<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-13-1287-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Early results and validation of SAGE III-ISS ozone profile measurements from onboard the International Space Station</article-title><alt-title>Early results and validation of SAGE III-ISS ozone profile measurements</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Early results and validation of SAGE III-ISS ozone profile measurements}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M. P. McCormick et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>McCormick</surname><given-names>M. Patrick</given-names></name>
          <email>pat.mccormick@hamptonu.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lei</surname><given-names>Liqiao</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hill</surname><given-names>Michael T.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Anderson</surname><given-names>John</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Querel</surname><given-names>Richard</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8792-2486</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Steinbrecht</surname><given-names>Wolfgang</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0680-6729</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Center for Atmospheric Sciences, Department of Atmospheric and
Planetary Sciences, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>Hampton University, Hampton, VA 23668, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Lauder,
New Zealand</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Deutscher Wetterdienst, Hohenpeißenberg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">M. Patrick McCormick (pat.mccormick@hamptonu.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>18</day><month>March</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>1287</fpage><lpage>1297</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>October</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>January</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>6</day><month>February</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 M. Patrick McCormick et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e141">The Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment III (SAGE
III, 2018) instrument was launched on 19 February 2017 from the NASA Kennedy
Space Center and was integrated aboard the International Space Station (ISS).
SAGE III-ISS has been providing ozone profile measurements since June 2017.
This paper presents an early validation of the Level 2 solar and lunar
occultation ozone data products using ground-based lidar and ozonesondes
from Hohenpeißenberg and Lauder as well as satellite ozone vertical products from
the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer
(ACE-FTS) instrument. Average differences in the ozone concentration between
SAGE III-ISS and Hohenpeißenberg lidar observations for 1 year are less
than 10 % between 16 and 42 km and less than 5 % between 20 and 40 km.
Hohenpeißenberg ozonesonde comparisons are mostly within 10 % between 18
and 30 km. The Lauder lidar comparison results are less than 10 % between
17 and 37 km, and the Lauder
ozonesonde comparison results are less than 10 % between 19 and 31 km. The seasonal average differences in the ozone concentration between
SAGE III-ISS and ACE-FTS are mostly less than 5 % between 20 and 45 km for
both the Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere. All results from these
comparisons show that the SAGE III-ISS ozone solar data compare well with
correlative measurements throughout the stratosphere. With few comparisons
available, the percentage difference between the SAGE III-ISS lunar ozone
data and the ozonesonde data is less than 10 % between 19 and 27 km. The
percentage difference between the SAGE III-ISS lunar ozone data and the
ACE-FTS ozone data is less than 10 % between 20 and 40 km.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e153">Ozone plays a significant role in the atmosphere because it contributes to
the radiative balance of the atmosphere by absorbing ultraviolet (UV) solar
radiation; it also affects the health of humans, animals, and
plants (Solomon, 1999). Therefore, it is important to understand its global
variations and trends (McCormick et al., 1992; Reinsel et al., 2002;
Bourassa et al., 2014; Harris et al., 2015) as well as its impact on climate
change (Rex et al., 2004; Son et al., 2008; Thompson et al., 2011). In
addition, by modifying the Brewer–Dobson circulation and stratospheric
temperatures, climate change impacts global ozone concentrations (Weber et
al., 2018). Ozone measurements from the SAGE series of satellite instruments,
including SAGE I, II, III/Meteor-3M, and III-ISS, provide important data to
investigate stratospheric change and long-term variability in the vertical
distribution of stratospheric ozone. The occultation technique that the SAGE
series utilizes provides a consistent methodology and fundamental assumption
for processing data (McCormick et al., 1989; Wang et al., 2006; Damadeo et
al., 2013). The solar occultation method makes SAGE one of the best series
of satellite instruments for high-resolution stratospheric ozone
measurements. In addition to the SAGE series, previous solar occultation
satellite instruments include the HALogen Occultation Experiment (HALOE; Russell et al., 1993), the Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM) III (Lucke et
al., 1999), and the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform
Spectrometer (ACE-FTS; Bernath et al., 2005). The SCanning Imaging
Absorption SpectroMeter for<?pagebreak page1288?> Atmospheric CHartographY (SCIAMACHY) also has an
occultation mode (Bovensmann et al., 1999). The ACE-FTS is still in
operation and provides valuable data for the SAGE III-ISS validation, as
is shown in this paper. It is important for the SAGE III-ISS ozone profiles
to be well validated to extend the long-standing ozone record of
observations from the SAGE series, POAM III, HALOE, and ACE-FTS. The well-characterized ozone data will contribute to the investigation of any trend
and possible ozone recovery due to a reduction in chlorofluorocarbons (CFC).
In this paper, the global SAGE III-ISS ozone profile data are compared with
correlative datasets to investigate possible differences. These comparisons
begin the process of showing that SAGE III-ISS ozone data can be used for
scientific studies. A systematic assessment of the early SAGE III-ISS ozone
profiles is conducted with observations made by comparing SAGE III-ISS ozone
profiles with ozone profiles made by Hohenpeißenberg and Lauder
ground-based lidar and ozonesondes as well as satellite data from the
ACE-FTS. Section 2 describes the instrument and ozone product for the
comparison, the criteria for coincidence, and the methodology for
validation. The comparison results between coincident events are shown in
Sect. 3. The overall summary and conclusion are presented in Sect. 4.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Instruments and methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>SAGE III-ISS</title>
      <p id="d1e171">The SAGE III-ISS payload was launched by the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket on 19 February 2017 from the NASA Kennedy Space Center and delivered to the ISS by
the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft. It was mated to the ISS on 7 March 2017. The
ISS is flying in a 51.64<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> inclination low-Earth orbit, which
provides low- and midlatitude occultation coverage. Figure 1 shows SAGE III-ISS solar and lunar occultation coverage from June 2017 to November
2018. The primary objective of the SAGE III-ISS mission is to obtain
vertical profiles of ozone, water vapor, nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen
trioxide, and aerosol extinction at multiple wavelengths, using solar and
lunar occultation measurements. Similar to the SAGE III/Meteor-3M, SAGE III-ISS uses an 809 pixel <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 pixel charge-coupled device (CCD) array to
provide continuous spectral coverage from 280 to 1040 nm with a spectral
resolution of 1 to 2 nm. Additionally, an InGaAs infrared (IR) photodiode
centered at 1550 nm is included for aerosol extinction measurements at a
longer wavelength (Wang et al., 2006). Only 87 pixel groups are transmitted
from the satellite for gaseous species and aerosol retrieval due to the
limitation in the telemetry bandwidth. In addition to solar occultation, SAGE
III-ISS is capable of making lunar occultation measurements at nighttime for
ozone, nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen trioxide, and chlorine dioxide. SAGE
III-ISS Level 2 solar species retrievals include three ozone profile
products.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e192">The SAGE III-ISS solar and lunar occultation coverage from
June 2017 to November 2018. The red curves show the sunrise events, the blue
curves show the sunset events, the orange curves show the moon rise events, and the green curves show the moonset events. The horizontal axis indicates year and fraction of a year.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e201">The profile based upon the measurement made in the Hartley–Huggins band is
denoted as “Mesospheric Ozone” (MesO3). The profile based upon measurements in
the Chappuis band is denoted as “Multiple Linear Regression Ozone” (ChapO3).
The profile obtained using a similar approach to that used by SAGE II is
denoted as “Least Squares Ozone” (Ozone_aO3; SAGE III-ISS Data
Products User's Guide: <uri>https://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/project/sageiii-iss/guide/DPUG-G3B-2-0.pdf</uri>, last access: 10 March 2020; Damadeo et al., 2013). The version 5.1 Least Squares Ozone profile is used
here for ozone comparison between the SAGE III-ISS and correlative
measurements. The vertical resolution of the SAGE III-ISS ozone profiles is
0.5 km with respect to altitude.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Lidar and ozonesonde</title>
      <?pagebreak page1289?><p id="d1e215">Lidar and ozonesonde ozone profiles provided by the Network for the
Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) are used for SAGE
III-ISS ozone profile comparisons. A NDACC station at the midlatitude in each
hemisphere (Hohenpeißenberg in the Northern Hemisphere and Lauder in the
Southern Hemisphere) with an established record of regular ozone
measurements from both lidars and sondes is selected for the initial
validation. Future validation efforts will include other stations. The
Hohenpeißenberg (48<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 11<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) ozone lidar has been
providing ozone profile data from 15 to 50 km since 1987. The
Hohenpeißenberg balloon ozonesonde has been providing ozone profile data
since 1967. A remote-sensing research station located at Lauder, New Zealand
(45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 169.7<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), has been providing lidar ozone profile
data from 8 to 50 km since 1994 and ozonesonde ozone profiles data from 0 to
32 km since 1986.</p>
      <p id="d1e254">During the first year of SAGE III-ISS observations (June 2017 to May 2018),
ozonesonde launches were generally conducted at Hohenpeißenberg two to three times
per week with greater frequencies occurring from October to April. Ozonesonde launches at Lauder were generally conducted three to five times per
month during the year with exceptions in June (two measurements) and October
(six measurements). Lidar measurements at Hohenpeißenberg were made six to nine times
per month in 2017 and four to six times per month in 2018, except for April in which
11 measurements were made. Lidar measurements at Lauder were made one to four times
per month during the year. For details see the NDACC website
(<uri>http://www.ndaccdemo.org/stations</uri>, last access: 10 March 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e260">Typical uncertainties in ozone measurements from the Hohenpeißenberg
Brewer–Mast sondes are better than 5 % near the ozone maximum at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa and increase to values of 10 % or more above 10 hPa
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) and up to 15 % in the troposphere (Kerr et al.,
1994; SPARC, 1998). Estimated uncertainties in the ozone profiles derived from
the Lauder electrochemical concentration cell (ECC) sondes are generally better than 5 % in the troposphere and
stratosphere up to 10 hPa (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) and up to 10 % at higher
altitudes (Bodeker et al., 1998). Uncertainties in ozone measurements from
the lidar systems are typically 5 % or better between 15 and 35 km
altitude and less than 10 % up to about 40 km altitude (Leblanc et al.,
2016a, b, c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e296"><bold>(a)</bold> The average of all coincident pairs for SAGE III-ISS
data and Hohenpeißenberg ozone lidar data from June 2017 to
May 2018. The average SAGE III-ISS ozone profile is shown using the black line with
twice the standard error (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2SEM) displayed as the black error bars. The
average Hohenpeißenberg lidar ozone profile is shown using a blue line with
twice the standard error shown as horizontal blue error bars. <bold>(b)</bold> The
average percentage difference between the coincident pairs is also shown. The
black line indicates the percentage difference, the black horizontal error
bars show twice the standard error of the difference, and the vertical gray
shading shows the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % region. The horizontal gray shading shows
the altitude range of the tropopause for panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold>. The horizontal
light gray dotted line shows the average altitude of the tropopause height
as reported in the SAGE III-ISS data product. The vertical shading on the
left of panel <bold>(b)</bold> indicates the variation in the number of coincident measurements at
each altitude (24 in total).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e339">Similar to Fig. 2 but for the average difference of
coincident pairs of ozone profiles for SAGE III-ISS and Lauder ozone lidar
data from June 2017 to May 2018.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>ACE-FTS</title>
      <p id="d1e356">The Canadian Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE) on the SCISAT-1
satellite was launched on 12 August 2003 (Bernath et al., 2005) and is currently
operational (at the time of writing). The ACE-FTS is one of the two
instruments onboard the spacecraft and provides vertical profiles of ozone
and trace gases, as well as temperature, pressure, and aerosol extinction
(Boone et al., 2005; Waymark et al., 2013). The ACE-FTS makes its solar
occultation measurements in the 85<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S to 85<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N latitude
region due to its circular 650 km, 74<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> inclination, low-Earth
orbit (Bernath et al., 2005). The ACE-FTS vertical measurement range
typically extends from 10 to 95 km for ozone. The maximum vertical resolution
of ACE-FTS is 3–4 km based on its instrument field of view (Dupuy et al.,
2009). ACE-FTS Level 2 version 3.5/3.6 data are used for the ozone
comparisons in this work.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>The methodology for comparisons</title>
      <?pagebreak page1290?><p id="d1e394">As a satellite with near-global coverage, SAGE III-ISS allows for a
significant number of coincident profiles with data from correlative instruments,
which are expected to yield reliable conclusions regarding the consistencies
of its data (Imai, 2013). Coincident ozone profiles from SAGE III-ISS and
correlative measurements are selected by finding the pair of profiles that
has the closest geographic distance within a given time interval. The
criteria used for finding coincidence varies for different validation
studies so as to obtain a sufficient number of coincident events for all datasets. In
order to obtain enough coincident profiles, the criteria used for comparison
between ACE-FTS and SAGE III-ISS are less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
latitude, less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in longitude, and less than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h in time. Criteria used to find coincident events between
SAGE III-ISS and lidar/ozonesonde data are less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
latitude, less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in longitude, and less than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h in time (Rong et al., 2009). In order to get sufficient
comparisons in the Southern Hemisphere, the criteria are expanded to less
than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in latitude, less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in
longitude, and less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h in time. These broad criteria could
result in multiple coincidences for a single SAGE III-ISS profile. In the
case of multiple matches, the coincident pair that has the smallest time and
spatial difference is chosen. This process reduces the duplicate coincident
events in the comparisons. The coincident profiles for the two correlative
instruments are found, and then the differences between the two coincident
profiles are calculated. For statistical analysis, coincident data are
screened to reject the profiles with low-quality measurements according to
the recommendation provided by each data product's user guide (SAGE III-ISS
Data Products User's Guide:
<uri>https://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/project/sageiii-iss/guide/DPUG-G3B-2-0.pdf</uri>, <uri>http://databace.scisat.ca/level2/ace_v3.5_v3.6</uri>, last access: 10 March 2020).
Therefore, part of the data record is removed, and this decreases the total
amount of coincident pairs in our comparisons. The coincident pair of ozone
profiles from the two instruments are linearly interpolated to the SAGE
III-ISS altitude grid (Rong et al., 2009; Dupuy et al., 2009).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e545">Similar to Fig. 2 but for the average difference of
coincident pairs for SAGE III-ISS and Hohenpeißenberg ozonesonde profiles
obtained from June 2017 to May 2018.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e556">Similar to Fig. 2 but for the average difference of
coincident pairs for SAGE III-ISS and Lauder ozonesonde profiles obtained
from June 2017 to May 2018.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e568"><bold>(a)</bold> The ACE-FTS and SAGE III-ISS solar and lunar occultation
coverage for comparison. <bold>(b)</bold> The latitude and longitude distribution for
coincident events of SAGE III-ISS and ACE-FTS under the criteria of a latitude
difference of less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, a longitude difference of less than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a time difference of less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h (coincident events could only be found in the Northern Hemisphere).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e630">Seasonal average ozone mixing ratio profile comparisons
between coincident SAGE III-ISS and ACE-FTS measurements for the Northern
Hemisphere criteria that are described in Fig. 6. The SAGE III-ISS average
ozone mixing ratio profiles are shown using the blue solid line with twice the
standard error (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2SEM) shown as horizontal blue error bars. The
ACE-FTS average ozone mixing ratio profiles are shown using the red solid line
with twice the standard error shown as the horizontal red error bars.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e646">The average difference between the coincident pairs of profiles at a given
altitude is calculated using Eq. (1):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M36" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SAGE III</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>corr</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the average ozone difference at a
given altitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SAGE III</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the ozone concentration
at altitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th coincident SAGE III-ISS profile, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>corr</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the corresponding concentration for the correlated comparison instrument
for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th coincident pair. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total number of
coincident measurement pairs at altitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th reference at altitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for calculating the difference. The
reference for calculating the absolute difference between the coincident
pair equals one. In the case of calculating the relative difference for each
coincident pair, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the average of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th
coincident pair concentration at altitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (Randall et al., 2003; Smith et
al., 2013):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M52" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SAGE III</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>corr</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          For comparisons with the lidars and ozonesondes, the reference is taken as
the measurement from the ground-based or balloon instrument. As shown in Eq. (3), the standard deviation of the distribution of the relative difference
at altitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> provides the spread in the difference for individual
coincident pairs. This provides information regarding the significance of the bias
of the SAGE III-ISS instrument. This standard deviation also provides a
measure of the total uncertainty of the<?pagebreak page1291?> instruments that are used for the
comparison (von Clarmann, 2006):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M54" display="block"><mml:mrow><?xmltex \hack{\hbox\bgroup\fontsize{8.1}{8.1}\selectfont$\displaystyle}?><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:msubsup><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SAGE III</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>corr</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>.</mml:mo><?xmltex \hack{$\egroup}?></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The statistical uncertainty of the mean difference, also known as the standard
error of the mean (SEM), is the quantity that allows the significance of the
estimated biases to be judged (Dupuy et al., 2009):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M55" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SEM</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          Larger average differences and uncertainties are expected for comparisons
using expanded coincidence criteria, such as those used for the sonde and
lidar as well as the Southern Hemisphere ACE-FTS measurements.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e1027">Seasonal average ozone mixing ratio profile comparisons
between coincident SAGE III-ISS and ACE-FTS measurements for the Southern
Hemisphere under the criteria of a latitude difference of less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, a longitude difference of less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a time difference of less
than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Comparison of SAGE III-ISS solar and ground-based lidar
measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1100">A total of 1 year of data, from June 2017 to May 2018, using the 24 coincident
profile pairs between the SAGE III-ISS and the Hohenpeißenberg lidar ozone
data, is shown in Fig. 2a. Note that the altitude spread of these
comparisons is shown as the vertical gray bar. The average difference of all
coincident pairs for 1 year of data is calculated and is shown in Fig. 2b. The average time difference is 11.8 h, the average latitude difference
is 3.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the average longitude difference is 4.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the
average profile distance is 526.6 km. The average percentage difference
between the SAGE III-ISS and the Hohenpeißenberg lidar data is less than
5 % from 20 to 40 km and 10 % from 16 to 42 km with a very low standard
error between 20 and 40 km that increases above and below this region.</p>
      <p id="d1e1121">Similarly, comparisons between the coincident pairs of the SAGE III-ISS and
Lauder ozone lidar are shown in Fig. 3. There is a total of seven coincident
pairs found within an average time difference of 12.6 h, an average latitude
difference of 2.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, an average longitude difference of 3.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and an<?pagebreak page1292?> average separation distance of 381.5 km. The average percentage difference is less than
10 % from about 17 to about 37 km with a low standard error between 20 and
40 km.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Comparison between SAGE III-ISS solar and ozonesonde measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1150">The average of 35 coincident ozone profile pairs between SAGE III-ISS and
Hohenpeißenberg ozonesondes is compared, as shown in Fig. 4. The
coincident pairs had an average time difference of 9.7 h, an average latitude
difference of 3.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, an average longitude difference of 4.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
an average separation distance of 516.0 km. The average ozone percentage differences are found to
be less than 10 % from about 18 to 30 km. The SAGE III-ISS ozone values
show an average positive difference increase above 27 km where uncertainties
in the Brewer–Mast ozonesonde measurements rapidly increase (Kerr et al.,
1994). The comparison of coincident profile pairs between SAGE III-ISS and
the Lauder ozonesonde data is shown in Fig. 5. A total of 13 coincident
pairs are found from June 2017 to May 2018. The coincident pairs have an
average time difference of 10.8 h, an average latitude difference of
1.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, an average longitude difference of 3.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and an average separation distance of
329.3 km. The average percentage difference between SAGE
III-ISS and Lauder ozone concentrations is less than 10 % between 19 and
31 km with a low standard error between about 20 and 30 km.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Comparisons between SAGE III-ISS solar and ACE-FTS measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e1197">The coincident ozone concentration between SAGE III-ISS and ACE-FTS is
compared in this section. In order to compare SAGE III-ISS with the ozone mixing ratio
data from ACE-FTS, the number density data of SAGE III-ISS are converted to a
volume mixing ratio (ppmv) using the temperature and pressure data reported
by SAGE III-ISS. The average coincident ozone profile pairs between SAGE
III-ISS and the ACE-FTS are compared for different seasons using SAGE III-ISS
Level 2 solar data from June 2017 to November 2018. A total of 403
coincident profiles are found using the criteria. As shown in Fig. 6b, the
coincident events between SAGE III-ISS and ACE-FTS are only found in the
Northern Hemisphere under the criteria of a latitude difference of less than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, a longitude difference of less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a time difference of less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h. Coincident events are generally
located in the mid- and high-latitudes in the Northern<?pagebreak page1293?> Hemisphere because
of the high inclination of the SAGE III-ISS and ACE-FTS
orbits (Dupuy et al., 2009). More than 85 % of the coincident SAGE III-ISS
and ACE-FTS events are located at latitudes higher than 40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N in
this case.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e1257">Zonal mean ozone comparisons between SAGE III-ISS and
ACE-FTS between 15 and 50 km. <bold>(a)</bold> The zonal mean ozone for SAGE III-ISS. <bold>(b)</bold>
The zonal mean ozone for ACE-FTS. <bold>(c)</bold> The zonal mean ozone percentage
difference between the two abovementioned instruments.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1275">Figure 7a, c, e, and g show the seasonal average ozone mixing ratio
profiles and twice the standard error (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2SEM) for the two
instruments in the Northern Hemisphere for JJA (June, July, and August; 182
pairs), SON (September, October, and November; 119 pairs), DJF (December,
January, and February; 39 pairs), and MAM (March, April, and May; 63 pairs).</p>
      <p id="d1e1286">Figure 7b, d, f, and h show the average percentage difference between the
two instruments and their standard deviations. The bold black line shows the
average percentage difference and the dash-dotted line shows the standard
deviation of the percentage difference. The vertical gray regions indicate
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % difference region. The mean percentage difference between
the two instruments is mostly less than 5 % from 20 to 45 km. The
comparisons show slightly larger positive differences near 40 km for the
DJF and MAM measurements. The comparisons show slightly negative
differences near 30 km for the SON measurements and show positive differences
near 30 km for DJF. Between 20 and 40 km, standard deviations for the
percentage differences are less than 5 % in JJA and MAM. DJF differences
show the largest standard deviation, but they are still mostly less than 10 %
between 20 and 50 km. The standard deviation below 20 km is larger for all
seasons with a maximum of 50 % in DJF.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e1301">Similar to Fig. 2 but for the average difference of
coincident pairs for SAGE III-ISS lunar occultation measurements and Lauder
ozonesonde profiles obtained from June 2017 to May 2018.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e1312">Similar to Fig. 2 but for the average difference between
SAGE III-ISS lunar occultation measurements and the ACE-FTS ozone.
Seven comparisons between the SAGE III-ISS lunar and ACE-FTS measurements
are shown.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/1287/2020/amt-13-1287-2020-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1321">A wider criteria of a latitude difference of less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
a longitude difference of less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a time difference of
less than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> h are used to find four seasonal coincident events
between the SAGE III-ISS and ACE-FTS in the Southern Hemisphere; a total
of 301 pairs of coincident profiles are found. Similar to Fig. 7, Fig. 8a, c, e, and g show the seasonal average ozone mixing ratio profiles and
twice the standard error (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2SEM) for the coincident events of the
two instruments in the Southern Hemisphere for JJA (144 pairs), SON (58
pairs), DJF (94 pairs), and MAM (5 pairs).</p>
      <p id="d1e1377">Figure 8b, d, f, and h show that the mean percentage difference between
the two instruments is less than 5 % from 20 to 45 km for SON and DJF. The
comparison for JJA shows less than a 10 % difference between 20 and 50 km
with slightly larger positive differences near 30 and 40 km. The comparison
for MAM shows less than a 5 % difference between 25 and 45 km. Between 25
and 45 km, standard deviations for the percentage differences are mostly less
than 10 % in SON and DJF. Results in JJA and MAM show the largest standard
deviation, but it is still mostly less than 20 % between 20 and 50 km. The
standard deviation below 20 km is larger for all seasons with a maximum as
large as 60 % in MAM.</p>
      <p id="d1e1381">The zonal mean ozone mixing ratios from 15 to 50 km for SAGE III-ISS and
ACE-FTS are calculated using 10 latitude bins from 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to
60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S. Results are shown in Fig. 9a and b. The maximum ozone
mixing ratios are located at about 32 km in the tropical region with maximum
mixing ratios larger than 9.8 ppmv shown for both SAGE III-ISS and
ACE-FTS. Figure 9c indicates that the SAGE III-ISS zonal average ozone mixing
ratios are generally less than the ACE-FTS throughout the tropical stratosphere
with an exception near 40 km. The differences are mostly less than 5 %
except close to the tropical tropopause area, which is most likely impacted
by cirrus clouds that occur more frequently near the tropical
tropopause (Nazaryan et al., 2008).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Comparison between SAGE III-ISS lunar and Lauder ozonesonde and ACE-FTS
profiles</title>
      <p id="d1e1410">The coincident lidar, ozonesonde, and ACE-FTS ozone profiles are compared
with SAGE III-ISS lunar ozone profiles. SAGE III/ISS lunar observations are
taken much less frequently than solar observations. Consequently, only a few
coincident profiles are obtained within the previously defined criteria, including
three with Lauder ozonesonde profiles, seven with ACE-FTS, and fewer than three with the
other instruments (whose comparisons are not shown).</p>
      <p id="d1e1413">Figure 10 shows a comparison between SAGE III-ISS and Lauder ozonesonde data
taken within an average of 7.2 h of each other, with an average latitude
difference of 2.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, a longitude difference of 5.4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
a spatial difference of 508.6 km. The percentage difference between the
coincident pairs is less than 10 % between approximately 19 and 27 km. The
average ozone concentration difference between SAGE III-ISS lunar profiles and the
ACE-FTS is shown in Fig. 11. The average difference between the two datasets is less than 10 % with a standard deviation of less than 5 %
between 20 and 45 km.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1443">This paper represents an early effort to provide validation of upper
tropospheric and stratospheric ozone measurements from SAGE III-ISS to the
broad scientific user community. It goes a long way toward verifying the performance
of the SAGE III-ISS satellite instrument as well as its capability to provide
reliable atmospheric ozone profile measurements. Coincident measurements
from the first year of ozone data provided by SAGE III-ISS are compared with
ozone profiles measured by ground-based lidars and ozonesondes. The average
differences in the ozone concentration measured by SAGE III-ISS and
Hohenpeißenberg lidar are less than 10 % between 16 and 42 km and less
than 5 % between 20 and 40 km. The comparisons between the SAGE III-ISS
and Lauder lidar ozone measurements are less than 10 % between 17 and 37 km. The results of comparisons between the SAGE III-ISS and Hohenpeißenberg
ozonesondes are mostly less than 10 % between 18 and 30 km. When compared
with Lauder ozonesondes, the average differences are less than 10 %
between 19 and 31 km. The average ozone concentration differences between
SAGE III-ISS and ACE-FTS are<?pagebreak page1294?> mostly less than 5 % between 20 and 45 km in
both the Northern Hemisphere and the Southern Hemisphere during different seasons over the
period from June 2017 to November 2018. In summary, more than 700 coincident
ozone profile pairs are used for the comparisons in this paper, and the
results show that SAGE III-ISS is capable of providing ozone profile
measurements that are consistent with another satellite instrument as well
as ground-based lidars and ozonesondes developed for such validation
measurements. Although there are significantly fewer coincident lunar profiles
available, early results suggest that the lunar ozone measurements agree
well with ozonesondes and the ACE-FTS. This suggests that SAGE III-ISS ozone data
compare well with a number of correlative measurements and, given a
reasonable lifetime, should be used for stratospheric trend and recovery
studies as well as research on the impact of ozone on climate variation
studies. The authors will continue these comparisons into the near future by
including more NDACC and other ozone measurements as well as new versions of
SAGE III-ISS Level 2 data when they become available.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e1451">The satellite ozone profile data used in this work were obtained from SAGE III-ISS v5.1 (2020, available at: <uri>ftp://l5ftl01.larc.nasa.gov/../distribution/SAGE_III_ISS/</uri>) and ACE-FTS v3.5/3.6  (2020, available at: <uri>https://databace.scisat.ca/level2/ace_v3.5_v3.6/</uri>). The ground-based lidar and ozonesonde ozone profile data were obtained from
the NDACC Data Host Facility (2020): the Hohenpeißenberg ozonsonde data were from <uri>ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ndacc/station/hohenpei/ames/o3sonde/</uri>; the Hohenpeissenberg lidar data were from <uri>ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ndacc/station/hohenpei/ames/lidar/</uri>; the Lauder ozonesonde data were from <uri>ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ndacc/station/lauder/ames/o3sonde/</uri>; and the Lauder lidar data were from <uri>ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ndacc/station/lauder/ames/lidar/</uri>.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e1476">MPM formulated the overarching research
goals. MTH compared the ozone profiles from SAGE III-ISS with
coincident ozone profiles obtained from lidar and sondes. LL compared
the SAGE III-ISS and ACE-FTS ozone profiles. LL wrote the initial draft of the paper
with contributions from all co-authors. All authors reviewed the manuscript,
and MPM provided the final paper for submission.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e1482">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1488">We want to thank the NASA Langley Research Center (NASA LaRC) SAGE III-ISS Data Algorithm Team. The ground-based lidar and ozonesonde data used in this publication
were obtained from the Hohenpeißenberg Meteorological Observatory, German
National Meteorological Hohenpeißenberg, Germany, and the National
Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research (NIWA), Lauder, New Zealand, as
part of the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change
(NDACC). The Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE), also known as SCISAT,
is a Canadian-led mission mainly supported by the Canadian Space Agency. We
want to thank the ACE team for providing the ACE-FTS ozone data used in this
work.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e1493">This work was partially supported by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration – Cooperative Science Center for Earth System
Sciences and Remote Sensing Technologies (NOAA-CESSRST; under the
cooperative agreement grant no. NA16SEC4810008). The statements
contained within the manuscript/research article are not the opinions of the
funding agency or the US government and reflect the author's opinions.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e1499">This paper was edited by Mark Weber and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>ACE-FTS v3.5/3.6: Satellite ozone profile data, available at: <uri>https://databace.scisat.ca/level2/ace_v3.5_v3.6/</uri>, last access: 10 March 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bernath, P. F., McElroy, C. T., Abrams, M. C., Boone, C. D., Butler, M.,
Camy-Peyret, C., Carleer, M., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P. F., Colin, R.,
DeCola, P., DeMaziíere, M., Drummond, J. R., Dufour, D., Evans, W. F. J.,
Fast, H., Fussen, D., Gilbert, K., Jennings, D. E., Llewellyn, E. J., Lowe,
R. P., Mahieu, E., McConnell, J. C., McHugh, M., McLeod, S. D., Michaud, R.,
Midwinter, C., Nassar, R., Nichitiu, F., Nowlan, C., Rinsland, C. P.,
Rochon, Y. J., Rowlands, N., Semeniuk, K., Simon, P., Skelton, R., Sloan, J.
J., Soucy, M.-A., Strong, K., Tremblay, P., Turnbull, D., Walker, K. A.,
Walkty, I., Wardle, D. A., Wehrle, V., Zander, R., and Zou, J.: Atmospheric
Chemistry Experiment (ACE): mission overview, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32,
L15S01, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022386" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL022386</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bodeker, G. E., Boyd, I. S., and Matthews, W. A.: Trends and variability in
vertical ozone and temperature profiles measured by ozonesondes at Lauder,
New Zealand: 1986–1996, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 28661–28681, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boone, C. D., Nassar, R., Walker, K. A., Rochon, Y., McLeod, S. D., Rinsland, C. P., and Bernath, P. F.: Retrievals for the atmospheric chemistry
experiment Fourier-transform spectrometer, Appl. Optics, 44,
7218–7231, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.44.007218" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.44.007218</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bourassa, A. E., Degenstein, D. A., Randel, W. J., Zawodny, J. M., Kyrölä, E., McLinden, C. A., Sioris, C. E., and Roth, C. Z.: Trends in stratospheric ozone derived from merged SAGE II and Odin-OSIRIS satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6983–6994, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6983-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-6983-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Noel, S.,
Rozanov, V. V., Chance, K. V., and Goede, A. P. H.: SCIAMACHY: Mission
objectives and measurement modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;0127:SMOAMM&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;0127:SMOAMM&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Damadeo, R. P., Zawodny, J. M., Thomason, L. W., and Iyer, N.: SAGE version 7.0 algorithm: application to SAGE II, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3539–3561, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3539-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-3539-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dupuy, E., Walker, K. A., Kar, J., Boone, C. D., McElroy, C. T., Bernath, P. F., Drummond, J. R., Skelton, R., McLeod, S. D., Hughes, R. C., Nowlan, C. R., Dufour, D. G., Zou, J., Nichitiu, F., Strong, K., Baron, P., Bevilacqua, R. M., Blumenstock, T., Bodeker, G. E., Borsdorff, T., Bourassa, A. E., Bovensmann, H., Boyd, I. S., Bracher, A., Brogniez, C., Burrows, J. P., Catoire, V., Ceccherini, S., Chabrillat, S., Christensen, T., Coffey, M. T., Cortesi, U., Davies, J., De Clercq, C., Degenstein, D. A., De Mazière, M., Demoulin, P., Dodion, J., Firanski, B., Fischer, H., Forbes, G., Froidevaux, L., Fussen, D., Gerard, P., Godin-Beekmann, S., Goutail, F., Granville, J., Griffith, D., Haley, C. S., Hannigan, J. W., Höpfner, M., Jin, J. J., Jones, A., Jones, N. B., Jucks, K., Kagawa, A., Kasai, Y., Kerzenmacher, T. E., Kleinböhl, A., Klekociuk, A. R., Kramer, I., Küllmann, H., Kuttippurath, J., Kyrölä, E., Lambert, J.-C., Livesey, N. J., Llewellyn, E. J., Lloyd, N. D., Mahieu, E., Manney, G. L., Marshall, B. T., McConnell, J. C., McCormick, M. P., McDermid, I. S., McHugh, M., McLinden, C. A., Mellqvist, J., Mizutani, K., Murayama, Y., Murtagh, D. P., Oelhaf, H., Parrish, A., Petelina, S. V.<?pagebreak page1296?>, Piccolo, C., Pommereau, J.-P., Randall, C. E., Robert, C., Roth, C., Schneider, M., Senten, C., Steck, T., Strandberg, A., Strawbridge, K. B., Sussmann, R., Swart, D. P. J., Tarasick, D. W., Taylor, J. R., Tétard, C., Thomason, L. W., Thompson, A. M., Tully, M. B., Urban, J., Vanhellemont, F., Vigouroux, C., von Clarmann, T., von der Gathen, P., von Savigny, C., Waters, J. W., Witte, J. C., Wolff, M., and Zawodny, J. M.: Validation of ozone measurements from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 287–343, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-287-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-287-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Harris, N. R. P., Hassler, B., Tummon, F., Bodeker, G. E., Hubert, D., Petropavlovskikh, I., Steinbrecht, W., Anderson, J., Bhartia, P. K., Boone, C. D., Bourassa, A., Davis, S. M., Degenstein, D., Delcloo, A., Frith, S. M., Froidevaux, L., Godin-Beekmann, S., Jones, N., Kurylo, M. J., Kyrölä, E., Laine, M., Leblanc, S. T., Lambert, J.-C., Liley, B., Mahieu, E., Maycock, A., de Mazière, M., Parrish, A., Querel, R., Rosenlof, K. H., Roth, C., Sioris, C., Staehelin, J., Stolarski, R. S., Stübi, R., Tamminen, J., Vigouroux, C., Walker, K. A., Wang, H. J., Wild, J., and Zawodny, J. M.: Past changes in the vertical distribution of ozone – Part 3: Analysis and interpretation of trends, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9965–9982, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9965-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-9965-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Imai, K., Manago, N., Mitsuda, C., Naito, Y., Nishimoto, E., Sakazaki, T.,
Fujiwara, M., Froidevaux, L., von Clarmann, T., Stiller, G. P., Murtagh, D.
P., Rong, P.-P., Mlynczak, M. G., Walker, K. A., Kinnison, D. E., Akiyoshi,
H., Nakamura, T., Miyasaka, T., Nishibori, T., Mizobuchi, S., Kikuchi, K.
I., Ozeki, H., Takahashi, C., Hayashi, H., Sano, T., Suzuki, M., Takayanagi,
M., and Shiotani, M.: Validation of ozone data from the superconducting
Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission Sounder (SMILES), J. Geophys. Res., 118,
5750–5769, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50434" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50434</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kerr, J. B., Fast, H., McElroy, C. T., Oltmans, S. J., Lathrop, J. A., Kyro, E., Paukkunen, A., Claude, H., Koehler, U., Sreedharan, C. R., Takao, T., and Tsukagoshi, Y.: The 1991 WMO International Ozonesonde Intercomparison at Vanscoy Canada, Atmos. Ocean, 32, 685–716, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Leblanc, T., Sica, R. J., van Gijsel, J. A. E., Godin-Beekmann, S., Haefele, A., Trickl, T., Payen, G., and Gabarrot, F.: Proposed standardized definitions for vertical resolution and uncertainty in the NDACC lidar ozone and temperature algorithms – Part 1: Vertical resolution, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4029–4049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4029-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-4029-2016</ext-link>, 2016a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Leblanc, T., Sica, R. J., van Gijsel, J. A. E., Godin-Beekmann, S., Haefele, A., Trickl, T., Payen, G., and Liberti, G.: Proposed standardized definitions for vertical resolution and uncertainty in the NDACC lidar ozone and temperature algorithms – Part 2: Ozone DIAL uncertainty budget, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4051–4078, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4051-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-4051-2016</ext-link>, 2016b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Leblanc, T., Sica, R. J., van Gijsel, J. A. E., Haefele, A., Payen, G., and Liberti, G.: Proposed standardized definitions for vertical resolution and uncertainty in the NDACC lidar ozone and temperature algorithms – Part 3: Temperature uncertainty budget, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4079–4101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4079-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-4079-2016</ext-link>, 2016c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lucke, R. L., Korwan, D., Bevilacqua, R. M., Hornstein, J. S., Shettle, E. P., Chen, D. T., Daehler, M., Lumpe, J. D., Fromm, M. D., Debrestian, D., Neff, B., Squire, M., König-Langlo, G., and Davies, J.: The Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM III) Instrument and Early Validation Results, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 18785–18799, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900235" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900235</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McCormick, M. P., Zawodny, J. M., Veiga, R. E., Larsen, J. C., and Wang, P. H.: An overview of SAGE I and II ozone measurements, Planetary Space Sci., 37, 1567–1586, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(89)90146-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0032-0633(89)90146-3</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McCormick, M. P., Veiga, R. E., and Chu, W. P.: Stratospheric ozone profile and total ozone trends derived from the SAGE I and SAGE II data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 269–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL00187" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92GL00187</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nazaryan, H., McCormick, M. P., and Menzel, W. P.: Global characterization of cirrus clouds using CALIPSO data, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D16211, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009481" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009481</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>NDACC Data Host Facility: Ground-based lidar and ozonesonde ozone profile data, Hohenpeißenberg ozonsonde data: <uri>ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ndacc/station/hohenpei/ames/o3sonde/</uri>, Hohenpeissenberg lidar data: <uri>ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ndacc/station/hohenpei/ames/lidar/</uri>, Lauder ozonesonde data: <uri>ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ndacc/station/lauder/ames/o3sonde/</uri>, Lauder lidar data: <uri>ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ndacc/station/lauder/ames/lidar/</uri>, last access: 10 March 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Randall, C. E., Rusch, D. W., Bevilacqua, R. M., Hoppel, K. W., Lumpe, J.
D., Shettle, E., Thompson, E., Deaver, L., Zawodny, J., Kyrö, E.,
Johnson, B., Kelder, H., Dorokhov, V. M., KönigLanglo, G., and Gil, M.:
Validation of POAM III ozone: Comparison with ozonesonde and satellite data,
J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002944" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002944</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reinsel, G., Weatherhead, E. C., Tiao, G. C., Miller, A. J., Nagatani, R.,
Wuebbles, D. J., and Flynn, L. E.: On detection of turnaround and recovery
in trend for ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 107, ACH 1-1–ACH 1-12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000500" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000500</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rex, M., Salawitch, R. J., von der Gathen, P., Harris, N. R. P.,
Chipperfield, M. P., and Naujokat, B.: Arctic ozone loss and climate change,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L04116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018844" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003GL018844</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rong, P. P., Russell III, J. M., Mlynczak, M. G., Remsberg, E. E., Marshall,
B. T., Gordley, L. L., and Lopez-Puertas, M.: Validation of Thermosphere
Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics/Sounding of the Atmosphere
using Broadband Emission Radiometry (TIMED/SABER) v1.07 ozone at 9.6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m
in altitude range 15–70 km, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D04306,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010073" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010073</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Russell, J. M., Gordley, L. L., Park, J. H., Drayson, S. R., Tuck, A. F.,
Harries, J. E., Cicerone, R. J., Crutzen, P. J., and Frederick, J. E.: The
Halogen Occultation Experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 10777–10797,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD00799" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/93JD00799</ext-link>, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>SAGE III-ISS v5.1: Ozone profile data, available at: <uri>ftp://l5ftl01.larc.nasa.gov/../distribution/SAGE_III_ISS/</uri>, last access: 10 March 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smith, A. K., Harvey, V. L., Mlynczak, M. G., Funke, B., Garcia-Comas, M.,
Hervig, M., Kaufmann, M., Kyrölä, E., López-Puertas, M., McDade,
I., Randall, C. E., Russell III, J. M., Sheese, P. E., Shiotani, M.,
Skinner, W. R., Suzuki, M., and Walker, K. A.: Satellite observations of
ozone in the upper mesosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 5803–5821, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50445" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50445</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page1297?><ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Solomon, S.: Stratospheric ozone depletion: a review of concepts and
history, Rev. Geophys., 37, 275–316, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG900008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999RG900008</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Son, S. W., Polvani, L. M., Waugh, D. W., Akiyoshi, H., Garcia, R., Kinnison, D., Pawson, S., Rozanov, E., Shepherd, T. G., and Shibata, K.: The impact
of stratospheric ozone recovery on the Southern Hemisphere westerly jet,
Science, 320, 1486–1489, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155939" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1155939</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
SPARC/IOC/GAW: Assessment of Trends in the Vertical Distribution of Ozone,
WMO – Ozone Research and Monitoring Project Report No. 43, World Meteorological Organization (WMO), Geneva, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment on the International Space Station
(SAGE III/ISS) Data Products User's Guide, Version 2.0 October 2018, available at: <uri>https://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/project/sageiii-iss/guide/DPUG-G3B-2-0.pdf</uri> (last access: 10 March 2020), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thompson, D. W. J., Solomon, S., Kushner, P. J., England, M. H., Grise, K.
M., and Karoly, D. J.: Signatures of the Antarctic ozone hole in Southern
Hemisphere surface climate change, Nat. Geosci., 4, 741–749, 2011.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>von Clarmann, T.: Validation of remotely sensed profiles of atmospheric state variables: strategies and terminology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4311–4320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4311-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4311-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, H.-J., Cunnold, D. M., Trepte, C., Thomason, L. W., and Zawodny, J.
M.: SAGE III solar ozone measurements: Initial results, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
33, L03805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025099" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005GL025099</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Waymark, C., Walker, K. A., Boone, C. D., and Bernath, P. F.: ACE-FTS version
3.0 data set: validation and data processing update, in: Proceedings of the
ACVE workshop, Frascati, Italy, March 2013, Ann. Geophys., 56,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6339" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4401/ag-6339</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Weber, M., Steinbrecht, W., van der A, R., Frith, S. M., Anderson, J., Coldewey-Egbers, M., Davis, S., Degenstein, D., Fioletov, V. E., Froidevaux, L., Hubert, D., de Laat, J., Long, C. S., Loyola, D., Sofieva, V., Tourpali, K., Roth, C., Wang, R., and Wild, J. D.: Stratospheric Ozone, in: “State of the
Climate in 2017”, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, S51–S54,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2018BAMSStateoftheClimate.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2018BAMSStateoftheClimate.1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Early results and validation of SAGE III-ISS ozone profile measurements from onboard the International Space Station</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment III (SAGE
III, 2018) instrument was launched on 19 February 2017 from the NASA Kennedy
Space Center and was integrated aboard the International Space Station (ISS).
SAGE III-ISS has been providing ozone profile measurements since June 2017.
This paper presents an early validation of the Level 2 solar and lunar
occultation ozone data products using ground-based lidar and ozonesondes
from Hohenpeißenberg and Lauder as well as satellite ozone vertical products from
the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer
(ACE-FTS) instrument. Average differences in the ozone concentration between
SAGE III-ISS and Hohenpeißenberg lidar observations for 1 year are less
than 10&thinsp;% between 16 and 42&thinsp;km and less than 5&thinsp;% between 20 and 40&thinsp;km.
Hohenpeißenberg ozonesonde comparisons are mostly within 10&thinsp;% between 18
and 30&thinsp;km. The Lauder lidar comparison results are less than 10&thinsp;% between
17 and 37&thinsp;km, and the Lauder
ozonesonde comparison results are less than 10&thinsp;% between 19 and 31&thinsp;km. The seasonal average differences in the ozone concentration between
SAGE III-ISS and ACE-FTS are mostly less than 5&thinsp;% between 20 and 45&thinsp;km for
both the Northern Hemisphere and Southern Hemisphere. All results from these
comparisons show that the SAGE III-ISS ozone solar data compare well with
correlative measurements throughout the stratosphere. With few comparisons
available, the percentage difference between the SAGE III-ISS lunar ozone
data and the ozonesonde data is less than 10&thinsp;% between 19 and 27&thinsp;km. The
percentage difference between the SAGE III-ISS lunar ozone data and the
ACE-FTS ozone data is less than 10&thinsp;% between 20 and 40&thinsp;km.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
ACE-FTS v3.5/3.6: Satellite ozone profile data, available at: <a href="https://databace.scisat.ca/level2/ace_v3.5_v3.6/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 10 March 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Bernath, P. F., McElroy, C. T., Abrams, M. C., Boone, C. D., Butler, M.,
Camy-Peyret, C., Carleer, M., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P. F., Colin, R.,
DeCola, P., DeMaziíere, M., Drummond, J. R., Dufour, D., Evans, W. F. J.,
Fast, H., Fussen, D., Gilbert, K., Jennings, D. E., Llewellyn, E. J., Lowe,
R. P., Mahieu, E., McConnell, J. C., McHugh, M., McLeod, S. D., Michaud, R.,
Midwinter, C., Nassar, R., Nichitiu, F., Nowlan, C., Rinsland, C. P.,
Rochon, Y. J., Rowlands, N., Semeniuk, K., Simon, P., Skelton, R., Sloan, J.
J., Soucy, M.-A., Strong, K., Tremblay, P., Turnbull, D., Walker, K. A.,
Walkty, I., Wardle, D. A., Wehrle, V., Zander, R., and Zou, J.: Atmospheric
Chemistry Experiment (ACE): mission overview, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32,
L15S01, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022386" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL022386</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bodeker, G. E., Boyd, I. S., and Matthews, W. A.: Trends and variability in
vertical ozone and temperature profiles measured by ozonesondes at Lauder,
New Zealand: 1986–1996, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 28661–28681, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Boone, C. D., Nassar, R., Walker, K. A., Rochon, Y., McLeod, S. D., Rinsland, C. P., and Bernath, P. F.: Retrievals for the atmospheric chemistry
experiment Fourier-transform spectrometer, Appl. Optics, 44,
7218–7231, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.44.007218" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.44.007218</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bourassa, A. E., Degenstein, D. A., Randel, W. J., Zawodny, J. M., Kyrölä, E., McLinden, C. A., Sioris, C. E., and Roth, C. Z.: Trends in stratospheric ozone derived from merged SAGE II and Odin-OSIRIS satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 6983–6994, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6983-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-6983-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Noel, S.,
Rozanov, V. V., Chance, K. V., and Goede, A. P. H.: SCIAMACHY: Mission
objectives and measurement modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;0127:SMOAMM&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;0127:SMOAMM&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Damadeo, R. P., Zawodny, J. M., Thomason, L. W., and Iyer, N.: SAGE version 7.0 algorithm: application to SAGE II, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3539–3561, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3539-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3539-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Dupuy, E., Walker, K. A., Kar, J., Boone, C. D., McElroy, C. T., Bernath, P. F., Drummond, J. R., Skelton, R., McLeod, S. D., Hughes, R. C., Nowlan, C. R., Dufour, D. G., Zou, J., Nichitiu, F., Strong, K., Baron, P., Bevilacqua, R. M., Blumenstock, T., Bodeker, G. E., Borsdorff, T., Bourassa, A. E., Bovensmann, H., Boyd, I. S., Bracher, A., Brogniez, C., Burrows, J. P., Catoire, V., Ceccherini, S., Chabrillat, S., Christensen, T., Coffey, M. T., Cortesi, U., Davies, J., De Clercq, C., Degenstein, D. A., De Mazière, M., Demoulin, P., Dodion, J., Firanski, B., Fischer, H., Forbes, G., Froidevaux, L., Fussen, D., Gerard, P., Godin-Beekmann, S., Goutail, F., Granville, J., Griffith, D., Haley, C. S., Hannigan, J. W., Höpfner, M., Jin, J. J., Jones, A., Jones, N. B., Jucks, K., Kagawa, A., Kasai, Y., Kerzenmacher, T. E., Kleinböhl, A., Klekociuk, A. R., Kramer, I., Küllmann, H., Kuttippurath, J., Kyrölä, E., Lambert, J.-C., Livesey, N. J., Llewellyn, E. J., Lloyd, N. D., Mahieu, E., Manney, G. L., Marshall, B. T., McConnell, J. C., McCormick, M. P., McDermid, I. S., McHugh, M., McLinden, C. A., Mellqvist, J., Mizutani, K., Murayama, Y., Murtagh, D. P., Oelhaf, H., Parrish, A., Petelina, S. V., Piccolo, C., Pommereau, J.-P., Randall, C. E., Robert, C., Roth, C., Schneider, M., Senten, C., Steck, T., Strandberg, A., Strawbridge, K. B., Sussmann, R., Swart, D. P. J., Tarasick, D. W., Taylor, J. R., Tétard, C., Thomason, L. W., Thompson, A. M., Tully, M. B., Urban, J., Vanhellemont, F., Vigouroux, C., von Clarmann, T., von der Gathen, P., von Savigny, C., Waters, J. W., Witte, J. C., Wolff, M., and Zawodny, J. M.: Validation of ozone measurements from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment (ACE), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 287–343, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-287-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-287-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Harris, N. R. P., Hassler, B., Tummon, F., Bodeker, G. E., Hubert, D., Petropavlovskikh, I., Steinbrecht, W., Anderson, J., Bhartia, P. K., Boone, C. D., Bourassa, A., Davis, S. M., Degenstein, D., Delcloo, A., Frith, S. M., Froidevaux, L., Godin-Beekmann, S., Jones, N., Kurylo, M. J., Kyrölä, E., Laine, M., Leblanc, S. T., Lambert, J.-C., Liley, B., Mahieu, E., Maycock, A., de Mazière, M., Parrish, A., Querel, R., Rosenlof, K. H., Roth, C., Sioris, C., Staehelin, J., Stolarski, R. S., Stübi, R., Tamminen, J., Vigouroux, C., Walker, K. A., Wang, H. J., Wild, J., and Zawodny, J. M.: Past changes in the vertical distribution of ozone – Part 3: Analysis and interpretation of trends, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 9965–9982, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9965-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-9965-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Imai, K., Manago, N., Mitsuda, C., Naito, Y., Nishimoto, E., Sakazaki, T.,
Fujiwara, M., Froidevaux, L., von Clarmann, T., Stiller, G. P., Murtagh, D.
P., Rong, P.-P., Mlynczak, M. G., Walker, K. A., Kinnison, D. E., Akiyoshi,
H., Nakamura, T., Miyasaka, T., Nishibori, T., Mizobuchi, S., Kikuchi, K.
I., Ozeki, H., Takahashi, C., Hayashi, H., Sano, T., Suzuki, M., Takayanagi,
M., and Shiotani, M.: Validation of ozone data from the superconducting
Submillimeter-Wave Limb-Emission Sounder (SMILES), J. Geophys. Res., 118,
5750–5769, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50434" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50434</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Kerr, J. B., Fast, H., McElroy, C. T., Oltmans, S. J., Lathrop, J. A., Kyro, E., Paukkunen, A., Claude, H., Koehler, U., Sreedharan, C. R., Takao, T., and Tsukagoshi, Y.: The 1991 WMO International Ozonesonde Intercomparison at Vanscoy Canada, Atmos. Ocean, 32, 685–716, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Leblanc, T., Sica, R. J., van Gijsel, J. A. E., Godin-Beekmann, S., Haefele, A., Trickl, T., Payen, G., and Gabarrot, F.: Proposed standardized definitions for vertical resolution and uncertainty in the NDACC lidar ozone and temperature algorithms – Part 1: Vertical resolution, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4029–4049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4029-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4029-2016</a>, 2016a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Leblanc, T., Sica, R. J., van Gijsel, J. A. E., Godin-Beekmann, S., Haefele, A., Trickl, T., Payen, G., and Liberti, G.: Proposed standardized definitions for vertical resolution and uncertainty in the NDACC lidar ozone and temperature algorithms – Part 2: Ozone DIAL uncertainty budget, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4051–4078, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4051-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4051-2016</a>, 2016b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Leblanc, T., Sica, R. J., van Gijsel, J. A. E., Haefele, A., Payen, G., and Liberti, G.: Proposed standardized definitions for vertical resolution and uncertainty in the NDACC lidar ozone and temperature algorithms – Part 3: Temperature uncertainty budget, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4079–4101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4079-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4079-2016</a>, 2016c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Lucke, R. L., Korwan, D., Bevilacqua, R. M., Hornstein, J. S., Shettle, E. P., Chen, D. T., Daehler, M., Lumpe, J. D., Fromm, M. D., Debrestian, D., Neff, B., Squire, M., König-Langlo, G., and Davies, J.: The Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM III) Instrument and Early Validation Results, J. Geophys. Res., 104, 18785–18799, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900235" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900235</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
McCormick, M. P., Zawodny, J. M., Veiga, R. E., Larsen, J. C., and Wang, P. H.: An overview of SAGE I and II ozone measurements, Planetary Space Sci., 37, 1567–1586, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(89)90146-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-0633(89)90146-3</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
McCormick, M. P., Veiga, R. E., and Chu, W. P.: Stratospheric ozone profile and total ozone trends derived from the SAGE I and SAGE II data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 269–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL00187" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/92GL00187</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Nazaryan, H., McCormick, M. P., and Menzel, W. P.: Global characterization of cirrus clouds using CALIPSO data, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D16211, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009481" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009481</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
NDACC Data Host Facility: Ground-based lidar and ozonesonde ozone profile data, Hohenpeißenberg ozonsonde data: <a href="ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ndacc/station/hohenpei/ames/o3sonde/" target="_blank"/>, Hohenpeissenberg lidar data: <a href="ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ndacc/station/hohenpei/ames/lidar/" target="_blank"/>, Lauder ozonesonde data: <a href="ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ndacc/station/lauder/ames/o3sonde/" target="_blank"/>, Lauder lidar data: <a href="ftp://ftp.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/ndacc/station/lauder/ames/lidar/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 10 March 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Randall, C. E., Rusch, D. W., Bevilacqua, R. M., Hoppel, K. W., Lumpe, J.
D., Shettle, E., Thompson, E., Deaver, L., Zawodny, J., Kyrö, E.,
Johnson, B., Kelder, H., Dorokhov, V. M., KönigLanglo, G., and Gil, M.:
Validation of POAM III ozone: Comparison with ozonesonde and satellite data,
J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4367, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002944" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002944</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Reinsel, G., Weatherhead, E. C., Tiao, G. C., Miller, A. J., Nagatani, R.,
Wuebbles, D. J., and Flynn, L. E.: On detection of turnaround and recovery
in trend for ozone, J. Geophys. Res., 107, ACH 1-1–ACH 1-12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000500" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000500</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Rex, M., Salawitch, R. J., von der Gathen, P., Harris, N. R. P.,
Chipperfield, M. P., and Naujokat, B.: Arctic ozone loss and climate change,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L04116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018844" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018844</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Rong, P. P., Russell III, J. M., Mlynczak, M. G., Remsberg, E. E., Marshall,
B. T., Gordley, L. L., and Lopez-Puertas, M.: Validation of Thermosphere
Ionosphere Mesosphere Energetics and Dynamics/Sounding of the Atmosphere
using Broadband Emission Radiometry (TIMED/SABER) v1.07 ozone at 9.6&thinsp;µm
in altitude range 15–70&thinsp;km, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D04306,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010073" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010073</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, J. M., Gordley, L. L., Park, J. H., Drayson, S. R., Tuck, A. F.,
Harries, J. E., Cicerone, R. J., Crutzen, P. J., and Frederick, J. E.: The
Halogen Occultation Experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 98, 10777–10797,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD00799" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/93JD00799</a>, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
SAGE III-ISS v5.1: Ozone profile data, available at: <a href="ftp://l5ftl01.larc.nasa.gov/../distribution/SAGE_III_ISS/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 10 March 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, A. K., Harvey, V. L., Mlynczak, M. G., Funke, B., Garcia-Comas, M.,
Hervig, M., Kaufmann, M., Kyrölä, E., López-Puertas, M., McDade,
I., Randall, C. E., Russell III, J. M., Sheese, P. E., Shiotani, M.,
Skinner, W. R., Suzuki, M., and Walker, K. A.: Satellite observations of
ozone in the upper mesosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 118, 5803–5821, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50445" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50445</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S.: Stratospheric ozone depletion: a review of concepts and
history, Rev. Geophys., 37, 275–316, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG900008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999RG900008</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Son, S. W., Polvani, L. M., Waugh, D. W., Akiyoshi, H., Garcia, R., Kinnison, D., Pawson, S., Rozanov, E., Shepherd, T. G., and Shibata, K.: The impact
of stratospheric ozone recovery on the Southern Hemisphere westerly jet,
Science, 320, 1486–1489, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155939" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1155939</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
SPARC/IOC/GAW: Assessment of Trends in the Vertical Distribution of Ozone,
WMO – Ozone Research and Monitoring Project Report No. 43, World Meteorological Organization (WMO), Geneva, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment on the International Space Station
(SAGE III/ISS) Data Products User's Guide, Version 2.0 October 2018, available at: <a href="https://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/project/sageiii-iss/guide/DPUG-G3B-2-0.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 10 March 2020), 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Thompson, D. W. J., Solomon, S., Kushner, P. J., England, M. H., Grise, K.
M., and Karoly, D. J.: Signatures of the Antarctic ozone hole in Southern
Hemisphere surface climate change, Nat. Geosci., 4, 741–749, 2011.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
von Clarmann, T.: Validation of remotely sensed profiles of atmospheric state variables: strategies and terminology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4311–4320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4311-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4311-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, H.-J., Cunnold, D. M., Trepte, C., Thomason, L. W., and Zawodny, J.
M.: SAGE III solar ozone measurements: Initial results, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
33, L03805, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025099" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005GL025099</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Waymark, C., Walker, K. A., Boone, C. D., and Bernath, P. F.: ACE-FTS version
3.0 data set: validation and data processing update, in: Proceedings of the
ACVE workshop, Frascati, Italy, March 2013, Ann. Geophys., 56,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6339" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6339</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Weber, M., Steinbrecht, W., van der A, R., Frith, S. M., Anderson, J., Coldewey-Egbers, M., Davis, S., Degenstein, D., Fioletov, V. E., Froidevaux, L., Hubert, D., de Laat, J., Long, C. S., Loyola, D., Sofieva, V., Tourpali, K., Roth, C., Wang, R., and Wild, J. D.: Stratospheric Ozone, in: “State of the
Climate in 2017”, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 99, S51–S54,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2018BAMSStateoftheClimate.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2018BAMSStateoftheClimate.1</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
