<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-14-2389-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>New observations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere from TROPOMI</article-title><alt-title><inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere from TROPOMI</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{{$\chem{NO_{2}}$} in the upper troposphere from TROPOMI}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{E. A. Marais et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Marais</surname><given-names>Eloise A.</given-names></name>
          <email>e.marais@ucl.ac.uk</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5477-8051</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Roberts</surname><given-names>John F.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4 aff5 aff16">
          <name><surname>Ryan</surname><given-names>Robert G.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0806-4880</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Eskes</surname><given-names>Henk</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8743-4455</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6 aff7">
          <name><surname>Boersma</surname><given-names>K. Folkert</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4591-7635</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8 aff9">
          <name><surname>Choi</surname><given-names>Sungyeon</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8">
          <name><surname>Joiner</surname><given-names>Joanna</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4278-1020</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff8 aff10">
          <name><surname>Abuhassan</surname><given-names>Nader</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff11">
          <name><surname>Redondas</surname><given-names>Alberto</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4826-6823</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff12">
          <name><surname>Grutter</surname><given-names>Michel</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9800-5878</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff13">
          <name><surname>Cede</surname><given-names>Alexander</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff14 aff15">
          <name><surname>Gomez</surname><given-names>Laura</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6655-7659</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff14">
          <name><surname>Navarro-Comas</surname><given-names>Monica</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Geography, University College London, London, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Centre for Landscape and Climate Research, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>School of Earth Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate System Science, Sydney, Australia</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>Satellite Observations Department, Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt, the Netherlands </institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>7</label><institution>Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen University (WUR), Wageningen, the Netherlands</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff8"><label>8</label><institution>NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff9"><label>9</label><institution>Science Systems and Applications, Inc., Lanham, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff10"><label>10</label><institution>Joint Center for Earth Systems Technology, University of Maryland,Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff11"><label>11</label><institution>Izaña Atmospheric Research Center, AEMET, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff12"><label>12</label><institution>Centro de Ciencias de la Atmósfera, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff13"><label>13</label><institution>LuftBlick, Fritz-Konzert-Straße 4, Innsbruck, Austria</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff14"><label>14</label><institution>Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial (INTA), Área de Investigación e Instrumentación Atmosférica, Madrid, Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff15"><label>15</label><institution>Groupe de Spectrométrie Moléculaire et Atmosphérique, URM CNRS 7331, UFR Sciences Exactes et Naturelles,<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Moulin de la Housse, BP 1039, 51687 Reims CEDEX 2, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff16"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Department of Geography, University College London, London, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Eloise A. Marais (e.marais@ucl.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>26</day><month>March</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>2389</fpage><lpage>2408</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>1</day><month>October</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>8</day><month>October</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>15</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e319">Nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited upper troposphere (UT) are long-lived and so have a
large influence on the oxidizing capacity of the troposphere and formation
of the greenhouse gas ozone. Models misrepresent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UT, and observations to address deficiencies in models are sparse. Here we obtain a year of near-global seasonal mean mixing ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UT (450–180 hPa) at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by applying
cloud-slicing to partial columns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from TROPOMI. This follows
refinement of the cloud-slicing algorithm with synthetic partial columns
from the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model. TROPOMI, prior to
cloud-slicing, is corrected for a 13 % underestimate in stratospheric
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variance and a 50 % overestimate in free-tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> determined by comparison to Pandora total columns at high-altitude free-tropospheric sites at Mauna Loa, Izaña, and Altzomoni and MAX-DOAS and
Pandora tropospheric columns at Izaña. Two cloud-sliced seasonal mean UT
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> products for June 2019 to May 2020 are retrieved from corrected
TROPOMI total columns using distinct TROPOMI cloud products that assume
clouds are reflective boundaries (FRESCO-S) or water droplet layers
(ROCINN-CAL). TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> typically ranges from 20–30 pptv over remote oceans to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pptv over locations with intense seasonal lightning. Spatial coverage is mostly in the tropics and subtropics with
FRESCO-S and extends to the midlatitudes and polar regions with ROCINN-CAL,
due to its greater abundance of optically thick clouds and wider cloud-top
altitude range. TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonal means are spatially consistent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.8) with an existing coarser spatial resolution (5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude) UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product from the
Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI). UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from TROPOMI is 12–26 pptv
more than that from OMI due to increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with altitude from the OMI pressure ceiling (280 hPa) to that for TROPOMI<?pagebreak page2390?> (180 hPa), but possibly
also due to altitude differences in TROPOMI and OMI cloud products and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval algorithms. The TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product offers
potential to evaluate and improve representation of UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in models and supplement aircraft observations that are sporadic and susceptible to large biases in the UT.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e591">Nitrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the upper troposphere (UT; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–12 km) influence the oxidizing capacity of the atmosphere and global climate, as the formation and radiative forcing of tropospheric ozone are most efficient in the predominantly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-limited UT (Mickley et al., 1999; Bradshaw et al., 2000; Dahlmann et al., 2011; Worden et al., 2011). Sources of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the UT include local emissions from lightning and cruising altitude aircraft, deep convective uplift of surface pollution, downwelling from the stratosphere, long-range transport, and chemical recycling of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from stable reservoir compounds (Ehhalt et al., 1992; Lamarque et al., 1996; Schumann, 1997; Jaeglé et al., 1998; Bradshaw et al., 2000; Bertram et al., 2007). The lifetime of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UT varies from a few hours to a few days depending on availability of hydrogen oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>≡</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">HO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and peroxy radicals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to convert <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to reservoir compounds (Jaeglé et al., 1998; Bradshaw et al., 2000; Nault et al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e721">Current understanding of UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is erroneous, as demonstrated by misrepresentation in chemical transport models (CTMs) of the vertical distribution, relative abundance (ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and absolute magnitude of UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when compared to in situ measurements from research aircraft (Boersma et al., 2011; Travis et al., 2016; Silvern et al., 2018). Models are used to determine the contribution of ozone to anthropogenic climate change in the absence of reliable historical measurements (Pavelin et al., 1999). Models also provide prior information about the vertical distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for retrieval of vertical column densities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from space-based UV–visible instruments. Errors in these retrievals are particularly vulnerable to biases in modelled UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, due to greater sensitivity of space-based observations to the UT than the middle and lower troposphere (Travis et al., 2016; Silvern et al., 2019). This impedes accurate top-down inference of air quality variability, surface concentrations, and precursor emissions (Stavrakou et al., 2013; Silvern et al., 2019). Models include heavily parameterized representation of lightning (Tost et al., 2007; Allen et
al., 2010; Ott et al., 2010; Murray et al., 2012, 2013), the largest global influencer of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UT (Bradshaw et al., 2000; Marais et al., 2018), and may misrepresent the reaction kinetics and
physical processing of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the cold, low-pressure conditions of the
UT (Chang et al., 2011; Henderson et al., 2011, 2012;
Stavrakou et al., 2013; Amedro et al., 2019).</p>
      <p id="d1e828">Observations that have been used to better understand UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are mostly
limited to research and commercial aircraft campaigns. For research
aircraft, the record of observations in the UT since the early 1990s have
been sustained almost exclusively by the NASA DC8 plane, with recent
contributions from the German High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft
(HALO) (Wendisch et al., 2016). There are also commercial aircraft
campaigns, but these are mostly limited to heavily trafficked flight
corridors that are often in the stratosphere at cruising altitude (Thomas
et al., 2015; Stratmann et al., 2016). In situ measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the UT can also be biased by interference from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reservoir compounds that thermally decompose to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the instrument inlet (Browne et al., 2011; Reed et al., 2016). Standard remote sensing products of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from space-based nadir- and limb-viewing instruments provide global coverage, but either as a single piece of vertical information in the
troposphere in the nadir as tropospheric column densities (Levelt et al., 2018) or as vertically resolved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the limb limited to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> abundances above the tropopause (Newchurch et al., 1996; Brogniez et al., 2002; Sioris et al., 2004; Brohede et al., 2007; Jones et al., 2012;
Dubé et al., 2021).</p>
      <p id="d1e909">Near-global research products of seasonal mean vertically resolved
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> have been retrieved by applying the cloud-slicing
technique to partial columns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the space-based Ozone
Monitoring Instrument (OMI) (Choi et al., 2014; Belmonte Rivas et al., 2015). Cloud-slicing involves regressing clusters of partial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
columns above optically thick clouds against corresponding cloud-top
pressures. The resultant regression slopes are converted to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratios that represent average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the cloud-top altitude range
(Ziemke et al., 2001). The advantages of cloud-slicing include enhanced signal over bright optically thick clouds (van der A et al., 2020) and removal of the dry
stratosphere due to lack of clouds there. Near-global multiyear (2005–2007)
seasonal means of UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from cloud-sliced OMI partial columns have
been shown to reproduce the spatial variability of UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured with
bias-corrected NASA DC8 aircraft measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> over North
America, though at very coarse scales (seasonal, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Marais et al., 2018). Even so, the OMI product confirms
the dominant global influence of lightning on UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and provides global constraints on lightning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> production rates (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">280</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mol <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per lightning flash) and annual lightning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> Tg N) (Marais et al., 2018). OMI pixels are at
relatively coarse resolution (13 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 km at nadir), and there is
substantial data loss after 2007 due to the so-called row anomaly (Schenkeveld et al., 2017; Torres et al., 2018). The recently launched
(October 2017) TROPOMI instrument on the Sentinel-5P satellite has the same
spatial coverage as pre-row-anomaly OMI (swath width of 2600 km) but with a
finer nadir pixel resolution of 7.2 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5 km (along track <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> across track) until 5 August 2019, further refined thereafter to 5.6 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5 km (Argyrouli et al., 2019). This offers better cloud-resolving<?pagebreak page2391?> capability and greater data pixel density than OMI with potential to retrieve finer-resolution <inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UT.</p>
      <p id="d1e1131">Here we refine and test the cloud-slicing retrieval using synthetic partial
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from the GEOS-Chem CTM before retrieving UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from TROPOMI partial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns with cloud information from two distinct TROPOMI cloud products. Application of cloud-slicing to TROPOMI follows evaluation of TROPOMI total, stratospheric, and tropospheric columns with ground-based measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from Pandora and multi-axis
differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS) at free-tropospheric
monitoring sites. We also evaluate TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with the OMI UT
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Cloud-slicing of GEOS-Chem synthetic partial columns</title>
      <p id="d1e1209">Targeting cloudy scenes could yield representation errors in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing
ratios in the UT, due to the influence of clouds on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> photochemistry (Holmes et al., 2019), large enhancements in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from lightning and convective uplift of surface pollution that accompany cloud formation (Price and Rind, 1992; Bertram et al., 2007), and low sampling frequency due to strict data filtering (Choi et al., 2014). We test the ability of the cloud-slicing technique to return
accurate, representative mixing ratios of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UT by applying
this technique to synthetic partial columns from GEOS-Chem. The “true”
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> used to evaluate cloud-sliced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is obtained by averaging
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> across the same vertical range as the cloud-sliced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the
same cloudy model grid squares as are cloud-sliced (true cloudy UT
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and for all clear and cloudy model grid squares (true all-sky UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e1323">Synthetic <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is from GEOS-Chem version 12.1.0 (the International GEOS-Chem User Community, 2018) simulated at a horizontal resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3125</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude) extending over 47 vertical layers from the surface to 0.01 hPa for the nested domains available in version 12.1.0. These include North America (9.75–60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 130–60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W), western Europe
(30–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–61.25<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), and Southeast Asia
(15–55<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 70–140<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). Dynamic (3-hourly) boundary
conditions are from a coarse-resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) global GEOS-Chem simulation. The model is driven with NASA GEOS-FP assimilated meteorology and includes comprehensive emission inventories from anthropogenic and natural sources. These include local emissions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UT from lightning as described by Murray et
al. (2012) and from aircraft using the Aviation Emissions Inventory Code
(AEIC) inventory detailed in Stettler et al. (2011). The model is simulated in boreal summer (June–August) when variability in UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in all nested domains is dominated by lightning (Marais et al., 2018). The model is sampled daily at 12:00–15:00 local time (LT) to be
consistent with the TROPOMI overpass time (13:30 LT). Two years (2016 and
2017) are simulated to increase data density. The model years predate
TROPOMI, but this has no bearing on assessment of the cloud-slicing
technique.</p>
      <p id="d1e1471">The cloud-slicing approach we apply to synthetic partial columns above
synthetic clouds to estimate seasonal means of UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the same as
will be applied to TROPOMI, so model variables are only used if these are
also available in or can be derived from publicly available TROPOMI data
products. GEOS-Chem daily partial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column densities (stratosphere <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> partial troposphere) and the corresponding GEOS-FP cloud-top pressures at 450–180 hPa and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3125</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are gathered into grid squares of the target resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Any <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grids of gathered pixels with non-uniform overlying stratospheric column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are discarded, as diagnosed with a strict stratospheric column <inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relative standard deviation of 0.02. Variability in stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is mostly from oxidation of nitrous oxide (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the mid-stratosphere (Crutzen, 1970). Its variability is dominated by solar
insolation and stratospheric circulation but is also influenced by
upwelling from the troposphere and downwelling from the mesosphere (Randall et al., 1998; Gruzdev and Elokhov, 2011). GEOS-FP thermal tropopause heights are used to determine the vertical extent of the stratosphere in the model. As many as 256 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3125</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partial columns can be gathered in a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid, so we increase the number of possible cloud-sliced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals by subdividing clusters of at least 100
partial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns into clusters of at least 40. A threshold of 80
instead of 100 yields similar seasonal mean UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Subdividing the
clusters of partial columns doubles the number of cloud-sliced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data used to obtain multiyear seasonal means. Additional filtering is applied to clusters to remove extreme <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partial columns (partial columns falling outside the 10th to 90th percentile range) that have a large
influence on regression of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> partial columns against cloud-top
pressures, clusters with fewer than 10 partial columns after screening for
extreme values, and clusters that do not extend across a sufficiently wide
altitude range (cloud-top pressure range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">140</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa and standard
deviation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa). GEOS-Chem cloud-top heights are diagnosed in the
model as the pressure at the top edge of the highest model layer of GEOS-FP
upward moist convective mass flux.</p>
      <p id="d1e1738">The slope of the relationship between cloud-top heights and partial columns
for each cluster is estimated with reduced major axis (RMA) regression, and
the standard deviation of the slope, obtained with bootstrap resampling, is
used as the error estimate of the slope. Additional filtering is applied to
retain slopes that have low relative error (relative error on the slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We find that a relatively large proportion of slopes (15 %) are
negative and would yield negative cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Most of these
occur over remote regions with low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations. These are
diagnosed as slopes significantly less than zero (sum of slope and slope
error <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and removed. The retained slopes and errors (molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) are converted to mixing ratios (pptv). The derivation of the mathematical<?pagebreak page2392?> expression for this conversion is detailed in Ziemke et al. (2001). The final step is to remove outliers
(UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pptv) caused by steep slopes. A threshold of
200 pptv is used, as this far exceeds the maximum seasonal mean UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 145 pptv in the OMI cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product (Marais et al., 2018). We find that only three cloud-sliced retrievals exceed 200 pptv. Seasonal means are obtained by Gaussian-weighting individual estimates of cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to the pressure centre (315 hPa). Gaussian weights are calculated as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="[" close="]"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>exp⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">315</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close="" open="/"><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">135</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean cloud-top pressure of the gathered points used in the cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval, 315 hPa is the pressure centre, and 135 hPa is the distance from the pressure centre to the edges.</p>
      <p id="d1e1929">The cloud-slicing retrieval adopted here is mostly similar to that applied
to OMI to estimate mid-tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 900–650 hPa (Choi et al., 2014) and UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 450–280 hPa (Marais et al., 2018). We extend the ceiling of the retrieval to 180 hPa (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) to better
capture the vertical extent of the upper troposphere. Another notable
distinction is that the method applied to OMI used vertical gradients of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the NASA Global Modeling Initiative (GMI) CTM to diagnose
scenes with non-uniform <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, to satisfy the assumption that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is vertically uniform for conversion of regression slopes to mixing ratios (Ziemke et al., 2001; Choi et al., 2014). The threshold used for this is 0.33 pptv hPa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. We dispense with this step, as its application to TROPOMI requires a model at a similar fine spatial resolution to TROPOMI, and CTMs may underestimate vertical <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> gradients in the UT (Boersma et al., 2011; Travis et al., 2016; Silvern et al., 2018). Anyway, we find that the strict filtering applied to GEOS-Chem partial columns removes most (85 %) scenes with absolute <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical gradients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pptv hPa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for a target resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2075">Figure 1 shows GEOS-Chem seasonal mean cloud-sliced and true cloudy UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The latter is also
Gaussian-weighted to 315 hPa. The uncertainty in individual cloud-sliced
values, estimated as the RMA regression slope error, ranges from 6 % to the imposed error limit, 99 %. This is reduced to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % for the
multiyear seasonal means in Fig. 1 due to temporal averaging. Agreement
between the cloud-sliced and true cloudy UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in the
scatterplot in Fig. 2. Successful cloud-sliced retrievals can exceed 35
for many grid squares, though these do not exhibit better agreement with the
“truth” than the grid squares with fewer (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) retrievals. The
two datasets are spatially consistent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and exhibit similar
variance (slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a
small positive offset in background UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (intercept <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pptv). On average, cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 17 % more than the true cloudy UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but this depends on the spatial resolution of the retrieved cloud-sliced product. Regression slopes increase from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.03</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 4.1 % less than the
true cloudy UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
37 % more at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The increasingly
positive bias with spatial resolution is because a greater relative
proportion of clusters with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical gradients <inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pptv hPa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are retained at coarser resolution. The percentage retained relative to all clusters with more than 10 data points and uniform overlying stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases from 9 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 15 % for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 23 %
for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Maps of synthetic cloud-sliced
UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are in Fig. S1 in the Supplement. Strict data filtering in the
cloud-slicing steps removes 90 % of the clusters of GEOS-Chem partial
columns for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product. Most (33 %)
data loss is due to the strict relative standard deviation threshold applied
to stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Cloud-slicing is very sensitive to this
threshold. Relaxing it from a relative standard deviation of 0.02 to 0.03
increases data retention from 10 % to 17 % but increases the positive
bias in cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from 17 % to 45 %. This is due to an
increase in the contribution of variability in the stratosphere to the
cloud-slicing regression slopes.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e2565">Comparison of synthetic cloud-sliced and true <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere (UT) for June–August 2016–2017. Maps show UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from cloud-slicing GEOS-Chem partial
columns above all clouds with cloud-top pressures at 450–180 hPa (top), as grid-average mixing ratios from GEOS-Chem for the same scenes as are cloud-sliced (middle), and for all-sky (clear and cloudy) scenes (bottom). Data are Gaussian-weighted to the pressure centre (315 hPa). Grey grids have <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data points.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/2389/2021/amt-14-2389-2021-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2626">Also shown in Fig. 1 is the true all-sky UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> obtained for all
(cloudy and clear) scenes across 450–180 hPa. Model grids with stratospheric
influence are identified and removed using GEOS-FP tropopause heights that
are updated hourly in the model. The true cloudy UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 17 %
more than the true all-sky UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Spatial resolution influences the size of
this difference, increasing from 11 % at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to 22 % at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This suggests that isolating cloudy scenes induces a 11 %–22 % bias in seasonal mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> that could be due to a combination of poor data retention (low<?pagebreak page2393?> sampling frequency of cloudy scenes), the influence of clouds on <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
photochemistry (Pour-Biazar et al., 2007; Holmes et al., 2019), and local
enhancements in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from events like lightning and deep convective uplift of surface pollution that accompany clouds (Crawford et al., 2000; Ridley et al., 2004; Bertram et al., 2007).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2738">Scatter plot of synthetic cloud-sliced versus true cloudy
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere (UT). Points are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonal means from Fig. 1 (top and middle panels) coloured by the number of successful cloud-sliced retrievals. Values inset are the RMA regression statistics and Pearson's correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Slope
and intercept errors are from bootstrap resampling.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=221.931496pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/2389/2021/amt-14-2389-2021-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e2786">Cloud-slicing applied to GEOS-Chem considers all cloudy scenes, whereas
cloud-slicing of satellite observations is applied to partial columns above
optically thick clouds, so that the clouds shield against contamination of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from below the cloud. If we only consider synthetic partial columns above clouds with a physical (geometric) cloud fraction across 450–180 hPa of at least 0.7, the cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> positive difference is similar (18 %) to that obtained for all cloudy scenes, but half the number of data are retained. Cloud fractions retrieved with TROPOMI are effective or radiometric cloud fractions that are systematically more than the physical cloud fraction from the model (Bucsela et al., 2013; Laughner et al., 2018). Our results suggest that representation error is not sensitive to the cloud fraction threshold. Another distinction in GEOS-Chem and TROPOMI cloud variables is that the model provides the physical cloud-top height, whereas TROPOMI cloud retrievals that use models that assume clouds are uniform reflective boundaries retrieve cloud-top heights that can be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km lower than the physical cloud top (Joiner et al., 2012; Choi et al., 2014; Loyola et al., 2018a). We again apply the cloud-slicing algorithm to the simulated partial columns, but with the altitude of the cloud-top
heights artificially lowered by 1 km. This approach assumes that the
difference in altitudes of effective (radiometric) clouds and physical
clouds is systematic and vertically and horizontally uniform. The difference
between the resultant cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the true cloudy UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases from 17 % to 24 %. This is because a 1 km decrease in cloud-top altitude leads to a larger relative increase in the column above high-altitude clouds than low-altitude clouds, leading to steeper regression slopes and larger UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Evaluation of TROPOMI with ground-based instruments at high-altitude sites</title>
      <p id="d1e2863">Pandora spectrometer systems provide observations of total and free-tropospheric columns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using direct sun, direct moon, and sky
radiance observations (Herman et al., 2009; Cede et al., 2019). Those at
high-altitude sites (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa) have limited influence from the planetary boundary layer (typically extending to 1–2 km altitude) and so are used here to evaluate TROPOMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> total columns of the free troposphere (middle and upper troposphere) and stratosphere. These
include long-term Pandora instruments at Mauna Loa, Hawaii (19.48<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 155.60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 4.2 km above sea level or a.s.l., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa); Izaña, Tenerife, Canary Islands (28.31<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
16.50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 2.4 km a.s.l., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">760</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa); and Altzomoni,
Mexico (19.12<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 98.66<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 4.0 km a.s.l., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">620</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa). Mauna Loa and Izaña are remote and have limited anthropogenic influence (Toledano et al., 2018), whereas Altzomoni is <inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km southeast of Mexico City and is often within the mixed layer of the city in the afternoon (Baumgardner et al., 2009) after the TROPOMI overpass. On average, multiyear mean tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from OMI are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>  molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> lower over Altzomoni (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) than the city (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Rivera et al., 2013). At Izaña, there is also a MAX-DOAS instrument that we use to retrieve free-tropospheric columns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to assess these from Pandora and TROPOMI. MAX-DOAS offers vertical sensitivity in the troposphere and has been used extensively to determine free-tropospheric concentrations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at high-altitude sites (Gomez et al., 2014; Gil-Ojeda et al., 2015; Schreier et al., 2016).
There are also Pandora instruments at remote sites in the northern middle
and high latitudes in Eureka, Canada, and Ny-Ålesund, Norway, but the
total columns of these sample the planetary boundary layer. The Eureka site
is at 617 m altitude and the Ny-Ålesund site is at 18 m.</p>
      <p id="d1e3125">Pandora level 2 total and tropospheric columns are from the Pandonia Global
Network (PGN, 2020). We use version 1.7 “nvs1” retrieval of total
columns and “nvh1” retrieval of tropospheric columns (described below).
Observations are for a full year (1 June 2019 to 31 May 2020) at Izaña.
The data record is shorter at Mauna Loa (ends 29 March 2020) and Altzomoni
(ends 9 March 2020). Total slant columns (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> abundances along the
instrument viewing path) are retrieved by fitting a fourth-order polynomial
to spectra at 400–440 nm using an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effective temperature of 254.4 K.
These are then converted to total vertical column densities by accounting
for the geometry of the viewing path (Cede et al., 2019). The Pandora tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2<?pagebreak page2394?></mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns have not yet been validated against other observations. Retrieval of these involves simultaneous retrieval of slant columns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dimer at multiple elevation angles (typically 0, 60, 75, 88, and 89<inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dimer slant columns are used to calculate a representative air mass factor (AMF) that is applied to the difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns at multiple pointing elevation angles to calculate a tropospheric vertical column. The data also include estimates of the uncertainty on the total and tropospheric columns due to instrument noise and atmospheric variability (Cede et al., 2019). The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effective temperature used in the total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column retrieval is greater than the column average ambient temperature at high-altitude sites. This induces a positive bias in the total columns estimated by Verhoelst et al. (2021) to be <inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % that we
address by decreasing the Pandora total columns and associated errors by
10 %. No correction is applied to the tropospheric columns, due to
variable contribution of the troposphere to the total column.</p>
      <p id="d1e3261">MAX-DOAS vertical tropospheric columns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Izaña are from
RASAS-II sky radiance spectra for June 2019 to February 2020. The spectra
are fitted for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the wavelength range 425–490 nm, and slant columns are calculated as the difference between these spectra at high-sun (90<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> instrument elevation angle) and multiple
elevation angles (1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 30, and 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Hönninger et
al., 2004; Gil et al., 2008; Puentedura et al., 2012; Gomez et al., 2014;
Gil-Ojeda et al., 2015). Vertical columns are estimated using optimal
estimation that solves an ill-constrained problem by introducing prior
information (Rodgers, 2000). Prior information for Izaña includes fixed
(with altitude) aerosol extinction of 0.01 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 20 pptv from the surface to the tropopause. Aerosol abundances at Izaña are sometimes influenced by windblown dust from the Sahara Desert, but are
typically low (aerosol optical depth or AOD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Gomez et al., 2014; Gil-Ojeda et al., 2015). The prior <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile is within the
range of background <inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UT (10–20 pptv) (Marais et al., 2018) and MAX-DOAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations previously retrieved at Izaña (20–40 pptv) (Gomez et al., 2014). Filtering is applied to remove vertical column retrievals with limited independent information (degrees of freedom for signal <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and significant light path attenuation by aerosols (AOD <inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and clouds (effective cloud fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). AOD is derived with MAX-DOAS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dimer differential slant columns retrieved over the same wavelength range as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Frieß et al., 2006), and cloud fraction is from the Fast Retrieval Scheme for Clouds from the Oxygen A band version S (FRESCO-S) product provided with the TROPOMI
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product. Filtering removes 40 % of the retrieved vertical
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns at Izaña.</p>
      <p id="d1e3472">TROPOMI data are from the Sentinel-5P Pre-Operations Data Hub (S5P Data Hub,
2020). We use a year of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data (1 June 2019 to 31 May 2020) from
the level-2 offline (OFFL) product version 01-03-02. The data product
includes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> abundances along the optical path from the sun to the
instrument (the total slant column or SCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical column densities in the stratosphere (VCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the stratospheric air mass factor (AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). A detailed description of retrieval of SCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and VCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is described in the product Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document (van Geffen et al., 2019) and by van Geffen et al. (2020). In brief, SCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are obtained by spectral fitting of TROPOMI top-of-atmosphere radiances at 405–465 nm by accounting for light absorption by <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and other relevant gases. VCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are from assimilation of TROPOMI and modelled total
slant columns over locations diagnosed by the model to have limited
tropospheric influence (predominantly remote oceans) (Boersma et al., 2004; Dirksen et al., 2011; van Geffen et al., 2019). The modelled slant columns are the product of vertical columns from the TM5-MP CTM (Williams et al., 2017) and AMFs calculated using TROPOMI viewing geometries and surface reflectivities. The CTM is simulated at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and driven with ECMWF meteorology updated every 3-hourly. SCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are separated into a stratospheric (SCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and tropospheric (SCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) component, and a tropospheric AMF (AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is applied to SCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to obtain tropospheric vertical columns (VCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>). AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> accounts for viewing geometry,
surface reflectivity, atmospheric absorption and scattering of light by
trace gases and aerosols, and sensitivity to the vertical distribution of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A vertically resolved correction is also applied to the
AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to correct for the fixed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> effective temperature (220 K) used to retrieve SCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The light path in the UT is relatively unobstructed by aerosols and, for cloud-slicing, would mostly be impacted by treatment of the reflectivity of optically thick clouds. We choose to use an AMF that only accounts for viewing geometry (AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">geo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) due to uncertainties in the modelled vertical distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UT (Stavrakou et al., 2013; Travis et al., 2016) and representation errors from a model at coarser resolution (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) than TROPOMI (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km at nadir). Choi et al. (2014) found that OMI partial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns calculated with AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">geo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> above optically thick clouds in the mid-troposphere (650 hPa) were at most 14 % more than those
calculated with a detailed AMF that assumed clouds are near-Lambertian
surfaces with albedo of 0.8 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is constant with altitude. The
effect of not including a temperature correction will be small in the UT
where temperatures are <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">220</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K anyway. To confirm this, we find that GEOS-Chem cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values calculated with the TROPOMI AMF
temperature correction expression in van Geffen et al. (2019) are only 6 % less than those in Figs. 1 and 2.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2395?><p id="d1e3815">We calculate VCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> by first obtaining SCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as the difference between SCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the data product and SCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> calculated as the product of the reported VCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M291" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SCD</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SCD</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>VCD</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AMF</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        This we use to estimate the above-cloud VCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">geo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> that we calculate with the reported solar zenith angle (SZA) and viewing zenith angle (VZA) values:
          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M294" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>VCD</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SCD</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>AMF</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">geo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SCD</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>SZA</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mtext>sec</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mtext>VZA</mml:mtext></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
        The TROPOMI VCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values we compare to Pandora are calculated as the sum of reported VCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">strat</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and our calculated VCD<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. 2). Only data with quality flags (“qa_value” in the data product) of at least 0.45 are used. This removes data affected by sun glint, poor
precision in the retrieval and radiances, and SZA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">84.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (van Geffen et al., 2019). Similarly, good-quality Pandora retrievals of total and tropospheric columns are identified as those with data quality flags of 0, 1, 10, or 11 (Cede et al., 2019), consistent with Ialongo et al. (2020). Coincident satellite and ground-based data are identified as TROPOMI pixels within a 0.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> radius (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) of the station and ground-based data <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min around the TROPOMI overpass.</p>
      <p id="d1e4064">Figure 3a–c compare collocated daily mean Pandora and TROPOMI total columns. This compares predominantly clear-sky observations from Pandora and all-sky observations from TROPOMI, as the larger sampling footprint of TROPOMI will include influence from clouds. TROPOMI cloud fractions from the FRESCO-S product coincident with Pandora range from cloud free (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to cloudy (0.8 for Mauna Loa and Izaña, 0.5 for Altzomoni) and average 0.3 at Mauna Loa and Izaña and 0.2 at Altzomoni. Errors on the daily means, obtained by adding in quadrature reported uncertainties of individual columns, are small at all sites. These vary from 0.1 % to 19 % for Pandora and 1.5 % to 16 % for TROPOMI. TROPOMI and Pandora total columns are temporally consistent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.69</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Mauna Loa, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Izaña, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Altzomoni), but there is a systematic positive offset in TROPOMI (intercepts in Fig. 3a–c) ranging from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.6</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at Mauna Loa to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at Altzomoni. TROPOMI is on average 18 % higher than Pandora at Mauna Loa, 26 % at Izaña, and 38 % at Altzomoni. Verhoelst et al. (2021) also report a positive bias in TROPOMI total columns at the same Pandora sites of 6 % at Mauna Loa, 19 % at Izaña, and 28 % at Altzomoni for April 2018 to February 2020. Our higher values compared to Verhoelst et al. (2021) is because of the 10 % downward adjustment we apply to Pandora total columns. The difference in sampling footprints of space- and ground-based instruments can influence agreement between the two (Pinardi et al., 2020). We find though that the difference between TROPOMI and Pandora at Mauna Loa and Izaña is
relatively insensitive to the choice of sampling coincidence. The difference
is 17 %–20 % at Mauna Loa and 25 %–26 % at Izaña for a TROPOMI sampling radius range of 0.05–0.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and for a Pandora sampling time window range of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–60 min. The comparison at Altzomoni, though, is very
sensitive to the sampling radius due to proximity to Mexico City. There the
difference increases from 22 % at 0.05<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 45 coincident points
to 48 % at 0.3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for 76 coincident points.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e4208">Comparison of TROPOMI and Pandora total <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns at
high-altitude sites located in the free troposphere (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km altitude). Points are daily means with at least five coincident observations at
Mauna Loa <bold>(a, d)</bold>, Izaña <bold>(b, e)</bold>, and Altzomoni <bold>(c, f)</bold> before <bold>(a, b, c)</bold> and after <bold>(d, e, f)</bold> applying correction factors to TROPOMI stratospheric and tropospheric columns (see text for details). Colours in <bold>(a, b, c)</bold> are the relative contribution of the free troposphere to the total column according to Pandora where available and grey otherwise. Data in <bold>(d, e, f)</bold> row are coloured by season. Lines are the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship (grey dashed) and RMA
regression (black solid). Inset values are Pearson's correlation
coefficients, RMA regression statistics, number of data points (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the
TROPOMI normalized mean bias (NMB). Also shown for Altzomoni <bold>(f)</bold> is the RMA regression without the Pandora <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> observation (black dashed line). Axes do not
start at the origin.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/2389/2021/amt-14-2389-2021-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e4312">At Mauna Loa, the free-tropospheric column contribution to the total
averages 5.1 % (range of 0.2 %–16 %), according to Pandora. This is likely an overestimate, as few (33 %) Pandora tropospheric daily means could be estimated, as indicated by the grey points in Fig. 3a. The contribution of the free troposphere to the total column at the other sites is 8.3 % (0.2 %–38 %) at Izaña and 31 % (8 %–91 %) at Altzomoni. Due to the small contribution of the free troposphere to the total at Mauna Loa, we use the comparison of Pandora and TROPOMI at this site to evaluate the TROPOMI stratospheric column, as has been done previously (Verhoelst et al., 2021). At Mauna Loa, TROPOMI underestimates stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variance by 13 % (slope <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.87</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). A regression slope less than unity suggests that higher-resolution features are smoothed by the coarser spatial resolution of the TM5-TMP model (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and time resolution of the meteorology (3-hourly). The underestimate in stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variance would lead to an overestimate in the relative contribution of the stratosphere to the total column for small column densities and vice versa. This would result in an overall overestimate in cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, increasing with decline in UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, as the relative overestimate in column densities will be greater for high-altitude clouds than for low-altitude clouds. The 18 % higher TROPOMI than Pandora total columns at Mauna Loa are larger than and opposite in sign to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) meridional difference in TROPOMI stratospheric columns from the near-real-time (NRTI) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product and those obtained with twilight measurements from the near-global Système d'Analyse par Observation Zénitale (SAOZ) network of zenith-scattered-light differential optical absorption spectroscopy (ZSL-DOAS) instruments (Lambert et al., 2019). The implied difference between SAOZ and Pandora stratospheric
columns coincident with TROPOMI (Pandora <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> SAOZ) may be due to the
need to account for time differences between the SAOZ measurements
(twilight) and TROPOMI (midday) (Verhoelst et al., 2021). This difference
warrants further investigation, as these ground-based measurements are
crucial for validating space-based sensors that measure <inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e4463">We apply a variance correction to TROPOMI stratospheric columns by dividing
these by 0.87 (the slope of the TROPOMI versus Pandora total columns at
Mauna Loa in Fig. 3a) and subtracting the resultant mean increase in
TROPOMI stratospheric columns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
This reduces the intercepts in Fig. 3a–c to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Mauna Loa, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Izaña, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for Altzomoni (not shown). Likely causes for the remaining discrepancy between TROPOMI and Pandora could be a positive offset in the TROPOMI radiance intensity that is estimated to be 5 % of the total column or 0.1–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (van Geffen et al., 2020), challenges obtaining a Pandora reference measurement (atmospheric column without <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Herman et al., 2009), and an overestimate in TROPOMI free-tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The radiance intensity offset has been<?pagebreak page2396?> shown to mostly affect retrievals over open oceans (van Geffen et al., 2020), and an overestimate in free-tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> would have a larger effect on the total column comparison at Izaña and Altzomoni than at Mauna Loa.</p>
      <p id="d1e4637">Figure 4 compares time series of free-tropospheric column densities of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at Izaña from Pandora, MAX-DOAS, and TROPOMI. As with the total columns, Pandora and MAX-DOAS are sampled 30 min around the satellite
overpass and TROPOMI 0.2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> around the site. We impose a modest
threshold to only use TROPOMI tropospheric columns <inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to mimic the detection limits of the
instruments (Gomez et al., 2014) and mitigate the influence of TROPOMI data that would be susceptible to errors in distinguishing the stratosphere from the troposphere. This brings the lower-end TROPOMI values into better agreement with the ground-based values and has no effect on TROPOMI columns <inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. On average, Pandora is 14 % more than MAX-DOAS for coincident midday daily means, and the temporal correlation is modest (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Temporal inconsistencies between Pandora and MAX-DOAS are due to challenges retrieving tropospheric columns routinely close to instrument detection limits (Gomez et al., 2014), lack of dynamic variability in the retrieved columns, and differences in the sampling extent
of the two instruments. The MAX-DOAS sampling footprint, for example, shifts
by at least 4<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in latitude between its most northerly extent in
winter solstices to its most southerly extent in summer solstices (Robles-Gonzalez et al., 2016). Most MAX-DOAS and Pandora data are at 1–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the range for TROPOMI
calculated using Eqs. (1) and (2) extends to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The range is the same as the comparison of
TROPOMI and shipborne MAX-DOAS tropospheric columns by P. Wang et al. (2020). In that study, TROPOMI was on average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> more than MAX-DOAS. In our comparison, TROPOMI free-tropospheric columns (red crosses in Fig. 4) are 77 % more than Pandora and 84 % more than MAX-DOAS. The overestimate is similar if the reported detailed tropospheric AMF is used instead of AMF<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">trop</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">geo</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Eq. 2) to calculate TROPOMI tropospheric columns.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4841">Time series of free-tropospheric column densities of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at
Izaña. Points are daily midday means from Pandora (black circles),
MAX-DOAS (green triangles), and TROPOMI (red) before (crosses) and after
(circles) applying scaling factors to the stratospheric and tropospheric
columns (see text for details). Error bars are individual retrieval
uncertainties added in quadrature. Inset values are the number of midday
daily means from each instrument.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=455.244094pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/2389/2021/amt-14-2389-2021-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page2397?><p id="d1e4861">The stratospheric variance correction reduces the difference between TROPOMI
and coincident ground-based measurements to 40 % compared to Pandora and
47 % compared to MAX-DOAS (not shown). This is due to an increase in the
relative contribution of the stratosphere to total columns <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> following the stratospheric column
variance correction. A 40 %–47 % overestimate in free-tropospheric columns would induce a systematic positive bias in cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. To address the remaining difference between TROPOMI free-tropospheric columns and the ground-based observations, we decrease TROPOMI free-tropospheric columns by 50 % (red circles in Fig. 4), leading to a difference of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % with Pandora and 1 % with MAX-DOAS. There is no temporal correlation between daily coincident observations of TROPOMI and the
ground-based measurements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), consistent with the comparison of TROPOMI to shipborne MAX-DOAS (P. Wang et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e4926">Figure 3d–f compare Pandora to TROPOMI total columns after
increasing TROPOMI stratospheric column variance by 13 % and reducing
TROPOMI free-tropospheric columns by 50 %. This correction reduces the
difference between TROPOMI and Pandora by just 3 percentage points at Mauna
Loa and Izaña and 11 percentage points at Altzomoni. The variance at
Altzomoni degrades from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.16</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.82</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, but this is
because the relatively few coincident points (76 compared to 308 at
Izaña) are influenced by the single Pandora observation <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (coincident corrected TROPOMI is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) that may be detecting
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from fires that typically occur in December–February in the
National Park where the instrument is located (Bravo et al., 2002;
Baumgardner et al., 2009). The TROPOMI free-tropospheric column contribution
at Mauna Loa and Izaña is more consistent with that from Pandora after
applying the stratospheric and free-tropospheric column corrections,
decreasing from 8 % to 6 % at Mauna Loa and 12 % to 7 % at
Izaña. This is not the case for Altzomoni (decrease from 14 % to
9 %), due to anthropogenic influence from Mexico City that the coarser
TROPOMI sampling footprint is not able to resolve. Points in Fig. 3 are
coloured by season to show that all sites experience a modest decline in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from summer (purple) to winter (cyan) due to the influence of solar variability on photochemical production of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the stratosphere (Gil et al., 2008; Robles-Gonzalez et al., 2016) and seasonality in long-range transport and subsidence in the free troposphere (Gil-Ojeda et al., 2015). The distinct distribution of points in December–February
compared to June–August and September–November at Mauna Loa suggests there
may be seasonality in the size of the discrepancy between TROPOMI and
Pandora stratospheric columns. The remaining TROPOMI positive offset of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> is consistent
with the 2–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> positive offset in
TROPOMI stratospheric columns reported by P. Wang et al. (2020) from comparison to shipborne MAX-DOAS measurements. If the remaining offset is exclusively due to the stratospheric column, this would cancel in the cloud-slicing retrieval for clusters of partial columns with uniform stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e5113">In what follows, we use TROPOMI total columns with a 13 % increase in
stratospheric column variance and a 50 % decrease in free-tropospheric
columns that are based on comparison to Pandora and MAX-DOAS.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Retrieval of TROPOMI {$\protect\chem{NO_{2}}$} in the upper troposphere}?><title>Retrieval of TROPOMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere</title>
      <?pagebreak page2398?><p id="d1e5136">Seasonal mean UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are obtained from TROPOMI for June 2019 to May
2020 at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The same cloud-slicing
retrieval and data-filtering steps applied to synthetic spectra from
GEOS-Chem (Sect. 2) are applied to corrected TROPOMI total columns. The
corrections include a 13 % adjustment to the stratospheric column variance and 50 % decrease in tropospheric columns based on comparison to the three high-altitude Pandora sites (Sect. 3). The degradation in resolution of
TROPOMI nadir pixels from 5.6 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3.5 km to the target resolution
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is 400-fold compared to 250-fold for
the synthetic experiment in Sect. 2 and a much greater (1300-fold)
degradation in OMI nadir pixel resolution (13 km <inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 km) for the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product (Marais et al., 2018). The
finer relative resolution we choose for TROPOMI cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
compared to OMI is informed by the synthetic experiment applied to GEOS-Chem
and the superior cloud-resolving capability of TROPOMI than OMI.
Cloud-slicing is applied to partial columns above optically thick clouds,
diagnosed with an effective cloud fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as in Marais et
al. (2018), to limit contamination from light transmitted through clouds.
Though the cloud-slicing retrieval steps applied to GEOS-Chem and TROPOMI
are the same, there are differences in the modelled and retrieved cloud
parameters that we discuss below.</p>
      <p id="d1e5246">Two TROPOMI cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> products are derived using cloud-top
heights and cloud fractions from distinct cloud products. The first are
FRESCO-S cloud fractions and cloud-top pressures from the same data file as
TROPOMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. These are determined by minimizing the difference between measured and simulated spectra in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band (758–766 nm) using lookup tables and assuming clouds are single layer Lambertian reflectors with an albedo of 0.8 (Wang et al., 2008; van Geffen et al., 2019). The second is the Optical Cloud Recognition Algorithm (OCRA) cloud fractions and Retrieval of Cloud Information using Neural Networks (ROCINN) cloud-top heights. OCRA cloud fractions are retrieved by determining the difference, in colour space, between cloudy and clear reflectances (Loyola et al., 2007, 2018a, b). ROCINN cloud-top heights are retrieved in kilometres by minimizing the difference between measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band radiances and neural-network-trained radiances modelled using OCRA cloud fractions (Loyola et al., 2007, 2018b). In ROCINN, clouds are modelled as multiple optically uniform layers of light-scattering water droplets (the clouds-as-layers or CAL model). We convert the ROCINN-clouds-as-layers (ROCINN-CAL) cloud-top heights to pressures for cloud-slicing and comparison to FRESCO-S. FRESCO-S data are quality screened using the same qa_value threshold (0.45) as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. A qa_value threshold of 0.5 is used for OCRA and ROCINN-CAL. Snow and/or ice scenes potentially misclassified as clouds by FRESCO-S are identified as differences in reported scene and surface pressures <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, as in van der A et al. (2020), as having snow cover <inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % or classified as permanent ice cover. In what follows, we distinguish the two cloud-sliced TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> products as FRESCO-S and ROCINN-CAL.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e5338">Seasonal mean  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere from TROPOMI. Maps
are UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in June–August
2019 (first row), September–November 2019 (second), December 2019 to
February 2020 (third), and March–May 2020 (fourth) using FRESCO-S (left) or
ROCINN-CAL (right) cloud information and with corrections applied to TROPOMI
stratospheric and tropospheric columns (see text for details). Inset numbers
give total successful cloud-sliced retrievals. Grey grid squares have fewer
than five cloud-sliced retrievals.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/2389/2021/amt-14-2389-2021-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e5390">Figure 5 shows maps of seasonal mean FRESCO-S and ROCINN-CAL UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The spatial features are consistent
with a combination of the density of lightning flashes (Cecil et al., 2014) and lightning properties such as flash footprint, duration, and energy (Beirle et al., 2014). These include elevated concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pptv) over Northern Hemisphere land masses in June–August, the year-round 40–60 pptv band over tropical landmasses that shifts meridionally with the Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ), and relatively low concentrations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pptv) over the remote Pacific Ocean. We find reasonable spatial correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.6) between seasonal mean TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and lightning flash densities from the Lightning Imaging Sensor–Optical Transient Detector (LIS–OTD) in all seasons, except September–November for FRESCO-S (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.34</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Seasonal LIS–OTD lightning flash densities at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are calculated from version 2.3 of the monthly climatology
(OPeNDAP, 2020). RMA slopes from regressing TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> against
LIS–OTD lightning flash densities range from 0.3 to 0.6 pptv (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> flashes km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M413" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the absence of lightning flashes in the tropics and subtropics (RMA intercepts) is very similar, 37–41 pptv, for both products in all seasons. In the cold polar regions in Fig. 5, UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M414" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values, limited to ROCINN-CAL, are near background (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M415" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pptv) as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M416" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is preferentially present as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M417" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reservoir compounds such as peroxyacetyl nitrates (PANs) (Bottenheim et al., 1986). Large enhancements (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M418" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">80</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pptv) over northern China and the northeast US in June–August and Australia in December–February most prevalent in the ROCINN-CAL product likely reflect contamination from surface pollution below clouds. These result from intense anthropogenic activity in North China and the northeast US (Zhao et al., 2013; Jiang et al., 2018; Z. Wang et al., 2020) and routine pyrocumulonimbus injection of fire plumes into the free troposphere and lower stratosphere during the extreme 2019–2020 fire season
in Australia (Kablick et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e5630">FRESCO-S and ROCINN-CAL UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M419" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are spatially consistent for coincident
grid squares (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M420" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.82 to 0.88), though ROCINN-CAL UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M421" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are 4.2–9.1 pptv more than FRESCO-S UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M422" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. As with the synthetic experiment, UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M423" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with degradation in resolution due to the relative increase in tropospheric columns with steep vertical gradients in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M424" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Depending on the season, cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M425" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are 2 %–4 % more at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M426" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 3 %–9 % more at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M427" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M428" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Good quality retrievals and optically thick clouds with cloud-top pressures at 450–180 hPa account for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M429" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % of TROPOMI pixels using
FRESCO-S and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M430" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % using ROCINN-CAL. Of these, 44 000–78 000
cloud-slicing retrievals are retained in each season for FRESCO-S and
118 000–177 000 for ROCINN-CAL (Fig. 5). Most data loss in the
cloud-slicing retrieval is because of too few points (clusters <inline-formula><mml:math id="M431" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
or a cloud-top pressure range <inline-formula><mml:math id="M432" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">140</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> hPa. Discarded extreme values of
cloud-sliced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M433" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pptv are only 0.1 %–0.5 % of retained data. More cloud-sliced retrievals with ROCINN-CAL are due to greater
abundance of optically thick clouds and clusters with greater cloud height
range.</p>
      <p id="d1e5824">Figure 6 compares the meridional abundance of optically thick clouds in the
UT from the two cloud products for June–August and December–February. The
same<?pagebreak page2399?> information for the other two seasons is in Fig. S2. Both products
retrieve effective (radiometric) cloud fractions. These are systematically
more than the physical (geometric) cloud fractions from GEOS-Chem, though
the two converge for optically thick clouds with physical cloud fractions
approaching 1 (Stammes et al., 2008; Laughner et al., 2018). The number
of OCRA optically thick clouds is always more (often double) than that of
FRESCO-S in all seasons and across all latitudes. The greatest difference in
the number of optically thick clouds tracks the ITCZ and is also typically
at 45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M434" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N/S. The majority (61 %–62 %) of OCRA cloud fractions exceed 0.975 compared to 42 %–45 % for FRESCO-S. Loyola et al. (2018a) determined that OCRA cloud fractions retrieved over oceans are 0.1 unit more than those from retrievals like FRESCO-S that assume fixed cloud albedo. Differences over land are not as systematic and vary from negligible in the tropics and subtropics to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M435" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> unit more in the Arctic (Loyola et al., 2018a). ROCINN-CAL retrieves cloud optical thicknesses
alongside cloud heights. These exceed 20 for most (84 %–93 %) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M436" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid squares used to cloud-slice TROPOMI, confirming that a cloud fraction threshold of 0.7 is sufficient to isolate optically thick clouds. The number of pixels in each cloud fraction threshold in Fig. 6 suggests that a stricter cloud fraction threshold of 1.0 applied to
the ROCINN-CAL product might lead to a more consistent spatial distribution
of UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M437" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to that from FRESCO-S in Fig. 5. The resultant ROCINN-CAL
UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M438" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values using a cloud fraction threshold of 1.0 are in Fig. S3. Half
the number of cloud-sliced retrievals are obtained, as expected, and there
are fewer retrievals over Northern Hemisphere high latitudes than in Fig. 5. Those over the Southern Ocean in austral autumn and winter persist and
may reflect enhanced occurrence of high-altitude clouds in these seasons
over Antarctica (Verlinden et al., 2011). The average difference between
ROCINN-CAL and FRESCO-S decreases from 5 %–8 % for the same cloud fraction threshold of 0.7 to 0.2 %–1.6 % using a cloud fraction threshold of 1.0 for ROCINN-CAL and 0.7 for FRESCO-S, likely due to reduced contamination of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M439" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from below clouds with the stricter cloud fraction threshold.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5902">Meridional distribution of FRESCO-S and OCRA optically thick clouds in the upper troposphere. Bars count the occurrence of native TROPOMI pixels with cloud fractions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M440" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.9, 0.8, and 0.7 binned into 15<inline-formula><mml:math id="M441" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude bands in June–August <bold>(a)</bold> and December–February <bold>(b)</bold> for FRESCO-S (cool colours) where FRESCO-S cloud-top pressures are at 450–180 hPa and OCRA (warm colours) where ROCINN-CAL cloud-top pressures
are at 450–180 hPa. Inset values are latitude band and global totals of
TROPOMI pixels with cloud fraction <inline-formula><mml:math id="M442" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/2389/2021/amt-14-2389-2021-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?pagebreak page2400?><p id="d1e5946">Figure 7 compares gridded cloud product cloud-top pressures for June–August
sampled where FRESCO-S cloud-top pressures are at 450–180 hPa and cloud
fractions are at least 0.7. Cloud-top pressures are spatially consistent in
the tropics (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M443" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0–35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M444" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M445" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 0–35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M446" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) and midlatitudes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M447" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.58</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> at 35–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M448" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M449" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M450" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.63 at 35–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M451" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) but degrade north of 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M452" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M453" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).
Variability in cloud-top pressures is similar for the two products in the
tropics (regional mean standard deviation of 28–33 hPa at 0–35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M454" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N
and 30–31 hPa at 0–35<inline-formula><mml:math id="M455" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) but deviates in the subtropics and
midlatitudes (18 hPa for FRESCO-S, 24–30 hPa for ROCINN-CAL) and more so in the Arctic (13 hPa for FRESCO-S, 54 hPa for ROCINN-CAL). There are no
coincident data south of 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M456" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S in June–August. In December–February (Fig. S4) south of 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M457" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S there is a similarly
weak correlation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M458" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and large difference in variability (19 hPa for FRESCO-S, 80 hPa for ROCINN-CAL). FRESCO-S does not account for scattering within and below clouds and so estimates the height as the optical centroid of the cloud (Joiner et al., 2012). The optical centroid is systematically lower in altitude (higher in pressure) than the physical cloud top, though FRESCO-S appears to be more consistent with ground-based observations than ROCINN-CAL for high-altitude cloud-top heights (Compernolle et al., 2020). Loyola et al. (2018a) determined that cloud-top altitudes from ROCINN-CAL were <inline-formula><mml:math id="M459" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km (range: 0.6 to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M460" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) higher than those from a FRESCO-S-type approach that assumes clouds are single layers with fixed albedo. Our test of the effect of an artificial decrease in cloud-top altitude of 1 km for cloud-slicing synthetic GEOS-Chem partial columns (Sect. 2) suggests that 1 km lower altitude cloud tops in FRESCO-S should lead to larger UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M461" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than those from ROCINN-CAL, but the opposite is observed (Fig. 5). This suggests that the effect of other differences between the cloud products on the cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M462" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> must dominate. Regression slopes in Fig. 7 are less than unity, indicating that the difference in cloud-top pressures between the two products decreases with pressure (increases with altitude). The implication for cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M463" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is greater global coverage with ROCINN-CAL, as clusters of TROPOMI pixels using ROCINN-CAL cloud-top pressures in the midlatitudes and polar regions overcome the 140 hPa cloud-top pressure range threshold imposed in the cloud-slicing algorithm. In the tropics and subtropics, ROCINN-CAL has less cloud-top pressure range than FRESCO-S for the same scenes. This leads to steeper cloud-slicing regression slopes for ROCINN-CAL and contributes to the 4–9 pptv greater UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M464" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> than FRESCO-S in Fig. 5.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e6174">Comparison of FRESCO-S and ROCINN-CAL cloud-top pressures from
optically thick clouds in the upper troposphere for June–August 2019. Data
are gridded to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M465" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for TROPOMI pixels with
FRESCO-S cloud fractions <inline-formula><mml:math id="M466" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and cloud-top pressures at 450–180 hPa.
Small points are gridded seasonal means, and lines are RMA regressions for
the tropics (grey points, black regression line), subtropics and
midlatitudes (cyan, blue), and the Arctic (pink, red). Large points are
latitude band means, and error bars are corresponding standard deviations.
Grey dashed lines show the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M467" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> relationship. Values in the legend are RMA
regression slopes (b) and Pearson's correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M468" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=213.395669pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/2389/2021/amt-14-2389-2021-f07.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Comparison of TROPOMI and OMI UT {$\protect\chem{NO_{2}}$}}?><title>Comparison of TROPOMI and OMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M469" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <?pagebreak page2401?><p id="d1e6252">We evaluate TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M470" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with multiyear (2005–2007) seasonal mean
cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M471" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from OMI at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M472" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Marais et al., 2018). OMI data are for 2005–2007, as this predates the
substantial data loss caused by the row anomaly (Schenkeveld et al., 2017; Torres et al., 2018). The OMI product is retrieved in a similar manner
to TROPOMI, except that the GMI CTM is used to diagnose and remove steep
gradients in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M473" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M474" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> pptv hPa<inline-formula><mml:math id="M475" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the OMI retrieval
ceiling is lower (280 hPa, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M476" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km) than TROPOMI (180 hPa,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M477" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km). In regions where lightning is prevalent, the
vertical distribution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M478" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increases with altitude by 10–50 pptv
across 280–180 hPa, as is observed with vertical profiles of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M479" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from spring–summer research aircraft campaign measurements over the US (Boersma et al., 2011; Silvern et al., 2018). Strict filtering applied to
cloud-slicing removes most scenes where the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M480" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
altitude exceeds 33 pptv across 280–180 hPa, based on the synthetic
experiment with GEOS-Chem. The influence of more than a 10-year gap between
the OMI and TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M481" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> datasets on the comparison is challenging to quantify, due to paucity of routine measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M482" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UT. The contribution of changes in lightning activity should be small, as
interannual variability is small (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M483" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), and there is no
discernible trend in the long-term record of satellite observations of
lightning flashes (Schumann and Huntrieser, 2007). According to most climate models, there is an increase in lightning flashes due to global warming (Romps et al., 2014; Finney et al., 2016), though almost all of these models use the same positive relationship between lightning flashes and cloud-top heights first proposed by Price and Rind (1992). The few models that consider lightning flash dependence on upward mass flux predict a decline in lightning flashes (Finney et al., 2014, 2018).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e6419">Comparison of TROPOMI and OMI cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M484" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Points are seasonal means in June 2019 to May 2020 for TROPOMI and January 2005 to
December 2007 for OMI gridded to the same <inline-formula><mml:math id="M485" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M486" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude) grid for FRESCO-S vs. OMI (upper
panel, red) and ROCINN-CAL vs. OMI (lower panel, blue). Values give the
number of points, Pearson's correlation coefficients (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M487" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), RMA regression
coefficients, and, in parentheses, bootstrap resampling slope and intercept
errors.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/2389/2021/amt-14-2389-2021-f08.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e6473">Figure 8 evaluates spatial consistency between TROPOMI and OMI seasonal mean
UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M488" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> on the OMI grid (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M489" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for TROPOMI cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M490" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M491" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid squares with at least 10 cloud-sliced retrievals. TROPOMI is spatially consistent with OMI in all seasons for both products (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M492" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–0.8). The TROPOMI background is 12–25 pptv more than OMI for FRESCO-S and 20–26 pptv more than OMI for ROCINN-CAL, based on the intercepts in Fig. 8. This may be due to the observed increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M493" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with altitude across the sampling pressure ceilings of the two products (280 hPa for OMI, 180 hPa for TROPOMI), but other differences between the products may contribute. The OMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M494" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> product uses cloud information derived from OMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M495" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns. The signal from the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M496" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> dimer declines with altitude, increasing uncertainty in the retrieval with altitude (Veefkind et al., 2016). High-altitude clouds from OMI would have to be higher in altitude than TROPOMI to contribute to the positive offset in TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M497" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 8, based on results from the synthetic test of lowering GEOS-Chem cloud-top heights by 1 km. The direction of the bias in OMI high-altitude cloud-top heights compared to
lidar–radar measurements also does not appear to be systematic (Veefkind et al., 2016). The retrieval approaches of the TROPOMI (DOMINO product) and OMI (NASA Standard Product) slant columns are also distinct. DOMINO-retrieved <inline-formula><mml:math id="M498" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column densities are typically greater than those from NASA (Hains et al., 2010; Dirksen et al., 2011). The regression slopes in Fig. 8 are closest to unity for June–August and March–May for FRESCO-S and September–November for ROCINN-CAL. The weaker variance in December–February in both TROPOMI products compared to OMI could reflect the need to account for seasonality in the stratospheric variance correction but also could be because we derive a stratospheric variance correction for a single site. The discrepancy between OMI and TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M499" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is much greater than in Fig. 8 if no correction factors are applied to TROPOMI (Fig. S5). TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M500" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> background concentrations (intercepts from RMA regression of TROPOMI versus OMI) are 16–35 pptv more than OMI for FRESCO-S and 27–36 pptv more for ROCINN-CAL, and slopes exceed unity in all seasons (1.3–1.7 for FRESCO-S, 1.2–1.5 for ROCINN-CAL).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>6</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e6662">We have developed new products of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M501" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere (UT; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M502" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–12 km) by cloud-slicing partial columns of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M503" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from the space-based TROPOMI instrument. This involves regressing partial <inline-formula><mml:math id="M504" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> columns against cloud-top pressures and converting regression slopes to UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M505" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios.</p>
      <?pagebreak page2402?><p id="d1e6719">We first refined and tested representativeness of cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M506" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
by applying cloud-slicing to synthetic partial columns from the GEOS-Chem
model. Synthetic cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M507" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are spatially consistent (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M508" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.64</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the synthetic truth, but preferentially sampling cloudy scenes
and substantial data loss contribute to a resolution-dependent positive bias
in cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M509" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 11 %–22 %.</p>
      <p id="d1e6767">Before applying cloud-slicing to TROPOMI, we evaluated TROPOMI with Pandora
total columns at high-altitude sites (Mauna Loa, Izaña, Altzomoni) and
Pandora and MAX-DOAS free-tropospheric columns at Izaña. We identified
discrepancies between TROPOMI and ground-based <inline-formula><mml:math id="M510" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements that
include a 13 % underestimate in TROPOMI stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M511" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> variance and 50 % overestimate in TROPOMI tropospheric columns that would lead to an overestimate in cloud-sliced UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M512" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e6803">We retrieved UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M513" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from TROPOMI by applying the refined cloud-slicing algorithm to corrected TROPOMI partial columns above optically thick clouds with cloud-top heights at 450–180 hPa using two alternate cloud products, FRESCO-S and ROCINN-CAL. ROCINN-CAL UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M514" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has more extensive coverage (0–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M515" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N/S) than FRESCO-S (0–45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M516" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N/S) due to its greater abundance of optically thick clouds. Coincident UT
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M517" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values from the two products exhibit similar spatial distribution, but
background UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M518" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from ROCINN-CAL is 4–9 pptv more than FRESCO-S. This is due to greater contamination from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M519" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> below clouds in ROCINN-CAL but also steeper cloud-slicing regression slopes for ROCINN-CAL, as cloud-top heights between the two products deviate with increasing cloud-top pressure. Ongoing validation studies are needed to resolve these
differences.</p>
      <p id="d1e6881">Both products are spatially correlated with the existing coarse resolution
(5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M520" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M521" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8<inline-formula><mml:math id="M522" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude) Ozone Monitoring
Instrument (OMI) product, except that TROPOMI is 16–36 pptv more than OMI, which we reason is due to the widely documented increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M523" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with
altitude from the OMI pressure ceiling (280 hPa) to that for TROPOMI (180 hPa) and differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M524" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column density retrievals.</p>
      <p id="d1e6931">TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M525" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> products presented here have the potential to provide
routine, extensive, and consistent measurements of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M526" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the UT and, as TROPOMI observations accumulate, aid in characterizing interannual and long-term variability in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M527" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the undersampled UT.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6971">Python code used to process TROPOMI data is available at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4058442" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4058442</ext-link> (Marais and Roberts, 2020).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6980">Data can be requested from Eloise A. Marais for TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M528" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Sungyeon Choi for OMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M529" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Monica Navarro-Comas for MAX-DOAS slant columns, and Robert G. Ryan for MAX-DOAS vertical columns.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e7005">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2389-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2389-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <?pagebreak page2403?><p id="d1e7014">EAM led the analysis and writing, simulated GEOS-Chem, and cloud-sliced
TROPOMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M530" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and GEOS-Chem. JFR refined and documented the Python
processing code. RGR retrieved MAX-DOAS vertical tropospheric columns. HE
and FKB provided guidance on best use and evaluation of TROPOMI <inline-formula><mml:math id="M531" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. SC and JJ retrieved OMI UT <inline-formula><mml:math id="M532" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and provided guidance on cloud-slicing. NA and AR are Pandora site PIs, and AC is PI of PGN. MNC maintains the RASAS-II
instrument and retrieved the MAX-DOAS slant columns at Izaña. LG
conducted MAX-DOAS geospatial sampling sensitivity tests for Izaña.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e7053">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e7059">The authors are grateful to Piet Stammes and colleagues for retrieval of the
FRESCO-S cloud product and Diego Loyola and colleagues for retrieval of the
OCRA and ROCINN-CAL cloud product. The PGN is a bilateral project supported
with funding from NASA and ESA. The Pandora measurements in Altzomoni were possible thanks to technical assistance from Alejandro Bezanilla.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e7064">This research has been supported by the European Research Council under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (through the Starting Grant awarded to Eloise A. Marais, UpTrop (grant no. 851854)). The Pandora measurements in Altzomoni were possible thanks to financial support of Conacyt-AEM (grant no. 275239). Robert G. Ryan has received financial support from the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes and the Albert Shimmins Memorial Fund through the University of Melbourne.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e7071">This paper was edited by Gerrit Kuhlmann and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Allen, D., Pickering, K., Duncan, B., and Damon, M.: Impact of lightning NO
emissions on North American photochemistry as determined using the Global
Modeling Initiative (GMI) model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, 1–24,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014062" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jd014062</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Amedro, D., Bunkan, A. J. C., Berasategui, M., and Crowley, J. N.: Kinetics of the OH + NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M533" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction: rate coefficients (217–333 K, 16–1200 mbar) and fall-off parameters for N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M534" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M535" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> bath gases, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10643–10657, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10643-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-10643-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Argyrouli, A., Sneep, M., and Lambert, J.-C.: S5P Mission Performance Centre
CLOUD [L2_CLOUD] Readme, available at:
<uri>https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/3541451/Sentinel-5P-Cloud-Level-2-Product-Readme-File</uri>
(last accessed: 20 January 2020), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Baumgardner, D., Grutter, M., Allan, J., Ochoa, C., Rappenglueck, B., Russell, L. M., and Arnott, P.: Physical and chemical properties of the regional mixed layer of Mexico's Megapolis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5711–5727, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5711-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5711-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Beirle, S., Koshak, W., Blakeslee, R., and Wagner, T.: Global patterns of lightning properties derived by OTD and LIS, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2715–2726, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2715-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-14-2715-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Belmonte Rivas, M., Veefkind, P., Eskes, H., and Levelt, P.: OMI tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M536" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles from cloud slicing: constraints on surface emissions, convective transport and lightning NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M537" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13519–13553, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13519-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-13519-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bertram, T. H., Perring, A. E., Wooldridge, P. J., Crounse, J. D., Kwan, A.
J., Wennberg, P. O., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., Avery, M., Sachse, G., Vay, S.
A., Crawford, J. H., McNaughton, C. S., Clarke, A., Pickering, K. E.,
Fuelberg, H., Huey, G., Blake, D. R., Singh, H. B., Hall, S. R., Shetter, R.
E., Fried, A., Heikes, B. G., and Cohen, R. C.: Direct measurements of the
convective recycling of the upper troposphere, Science, 315, 816–820,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134548" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1134548</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., and Brinksma, E. J.: Error analysis for
tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M538" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval from space, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109,
1–26, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003962" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003jd003962</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Dirksen, R. J., van der A, R. J., Veefkind, J. P., Stammes, P., Huijnen, V., Kleipool, Q. L., Sneep, M., Claas, J., Leitão, J., Richter, A., Zhou, Y., and Brunner, D.: An improved tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M539" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> column retrieval algorithm for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1905–1928, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bottenheim, J. W., Gallant, A. G., and Brice, K. A.: Measurements of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M540" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> species and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M541" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at 82<inline-formula><mml:math id="M542" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>N latitude, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 13, 113–116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL013i002p00113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/GL013i002p00113</ext-link>, 1986.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bradshaw, J., Davis, D., Grodzinsky, G., Smyth, S., Newell, R., Sandholm,
S., and Liu, S.: Observed distributions of nitrogen oxides in the remote
free troposphere from the NASA global tropospheric experiment programs, Rev.
Geophys., 38, 61–116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999rg900015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999rg900015</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bravo, A. H., Sosa, E. R., Sánchez, A. P., Jaimes, P. M., and Saavedra,
R. M. I.: Impact of wildfires on the air quality of Mexico City, 1992–1999,
Environ. Pollut., 117, 243–253, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00277-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00277-9</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brogniez, C., Bazureau, A., Lenoble, J., and Chu, W. P.: Stratospheric
Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) III measurements: A study on the retrieval
of ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and aerosol extinction coefficients, J. Geophys.
Res., 107, 1–21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001576" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001jd001576</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brohede, S. M., Haley, C. S., McLinden, C. A., Sioris, C. E., Murtagh, D.
P., Petelina, S. V., Llewellyn, E. J., Bazureau, A., Goutail, F., Randall,
C. E., Lumpe, J. D., Taha, G., Thomasson, L. W., and Gordley, L. L.:
Validation of Odin/OSIRIS stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M543" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, 1–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007586" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007586</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2404?><ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Browne, E. C., Perring, A. E., Wooldridge, P. J., Apel, E., Hall, S. R., Huey, L. G., Mao, J., Spencer, K. M., Clair, J. M. St., Weinheimer, A. J., Wisthaler, A., and Cohen, R. C.: Global and regional effects of the photochemistry of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M544" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M545" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M546" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: evidence from ARCTAS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4209–4219, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4209-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-4209-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bucsela, E. J., Krotkov, N. A., Celarier, E. A., Lamsal, L. N., Swartz, W.
H., Bhartia, P. K., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P., Gleason, J. F., and
Pickering, K. E.: A new stratospheric and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M547" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; retrieval
algorithm for nadir-viewing satellite instruments: applications to OMI,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2607-2626, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cecil, D. J., Buechler, D. E., and Blakeslee, R. J.: Gridded lightning
climatology from TRMM-LIS and OTD: Dataset description, Atmos. Res., 135,
404–414, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.028" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.028</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cede, A., Tiefengraber, M., Gebetsberger, M., and Kreuter, A.: Fiducial
reference measurements for air quality: TN on PGN products “correct use”
guidelines, version 1, LuftBlick, Innsbruck, Austria, available at: <uri>https://www.pandonia-global-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/LuftBlick_FRM4AQ_PGNUserGuidelines_RP_2019009_v1.pdf</uri> (last access: 4 February 2020), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chang, W. L., Bhave, P. V., Brown, S. S., Riemer, N., Stutz, J., and Dabdub,
D.: Heterogeneous atmospheric chemistry, ambient measurements, and model
calculations of N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M548" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M549" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: A review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 665–695,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.551672" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.551672</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Choi, S., Joiner, J., Choi, Y., Duncan, B. N., Vasilkov, A., Krotkov, N., and Bucsela, E.: First estimates of global free-tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M550" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> abundances derived using a cloud-slicing technique applied to satellite observations from the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10565–10588, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10565-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10565-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Compernolle, S., Argyrouli, A., Lutz, R., Sneep, M., Lambert, J.-C., Fjæraa, A. M., Hubert, D., Keppens, A., Loyola, D., O'Connor, E., Romahn, F., Stammes, P., Verhoelst, T., and Wang, P.: Validation of the Sentinel-5 Precursor TROPOMI cloud data with Cloudnet, Aura OMI O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M551" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M552" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, MODIS and Suomi-NPP VIIRS, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2020-122</ext-link>, in review, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crawford, J., Davis, D., Olson, J., Chen, G., Liu, S., Fuelberg, H., Hannan,
J., Kondo, Y., Anderson, B., Gregory, G., Sachse, G., Talbot, R., Viggiano,
A., Heikes, B., Snow, J., Singh, H., and Blake, D.: Evolution and chemical
consequences of lightning-produced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M553" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observed in the North Atlantic
upper troposphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 19795–19809,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900183" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900183</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crutzen, P. J.: The influence of nitrogen oxides on the atmospheric ozone
content, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 96, 320–325,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709640815" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.49709640815</ext-link>, 1970.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dahlmann, K., Grewe, V., Ponater, M., and Matthes, S.: Quantifying the
contributions of individual NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M554" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources to the trend in ozone radiative
forcing, Atmos. Environ., 45, 2860–2868, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.071" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.071</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dirksen, R. J., Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Ionov, D. V., Bucsela, E. J.,
Levelt, P. F., and Kelder, H. M.: Evaluation of stratospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M555" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrieved from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: Intercomparison, diurnal
cycle, and trending, J. Geophys. Res., 116, 1–22, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014943" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jd014943</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dubé, K., Bourassa, A., Zawada, D., Degenstein, D., Damadeo, R., Flittner, D., and Randel, W.: Accounting for the photochemical variation in stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M556" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the SAGE III/ISS solar occultation retrieval, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 557–566, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-557-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-557-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ehhalt, D. H., Rohrer, F., and Wahner, A.: Sources and distribution of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M557" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere at northern midlatitudes, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 97, 3725–3738, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD03081" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91JD03081</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Finney, D. L., Doherty, R. M., Wild, O., Huntrieser, H., Pumphrey, H. C., and Blyth, A. M.: Using cloud ice flux to parametrise large-scale lightning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12665–12682, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12665-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-12665-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Finney, D. L., Doherty, R. M., Wild, O., Young, P. J., and Butler, A.:
Response of lightning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M558" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and ozone production to climate
change: Insights from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model
Intercomparison Project, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 5492–5500,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl068825" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016gl068825</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Finney, D. L., Doherty, R. M., Wild, O., Stevenson, D. S., MacKenzie, I. A.,
and Blyth, A. M.: A projected decrease in lightning under climate change,
Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 210–213, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0072-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41558-018-0072-6</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Frieß, U., Monks, P. S., Remedios, J. J., Rozanov, A., Sinreich, R.,
Wagner, T., and Platt, U.: MAX-DOAS O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M559" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements: A new technique to
derive information on atmospheric aerosols: 2. Modeling studies, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 111, 1–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006618" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006618</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gil, M., Yela, M., Gunn, L. N., Richter, A., Alonso, I., Chipperfield, M. P., Cuevas, E., Iglesias, J., Navarro, M., Puentedura, O., and Rodríguez, S.: NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M560" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> climatology in the northern subtropical region: diurnal, seasonal and interannual variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1635–1648, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1635-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-1635-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gil-Ojeda, M., Navarro-Comas, M., Gómez-Martín, L., Adame, J. A., Saiz-Lopez, A., Cuevas, C. A., González, Y., Puentedura, O., Cuevas, E., Lamarque, J.-F., Kinninson, D., and Tilmes, S.: NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M561" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seasonal evolution in the north subtropical free troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10567–10579, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10567-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-10567-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gomez, L., Navarro-Comas, M., Puentedura, O., Gonzalez, Y., Cuevas, E., and Gil-Ojeda, M.: Long-path averaged mixing ratios of O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M562" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M563" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the free troposphere from mountain MAX-DOAS, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3373–3386, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3373-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-3373-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gruzdev, A. N. and Elokhov, A. S.: Variability of stratospheric and
tropospheric nitrogen dioxide observed by the visible spectrophotometer at
Zvenigorod, Russia, Int. J. Remote Sens., 32, 3115–3127,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.541524" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/01431161.2010.541524</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hains, J. C., Boersma, K. F., Kroon, M., Dirksen, R. J., Cohen, R. C.,
Perring, A. E., Bucsela, E., Volten, H., Swart, D. P. J., Richter, A.,
Wittrock, F., Schoenhardt, A., Wagner, T., Ibrahim, O. W., van Roozendael,
M., Pinardi, G., Gleason, J. F., Veefkind, J. P., and Levelt, P.: Testing
and improving OMI DOMINO tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M564" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using observations from the
DANDELIONS and INTEX-B validation campaigns, J. Geophys. Res.,
115, 1–20, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012399" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd012399</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Henderson, B. H., Pinder, R. W., Crooks, J., Cohen, R. C., Hutzell, W. T., Sarwar, G., Goliff, W. S., Stockwell, W. R., Fahr, A., Mathur, R., Carlton, A. G., and Vizuete, W.: Evaluation of simulated photochemical partitioning of oxidized nitroge<?pagebreak page2405?>n in the upper troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 275–291, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-275-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-275-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Henderson, B. H., Pinder, R. W., Crooks, J., Cohen, R. C., Carlton, A. G., Pye, H. O. T., and Vizuete, W.: Combining Bayesian methods and aircraft observations to constrain the HO. + NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M565" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reaction rate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 653–667, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-653-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-653-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Herman, J., Cede, A., Spinei, E., Mount, G., Tzortziou, M., and Abuhassan,
N.: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M566" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> column amounts from ground-based Pandora and MFDOAS
spectrometers using the direct-sun DOAS technique: Intercomparisons and
application to OMI validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 1–20,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011848" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd011848</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Holmes, C. D., Bertram, T. H., Confer, K. L., Graham, K. A., Ronan, A. C.,
Wirks, C. K., and Shah, V.: The role of clouds in the tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M567" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
cycle: A new modeling approach for cloud chemistry and its global
implications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 4980–4990, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL081990" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL081990</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hönninger, G., von Friedeburg, C., and Platt, U.: Multi axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 231–254, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-231-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-231-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ialongo, I., Virta, H., Eskes, H., Hovila, J., and Douros, J.: Comparison of TROPOMI/Sentinel-5 Precursor NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M568" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations with ground-based measurements in Helsinki, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 205–218, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-205-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-205-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jaeglé, L., Jacob, D. J., Wang, Y., Weinheimer, A. J., Ridley, B. A.,
Campos, T. L., Sachse, G. W., and Hagen, D. E.: Sources and chemistry of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M569" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere over the United States, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 25, 1705–1708, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97gl03591" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97gl03591</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jiang, Z., McDonald, B. C., Worden, H., Worden, J. R., Miyazaki, K., Qu, Z.,
Henze, D. K., Jones, D. B. A., Arellano, A. F., Fischer, E. V., Zhu, L., and
Boersma, K. F.: Unexpected slowdown of US pollutant emission reduction in
the past decade, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 5099, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801191115" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1801191115</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Joiner, J., Vasilkov, A. P., Gupta, P., Bhartia, P. K., Veefkind, P., Sneep, M., de Haan, J., Polonsky, I., and Spurr, R.: Fast simulators for satellite cloud optical centroid pressure retrievals; evaluation of OMI cloud retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 529–545, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-529-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-529-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jones, A., Walker, K. A., Jin, J. J., Taylor, J. R., Boone, C. D., Bernath, P. F., Brohede, S., Manney, G. L., McLeod, S., Hughes, R., and Daffer, W. H.: Technical Note: A trace gas climatology derived from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) data set, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5207–5220, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5207-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5207-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kablick III, G. P., Allen, D. R., Fromm, M. D., and Nedoluha, G. E.:
Australian PyroCb smoke generates synoptic-scale stratospheric anticyclones,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, 1–9, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL088101</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lamarque, J. F., Brasseur, G. P., Hess, P. G., and Müller, J. F.:
Three-dimensional study of the relative contributions of the different
nitrogen sources in the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101,
22955–22968, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02160" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD02160</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lambert, J.-C., Keppens, A., Hubert, D., Langerock, B., Eichmann, K.-U.,
Kleipool, Q., Sneep, M., Verhoelst, T., Wagner, T., Weber, M., Ahn, C.,
Argyrouli, A., Balis, D., Chan, K. L., Compernolle, S., Smedt, I. D., Eskes, H.,
Fjæraa, A. M., Garane, K., Gleason, J. F., Goutail, F., Granville, J.,
Hedelt, P., Heue, K.-P., Jaross, G., Koukouli, M., Landgraf, J., Lutz, R.,
Niemejer, S., Pazmiño, A., Pinardi, G., Pommereau, J.-P., Richter, A.,
Rozemeijer, N., Sha, M. K., Zweers, D. S., Theys, N., Tilstra, G., Torres,
O., Valks, P., Vigouroux, C., and Wang, P.: S5P Mission Performance Centre
Routine Operations Consolidated Validation Report series, Issue 2,
Version 02.0.2, available at: <uri>http://www.tropomi.eu/sites/default/files/files/publicS5P-MPC-IASB-ROCVR-02.0.2-20190411_FINAL.pdf</uri> (last access: 3 February 2020), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laughner, J. L., Zhu, Q., and Cohen, R. C.: The Berkeley High Resolution Tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M570" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> product, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 2069–2095, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2069-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-10-2069-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Levelt, P. F., Joiner, J., Tamminen, J., Veefkind, J. P., Bhartia, P. K., Stein Zweers, D. C., Duncan, B. N., Streets, D. G., Eskes, H., van der A, R., McLinden, C., Fioletov, V., Carn, S., de Laat, J., DeLand, M., Marchenko, S., McPeters, R., Ziemke, J., Fu, D., Liu, X., Pickering, K., Apituley, A., González Abad, G., Arola, A., Boersma, F., Chan Miller, C., Chance, K., de Graaf, M., Hakkarainen, J., Hassinen, S., Ialongo, I., Kleipool, Q., Krotkov, N., Li, C., Lamsal, L., Newman, P., Nowlan, C., Suleiman, R., Tilstra, L. G., Torres, O., Wang, H., and Wargan, K.: The Ozone Monitoring Instrument: overview of 14 years in space, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5699–5745, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5699-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-5699-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Loyola, D. G., Thomas, W., Livschitz, Y., Ruppert, T., Albert, P., and
Hollmann, R.: Cloud properties derived from GOME/ERS-2 backscatter data for
trace gas retrieval, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 45, 2747–2758,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.901043" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2007.901043</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Loyola, D. G., Gimeno García, S., Lutz, R., Argyrouli, A., Romahn, F., Spurr, R. J. D., Pedergnana, M., Doicu, A., Molina García, V., and Schüssler, O.: The operational cloud retrieval algorithms from TROPOMI on board Sentinel-5 Precursor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 409–427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-409-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-409-2018</ext-link>, 2018a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Loyola, D. G., Lutz, R., Argyrouli, A., and Spurr, R.: S5P/TROPOMI ATBD
Cloud Products, available at: <uri>https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/2476257/Sentinel-5P-TROPOMI-ATBD-Clouds</uri>
(last access: 20 January 2020), 2018b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marais, E. A. and Roberts, J. F.: eamarais/erc-uptrop: tropomi-ut-no2-1.1.0, Version 1.1.0, Zenodo, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4058442" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.4058442</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Marais, E. A., Jacob, D. J., Choi, S., Joiner, J., Belmonte-Rivas, M., Cohen, R. C., Beirle, S., Murray, L. T., Schiferl, L. D., Shah, V., and Jaeglé, L.: Nitrogen oxides in the global upper troposphere: interpreting cloud-sliced NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M571" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations from the OMI satellite instrument, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17017–17027, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17017-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17017-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mickley, L. J., Murti, P. P., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Koch, D. M., and
Rind, D.: Radiative forcing from tropospheric ozone calculated with a
unified chemistry-climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 30153–30172,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900439" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900439</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murray, L. T., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Hudman, R. C., and Koshak, W. J.:
Optimized regional and interannual variability o<?pagebreak page2406?>f lightning in a global
chemical transport model constrained by LIS/OTD satellite data, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 117, D20307, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017934" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2012jd017934</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murray, L. T., Logan, J. A., and Jacob, D. J.: Interannual variability in
tropical tropospheric ozone and OH: The role of lightning, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 11468–11480, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50857" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50857</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nault, B. A., Garland, C., Wooldridge, P. J., Brune, W. H., Campuzano-Jost,
P., Crounse, J. D., Day, D. A., Dibb, J., Hall, S. R., Huey, L. G., Jimenez,
J. L., Liu, X. X., Mao, J. Q., Mikoviny, T., Peischl, J., Pollack, I. B.,
Ren, X. R., Ryerson, T. B., Scheuer, E., Ullmann, K., Wennberg, P. O.,
Wisthaler, A., Zhang, L., and Cohen, R. C.: Observational constraints on the
oxidation of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M572" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere, J. Phys. Chem. A, 120,
1468–1478, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07824" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07824</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Newchurch, M. J., Allen, M., Gunson, M. R., Salawitch, R. J., Collins, G.
B., Huston, K. H., Abbas, M. M., Abrams, M. C., Chang, A. Y., Fahey, D. W.,
Gao, R. S., Irion, F. W., Loewenstein, M., Manney, G. L., Michelsen, H. A.,
Podolske, J. R., Rinsland, C. P., and Zander, R.: Stratospheric NO and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M573" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> abundances from ATMOS solar-occultation measurements, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 23, 2373–2376, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL01196" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96GL01196</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>OPeNDAP: Open-source Project for a Network Data Access Protocol, available at: <uri>https://ghrc.nsstc.nasa.gov/opendap/lis/climatology/LIS-OTD/HRMC/data/nc/contents.html</uri>, last access: 31 December 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ott, L. E., Pickering, K. E., Stenchikov, G. L., Allen, D. J., DeCaria, A.
J., Ridley, B., Lin, R. F., Lang, S., and Tao, W. K.: Production of
lightning <inline-formula><mml:math id="M574" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its vertical distribution calculated from
three-dimensional cloud-scale chemical transport model simulations, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, 1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011880" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd011880</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pavelin, E. G., Johnson, C. E., Rughooputh, S., and Toumi, R.: Evaluation of
pre-industrial surface ozone measurements made using Schönbein's method,
Atmos. Environ., 33, 919–929, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00257-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00257-X</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>PGN (Pandonia Global Network): Pandonia data archive, available at:
<uri>http://data.pandonia-global-network.org/</uri>, last access: 1 June 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pinardi, G., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F., Theys, N., Abuhassan, N., Bais, A., Boersma, F., Cede, A., Chong, J., Donner, S., Drosoglou, T., Dzhola, A., Eskes, H., Frieß, U., Granville, J., Herman, J. R., Holla, R., Hovila, J., Irie, H., Kanaya, Y., Karagkiozidis, D., Kouremeti, N., Lambert, J.-C., Ma, J., Peters, E., Piters, A., Postylyakov, O., Richter, A., Remmers, J., Takashima, H., Tiefengraber, M., Valks, P., Vlemmix, T., Wagner, T., and Wittrock, F.: Validation of tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M575" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> column measurements of GOME-2A and OMI using MAX-DOAS and direct sun network observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6141–6174, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6141-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-6141-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pour-Biazar, A., McNider, R. T., Roselle, S. J., Suggs, R., Jedlovec, G.,
Byun, D. W., Kim, S., Lin, C. J., Ho, T. C., Haines, S., Dornblaser, B., and
Cameron, R.: Correcting photolysis rates on the basis of satellite observed
clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, 1–17, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007422" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007422</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Price, C. and Rind, D.: A simple lightning parameterization for calculating
global lightning distributions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97, 9919–9933,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD00719" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/92JD00719</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Puentedura, O., Gil, M., Saiz-Lopez, A., Hay, T., Navarro-Comas, M., Gómez-Pelaez, A., Cuevas, E., Iglesias, J., and Gomez, L.: Iodine monoxide in the north subtropical free troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4909–4921, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4909-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-4909-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Randall, C. E., Rusch, D. W., Bevilacqua, R. M., Hoppel, K. W., and Lumpe,
J. D.: Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM) II stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M576" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
1993–1996, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 28361–28371,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98jd02092" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98jd02092</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Reed, C., Evans, M. J., Di Carlo, P., Lee, J. D., and Carpenter, L. J.: Interferences in photolytic NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M577" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements: explanation for an apparent missing oxidant?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4707–4724, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4707-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4707-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ridley, B., Ott, L., Pickering, K., Emmons, L., Montzka, D., Weinheimer, A.,
Knapp, D., Grahek, F., Li, L., Heymsfield, G., McGill, M., Kucera, P.,
Mahoney, M. J., Baumgardner, D., Schultz, M., and Brasseur, G.: Florida
thunderstorms: A faucet of reactive nitrogen to the upper troposphere, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, 1–19, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004769" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004769</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rivera, C., Stremme, W., and Grutter, M.: Nitrogen dioxide DOAS measurements
from ground and space: Comparison of zenith scattered sunlight ground-based
measurements and OMI data in Central Mexico, Atmósfera, 26, 401–414,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-6236(13)71085-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0187-6236(13)71085-3</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Robles-Gonzalez, C., Navarro-Comas, M., Puentedura, O., Schneider, M., Hase, F., Garcia, O., Blumenstock, T., and Gil-Ojeda, M.: Intercomparison of stratospheric nitrogen dioxide columns retrieved from ground-based DOAS and FTIR and satellite DOAS instruments over the subtropical Izana station, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4471–4485, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4471-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-4471-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice, Series on Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Vol. 2, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Romps, D. M., Seeley, J. T., Vollaro, D., and Molinari, J.: Projected
increase in lightning strikes in the United States due to global warming,
Science, 346, 851–854, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259100" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1259100</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>S5P (Sentinel-5P Pre-Operations) Data Hub: availale at:
<uri>https://s5phub.copernicus.eu/dhus/</uri>, last access: 15 June 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schenkeveld, V. M. E., Jaross, G., Marchenko, S., Haffner, D., Kleipool, Q. L., Rozemeijer, N. C., Veefkind, J. P., and Levelt, P. F.: In-flight performance of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1957–1986, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1957-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-1957-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schreier, S. F., Richter, A., Wittrock, F., and Burrows, J. P.: Estimates of free-tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M578" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and HCHO mixing ratios derived from high-altitude mountain MAX-DOAS observations at midlatitudes and in the tropics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2803–2817, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2803-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-2803-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schumann, U.: The impact of nitrogen oxides emissions from aircraft upon the
atmosphere at flight altitudes – results from the AERONOX project, Atmos.
Environ., 31, 1723–1733, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00326-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00326-3</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schumann, U. and Huntrieser, H.: The global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3823–3907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Silvern, R. F., Jacob, D. J., Travis, K. R., Sherwen, T., Evans, M. J.,
Cohen, R. C., Laughner, J. L., Hall, S. R., Ullmann, K., Crounse, J. D.,
Wennberg, P. O., Peischl, J., and Pollack, I. B.: Observed NO/<inline-formula><mml:math id="M579" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratios in the upper troposphere imply errors in NO-<inline-formula><mml:math id="M580" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M581" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cycling
kinetics or an unaccounted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M582" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO<?pagebreak page2407?></mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> reservoir, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45,
4466–4474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077728" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2018GL077728</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Silvern, R. F., Jacob, D. J., Mickley, L. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Travis, K. R., Marais, E. A., Cohen, R. C., Laughner, J. L., Choi, S., Joiner, J., and Lamsal, L. N.: Using satellite observations of tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M583" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns to infer long-term trends in US NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M584" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions: the importance of accounting for the free tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M585" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> background, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8863–8878, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8863-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-8863-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sioris, C. E., Kurosu, T. P., Martin, R. V., and Chance, K.: Stratospheric
and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M586" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> observed by SCIAMACHY: First results, Adv. Spac
Res., 34, 780–785, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.08.066" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2003.08.066</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stammes, P., Sneep, M., de Haan, J. F., Veefkind, J. P., Wang, P., and
Levelt, P. F.: Effective cloud fractions from the Ozone Monitoring
Instrument: Theoretical framework and validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
113, 1–12, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008820" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008820</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Boersma, K. F., van der A, R. J., Kurokawa, J., Ohara, T., and Zhang, Q.: Key chemical NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M587" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sink uncertainties and how they influence top-down emissions of nitrogen oxides, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9057–9082, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9057-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-9057-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stettler, M. E. J., Eastham, S., and Barrett, S. R. H.: Air quality and
public health impacts of UK airports. Part I: Emissions, Atmos. Environ.,
45, 5415–5424, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.012</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stratmann, G., Ziereis, H., Stock, P., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Zahn, A.,
Rauthe-Schoch, A., Velthoven, P. V., Schlager, H., and Volz-Thomas, A.: NO
and NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M588" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the upper troposphere: Nine years of CARIBIC measurements
onboard a passenger aircraft, Atmos. Environ., 133, 93–111,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.035</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>The International GEOS-Chem User Community: GEOS-Chem Version 12.1.0, Zenodo,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1553349" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.1553349</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thomas, K., Berg, M., Boulanger, D., Houben, N., Gressent, A., Nedelec, P.,
Patz, H. W., Thouret, V., and Volz-Thomas, A.: Climatology of NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M589" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
the troposphere and UT/LS from measurements made in MOZAIC, Tellus B, 67,
1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v67.28793" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v67.28793</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Toledano, C., González, R., Fuertes, D., Cuevas, E., Eck, T. F., Kazadzis, S., Kouremeti, N., Gröbner, J., Goloub, P., Blarel, L., Román, R., Barreto, Á., Berjón, A., Holben, B. N., and Cachorro, V. E.: Assessment of Sun photometer Langley calibration at the high-elevation sites Mauna Loa and Izaña, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14555–14567, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14555-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-14555-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Torres, O., Bhartia, P. K., Jethva, H., and Ahn, C.: Impact of the ozone monitoring instrument row anomaly on the long-term record of aerosol products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2701–2715, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2701-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-2701-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tost, H., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Lightning and convection parameterisations – uncertainties in global modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4553–4568, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4553-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-4553-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Travis, K. R., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Kim, P. S., Marais, E. A., Zhu, L., Yu, K., Miller, C. C., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., Thompson, A. M., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Cohen, R. C., Laughner, J. L., Dibb, J. E., Hall, S. R., Ullmann, K., Wolfe, G. M., Pollack, I. B., Peischl, J., Neuman, J. A., and Zhou, X.: Why do models overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13561–13577, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van der A, R. J., de Laat, A. T. J., Ding, J., and Eskes, H. J.: Connecting
the dots: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M590" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions along a West Siberian natural gas pipeline, NPJ
Clim. Atmos. Sci., 3, 16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-0119-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-020-0119-z</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van Geffen, J., Eskes, H. J., Boersma, K. F., Maasakkers, J. D., and
Veefkind, J. P.: TROPOMI ATBD of the total and tropospheric <inline-formula><mml:math id="M591" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> data
products, available at:
<uri>https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/2476257/Sentinel-5P-TROPOMI-ATBD-NO2-data-products</uri>
(last access: 20 January 2020), 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>van Geffen, J., Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H., Sneep, M., ter Linden, M., Zara, M., and Veefkind, J. P.: S5P TROPOMI NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M592" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> slant column retrieval: method, stability, uncertainties and comparisons with OMI, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1315–1335, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1315-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-1315-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Veefkind, J. P., de Haan, J. F., Sneep, M., and Levelt, P. F.: Improvements to the OMI O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M593" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M594" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> operational cloud algorithm and comparisons with ground-based radar–lidar observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 6035–6049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6035-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-6035-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Verhoelst, T., Compernolle, S., Pinardi, G., Lambert, J.-C., Eskes, H. J., Eichmann, K.-U., Fjæraa, A. M., Granville, J., Niemeijer, S., Cede, A., Tiefengraber, M., Hendrick, F., Pazmiño, A., Bais, A., Bazureau, A., Boersma, K. F., Bognar, K., Dehn, A., Donner, S., Elokhov, A., Gebetsberger, M., Goutail, F., Grutter de la Mora, M., Gruzdev, A., Gratsea, M., Hansen, G. H., Irie, H., Jepsen, N., Kanaya, Y., Karagkiozidis, D., Kivi, R., Kreher, K., Levelt, P. F., Liu, C., Müller, M., Navarro Comas, M., Piters, A. J. M., Pommereau, J.-P., Portafaix, T., Prados-Roman, C., Puentedura, O., Querel, R., Remmers, J., Richter, A., Rimmer, J., Rivera Cárdenas, C., Saavedra de Miguel, L., Sinyakov, V. P., Stremme, W., Strong, K., Van Roozendael, M., Veefkind, J. P., Wagner, T., Wittrock, F., Yela González, M., and Zehner, C.: Ground-based validation of the Copernicus Sentinel-5P TROPOMI NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M595" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements with the NDACC ZSL-DOAS, MAX-DOAS and Pandonia global networks, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 481–510, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-481-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-481-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Verlinden, K. L., Thompson, D. W. J., and Stephens, G. L.: The
three-dimensional distribution of clouds over the southern hemisphere high
latitudes, J. Climate, 24, 5799–5811, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI3922.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2011JCLI3922.1</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, P., Stammes, P., van der A, R., Pinardi, G., and van Roozendael, M.: FRESCO+: an improved O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M596" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band cloud retrieval algorithm for tropospheric trace gas retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6565–6576, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6565-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-6565-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2408?><ref id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, P., Piters, A., van Geffen, J., Tuinder, O., Stammes, P., and Kinne, S.: Shipborne MAX-DOAS measurements for validation of TROPOMI NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M597" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1413–1426, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1413-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-1413-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Liu, L., Cheng, M., and Xu, J.: Spatial and seasonal
patterns of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in North China, Atmos. Ocean.
Sci. Lett., 13, 188–194, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2019.1701385" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/16742834.2019.1701385</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wendisch, M., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., Machado, L. A. T., Albrecht,
R., Schlager, H., Rosenfeld, D., Martin, S. T., Abdelmonem, A., Afchine, A.,
Araùjo, A. C., Artaxo, P., Aufmhoff, H., Barbosa, H. M. J., Borrmann,
S., Braga, R., Buchholz, B., Cecchini, M. A., Costa, A., Curtius, J.,
Dollner, M., Dorf, M., Dreiling, V., Ebert, V., Ehrlich, A., Ewald, F.,
Fisch, G., Fix, A., Frank, F., Fütterer, D., Heckl, C., Heidelberg, F.,
Hüneke, T., Jäkel, E., Järvinen, E., Jurkat, T., Kanter, S.,
Kästner, U., Kenntner, M., Kesselmeier, J., Klimach, T., Knecht, M.,
Kohl, R., Kölling, T., Krämer, M., Krüger, M., Krisna, T. C.,
Lavric, J. V., Longo, K., Mahnke, C., Manzi, A. O., Mayer, B., Mertes, S.,
Minikin, A., Molleker, S., Münch, S., Nillius, B., Pfeilsticker, K.,
Pöhlker, C., Roiger, A., Rose, D., Rosenow, D., Sauer, D., Schnaiter,
M., Schneider, J., Schulz, C., de Souza, R. A. F., Spanu, A., Stock, P.,
Vila, D., Voigt, C., Walser, A., Walter, D., Weigel, R., Weinzierl, B.,
Werner, F., Yamasoe, M. A., Ziereis, H., Zinner, T., and Zöger, M.:
ACRIDICON-CHUVA campaign: Studying tropical deep convective clouds and
precipitation over Amazonia using the new German research aircraft HALO,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 1885–1908, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00255.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00255.1</ext-link>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Williams, J. E., Boersma, K. F., Le Sager, P., and Verstraeten, W. W.: The high-resolution version of TM5-MP for optimized satellite retrievals: description and validation, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 721–750, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-721-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-10-721-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Worden, H. M., Bowman, K. W., Kulawik, S. S., and Aghedo, A. M.: Sensitivity
of outgoing longwave radiative flux to the global vertical distribution of
ozone characterized by instantaneous radiative kernels from Aura-TES, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, 1–15, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010jd015101</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhao, B., Wang, S. X., Liu, H., Xu, J. Y., Fu, K., Klimont, Z., Hao, J. M., He, K. B., Cofala, J., and Amann, M.: NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M598" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in China: historical trends and future perspectives, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9869–9897, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9869-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-9869-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ziemke, J. R., Chandra, S., and Bhartia, P. K.: “Cloud slicing”: A new
technique to derive upper tropospheric ozone from satellite measurements, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 9853–9867, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900768" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000jd900768</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>New observations of NO<sub>2</sub> in the upper troposphere from TROPOMI</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Nitrogen oxides (NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> ≡ NO + NO<sub>2</sub>) in
the NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>-limited upper troposphere (UT) are long-lived and so have a
large influence on the oxidizing capacity of the troposphere and formation
of the greenhouse gas ozone. Models misrepresent NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> in the UT, and observations to address deficiencies in models are sparse. Here we obtain a year of near-global seasonal mean mixing ratios of NO<sub>2</sub> in the UT (450–180&thinsp;hPa) at 1° × 1° by applying
cloud-slicing to partial columns of NO<sub>2</sub> from TROPOMI. This follows
refinement of the cloud-slicing algorithm with synthetic partial columns
from the GEOS-Chem chemical transport model. TROPOMI, prior to
cloud-slicing, is corrected for a 13&thinsp;% underestimate in stratospheric
NO<sub>2</sub> variance and a 50&thinsp;% overestimate in free-tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> determined by comparison to Pandora total columns at high-altitude free-tropospheric sites at Mauna Loa, Izaña, and Altzomoni and MAX-DOAS and
Pandora tropospheric columns at Izaña. Two cloud-sliced seasonal mean UT
NO<sub>2</sub> products for June 2019 to May 2020 are retrieved from corrected
TROPOMI total columns using distinct TROPOMI cloud products that assume
clouds are reflective boundaries (FRESCO-S) or water droplet layers
(ROCINN-CAL). TROPOMI UT NO<sub>2</sub> typically ranges from 20–30&thinsp;pptv over remote oceans to  &gt; 80&thinsp;pptv over locations with intense seasonal lightning. Spatial coverage is mostly in the tropics and subtropics with
FRESCO-S and extends to the midlatitudes and polar regions with ROCINN-CAL,
due to its greater abundance of optically thick clouds and wider cloud-top
altitude range. TROPOMI UT NO<sub>2</sub> seasonal means are spatially consistent (<i>R</i> = 0.6–0.8) with an existing coarser spatial resolution (5°
latitude&thinsp; × &thinsp;8° longitude) UT NO<sub>2</sub> product from the
Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI). UT NO<sub>2</sub> from TROPOMI is 12–26&thinsp;pptv
more than that from OMI due to increase in NO<sub>2</sub> with altitude from the OMI pressure ceiling (280&thinsp;hPa) to that for TROPOMI (180&thinsp;hPa), but possibly
also due to altitude differences in TROPOMI and OMI cloud products and
NO<sub>2</sub> retrieval algorithms. The TROPOMI UT NO<sub>2</sub> product offers
potential to evaluate and improve representation of UT NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> in models and supplement aircraft observations that are sporadic and susceptible to large biases in the UT.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, D., Pickering, K., Duncan, B., and Damon, M.: Impact of lightning NO
emissions on North American photochemistry as determined using the Global
Modeling Initiative (GMI) model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, 1–24,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014062" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014062</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Amedro, D., Bunkan, A. J. C., Berasategui, M., and Crowley, J. N.: Kinetics of the OH + NO<sub>2</sub> reaction: rate coefficients (217–333 K, 16–1200 mbar) and fall-off parameters for N<sub>2</sub> and O<sub>2</sub> bath gases, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10643–10657, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10643-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10643-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Argyrouli, A., Sneep, M., and Lambert, J.-C.: S5P Mission Performance Centre
CLOUD [L2_CLOUD] Readme, available at:
<a href="https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/3541451/Sentinel-5P-Cloud-Level-2-Product-Readme-File" target="_blank"/>
(last accessed: 20 January 2020), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Baumgardner, D., Grutter, M., Allan, J., Ochoa, C., Rappenglueck, B., Russell, L. M., and Arnott, P.: Physical and chemical properties of the regional mixed layer of Mexico's Megapolis, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5711–5727, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5711-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5711-2009</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Beirle, S., Koshak, W., Blakeslee, R., and Wagner, T.: Global patterns of lightning properties derived by OTD and LIS, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 2715–2726, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2715-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-2715-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Belmonte Rivas, M., Veefkind, P., Eskes, H., and Levelt, P.: OMI tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> profiles from cloud slicing: constraints on surface emissions, convective transport and lightning NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 13519–13553, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13519-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-13519-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Bertram, T. H., Perring, A. E., Wooldridge, P. J., Crounse, J. D., Kwan, A.
J., Wennberg, P. O., Scheuer, E., Dibb, J., Avery, M., Sachse, G., Vay, S.
A., Crawford, J. H., McNaughton, C. S., Clarke, A., Pickering, K. E.,
Fuelberg, H., Huey, G., Blake, D. R., Singh, H. B., Hall, S. R., Shetter, R.
E., Fried, A., Heikes, B. G., and Cohen, R. C.: Direct measurements of the
convective recycling of the upper troposphere, Science, 315, 816–820,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134548" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1134548</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., and Brinksma, E. J.: Error analysis for
tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> retrieval from space, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109,
1–26, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003962" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003jd003962</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Dirksen, R. J., van der A, R. J., Veefkind, J. P., Stammes, P., Huijnen, V., Kleipool, Q. L., Sneep, M., Claas, J., Leitão, J., Richter, A., Zhou, Y., and Brunner, D.: An improved tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> column retrieval algorithm for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1905–1928, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Bottenheim, J. W., Gallant, A. G., and Brice, K. A.: Measurements of
NO<sub><i>y</i></sub> species and O<sub>3</sub> at 82°N latitude, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 13, 113–116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GL013i002p00113" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/GL013i002p00113</a>, 1986.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Bradshaw, J., Davis, D., Grodzinsky, G., Smyth, S., Newell, R., Sandholm,
S., and Liu, S.: Observed distributions of nitrogen oxides in the remote
free troposphere from the NASA global tropospheric experiment programs, Rev.
Geophys., 38, 61–116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999rg900015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999rg900015</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Bravo, A. H., Sosa, E. R., Sánchez, A. P., Jaimes, P. M., and Saavedra,
R. M. I.: Impact of wildfires on the air quality of Mexico City, 1992–1999,
Environ. Pollut., 117, 243–253, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00277-9" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00277-9</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Brogniez, C., Bazureau, A., Lenoble, J., and Chu, W. P.: Stratospheric
Aerosol and Gas Experiment (SAGE) III measurements: A study on the retrieval
of ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and aerosol extinction coefficients, J. Geophys.
Res., 107, 1–21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001576" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2001jd001576</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Brohede, S. M., Haley, C. S., McLinden, C. A., Sioris, C. E., Murtagh, D.
P., Petelina, S. V., Llewellyn, E. J., Bazureau, A., Goutail, F., Randall,
C. E., Lumpe, J. D., Taha, G., Thomasson, L. W., and Gordley, L. L.:
Validation of Odin/OSIRIS stratospheric NO<sub>2</sub> profiles, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 112, 1–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007586" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007586</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Browne, E. C., Perring, A. E., Wooldridge, P. J., Apel, E., Hall, S. R., Huey, L. G., Mao, J., Spencer, K. M., Clair, J. M. St., Weinheimer, A. J., Wisthaler, A., and Cohen, R. C.: Global and regional effects of the photochemistry of CH<sub>3</sub>O<sub>2</sub>NO<sub>2</sub>: evidence from ARCTAS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 4209–4219, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4209-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-4209-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Bucsela, E. J., Krotkov, N. A., Celarier, E. A., Lamsal, L. N., Swartz, W.
H., Bhartia, P. K., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P., Gleason, J. F., and
Pickering, K. E.: A new stratospheric and tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub>; retrieval
algorithm for nadir-viewing satellite instruments: applications to OMI,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2607-2626, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Cecil, D. J., Buechler, D. E., and Blakeslee, R. J.: Gridded lightning
climatology from TRMM-LIS and OTD: Dataset description, Atmos. Res., 135,
404–414, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.028" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2012.06.028</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Cede, A., Tiefengraber, M., Gebetsberger, M., and Kreuter, A.: Fiducial
reference measurements for air quality: TN on PGN products “correct use”
guidelines, version 1, LuftBlick, Innsbruck, Austria, available at: <a href="https://www.pandonia-global-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/LuftBlick_FRM4AQ_PGNUserGuidelines_RP_2019009_v1.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 4 February 2020), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Chang, W. L., Bhave, P. V., Brown, S. S., Riemer, N., Stutz, J., and Dabdub,
D.: Heterogeneous atmospheric chemistry, ambient measurements, and model
calculations of N<sub>2</sub>O<sub>5</sub>: A review, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 665–695,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.551672" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.551672</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Choi, S., Joiner, J., Choi, Y., Duncan, B. N., Vasilkov, A., Krotkov, N., and Bucsela, E.: First estimates of global free-tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> abundances derived using a cloud-slicing technique applied to satellite observations from the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 10565–10588, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10565-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10565-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Compernolle, S., Argyrouli, A., Lutz, R., Sneep, M., Lambert, J.-C., Fjæraa, A. M., Hubert, D., Keppens, A., Loyola, D., O'Connor, E., Romahn, F., Stammes, P., Verhoelst, T., and Wang, P.: Validation of the Sentinel-5 Precursor TROPOMI cloud data with Cloudnet, Aura OMI O<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>2</sub>, MODIS and Suomi-NPP VIIRS, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2020-122</a>, in review, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Crawford, J., Davis, D., Olson, J., Chen, G., Liu, S., Fuelberg, H., Hannan,
J., Kondo, Y., Anderson, B., Gregory, G., Sachse, G., Talbot, R., Viggiano,
A., Heikes, B., Snow, J., Singh, H., and Blake, D.: Evolution and chemical
consequences of lightning-produced NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> observed in the North Atlantic
upper troposphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 105, 19795–19809,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900183" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900183</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Crutzen, P. J.: The influence of nitrogen oxides on the atmospheric ozone
content, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 96, 320–325,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709640815" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49709640815</a>, 1970.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Dahlmann, K., Grewe, V., Ponater, M., and Matthes, S.: Quantifying the
contributions of individual NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> sources to the trend in ozone radiative
forcing, Atmos. Environ., 45, 2860–2868, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.071" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.02.071</a>,
2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Dirksen, R. J., Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Ionov, D. V., Bucsela, E. J.,
Levelt, P. F., and Kelder, H. M.: Evaluation of stratospheric NO<sub>2</sub>
retrieved from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: Intercomparison, diurnal
cycle, and trending, J. Geophys. Res., 116, 1–22, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014943" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd014943</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Dubé, K., Bourassa, A., Zawada, D., Degenstein, D., Damadeo, R., Flittner, D., and Randel, W.: Accounting for the photochemical variation in stratospheric NO<sub>2</sub> in the SAGE III/ISS solar occultation retrieval, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 557–566, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-557-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-557-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Ehhalt, D. H., Rohrer, F., and Wahner, A.: Sources and distribution of
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> in the upper troposphere at northern midlatitudes, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 97, 3725–3738, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD03081" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD03081</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Finney, D. L., Doherty, R. M., Wild, O., Huntrieser, H., Pumphrey, H. C., and Blyth, A. M.: Using cloud ice flux to parametrise large-scale lightning, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 12665–12682, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12665-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-12665-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Finney, D. L., Doherty, R. M., Wild, O., Young, P. J., and Butler, A.:
Response of lightning NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions and ozone production to climate
change: Insights from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model
Intercomparison Project, Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 5492–5500,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl068825" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl068825</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Finney, D. L., Doherty, R. M., Wild, O., Stevenson, D. S., MacKenzie, I. A.,
and Blyth, A. M.: A projected decrease in lightning under climate change,
Nat. Clim. Change, 8, 210–213, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0072-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0072-6</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Frieß, U., Monks, P. S., Remedios, J. J., Rozanov, A., Sinreich, R.,
Wagner, T., and Platt, U.: MAX-DOAS O<sub>4</sub> measurements: A new technique to
derive information on atmospheric aerosols: 2. Modeling studies, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 111, 1–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006618" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006618</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Gil, M., Yela, M., Gunn, L. N., Richter, A., Alonso, I., Chipperfield, M. P., Cuevas, E., Iglesias, J., Navarro, M., Puentedura, O., and Rodríguez, S.: NO<sub>2</sub> climatology in the northern subtropical region: diurnal, seasonal and interannual variability, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 1635–1648, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1635-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-1635-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Gil-Ojeda, M., Navarro-Comas, M., Gómez-Martín, L., Adame, J. A., Saiz-Lopez, A., Cuevas, C. A., González, Y., Puentedura, O., Cuevas, E., Lamarque, J.-F., Kinninson, D., and Tilmes, S.: NO<sub>2</sub> seasonal evolution in the north subtropical free troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 10567–10579, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10567-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-10567-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Gomez, L., Navarro-Comas, M., Puentedura, O., Gonzalez, Y., Cuevas, E., and Gil-Ojeda, M.: Long-path averaged mixing ratios of O<sub>3</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> in the free troposphere from mountain MAX-DOAS, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3373–3386, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3373-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3373-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Gruzdev, A. N. and Elokhov, A. S.: Variability of stratospheric and
tropospheric nitrogen dioxide observed by the visible spectrophotometer at
Zvenigorod, Russia, Int. J. Remote Sens., 32, 3115–3127,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.541524" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.541524</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Hains, J. C., Boersma, K. F., Kroon, M., Dirksen, R. J., Cohen, R. C.,
Perring, A. E., Bucsela, E., Volten, H., Swart, D. P. J., Richter, A.,
Wittrock, F., Schoenhardt, A., Wagner, T., Ibrahim, O. W., van Roozendael,
M., Pinardi, G., Gleason, J. F., Veefkind, J. P., and Levelt, P.: Testing
and improving OMI DOMINO tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> using observations from the
DANDELIONS and INTEX-B validation campaigns, J. Geophys. Res.,
115, 1–20, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012399" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd012399</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Henderson, B. H., Pinder, R. W., Crooks, J., Cohen, R. C., Hutzell, W. T., Sarwar, G., Goliff, W. S., Stockwell, W. R., Fahr, A., Mathur, R., Carlton, A. G., and Vizuete, W.: Evaluation of simulated photochemical partitioning of oxidized nitrogen in the upper troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 275–291, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-275-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-275-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
Henderson, B. H., Pinder, R. W., Crooks, J., Cohen, R. C., Carlton, A. G., Pye, H. O. T., and Vizuete, W.: Combining Bayesian methods and aircraft observations to constrain the HO. + NO<sub>2</sub> reaction rate, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 653–667, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-653-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-653-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Herman, J., Cede, A., Spinei, E., Mount, G., Tzortziou, M., and Abuhassan,
N.: NO<sub>2</sub> column amounts from ground-based Pandora and MFDOAS
spectrometers using the direct-sun DOAS technique: Intercomparisons and
application to OMI validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, 1–20,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011848" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011848</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Holmes, C. D., Bertram, T. H., Confer, K. L., Graham, K. A., Ronan, A. C.,
Wirks, C. K., and Shah, V.: The role of clouds in the tropospheric NO<sub><i>x</i></sub>
cycle: A new modeling approach for cloud chemistry and its global
implications, Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 4980–4990, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL081990" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL081990</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Hönninger, G., von Friedeburg, C., and Platt, U.: Multi axis differential optical absorption spectroscopy (MAX-DOAS), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 231–254, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-231-2004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-231-2004</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Ialongo, I., Virta, H., Eskes, H., Hovila, J., and Douros, J.: Comparison of TROPOMI/Sentinel-5 Precursor NO<sub>2</sub> observations with ground-based measurements in Helsinki, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 205–218, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-205-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-205-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Jaeglé, L., Jacob, D. J., Wang, Y., Weinheimer, A. J., Ridley, B. A.,
Campos, T. L., Sachse, G. W., and Hagen, D. E.: Sources and chemistry of
NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> in the upper troposphere over the United States, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 25, 1705–1708, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/97gl03591" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/97gl03591</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Jiang, Z., McDonald, B. C., Worden, H., Worden, J. R., Miyazaki, K., Qu, Z.,
Henze, D. K., Jones, D. B. A., Arellano, A. F., Fischer, E. V., Zhu, L., and
Boersma, K. F.: Unexpected slowdown of US pollutant emission reduction in
the past decade, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 115, 5099, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801191115" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1801191115</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Joiner, J., Vasilkov, A. P., Gupta, P., Bhartia, P. K., Veefkind, P., Sneep, M., de Haan, J., Polonsky, I., and Spurr, R.: Fast simulators for satellite cloud optical centroid pressure retrievals; evaluation of OMI cloud retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 529–545, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-529-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-529-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Jones, A., Walker, K. A., Jin, J. J., Taylor, J. R., Boone, C. D., Bernath, P. F., Brohede, S., Manney, G. L., McLeod, S., Hughes, R., and Daffer, W. H.: Technical Note: A trace gas climatology derived from the Atmospheric Chemistry Experiment Fourier Transform Spectrometer (ACE-FTS) data set, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5207–5220, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5207-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5207-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Kablick III, G. P., Allen, D. R., Fromm, M. D., and Nedoluha, G. E.:
Australian PyroCb smoke generates synoptic-scale stratospheric anticyclones,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, 1–9, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088101</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Lamarque, J. F., Brasseur, G. P., Hess, P. G., and Müller, J. F.:
Three-dimensional study of the relative contributions of the different
nitrogen sources in the troposphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 101,
22955–22968, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02160" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96JD02160</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Lambert, J.-C., Keppens, A., Hubert, D., Langerock, B., Eichmann, K.-U.,
Kleipool, Q., Sneep, M., Verhoelst, T., Wagner, T., Weber, M., Ahn, C.,
Argyrouli, A., Balis, D., Chan, K. L., Compernolle, S., Smedt, I. D., Eskes, H.,
Fjæraa, A. M., Garane, K., Gleason, J. F., Goutail, F., Granville, J.,
Hedelt, P., Heue, K.-P., Jaross, G., Koukouli, M., Landgraf, J., Lutz, R.,
Niemejer, S., Pazmiño, A., Pinardi, G., Pommereau, J.-P., Richter, A.,
Rozemeijer, N., Sha, M. K., Zweers, D. S., Theys, N., Tilstra, G., Torres,
O., Valks, P., Vigouroux, C., and Wang, P.: S5P Mission Performance Centre
Routine Operations Consolidated Validation Report series, Issue 2,
Version 02.0.2, available at: <a href="http://www.tropomi.eu/sites/default/files/files/publicS5P-MPC-IASB-ROCVR-02.0.2-20190411_FINAL.pdf" target="_blank"/> (last access: 3 February 2020), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Laughner, J. L., Zhu, Q., and Cohen, R. C.: The Berkeley High Resolution Tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> product, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 2069–2095, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2069-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-2069-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Levelt, P. F., Joiner, J., Tamminen, J., Veefkind, J. P., Bhartia, P. K., Stein Zweers, D. C., Duncan, B. N., Streets, D. G., Eskes, H., van der A, R., McLinden, C., Fioletov, V., Carn, S., de Laat, J., DeLand, M., Marchenko, S., McPeters, R., Ziemke, J., Fu, D., Liu, X., Pickering, K., Apituley, A., González Abad, G., Arola, A., Boersma, F., Chan Miller, C., Chance, K., de Graaf, M., Hakkarainen, J., Hassinen, S., Ialongo, I., Kleipool, Q., Krotkov, N., Li, C., Lamsal, L., Newman, P., Nowlan, C., Suleiman, R., Tilstra, L. G., Torres, O., Wang, H., and Wargan, K.: The Ozone Monitoring Instrument: overview of 14 years in space, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 5699–5745, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5699-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-5699-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Loyola, D. G., Thomas, W., Livschitz, Y., Ruppert, T., Albert, P., and
Hollmann, R.: Cloud properties derived from GOME/ERS-2 backscatter data for
trace gas retrieval, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 45, 2747–2758,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.901043" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2007.901043</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Loyola, D. G., Gimeno García, S., Lutz, R., Argyrouli, A., Romahn, F., Spurr, R. J. D., Pedergnana, M., Doicu, A., Molina García, V., and Schüssler, O.: The operational cloud retrieval algorithms from TROPOMI on board Sentinel-5 Precursor, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 409–427, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-409-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-409-2018</a>, 2018a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Loyola, D. G., Lutz, R., Argyrouli, A., and Spurr, R.: S5P/TROPOMI ATBD
Cloud Products, available at: <a href="https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/2476257/Sentinel-5P-TROPOMI-ATBD-Clouds" target="_blank"/>
(last access: 20 January 2020), 2018b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Marais, E. A. and Roberts, J. F.: eamarais/erc-uptrop: tropomi-ut-no2-1.1.0, Version 1.1.0, Zenodo, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4058442" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4058442</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Marais, E. A., Jacob, D. J., Choi, S., Joiner, J., Belmonte-Rivas, M., Cohen, R. C., Beirle, S., Murray, L. T., Schiferl, L. D., Shah, V., and Jaeglé, L.: Nitrogen oxides in the global upper troposphere: interpreting cloud-sliced NO<sub>2</sub> observations from the OMI satellite instrument, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17017–17027, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17017-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17017-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Mickley, L. J., Murti, P. P., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Koch, D. M., and
Rind, D.: Radiative forcing from tropospheric ozone calculated with a
unified chemistry-climate model, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 104, 30153–30172,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900439" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900439</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, L. T., Jacob, D. J., Logan, J. A., Hudman, R. C., and Koshak, W. J.:
Optimized regional and interannual variability of lightning in a global
chemical transport model constrained by LIS/OTD satellite data, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 117, D20307, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017934" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012jd017934</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Murray, L. T., Logan, J. A., and Jacob, D. J.: Interannual variability in
tropical tropospheric ozone and OH: The role of lightning, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 118, 11468–11480, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50857" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50857</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Nault, B. A., Garland, C., Wooldridge, P. J., Brune, W. H., Campuzano-Jost,
P., Crounse, J. D., Day, D. A., Dibb, J., Hall, S. R., Huey, L. G., Jimenez,
J. L., Liu, X. X., Mao, J. Q., Mikoviny, T., Peischl, J., Pollack, I. B.,
Ren, X. R., Ryerson, T. B., Scheuer, E., Ullmann, K., Wennberg, P. O.,
Wisthaler, A., Zhang, L., and Cohen, R. C.: Observational constraints on the
oxidation of NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> in the upper troposphere, J. Phys. Chem. A, 120,
1468–1478, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07824" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.5b07824</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Newchurch, M. J., Allen, M., Gunson, M. R., Salawitch, R. J., Collins, G.
B., Huston, K. H., Abbas, M. M., Abrams, M. C., Chang, A. Y., Fahey, D. W.,
Gao, R. S., Irion, F. W., Loewenstein, M., Manney, G. L., Michelsen, H. A.,
Podolske, J. R., Rinsland, C. P., and Zander, R.: Stratospheric NO and
NO<sub>2</sub> abundances from ATMOS solar-occultation measurements, Geophys. Res.
Lett., 23, 2373–2376, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL01196" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/96GL01196</a>, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
OPeNDAP: Open-source Project for a Network Data Access Protocol, available at: <a href="https://ghrc.nsstc.nasa.gov/opendap/lis/climatology/LIS-OTD/HRMC/data/nc/contents.html" target="_blank"/>, last access: 31 December 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Ott, L. E., Pickering, K. E., Stenchikov, G. L., Allen, D. J., DeCaria, A.
J., Ridley, B., Lin, R. F., Lang, S., and Tao, W. K.: Production of
lightning NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> and its vertical distribution calculated from
three-dimensional cloud-scale chemical transport model simulations, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 115, 1–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011880" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd011880</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Pavelin, E. G., Johnson, C. E., Rughooputh, S., and Toumi, R.: Evaluation of
pre-industrial surface ozone measurements made using Schönbein's method,
Atmos. Environ., 33, 919–929, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00257-X" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(98)00257-X</a>, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
PGN (Pandonia Global Network): Pandonia data archive, available at:
<a href="http://data.pandonia-global-network.org/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 June 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Pinardi, G., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F., Theys, N., Abuhassan, N., Bais, A., Boersma, F., Cede, A., Chong, J., Donner, S., Drosoglou, T., Dzhola, A., Eskes, H., Frieß, U., Granville, J., Herman, J. R., Holla, R., Hovila, J., Irie, H., Kanaya, Y., Karagkiozidis, D., Kouremeti, N., Lambert, J.-C., Ma, J., Peters, E., Piters, A., Postylyakov, O., Richter, A., Remmers, J., Takashima, H., Tiefengraber, M., Valks, P., Vlemmix, T., Wagner, T., and Wittrock, F.: Validation of tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> column measurements of GOME-2A and OMI using MAX-DOAS and direct sun network observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 6141–6174, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6141-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-6141-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Pour-Biazar, A., McNider, R. T., Roselle, S. J., Suggs, R., Jedlovec, G.,
Byun, D. W., Kim, S., Lin, C. J., Ho, T. C., Haines, S., Dornblaser, B., and
Cameron, R.: Correcting photolysis rates on the basis of satellite observed
clouds, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 112, 1–17, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007422" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007422</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
Price, C. and Rind, D.: A simple lightning parameterization for calculating
global lightning distributions, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97, 9919–9933,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD00719" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/92JD00719</a>, 1992.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
Puentedura, O., Gil, M., Saiz-Lopez, A., Hay, T., Navarro-Comas, M., Gómez-Pelaez, A., Cuevas, E., Iglesias, J., and Gomez, L.: Iodine monoxide in the north subtropical free troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 4909–4921, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4909-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-4909-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
Randall, C. E., Rusch, D. W., Bevilacqua, R. M., Hoppel, K. W., and Lumpe,
J. D.: Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement (POAM) II stratospheric NO<sub>2</sub>,
1993–1996, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 103, 28361–28371,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98jd02092" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98jd02092</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
Reed, C., Evans, M. J., Di Carlo, P., Lee, J. D., and Carpenter, L. J.: Interferences in photolytic NO<sub>2</sub> measurements: explanation for an apparent missing oxidant?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4707–4724, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4707-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4707-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
Ridley, B., Ott, L., Pickering, K., Emmons, L., Montzka, D., Weinheimer, A.,
Knapp, D., Grahek, F., Li, L., Heymsfield, G., McGill, M., Kucera, P.,
Mahoney, M. J., Baumgardner, D., Schultz, M., and Brasseur, G.: Florida
thunderstorms: A faucet of reactive nitrogen to the upper troposphere, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 109, 1–19, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004769" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004769</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
Rivera, C., Stremme, W., and Grutter, M.: Nitrogen dioxide DOAS measurements
from ground and space: Comparison of zenith scattered sunlight ground-based
measurements and OMI data in Central Mexico, Atmósfera, 26, 401–414,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-6236(13)71085-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0187-6236(13)71085-3</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
Robles-Gonzalez, C., Navarro-Comas, M., Puentedura, O., Schneider, M., Hase, F., Garcia, O., Blumenstock, T., and Gil-Ojeda, M.: Intercomparison of stratospheric nitrogen dioxide columns retrieved from ground-based DOAS and FTIR and satellite DOAS instruments over the subtropical Izana station, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 4471–4485, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4471-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-4471-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice, Series on Atmospheric, Oceanic and Planetary Physics, Vol. 2, World Scientific Publishing Co., Singapore, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
Romps, D. M., Seeley, J. T., Vollaro, D., and Molinari, J.: Projected
increase in lightning strikes in the United States due to global warming,
Science, 346, 851–854, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259100" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259100</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
S5P (Sentinel-5P Pre-Operations) Data Hub: availale at:
<a href="https://s5phub.copernicus.eu/dhus/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 15 June 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
Schenkeveld, V. M. E., Jaross, G., Marchenko, S., Haffner, D., Kleipool, Q. L., Rozemeijer, N. C., Veefkind, J. P., and Levelt, P. F.: In-flight performance of the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 1957–1986, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1957-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-1957-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib79"><label>79</label><mixed-citation>
Schreier, S. F., Richter, A., Wittrock, F., and Burrows, J. P.: Estimates of free-tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> and HCHO mixing ratios derived from high-altitude mountain MAX-DOAS observations at midlatitudes and in the tropics, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 2803–2817, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2803-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-2803-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib80"><label>80</label><mixed-citation>
Schumann, U.: The impact of nitrogen oxides emissions from aircraft upon the
atmosphere at flight altitudes – results from the AERONOX project, Atmos.
Environ., 31, 1723–1733, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00326-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(96)00326-3</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib81"><label>81</label><mixed-citation>
Schumann, U. and Huntrieser, H.: The global lightning-induced nitrogen oxides source, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3823–3907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3823-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib82"><label>82</label><mixed-citation>
Silvern, R. F., Jacob, D. J., Travis, K. R., Sherwen, T., Evans, M. J.,
Cohen, R. C., Laughner, J. L., Hall, S. R., Ullmann, K., Crounse, J. D.,
Wennberg, P. O., Peischl, J., and Pollack, I. B.: Observed NO/NO<sub>2</sub>
ratios in the upper troposphere imply errors in NO-NO<sub>2</sub>-O<sub>3</sub> cycling
kinetics or an unaccounted NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> reservoir, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45,
4466–4474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077728" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL077728</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib83"><label>83</label><mixed-citation>
Silvern, R. F., Jacob, D. J., Mickley, L. J., Sulprizio, M. P., Travis, K. R., Marais, E. A., Cohen, R. C., Laughner, J. L., Choi, S., Joiner, J., and Lamsal, L. N.: Using satellite observations of tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> columns to infer long-term trends in US NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions: the importance of accounting for the free tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> background, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 8863–8878, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8863-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-8863-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib84"><label>84</label><mixed-citation>
Sioris, C. E., Kurosu, T. P., Martin, R. V., and Chance, K.: Stratospheric
and tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> observed by SCIAMACHY: First results, Adv. Spac
Res., 34, 780–785, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.08.066" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2003.08.066</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib85"><label>85</label><mixed-citation>
Stammes, P., Sneep, M., de Haan, J. F., Veefkind, J. P., Wang, P., and
Levelt, P. F.: Effective cloud fractions from the Ozone Monitoring
Instrument: Theoretical framework and validation, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
113, 1–12, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008820" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008820</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib86"><label>86</label><mixed-citation>
Stavrakou, T., Müller, J.-F., Boersma, K. F., van der A, R. J., Kurokawa, J., Ohara, T., and Zhang, Q.: Key chemical NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> sink uncertainties and how they influence top-down emissions of nitrogen oxides, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9057–9082, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9057-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9057-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib87"><label>87</label><mixed-citation>
Stettler, M. E. J., Eastham, S., and Barrett, S. R. H.: Air quality and
public health impacts of UK airports. Part I: Emissions, Atmos. Environ.,
45, 5415–5424, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.07.012</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib88"><label>88</label><mixed-citation>
Stratmann, G., Ziereis, H., Stock, P., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Zahn, A.,
Rauthe-Schoch, A., Velthoven, P. V., Schlager, H., and Volz-Thomas, A.: NO
and NO<sub><i>y</i></sub> in the upper troposphere: Nine years of CARIBIC measurements
onboard a passenger aircraft, Atmos. Environ., 133, 93–111,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.02.035</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib89"><label>89</label><mixed-citation>
The International GEOS-Chem User Community: GEOS-Chem Version 12.1.0, Zenodo,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1553349" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1553349</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib90"><label>90</label><mixed-citation>
Thomas, K., Berg, M., Boulanger, D., Houben, N., Gressent, A., Nedelec, P.,
Patz, H. W., Thouret, V., and Volz-Thomas, A.: Climatology of NO<sub><i>y</i></sub> in
the troposphere and UT/LS from measurements made in MOZAIC, Tellus B, 67,
1–16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v67.28793" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v67.28793</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib91"><label>91</label><mixed-citation>
Toledano, C., González, R., Fuertes, D., Cuevas, E., Eck, T. F., Kazadzis, S., Kouremeti, N., Gröbner, J., Goloub, P., Blarel, L., Román, R., Barreto, Á., Berjón, A., Holben, B. N., and Cachorro, V. E.: Assessment of Sun photometer Langley calibration at the high-elevation sites Mauna Loa and Izaña, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 14555–14567, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14555-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-14555-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib92"><label>92</label><mixed-citation>
Torres, O., Bhartia, P. K., Jethva, H., and Ahn, C.: Impact of the ozone monitoring instrument row anomaly on the long-term record of aerosol products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 11, 2701–2715, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2701-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-2701-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib93"><label>93</label><mixed-citation>
Tost, H., Jöckel, P., and Lelieveld, J.: Lightning and convection parameterisations – uncertainties in global modelling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 4553–4568, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4553-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-4553-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib94"><label>94</label><mixed-citation>
Travis, K. R., Jacob, D. J., Fisher, J. A., Kim, P. S., Marais, E. A., Zhu, L., Yu, K., Miller, C. C., Yantosca, R. M., Sulprizio, M. P., Thompson, A. M., Wennberg, P. O., Crounse, J. D., St. Clair, J. M., Cohen, R. C., Laughner, J. L., Dibb, J. E., Hall, S. R., Ullmann, K., Wolfe, G. M., Pollack, I. B., Peischl, J., Neuman, J. A., and Zhou, X.: Why do models overestimate surface ozone in the Southeast United States?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 13561–13577, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-13561-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib95"><label>95</label><mixed-citation>
van der A, R. J., de Laat, A. T. J., Ding, J., and Eskes, H. J.: Connecting
the dots: NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions along a West Siberian natural gas pipeline, NPJ
Clim. Atmos. Sci., 3, 16, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-0119-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-020-0119-z</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib96"><label>96</label><mixed-citation>
van Geffen, J., Eskes, H. J., Boersma, K. F., Maasakkers, J. D., and
Veefkind, J. P.: TROPOMI ATBD of the total and tropospheric NO<sub>2</sub> data
products, available at:
<a href="https://sentinel.esa.int/documents/247904/2476257/Sentinel-5P-TROPOMI-ATBD-NO2-data-products" target="_blank"/>
(last access: 20 January 2020), 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib97"><label>97</label><mixed-citation>
van Geffen, J., Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H., Sneep, M., ter Linden, M., Zara, M., and Veefkind, J. P.: S5P TROPOMI NO<sub>2</sub> slant column retrieval: method, stability, uncertainties and comparisons with OMI, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1315–1335, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1315-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1315-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib98"><label>98</label><mixed-citation>
Veefkind, J. P., de Haan, J. F., Sneep, M., and Levelt, P. F.: Improvements to the OMI O<sub>2</sub>–O<sub>2</sub> operational cloud algorithm and comparisons with ground-based radar–lidar observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 6035–6049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6035-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-6035-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib99"><label>99</label><mixed-citation>
Verhoelst, T., Compernolle, S., Pinardi, G., Lambert, J.-C., Eskes, H. J., Eichmann, K.-U., Fjæraa, A. M., Granville, J., Niemeijer, S., Cede, A., Tiefengraber, M., Hendrick, F., Pazmiño, A., Bais, A., Bazureau, A., Boersma, K. F., Bognar, K., Dehn, A., Donner, S., Elokhov, A., Gebetsberger, M., Goutail, F., Grutter de la Mora, M., Gruzdev, A., Gratsea, M., Hansen, G. H., Irie, H., Jepsen, N., Kanaya, Y., Karagkiozidis, D., Kivi, R., Kreher, K., Levelt, P. F., Liu, C., Müller, M., Navarro Comas, M., Piters, A. J. M., Pommereau, J.-P., Portafaix, T., Prados-Roman, C., Puentedura, O., Querel, R., Remmers, J., Richter, A., Rimmer, J., Rivera Cárdenas, C., Saavedra de Miguel, L., Sinyakov, V. P., Stremme, W., Strong, K., Van Roozendael, M., Veefkind, J. P., Wagner, T., Wittrock, F., Yela González, M., and Zehner, C.: Ground-based validation of the Copernicus Sentinel-5P TROPOMI NO<sub>2</sub> measurements with the NDACC ZSL-DOAS, MAX-DOAS and Pandonia global networks, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 481–510, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-481-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-481-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib100"><label>100</label><mixed-citation>
Verlinden, K. L., Thompson, D. W. J., and Stephens, G. L.: The
three-dimensional distribution of clouds over the southern hemisphere high
latitudes, J. Climate, 24, 5799–5811, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI3922.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2011JCLI3922.1</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib101"><label>101</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, P., Stammes, P., van der A, R., Pinardi, G., and van Roozendael, M.: FRESCO+: an improved O<sub>2</sub> A-band cloud retrieval algorithm for tropospheric trace gas retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6565–6576, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6565-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6565-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib102"><label>102</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, P., Piters, A., van Geffen, J., Tuinder, O., Stammes, P., and Kinne, S.: Shipborne MAX-DOAS measurements for validation of TROPOMI NO<sub>2</sub> products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 1413–1426, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1413-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-1413-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib103"><label>103</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, Z., Zhang, X., Liu, L., Cheng, M., and Xu, J.: Spatial and seasonal
patterns of atmospheric nitrogen deposition in North China, Atmos. Ocean.
Sci. Lett., 13, 188–194, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2019.1701385" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2019.1701385</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib104"><label>104</label><mixed-citation>
Wendisch, M., Pöschl, U., Andreae, M. O., Machado, L. A. T., Albrecht,
R., Schlager, H., Rosenfeld, D., Martin, S. T., Abdelmonem, A., Afchine, A.,
Araùjo, A. C., Artaxo, P., Aufmhoff, H., Barbosa, H. M. J., Borrmann,
S., Braga, R., Buchholz, B., Cecchini, M. A., Costa, A., Curtius, J.,
Dollner, M., Dorf, M., Dreiling, V., Ebert, V., Ehrlich, A., Ewald, F.,
Fisch, G., Fix, A., Frank, F., Fütterer, D., Heckl, C., Heidelberg, F.,
Hüneke, T., Jäkel, E., Järvinen, E., Jurkat, T., Kanter, S.,
Kästner, U., Kenntner, M., Kesselmeier, J., Klimach, T., Knecht, M.,
Kohl, R., Kölling, T., Krämer, M., Krüger, M., Krisna, T. C.,
Lavric, J. V., Longo, K., Mahnke, C., Manzi, A. O., Mayer, B., Mertes, S.,
Minikin, A., Molleker, S., Münch, S., Nillius, B., Pfeilsticker, K.,
Pöhlker, C., Roiger, A., Rose, D., Rosenow, D., Sauer, D., Schnaiter,
M., Schneider, J., Schulz, C., de Souza, R. A. F., Spanu, A., Stock, P.,
Vila, D., Voigt, C., Walser, A., Walter, D., Weigel, R., Weinzierl, B.,
Werner, F., Yamasoe, M. A., Ziereis, H., Zinner, T., and Zöger, M.:
ACRIDICON-CHUVA campaign: Studying tropical deep convective clouds and
precipitation over Amazonia using the new German research aircraft HALO,
B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 97, 1885–1908, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00255.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00255.1</a>, 2016.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib105"><label>105</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, J. E., Boersma, K. F., Le Sager, P., and Verstraeten, W. W.: The high-resolution version of TM5-MP for optimized satellite retrievals: description and validation, Geosci. Model Dev., 10, 721–750, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-721-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-721-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib106"><label>106</label><mixed-citation>
Worden, H. M., Bowman, K. W., Kulawik, S. S., and Aghedo, A. M.: Sensitivity
of outgoing longwave radiative flux to the global vertical distribution of
ozone characterized by instantaneous radiative kernels from Aura-TES, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 116, 1–15, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015101</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib107"><label>107</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, B., Wang, S. X., Liu, H., Xu, J. Y., Fu, K., Klimont, Z., Hao, J. M., He, K. B., Cofala, J., and Amann, M.: NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions in China: historical trends and future perspectives, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 9869–9897, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9869-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-9869-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib108"><label>108</label><mixed-citation>
Ziemke, J. R., Chandra, S., and Bhartia, P. K.: “Cloud slicing”: A new
technique to derive upper tropospheric ozone from satellite measurements, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 9853–9867, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900768" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jd900768</a>, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
