<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-13-5569-2020</article-id><title-group><article-title>Solar radiometer sensing of multi-year aerosol features over a
tropical urban station: direct-Sun and inversion products</article-title><alt-title>NASA-AERONET measurements at IITM, Pune, India</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{NASA-AERONET measurements at IITM, Pune, India}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{K.~Vijayakumar et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Vijayakumar</surname><given-names>Katta</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Devara</surname><given-names>Panuganti C. S.</given-names></name>
          <email>pcsdevara@ggn.amity.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Sonbawne</surname><given-names>Sunil M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5">
          <name><surname>Giles</surname><given-names>David M.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6093-2051</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Holben</surname><given-names>Brent N.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1251-9809</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Rao</surname><given-names>Sarangam Vijaya Bhaskara</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jayasankar</surname><given-names>Chalicheemalapalli K.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Physics, Sri Venkateswara University (SVU), Tirupati
517502, India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Amity Centre for Ocean-Atmospheric Science and Technology (ACOAST); Amity Centre for Environmental<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Science and Health (ACESH) &amp; Amity School of Earth and Environmental Sciences (ASEES),<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Amity University Haryana, Manesar 122413, India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (IITM), Pune 411008, India</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Science Systems and Applications (SSA), Inc., Lanham, MD 20706,
USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC), Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Panuganti C. S. Devara (pcsdevara@ggn.amity.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>October</month><year>2020</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>13</volume>
      <issue>10</issue>
      <fpage>5569</fpage><lpage>5593</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>17</day><month>November</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>20</day><month>December</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>July</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day><month>July</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2020 Katta Vijayakumar et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2020</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e166">The AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) is the most developed
ground-based network for aerosol remote sensing and has been playing a
significant role not only in monitoring air quality for protecting human
health but also in assessing the radiative budget of our planet Earth. In
this paper, we report the direct-Sun and inversion products, comprising of
spectral variation of aerosol optical depth (AOD), associated
Ångström exponent (AE), fine- and coarse-mode aerosol fractions,
aerosol size distribution (ASD), refractive index (RI), asymmetry parameter
(AP), single scattering albedo (SSA), aerosol radiative forcing (ARF) and
columnar concentration of gas constituents such as water vapor (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
obtained from a Cimel Sun–sky radiometer, functioning in Pune, India, under
the AERONET program since October 2004. These long-term measurements carried
out from 2005 to 2015 could serve as an urban aerosol optical long-term
average or climatology. The AOD long-term variations at all wavelengths,
considered in the study, exhibited an increasing trend, implying year-to-year
enhancement in aerosol loading. The mean seasonal variations in AOD from
cloud-free days indicated greater values during the monsoon season, revealing dominance
of hygroscopic aerosol particles over the station. Contribution by different
aerosol types to AOD has also been deduced and discussed,  and dominance  of
a mixed type of aerosols (44.85 %) found, followed by combination of biomass
burning and urban industrial aerosols (22.57 %) compared to other types
of aerosols during the study period. The long-term datasets, derived aerosol
and trace gas products play a significant role in understanding aerosol climate
forcing, trends and evaluation of regional air pollution and validation of
aerosol transport models over the study region.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e191">Atmospheric aerosol concentration and optical properties are
one of the largest sources of uncertainty in current assessments and predictions
of global climatic change (Hansen et al., 2000; IPCC, 2001). Changes in the
aerosol content of the atmosphere constitute a major forcing mechanism by
affecting the radiative balance of the climate system (Crutzen and Andreae,
1990; Charlson et al., 1992). A thorough understanding of regionally dependent
chemical and optical properties of aerosols (e.g., aerosol optical thickness,
size distribution) and their spatial (both horizontal and vertical) and temporal
distribution is required for accurate evaluation of
aerosol effects in the climate system (Hsu et al., 2000). Systematic
observational evidence is required to study the highly variable
characteristics of atmospheric aerosols in time and space (IPCC, 2007).
Added, long-term measurements of key aerosol optical properties are urgently
needed to better understand the climate changes (Wang et al., 2001; Streets
et<?pagebreak page5570?> al., 2009; Wild et al., 2009). Aerosol optical depth (AOD) data from the
Advanced Very High-Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) satellite were used to
account for the dimming and brightening tendencies (Mishchenko et al., 2007a;
Zhao et al., 2008). Long-term aerosol datasets with climate quality
are essential in reducing the uncertainty of aerosol effects on climate.
Hence, there is an immediate need to regularly monitor aerosol distributions
annually and seasonally, and to find out if there is any significant trend
in their changing patterns over the years and what effect they will
ultimately have on the regional/global climate. Such results greatly help in
better quantification of aerosol radiative effects, aerosol–climate
interactions and impacts of aerosol loading on the Earth's biogeosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e194">Ground-based and space-borne optical remote sensing techniques are the most
efficient means of studying aerosol particle parameters, properties,
dynamics and lifetimes in the Earth's atmosphere due to local and global
climate changes (King et al., 1999; Mishchenko et al., 2007b). The AErosol
RObotic NETwork (AERONET; <uri>https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri>, last access:
13 June 2019), a ground-based remote
sensing aerosol network of well-calibrated Sun–sky radiometers established
in the early 1990s, is one of the well-developed and productive facilities for
passive aerosol measurements (Holben et al., 1998). Moreover, it is a
well-established ground-based remote sensing aerosol monitoring network that
is composed of more than 700 stations across the world. It provides
standardized high-quality aerosol products (Xia, 2015), and the network
continues to expand rapidly, which constitutes a valuable source of
information for the establishment of local and regional aerosol
characterizations (Holben et al., 2001). Further, AERONET provides
continuous time series data with a very high temporal resolution for the
measurement sites over many years. These datasets have been used to obtain
aerosol particle properties as a function of time in atmosphere column over
the place and for satellite data validation (e.g., Abdou et al., 2005;
Kacenelenbogen et al., 2006; Sinyuk et al., 2007). Coordination between
surface-based network observations and satellite measurements is essential
to develop a long-term monitoring system of the Earth's aerosol environment.
The present communication deals with such a long-term dataset composed of
direct-Sun products, covering 2005–2015, archived at a site
located in a tropical urban environment in central India.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Site description</title>
      <p id="d1e208">Long-term aerosol data were acquired at a tropical urban site, Pune
(18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 73<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 559 m above mean sea level),
India, as shown in Fig. 1. Pune is governed by the municipal corporation which
comes under the Pune metropolitan region. Pune is the eighth largest metropolis
in India and second largest in the state of Maharashtra (Source:
<uri>https://pune.gov.in/</uri>, last access: 19 September 2020). It is situated on the lee side of the Western Ghats
and is about 100 km inland from the west coast of India. In recent years,
Pune has witnessed a substantial growth in terms of population as well as
vehicular density and industrial installation due to rapid urbanization.
The population of the Pune city is 31 32 143 as per the 2011 census (source:
<uri>https://pmc.gov.in/en/census</uri>, last access: 19 September 2020). The city is situated centrally between the other metropolises
of Mumbai and Bengaluru, and is well connected by road, rail and air.
Observations were carried out on the terrace of the building at about
12 m above the surface. The site is surrounded by hillocks of variable
height (up to 200 m), forming a valley-like terrain. The climate of
the region is urban with a total rainfall of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">700</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm occurring
mostly during the monsoon season in the June–September period, and July
is the wettest month of the year. The climatology of the area experiences
four dominant seasons each year: pre-monsoon (March–May), monsoon (June–September),
post-monsoon (October–November) and winter (December–February).
The weather during the pre-monsoon season is very hot with
mostly gusty surface winds, and the daytime temperature reaches over
40 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The air flow in the lower troposphere is predominantly
westerly during the southwest (SW) monsoon season, which brings a large
influx of moist air from the Arabian Sea. The westerly flow sets in during the
post-monsoon season, and rich continental air masses pass over the region
during this season. Fair-weather conditions, with clear skies and very low
relative humidity, exist during the winter season. Low-level inversions
during morning and evening hours, and dust haze during morning hours, occur
during this season. More details can be found in Devara et al. (1994, 2005).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e275">Location of Cimel Sun–sky radiometer and its surroundings at the
Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (IITM), Pune (18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 73<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>′</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;
559 m a.m.s.l.), Maharashtra State, India: <bold>(a, c)</bold> base map from
© Google Earth, source: <uri>https://www.google.com/earth/</uri>,
last access: 19 September 2020; <bold>(b)</bold> base map from ©
Google images of Maharashtra state map; <bold>(d)</bold> radiometer with mount and control panel box with solar panel at the top.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Variations in meteorological elements</title>
      <?pagebreak page5571?><p id="d1e341">The meteorological key fields such as wind, temperature and humidity play a
vital role in several stages of aerosol optical, microphysical and dynamical
evolution. In order to examine these effects, European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF)
daily reanalysis  data for the study period are shown in Fig. 2 (Fig. 2a: winter;
Fig. 2b: pre-monsoon; Fig. 2c: monsoon; Fig. 2d: post-monsoon and wind, air temperature and
specific humidity (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at 850 hPa pressure level, averaged over the Indian
region). Winds are represented with arrows pointing toward wind direction,
where length and orientation of each arrow define the magnitude (m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and direction (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively. Line contours represent air temperature
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) and shaded color contours represent specific humidity <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> water
vapor mixing ratio (kg kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). It is evident from the figure that besides a
large contrast between land and ocean regions, a significant seasonal variation in the above-mentioned parameters can be
noted over the experimental site. Higher specific humidity values are
evident over the Indo-Gangetic Plain and ocean regions during the monsoon season
as compared to other three seasons. Highest moisture (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) values can be noted
over the northern part of India during the monsoon season for the entire study
period. In contrast, lowest <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi>q</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values can be seen over India during the winter
season. The circulation was intense in and around India during
the monsoon season as opposed to other seasons. However, anti-cyclonic circulation can
be seen over India during winter and post-monsoon seasons, while the winds
were mostly northwesterly during the pre-monsoon and southwesterly during
the monsoon during the study period. This would further be accentuated by the
absence of rainfall, so that the typical lifetime of aerosols is longer than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> week in the lower troposphere. These features favor growth
and intrusion of aerosol particles from longer distances to the study site,
which result in greater AOD values during the monsoon season.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e427">Seasonal composite of ECMWF wind, temperature and humidity fields
over India during 2005–2015.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Instrumentation and data methodology</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>AERONET</title>
      <p id="d1e451">All the ground-based measurements reported in this paper were made with
Cimel Electronique CE-318 Sun–sky radiometer, which is a part of the AERONET
global network. This instrument works on the principle of measuring the
solar radiation intensity at some specified wavelengths and converts them
into optical depth by knowing the corresponding intensities at the
top of the atmosphere (Holben et al., 1998). The Cimel Sun photometer is a
solar-powered, hardy, robotically pointed Sun and sky spectral radiometer. A
microprocessor computes the position of the Sun based on time, latitude and
longitude, which directs the sensor head to within approximately
1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> of the Sun, after which, a four-quadrant detector tracks
the Sun precisely to a programmed measurement sequence. After the routine
measurement is completed, the instrument returns to the “park” position,
awaiting the<?pagebreak page5572?> next measurement sequence. A “wet sensor” exposed to
precipitation will cancel any measurement sequence during rain events. Data
in the memory of the Sun photometer are transferred to the PC and are sent
to NASA for processing and archival of products. The columnar precipitable
water content is determined based on the measurements at 940 nm (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
absorption peak) and at 1020 nm (no absorption by water content). The
details of the retrieval of water content and the types of errors involved
in it can be found in the works of Schmid et al. (2001), Devara et al. (2001),
Smirnov et al. (2004) and Alexandrov et al. (2009). The
“Almucantar”  scenario denotes a series of measurements taken at an elevation angle
of the Sun for specific azimuth angles relative to the position of the Sun.
These measurements are taken at 440, 675, 870 and 1020 nm channels. During
Almucantar measurements, observations from a single channel are made in a
sweep at a constant elevation angle across the solar disk and continue
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">180</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from the Sun in about 40 s. This is repeated for
each channel to complete an almucantar sequence (Holben et al., 1998).</p>
      <p id="d1e494">The calibration of the instrument was performed regularly at the Goddard
Space Flight Center (GSFC) by a transfer of calibration from reference
instruments that were calibrated by the Langley method at Mauna Loa
Observatory (MLO), Hawaii. The combined effects of uncertainties in
calibration, atmospheric pressure and total ozone amount (climatology is
used) result in a total uncertainty in derived aerosol optical depth of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.010</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.021, with the largest error in the UV (Eck et al., 1999).
The AERONET algorithms compute the aerosol optical depth retrievals
in near-real time (Holben et al., 1998). Data are quality checked and
cloud screened following the methodology of Smirnov et al. (2000), which
relies on the greater temporal variance of cloud optical depth vs.
aerosol optical depth. The AERONET archive is divided into three quality levels:
level 1.0 for raw data, level 1.5 for cloud-screened data and level 2.0 for
quality-assured data (Holben et al., 1998; Smirnov<?pagebreak page5573?> et al., 2000) and can be
downloaded from the AERONET website (<uri>https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri>,
last access: 13 June 2019). The
AERONET data (from January 2005 to December 2015) used in this study belong
to version 2.0 at level 2.0, which are cloud screened and have been manually
screened, ensuring the data quality (Giles et al., 2019). A number of
studies have already described the instrumentation, data acquisition,
retrieval algorithms and calibration procedures, which conform to the
standards of the AERONET global network, as well as the uncertainty in final
products and the applied cloud-screening procedures (Holben et al., 1998,
2001; Eck et al., 1999; Smirnov et al., 2000, 2002a, 2002b). More details
about AERONET instrument used in the present study in Pune, India, have been
reported by Kumar et al. (2011).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Aerosol radiative forcing</title>
      <p id="d1e518">In the present study, the aerosol radiative forcing (ARF) at bottom of the
atmosphere (BOA), in the atmosphere (ATM) and at the top of the atmosphere (TOA)
has been estimated by following the method reported by Xie et al. (2018).
This method involves forcing calculations from broadband fluxes between 0.2
and 4.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from
aerosol size distribution (ASD), spectral AOD, single scattering albedo and
phase function by using the radiative transfer module integrated in the
AERONET inversions (García et al., 2008, 2012). In this method, the
AERONET-defined <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values have been directly
used to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ATM</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TOA</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>RF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BOA</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>MODIS</title>
      <p id="d1e586">The Moderate-resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) is a scientific
instrument (radiometer) aboard the NASA Terra and Aqua satellite
platforms. The Terra and Aqua satellite platforms were launched in 1999 and
2002, respectively, to study global dynamics of the Earth's atmosphere, land,
ice and oceans. Thus, the instrument collects a variety of global datasets.
The Terra and Aqua satellites, with MODIS instruments attached, fly on
Sun-synchronous orbits at 705 km altitude and pass over the same spot of the
Earth at about the same local time every day, i.e., 10:30 LT in the case of
Terra and 13:30 LT for Aqua. Due to the large swath of data collected by MODIS
(over 2300 km wide), it is possible to observe almost the entire Earth's
surface every day. MODIS measures reflected solar and emitted thermal
radiation in a total of 36 bands ranging in wavelength from 0.4 to
14.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and at varying spatial resolutions (2 bands at 250 m,
5 bands at 500 m and 29 bands at 1 km). Detailed descriptions of the MODIS
aerosol retrieval and its evolution since the start of MODIS operation are given
in the work of Remer et al. (2005). In this study, the  Deep Blue product of AOD
at 550 nm and water vapor observations was used.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>OMI</title>
      <p id="d1e608">The Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) measures the solar radiation
backscattered by the Earth's atmosphere and surface over the entire
wavelength range from 270 to 500 nm with a spectral resolution of about
0.5 nm. OMI measurements are highly synergistic with the other instruments
on the Aura platform. The 114<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> viewing angle of the telescope
corresponds to a 2600 km wide swath on the surface, which enables
measurements with a daily global coverage. OMI continues the Total
Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) record for
total ozone and other atmospheric parameters related to ozone chemistry and
climate. Also, total columns of gases like <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">BrO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> will be derived. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
has designated these atmospheric constituents as posing serious threats to
human health and agricultural productivity. These measurements are made at
near-urban-scale resolution and track industrial pollution and biomass
burning. Furthermore, aerosol and cloud parameters will be determined from
the OMI measurements. The OMI instrument is a contribution of the
Netherlands's Agency for Aerospace Programs (NIVR) in collaboration with the
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI) to the Aura mission. In this study,
we used the OMAEROev003 product of AOD at 442 nm measurements for comparison
with ground-based observations of AERONET data during the study period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>Heating rate</title>
      <p id="d1e659">The amount of solar radiation trapped in the atmosphere by aerosols, as
quantified by the atmospheric heating rate (HR; K d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), has been
analyzed. The HR due to aerosol absorption is calculated according to the
first law of thermodynamics and assuming hydrostatic equilibrium, as
suggested by Liou (2002):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.Ex1"><mml:math id="M36" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>ARF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ATM</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∂</mml:mo><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula> is the HR in K d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mi>g</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
acceleration due to gravity, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the specific heat capacity of air at
constant pressure (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1006</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> J kg<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> K<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">∇</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
is the atmospheric pressure difference between the surface and 3 km altitude, where most aerosols are present.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <label>4.6</label><title>Discrimination of aerosol types</title>
      <p id="d1e819">The discrimination of aerosol types increases accuracy of the assessment of
the aerosol radiative impact and  is  therefore important to climate modeling
(Diner et al., 1999). Previous studies showed that different aerosol types
have different effects on climate because their diverse morphology, size
distribution, hygroscopic properties and chemical components will lead to
different aerosol optical properties (Giles et al., 2011, 2012; He et al., 2018;
Kumar et al., 2018). For<?pagebreak page5574?> example, dust aerosols are often large
particles and have a scattering tendency (Vijayakumar et al., 2014), whereas
black carbon aerosols are usually smaller particles and have an absorbing
nature (Tan et al., 2016). Various optical and microphysical parameters have
been used for aerosol classification. The spectral dependence of AOD,
expressed by the Ångström exponent (AE), is a good
indicator of particle size. These two parameters are commonly used in
aerosol remote sensing to infer dominant aerosol types given knowledge of
the source region or typical aerosol transport mechanisms (Kaskaoutis et
al., 2009; Pathak et al., 2012; Vijayakumar and Devara, 2013; Verma et al., 2015).
Gobbi et al. (2007) used this parameter and its spectral curvature to propose a
graphical method for evaluating the contribution of fine-mode
particles to AOD and to track mixture of pollution containing dust. Schuster
et al. (2006) determined that variation in AE wavelength pairs is sensitive
to aerosol composition. In addition, the spectral AOD and AE data were used
in deriving the curvatures (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) correlated with AOD and  can be
effectively used for discriminating different aerosol types (Vijayakumar et
al., 2012; Kumar et al., 2013) information content from these relationships
varies from generic identification of major aerosol particle types (e.g.,
dust mixed and urban industrial pollution) to specific degrees of absorbing
aerosols. In the Indian subcontinent, Kaskaoutis et al. (2009) have made the
first attempt to distinguish different aerosol types originating from
variety of sources over Hyderabad. Furthermore, Vijayakumar et al. (2012)
over Pune and Vijayakumar and Devara (2013) over Sinhagad have
discriminated different aerosol types over different regions in the Indian
land mass.</p>
      <p id="d1e844">For the classification of aerosols into specific types, some “appropriate”
threshold values are required. Our approach to infer major aerosol types is
based on the combination of particle size and absorption–scattering
information, following Kaskaoutis et al. (2009), Vijayakumar et al. (2014)
and Lee et al. (2010). The AOD–AE patterns have been utilized to describe
different aerosol types (e.g., clean maritime, continental clean, desert
dust, urban industrial/biomass burning and mixed-type aerosol). In this
study, we used AOD at 440 nm and an Ångström exponent of 440–870 nm. The
threshold values used in this study represented a slight adjustment from
those previously used by authors, as cited above. Cases of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AOD</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AE</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">870</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values of small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) or large (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) represented clean maritime-influenced
aerosols (CM) and continental clean type represented as background aerosols (CC),
respectively. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AOD</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AE</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">870</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
can be used to characterize long-range-transported biomass burning/urban industrial
aerosols (BB/UI) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AOD</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> associated
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AE</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">870</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are indicative of desert
dust (DD) particles transported over oceanic areas. Finally, the aerosols which do not fall under any of the above categories (types) are considered as mixed aerosol type (MA), considering different effects of aerosol-mixing processes in the atmosphere (e.g., coagulation, condensation, humidiﬁcation, gas-to-particle conversion).  The classification method (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AOD</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AE</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">870</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is illustrated in Fig. 3a.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1047">Classification of aerosol types based on different thresholds of
<bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AOD</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AE</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">870</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SSA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FMF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1132">The Cimel Sun–sky radiometer derived fine-mode fraction (FMF) at 500 nm has been
used to represent the dominant aerosol size mode, because FMF provides
quantitative information for both fine- and coarse-mode aerosols. SSA has
been used to quantify the aerosol absorption–scattering at 440 nm, which is
the shortest wavelength of AERONET channels and generally used to
distinguish absorbing from non-absorbing aerosols (Lee et al., 2010). The
categories of aerosol types are distinguished between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FMF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SSA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is polluted dust (PD, dominantly dust with anthropogenic
aerosols), polluted continental (PC, dominantly anthropogenic mixed with dust),
absorbing and non-absorbing aerosols. The threshold values of groups are as follows:
(i) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FMF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for any range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SSA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
indicates predominantly coarse-mode aerosols and hence is assigned to PD,
(ii) introducing a safety margin of 0.4 between fine- and coarse-mode aerosol,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FMF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for any range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SSA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
represented PC. All
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FMF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were considered as fine-mode aerosols which
were further discriminated as absorbing (mainly black carbon, BC) or
non-absorbing depending on values of SSA440. (iii) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FMF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SSA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as non-absorbing (NA, which includes sulfates,
nitrates and aged water-soluble organic carbons),
(iv) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FMF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SSA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
as slightly absorbing (SA), (v) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FMF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SSA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
as moderately absorbing (MA), whereas
(vi) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FMF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SSA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
represented highly absorbing (HA) fine-mode aerosols. It should be noted that this
classification must be considered only qualitatively not
quantitatively, since the percentages may be strongly modified with a change in
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AOD</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AE</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">870</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FMF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SSA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
threshold values. The method of classification (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SSA</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>FMF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is illustrated in Fig. 3b.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e1544">When making ground-based observations at single point, it is important to
know their representativeness for the region under consideration. Long-term
monitoring of aerosol optical properties over Pune AERONET site was
performed, on all non-rainy days, from January 2005 to December 2015. The
distribution of the number of observations in each month during the study
period (one decade) is shown in a bar diagram (Fig. 4). The month-to-month
variation in number of observation days and data gaps in the data series
are due to unfavorable sky conditions over the study site and due to
shipment of the instrument for calibration at GSFC, NASA (USA).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1549">Month-wise distribution of observation days during the study
period from January 2005 to December 2015.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

<?pagebreak page5575?><sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>Composite average of aerosol properties</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>5.1.1</label><title>AOD</title>
      <p id="d1e1572">Aerosols originating
from differing source regions are likely to have significant differences in
their optical properties. However, regional distribution of aerosols, their interannual variability and detailed
description of spectral aerosol optical properties are needed to understand
the influence of aerosols on the climate of the study region (Eck et al., 2001).
The optical properties of aerosols over Pune (one of the rapidly
growing cities) show strong seasonal and interannual variations. Aerosol
characteristics vary with time and region because of its different aerosol
sources (e.g., aerosol types and emission intensity) and different
atmospheric conditions (e.g., relative humidity and boundary layer height
etc.). The Cimel Sun–sky radiometer of AERONET, used in the present study,
provides the column-integrated aerosol optical depth at different
wavelengths. Such columnar optical depth is appropriate for most of the
radiative forcing assessments. Figure 5 depicts the composite picture of
spectral variation of AOD for the entire observation period from January
2005 to December 2015. While the maximum AOD value is 0.52 at 440 nm and
the minimum value is 0.28 at 1020 nm, it shows strict wavelength dependence
(higher AOD at shorter wavelength, and vice versa).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1577">Composite spectral AOD variations from one-decade Cimel
measurements in Pune, India. The vertical bar at each data point represents the
standard deviation from the mean.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>5.1.2</label><title>ASD</title>
      <?pagebreak page5576?><p id="d1e1594">The size distribution of aerosols is an important parameter in understanding
their climate effect. The worldwide aerosol size distribution exhibits two
distinct modes: fine particles with particle size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
coarse with particles size <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Dubovik et al., 2002).
Thus, the fine and coarse modes can be separated by a radius of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The bimodal structure of volume size distribution may be due to various reasons,
such as mixing of two air masses with different aerosol populations
(Hoppel et al., 1985), homogeneous heteromolecular nucleation of new fine
particles in the air or heterogeneous nucleation and growth of large particles by condensation of
gas-phase products. The AERONET aerosol size distributions are retrieved
from the spectral Sun photometer using 22 radius size bins in the size range
of 0.05–15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Figure 6 shows the composite volume size distribution
of aerosols over Pune. Here, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>min⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> show the range of radii for
corresponding modes. The value of volume size distribution in coarse mode is
higher compared to fine mode likely due to atmospheric elements.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1692">Composite volume size distribution of aerosols over Pune during
2005–2015.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f06.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Seasonal average of aerosol properties</title>
      <p id="d1e1711">In order to obtain a holistic view of the regional aerosol characteristics
during the period of study, the seasonal variations in aerosol quantities
are grouped and shown in Fig. 7. The different panels in the figure display
variations in different aerosol products. Different panels in this figure
indicate variations in aerosol optical depth (Fig. 7a); water vapor (Fig. 7b);
Ångström exponent (Fig. 7c); total, fine-mode and coarse-mode fractions (Fig. 7d);
aerosol size distribution (Fig. 7e); single scattering albedo (Fig. 7f);
asymmetry factor (Fig. 7g); aerosol refractive index, real (Fig. 7h);
refractive index, imaginary (Fig. 7i); effective radius (Fig. 7j); and
volume-weighted mean radius (Fig. 7k).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1716">Seasonal mean variations in aerosol products.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1725">Figure 7a displays the seasonal variation of AOD at different wavelengths.
At all wavelengths, AODs show lower values in the winter season, which could be
due to strong inversions, and whatever aerosols due to various human
activities (domestic cooking, vehicular and industrial emissions, etc.) are
let out into the surface layer get trapped in the lower atmosphere due to
less ventilation.</p>
      <p id="d1e1729">Also, due to calm wind conditions, aerosols of soil-dust type are less common
during winter. In the pre-monsoon, the greater AOD values be attributed to
the increased concentration of continental aerosol loading due to higher
temperatures in the study region. Moreover, processes such as long-range
transport are decreasing from winter to pre-monsoon which may be associated
with air masses consisting of dust from west of the Arabian Sea (Devara et
al., 2002; Kumar et al., 2011). In addition, Vijayakumar and Devara (2012)
reported that the anthropogenic aerosols are abundant in the pre-monsoon season
could also be due to festive celebrations. In India,  a festival
called “Holi” is celebrated every year during the pre-monsoon season. More popularly,
this festival is also known as the “Festival of Colors”. During this festival,
people play with colored powder and paste. The associated Holika Dahan (fire
burning) activities will enhance the particle concentration and alter
chemistry of the local environment. Higher aerosol loading during the
monsoon period at all wavelengths was noticed in the present study due to
paucity of useful data points and prevalence of turbid atmospheric
conditions.</p>
      <p id="d1e1732">Figure 7b shows the seasonal variation in water vapor. The monthly mean
values of the water vapor varied from 1.39 to 3.98 cm, representing a
minimum value in January (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.39</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and maximum in July (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.98</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
It is observed that water vapor is lower during the months of
January and February. It starts increasing from March with the onset of the
hot summer season and reaches a maximum during the months of the southwest
monsoon season (June–September). However, the number of days of observations
during June–September is lower because of a smaller number of clear-sky/partly
clear-sky days. Therefore, the relative magnitude of water vapor during
these 4 months could be partly due to sampling bias. However, the average
value of water vapor during the monsoon season is still significantly higher
when compared to other seasons. Water vapor starts decreasing once the
monsoon season ends in September. Lower values are observed in winter,
slightly increasing up to monsoon<?pagebreak page5577?> season, and thereafter water vapor
decreases due to monsoon rains and decreased aerosol input due to colder
ground surface. The lower possibility of hygroscopic growth of aerosols due
to low water vapor content may also contribute to this. On a seasonal scale, the
increase water vapor from the winter (December–February) to the pre-monsoon
(March–May) season is about 39.72 % and from the pre-monsoon to monsoon
(June–September) seasons is as high as 80.95 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e1759">Figure 7c illustrates the mean seasonal variation in Ångström exponent.
The Ångström exponent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">870</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is determined from the
spectral dependence of the measured optical depth and is a measure of the
relative dominance of fine (submicrometer) aerosols over the coarse
(micrometer-size) aerosols (Kumar et al., 2011) as shown in Fig. 7d.
Higher values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> indicate the dominance of fine particles, whereas
lower values indicate the dominance of coarse particles and relatively less
concentration of fine particles. It is expected that when the aerosol
particles are very small, on the order of air molecules, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">870</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
should approach 4, and it should approach 0 for very large
particles (Holben et al., 2001). The decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from winter to
pre-monsoon and monsoon months is indicative of increased coarse-mode
particle contribution, consistent with dust particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
in the aerosol loading. This strong decrease in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">870</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value
could be due to mixing of air originating from oceanic and desert regions.
The notable lower values of the Ångström exponent during June–September
are ascribed to cloud contamination of data
retrievals caused by thin invisible cirrus (Chew et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2012).</p>
      <?pagebreak page5578?><p id="d1e1847">Figure 7e portrays mean seasonal variation in aerosol size distribution. It
is clear from the figure that during the monsoon season, coarse-mode volume
concentration is higher than the fine mode, which suggests that there is
dominance of coarse-mode aerosol particles over the site due to the monsoon
activities that start during this season and also due to local
meteorological conditions, land-surface and long-range transport processes.
Tripathi et al. (2005) found that there was an increase of 50 % in volume
concentration in coarse mode over the Indian region during the monsoon
season. On the other hand, there is a very small variation in mean radius of
fine-mode aerosol particles in comparison to coarse mode during post-monsoon
and winter seasons, which suggest that there may be different types of
sources of coarse-mode particles. The errors associated with the particle
retrieval in the size range (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) do not exceed
10 % in the maxima of the size distribution and may increase up to about
35 % for the points corresponding to the minimum values of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>V</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this size range (Dubovik et al., 2002).</p>
      <p id="d1e1900">Figure 7f depicts the seasonal dependence of single scattering albedo (SSA)
during different seasons. SSA is calculated from the scattering optical
thickness which is obtained from the normalized aerosol phase function using
diffuse radiance measured at different angles. The detailed method of
determining the SSA was given by Dubovik et al. (1998). SSA has nearly a
unit value for purely scattering aerosols (e.g., sulfate aerosols) and has
low value for strongly absorbing aerosols (e.g., black carbon and/or mineral
dust). The mean seasonal variation of SSA at different wavelengths during
the study period shows increase in SSA from winter to monsoon due to the
dominance of anthropogenic aerosols in the atmosphere. It can also be seen
that during post-monsoon and winter seasons, SSA decreases with wavelength due to
dominance of absorbing aerosols over the experimental site, which is
attributed to presence of a mixture of aerosols from multiple sources like
vehicular and industrial pollution, and biomass burning in the field. But in
the pre-monsoon season, SSA values are slightly higher at 1020 nm, compared to 440 nm.
This suggests that the dominance of dust and marine events, thus enhancement
in the scattering contribution of coarse particle. The atmosphere contains
more water-soluble particles, in conditions like those found by Singh et al. (2004)
in Kanpur, India. In addition, for locations closer to the ocean, the air is more
humid during summer, leading to enhanced water uptake of the
water-soluble particles fraction. But from monsoon to post-monsoon, the SSA values
are slightly low, which suggests a possible combination of urban industrial
particles and sea salt aerosols over the region.</p>
      <p id="d1e1903">Figure 7g depicts the seasonal dependence of the asymmetry parameter (AP) during
different seasons. Theoretically, the range of AP lies between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (for the
backward scattered radiation) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (for the forward scattered radiation).
However, the zero value represents symmetric scattering. There is relatively
little variation in AP among these four seasons at shorter wavelengths (440 nm),
while AP was larger at 440 nm in the monsoon season compared to other
wavelengths (675, 870 and 1020 nm). The greater relative contribution of
coarse-mode particles to the aerosol size distribution might have resulted
in a phase function shift toward greater forward scattering at the longer
(infrared) wavelengths and very little change in the shorter (visible)
wavelength. The AP is also wavelength dependent and varies from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.01</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the whole period.</p>
      <p id="d1e1951">Figure 7h–i depict the wavelength dependence of real and imaginary
parts of refractive index (RI), respectively, during different seasons. The
refractive index is a complex quantity, expressed in terms of real
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and imaginary <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parts, which provide an indication of
highly scattering or highly absorbing types of aerosols, with higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values corresponding to the scattering type and higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
values corresponding to the absorbing type (Sinyuk et al., 2003).
Real and imaginary parts, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, are not independent of
SSA and the retrieved size distribution of the aerosols in the region,
but some differences in trends may be observed because of the presence of
different types of aerosols (Dubovik et al., 2002). The useful information
about the RI comes from aureole radiance, which is strongly affected by
errors in the angle-pointing bias. The errors are estimated to be 30 %–50 %
for the imaginary part and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.04</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the real part of the RI (Dubovik et al., 2002).
These estimated errors are for high aerosol loading (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AOD</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
at a solar zenith angle <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2087">The seasonal variation of real part of RI shows increase in the real part of
values with an increase in wavelength, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is highest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) at all wavelengths during the pre-monsoon season in the years
2005–2015, showing the higher scattering optical state of the atmosphere
during this period. This is also supported by the higher SSA in the years
2005–2015. However, lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values during the post-monsoon season
could probably be associated with higher relative humidity and resultant
hygroscopic growth, similar to the conditions found over Goddard Space
Flight Center (Dubovik et al., 2002). During the pre-monsoon season,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values at higher wavelengths are close to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values
of dust (1.53) found from several models (WMO, 1983; Koepke et al., 1997), clearly indicating the contribution of
dust to the optical properties. However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the monsoon
and winter seasons has intermediate values. The lowest value in
post-monsoon is due to the anthropogenic activities. The real part of
refractive index of dust aerosol is usually greater than that of the
anthropogenic aerosols (Alam et al., 2011).</p>
      <p id="d1e2171">The imaginary value is found to be higher in winter and lower in the monsoon season,
with higher values relating to absorbing anthropogenic aerosols and the
lower values to dust aerosols. The imaginary part is highest during
December, which shows that anthropogenic aerosols are dominant during this
period. The higher imaginary part values at the two shortest wavelengths
(440 and 670 nm) are attributed to the absorption of organic carbon/black
carbon (Arola et al., 2011). On the contrary, the imaginary part values<?pagebreak page5579?> are
lower in the monsoon season. This suggests that dust aerosols are dominant
during the monsoon season, similar to the conditions found in the Kanpur region,
India (Singh et al., 2004).</p>
      <p id="d1e2174">Figure 7j–k indicate seasonal variation in effective radius
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and volume-weighted mean radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), respectively.
Effective radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is quite representative of the optical properties
of coarse-mode particles, whereas for fine particles, volume-weighted mean radius
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is the more appropriate parameter (Tanré et al., 2001).
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is found to be higher during the pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons.
The high values in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during the monsoon season are attributed
to the abundant transport of aerosols of natural origin and also the surface-level
anthropogenic aerosols, which increases the loading of coarse-mode particles
(Vijayakumar et al., 2012). The increase and decrease in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
during post-monsoon and winter seasons, respectively, are interesting. Although
no significant coarse-mode particle loading takes place during the post-monsoon season and
the hygroscopic growth of these particles is unlikely, the effective radius of
coarse-mode particles may increase if the fine-mode particles get attached to
the surface of the coarse-mode particles. However, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has not
been found to increase significantly, because it is more influenced by the
number concentration compared to the volume concentration. The increase in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is attributed to the hygroscopic growth of the fine-mode
particles. The seasonal variability in coarse-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
is found to be greater than that of fine-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
with a maximum during the monsoon season due to
changes in circulation, land-surface and long-range transport processes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>Seasonal variation in aerosol types</title>
      <p id="d1e2307">Figure 8 shows the pie diagram of different aerosol types over Pune using
above threshold values. The analysis reveals that the mixed-type (MT) aerosols clearly
dominates in the pre-monsoon (47.07 %) and
monsoon (56.82 %) seasons and in some fractions (40.55 %, 39.97 %) during
winter and post-monsoon seasons, while the BB/UI type exhibits its highest
presence during the post-monsoon (31.55 %) and more rarely (5.18 %) in the
monsoon season. It is interesting to note that CM aerosols are absent during the
post-monsoon period. Polluted continental aerosols are dominant in the
pre-monsoon (16.04 %), compared to the monsoon (8.46 %) and post-monsoon
(6.64 %) seasons due to rainout/washout effects.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2312">Average proportion of different aerosol types in <bold>(a)</bold> winter,
<bold>(b)</bold> pre-monsoon, <bold>(c)</bold> monsoon and <bold>(d)</bold> post-monsoon seasons, and <bold>(e)</bold> their total (2005–2015).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2336">The absorbing aerosols have much lower contribution in the monsoon season.
Overall, the MT (44.85 %) aerosols are dominant compared to other types of
aerosols over study region. Furthermore, the total contribution of various
types of aerosols is as follows: CM (1.02 %), CC (0.47 %), BB/UI (22.57 %),
DD (2.27 %), PD (1.94 %), PC (10.36 %), SA (2.7 %), MA (5.56 %),
HA (7.93 %) and NA (0.33 %). However, it should be noted that the
present fractions may be considered rather qualitatively and not quantitatively,
since they correspond to specific threshold values, while an alteration in the
thresholds would cause changes in the fractions but not in the general
pattern of the seasonal distribution of aerosol types. A comparison of the
present results of Pune with those obtained from similar analyses performed
over other locations on the globe is not an easy task due to different
land-use and environmental characteristics as well as differences in the
time periods of the observations and in the seasonal pattern of the air
masses and long-range transport, the specific influence of anthropogenic
pollution, etc. The aerosol types inferred from the present study are
compared with those obtained from other Indian sites in Table 1.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2343">Comparison of aerosol types at different stations in India.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Station (latitude,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Aerosol types</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col6" align="center">Percentage of different types of </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">References</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">longitude; m a.m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col6" align="center">aerosols in different seasons </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Pre-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Post-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hyderabad</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">7.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Kaskaoutis et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(17.38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">44.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">56.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">72.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">62.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">78.45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">HUI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">47.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">14.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">32.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">515</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">HDD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">7.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Jaipur</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">20.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Verma et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(26.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">75.8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">48.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">450</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">22.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">73.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Varanasi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">40.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">23.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Tiwari et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(25.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">25.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">21.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">82.9<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">20.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">41.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">56.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">61.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BB</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">37.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">22.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">12.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">13.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pune</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Present study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(18.32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">CC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">73.51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">BB/UI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">17.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">31.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">29.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">559</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">DD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">47.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">58.8</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">39.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">40.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">PC</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">16.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">7.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">NA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">MA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">7.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">HA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">12.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e2346">MI is maritime influenced; MT is mixed type; HUI is high-AOD
urban industrial; HDD is high-AOD desert dust; BB is biomass burning;
AB is arid background; DD is desert dust; MR is marine; PC is polluted
continental; AA is anthropogenic aerosols; MD is mostly dust; CM is clean
maritime; CC is continental clean; BB/UI is biomass burning/urban industrial;
MA is mixed-type aerosols; PD is polluted dust; NA is non-absorbing;
SA is slightly absorbing; MA is moderately absorbing; HA is highly absorbing.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <label>5.4</label><title>Long-term trends in aerosol properties</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4.SSS1">
  <label>5.4.1</label><title>Long-term trends in aerosol products of AOD, SSA, AP, RI (real) and RI (imaginary) at different wavelengths</title>
      <p id="d1e3147">The long-term trends in monthly average values have been calculated from the
daily average AODs at 440, 675, 870 and 1020 nm during the study period.
Figure 9 depicts the long-term trends in monthly average values, calculated
from the daily average AOD (Fig. 9a), SSA (Fig. 9b), AP (Fig. 9c), RI (real) (Fig. 9d)
and RI (imaginary) (Fig. 9e) at 440 nm. It is evident from Fig. 9a that the
AODs are strongly dependent on receiving filter center wavelength, resembling
that of a continental environment (Vijayakumar et al., 2012), whereas flat
spectra are generally expected over marine and dust
environments (Kumar and Devara, 2012a). AOD at 440 nm shows an increasing trend
because this region is mainly affected by various kinds of aerosol sources
(Vijayakumar et al., 2012) and change of meteorological patterns. The
variations in SSA at 440 nm (Fig. 9b) reveal the influence of dust and urban
pollution, with the SSA tending to increase rapidly with wavelength during
dust events but decrease during periods of increased urban pollution
(Bergstrom et al., 2007; Dubovik et al., 2002). The percentage increase in
trend and other statistical parameters are provided in a table to follow.
The increase in SSA with wavelength suggests an enhanced mixed aerosols and
biomass-generated aerosols along with urban industrial aerosols (Bergstrom
et al., 2007; Russell et al., 2010). Thus, the results clearly suggest the
spectral behavior of SSA highly depends on the nature of aerosol particles.
It can be seen from Fig. 9c that variations in AP
at 440 nm indicate the dependency of AP on aerosol particle size and
composition. The AP decreases with increasing wavelength, and the overall
range varies from 0.71 to 0.65 for the four wavelengths. Zege et al. (1991)
showed that the asymmetry parameter ranges from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for very clean atmospheres to heavily polluted conditions. The time series
plot of monthly average values of asymmetry parameter over this region shows
increasing trend by 0.06 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 440 nm. The variations in
refractive index (both real and imaginary) are shown in Fig. 9d and e,
respectively. The real<?pagebreak page5580?> part of RI at higher wavelengths is larger than that at
shorter wavelengths (as shown in the figures to follow) due to the higher
absorption at longer wavelengths by coarse particles (Cheng et al., 2006a, b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3184">Long-term trends in aerosol products at 440 nm.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e3193">The long-term trends in monthly averages, calculated from the daily average
AOD (Fig. 9a), SSA (Fig. 9b), AP (Fig. 9c), RI (real) (Fig. 9d) and RI (imaginary) (Fig. 9e) at
675, 870 and 1020 nm, are shown in Figs. S1, S2 and S3, respectively (see the Supplement).
Information on the statistical parameters, involved in the aerosol products measured at
440, 675, 870 and 1020 nm in the study, is presented in Table 2.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e3200">Statistical information on the trend analysis of different aerosol
products.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="8">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">S. no.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Wavelength</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Fitting line</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">No. of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Trend</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">points</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(% yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AOD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">440</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.80</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.51</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.50</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">675</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.77</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.09</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">870</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.27</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.20</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">96</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.47</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SSA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">440</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.54</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.05</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.34</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">675</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.001</mml:mn><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.07</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.86</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">870</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.61</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.56</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.78</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.08</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">84</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">1.60</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AP</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">440</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.71</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.06</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">675</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.22</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.13</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">870</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.94</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.00</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.65</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">86</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">440</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.74</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.52</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(real part)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">675</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.66</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.43</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">870</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.53</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.54</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.69</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.55</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RI</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">440</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.46</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.35</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.63</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(imaginary part)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">675</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.89</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.41</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.73</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">870</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.29</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1020</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>Y</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.51</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mtext>X</mml:mtext><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.02</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.02</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">85</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.83</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4.SSS2">
  <label>5.4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Effective radius ($R_{\mathrm{eff}}$) and volume-weighted mean radius ($R_{\mathrm{v}}$)}?><title>Effective radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and volume-weighted mean radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d1e4555">The time series of monthly mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (for coarse mode) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (for fine mode)
are shown in Fig. 10. Both parameters show a slightly decreasing trend by 0.13 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
for effective radius and an increased trend by 2.14 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for volume-weighted mean radius
due to lack of observations and unfavorable sky conditions.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e4606">Long-term monthly mean variation of effective radius
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and volume-weighted mean radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
The vertical bar at each data point represents the standard deviation from the mean.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f10.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4.SSS3">
  <label>5.4.3</label><title>Columnar water vapor</title>
      <?pagebreak page5582?><p id="d1e4665">The year-to-year variation in columnar precipitable water content is shown
in Fig. 11. A monotonic increase in water vapor at a rate of 1.16 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
is evident from the figure. This feature provides additional
support to attribute the increase observed in AODs that can occur because of
hygroscopic growth of water-soluble aerosols, transport of larger-sized
aerosols (dust and sea salt) during favorable wind conditions (Ramachandran
and Cherian, 2008) and new particle formation by condensation and nucleation
(Fig. 9a). The lower AOD values, observed in the post-monsoon season, could be
explained due to wet soil which inhibits aerosol emissions in the lower
atmosphere.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e4682">Monthly mean variations in columnar precipitable water content
during 2005–2015 over Pune, India.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4.SSS4">
  <label>5.4.4</label><title>AE, fine- and coarse-mode AOD</title>
      <p id="d1e4699">Greater AE values during winter and post-monsoon seasons indicate rich
concentration of fine-mode particles. The strong decrease in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">870</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
value during the monsoon season could be explained by
coarse-mode particles originating from the Arabian Sea (Kumar et al., 2011).
Thus, the decrease of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from winter to pre-monsoon and monsoon
months is indicative of increased coarse-mode particle contribution,
consistent with dust particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the aerosol loading.
This strong decrease in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">870</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value could be due to mixing
of air originating from oceanic and desert regions. The notable lower values
of the Ångström exponent during June–September are ascribed to
cloud contamination of data retrievals caused by thin invisible
cirrus (Chew et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d1e4761">Monthly averages of the Ångström exponent, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">870</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, for the whole
period of observations are shown in Fig. 12. The
Ångström exponent appears to have decreased by about 2.03 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
over the duration of the study period. The monthly mean values of the Ångström
exponent varied from 0.21 to 1.35, representing a minimum value in January (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.21</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and maximum in July (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.35</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.07</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which are consistent.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e4818">Monthly mean variation of AE during the study
period. The vertical bar at each data point represents the standard deviation from
the mean. The solid red line indicates long-term decreasing trend.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

      <?pagebreak page5584?><p id="d1e4828">The spectral deconvolution algorithm (SDA), developed by O’Neill et al. (2001, 2003), has been applied to the direct-Sun AOD analysis to partition the fine- and coarse-mode contributions to the total AOD at a standard wavelength of 500 nm. This parameter
proves to be a quite effective indicator of the size distribution of the
observed aerosols. Figure 13 displays the monthly mean variations of total,
fine-mode and coarse-mode AOD at 500 nm. It is evident that the total AOD is
almost constant throughout the period, while the fine mode shows a decreasing
trend (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the coarse mode shows an increasing trend
(4.25 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The decreasing trend in fine mode implies reduction
in anthropogenic activity, while the increasing trend in coarse mode suggests
dominance of natural sources such as dust and sea salt.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e4867">Year-to-year variation in total, fine-mode and coarse-mode AOD
during 2005–2015. The solid red lines passing through the data
represent respective long-term trends. The vertical bar at each data point
represents the standard deviation from the mean.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f13.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS5">
  <label>5.5</label><title>Aerosol radiative forcing (including trends in ARF)</title>
      <p id="d1e4885">Aerosols modify incoming solar and outgoing infrared radiation. The ARF at
TOA or BOA is defined as the difference in the net solar fluxes (down minus
up) (solar plus longwave; in W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) with and without aerosol. The
difference between these two quantities gives the ARF in the whole
atmosphere. Generally, negative values of TOA, implying the presence of
aerosols, result in an increase in the radiation loss to the space (by enhanced
backscattering), leading to a cooling in the Earth–atmosphere system, while
positive values imply an atmospheric warming. At BOA, the forcing will always
be negative because aerosols reduce the surface reaching solar radiation, and
these values are more sensitive to aerosol loading only. The difference
between the radiative forcing at TOA and BOA is defined as ATM. It
represents the amount of energy trapped within the atmosphere due to the
presence of aerosols. If ATM is positive, the aerosols produce a net gain of
radiative flux to the atmosphere leading to a heating (warming), while
negative ATM indicates loss and thereby cooling. Generally, the intensity of
ARF depends on the aerosol loading, and therefore it is difficult to
consistently intercompare the radiative forcing by the typical aerosol
types. Seasonal variations of radiative forcing at TOA, BOA and ATM observed
in the present study are compared with such studies available at other
Indian sites in Table 3.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4903">Comparison of aerosol radiative forcing (W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) at different
stations in India.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Stations (latitude,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Seasons</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center">Aerosol radiative </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">longitude; m a.m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col5" align="center">forcing (W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">TOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">BOA</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">ATM</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Delhi</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pre-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">69.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">198.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Pandithurai et al. (2008)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(28.63<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">77.17<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">235</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Dibrugarh</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pre-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Pathak et al. (2010)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(27.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">94.6<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Post-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">111</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.m.s.l.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">33.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Bengaluru</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">November</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Babu et al. (2002)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 77<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">960</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Hyderabad <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pre-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">128.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">102.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Sinha et al. (2012)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(17.38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">112.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">78.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">78.45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Post-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">110.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">88.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">515</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">144.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">123.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kanpur</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pre-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">57.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Kaskaoutis et al. (2013)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(26.47<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">42.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">80.33<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Post-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">142</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Chennai</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pre-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Aruna et al. (2016)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(12.81<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">38.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">80.03<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Post-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Trivandrum</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pre-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Suresh Babu et al. (2007)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(8.55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">23.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">76.97<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Post-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">29.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ahmedabad</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pre-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">49.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Ganguly et al. (2006)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(23.03<inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">72.55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Post-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">63.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">41.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">54.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pune</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pre-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">72.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Present study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(18.32<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">62.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">52.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">73.51<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E;</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Post-monsoon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">76.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">559</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m a.m.s.l.)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Winter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">73.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">55.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e6686">The monthly average ARF variations at the TOA, BOA and within the ATM during
the study period are plotted in Fig. 14. The decreasing trend of radiative
forcing in the ATM and at TOA reveals dominance of hygroscopic (scattering)
particles, whereas the increasing trend of radiative forcing at BOA indicates
the dominance of hydrophobic (absorbing) aerosol particles. The BOA forcing
is found to be negative, while ATM is positive for all months. These
interactions between aerosols and solar radiation can be attributed to
combination of aerosol properties (i.e., types), surface properties (i.e.,
albedo) and geographical parameters (latitude, season) (Yu et al., 2006).
The large difference between TOA and BOA forcing demonstrates that solar
radiation is being absorbed within the atmosphere, and as a result the
atmosphere gets warmer, but the Earth's surface gets cooler (Alam et al., 2011;
Kumar and Devara, 2012b). This can substantially alter the atmospheric stability
and influence the dynamic system of the atmosphere (Li et al., 2010). For the ARF
during<?pagebreak page5585?> winter, the BOA is more strongly negative associated with the corresponding TOA,
giving rise to the highest ATM. In contrast to this, during pre-monsoon and post-monsoon
seasons, ATM appears to be reduced with reduced heating rate. ATM forcing will
increase if aerosol forcing at the TOA is more toward the positive side, while there
is a large negative forcing at surface level. But TOA shows almost minor variation between positive and negative.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e6692">Long-term monthly mean variation in radiative forcing at the TOA (W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
BOA (W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
and in the  ATM (W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The vertical bar at each data point
represents the standard deviation from the mean.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e6737">The ARF for the whole observation period at the TOA is in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">46</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and at the BOA from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">152</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), increasing the ATM forcing
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">149</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">64</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). But for the radiative
forcing during winter, the BOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">73.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">18.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is more strongly negative,
associated with corresponding TOA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), giving rise to the
highest ATM value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">58.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a resulting heating rate of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.95</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> during this season. In contrast to this, during pre-monsoon
and post-monsoon seasons, ATM appears to be reduced with the reduced heating rates of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS6">
  <label>5.6</label><title>Comparison with satellite observations</title>
      <p id="d1e7062">Figure 15 depicts the comparison between long-term climatology of AOD and
water vapor datasets from AERONET observations with MODIS and OMI
observations. Here, the MODIS satellite gives AOD at 550 nm, while AERONET data
had no corresponding wavelength to match it exactly. So, the AERONET AOD at
550 nm was obtained by interpolation between 440 and 675 nm following the
Ångström equation. All figures clearly show an increasing
trend except the water vapor parameter. Figure 15b clearly shows that<?pagebreak page5586?> AERONET AOD
observations were relatively higher overestimations compared to OMI AOD. The
possible reasons for relatively lower correlation observed between the AODs
recorded by AERONET and OMI have been explained. Figure 15c shows that the AERONET
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend is higher compared to the satellite <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> trend, but
magnitude-wise both are following similar trends. Figure 16 shows the correlation
between AERONET observations and satellite observations. They show a strong
correlation between satellite observations and AERONET data (Fig. 16a, c).
A weak correlation (Fig. 16b) was observed between OMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AOD</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">442</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
and AERONET <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AOD</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">440</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Apart from a small sensing wavelength
difference of 2 nm, higher AOD values by AERONET and relatively lower values by
OMI have also been reported by Humera et al. (2015) due to
anthropogenic activity and biomass burning. Now the correlation has been
improved by reducing the scatter (eliminating the significant out-layered
data points) between the observations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{15}?><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p id="d1e7125">Long-term monthly mean variation of AOD and water vapor (cm)
datasets from ground-based and satellite observations.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F16"><?xmltex \currentcnt{16}?><label>Figure 16</label><caption><p id="d1e7136">Correlation between <bold>(a)</bold> AERONET AOD at 550 nm with MODIS AOD at
550 nm, <bold>(b)</bold> AERONET AOD at 440 nm with OMI AOD at 442 nm and
<bold>(c)</bold> AERONET water vapor (cm) with MODIS water vapor (cm).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=199.169291pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/13/5569/2020/amt-13-5569-2020-f16.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page5587?><sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e7163">Long-term detection of changes in aerosol characteristics has been
one of the key issues for researchers working on climate and environment. AERONET,
the largest global network for ground-based remote sensing of aerosol optical
properties, has grown rapidly, and more than 10 years of continuous observations
have been maintained by a large number of independent academic and research
institutions. The high quality and accuracy of AERONET observations provided
a tremendous opportunity to investigate how and what causes the changes in
AOD (Wu and Zeng, 2011). The main conclusions that can be drawn from the present study are summarized as follows:
<list list-type="custom"><list-item><label>1.</label>
      <p id="d1e7168">Time series of AOD exhibit an increasing trend over Pune during the
study period (January 2005–December 2015), which is ascribed mainly to growth
in urbanization. The daily variability of AOD was found to be higher in the monsoon season
and lower in winter months, corresponding to the changes in season. The relative
increase of aerosol loading during the monsoon season is considered to be due to
dominance of aerosols of marine origin at the study region.</p></list-item><list-item><label>2.</label>
      <p id="d1e7172">The long-term variations in columnar water vapor also showed an increasing
trend at a rate of 1.16 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which is found to be responsible for the
increasing trend in AOD, particularly during the monsoon season.</p></list-item><list-item><label>3.</label>
      <p id="d1e7188">The Ångström exponent showed decreasing trend from January
2005 to December 2015, exhibiting seasonal dependence. The relationship between
AE and AOD suggests that experimental region is characterized by different types
of aerosols and their transport by regional air mass changes from season to season.</p></list-item><list-item><label>4.</label>
      <p id="d1e7192">The increase in fine-mode fraction of composite aerosol is found to be
marginal as compared to that of coarse mode, which reveals dominance of natural
processes against anthropogenic sources at the study location.</p></list-item><list-item><label>5.</label>
      <?pagebreak page5588?><p id="d1e7196">The seasonal variability in coarse-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">eff</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
is found to be greater than that of fine-mode particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
with a maximum during the monsoon season due to changes in circulation, land-surface
and long-range transport and the relatively higher contribution of the coarse-mode
particles to the observed AOD as compared to that of fine-mode particles.</p></list-item><list-item><label>6.</label>
      <p id="d1e7222">Long-term climatology of SSA shows an increasing trend. It is 1.34 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
at 440, 1.86 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 675, 1.56 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at 870 and 1.60 % yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
at 1020 nm. Furthermore, the spectral mean SSA values for all wavelengths show a decrease
with increasing wavelength, which suggests enhanced mixed aerosols and biomass-burning-generated
aerosols along with urban industrial aerosols.</p></list-item><list-item><label>7.</label>
      <p id="d1e7274">The decrease in ASP values from monsoon to post-monsoon and winter seasons is attributed to the transport of dust, and a signiﬁcant fraction of total aerosol loading in this region consists of ﬁne anthropogenic particles.</p></list-item><list-item><label>8.</label>
      <p id="d1e7278">The ARF for the whole observation period
at the TOA is in the range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">28</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
at the BOA from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">48</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">233</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">86</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
increasing the ATM forcing from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">210</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">68</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></list-item><list-item><label>9.</label>
      <p id="d1e7458">Aerosol types showed dominance of a mixed type of aerosols (44.85 %), followed by biomass
burning and urban industrial aerosols (22.57 %).</p></list-item><list-item><label>10.</label>
      <p id="d1e7462">The AERONET data provide high quality and accuracy, as compared to satellite remote
sensing data, though the spatial coverage of AERONET is relatively limited. However, the
ground-based networks have been widely used to validate and help interpret the results
from satellite sensors and model simulations.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <?pagebreak page5589?><p id="d1e7469">The work reported in this paper is part of the joint collaborative
research program between Amity University Haryana (AUH), Manesar-Gurgaon,
India; Sri Venkateswara University, Tirupati, India; the Indian Institute of
Tropical Meteorology, Pune, India; Science Systems and Applications (SSA),
Inc., Lanham, MD 20706, USA; and NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC),
Greenbelt, MD 20771, USA. However, the majority of the data have already
been made available in our published papers at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023976" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023976</ext-link>
(Khatri et al., 2016) and <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014944" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014944</ext-link> (Kumar et al., 2011).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e7478">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5569-2020-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-5569-2020-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e7487">All authors have, directly or indirectly, participated
in the installation of the Sun–sky radiometer, calibration, maintenance,
data archival and analysis, attribution of results and manuscript preparation and
communication.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e7493">The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e7499">The corresponding author (Panuganti C. S. Devara) expresses his sincere gratitude to Ashok K. Chauhan, Founder President; Aseem Chauhan, Chancellor; P.B. Sharma, Vice Chancellor; B. S. Suhag, Dy. Vice Chancellor; Padmakali Banerjee, Pro-Vice Chancellor, and all other authorities of AUH for continuous support, and appreciates his team for cooperation. The principal author (Katta Vijayakumar) acknowledges the support, in the form of Research Associate (RA) Fellowship, from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India (GOI), New Delhi. The constant support from M. Rajeevan, Secretary, MoES, GOI, New Delhi is gratefully acknowledged. Thanks are due to the director of IITM (Pune) for the infrastructure facilities. The authors would also like to thank AERONET (NASA) staff for support (<uri>https://aeronet.gsfc.nasa.gov/</uri>, last access: 13 June 2019) in calibrating the instrument and processing the data. We also acknowledge the ECMWF for synoptic meteorological data used in the study. The authors would also like to thank the MODIS and OMI science teams for providing access to the excellent data products that made this study more effective. The authors are highly grateful to the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and useful suggestions on the original manuscript.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e7507">This paper was edited by Hiren Jethva and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Abdou, W. A., Diner, D. J., Martonchik, J. V., Bruegge, C. J., Kahn, R.A.,
Gaitley, B. J., Crean, K. A., Remer, L. A., and Holben, B. N.: Comparison of
coincident multi angle imaging spectroradiometer and moderate resolution
imaging spectroradiometer aerosol optical depths over land and ocean scenes
containing AErosol RObotic NETwork sites, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D10S07,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004693" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004693</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Alam, K., Trautmann, T., and Blaschke, T.: Aerosol optical properties and
radiative forcing over mega-city Karachi, Atmos. Res., 101, 773–782, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Alexandrov, M. D., Schmid, B., Turner, D. D., Cairns, B., Oinas, V., Lacis,
A. A., Gutman, S. I., Westwater, Ed. R., Smirnov, A., and Eilers, J.:
Columnar water vapor retrievals from multi-filter rotating shadow-band
radiometer data, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D02306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010543" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010543</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Arola, A., Schuster, G., Myhre, G., Kazadzis, S., Dey, S., and Tripathi, S. N.: Inferring absorbing organic carbon content from AERONET data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 215–225, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-215-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-215-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Aruna, K., Lakshmi Kumar, T. V., Krishna Murthy, B. V., Suresh Babu, S.,
Venkat Ratnam, M., and Narayana Rao, D.: Short wave Aerosol Radiative
Forcing estimates over a semi urban coastal environment in south-east India
and validation with surface flux measurements, Atmos. Environ., 125,
418–428, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Babu, S. S., Satheesh, S. K., and Moorthy, K. K.: Aerosol radiative forcing
due to enhanced black carbon at an urban site in India, Geophys. Res. Lett.
29, 1880, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015826" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL015826</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bergstrom, R. W., Pilewskie, P., Russell, P. B., Redemann, J., Bond, T. C., Quinn, P. K., and Sierau, B.: Spectral absorption properties of atmospheric aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5937–5943, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5937-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-5937-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Charlson, R. J., Schwartz, S. E., Hales,  J. M., Cess, R. D., Coakley, Jr., J. A., Hansen, J. E., and Hofman, D. J.: Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols, Science, 255, 423–430, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cheng, T., Wang, H., Xu, Y., Li, H., and Tian, L.: Climatology of aerosol
optical properties in northern China, Atmos. Environ., 40, 1495–1509,
2006a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cheng, T., Liu, Y., Lu, D., Xu, Y., and Li, H.: Aerosol properties and
radiative forcing in Hunshan Dake desert, northern China, Atmos. Environ.,
40, 2169–2179, 2006b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chew, B. N., Campbell, J. R., Reid, J. S., Giles, D. M., Welton, E. J.,
Salinas, S. V., and Liew, S. C.: Tropical cirrus cloud contamination in sun
photometer data, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6724–6731, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.017</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Crutzen, P. J. and Andreae, M. O.: Biomass burning in tropics: impact on
atmospheric chemistry and biogeochemical cycles, Science, 250, 1669–1678,
1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Devara, P. C. S., Raj, P. E., Sharma, S., and Pandithurai, G.: Long-term
variations in lidar-observed urban aerosol characteristics and their
connection with meteorological parameters, Int. J. Climatol., 14, 581–591, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Devara, P. C. S., Maheskumar, R. S., Raj, P. E., Dani, K. K., and Sonbawne,
S. M.: Some features of aerosol optical depth, ozone and Precipitable water
content observed over land during the INDOEX-IFP 99, Meteorol. Z., 10, 123–130, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Devara, P. C. S., Maheskumar, R. S., Raj, P. E., Pandithurai, G., and Dani,
K. K.: Recent trends in aerosol climatology and air pollution as inferred
from multi-year Lidar observations over a tropical urban station, Int. J.
Climatol., 22, 435–449, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Devara, P. C. S., Saha, S. K., Ernest Raj, P., Sonbawne, S. M., Dani, K. K.,
Tiwari, K., and Maheskumar, R. S.: A four-year climatology of total column
tropical urban aerosol, ozone and water vapor distributions over Pune,
India, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 5, 103–114, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Diner, D. J., Asner, G. P., Davies, R., Knyazikhin, Y., Muller, J. -P.,
Nolin, A. W., Pinty, B., Schaaf, C. B., and Stroeve, J.: New directions in
Earth observing: Scientific applications of multiangle remote sensing, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 2209–2228, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080&lt;2209:NDIEOS&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080&lt;2209:NDIEOS&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Holben, B. N., Kaufman, Y. J., Yamasoe, M., Smirnov, A.,
Tanré, D., and Slutsker, I.: Single-scattering albedo of smoke retrieved
from the sky radiance and solar transmittance measured from ground, J.
Geophys. Res., 103, 31903–31924, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Holben, B. N., Eck, T., Smirnov, A., Kaufman, Y. J., King, M.,
Tanré, D., and Slutsker, I.: Variability of absorption and optical
properties of key aerosol types observed in worldwide locations, J. Atmos.
Sci., 59, 590–608, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Reid, J. S., Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., O'Neill,
N. T., Slutsker, I., and Kinne, S.: Wavelength dependence of the optical
depth of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.,
104, 31333–31349, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900923" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900923</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., Slutsker, I., Lobert, J.
M., and Ramanathan, V.: Column-integrated aerosol optical properties over
the Maldives during the northeast monsoon for 1998–2000, J. Geophys. Res.,
106, 555–566, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ganguly, D., Jayaraman, A., and Gadhavi, H.: Physical and optical properties
of aerosols over an urban location in western India: seasonal variabilities,
J. Geophys. Res., 111, D24206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007392" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007392</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>García, O. E., Díaz, A. M., Expósito, F. J, Díaz, J. P., Dobovik, O., Dubuisson, P., Roger, J.-C., Eck, T. F., Sinuk, A., Derimian, Y., Dutton, E. G., Schafer, J. S., Holben, B. N., and García, C.A.: Validation of AERONET estimates of atmospheric solar fluxes and aerosol radiative forcing by ground-based broadband measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D21207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010211" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010211</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>García, O. E., Díaz, J. P., Expósito, F. J., Díaz, A. M., Dubovik, O., Derimian, Y., Dubuisson, P., and Roger, J.-C.: Shortwave radiative forcing and efficiency of key aerosol types using AERONET data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5129–5145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5129-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5129-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Giles, D. M., Holben, B. N., Tripathi, S. N., Eck, T. F., Newcomb, W. W.,
Slutsker, I., Dickerson, R. R., Thompson, A. M., Mattoo, S., Wang, S. H.,
Singh, R. P., Sinyuk, A., and Schafer, J. S.: Aerosol properties over the
Indo-Gangetic plain: a mesoscale perspective from the TIGERZ experiment, J.
Geophys. Res., 116, D18203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015809" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011JD015809</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Giles, D. M., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Sinyuk, A., Smirnov, A., Slutsker,
I., Dickerson, R. R., and Thompson, A. M., and Schafer, J. S.: An analysis of
AERONET aerosol absorption properties and classifications representative of
aerosol source regions, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D17203, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018127" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD018127</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5591?><ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Giles, D. M., Sinyuk, A., Sorokin, M. G., Schafer, J. S., Smirnov, A., Slutsker, I., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Lewis, J. R., Campbell, J. R., Welton, E. J., Korkin, S. V., and Lyapustin, A. I.: Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 169–209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-169-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gobbi, G. P., Kaufman, Y. J., Koren, I., and Eck, T. F.: Classification of aerosol properties derived from AERONET direct sun data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 453–458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-453-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-453-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Lacis, A., and Oinas, V.: Global warming in
the twenty-first century: An alternative scenario, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 9875–9880, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
He, Z. Z., Mao, J. K., and Han, X. S.: Non-parametric estimation of particle
size distribution from spectral extinction data with PCA approach, Powder
Technol., 325, 510–518, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanre, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer, A.,
Vermote, E., Ragan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F.,
Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A.: AERONET–A federated instrument network and
data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Holben, B. N.,Tanré, D., Smirnov, A., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I.,
Abuhassan, N., Newcomb, W. W., Schafer, J. S., Chatenet, B., Lavenu, F.,
Kaufman, Y. J., Vande Castle, J., Setzer, A., Markham, B., Clark, D.,
Frouin, R., Halthore, R., Karneli, A., O`Neill, N. T., Pietras, C., Pinker,
R. T., Voss, K., and Zibordi, G.: An emerging ground–based aerosol
climatology: Aerosol optical depth from AERONET, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
12067–12097, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD900014</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hoppel, W. A., Fitzgerald, J. W., and Larson, R. E.: Aerosol size distributions in air masses advecting off the east coast of the United States, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 2365–2379, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hsu, N. C., Hermann, J. R., and Weaver, C.: Determination of radiative
forcing of Saharan dust using combined TOMS and ERBE data, J. Geophys. Res.,
108, 20649–20661, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Huang, J. F., Hsu, N. C., Tsay, S. C, Holben, B. N., Welton, E. J., Smirnov,
A., Hansell, R. A., Berkoff, T. A., Liu, Z. Y., Liu, G. R., Cambell, I. R.,
Liew, S. C., Jeong, M. J., and Bames, I. E.: Evaluations of cirrus
contamination and screening in ground aerosol observations using collocated
lidar systems, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D15204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017757" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012JD017757</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Humera, B., Khan, A., Farrukh, C., Samina, B., Imran, S., and Thomas, B.:
Inter-comparison of MODIS, MISR, OMI and CALIPSO aerosol optical depth
retrievals for four locations on the Indo-Gangetic plains and validation
against AERONET data, Atmos. Environ., 111, 113–126, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): Climate Change 2001: The
scientific basis-contribution of Working Group I to the third assessment
report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge Univ.
Press, New York, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): Climate Change 2007: The
scientific basis-contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment
report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge Univ.
Press, New York, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kacenelenbogen, M., Léon, J.-F., Chiapello, I., and Tanré, D.: Characterization of aerosol pollution events in France using ground-based and POLDER-2 satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4843–4849, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4843-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-4843-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kaskaoutis, D. G., Badarinath, K. V. S., Kharol, S. K., Sharma, A. R., and
Kambezidis, H. D.: Variations in the aerosol optical properties and types
over the tropical urban site of Hyderabad, India, J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D22204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012423" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012423</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kaskaoutis, D. G., Sinha, P. R., Vinoj, V., Kosmopoulos, P. G., Tripathi, S.
N., Misra, A., Sharma, M., and Singh, R. P.: Aerosol properties and
radiative forcing over Kanpur during severe aerosol loading conditions,
Atmos. Environ., 79, 7–19, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Khatri, P., Takamura, T., Nakajima, T., Estellés, V., Irie, H., Kuze, H., Campanelli, M., Sinyuk, A., Lee, S.‐M., Sohn, B. J., Padhithurai, G., Kim, S.-W., Yoon, S. C., Lozano, J. A. M., Hashimoto, M., Devara, P. C. S., and Manago, N.: Factors for inconsistent aerosol single scattering albedo between
SKYNET and AERONET, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1859–1877, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023976" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023976</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
King, M. D., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., and Nakajima, T.: Remote sensing
of tropospheric aerosols from space: past, present, and future, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 80, 2229–2259, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Koepke, P., Hess, M., Schult, I., and Shettle, E. P.: Global aerosol data
set, MPI Meteorol. Hamburg, Report No. 243, 44 pp., 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kumar, K. R., Sivakumar, V., Reddy, R. R., Gopal, K. R., and Adesina, A. J.:
Inferring wavelength dependence of AOD and Ångström exponent over a
sub-tropical station in South Africa using AERONET data: Influence of
meteorology, long-range transport and curvature effect, Sci. Total Environ.,
461, 397–408, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kumar, K. R., Kang, N., and Yin, Y.: Classification of key aerosol types and
their frequency distributions based on satellite remote sensing data at an
industrially polluted city in the Yangtze River Delta, China, Int. J. Climatol., 38, 320–336, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kumar, S., Devara, P. C. S., Dani, K. K., Sonbawne, S. M., and Saha, S. K.:
Sun-sky radiometer–derived column-integrated aerosol optical and physical
properties over a tropical urban station during 2004–2009, J. Geophys.
Res., 116, D10201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014944" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014944</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kumar, S. and Devara, P. C. S.: Aerosol characterization: comparison
between measured and modelled surface radiative forcing over Bay of Bengal,
Remote. Sens. Lett., 3, 373–381, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.600466" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431161.2011.600466</ext-link>, 2012a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kumar, S. and Devara, P. C. S.: A long-term study of aerosol modulation of
atmospheric and surface solar heating over Pune, India, Tellus B, 64, 18420,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.18420" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.18420</ext-link>, 2012b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lee, J., Kim, J., Song, C. H., Chun, Y., Sohn, B. J., and Holben, B. N.:
Characteristics of aerosol types from AERONET sunphotometer measurements,
Atmos. Environ., 44, 3110–3117, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Lee, K. -H., Wang, Y., Xin, J., Hao, and W.-M.: First
observation-based estimates of cloud-free aerosol radiative forcing across
China, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 115(D00K18), 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liou, K. N.: An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation, Academic Press, Oxford, UK, 583 pp., <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1256/003590003102695746" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1256/003590003102695746</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mishchenko, M. I., Geogdzhaye, I. V., Rossow, W. B., Cairns, B., Carlson, B.
E., Lacis, A. A., Liu, L., and Travis, L. D.: Long-ter<?pagebreak page5592?>m satellite record
reveals likely recent aerosol trend, Science, 315, 1543, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136709" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1136709</ext-link>, 2007a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mishchenko, M. I., Cairns, B., Hansen, J. E., Travis, L. D., Kopp, G.,
Schueler, C. F., Fafaul, B. A., Hooker, R. J., Maring, H. B., and
Itchkawich, T.: Accurate monitoring of terrestrial aerosol and total solar
irradiance. Introducing the GLORY mission, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 2229–2259, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-5-677" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-88-5-677</ext-link>, 2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>O'Neill, N. T., Dubovik, O., and Eck, T. F.: Modified Ångström
coefficient for the characterization of sub-micrometer aerosols, Appl. Optics, 40, 2368–2375, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.002368" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.40.002368</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>O'Neill, N. T., Eck, T. F., Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., and Thulasiraman,
S.: Spectral discrimination of coarse and fine mode optical depth, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 4559–4573, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002975" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD002975</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pandithurai, G., Dipu, S., Dani, K. K., Tiwari, S., Bisht, D. S., Devara, P.
C. S., and Pinker, R. T.: Aerosol radiative forcing during dust events over
New Delhi, India, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13209, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009804" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD009804</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pathak, B., Kalita, G., Bhuyan, P., and Moorthy, K.: Aerosol temporal
characteristics and its impact on short wave radiative forcing at a location
in the northeast of India, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D19204,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013462" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013462</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pathak, B., Bhuyan, P. K., Gogoi, M. M., and Bhuyan, K.: Seasonal
heterogeneity in aerosol types over Dibrugarh, North – Eastern India,
Atmos. Environ., 47, 307–315, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.061</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ramachandran, S. and Cherian, R.: Regional and seasonal variations in aerosol optical characteristics and their frequency distributions over India during 2001–2005, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D08207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008560" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008560</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Remer, L. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., Mattoo, S., Chu, D. A.,
Martins, J. V., Li, R.-R., Ichoku, C., Levy, R. C., Kledman, R. G., Eck, T.
F., Vermote, E., and Holben, B. N.: The MODIS aerosol algorithm, products,
and validation, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 947–973, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3385.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAS3385.1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Russell, P. B., Bergstrom, R. W., Shinozuka, Y., Clarke, A. D., DeCarlo, P. F., Jimenez, J. L., Livingston, J. M., Redemann, J., Dubovik, O., and Strawa, A.: Absorption Angstrom Exponent in AERONET and related data as an indicator of aerosol composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1155–1169, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1155-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-1155-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmid, J., Michalsky, J. J., Slater, D. W., Bernard, J. C., Halthore, R.
N., Liljegren, J. C., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Livingston, J. M., Russell,
J. B., Ingold, T., and Slustsker, I.: Comparison of columnar water-vapor
measurements from solar transmittance methods, Appl. Optics, 40, 1886–1896,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.001886" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.40.001886</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schuster, G. L., Dubovik, O., and Holben, B. N.: Angstrom exponent and
bimodal aerosol size distributions, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D07207, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006328" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006328</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Singh, R. P., Dey, S., Tripathi, S. N., Tare, V., and Holben, B. N.:
Variability of aerosol parameters over Kanpur, Northern India, J. Geophys.
Res., 109, D23206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004966" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004966</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sinha, P. R., Kaskaoutis, D. G., Manchanda, R. K., and Sreenivasan, S.: Characteristics of aerosols over Hyderabad in southern Peninsular India: synergy in the classification techniques, Ann. Geophys., 30, 1393–1410, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-30-1393-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-30-1393-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sinyuk, A., Torres, O., and Dubovik, O.: Combined use of satellite and
surface observations to infer the imaginary part of the refractive index of
Saharan dust, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1081, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016189" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL016189</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Sinyuk, A., Dubovik, O., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Breon, F-M., Martonchik,
J., Khan, R., Diner, D. J., Verrmote, E. F., Roger, J.-C., Lapyonok, T.,
and Ilya, S.: Simultaneous retrieval of aerosol and surface properties from
a combination of AERONET and satellite data, Remote Sens. Environ., 107,
90–108, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Dubovik, O., and Slutsker, I.: Cloud
screening and quality control algorithms for the AERONET data base, Remote
Sens. Environ., 73, 337–349, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., Dubovic, O, O'Neill, N. T., Eck, T. F.,
Westphal, D. L., Goroth, A. K., Pietras, C., and Slutsker, I.: Atmospheric
aerosol optical properties in the Persian Gulf, J. Atmos. Sci., 59,
620–634, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0620:AAOPIT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0620:AAOPIT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2002a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., Kaufman, Y. J., Dubovic, O., Eck, T. F.,
Slutsker, I., Pietras, C., and Halthore, R. N.: Optical properties of
atmospheric aerosol in maritime environments, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 501–523,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0501:OPOAAI&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0501:OPOAAI&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2002b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., Lyapustin, A., Slutsker, I., and Eck, T. F.:
AERONET processing algorithms refinement, AERONET 2004 Workshop, 10–14 May 2004, El Arenosillo, Spain, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Streets, D. G., Yan, F., Chin, M., Diehl, T., Mahowald, N., Schultz, M., Wild, M., Wu, Y., and Yu, C.: Anthropogenic and natural contributions to
regional trends in aerosol optical depth, 1980–2006, J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D00D18, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011624" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011624</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Suresh Babu, S., Krishna Moorthy, K., and Satheesh, S. K.: Temporal heterogeneity in aerosol characteristics and the resulting radiative impacts at a tropical coastal station – Part 2: Direct short wave radiative forcing, Ann. Geophys., 25, 2309–2320, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-2309-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-25-2309-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tan, H., Liu, L., Fan, S., Li, F., Yin, Y., Cai, M., and Chan, P. W.:
Aerosol optical properties and mixing state of black carbon in the Pearl
River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ., 131, 196–208, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Tanré, D., Bréon, F. M., Deuzé, J. L., Herman, M., Goloub, P.,
Nadal, F., and Marchand, A.: Global observation of anthropogenic aerosols
from satellite, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4555–4558, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tiwari, S., Kaskaoutis, D., Soni, V. K., Attri, S. D., and Singh, A. K.:
Aerosol columnar characteristics and their heterogeneous nature over
Varanasi, in the central Ganges valley, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 25, 24726–24745, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2502-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11356-018-2502-4</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tripathi, S. N., Dey, S., Chandel, A., Srivastava, S., Singh, R. P., and Holben, B. N.: Comparison of MODIS and AERONET derived aerosol optical depth over the Ganga Basin, India, Ann. Geophys., 23, 1093–1101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-1093-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/angeo-23-1093-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Verma, S., Prakash, D., Ricaud, P., Payra, S., Attie, J.-L., and Soni, M.:
A new classification of aerosol sources and types as measured over Jaipur,
India, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 15, 985–993, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page5593?><ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vijayakumar, K., Devara, P. C. S., and Simha, C. P.: Aerosol features during
drought and normal monsoon years: A study undertaken with multi-platform
measurements over a tropical urban site. Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 12,
1444–1458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.01.0005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4209/aaqr.2012.01.0005</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Vijayakumar, K. and Devara, P. C. S.: Variations in aerosol optical and
microphysical properties during an Indian festival observed with space-borne
and ground-based observations, Atmósfera, 25, 381–395, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Vijayakumar, K. and Devara, P. C. S.: Study of aerosol optical depth,
ozone, and precipitable water vapour content over Sinhagad, a high-altitude
station in the Western Ghats, Int. J. Remote Sens., 34, 613–630, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Vijayakumar, K., Devara, P. C. S., and Sonbawne, S. M.: Type-segregated
aerosol effects on regional monsoon activity: A study using ground-based
experiments and model simulations, Atmos. Environ., 99, 650–659, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wang, M., Zhang, R., and Pu, Y.: Recent researches on aerosol in China, Adv.
Atmos. Sci., 18, 576–586, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wild, M., Trüssel, B., Ohmura, A., Long, C. N., König-Langlo, G.,
Dutton, E. G., and Tsvetkov, A.: Global dimming and brightening: An update
beyond 2000, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00D13, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011382" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD011382</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>WMO: Radiation Commission of IAPAM Meeting of Experts on Aerosol and Their
Climatic Effects,Williamsburg, VA, WCP55, 28–30, 1983.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wu, L. and Zeng, Q.-C.: Study on probability distributions of
multi-timescale aerosol optical depth using AERONET data, Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 4, 216–222, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xia, X.: Parameterization of clear-sky surface irradiance and its
implications for estimation of aerosol direct radiative effect and aerosol
optical depth, Scientific Reports, 5, 14376, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14376" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep14376</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, Y., Li, Z., and Li, L.: Aerosol optical, microphysical, chemical and
radiative properties of high aerosol load cases over the Arctic based on
AERONET measurements, Scientific Reports, 8, 9376, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27744-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-018-27744-z</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yu, H., Kaufman, Y. J., Chin, M., Feingold, G., Remer, L. A., Anderson, T. L., Balkanski, Y., Bellouin, N., Boucher, O., Christopher, S., DeCola, P., Kahn, R., Koch, D., Loeb, N., Reddy, M. S., Schulz, M., Takemura, T., and Zhou, M.: A review of measurement-based assessments of the aerosol direct radiative effect and forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 613–666, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-613-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-613-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zege, E. P., Ivanov, A. P., and Katzev, I. L.: Image transfer through a
scattering medium, Springer, Berlin, New York, USA, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, T. X., Laszlo, P. I., Guo, W., Heidinger, A., Cao, C., Jelenak, A., Tarpley, D., and Sullivan, J.: Study of long-term trend in aerosol
optical thickness observed from operational AVHRR satellite instrument, J.
Geophys. Res., 113, D07201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD009061</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Solar radiometer sensing of multi-year aerosol features over a tropical urban station: direct-Sun and inversion products</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>The AErosol RObotic NETwork (AERONET) is the most developed
ground-based network for aerosol remote sensing and has been playing a
significant role not only in monitoring air quality for protecting human
health but also in assessing the radiative budget of our planet Earth. In
this paper, we report the direct-Sun and inversion products, comprising of
spectral variation of aerosol optical depth (AOD), associated
Ångström exponent (AE), fine- and coarse-mode aerosol fractions,
aerosol size distribution (ASD), refractive index (RI), asymmetry parameter
(AP), single scattering albedo (SSA), aerosol radiative forcing (ARF) and
columnar concentration of gas constituents such as water vapor (H<sub>2</sub>O),
obtained from a Cimel Sun–sky radiometer, functioning in Pune, India, under
the AERONET program since October 2004. These long-term measurements carried
out from 2005 to 2015 could serve as an urban aerosol optical long-term
average or climatology. The AOD long-term variations at all wavelengths,
considered in the study, exhibited an increasing trend, implying year-to-year
enhancement in aerosol loading. The mean seasonal variations in AOD from
cloud-free days indicated greater values during the monsoon season, revealing dominance
of hygroscopic aerosol particles over the station. Contribution by different
aerosol types to AOD has also been deduced and discussed,  and dominance  of
a mixed type of aerosols (44.85&thinsp;%) found, followed by combination of biomass
burning and urban industrial aerosols (22.57&thinsp;%) compared to other types
of aerosols during the study period. The long-term datasets, derived aerosol
and trace gas products play a significant role in understanding aerosol climate
forcing, trends and evaluation of regional air pollution and validation of
aerosol transport models over the study region.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Abdou, W. A., Diner, D. J., Martonchik, J. V., Bruegge, C. J., Kahn, R.A.,
Gaitley, B. J., Crean, K. A., Remer, L. A., and Holben, B. N.: Comparison of
coincident multi angle imaging spectroradiometer and moderate resolution
imaging spectroradiometer aerosol optical depths over land and ocean scenes
containing AErosol RObotic NETwork sites, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D10S07,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004693" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004693</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Alam, K., Trautmann, T., and Blaschke, T.: Aerosol optical properties and
radiative forcing over mega-city Karachi, Atmos. Res., 101, 773–782, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Alexandrov, M. D., Schmid, B., Turner, D. D., Cairns, B., Oinas, V., Lacis,
A. A., Gutman, S. I., Westwater, Ed. R., Smirnov, A., and Eilers, J.:
Columnar water vapor retrievals from multi-filter rotating shadow-band
radiometer data, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D02306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010543" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010543</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Arola, A., Schuster, G., Myhre, G., Kazadzis, S., Dey, S., and Tripathi, S. N.: Inferring absorbing organic carbon content from AERONET data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 215–225, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-215-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-215-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Aruna, K., Lakshmi Kumar, T. V., Krishna Murthy, B. V., Suresh Babu, S.,
Venkat Ratnam, M., and Narayana Rao, D.: Short wave Aerosol Radiative
Forcing estimates over a semi urban coastal environment in south-east India
and validation with surface flux measurements, Atmos. Environ., 125,
418–428, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Babu, S. S., Satheesh, S. K., and Moorthy, K. K.: Aerosol radiative forcing
due to enhanced black carbon at an urban site in India, Geophys. Res. Lett.
29, 1880, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015826" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015826</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bergstrom, R. W., Pilewskie, P., Russell, P. B., Redemann, J., Bond, T. C., Quinn, P. K., and Sierau, B.: Spectral absorption properties of atmospheric aerosols, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 5937–5943, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5937-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-5937-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Charlson, R. J., Schwartz, S. E., Hales,  J. M., Cess, R. D., Coakley, Jr., J. A., Hansen, J. E., and Hofman, D. J.: Climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols, Science, 255, 423–430, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, T., Wang, H., Xu, Y., Li, H., and Tian, L.: Climatology of aerosol
optical properties in northern China, Atmos. Environ., 40, 1495–1509,
2006a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cheng, T., Liu, Y., Lu, D., Xu, Y., and Li, H.: Aerosol properties and
radiative forcing in Hunshan Dake desert, northern China, Atmos. Environ.,
40, 2169–2179, 2006b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chew, B. N., Campbell, J. R., Reid, J. S., Giles, D. M., Welton, E. J.,
Salinas, S. V., and Liew, S. C.: Tropical cirrus cloud contamination in sun
photometer data, Atmos. Environ., 45, 6724–6731, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.08.017</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Crutzen, P. J. and Andreae, M. O.: Biomass burning in tropics: impact on
atmospheric chemistry and biogeochemical cycles, Science, 250, 1669–1678,
1990.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Devara, P. C. S., Raj, P. E., Sharma, S., and Pandithurai, G.: Long-term
variations in lidar-observed urban aerosol characteristics and their
connection with meteorological parameters, Int. J. Climatol., 14, 581–591, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Devara, P. C. S., Maheskumar, R. S., Raj, P. E., Dani, K. K., and Sonbawne,
S. M.: Some features of aerosol optical depth, ozone and Precipitable water
content observed over land during the INDOEX-IFP 99, Meteorol. Z., 10, 123–130, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Devara, P. C. S., Maheskumar, R. S., Raj, P. E., Pandithurai, G., and Dani,
K. K.: Recent trends in aerosol climatology and air pollution as inferred
from multi-year Lidar observations over a tropical urban station, Int. J.
Climatol., 22, 435–449, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Devara, P. C. S., Saha, S. K., Ernest Raj, P., Sonbawne, S. M., Dani, K. K.,
Tiwari, K., and Maheskumar, R. S.: A four-year climatology of total column
tropical urban aerosol, ozone and water vapor distributions over Pune,
India, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 5, 103–114, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Diner, D. J., Asner, G. P., Davies, R., Knyazikhin, Y., Muller, J. -P.,
Nolin, A. W., Pinty, B., Schaaf, C. B., and Stroeve, J.: New directions in
Earth observing: Scientific applications of multiangle remote sensing, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 2209–2228, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080&lt;2209:NDIEOS&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080&lt;2209:NDIEOS&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Holben, B. N., Kaufman, Y. J., Yamasoe, M., Smirnov, A.,
Tanré, D., and Slutsker, I.: Single-scattering albedo of smoke retrieved
from the sky radiance and solar transmittance measured from ground, J.
Geophys. Res., 103, 31903–31924, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Dubovik, O., Holben, B. N., Eck, T., Smirnov, A., Kaufman, Y. J., King, M.,
Tanré, D., and Slutsker, I.: Variability of absorption and optical
properties of key aerosol types observed in worldwide locations, J. Atmos.
Sci., 59, 590–608, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Reid, J. S., Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., O'Neill,
N. T., Slutsker, I., and Kinne, S.: Wavelength dependence of the optical
depth of biomass burning, urban, and desert dust aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.,
104, 31333–31349, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900923" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900923</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Dubovik, O., Smirnov, A., Slutsker, I., Lobert, J.
M., and Ramanathan, V.: Column-integrated aerosol optical properties over
the Maldives during the northeast monsoon for 1998–2000, J. Geophys. Res.,
106, 555–566, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Ganguly, D., Jayaraman, A., and Gadhavi, H.: Physical and optical properties
of aerosols over an urban location in western India: seasonal variabilities,
J. Geophys. Res., 111, D24206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007392" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007392</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
García, O. E., Díaz, A. M., Expósito, F. J, Díaz, J. P., Dobovik, O., Dubuisson, P., Roger, J.-C., Eck, T. F., Sinuk, A., Derimian, Y., Dutton, E. G., Schafer, J. S., Holben, B. N., and García, C.A.: Validation of AERONET estimates of atmospheric solar fluxes and aerosol radiative forcing by ground-based broadband measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D21207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010211" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010211</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
García, O. E., Díaz, J. P., Expósito, F. J., Díaz, A. M., Dubovik, O., Derimian, Y., Dubuisson, P., and Roger, J.-C.: Shortwave radiative forcing and efficiency of key aerosol types using AERONET data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5129–5145, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5129-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5129-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Giles, D. M., Holben, B. N., Tripathi, S. N., Eck, T. F., Newcomb, W. W.,
Slutsker, I., Dickerson, R. R., Thompson, A. M., Mattoo, S., Wang, S. H.,
Singh, R. P., Sinyuk, A., and Schafer, J. S.: Aerosol properties over the
Indo-Gangetic plain: a mesoscale perspective from the TIGERZ experiment, J.
Geophys. Res., 116, D18203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015809" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD015809</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Giles, D. M., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Sinyuk, A., Smirnov, A., Slutsker,
I., Dickerson, R. R., and Thompson, A. M., and Schafer, J. S.: An analysis of
AERONET aerosol absorption properties and classifications representative of
aerosol source regions, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D17203, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018127" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD018127</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Giles, D. M., Sinyuk, A., Sorokin, M. G., Schafer, J. S., Smirnov, A., Slutsker, I., Eck, T. F., Holben, B. N., Lewis, J. R., Campbell, J. R., Welton, E. J., Korkin, S. V., and Lyapustin, A. I.: Advancements in the Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) Version 3 database – automated near-real-time quality control algorithm with improved cloud screening for Sun photometer aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 169–209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-169-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Gobbi, G. P., Kaufman, Y. J., Koren, I., and Eck, T. F.: Classification of aerosol properties derived from AERONET direct sun data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 453–458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-453-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-453-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Lacis, A., and Oinas, V.: Global warming in
the twenty-first century: An alternative scenario, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97, 9875–9880, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
He, Z. Z., Mao, J. K., and Han, X. S.: Non-parametric estimation of particle
size distribution from spectral extinction data with PCA approach, Powder
Technol., 325, 510–518, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I., Tanre, D., Buis, J. P., Setzer, A.,
Vermote, E., Ragan, J. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Nakajima, T., Lavenu, F.,
Jankowiak, I., and Smirnov, A.: AERONET–A federated instrument network and
data archive for aerosol characterization, Remote Sens. Environ., 66, 1–16,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(98)00031-5</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Holben, B. N.,Tanré, D., Smirnov, A., Eck, T. F., Slutsker, I.,
Abuhassan, N., Newcomb, W. W., Schafer, J. S., Chatenet, B., Lavenu, F.,
Kaufman, Y. J., Vande Castle, J., Setzer, A., Markham, B., Clark, D.,
Frouin, R., Halthore, R., Karneli, A., O`Neill, N. T., Pietras, C., Pinker,
R. T., Voss, K., and Zibordi, G.: An emerging ground–based aerosol
climatology: Aerosol optical depth from AERONET, J. Geophys. Res., 106,
12067–12097, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD900014</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Hoppel, W. A., Fitzgerald, J. W., and Larson, R. E.: Aerosol size distributions in air masses advecting off the east coast of the United States, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 2365–2379, 1985.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Hsu, N. C., Hermann, J. R., and Weaver, C.: Determination of radiative
forcing of Saharan dust using combined TOMS and ERBE data, J. Geophys. Res.,
108, 20649–20661, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Huang, J. F., Hsu, N. C., Tsay, S. C, Holben, B. N., Welton, E. J., Smirnov,
A., Hansell, R. A., Berkoff, T. A., Liu, Z. Y., Liu, G. R., Cambell, I. R.,
Liew, S. C., Jeong, M. J., and Bames, I. E.: Evaluations of cirrus
contamination and screening in ground aerosol observations using collocated
lidar systems, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D15204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017757" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017757</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Humera, B., Khan, A., Farrukh, C., Samina, B., Imran, S., and Thomas, B.:
Inter-comparison of MODIS, MISR, OMI and CALIPSO aerosol optical depth
retrievals for four locations on the Indo-Gangetic plains and validation
against AERONET data, Atmos. Environ., 111, 113–126, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): Climate Change 2001: The
scientific basis-contribution of Working Group I to the third assessment
report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge Univ.
Press, New York, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): Climate Change 2007: The
scientific basis-contribution of Working Group I to the fourth assessment
report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge Univ.
Press, New York, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Kacenelenbogen, M., Léon, J.-F., Chiapello, I., and Tanré, D.: Characterization of aerosol pollution events in France using ground-based and POLDER-2 satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 4843–4849, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4843-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-4843-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Kaskaoutis, D. G., Badarinath, K. V. S., Kharol, S. K., Sharma, A. R., and
Kambezidis, H. D.: Variations in the aerosol optical properties and types
over the tropical urban site of Hyderabad, India, J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D22204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012423" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012423</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Kaskaoutis, D. G., Sinha, P. R., Vinoj, V., Kosmopoulos, P. G., Tripathi, S.
N., Misra, A., Sharma, M., and Singh, R. P.: Aerosol properties and
radiative forcing over Kanpur during severe aerosol loading conditions,
Atmos. Environ., 79, 7–19, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Khatri, P., Takamura, T., Nakajima, T., Estellés, V., Irie, H., Kuze, H., Campanelli, M., Sinyuk, A., Lee, S.‐M., Sohn, B. J., Padhithurai, G., Kim, S.-W., Yoon, S. C., Lozano, J. A. M., Hashimoto, M., Devara, P. C. S., and Manago, N.: Factors for inconsistent aerosol single scattering albedo between
SKYNET and AERONET, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 1859–1877, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023976" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023976</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
King, M. D., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., and Nakajima, T.: Remote sensing
of tropospheric aerosols from space: past, present, and future, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 80, 2229–2259, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Koepke, P., Hess, M., Schult, I., and Shettle, E. P.: Global aerosol data
set, MPI Meteorol. Hamburg, Report No. 243, 44 pp., 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, K. R., Sivakumar, V., Reddy, R. R., Gopal, K. R., and Adesina, A. J.:
Inferring wavelength dependence of AOD and Ångström exponent over a
sub-tropical station in South Africa using AERONET data: Influence of
meteorology, long-range transport and curvature effect, Sci. Total Environ.,
461, 397–408, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, K. R., Kang, N., and Yin, Y.: Classification of key aerosol types and
their frequency distributions based on satellite remote sensing data at an
industrially polluted city in the Yangtze River Delta, China, Int. J. Climatol., 38, 320–336, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, S., Devara, P. C. S., Dani, K. K., Sonbawne, S. M., and Saha, S. K.:
Sun-sky radiometer–derived column-integrated aerosol optical and physical
properties over a tropical urban station during 2004–2009, J. Geophys.
Res., 116, D10201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014944" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014944</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, S. and Devara, P. C. S.: Aerosol characterization: comparison
between measured and modelled surface radiative forcing over Bay of Bengal,
Remote. Sens. Lett., 3, 373–381, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.600466" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2011.600466</a>, 2012a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, S. and Devara, P. C. S.: A long-term study of aerosol modulation of
atmospheric and surface solar heating over Pune, India, Tellus B, 64, 18420,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.18420" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v64i0.18420</a>, 2012b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, J., Kim, J., Song, C. H., Chun, Y., Sohn, B. J., and Holben, B. N.:
Characteristics of aerosol types from AERONET sunphotometer measurements,
Atmos. Environ., 44, 3110–3117, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Z., Lee, K. -H., Wang, Y., Xin, J., Hao, and W.-M.: First
observation-based estimates of cloud-free aerosol radiative forcing across
China, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 115(D00K18), 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Liou, K. N.: An Introduction to Atmospheric Radiation, Academic Press, Oxford, UK, 583 pp., <a href="https://doi.org/10.1256/003590003102695746" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1256/003590003102695746</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Mishchenko, M. I., Geogdzhaye, I. V., Rossow, W. B., Cairns, B., Carlson, B.
E., Lacis, A. A., Liu, L., and Travis, L. D.: Long-term satellite record
reveals likely recent aerosol trend, Science, 315, 1543, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136709" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136709</a>, 2007a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Mishchenko, M. I., Cairns, B., Hansen, J. E., Travis, L. D., Kopp, G.,
Schueler, C. F., Fafaul, B. A., Hooker, R. J., Maring, H. B., and
Itchkawich, T.: Accurate monitoring of terrestrial aerosol and total solar
irradiance. Introducing the GLORY mission, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 2229–2259, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-5-677" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-5-677</a>, 2007b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
O'Neill, N. T., Dubovik, O., and Eck, T. F.: Modified Ångström
coefficient for the characterization of sub-micrometer aerosols, Appl. Optics, 40, 2368–2375, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.002368" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.002368</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
O'Neill, N. T., Eck, T. F., Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., and Thulasiraman,
S.: Spectral discrimination of coarse and fine mode optical depth, J.
Geophys. Res., 108, 4559–4573, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002975" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002975</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Pandithurai, G., Dipu, S., Dani, K. K., Tiwari, S., Bisht, D. S., Devara, P.
C. S., and Pinker, R. T.: Aerosol radiative forcing during dust events over
New Delhi, India, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D13209, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009804" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD009804</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Pathak, B., Kalita, G., Bhuyan, P., and Moorthy, K.: Aerosol temporal
characteristics and its impact on short wave radiative forcing at a location
in the northeast of India, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D19204,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013462" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013462</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Pathak, B., Bhuyan, P. K., Gogoi, M. M., and Bhuyan, K.: Seasonal
heterogeneity in aerosol types over Dibrugarh, North – Eastern India,
Atmos. Environ., 47, 307–315, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.10.061</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Ramachandran, S. and Cherian, R.: Regional and seasonal variations in aerosol optical characteristics and their frequency distributions over India during 2001–2005, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D08207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008560" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008560</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Remer, L. A., Kaufman, Y. J., Tanré, D., Mattoo, S., Chu, D. A.,
Martins, J. V., Li, R.-R., Ichoku, C., Levy, R. C., Kledman, R. G., Eck, T.
F., Vermote, E., and Holben, B. N.: The MODIS aerosol algorithm, products,
and validation, J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 947–973, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3385.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3385.1</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Russell, P. B., Bergstrom, R. W., Shinozuka, Y., Clarke, A. D., DeCarlo, P. F., Jimenez, J. L., Livingston, J. M., Redemann, J., Dubovik, O., and Strawa, A.: Absorption Angstrom Exponent in AERONET and related data as an indicator of aerosol composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 1155–1169, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1155-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-1155-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Schmid, J., Michalsky, J. J., Slater, D. W., Bernard, J. C., Halthore, R.
N., Liljegren, J. C., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Livingston, J. M., Russell,
J. B., Ingold, T., and Slustsker, I.: Comparison of columnar water-vapor
measurements from solar transmittance methods, Appl. Optics, 40, 1886–1896,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.001886" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.40.001886</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Schuster, G. L., Dubovik, O., and Holben, B. N.: Angstrom exponent and
bimodal aerosol size distributions, J. Geophys. Res., 111, D07207, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006328" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006328</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Singh, R. P., Dey, S., Tripathi, S. N., Tare, V., and Holben, B. N.:
Variability of aerosol parameters over Kanpur, Northern India, J. Geophys.
Res., 109, D23206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004966" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004966</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Sinha, P. R., Kaskaoutis, D. G., Manchanda, R. K., and Sreenivasan, S.: Characteristics of aerosols over Hyderabad in southern Peninsular India: synergy in the classification techniques, Ann. Geophys., 30, 1393–1410, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-30-1393-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-30-1393-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Sinyuk, A., Torres, O., and Dubovik, O.: Combined use of satellite and
surface observations to infer the imaginary part of the refractive index of
Saharan dust, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1081, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016189" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL016189</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Sinyuk, A., Dubovik, O., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Breon, F-M., Martonchik,
J., Khan, R., Diner, D. J., Verrmote, E. F., Roger, J.-C., Lapyonok, T.,
and Ilya, S.: Simultaneous retrieval of aerosol and surface properties from
a combination of AERONET and satellite data, Remote Sens. Environ., 107,
90–108, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., Eck, T. F., Dubovik, O., and Slutsker, I.: Cloud
screening and quality control algorithms for the AERONET data base, Remote
Sens. Environ., 73, 337–349, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., Dubovic, O, O'Neill, N. T., Eck, T. F.,
Westphal, D. L., Goroth, A. K., Pietras, C., and Slutsker, I.: Atmospheric
aerosol optical properties in the Persian Gulf, J. Atmos. Sci., 59,
620–634, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0620:AAOPIT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0620:AAOPIT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2002a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., Kaufman, Y. J., Dubovic, O., Eck, T. F.,
Slutsker, I., Pietras, C., and Halthore, R. N.: Optical properties of
atmospheric aerosol in maritime environments, J. Atmos. Sci., 59, 501–523,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0501:OPOAAI&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(2002)059&lt;0501:OPOAAI&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2002b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Smirnov, A., Holben, B. N., Lyapustin, A., Slutsker, I., and Eck, T. F.:
AERONET processing algorithms refinement, AERONET 2004 Workshop, 10–14 May 2004, El Arenosillo, Spain, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Streets, D. G., Yan, F., Chin, M., Diehl, T., Mahowald, N., Schultz, M., Wild, M., Wu, Y., and Yu, C.: Anthropogenic and natural contributions to
regional trends in aerosol optical depth, 1980–2006, J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D00D18, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011624" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011624</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Suresh Babu, S., Krishna Moorthy, K., and Satheesh, S. K.: Temporal heterogeneity in aerosol characteristics and the resulting radiative impacts at a tropical coastal station – Part 2: Direct short wave radiative forcing, Ann. Geophys., 25, 2309–2320, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-2309-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-25-2309-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Tan, H., Liu, L., Fan, S., Li, F., Yin, Y., Cai, M., and Chan, P. W.:
Aerosol optical properties and mixing state of black carbon in the Pearl
River Delta, China, Atmos. Environ., 131, 196–208, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Tanré, D., Bréon, F. M., Deuzé, J. L., Herman, M., Goloub, P.,
Nadal, F., and Marchand, A.: Global observation of anthropogenic aerosols
from satellite, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 4555–4558, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
Tiwari, S., Kaskaoutis, D., Soni, V. K., Attri, S. D., and Singh, A. K.:
Aerosol columnar characteristics and their heterogeneous nature over
Varanasi, in the central Ganges valley, Environ. Sci. Pollut. R., 25, 24726–24745, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2502-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2502-4</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Tripathi, S. N., Dey, S., Chandel, A., Srivastava, S., Singh, R. P., and Holben, B. N.: Comparison of MODIS and AERONET derived aerosol optical depth over the Ganga Basin, India, Ann. Geophys., 23, 1093–1101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-1093-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-23-1093-2005</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Verma, S., Prakash, D., Ricaud, P., Payra, S., Attie, J.-L., and Soni, M.:
A new classification of aerosol sources and types as measured over Jaipur,
India, Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 15, 985–993, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Vijayakumar, K., Devara, P. C. S., and Simha, C. P.: Aerosol features during
drought and normal monsoon years: A study undertaken with multi-platform
measurements over a tropical urban site. Aerosol Air Qual. Res., 12,
1444–1458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.01.0005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.01.0005</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Vijayakumar, K. and Devara, P. C. S.: Variations in aerosol optical and
microphysical properties during an Indian festival observed with space-borne
and ground-based observations, Atmósfera, 25, 381–395, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Vijayakumar, K. and Devara, P. C. S.: Study of aerosol optical depth,
ozone, and precipitable water vapour content over Sinhagad, a high-altitude
station in the Western Ghats, Int. J. Remote Sens., 34, 613–630, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Vijayakumar, K., Devara, P. C. S., and Sonbawne, S. M.: Type-segregated
aerosol effects on regional monsoon activity: A study using ground-based
experiments and model simulations, Atmos. Environ., 99, 650–659, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, M., Zhang, R., and Pu, Y.: Recent researches on aerosol in China, Adv.
Atmos. Sci., 18, 576–586, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Wild, M., Trüssel, B., Ohmura, A., Long, C. N., König-Langlo, G.,
Dutton, E. G., and Tsvetkov, A.: Global dimming and brightening: An update
beyond 2000, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D00D13, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011382" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD011382</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
WMO: Radiation Commission of IAPAM Meeting of Experts on Aerosol and Their
Climatic Effects,Williamsburg, VA, WCP55, 28–30, 1983.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, L. and Zeng, Q.-C.: Study on probability distributions of
multi-timescale aerosol optical depth using AERONET data, Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 4, 216–222, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Xia, X.: Parameterization of clear-sky surface irradiance and its
implications for estimation of aerosol direct radiative effect and aerosol
optical depth, Scientific Reports, 5, 14376, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14376" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14376</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, Y., Li, Z., and Li, L.: Aerosol optical, microphysical, chemical and
radiative properties of high aerosol load cases over the Arctic based on
AERONET measurements, Scientific Reports, 8, 9376, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27744-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27744-z</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Yu, H., Kaufman, Y. J., Chin, M., Feingold, G., Remer, L. A., Anderson, T. L., Balkanski, Y., Bellouin, N., Boucher, O., Christopher, S., DeCola, P., Kahn, R., Koch, D., Loeb, N., Reddy, M. S., Schulz, M., Takemura, T., and Zhou, M.: A review of measurement-based assessments of the aerosol direct radiative effect and forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 613–666, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-613-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-613-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Zege, E. P., Ivanov, A. P., and Katzev, I. L.: Image transfer through a
scattering medium, Springer, Berlin, New York, USA, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, T. X., Laszlo, P. I., Guo, W., Heidinger, A., Cao, C., Jelenak, A., Tarpley, D., and Sullivan, J.: Study of long-term trend in aerosol
optical thickness observed from operational AVHRR satellite instrument, J.
Geophys. Res., 113, D07201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009061</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
