<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-13-3787-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Counting on chemistry: laboratory evaluation of seed-material-dependent detection efficiencies of<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> ultrafine condensation particle counters</article-title><alt-title>Seed-material-dependent detection efficiencies of UCPCs</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Seed-material-dependent detection efficiencies of UCPCs}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{P.~J.~Wlasits et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wlasits</surname><given-names>Peter Josef</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4291-6004</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Stolzenburg</surname><given-names>Dominik</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1014-1360</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Tauber</surname><given-names>Christian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1453-1067</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Brilke</surname><given-names>Sophia</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3133-249X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Schmitt</surname><given-names>Sebastian Harald</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5491-3572</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Winkler</surname><given-names>Paul Martin</given-names></name>
          <email>paul.winkler@univie.ac.at</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Wimmer</surname><given-names>Daniela</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5539-9958</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>University of Vienna, Aerosol Physics and Environmental Physics, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090 Vienna, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>University of Helsinki, Institute for Atmospheric and Earth System Research/Physics, 00014 Helsinki, Finland</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>TSI GmbH, Neukoellner Straße 4, 52068 Aachen, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Paul Martin Winkler (paul.winkler@univie.ac.at)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>13</day><month>July</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>3787</fpage><lpage>3798</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>17</day><month>December</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>18</day><month>February</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13</day><month>May</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>27</day><month>May</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 Peter Josef Wlasits et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/3787/2020/amt-13-3787-2020.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/3787/2020/amt-13-3787-2020.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/3787/2020/amt-13-3787-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/3787/2020/amt-13-3787-2020.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e150">Condensation particle counters (CPCs) are crucial instruments for detecting sub-10 nm aerosol particles. Understanding the detection performance of a CPC requires thorough characterization under well-controlled laboratory conditions. Besides the size of the seed particles, chemical interactions between the working fluid and the seed particles also influence the activation efficiencies. However, common seed particle materials used for CPC characterizations are not chosen with respect to chemical interactions with vapor molecules of the working fluid by default. Here, we present experiments on the influence of the seed particle material on the detection efficiencies and the 50 % cutoff diameters  of commonly used CPCs for the detection of sub-10 nm particles. A remarkable set consisting of six different and commercially available particle detectors, including the newly developed TSI V-WCPC 3789 and a tuned TSI 3776, was tested. The corresponding working fluids of the instruments are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol, diethylene glycol and water. Among other materials we were able to measure detection efficiencies with nanometer-sized organic seed particles reproducibly generated by the oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene vapor in a flow tube. Theoretical simulations of supersaturation profiles in the condensers were successfully related to measured detection efficiencies. Our results demonstrate the importance of chemical similarities between seed particles and the working fluids used when CPCs are characterized. We anticipate our study to contribute to a deeper understanding of chemical interactions during heterogeneous nucleation processes.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e178">Ultrafine aerosol particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) might cause severe effects on human health <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.1"/> and impact the global climate through the aerosol indirect effect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx3" id="paren.2"/>. In the atmosphere, aerosol particles have primary and secondary sources. Secondary particles form when gaseous precursors oxidize to low-volatility compounds, which at high enough abundances can form molecular clusters. Clusters grow by condensation into the nucleation- and Aitken-mode size range and eventually reach sizes at which they can act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). A detailed understanding of the mechanisms leading to aerosol formation and growth, i.e., new particle formation (NPF; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="altparen.3"/>), requires the careful measurement of particles in the cluster–particle transition and nucleation-mode size regime. Quantitative measurements of aerosol particles in the size range 1–10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remain a major challenge for the understanding of the mechanisms responsible for NPF.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3788?><p id="d1e217">Condensation particle counters (CPCs), which optically detect nanometer-sized particles after condensational growth, are state-of-the art instruments for particle measurements in the sub-10 nm size regime. Since the introduction of Aitken's “dust counter” towards the end of the 19th century <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.4"/>, particle counters capable of detecting smaller and smaller aerosol particles have been developed <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45 bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx13 bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.5"/>. Thus, CPCs are used in many different fields, including atmospheric studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.6"/>, the characterization of combustion processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.7"/>, monitoring occupational health hazards <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.8"/> and clean-room monitoring systems <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.9"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e239">CPCs are based on two fundamental processes: heterogeneous nucleation and subsequent condensational growth. The seed particles are mixed with a condensable vapor, followed by a rapid temperature change, leading to vapor supersaturation, particle activation by heterogeneous nucleation and subsequent condensational growth. The seed particles grow to sizes large enough that they can be detected optically. This process can be achieved by different working fluids such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol, water or diethylene glycol (DEG), which are commonly used in commercial instruments. Previous research has shown that the molecular weight and the surface tension of the working fluid have an impact on particle activation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx33" id="paren.10"/>. Higher molecular weights and higher surface tensions allow for the activation of smaller particles.</p>
      <p id="d1e252">The detection performance of CPCs is commonly quantified by the 50 % cutoff diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The total detection efficiency of a CPC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, is given by the following relation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.11"/>:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M9" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the sampling efficiency accounting for the particle losses inside the instrument. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> corresponds to the activation efficiency of the seed particles by heterogeneous nucleation, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the detection efficiency of the particles in the optical system.</p>
      <p id="d1e428">Heterogeneous nucleation processes are influenced by the physicochemical properties of the seed particles. If the seed particle is entirely soluble in the condensing liquid, Köhler theory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.12"/> can describe the activation behavior. If the seed is insoluble, heterogeneous nucleation theory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.13"/> is applicable. Other relevant seed particle properties for their activation are size, shape, wettability and charging state <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.14"/>. Previous studies have shown that the charging state of the seed particles might also have an influence on their respective detection efficiencies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.15"/>. Chemical processes on the molecular level mediate particle activation, including interactions related to the chemical composition of the seed particles and the molecules of the working fluids <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.16"/>. Previous research has identified potential molecular characteristics that act as docking stations to the seed particle. These docking stations are polar groups, like –<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.17"/>. The distribution of polar groups, in general, defines the chemical polarity of a vapor molecule. A table summarizing the relevant physical properties of the working fluids can be found in the Supplement (Table S1). Furthermore, it has been shown that the activation probability is influenced by the supersaturation occurring in the condenser of the CPC and the working fluid used <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx52" id="paren.18"/>. As a result the combination of CPCs based on different working fluids might even provide information concerning the chemical composition of the seed particles by showing differing detection efficiencies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.19"/>. Additionally, previous studies have shown that the detection efficiency of CPCs for sub-2 nm particles can be improved by tuning the instrument settings <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.20"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e467">Here we present the results of studying the effect of the working fluid on the activation efficiencies with respect to various seed particle compositions. The broad array of investigated particle detectors was composed of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol-based CPCs (TSI 3772, TSI 3776 and Airmodus A20), water-based CPCs (TSI 3788 and V-WCPC 3789) and a DEG-based booster stage (TSI 3777). The experiments have been performed under reproducible laboratory conditions and provide further insights into particle activation in CPCs.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experimental methods</title>
      <p id="d1e485">A schematic of the experimental setup is displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. The counting efficiencies of the CPCs were measured using four different types of seed particles generated from sodium chloride (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pro analysi, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), silver (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, wool for elemental analysis, CAS no.: 7440-22-4, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany), ammonium sulfate (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, pro analysi, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, BCY, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, CAS no.: 87-44-5, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). To avoid a possible influence of the relative humidity of the carrier gas on the detection efficiency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx27" id="paren.21"/>, synthetic air (ALPHAGAZ 1 Air, 99.999 % (5.0), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm mol<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, Air Liquide) was used as a carrier gas and the aerosol was generated in dry conditions in all measurements. Sodium chloride, silver and ammonium sulfate particles were produced in a tube furnace <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="paren.22"/> manufactured by Carbolite Gero GmbH &amp; Co. KG, Germany. The particle material is put onto a crucible and inserted into the cylindrical furnace. The material evaporates in the heated furnace, and rapid cooling downstream of the heated section leads to particle formation. Table S2 contains the approximate furnace temperatures for different seed particle materials.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e601">Schematic of the experimental setup: the figure shows a schematic of the experimental setup that was used to measure the detection efficiency of the ultrafine particle counters. A Faraday cup electrometer was used as a reference. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds were generated using BCY (BC), an ozone generator (OG) and a flow tube. The curved arrows mark the sheath air cycle. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the setup for the measurements involving just CPCs. Due to the higher aerosol inlet flow rate of the TSI  3777 the setup was modified <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/3787/2020/amt-13-3787-2020-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page3790?><p id="d1e637">Subsequent to the aerosol generator, a dilution flow of synthetic air is joined with the aerosol flow. A soft X-ray charger (TSI 3088 Advanced Aerosol Neutralizer) is used to achieve a steady-state charge distribution for the analyzed aerosol flow. In the next step, the aerosol enters a custom-made Vienna-type differential mobility analyzer (DMA, as presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="altparen.23"/>, and referred to as nano-DMA; see the Supplement), where particles are selected according to their electrical mobility. The electrical mobility diameters of the selected particles range between 1 and 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="text.24"/>, the flow rate ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> defines the limiting resolution in the absence of diffusion when the DMA flows are balanced and is given by the sum of the aerosol inlet flow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the sample outlet flow <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> divided by the sum of the sheath flow rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sh</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the excess flow rate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M30" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sh</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        The limiting resolution throughout our experiments is therefore approximated by 0.15. It is important to note that in the 1–2 nm size range diffusional broadening can degrade the DMA resolution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.25"/>. The selected aerosol might be polydisperse and the selected particle diameter must be seen as an average diameter with an envelope (see Fig. S1). In our study this envelope is given by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> based on a maximum uncertainty approximation by taking into account the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="text.26"/>. The diffusional broadening of the transfer function of the nano-DMA between 1 and 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was also presented by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="text.27"/>. In their study the authors calculated a geometric standard deviation of approximately 1.07 for a size-classified output aerosol composed of particles with a mean diameter of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. By applying positive voltage to the nano-DMA, particles with negative charge were selected. Negatively charged particles of the same composition are assumed to achieve higher activation efficiencies at small sizes independently of the CPCs used <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.28"/> and are thus preferred for applications in size distribution measurements down to particles as small as 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Previous studies on the counting efficiency of CPCs involving sub-2 nm particles were conducted using high-resolution DMAs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.29"/>. In order to assess the suitability of the nano-DMA used for seed particles with diameters smaller than 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, previous measurements of negatively charged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds using a tuned TSI 3776, the TSI 3777 and a high-resolution DMA (UDMA) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.30"/> were used. Parts of the results and the experimental setup used were published by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.31"/>. The results of the comparison are displayed in the Supplement.</p>
      <p id="d1e837">A flow unit, including a total particle filter and a silica gel dryer, maintains a sheath airflow rate of 19.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>a)  or 33.0 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b), respectively, in the DMA. The silica gel was exchanged frequently in order to maintain a dry sheath air cycle (closed-loop system). Downstream of the DMA the aerosol is evenly distributed among a CPC and a Faraday cup electrometer (TSI 3068B Aerosol Electrometer) using a T junction. The flow rates were adjusted and monitored using a TSI 4140 mass flowmeter. For the measurements with the DEG-based booster stage, a different flow setup was used due to the higher inlet flow rate of the instrument (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>b). Accordingly, the tube furnace was operated with 2.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of synthetic air and the aerosol inlet flow of the nano-DMA was increased to 5.0 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Consequently, the setup used for the generation of seed particles based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bears a close resemblance to the setup described in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.32"/>, wherein the authors also present mass spectra of furnace-generated clusters. The study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.33"/> can be used to infer the chemical composition of some of the seed particles used in this study.</p>
      <p id="d1e941">Particles consisting of oxidized <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-caryophyllene (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BCYO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were produced in a flow tube <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.34"/>. The seeds were produced by evaporating BCY into a clean airstream and subsequently mixing it with ozone, allowing the ozonolysis reaction to take place inside the flow tube. Ozone was generated using a custom-made ultraviolet (UV) lamp with adjustable intensity. An intensity–ozone calibration was performed prior to the experiments with an ozone monitor (ThermoFisher Scientific, model i49), suggesting that the ozone concentrations were in the range of 100–500 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ppb</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The mode diameter of the resulting size distribution can be shifted by varying the length of the reaction path of the flow tube using an adjustable piston and thus the reaction time of the organic compounds. The diameter of the flow tube used was 0.05 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the length of the reaction path was varied between 0.1 and 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The temperature of the BCY evaporator was kept at 283.15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">K</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1019">The CPCs used and the booster stage are presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>. All particle counters are based on the laminar-flow principle and have 50 % cutoff diameters below 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> according to the manufacturers. Here, it should be noted that the TSI 3789 was operated in the 2 nm mode for all experiments. The 2 nm mode is the default setting by the manufacturer for low-cutoff measurements based on calibrations with sucrose. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol- and DEG-based instruments implement a typical architecture consisting of a heated saturator and a cooled condenser. In the case of the TSI 3772 and the Airmodus A20 the entire aerosol flow reaches the heated saturator. The TSI 3776 and TSI 3777 are additionally equipped with a capillary regulating the aerosol flow <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.35"/>. This capillary–sheath layout helps to keep the aerosol flow centered and enhances the detection efficiency by achieving a higher and sharper  supersaturation profile within the condenser and reducing diffusional losses <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.36"/>. In the case of the water-based TSI 3788 a cooler conditioner is followed by a heated growth tube <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.37"/>. Here, the aerosol flow is first cooled and then enters a heated region of supersaturated vapor. The temperatures of the sections have to be switched due to the higher diffusion coefficient of water compared to heat transfer. Lastly, the TSI 3789 (V-WCPC 3789) is based on a three-step principle: a cool conditioner, a warm initiator and a cooler moderator <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="paren.38"/>. The moderator is necessary for removing water vapor and heat while maintaining supersaturated conditions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.39"/>. In contrast to the TSI 3788, the TSI 3789 is not based on a capillary–sheath layout.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1058">Instrumentation used: the table shows the particle counters used,
including their model numbers, the working fluids used and the 50 %
cutoff diameter as stated by the manufacturers.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Manufacturer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Model</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Working fluid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(nm)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3776</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3772</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3788</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">water</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3789</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">water</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3777</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DEG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Airmodus</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">A20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e1232">By changing the internal settings of three selected CPCs, the 50 % cutoff diameters were pushed to smaller sizes using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BCYO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles. In the case of the TSI 3777 and the TSI 3789, the boosting was achieved by changing the temperature settings. In the case of the tuned TSI 3776 (denoted as TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), the internal flows were also adjusted. The valve regulating the sheath airflow is adjusted such that the sample flow rate of the CPC increases to 2.5 L min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.40"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1271">The detection efficiency <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined by comparing the particle number concentration measured by a CPC, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CPC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to the particle number concentration of the Faraday cup electrometer (FCE), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FCE</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M65" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CPC</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">FCE</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        After the tube furnace had reached a stable state, the number concentrations were simultaneously measured for 45 s.<?pagebreak page3791?> An uncertainty analysis of measurement data was performed according to the rules of Gaussian error propagation.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Composition-dependent counting efficiencies</title>
      <p id="d1e1344">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> shows the detection efficiencies measured with two CPCs (TSI 3776 and TSI 3789) and the CPC–conditioner combination (TSI 3777 and TSI 3772). The abscissa is kept between 1 and 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in order to set focus on the differences between the seed particles used. The detection efficiency shows a clear dependence on the seed particle composition and the working fluid. The smallest 50 % cutoff diameters using the DEG-based TSI 3777 were accomplished by using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds. Both seed particles showed a 50 % cutoff diameter of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In the case of the TSI 3776, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BCYO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds were found to have the smallest 50 % cutoff diameter of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Lastly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds exhibited the smallest 50 % cutoff diameter using the TSI 3789 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Interestingly, the TSI 3777 shows a significant difference between the activation of ionically bound (and polar) salts (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and less polar seed particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BCYO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>): the polar compounds are activated at smaller diameters compared to the nonpolar ones. In the case of the TSI 3776 the detection efficiency curves are very similar for all seed particles, except for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The related detection efficiency curve is shifted towards larger diameters. The water-based CPC shows a much smaller 50 % cutoff diameter for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ammonium sulfate compared to the butanol-based counter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.30</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.08</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Overall, the difference between the smallest and the largest 50 % cutoff diameter is approximately 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for all three CPCs.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1618">Detection efficiencies and working fluids: the figure shows the detection efficiencies for different seed particle materials as a function of the electrical mobility equivalent diameter. Different colors correspond to different seed particles, and every plot is related to a different working fluid: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol <bold>(a)</bold>, DEG <bold>(b)</bold> and water <bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/3787/2020/amt-13-3787-2020-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1643">The measured detection efficiency curves show the following two features: (i) the slopes corresponding to the DEG-based TSI 3777 are steeper compared to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol-based TSI 3776 and the water-based TSI 3789. (ii) The counting efficiency of the TSI 3776 and the TSI 3777 reaches 1 around 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in both cases. In contrast, the detection  efficiency of the TSI 3789 reaches 1 at about 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Figs. S2 and S3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Comparison of the water-based CPCs</title>
      <p id="d1e1677">Subsequently, the two investigated water-based CPCs were directly compared to each other. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows a direct comparison of the detection efficiency curves for the two different water-based CPCs (TSI 3788 and TSI 3789). The TSI 3788 shows almost identical curves for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ammonium sulfate, with a 50 % cutoff diameter of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for ammonium sulfate, while the curves for the less polar compounds (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BCYO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are shifted by approximately 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>a). The TSI 3789, on the other hand, shows a different kind of compound dependence, since the detection efficiency curves for polar and less polar seeds are not separated as clearly. All 50 % cutoff diameters range from 2.3 to 3.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and are similar to the cutoff diameters of the TSI 3788, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> having the lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BCYO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> having a rather high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The curves measured with the TSI 3788 are steeper compared to the TSI 3789. As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>c, the lower detection efficiencies for the TSI 3789 below 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are due to higher internal losses compared to the TSI 3788. This behavior is most probably linked to the fact that the TSI 3789 is not based on a capillary–sheath layout. The upper curve shows the detection efficiency corrected for diffusional losses in the inlet and conditioner according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="text.41"/> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds. The corrected detection efficiency curves of the other seeds are presented in the Supplement (see Fig. S5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1825">Detection efficiencies of the water-based CPCs: the figure shows the detection efficiencies as a function of the electrical mobility equivalent diameter. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> corresponds to the TSI 3788, and panel <bold>(b)</bold> shows the data measured with the TSI 3789. Panel <bold>(c)</bold> displays the data set for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that has been corrected for diffusion losses; panels <bold>(a, b)</bold> show uncorrected data.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/3787/2020/amt-13-3787-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Comparison of the $n$-butanol-based CPCs}?><title>Comparison of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol-based CPCs</title>
      <p id="d1e1870">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> shows the direct comparison of the butanol-based CPCs. Three out of the four butanol-based CPCs, i.e., the TSI 3772, the TSI 3776 and the Airmodus A20, show the expected activation pattern: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BCYO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds are activated at smaller diameters compared to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds. The Airmodus A20 reaches its plateau at detection efficiency values of about 0.9 at 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e1934">The TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> barely shows a composition dependence of the 50 % cutoff diameters, thereby confirming the results of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.42"/> for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds. There is no significant difference between the smallest and the largest 50 % cutoff diameters, which are centered around 2.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The detection efficiency curves are steep and already reach plateau levels of 1 at 4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1975">Detection efficiencies of the butanol-based CPCs: the figure shows the detection efficiencies as a function of the electrical mobility equivalent diameter. Every plot corresponds to a different butanol-based CPC: TSI 3772 <bold>(a)</bold>, TSI 3776 <bold>(b)</bold>, Airmodus A20 <bold>(c)</bold> and TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(d)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/3787/2020/amt-13-3787-2020-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{50\,{\%} cutoff diameters}?><title>50 % cutoff diameters</title>
      <p id="d1e2014">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/> summarizes the 50 % cutoff diameters measured with the aforementioned instruments operated at standard settings. The discussed dependence of the detection efficiencies on the working fluids and the seed particle compositions can be seen clearly. The DEG-based TSI 3777 and the two water-based CPCs (TSI 3788 and TSI 3789) show the smallest 50 % cutoff diameters for polar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ammonium sulfate seeds. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol-based CPCs activate less polar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BCYO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds at the smallest 50 % cutoff diameters. Additionally, our results clearly show that the dependence of the detection efficiency on the seed particle material also influences CPCs with 50 % cutoff diameters larger than 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the absolute shifts in the diameters get larger for these models. This applies for the Airmodus A20 and the TSI 3772.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2055">The 50 % cutoff diameters for different working fluids: the figure shows the 50 % cutoff diameters measured with the TSI 3776,  Airmodus A20, TSI 3772, TSI 3777, TSI 3788 and TSI 3789. Different colors correspond to different seed particle compositions.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/3787/2020/amt-13-3787-2020-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Effect of instrument boosting</title>
      <p id="d1e2073">As the internal temperature settings in all CPCs used in this work can be adjusted by the customer, a set of experiments was performed to test the instruments with different temperature settings (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). The tests were done using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BCYO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seed particles, and the tested CPCs were the butanol-based<?pagebreak page3792?> TSI 3776, the DEG-based TSI 3777 and the water-based TSI 3789. In the case of the TSI 3777 and the TSI 3789, only the temperatures were adjusted, and for the TSI 3776 the flows were also changed (TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>; see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/> for tuned settings). The adjustment of the temperatures did not increase the background count rate of the instruments. The results are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. For all tested CPCs, the 50 % cutoff diameters could be reduced (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>). The shapes of the curves did not show any significant change except for the TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is due to a change in the internal flow rates, leading to reduced diffusion losses at the instrument's inlet. As a result, the overall counting efficiency is enhanced and exhibits a steeper slope. The 50 % cutoff diameter could be lowered by approximately 35 % in the case of the TSI 3776, TSI 3777 and TSI 3789. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a shows the effect of changing the temperature settings and the inlet flow of the TSI 3776. The effect of just changing the temperature settings is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b and c (TSI 3777 and TSI 3789).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2121">Temperature settings: the table summarizes the standard temperature settings according to the user manuals of the particle counters and the empirically derived tuned temperature settings (see also <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="altparen.43"/>).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Instrument</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Condenser</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Saturator</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Optics</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Conditioner</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Initiator</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cabinet</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7" align="center">Standard <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> settings (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSI 3776</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">39.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSI 3789</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">90.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">15.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSI 3777</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">62.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col7" align="center">Tuned <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> settings (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">33.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">34.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSI 3789<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">40.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">95.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">23.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSI 3777<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">68.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e2454">Summarized 50 % cutoff diameters: the table shows the measured
50 % cutoff diameters for the four different seed particle materials and
for every particle counter in use.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Seed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Working</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Instrument</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">fluid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3776</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3772</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">A20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">7.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">0.8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">water</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3788</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">TSI 3789</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DEG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3777</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3776</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3772</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.0</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">A20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">6.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">0.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">water</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3788</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">TSI 3789</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DEG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3777</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3776</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3772</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">9.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">A20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">7.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">water</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3788</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">TSI 3789</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DEG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3777</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">24</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3776</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3772</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">A20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">4.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">0.5</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">water</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3788</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3789</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">TSI 3789<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">3.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5">0.2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DEG</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3777</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TSI 3777<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e3189">Detection efficiencies of the tuned instruments: the figure shows the detection efficiencies for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>BCYO</mml:mtext><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds as a function of the electrical mobility equivalent diameter. The green lines correspond to the standard settings, and the orange lines correspond to the tuned settings. Every plot shows data from a different instrument: TSI 3776 <bold>(a)</bold>, TSI 3777 <bold>(b)</bold> and TSI 3789 <bold>(c)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=412.564961pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/3787/2020/amt-13-3787-2020-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Discussion of the measurement results</title>
      <?pagebreak page3794?><p id="d1e3226">The results of the performed measurements show that chemical similarities between the seed particle material and the working fluids influence the detection efficiencies of CPCs. As a rule of thumb, compounds of similar chemical structure dissolve more easily. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol is a rather nonpolar fluid and interacts more strongly with particles of nonpolar substances. In contrast, water and DEG are highly polar fluids, and ammonium sulfate and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are ionic compounds. Therefore, it is expected that ionic compounds such as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and ammonium sulfate easily dissolve in the polar working fluids and that the less polar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BCYO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> particles interact more strongly with the nonpolar <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-butanol. These chemical similarities of the seed and working fluid are indeed reflected in the counting efficiencies: the 50 % cutoff diameters of the ionic seeds are smaller when measured with the TSI 3789 or TSI 3777. On the other hand, the 50 % cutoff diameters of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BCYO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds are smaller when measured with a butanol-based CPC (see Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>–<xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>). This different activation behavior also requires different theoretical approaches: while particle activation of two soluble compounds can be described by Köhler theory <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.44"/>, the Fletcher theory of heterogeneous nucleation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="paren.45"/> needs to be applied when the seed particle is not entirely soluble in the working fluid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.46"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3312">Additionally, the detection efficiency of the instruments is influenced by technical factors. The TSI 3776 and the TSI 3777 are based on a capillary–sheath layout. As a result, particle losses due to diffusion are smaller and the detection efficiencies reach higher values at smaller diameters compared to the TSI 3789 (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>). Additionally, the detection efficiency curves become steeper.</p>
      <p id="d1e3317">By changing the temperature settings, higher peak saturation ratios are achieved, leading to smaller 50 % cutoff diameters (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>). The chosen settings increase the temperature difference between the cooled and heated regions inside the instruments, while simultaneously avoiding significant homogeneous nucleation. Homogeneous nucleation inside the instrument is tested by connecting a total particle filter to the inlet and verifying that no signal is detected. As shown by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.47"/>, lowering the operating temperatures of a TSI 3776 by keeping the temperature difference between the saturator and condenser constant leads to an elevated saturation ratio profile in the condenser tube.</p>
      <p id="d1e3325">Furthermore, the interpretation of the results of seed particles with diameters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is restricted to the knowledge of the exact composition of the seed particle material and cannot be extended to the composition of the produced aerosol particles. Previous research has shown that the use of tube furnaces and aerosol chargers based on radioactivity causes impurities in the produced aerosol particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.48"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e3350"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.49"/> presented results of detection efficiency measurements from the TSI 3776 using <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds. Our results for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are in perfect agreement with the results for a dry aerosol flow of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="text.50"/>. As <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.51"/> highlight, there is no composition dependence of the detection efficiencies of the TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The 50 % cutoff diameters for negatively charged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds presented by the authors are also confirmed by our measurements. We report the same 50 % cutoff diameters for the TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.52"/>, who also used a tuned TSI 3776. We<?pagebreak page3795?> confirm that the discussed trend of smaller 50 % cutoff diameters when using CPCs based on water and DEG (with DEG being linked to the smallest one) is backed by our results. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="text.53"/> performed a laboratory characterization of the TSI 3788 and compared the results to the TSI 3776. The seed particles used also include negatively charged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds. The 50 % cutoff diameters for positively charged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured with the TSI 3788 are in good agreement, but we report distinctly larger 50 % cutoff diameters for positively charged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured with the TSI 3776. In their publication about DEG-based particle counters, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.54"/> present 50 % cutoff diameters for negatively charged <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds. The results of our study also support these measurements.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <label>3.7</label><title>Supersaturation profiles</title>
      <p id="d1e3508">To confirm our measurement results regarding the cutoff diameters with theoretical calculations, we simulated the maximum supersaturations for the three butanol-based CPCs (TSI 3776, TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and TSI 3772). The supersaturations in the Airmodus A20 were provided by the manufacturer. Measurements of neutral <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds performed with a size analyzing nuclei counter (SANC; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx50" id="altparen.55"/>) were used to correctly simulate the maximum supersaturation that seed particles were exposed to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.56"/>. Therefore, we evaluated the heat and mass transfer for a fully developed laminar flow with no mixing according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="text.57"/>. The original geometry was transformed to a circular tube to solve the equations with constant boundary conditions (constant
temperatures; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="altparen.58"/>). For the flow a parabolic velocity flow profile was considered and used to simulate the convective–diffusive heat and mass transfer for the simulation domain following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.59"/>. The results are presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>, showing the calculated corresponding minimum diameters that can be activated. The highest supersaturations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>=4.61) are reached in the TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and particles are exposed to the lowest supersaturations in the TSI 3772 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.93</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), as expected according to our calculations.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e3584">Calculated supersaturation ratios: the table shows the results of the modeling of the supersaturation profiles of four different particle counters. The maximum supersaturation ratio is related to the smallest particle diameter necessary for the activation of neutral silver seeds.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Instrument</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">max</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(nm)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSI 3776</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSI 3776<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4.61</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.80</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">TSI 3772</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.68</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5.40</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Airmodus A20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">4.20</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e3706">We correlated the measured 5 % cutoff diameter with the diameters that can be theoretically activated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The comparison was done for silver particles. In the theoretical calculations neutral particles were used, whereas in the case of the measurements we used negatively charged silver particles. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/> shows a remarkable correlation between the theory and the measurements, resulting in an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.98. In the case of the smallest diameter, the calculated diameter is 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the measured one is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This deviation is most likely due to the charge effect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.60"/>. We are therefore able to correctly predict the onset of detection in CPCs from simulated supersaturation profiles; this implies that we can infer the maximum supersaturation inside the condenser for specific CPCs, which was generally unknown for most CPCs so far. Calculated supersaturation profiles can be found in the Supplement (see Figs. S6 and S7).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e3776">Theoretical diameters: the figure shows the theoretically minimal diameters necessary for particle activation of neutral silver seeds as a function of the measured 5 % cutoff diameter for negatively charged silver seeds. Every color corresponds to a different particle counter. Data points on the dashed line stand for the equality of the theoretical and measured diameters.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/3787/2020/amt-13-3787-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3796?><sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3795">The effect of the chemical composition of seed particles on the detection efficiency in commonly used CPCs based on different working fluids was investigated. These characterizations included organic seed particles that were generated in a controlled way. We present the first characterization measurements of the newly developed TSI 3789 using seed particles with diameters between 1 and 25 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Furthermore, the onset of detection in CPCs was successfully and correctly predicted based on simulated supersaturation profiles.</p>
      <p id="d1e3806">Chemical similarities between the seed particle material and the working fluids used have been found to have an impact on the detection efficiency of CPCs. It has been shown that shifts in the detection efficiencies also occur for CPCs with 50 % cutoff diameters larger than 5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Additionally, it was confirmed that the detection efficiency can be improved by changing the temperature and flow rate settings of the instruments. Remarkably, the TSI 3776 also did not show any shifts in the detection efficiency for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BCYO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds when operated using the tuned settings. This behavior is linked to the higher saturation ratio after tuning the CPC. The saturation ratio might be high enough that differences in the detection efficiencies of different seed particles no longer occur.</p>
      <p id="d1e3859">Consequently, we conclude that the 50 % cutoff diameter as the sole parameter is not sufficient to characterize the detection efficiency of a CPC. Shifts of the detection efficiency and curve shapes are influenced by the aforementioned interactions. We recommend that CPC characterizations be performed using various polar and less polar seed particles, including <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds, in order to correctly present the detection efficiency of a CPC. The chemical composition of the measured aerosol particles should be considered when instruments are calibrated. The authors recommend following the calibration standard based on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seeds, introduced by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="text.61"/>, when a variety of seed particle materials is not at hand. In the future, measurements of the activation efficiency with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ag</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could then be used to infer the achieved supersaturation in the CPC. Subsequent comparisons to further SANC measurements with other seed materials (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="altparen.62"/>) then allow researchers to infer the corresponding counting efficiencies. Future research needs to focus on the extension and verification of the presented results for sub-2 nm particles with known composition. Hence, the presented study suggests a novel and improved approach to determining the counting efficiencies of CPCs when a calibration with a variety of seed particles is not available.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3905">Raw data are available upon request from the authors.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e3908">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3787-2020-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3787-2020-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3917">DW, SHS and PMW presented the idea. PJW, DS, SB and DW designed the setup and performed the measurements. CT calculated the supersaturation profiles for the TSI CPCs. PJW, DS, CT and DW analyzed the data. PJW, DS, CT, SB, SHS, PMW and DW were involved in the scientific interpretation of the results. PJW, DS, SB and DW wrote the paper. All authors participated in reviewing the paper.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3923">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This study was independently performed and was not co-funded by TSI Inc. and Airmodus Ltd.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3929">The authors thank TSI Inc. for kindly providing a TSI 3789 for the measurements. Furthermore, the authors acknowledge Axel Zerrath for providing technical support concerning the newly developed TSI 3789. Joonas Enroth is acknowledged for calculating the supersaturation profile of the Airmodus A20 and providing it to the authors.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3934">This research has been supported by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) (project no. J3951-N36) and the European Research Council (grant no. 616075).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3940">This paper was edited by Pierre Herckes and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Ahonen et al.(2017)</label><?label Ahonen2017?><mixed-citation>Ahonen, L. R., Kangasluoma, J., Lammi, J., Lehtipalo, K., Hämeri, K.,  Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: First measurements of the number size  distribution of 1–2 nm aerosol particles released from manufacturing  processes in a cleanroom environment, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 51, 685–693, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1292347" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2017.1292347</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Aitken(1888)</label><?label Aitken1888?><mixed-citation>
Aitken, J.: On the number of dust particles in the atmosphere, T. Roy. Soc. Edin.-Earth, 35, 1–19, 1888.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Albrecht(1989)</label><?label Albrecht1989?><mixed-citation>Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness,  Science, 245, 1227–1230, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.245.4923.1227</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Attoui(2018)</label><?label Attoui2018?><mixed-citation>Attoui, M.: Activation of sub 2 nm singly charged particles with butanol vapors in a boosted 3776 TSI CPC, J. Aerosol Sci., 126, 47–57,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.08.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.08.005</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Attoui and Kangasluoma(2019)</label><?label Attoui2019_1?><mixed-citation>Attoui, M. and Kangasluoma, J.: Activation of sub 2 nm Water Soluble and  Insoluble Standard Ions with Saturated Vapors of Butanol in a Boosted TSI  ultrafine CPC, Atmosphere, 10, 655, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10110665" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos10110665</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Barmpounis et al.(2017)</label><?label Barmpounis17?><mixed-citation>Barmpounis, K., Ranjithkumar, A., Schmidt-Ott, A., Attoui, M., and Biskos, G.: Enhancing the Detection Efficiency of Condensation Particle Counters for  Sub-2 nm Particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 117, 44–53,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.12.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.12.005</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Bauer and Menon(2012)</label><?label Bauer12?><mixed-citation>Bauer, S. E. and Menon, S.: Aerosol direct, indirect, semidirect, and surface albedo effects from sector contributions based on the IPCC AR5 emissions for  preindustrial and present-day conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D01206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016816" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD016816</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Brilke et al.(2020a)</label><?label Brilke2019_2?><mixed-citation>Brilke, S., Fölker, N., Müller, T., Kandler, K., Gong, X., Peischl, J., Weinzierl, B., and Winkler, P. M.: New particle formation and sub-10 nm size distribution measurements during the A-LIFE field experiment in Paphos, Cyprus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5645–5656, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5645-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-5645-2020</ext-link>, 2020a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Brilke et al.(2020b)</label><?label Brilke2019?><mixed-citation>Brilke, S., Resch, J., Leiminger, M., Steiner, G., Tauber, C., Wlasits, P. J., and Winkler, P. M.: Precision characterization of three ultrafine  condensation particle counters using mobility standards in the 1–4 nm size  range generated by a bipolar electrospray source, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 54, 396–409, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1708260" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2019.1708260</ext-link>, 2020b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Eckert and Drake(1972)</label><?label Eckert72?><mixed-citation>
Eckert, E. and Drake, R.: Analysis of Heat and Mass Transfer, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Flagan(1999)</label><?label Flagan99?><mixed-citation>Flagan, R. C.: On Differential Mobility Analyzer Resolution, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 30, 556–570, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868299304417" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868299304417</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Fletcher(1958)</label><?label Fletcher58?><mixed-citation>Fletcher, N. H.: Size Effect in Heterogeneous Nucleation, J. Chem. Phys., 29, 572–576, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1744540" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.1744540</ext-link>, 1958.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Gamero-Casta\~{n}o and Fern\'{a}ndez de~la Mora(2000)}}?><label>Gamero-Castaño and Fernández de la Mora(2000)</label><?label Gamero2000?><mixed-citation>Gamero-Castaño, M. and Fernández de la Mora, J.: A condensation nucleus counter (CNC) sensitive to singly charged sub-nanometer particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 31, 757–772, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00555-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00555-8</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Gao et al.(2019)</label><?label Gao2019?><mixed-citation>Gao, X., Zou, H., Xu, X., Zhou, L., Tang, S., Yuan, W., and Zhang, M.: Developing a guideline for measuring the total number concentration of  engineering nanomaterials in workplaces in China, J. Occup. Health, 61, 197–202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/1348-9585.12044</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Giechaskiel et al.(2009)</label><?label Giechaskiel2009?><mixed-citation>Giechaskiel, B., Wang, X., Horn, H.-G., Spielvogel, J., Gerhart, C.,  Southgate, J., Jing, L., Kasper, M., Drossinos, Y., and Krasenbrink, A.:  Calibration of Condensation Particle Counters for Legislated Vehicle Number  Emission Measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 1164–1173,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903242029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820903242029</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Giechaskiel et al.(2011)</label><?label Giechaskiel11?><mixed-citation>Giechaskiel, B., Wang, X., Gilliland, D., and Drossinos, Y.: The effect of  particle chemical composition on the activation probability in n-butanol  condensation particle counters, J. Aerosol Sci., 42, 20–37,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.10.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.10.006</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Gormley and Kennedy(1948)</label><?label Gromley49?><mixed-citation>
Gormley, P. G. and Kennedy, M.: Diffusion from a Stream Flowing through a  Cylindrical Tube, P. Roy. Irish Acad. A, 52, 163–169, 1948.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Hearn and Smith(2006)</label><?label Hearn06?><mixed-citation>Hearn, J. D. and Smith, G. D.: A mixed-phase relative rates technique for  measuring aerosol reaction kinetics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17805,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026963" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006GL026963</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Hering et al.(2005)</label><?label hering05?><mixed-citation>Hering, S. V., Stolzenburg, M. R., Quant, F. R., Oberreit, D. R., and Keady,  P. B.: A Laminar-Flow, Water-Based Condensation Particle Counter (WCPC),  Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 659–672, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500182123" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500182123</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Hering et al.(2017)</label><?label Hering2017?><mixed-citation>Hering, S. V., Lewis, G. S., Spielman, S. R., Eiguren-Fernandez, A., Kreisberg, N. M., Kuang, C., and Attoui, M.: Detection near 1-nm with a laminar-flow, water-based condensation particle counter, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,  51, 354–362, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1262531" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2016.1262531</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Hering et al.(2019)</label><?label hering19?><mixed-citation>Hering, S. V., Lewis, G. S., Spielman, S. R., and Eiguren-Fernandez, A.: A  MAGIC concept for self-sustained, water-based, ultrafine particle counting,  Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 63–72, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1538549" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2018.1538549</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Iida et al.(2009)</label><?label Iida09?><mixed-citation>Iida, K., Stolzenburg, M., and McMurry, P.: Effect of Working Fluid on Sub-2  nm Particle Detection with a Laminar Flow Ultrafine Condensation Particle  Counter, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 81–96, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802488194" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820802488194</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Jiang et al.(2011)</label><?label Jiang2011?><mixed-citation>Jiang, J., Attoui, M., Heim, M., Brunelli, N. A., McMurry, P. H., Kasper, G.,  Flagan, R. C., Giapis, K., and Mouret, G.: Transfer Functions and  Penetrations of Five Differential Mobility Analyzers for Sub-2 nm Particle  Classification, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 480–492,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.546819" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.546819</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Kangasluoma and Attoui(2019)</label><?label Kanga19?><mixed-citation>Kangasluoma, J. and Attoui, M.: Review of sub-3 nm condensation particle  counters, calibrations and cluster generation methods, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 1277–1310, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1654084" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2019.1654084</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Kangasluoma et al.(2013)</label><?label Kangasluoma13_2?><mixed-citation>Kangasluoma, J., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Mikkilä, J., Vanhanen, J.,  Attoui, M., Sipilä, M., Worsnop, D., Kulmala, M., and Petäjä, T.: Remarks on Ion Generation for CPC Detection Efficiency Studies in Sub-3 nm Size Range, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 47, 556–563,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.773393" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2013.773393</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Kangasluoma et al.(2014)</label><?label Kangasluoma14?><mixed-citation>Kangasluoma, J., Kuang, C., Wimmer, D., Rissanen, M. P., Lehtipalo, K., Ehn, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wang, J., Kulmala, M., and Petäjä, T.: Sub-3 nm particle size and composition dependent response of a nano-CPC battery, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 689–700, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-689-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-689-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Kangasluoma et al.(2016)</label><?label Kangasluoma16?><mixed-citation>Kangasluoma, J., Samodurov, A., Attoui, M., Franchin, A., Junninen, H.,  Korhonen, F., Kurtén, T., Vehkamäki, H., Sipilä, M., Lehtipalo, K., Worsnop, D. R., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Heterogeneous Nucleation onto Ions and Neutralized Ions: Insights into Sign-Preference, J. Phys. Chem. C, 120, 7444–7450, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01779" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01779</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Kulmala et al.(2007)</label><?label Kulmala2007?><mixed-citation>Kulmala, M., Mordas, G., Petäjä, T., Grönholm, T., Aalto, P. P., Vehkamäki, H., Hienola, A. I., Herrmann, E., Sipilä, M., Riipinen, I., Manninen, H. E., Hämeri, K., Stratmann, F., Bilde, M., Winkler, P. M., Birmili, W., and Wagner, P. E.: The condensation particle counter battery (CPCB): A new tool to inve<?pagebreak page3798?>stigate the activation properties of nanoparticles, J. Aerosol Sci., 38, 289–304, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.11.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.11.008</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Kupc et al.(2013a)</label><?label Kupc132?><mixed-citation>Kupc, A., Bischof, O., Tritscher, T., Beeston, M., Krinke, T., and Wagner,  P. E.: Laboratory Characterization of a New Nano-Water-Based CPC 3788 and  Performance Comparison to an Ultrafine Butanol-Based CPC 3776, Aerosol  Sci. Tech., 47, 183–191, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.738317" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2012.738317</ext-link>, 2013a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Kupc et al.(2013b)</label><?label Kupc13?><mixed-citation>Kupc, A., Winkler, P. M., Vrtala, A., and Wagner, P.: Unusual Temperature  Dependence of Heterogeneous Nucleation of Water Vapor on Ag Particles,  Aerosol Sci. Tech., 47, i–iv, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.810330" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2013.810330</ext-link>, 2013b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{K\"{o}hler(1936)}}?><label>Köhler(1936)</label><?label Koehler36?><mixed-citation>Köhler, H.: The nucleus in and the growth of hygroscopic droplets, T. Faraday Soc., 32, 1152–1161, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9363201152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1039/TF9363201152</ext-link>, 1936.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Li and Hogan(2017)</label><?label Hogan17?><mixed-citation>Li, C. and Hogan Jr., C. J.: Vapor specific extents of uptake by nanometer  scale charged particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 51, 653–664,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1288285" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2017.1288285</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Magnusson et al.(2003)</label><?label Magnusson03?><mixed-citation>Magnusson, L.-E., Koropchak, J., Anisimov, M., M Poznjakovskiy, V., and  Fernandez de la Mora, J.: Correlations for Vapor Nucleating Critical Embryo  Parameters, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 32, 1387–1409,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1555590" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.1555590</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mai{\ss}er et~al.(2015)}}?><label>Maißer et al.(2015)</label><?label Maisser2015?><mixed-citation>Maißer, A., Thomas, J. M., Larriba-Andaluz, C., He, S., and Hogan, C. J.: The mass–mobility distributions of ions produced by a Po-210 source in air, J. Aerosol Sci., 90, 36–50, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.08.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.08.004</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>McMurry(2000)</label><?label McMurry00?><mixed-citation>McMurry, P. H.: The History of Condensation Nucleus Counters, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 297–322, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820050121512" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820050121512</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Nieminen et al.(2018)</label><?label Nieminen2019?><mixed-citation>Nieminen, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Petäjä, T., Aalto, P. P., Arshinov, M., Asmi, E., Baltensperger, U., Beddows, D. C. S., Beukes, J. P., Collins, D., Ding, A., Harrison, R. M., Henzing, B., Hooda, R., Hu, M., Hõrrak, U., Kivekäs, N., Komsaare, K., Krejci, R., Kristensson, A., Laakso, L., Laaksonen, A., Leaitch, W. R., Lihavainen, H., Mihalopoulos, N., Németh, Z., Nie, W., O'Dowd, C., Salma, I., Sellegri, K., Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Tunved, P., Ulevicius, V., Vakkari, V., Vana, M., Wiedensohler, A., Wu, Z., Virtanen, A., and Kulmala, M.: Global analysis of continental boundary layer new particle formation based on long-term measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14737–14756, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14737-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14737-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Pedata et al.(2015)</label><?label Pedata15?><mixed-citation>Pedata, P., Stoeger, T., Zimmermann, R., Peters, A., Oberdörster, G., and  D'Anna, A.: “Are we forgetting the smallest, sub 10 nm combustion generated  particles?”, Part. Fibre Toxicol., 12, 34, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-015-0107-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1186/s12989-015-0107-3</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pet\"{a}j\"{a} et~al.(2006)}}?><label>Petäjä et al.(2006)</label><?label Petaja06?><mixed-citation>Petäjä, T., Mordas, G., Manninen, H., Aalto, P. P., Hämeri, K., and Kulmala, M.: Detection Efficiency of a Water-Based TSI Condensation Particle Counter 3785, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40, 1090–1097,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820600979139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820600979139</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Reischl et al.(1997)</label><?label Reischl1997?><mixed-citation>Reischl, G. P., Mäkelä, J. M., and Necid, J.: Performance of Vienna Type Differential Mobility Analyzer at 1.2–20 Nanometer, Aerosol Sci.  Tech., 27, 651–672, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829708965503" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829708965503</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Scheibel and Porstendorfer(1983)</label><?label Scheibel83?><mixed-citation>Scheibel, H. and Porstendorfer, J.: Generation of monodisperse Ag- and  NaCl-aerosols with particle diameters between 2 and 300 nm, J. Aerosol Sci., 14, 113–126, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(83)90035-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-8502(83)90035-6</ext-link>, 1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Seto et al.(1997)</label><?label Seto1997?><mixed-citation>Seto, T., Okuyama, K., de Juan, L., and Fernández de la Mora, J.: Condensation of supersaturated vapors on monovalent and divalent ions of varying size, J. Chem. Phys., 107, 1576–1585, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.474510" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1063/1.474510</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Sgro and Fern\'{a}ndez de~la Mora(2004)}}?><label>Sgro and Fernández de la Mora(2004)</label><?label Sgro04?><mixed-citation>Sgro, L. A. and Fernández de la Mora, J.: A Simple Turbulent Mixing CNC for Charged Particle Detection Down to 1.2 nm, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38, 1–11, <uri>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02786820490247560</uri>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Steiner et al.(2010)</label><?label Steiner10?><mixed-citation>Steiner, G., Attoui, M., Wimmer, D., and Reischl, G. P.: A Medium Flow,  High-Resolution Vienna DMA Running in Recirculating Mode, Aerosol Sci.  Tech., 44, 308–315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003636763" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786821003636763</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Steiner et al.(2014)</label><?label Steiner2014?><mixed-citation>Steiner, G., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Sipilä, M., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D., Reischl, G. P., and Kulmala, M.: High-Resolution Mobility and Mass Spectrometry of Negative Ions Produced in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">241</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Am</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Aerosol Charger, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48, 261–270, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.870327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2013.870327</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Stolzenburg and McMurry(1991)</label><?label Stolzenburg91?><mixed-citation>Stolzenburg, M. R. and McMurry, P. H.: An Ultrafine Aerosol Condensation  Nucleus Counter, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 14, 48–65,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829108959470" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829108959470</ext-link>, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Tauber et al.(2018)</label><?label Tauber18?><mixed-citation>Tauber, C., Chen, X., E Wagner, P., M Winkler, P., Hogan, C., and Maisser, A.: Heterogeneous Nucleation onto Monoatomic Ions: Support for the Kelvin-Thomson Theory, ChemPhysChem, 19, 3144, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201800698" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/cphc.201800698</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Tauber et al.(2019a)</label><?label Tauber19?><mixed-citation>Tauber, C., Brilke, S., Wlasits, P. J., Bauer, P. S., Köberl, G., Steiner, G., and Winkler, P. M.: Humidity effects on the detection of soluble and insoluble nanoparticles in butanol operated condensation particle counters, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3659–3671, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3659-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-3659-2019</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Tauber et al.(2019b)</label><?label Tauber19_2?><mixed-citation>Tauber, C., Steiner, G., and Winkler, P. M.: Counting efficiency determination from quantitative intercomparison between expansion and laminar flow type condensation particle counter, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 344–354,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1568382" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2019.1568382</ext-link>, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Vanhanen et al.(2011)</label><?label Vanhanen11?><mixed-citation>Vanhanen, J., Mikkilä, J., Lehtipalo, K., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E., Siivola, E., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Particle Size Magnifier for  Nano-CN Detection, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 533–542,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.547889" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.547889</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Wagner(1985)</label><?label Wagner85?><mixed-citation>Wagner, P. E.: A Constant-Angle Mie Scattering Method (CAMS) for Investigation of Particle Formation Processes, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 105, 456–467, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(85)90319-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0021-9797(85)90319-4</ext-link>, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Wiedensohler et al.(2018)</label><?label Wiedensohler18?><mixed-citation>Wiedensohler, A., Wiesner, A., Weinhold, K., Birmili, W., Hermann, M., Merkel, M., Müller, T., Pfeifer, S., Schmidt, A., Tuch, T., Velarde, F., Quincey, P., Seeger, S., and Nowak, A.: Mobility particle size spectrometers:  Calibration procedures and measurement uncertainties, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 146–164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1387229" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2017.1387229</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Wimmer et al.(2013)</label><?label Wimmer13?><mixed-citation>Wimmer, D., Lehtipalo, K., Franchin, A., Kangasluoma, J., Kreissl, F., Kürten, A., Kupc, A., Metzger, A., Mikkilä, J., Petäjä, T., Riccobono, F., Vanhanen, J., Kulmala, M., and Curtius, J.: Performance of diethylene glycol-based particle counters in the sub-3 nm size range, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1793–1804, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1793-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-1793-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Winkler et al.(2008)</label><?label Winkler08?><mixed-citation>Winkler, P. M., Steiner, G., Vrtala, A., Vehkamäki, H., Noppel, M.,  Lehtinen, K. E. J., Reischl, G. P., Wagner, P. E., and Kulmala, M.:  Heterogeneous Nucleation Experiments Bridging the Scale from Molecular Ion  Clusters to Nanoparticles, Science, 319, 1374–1377,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1149034</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Counting on chemistry: laboratory evaluation of seed-material-dependent detection efficiencies of ultrafine condensation particle counters</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Condensation particle counters (CPCs) are crucial instruments for detecting sub-10&thinsp;nm aerosol particles. Understanding the detection performance of a CPC requires thorough characterization under well-controlled laboratory conditions. Besides the size of the seed particles, chemical interactions between the working fluid and the seed particles also influence the activation efficiencies. However, common seed particle materials used for CPC characterizations are not chosen with respect to chemical interactions with vapor molecules of the working fluid by default. Here, we present experiments on the influence of the seed particle material on the detection efficiencies and the 50&thinsp;% cutoff diameters  of commonly used CPCs for the detection of sub-10&thinsp;nm particles. A remarkable set consisting of six different and commercially available particle detectors, including the newly developed TSI V-WCPC 3789 and a tuned TSI 3776, was tested. The corresponding working fluids of the instruments are <i>n</i>-butanol, diethylene glycol and water. Among other materials we were able to measure detection efficiencies with nanometer-sized organic seed particles reproducibly generated by the oxidation of <i>β</i>-caryophyllene vapor in a flow tube. Theoretical simulations of supersaturation profiles in the condensers were successfully related to measured detection efficiencies. Our results demonstrate the importance of chemical similarities between seed particles and the working fluids used when CPCs are characterized. We anticipate our study to contribute to a deeper understanding of chemical interactions during heterogeneous nucleation processes.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Ahonen et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Ahonen, L. R., Kangasluoma, J., Lammi, J., Lehtipalo, K., Hämeri, K.,  Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: First measurements of the number size  distribution of 1–2&thinsp;nm aerosol particles released from manufacturing  processes in a cleanroom environment, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 51, 685–693, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1292347" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1292347</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Aitken(1888)</label><mixed-citation>
Aitken, J.: On the number of dust particles in the atmosphere, T. Roy. Soc. Edin.-Earth, 35, 1–19, 1888.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Albrecht(1989)</label><mixed-citation>
Albrecht, B. A.: Aerosols, Cloud Microphysics, and Fractional Cloudiness,  Science, 245, 1227–1230, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.245.4923.1227</a>, 1989.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Attoui(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Attoui, M.: Activation of sub 2&thinsp;nm singly charged particles with butanol vapors in a boosted 3776 TSI CPC, J. Aerosol Sci., 126, 47–57,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.08.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2018.08.005</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Attoui and Kangasluoma(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Attoui, M. and Kangasluoma, J.: Activation of sub 2&thinsp;nm Water Soluble and  Insoluble Standard Ions with Saturated Vapors of Butanol in a Boosted TSI  ultrafine CPC, Atmosphere, 10, 655, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10110665" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10110665</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Barmpounis et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Barmpounis, K., Ranjithkumar, A., Schmidt-Ott, A., Attoui, M., and Biskos, G.: Enhancing the Detection Efficiency of Condensation Particle Counters for  Sub-2 nm Particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 117, 44–53,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.12.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2017.12.005</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Bauer and Menon(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Bauer, S. E. and Menon, S.: Aerosol direct, indirect, semidirect, and surface albedo effects from sector contributions based on the IPCC AR5 emissions for  preindustrial and present-day conditions, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D01206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016816" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016816</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Brilke et al.(2020a)</label><mixed-citation>
Brilke, S., Fölker, N., Müller, T., Kandler, K., Gong, X., Peischl, J., Weinzierl, B., and Winkler, P. M.: New particle formation and sub-10&thinsp;nm size distribution measurements during the A-LIFE field experiment in Paphos, Cyprus, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5645–5656, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5645-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5645-2020</a>, 2020a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Brilke et al.(2020b)</label><mixed-citation>
Brilke, S., Resch, J., Leiminger, M., Steiner, G., Tauber, C., Wlasits, P. J., and Winkler, P. M.: Precision characterization of three ultrafine  condensation particle counters using mobility standards in the 1–4&thinsp;nm size  range generated by a bipolar electrospray source, Aerosol Sci. Technol., 54, 396–409, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1708260" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1708260</a>, 2020b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Eckert and Drake(1972)</label><mixed-citation>
Eckert, E. and Drake, R.: Analysis of Heat and Mass Transfer, McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1972.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Flagan(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
Flagan, R. C.: On Differential Mobility Analyzer Resolution, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 30, 556–570, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/027868299304417" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/027868299304417</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Fletcher(1958)</label><mixed-citation>
Fletcher, N. H.: Size Effect in Heterogeneous Nucleation, J. Chem. Phys., 29, 572–576, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1744540" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1744540</a>, 1958.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Gamero-Castaño and Fernández de la Mora(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Gamero-Castaño, M. and Fernández de la Mora, J.: A condensation nucleus counter (CNC) sensitive to singly charged sub-nanometer particles, J. Aerosol Sci., 31, 757–772, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00555-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(99)00555-8</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Gao et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Gao, X., Zou, H., Xu, X., Zhou, L., Tang, S., Yuan, W., and Zhang, M.: Developing a guideline for measuring the total number concentration of  engineering nanomaterials in workplaces in China, J. Occup. Health, 61, 197–202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12044</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Giechaskiel et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Giechaskiel, B., Wang, X., Horn, H.-G., Spielvogel, J., Gerhart, C.,  Southgate, J., Jing, L., Kasper, M., Drossinos, Y., and Krasenbrink, A.:  Calibration of Condensation Particle Counters for Legislated Vehicle Number  Emission Measurements, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 1164–1173,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903242029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820903242029</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Giechaskiel et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Giechaskiel, B., Wang, X., Gilliland, D., and Drossinos, Y.: The effect of  particle chemical composition on the activation probability in n-butanol  condensation particle counters, J. Aerosol Sci., 42, 20–37,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.10.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2010.10.006</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Gormley and Kennedy(1948)</label><mixed-citation>
Gormley, P. G. and Kennedy, M.: Diffusion from a Stream Flowing through a  Cylindrical Tube, P. Roy. Irish Acad. A, 52, 163–169, 1948.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Hearn and Smith(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Hearn, J. D. and Smith, G. D.: A mixed-phase relative rates technique for  measuring aerosol reaction kinetics, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L17805,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026963" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL026963</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Hering et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Hering, S. V., Stolzenburg, M. R., Quant, F. R., Oberreit, D. R., and Keady,  P. B.: A Laminar-Flow, Water-Based Condensation Particle Counter (WCPC),  Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 659–672, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500182123" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500182123</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Hering et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Hering, S. V., Lewis, G. S., Spielman, S. R., Eiguren-Fernandez, A., Kreisberg, N. M., Kuang, C., and Attoui, M.: Detection near 1-nm with a laminar-flow, water-based condensation particle counter, Aerosol Sci. Tech.,  51, 354–362, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1262531" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2016.1262531</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Hering et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Hering, S. V., Lewis, G. S., Spielman, S. R., and Eiguren-Fernandez, A.: A  MAGIC concept for self-sustained, water-based, ultrafine particle counting,  Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 63–72, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1538549" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2018.1538549</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Iida et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Iida, K., Stolzenburg, M., and McMurry, P.: Effect of Working Fluid on Sub-2  nm Particle Detection with a Laminar Flow Ultrafine Condensation Particle  Counter, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 81–96, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802488194" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820802488194</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Jiang et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, J., Attoui, M., Heim, M., Brunelli, N. A., McMurry, P. H., Kasper, G.,  Flagan, R. C., Giapis, K., and Mouret, G.: Transfer Functions and  Penetrations of Five Differential Mobility Analyzers for Sub-2&thinsp;nm Particle  Classification, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 480–492,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.546819" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.546819</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Kangasluoma and Attoui(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Kangasluoma, J. and Attoui, M.: Review of sub-3 nm condensation particle  counters, calibrations and cluster generation methods, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 1277–1310, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1654084" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1654084</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Kangasluoma et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Kangasluoma, J., Junninen, H., Lehtipalo, K., Mikkilä, J., Vanhanen, J.,  Attoui, M., Sipilä, M., Worsnop, D., Kulmala, M., and Petäjä, T.: Remarks on Ion Generation for CPC Detection Efficiency Studies in Sub-3&thinsp;nm Size Range, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 47, 556–563,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.773393" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.773393</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Kangasluoma et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Kangasluoma, J., Kuang, C., Wimmer, D., Rissanen, M. P., Lehtipalo, K., Ehn, M., Worsnop, D. R., Wang, J., Kulmala, M., and Petäjä, T.: Sub-3&thinsp;nm particle size and composition dependent response of a nano-CPC battery, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 689–700, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-689-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-689-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Kangasluoma et al.(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Kangasluoma, J., Samodurov, A., Attoui, M., Franchin, A., Junninen, H.,  Korhonen, F., Kurtén, T., Vehkamäki, H., Sipilä, M., Lehtipalo, K., Worsnop, D. R., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Heterogeneous Nucleation onto Ions and Neutralized Ions: Insights into Sign-Preference, J. Phys. Chem. C, 120, 7444–7450, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01779" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01779</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Kulmala et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Kulmala, M., Mordas, G., Petäjä, T., Grönholm, T., Aalto, P. P., Vehkamäki, H., Hienola, A. I., Herrmann, E., Sipilä, M., Riipinen, I., Manninen, H. E., Hämeri, K., Stratmann, F., Bilde, M., Winkler, P. M., Birmili, W., and Wagner, P. E.: The condensation particle counter battery (CPCB): A new tool to investigate the activation properties of nanoparticles, J. Aerosol Sci., 38, 289–304, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.11.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2006.11.008</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Kupc et al.(2013a)</label><mixed-citation>
Kupc, A., Bischof, O., Tritscher, T., Beeston, M., Krinke, T., and Wagner,  P. E.: Laboratory Characterization of a New Nano-Water-Based CPC 3788 and  Performance Comparison to an Ultrafine Butanol-Based CPC 3776, Aerosol  Sci. Tech., 47, 183–191, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.738317" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.738317</a>, 2013a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Kupc et al.(2013b)</label><mixed-citation>
Kupc, A., Winkler, P. M., Vrtala, A., and Wagner, P.: Unusual Temperature  Dependence of Heterogeneous Nucleation of Water Vapor on Ag Particles,  Aerosol Sci. Tech., 47, i–iv, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.810330" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.810330</a>, 2013b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Köhler(1936)</label><mixed-citation>
Köhler, H.: The nucleus in and the growth of hygroscopic droplets, T. Faraday Soc., 32, 1152–1161, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9363201152" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1039/TF9363201152</a>, 1936.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Li and Hogan(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Li, C. and Hogan Jr., C. J.: Vapor specific extents of uptake by nanometer  scale charged particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 51, 653–664,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1288285" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1288285</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Magnusson et al.(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
Magnusson, L.-E., Koropchak, J., Anisimov, M., M Poznjakovskiy, V., and  Fernandez de la Mora, J.: Correlations for Vapor Nucleating Critical Embryo  Parameters, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 32, 1387–1409,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1555590" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1555590</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Maißer et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Maißer, A., Thomas, J. M., Larriba-Andaluz, C., He, S., and Hogan, C. J.: The mass–mobility distributions of ions produced by a Po-210 source in air, J. Aerosol Sci., 90, 36–50, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.08.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2015.08.004</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>McMurry(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
McMurry, P. H.: The History of Condensation Nucleus Counters, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 297–322, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820050121512" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820050121512</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Nieminen et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Nieminen, T., Kerminen, V.-M., Petäjä, T., Aalto, P. P., Arshinov, M., Asmi, E., Baltensperger, U., Beddows, D. C. S., Beukes, J. P., Collins, D., Ding, A., Harrison, R. M., Henzing, B., Hooda, R., Hu, M., Hõrrak, U., Kivekäs, N., Komsaare, K., Krejci, R., Kristensson, A., Laakso, L., Laaksonen, A., Leaitch, W. R., Lihavainen, H., Mihalopoulos, N., Németh, Z., Nie, W., O'Dowd, C., Salma, I., Sellegri, K., Svenningsson, B., Swietlicki, E., Tunved, P., Ulevicius, V., Vakkari, V., Vana, M., Wiedensohler, A., Wu, Z., Virtanen, A., and Kulmala, M.: Global analysis of continental boundary layer new particle formation based on long-term measurements, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14737–14756, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14737-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14737-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Pedata et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Pedata, P., Stoeger, T., Zimmermann, R., Peters, A., Oberdörster, G., and  D'Anna, A.: “Are we forgetting the smallest, sub 10 nm combustion generated  particles?”, Part. Fibre Toxicol., 12, 34, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-015-0107-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1186/s12989-015-0107-3</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Petäjä et al.(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Petäjä, T., Mordas, G., Manninen, H., Aalto, P. P., Hämeri, K., and Kulmala, M.: Detection Efficiency of a Water-Based TSI Condensation Particle Counter 3785, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 40, 1090–1097,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820600979139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820600979139</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Reischl et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Reischl, G. P., Mäkelä, J. M., and Necid, J.: Performance of Vienna Type Differential Mobility Analyzer at 1.2–20 Nanometer, Aerosol Sci.  Tech., 27, 651–672, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829708965503" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829708965503</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Scheibel and Porstendorfer(1983)</label><mixed-citation>
Scheibel, H. and Porstendorfer, J.: Generation of monodisperse Ag- and  NaCl-aerosols with particle diameters between 2 and 300&thinsp;nm, J. Aerosol Sci., 14, 113–126, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(83)90035-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-8502(83)90035-6</a>, 1983.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Seto et al.(1997)</label><mixed-citation>
Seto, T., Okuyama, K., de Juan, L., and Fernández de la Mora, J.: Condensation of supersaturated vapors on monovalent and divalent ions of varying size, J. Chem. Phys., 107, 1576–1585, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1063/1.474510" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1063/1.474510</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Sgro and Fernández de la Mora(2004)</label><mixed-citation>
Sgro, L. A. and Fernández de la Mora, J.: A Simple Turbulent Mixing CNC for Charged Particle Detection Down to 1.2&thinsp;nm, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38, 1–11, <a href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02786820490247560" target="_blank"/>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Steiner et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Steiner, G., Attoui, M., Wimmer, D., and Reischl, G. P.: A Medium Flow,  High-Resolution Vienna DMA Running in Recirculating Mode, Aerosol Sci.  Tech., 44, 308–315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003636763" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786821003636763</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Steiner et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Steiner, G., Jokinen, T., Junninen, H., Sipilä, M., Petäjä, T., Worsnop, D., Reischl, G. P., and Kulmala, M.: High-Resolution Mobility and Mass Spectrometry of Negative Ions Produced in a <sup>241</sup>Am Aerosol Charger, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 48, 261–270, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.870327" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2013.870327</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Stolzenburg and McMurry(1991)</label><mixed-citation>
Stolzenburg, M. R. and McMurry, P. H.: An Ultrafine Aerosol Condensation  Nucleus Counter, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 14, 48–65,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829108959470" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786829108959470</a>, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Tauber et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Tauber, C., Chen, X., E Wagner, P., M Winkler, P., Hogan, C., and Maisser, A.: Heterogeneous Nucleation onto Monoatomic Ions: Support for the Kelvin-Thomson Theory, ChemPhysChem, 19, 3144, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201800698" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201800698</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Tauber et al.(2019a)</label><mixed-citation>
Tauber, C., Brilke, S., Wlasits, P. J., Bauer, P. S., Köberl, G., Steiner, G., and Winkler, P. M.: Humidity effects on the detection of soluble and insoluble nanoparticles in butanol operated condensation particle counters, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3659–3671, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3659-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3659-2019</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Tauber et al.(2019b)</label><mixed-citation>
Tauber, C., Steiner, G., and Winkler, P. M.: Counting efficiency determination from quantitative intercomparison between expansion and laminar flow type condensation particle counter, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 53, 344–354,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1568382" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2019.1568382</a>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Vanhanen et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Vanhanen, J., Mikkilä, J., Lehtipalo, K., Sipilä, M., Manninen, H. E., Siivola, E., Petäjä, T., and Kulmala, M.: Particle Size Magnifier for  Nano-CN Detection, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 533–542,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.547889" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.547889</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Wagner(1985)</label><mixed-citation>
Wagner, P. E.: A Constant-Angle Mie Scattering Method (CAMS) for Investigation of Particle Formation Processes, J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 105, 456–467, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(85)90319-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9797(85)90319-4</a>, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Wiedensohler et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Wiedensohler, A., Wiesner, A., Weinhold, K., Birmili, W., Hermann, M., Merkel, M., Müller, T., Pfeifer, S., Schmidt, A., Tuch, T., Velarde, F., Quincey, P., Seeger, S., and Nowak, A.: Mobility particle size spectrometers:  Calibration procedures and measurement uncertainties, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 52, 146–164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1387229" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2017.1387229</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Wimmer et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Wimmer, D., Lehtipalo, K., Franchin, A., Kangasluoma, J., Kreissl, F., Kürten, A., Kupc, A., Metzger, A., Mikkilä, J., Petäjä, T., Riccobono, F., Vanhanen, J., Kulmala, M., and Curtius, J.: Performance of diethylene glycol-based particle counters in the sub-3 nm size range, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1793–1804, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1793-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1793-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Winkler et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Winkler, P. M., Steiner, G., Vrtala, A., Vehkamäki, H., Noppel, M.,  Lehtinen, K. E. J., Reischl, G. P., Wagner, P. E., and Kulmala, M.:  Heterogeneous Nucleation Experiments Bridging the Scale from Molecular Ion  Clusters to Nanoparticles, Science, 319, 1374–1377,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149034</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
