower (higher) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in two observation
directions for the case of an oblate (prolate) particle was considered a
meaningful value. The perfect sphere could not have their value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
determined theoretically because there is the possibility of a rotating
symmetric axis in any direction.</p>
      <p id="d1e1152">Based on the definition of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2), the perfect condition with
respect to ellipsoids is satisfied when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for OH and PV (OV and PH); these
values are defined as the center values. However, 2DVD calculated that the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for each particle shape type was concentrated around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) with respect
to horizontally (vertically) oriented particles, which correspond to OH and
PH (OV and PV). Furthermore, analysis of particles with an orthogonal center
angle from 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is difficult, since they have two center
angles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). To address observation errors and
enhance the convenience of analysis, all center angles were set to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and modified to give the
representative canting angle, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, using the following equation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex3"><mml:math id="M89" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the orienting angle, defined by the central angle
of oscillation. In the case of vertically oriented particles (OV and PV),
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could be defined as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The sign
of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> follows that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1374">Ash particle classification criteria.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="85.358268pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Classification</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">conditions</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Horizontal oblate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">OV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Vertical oblate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PH</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Horizontal prolate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="|" open="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Vertical prolate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sp</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sphere</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="|" close="|"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1757">After removing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, each particle shape was defined using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 1). Note that a 10 % bias range was allowed, to take
observational error into account. For example, a particle was considered
a sphere when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is an
applied 10 % bias range from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In addition, the
particle types OH and PV (OV and PH) were classified when the value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was smaller (larger)
than 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to consider particles with only a rotating
symmetric axis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Calculate the terminal velocity for the various particle shape types</title>
      <p id="d1e1858">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of volcanic ash is required to estimate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) on the ground where this depends on atmospheric density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and its shape. Kunii and Levenspiel (1969) developed a theoretical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
equation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M124" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <?pagebreak page5367?><p id="d1e2066">Later, Suzuki (1983) developed a theoretical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equation for tephra.
Bonadonna et al. (2011) then modified the theoretical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equation
suggested by Kunii and Levenspiel (1969) with observed ash data, which
implied that the result of the theoretical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equation could be
unsuitable for nonspherical particles. Based on these equations, various
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equations considering nonspherical particles were subsequently
developed. Tran-Cong et al. (2004) developed a new equation for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
using the function of circularity, and Hölzer and Sommerfeld (2008)
introduced a progressed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> equation considering two types of
sphericity: lengthwise (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and crosswise (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>⊥</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). This equation is as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M133" display="block"><mml:mtable columnspacing="1em" rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:msqrt><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>⊥</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2290">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M135" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the dynamic viscosity (kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), which we
assumed to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.983</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on atmospheric conditions at
a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Three types of sphericity were defined as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><label>5</label><mml:math id="M142" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where SA is the surface area of the particle (mm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The lengthwise
sphericity is defined as the ratio between the cross-sectional area of the
volume-equivalent sphere and the difference between half the surface area
and the mean of the projected vertical cross-sectional area (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the
particle (Eq. 6):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><label>6</label><mml:math id="M145" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SA</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">V</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2492">The crosswise sphericity is the same as the lengthwise sphericity, except
for the denominator, which includes the projected horizontal cross-sectional
area of the particle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), defined as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M147" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>⊥</mml:mo></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e2539">It is noteworthy that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is required to calculate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which refers to the final product. To solve this problem, the
theoretical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. 2) was used as the input value of Eq. (4) until Eq. (2) converged.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2587">The locations of tephrometers and Showa crater on Sakurajima, Japan. Black symbols indicate the locations of tephrometers, and the
star, square, and circle symbols correspond to data sets A, B and C–E,
respectively. The white circle symbol represents the location of Showa
crater.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Sakurajima</title>
      <p id="d1e2604">Japan has around 10 % (110) of all of the active volcanos in the world.
Sakurajima (1117 m.a.s.l, 31.58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 130.65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E,
Kyushu, Japan) is an active volcanic island formed around 13 000 yr ago,
and its tephra is approximately 60 %–66 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Peléan type
(Oguchi et al., 2009; Takahashi et al., 2013). The major eruptive events in the
historic age of Sakurajima were 1471–1476 (Bunmei era), 1779–1782 (An'ei
era), and 1914 (Taishō era). Sakurajima is an andesitic volcano with two
peaks (Kita-dake and Minami-dake). Volcanic activity at Kita-dake ended
around 4900 yr ago when it changed to Minami-dake. Activity has centered
on Showa crater from 2006 (Iguchi, 2013). Showa crater is located on the
eastern flank, approximately 500 m east of Minami-dake (southern peak) on
Sakurajima. It was appeared in 1939 after 1 month of eruptions (Yokoo and Ishihara, 2007). The Minami-dake summit crater was the
only active center of Sakurajima until the recommencement of Showa
crater from 1948 to 2006. The eruptive activity of Showa crater resumed
in June 2006, and vulcanian eruptions gradually increased in the autumn of
2009 (Hotta et al., 2016). The Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) reported
that the eruption frequency of Sakurajima would increase significantly from
2009, and the accumulated ash fall exceeded 3.5 kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Kagoshima
in 2012. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism
(MLITT) installed an operational X-band radar 10.7 km from the vent, as well
as 16 automatic volcanic ash weight measurements, to observe volcanic
eruptions in 2011 (Fig. 3).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2659">Real images of volcanic ash particles used in the present study.
The particles were classified as <bold>(a)</bold> 0.125 mm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, <bold>(b)</bold> 0.25 mm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, <bold>(c)</bold> 1 mm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, and <bold>(d)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2736">Information on the collected volcanic ash particles.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Data</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Collection date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Period of free fall</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Condition of free fall</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">experiment (18 June 2014)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1–31 December 2008</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10:00–12:34 (154 min)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Size by size (phi scale)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">B</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1–31 March 2010</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13:43–14:53 (70 min)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Size by size (phi scale)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">C</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">28 February 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">15:11–16:17 (66 min)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mixed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">D</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">31 March 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16:19–17:05 (46 min)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mixed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">E</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30 April 2014</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17:07–18:00 (53 min)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Mixed</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>Free-fall experiments</title>
      <p id="d1e2870">The data were collected by automatic volcanic ash weight measurements
performed on Sakurajima (Tajima et al., 2015;<?pagebreak page5368?> Maki et al., 2014, 2016). The free-fall experiments were divided into two types: one was
performed for each phi scale (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Φ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.125</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm) and the other was not considered on
a particle-size scale. The former data, expressed by A and B (Type 1), were
collected at two sites and screened by size (Fig. 4); the latter data,
expressed as C–E (Type 2), were collected at 18 sites (Table 2). Free-fall
experiments on collected volcanic ash particles were carried out in the
large-scale rainfall simulator of the National Research Institute for Earth
Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED) in Tsukuba, Japan. The collected
particles were dropped manually around 17 m from the ground and re-collected
by a third-generation 2DVD (Maki et al., 2016). Each sample was dropped for
30 s to stimulate dispersion, and the measurement period was 1 min. To
avoid wind effects including turbulence, the 2DVD was surrounded by a
3 m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> wind-breaking wall (Fig. 5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2941">Free-fall experiment conditions of volcanic ash particles on the
<bold>(a)</bold> outside and <bold>(b)</bold> inside of the wind-breaking wall covering the
disdrometers in the large-scale rainfall simulator of the National Research
Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2956">The free-fall experiments were conducted at intervals of 1 min over 6.5 h, as shown in Fig. 6. The number of particles detected by 2DVD was less
than 10 000 for 1 min, and the particle size range of the Type 1 data set was
proportional to its phi scale, since small particles may be contained by
screening.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5369?><p id="d1e2960"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Figure 7 shows the distribution of raw data (the number of data: 274 215)
for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. There were various <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, and most of the data were concentrated near <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values converged around 1 and their distributional
range decreased with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The median value with a 0.25 mm <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> interval
corresponded well to the center of the data contour. The median line
converged around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.935</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on the correlation coefficient
value (CC). When this was higher than 0.95 for each <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> interval, the data
converged. According to this condition, the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm was satisfied and the mean value was calculated using these data. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> had a wider range when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm but the median line
corresponded well to the center of the data (Fig. 7b). The line representing
the largest number of data is lower than the volcanic ash discussed by
Bonadonna et al. (2011). To select a available range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, a theoretical
terminal velocity equation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mtext>T,Ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for a non-sphere corresponding to
Eqs. (2)–(7) was used as the reference. The particle density associated with
the eruption of Sakurajima is between 2.43 and 2.59 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Oguchi et al., 2009), but the actual particles contain air vacuoles (Van
Eaton et al., 2012). This means that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> including vacuoles is
smaller than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> alone. Therefore, the minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was
considered to be 2.43 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and this was used as an input parameter.
The atmospheric conditions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were considered from an automatic
weather station (AWS), supported by the JMA. The falling height of a
particle, which followed the aforementioned conditions (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.935</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was lower than that under
the condition of the free-fall experiment (17 m) and it reached 90 % of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (13.9 m); therefore, the available data range is considered to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, and this would satisfy the terminal fall velocity. The detailed
equations used in the present study are shown in Appendix A.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3276">The 1 min interval time series of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the number of particles in
the free-fall experiment conducted at the NIED.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS6">
  <label>2.6</label><title>Quality control procedures</title>
      <p id="d1e3300">The 2DVD was originally developed to detect raindrop hydrometeors. For this
reason, additional quality control (QC) checks were deemed necessary to
ensure applicability to non-hydrometeors, such as volcanic ash particles.
Specifically, we performed the following three QC procedures for accurate
analysis of the data.
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>i.</label>
      <p id="d1e3305">Particle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm was selected in consideration of the
minimum spatial resolution of 2DVD.</p></list-item><list-item><label>ii.</label>
      <p id="d1e3321">If the major axis observed by 2DVD was 10 % longer than that of the
value calculated directly based on data coordinates, the data were
considered erroneous and thus removed. A 10 % bias range was considered
due to mathematical error, the irregular particle shape, and the limitation
of the spatiotemporal resolution of 2DVD.</p></list-item><list-item><label>iii.</label>
      <p id="d1e3325">To consider volcanic ash particles, the sample that satisfied the criteria in the chosen
range of the terminal velocity relationship was selected. If we consider a
single <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> QC measurements for the entire particle shape type, a number of
available data will be removed, since <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> critically depends on particle
shape. Therefore, we applied a 60 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> QC threshold (Jaffrain et al.,
2011) for each particle shape type. It could be applied once the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
relationship of volcanic ash particles is obtained. After selecting the
particle shape types and applying these two QC procedures (i and ii),
19.31 % of the data (62 953) remained (Table 1).</p></list-item></list></p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3374">Contour image of volcanic ash particles for <bold>(a)</bold> the axis ratio
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <bold>(b)</bold> terminal velocity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The solid red line is the averaged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> satisfying the condition that
the correlation coefficient exceeds 0.95. The solid grey line is the
relationship of volcanic ash particles suggested by Bonadonna et al. (2011).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Ash particle shape</title>
      <p id="d1e3430">The ash particle size over the entire volcanic ash sample was skewed
leftward, and the dominant particle shape type changed with particle size
(Fig. 8). The particles were predominantly horizontally oriented (75.51 %)
and vertically oriented (21.60 %). Oblate and prolate spheroids made up
76.26 % and 23.85 % of the particles, respectively. Hence, the particles
were mainly OH (57.38 %) or PH (15.88 %) (Table 2). The particles were
predominantly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm (63.00 %) or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm (32.80 %). Relatively few particles had <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm (4.20 %).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3479">Histograms of volcanic ash particles for <bold>(a)</bold> all particle types
and <bold>(b–d)</bold> each particle shape type of the phi scale. The grey-shaded and dark-grey-shaded (patterned) bars indicate horizontal oblate (OH) (vertical
oblate, OV) and horizontal prolate (PH) (vertical prolate, PV),
respectively. The black bar corresponds to spherical (Sp) particles. The
number on the top of each bar plot is the number of data points, and the number in
parentheses is the percentage for each phi scale.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3494">There was large variation in shape among particles <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, but the variation decreased with increasing <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. All of the
particle shape types had the largest number of particle at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm and the next largest were shown at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, except
for OH. In total, 95.80 % of OH particles had <inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm the value was 75.68 %, and at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–1 mm it was
22.36 %. In the cases of PH and OV, 93.63 % and 93.87 % of these
particles, respectively, had <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm. Beyond <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm,
the<?pagebreak page5370?> differences in the number of particles for each particle shape type were
considerably decreased.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3612">Distribution of <bold>(a)</bold> quartile and <bold>(b)</bold> median terminal velocity
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) values after applying the 60 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> QC threshold for all shape types and
each individual particle shape type, respectively. The solid grey line shows
the relationships of the volcanic ash particles suggested by Bonadonna et al. (2011).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Terminal velocity</title>
      <p id="d1e3657">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the entire particle shape types follows a polynomial
regression analysis that was applied to define the nonlinear relationship
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 9a). It corresponds to that obtained by Miwa et
al. (2015), who analyzed Parsivel data using the same laboratory experiments.
The inflection point of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm and it came
from an increase in the number of OH and a decrease in their <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm. As a result, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship for each particle
shape type can be seen clearly.</p>
      <p id="d1e3747">The observed values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were well classified by particle shapes (Fig. 9b). The highest values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were recorded in the following order: prolate,
sphere, and oblate. Vertically oriented particles had higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
than horizontal ones. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for every particle type can be expressed
in a power law form, except for OH. OH particles followed the regression
line relatively closely and showed the highest CC and root-mean-square
error (RMSE) values of 0.94 and 0.46 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Horizontally
oriented particles had relatively high correlations (OH: 0.94; PH: 0.87)
compared to those with a vertical orientation (OV: 0.75; PV: 0.71). The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationships and those of statistical parameters are summarized in
Table 3.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3821">Relationships of terminal velocity, with the number of data points,
the value of the correlation coefficient (CC), and the root-mean-square error
(RMSE), after applying the 60 % <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> QC threshold for each particle
shape type.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="160pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Type</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Data number (%)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Relationship (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mm) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">CC</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">RMSE</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">All</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">32 685 (100)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.51</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.69</mml:mn><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.56</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.22</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1" morerows="1">OH</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2" morerows="1">10 757 (33)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.40</mml:mn><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.77</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">0.94</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">0.46</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.96</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.53</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.75</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.85</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PH</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">8619 (26)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.09</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.87</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.74</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">PV</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3170 (10)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.47</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.71</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.96</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>

         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sp</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1444 (4)</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.61</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.56</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.91</oasis:entry>

         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.78</oasis:entry>

       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e4224">To verify the reliability of the particle data obtained by 2DVD, which was
originally developed to detect liquid raindrops, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as well as theoretical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values according to these parameters,
were analyzed. To calculate the parameters of interest, including the
surface area and cross-sectional area of irregular particles, we applied the
irregular particle volume estimation equations of Huang et al. (2010).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e4272">Same as Fig. 9 but for particle density (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Aerodynamic properties</title>
      <p id="d1e4300">Particle densities were estimated using the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ref</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, converged to 2.37 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm (Fig. 10a). This value corresponds well to
that of the minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (2.43 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) reported by Oguchi et al. (2009). The slight difference is likely due to observation errors and
the presence of vesicles (e.g., Seligman et al., 2016). The median value of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is changed to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, and this range
corresponds to that of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Horizontally oriented particles (OH and PH)
have relatively smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and vertically oriented particles (OV
and PV) have higher density (Fig. 10b); spheres have particle densities that
accord best with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values for all particle shapes
converged when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, and the converged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
ranged from 2.35 to 2.50 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e4472">Same as Fig. 9 but for Reynolds number (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and drag coefficient
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The solid grey and broken grey lines in <bold>(a)</bold> are the relationships of
spheres suggested by Clift and Gauvin (1971) and Stokes (1851),
respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4505">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the all particle shapes ranged from 10 to 4000 and
0.6 to 20, respectively (Fig. 11a). Higher values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed
when log(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.845</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); above this threshold,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dramatically decreased. These results were derived according to the
number of OH particles, which mainly had <inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm and had higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Particle shape was divided into two types: OH and
others (Fig. 11b). OH particles had higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the other
particle shapes, which in turn showed few differences among themselves. The
OH particles experience strong drag forces under the same flow conditions,
leading to lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The differences between OH and other particles
diminished with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The other particle shapes had relatively
higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3000</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Rong et al. (2015) analyzed the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for oblate and
prolate particles and showed that OH particles had higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared
to the reference line (Clift and Gauven, 1971) in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">400</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Each relationship is summarized in Fig. 11.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Axis ratio</title>
      <p id="d1e4740">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of a particle affects the backscattering power of
electromagnetic waves and is necessary to calculate the horizontal
reflectivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in dBZ), differential reflectivity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DR</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in dB), and
specific differential phase shift (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Note
that previous studies have analyzed the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution for raindrops
and snow, including hail; however, few studies have been reported on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of ash particles compared to those for hydrometeors.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e4817">Same as Fig. 9 but for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page5371?><p id="d1e4833">Figure 12 shows the quartiles and median values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for all
particle shapes and for each individual particle shape type. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
had a higher standard deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, which decreased and converged to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm (Fig. 12a). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> range converged to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
could be expressed as follows:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><label>8</label><mml:math id="M301" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.90</mml:mn><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e4978">The particles are more easily classified by shape than by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 12b). Every particle shape type was independent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, except for OH. The
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of each particle type is expressed via the following relationships
(Eqs. 9–12).

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M305" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>9</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn><mml:mtext>tanh</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.84</mml:mn><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.38</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>10</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OV</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E11"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>11</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PH</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.88</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E12"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>12</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">PV</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p id="d1e5094">The parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was calculated using the hyperbolic
tangent (tanh) for the following reasons: (i) its range<?pagebreak page5372?> of values was wider
than those of other particle types, (ii) its data distribution changed
continuously with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and (iii) it was present in a higher proportion
(30.44 %) compared to the other parameters. We found that variations in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the proportion of Sp shapes increased when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm. The particle types OV and PH showed a wide distribution
over <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, but the variability in
median values was relatively low. The relationships of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for each
particle shape type could be expressed by constant values at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (OH), 0.88 (PH), 1.15 (OV), and 1.24 (PV), respectively, and these
differences are around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e5225">Histograms of representative canting angle (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for
each particle shape type, including the data for all particles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Canting angle</title>
      <p id="d1e5254">Statistical analysis of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is required to understand the aerodynamic
properties of volcanic ash particles and the input parameters of T-matrix
scattering simulations to verify the observed radar variables. The
histogram of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in Fig. 13.</p>
      <p id="d1e5275">More than 95 % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values for each particle shape type were
concentrated in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as the center (Fig. 13). The
particles were symmetrically distributed around 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and more
than 50 % were concentrated in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The horizontally oriented <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
distribution was relatively narrow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and exhibited a unimodal distribution. It is
noteworthy that 90 % of OH particles were concentrated in the range
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
vertically oriented <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution was relatively broad <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and followed a
bimodal distribution. PV exhibited a bimodal form, but this was not
symmetrical around 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For spheres, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
distribution was narrower, similar to horizontally oriented particles, and
it had a bimodal distribution, similar to vertically oriented particles,
indicating that the independent features of both orientations were combined.</p>
      <p id="d1e5458">The values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for OH and PV (OV, PH) were 0
and 3.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.4, 13.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and 1.3 and 12.7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.2,
10.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively. OV (OH) had the highest (lowest)
value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This validates the
assumption of Marzano et al. (2012) under stable conditions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, we believe that
the tumbling phenomenon <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the particles under calm atmospheric conditions was
likely to be minor.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e5604">Distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for each particle shape
type including the data for all particles. The solid red line indicates the
standard deviation.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5631">To analyze the correlation between particle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, quartiles for
each particle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> interval were calculated (Fig. 14). The particles were
concentrated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> regardless of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and median values were stable when
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm for the entire particle shape types; however, fluctuation
increased with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 14a). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values gradually increased from 10 to 13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, and variability was greatest around the center
(13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). This increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would not be expected in the case of a relatively small number of particles
(Fig. 8a), since their standard deviation is largely maintained at about
13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> regardless of data set size.</p>
      <p id="d1e5779">Variability in the median values for individual particles was more apparent.
The values converged around 0<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> but fluctuation increased with
greater <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from the zero line. The median <inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">R</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values exceeded 3, 5,
10, and 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm,
respectively (Fig. 14b).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussions</title>
      <p id="d1e5888">The results of present study can be extended in viewpoint of the radar
meteorology: (i) the radar observation and (ii) ash-fall rate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
estimations. Weather radar operates for a similar purpose to that of
meteorological satellites, and provides information for determining the
volume, mass, and echo top height of weather systems. Short-duration
eruptions, i.e., less than 1 h, can be detected at high spatiotemporal
resolution, especially in the early period of an eruption. The temporal
resolution of weather radar is a few minutes for a single volume scan and
depends on the observation strategy and radar band. The spatial resolution
of weather radar is a few hundred meters and is proportional to the radar
frequency. A number of ash cloud detections were reported in several
observational cases in the US and Japan (Maki and Doviak, 2001; Maki et al.,
2012). Marzano et al. (2013) summarized 28 major explosive volcanic
eruptions detected by weather radars from 1970 to 2011. Harris and Rose
(1983) attempted to analyze volcanic ash particle size and total mass using
a C-band weather radar. Maki and Doviak (2001) proposed the method to
retrieve particle size distribution (PSD) from radar measurements of volcanic ash, and Donnadieu et al. (2012) detected volcanic eruptions using an L-band fixed radar. Marzano et al. (2006, 2012) and Maki et al. (2012, 2014) detected and analyzed volcanic
eruptions using weather radars from theoretical (physical) and experimental
(engineering) perspectives, respectively. Thus, observability of volcanic ash clouds using
weather radar can be confirmed from previous researches. To verify
radar-based volcanic ash cloud observations, a scattering simulation can be
considered. The basic parameters, axis ratio and canting angle, are the
results presented in this study and the input information of scattering
simulations used to simulate the theoretical radar variables. In particular, the
T-matrix scattering simulation developed by Waterman (1971)
is useful for
calculation of the theoretical backscattering power of nonspherical
particles.</p>
      <?pagebreak page5373?><p id="d1e5902">Second, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is one of the main parameters for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and is defined in terms of PSD and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as follows:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M370" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?>where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the particle volume ratio. In case of sphere, it is
considered <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e6057">Marzano et al. (2012b) proposed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationships using the ash-fall
concentration (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in g m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Maki et al. (2016) introduced
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship for Sakurajima eruption case (18 August 2013) using
the time integration of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) obtained by
automatic volcanic ash weight measurements. However, once we use a
disdrometer, such as 2DVD, it will be possible to estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> directly
since 2DVD can measure PSD, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, basic
parameters could help to simulate radar variables and estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
are necessary to develop the quantitative ash-fall estimation (QAE) method.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e6211">The basic parameters (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of volcanic ash
particles were analyzed from the free-fall experiments with 2DVD. Data were
collected with 18 automatic volcanic ash weight measurements performed on
Sakurajima, Japan (31.58<inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 130.65<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). To identify the aerodynamic properties of the volcanic ash particles in
the samples, a free-fall experiment was conducted in the large-scale
rainfall simulator of the NIED, and 274 215 samples were analyzed.</p>
      <p id="d1e6257">Radar variables are highly dependent on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, size,
and shape of particles. Particle types with rotating symmetric axes were
assumed to represent volcanic ash particles that have a wide variety of
irregular shapes. Their orientation was also considered with respect to
horizontally (OH, PH) and vertically (OV, PV) oriented oblate and prolate
spheroids.</p>
      <p id="d1e6275">The dominant particle shapes were comprised of horizontally and vertical oriented
particles and present in proportions of 75.51 % and 21.60 %, respectively.
Regarding particle shape, oblate (prolate) spheroids comprised 76.26 %
(23.85 %) of all particles in the samples. The most common particle shape
type was OH, accounting for 59 % of all particles when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm
and 69 % when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm. Overall, 95.80 %, 93.87 %, and
93.63 % of the OH, OV, and PH particles had <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm,
respectively.</p>
      <p id="d1e6314">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the particles were classified in the following order: PV, OV, Sp, PH,
and OH. These results are consistent with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ref</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which suggests
that 2DVD is reliable for observing volcanic ash particles under stable
weather conditions. A noticeable increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for OH in the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm occurred through an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>; this
was not observed for other particle types.</p>
      <p id="d1e6379">The estimated <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> converged to 2.37 g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, and the median value changed over the range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm. The converged value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is consistent with
the value for Sakurajima reported by Oguchi et al. (2009). The
relationship of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were divided into two particle type
categories (OH and the others) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>(OH) was dramatically increased in
the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These results were derived from the particle
concentration of OH, which was highest when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm; at this
threshold, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was higher and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi>e</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was lower. The range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm was informed by both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e6570">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> decreased in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm
to 0.15 and converged to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.94</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Maki et al. (2014) introduced
the radar variables and found that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DR</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gradually increased with time;
the dominant values at 10 and 18 min after the eruption were close to 1 and
2 dB, respectively. The results presented in this study corresponded to
volcanic eruption clouds with positive <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DR</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> since it is a function of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Herzegh and Jameson, 1992). In
addition, it can be explained by using the results of present study, that the size sorting of ash particle (e.g.,
Beckett et al., 2015; Stevenson et al., 2015) will affect the increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DR</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e6664">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of OV particles with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was largest (13.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) among all particle
types and OH particles had the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 3.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Based on the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> results, the tumbling phenomenon would not be dominant under calm
atmospheric conditions. The quartiles were stable when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm for
the entire particle shape types but increased with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was higher when <inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm and started to converge
around 13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> due to a decrease in the number of OH particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e6805">These results could be the essential information to develop the new
approaches for detecting non-hydrometeors and numerical model. The axis
ratio and canting angle of ash particles obtained from the present study are
necessary for scattering simulations. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained by the present study
suggests that smaller particles can be transported over longer distances.
Therefore, it will be useful for scattering simulation of ash particles to
develop QAE and help to improve the numerical model using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">T</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained by
the present study.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6834">The data obtained by 2DVD from the free-fall experiments are available on request from Masayuki Maki.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><app-group>

<?pagebreak page5377?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title>Appendix A</title>
      <p id="d1e6848">The theoretical fall velocity and falling distance with time are calculated
as follows:

              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M438" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S1.E14"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>A1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S1.E15"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>A2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="App1.Ch1.S1.E16"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>A3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">DA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is universal gravitation, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is drag force, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is mass,
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mi>a</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the free-fall acceleration. In Eq. (A2), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the acceleration due to
gravity, considered to be 9.81 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">D</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (A3)
correspond to the values in Eqs. (2)–(7). The symbols <inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ρ</mml:mi><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
are the dynamic viscosity and density of the atmosphere and were assumed to be
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.837</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.194</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. The results were based on conditions at
an atmospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
      <p id="d1e7127">To ensure accuracy, we considered the surface roughness effect of a volcanic
ash particle (1.07<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) on the fall velocity, as suggested by Bagheri and
Bonadonna (2016), and the results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm are shown in Fig. A1.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{th!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F15"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e7156">Theoretical <bold>(a)</bold> fall velocity and <bold>(b)</bold> falling height for a
spheroid with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, considering the surface roughness coefficient of
the volcanic ash particle (1.07<inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) relative to its fall velocity
(Bagheri and Bonadonna, 2016).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/12/5363/2019/amt-12-5363-2019-f15.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e7201">MI and MM designed the study. AY and
TM collected the samples and performed the free-fall
experiment. SHS modified the original study topic and performed the
study. MM and SHS performed research, obtained the
results, and prepared the manuscript, along with contributions from all of the
co-authors. DIL examined the results and checked the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e7207">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e7213">The 2DVD data were provided by MEXT, Japan. We also thank the NIED for use of their large-rainfall simulator.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e7218">This work was supported by a grant-in aid for JSPS KAKENHI (grant number
JP16H03145) and partially supported by a DPRI collaborative research grant
(Kyoto University grant no. 25G-11).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e7224">This paper was edited by Alexander Kokhanovsky and reviewed by Masayuki Oishi and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bagheri, G., Bonadonna, C., Manzella, I., Pontelandolfo, P., and Haas, P.:
Dedicated vertical wind tunnel for the study of sedimentation of
non-spherical particles, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 84, 054501, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4805019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.4805019</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bagheri, G. and Bonadonna, C.: On the drag of freely falling non-spherical
particles, Powder Technol., 301, 526–544, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Beckett, F., Witham, C., Hort, M., Stevenson, J., Bonadonna, C., and
Millington, S.: Sensitivity of dispersion model forecasts of volcanic ash
clouds to the physical characteristics of the particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 11636–11652, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023609" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023609</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bonadonna, C., Ernst, G., and Sparks, R.: Thickness variations and volume
estimates of tephra fall deposits: the importance of particle Reynolds
number, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 81, 173–187, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bonadonna, C., Genco, R., Gouhier, M., Pistolesi, M., Cioni, R., Alfano, F.,
Hoskuldsson, A., and Ripepe, M.: Tephra sedimentation during the 2010
Eyjafjallajökull eruption (Iceland) from deposit, radar, and satellite
observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,
116, B12202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008462" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JB008462</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bonadonna, C., Folch, A., Loughlin, S., and Puempel, H.: Future developments
in modelling and monitoring of volcanic ash clouds: outcomes from the first
IAVCEI-WMO workshop on Ash Dispersal Forecast and Civil Aviation, B. Volcanol., 74, 1–10, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Böhm, H. P.: A general equation for the terminal fall speed of solid
hydrometeors, J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 2419–2427, 1989.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Clift, R. and Gauvin, W.: Motion of particles in turbulent gas streams,
Brit. Chem. Eng. Pr. Tec., 16, 439–448, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Coltelli, M., Miraglia, L., and Scollo, S.: Characterization of shape and
terminal velocity of tephra particles erupted during the 2002 eruption of
Etna volcano, Italy, B. Volcanol., 70, 1103–1112, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Del Bello, E., Taddeucci, J., Vitturi, M. d. M., Scarlato, P., Andronico,
D., Scollo, S., Kueppers, U., and Ricci, T.: Effect of particle volume
fraction on the settling velocity of volcanic ash particles: insights from
joint experimental and numerical simulations, Sci. Rep., 7, 39620, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39620" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep39620</ext-link>,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dellino, P., Mele, D., Bonasia, R., Braia, G., La Volpe, L., and Sulpizio,
R.: The analysis of the influence of pumice shape on its terminal velocity,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L21306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023954" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL023954</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dioguardi, F., Mele, D., Dellino, P., and Dürig, T.: The terminal
velocity of volcanic particles with shape obtained from 3-D X-ray
microtomography, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 329, 41–53,
2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dioguardi, F., Mele, D., and Dellino, P.: A New One-Equation Model of Fluid
Drag for Irregularly Shaped Particles Valid Over a Wide Range of Reynolds
Number, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 123, 144–156, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Donnadieu, F.: Volcanological applications of Doppler radars: A review and
examples from a transportable pulse radar in L-band, INTECH Open Access
Publisher, 409–446, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Folch, A., Costa, A., and Macedonio, G.: FALL3D: A computational model for
transport and deposition of volcanic ash, Comput. Geosci., 35,
1334–1342, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ganser, G. H.: A rational approach to drag prediction of spherical and
nonspherical particles, Powder Technol., 77, 143–152, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Garboczi, E. and Bullard, J.: 3D analytical mathematical models of random
star-shape particles via a combination of X-ray computed microtomography and
spherical harmonic analysis, Adv. Powder Technol., 28, 325–339, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Haider, A. and Levenspiel, O.: Drag coefficient and terminal velocity of
spherical and nonspherical particles, Powder Technol., 58, 63–70, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Happel, J. and Brenner, H.: Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics: with special
applications to particulate media, Springer Science &amp; Business Media,
1–543, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Harris, D. M. and Rose, W. I.: Estimating particle sizes, concentrations,
and total mass of ash in volcanic clouds using weather radar, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 88, 10969–10983, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Herzegh, P. H. and Jameson, A. R.: Observing precipitation through
dual-polarization radar measurements, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 73, 1365–1376, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hotta, K., Iguchi, M., and Tameguri, T.: Rapid dike intrusion into
Sakurajima volcano on August 15, 2015, as detected by multi-parameter ground
deformation observations, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 68,  1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0450-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s40623-016-0450-0</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hölzer, A. and Sommerfeld, M.: New simple correlation formula for the
drag coefficient of non-spherical particles, Powder Technol., 184,
361–365, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, G.-J., Bringi, V., Cifelli, R., Hudak, D., and Petersen, W.: A
methodology to derive radar reflectivity-liquid equivalent snow rate
relations using C-band radar and a 2-D video disdrometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 27, 637–651, 2010.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Huang, G.-J., Bringi, V., Moisseev, D., Petersen, W. A., Bliven, L., and
Hudak, D.: Use of 2-D-video disdrometer to derive mean density-size and Ze–SR relations: Four snow cases from the light precipitation validation
experiment, Atmos. Res., 153, 34–48, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Iguchi, M.: Magma Movement from the Deep to Shallow Sakurajima Volcano as
Revealed by Geophysical Observations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Special Section <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> Sakurajima Special Issue), Bulletin of the Volcanological Society of Japan,
58, 1–18, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jaffrain, J., Studzinski, A., and Berne, A.: A network of disdrometers to
quantify the small-scale variability of the raindrop size distribution,
Water Resour. Res., 47, 1–8, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009872" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010WR009872</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Joss, J. and Waldvogel A.: A spectrograph for the automatic analysis of
raindrops, Pure Appl. Geophys., 69, 240–246, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kruger, A. and Krajewski, W. F.: Two-dimensional video disdrometer: A
description, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 19, 602–617,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kunii, D. and Levenspiel, O.: Fluidization Engineering, John Wiley, 8, 44–45,
1969.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Langmann, B., Folch, A., Hensch, M., and Matthias, V.: Volcanic ash over
Europe during the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull on Iceland, April–May
2010, Atmos. Environ., 48, 1–8, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Löffler-Mang, M. and Joss. J: An optical disdrometer for measuring size
and velocity of hydrometeors, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech.,
17, 130–139, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Maki, M. and Doviak, R.: Volcanic ash size distribution determined by
weather radar, 1810–1811, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Maki, M., Maesaka, T., Kozono, T., Nagai, M., Furukawa, R., Nakada, S.,
Koshida, T., and Takenaka, H.: Quantitative volcanic ash estimation by
operational polarimetric weather radar, The 9th International Symposium on Tropospheric Profiling, L'Aquila, Italy, September 2012, ISBN 978-90-815839-4-7, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Maki, M., Maesaka, T., Muraji, Y., and Suzuki, I.: Statistical analysis of
volcanic ash measured by X-band polarimetric radar,  8th European Conference on Radar in Meteorology and Hydrology, 15 September, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Maki, M., Iguchi, M., Maesaka, T., Miwa, T., Tanada, T., Kozono, T.,
Momotani, T., Yamaji, A., and Kakimoto, I.: Preliminary results of weather
radar observations of sakurajima volcanic smoke, J. Disaster
Res., 11, 15–30, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Marzano, F. S., Barbieri, S., Vulpiani, G., and Rose, W. I.: Volcanic ash
cloud retrieval by ground-based microwave weather radar, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 44, 3235–3246, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Marzano, F. S., Picciotti, E., Vulpiani, G., and Montopoli, M.: Synthetic
signatures of volcanic ash cloud particles from X-band dual-polarization
radar, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 50, 193–211,
2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Marzano, F. S., Picciotti, E., Montopoli, M., and Vulpiani, G.: Inside
volcanic clouds: Remote sensing of ash plumes using microwave weather
radars, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1567–1586,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nešpor, V., Krajewski, W. F., and Kruger, A.: Wind-induced error of
raindrop size distribution measurement using a two-dimensional video
disdrometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 17, 1483–1492,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Oguchi, T., Udagawa, M., Nanba, N., Maki, M., and Ishimine, Y.: Measurements
of dielectric constant of volcanic ash erupted from five volcanoes in Japan,
IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 47, 1089–1096, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Poulidis, A. P., Takemi, T., Iguchi, M., and Renfrew, I. A.: Orographic
effects on the transport and deposition of volcanic ash: A case study of
Mount Sakurajima, Japan, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122,
9332–9350, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rong, L., Zhou, Z., and Yu, A.: Lattice–Boltzmann simulation of fluid flow
through packed beds of uniform ellipsoids, Powder Technol., 285, 146–156,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rosenfeld, D. and Ulbrich, C. W.: Cloud microphysical properties, processes,
and rainfall estimation opportunities, in: Radar and Atmospheric Science: A
Collection of Essays in Honor of David Atlas, Springer, 30, 237–258, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seligman, A. N., Bindeman, I. N., Watkins, J. M., and Ross, A. M.: Water in
volcanic glass: From volcanic degassing to secondary hydration, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 191, 216–238, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sheppard, B. E.: Measurement of raindrop size distributions using a small
Doppler radar, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 7, 255–268,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sigurdsson, H., Houghton, B., McNutt, S., Rymer, H., and Stix, J.: The
encyclopedia of volcanoes, Elsevier, 30, 1–1456, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stevenson, J. A., Millington, S. C., Beckett, F. M., Swindles, G. T., and Thordarson, T.: Big grains go far: understanding the discrepancy between tephrochronology and satellite infrared measurements of volcanic ash, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2069–2091, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2069-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-2069-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Stokes, G. G.: On the effect of the internal friction of fluids on the
motion of pendulums, Pitt Press Cambridge, 1–86, 1851.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Suzuki, T.: A theoretical model for dispersion of tephra, Arc volcanism:
physics and tectonics, 95–113, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, M., Otsuka, T., Sako, H., Kawamata, H., Yasui, M., Kanamaru, T.,
Otsuki, M., Kobayashi, T., Ishihara, K., and Miki, D.: Temporal Variation
for Magmatic Chemistry of the Sakurajima Volcano and Aira Caldera Region,
Southern Kyushu, Southwest Japan since 61 ka and Its Implications for the
Evolution of Magma Chamber System, Bulletin of the Volcanological Society of
Japan, 58, 19–42, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tajima, Y., Ohara, D., Fukuda, K., and Shimomura, S.: Development of
Automatic Tephrometer for Monitoring of Volcano, 23, 39–46, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Thurai, M. and Bringi, V.: Drop axis ratios from a 2-D video disdrometer,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 22, 966–978, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tokay, A., Wolff, D. B., and Petersen, W. A.: Evaluation of the new version
of the laser-optical disdrometer, OTT Parsivel2, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 31, 1276–1288, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tran-Cong, S., Gay, M., and Michaelides, E. E.: Drag coefficients of
irregularly shaped particles, Powder Technol., 139, 21–32, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Van Eaton, A. R., Muirhead, J. D., Wilson, C. J., and Cimarelli, C.: Growth
of volcanic ash aggregates in the presence of liquid water and ice: an
experimental approach, B. Volcanol., 74, 1963–1984, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Waterman, P. C.: Symmetry, unitarity, and geometry in electromagnetic
scattering, Phys. Rev. D, 3, 825, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.3.825, 1971.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wilson, L. and Huang, T.: The influence of shape on the atmospheric settling
velocity of volcanic ash particles, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 44,
311–324, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wilson, T. M., Stewart, C., Sword-Daniels, V., Leonard, G. S., Johnston, D.
M., Cole, J. W., Wardman, J., Wilson, G., and Barnard, S. T.: Volcanic ash
impacts on critical infrastructure, Phys. Chem. Earth, 45, 5–23, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5380?><ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wilson, T. M., Jenkins, S., and Stewart, C.: Impacts from volcanic ash fall, in: Volcanic Hazards, Risks and Disasters, Elsevier, 2015.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Yokoo, A. and Ishihara, K.: Volcanic activity around Showa Crater of
Sakurajima Volcano monitored with infrared and video cameras, Annuals of
Disas. Prev. Res. Inst., Kyoto Univ., No. 50 C., 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Free-fall experiments of volcanic ash particles using a 2-D  video disdrometer</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Information of aerodynamic parameters of volcanic ash particles, such as
terminal velocity, axis ratio, and canting angle, are necessary for
quantitative ash-fall estimations with weather radar. In this study,
free-fall experiments of volcanic ash particles were accomplished using a
two-dimensional video disdrometer under controlled conditions.</p><p>Samples containing a rotating symmetric axis were selected and divided into
five types according to shape and orientation: oblate spheroid with
horizontal rotating axis (OH), oblate spheroid with vertical axis (OV),
prolate spheroid with horizontal rotating axis (PH), prolate spheroid with
vertical rotating axis (PV), and sphere (Sp). The horizontally (OH and PH)
and vertically (OV and PV) oriented particles were present in proportions of
76&thinsp;% and 22&thinsp;%, and oblate and prolate spheroids were in proportions of
76&thinsp;% and 24&thinsp;%, respectively. The most common shape type was OH (57&thinsp;%).</p><p>The terminal velocities of OH, OV, PH, PV, and Sp were obtained analyzing
2-D video disdrometer data. The terminal velocities of PV were highest compared to those of
other particle types. The lowest terminal velocities were found in OH
particles. It is interesting that the terminal velocities for OH decreased
rapidly in the range 0.5 &lt; <i>D</i> &lt; 1&thinsp;mm, corresponding to the
decrease in axis ratio (i.e., smaller the particle, the flatter the shape).
The axis ratios of all particle types except Sp were found to be converged
to 0.94 at <i>D</i> &gt; 2&thinsp;mm.</p><p>The histogram of canting angles followed unimodal and bimodal distributions
with respect to horizontally and vertically oriented particles,
respectively. The mean values and the standard deviation of entire particle
shape types were close to 0 and 10°, respectively,
under calm atmospheric conditions.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Bagheri, G., Bonadonna, C., Manzella, I., Pontelandolfo, P., and Haas, P.:
Dedicated vertical wind tunnel for the study of sedimentation of
non-spherical particles, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 84, 054501, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4805019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4805019</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bagheri, G. and Bonadonna, C.: On the drag of freely falling non-spherical
particles, Powder Technol., 301, 526–544, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Beckett, F., Witham, C., Hort, M., Stevenson, J., Bonadonna, C., and
Millington, S.: Sensitivity of dispersion model forecasts of volcanic ash
clouds to the physical characteristics of the particles, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 11636–11652, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023609" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023609</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bonadonna, C., Ernst, G., and Sparks, R.: Thickness variations and volume
estimates of tephra fall deposits: the importance of particle Reynolds
number, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 81, 173–187, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bonadonna, C., Genco, R., Gouhier, M., Pistolesi, M., Cioni, R., Alfano, F.,
Hoskuldsson, A., and Ripepe, M.: Tephra sedimentation during the 2010
Eyjafjallajökull eruption (Iceland) from deposit, radar, and satellite
observations, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea.,
116, B12202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008462" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JB008462</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bonadonna, C., Folch, A., Loughlin, S., and Puempel, H.: Future developments
in modelling and monitoring of volcanic ash clouds: outcomes from the first
IAVCEI-WMO workshop on Ash Dispersal Forecast and Civil Aviation, B. Volcanol., 74, 1–10, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Böhm, H. P.: A general equation for the terminal fall speed of solid
hydrometeors, J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 2419–2427, 1989.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Clift, R. and Gauvin, W.: Motion of particles in turbulent gas streams,
Brit. Chem. Eng. Pr. Tec., 16, 439–448, 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Coltelli, M., Miraglia, L., and Scollo, S.: Characterization of shape and
terminal velocity of tephra particles erupted during the 2002 eruption of
Etna volcano, Italy, B. Volcanol., 70, 1103–1112, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Del Bello, E., Taddeucci, J., Vitturi, M. d. M., Scarlato, P., Andronico,
D., Scollo, S., Kueppers, U., and Ricci, T.: Effect of particle volume
fraction on the settling velocity of volcanic ash particles: insights from
joint experimental and numerical simulations, Sci. Rep., 7, 39620, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39620" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39620</a>,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Dellino, P., Mele, D., Bonasia, R., Braia, G., La Volpe, L., and Sulpizio,
R.: The analysis of the influence of pumice shape on its terminal velocity,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L21306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023954" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL023954</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Dioguardi, F., Mele, D., Dellino, P., and Dürig, T.: The terminal
velocity of volcanic particles with shape obtained from 3-D X-ray
microtomography, J. Volcanol. Geoth. Res., 329, 41–53,
2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Dioguardi, F., Mele, D., and Dellino, P.: A New One-Equation Model of Fluid
Drag for Irregularly Shaped Particles Valid Over a Wide Range of Reynolds
Number, J. Geophys. Res.-Sol. Ea., 123, 144–156, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Donnadieu, F.: Volcanological applications of Doppler radars: A review and
examples from a transportable pulse radar in L-band, INTECH Open Access
Publisher, 409–446, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Folch, A., Costa, A., and Macedonio, G.: FALL3D: A computational model for
transport and deposition of volcanic ash, Comput. Geosci., 35,
1334–1342, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Ganser, G. H.: A rational approach to drag prediction of spherical and
nonspherical particles, Powder Technol., 77, 143–152, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Garboczi, E. and Bullard, J.: 3D analytical mathematical models of random
star-shape particles via a combination of X-ray computed microtomography and
spherical harmonic analysis, Adv. Powder Technol., 28, 325–339, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Haider, A. and Levenspiel, O.: Drag coefficient and terminal velocity of
spherical and nonspherical particles, Powder Technol., 58, 63–70, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Happel, J. and Brenner, H.: Low Reynolds number hydrodynamics: with special
applications to particulate media, Springer Science &amp; Business Media,
1–543, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Harris, D. M. and Rose, W. I.: Estimating particle sizes, concentrations,
and total mass of ash in volcanic clouds using weather radar, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 88, 10969–10983, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Herzegh, P. H. and Jameson, A. R.: Observing precipitation through
dual-polarization radar measurements, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 73, 1365–1376, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hotta, K., Iguchi, M., and Tameguri, T.: Rapid dike intrusion into
Sakurajima volcano on August 15, 2015, as detected by multi-parameter ground
deformation observations, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 68,  1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0450-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-016-0450-0</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Hölzer, A. and Sommerfeld, M.: New simple correlation formula for the
drag coefficient of non-spherical particles, Powder Technol., 184,
361–365, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, G.-J., Bringi, V., Cifelli, R., Hudak, D., and Petersen, W.: A
methodology to derive radar reflectivity-liquid equivalent snow rate
relations using C-band radar and a 2-D video disdrometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 27, 637–651, 2010.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, G.-J., Bringi, V., Moisseev, D., Petersen, W. A., Bliven, L., and
Hudak, D.: Use of 2-D-video disdrometer to derive mean density-size and Ze–SR relations: Four snow cases from the light precipitation validation
experiment, Atmos. Res., 153, 34–48, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Iguchi, M.: Magma Movement from the Deep to Shallow Sakurajima Volcano as
Revealed by Geophysical Observations ( &lt; &thinsp;Special Section&thinsp; &gt; &thinsp;Sakurajima Special Issue), Bulletin of the Volcanological Society of Japan,
58, 1–18, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Jaffrain, J., Studzinski, A., and Berne, A.: A network of disdrometers to
quantify the small-scale variability of the raindrop size distribution,
Water Resour. Res., 47, 1–8, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009872" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009872</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Joss, J. and Waldvogel A.: A spectrograph for the automatic analysis of
raindrops, Pure Appl. Geophys., 69, 240–246, 1967.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Kruger, A. and Krajewski, W. F.: Two-dimensional video disdrometer: A
description, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 19, 602–617,
2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Kunii, D. and Levenspiel, O.: Fluidization Engineering, John Wiley, 8, 44–45,
1969.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Langmann, B., Folch, A., Hensch, M., and Matthias, V.: Volcanic ash over
Europe during the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull on Iceland, April–May
2010, Atmos. Environ., 48, 1–8, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Löffler-Mang, M. and Joss. J: An optical disdrometer for measuring size
and velocity of hydrometeors, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech.,
17, 130–139, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Maki, M. and Doviak, R.: Volcanic ash size distribution determined by
weather radar, 1810–1811, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Maki, M., Maesaka, T., Kozono, T., Nagai, M., Furukawa, R., Nakada, S.,
Koshida, T., and Takenaka, H.: Quantitative volcanic ash estimation by
operational polarimetric weather radar, The 9th International Symposium on Tropospheric Profiling, L'Aquila, Italy, September 2012, ISBN 978-90-815839-4-7, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Maki, M., Maesaka, T., Muraji, Y., and Suzuki, I.: Statistical analysis of
volcanic ash measured by X-band polarimetric radar,  8th European Conference on Radar in Meteorology and Hydrology, 15 September, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Maki, M., Iguchi, M., Maesaka, T., Miwa, T., Tanada, T., Kozono, T.,
Momotani, T., Yamaji, A., and Kakimoto, I.: Preliminary results of weather
radar observations of sakurajima volcanic smoke, J. Disaster
Res., 11, 15–30, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Marzano, F. S., Barbieri, S., Vulpiani, G., and Rose, W. I.: Volcanic ash
cloud retrieval by ground-based microwave weather radar, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 44, 3235–3246, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Marzano, F. S., Picciotti, E., Vulpiani, G., and Montopoli, M.: Synthetic
signatures of volcanic ash cloud particles from X-band dual-polarization
radar, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 50, 193–211,
2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Marzano, F. S., Picciotti, E., Montopoli, M., and Vulpiani, G.: Inside
volcanic clouds: Remote sensing of ash plumes using microwave weather
radars, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1567–1586,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Nešpor, V., Krajewski, W. F., and Kruger, A.: Wind-induced error of
raindrop size distribution measurement using a two-dimensional video
disdrometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 17, 1483–1492,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Oguchi, T., Udagawa, M., Nanba, N., Maki, M., and Ishimine, Y.: Measurements
of dielectric constant of volcanic ash erupted from five volcanoes in Japan,
IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 47, 1089–1096, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Poulidis, A. P., Takemi, T., Iguchi, M., and Renfrew, I. A.: Orographic
effects on the transport and deposition of volcanic ash: A case study of
Mount Sakurajima, Japan, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122,
9332–9350, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Rong, L., Zhou, Z., and Yu, A.: Lattice–Boltzmann simulation of fluid flow
through packed beds of uniform ellipsoids, Powder Technol., 285, 146–156,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenfeld, D. and Ulbrich, C. W.: Cloud microphysical properties, processes,
and rainfall estimation opportunities, in: Radar and Atmospheric Science: A
Collection of Essays in Honor of David Atlas, Springer, 30, 237–258, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Seligman, A. N., Bindeman, I. N., Watkins, J. M., and Ross, A. M.: Water in
volcanic glass: From volcanic degassing to secondary hydration, Geochim. Cosmochim. Ac., 191, 216–238, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Sheppard, B. E.: Measurement of raindrop size distributions using a small
Doppler radar, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 7, 255–268,
1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Sigurdsson, H., Houghton, B., McNutt, S., Rymer, H., and Stix, J.: The
encyclopedia of volcanoes, Elsevier, 30, 1–1456, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Stevenson, J. A., Millington, S. C., Beckett, F. M., Swindles, G. T., and Thordarson, T.: Big grains go far: understanding the discrepancy between tephrochronology and satellite infrared measurements of volcanic ash, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 2069–2091, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2069-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2069-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Stokes, G. G.: On the effect of the internal friction of fluids on the
motion of pendulums, Pitt Press Cambridge, 1–86, 1851.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Suzuki, T.: A theoretical model for dispersion of tephra, Arc volcanism:
physics and tectonics, 95–113, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Takahashi, M., Otsuka, T., Sako, H., Kawamata, H., Yasui, M., Kanamaru, T.,
Otsuki, M., Kobayashi, T., Ishihara, K., and Miki, D.: Temporal Variation
for Magmatic Chemistry of the Sakurajima Volcano and Aira Caldera Region,
Southern Kyushu, Southwest Japan since 61 ka and Its Implications for the
Evolution of Magma Chamber System, Bulletin of the Volcanological Society of
Japan, 58, 19–42, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Tajima, Y., Ohara, D., Fukuda, K., and Shimomura, S.: Development of
Automatic Tephrometer for Monitoring of Volcano, 23, 39–46, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Thurai, M. and Bringi, V.: Drop axis ratios from a 2-D video disdrometer,
J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 22, 966–978, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Tokay, A., Wolff, D. B., and Petersen, W. A.: Evaluation of the new version
of the laser-optical disdrometer, OTT Parsivel2, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 31, 1276–1288, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Tran-Cong, S., Gay, M., and Michaelides, E. E.: Drag coefficients of
irregularly shaped particles, Powder Technol., 139, 21–32, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Van Eaton, A. R., Muirhead, J. D., Wilson, C. J., and Cimarelli, C.: Growth
of volcanic ash aggregates in the presence of liquid water and ice: an
experimental approach, B. Volcanol., 74, 1963–1984, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Waterman, P. C.: Symmetry, unitarity, and geometry in electromagnetic
scattering, Phys. Rev. D, 3, 825, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.3.825, 1971.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, L. and Huang, T.: The influence of shape on the atmospheric settling
velocity of volcanic ash particles, Earth Planet. Sc. Lett., 44,
311–324, 1979.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, T. M., Stewart, C., Sword-Daniels, V., Leonard, G. S., Johnston, D.
M., Cole, J. W., Wardman, J., Wilson, G., and Barnard, S. T.: Volcanic ash
impacts on critical infrastructure, Phys. Chem. Earth, 45, 5–23, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Wilson, T. M., Jenkins, S., and Stewart, C.: Impacts from volcanic ash fall, in: Volcanic Hazards, Risks and Disasters, Elsevier, 2015.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Yokoo, A. and Ishihara, K.: Volcanic activity around Showa Crater of
Sakurajima Volcano monitored with infrared and video cameras, Annuals of
Disas. Prev. Res. Inst., Kyoto Univ., No. 50 C., 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
