<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-14-2799-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Elemental analysis of oxygenated organic coating on black carbon particles using a soot-particle aerosol mass spectrometer</article-title><alt-title>Elemental analysis of oxygenated organic coating on black carbon particles</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Elemental analysis of oxygenated organic coating on black carbon particles}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{M.~Ma et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ma</surname><given-names>Mutian</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Rivellini</surname><given-names>Laura-Hélèna</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Cui</surname><given-names>YuXi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Willis</surname><given-names>Megan D.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0386-0156</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Wilkie</surname><given-names>Rio</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6800-513X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Abbatt</surname><given-names>Jonathan P. D.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3372-334X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Canagaratna</surname><given-names>Manjula R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8803-4007</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Wang</surname><given-names>Junfeng</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6215-1953</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff6">
          <name><surname>Ge</surname><given-names>Xinlei</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9531-6478</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff7">
          <name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Alex K. Y.</given-names></name>
          <email>alex.lee@canada.ca</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National
University of Singapore, Singapore</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>NUS Environmental Research Institute, National University of
Singapore, Singapore</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins,
CO, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Department of Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Aerodyne Research, Inc., Billerica, MA, USA</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff6"><label>6</label><institution>School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Nanjing
University of Information Science<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> and Technology, Nanjing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff7"><label>a</label><institution>now at: Air Quality Processes Research Section, Environment and Climate
Change Canada, Toronto, ON, Canada</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Alex K. Y. Lee (alex.lee@canada.ca)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>12</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>4</issue>
      <fpage>2799</fpage><lpage>2812</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>July</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>26</day><month>August</month><year>2020</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>16</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>17</day><month>February</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e207">Chemical characterization of organic coatings is important to advance our
understanding of the physio-chemical properties and environmental fate of
black carbon (BC) particles. The soot-particle aerosol mass spectrometer
(SP-AMS) has been utilized for this purpose in recent field studies. The
laser vaporization (LV) scheme of the SP-AMS can heat BC cores gradually until
they are completely vaporized, during which organic coatings can be
vaporized at temperatures lower than that of the thermal vaporizer (TV) used
in a standard high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer
(HR-ToF-AMS) that employs flash vaporization. This work investigates the
effects of vaporization schemes on fragmentation and elemental analysis of
known oxygenated organic species using three SP-AMS instruments. We show
that LV can reduce fragmentation of organic molecules. Substantial
enhancement of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals was observed for most of the tested
species when the LV scheme was used, suggesting that the observational
frameworks based on the use of HR-ToF-AMS field data may not be directly applicable
for evaluating the chemical evolution of oxygenated organic aerosol (OOA)
components coated on ambient BC particles. The uncertainties of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
determined using the improved-ambient (I-A) method for both LV and TV
approaches were similar, and scaling factors of 1.10 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.89 for
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were determined to facilitate more direct comparisons between
observations from the two vaporization schemes. Furthermore, the I-A method
was updated based on the multilinear regression model for the LV scheme
measurements. The updated parameters can reduce the relative errors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to 5.8 %, whereas the relative errors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remain roughly
the same. Applying the scaling factors and the updated parameters for the
I-A method to ambient data, we found that even though the time series of OOA
components determined using the LV and TV schemes are strongly correlated at
the same location, OOA coatings were likely less oxygenated compared to
those externally mixed with BC.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e375">Atmospheric black carbon (BC) particles have significant impacts on climate
and human health. Studies have shown that BC particles have negative impact
on vascular, cardiopulmonary, respiratory, and chronic diseases (Brook et
al., 2010; Heal et al., 2012; Heinzerling et al., 2016; Nel, 2005). They are
strongly light-absorbing, resulting in positive radiative forcing which is
equivalent to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 55 % of the radiative forcing caused by
carbon dioxide (Bond and Bergstrom, 2007;<?pagebreak page2800?> Bond et al., 2013; Ramanathan
and Carmichael, 2008). Ambient BC particles are largely internally mixed
with organic aerosols (OAs). While BC and hydrophobic organic coating can be
co-emitted from combustion processes, BC can be coated by oxygenated organic
compounds formed via oxidation of organic vapors and heterogeneous
processing (China et al., 2013; Lee et al., 2019b; Wu et al., 2019).
Organic coatings can alter the physio-chemical properties of BC particles,
such as enhancements of light absorptivity (Liu et al., 2017; Peng et
al., 2016), cloud formation potential (Kuwata et al., 2009; Liu et al.,
2013), and subsequently atmospheric transport and lifetime of BC particles
(Bond et al., 2013; Laborde et al., 2013; McMeeking et al., 2011).
However, characterization of organic coatings on BC particles remains a
great analytical challenge due to their chemical complexity.</p>
      <p id="d1e385">The soot-particle aerosol mass spectrometer (SP-AMS), which is a standard
high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer (HR-ToF-AMS)
equipped with an additional infrared (IR) laser vaporizer
(Onasch et al., 2012), has been utilized to
characterize refractory BC (rBC) and its coatings (Collier et al., 2018;
Lee et al., 2017; Massoli et al., 2015; Willis et al., 2016; Wu et al.,
2019). The laser vaporization scheme of the SP-AMS can heat rBC cores gradually
(up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4000 K) until they are completely vaporized, during
which non-refractory coatings can be vaporized at a temperature lower than
the operating temperature of thermal vaporizer (600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) typically used
in HR-ToF-AMSs for flash vaporization (DeCarlo et al., 2006; Onasch et
al., 2012) (Fig. 1). Different fragmentation patterns of oxygenated OA
(OOA) components have been observed between the two vaporization schemes in both
laboratory and field studies (Canagaratna et al., 2015b; Massoli et al.,
2015). In particular, positive matrix factorization (PMF) of field
measurements has shown that mass spectra of OOAs, which usually represents
secondary OA (SOA) components in the atmosphere, determined by the laser
vaporization (LV) scheme of the SP-AMS were dominated by C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
signals (Collier et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2019). In contrast, the
co-located HR-ToF-AMS measurements (i.e., thermal vaporization (TV) scheme)
generated mass spectra of more-oxidized OOA components with the most intense
signals from CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments (Chen et al., 2018;
Lee et al., 2017; Massoli et al., 2015) as illustrated in Fig. 1a and b.
Previous field studies have also shown that there were some mass spectral
differences (e.g., C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios) between the
hydrocarbon-like OA (HOA) factors, which usually represents primary OA (POA)
components emitted from traffic or fossil fuel combustion processes, identified
using the TV and LV schemes at the same location (Chen et al., 2018; Lee et
al., 2017; Massoli et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2019, 2020, 2017; Xie et al., 2019a, b).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e544">Mass spectra of more-oxidized OOA materials measured in Fontana,
California, using the <bold>(a)</bold> laser and <bold>(b)</bold> thermal vaporization schemes. <bold>(c)</bold> A
simplified diagram of the laser vaporizer scheme in the SP-AMS. The laser intensity
is stronger at the center, in which rBC can be completely vaporized at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4000 K. Organic coatings start to vaporize at the edge of
laser beam during the heating process of rBC.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/2799/2021/amt-14-2799-2021-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e570">Elemental ratios of OAs (i.e., hydrogen-to-carbon, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and oxygen-to-carbon,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) measured by HR-ToF-AMSs have been widely used to investigate the
physical and chemical properties of OAs (Koop et al., 2011; Kuwata et al.,
2012; Lambe et al., 2013; Massoli et al., 2010; Wong et al., 2011), and their
evolution depends on the types of primary emissions and aging processes
(Heald et al., 2010; Jimenez et al., 2009; Kroll et al., 2011). The
elemental ratios obtained from HR-ToF-AMS mass spectra can be potentially
biased by vaporization and ion fragmentation processes as described in
detail by Canagaratna et al. (2015a).
To account for such measurement uncertainties, the calibration factors
between experimentally measured and theoretical elemental compositions of
known organic compounds were reported by Aiken et al. (2007, 2008). The
“Aiken-ambient” (A-A) method was developed for elemental analysis of
ambient OAs using empirically estimated CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> ion
signals to avoid interferences from ambient air (Aiken et al., 2008).
Canagaratna et al. (2015a) further
established the “improved-ambient” (I-A) method that uses specific ion
fragments as markers to reduce composition-dependent systematic biases. Both
A-A and I-A methods have been fully integrated into the standard procedure
for analyzing ambient OAs measured by HR-ToF-AMSs. However, the two methods
were developed based on OA mass spectra generated by the TV approach; hence
their direct applications for determining elemental compositions of OAs
vaporized using the LV scheme (i.e., organic coating on BC particles) may not
be appropriate (Canagaratna et al., 2015b).</p>
      <p id="d1e624">To improve the accuracy of elemental analysis for OOA materials coated on
ambient BC particles using SP-AMSs, this work compares the elemental ratios
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of known oxygenated organic compounds determined by both TV
and LV schemes. This work focuses on investigating oxygenated organic
compounds as significant mass spectra differences were observed from ambient
OOA components detected using TV and LV schemes. The I-A method was applied to
determine the elemental composition of OOA materials for all our laboratory
experiments. Such comparison has been conducted by Canagaratna et al. (2015b), in which only a small number of organic species was tested by a
single SP-AMS. In this study, we extend this type of investigation in three
ways: (1) increasing the number of organic species with different functional
groups to be tested, (2) deploying two additional independent SP-AMSs from
different research groups to conduct our measurements, and (3) generating
new fitting parameters based on the approach for developing the I-A method
to enhance the accuracy of elemental analysis for organic coatings detected
using the LV scheme of the SP-AMS. The results can be used to evaluate the
robustness of applying the combination of the laser vaporization approach
and the I-A method for determining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of ambient OOAs
coated on BC particles, and to provide insight into the potential
discrepancies between ambient OOA materials that are externally and
internally mixed with BC particles.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2801?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Experiment</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Particle generation</title>
      <p id="d1e699">A total of 30 oxygenated organic species, including dicarboxylic acids,
polycarboxylic acids, alcohols, and multifunctional compounds, were included
in this study (Table 1). Small amounts of a standard organic compound were
dissolved in ultrapure water, which was subsequently used to generate pure
organic particles using a constant output atomizer (Model 2076, TSI). For
generating rBC–organic mixed particles, REGAL black pigment (REGAL 400R,
Cabot Corp) and a standard organic compound were mixed in the bulk solution
for atomization. REGAL black was used in this study because it has been
suggested as an rBC standard for calibrating the LV scheme of the SP-AMS
(Onasch et al., 2012). Atomized particles were
subsequently dried by a diffusion dryer using silica gel to minimize the
interference of particle-phase water to H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> signals and other
related fragments (i.e., O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and HO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Pure argon gas was used for
atomization and dilution to minimize the interference of gaseous N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to the quantification of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals in
organic mass spectra (Canagaratna et al., 2015a; Corbin et al., 2014;
Willis et al., 2014).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e781">Summary of the true values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of the
oxygenated organic species tested by the three SP-AMSs. </p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="7">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Class</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Formula</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">SP-AMS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Multifunctional</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-Pinonic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.00</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2, 3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Citric acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1, 2, 3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Glutamic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Glycolic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1, 2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ketoglutaric acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ketopimelic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.43</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Levulinic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Malic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1, 2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pyruvic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tartaric acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1, 2, 3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Diacids</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Adipic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.33</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1, 2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Azelaic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.78</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.44</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1, 2, 3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Glutaric acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.60</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.80</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1, 2, 3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Maleic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Malonic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1, 2, 3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Oxalic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1, 2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Phthalic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Pimelic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.71</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.57</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.57</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1, 3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Suberic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Succinic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1, 2, 3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Polyacids</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Tricarballylic acid</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Alcohols</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Arabitol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Phenol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.67</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Xylitol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1, 3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1,5-Pentanediol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.40</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.60</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Dextrose</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Glucose</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.00</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sucrose</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">11</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1, 3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Levoglucosan</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.67</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.83</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Esters</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Bis(2-ethylhexyl) sebacate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1.92</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">2</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Soot-particle aerosol mass spectrometer measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e2513">The details of the SP-AMS (Aerodyne Research, Inc.) have been reported in detail
by Onasch et al. (2012). In brief, the SP-AMS
is equipped with a thermal vaporizer (i.e., a heated tungsten surface) and a
laser vaporizer (i.e., a continuous-wave intra-cavity 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser).
While the thermal vaporizer operated at 600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C can vaporize
non-refractory particulate matter (NR-PM, including organic, sulfate,
nitrate, ammonium, and chloride), the laser vaporizer is designed for
vaporizing rBC-containing particles at which rBC cores can be gradually
heated up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 4000 K. During this heating process, organic
coatings can be vaporized at a lower range of temperature (likely <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">600</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C) depending on the volatility of each organic compound. The
vaporized analytes are ionized using 70 eV electron impact (EI) ionization,
and the ions are subsequently detected by a high-resolution time-of-flight
mass spectrometer operated in V mode (Canagaratna et al., 2007; DeCarlo
et al., 2006).</p>
      <p id="d1e2551">The SP-AMS instruments were operated in two different vaporization schemes
for characterizing pure organic particles and rBC–organic mixed particles,
respectively. When the laser vaporizer of the SP-AMS was off, the instrument
was operated as a standard HR-ToF-AMS to facilitate flash-vaporization of
pure organic particles (TV scheme). For the second part of the experiments,
the thermal vaporizer was removed from the SP-AMS and the laser vaporizer was
turned on for measuring standard organic compounds coated on REGAL black
exclusively (LV scheme; Fig. 1c). Note that some pure organic particles
might be generated through atomization of the rBC-organic mixture, but they
cannot be detected using the LV scheme. Observations from three SP-AMSs were
reported in this study, and they are labeled as SP-AMS 1, 2, and 3. SP-AMS 1
and 2 were used to generate new data for 18 and 20 organic species,
respectively. Data of SP-AMS 3 (10 organic species) were extracted from
Canagaratna et al. (2015b). Table 1 summarizes the tested species for
each SP-AMS. The three SP-AMSs were operated by different researchers from
the National University of Singapore (SP-AMS 1), University of Toronto
(SP-AMS 2), and Aerodyne Research (SP-AMS 3).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Data analysis</title>
      <p id="d1e2562">The raw data of SP-AMS measurements were processed by the AMS data analysis
software (Squirrel for unit mass resolution (UMR) data and PIKA 1.21b for
high-resolution peak fitting; Sueper, 2015), and statistical
analyses were processed<?pagebreak page2802?> by R (version 3.6). Given that pure argon gas was
used for particle generation and dilution in all the experiments, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
signals could be quantified in the high-resolution aerosol mass spectra.
Note that only small N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals were detected in some of the
experiments using SP-AMS 1 due to the residual N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> desorbed from the
desiccant. For the results of rBC-organic mixed particles, the interference
of refractory CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, i.e., CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) formed during rBC vaporization to organic mass spectra was
corrected in the fragmentation table using C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> : C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> : C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios obtained from
pure REGAL black particles. REGAL black calibrations were performed for each
instrument, and thus the applied corrections for the fragmentation table were
instrument specific. Elemental analysis was performed using the I-A method
(Canagaratna et al., 2015b) to calculate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of each
organic compound. The average carbon oxidation state of each organic
compound was also calculated based on the method reported in
Kroll et al. (2011) (i.e., OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Different fragmentation patterns between TV and LV schemes</title>
      <p id="d1e2787">Figure 2 shows the normalized mass spectra of azelaic acid (a dicarboxylic
acid) measured by the SP-AMS 1 for illustrating different fragmentation
patterns generated using the TV and LV schemes. The comparison for azelaic acid
shows that the LV approach can produce larger organic fragments (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
60, 69, 73, 83, and 84) compared to the TV approach. Similarly, arabitol (a
sugar alcohol) and levoglucosan (a chemical marker for biomass burning OAs)
show less fragmentation when they were vaporized with rBC particles by the
laser vaporizer (Figs. S1 and S2). The normalized cumulative histograms of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the organic compounds measured by the SP-AMS 1 are presented in
Fig. 2c (i.e., the average of 18 species), which clearly shows that the
curve shifts toward larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when the compounds were vaporized by the LV
scheme. The green dashed line represents the differences<?pagebreak page2803?> between respective
fragments from the TV (blue line) and LV (red line) schemes. It shows a
decreasing trend within the red shaded region, illustrating that the LV
scheme could generate more organic fragments starting from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 55 on
average. Overall, our observations support the general hypothesis and
previous observations (Canagaratna et al., 2015b) that a thermal
vaporizer operated at 600 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C tends to generate organic mass spectra with
smaller molecular fragments compared to the LV scheme, in which organic
vaporization and fragmentation can occur at a lower range of temperature,
for the same organic compound. It is worth mentioning that although
organo-nitrate compounds, which have significant contribution to SOA mass in
some locations (Fry et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2019a; Xu et al., 2015, 2017), were not tested in this work, changes in fragmentation for
ammonium nitrate (i.e., AMS calibration standard) due to the vaporization scheme
were observed. Our observations show that the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios
of ammonium nitrate measured using the TV and LV schemes are equal to 1.9 and
0.7, respectively, suggesting that the quantification of organo-nitrate
compounds based on the NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios approach can also be
affected using the vaporization scheme (Farmer et al., 2010; Xu et al.,
2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e2898">Mass spectra of azelaic acid, measured by SP-AMS 1 using the thermal
<bold>(a)</bold> and laser <bold>(b)</bold> vaporization schemes. <bold>(c)</bold> Normalized cumulative histogram
of mass-to-charge ratios for the oxygenated organic compounds measured by
the SP-AMS 1. The blue area indicates that the thermal vaporization scheme
tends to provide organic fragments with smaller <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, whereas the pink area
indicates that the laser vaporization scheme tends to give organic fragments
with larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/2799/2021/amt-14-2799-2021-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Changes in
$f_{\mathrm{{C}_{{{2}}}{H}_{{{3}}}{O}^{{+}}}}{/{f}}_{\mathrm{{{CO}}_{{{2}}}^{{+}}}}$
ratio}?><title>Changes in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratio</title>
      <p id="d1e2987">The organic fragments of C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the
two dominant peaks observed in ambient OOA components identified by the PMF
analysis of standard HR-ToF-AMS measurements (i.e., TV scheme)
(Ng et al., 2011). The relative importance of the
two fragments varies between OOA components identified at the same
locations, and the ratio of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> a mass fraction of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to total organic) usually
decreases with the degree of oxidative aging (Ng et al., 2011,
2010). Based on the observations from SP-AMS 1 and 2, Fig. 3a shows that
most of the organic species detected using the LV scheme gave higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios compared to the TV scheme.
Note that dicarboxylic acids and multifunctional organic compounds show
stronger enhancement compared to alcohols. The average of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios measured by the TV and LV
schemes are 0.48 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.52) and 3.07 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.59), respectively,
indicating less thermal-induced decarboxylation with the gradual
vaporization.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e3201">Comparison of <bold>(a)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio and
<bold>(b)</bold> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measured using the LV and TV schemes from
laboratory data (hollow markers) and collocated field measurement (solid
markers) (see Table S1 for the detail of ambient data comparison).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/2799/2021/amt-14-2799-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3281">The observed enhancement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios
in this work suggests that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">43</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) observational framework developed based on the
HR-ToF-AMS datasets worldwide by Ng et al. (2010) may not be directly
applicable for evaluating the degree of aging and characteristics of OOA
coatings measured using the LV scheme of the SP-AMS. Figure 3a compares the ambient
OOA components determined using the TV and LV schemes (i.e., concurrent
HR-ToF-AMS and SP-AMS LV scheme measurements) at the same location if their
time series of mass concentrations are strongly correlated (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.75</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Table S1 summarizes the characteristics of the OOA
components observed in Beijing summer (Xie et al., 2019a; Xu et al.,
2019); Beijing winter (Wang et al., 2019; Xie et al., 2019b); Tibet
(Wang et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2018); and Fontana, CA (Chen et al.,
2018; Lee et al., 2017), that are used for our comparison. It can be found
that most of the OOA factors determined using the LV scheme gave significantly
higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios compared to those
determined using the TV scheme by factors of 6–18, which is similar to those
observed for dicarboxylic acids and multifunctional organic compounds
(Fig. 3a). Therefore, the differences in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios between the ambient OOA
components determined using the two vaporization schemes can be partially
explained by the laboratory observation reported in this<?pagebreak page2804?> section.
Nevertheless, we cannot rule out the possibility that the chemical
compositions of the OOA coatings on BC particles were different than those
externally mixed with BC particles despite their strong temporal
correlations (see more discussion on this topic in Sect. 3.6 based on the
elemental analysis).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Changes in
${f}_{\mathrm{{C}_{{{2}}}{H}_{{{4}}}{O}_{{{2}}}^{{+}}}}$}?><title>Changes in
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e3510">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a tracer fragment often associated with
biomass burning OAs (BBOA), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is commonly used to
identify the presence of BBOA and to evaluate their degree of aging
(Bozzetti et al., 2017; Cubison et al., 2011; Milic et al., 2017). Figure 3b shows that most of the species from SP-AMS 1 and 2 (i.e., 97 % of the
tested species) showed the enhancement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> when
they were detected using the LV scheme regardless of their functional moieties.
The average enhancement factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for alcohol,
dicarboxylic acids, and multifunctional groups are 2.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.92,
2.90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.78, and 2.69 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.11, respectively. Levoglucosan, a known
cellulose-derived compound produced during biomass burning
(Simoneit et al., 1999), gives an enhancement of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by a factor of 2.33. Different to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios that show scattered data
between vaporization schemes, a strong linear correlation was obtained for
all the tested species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.95</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with the slope equal to 2.45. This
strong linear correlation suggests that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
increased to a similar extent for most of the tested oxygenated organic
species.</p>
      <p id="d1e3751">Together with the changes in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> caused by the vaporization
schemes, our observation suggests that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">44</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">60</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (or
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) observational framework
developed by Cubison et al. (2011) has to be used
cautiously for evaluating potential influences of biomass burning emissions
on the chemical composition of OOA coatings. For example,
Rivellini et al. (2020) observed that the laser vaporization
approach led to the enhancement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for total OAs, less oxidized OOA (LO-OOA), and more oxidized OOA (MO-OOA) in an urban environment by comparing their laser-off and
laser-on measurements using a dual-vaporizers scheme (i.e., the SP-AMS
switched between the TV scheme and TV <inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> LV scheme during operation).
Wang et al. (2019) and Xie et al. (2019b)
identified BBOA factors in Beijing winter from their concurrent SP-AMS and
HR-ToF-AMS measurements, respectively, and a higher
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value was observed for the BBOA factor determined
using the TV scheme. However, it is important to note that the two BBOA factors
were weakly correlated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.42</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and thus they likely represented BBOA
materials from different origins.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Elemental analysis of organic coating</title>
      <p id="d1e3919">Elemental analysis of pure OAs and organic coatings on rBC particles was
performed based on the I-A method. Tables S2–S4 summarize the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of all the organic compounds measured by the three SP-AMSs.
Figure 4 compares the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values of all the
organic compounds generated using the LV scheme to their true values. While the
measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios are scattered around the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line (Fig. 4a), the measured
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values are generally lower than their corresponding true
values (Fig. 4b and c). Note that some organic species, such as glycolic
acid and glutamic acid, give relatively large discrepancies between the
measured and the true <inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values that can be due to their low contribution
of CHO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> signals to the total organic mass
(e.g., 1 %–2 %). The average relative errors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios for
individual SP-AMSs varied from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to 11.5 % (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6.6 %) and
from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">37.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">22.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %), respectively (Table 2).
Note that there are no statistical differences (ANOVA, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
between the relative errors of elemental ratios determined by the three
instruments, suggesting that the elemental analysis is not strongly
instrument<?pagebreak page2805?> dependent. For the thermal vaporization approach, the average
relative errors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %) and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">21.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %)
ratios determined in this work are similar to the measurement uncertainties
of HR-ToF-AMSs previously reported by
Canagaratna et al. (2015a).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e4221">Relative errors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measured by the three
independent SP-AMSs.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Vaporization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">SP-AMS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Elemental</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col4" nameend="col6" align="center">Average relative errors ( %) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">scheme</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">analysis method</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Laser vaporization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">I-A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">8.5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>22.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>33.2 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">I-A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">11.5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>23.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>18.3 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">I-A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.4 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>37.1 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>36.9 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1, 2 &amp; 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">I-A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.6 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>26.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27.2 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1 &amp; 2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.3 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.8 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>9.8 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Thermal vaporization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">I-A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.6 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>46.7 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">I-A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17.8 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>49.5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">I-A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>12.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>27.0 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>32.0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1, 2 &amp; 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">I-A</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5.2 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>21.5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>44.3 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e4679">Comparisons between the measured and true values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> determined using the three SP-AMSs using the LV scheme. Panels <bold>(a–c)</bold> and
<bold>(d–f)</bold> show the results calculated using the I-A method and I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method,
respectively. Red circles, blue triangles, and green crosses represent data
measured by SP-AMS 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The dashed lines represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
line.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/2799/2021/amt-14-2799-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e4750">Figure 5 compares the elemental ratios of standard organic compounds
determined using the LV and TV schemes. The data points from the three
independent SP-AMSs are well-aligned with each other even though a large
fraction of the tested organic species (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 50 %) were not
repeated between the different SP-AMS instruments. The linear fits of all
the measured data demonstrate that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios determined by the LV
scheme differ from their corresponding values determined using the TV scheme by
factors of 0.89 and 1.10, respectively. Canagaratna et al. (2015b)
conducted similar comparisons for 10 organic species (i.e., data from SP-AMS
3 in this work) based on the results obtained from the A-A method, reporting
that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values determined using the LV scheme differ from their
corresponding values determined using the TV scheme by factors of 0.83 and
1.16, respectively. The uncertainty of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios is further
reduced to approximately <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>10 % between the TV and LV schemes on
average in this study. Figure S4 shows that the I-A method with the scaling
factor applied can improve the accuracy of elemental ratios of oxygenated
species in general except for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of alcohol group. While the
fragmentation of oxygenated organic species due to the TV and LV scheme can
be significantly different, this work illustrates that their elemental
compositions can be comparable to the I-A method applied for
laboratory-generated particles with a single oxygenated organic species.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e4854">Comparisons of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of oxygenated organic compounds
determined using the LV and TV schemes. The I-A method was used for the
elemental analysis. The dashed and solid lines represent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line and data
fitting, respectively.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/2799/2021/amt-14-2799-2021-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Improved-ambient method for the LV scheme (I-A${}_{\mathrm{SP}}$)}?><title>Improved-ambient method for the LV scheme (I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)</title>
      <p id="d1e4918">The I-A method has been widely used for the elemental analysis of ambient OAs
measured using the TV scheme of HR-ToF-AMSs, and this approach has been described
in detail by Canagaratna et al.
(2015a). In brief, chemical standards,
including dicarboxylic acids, multifunctional acids, and alcohols, were
tested using the TV scheme. The elemental ratios were first determined by
the A-A method developed by Aiken et al. (2008), and they were
subsequently corrected by a multi-linear regression (MLR) model based on the
fraction contributions of CHO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments (i.e.,
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to address the composition dependence
in the OA fragmentation, which is referred to as the I-A method. Note that
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be used as surrogates for alcohol
and acid groups, respectively, and they are major peaks observed in ambient
OOAs (Canagaratna et al., 2015a; Duplissy et al., 2011; Takegawa et al.,
2007). As illustrated in the previous sections, OA fragmentation can be
significantly different between the LV and TV schemes, and hence an updated
multilinear regression parameter is conducted to check whether the model
accuracy can be improved for analyzing data generated using the LV scheme.
Following the approach for developing the I-A method
(Canagaratna et al., 2015a), updated
multiple linear regression parameters for determining <inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of
organic coatings were obtained based on the data from two SP-AMSs (1 and 2)
as shown in Eqs. (1) and (2), respectively.

                <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M319" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E1"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>1</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" columnspacing="1em" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.90</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.02</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.78</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" columnspacing="1em" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.74</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.50</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CHO</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.93</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the elemental ratios obtained
from the new fitting parameters (denoted as I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method hereafter)
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M324" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">A</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the elemental ratios obtained by the A-A
method.</p>
      <p id="d1e5325">Given that most of the tested organic species were not the same for each
SP-AMS, a direct inter-instrument comparison was not possible. Hence the
average relative errors obtained from the two instruments were used to
evaluate the performance of the I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M325" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method across all the tested species.
The relative errors of I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M326" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M327" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M328" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M329" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were
6.3 %, 5.8 %, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M330" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> %, respectively, for the LV scheme data. While
the I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M331" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method leads to a substantial improvement of the relative
errors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M332" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to the I-A method (i.e., from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M333" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to 5.8 %),
the relative average errors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M334" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio obtained from I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M335" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and I-A
method are comparable. As shown in Fig. 4d–f, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M336" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M337" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
OS<inline-formula><mml:math id="M338" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> values calculated using the I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M339" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method are better aligned with
the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M340" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line compared to those determined using the I-A method (Fig. 4a–c) with smaller root mean squared error (RMSE) reported in Table S5.
However, it is worth noting that the I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M341" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method gives the highest
positive bias for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M342" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio for alcohol species compared to the results
from the I-A method (with and without applying the scaling factor) as
illustrated in Fig. S4. For the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M343" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, the I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M344" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method can
reduce relative error for alcohol species but generate a larger range of
errors for dicarboxylic acids and multifunctional species.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <label>3.6</label><title>Insight into ambient OOA characteristics</title>
      <p id="d1e5548">There is an increasing number of field studies operating a standard
HR-ToF-AMS and an SP-AMS concurrently (i.e., total OAs measured by the TV
scheme vs. organic coatings measured using the LV scheme) to investigate the
mixing state of BC particles and the effects of primary emissions and
atmospheric processing on the formation of organic coatings on BC particles
(Lee et al., 2017; Massoli et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020). In
particular, whether SOA materials condensed on BC particles have similar
chemical characteristics to those externally mixed with BC particles remains
poorly understood. Previous observations in urban environments have reported
that the mass spectral features of ambient OOA components identified by the
PMF analysis were significantly different between the two co-located
measurements even though their temporal variabilities strongly correlated to
each other (Chen et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2019;
Massoli et al., 2015; Wang et al., 2020; Xu et al.,
2019; Zhao et al., 2019). Given our observations that vaporization
scheme plays a critical role in the fragmentation process of oxygenated
organic species, the LV elemental analysis scaling factors (0.89 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M345" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
1.10 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M346" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M347" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method obtained in this work can
facilitate more direct and robust comparison between the two types of
measurements based on elemental analysis. Nevertheless, it is important to
note that rBC and organics were likely more homogeneously mixed within our
laboratory-generated particles, which can be very different from the
morphology of<?pagebreak page2807?> ambient organically coated BC particles. Therefore, such
inter-instrument comparisons assume that BC morphology is not a key factor
to affect organic fragmentation observed using the LV scheme.</p>
      <p id="d1e5584">Figure 6 shows the elemental ratios of OOA components observed from previous
field studies conducted in California Research at the Nexus of Air Quality
and Climate Change (CalNex) 2010 campaign
(Massoli et al., 2015), Fontana, California, in
2015 (Chen et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2017), Tibet in 2015 (Wang et
al., 2017; Xu et al., 2018), Beijing winter in 2016 (Wang et al., 2019;
Xie et al., 2019b), and Beijing summer in 2017 (Wang et al., 2020; Xie
et al., 2019a; Xu et al., 2019). Correlations of hourly-averaged mass
concentrations between different PMF factors identified by the TV and LV
schemes were investigated, and only strongly correlated OOA factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M348" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were included in Fig. 6. If an OOA component
correlated well to multiple PMF OA factors identified by another
vaporization scheme, the comparison was only performed for a pair of OA
factors that gave the strongest correlation (see Table S1). Note that a
transported BBOA factor identified in Tibet, which was associated with a
significant amount of OOA materials (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M349" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), was also included in this
comparison. Figure 6a and b show the adjusted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M350" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M351" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios measured
using the LV scheme (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M352" display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis) using the inter-conversion factor and the
I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M353" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method, respectively. The error bars of each data point represent
the average absolute errors of the I-A and I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M354" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method obtained in
this study. Note that both I-A and I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M355" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> methods likely over-estimate
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M356" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of organics coated on ambient BC particles because of the
contributions of refractory CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M357" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> fragments (e.g., CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M358" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M359" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) usually remain unresolved.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e5718">Comparisons between ambient OOA data measured by co-located SP-AMSs
and HR-ToF-AMSs in the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate Change (CalNex) 2010
campaign (Massoli et al., 2015); Fontana,
California, in 2015 (Chen et al., 2018; Lee et al., 2017); Tibet in 2015
(Wang et al., 2017; Xu et al., 2018); and Beijing in 2016 (Wang et
al., 2019; Xie et al., 2019b) and 2017 (Wang et al., 2020; Xie et al.,
2019a; Xu et al., 2019) (see Table S1 for the detail of ambient data
comparison). For <bold>(a)</bold>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M360" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M361" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios determined by the laser
vaporization approached were corrected by the LV elemental analysis scaling
factors (1.10 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M362" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 0.89 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M363" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). For <bold>(b)</bold>, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M364" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M365" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios
were determined using the I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M366" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method. The LV scheme of the SP-AMS was used to
detect rBC-containing particles exclusively. The error bar represents the
average absolute errors of I-A (TV in  <bold>a</bold> and <bold>b</bold>, and LV in <bold>a</bold>) and
I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M367" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (LV in  <bold>b</bold>) for determining the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M368" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M369" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios. The
dashed black line represents the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M370" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line and the dashed grey line indicates
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M371" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>0.25 of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M372" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/2799/2021/amt-14-2799-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e5894">In Fig. 6a, although a few <inline-formula><mml:math id="M373" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M374" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios were well-aligned onto the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M375" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> line, it can be found that the majority of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M376" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios measured by
the LV scheme with the LV elemental analysis scaling factors applied (i.e.,
LV-OOA from CalNex, OOA-2 from Fontana, BBOA from Tibet, OOA-1, OOA-2 from
Beijing winter and OOA-1 from Beijing summer) were still lower than those
measured using the TV scheme after considering the uncertainties of I-A method.
In addition, some <inline-formula><mml:math id="M377" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of OOA coatings were higher than the OOAs
measured using the TV scheme. When the I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M378" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method was used, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M379" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
ratios generally increased compared to those determined using the I-A method
with the inter-conversion factors applied (Figs. 6b and S3). In
particular, LO-OOA from CalNex gave the largest enhancement of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M380" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio,
followed by OOA-2 from Fontana and SV-OOA from CalNex. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M381" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios
remained roughly the same between the two methods. Combining the results
presented in Fig. 6a and b, it can be concluded that the OOA materials
associated with rBC particles were likely less oxygenated (i.e., lower <inline-formula><mml:math id="M382" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
compared to the total OOAs measured using the TV scheme at some of the sampling
locations. This observation may be due to the fact that OOAs formed from
heterogeneous oxidation of POA such as HOA that are co-emitted and internally
mixed with BC are likely to be less and/or non-oxygenated in nature. For
example, our comparison shows the largest differences of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M383" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios between
the two vaporization schemes for the observations from Beijing (OOA-2 in
winter and OOA-1 in summer), where the air quality was expected to be
significantly influenced by local combustion sources. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M384" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of an
aged/transported BBOA factor detected using the LV scheme of the SP-AMS in Tibet is
also noticeably lower than that of MO-OOA detected by the HR-ToF-AMS even
though they are strongly correlated (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M385" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Overall, our observations
indicate that even though the time series of OOA factors determined by the
TV and LV scheme are strongly correlated (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M386" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.9</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
suggesting that they were likely co-emitted or formed through similar aging
processes during transport, they might contain multiple types of OA
materials and their relative distribution between rBC and non-BC particles
might be significantly different.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page2808?><sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Summary</title>
      <p id="d1e6073">Elemental ratios, in particularly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M387" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M388" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, have been widely used
to investigate the chemical properties of OAs such as particle viscosity
(Chen et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2015), particle phase transition
(Pye et al., 2017), aromatic structure or sorption properties
(Xiao et al., 2016), light absorption properties
(Kumar et al., 2018), and hygroscopicity
(Massoli et al., 2010) in many
field and laboratory studies. Enhancing the accuracy of elemental analysis
of OAs is important to improve understanding of their physio-chemical
properties and aging mechanisms. Although the I-A method has been widely
utilized to quantify <inline-formula><mml:math id="M389" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M390" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios of OAs measured by a standard
HR-ToF-AMS (i.e., TV scheme), the applicability of the I-A method for the
elemental analysis of organic coatings that are measured using the LV scheme of the SP-AMS remains uncertain, especially for ambient OOA components that are
always referred to as freshly formed and aged SOA materials based on their
degree of oxygenation.</p>
      <p id="d1e6124">To address this knowledge gap, this work examined 30 oxygenated organic
species with different functional moieties, which were characterized by both
TV and LV schemes of three SP-AMS instruments operated in different
laboratories. The results demonstrate that the LV scheme can retain larger
fragment ions during OA fragmentation compared to the TV scheme. Changes in
OA fragmentation due to the LV scheme can significantly impact the
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M391" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M392" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of organic mass spectra. Therefore, the application of the
observational-based framework developed based on these three organic
fragments may not be straightforward for evaluating the chemical
characteristics and aging of SOA and BBOA materials coated on ambient BC
particles (Cubison et al., 2011; Ng et al., 2010). The I-A method is
robust for determining elemental compositions of OOA materials detected by
both TV and LV schemes, and the LV elemental analysis scaling factors of
1.10 and 0.89 for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M393" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M394" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios, respectively, were determined to
further improve the accuracy. The I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M395" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method is developed in this
work based on the updated multilinear regression model for the LV scheme
measurements. Compared to the I-A method, the I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M396" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method can
further reduce the relative errors of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M397" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio, which were from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M398" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> % to
5.8 % on average for our tested species, and the average of relative
errors for <inline-formula><mml:math id="M399" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios remain roughly the same. Nevertheless, it is worth
noting that the I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M400" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method may overestimate the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M401" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratio of alcohol
species and lead to more scattered <inline-formula><mml:math id="M402" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios for dicarboxylic acids and
multifunctional species. Applying the LV elemental analysis scaling factors
and the I-A<inline-formula><mml:math id="M403" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SP</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> method to ambient data, this work demonstrates that the
formation mechanisms and chemical characteristics of OOA coatings on BC
particles can be different than OOA materials externally mixed with BC at
the same location. Lastly, a significant difference between the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M404" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M405" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios for ammonium nitrate particles measured by
the TV and LV scheme was observed in this work. As the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M406" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M407" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ratios have been widely used for quantifying
particle-phase organo-nitrate compounds, this observation suggests that
changes in fragmentation can have an impact on quantifying organo-nitrate
compounds coated on BC.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e6365">The dataset for this publication is available upon contacting the
corresponding authors.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e6368">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2799-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-2799-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e6377">AKYL supervised the project. YXC, RW, MDW, and MRC carried
out the experiments. MM, LHR, RW, MDW, and MRC analyzed the
lab data. MM, JW, and XG analyzed the field data. MM and AKYL
wrote the paper with support and comments from all the co-authors.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e6383">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e6389">The authors would like to thank Max G. Adam for his assistance on initial
stage of the experiments conducted at the National University of Singapore.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e6394">This work is supported by the National Environmental Agency (NEA) of
Singapore (NEA, R-706-000-043-490). The content does not represent NEA's
view. Measurements conducted at the University of Toronto were supported by
the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e6400">This paper was edited by Mingjin Tang and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Elemental analysis of
organic species with electron ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry,
Anal. Chem., 79, 8350–8358, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., Decarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Sun,
Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P. J., Canagaratna, M.
R., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J.,
Metzger, A., Baltensperger, U., and Jimenez, J. L.: O/C and OM/OC ratios of
primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols with high-resolution
time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42,
4478–4485, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light Absorption by Carbonaceous
Particles: An Investigative Review,
Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 40,  27–67, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500421521</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bozzetti, C., Sosedova, Y., Xiao, M., Daellenbach, K. R., Ulevicius, V., Dudoitis, V., Mordas, G., Byčenkienė, S., Plauškaitė, K., Vlachou, A., Golly, B., Chazeau, B., Besombes, J.-L., Baltensperger, U., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Slowik, J. G., El Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Argon offline-AMS source apportionment of organic aerosol over yearly cycles for an urban, rural, and marine site in northern Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 117–141, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-117-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-117-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Brook, R. D., Rajagopalan, S., Pope, C. A., 3rd, Brook, J. R., Bhatnagar,
A., Diez-Roux, A. V., Holguin, F., Hong, Y., Luepker, R. V., Mittleman, M.
A., Peters, A., Siscovick, D., Smith Jr., S. C., Whitsel, L., Kaufman, J.
D., American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism: Particulate matter air
pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement
from the American Heart Association, Circulation, 121, 2331–2378, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181dbece1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181dbece1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Jimenez, J. L., Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M.
R., Zhang, Q., Onasch, T. B., Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., Delia,
A., Williams, L. R., Trimborn, A. M., Northway, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., Kolb,
C. E., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chemical and microphysical
characterization of ambient aerosols with the aerodyne aerosol mass
spectrometer, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 185–222, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H., Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K. R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Massoli, P., Browne, E. C., Franklin, J. P., Wilson, K.
R., Onasch, T. B., Kirchstetter, T. W., Fortner, E. C., Kolb, C. E., Jayne,
J. T., Kroll, J. H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chemical compositions of black
carbon particle cores and coatings via soot particle aerosol mass
spectrometry with photoionization and electron ionization, J. Phys. Chem. A,
119, 4589–4599, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Chen, C. L., Chen, S., Russell, L. M., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Betha, R.,
Sanchez, K. J., Lee, A. K. Y., Williams, L., Collier, S. C., Zhang, Q.,
Kumar, A., Kleeman, M. J., Zhang, X., and Cappa, C. D.: Organic Aerosol
Particle Chemical Properties Associated With Residential Burning and Fog in
Wintertime San Joaquin Valley (Fresno) and With Vehicle and Firework
Emissions in Summertime South Coast Air Basin (Fontana), J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 123, 10707–10731, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chen, Q., Liu, Y., Donahue, N. M., Shilling, J. E., and Martin, S. T.:
Particle-phase chemistry of secondary organic material: modeled compared to
measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M408" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M409" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">H</mml:mi><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> elemental ratios provide constraints, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 45, 4763–4770, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>China, S., Mazzoleni, C., Gorkowski, K., Aiken, A. C., and Dubey, M. K.:
Morphology and mixing state of individual freshly emitted wildfire
carbonaceous particles, Nature Commun., 4, 2122, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3122" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms3122</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Collier, S., Williams, L. R., Onasch, T. B., Cappa, C. D., Zhang, X.,
Russell, L. M., Chen, C.-L., Sanchez, K. J., Worsnop, D. R., an<?pagebreak page2810?>d Zhang, Q.:
Influence of Emissions and Aqueous Processing on Particles Containing Black
Carbon in a Polluted Urban Environment: Insights From a Soot
Particle-Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 6648–6666,
2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Corbin, J. C., Sierau, B., Gysel, M., Laborde, M., Keller, A., Kim, J., Petzold, A., Onasch, T. B., Lohmann, U., and Mensah, A. A.: Mass spectrometry of refractory black carbon particles from six sources: carbon-cluster and oxygenated ions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2591–2603, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2591-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2591-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cubison, M. J., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Farmer, D. K., Day, D., Lechner, M. J., Brune, W. H., Apel, E., Diskin, G. S., Fisher, J. A., Fuelberg, H. E., Hecobian, A., Knapp, D. J., Mikoviny, T., Riemer, D., Sachse, G. W., Sessions, W., Weber, R. J., Weinheimer, A. J., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in aircraft and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049–12064, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., and Docherty, K. S.:
Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer,
Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Duplissy, J., DeCarlo, P. F., Dommen, J., Alfarra, M. R., Metzger, A., Barmpadimos, I., Prevot, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., Tritscher, T., Gysel, M., Aiken, A. C., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Collins, D. R., Tomlinson, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Relating hygroscopicity and composition of organic aerosol particulate matter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1155–1165, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Farmer, D. K., Matsunaga, A., Docherty, K. S., Surratt, J. D., Seinfeld, J.
H., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.: Response of an aerosol mass
spectrometer to organonitrates and organosulfates and implications for
atmospheric chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6670–6675, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fry, J. L., Brown, S. S., Middlebrook, A. M., Edwards, P. M., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Jimenez, J. L., Allen, H. M., Ryerson, T. B., Pollack, I., Graus, M., Warneke, C., de Gouw, J. A., Brock, C. A., Gilman, J., Lerner, B. M., Dubé, W. P., Liao, J., and Welti, A.: Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) yields from NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M410" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> radical + isoprene based on nighttime aircraft power plant plume transects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11663–11682, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11663-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-11663-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Heal, M. R., Kumar, P., and Harrison, R. M.: Particles, air quality, policy
and health, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6606–6630, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heald, C. L., Kroll, J. H., Jimenez, J. L., Docherty, K. S., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Aiken, A. C., Chen, Q., Martin, S. T., Farmer, D. K., and Artaxo, P.: A
simplified description of the evolution of organic aerosol composition in
the atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L08803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042737" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL042737</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heinzerling, A., Hsu, J., and Yip, F.: Respiratory Health Effects of
Ultrafine Particles in Children: A Literature Review, Water Air Soil
Pollut., 227, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2726-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11270-015-2726-6</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P.
I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer,
S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A.,
Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina,
K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A.
M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E.,
Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the
Atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525-1529,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1180353</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Koop, T., Bookhold, J., Shiraiwa, M., and Pöschl, U.: Glass transition and
phase state of organic compounds: dependency on molecular properties and
implications for secondary organic aerosols in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13,
19238–19255, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna,
M. R., Wilson, K. R., Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S.,
Bluhm, H., Mysak, E. R., Smith, J. D., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of
atmospheric organic aerosol, Nat. Chem., 3, 133–139, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kumar, N. K., Corbin, J. C., Bruns, E. A., Massabó, D., Slowik, J. G., Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Prati, P., Vlachou, A., Baltensperger, U., Gysel, M., El-Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Production of particulate brown carbon during atmospheric aging of residential wood-burning emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17843–17861, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17843-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17843-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kuwata, M., Kondo, Y., and Takegawa, N.: Critical condensed mass for
activation of black carbon as cloud condensation nuclei in Tokyo, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D20202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012086" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012086</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kuwata, M., Zorn, S. R., and Martin, S. T.: Using elemental ratios to
predict the density of organic material composed of carbon, hydrogen, and
oxygen, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 787–794, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Laborde, M., Crippa, M., Tritscher, T., Jurányi, Z., Decarlo, P. F., Temime-Roussel, B., Marchand, N., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., and Gysel, M.: Black carbon physical properties and mixing state in the European megacity Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5831–5856, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5831-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-5831-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lambe, A. T., Cappa, C. D., Massoli, P., Onasch, T. B., Forestieri, S. D.,
Martin, A. T., Cummings, M. J., Croasdale, D. R., Brune, W. H., Worsnop, D.
R., and Davidovits, P.: Relationship between oxidation level and optical
properties of secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
6349–6357, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, A. K. Y., Chen, C.-L., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Betha, R., Russell, L. M., Zhang, X., and Cappa, C. D.: Formation of secondary organic aerosol coating on black carbon particles near vehicular emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 15055–15067, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-15055-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-15055-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lee, A. K. Y., Adam, M. G., Liggio, J., Li, S.-M., Li, K., Willis, M. D., Abbatt, J. P. D., Tokarek, T. W., Odame-Ankrah, C. A., Osthoff, H. D., Strawbridge, K., and Brook, J. R.: A large contribution of anthropogenic organo-nitrates to secondary organic aerosol in the Alberta oil sands, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12209–12219, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12209-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-12209-2019</ext-link>, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2811?><ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lee, A. K. Y., Rivellini, L. H., Chen, C. L., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Betha,
R., Russell, L. M., Zhang, X., and Cappa, C. D.: Influences of Primary
Emission and Secondary Coating Formation on the Particle Diversity and
Mixing State of Black Carbon Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53,
9429–9438, 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Allan, J., Whitehead, J., Young, D., Flynn, M., Coe, H., McFiggans, G., Fleming, Z. L., and Bandy, B.: Ambient black carbon particle hygroscopic properties controlled by mixing state and composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2015–2029, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2015-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-2015-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Whitehead, J., Alfarra, M. R., Reyes-Villegas, E., Spracklen,
D. V., Reddington, C. L., Kong, S., Williams, P. I., Ting, Y.-C.,
Haslett, S., Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M. J., Morgan, W. T.,
McFiggans, G., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Black-carbon absorption
enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state, Nat.
Geosci., 10, 184–188, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, D., Joshi, R., Wang, J., Yu, C., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Flynn, M. J., Xie, C., Lee, J., Squires, F., Kotthaus, S., Grimmond, S., Ge, X., Sun, Y., and Fu, P.: Contrasting physical properties of black carbon in urban Beijing between winter and summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6749–6769, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6749-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-6749-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Massoli, P., Lambe, A. T., Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Ehn, M.,
Mikkilä, J., Canagaratna, M. R., Brune, W. H., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J.
T., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Kolb, C. E., Davidovits,
P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Relationship between aerosol oxidation level and
hygroscopic properties of laboratory generated secondary organic aerosol
(SOA) particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L24801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045258" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010GL045258</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Massoli, P., Onasch, T. B., Cappa, C. D., Nuamaan, I., Hakala, J., Hayden,
K., Li, S.-M., Sueper, D. T., Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Jayne, J. T., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Characterization of black carbon-containing particles from
soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer measurements on the
R/VAtlantisduring CalNex 2010, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 2575–2593,
2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>McMeeking, G. R., Good, N., Petters, M. D., McFiggans, G., and Coe, H.: Influences on the fraction of hydrophobic and hydrophilic black carbon in the atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5099–5112, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5099-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-5099-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Milic, A., Mallet, M. D., Cravigan, L. T., Alroe, J., Ristovski, Z. D., Selleck, P., Lawson, S. J., Ward, J., Desservettaz, M. J., Paton-Walsh, C., Williams, L. R., Keywood, M. D., and Miljevic, B.: Biomass burning and biogenic aerosols in northern Australia during the SAFIRED campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3945–3961, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3945-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-3945-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Nel, A.: Atmosphere. Air pollution-related illness: effects of particles,
Science, 308, 804–806, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Tian, J., Ulbrich, I. M., Kroll, J. H., Docherty, K. S., Chhabra, P. S., Bahreini, R., Murphy, S. M., Seinfeld, J. H., Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., DeCarlo, P. F., Lanz, V. A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Dinar, E., Rudich, Y., and Worsnop, D. R.: Organic aerosol components observed in Northern Hemispheric datasets from Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4625–4641, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld, J. H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging inferred from aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6465–6474, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Onasch, T. B., Trimborn, A., Fortner, E. C., Jayne, J. T., Kok, G. L.,
Williams, L. R., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Soot Particle Aerosol
Mass Spectrometer: Development, Validation, and Initial Application, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 46, 804–817, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.663948" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2012.663948</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Levy Zamora, M.,
Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wu, Y. S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Glen, C. R., Collins, D.
R., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct
radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4266–4271, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pye, H. O. T., Murphy, B. N., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Carlton, A. G., Guo, H., Weber, R., Vasilakos, P., Appel, K. W., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Surratt, J. D., Nenes, A., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Misztal, P. K., and Goldstein, A. H.: On the implications of aerosol liquid water and phase separation for organic aerosol mass, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 343–369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-343-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-343-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ramanathan, V. and Carmichael, G.: Global and regional climate changes due
to black carbon, Nature Geosci., 1, 221–227, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rivellini, L.-H., Adam, M. G., Kasthuriarachchi, N., and Lee, A. K. Y.: Characterization of carbonaceous aerosols in Singapore: insight from black carbon fragments and trace metal ions detected by a soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5977–5993, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5977-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-5977-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Simoneit, B. R. T., Schauer, J. J., Nolte, C. G., Oros, D. R., Elias, V. O.,
Fraser, M. P., Rogge, W. F., and Cass, G. R.: Levoglucosan, a tracer for
cellulose in biomass burning and atmospheric particles, Atmos. Environ., 33,
173–182, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sueper, D.: ToF-AMS Analysis Software, available at: <uri>http://cires1.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/ToFAMSResources/ToFSoftware/index.html</uri> (last access: 19 July 2020), 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Takegawa, N., Miyakawa, T., Kawamura, K., and Kondo, Y.: Contribution of
Selected Dicarboxylic and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M411" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ω</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-Oxocarboxylic Acids in Ambient Aerosol
to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M412" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 44 Signal of an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 41, 418–437, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wang, J., Zhang, Q., Chen, M., Collier, S., Zhou, S., Ge, X., Xu, J., Shi,
J., Xie, C., Hu, J., Ge, S., Sun, Y., and Coe, H.: First Chemical
Characterization of Refractory Black Carbon Aerosols and Associated Coatings
over the Tibetan Plateau (4730 m a.s.l), Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
14072–14082, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Liu, D., Ge, X., Wu, Y., Shen, F., Chen, M., Zhao, J., Xie, C., Wang, Q., Xu, W., Zhang, J., Hu, J., Allan, J., Joshi, R., Fu, P., Coe, H., and Sun, Y.: Characterization of black carbon-containing fine particles in Beijing during wintertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 447–458, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-447-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-447-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, J., Ye, J., Liu, D., Wu, Y., Zhao, J., Xu, W., Xie, C., Shen, F., Zhang, J., Ohno, P. E., Qin, Y., Zhao, X., Martin, S. T., Lee, A. K. Y., Fu, P., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y., Chen, M., and Ge, X.: Characterization of submicron organic particles in Beijing during summertime: comparison between SP-AMS and HR-AMS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14091–14102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14091-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-14091-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page2812?><ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Willis, M. D., Lee, A. K. Y., Onasch, T. B., Fortner, E. C., Williams, L. R., Lambe, A. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Collection efficiency of the soot-particle aerosol mass spectrometer (SP-AMS) for internally mixed particulate black carbon, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4507–4516, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4507-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-4507-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Willis, M. D., Healy, R. M., Riemer, N., West, M., Wang, J. M., Jeong, C.-H., Wenger, J. C., Evans, G. J., Abbatt, J. P. D., and Lee, A. K. Y.: Quantification of black carbon mixing state from traffic: implications for aerosol optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4693–4706, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4693-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4693-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wong, J. P. S., Lee, A. K. Y., Slowik, J. G., Cziczo, D. J., Leaitch, W. R.,
Macdonald, A., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Oxidation of ambient biogenic secondary
organic aerosol by hydroxyl radicals: Effects on cloud condensation nuclei
activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L22805, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049351" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL049351</ext-link>,  2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Wu, Y., Liu, D., Wang, J., Shen, F., Chen, Y., Cui, S., Ge, S., Wu, Y.,
Chen, M., and Ge, X.: Characterization of Size-Resolved Hygroscopicity of
Black Carbon-Containing Particle in Urban Environment, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 53, 14212–14221, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xiao, X., Chen, Z., and Chen, B.: H/C atomic ratio as a smart linkage
between pyrolytic temperatures, aromatic clusters and sorption properties of
biochars derived from diverse precursory materials, Sci. Rep., 6, 22644, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22644" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep22644</ext-link>,
2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Xie, C., Xu, W., Wang, J., Liu, D., Ge, X., Zhang, Q., Wang, Q., Du, W.,
Zhao, J., Zhou, W., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Worsnop, D., and Sun, Y.:
Light absorption enhancement of black carbon in urban Beijing in summer,
Atmos. Environ., 213, 499–504, 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xie, C., Xu, W., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Liu, D., Tang, G., Chen, P., Du, W., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Zhou, W., Han, T., Bian, Q., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Ge, X., Allan, J., Coe, H., and Sun, Y.: Vertical characterization of aerosol optical properties and brown carbon in winter in urban Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 165–179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-165-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-165-2019</ext-link>, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xu, J., Zhang, Q., Shi, J., Ge, X., Xie, C., Wang, J., Kang, S., Zhang, R., and Wang, Y.: Chemical characteristics of submicron particles at the central Tibetan Plateau: insights from aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 427–443, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-427-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-427-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xu, L., Suresh, S., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Aerosol characterization over the southeastern United States using high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry: spatial and seasonal variation of aerosol composition and sources with a focus on organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7307–7336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Xu, W., Sun, Y., Wang, Q., Du, W., Zhao, J., Ge, X., Han, T., Zhang, Y.,
Zhou, W., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., and Worsnop, D. R.: Seasonal
Characterization of Organic Nitrogen in Atmospheric Aerosols Using High
Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry in Beijing, China, ACS Earth and Space
Chem., 1, 673–682, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xu, W., Xie, C., Karnezi, E., Zhang, Q., Wang, J., Pandis, S. N., Ge, X., Zhang, J., An, J., Wang, Q., Zhao, J., Du, W., Qiu, Y., Zhou, W., He, Y., Li, Y., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Summertime aerosol volatility measurements in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10205–10216, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10205-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-10205-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Sanchez, M. S., Douet, C., Wang, Y., Bateman, A. P., Gong, Z., Kuwata, M., Renbaum-Wolff, L., Sato, B. B., Liu, P. F., Bertram, A. K., Geiger, F. M., and Martin, S. T.: Changing shapes and implied viscosities of suspended submicron particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7819–7829, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7819-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7819-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Zhao, J., Qiu, Y., Zhou, W., Xu, W., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Xie, C.,
Wang, Q., Du, W., Worsnop, D. R., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhou, L., Ge, X., Fu,
P., Li, J., Wang, Z., Donahue, N. M., and Sun, Y.: Organic Aerosol
Processing During Winter Severe Haze Episodes in Beijing, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 124, 10248–10263, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Elemental analysis of oxygenated organic coating on black carbon particles using a soot-particle aerosol mass spectrometer</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Chemical characterization of organic coatings is important to advance our
understanding of the physio-chemical properties and environmental fate of
black carbon (BC) particles. The soot-particle aerosol mass spectrometer
(SP-AMS) has been utilized for this purpose in recent field studies. The
laser vaporization (LV) scheme of the SP-AMS can heat BC cores gradually until
they are completely vaporized, during which organic coatings can be
vaporized at temperatures lower than that of the thermal vaporizer (TV) used
in a standard high-resolution time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer
(HR-ToF-AMS) that employs flash vaporization. This work investigates the
effects of vaporization schemes on fragmentation and elemental analysis of
known oxygenated organic species using three SP-AMS instruments. We show
that LV can reduce fragmentation of organic molecules. Substantial
enhancement of C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>3</sub>O<sup>+</sup>∕CO<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> and
C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>O<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> signals was observed for most of the tested
species when the LV scheme was used, suggesting that the observational
frameworks based on the use of HR-ToF-AMS field data may not be directly applicable
for evaluating the chemical evolution of oxygenated organic aerosol (OOA)
components coated on ambient BC particles. The uncertainties of H : C and O : C
determined using the improved-ambient (I-A) method for both LV and TV
approaches were similar, and scaling factors of 1.10 for H : C and 0.89 for
O : C were determined to facilitate more direct comparisons between
observations from the two vaporization schemes. Furthermore, the I-A method
was updated based on the multilinear regression model for the LV scheme
measurements. The updated parameters can reduce the relative errors of O : C
from −26.3&thinsp;% to 5.8&thinsp;%, whereas the relative errors of H : C remain roughly
the same. Applying the scaling factors and the updated parameters for the
I-A method to ambient data, we found that even though the time series of OOA
components determined using the LV and TV schemes are strongly correlated at
the same location, OOA coatings were likely less oxygenated compared to
those externally mixed with BC.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., DeCarlo, P. F., and Jimenez, J. L.: Elemental analysis of
organic species with electron ionization high-resolution mass spectrometry,
Anal. Chem., 79, 8350–8358, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Aiken, A. C., Decarlo, P. F., Kroll, J. H., Worsnop, D. R., Huffman, J. A.,
Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Mohr, C., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Sun,
Y., Zhang, Q., Trimborn, A., Northway, M., Ziemann, P. J., Canagaratna, M.
R., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Prevot, A. S., Dommen, J., Duplissy, J.,
Metzger, A., Baltensperger, U., and Jimenez, J. L.: O/C and OM/OC ratios of
primary, secondary, and ambient organic aerosols with high-resolution
time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 42,
4478–4485, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C. and Bergstrom, R. W.: Light Absorption by Carbonaceous
Particles: An Investigative Review,
Aerosol Sci.
Technol., 40,  27–67, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820500421521</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bond, T. C., Doherty, S. J., Fahey, D. W., Forster, P. M., Berntsen, T.,
DeAngelo, B. J., Flanner, M. G., Ghan, S., Kärcher, B., Koch, D., Kinne,
S., Kondo, Y., Quinn, P. K., Sarofim, M. C., Schultz, M. G., Schulz, M.,
Venkataraman, C., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Bellouin, N., Guttikunda, S. K.,
Hopke, P. K., Jacobson, M. Z., Kaiser, J. W., Klimont, Z., Lohmann, U.,
Schwarz, J. P., Shindell, D., Storelvmo, T., Warren, S. G., and Zender, C.
S.: Bounding the role of black carbon in the climate system: A scientific
assessment, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 5380–5552, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bozzetti, C., Sosedova, Y., Xiao, M., Daellenbach, K. R., Ulevicius, V., Dudoitis, V., Mordas, G., Byčenkienė, S., Plauškaitė, K., Vlachou, A., Golly, B., Chazeau, B., Besombes, J.-L., Baltensperger, U., Jaffrezo, J.-L., Slowik, J. G., El Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Argon offline-AMS source apportionment of organic aerosol over yearly cycles for an urban, rural, and marine site in northern Europe, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 117–141, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-117-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-117-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Brook, R. D., Rajagopalan, S., Pope, C. A., 3rd, Brook, J. R., Bhatnagar,
A., Diez-Roux, A. V., Holguin, F., Hong, Y., Luepker, R. V., Mittleman, M.
A., Peters, A., Siscovick, D., Smith Jr., S. C., Whitsel, L., Kaufman, J.
D., American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention, Council on the Kidney in Cardiovascular Disease, and Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity and Metabolism: Particulate matter air
pollution and cardiovascular disease: An update to the scientific statement
from the American Heart Association, Circulation, 121, 2331–2378, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181dbece1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181dbece1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jayne, J. T., Jimenez, J. L., Allan, J. D., Alfarra, M.
R., Zhang, Q., Onasch, T. B., Drewnick, F., Coe, H., Middlebrook, A., Delia,
A., Williams, L. R., Trimborn, A. M., Northway, M. J., DeCarlo, P. F., Kolb,
C. E., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chemical and microphysical
characterization of ambient aerosols with the aerodyne aerosol mass
spectrometer, Mass Spectrom. Rev., 26, 185–222, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Kroll, J. H., Chen, Q., Kessler, S. H., Massoli, P., Hildebrandt Ruiz, L., Fortner, E., Williams, L. R., Wilson, K. R., Surratt, J. D., Donahue, N. M., Jayne, J. T., and Worsnop, D. R.: Elemental ratio measurements of organic compounds using aerosol mass spectrometry: characterization, improved calibration, and implications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 253–272, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-253-2015</a>, 2015a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Canagaratna, M. R., Massoli, P., Browne, E. C., Franklin, J. P., Wilson, K.
R., Onasch, T. B., Kirchstetter, T. W., Fortner, E. C., Kolb, C. E., Jayne,
J. T., Kroll, J. H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Chemical compositions of black
carbon particle cores and coatings via soot particle aerosol mass
spectrometry with photoionization and electron ionization, J. Phys. Chem. A,
119, 4589–4599, 2015b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, C. L., Chen, S., Russell, L. M., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Betha, R.,
Sanchez, K. J., Lee, A. K. Y., Williams, L., Collier, S. C., Zhang, Q.,
Kumar, A., Kleeman, M. J., Zhang, X., and Cappa, C. D.: Organic Aerosol
Particle Chemical Properties Associated With Residential Burning and Fog in
Wintertime San Joaquin Valley (Fresno) and With Vehicle and Firework
Emissions in Summertime South Coast Air Basin (Fontana), J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 123, 10707–10731, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chen, Q., Liu, Y., Donahue, N. M., Shilling, J. E., and Martin, S. T.:
Particle-phase chemistry of secondary organic material: modeled compared to
measured O : C and H : C elemental ratios provide constraints, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 45, 4763–4770, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
China, S., Mazzoleni, C., Gorkowski, K., Aiken, A. C., and Dubey, M. K.:
Morphology and mixing state of individual freshly emitted wildfire
carbonaceous particles, Nature Commun., 4, 2122, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3122" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3122</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Collier, S., Williams, L. R., Onasch, T. B., Cappa, C. D., Zhang, X.,
Russell, L. M., Chen, C.-L., Sanchez, K. J., Worsnop, D. R., and Zhang, Q.:
Influence of Emissions and Aqueous Processing on Particles Containing Black
Carbon in a Polluted Urban Environment: Insights From a Soot
Particle-Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 123, 6648–6666,
2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Corbin, J. C., Sierau, B., Gysel, M., Laborde, M., Keller, A., Kim, J., Petzold, A., Onasch, T. B., Lohmann, U., and Mensah, A. A.: Mass spectrometry of refractory black carbon particles from six sources: carbon-cluster and oxygenated ions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2591–2603, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2591-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2591-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Cubison, M. J., Ortega, A. M., Hayes, P. L., Farmer, D. K., Day, D., Lechner, M. J., Brune, W. H., Apel, E., Diskin, G. S., Fisher, J. A., Fuelberg, H. E., Hecobian, A., Knapp, D. J., Mikoviny, T., Riemer, D., Sachse, G. W., Sessions, W., Weber, R. J., Weinheimer, A. J., Wisthaler, A., and Jimenez, J. L.: Effects of aging on organic aerosol from open biomass burning smoke in aircraft and laboratory studies, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 12049–12064, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-12049-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>DeCarlo, P. F., Kimmel, J. R., Trimborn, A., Northway, M. J., Jayne, J. T.,
Aiken, A. C., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Horvath, T., and Docherty, K. S.:
Field-deployable, high-resolution, time-of-flight aerosol mass spectrometer,
Anal. Chem., 78, 8281–8289, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Duplissy, J., DeCarlo, P. F., Dommen, J., Alfarra, M. R., Metzger, A., Barmpadimos, I., Prevot, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., Tritscher, T., Gysel, M., Aiken, A. C., Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Worsnop, D. R., Collins, D. R., Tomlinson, J., and Baltensperger, U.: Relating hygroscopicity and composition of organic aerosol particulate matter, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 1155–1165, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-1155-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Farmer, D. K., Matsunaga, A., Docherty, K. S., Surratt, J. D., Seinfeld, J.
H., Ziemann, P. J., and Jimenez, J. L.: Response of an aerosol mass
spectrometer to organonitrates and organosulfates and implications for
atmospheric chemistry, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107, 6670–6675, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Fry, J. L., Brown, S. S., Middlebrook, A. M., Edwards, P. M., Campuzano-Jost, P., Day, D. A., Jimenez, J. L., Allen, H. M., Ryerson, T. B., Pollack, I., Graus, M., Warneke, C., de Gouw, J. A., Brock, C. A., Gilman, J., Lerner, B. M., Dubé, W. P., Liao, J., and Welti, A.: Secondary organic aerosol (SOA) yields from NO<sub>3</sub> radical + isoprene based on nighttime aircraft power plant plume transects, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11663–11682, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11663-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11663-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Heal, M. R., Kumar, P., and Harrison, R. M.: Particles, air quality, policy
and health, Chem. Soc. Rev., 41, 6606–6630, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Heald, C. L., Kroll, J. H., Jimenez, J. L., Docherty, K. S., DeCarlo, P. F.,
Aiken, A. C., Chen, Q., Martin, S. T., Farmer, D. K., and Artaxo, P.: A
simplified description of the evolution of organic aerosol composition in
the atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L08803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042737" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL042737</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Heinzerling, A., Hsu, J., and Yip, F.: Respiratory Health Effects of
Ultrafine Particles in Children: A Literature Review, Water Air Soil
Pollut., 227, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2726-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2726-6</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Jimenez, J. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Donahue, N. M., Prevot, A. S. H., Zhang,
Q., Kroll, J. H., DeCarlo, P. F., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Ng, N. L., Aiken,
A. C., Docherty, K. S., Ulbrich, I. M., Grieshop, A. P., Robinson, A. L.,
Duplissy, J., Smith, J. D., Wilson, K. R., Lanz, V. A., Hueglin, C., Sun, Y.
L., Tian, J., Laaksonen, A., Raatikainen, T., Rautiainen, J., Vaattovaara,
P., Ehn, M., Kulmala, M., Tomlinson, J. M., Collins, D. R., Cubison, M. J.,
Dunlea, E. J., Huffman, J. A., Onasch, T. B., Alfarra, M. R., Williams, P.
I., Bower, K., Kondo, Y., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F., Borrmann, S., Weimer,
S., Demerjian, K., Salcedo, D., Cottrell, L., Griffin, R., Takami, A.,
Miyoshi, T., Hatakeyama, S., Shimono, A., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Dzepina,
K., Kimmel, J. R., Sueper, D., Jayne, J. T., Herndon, S. C., Trimborn, A.
M., Williams, L. R., Wood, E. C., Middlebrook, A. M., Kolb, C. E.,
Baltensperger, U., and Worsnop, D. R.: Evolution of Organic Aerosols in the
Atmosphere, Science, 326, 1525-1529,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180353</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Koop, T., Bookhold, J., Shiraiwa, M., and Pöschl, U.: Glass transition and
phase state of organic compounds: dependency on molecular properties and
implications for secondary organic aerosols in the atmosphere, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13,
19238–19255, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>Kroll, J. H., Donahue, N. M., Jimenez, J. L., Kessler, S. H., Canagaratna,
M. R., Wilson, K. R., Altieri, K. E., Mazzoleni, L. R., Wozniak, A. S.,
Bluhm, H., Mysak, E. R., Smith, J. D., Kolb, C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.:
Carbon oxidation state as a metric for describing the chemistry of
atmospheric organic aerosol, Nat. Chem., 3, 133–139, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Kumar, N. K., Corbin, J. C., Bruns, E. A., Massabó, D., Slowik, J. G., Drinovec, L., Močnik, G., Prati, P., Vlachou, A., Baltensperger, U., Gysel, M., El-Haddad, I., and Prévôt, A. S. H.: Production of particulate brown carbon during atmospheric aging of residential wood-burning emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17843–17861, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17843-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17843-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Kuwata, M., Kondo, Y., and Takegawa, N.: Critical condensed mass for
activation of black carbon as cloud condensation nuclei in Tokyo, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 114, D20202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012086" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012086</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Kuwata, M., Zorn, S. R., and Martin, S. T.: Using elemental ratios to
predict the density of organic material composed of carbon, hydrogen, and
oxygen, Environ. Sci. Technol., 46, 787–794, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Laborde, M., Crippa, M., Tritscher, T., Jurányi, Z., Decarlo, P. F., Temime-Roussel, B., Marchand, N., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Baltensperger, U., Prévôt, A. S. H., Weingartner, E., and Gysel, M.: Black carbon physical properties and mixing state in the European megacity Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 5831–5856, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5831-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5831-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Lambe, A. T., Cappa, C. D., Massoli, P., Onasch, T. B., Forestieri, S. D.,
Martin, A. T., Cummings, M. J., Croasdale, D. R., Brune, W. H., Worsnop, D.
R., and Davidovits, P.: Relationship between oxidation level and optical
properties of secondary organic aerosol, Environ. Sci. Technol., 47,
6349–6357, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, A. K. Y., Chen, C.-L., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Betha, R., Russell, L. M., Zhang, X., and Cappa, C. D.: Formation of secondary organic aerosol coating on black carbon particles near vehicular emissions, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 15055–15067, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-15055-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-15055-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, A. K. Y., Adam, M. G., Liggio, J., Li, S.-M., Li, K., Willis, M. D., Abbatt, J. P. D., Tokarek, T. W., Odame-Ankrah, C. A., Osthoff, H. D., Strawbridge, K., and Brook, J. R.: A large contribution of anthropogenic organo-nitrates to secondary organic aerosol in the Alberta oil sands, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 12209–12219, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12209-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-12209-2019</a>, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Lee, A. K. Y., Rivellini, L. H., Chen, C. L., Liu, J., Price, D. J., Betha,
R., Russell, L. M., Zhang, X., and Cappa, C. D.: Influences of Primary
Emission and Secondary Coating Formation on the Particle Diversity and
Mixing State of Black Carbon Particles, Environ. Sci. Technol., 53,
9429–9438, 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Allan, J., Whitehead, J., Young, D., Flynn, M., Coe, H., McFiggans, G., Fleming, Z. L., and Bandy, B.: Ambient black carbon particle hygroscopic properties controlled by mixing state and composition, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 2015–2029, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2015-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-2015-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Whitehead, J., Alfarra, M. R., Reyes-Villegas, E., Spracklen,
D. V., Reddington, C. L., Kong, S., Williams, P. I., Ting, Y.-C.,
Haslett, S., Taylor, J. W., Flynn, M. J., Morgan, W. T.,
McFiggans, G., Coe, H., and Allan, J. D.: Black-carbon absorption
enhancement in the atmosphere determined by particle mixing state, Nat.
Geosci., 10, 184–188, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, D., Joshi, R., Wang, J., Yu, C., Allan, J. D., Coe, H., Flynn, M. J., Xie, C., Lee, J., Squires, F., Kotthaus, S., Grimmond, S., Ge, X., Sun, Y., and Fu, P.: Contrasting physical properties of black carbon in urban Beijing between winter and summer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 6749–6769, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6749-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-6749-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Massoli, P., Lambe, A. T., Ahern, A. T., Williams, L. R., Ehn, M.,
Mikkilä, J., Canagaratna, M. R., Brune, W. H., Onasch, T. B., Jayne, J.
T., Petäjä, T., Kulmala, M., Laaksonen, A., Kolb, C. E., Davidovits,
P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Relationship between aerosol oxidation level and
hygroscopic properties of laboratory generated secondary organic aerosol
(SOA) particles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 37, L24801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045258" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL045258</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Massoli, P., Onasch, T. B., Cappa, C. D., Nuamaan, I., Hakala, J., Hayden,
K., Li, S.-M., Sueper, D. T., Bates, T. S., Quinn, P. K., Jayne, J. T., and
Worsnop, D. R.: Characterization of black carbon-containing particles from
soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer measurements on the
R/VAtlantisduring CalNex 2010, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 2575–2593,
2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
McMeeking, G. R., Good, N., Petters, M. D., McFiggans, G., and Coe, H.: Influences on the fraction of hydrophobic and hydrophilic black carbon in the atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 5099–5112, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5099-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-5099-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Milic, A., Mallet, M. D., Cravigan, L. T., Alroe, J., Ristovski, Z. D., Selleck, P., Lawson, S. J., Ward, J., Desservettaz, M. J., Paton-Walsh, C., Williams, L. R., Keywood, M. D., and Miljevic, B.: Biomass burning and biogenic aerosols in northern Australia during the SAFIRED campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 3945–3961, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3945-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-3945-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Nel, A.: Atmosphere. Air pollution-related illness: effects of particles,
Science, 308, 804–806, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhang, Q., Jimenez, J. L., Tian, J., Ulbrich, I. M., Kroll, J. H., Docherty, K. S., Chhabra, P. S., Bahreini, R., Murphy, S. M., Seinfeld, J. H., Hildebrandt, L., Donahue, N. M., DeCarlo, P. F., Lanz, V. A., Prévôt, A. S. H., Dinar, E., Rudich, Y., and Worsnop, D. R.: Organic aerosol components observed in Northern Hemispheric datasets from Aerosol Mass Spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 4625–4641, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-4625-2010</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Ng, N. L., Canagaratna, M. R., Jimenez, J. L., Chhabra, P. S., Seinfeld, J. H., and Worsnop, D. R.: Changes in organic aerosol composition with aging inferred from aerosol mass spectra, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 6465–6474, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-6465-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Onasch, T. B., Trimborn, A., Fortner, E. C., Jayne, J. T., Kok, G. L.,
Williams, L. R., Davidovits, P., and Worsnop, D. R.: Soot Particle Aerosol
Mass Spectrometer: Development, Validation, and Initial Application, Aerosol
Sci. Tech., 46, 804–817, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.663948" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.663948</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Peng, J., Hu, M., Guo, S., Du, Z., Zheng, J., Shang, D., Levy Zamora, M.,
Zeng, L., Shao, M., Wu, Y. S., Zheng, J., Wang, Y., Glen, C. R., Collins, D.
R., Molina, M. J., and Zhang, R.: Markedly enhanced absorption and direct
radiative forcing of black carbon under polluted urban environments, P.
Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 4266–4271, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Pye, H. O. T., Murphy, B. N., Xu, L., Ng, N. L., Carlton, A. G., Guo, H., Weber, R., Vasilakos, P., Appel, K. W., Budisulistiorini, S. H., Surratt, J. D., Nenes, A., Hu, W., Jimenez, J. L., Isaacman-VanWertz, G., Misztal, P. K., and Goldstein, A. H.: On the implications of aerosol liquid water and phase separation for organic aerosol mass, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 343–369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-343-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-343-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Ramanathan, V. and Carmichael, G.: Global and regional climate changes due
to black carbon, Nature Geosci., 1, 221–227, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Rivellini, L.-H., Adam, M. G., Kasthuriarachchi, N., and Lee, A. K. Y.: Characterization of carbonaceous aerosols in Singapore: insight from black carbon fragments and trace metal ions detected by a soot particle aerosol mass spectrometer, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 5977–5993, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5977-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-5977-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Simoneit, B. R. T., Schauer, J. J., Nolte, C. G., Oros, D. R., Elias, V. O.,
Fraser, M. P., Rogge, W. F., and Cass, G. R.: Levoglucosan, a tracer for
cellulose in biomass burning and atmospheric particles, Atmos. Environ., 33,
173–182, 1999.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Sueper, D.: ToF-AMS Analysis Software, available at: <a href="http://cires1.colorado.edu/jimenez-group/ToFAMSResources/ToFSoftware/index.html" target="_blank"/> (last access: 19 July 2020), 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Takegawa, N., Miyakawa, T., Kawamura, K., and Kondo, Y.: Contribution of
Selected Dicarboxylic and <i>ω</i>-Oxocarboxylic Acids in Ambient Aerosol
to the <i>m</i>∕<i>z</i> 44 Signal of an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer, Aerosol Sci.
Tech., 41, 418–437, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J., Zhang, Q., Chen, M., Collier, S., Zhou, S., Ge, X., Xu, J., Shi,
J., Xie, C., Hu, J., Ge, S., Sun, Y., and Coe, H.: First Chemical
Characterization of Refractory Black Carbon Aerosols and Associated Coatings
over the Tibetan Plateau (4730 m a.s.l), Environ. Sci. Technol., 51,
14072–14082, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J., Liu, D., Ge, X., Wu, Y., Shen, F., Chen, M., Zhao, J., Xie, C., Wang, Q., Xu, W., Zhang, J., Hu, J., Allan, J., Joshi, R., Fu, P., Coe, H., and Sun, Y.: Characterization of black carbon-containing fine particles in Beijing during wintertime, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 447–458, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-447-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-447-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, J., Ye, J., Liu, D., Wu, Y., Zhao, J., Xu, W., Xie, C., Shen, F., Zhang, J., Ohno, P. E., Qin, Y., Zhao, X., Martin, S. T., Lee, A. K. Y., Fu, P., Jacob, D. J., Zhang, Q., Sun, Y., Chen, M., and Ge, X.: Characterization of submicron organic particles in Beijing during summertime: comparison between SP-AMS and HR-AMS, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14091–14102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14091-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14091-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Willis, M. D., Lee, A. K. Y., Onasch, T. B., Fortner, E. C., Williams, L. R., Lambe, A. T., Worsnop, D. R., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Collection efficiency of the soot-particle aerosol mass spectrometer (SP-AMS) for internally mixed particulate black carbon, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4507–4516, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4507-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4507-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Willis, M. D., Healy, R. M., Riemer, N., West, M., Wang, J. M., Jeong, C.-H., Wenger, J. C., Evans, G. J., Abbatt, J. P. D., and Lee, A. K. Y.: Quantification of black carbon mixing state from traffic: implications for aerosol optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 4693–4706, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4693-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4693-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>Wong, J. P. S., Lee, A. K. Y., Slowik, J. G., Cziczo, D. J., Leaitch, W. R.,
Macdonald, A., and Abbatt, J. P. D.: Oxidation of ambient biogenic secondary
organic aerosol by hydroxyl radicals: Effects on cloud condensation nuclei
activity, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L22805, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049351" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL049351</a>,  2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, Y., Liu, D., Wang, J., Shen, F., Chen, Y., Cui, S., Ge, S., Wu, Y.,
Chen, M., and Ge, X.: Characterization of Size-Resolved Hygroscopicity of
Black Carbon-Containing Particle in Urban Environment, Environ. Sci.
Technol., 53, 14212–14221, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Xiao, X., Chen, Z., and Chen, B.: H/C atomic ratio as a smart linkage
between pyrolytic temperatures, aromatic clusters and sorption properties of
biochars derived from diverse precursory materials, Sci. Rep., 6, 22644, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22644" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep22644</a>,
2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, C., Xu, W., Wang, J., Liu, D., Ge, X., Zhang, Q., Wang, Q., Du, W.,
Zhao, J., Zhou, W., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Worsnop, D., and Sun, Y.:
Light absorption enhancement of black carbon in urban Beijing in summer,
Atmos. Environ., 213, 499–504, 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
Xie, C., Xu, W., Wang, J., Wang, Q., Liu, D., Tang, G., Chen, P., Du, W., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Zhou, W., Han, T., Bian, Q., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Ge, X., Allan, J., Coe, H., and Sun, Y.: Vertical characterization of aerosol optical properties and brown carbon in winter in urban Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 165–179, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-165-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-165-2019</a>, 2019b.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, J., Zhang, Q., Shi, J., Ge, X., Xie, C., Wang, J., Kang, S., Zhang, R., and Wang, Y.: Chemical characteristics of submicron particles at the central Tibetan Plateau: insights from aerosol mass spectrometry, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 427–443, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-427-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-427-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, L., Suresh, S., Guo, H., Weber, R. J., and Ng, N. L.: Aerosol characterization over the southeastern United States using high-resolution aerosol mass spectrometry: spatial and seasonal variation of aerosol composition and sources with a focus on organic nitrates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7307–7336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7307-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, W., Sun, Y., Wang, Q., Du, W., Zhao, J., Ge, X., Han, T., Zhang, Y.,
Zhou, W., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., and Worsnop, D. R.: Seasonal
Characterization of Organic Nitrogen in Atmospheric Aerosols Using High
Resolution Aerosol Mass Spectrometry in Beijing, China, ACS Earth and Space
Chem., 1, 673–682, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
Xu, W., Xie, C., Karnezi, E., Zhang, Q., Wang, J., Pandis, S. N., Ge, X., Zhang, J., An, J., Wang, Q., Zhao, J., Du, W., Qiu, Y., Zhou, W., He, Y., Li, Y., Li, J., Fu, P., Wang, Z., Worsnop, D. R., and Sun, Y.: Summertime aerosol volatility measurements in Beijing, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 10205–10216, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10205-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-10205-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, Y., Sanchez, M. S., Douet, C., Wang, Y., Bateman, A. P., Gong, Z., Kuwata, M., Renbaum-Wolff, L., Sato, B. B., Liu, P. F., Bertram, A. K., Geiger, F. M., and Martin, S. T.: Changing shapes and implied viscosities of suspended submicron particles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 7819–7829, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7819-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7819-2015</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
Zhao, J., Qiu, Y., Zhou, W., Xu, W., Wang, J., Zhang, Y., Li, L., Xie, C.,
Wang, Q., Du, W., Worsnop, D. R., Canagaratna, M. R., Zhou, L., Ge, X., Fu,
P., Li, J., Wang, Z., Donahue, N. M., and Sun, Y.: Organic Aerosol
Processing During Winter Severe Haze Episodes in Beijing, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 124, 10248–10263, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
