<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-14-7153-2021</article-id><title-group><article-title>Methodology to obtain highly resolved SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
vertical profiles for representation of volcanic emissions in climate
models</article-title><alt-title>Methodology to obtain highly resolved SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
vertical profiles</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Methodology to obtain highly resolved SO${}_{{2}}$
vertical profiles}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{O.~S.~Sandvik et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Sandvik</surname><given-names>Oscar S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9782-991X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Friberg</surname><given-names>Johan</given-names></name>
          <email>johan.friberg@nuclear.lu.se</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7971-4967</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Sporre</surname><given-names>Moa K.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9240-5114</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
          <name><surname>Martinsson</surname><given-names>Bengt G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Physics, Lund University, Lund, 22100, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Johan Friberg (johan.friberg@nuclear.lu.se)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>November</month><year>2021</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>11</issue>
      <fpage>7153</fpage><lpage>7165</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>1</day><month>April</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>26</day><month>May</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>4</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2021 Oscar S. Sandvik et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2021</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/7153/2021/amt-14-7153-2021.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/7153/2021/amt-14-7153-2021.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/7153/2021/amt-14-7153-2021.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/7153/2021/amt-14-7153-2021.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e123">In this study we describe a methodology to create high-vertical-resolution SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles from volcanic emissions. We
demonstrate the method's performance for the volcanic clouds following the
eruption of Sarychev in June 2009. The resulting profiles are based on a
combination of satellite SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and aerosol retrievals together with
trajectory modelling. We use satellite-based measurements, namely lidar
backscattering profiles from the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal
Polarization (CALIOP) satellite instrument, to create vertical profiles for
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> swaths from the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) aboard the Aqua
satellite. Vertical profiles are created by transporting the air containing
volcanic aerosol seen in CALIOP observations using the
FLEXible PARTicle dispersion model (FLEXPART) while preserving the high vertical resolution using the
potential temperatures from the MERRA-2 (Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Application) meteorological data for the original
CALIOP swaths. For the Sarychev eruption, air tracers from 75 CALIOP swaths
within 9 d after the eruption are transported forwards and backwards and
then combined at a point in time when AIRS swaths cover the complete
volcanic SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud. Our method creates vertical distributions for
column density observations of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for individual AIRS swaths, using
height information from multiple CALIOP swaths. The resulting dataset gives
insight into the height distribution in the different sub-clouds of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
within the stratosphere. We have compiled a gridded high-vertical-resolution
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory that can be used in Earth system models, with a vertical
resolution of 1 K in potential temperature, 61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 56 m, or 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.9 mbar.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e213">Volcanism can affect the climate by increasing aerosol levels in the
stratosphere (Robock, 2000). The strongest effect is seen from the
eruptions that emitted the largest amounts of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to high altitudes,
such as Mt. Pinatubo in 1991, which is estimated to have decreased global
average surface temperatures by several tenths of a degree Celsius (Kremser
et al., 2016; Canty et al., 2013). A significant effect from moderate-sized
eruptions that reach into the stratosphere has also been reported
(Vernier et al., 2011; Andersson et al., 2015; Ge et al., 2016). The
stratospheric aerosol from these eruptions can have a climate effect if
enough SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is released into the stratosphere. This climate effect was
underestimated in the CMIP5 (Coupled Model Intercomparison Project – Phase 5) simulations since the simulations did not take
into account the increased stratospheric volcanic aerosol loadings from
moderate-sized eruptions (Solomon et al., 2011; Santer et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e234">The duration of the effect of volcanism on climate is highly dependent on
the altitude where the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is released (SPARC, 2006).
Aerosol in the stratosphere can remain there for several years depending on
the injection height and through which branch of the Brewer–Dobson
circulation it is transported (Butchart, 2014; Friberg et al.,
2018). Since transport mainly occurs on surfaces of constant potential
temperature, the stratosphere is usually layered into intervals of potential
temperature, with the lowermost stratosphere (LMS) being bounded by the
tropopause and the 380 K potential temperature surface. And while aerosol
can reside in the stratosphere for a long time, once the aerosol particles
descend below the tropopause, they will rapidly be removed from the
atmosphere by wet deposition. Global climate models use SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission
observations from satellite-based instruments to<?pagebreak page7154?> estimate the climate impact
of volcanic eruptions. One conundrum is to provide SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations
for climate modellers at accurate heights (Timmreck et al.,
2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e264">Volcanic eruptions intermittently add aerosol and aerosol precursor gases to
the stratospheric background. This stratospheric background aerosol mainly
consists of water-soluble sulfate, organics, black carbon, and
extra-terrestrial material (Murphy et al., 1998; Martinsson et al.,
2009; Friberg et al., 2014; Sandvik et al., 2019). The gas precursors for the
sulfate in the stratosphere are mostly SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and carbonyl sulfide
(OCS), with OCS being released from oceans and anthropogenic sources
(Kremser et al., 2016). The Brewer–Dobson circulation seasonally transports
aerosol from the overlying layers down to the LMS (Martinsson et
al., 2019). Wildfires also contribute aerosol particles to the
stratosphere (Fromm et al., 2000; Khaykin et al., 2018; Peterson et al.,
2018; Kablick et al., 2020). There is a seasonal aerosol layer called the
Asian tropopause aerosol layer (ATAL) in the region 5–105<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 15–45<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N that also contributes to the background stratospheric
aerosol (Vernier et al., 2015).</p>
      <p id="d1e294">Satellite instruments can be used to measure the stratospheric aerosol and
trace gases from volcanism (Kremser et al., 2016). The
satellites in the A-train satellite constellation pass over the same
locations near simultaneously (Stephens et al., 2002).
Two of these satellites, Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder
Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) and Aqua, are used in this study. CALIPSO
has the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal
Polarization (CALIOP) lidar instrument on board, which provides backscattering
height profiles with a vertical resolution of 60 m in the lower stratosphere
(Winker et al., 2010). Aqua carries
the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) instrument. It has been used to
measure vertical column densities of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over wide areas with high
spatial resolution but with limited vertical resolution (Prata
and Bernardo, 2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e307">Since most SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sensors are passive satellite instruments, the height
information needs to be estimated indirectly. Due to interference from water
vapour at lower altitudes, the vertical column densities of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from
AIRS are representative of the upper troposphere and the lower stratosphere.
The focus of this study is aerosol layers found above the tropopause in the
CALIOP datasets, which is where climate-impacting volcanic aerosol is
situated. CALIOP and AIRS are part of the large family of satellite
instruments measuring aerosol and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Thies and Bendix, 2011).
Another instrument is the Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer
(IASI), aboard the METOP satellite, which has been used to infer a plume
altitude and SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> levels simultaneously from high-spectral-resolution
measurements (Carboni et al., 2016). However, volcanic aerosol
can be injected into several altitude layers over the same location, and
CALIOP can readily detect these distributions, whereas IASI retrieves only a
single altitude per pixel. Wu et al. (2017) used the AIRS SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sensor
together with trajectory computations, validating the obtained profile by
aerosol measurements from the satellite-based Michelson Interferometer for
Passive Atmospheric Sounding (MIPAS) with a vertical resolution of 3–4 km
(Günther et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e355">This work proposes a new method for retrieving height profiles of the
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observed by passive instruments. The method uses AIRS for vertical
column densities of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and then uses vertical profiles from CALIOP
swaths with a vertical resolution of 0.06 km to create vertical profiles of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration for the emissions of a volcanic eruption. The
FLEXible PARTicle dispersion model (FLEXPART) (Pisso et al., 2019)
is used to transport the horizontally thin CALIOP observations to the time
and location of the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> swaths. This approach enables us to use height
information from multiple CALIOP swaths for each AIRS swath, giving a more
complete view of the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> clouds vertical profiles; see Fig. 1. In order
to do this, we have made the assumption that SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and aerosol particles
are co-located and have the same height profile.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e415">Concept sketch of the use of many CALIOP swaths to determine the
height of an SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud (shown in light blue). Vertical profiles from
the daytime CALIOP orbital tracks retrieved simultaneously as the AIRS
swaths (purple) are used together with data from CALIOP night-time orbital
tracks (dashed blue lines) and daytime CALIOP orbital tracks from other
instances (dashed purple lines). The thick block segments on the orbital
tracks are the segments where volcanic aerosol is detected. Since the
volcanic SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud is subject to transport, the height information from
the non-concurrent swaths is transported using FLEXPART (black arrows) to
give a more complete picture of the altitude of the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud. The grey
areas are where FLEXPART trajectories contribute SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud
altitude information.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/7153/2021/amt-14-7153-2021-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e462">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> partial column densities from AIRS swaths on
18 and 19 June. The total
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass is 1.09 Tg, with no location counted more than once.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/7153/2021/amt-14-7153-2021-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Eruption, instruments, and models</title>
      <p id="d1e497">This section will provide background information on the Sarychev 2009
eruption, the AIRS and CALIOP instruments, FLEXPART, and supporting datasets.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7155?><p id="d1e500"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The altitudes of the Sarychev 2009 eruptions are difficult to determine, and
the complete set of eruptions is therefore a good candidate to develop and
demonstrate our method on. The Sarychev volcano erupted several times over
the course of 5 d and injected SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at various altitudes, creating
a complex SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical profile. The 2009 Sarychev eruption started on
11 June by mainly emitting ash, and on 14 June
there was an isolated eruption that reached an estimated altitude of around
21 km (Levin et al., 2010). The highest number of eruptions reaching above 6 km occurred on 15 June (Levin et al., 2010), and most of the emitted SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
was released on this day according to Rybin et al. (2011). A second
large plume was observed on 16 June using IASI (Haywood et al., 2010).
From 17 June, no stratospheric SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> injections were found. The
total emitted SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass of the eruption has been reported to be
1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.1 Tg by Haywood et al. (2010), 0.6 Tg by
Carboni et al. (2016), and 0.9 Tg by Berthet et al. (2017). A total SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass of 0.9 Tg is also reported in Fig. 8 in
Carn et al. (2016).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>AIRS</title>
      <p id="d1e573">The Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS) was launched on board the Aqua
satellite in 2002 with the purpose to improve weather predictions and
provide measurements of gases important for our understanding of the climate
(Chahine et al., 2006). AIRS measures infrared light from
the atmosphere in 2378 channels between 650 and 2665 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a high
spectral resolution (Chahine et al., 2006). The
horizontal resolution of AIRS pixels in a product is 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 15 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at nadir and 18 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at the edges of a swath
(Prata and Bernardo, 2007).</p>
      <p id="d1e620">Using the channels sensitive to SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the spectrum covered by AIRS,
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> column densities are retrieved (Carn,
2005; Prata and Bernardo, 2007). In this study we used SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data provided
by  Fred Prata, with methods described in Prata and Bernardo (2007). Their dataset is based on a least-squares fit between results from
radiative transfer simulations and the observed spectrum from AIRS. They
reported that the accuracy of the retrieval scheme was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 6 DU (1 DU <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.9</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), but in a case with
little water vapour interference and good background conditions, the accuracy
has been estimated to be as good as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 DU (Eckhardt et
al., 2008). A collection of AIRS swaths covering the Sarychev SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud
is shown in Fig. 2. Using this collection of AIRS swaths, the complete
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are studied in this paper.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e731">A CALIOP swath containing volcanic aerosol at latitude
46<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N and altitudes between 13 and 17 km (red circle). This CALIOP
swath is also used in Fig. 5. This figure is part of the CALIOP browse
images from NASA.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/7153/2021/amt-14-7153-2021-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>CALIOP</title>
      <p id="d1e757">CALIOP is a polarization-sensitive lidar instrument, and was launched
on board the CALIPSO satellite in 2006 (Winker et al., 2007) .
CALIOP has been used extensively to track the height of volcanic aerosols
(Kristiansen et al., 2010; Vernier et al., 2011; Andersson et al.,
2015; Friberg et al., 2018; Sandvik et al., 2019). In Fig. 3, we show a CALIOP
swath containing volcanic aerosol from the Sarychev 2009 eruption. In this
study we have used the Level 1B product from version 4–10 (Kar et al.,
2018; Getzewich et al., 2018), which has a horizontal resolution of 300 m and
is the raw product.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e762">Flowchart of our method.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/7153/2021/amt-14-7153-2021-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e771">While SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data from passive satellite sensors can have an estimated
altitude resolution of 1–2 km (Carboni et al., 2012), CALIOP has
a higher vertical resolution. The vertical resolution is highest at lower
altitudes: 30 m between the surface and 8.2 km altitude, 60 m between 8.2
and 20.2 km altitude, 180 m between 20.2 and 30.1 km altitude, and 300 m
above 30.1 km (Winker et al., 2010),
i.e. more than an order of magnitude better than satellite-borne SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
sensors in the lower stratosphere.</p>
      <p id="d1e793">Since CALIPSO and AIRS at the time of the 2009 Sarychev eruption were in the
A-train satellite constellation, CALIOP passes over the same air masses as
AIRS. However, due to the narrow footprint of the CALIOP laser beam, it
measures a thin slice of the AIRS footprint.</p>
      <p id="d1e796">In this study we have used the attenuated backscattering from CALIOP to
calculate the scattering from volcanic aerosol particles. From the total
attenuated backscattering measured by CALIOP, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we define
aerosol backscattering as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M65" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where we calculated the molecular backscattering, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, from the
meteorological parameters from the MERRA-2 (Modern-Era Retrospective analysis for Research and Application) model provided with
version 4–10 of the CALIOP data (Kar et al., 2018). In order
to have a more height-invariant variable for aerosol scattering, we also
define the scattering ratio as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M67" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SR</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          In this study, we use individual CALIOP swaths to observe the early
transport of volcanic aerosol layers that clearly<?pagebreak page7156?> contrast the background
aerosol. Since CALIOP did not produce any data on 13 June, our
selection of swaths starts on 14 June, when the first aerosol
layers are observed. The aerosol layers become less dense in individual
CALIOP swaths as time progresses, and the last day for our selection of
swaths is 22 June. Further into our method, this time interval
has the added benefit of avoiding long transport times with the FLEXPART
model. Due to the rapid removal of aerosols in the troposphere, we have
solely focused on stratospheric aerosol layers in this study.</p>
      <p id="d1e874">To make sure that not a large portion of the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass in the AIRS swath
collection is located in the upper troposphere, we performed manual
inspection of co-located CALIOP swaths to determine the height of the
volcanic clouds. In half of the AIRS swaths in our time period, the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
was solely located in the stratosphere. Within the other half of the AIRS
swaths, the volcanic aerosol layers were mostly located in the stratosphere,
with minor aerosol layers in the underlying troposphere. Thus, the AIRS
swaths shown in Fig. 2 contain volcanic aerosol in the stratosphere and very
little in the troposphere. In the swaths passing over the region close to
the volcano, there is also volcanic aerosol further down in the troposphere,
close to the ground. However, the AIRS SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> measurements are less
sensitive at these altitudes due to water vapour interference.</p>
      <p id="d1e904">In the chosen time interval, we found 75 CALIOP swaths (see Table S1 in the Supplement for
full list). These swaths contained stratospheric aerosol layers that were
clearly separated from the background aerosol and not in contact with ice
clouds. The CALIOP swaths identified in this way contain most of the
stratospheric aerosol layers from the Sarychev eruption in this interval.</p>
      <p id="d1e907">To check if there was ash or ice altering the measured height profiles
within these stratospheric aerosol layers, we used the ratio between
perpendicularly polarized and total backscattering, called the volume
depolarization ratio, and the ratio between the total backscattering of the
1064 nm and 532 nm channels, called the colour ratio. Previous CALIOP
classification algorithms in version 3 would misclassify fresh stratospheric
volcanic aerosol as ice clouds when the stratospheric aerosol had
depolarization ratios over 0.03 (Liu et al., 2019). For ice-containing pixels, the depolarization ratios would mostly be above 0.3. This
threshold was used by Khaykin et al. (2018). The threshold is
corroborated by Fig. 4 in Liu et al. (2019), where aerosol layers
become increasingly scarce when the depolarization ratio exceeds 0.3. These
pixels were instead classified as clouds in their study. In the aerosol
layers of the 75 CALIOP swaths, the particle depolarization ratios were 0.1–0.3. The depolarization ratios<?pagebreak page7157?> are lower in the later swaths, indicating
formation and condensation of sulfate. Sedimentation of ash particles could
alter the vertical profile of the aerosol, whereas the submicron sulfate
particles have a negligible sedimentation rate during the short time period in
our study (Martinsson et al., 2005). This may not be the case for more
ash-rich eruptions. In such a case, the ash would be unevenly distributed
vertically inside the layers since the large particles would settle more
quickly than smaller ones, inducing a vertical gradient in the
depolarization ratio (Vernier et al., 2016). We investigated the vertical
distribution of the depolarization ratio and colour ratio in relation to the
scattering ratio for the 75 CALIOP swaths. We found no evidence for vertical
inhomogeneity in this study of the Sarychev 2009 eruption. This indicates
that SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and aerosol particles have the same vertical distribution.
This co-location means that we have detailed height profiles of how the
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is distributed, albeit in thin slices in each CALIOP swath. These
thin slices of height profiles from all 75 CALIOP swaths were transported
using the dispersion model FLEXPART (see next section) to the times of
individual AIRS swaths so that the AIRS swaths get matching height profiles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>FLEXPART</title>
      <p id="d1e937">FLEXPART, full name FLEXible PARTicle dispersion model, is a trajectory and
dispersion model with Lagrangian dynamics (Pisso et al., 2019). By
being Lagrangian, FLEXPART tracks each individual air tracer particle's
position instead of calculating box quantities. This study uses FLEXPART
version 10.4. The model was originally developed to track radioactive
particles (Pisso et al., 2019) but has since been used for many
other types of studies, for example, to track volcanic clouds (Eckhardt et al.,
2008; Kristiansen et al., 2010). Transport with FLEXPART produces results in
good agreement with both transport simulated by the Norwegian Earth System
Model (Cassiani et al., 2016) and observational data (Groot
Zwaaftink et al., 2018; Langford et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e940">In this study we released air tracer particles in FLEXPART from each aerosol
layer observed by CALIOP, with each FLEXPART release corresponding to a
single pixel in the CALIOP data's aerosol layers. In order to manage this
and to simulate FLEXPART both forwards and backwards, starting from each
CALIOP swath, we created one “RELEASES” file, specifying where and how many
particles should be released into the model, and two “COMMAND” files,
specifying how the model is run and for how long, for each CALIOP swath.
Each RELEASES file contained around 95 000 air tracer particles.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Meteorological data</title>
      <p id="d1e951">We used ERA5 meteorological data in the FLEXPART simulations. ERA5 is the
latest reanalysis product from ECMWF, replacing ERA-Interim (Hersbach et
al., 2020). The preparation of ERA5 data for input into FLEXPART was done
with flex_extract_v7.1 (Tipka et al.,
2020) with an hourly 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution on 137
vertical levels. In the CALIOP data, the tropopause and potential
temperature levels come from the MERRA-2 model (Kar et
al., 2018). Using the supporting meteorological dataset for the CALIOP
swaths, our final vertical profiles have a resolution of 1 K in potential
temperature. Converted to geometric altitude and pressure, this corresponds
to 61 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 56 m and 1.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2.9 mbar (mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1 standard
deviation) for the altitude range of the volcanic sub-clouds in the AIRS
swaths in Fig. 1.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Retrieval of vertical distributions</title>
      <p id="d1e1010">In this section, we will describe and show results from each step in this
method to obtain vertical profiles for SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. We use the
Sarychev eruption in June 2009 to develop our method and the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
observations shown in Fig. 2 since this is AIRS's most complete coverage of
the volcanic SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> clouds. We use the satellite-based lidar CALIOP for
the vertical profiles of particles co-located with SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. CALIOP
observations only cover a small portion of the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions at various
times. Therefore, CALIOP observations inside a 4 d span before and
after the observations in Fig. 2 were transported to the times of the swaths
in that figure using FLEXPART simulations; see Fig. 1. An overview of our
method and how it is presented in the different sections is shown in Fig. 4.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1060">Example of how a volcanic cloud is located in a CALIOP swath and
how it is prepped for RELEASES. <bold>(a)</bold> The calculated scattering ratio from a
Level 1 CALIOP swath with pixels below the tropopause filtered away (white),
<bold>(b)</bold> the scattering ratio after smoothing has been applied, <bold>(c)</bold> the smoothed
scattering ratio after the scattering ratio threshold has been applied, and <bold>(d)</bold> sub-clouds identified by computer vision. The assigned ID numbers are used
to track the individual sub-clouds when FLEXPART simulates them
simultaneously. Additionally, in <bold>(e)</bold> and <bold>(f)</bold>, the vertical profiles of SR and
depolarization ratios of the average backscattering in the sub-clouds are
shown. The steep shifts near the edges are due to few pixels with weak
signal. Note that the profile in <bold>(f)</bold> is otherwise fairly homogeneous. The
swath is CAL_LID_L1-Standard-V4-10.2009-06-15T15-31-31ZN (the same as in Fig. 3).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/7153/2021/amt-14-7153-2021-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Preparation of CALIOP data for FLEXPART release</title>
      <p id="d1e1098">Starting from a section of a CALIOP swath that contains volcanic aerosol
layers (see Fig. 5a and the solid blocks in Fig. 1), information that can be
turned into a FLEXPART release is extracted and prepared. Smoothing is
applied to the CALIOP data to reduce noise. This is done by applying a
moving mean on the data; see Fig. 5b. A scattering ratio threshold (10 for
night-time swaths and 15 for daytime swaths due to more noise in daytime data) is used to
separate the volcanic cloud from the background. With the background
filtered away, all that remains in the CALIOP data is separated volcanic
sub-clouds; see Fig. 5c. In order to keep track of these sub-clouds
throughout our analysis, we grouped the grid cells belonging to each
sub-cloud and put ID labels on them; see Fig. 5d. These ID labels were used
in the later analysis to keep track of which FLEXPART particles come from
which sub-cloud. During manual inspection of the selected sub-clouds,
sub-clouds with a high likelihood of containing ice and ash were removed.
These ice and ash sub-clouds contained only 2.1 % of the total light
scattering observed by CALIOP from the clouds classified as volcanic. Hence,
their removal did not affect our final results.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7158?><p id="d1e1101"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>With the sub-clouds now clearly identified, we want to convert the
backscattering into FLEXPART air tracer particles. This is done by
swath-wise scaling the number of released FLEXPART air tracer particles by
the aerosol backscattering (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in a pixel, making <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the relative strength of a FLEXPART release. Thus, FLEXPART air
tracer particles are released for each pixel in a sub-cloud in the CALIOP
data and at the time, latitude, longitude, and geometric altitude of the
pixel. Around 95 000 air tracer particles were released for each FLEXPART
simulation, i.e. for each CALIOP swath (except for the two swaths that were
divided into two separate simulations).</p>
      <p id="d1e1127">For the released FLEXPART air tracer particles in each CALIOP pixel, the
potential temperature is stored. Potential temperature is a robust height
coordinate in the stratosphere since the air transport normally follows
isentropes, which are usually not aligned with geometric altitudes.
Therefore, the potential temperature is used later as the vertical
coordinate for making combined height profiles out of the FLEXPART
simulations that cover the locations and times of the AIRS observations.
Dense super-micron aerosol layers, such as those from Mt. Pinatubo 1991, can be
warmed through absorption of radiation causing cross-isentropic transport,
so-called self-lofting. It is unknown to what extent self-lofting is
important for moderate-sized eruptions, but a study of Nabro (Fairlie et al.,
2013), another moderate-sized eruption, found the effect to be minor (max
0.3 K d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Self-lofting is not captured by our method, but its impact can
be assumed negligible for Sarychev given the low rates in Fairlie et al. (2013) and the short time span in our study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1145">Overview of the transport of vertical profiles from the CALIOP
swaths to the time of the AIRS swaths from Fig. 2. The figures are zoomed in on
the areas of the most SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for ease of comparison. To get a
flat horizontal mapping of the transported CALIOP swaths, the combined
profiles were integrated vertically. Percentages of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass
outside the 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> contour compared to the total
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass are 0.5 % (18T22:00), 0.8 % (19T00:00),
0.7 % (19T01:30), 0.7 % (19T03:00), and 0.6 % (19T05:00).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/7153/2021/amt-14-7153-2021-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Air tracer transport using FLEXPART</title>
      <p id="d1e1202">The released particles from CALIOP were transported with FLEXPART forwards
or backwards in time until the time of the AIRS swaths in Fig. 2 (see the
black arrows in Fig. 1). Hence, we have collected and transported all the
vertical information from the 75 CALIOP swaths to the times of each AIRS
swath. An advantage of making one FLEXPART simulation for each CALIOP swath
is that it increases the possible number of air tracer particles from every
CALIOP swath. One swath contained aerosol layers at two locations separated
by a large distance and could not be enclosed by boundaries without also
including a large chunk of noise. The aerosol at the two locations was
therefore prepared and run separately. Our approach enabled us to do all
FLEXPART simulations on an ordinary personal computer. The alternative would
have been to make a single FLEXPART simulation containing all CALIOP swaths,
where program restrictions would limit the number of air tracer particles
per CALIOP swath.</p>
      <p id="d1e1205">From a technical point of view, the procedures in the paragraph above were
implemented by creating two FLEXPART COMMAND files for each RELEASES file:
one<?pagebreak page7159?> COMMAND file tells FLEXPART to simulate in the forward time direction
and one in the backwards direction (see the Supplement for an
example COMMAND file). For forward (backward) simulations, FLEXPART starts
at the closest hour before (after) the first (last) release in the
corresponding RELEASES file and stops after the last (before the first) AIRS
swath in Fig. 2. All in all, 152 FLEXPART simulations were made for a total
of 836 simulated days.</p>
      <p id="d1e1208">While FLEXPART's internal calculations have no gridded resolution, the
produced output data were placed on a grid. In our study, we chose
0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N resolution for the Northern
Hemisphere. The Southern Hemisphere was ignored since the cloud from
Sarychev stayed far from the Equator in the first weeks after the eruption.
The high horizontal resolution of the FLEXPART output was used because both
CALIOP and AIRS have high horizontal resolutions. The chosen FLEXPART output
time intervals were set to 30 min and are therefore within 15 min before
or after an AIRS swath; i.e. there is only minor possible misalignment in
time between the satellite and model data.</p>
      <p id="d1e1236">We used FLEXPART to transport the data in the CALIOP swaths horizontally
through time. Since CALIOP already has the highly resolved height
information, we rely on these observational data for vertical coordinates,
while FLEXPART produces the horizontal transport. We therefore set only one
single vertical coordinate for the FLEXPART output. This approach has the
advantages that our method becomes independent of possible errors in
vertical transport in FLEXPART and allow us to increase the resolution of
the other output coordinates.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1242"><bold>(a)</bold> A collection of AIRS SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> swaths spanning the
entire volcanic cloud. The SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass in the wedge of missing
coverage between swaths 18.222, 18.238, and 18.239 is estimated to be 0.036 Tg
(3 % of the total mass). <bold>(b–d)</bold> Height profiles for the AIRS swaths in the
collection shown in <bold>(a)</bold> and in potential temperature <bold>(b)</bold>, geometric altitude <bold>(c)</bold>, and pressure <bold>(d)</bold>. The number of CALIOP swaths that had air tracers
transported into the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> swaths were 18.222 (34 CALIOP
swaths), 18.223 (34), 18.238 (17), 18.239 (25), 19.014 (1), 19.015 (5),
19.016 (6), 19.031 (5), 19.032 (20), 19.048 (8), and 19.049 (15). Vertical
profiles were not compiled for three of the swaths in <bold>(a)</bold>, since the volcanic
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration was very low, and no CALIOP data could be matched with
these AIRS swaths.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/7153/2021/amt-14-7153-2021-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Height profile of an AIRS swath</title>
      <p id="d1e1316">After FLEXPART has simulated every CALIOP swath, the numerous output files
were combined. Vertical profiles were created for each AIRS pixel by
spreading the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass in each AIRS pixel over a range of potential
temperature bins. The amount of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in each bin was computed by weighting
the FLEXPART data with the aerosol backscattering data from CALIOP.</p>
      <p id="d1e1337">No chemistry is used during the transport or for the preparation of data
before FLEXPART. Therefore, one unit of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the same
amount of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, regardless of CALIOP swath time. The time it takes for
the aerosol to form could thus affect the representation of the cloud. The
9 d used here is shorter than previous estimates of volcanic SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
conversion in the stratosphere (Andersson et al., 2013), but ongoing
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> conversion adds uncertainty to our estimation. The short time span
covered in the present study can thus be assumed to have a small effect on
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">aer</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> per SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. This can be seen in Fig. 8 in
Friberg et al. (2018), where the stratospheric aerosol load from
Sarychev peaks in September, i.e. months after the last swath used in this
study.</p>
      <p id="d1e1399">In Fig. 6, we show a snapshot of the FLEXPART-transported aerosol scattering
from all 75 CALIOP swaths at the times of the AIRS swaths in Fig. 2 (similar
to the grey areas shown in the concept sketch in Fig. 1). The geographical
extents have been chosen to focus on the regions of Fig. 2 with the most
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> for each of the five orbits. Starting from the rightmost subfigure
and earliest time, the transported aerosol scattering outlines the largest
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud seen by AIRS. At 00:00 UTC on 19 June, more southern
clouds are outlined, while the northern string of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is sparsely
covered by time-adjacent CALIOP swaths. At 01:30 UTC, the transported
aerosol scattering fails to outline the faint SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud. In the two
final comparisons, the transported aerosol scattering is centred on the
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, but there are also difficulties in contouring the more peripheral
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. While the transported aerosol scattering generally outlines the
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seen with AIRS, there are a few mismatches and false positives<?pagebreak page7160?> of
where the FLEXPART-transported aerosol scattering indicates SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> presence
where there is none detected by AIRS.</p>
      <p id="d1e1475">The overlap between the transported aerosol and the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from Fig. 2
varies for the five orbits of the AIRS instrument, which is shown in Fig. 6,
where the rightmost subfigure contains the first orbit. While the aerosol
generally outlines the horizontal location of SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> during the first,
fourth, and fifth orbits, the transported aerosol does not contain the
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> seen during the second and third orbits. For the second orbit at
00:00 UTC shown in Fig. 6, the northern part of the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is scarcely covered by
the transported aerosol with 0.0086 Tg (0.8 % of all SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the AIRS
swaths) outside the 10<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> contour. The reason for this could be that the
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is located below the tropopause, but the aerosol scattering in the
closest CALIOP swath is located only in the stratosphere. Also, CALIOP does
not observe all parts of the volcanic cloud, and at some locations the height
information can come from a relatively weak CALIOP profile. Therefore, we
chose to horizontally average the combined transported aerosol within each
individual AIRS swath. This horizontal averaging was done by first
interpolating the combined transported CALIOP data from FLEXPART to the
coordinates of the AIRS pixels. Then a horizontal averaging was made over
the whole AIRS footprint to get a representative height profile. This
averaging accounts for when FLEXPART and the observed SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are slightly
mismatched or when there is limited coverage from the transported CALIOP
swaths. The averaging created a single height distribution for each AIRS
swath containing observations of the volcanic clouds. The horizontal
averaging also compensates for the fact that CALIOP has limited spatial
coverage, which means that not all parts of the AIRS cloud was completely
covered by CALIOP's height information transported by FLEXPART. Of the 75
CALIOP swaths, 69 have trajectories that enter the main SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> AIRS
observations. The six CALIOP swaths whose trajectories do not enter the AIRS
observations in Fig. 2 contain little aerosol scattering. There is a list of
which CALIOP swaths are transported into which AIRS swaths in the
Supplement.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e1566">SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles from other studies compared with the sum of our
profiles from Fig. 7c. The emissions in the model studies were released as follows:
Haywood et al. (2010) – 15–16 June 2009; Lurton et al. (2018) –
15 June 2009; Ge et al. (2016) – 11 June 2009; Günter el at. (2018) –
12 June 2009; and Höpfner et al. (2015) – 12 June 2009. For Carn et al. (2016) and
Carboni et al. (2016), the data closest in time to our dataset were used. In Wu
et al. (2017), SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions are integrated between 12 and
16 June 2009. </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/14/7153/2021/amt-14-7153-2021-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><title>Combining height-resolved AIRS swaths into a complete collection</title>
      <p id="d1e1601">The collection of AIRS swaths from Fig. 2 was found to cover almost all of
the volcanic clouds from Sarychev during several hours of orbit; see Fig. 7a. One AIRS swath takes 6 min to scan. Thus, there are 240 swaths for
each day. In this study, AIRS swaths will be referenced as “<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> day
of June 2009 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> swath number of day <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&gt;</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>”; for example, 18.223 means the 223rd swath on 18 June. The height profiles for
the AIRS swaths in this collection are shown in Fig. 7b–d. Height
distributions using geometric altitude and pressure as height coordinates
were calculated from the potential temperature using ERA5 temperature data
for the<?pagebreak page7161?> AIRS footprints. The height profiles in Fig. 7b–d clearly show that
the clouds over the eastern Pacific Ocean (130<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) are located at
higher altitudes than the clouds over eastern Siberia (130<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E).</p>
      <p id="d1e1651">From this collection of AIRS swaths, a 3D global dataset was compiled for
implementation in models. The dataset has 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude horizontal resolution and comes in the three
different versions depending on which vertical coordinates are preferred
(potential temperature, geometric altitude, and pressure). The vertical
resolutions are 1 K for the potential temperature grid and 200 m for geometric
altitude, and for the pressure grid, the pressure levels correspond to
geometric altitude steps of 200 m. The dataset is available
at <uri>https://www.snd.gu.se</uri> (last access: 12 November 2021).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e1691">The clouds over the eastern Pacific Ocean have broad vertical distributions
(Fig. 7b–d), probably due to a higher number of eruption emissions being
transported into this region and their variation in injection height. In
Fig. 8, we show a comparison between the sum of our height profiles and the
height distributions that other studies have reported on or used as input in
model simulations. We sum profiles at swaths during 18 and
19 June, whereas in three modelling studies (Haywood et al.,
2010; Mills et al., 2016; Lurton et al., 2018), sulfur is released closer in
time to the eruption. We have no information about the potential temperature
at the release points in the other studies, so they are compared using
geometric altitude.</p>
      <p id="d1e1694"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>A majority of the other studies have all of the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass placed below
15 km, while roughly half of the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reported by us is above this
limit. This altitude coincides with the potential temperature level of 380 K
in the release area of this study, which is the upper limit of the LMS. The
residence time and transport paths for sulfate aerosol are substantially
different in the LMS compared to the overlying stratosphere. Therefore,
placing the entire SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mass from the eruption in the LMS instead of
half above it should have impacts on the aerosol residence time and climate
impact when using these data in modelling studies.</p>
      <p id="d1e1725">The Sarychev SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles by Wu et al. (2017), Höpfner et al. (2015), and Günther et al. (2018) are more similar to our profiles in terms
of the mass distributed at higher altitudes. Nevertheless, their profiles do
not contain the two strong peaks that are present in our profile at 13 and 15 km altitude. The peak above 15 km is associated with the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud
located over the eastern Pacific, while the one at 13 km is associated with
the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud located over eastern Siberia. As can be seen in Fig. 5,
the volcanic clouds often have a limited vertical extent. Since we use the
altitude information from CALIOP with its high resolution, our dataset
captures the limited vertical extent of the volcanic clouds, resulting in
peaks in the overall profile. The peaks do not appear in the other datasets
as their methods are likely not capable of resolving the heights of the
individual sub-clouds. That our dataset can resolve the variation in height
between the different sub-clouds enables more realistic modelling of the
movement of the Sarychev volcanic clouds as wind profiles can vary strongly
with geographical location.</p>
      <?pagebreak page7162?><p id="d1e1755">More than half of the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Fig. 7b is above the 380 K isentrope. This
is in agreement with the distribution in Fig. 8 in the long-term aerosol
load study of Friberg et al. (2018), where July data show that
more than half the stratospheric aerosol optical depth was located above the
380 K isentrope. This means that a large fraction of the aerosol is in
layers that are isentropically connected to the tropical stratosphere, as
Fig. 7 in Friberg et al. (2018) also shows. Thus, the results from
the method presented in this paper, based on early observations after the
eruptions, agree with observations at the time when most of the aerosol has
formed from the volcanic SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions. This shows that the salient
features of the vertical distribution of the volcanic clouds are captured by
our method.</p>
      <p id="d1e1777">While our method fails to ascribe height distributions to individual pixels
in an AIRS swath, it provides height distributions with high vertical
resolution representative of entire AIRS swaths. Note that our method is not
dependent on which SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> instrument is used. The core of the method is to
make use of many CALIOP observations and detailed FLEXPART simulations to
transport the vertical information in CALIOP swaths to the time and place of
other less vertically resolved measurements. Our approach works well for
Sarychev and will likely do so for other eruptions. However, for eruptions
with large amounts of ash, one might need to check the impact from
sedimentation of ash using the depolarization and colour ratios in the
CALIOP data.</p>
      <p id="d1e1789">Our method could also be simplified further by not resolving the height
distributions of individual sub-clouds and instead only resolving the emitted
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> as a whole. This simplified method would then start with finding
stratospheric clouds in CALIOP swaths. Ensuring that they do not contain
heterogeneous ash distributions would be done by checking the depolarization
ratios. Then a SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> satellite instrument would verify that the aerosol
cloud obtained from CALIOP is of volcanic origin. Finally, the approved
CALIOP clouds could all be weighted together, keeping the potential
temperature level at the original measurement positions, by relating to the
scattering intensity from CALIOP in each pixel. This simplified approach
would not need FLEXPART and would be much more accessible and rapid.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1819">We have shown how a large number of lidar observations of fresh volcanic
aerosol particles can provide a vertical dimension to passive horizontal
sulfur dioxide observations, which would improve volcanic inputs to climate
models. Lidar measurements cover narrow stretches of the atmosphere and are
on their own difficult to link to the wider observations by passive
instruments. To remedy this, CALIOP data were prepared in a semi-automatic
way to be used as input to FLEXPART. To ensure a smooth interface between
CALIOP and FLEXPART, the fine resolution of the aerosol layers in the CALIOP
data was preserved when entered into FLEXPART as air tracers. Volcanic
sulfate aerosol particles, which CALIOP observe light scattering from, are
created out of the emitted SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas, which is observed by passive
satellite instruments. In the method, we use the high vertical resolution of
CALIOP, assuming that the particles and the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are co-located.</p>
      <p id="d1e1840">Previously published SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical distributions used for modelling
purposes have a lower vertical resolution and oftentimes place the SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
from the Sarychev eruption at too low an altitude compared with our results.
Our deduced vertical SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> distribution from the first 2 weeks after
the eruptions shows good agreement with published vertical high-resolution
aerosol profiles, describing the conditions during the weeks and several
months after the eruption, i.e. when almost all SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is converted to
sulfate particles. Here we have demonstrated the method for one volcanic
eruption (Sarychev 2009). We find that this method increases the vertical
resolution and attainable accuracy compared to previous studies of the
SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical profiles in the stratosphere following the studied
volcanic eruptions.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e1892">Code to produce the figures is available upon request. The code for the FLEXPART model is publicly available at <uri>https://www.flexpart.eu/wiki/FpRoadmap</uri> (last access: 15 November 2021).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e1901">The 3D dataset produced in the study can be accessed at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5878/q2ea-kt53" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5878/q2ea-kt53</ext-link> (Sandvik et al., 2021). The underlying SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> AIRS data were provided by Fred Prata. The underlying CALIOP data can be accessed at <uri>https://doi.org/10.5067/CALIOP/CALIPSO/LID_L1-STANDARD-V4-10</uri> (NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC, 2016).</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e1919">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7153-2021-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-7153-2021-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e1928">OSS performed the data analysis and wrote the code and most of the manuscript. JF assisted with methods and analysis of satellite data. BGM designed the study. MKS assisted in the FLEXpart simulations. JF and MKS assisted with coding. All authors contributed to the analysis, discussions, and writing of the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e1934">The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e1940">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1946">We would like to thank Fred Prata for providing us with the AIRS SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
data and for patiently answering our questions. We are grateful for the
thorough reviews by Marc von Hobe and one anonymous referee that helped us
improve the manuscript. We also thank Xue Wu, Sabine Griessbach, and Lars Hoffmann for their discussion and comments and for providing us with SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
profile data. The CALIOP data (NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC, 2016) come from the
joint satellite mission between NASA and CNES.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e1969">This research has been supported by the Swedish National Space Agency (grant nos.
130/15 and 104/17), the Swedish
research council for sustainable development (FORMAS) (grant nos. 2018-00973 and 2020-00997), and the
Crafoord
Foundation (grant no. 20190690).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e1975">This paper was edited by Marloes Penning de Vries and reviewed by Marc von Hobe and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andersson, S. M., Martinsson, B. G., Friberg, J., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.,
Rauthe-Schöch, A., Hermann, M., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn, A.:
Composition and evolution of volcanic aerosol from eruptions of Kasatochi,
Sarychev and Eyjafjallajökull in 2008–2010 based on CARIBIC
observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1781–1796,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1781-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-1781-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Andersson, S. M., Martinsson, B. G., Vernier, J. P., Friberg, J.,
Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Hermann, M., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn,
A.: Significant radiative impact of volcanic aerosol in the lowermost
stratosphere, Nat. Commun., 6, 7692, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8692" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms8692</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berthet, G., Jégou, F., Catoire, V., Krysztofiak, G., Renard, J.-B.,
Bourassa, A. E., Degenstein, D. A., Brogniez, C., Dorf, M., Kreycy, S.,
Pfeilsticker, K., Werner, B., Lefèvre, F., Roberts, T. J., Lurton, T.,
Vignelles, D., Bègue, N., Bourgeois, Q., Daugeron, D., Chartier, M.,
Robert, C., Gaubicher, B., and Guimbaud, C.: Impact of a moderate volcanic
eruption on chemistry in the lower stratosphere: balloon-borne observations
and model calculations, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 17, 2229–2253,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2229-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2229-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Butchart, N.: The Brewer-Dobson circulation, Rev. Geophys., 52, 157–184,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013rg000448" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013rg000448</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Canty, T., Mascioli, N. R., Smarte, M. D., and Salawitch, R. J.: An
empirical model of global climate – Part 1: A critical evaluation of
volcanic cooling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3997–4031,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3997-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-3997-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carboni, E., Grainger, R., Walker, J., Dudhia, A., and Siddans, R.: A new
scheme for sulphur dioxide retrieval from IASI measurements: application to
the Eyjafjallajökull eruption of April and May 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys,
12, 11417–11434, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11417-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-11417-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carboni, E., Grainger, R. G., Mather, T. A., Pyle, D. M., Thomas, G. E.,
Siddans, R., Smith, A. J. A., Dudhia, A., Koukouli, M. E., and Balis, D.:
The vertical distribution of volcanic SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> plumes measured by IASI, Atmos.
Chem. Phys, 16, 4343–4367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4343-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-4343-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carn, S. A.: Quantifying tropospheric volcanic emissions with AIRS: The 2002
eruption of Mt. Etna (Italy), Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L02301, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl021034" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004gl021034</ext-link>,
2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., and Prata, A. J.: Multi-decadal satellite
measurements of global volcanic degassing, J. Volcanol.
Geoth. Res., 311, 99–134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.01.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.01.002</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Cassiani, M., Stohl, A., Olivié, D., Seland, Ø., Bethke, I., Pisso,
I., and Iversen, T.: The offline Lagrangian particle model
FLEXPART–NorESM/CAM (v1): model description and comparisons with the online
NorESM transport scheme and with the reference FLEXPART model, Geosci.
Model Dev., 9, 4029–4048, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4029-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-9-4029-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chahine, M. T., Pagano, T. S., Aumann, H. H., Atlas, R., Barnet, C.,
Blaisdell, J., Chen, L., Divakarla, M., Fetzer, E. J., Goldberg, M.,
Gautier, C., Granger, S., Hannon, S., Irion, F. W., Kakar, R., Kalnay, E.,
Lambrigtsen, B. H., Lee, S.-Y., Le Marshall, J., McMillan, W. W., McMillin,
L., Olsen, E. T., Revercomb, H., Rosenkranz, P., Smith, W. L., Staelin, D.,
Strow, L. L., Susskind, J., Tobin, D., Wolf, W., and Zhou, L.: AIRS:
Improving Weather Forecasting and Providing New Data on Greenhouse Gases, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87, 911–926, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-87-7-911" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/bams-87-7-911</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Eckhardt, S., Prata, A. J., Seibert, P., Stebel, K., and Stohl, A.:
Estimation of the vertical profile of sulfur dioxide injection into the
atmosphere by a volcanic eruption using satellite column measurements and
inverse transport modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 8, 3881–3897,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3881-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-3881-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fairlie, T. D., Vernier, J.-P., Natarajan, M., and Bedka, K. M.: Dispersion
of the Nabro volcanic plume and its relation to the Asian summer monsoon,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7045–7057,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7045-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7045-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Friberg, J., Martinsson, B. G., Andersson, S. M., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.,
Hermann, M., Van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn, A.: Sources of increase in
lowermost stratospheric sulphurous and carbonaceous aerosol background
concentrations during 1999-2008 derived from CARIBIC flights, Tellus B, 66,
23428, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.23428" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v66.23428</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Friberg, J., Martinsson, B. G., Andersson, S. M., and Sandvik, O. S.:
Volcanic impact on the climate – the stratospheric aerosol load in the
period 2006–2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 18, 11149–11169,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11149-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-11149-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fromm, M., Alfred, J., Hoppel, K., Hornstein, J., Bevilacqua, R., Shettle,
E., Servranckx, R., Li, Z., and Stocks, B.: Observations of boreal forest
fire smoke in the stratosphere by POAM III, SAGE II, and lidar in 1998,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 1407–1410, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gl011200" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999gl011200</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ge, C., Wang, J., Carn, S., Yang, K., Ginoux, P., and Krotkov, N.:
Satellite-based global volcanic SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and sulfate direct radiative
forcing during 2005–2012, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 3446–3464,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023134" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015jd023134</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Getzewich, B. J., Vaughan, M. A., Hunt, W. H., Avery, M. A., Powell, K. A.,
Tackett, J. L., Winker, D. M., Kar, J., Lee, K.-P., and Toth, T. D.: CALIPSO
lidar calibration at 532 nm: version 4 daytime algorithm, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 11, 6309–6326, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6309-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-6309-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page7164?><ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Groot Zwaaftink, C. D., Henne, S., Thompson, R. L., Dlugokencky, E. J.,
Machida, T., Paris, J.-D., Sasakawa, M., Segers, A., Sweeney, C., and Stohl,
A.: Three-dimensional methane distribution simulated with FLEXPART 8-CTM-1.1
constrained with observation data, Geosci. Model Dev., 11,
4469–4487, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4469-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-4469-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Günther, A., Höpfner, M., Sinnhuber, B.-M., Griessbach, S., Deshler,
T., von Clarmann, T., and Stiller, G.: MIPAS observations of volcanic
sulfate aerosol and sulfur dioxide in the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
18, 1217–1239, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1217-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-1217-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Haywood, J. M., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P., Degenstein, D., Braesicke, P.,
Jones, A., Clarisse, L., Bourassa, A., Barnes, J., Telford, P., Bellouin,
N., Boucher, O., and Agnew, P.: Observations of the eruption of the Sarychev
volcano and simulations using the HadGEM2 climate model, J. Geophys. Res.,
115, D21212, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014447" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014447</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D.,
Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P.,
Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková,
M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., Rosnay, P.,
Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J. N.: The ERA5
global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>,
2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Höpfner, M., Boone, C. D., Funke, B., Glatthor, N., Grabowski, U.,
Günther, A., Kellmann, S., Kiefer, M., Linden, A., Lossow, S., Pumphrey,
H. C., Read, W. G., Roiger, A., Stiller, G., Schlager, H., von Clarmann, T.,
and Wissmüller, K.: Sulfur dioxide (SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) from MIPAS in the upper
troposphere and lower stratosphere 2002–2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
7017–7037, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7017-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-7017-2015</ext-link>, 2015</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kablick, G. P., Allen, D. R., Fromm, M. D., and Nedoluha, G. E.: Australian
PyroCb Smoke Generates Synoptic-Scale Stratospheric Anticyclones, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl088101" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020gl088101</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kar, J., Vaughan, M. A., Lee, K.-P., Tackett, J. L., Avery, M. A., Garnier,
A., Getzewich, B. J., Hunt, W. H., Josset, D., Liu, Z., Lucker, P. L.,
Magill, B., Omar, A. H., Pelon, J., Rogers, R. R., Toth, T. D., Trepte, C.
R., Vernier, J.-P., Winker, D. M., and Young, S. A.: CALIPSO lidar
calibration at 532 nm: version 4 nighttime algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech.,
11, 1459–1479, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1459-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-11-1459-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Khaykin, S. M., Godin-Beekmann, S., Hauchecorne, A., Pelon, J., Ravetta, F.,
and Keckhut, P.: Stratospheric Smoke With Unprecedentedly High Backscatter
Observed by Lidars Above Southern France, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45,
1639–1646, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl076763" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017gl076763</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kremser, S., Thomason, L. W., von Hobe, M., Hermann, M., Deshler, T.,
Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Stenke, A., Schwarz, J. P., Weigel, R.,
Fueglistaler, S., Prata, F. J., Vernier, J.-P., Schlager, H., Barnes, J. E.,
Antuña-Marrero, J.-C., Fairlie, D., Palm, M., Mahieu, E., Notholt, J.,
Rex, M., Bingen, C., Vanhellemont, F., Bourassa, A., Plane, J. M. C.,
Klocke, D., Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., Trickl, T., Neely, R., James, A. D.,
Rieger, L., Wilson, J. C., and Meland, B.: Stratospheric
aerosol-Observations, processes, and impact on climate, Rev. Geophys., 54,
278–335, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015rg000511" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015rg000511</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kristiansen, N. I., Stohl, A., Prata, A. J., Richter, A., Eckhardt, S.,
Seibert, P., Hoffmann, A., Ritter, C., Bitar, L., Duck, T. J., and Stebel,
K.: Remote sensing and inverse transport modeling of the Kasatochi eruption
sulfur dioxide cloud, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00L16,  <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013286" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009jd013286</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Langford, A. O., Alvarez, R. J., Brioude, J., Evan, S., Iraci, L. T.,
Kirgis, G., Kuang, S., Leblanc, T., Newchurch, M. J., Pierce, R. B., Senff,
C. J., and Yates, E. L.: Coordinated profiling of stratospheric intrusions
and transported pollution by the Tropospheric Ozone Lidar Network (TOLNet)
and NASA Alpha Jet experiment (AJAX): Observations and comparison to
HYSPLIT, RAQMS, and FLEXPART, Atmos. Environ., 174, 1–14,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.031" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.031</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Levin, B. W., Rybin, A. V., Vasilenko, N. F., Prytkov, A. S., Chibisova, M.
V., Kogan, M. G., Steblov, G. M., and Frolov, D. I.: Monitoring of the
eruption of the Sarychev Peak Volcano in Matua Island in 2009 (central
Kurile islands), Doklady Earth Sci., 435, 1507–1510,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1134/s1028334x10110218" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1134/s1028334x10110218</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, Z., Kar, J., Zeng, S., Tackett, J., Vaughan, M., Avery, M., Pelon, J.,
Getzewich, B., Lee, K.-P., Magill, B., Omar, A., Lucker, P., Trepte, C., and
Winker, D.: Discriminating between clouds and aerosols in the CALIOP version
4.1 data products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 703–734, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-703-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-703-2019</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lurton, T., Jégou, F., Berthet, G., Renard, J.-B., Clarisse, L.,
Schmidt, A., Brogniez, C., and Roberts, T. J.: Model simulations of the
chemical and aerosol microphysical evolution of the Sarychev Peak 2009
eruption cloud compared to in situ and satellite observations, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 18, 3223–3247, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3223-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-3223-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Martinsson, B. G., Nguyen, H. N., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Zahn, A., Heintzenberg, J., Hermann, M., and van Velthoven, P. F. J.:
Characteristics and origin of lowermost stratospheric aerosol at northern
midlatitudes under volcanically quiescent conditions based on CARIBIC
observations, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D12201,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005644" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005644</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Martinsson, B. G., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Carn, S. A., Hermann, M., Heue,
K. P., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn, A.: Influence of the 2008
Kasatochi volcanic eruption on sulfurous and carbonaceous aerosol
constituents in the lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L12813,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl038735" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009gl038735</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Martinsson, B. G., Friberg, J., Sandvik, O. S., Hermann, M., van Velthoven,
P. F. J., and Zahn, A.: Formation and composition of the UTLS aerosol, NPJ
Clim. Atmos. Sci., 2, 40, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0097-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-019-0097-1</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Mills, M. J., Schmidt, A., Easter, R., Solomon, S., Kinnison, D. E., Ghan,
S. J., Neely, R. R., Marsh, D. R., Conley, A., Bardeen, C. G., and
Gettelman, A.: Global volcanic aerosol properties derived from emissions,
1990–2014, using CESM1(WACCM), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 2332–2348,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024290" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015jd024290</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M., Thomson, D. S., and Mahoney, M. J.: In situ measurements of
organics, meteoritic material, mercury, and other elements in aerosols at 5
to 19 kilometers, Science, 282, 1664–1669, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5394.1664" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.282.5394.1664</ext-link>,
1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page7165?><ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC: CALIPSO Lidar Level 1B profile data, V4‐10 [data set],
available at: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/CALIOP/CALIPSO/LID_L1-STANDARD-V4-10" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/CALIOP/CALIPSO/LID_L1-STANDARD-V4-10</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peterson, D. A., Campbell, J. R., Hyer, E. J., Fromm, M. D., Kablick, G. P.,
3rd, Cossuth, J. H., and DeLand, M. T.: Wildfire-driven thunderstorms cause
a volcano-like stratospheric injection of smoke, NPJ Clim. Atmos. Sci., 1, 30,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0039-3" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41612-018-0039-3</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tipka, A., Haimberger, L., and Seibert, P.: Flex_extract v7.1.2 – a software package to retrieve and prepare ECMWF data for use in FLEXPART, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5277–5310, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5277-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-13-5277-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pisso, I., Sollum, E., Grythe, H., Kristiansen, N. I., Cassiani, M.,
Eckhardt, S., Arnold, D., Morton, D., Thompson, R. L., Groot Zwaaftink, C.
D., Evangeliou, N., Sodemann, H., Haimberger, L., Henne, S., Brunner, D.,
Burkhart, J. F., Fouilloux, A., Brioude, J., Philipp, A., Seibert, P., and
Stohl, A.: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 10.4,
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4955–4997, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4955-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-12-4955-2019</ext-link>,
2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Prata, A. J. and Bernardo, C.: Retrieval of volcanic SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> column
abundance from atmospheric infrared sounder data, J. Geophys. Res., 112,
D20204, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007955" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007955</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Robock, A.: Volcanic eruptions and climate, Rev. Geophys., 38, 191–219,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rybin, A., Chibisova, M., Webley, P., Steensen, T., Izbekov, P., Neal, C.,
and Realmuto, V.: Satellite and ground observations of the June 2009
eruption of Sarychev Peak volcano, Matua Island, Central Kuriles, Bull.
Volcanol., 73, 1377–1392, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0481-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00445-011-0481-0</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sandvik, O. S., Friberg, J., Martinsson, B. G., van Velthoven, P. F. J.,
Hermann, M., and Zahn, A.: Intercomparison of in-situ aircraft and satellite
aerosol measurements in the stratosphere, Sci. Rep., 9, 15576,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52089-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-019-52089-6</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Sandvik, O. S., Friberg, J.,
Sporre, M. K., Martinsson, B. G.: 3D dataset from “Methodology to obtain highly
resolved SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical profiles for representation of volcanic emissions in climate models”,
Swedish National Data Service [data set],
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5878/q2ea-kt53" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5878/q2ea-kt53</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Santer, B. D., Bonfils, C., Painter, J. F., Zelinka, M. D., Mears, C.,
Solomon, S., Schmidt, G. A., Fyfe, J. C., Cole, J. N. S., Nazarenko, L.,
Taylor, K. E., and Wentz, F. J.: Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in
tropospheric temperature, Nat. Geosci., 7, 185–189, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2098" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo2098</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Solomon, S., Daniel, J. S., Neely III, R. R., Vernier, J. P., Dutton, E. G.,
and Thomason, L. W.: The persistently variable “background” stratospheric
aerosol layer and global climate change, Science, 333, 866–870,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1206027</ext-link>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
SPARC: SPARC Assessment of Stratospheric Aerosol Properties (ASAP), SPARC
Report, 322 pp., 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Stephens, G. L., Vane, D. G., Boain, R. J., Mace, G. G., Sassen, K., Wang,
Z., Illingworth, A. J., O'Connor, E. J., Rossow, W. B., Durden, S. L.,
Miller, S. D., Austin, R. T., Benedetti, A., and Mitrescu, C.: The Cloudsat
Mission and the a-Train, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 1771–1790,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-83-12-1771" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/bams-83-12-1771</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Thies, B. and Bendix, J.: Satellite based remote sensing of weather and
climate: recent achievements and future perspectives, Meteorol.
Appl., 18, 262–295, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/met.288" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/met.288</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Timmreck, C., Mann, G. W., Aquila, V., Hommel, R., Lee, L. A., Schmidt, A.,
Brühl, C., Carn, S., Chin, M., Dhomse, S. S., Diehl, T., English, J. M.,
Mills, M. J., Neely, R., Sheng, J., Toohey, M., and Weisenstein, D.: The
Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (ISA-MIP):
motivation and experimental design, Geosci. Model Dev., 11,
2581–2608, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2581-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-2581-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vernier, J.-P., Thomason, L. W., Pommereau, J.-P., Bourassa, A., Pelon, J.,
Garnier, A., Hauchecorne, A., Blanot, L., Trepte, C., Degenstein, D., and
Vargas, F.: Major influence of tropical volcanic eruptions on the
stratospheric aerosol layer during the last decade, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
L12807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047563" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2011GL047563</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Vernier, J. P., Fairlie, T. D., Natarajan, M., Wienhold, F. G., Bian, J.,
Martinsson, B. G., Crumeyrolle, S., Thomason, L. W., and Bedka, K. M.:
Increase in upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric aerosol levels and
its potential connection with Asian pollution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
1608–1619, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022372" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2014JD022372</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Watts, S. F.: The mass budgets of carbonyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfide, carbon
disulfide and hydrogen sulfide, Atmos. Environ., 34, 761–779,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00342-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00342-8</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Winker, D. M., Hunt, W. H., and McGill, M. J.: Initial performance
assessment of CALIOP, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19803, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030135" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007gl030135</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Winker, D. M., Pelon, J., Coakley, J. A., Ackerman, S. A., Charlson, R. J.,
Colarco, P. R., Flamant, P., Fu, Q., Hoff, R. M., Kittaka, C., Kubar, T. L.,
Le Treut, H., McCormick, M. P., Mégie, G., Poole, L., Powell, K.,
Trepte, C., Vaughan, M. A., and Wielicki, B. A.: The CALIPSO Mission: A
Global 3D View of Aerosols and Clouds, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 1211–1229,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010bams3009.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2010bams3009.1</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wu, X., Griessbach, S., and Hoffmann, L.: Equatorward dispersion of a
high-latitude volcanic plume and its relation to the Asian summer monsoon: a
case study of the Sarychev eruption in 2009, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
13439–13455, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13439-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-13439-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Methodology to obtain highly resolved SO<sub>2</sub> vertical profiles for representation of volcanic emissions in climate models</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Andersson, S. M., Martinsson, B. G., Friberg, J., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.,
Rauthe-Schöch, A., Hermann, M., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn, A.:
Composition and evolution of volcanic aerosol from eruptions of Kasatochi,
Sarychev and Eyjafjallajökull in 2008–2010 based on CARIBIC
observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1781–1796,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1781-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1781-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Andersson, S. M., Martinsson, B. G., Vernier, J. P., Friberg, J.,
Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Hermann, M., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn,
A.: Significant radiative impact of volcanic aerosol in the lowermost
stratosphere, Nat. Commun., 6, 7692, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8692" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8692</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Berthet, G., Jégou, F., Catoire, V., Krysztofiak, G., Renard, J.-B.,
Bourassa, A. E., Degenstein, D. A., Brogniez, C., Dorf, M., Kreycy, S.,
Pfeilsticker, K., Werner, B., Lefèvre, F., Roberts, T. J., Lurton, T.,
Vignelles, D., Bègue, N., Bourgeois, Q., Daugeron, D., Chartier, M.,
Robert, C., Gaubicher, B., and Guimbaud, C.: Impact of a moderate volcanic
eruption on chemistry in the lower stratosphere: balloon-borne observations
and model calculations, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 17, 2229–2253,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2229-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2229-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Butchart, N.: The Brewer-Dobson circulation, Rev. Geophys., 52, 157–184,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013rg000448" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013rg000448</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Canty, T., Mascioli, N. R., Smarte, M. D., and Salawitch, R. J.: An
empirical model of global climate – Part 1: A critical evaluation of
volcanic cooling, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 3997–4031,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3997-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-3997-2013</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Carboni, E., Grainger, R., Walker, J., Dudhia, A., and Siddans, R.: A new
scheme for sulphur dioxide retrieval from IASI measurements: application to
the Eyjafjallajökull eruption of April and May 2010, Atmos. Chem. Phys,
12, 11417–11434, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11417-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-11417-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Carboni, E., Grainger, R. G., Mather, T. A., Pyle, D. M., Thomas, G. E.,
Siddans, R., Smith, A. J. A., Dudhia, A., Koukouli, M. E., and Balis, D.:
The vertical distribution of volcanic SO<sub>2</sub> plumes measured by IASI, Atmos.
Chem. Phys, 16, 4343–4367, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4343-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-4343-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Carn, S. A.: Quantifying tropospheric volcanic emissions with AIRS: The 2002
eruption of Mt. Etna (Italy), Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L02301, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl021034" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004gl021034</a>,
2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., and Prata, A. J.: Multi-decadal satellite
measurements of global volcanic degassing, J. Volcanol.
Geoth. Res., 311, 99–134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.01.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2016.01.002</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Cassiani, M., Stohl, A., Olivié, D., Seland, Ø., Bethke, I., Pisso,
I., and Iversen, T.: The offline Lagrangian particle model
FLEXPART–NorESM/CAM (v1): model description and comparisons with the online
NorESM transport scheme and with the reference FLEXPART model, Geosci.
Model Dev., 9, 4029–4048, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4029-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-4029-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Chahine, M. T., Pagano, T. S., Aumann, H. H., Atlas, R., Barnet, C.,
Blaisdell, J., Chen, L., Divakarla, M., Fetzer, E. J., Goldberg, M.,
Gautier, C., Granger, S., Hannon, S., Irion, F. W., Kakar, R., Kalnay, E.,
Lambrigtsen, B. H., Lee, S.-Y., Le Marshall, J., McMillan, W. W., McMillin,
L., Olsen, E. T., Revercomb, H., Rosenkranz, P., Smith, W. L., Staelin, D.,
Strow, L. L., Susskind, J., Tobin, D., Wolf, W., and Zhou, L.: AIRS:
Improving Weather Forecasting and Providing New Data on Greenhouse Gases, B.
Am. Meteorol. Soc., 87, 911–926, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-87-7-911" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-87-7-911</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Eckhardt, S., Prata, A. J., Seibert, P., Stebel, K., and Stohl, A.:
Estimation of the vertical profile of sulfur dioxide injection into the
atmosphere by a volcanic eruption using satellite column measurements and
inverse transport modeling, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 8, 3881–3897,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3881-2008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-3881-2008</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Fairlie, T. D., Vernier, J.-P., Natarajan, M., and Bedka, K. M.: Dispersion
of the Nabro volcanic plume and its relation to the Asian summer monsoon,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7045–7057,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7045-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7045-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Friberg, J., Martinsson, B. G., Andersson, S. M., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M.,
Hermann, M., Van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn, A.: Sources of increase in
lowermost stratospheric sulphurous and carbonaceous aerosol background
concentrations during 1999-2008 derived from CARIBIC flights, Tellus B, 66,
23428, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.23428" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v66.23428</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Friberg, J., Martinsson, B. G., Andersson, S. M., and Sandvik, O. S.:
Volcanic impact on the climate – the stratospheric aerosol load in the
period 2006–2015, Atmos. Chem. Phys, 18, 11149–11169,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11149-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11149-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Fromm, M., Alfred, J., Hoppel, K., Hornstein, J., Bevilacqua, R., Shettle,
E., Servranckx, R., Li, Z., and Stocks, B.: Observations of boreal forest
fire smoke in the stratosphere by POAM III, SAGE II, and lidar in 1998,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 1407–1410, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gl011200" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/1999gl011200</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Ge, C., Wang, J., Carn, S., Yang, K., Ginoux, P., and Krotkov, N.:
Satellite-based global volcanic SO<sub>2</sub> emissions and sulfate direct radiative
forcing during 2005–2012, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 3446–3464,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023134" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd023134</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Getzewich, B. J., Vaughan, M. A., Hunt, W. H., Avery, M. A., Powell, K. A.,
Tackett, J. L., Winker, D. M., Kar, J., Lee, K.-P., and Toth, T. D.: CALIPSO
lidar calibration at 532&thinsp;nm: version 4 daytime algorithm, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 11, 6309–6326, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6309-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-6309-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Groot Zwaaftink, C. D., Henne, S., Thompson, R. L., Dlugokencky, E. J.,
Machida, T., Paris, J.-D., Sasakawa, M., Segers, A., Sweeney, C., and Stohl,
A.: Three-dimensional methane distribution simulated with FLEXPART 8-CTM-1.1
constrained with observation data, Geosci. Model Dev., 11,
4469–4487, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4469-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-4469-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Günther, A., Höpfner, M., Sinnhuber, B.-M., Griessbach, S., Deshler,
T., von Clarmann, T., and Stiller, G.: MIPAS observations of volcanic
sulfate aerosol and sulfur dioxide in the stratosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys.,
18, 1217–1239, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1217-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-1217-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Haywood, J. M., Clerbaux, C., Coheur, P., Degenstein, D., Braesicke, P.,
Jones, A., Clarisse, L., Bourassa, A., Barnes, J., Telford, P., Bellouin,
N., Boucher, O., and Agnew, P.: Observations of the eruption of the Sarychev
volcano and simulations using the HadGEM2 climate model, J. Geophys. Res.,
115, D21212, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014447" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014447</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D.,
Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P.,
Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková,
M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., Rosnay, P.,
Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J. N.: The ERA5
global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>,
2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Höpfner, M., Boone, C. D., Funke, B., Glatthor, N., Grabowski, U.,
Günther, A., Kellmann, S., Kiefer, M., Linden, A., Lossow, S., Pumphrey,
H. C., Read, W. G., Roiger, A., Stiller, G., Schlager, H., von Clarmann, T.,
and Wissmüller, K.: Sulfur dioxide (SO<sub>2</sub>) from MIPAS in the upper
troposphere and lower stratosphere 2002–2012, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15,
7017–7037, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7017-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-7017-2015</a>, 2015
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kablick, G. P., Allen, D. R., Fromm, M. D., and Nedoluha, G. E.: Australian
PyroCb Smoke Generates Synoptic-Scale Stratospheric Anticyclones, Geophys.
Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL088101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl088101" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gl088101</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Kar, J., Vaughan, M. A., Lee, K.-P., Tackett, J. L., Avery, M. A., Garnier,
A., Getzewich, B. J., Hunt, W. H., Josset, D., Liu, Z., Lucker, P. L.,
Magill, B., Omar, A. H., Pelon, J., Rogers, R. R., Toth, T. D., Trepte, C.
R., Vernier, J.-P., Winker, D. M., and Young, S. A.: CALIPSO lidar
calibration at 532&thinsp;nm: version 4 nighttime algorithm, Atmos. Meas. Tech.,
11, 1459–1479, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1459-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-11-1459-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Khaykin, S. M., Godin-Beekmann, S., Hauchecorne, A., Pelon, J., Ravetta, F.,
and Keckhut, P.: Stratospheric Smoke With Unprecedentedly High Backscatter
Observed by Lidars Above Southern France, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45,
1639–1646, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl076763" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017gl076763</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Kremser, S., Thomason, L. W., von Hobe, M., Hermann, M., Deshler, T.,
Timmreck, C., Toohey, M., Stenke, A., Schwarz, J. P., Weigel, R.,
Fueglistaler, S., Prata, F. J., Vernier, J.-P., Schlager, H., Barnes, J. E.,
Antuña-Marrero, J.-C., Fairlie, D., Palm, M., Mahieu, E., Notholt, J.,
Rex, M., Bingen, C., Vanhellemont, F., Bourassa, A., Plane, J. M. C.,
Klocke, D., Carn, S. A., Clarisse, L., Trickl, T., Neely, R., James, A. D.,
Rieger, L., Wilson, J. C., and Meland, B.: Stratospheric
aerosol-Observations, processes, and impact on climate, Rev. Geophys., 54,
278–335, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015rg000511" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015rg000511</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Kristiansen, N. I., Stohl, A., Prata, A. J., Richter, A., Eckhardt, S.,
Seibert, P., Hoffmann, A., Ritter, C., Bitar, L., Duck, T. J., and Stebel,
K.: Remote sensing and inverse transport modeling of the Kasatochi eruption
sulfur dioxide cloud, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D00L16,  <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013286" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009jd013286</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Langford, A. O., Alvarez, R. J., Brioude, J., Evan, S., Iraci, L. T.,
Kirgis, G., Kuang, S., Leblanc, T., Newchurch, M. J., Pierce, R. B., Senff,
C. J., and Yates, E. L.: Coordinated profiling of stratospheric intrusions
and transported pollution by the Tropospheric Ozone Lidar Network (TOLNet)
and NASA Alpha Jet experiment (AJAX): Observations and comparison to
HYSPLIT, RAQMS, and FLEXPART, Atmos. Environ., 174, 1–14,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.031" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.11.031</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Levin, B. W., Rybin, A. V., Vasilenko, N. F., Prytkov, A. S., Chibisova, M.
V., Kogan, M. G., Steblov, G. M., and Frolov, D. I.: Monitoring of the
eruption of the Sarychev Peak Volcano in Matua Island in 2009 (central
Kurile islands), Doklady Earth Sci., 435, 1507–1510,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1134/s1028334x10110218" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1134/s1028334x10110218</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, Z., Kar, J., Zeng, S., Tackett, J., Vaughan, M., Avery, M., Pelon, J.,
Getzewich, B., Lee, K.-P., Magill, B., Omar, A., Lucker, P., Trepte, C., and
Winker, D.: Discriminating between clouds and aerosols in the CALIOP version
4.1 data products, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 703–734, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-703-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-703-2019</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Lurton, T., Jégou, F., Berthet, G., Renard, J.-B., Clarisse, L.,
Schmidt, A., Brogniez, C., and Roberts, T. J.: Model simulations of the
chemical and aerosol microphysical evolution of the Sarychev Peak 2009
eruption cloud compared to in situ and satellite observations, Atmos. Chem.
Phys., 18, 3223–3247, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3223-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-3223-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Martinsson, B. G., Nguyen, H. N., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Zahn, A., Heintzenberg, J., Hermann, M., and van Velthoven, P. F. J.:
Characteristics and origin of lowermost stratospheric aerosol at northern
midlatitudes under volcanically quiescent conditions based on CARIBIC
observations, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D12201,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005644" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005644</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Martinsson, B. G., Brenninkmeijer, C. A. M., Carn, S. A., Hermann, M., Heue,
K. P., van Velthoven, P. F. J., and Zahn, A.: Influence of the 2008
Kasatochi volcanic eruption on sulfurous and carbonaceous aerosol
constituents in the lower stratosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L12813,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl038735" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009gl038735</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
Martinsson, B. G., Friberg, J., Sandvik, O. S., Hermann, M., van Velthoven,
P. F. J., and Zahn, A.: Formation and composition of the UTLS aerosol, NPJ
Clim. Atmos. Sci., 2, 40, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0097-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-019-0097-1</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Mills, M. J., Schmidt, A., Easter, R., Solomon, S., Kinnison, D. E., Ghan,
S. J., Neely, R. R., Marsh, D. R., Conley, A., Bardeen, C. G., and
Gettelman, A.: Global volcanic aerosol properties derived from emissions,
1990–2014, using CESM1(WACCM), J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 2332–2348,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024290" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jd024290</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M., Thomson, D. S., and Mahoney, M. J.: In situ measurements of
organics, meteoritic material, mercury, and other elements in aerosols at 5
to 19 kilometers, Science, 282, 1664–1669, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5394.1664" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5394.1664</a>,
1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
NASA/LARC/SD/ASDC: CALIPSO Lidar Level 1B profile data, V4‐10 [data set],
available at: <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/CALIOP/CALIPSO/LID_L1-STANDARD-V4-10" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/CALIOP/CALIPSO/LID_L1-STANDARD-V4-10</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Peterson, D. A., Campbell, J. R., Hyer, E. J., Fromm, M. D., Kablick, G. P.,
3rd, Cossuth, J. H., and DeLand, M. T.: Wildfire-driven thunderstorms cause
a volcano-like stratospheric injection of smoke, NPJ Clim. Atmos. Sci., 1, 30,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0039-3" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41612-018-0039-3</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Tipka, A., Haimberger, L., and Seibert, P.: Flex_extract v7.1.2 – a software package to retrieve and prepare ECMWF data for use in FLEXPART, Geosci. Model Dev., 13, 5277–5310, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5277-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-13-5277-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Pisso, I., Sollum, E., Grythe, H., Kristiansen, N. I., Cassiani, M.,
Eckhardt, S., Arnold, D., Morton, D., Thompson, R. L., Groot Zwaaftink, C.
D., Evangeliou, N., Sodemann, H., Haimberger, L., Henne, S., Brunner, D.,
Burkhart, J. F., Fouilloux, A., Brioude, J., Philipp, A., Seibert, P., and
Stohl, A.: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 10.4,
Geosci. Model Dev., 12, 4955–4997, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4955-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-12-4955-2019</a>,
2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Prata, A. J. and Bernardo, C.: Retrieval of volcanic SO<sub>2</sub> column
abundance from atmospheric infrared sounder data, J. Geophys. Res., 112,
D20204, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007955" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007955</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Robock, A.: Volcanic eruptions and climate, Rev. Geophys., 38, 191–219,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Rybin, A., Chibisova, M., Webley, P., Steensen, T., Izbekov, P., Neal, C.,
and Realmuto, V.: Satellite and ground observations of the June 2009
eruption of Sarychev Peak volcano, Matua Island, Central Kuriles, Bull.
Volcanol., 73, 1377–1392, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0481-0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-011-0481-0</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Sandvik, O. S., Friberg, J., Martinsson, B. G., van Velthoven, P. F. J.,
Hermann, M., and Zahn, A.: Intercomparison of in-situ aircraft and satellite
aerosol measurements in the stratosphere, Sci. Rep., 9, 15576,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52089-6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52089-6</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Sandvik, O. S., Friberg, J.,
Sporre, M. K., Martinsson, B. G.: 3D dataset from “Methodology to obtain highly
resolved SO<sub>2</sub> vertical profiles for representation of volcanic emissions in climate models”,
Swedish National Data Service [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.5878/q2ea-kt53" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5878/q2ea-kt53</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Santer, B. D., Bonfils, C., Painter, J. F., Zelinka, M. D., Mears, C.,
Solomon, S., Schmidt, G. A., Fyfe, J. C., Cole, J. N. S., Nazarenko, L.,
Taylor, K. E., and Wentz, F. J.: Volcanic contribution to decadal changes in
tropospheric temperature, Nat. Geosci., 7, 185–189, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2098" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2098</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Solomon, S., Daniel, J. S., Neely III, R. R., Vernier, J. P., Dutton, E. G.,
and Thomason, L. W.: The persistently variable “background” stratospheric
aerosol layer and global climate change, Science, 333, 866–870,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1206027</a>, 2011.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
SPARC: SPARC Assessment of Stratospheric Aerosol Properties (ASAP), SPARC
Report, 322 pp., 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Stephens, G. L., Vane, D. G., Boain, R. J., Mace, G. G., Sassen, K., Wang,
Z., Illingworth, A. J., O'Connor, E. J., Rossow, W. B., Durden, S. L.,
Miller, S. D., Austin, R. T., Benedetti, A., and Mitrescu, C.: The Cloudsat
Mission and the a-Train, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 1771–1790,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-83-12-1771" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-83-12-1771</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Thies, B. and Bendix, J.: Satellite based remote sensing of weather and
climate: recent achievements and future perspectives, Meteorol.
Appl., 18, 262–295, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/met.288" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/met.288</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
Timmreck, C., Mann, G. W., Aquila, V., Hommel, R., Lee, L. A., Schmidt, A.,
Brühl, C., Carn, S., Chin, M., Dhomse, S. S., Diehl, T., English, J. M.,
Mills, M. J., Neely, R., Sheng, J., Toohey, M., and Weisenstein, D.: The
Interactive Stratospheric Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (ISA-MIP):
motivation and experimental design, Geosci. Model Dev., 11,
2581–2608, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2581-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2581-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
Vernier, J.-P., Thomason, L. W., Pommereau, J.-P., Bourassa, A., Pelon, J.,
Garnier, A., Hauchecorne, A., Blanot, L., Trepte, C., Degenstein, D., and
Vargas, F.: Major influence of tropical volcanic eruptions on the
stratospheric aerosol layer during the last decade, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38,
L12807, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047563" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL047563</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Vernier, J. P., Fairlie, T. D., Natarajan, M., Wienhold, F. G., Bian, J.,
Martinsson, B. G., Crumeyrolle, S., Thomason, L. W., and Bedka, K. M.:
Increase in upper tropospheric and lower stratospheric aerosol levels and
its potential connection with Asian pollution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
1608–1619, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022372" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022372</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Watts, S. F.: The mass budgets of carbonyl sulfide, dimethyl sulfide, carbon
disulfide and hydrogen sulfide, Atmos. Environ., 34, 761–779,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00342-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00342-8</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Winker, D. M., Hunt, W. H., and McGill, M. J.: Initial performance
assessment of CALIOP, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L19803, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030135" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007gl030135</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Winker, D. M., Pelon, J., Coakley, J. A., Ackerman, S. A., Charlson, R. J.,
Colarco, P. R., Flamant, P., Fu, Q., Hoff, R. M., Kittaka, C., Kubar, T. L.,
Le Treut, H., McCormick, M. P., Mégie, G., Poole, L., Powell, K.,
Trepte, C., Vaughan, M. A., and Wielicki, B. A.: The CALIPSO Mission: A
Global 3D View of Aerosols and Clouds, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 91, 1211–1229,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2010bams3009.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010bams3009.1</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Wu, X., Griessbach, S., and Hoffmann, L.: Equatorward dispersion of a
high-latitude volcanic plume and its relation to the Asian summer monsoon: a
case study of the Sarychev eruption in 2009, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17,
13439–13455, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13439-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-13439-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
