<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-15-677-2022</article-id><title-group><article-title>Synergistic radar and sub-millimeter radiometer retrievals of ice hydrometeors in mid-latitude frontal cloud systems</article-title><alt-title>Synergistic radar and sub-millimeter radiometer retrievals of ice hydrometeors</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Synergistic radar and sub-millimeter radiometer retrievals of ice hydrometeors}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{S. Pfreundschuh et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Pfreundschuh</surname><given-names>Simon</given-names></name>
          <email>simon.pfreundschuh@chalmers.se</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6566-2732</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Fox</surname><given-names>Stuart</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3110-872X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Eriksson</surname><given-names>Patrick</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8475-0479</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Duncan</surname><given-names>David</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1955-4391</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Buehler</surname><given-names>Stefan A.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6389-1160</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Brath</surname><given-names>Manfred</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4898-3811</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Cotton</surname><given-names>Richard</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Ewald</surname><given-names>Florian</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5899-0890</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Department of Space, Earth and Environment, Chalmers University of Technology, 41296 Gothenburg, Sweden</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Met Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, United Kingdom</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>ECMWF, Shinfield Park, Reading, RG2 9AX, United Kingdom</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Meteorologisches Institut, Fachbereich Geowissenschaften, Centrum für Erdsystem und Nachhaltigkeitsforschung (CEN), Universität Hamburg, Bundesstraße 55, 20146 Hamburg, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Pfaffenhofen, Germany​​​​​​​</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Simon Pfreundschuh (simon.pfreundschuh@chalmers.se)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>9</day><month>February</month><year>2022</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>15</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>677</fpage><lpage>699</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>September</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>20</day><month>October</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>22</day><month>December</month><year>2021</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>25</day><month>December</month><year>2021</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2022 Simon Pfreundschuh et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2022</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e172">Accurate measurements of ice hydrometeors are required to improve the
representation of clouds and precipitation in weather and climate models. In this study, a newly developed, synergistic retrieval algorithm that combines radar with passive millimeter and sub-millimeter observations is applied to observations of three frontally generated, mid-latitude cloud systems in order to validate the retrieval and assess its capabilities to constrain the properties of ice hydrometeors. To account for uncertainty in the assumed shapes of ice particles, the retrieval is run multiple times while the shape is varied. Good agreement with in situ measurements of ice water content and particle concentrations for particle maximum diameters larger than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m is found for one of the flights for the large plate aggregate and the six-bullet rosette shapes. The variational retrieval fits the observations well, although small systematic deviations are observed for some of the sub-millimeter channels pointing towards issues with the sensor calibration or the modeling of gas absorption. For one of the flights the quality of the fit to the observations exhibits a weak dependency on the assumed ice particle shape, indicating that the employed combination of observations may provide limited information on the shape of ice particles in the observed clouds. Compared to a radar-only retrieval, the results show an improved sensitivity of the synergistic retrieval to the microphysical properties of ice hydrometeors at the base of the cloud.</p>

      <p id="d1e190">Our findings indicate that the synergy between active and passive microwave
observations may improve remote-sensing measurements of ice hydrometeors and thus help to reduce uncertainties that affect currently available data
products. Due to the increased sensitivity to their microphysical properties, the retrieval may also be a valuable tool to study ice hydrometeors in field campaigns. The good fits obtained to the observations increase confidence in the modeling of clouds in the Atmospheric Radiative Transfer Simulator and the corresponding single scattering database, which were used to implement the retrieval forward model. Our results demonstrate the suitability of these tools to produce realistic simulations for upcoming sub-millimeter sensors such as the Ice Cloud Image or the Arctic Weather Satellite.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page678?><p id="d1e202">The representation of clouds in climate models remains an important issue that causes significant uncertainties in their predictions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.1"/>.
Improving and validating these models requires measurements that accurately
characterize the distribution of hydrometeors in the atmosphere. At regional and global scales, such observations can be obtained efficiently only through remote sensing. Unfortunately, currently available remote-sensing observations do not constrain the distribution of ice in the atmosphere well <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52 bib1.bibx11 bib1.bibx10" id="paren.2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e211">To address this, the Ice Cloud Imager (ICI) radiometer, to be launched on board the second generation of European operational meteorological satellites (MetOp-SG), will be the first operational sensor to provide global observations of clouds at microwave frequencies exceeding 183 GHz. Compared to microwave observations at currently available frequencies (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">183</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz), observations at and above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">243</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz have been shown to be sensitive to a broader size range of hydrometeors <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.3"/> as well as their shape and particle size distribution <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.4"/>. Although the increased sensitivity to smaller particles and their microphysical properties is expected to help improve measurements of ice in the atmosphere, it also increases the complexity of simulations of cloud observations, which are an essential tool for performing these measurements in the first place.</p>
      <p id="d1e237">In <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.5"/>, we have developed a cloud-ice retrieval based on
radar and passive sub-millimeter observations to investigate the potential
benefits of a synergistic radar mission to fly in constellation with ICI on
MetOp-SG. The simulation-based results from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.6"/> indicate that combining active and passive observations across millimeter and sub-millimeter
observations can indeed help to better constrain the distributions of ice
hydrometeors in cloud retrievals. The principal aim of this study is to validate the synergistic retrieval using real observations and to investigate its ability to retrieve the vertical distributions of ice hydrometeors.</p>
      <p id="d1e246">Since the retrieval has been shown to work on simulated observations, the
validation of the synergistic retrieval essentially amounts to verifying the
physical realism of the underlying forward model. The observations from the
three flights considered here thus also constitute an opportunity to validate
the radiative transfer model that is used in the retrieval, i.e., the Atmospheric
Radiative Transfer Simulator (ARTS, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="altparen.7"/>) and
the corresponding ARTS single scattering database (ARTS SSDB,
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="altparen.8"/>), to accurately simulate cloud
observations at sub-millimeter wavelengths. Such simulations are of paramount
importance not only for future cloud retrievals from ICI observations
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.9"/> but also for assimilating cloud-contaminated observations in numerical weather prediction models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.10"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e262">In this study, the synergistic retrieval is applied to co-located radar and
microwave radiometer observations of three mid-latitude cloud systems. The
sensitivity of the retrieval to the ice particle shape that is assumed in the
forward simulations is tested by running the retrieval multiple times while
varying the assumed shape. To test the accuracy of the retrieval, retrieval
results are compared to in situ measurements of bulk ice water content (IWC) and particle size distributions (PSDs) for the two flights where these were
available. Finally, we assess the consistency of the forward model simulations by investigating the agreement between simulated and real observations as well as between retrieved atmospheric state and in situ measurements.</p>
      <p id="d1e265">The remainder of this article is structured as follows:
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2"/> provides a description of the datasets and
the retrieval algorithm upon which this study is based.
Section <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3"/> presents the results of the retrieval as well as the comparisons to in situ data followed by a discussion of those results in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/> and conclusions in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S5"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Data and methods</title>
      <p id="d1e284">The synergistic retrieval algorithm uses combined observations from radar and
passive microwave sensors to retrieve vertical profiles ice hydrometeor
distributions. The passive observations for this study are taken from the
MARSS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.11"/> and ISMAR <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.12"/> radiometers on board the UK’s
BAe-146-301 Atmospheric Research Aircraft (FAAM BAe-146) aircraft. Since the
instrumentation of the FAAM BAe-146 aircraft does not include a cloud radar,
only flights for which the radiometer observations can be co-located with radar
observations from another platform are suitable for the combined retrieval.
Since ISMAR is currently the only operational radiometer with channels up to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">664</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">874</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz, the flights considered in this study provide a rare
opportunity to study the synergies between radar and passive (sub-)millimeter
observations using real observations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e309">Flight paths of the cloud overpasses considered in this study. First
row of panels shows the true-color composite derived from the closest
overpasses of the MODIS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.13"/> sensor on board the Aqua satellite.
Second row shows ERA5 temperature (colored background),
geopotential (contours) and wind speed (arrows) at the 800 mb
pressure level from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.14"/>.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=446.708268pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e327">Datasets used in the this study.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="6cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="4.5cm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="5.6cm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Title</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Usage</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HALO Microwave Package measurements during North Atlantic Waveguide and Downstream impact EXperiment (NAWDEX)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Radar observations for flight <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>B984</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="text.15"/>, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <uri>https://doi.org/10.1594/WDCC/HALO_measurements_4</uri></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">CloudSat 1B-CPR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Radar observations for flight C159 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(Granule 67658), C161 (Granule <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>68702)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.16"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.17"/>, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <uri>https://www.cloudsat.cira.colostate.edu/data-products/1b-cpr</uri> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>(last access: 1 February 2022)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FAAM B984 ISMAR and T-NAWDEX flight: airborne atmospheric measurements from core instrument suite on board the BAE-146 aircraft</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Radiometer observations and in situ measurements for flight B984</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20" id="text.18"/>, <uri>https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/46ca2a2cc8ce497fbf06beaf31f67098</uri> (last access: 1 February 2022)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FAAM C159 PIKNMIX-F flight: airborne atmospheric measurements from core and non-core instrument suites on board the BAE-146 aircraft</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Radiometer observations and in situ measurements for flight  C159</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.19"/>, <uri>https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/68cfc7f294554646803c80b2a389e105</uri> (last access: 1 February 2022)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">FAAM C161 PIKNMIX-F flight: airborne atmospheric measurements from core and non-core instrument suites on board the BAE-146 aircraft</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Radiometer observations for flight <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>C159</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="text.20"/>, <uri>https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/133e15c47c024aa4b30e3f6f54af8b77</uri> (last access: 1 February 2022)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">ERA5 global reanalysis</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">A priori state and atmospheric <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>background fields</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.21"/>, <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?> <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</ext-link></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e482">An overview of the three flights and the corresponding meteorological contexts is provided in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. The first considered flight, designated B984, was performed on 14 October 2016 as part of the North Atlantic
Waveguide and Downstream Impact Experiment (NAWDEX), which took place during
September and October 2016 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="paren.22"/>. During this flight, a cloud
system generated by an occluded front has been observed quasi-simultaneously by three research aircraft: The High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft (HALO, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="altparen.23"/>), the FAAM BAe-146 and the Falcon 20 of the Service
des Avions Francais Instrumentations pour la Recherche en Environnement
(SAFIRE). The two other flights, designated C159 and C161, were part of the
PIKNMIX-F campaign, which took place in March 2019. These two flights were
performed following the ground track of simultaneous overpasses of the CloudSat
satellite. The observations probe clouds in different regions of a frontal
system generated by a low-pressure system passing over Iceland around 21 March
2019. The cloud system observed during flight C159 is a stratiform,
lightly precipitating cloud located in the warm sector of the frontal system,
whereas the clouds observed during flight C161 are of convective origin and
located in the active region of the cold front. All datasets that were used in this study are listed together with their sources in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<?pagebreak page680?><sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Radar observations</title>
      <p id="d1e503">The radar observations from the three flights are displayed in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. Observations for flight B984 stem from the
HAMP MIRA radar <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.24"/> on board the HALO aircraft, which operates at a
frequency of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz and has been characterized and calibrated by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="text.25"/>. Its observations have been downsampled to a vertical resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">210</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> m and a horizontal resolution of roughly <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">700</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> m in
order to reduce the computational complexity of the retrieval and to better
match the field of view of the passive observations, which, at an altitude of
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km, vary between about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">900</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> m for the low-frequency
channels and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> m for the high-frequency channels.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e559">Radar observations from the flights used in this study. Panel <bold>(a)</bold> shows the radar reflectivity measured by the HAMP MIRA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">35</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz cloud radar. Panels <bold>(b)</bold> and <bold>(c)</bold> show the reflectivity measured by the CloudSat CPR at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">94</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz. The white line displays the ERA5 freezing level from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.26"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e595">The radar observations for flights C159 and C161 stem from the CloudSat Cloud
Profiling Radar (CPR, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="altparen.27"/>), which operates at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">94</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz.
Since the CloudSat observations were affected strongly by ground clutter, the
first five bins located completely above surface altitude were set to the
reflectivity found in the sixth bin above the surface. The CPR observations
have a vertical resolution of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">240</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> m and a horizontal resolution of
about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km. The horizontal distance between subsequent observations is
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km.</p>
      <p id="d1e630">While the radar observations for flight B984 come from an airborne radar, the
observations for flights C159 and C161 stem from a spaceborne sensor. The high velocity of the spaceborne sensor causes significant temporal delay between co-located observations from the radiometers and the radar.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> displays the delay between co-located radar and
radiometer observations with respect to the along-track distance for the three
flight scenes. While the delays for flight B984 remain mostly within 5 min, they reach values exceeding 30 min for the two other flights.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e637">Delays between the co-located observations from radar and radiometers for the three flights.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>2.1.1</label><title>MARSS</title>
      <p id="d1e653">The MARSS radiometer measures microwave radiances at 89,
157 GHz and channels located around the water vapor line at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">183</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz. Although MARSS is a scanning radiometer only observations within
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> off nadir are used in the retrieval. The observations from
the three flights are displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>.
Observations from channels that are sensitive to surface emission
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">89</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">157</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz) are excluded from the retrieval for
flight sections over land. The MARSS observations were mapped to the radar
observations using nearest-neighbor interpolation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e696">Passive microwave measurements from the MARSS radiometer together with the matched radar observations. Grey background in the radiance plots marks observations that were taken over land.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f04.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>2.1.2</label><title>ISMAR</title>
      <p id="d1e713">The ISMAR radiometer has channels covering the frequency range from
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">118</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">874</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz. As for MARSS, only observations
within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> off nadir are used in the retrieval. The
observations from the three flights are displayed in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. Similar to for the two low-frequency
channels of MARSS, the four outermost channels around the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">118</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz oxygen
line are not used over land. The matching of ISMAR observations to radar
observations is performed in the same way as for MARSS. It should be noted that not all channels were available on all flights: the channels around
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">448</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz were not available on the B984 flight, while two of the
channels around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">325</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz were missing for the C159 and C161 flights.
From the channels at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">874</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz only the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> polarization was available
for flights C159 and C161.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e785">Passive microwave measurements from the ISMAR radiometer together with the matched radar observations. Grey background in the radiance plots marks observations that were taken over land and are therefore not used in
the retrieval.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f05.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e794">The polarized measurements at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">243</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">664</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz for
flight B984 were replaced by the average of the measured <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> polarizations.
For flights C159 and C161, only the horizontally polarized measurements at
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">664</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz were used due to excessive noise in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi>V</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> channel.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>In situ measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e849">The in situ measurements that are relevant to this study are measurements of
bulk ice water content using a Nevzorov hot-wire probe <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.28"/> and
PSDs recorded using DMT CIP-15 and CIP-100 probes, which measure size-resolved particle concentrations with resolutions of 15 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m, respectively. In situ measurements are available only for flights B984 and C159, which each consist of two parts: a high-level run during which the aircraft flew above the cloud system to perform the remote-sensing observations and a low-level run during which the aircraft flew at lower altitude through the cloud to perform the in situ measurements. A detailed view of the high- and low-level runs for the two flights is provided in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>. For flight C159, this view reveals a noticeable horizontal offset of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km between the ground tracks
of radar and radiometer observations. Even larger deviations occur between
certain parts of the low-level run and the ground tracks of the remote-sensing
observations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e889">Detailed view of the flight paths of the high-level runs and in situ sampling paths for flights B984 and C159. The background is the true-color composite derived from the closest overpasses of the MODIS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.29"/> sensor on the Aqua satellite.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e903">In situ-measured IWC and PSDs for flights B984 and C159. The first
row of panels displays the measured IWC along the flight path plotted on top
of the co-located radar observations. The second row displays the variation
of the mean of the in situ-measured PSDs for different altitudes in the
cloud.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e913">An overview of the  measured IWC and PSDs is provided in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>. While for flight B984 the measured IWC is mostly consistent with the radar observations, there are clear disparities between the measured IWC and the CPR reflectivities for flight C159. This indicates that there may be considerable differences between the regions of the cloud that were sampled during the in situ sampling and the part that was observed by the CloudSat CPR.</p>
      <p id="d1e918">The PSD profiles for flight B984 show a clear size-sorting pattern with a
gradual decrease in the concentration of particles smaller than
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m and a simultaneous increase in the concentration of larger particles. For
flight C159, high concentrations of small particles are encountered at low
altitudes which decrease with altitude. For larger particles no systematic
variation with altitude is observed.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Retrieval algorithm</title>
      <p id="d1e944">The synergistic retrieval algorithm used in this study is based on the optimal estimation framework <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.30"/> and retrieves distributions of frozen and
liquid hydrometeors together with water vapor by simultaneously fitting a
forward<?pagebreak page681?> model to the active and passive observations. Since the algorithm is
described in detail in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.31"/> the following section only
outlines its main features and how it has been adapted to the flight data.</p>
      <p id="d1e953">The retrieval input consists of a single radar profile and the corresponding
spatially closest radiometer observations. Background properties of the
atmosphere and the surface, such as temperature and wind speed, as well as a
priori profiles for relative humidity and liquid cloud water are taken from the ERA5 hourly reanalysis <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.32"/>. The output of the retrieval are two
parameters of the PSDs of frozen and liquid hydrometeors as well as liquid cloud
water content (LCWC) and relative humidity. Hydrometeor PSDs are represented
using the approach proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.33"/>: At each level in the
atmosphere the concentration of hydrometeors with respect to the volume
equivalent diameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M46" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a fixed function that specifies the shape of the normalized PSD, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the retrieved parameters. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> parameter is retrieved in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> space while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is retrieved in linear space. Relative
humidity is retrieved in a transformed space based on an inverse hyperbolic
tangent transformation and cloud liquid water content in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> space. A listing
of all retrieval targets and corresponding a priori assumptions is provided in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T2"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d1e1092">Retrieval quantities and a priori assumptions used in the retrieval.
The relation for the a priori mean of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is taken from
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.34"/>.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Quantity</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Retrieved parameters</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">A priori mean</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">A priori SD</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ice water content (IWC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.076586</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">273.15</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.948</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3">with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> temperature in K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Chosen so that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>IWC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">at all levels.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rain water content (RWC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cloud liquid water content (CLWC)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>CLWC</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">From ERA5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Relative humidity (RH)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>arctanh</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mtext>RH</mml:mtext></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">From ERA5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?pagebreak page682?><p id="d1e1494">The forward model and retrieval were made adaptive so that the ingested
observations can be easily adapted to the different sensors and channels that
were available for each flight. Low-frequency channels that are used only over
ocean surfaces are deactivated over land by setting the corresponding channel
uncertainty to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K. The atmospheric grid was limited to altitudes
between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km and matched to the resolution of the radar
observations. The latest stable release (version 2.4) of ARTS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.35"/> is used to implement the forward model used in the retrieval. The built-in
single-scattering radar solver of ARTS is used to calculate radar observations and Jacobians. To account for the effect of multiple scattering in CloudSat observations, the attenuation due to hydrometeors is scaled at each atmospheric layer by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> following Fig. 16 in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="text.36"/>. Passive radiances are calculated using the ARTS interface to DISORT <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="paren.37"/>, and their Jacobians are approximated using a first-order scattering approximation.
Gaseous absorption is modeled using the absorption models from
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="text.38"/> for N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.39"/>, absorption
from water vapor is calculated using a combination of the AER database v3.6
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="paren.40"/> for resonant absorption and the MT-CKD model version 3.2 for
continuum absorption <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.41"/>.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>2.3.1</label><title>Representation of frozen hydrometeors</title>
      <p id="d1e1577">The forward model simulates active and passive observations in two steps: in the first one, the bulk properties that are used to represent hydrometeors in the retrieval are mapped to corresponding optical properties. The optical properties are then, in the second step, used together with background atmosphere and surface to simulate the observations.</p>
      <?pagebreak page684?><p id="d1e1580">The mapping of bulk to optical properties is based on a PSD and an ice particle
habit that associates particles of different sizes and shapes to optical
properties. As described above, the forward model uses the normalized PSD
approach proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.42"/> with the mass-weighted mean diameter
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and intercept parameter (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as parameters. The normalized shape function <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) follows a modified gamma distribution shape
using the parameters from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="text.43"/>. The ice particle habit is
represented by a collection of ice particle shapes and corresponding,
pre-computed single particle optical properties. Bulk optical properties are
calculated by integrating the product of particle density and optical properties over the particle size. As the retrieval is currently set up, the particle habit cannot be retrieved and must be assumed a priori. Due to the large variability of ice particle shapes in real clouds, it is unclear which particle habit should be chosen to best represent their radiative properties or whether such a unique best model exists at all. Hence, the approach taken here is to select a set of habits and perform the retrieval with each of them. This will allow us to investigate the impact of the selected habit on the retrieval results.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1626">Particle habits used in the retrieval. The mass–size relationship is given in terms of the parameters of a fitted power law of the form <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MAX</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MAX</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> the maximum diameter and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in kg.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Habit name</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Shapes used</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center" colsep="1">Size range </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col6" align="center">Mass–size relationship </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Name (ID)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq, min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>eq, max</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Six-bullet rosette</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Six-bullet rosette (6)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8905</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.4927</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.4278</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Eight-column aggregate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Eight-column aggregate (8)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3000</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">440</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Evans snow aggregate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Evans snow aggregate (1)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2109</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.196</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.386</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Large plate aggregate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Thick plate (15)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">110</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Large plate aggregate (20)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">160</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3021</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Large column aggregate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Block column (12)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">110</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Large column aggregate (18)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">160</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3021</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.25</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.43</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2000">Properties of the selected ice particle shapes that are used to
represent frozen hydrometeors in the retrieval forward model. Colored lines
display the properties of the selected habits, while grey lines show the
properties of the remaining standard habits distributed with the ARTS SSDB.
Bulk optical properties were calculated using the PSD parametrization that
is used in the retrieval.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2009">Five particles were selected from the set of standard habits that is distributed
with the ARTS SSDB <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.44"/>. The standard habits are particle mixes
that combine pristine crystals at small sizes with aggregate shapes at larger
sizes. The selected habits are listed in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T3"/>. To
provide an overview of their optical properties, characteristic bulk optical
properties have been calculated and displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> together with their mass–size relationships. The PSD used to calculate the bulk optical properties is the same that is used in the retrieval with the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>*</mml:mo></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value set to the a priori value at a temperature of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">260</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> K. The particles were selected so that their
properties cover most of the variability of the available set of standard habits both in terms of the mass–size relationship as well as their optical properties.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2041">Comparison of bulk IWC as measured by the Nevzorov probe and
inferred from in situ-measured PSDs using a given particle shape. The
background in each plot shows the distribution of Nevzorov-measured IWC for
a given <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km altitude bin. Colored boxes display the distribution
of IWC in that bin inferred for a given particle shape. Boxes, whiskers and
outliers are drawn following Tukey's conventions for box plots.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f09.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d1e2057">Complementary information that can help guide the selection of a suitable
particle shape can be obtained from in situ measurements. Since the particle
habit associates particle sizes with a specific shape it can be used to compute a bulk water content corresponding to PSD measurements. This allows calculating the IWC corresponding to the in situ-measured PSDs, which can be compared with
the IWC measured by the Nevzorov probe. The agreement between the PSD-derived
IWC and the in situ-measured IWC can then provide insight into whether the
mass–size relation corresponding to the particle shape is consistent with
that of the particles in the cloud. Such a comparison is provided in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2062">For both flights, the large plate aggregate and the six-bullet rosette yield
the best overall agreement with the in situ-measured IWC. The large column
aggregate yields values at the low end of the measured distribution for all
flights and altitudes. The Evans Snow Aggregate yields similar results to those of the large column aggregate except at high altitudes for flight B984 and low altitudes for flight C159. The eight-column aggregate generally yields higher IWC values than most other habits and tends to overestimate the in situ IWC at low altitudes for flight B984.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page685?><sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e2075">The primary results of the combined retrieval are the retrieved hydrometeor size distributions. In addition to that, the retrieval also fits a radiative transfer model to the observations whose agreement with the real observations can provide valuable information regarding the accuracy of the forward model and the fitness of a priori and modeling assumptions.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>Fit to observations</title>
      <p id="d1e2086">The retrieval residuals, i.e., the difference between simulated and real
observations, for the large plate aggregate habit are displayed in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>. As the figure shows, the retrieval was able to fit
both radar and radiometer observations fairly well for all flights. For flight B984, the radar residuals show some scattered deviations located at the edge of the cloud, which are likely discretization artifacts. Except for that, residuals
for this flight remain well within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> dB. The residuals for flight
C159 exhibit four vertical stripes with significant residuals in the radar
observations. In these regions, which correspond to<?pagebreak page686?> significant scattering
depressions in most passive channels up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">325</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz, the simulations
overestimate the radar reflectivity. Apart from this, there are some smaller
regions where the simulations underestimate the radar reflectivity, but these
remain limited to within few dB. For flight C161, moderate negative
residuals in the radar observations can be observed in the right half of the
convective core, which coincide with an overestimation of the scattering signal at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">243</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e2114">Differences between observed and fitted observations for the large
plate aggregate particle. The first two rows depict the radar observations and
their residuals, respectively. The following rows show the retrieval residual in
the radiometer measurements for each of the frequency bands used in the
retrieval. The grey shading marks sections of the flight path that were
located over land surfaces.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2123">Radiometer residuals for flight B984 are mostly within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K but
larger for flights C159 and C161. For these two flights, residuals exceeding
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> K are observed in the window channels up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">243</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz as
well as the outermost channels around the absorption lines at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">118</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">183</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz. Since these occur in profiles where precipitation is
present and in which similar residuals can be observed in the radar observations and other channels that are sensitive to the lower parts of the atmosphere, a likely explanation is that they are caused by precipitation that is not observed
by all sensors due to spatial and temporal co-location issues. In particular, the
large residuals in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">243</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz channel for flight C161 at around
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km along-track distance may well be caused by the evolution of the
convective cloud during the delay of about 30 min that separates the
radiometer and radar observations.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e2182">Distributions of retrieval residuals for different particle
shapes used in the forward model for each of the three flights.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2191">For a more systematic analysis of the effect of the assumed particle shape on
the retrieval residuals, their distribution for radar and radiometer channels
around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">183</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz and above are displayed in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>. The distributions, which for most channels are
close to or centered around zero, confirm that the retrieval generally fits the
observations well. The largest deviations are observed for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">874</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz
channel and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">243</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz channel for flight C161. For flights C159 and
C161, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">874</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">664</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz channels exhibit small
systematic biases of opposite signs, which may indicate issues with the
calibration or the modeling of water vapor absorption at these channels.
Furthermore, it is interesting to note that the ice particle habit only has a
minor impact on the residuals, indicating that the retrieval can compensate for mismatches in the assumed particle shape by adjusting the retrieval variables.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Retrieved ice water content</title>
      <p id="d1e2240">The retrieved bulk IWC and corresponding IWP for all three cloud scenes are
displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>. For all three flights, the ice
particle shape has a significant effect on the retrieved amount of ice. In terms of IWP, the large-column aggregate and Evans snow aggregate habits yield the highest values, while the eight-column aggregate consistently yields the lowest IWP.
The large plate aggregate and six-bullet rosette both yield values within the
range of the other particle models with the six-bullet rosette leading to slightly higher IWP values than the large plate aggregate. In addition to the effect of the increased total retrieved water content, the particle habit also has a small
effect on the vertical distribution of the ice hydrometeors, which is visible
particularly for retrieved IWC in the convective core observed during flight
C161.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e2247">Retrieved IWP and IWC content for all flights and different ice
particle shapes assumed in the retrieval. The white line displays the ERA5
freezing level from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.45"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=497.923228pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page687?><sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><title>Comparison to in situ measurements</title>
      <p id="d1e2270">The most important question regarding the hydrometeor retrieval is certainly
whether the retrieved bulk properties are consistent with the in situ
measurements. To compare the in situ measurements to the retrieval results, they
were mapped to the radar observations using a nearest-neighbor criterion. For
B984, retrieval results within a distance of 1 km of the flight path were then
associated with the in situ measurements. Because of the mismatch between
observations and in situ sampling paths, another approach was taken for flight
C159. Here the retrieval results were mapped to the in situ<?pagebreak page688?> measurements by
selecting all retrieval results between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">50</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">150</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km along-track
distance. Both the matched retrieval results and the vertically resolved
distributions of measured and retrieved IWC are displayed in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{13}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 13</label><caption><p id="d1e2291">In situ-measured and retrieved IWC for flights B984 and C159. Panels <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> show the in situ sampling paths in relation to the measured radar reflectivity as well as the retrieval values that are mapped to the in situ measurements (blue shading). Panels <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> show in the background the distribution of in situ-measured IWC values in altitude bins with a height of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">500</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> m. Colored boxes display the corresponding distribution of retrieved IWC values for different ice particle shapes. Boxes are drawn following Tukey's conventions for box plots. The colored triangles mark the mean of the distribution.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=384.112205pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2319">For flight B984, the distribution of in situ-measured IWC values is well within the range of retrieved IWC values across all particle shapes up to an altitude of around <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km. At these altitudes, the best match to the in situ
measurements is achieved with the six-bullet rosette particle and the large plate aggregate. The eight-column aggregate underestimates the in situ-measured IWC while the large column aggregate and Evans snow aggregate overestimate it. Above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km all particles lead to results that underestimate the in situ-measured IWC. A likely cause for this is the high concentration of small
particles as observed in the in situ measurements (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>) for which microwave observations lack sensitivity.</p>
      <p id="d1e2339">For flight C159, the distribution of retrieved IWC still covers the distribution of in situ-measured values for altitudes above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km but exhibits a tendency towards underestimation. Overall, the differences between the results for different habits are smaller for this flight. However, the uncertainties caused by the large sampling region as well as the potential co-location issues affecting the results make them less conclusive.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F14" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{14}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 14</label><caption><p id="d1e2351">In situ-measured and retrieved PSDs for flights B984 (left column)
and C159 (right column). Each row of panels shows the mean of the in situ-measured PSDs (black) together with randomly drawn samples of measured PSDs (light grey) for a given altitude bin of a height of 1 km. Colored lines on top show the corresponding mean retrieved PSD for different assumed particle shapes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f14.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page689?><p id="d1e2360">Finally, we want to address the question whether the representation of cloud
microphysics within the retrieval forward model is consistent with the in situ-measured PSDs. For this, we calculate the PSDs corresponding to the retrieved bulk properties and compare them to the in situ measurements. The results of the
comparison are displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>. For flight B984, we
find good agreement between retrieved and in situ-measured PSDs for larger
particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MAX</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) for the large plate aggregate
and the six-bullet rosette. Since this is observed even at altitudes above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km, it confirms that the underestimation of IWC at these altitudes is
likely caused by the high concentration of smaller ice particles. For flight
C159, the retrieved PSDs deviate significantly from the in situ measurements.
Although the six-bullet rosette and large plate aggregate seem to fit the tail
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MAX</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm) of the PSD for most altitudes except between 3–4 km, the measured PSDs deviate considerably at smaller sizes. This may
also indicate that the assumed shape of the PSD may not be suitable for the observed cloud system.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
      <p id="d1e2419">This study used a novel, synergistic retrieval to retrieve vertically resolved distributions of ice hydrometeors from co-located radar and microwave radiometer observations. For most of the considered channels, the retrieval succeeded in fitting both the active and passive observations without significant, systematic deviations. For two of the flights, the retrieved hydrometeor distributions were compared to in situ measurements. For one of the flights (B984), we found good
agreement with the in situ-measured bulk IWC for altitudes between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km for two of the particle shapes. The same particle shapes also
yield the best agreements with the in situ-measured PSDs for larger ice
particles (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MAX</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m). For the second flight (C159), no consistency was found between the in situ measurements and the retrieval. A likely explanation for this is that the in situ measurements are not as well co-located due to the temporal and spatial differences between the different observations as well as the in situ measurements.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Sub-millimeter radiative transfer in cloudy atmospheres</title>
      <p id="d1e2466">A first important result of this study is the ability of the retrieval to find
atmospheric states that are consistent with the observed radiances and radar
reflectivities for all three flights. This in itself is not self-evident due to the<?pagebreak page690?> uncertainties that still affect the modeling of ice-particle scattering at millimeter and sub-millimeter wavelengths. Previous studies that tried to directly validate sub-millimeter RT through clouds were limited to either tropical clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17 bib1.bibx12" id="paren.46"/> or cirrus clouds <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.47"/>. For flight B984, the radar and all passive observations were fitted up to small systematic biases no larger than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> K. The deviations for the two other flights were generally larger, but these were likely caused by spatial and temporal co-location errors. This indicates that both the assumed optical properties as well as the retrieval forward model are consistent across the considered wavelengths. Furthermore, the two particle shapes for which the best agreement between retrieved and in situ-measured hydrometeor distributions was found for flight B984 were also those whose mass–size relationship yielded the best agreement between in situ measurements of IWC and PSDs. Since this ties the microphysical properties of the particles to their optical properties, it suggests that the modeling of these particles in the ARTS SSDB is physically consistent.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>The impact of assumed ice particle shape</title>
      <p id="d1e2490">A rather unexpected result that emerged from this study is that the retrieval
can fit the observations fairly well regardless of the assumed ice particle
shape. This indicates that although the observations are sensitive to variations in ice particle shape, they alone cannot constrain it. This is in agreement with
what has been reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.48"/>, namely that no correlation
could be found between the particle shape yielding the best retrieval fit and the
one yielding the most accurate retrieval results.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F15" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{15}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 15</label><caption><p id="d1e2498">Brightness temperature residuals between true and simulated observations for two channels from flight B984. The first row shows the results for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">243</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz channel, while the second row shows the results for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">325</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz channel. Columns show the results for the five tested particle shapes. The grey line in each panel represents the regression line for the plotted data points. The text displays the correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of a two-sided significance test for the slope of regression line.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f15.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2545">In an effort to better separate a potential signal from the ice particle shape in the retrieval residuals, we have investigated the relationship between retrieved IWP and the residual for different channels. Most channels that were available on all flights do not show a clear sign of a relation between the particle shape and the residuals. As an example for those channels we provide scatter plots of the retrieved IWP and the channel residual for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">325</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz channel in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="App1.Ch1.S1.F18"/> in the Appendix. We did,
however, identify two channels from flight B984 that may exhibit a potential
signal from the ice particle shape in the residuals. The scatter plots for these two channels are provided in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>. For the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">325</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">9.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz<?pagebreak page691?> channel, all tested particles except the large plate
aggregate seem to manifest a positive correlation between IWP and the residuals. For the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">243</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz, the six-bullet rosette, eight-column aggregate and large plate aggregate exhibit a weak negative trend in the residuals, while it remains positive for the large column aggregate and Evans snow aggregate. At least for these two channels the large plate aggregate seems to stand out as the ice particle shape yielding the smallest residuals across the retrieved range of IWP values.</p>
      <p id="d1e2589">Since the large plate aggregate is one of the particles for which the best
agreement between retrieved and in situ measurements was obtained, this may be viewed as an encouraging result indicating that sub-millimeter observations can, at least in combination with radar observations, be used to constrain the shape of ice particles in clouds. However, taking into account that these are observations from only one flight as well as the complicated statistics of the results from Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/>, it remains unclear whether these findings are statistically significant. A potential confounding factor may be the impact of the a priori assumptions on these results. Since the retrieval balances the residual with the deviation from the a priori, this may lead to a
worse fit for the softer particles (large column aggregate, Evans snow flake)
for which a much higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> must be retrieved for a similar scattering effect.
While this effect may be desired in the retrieval to avoid the apparently
excessive amounts of ice retrieved using these particle shapes, it is the
combination of observations and a priori assumptions that constrains the
particle shape and not the observations alone. We present these results here
mainly for completeness and to serve as a potential basis for further
investigation.</p>
      <p id="d1e2605">Nonetheless, even if indeed present, a potential signal from the ice particle
shape in the results would be limited to a few Kelvin. This implies that future ice hydrometeor retrievals that make use of millimeter and sub-millimeter microwave observations must either account for the uncertainty caused by variations in ice particle shape or find ways to more accurately constrain the shape a priori. Moreover, for<?pagebreak page692?> studies that seek to validate model predictions by comparing simulated and observed microwave observations, this implies that care must be taken to accurately characterize the ice particle shape. This is because agreement up to a few Kelvin between simulations and observations can be achieved for bulk water contents that vary by almost an order of magnitude (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><title>Representation of cloud microphysics</title>
      <p id="d1e2618">The lack of a distinct signal that constrains the ice particle shape even in the combined observations puts additional weight on the question of how to best represent ice particles in simulations of microwave observations. The habits that lead to the most accurate retrieval results in this study were the large plate aggregate and the six-bullet rosette. The channel residuals presented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F15"/> indicate the best fit for the large plate aggregate although it is unclear how robust these findings are. Furthermore, it
is interesting to note that the large plate aggregate was also found to yield
the best agreement between simulations based on a numerical weather prediction (NWP) model and satellite
observations at frequencies between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">19</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">190</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz for stratiform
snow in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="text.49"/>.</p>
      <p id="d1e2640">Nonetheless, these findings are based on observations from the single flight for which the retrieval results could be reliably compared with in situ
measurements. This result can thus be seen as indication that these habits may work well for similar mid-latitude cloud systems, but more generally applicable
conclusions would require further and more systematic investigation.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Retrieval validation</title>
      <p id="d1e2653">Since the results presented in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.50"/> were limited to
simulations based on a high-resolution climate model, the validation of the
retrieval using real observations remained an open issue. For flight B984, good agreement was found between retrieval results and in situ measurements. Although
the retrieved IWC deviates from the in situ measurements at altitudes <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km, the retrieved PSDs still match the in situ measurements well for
particles with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MAX</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m. This indicates that the
concentrations of these larger particles may be retrieved correctly but that the total IWC is underestimated due to the mismatch between assumed and actual PSD shape, the former of which lacks the very high concentration of small particles
that are present in the in situ measurements. Although <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.51"/> and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.52"/> show that the occurrence of high particle concentrations at
sizes below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m may be due to measurement inaccuracies of the
CIP-15 probe, the measured PSDs correctly reproduce the measured IWC at these
altitudes when the corresponding water content is calculated using any of the
tested particle habits (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>). Furthermore, the
presence of a cloud layer with a large number of small particles was also
reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="text.53"/> who investigated the same cloud system with combined radar–lidar observations.</p>
      <?pagebreak page693?><p id="d1e2719">For flight C159 no good agreement was found between retrieved and in situ-measured IWC and PSDs. However, some evidence suggest that this may be due to
co-location: firstly, the flight path for the in situ sampling was found to be offset from the high-level run during which the observations were taken in the direction opposite to the wind at 800 mb
(Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>, <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>).
Secondly, a clear backscattering signal is present in the CloudSat CPR
observations even in regions where only negligible amounts of IWC are present in the in situ measurements (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>). Thirdly, the residuals observed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> are indicative of additional co-location issues between radar and radiometer observations. Finally, also the comparison of retrieved and in situ-measured PSDs (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F14"/>) seems to indicate large deviations between the observed and the assumed PSD shape.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <label>4.5</label><title>The added value synergistic cloud retrievals</title>
      <p id="d1e2740">Although the evidence from flight B984 suggests that the synergistic
retrieval algorithm works well for retrieving ice hydrometeor concentrations,
similar retrievals can be performed using only radar observations. A retrieval
using only radar observations has the obvious advantage of requiring only
a single sensor and being computationally much less complex. This naturally
leads to the question of the added value that a synergistic retrieval
can provide.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F16" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{16}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 16</label><caption><p id="d1e2745">In situ-measured and retrieved PSDs for flight B984 for the combined and the radar-only retrieval. Each panel displays the distributions of in situ-measured IWC for different altitude bins in the background and the distribution of retrieved IWC values for different ice habits as colored boxes on top.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f16.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2754">To investigate this, the results of the combined and an equivalent radar-only
retrieval for flight B984 are displayed in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F16"/>. For the large plate aggregate and
six-bullet-rosette habits, the results of the combined and the radar-only
retrieval are largely similar down to an altitude of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km,
below which the radar-only retrieval tends to overestimate the in situ IWC. In contrast to the combined retrieval, the results of the radar-only retrieval exhibit almost no impact from the particle habit. While the radar-only retrieval
remains mostly unaffected by the habit choice, using a different habit in the
combined retrieval may cause systematic overestimation (Evans snow aggregate and large column aggregate) or underestimation (eight-COLUMN AGGREGate).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F17" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{17}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 17</label><caption><p id="d1e2769">In situ-measured and retrieved PSDs for flight B984 retrieved using the combined <bold>(a)</bold> and the radar-only retrieval <bold>(b)</bold>. Each row of panels shows the mean of the in situ-measured PSDs (black) together with randomly drawn samples of measured PSDs (light grey) for a given altitude bin of a height of 1 km. Colored lines on top show the corresponding mean retrieved PSD for different assumed particle shapes.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f17.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2784">A similar comparison is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F17"/> for the retrieved PSDs. The PSDs are largely similar for both retrievals for altitudes above <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km. Below that, however, the radar-only retrieval
overestimates the particle concentrations, while the combined retrieval matches the in situ measurements well for the large plate aggregate and six-bullet rosette habits. This indicates that the combined retrieval utilizes the complementary information in the radar and passive observations to match both moments of the PSD, whereas the radar-only retrieval can only match one of them.</p>
      <p id="d1e2796">The tendencies observed for the retrieved IWC in Fig. 14 are even more
pronounced when the IWP is calculated along the sampling path of the in situ
measurements. The resulting retrieved IWP values are displayed in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T4"/>. The radar-only retrieval systematically overestimates the reference IWP for all tested particle shapes. The combined retrieval leads to even stronger overestimation when the large column aggregate or the Evans snow aggregate are used as ice particle shapes, while the eight-column aggregate leads to a strong underestimation of the true IWP. With the six-bullet rosette and the large plate aggregate used as ice particle shapes, the combined retrieval yields
results that are closest to the in situ measurements. Thus, while the
incorporation of passive observations increases the sensitivity to the
representation of hydrometeors, it can help to improve the retrieval of IWP
given that a suitable particle model is used in the retrieval.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2804">Retrieved IWP along in situ flight path for flight B984 for the
combined and radar-only retrieval.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center">IWP (kg m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">In situ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col2" nameend="col3" align="center">0.3615 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Habit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Combined</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Radar-only</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">  Six-bullet rosette</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3362</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4971</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">  Eight-column aggregate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2383</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6783</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">  Large column aggregate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7868</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4116</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">  Large plate aggregate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3666</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.4664</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">  Evans snow aggregate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7082</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5073</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e2976">These results thus suggest that combining radar with passive microwave
observations helps to constrain the PSD of ice hydrometeors for sufficiently
large particle sizes (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MAX</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m). Since for air- and
space-borne observations only microwave observations can sense the base of thick clouds, this is a unique synergy between these types of observations.</p>
      <p id="d1e3003">While these results were obtained for a Ka band cloud radar, we do not expect
them to change much for a W band radar. Although the habit may have a stronger effect on the retrieval results of a W band radar due to its higher frequency, the underlying problem remains that the radar observations provide only a single piece of information per range bin. To retrieve the two moments of the hydrometeor PSD, the retrieval thus has to rely on a priori information, which cannot accurately describe the distributions in all clouds. Although the passive observations provide only a comparably small amount of additional information, our results indicate that the retrieval is able to use that to better constrain
the retrieved hydrometeor distributions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS6">
  <label>4.6</label><title>Limitations</title>
      <p id="d1e3014">Since microwave radiative transfer simulations in cloudy atmospheres remain a
challenging problem, it is important to also consider the limitations of the
simulations and derived results that were presented in this study. The
simplifications that were applied in the simulations are the following:
<list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3019">Horizontal photon transport between the retrieved profiles is ignored.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3023">Inhomogeneity across the radar and radiometer beams is ignored.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3027">The finite spectral resolution of the passive channels is neglected.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3031">The radar solver neglects multiple scattering.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d1e3035">The effects of particle orientation are ignored.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p id="d1e3038"><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="text.54"/> found that neglecting photon transport in simulations of
sub-millimeter observations across a footprint of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km incurs only a
small random error with biases <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K, so it is likely also small for
the simulations presented here. For flight B984, the horizontal averaging of the radar observations leads to a profile width of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">700</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> m which is fairly
close to the width of the radiometer field of view which varies between about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">900</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> m at an altitude of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km. The effect of beam
inhomogeneity is therefore expected to be small for this flight. For flights
C159 and C161, the radar beam has an along-track width of about
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.4</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km, which is larger than that of the radiometers, so these
observations may be affected to a larger extent than those for flight B984.</p>
      <p id="d1e3096">Neglecting the finite spectral resolution of the passive channels can lead to an error of up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> K for satellite observations that are affected by
ozone absorption <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.55"/>. Since the passive observations used in this study were all taken from altitudes below <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> km the effect of this
approximation is likely negligible.</p>
      <p id="d1e3116">The effect of multiple scattering for air-borne radar observations is generally negligible <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.56"/>. For CloudSat observations, however, the higher
frequency and the considerably wider footprint will increase the effects of
multiple scattering on the observations. Although the simulations account for
the signal-enhancing effect of multiple scattering by layer-wise reduction of
the attenuation, the presence of multiple scattering may still add to the
uncertainty in the simulations for flights C159 and C161.</p>
      <p id="d1e3123"><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Finally, there is the potential presence of oriented particles in the cloud. The different ice habits used in this study all assume totally random orientation of the ice particles. Systematic vertical orientation of particles of a given shape in the cloud would effectively alter their scattering properties. For observations at nadir, particle orientation can increase the extinction of the large plate aggregate of up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> % <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.57"/>. To first order, the increase in extinction can be expected to cause a similar overestimation of the retrieved IWC. This, however, is still considerably lower than the differences observed due to different ice habits.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page694?><sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3147">The main result from the experiments presented in this study is that we were
able to find two ice particle shapes, the large plate aggregate and the six-bullet rosette, for which the results of the combined retrieval were consistent with the observations as well as the in situ-measured IWC and PSDs for flight B984. Considering the co-location issues that likely affected the other two flights, we interpret this as a cautious indication of the validity of the retrieval implementation. Since the ARTS radiative transfer model and optical properties from the ARTS single-scattering database constitute a crucial component of the retrieval, this result also indicates that they work reliably across the millimeter- and sub-millimeter domain.</p>
      <p id="d1e3150">The results confirm the simulation-based findings from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.58"/> that a synergistic retrieval based on active and passive microwave observations can help to characterize the PSD of large ice hydrometeors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mtext>MAX</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">200</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>m) better than a radar-only retrieval alone. This<?pagebreak page695?> indicates that such retrievals can be used to study the microphysical properties of clouds and thus help to improve their representation in weather and climate models.</p>
      <p id="d1e3179">However, the retrieval is at the same time very sensitive to the assumed ice
particle habit that is used in the retrieval forward model. Although we found
some evidence of a signal that could help to constrain the ice particle shape
based on the combination of radar and sub-millimeter observations, it remains
limited to not more than <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> K. This means that more work is needed
to find out how to effectively constrain the ice particle shape with
remote-sensing observations or to better constrain it a priori.</p>
      <p id="d1e3189">Although further work will be required, this study demonstrates the feasibility and potential of synergistic retrievals of ice hydrometeors by combining active and passive observations at millimeter and sub-millimeter wavelengths. Since the combined retrieval can better constrain the PSD of ice hydrometeors, it may be a useful tool to study the representation of clouds in NWP and climate models. Additionally, as illustrated in this study, the retrieval can be used to study the representation of ice hydrometeors in radiative transfer simulations, which will be vital to many applications of observations from upcoming sub-millimeter sensors such as ICI and the Arctic Weather Satellite <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="paren.59"/>.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<?pagebreak page696?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title/>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F18"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e3208">Scatter plots of retrieved IWP and corresponding residual in the fitted
observations for the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">325</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> GHz ISMAR channel. Each column displays
the residual distributions for the five different particle habits. The grey
line in each panel represents the regression line for the plotted data
points. The text displays the correlation coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of a two-sided significance test for the slope of regression line.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=332.897244pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/15/677/2022/amt-15-677-2022-f18.png"/>

      </fig>

</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3249">All code used to produce the results in this study is available through public repositories (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3467316" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3467316</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40" id="altparen.60"/>; <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5537885" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5537885</ext-link>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="altparen.61"/>).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3267">A detailed listing of the datasets that were used in this study together with their sources is provided in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="text.62"/> was downloaded from the Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S)
Climate Data Store (<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</ext-link>).​​​​​​​</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{~\\[166mm]}?><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3283">SP performed the retrieval calculations and data analysis as well as writing the paper. PE, SAB, MB, DD and SP collaborated on the study that lead to the development of the presented  algorithm. SF, RC and FE provided the flight campaign data and guidance regarding their usage and contributed to the interpretation and discussion of the retrieval results.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3289">At least one of the (co-)authors is a member of the editorial board of <italic>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</italic>. The peer-review process was guided by an independent editor, and the authors have also no other competing interests to declare.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e3299">The results contain modified Copernicus Climate Change Service information 2021. Neither the European Commission nor ECMWF is responsible for any use that may be made of the Copernicus information or data it contains.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3309">The work of Simon Pfreundschuh and Patrick Eriksson on this study was financially supported by the Swedish
National Space Agency (SNSA) under grants 150/14 and 166/18.</p><p id="d1e3311">Stefan A. Buehler was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy – EXC 2037 “Climate, Climatic Change, and Society” – Project Number: 390683824, contributing to the Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN) of Universität Hamburg.</p><p id="d1e3313">Stefan A. Buehler's work contributes to the Cluster of Excellence “CLICCS – Climate, Climatic Change, and Society” funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG (EXC 2037, Project Number 390683824), and to the Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability (CEN) of Universität Hamburg.</p><p id="d1e3315">The computations for this study were performed using several freely available
programming languages and software packages, most prominently the Python
language <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.63"/>; the IPython computing environment <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.64"/>; the numpy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.65"/>, pandas <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.66"/> and xarray <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.67"/> packages for numerical computing; the satpy package <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="paren.68"/> for the processing of satellite data; and matplotlib for generating figures <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.69"/>.</p><p id="d1e3339">The computations were performed on resources at Chalmers Centre for
Computational Science and Engineering (C3SE) provided by the Swedish National
Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC).</p><p id="d1e3341">HALO data are from SPP 1294 “High Altitude and Long Range Research Aircraft
(HALO)”, funded by the German Research Foundation (Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft – DFG), project number 316646266.</p><p id="d1e3343">The FAAM BAe-146 research aircraft is operated by Airtask and Avalon and managed by the Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements. The flights used for this study were funded by the Met Office and European Space Agency.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3348">This research has been supported by the Swedish National Space Agency (grant nos. 150/14 and 166/18), the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation; EXC 2037 “Climate, Climatic Change, and Society” – project nos. 390683824 and 316646266), the Met Office and European Space Agency.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3354">This paper was edited by Gianfranco Vulpiani and reviewed by three anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Barlakas and Eriksson(2020)}}?><label>Barlakas and Eriksson(2020)</label><?label barlakas20?><mixed-citation>Barlakas, V. and Eriksson, P.: Three Dimensional Radiative Effects in Passive Millimeter/Sub-Millimeter All-sky Observations, Remote Sens., 12, 531, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030531" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs12030531</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Barlakas et~al.(2021)}}?><label>Barlakas et al.(2021)</label><?label barlakas21?><mixed-citation>Barlakas, V., Geer, A. J., and Eriksson, P.: Introducing hydrometeor orientation into all-sky microwave and submillimeter assimilation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3427–3447, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3427-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-3427-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Battaglia et~al.(2010)}}?><label>Battaglia et al.(2010)</label><?label battaglia10?><mixed-citation>
Battaglia, A., Tanelli, S., Kobayashi, S., Zrnic, D., Hogan, R. J., and Simmer, C.: Multiple-scattering in radar systems: A review, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 111, 917–947, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Buehler et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Buehler et al.(2012)</label><?label buehler12?><mixed-citation>Buehler, S. A., Defer, E., Evans, F., Eliasson, S., Mendrok, J., Eriksson, P., Lee, C., Jiménez, C., Prigent, C., Crewell, S., Kasai, Y., Bennartz, R., and Gasiewski, A. J.: Observing ice clouds in the submillimeter spectral range: the CloudIce mission proposal for ESA's Earth Explorer 8, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1529–1549, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1529-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-1529-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Buehler et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Buehler et al.(2018)</label><?label arts18?><mixed-citation>Buehler, S. A., Mendrok, J., Eriksson, P., Perrin, A., Larsson, R., and Lemke, O.: ARTS, the Atmospheric Radiative Transfer Simulator – version 2.2, the planetary toolbox edition, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1537–1556, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1537-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/gmd-11-1537-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cady-Pereira et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Cady-Pereira et al.(2020)</label><?label aer36?><mixed-citation>Cady-Pereira, K., Alvarado, M., Mlawer, E., Iacono, M., Delamere, J., and
Pernak, R.: AER Line File Parameters (v3.8.1), Zenodo [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5120012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5120012</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Cazenave et~al.(2019)}}?><label>Cazenave et al.(2019)</label><?label cazenave19?><mixed-citation>Cazenave, Q., Ceccaldi, M., Delanoë, J., Pelon, J., Groß, S., and Heymsfield, A.: Evolution of DARDAR-CLOUD ice cloud retrievals: new parameters and impacts on the retrieved microphysical properties, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2819–2835, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2819-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-2819-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{CloudSat DPC(2021)}}?><label>CloudSat DPC(2021)</label><?label CloudSatDPC22?><mixed-citation>CloudSat DPC: 1B-CPR, CloudSat DPC [data set], available at: <uri>https://www.cloudsat.cira.colostate.edu/data-products/1b-cpr</uri>
(last access: 1 February 2022), 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Delano{\"{e}} et~al.(2005)}}?><label>Delanoë et al.(2005)</label><?label delanoe05?><mixed-citation>Delanoë, J., Protat, A., Testud, J., Bouniol, D., Heymsfield, A. J.,
Bansemer, A., Brown, P., and Forbes, R.: Statistical properties of the
normalized ice particle size distribution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110,  D10201, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005405" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD005405</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Duncan and Eriksson(2018)}}?><label>Duncan and Eriksson(2018)</label><?label duncan18a?><mixed-citation>Duncan, D. I. and Eriksson, P.: An update on global atmospheric ice estimates from satellite observations and reanalyses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11205–11219, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11205-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-11205-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Eliasson et~al.(2011)}}?><label>Eliasson et al.(2011)</label><?label eliasson11?><mixed-citation>Eliasson, S., Buehler, S. A., Milz, M., Eriksson, P., and John, V. O.: Assessing observed and modelled spatial distributions of ice water path using satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 375–391, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-375-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-375-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Eriksson et~al.(2007)}}?><label>Eriksson et al.(2007)</label><?label eriksson07?><mixed-citation>Eriksson, P., Ekström, M., Rydberg, B., and Murtagh, D. P.: First Odin sub-mm retrievals in the tropical upper troposphere: ice cloud properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 471–483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-471-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-471-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Eriksson et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Eriksson et al.(2018)</label><?label eriksson18?><mixed-citation>Eriksson, P., Ekelund, R., Mendrok, J., Brath, M., Lemke, O., and Buehler, S. A.: A general database of hydrometeor single scattering properties at microwave and sub-millimetre wavelengths, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 1301–1326, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1301-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/essd-10-1301-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Eriksson et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Eriksson et al.(2020)</label><?label eriksson20?><mixed-citation>Eriksson, P., Rydberg, B., Mattioli, V., Thoss, A., Accadia, C., Klein, U., and Buehler, S. A.: Towards an operational Ice Cloud Imager (ICI) retrieval product, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 53–71, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-53-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-53-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{ESA(2021)}}?><label>ESA(2021)</label><?label arctic_weather_satellite?><mixed-citation>ESA: ESA – Arctic Weather Satellite, available at: <uri>https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Meteorological_missions/Arctic_Weather_Satellite</uri>, last access: 27 September 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Evans et~al.(1998)}}?><label>Evans et al.(1998)</label><?label evans98?><mixed-citation>Evans, K. F., Walter, S. J., Heymsfield, A. J., and Deeter, M. N.: Modeling of Submillimeter Passive Remote Sensing of Cirrus Clouds, J. Appl. Meteorol.,
37, 184–205, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037&lt;0184:MOSPRS&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037&lt;0184:MOSPRS&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Evans et~al.(2005)}}?><label>Evans et al.(2005)</label><?label evans05?><mixed-citation>Evans, K. F., Wang, J. R., Racette, P. E., Heymsfield, G., and Li, L.: Ice
Cloud Retrievals and Analysis with the Compact Scanning Submillimeter Imaging
Radiometer and the Cloud Radar System during CRYSTAL FACE, J. Appl.
Meteorol., 44, 839–859, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2250.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JAM2250.1</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ewald et~al.(2019)}}?><label>Ewald et al.(2019)</label><?label ewald19?><mixed-citation>Ewald, F., Groß, S., Hagen, M., Hirsch, L., Delanoë, J., and Bauer-Pfundstein, M.: Calibration of a 35 GHz airborne cloud radar: lessons learned and intercomparisons with 94 GHz cloud radars, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 1815–1839, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1815-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-1815-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Ewald et~al.(2021)}}?><label>Ewald et al.(2021)</label><?label ewald21?><mixed-citation>Ewald, F., Groß, S., Wirth, M., Delanoë, J., Fox, S., and Mayer, B.: Why we need radar, lidar, and solar radiance observations to constrain ice cloud microphysics, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5029–5047, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5029-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-5029-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements(2016)}}?><label>Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements(2016)</label><?label faam_nawdex_obs?><mixed-citation>Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements, Natural Environment Research Council, Met Office: FAAM B984 ISMAR and T-NAWDEX flight: Airborne atmospheric measurements from core instrument suite on board the BAE-146 aircraft, Centre for Environmental Data Analysis [data set]​​​​​​​, available at:
<uri>https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/46ca2a2cc8ce497fbf06beaf31f67098</uri> (last access: 1 February 2022), 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements(2019a)}}?><label>Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements(2019a)</label><?label faam_c159_obs?><mixed-citation>Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements, Natural Environment Research Council, Met Office: FAAM C159 PIKNMIX-F flight: Airborne atmospheric measurements from core and non-core instrument suites on board the BAE-146 aircraft, Centre for Environmental Data Analysis [data set], available at: <uri>https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/68cfc7f294554646803c80b2a389e105</uri> (last access: 1 February 2022), 2019a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements(2019b)}}?><label>Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements(2019b)</label><?label faam_c161_obs?><mixed-citation>Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements, Natural Environment Research Council, Met Office: FAAM C161 PIKNMIX-F flight: Airborne atmospheric measurements from core and non-core instrument suites on board the BAE-146 aircraft, Centre for Environmental Data Analysis [data set], available at: <uri>https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/133e15c47c024aa4b30e3f6f54af8b77</uri> (last access: 1 February 2022), 2019b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fox(2020)}}?><label>Fox(2020)</label><?label fox20?><mixed-citation>Fox, S.: An Evaluation of Radiative Transfer Simulations of Cloudy Scenes from a Numerical Weather Prediction Model at Sub-Millimetre Frequencies Using
Airborne Observations, Remote Sens., 12, 2758, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172758" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs12172758</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Fox et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Fox et al.(2017)</label><?label fox17?><mixed-citation>Fox, S., Lee, C., Moyna, B., Philipp, M., Rule, I., Rogers, S., King, R., Oldfield, M., Rea, S., Henry, M., Wang, H., and Harlow, R. C.: ISMAR: an airborne submillimetre radiometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 477–490, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-477-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-477-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Geer(2021)}}?><label>Geer(2021)</label><?label geer21?><mixed-citation>Geer, A. J.: Physical characteristics of frozen hydrometeors inferred with parameter estimation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5369–5395, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5369-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-5369-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Geer et~al.(2017)}}?><label>Geer et al.(2017)</label><?label geer17?><mixed-citation>Geer, A. J., Baordo, F., Bormann, N., Chambon, P., English, S. J., Kazumori,
M., Lawrence, H., Lean, P., Lonitz, K., and Lupu, C.: The growing impact of
satellite observations sensitive to humidity, cloud and precipitation, Q. J.
R. Meteorol. Soc., 143, 3189–3206, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3172" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3172</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hersbach et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Hersbach et al.(2018)</label><?label era5?><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A.,  Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1979 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hoyer and Hamman(2017)}}?><label>Hoyer and Hamman(2017)</label><?label xarray?><mixed-citation>Hoyer, S. and Hamman, J.: xarray: N-D labeled arrays and datasets in
Python, Journal of Open Research Software, 5, p. 10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.148" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5334/jors.148</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Hunter(2007)}}?><label>Hunter(2007)</label><?label matplotlib?><mixed-citation>Hunter, J. D.: Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment, Comput. Sce. Eng., 9,
90–95, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/MCSE.2007.55</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Konow et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Konow et al.(2018)</label><?label hamp_nawdex?><mixed-citation>Konow, H., Jacob, M., Ament, F., Crewell, S., Ewald, F., Hagen, M., Hirsch, L., Jansen, F., Mech, M., and Stevens, B.: HALO Microwave Package measurements during North Atlantic Waveguide and Downstream impact EXperiment (NAWDEX), World Data Center for Climate (WDCC) at DKRZ [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1594/WDCC/HALO_measurements_4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1594/WDCC/HALO_measurements_4</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Korolev et~al.(2013)}}?><label>Korolev et al.(2013)</label><?label korolev13?><mixed-citation>Korolev, A., Strapp, J. W., Isaac, G. A., and Emery, E.: Improved Airborne
Hot-Wire Measurements of Ice Water Content in Clouds, J. Appl. Opt., 30,
2121–2131, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00007.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00007.1</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Krautstrunk and Giez(2012)}}?><label>Krautstrunk and Giez(2012)</label><?label krautstrunk12?><mixed-citation>Krautstrunk, M. and Giez, A.: The transition from FALCON to HALO era airborne
atmospheric research, in: Atmospheric Physics, Springer, 609–624, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30183-4_37" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-30183-4_37</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{McGrath and Hewison(2001)}}?><label>McGrath and Hewison(2001)</label><?label mcgrath01?><mixed-citation>
McGrath, A. and Hewison, T.: Measuring the accuracy of MARSS – An airborne
microwave radiometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 18, 2003–2012, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mech et~al.(2014)}}?><label>Mech et al.(2014)</label><?label mech14?><mixed-citation>Mech, M., Orlandi, E., Crewell, S., Ament, F., Hirsch, L., Hagen, M., Peters, G., and Stevens, B.: HAMP – the microwave package on the High Altitude and LOng range research aircraft (HALO), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4539–4553, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4539-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-4539-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Mlawer et~al.(2012)}}?><label>Mlawer et al.(2012)</label><?label mlawer12?><mixed-citation>
Mlawer, E. J., Payne, V. H., Moncet, J.-L. ane Delamere, J. S., Alvarado,
M. J., and Tobin, D. C.: Development and recent evaluation of the MT_CKD
model of continuum absorption, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 370, 2520–2556, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{MCST(2017)}}?><label>MCST(2017)</label><?label modis?><mixed-citation>MODIS Characterization Support Team (MCST)​​​​​​​: MODIS 1km Calibrated Radiances Product, Atmosphere Archive and Distribution System (LAADS) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD021KM.061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5067/MODIS/MYD021KM.061</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{O'Shea et~al.(2021)}}?><label>O'Shea et al.(2021)</label><?label oshea21?><mixed-citation>O'Shea, S., Crosier, J., Dorsey, J., Gallagher, L., Schledewitz, W., Bower, K., Schlenczek, O., Borrmann, S., Cotton, R., Westbrook, C., and Ulanowski, Z.: Characterising optical array particle imaging probes: implications for small-ice-crystal observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1917–1939, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1917-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-1917-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{O'Shea et~al.(2019)}}?><label>O'Shea et al.(2019)</label><?label oshea19?><mixed-citation>O'Shea, S. J., Crosier, J., Dorsey, J., Schledewitz, W., Crawford, I., Borrmann, S., Cotton, R., and Bansemer, A.: Revisiting particle sizing using greyscale optical array probes: evaluation using laboratory experiments and synthetic data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3067–3079, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3067-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-12-3067-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page699?><ref id="bib1.bibx39"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{{Perez} and {Granger}(2007)}}?><label>Perez and Granger(2007)</label><?label ipython?><mixed-citation>Perez, F. and Granger, B. E.: IPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Computing, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 21–29,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.53" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/MCSE.2007.53</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pfreundschuh(2019)}}?><label>Pfreundschuh(2019)</label><?label mcrf?><mixed-citation>Pfreundschuh, S.: mcrf – A microwave cloud retrieval framework, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3467316" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.3467316</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pfreundschuh(2021)}}?><label>Pfreundschuh(2021)</label><?label ismar_combined?><mixed-citation>Pfreundschuh, S.: ISMAR combined retrievals (v0.0), Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5537885" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5537885</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Pfreundschuh et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Pfreundschuh et al.(2020)</label><?label pfreundschuh20?><mixed-citation>Pfreundschuh, S., Eriksson, P., Buehler, S. A., Brath, M., Duncan, D., Larsson, R., and Ekelund, R.: Synergistic radar and radiometer retrievals of ice hydrometeors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4219–4245, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4219-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-4219-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Raspaud et~al.(2021)}}?><label>Raspaud et al.(2021)</label><?label satpy?><mixed-citation>Raspaud, M., Hoese, D., Lahtinen, P., Finkensieper, S., Holl, G., Dybbroe, A., Proud, S., Meraner, A., Feltz, J., Zhang, X., Joro, S., Roberts, W., Ørum
Rasmussen, L., BENR0​​​​​​​, Méndez, J. H. B., Zhu, Y., strandgren, Daruwala, R., Jasmin, T., Kliche, C., Barnie, T., Sigurðsson, E., Garcia, R. K., Leppelt, T., TT​​​​​​​, ColinDuff, Egede, U., LTMeyer, Itkin, M., and Goodson, R.: pytroll/satpy: Version 0.30.0, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5514044" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5514044</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Reback et~al.(2021)}}?><label>Reback et al.(2021)</label><?label pandas?><mixed-citation>Reback, J., jbrockmendel, McKinney, W., den Bossche, J. V., Augspurger, T.,
Cloud, P., Hawkins, S., gfyoung, Roeschke, M., Sinhrks, Klein, A., Petersen,
T., Tratner, J., She, C., Ayd, W., Hoefler, P., Naveh, S., Garcia, M.,
Schendel, J., Hayden, A., Saxton, D., Darbyshire, J., Shadrach, R., Gorelli,
M. E., Li, F., Jancauskas, V., McMaster, A., Zeitlin, M., Battiston, P., and
Seabold, S.: pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas 1.3.3, Zenodo [code], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5501881" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5281/zenodo.5501881</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rodgers(2000)}}?><label>Rodgers(2000)</label><?label rodgers00?><mixed-citation>Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse methods for atmospheric sounding: theory and practice, vol. 2, World scientific, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1142/3171" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1142/3171</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Rosenkranz(1993)}}?><label>Rosenkranz(1993)</label><?label rosenkranz93?><mixed-citation>
Rosenkranz, P. W.: Absorption of microwaves by atmospheric gases, in:
Atmospheric remote sensing by microwave radiometry, edited by: Janssen, M. A., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, USA, 37–90, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Schäfler et~al.(2018)}}?><label>Schäfler et al.(2018)</label><?label schafler18?><mixed-citation>Schäfler, A., Craig, G., Wernli, H., Arbogast, P., Doyle, J. D.,  McTaggart-Cowan, R., Methven, J., Rivière, G., Ament, F., Boettcher, M.,  Bramberger, M., Cazenave, Q., Cotton, R., Crewell, S., Delanoë, J.,  Dörnbrack, A., Ehrlich, A., Ewald, F., Fix, A., Grams, C. M., Gray, S. L.,  Grob, H., Groß, S., Hagen, M., Harvey, B., Hirsch, L., Jacob, M., Kölling,  T., Konow, H., Lemmerz, C., Lux, O., Magnusson, L., Mayer, B., Mech, M.,  Moore, R., Pelon, J., Quinting, J., Rahm, S., Rapp, M., Rautenhaus, M.,  Reitebuch, O., Reynolds, C. A., Sodemann, H., Spengler, T., Vaughan, G.,  Wendisch, M., Wirth, M., Witschas, B., Wolf, K., and Zinner, T.: The North
Atlantic Waveguide and Downstream Impact Experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
99, 1607–1637, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0003.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0003.1</ext-link>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Stamnes et~al.(2000)}}?><label>Stamnes et al.(2000)</label><?label disort00?><mixed-citation>
Stamnes, K., Tsay, S.-C., Wiscombe, W., and Laszlo, I.: DISORT, a
general-purpose Fortran program for discrete-ordinate-method radiative
transfer in scattering and emitting layered media: documentation of
methodology, Tech. rep., Tech. rep., Dept. of Physics and Engineering
Physics, Stevens Institute of Technology​​​​​​​, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Tanelli et~al.(2008)}}?><label>Tanelli et al.(2008)</label><?label tanelli08?><mixed-citation>Tanelli, S., Durden, S. L., Im, E., Pak, K. S., Reinke, D. G.,
Partain, P., Haynes, J. M., and Marchand, R. T.: CloudSat's Cloud
Profiling Radar After Two Years in Orbit: Performance, Calibration, and
Processing, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 46, 3560–3573,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.2002030" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2008.2002030</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{The Python Language Foundation(2018)}}?><label>The Python Language Foundation(2018)</label><?label python?><mixed-citation>The Python Language Foundation: The Python Language Reference, available at: <uri>https://docs.python.org/3/reference/index.html</uri> (last access: 1 February 2022), 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{van der Walt et~al.(2011)}}?><label>van der Walt et al.(2011)</label><?label numpy?><mixed-citation>van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., and Varoquaux, G.: The NumPy Array: A
Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation, Comput. Sci. Eng., 13, 22–30, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.37" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/MCSE.2011.37</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Waliser et~al.(2009)}}?><label>Waliser et al.(2009)</label><?label waliser09?><mixed-citation>Waliser, D. E., Li, J.-L. F., Woods, C. P., Austin, R. T., Bacmeister, J.,
Chern, J., Del Genio, A., Jiang, J. H., Kuang, Z., Meng, H., Minnis, P.,
Platnick, S., Rossow, W. B., Stephens, G. L., Sun-Mack, S., Tao, W.-K.,
Tompkins, A. M., Vane, D. G., Walker, C., and Wu, D.: Cloud ice: A climate
model challenge with signs and expectations of progress, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 114, D00A21, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010015</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><?xmltex \def\ref@label{{Zelinka et~al.(2020)}}?><label>Zelinka et al.(2020)</label><?label zelinka20?><mixed-citation>Zelinka, M. D., Myers, T. A., McCoy, D. T., Po-Chedley, S., Caldwell, P. M.,
Ceppi, P., Klein, S. A., and Taylor, K. E.: Causes of Higher Climate
Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085782, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019GL085782</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Synergistic radar and sub-millimeter radiometer retrievals of ice hydrometeors in mid-latitude frontal cloud systems</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Barlakas and Eriksson(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Barlakas, V. and Eriksson, P.: Three Dimensional Radiative Effects in Passive Millimeter/Sub-Millimeter All-sky Observations, Remote Sens., 12, 531, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030531" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030531</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Barlakas et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Barlakas, V., Geer, A. J., and Eriksson, P.: Introducing hydrometeor orientation into all-sky microwave and submillimeter assimilation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 3427–3447, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3427-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-3427-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Battaglia et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Battaglia, A., Tanelli, S., Kobayashi, S., Zrnic, D., Hogan, R. J., and Simmer, C.: Multiple-scattering in radar systems: A review, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 111, 917–947, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Buehler et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Buehler, S. A., Defer, E., Evans, F., Eliasson, S., Mendrok, J., Eriksson, P., Lee, C., Jiménez, C., Prigent, C., Crewell, S., Kasai, Y., Bennartz, R., and Gasiewski, A. J.: Observing ice clouds in the submillimeter spectral range: the CloudIce mission proposal for ESA's Earth Explorer 8, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1529–1549, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1529-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1529-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Buehler et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Buehler, S. A., Mendrok, J., Eriksson, P., Perrin, A., Larsson, R., and Lemke, O.: ARTS, the Atmospheric Radiative Transfer Simulator – version 2.2, the planetary toolbox edition, Geosci. Model Dev., 11, 1537–1556, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1537-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-1537-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Cady-Pereira et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Cady-Pereira, K., Alvarado, M., Mlawer, E., Iacono, M., Delamere, J., and
Pernak, R.: AER Line File Parameters (v3.8.1), Zenodo [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5120012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5120012</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Cazenave et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Cazenave, Q., Ceccaldi, M., Delanoë, J., Pelon, J., Groß, S., and Heymsfield, A.: Evolution of DARDAR-CLOUD ice cloud retrievals: new parameters and impacts on the retrieved microphysical properties, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 2819–2835, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2819-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-2819-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>CloudSat DPC(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
CloudSat DPC: 1B-CPR, CloudSat DPC [data set], available at: <a href="https://www.cloudsat.cira.colostate.edu/data-products/1b-cpr" target="_blank"/>
(last access: 1 February 2022), 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Delanoë et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Delanoë, J., Protat, A., Testud, J., Bouniol, D., Heymsfield, A. J.,
Bansemer, A., Brown, P., and Forbes, R.: Statistical properties of the
normalized ice particle size distribution, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 110,  D10201, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005405" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004JD005405</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Duncan and Eriksson(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Duncan, D. I. and Eriksson, P.: An update on global atmospheric ice estimates from satellite observations and reanalyses, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 11205–11219, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11205-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-11205-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Eliasson et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
Eliasson, S., Buehler, S. A., Milz, M., Eriksson, P., and John, V. O.: Assessing observed and modelled spatial distributions of ice water path using satellite data, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 375–391, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-375-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-375-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Eriksson et al.(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Eriksson, P., Ekström, M., Rydberg, B., and Murtagh, D. P.: First Odin sub-mm retrievals in the tropical upper troposphere: ice cloud properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 471–483, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-471-2007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-471-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Eriksson et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Eriksson, P., Ekelund, R., Mendrok, J., Brath, M., Lemke, O., and Buehler, S. A.: A general database of hydrometeor single scattering properties at microwave and sub-millimetre wavelengths, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 10, 1301–1326, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1301-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1301-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Eriksson et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Eriksson, P., Rydberg, B., Mattioli, V., Thoss, A., Accadia, C., Klein, U., and Buehler, S. A.: Towards an operational Ice Cloud Imager (ICI) retrieval product, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 53–71, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-53-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-53-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>ESA(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
ESA: ESA – Arctic Weather Satellite, available at: <a href="https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Meteorological_missions/Arctic_Weather_Satellite" target="_blank"/>, last access: 27 September 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Evans et al.(1998)</label><mixed-citation>
Evans, K. F., Walter, S. J., Heymsfield, A. J., and Deeter, M. N.: Modeling of Submillimeter Passive Remote Sensing of Cirrus Clouds, J. Appl. Meteorol.,
37, 184–205, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037&lt;0184:MOSPRS&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0450(1998)037&lt;0184:MOSPRS&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1998.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Evans et al.(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Evans, K. F., Wang, J. R., Racette, P. E., Heymsfield, G., and Li, L.: Ice
Cloud Retrievals and Analysis with the Compact Scanning Submillimeter Imaging
Radiometer and the Cloud Radar System during CRYSTAL FACE, J. Appl.
Meteorol., 44, 839–859, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2250.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JAM2250.1</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Ewald et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Ewald, F., Groß, S., Hagen, M., Hirsch, L., Delanoë, J., and Bauer-Pfundstein, M.: Calibration of a 35&thinsp;GHz airborne cloud radar: lessons learned and intercomparisons with 94&thinsp;GHz cloud radars, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 1815–1839, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1815-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-1815-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Ewald et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Ewald, F., Groß, S., Wirth, M., Delanoë, J., Fox, S., and Mayer, B.: Why we need radar, lidar, and solar radiance observations to constrain ice cloud microphysics, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5029–5047, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5029-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5029-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements(2016)</label><mixed-citation>
Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements, Natural Environment Research Council, Met Office: FAAM B984 ISMAR and T-NAWDEX flight: Airborne atmospheric measurements from core instrument suite on board the BAE-146 aircraft, Centre for Environmental Data Analysis [data set]​​​​​​​, available at:
<a href="https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/46ca2a2cc8ce497fbf06beaf31f67098" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 February 2022), 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements(2019a)</label><mixed-citation>
Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements, Natural Environment Research Council, Met Office: FAAM C159 PIKNMIX-F flight: Airborne atmospheric measurements from core and non-core instrument suites on board the BAE-146 aircraft, Centre for Environmental Data Analysis [data set], available at: <a href="https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/68cfc7f294554646803c80b2a389e105" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 February 2022), 2019a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements(2019b)</label><mixed-citation>
Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements, Natural Environment Research Council, Met Office: FAAM C161 PIKNMIX-F flight: Airborne atmospheric measurements from core and non-core instrument suites on board the BAE-146 aircraft, Centre for Environmental Data Analysis [data set], available at: <a href="https://catalogue.ceda.ac.uk/uuid/133e15c47c024aa4b30e3f6f54af8b77" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 February 2022), 2019b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Fox(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Fox, S.: An Evaluation of Radiative Transfer Simulations of Cloudy Scenes from a Numerical Weather Prediction Model at Sub-Millimetre Frequencies Using
Airborne Observations, Remote Sens., 12, 2758, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172758" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12172758</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Fox et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Fox, S., Lee, C., Moyna, B., Philipp, M., Rule, I., Rogers, S., King, R., Oldfield, M., Rea, S., Henry, M., Wang, H., and Harlow, R. C.: ISMAR: an airborne submillimetre radiometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 477–490, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-477-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-477-2017</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Geer(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Geer, A. J.: Physical characteristics of frozen hydrometeors inferred with parameter estimation, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 5369–5395, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5369-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-5369-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Geer et al.(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Geer, A. J., Baordo, F., Bormann, N., Chambon, P., English, S. J., Kazumori,
M., Lawrence, H., Lean, P., Lonitz, K., and Lupu, C.: The growing impact of
satellite observations sensitive to humidity, cloud and precipitation, Q. J.
R. Meteorol. Soc., 143, 3189–3206, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3172" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3172</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Hersbach et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A.,  Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1979 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Hoyer and Hamman(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
Hoyer, S. and Hamman, J.: xarray: N-D labeled arrays and datasets in
Python, Journal of Open Research Software, 5, p. 10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.148" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5334/jors.148</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Hunter(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Hunter, J. D.: Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment, Comput. Sce. Eng., 9,
90–95, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Konow et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Konow, H., Jacob, M., Ament, F., Crewell, S., Ewald, F., Hagen, M., Hirsch, L., Jansen, F., Mech, M., and Stevens, B.: HALO Microwave Package measurements during North Atlantic Waveguide and Downstream impact EXperiment (NAWDEX), World Data Center for Climate (WDCC) at DKRZ [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.1594/WDCC/HALO_measurements_4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1594/WDCC/HALO_measurements_4</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Korolev et al.(2013)</label><mixed-citation>
Korolev, A., Strapp, J. W., Isaac, G. A., and Emery, E.: Improved Airborne
Hot-Wire Measurements of Ice Water Content in Clouds, J. Appl. Opt., 30,
2121–2131, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00007.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-13-00007.1</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Krautstrunk and Giez(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Krautstrunk, M. and Giez, A.: The transition from FALCON to HALO era airborne
atmospheric research, in: Atmospheric Physics, Springer, 609–624, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30183-4_37" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30183-4_37</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>McGrath and Hewison(2001)</label><mixed-citation>
McGrath, A. and Hewison, T.: Measuring the accuracy of MARSS – An airborne
microwave radiometer, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 18, 2003–2012, 2001.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Mech et al.(2014)</label><mixed-citation>
Mech, M., Orlandi, E., Crewell, S., Ament, F., Hirsch, L., Hagen, M., Peters, G., and Stevens, B.: HAMP – the microwave package on the High Altitude and LOng range research aircraft (HALO), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4539–4553, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4539-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4539-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Mlawer et al.(2012)</label><mixed-citation>
Mlawer, E. J., Payne, V. H., Moncet, J.-L. ane Delamere, J. S., Alvarado,
M. J., and Tobin, D. C.: Development and recent evaluation of the MT_CKD
model of continuum absorption, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 370, 2520–2556, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>MCST(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
MODIS Characterization Support Team (MCST)​​​​​​​: MODIS 1km Calibrated Radiances Product, Atmosphere Archive and Distribution System (LAADS) Distributed Active Archive Center (DAAC), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD021KM.061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MYD021KM.061</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>O'Shea et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
O'Shea, S., Crosier, J., Dorsey, J., Gallagher, L., Schledewitz, W., Bower, K., Schlenczek, O., Borrmann, S., Cotton, R., Westbrook, C., and Ulanowski, Z.: Characterising optical array particle imaging probes: implications for small-ice-crystal observations, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 1917–1939, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1917-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-1917-2021</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>O'Shea et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
O'Shea, S. J., Crosier, J., Dorsey, J., Schledewitz, W., Crawford, I., Borrmann, S., Cotton, R., and Bansemer, A.: Revisiting particle sizing using greyscale optical array probes: evaluation using laboratory experiments and synthetic data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 12, 3067–3079, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3067-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-12-3067-2019</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Perez and Granger(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Perez, F. and Granger, B. E.: IPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Computing, Comput. Sci. Eng., 9, 21–29,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.53" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.53</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Pfreundschuh(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
Pfreundschuh, S.: mcrf – A microwave cloud retrieval framework, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3467316" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3467316</a>, 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Pfreundschuh(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Pfreundschuh, S.: ISMAR combined retrievals (v0.0), Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5537885" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5537885</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Pfreundschuh et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Pfreundschuh, S., Eriksson, P., Buehler, S. A., Brath, M., Duncan, D., Larsson, R., and Ekelund, R.: Synergistic radar and radiometer retrievals of ice hydrometeors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 4219–4245, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4219-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-4219-2020</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Raspaud et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Raspaud, M., Hoese, D., Lahtinen, P., Finkensieper, S., Holl, G., Dybbroe, A., Proud, S., Meraner, A., Feltz, J., Zhang, X., Joro, S., Roberts, W., Ørum
Rasmussen, L., BENR0​​​​​​​, Méndez, J. H. B., Zhu, Y., strandgren, Daruwala, R., Jasmin, T., Kliche, C., Barnie, T., Sigurðsson, E., Garcia, R. K., Leppelt, T., TT​​​​​​​, ColinDuff, Egede, U., LTMeyer, Itkin, M., and Goodson, R.: pytroll/satpy: Version 0.30.0, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5514044" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5514044</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Reback et al.(2021)</label><mixed-citation>
Reback, J., jbrockmendel, McKinney, W., den Bossche, J. V., Augspurger, T.,
Cloud, P., Hawkins, S., gfyoung, Roeschke, M., Sinhrks, Klein, A., Petersen,
T., Tratner, J., She, C., Ayd, W., Hoefler, P., Naveh, S., Garcia, M.,
Schendel, J., Hayden, A., Saxton, D., Darbyshire, J., Shadrach, R., Gorelli,
M. E., Li, F., Jancauskas, V., McMaster, A., Zeitlin, M., Battiston, P., and
Seabold, S.: pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas 1.3.3, Zenodo [code], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5501881" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5501881</a>, 2021.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Rodgers(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse methods for atmospheric sounding: theory and practice, vol. 2, World scientific, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1142/3171" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1142/3171</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Rosenkranz(1993)</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenkranz, P. W.: Absorption of microwaves by atmospheric gases, in:
Atmospheric remote sensing by microwave radiometry, edited by: Janssen, M. A., John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, USA, 37–90, 1993.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Schäfler et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
Schäfler, A., Craig, G., Wernli, H., Arbogast, P., Doyle, J. D.,  McTaggart-Cowan, R., Methven, J., Rivière, G., Ament, F., Boettcher, M.,  Bramberger, M., Cazenave, Q., Cotton, R., Crewell, S., Delanoë, J.,  Dörnbrack, A., Ehrlich, A., Ewald, F., Fix, A., Grams, C. M., Gray, S. L.,  Grob, H., Groß, S., Hagen, M., Harvey, B., Hirsch, L., Jacob, M., Kölling,  T., Konow, H., Lemmerz, C., Lux, O., Magnusson, L., Mayer, B., Mech, M.,  Moore, R., Pelon, J., Quinting, J., Rahm, S., Rapp, M., Rautenhaus, M.,  Reitebuch, O., Reynolds, C. A., Sodemann, H., Spengler, T., Vaughan, G.,  Wendisch, M., Wirth, M., Witschas, B., Wolf, K., and Zinner, T.: The North
Atlantic Waveguide and Downstream Impact Experiment, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc.,
99, 1607–1637, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0003.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0003.1</a>, 2018.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Stamnes et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Stamnes, K., Tsay, S.-C., Wiscombe, W., and Laszlo, I.: DISORT, a
general-purpose Fortran program for discrete-ordinate-method radiative
transfer in scattering and emitting layered media: documentation of
methodology, Tech. rep., Tech. rep., Dept. of Physics and Engineering
Physics, Stevens Institute of Technology​​​​​​​, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Tanelli et al.(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Tanelli, S., Durden, S. L., Im, E., Pak, K. S., Reinke, D. G.,
Partain, P., Haynes, J. M., and Marchand, R. T.: CloudSat's Cloud
Profiling Radar After Two Years in Orbit: Performance, Calibration, and
Processing, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 46, 3560–3573,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.2002030" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.2002030</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>The Python Language Foundation(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
The Python Language Foundation: The Python Language Reference, available at: <a href="https://docs.python.org/3/reference/index.html" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 February 2022), 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>van der Walt et al.(2011)</label><mixed-citation>
van der Walt, S., Colbert, S. C., and Varoquaux, G.: The NumPy Array: A
Structure for Efficient Numerical Computation, Comput. Sci. Eng., 13, 22–30, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.37" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2011.37</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Waliser et al.(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Waliser, D. E., Li, J.-L. F., Woods, C. P., Austin, R. T., Bacmeister, J.,
Chern, J., Del Genio, A., Jiang, J. H., Kuang, Z., Meng, H., Minnis, P.,
Platnick, S., Rossow, W. B., Stephens, G. L., Sun-Mack, S., Tao, W.-K.,
Tompkins, A. M., Vane, D. G., Walker, C., and Wu, D.: Cloud ice: A climate
model challenge with signs and expectations of progress, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 114, D00A21, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010015</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Zelinka et al.(2020)</label><mixed-citation>
Zelinka, M. D., Myers, T. A., McCoy, D. T., Po-Chedley, S., Caldwell, P. M.,
Ceppi, P., Klein, S. A., and Taylor, K. E.: Causes of Higher Climate
Sensitivity in CMIP6 Models, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2019GL085782, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL085782</a>, 2020.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
