<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-14-1191-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Improvement in tropospheric moisture retrievals from VIIRS through the use of infrared absorption bands constructed<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> from VIIRS and CrIS data fusion</article-title><alt-title>Moisture retrievals from VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion radiances</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Moisture retrievals from VIIRS$+$CrIS fusion radiances}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{E.~E.~Borbas et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Borbas</surname><given-names>E. Eva</given-names></name>
          <email>eva.borbas@ssec.wisc.edu</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Weisz</surname><given-names>Elisabeth</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1835-2966</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Moeller</surname><given-names>Chris</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Menzel</surname><given-names>W. Paul</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Baum</surname><given-names>Bryan A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7193-2767</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University
of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Science and Technology Corporation, Madison, WI, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">E. Eva Borbas (eva.borbas@ssec.wisc.edu)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>15</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>1191</fpage><lpage>1203</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>June</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>8</day><month>July</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>23</day><month>October</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day><month>December</month><year>2020</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 E. Eva Borbas et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e132">An operational data product available for both the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (S-NPP) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-20 (NOAA-20) platforms provides high-spatial-resolution infrared
(IR) absorption band radiances for Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) based on a VIIRS and Crosstrack
Infrared Sounder (CrIS) data fusion
method. This study investigates the use of these IR radiances, centered at
4.5, 6.7, 7.3, 9.7, 13.3, 13.6, 13.9, and 14.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to construct
atmospheric moisture products (e.g., total precipitable water and upper
tropospheric humidity) and to evaluate their accuracy. Total precipitable
water (TPW) and upper tropospheric humidity (UTH) retrieved from
hyperspectral sounder CrIS measurements are provided at the associated VIIRS
sensor's high spatial resolution (750 m) and are compared subsequently to
collocated operational Aqua Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and S-NPP VIIRS moisture products.
This study suggests that the use of VIIRS IR absorption band radiances will
provide continuity with Aqua MODIS moisture products.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e154">Retrieval of atmospheric water vapor properties from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) satellite sensor on the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (S-NPP) and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-20 (NOAA-20) platforms is challenging due to the absence of
infrared (IR) water vapor absorption bands. Fortunately, measurements in the
missing spectral region are available on the Crosstrack Infrared Sounder
(CrIS), a hyperspectral IR sensor also on the same platforms. Spectral
measurements in these IR absorption bands can be constructed for VIIRS
through fusion of the imager and sounder data. Weisz et al. (2017)
demonstrated a fusion method to construct IR water vapor and carbon dioxide
absorption band radiances for VIIRS at 750 m spatial resolution. With the
addition of the missing spectral bands to VIIRS on S-NPP, this study
evaluates total column precipitable water vapor (TPW) and upper tropospheric
humidity (UTH) in clear skies through comparison to the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) MYD07 (Borbas et al., 2017) and MYD08
(Platnick et al., 2017) Collection 6.1 and version 1.0 VIIRS (Borbas et al., 2019a–d) atmospheric products. The MYD07 is a level-2 swath product that provides temperature and water vapor profiles at 5 km spatial resolution, while the MYD08 provides water vapor on a daily, 8 d and monthly global grid at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution. Through comparison to the MYD07/MYD08 products, we will demonstrate that the VIIRS water vapor product shows better agreement when these constructed band radiances are included, with the major improvement being found in the tropics.</p>
      <p id="d1e177">While VIIRS has a wide scanning swath, high horizontal resolution, a nearly
constant pixel size across the scan, and a day/night band (DNB), its
spectral complement lacks thermal infrared (IR) absorption bands necessary
to accurately retrieve tropospheric moisture content as well as cloud
properties that rely on those spectral measurements. In particular for
moisture retrievals, VIIRS does not take measurements in the broad
6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> water vapor band that are measured by<?pagebreak page1192?> the MODIS (Seemann et al., 2003). Fortunately, the missing IR spectral bands can be gleaned from
measurements on the companion hyperspectral CrIS sensor on the same
platform.</p>
      <p id="d1e190">Here, we denote the instantaneous field of regard as field of view (FOV) for
the sounder and pixel for the imager exclusively to minimize confusion
between the two sensors. To achieve TPW and UTH at imager pixel resolution,
this study employs the innovative data fusion approach of Weisz et al. (2017) that constructs MODIS-like water vapor and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sensitive
radiances directly at the imager resolution through use of collocated VIIRS
and CrIS radiances. In this study, the data fusion method provides
MODIS-like IR absorption band radiances at the VIIRS M-band spatial
resolution (750 m). The VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion radiances are available for the
entire record of both the S-NPP and NOAA-20 platforms (Baum et al., 2019a).</p>
      <p id="d1e211">The availability of these IR-band radiances for VIIRS at 750 m pixel
resolution makes it possible to retrieve a cloud mask and moisture
properties using algorithms developed and tested using the full MODIS
spectral band suite (Borbas et al., 2011). The goal of this study is to
determine the impact of supplementing VIIRS with imager-resolution
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion bands on retrieving TPW and UTH and establish the
feasibility of extending the MODIS TPW and UTH into the future with those
derived from VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion. The continuation of such a high-spatial-resolution product will maintain the benefit to observe high-spatial-scale
weather phenomena, detect an urban heat island (Hu and Brunsell, 2015), or
determine atmospheric correction for high-spatial-resolution remote sensing
products, such as the MODIS land surface temperature products (Proud et al., 2010; Hulley et al., 2017; Wan, 2010).</p>
      <p id="d1e229">This work is a clear-sky moisture companion to the cloud parameter fusion paper of Li et al. (2020), wherein they reported on the improvement in VIIRS detection and characterization of clouds through the use of additional infrared fusion radiances.</p>
      <p id="d1e232">This paper is organized as follows: Sect. 2 discusses data and fusion
method, Sect. 3 summarizes the moisture retrieval method and presents
results, and a summary of the findings is provided in Sect. 4.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and methodology</title>
      <p id="d1e243">The VIIRS sensor is a 22-band scanning radiometer that is currently flying
on the NASA S-NPP and the NOAA-20 platforms. VIIRS has 16 bands scanning
a 3000 km swath at 750 m resolution (medium resolution, or M), five bands at 375 m resolution (imaging, or I), and a day/night band. For this
investigation, the focus is on using the bands at M resolution. The data
used in this study include the standard level-1B VIIRS data for both the
S-NPP and NOAA-20 platforms made available by the Atmosphere Science
Investigator-led Processing System (A-SIPS) located at the University of
Wisconsin – Madison Space Science Engineering Center (SSEC).</p>
      <p id="d1e246">CrIS is a Fourier transform spectrometer
with 1305 spectral channels in normal spectral resolution (NSR) and 2211
channels in full spectral resolution (FSR) over three wavelength ranges: longwave infrared  (LWIR) (9.14 to 15.38 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); midwave-infrared (MWIR) (5.71 to 8.26 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>); and shortwave infrared (SWIR) (3.92 to 4.64 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). CrIS scans a 2200 km swath width (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), with 30 Earth-scene views. Each view consists of nine FOVs from a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> array that have a nadir spatial resolution of approximately 14 km.</p>
      <p id="d1e311">The fusion method requires an accurate collocation between the high-spatial-resolution imager data (with pixels at 750 m) and the
lower-spatial-resolution sounder data (with FOVs at about 14 km). The fusion
method described in Weisz et al. (2017) consists of two steps for each
imager pixel: (a) search nearby neighbors to find the five FOVs that best
match the split-window (i.e., 11 and 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) imager pixel radiances averaged over the FOV to an individual pixel's split-window measurements – this is accomplished using a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (or multi-dimensional) tree search algorithm (Bentley, 1975) on both high-spatial-resolution (M-band 11 and 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data) and low-spatial-resolution (M-band 11 and 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data averaged over the CrIS FOV)  imager radiances. (b) Convolve the high-spectral-sounder
radiances (at low spatial resolution) to the desired IR broadband, then
average the convolved sounder radiances associated with the selected five
nearest neighbors to construct the desired spectral band for each imager
pixel. Spectral radiance convolution refers to the process of converting
high-spectral-resolution (narrowband) to broadband radiance measurements by
applying a spectral response function (SRF) of a given broadband. Here, SRFs
associated with the spectral bands of the MODIS sensor on the NASA Earth
Observation System (EOS) Aqua platform are applied to CrIS measurements. The
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion IR absorption band radiances are available for the
entire records of S-NPP and NOAA-20 at the Level-1 and Atmosphere Archive
and Distribution System (LAADS) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC) at
the NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (Baum et al., 2019ab).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e366">CrIS sounder radiance (left), newly constructed fusion
radiance (middle), and the observed MODIS radiance differences (right) for
MODIS bands 25 (4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 27 (6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and 35 (13.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in rows <bold>(a, b, c)</bold>, respectively, for one granule at 14:36 UTC on 17 April 2015. This is shown in Fig. 8 in Weisz et al. (2017).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e408">VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion radiances alongside observed radiances for MODIS bands
25 (4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), 27 (6.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and 35 (13.9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), repeated from Weisz et al. (2017), are shown in Fig. 1. The fusion results for band 27 show more inaccuracies, because <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-sensitive spectral bands sense different tropospheric regions than split-window spectral bands. Also, small-scale and narrow spatial features in moisture (e.g., dry slots and cloud edges), which are not captured by the sounder due to its large spatial resolution, are more problematic for the fusion process. Furthermore, the results at the edge of the imager granule (i.e., outside the sounder swath) should be used with caution since they do not account for “limb darkening” and hence tend to be less accurate. Results shown in Fig. 1 for the
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion radiances compared well<?pagebreak page1193?> in a qualitative sense with the
observed MODIS radiances, even in the more challenging water vapor band.</p>
      <p id="d1e469">To assess the viability of the moisture products to provide continuity with
similar products from MODIS, we perform a comparison with collocated
measurements (i.e., matchups) with Aqua MODIS. For this study, the
collocation process requires the VIIRS 750 m pixel to be fully contained
within the MODIS 1 km pixel; the scene must be high confidence clear (as
identified by the MODIS cloud mask MYD35); and the scan angles for the
matching pair must be less than 50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> so that it is within the swath
of the CrIS sensor. Figure 2 shows the results of tens of thousands of
instances of collocated MODIS and VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion radiances that are
converted to brightness temperatures (BTs) in two water vapor and four
carbon dioxide bands for the month of April 2018. It can be seen that the
mean clear-sky brightness temperature differences (BTDs) between
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion and original MODIS data are less than 0.5 K for MODIS
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bands 27 and 28 (6.7 and 7.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and MODIS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bands 33
to 36 (13.3, 13.6, 13.9, and 14.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for 11 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> BTs ranging
from 200 to 280 K. Root mean square scatter (not shown) about these mean
values is found to be 1.1 K for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bands and 0.5 K for the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bands. MODIS radiance comparisons with respect to Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) over 6 years found that the water vapor bands showed scatter up to 1.0 K in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bands and 0.5 K in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bands (Moeller et al., 2014). The fusion comparison results are similar. Thus, it can be summarized that an order of magnitude spatial resolution (from 14 km to 750 m) has been added at the cost of introducing measurement offsets of 0.25 to 0.5 K and noise of 0.5 to 1.0 K. Results for all 12 months in 2018 (not shown) are similar; in
fact, results for the entire S-NPP archive show comparably positive fusion
results.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e601">Comparison of collocated MODIS and VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS
fusion water vapor <bold>(a)</bold> and carbon dioxide <bold>(b)</bold> band brightness temperatures for the month of April 2018. Each data point in the plots (within a 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> brightness temperature bin) represents more than 10 000 collocations.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>TPW and UTH algorithm and results</title>
      <p id="d1e640">Our retrieval of TPW and UTH from selected IR measurements adopts a
statistical regression algorithm (Seemann et al., 2003, 2008; Li et al., 2000; Smith and Woolf, 1988; Hayden, 1988) performed using clear-sky
radiances (and BTs) measured over land and ocean for both day and night. The
regression is developed with the SeeBor training database (Borbas et al., 2005) that consists of over 15 000 atmospheric profiles globally and
seasonally well distributed. The water vapor retrieval algorithm has two
parts: first, the regression coefficients are calculated using radiative
transfer calculations, and then the regression retrieval is performed. The
radiative transfer calculation of the MODIS-like radiances of<?pagebreak page1194?> bands 25, 27,
28, and 30–36 is performed using the forward model called Radiative Transfer
for TOVS (RTTOV) version 12 (Saunders et al., 2018). The regression
relationships between the calculated BTs and retrieved moisture products are
generated for four (and three) different BT zones over land and ocean,
respectively, and 60 sensor zenith angles from nadir to 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The only
other ancillary information required is the surface pressure, which is provided by National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) reanalysis data (Saha et al., 2010). TPW and UTH are
determined for clear-sky radiances measured by VIIRS and calculated from
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion. The retrieval approach is similar to that adopted for
MODIS. There is a strong reliance on radiances from 6.7, 11, and 12 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The operational VIIRS cloud mask (called CLDMSK_L2_VIIRS_SNPP.001; Ackerman et al., 2019) is
applied to VIIRS to characterize the probability of cloud cover.</p>
      <p id="d1e669">Figure 3 shows CrIS TPW and UTH at the sounder FOV resolution; they outline
the tropospheric moisture gradients at coarse (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) resolution for clear and partly cloudy skies. The soundings are obtained using the dual regression method (Smith et al., 2012; Weisz et al., 2013), which is a computationally fast, physically based method that retrieves profiles as well as surface and cloud properties from high-spectral-resolution radiances measured in both clear- and cloudy-sky conditions at single-FOV resolution. TPW represents the total column integration of the moisture profile, while UTH is the integration from 400 hPa to the top of the atmosphere. Also shown are the regression retrieval results for the
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion spectral band radiances (created using the MODIS-like IR
spectral response functions) at higher spatial resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">750</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m) in pixels deemed to be clear in the VIIRS cloud mask. They display
more refined features and improve the coverage but show higher values of
TPW off the coast of Baja and miss some of the UTH features in Wyoming and
Colorado that were suggested in the CrIS soundings. While the results are derived from
two independent algorithms, this example illustrates a challenge for the
VIIRS split-window search for nearby FOVs; the search will rely primarily on
low-level temperature and moisture features and less on mid-level to upper-level moisture gradients.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e701">TPW <bold>(a, b)</bold> and UTH <bold>(c, d)</bold> (both in mm) are shown for CrIS DR retrievals at sounder resolution <bold>(a, c)</bold> along with regression retrievals derived from VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion radiances at imager resolution <bold>(b, d)</bold> for 10 April 2018, at 09:36 and 09:42 UTC (CrIS granule start times).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>TPW results</title>
      <p id="d1e737">A 1 d evaluation of the VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS TPW fusion product is shown in Fig. 4. Global comparisons for 9 April 2018 are made for the TPW field derived from (1) VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion radiances using the operational MODIS L2
algorithm, (2) MODIS operational Collection 6.1 MYD08 (MYD08_D3.061,
Platnick et al., 2017), (3) VIIRS-only (Borbas et al., 2019d), and (4) the
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS (Borbas et al., 2019d) operational products developed under a
NASA-funded project.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e763">Left panels: geographical distribution of TPW (mm) results derived from the MODIS MYD08_D3 Collection 6.1 <bold>(a)</bold>, VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion <bold>(c)</bold>, VIIRS-only <bold>(e)</bold>, and the VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS <bold>(g)</bold> products for 9 April 2018. The right panels show the corresponding difference fields with their statistics, such as the minimum (min), maximum (max), mean, standard deviation (SD), and root mean square (rms) differences; their values are included in the subtitles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e799">The VIIRS-only product is a statistical regression based on the split-window
radiances; it suffers from no information about mid- to upper tropospheric
moisture. In the VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS operational products, VIIRS IR measurements
are merged with CrIS and Advance Technology Microwave Sounder (ATMS) water vapor soundings in an earlier attempt to
continue the depiction of global moisture at high spatial resolution started
with MODIS. A clear-sky regression relationship has been established between
TPW and VIIRS IR window BTs and NOAA Unique Combined Atmospheric Processing System (NUCAPS) water vapor soundings calculated from
a global training radiosonde-based profile dataset. NUCAPS TPW was added in
clear and partly cloudy regions to enhance the TPW depiction and to extend
the coverage. The CrIS and ATMS sounding products are provided by NUCAPS (Gambacorta, 2013).
The main<?pagebreak page1195?> idea of merging these products is to capitalize on the unique
strengths of each product's spatial and spectral characteristics in the
infrared region. VIIRS, with solely the IR window channels, only gives some
indication of low-level moisture (which constitutes much of the total column
amount), and we complement this with CrIS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>ATMS sounding column moisture
retrievals. This VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS algorithm follows the approach used for
MODIS. A clear-sky regression relationship is established between TPW
(predictand) and VIIRS IR window brightness temperatures (BTs), and the
NUCAPS TPW soundings (predictors) calculated from a global training
radiosonde-based profile dataset. To help differentiate surface emission
and atmospheric moisture absorption and to get better surface
characteristics in the forward model calculation, surface emissivity for the
VIIRS channels used in the regression method has been assigned for each
profile in the training dataset from the University of Wisconsin high-spatial-resolution surface emissivity database (Borbas et al., 2018). First,
the VIIRS-only clear-sky TPW is generated and stored; subsequently, the
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS TPW is calculated in clear-sky conditions. Gaps in the
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS TPW field are filled with adjusted VIIRS-only or adjusted
NUCAPS-only products. In this paper, we use both the VIIRS-only and
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS total column properties for evaluation.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1196?><p id="d1e846">Figure 4 shows that the global mean of the TPW derived from the VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS
fusion radiances is found to be 0.3 mm too low, with a scatter of 3.3 mm when compared to the MYD08 TPW. The VIIRS-only operational TPWs are 1.3 mm higher than the MYD08 TPW with a scatter of 4.0 mm; much of the VIIRS
overestimation of TPW occurs in the tropical oceans. VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS TPWs
also compare well with the same 0.3 mm bias but with a slightly higher 3.5 mm scatter in the comparison to MYD08 TPW. However, it does not capture the
maxima in the Brazilian rainforest moisture found in the MYD08 TPW. The
latitudinal distribution of the differences in Fig. 5 shows good agreement
between VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion and MYD08 and overestimation of VIIRS-only from
40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S to 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N latitude. Over the tropics, where the
highest moisture levels occur, the VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion product agrees more
closely with the MYD08 than the VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS, which mostly underestimates
the water vapor content. For this 1 d global comparison, providing
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fields from fusion bands can be regarded as a success for bringing VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS TPW into family with MYD08 TPW with a slightly better agreement
than with the VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS product and additionally providing a
significant improvement over the VIIRS-only product.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e932">Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the latitudinal distribution of TPW (mm) results for the
same days and products as in Fig. 4. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> illustrates
the corresponding differences, while panel <bold>(c)</bold> shows the number of
observations occurring in each 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude bin.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e961">TPW scatter plot of VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion <bold>(a, d, g)</bold>,
VIIRS-only <bold>(b, e, h)</bold>, and VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS <bold>(c, f, i)</bold> versus MODIS MYD08_M3 Collection 6.1 for northern midlatitudes (NML) between 30 and 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N <bold>(a, b, c)</bold>, tropics between 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S and
30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N <bold>(d, e, f)</bold>, and southern midlatitudes (SML) between
30 and 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S <bold>(g, h, i)</bold> in April 2017.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1042">January 2017 geographical distribution of TPW (mm) results derived from the <bold>(a)</bold> MODIS MYD08_M3 Collection 6.1, <bold>(b)</bold> VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion, <bold>(c)</bold> VIIRS-only, and <bold>(d)</bold> VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS products.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page1198?><p id="d1e1079">The 1 d comparisons are now extended to monthly comparisons. Figure 6
shows zonal scatter plots for the month of April 2017 of VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS
fusion, VIIRS-only, and VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS TPW, each with respect to MYD08. The
segmentation is divided into three zones of 60 to 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N
(northern midlatitudes), 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N to 30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S (tropics), and
30 to 60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S latitudes (southern midlatitudes).
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion TPW shows differences in all three zones in the mean
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.24, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.49</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, respectively) and standard deviation (0.95, 1.89, and 0.66 mm, respectively); the dry bias is greater than 1 mm in the northern midlatitudes and is pervasive in the eastern US, the northern Atlantic Ocean, through Europe, and continuing to western Russia. Overall good agreement is found in dry (less than 5 mm) as well as wet (greater than 60 mm) atmospheres. Similar comparisons are less favorable for VIIRS-only and VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS, with the exception of northern midlatitudes where
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS shows a smaller absolute bias in the mean of 0.92 mm. The
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion compares with MODIS TPW within the MODIS product
accuracy of determined from CART site comparisons (Borbas et al., 2011,
MODIS Atmospheric Products ATBD); thus, VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS is shown to be a viable
source for MODIS moisture product record continuation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e1191">January 2017 TPW (mm) difference fields of VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion minus VIIRS-only <bold>(a)</bold>, VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion minus VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS <bold>(b)</bold>, VIIRS-only minus MODIS <bold>(c)</bold>,
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS minus MODIS <bold>(d)</bold>, and VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion minus MODIS.
MODIS refers to MYD08_M3 Collection 6.1 products. Minimum (min), maximum (max), mean, standard deviation (SD), and root mean square (rms) differences are shown in the subtitles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1248">Figures 7 and 8 show the global comparison of monthly differences for
January 2017. These results reinforce the 1 d results, especially with
regard to VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS TPW being the best match of the three VIIRS-derived
TPWs with MYD08 TPW; VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS has the lowest mean difference at 0.2 mm
and standard deviation of 1.4 mm compared to, respectively, 1.1 and 2.7 mm for VIIRS alone and 0.3 and 2.0 mm for VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS. The improvement is most noticeable (see Fig. 8) over the Brazilian rainforest and the ITCZ (Intertropical Convergence Zone).</p>
      <p id="d1e1272">To extend this analysis to a four-season evaluation, VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS TPW
differences with respect to MYD08 TPW are shown for January, April, July,
and October 2017 in Fig. 9. Mean agreement ranges from 0.0 mm in April to
0.4 mm in October; the standard deviation is largest in July at 1.8 mm,
which is still smaller than the standard deviation of any of the other three
VIIRS-derived products in January 2017. Local VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS overestimations
occur over Australian deserts in January and during the Indian monsoon in
July; underestimation is found in the Brazilian rainforest and the ITCZ in
January and the Sahara in July. Overall, VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS TPW agrees very
well with MODIS TPW for all 4 months representing the four seasons.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e1298">Geographical distribution of TPW (mm) differences between the VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion and the MODIS MYD08_M3 Collection 6.1 products for <bold>(a)</bold> January, <bold>(b)</bold> April, <bold>(c)</bold> July, and <bold>(d)</bold> October 2017 representing the four seasons. Minimum (min), maximum (max), mean, standard deviation (SD), and root mean square (rms) differences are shown in the subtitles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>UTH results</title>
      <p id="d1e1334">Figure 10 shows the results for the VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion UTH product. The UTH
global images on the top two panels show the spatial distribution of UTH
within the 0–3 mm range. Here, the global mean derived from the VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS
fusion radiances is found to be 0.02 mm higher with a scatter of 0.14 mm
when compared to the MYD08 UTH. Local differences of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm are found
in the tropics. The latitudinal distribution of the differences (Fig. 11)
shows modest overestimation in the VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion UTH everywhere with a
peak from 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S to the Equator. Note that the operational VIIRS
moisture products do not currently include the UTH product but only total
column moisture information, since VIIRS has a limited ability to sense the
upper tropospheric moisture. Again, in this global comparison for 1 d,
use of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fusion bands brings VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion UTH into family with MYD08 UTH. Without the fusion radiances, VIIRS has little or no
sensitivity to UTH.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e1400">Geographical distribution of UTH (mm) results derived from the MODIS Collection 6.1 <bold>(a)</bold> VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion <bold>(b)</bold>, and their differences <bold>(c)</bold> for 9 April 2018. The minimum (min), maximum (max),
mean, standard deviation (SD), and root mean square (rms) differences are
shown in the subtitles.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e1427">Panel <bold>(a)</bold> latitudinal distribution of UTH (mm) results for
MODIS and VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion-derived from the same 9 April 2018
data shown in Fig. 10. Panel <bold>(b)</bold> illustrates the corresponding
differences. The number of observations found in each 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude
bins is shown in Fig. 5c.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1459">Figure 12 shows the UTH comparison results for 1 month in each season that
complement the TPW results in Fig. 9. The mean agreement for VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS UTH
with MODIS UTH ranges from 0.03 to 0.05 mm and standard deviation from 0.05
to 0.08 mm. The greatest local differences are found with VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS too wet
in the ITCZ in January, too wet in the Brazilian rainforest in April, too
dry in the Himalayas, and too wet in India in July, and again too wet in<?pagebreak page1199?> the
ITCZ in October. Overall, the results are typically within 10 % of each
other and accurate enough to determine daily and seasonal variability.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e1478">Same as Fig. 9 but for UTH.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/1191/2021/amt-14-1191-2021-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1496">The absence of water vapor and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption IR spectral bands on the
VIIRS imager on the S-NPP and NOAA-20 polar-orbiting platforms limits
the capability for tropospheric moisture retrievals, especially for upper
tropospheric moisture. This study shows the advantage of using IR absorption
bands 4.5, 6.7, 7.3, 13.3, 13.6, 13.9, and 14.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which are
constructed at VIIRS spatial resolution (750 m) using a data fusion approach
using both sounder (CrIS) and imager (VIIRS) measurements following the
approach in Weisz et al. (2017). The positive impact of adding the
constructed fusion spectral bands on TPW and UTH retrievals is demonstrated.
The moisture retrievals are based on the MODIS MYD07 Collection 6.1
algorithm package. Evaluations of the resulting moisture products are
performed through comparisons to the operational MODIS Collection 6.1 and
VIIRS (VIIRS-only and VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS) version 1.0 moisture products.</p>
      <?pagebreak page1201?><p id="d1e1527">Improvements in VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS products, enabled by addition of fusion
radiances, over the VIIRS-only and VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS products are observed for
TPW when quantitatively compared to the MYD08 products. In our 1-month
study for January 2017, the global mean of the TPW derived from the
VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion radiances is 0.2 mm higher with a scatter of 1.4 mm when compared to the MYD08 TPW; without the fusion radiances (VIIRS-only product), the mean is 1.1 mm too high with a scatter of 2.7 mm with most of the
overestimation occurring in the tropics. The VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion TPW also
demonstrates improvement over the VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS TPW (with 0.3 mm mean and
2.0 mm scatter with respect to the MYD08 product). Similar TPW results are
also found for 1 month in each season of 2017. VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS UTH, now
possible with the addition of the fusion radiances, is found to be within
10 % of the MYD08 UTH in mean and scatter for the same 4 months.</p>
      <p id="d1e1573">The results in this study are limited to a VIIRS sensor scan angle of
50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to minimize the impact of the CrIS swath<?pagebreak page1202?> being less than that
of the imager. These findings are limited in scope but clearly demonstrate
the potential in the use of the fusion IR absorption spectral bands in
generating moisture products and continuing the moisture record from MODIS
and the previous generations of polar-orbiting satellite sensors. In future
work, we plan to extend this evaluation to longer time periods, undertake a
global comparison of VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion moisture products with ground-based
measurements (Bedka et al., 2010; Roman et al., 2016), and possibly replace the operational VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>NUCAPS moisture products with the VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS fusion-derived moisture products.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codedataavailability"><title>Code and data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e1611">The codes in the present work are available from the corresponding author upon request.  The VIIRS/SNPP Cloud Mask, fusion (FUSRAD), and water vapor (WATVP) products and the level-3 MODIS 15 MYD08 products used in this study can be obtained from the NASA Level-1 and Atmosphere Archive and Distribution System (LAADS) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC), Goddard Space Flight Center, USA (Ackerman et al., 2019, <uri>https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/CLDMSK_L2_VIIRS_SNPP.001</uri>; Baum et al., 2019a, <uri>https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/FSNRAD_L2_VIIRS_CRIS_SNPP.001</uri>; Borbas et al., 2019c, <uri>https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/WATVP_L2_VIIRS_SNPP.001</uri>; Borbas et al., 2019d, <uri>https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/WATVP_M3_VIIRS_SNPP.001</uri>; Platnick et al., 2017a, <uri>http://dx.doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD08_D3.061</uri>; Platnick et al., 2017b, <uri>http://dx.doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD08_M3.061</uri>).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e1636">EEB conceived and designed the TPW regression method, conducted the impact study, and performed the analyses. CM performed the fusion radiance validation in Sect. 2. WPM and BAB made critical suggestions regarding the design of the study and significant improvements to the manuscript. EW provided expertise on the use of fusion products.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e1642">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1648">We are grateful for the encouragement and support of
Hal Maring (NASA Headquarters, Washington, DC). The fusion data are
generated by A-SIPS at University of Wisconsin – Madison and
sent to LAADS for public distribution. The writing of this paper benefited
from discussions with our colleague Richard Frey through his insight on the
VIIRS cloud mask. We thank Pascal Brunel (Météo-France) for providing the
spectrally shifted MODIS coefficients for RTTOV, and Geoff Cureton and Ethan
Nelson for their processing efforts at the A-SIPS.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e1653">This research has been supported by the NASA (grant no. 80NSSC18K0816).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e1659">This paper was edited by Domenico Cimini and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ackerman, S., Frey, R., Holtz, R., and Dutcher, S: VIIRS/SNPP Cloud Mask and Spectral Test Results 6-min
L2 Swath 750m, Version-1, NASA Level1 and Atmosphere Archive &amp;
Distribution System (LAADS) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC),
Goddard Space Flight Center, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/CLDMSK_L2_VIIRS_SNPP.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/VIIRS/CLDMSK_L2_VIIRS_SNPP.001</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baum, B. A., Weisz, E., and Menzel, W. P.: SNPP VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS Fusion L2 Product, NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, USA, <uri>https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/FSNRAD_L2_VIIRS_CRIS_SNPP.001</uri>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baum, B. A., Menzel, W. P., and Weisz E.: Fusion of CrIS and VIIRS data to
construct infrared (IR) absorption band radiances for VIIRS, Algorithm
Theoretical Basis Document, V1.0,  Cooperative Institute of Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, available at:
<uri>https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/missions-and-measurements/viirs/VIIRSCrISFusionATBDv1.1.pdf</uri> (last access: 22 January 2021), 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bedka S., Knuteson, R., Revercomb, H., Tobin, D., and Turner, D.: An
assessment of the absolute accuracy of the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder v5
precipitable water vapor product at tropical, midlatitude, and arctic
ground-truth sites: September 2002 through August 2008, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D17310, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013139" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013139</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bentley, J. L.: Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative
searching, Commun. ACM, 18, 509–517, 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Borbas, E., Seemann, S. W., Huang, H.-L., Li, J., and Menzel, W. P.: Global
profile training database for satellite regression retrievals with estimates
of skin temperature and emissivity, Proc. of the Int. ATOVS Study
Conference-XIV, Beijing, China, 25–31 May 2005, 763–770, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Borbas, E., Seemann, S. W., Kern, A., Moy, L., Li, J., Gumley, L., and
Menzel W.P.: MODIS Atmospheric Profile Retrieval – ATBD, Collection 6, Products: 07_L2, Cooperative Institute of Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, available at:
<uri>https://atmosphere-imager.gsfc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/ModAtmo/MOD07_atbd_v7_April2011_0.pdf</uri> (last access: 23 January 2021), 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Borbas, E. E., Seemann, S. W., Li, Z., Li, J., Kern, A., and Menzel, W. P.: MODIS Atmosphere Profiles Product (07_L2) (Aqua), NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD07_L2.061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/MODIS/MYD07_L2.061</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Borbas, E. E., Hulley, G., Feltz, M., Knuteson, R., and Hook, S.: The
Combined ASTER MODIS Emissivity over Land (CAMEL) Part 1: Methodology and
High Spectral Resolution Application, Remote Sens., 10, 643,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040643" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs10040643</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Borbas, E. E., Li, Z., Menzel, W. P., Dobor, L., and Rada, M.: VIIRS/Suomi-NPP Water Vapor Products; Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document,  Cooperative Institute of Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, available at: <uri>https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/missions-and-measurements/viirs/SNPPVIIRSWATVP001ATBD2019.pdf</uri> (last access: 23 January 2021), 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Borbas, E. E., Li, Z., Menzel, W. P., Dobor L., and Rada, M.:
VIIRS/Suomi-NPP Water Vapor Products (WATVP) Users' Guide,  Cooperative Institute of Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, available at:
<uri>https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/missions-and-measurements/viirs/SNPPVIIRSWATVP001UserGuide2019.pdf</uri> (last access: 24 January 2021), 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Borbas, E. E., Li, Z., Menzel, W. P., Dobor, L., and Rada, M.: VIIRS/SNPP Level-2 Water Vapor Products, NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/WATVP_L2_VIIRS_SNPP.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/VIIRS/WATVP_L2_VIIRS_SNPP.001</ext-link>, 2019c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Borbas, E. E., Li, Z., Menzel, W. P., Dobor, L., and Rada, M.: VIIRS/SNPP Level-3 Daily and Monthly Mean Water Vapor
Products, NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight
Center, USA, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/WATVP_M3_VIIRS_SNPP.001" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/VIIRS/WATVP_M3_VIIRS_SNPP.001</ext-link>, 2019d.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gambacorta, A.: The NOAA Unique CrIS/ATMS Processing System (NUCAPS):
Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction (NCWCP), available at:
<uri>https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8f02/7a6e31d08e299c4b79433ee4302b7a8d62cd.pdf</uri> (last access: 24 January 2021), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hayden, C. M.: GOES-VAS simultaneous temperature-moisture retrieval
algorithm, J. Appl. Meteor., 27, 705–733, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hu, L. and Brunsell, N. A.: A new perspective to assess the urban heat island through remotely sensed atmospheric profiles, Remote Sens. Environ., 158, 393–406, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.022</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hulley, G., Malakar, N., and Freepartner, R.: Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Land Surface Temperature and Emissivity Product
(MxD21) Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, Collection-6, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, available at:
<uri>https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/atbd/atbd_mod21.pdf</uri> (last access: 24 January 2021), 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Wolf, W., Menzel, W. P., Zhang, W., Huang, H.-L., and Achtor, T. H.:
Global soundings of the atmosphere from ATOVS measurements: The algorithm
and validation, J. Appl. Meteorol., 39, 1248–1268, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, Y., Baum, B. A., Heidinger, A. K., Menzel, W. P., and Weisz, E.: Improvement in cloud retrievals from VIIRS through the use of infrared absorption channels constructed from VIIRS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>CrIS data fusion, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4035–4049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4035-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-4035-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Moeller, C., Menzel, W. P., and Quinn, G.: Review of Terra MODIS thermal
emissive band L1B Radiometric Performance, Proc. SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications, San Diego, USA, 26 September 2014, 92180T <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2062138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1117/12.2062138</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Platnick, S., King, M., and Hubanks, P.: MODIS Atmosphere L3 Daily Product, NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, USA, <uri>http://dx.doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD08_D3.061</uri>, 2017a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Platnick, S., King, M., and Hubanks, P.: MODIS Atmosphere L3 Monthly Product, NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, USA, <uri>http://dx.doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD08_M3.061</uri>, 2017b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Proud, S. R., Rasmussen, M. O., Fensholt, R., Sandholt, I., Shisanya, C.,
Mutero, W., Mbow, C., and Anyamba, A.: Improving the SMAC atmospheric
correction code by analysis of Meteosat Second Generation NDVI and surface
reflectance data, Remote Sens. Environ., 114, 1687–1698, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.02.020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2010.02.020</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Roman, J., Knuteson, R., August, T., Hultberg, T., Ackerman, S., and Revercomb, H.: A global assessment of NASA AIRS v6 and EUMETSAT IASI v6 precipitable water vapor using ground-based GPS SuomiNet stations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 8925–8948, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024806" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016JD024806</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Pan, H., Wu, X., and Wang, J.: The NCEP Climate
Forecast System Reanalysis, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 1015–1057, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Saunders, R., Hocking, J., Turner, E., Rayer, P., Rundle, D., Brunel, P., Vidot, J., Roquet, P., Matricardi, M., Geer, A., Bormann, N., and Lupu, C.: An update on the RTTOV fast radiative transfer model (currently at version 12), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2717–2737, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2717-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-2717-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seemann, S. W., Li, J., Menzel, W. P., and Gumley, L. E.: Operational
retrieval of atmospheric temperature, moisture, and ozone from MODIS
infrared radiances, J. Appl. Meteor., 42, 1072–1091, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seemann, S. W., Borbas, E. E., Knuteson, R. O., Stephenson, G. R., and Huang,
H.-L.: Development of a global infrared emissivity database for application
to clear sky sounding retrievals from multi-spectral satellite radiances
measurements, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 47, 108–123, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Smith, W. L. and Woolf, H. M.: A Linear Simultaneous Solution for
Temperature and Absorbing Constituent Profiles from Radiance Spectra,
Technical Proceedings of the Fourth International TOVS Study Conference held
in Igls, Austria, 16–22 March 1988, edited by: Menzel, W. P., 330–347, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Smith, W. L., Weisz, E., Kireev, S., Zhou, D., Li, Z., and Borbas, E.:
Dual-regression retrieval algorithm for real-time processing of satellite
ultraspectral radiances, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 51, 1455–1476, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wan, Z.: New refinements and validation of the MODIS Land-Surface
Temperature/Emissivity products, Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 59–74, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.026</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Weisz, E., Smith Sr, W. L., and Smith, N.: Advances in simultaneous
atmospheric profile and cloud parameter regression based retrieval from high
spectral resolution radiance measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
6433–6443, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Weisz, E., Baum, B. A., and Menzel, W. P.: Fusion of Satellite-Based Imager
and Sounder Data to Construct Supplementary High Spatial Resolution
Narrowband IR Radiances, J. Appl. Remote Sens., 11, 036022,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.036022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1117/1.JRS.11.036022</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Improvement in tropospheric moisture retrievals from VIIRS through the use of infrared absorption bands constructed from VIIRS and CrIS data fusion</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>An operational data product available for both the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (S-NPP) and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-20 (NOAA-20) platforms provides high-spatial-resolution infrared
(IR) absorption band radiances for Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) based on a VIIRS and Crosstrack
Infrared Sounder (CrIS) data fusion
method. This study investigates the use of these IR radiances, centered at
4.5, 6.7, 7.3, 9.7, 13.3, 13.6, 13.9, and 14.2&thinsp;µm, to construct
atmospheric moisture products (e.g., total precipitable water and upper
tropospheric humidity) and to evaluate their accuracy. Total precipitable
water (TPW) and upper tropospheric humidity (UTH) retrieved from
hyperspectral sounder CrIS measurements are provided at the associated VIIRS
sensor's high spatial resolution (750&thinsp;m) and are compared subsequently to
collocated operational Aqua Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and S-NPP VIIRS moisture products.
This study suggests that the use of VIIRS IR absorption band radiances will
provide continuity with Aqua MODIS moisture products.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Ackerman, S., Frey, R., Holtz, R., and Dutcher, S: VIIRS/SNPP Cloud Mask and Spectral Test Results 6-min
L2 Swath 750m, Version-1, NASA Level1 and Atmosphere Archive &amp;
Distribution System (LAADS) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC),
Goddard Space Flight Center, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/CLDMSK_L2_VIIRS_SNPP.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/CLDMSK_L2_VIIRS_SNPP.001</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Baum, B. A., Weisz, E., and Menzel, W. P.: SNPP VIIRS+CrIS Fusion L2 Product, NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/FSNRAD_L2_VIIRS_CRIS_SNPP.001" target="_blank"/>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Baum, B. A., Menzel, W. P., and Weisz E.: Fusion of CrIS and VIIRS data to
construct infrared (IR) absorption band radiances for VIIRS, Algorithm
Theoretical Basis Document, V1.0,  Cooperative Institute of Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, available at:
<a href="https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/missions-and-measurements/viirs/VIIRSCrISFusionATBDv1.1.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 22 January 2021), 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bedka S., Knuteson, R., Revercomb, H., Tobin, D., and Turner, D.: An
assessment of the absolute accuracy of the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder v5
precipitable water vapor product at tropical, midlatitude, and arctic
ground-truth sites: September 2002 through August 2008, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 117, D17310, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013139" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013139</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bentley, J. L.: Multidimensional binary search trees used for associative
searching, Commun. ACM, 18, 509–517, 1975.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Borbas, E., Seemann, S. W., Huang, H.-L., Li, J., and Menzel, W. P.: Global
profile training database for satellite regression retrievals with estimates
of skin temperature and emissivity, Proc. of the Int. ATOVS Study
Conference-XIV, Beijing, China, 25–31 May 2005, 763–770, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Borbas, E., Seemann, S. W., Kern, A., Moy, L., Li, J., Gumley, L., and
Menzel W.P.: MODIS Atmospheric Profile Retrieval – ATBD, Collection 6, Products: 07_L2, Cooperative Institute of Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, available at:
<a href="https://atmosphere-imager.gsfc.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/ModAtmo/MOD07_atbd_v7_April2011_0.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 23 January 2021), 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Borbas, E. E., Seemann, S. W., Li, Z., Li, J., Kern, A., and Menzel, W. P.: MODIS Atmosphere Profiles Product (07_L2) (Aqua), NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD07_L2.061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD07_L2.061</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Borbas, E. E., Hulley, G., Feltz, M., Knuteson, R., and Hook, S.: The
Combined ASTER MODIS Emissivity over Land (CAMEL) Part 1: Methodology and
High Spectral Resolution Application, Remote Sens., 10, 643,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040643" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10040643</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Borbas, E. E., Li, Z., Menzel, W. P., Dobor, L., and Rada, M.: VIIRS/Suomi-NPP Water Vapor Products; Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document,  Cooperative Institute of Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, available at: <a href="https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/missions-and-measurements/viirs/SNPPVIIRSWATVP001ATBD2019.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 23 January 2021), 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Borbas, E. E., Li, Z., Menzel, W. P., Dobor L., and Rada, M.:
VIIRS/Suomi-NPP Water Vapor Products (WATVP) Users' Guide,  Cooperative Institute of Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, available at:
<a href="https://ladsweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/missions-and-measurements/viirs/SNPPVIIRSWATVP001UserGuide2019.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 24 January 2021), 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Borbas, E. E., Li, Z., Menzel, W. P., Dobor, L., and Rada, M.: VIIRS/SNPP Level-2 Water Vapor Products, NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/WATVP_L2_VIIRS_SNPP.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/WATVP_L2_VIIRS_SNPP.001</a>, 2019c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Borbas, E. E., Li, Z., Menzel, W. P., Dobor, L., and Rada, M.: VIIRS/SNPP Level-3 Daily and Monthly Mean Water Vapor
Products, NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight
Center, USA, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/WATVP_M3_VIIRS_SNPP.001" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/VIIRS/WATVP_M3_VIIRS_SNPP.001</a>, 2019d.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Gambacorta, A.: The NOAA Unique CrIS/ATMS Processing System (NUCAPS):
Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, NOAA Center for Weather and Climate Prediction (NCWCP), available at:
<a href="https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8f02/7a6e31d08e299c4b79433ee4302b7a8d62cd.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 24 January 2021), 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Hayden, C. M.: GOES-VAS simultaneous temperature-moisture retrieval
algorithm, J. Appl. Meteor., 27, 705–733, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Hu, L. and Brunsell, N. A.: A new perspective to assess the urban heat island through remotely sensed atmospheric profiles, Remote Sens. Environ., 158, 393–406, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.10.022</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Hulley, G., Malakar, N., and Freepartner, R.: Moderate Resolution Imaging
Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Land Surface Temperature and Emissivity Product
(MxD21) Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document, Collection-6, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, available at:
<a href="https://modis.gsfc.nasa.gov/data/atbd/atbd_mod21.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 24 January 2021), 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Li, J., Wolf, W., Menzel, W. P., Zhang, W., Huang, H.-L., and Achtor, T. H.:
Global soundings of the atmosphere from ATOVS measurements: The algorithm
and validation, J. Appl. Meteorol., 39, 1248–1268, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Li, Y., Baum, B. A., Heidinger, A. K., Menzel, W. P., and Weisz, E.: Improvement in cloud retrievals from VIIRS through the use of infrared absorption channels constructed from VIIRS+CrIS data fusion, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4035–4049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4035-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4035-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Moeller, C., Menzel, W. P., and Quinn, G.: Review of Terra MODIS thermal
emissive band L1B Radiometric Performance, Proc. SPIE Optical Engineering + Applications, San Diego, USA, 26 September 2014, 92180T <a href="https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2062138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2062138</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Platnick, S., King, M., and Hubanks, P.: MODIS Atmosphere L3 Daily Product, NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, USA, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD08_D3.061" target="_blank"/>, 2017a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Platnick, S., King, M., and Hubanks, P.: MODIS Atmosphere L3 Monthly Product, NASA MODIS Adaptive Processing System, Goddard Space Flight Center, USA, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD08_M3.061" target="_blank"/>, 2017b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Proud, S. R., Rasmussen, M. O., Fensholt, R., Sandholt, I., Shisanya, C.,
Mutero, W., Mbow, C., and Anyamba, A.: Improving the SMAC atmospheric
correction code by analysis of Meteosat Second Generation NDVI and surface
reflectance data, Remote Sens. Environ., 114, 1687–1698, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.02.020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.02.020</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Roman, J., Knuteson, R., August, T., Hultberg, T., Ackerman, S., and Revercomb, H.: A global assessment of NASA AIRS v6 and EUMETSAT IASI v6 precipitable water vapor using ground-based GPS SuomiNet stations, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 8925–8948, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024806" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JD024806</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Saha, S., Moorthi, S., Pan, H., Wu, X., and Wang, J.: The NCEP Climate
Forecast System Reanalysis, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 1015–1057, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010BAMS3001.1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Saunders, R., Hocking, J., Turner, E., Rayer, P., Rundle, D., Brunel, P., Vidot, J., Roquet, P., Matricardi, M., Geer, A., Bormann, N., and Lupu, C.: An update on the RTTOV fast radiative transfer model (currently at version 12), Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 2717–2737, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2717-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2717-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Seemann, S. W., Li, J., Menzel, W. P., and Gumley, L. E.: Operational
retrieval of atmospheric temperature, moisture, and ozone from MODIS
infrared radiances, J. Appl. Meteor., 42, 1072–1091, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Seemann, S. W., Borbas, E. E., Knuteson, R. O., Stephenson, G. R., and Huang,
H.-L.: Development of a global infrared emissivity database for application
to clear sky sounding retrievals from multi-spectral satellite radiances
measurements, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 47, 108–123, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, W. L. and Woolf, H. M.: A Linear Simultaneous Solution for
Temperature and Absorbing Constituent Profiles from Radiance Spectra,
Technical Proceedings of the Fourth International TOVS Study Conference held
in Igls, Austria, 16–22 March 1988, edited by: Menzel, W. P., 330–347, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Smith, W. L., Weisz, E., Kireev, S., Zhou, D., Li, Z., and Borbas, E.:
Dual-regression retrieval algorithm for real-time processing of satellite
ultraspectral radiances, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 51, 1455–1476, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Wan, Z.: New refinements and validation of the MODIS Land-Surface
Temperature/Emissivity products, Remote Sens. Environ., 112, 59–74, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.026</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Weisz, E., Smith Sr, W. L., and Smith, N.: Advances in simultaneous
atmospheric profile and cloud parameter regression based retrieval from high
spectral resolution radiance measurements, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118,
6433–6443, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Weisz, E., Baum, B. A., and Menzel, W. P.: Fusion of Satellite-Based Imager
and Sounder Data to Construct Supplementary High Spatial Resolution
Narrowband IR Radiances, J. Appl. Remote Sens., 11, 036022,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.036022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.11.036022</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
