<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-16-3693-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Optimal estimation retrieval of tropospheric ammonia from the Geostationary Interferometric Infrared Sounder on board FengYun-4B</article-title><alt-title>Geostationary observations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from FY-4B/GIIRS</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Geostationary observations of NH${}_{3}$ from FY-4B/GIIRS}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{Z.-C. Zeng et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Zeng</surname><given-names>Zhao-Cheng</given-names></name>
          <email>zczeng@pku.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0008-6508</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Lee</surname><given-names>Lu</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3665-1556</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Qi</surname><given-names>Chengli</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Clarisse</surname><given-names>Lieven</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8805-2141</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3 aff4">
          <name><surname>Van Damme</surname><given-names>Martin</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1752-0558</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Earth and Space Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Innovation Center for FengYun Meteorological Satellite, Key Laboratory of Radiometric Calibration and<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Validation for Environmental Satellites, National Satellite Meteorological Center, <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>China Meteorological Administration, Beijing 100081, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Spectroscopy, Quantum Chemistry and Atmospheric Remote Sensing, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB),<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> 1050 Brussels, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Royal Belgian Institute for Space Aeronomy, 1180 Brussels, Belgium</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Zhao-Cheng Zeng (zczeng@pku.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>9</day><month>August</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>15</issue>
      <fpage>3693</fpage><lpage>3713</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>25</day><month>January</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>30</day><month>January</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>12</day><month>June</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day><month>July</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 Zhao-Cheng Zeng et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e153">Atmospheric ammonia (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a reactive nitrogen compound
that pollutes our environment and threatens public health. Monitoring the
spatial and temporal variations is important for quantifying its emissions
and depositions and evaluating the strategies for managing anthropogenic
sources of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this study, we present an NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval
algorithm based on the optimal estimation method for the Geostationary
Interferometric Infrared Sounder (GIIRS) on board China's FengYun-4B
satellite (FY-4B/GIIRS). In particular, we examine the information content
based on the degree of freedom for signal (DOFS) in retrieving the diurnal
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in East Asia, with a focus on two source regions including the North
China Plain and North India. Our retrieval is based on the FengYun
Geostationary satellite Atmospheric Infrared Retrieval (FY-GeoAIR) algorithm
and exploits the strong NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption window of 955–975 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Retrieval results using FY-4B/GIIRS spectra from July to December 2022 show
that the DOFS for the majority ranges from 0 to 1.0, mainly depending on the thermal contrast (TC) defined as the temperature difference between the
surface and the lowest atmospheric layer. Consistent with retrievals from
low-Earth-orbit (LEO) infrared sounders, the detection sensitivity, as
quantified by the averaging kernel (AK) matrix, peaks in the lowest 2 km
atmospheric layers. The DOFS and TC are highly correlated, resulting in a
typical “butterfly” shape. That is, the DOFS increases when TC becomes
either more positive or more negative. The NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from FY-4B/GIIRS
exhibit significant diurnal cycles that are consistent with the day–night
gradient from the collocated IASI retrievals in the North China Plain and North
India for the averages in July–August, September–October, and
November–December, respectively. A collocated point-by-point intercomparison
with the IASI NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dataset shows generally good agreement with a small
systematic difference in the summer months that may be attributed to the
slight difference in a priori profiles. This study demonstrates the
capability of FY-4B/GIIRS in capturing the diurnal NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes in East
Asia, which will have the potential to improve regional and global air
quality and climate research.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42275142</award-id>
<award-id>12292981</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>National Key Research and Development Program of China</funding-source>
<award-id>2022YFA1003801</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities</funding-source>
<award-id>7101302981</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs4">
<funding-source>China Meteorological Administration</funding-source>
<award-id>FY-APP-2021.0507</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs5">
<funding-source>Belgian Federal Science Policy Office</funding-source>
<award-id>NA</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs6">
<funding-source>Fondation Air Liquide</funding-source>
<award-id>NA</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs7">
<funding-source>Belgian Federal Science Policy Office</funding-source>
<award-id>NA</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs8">
<funding-source>European Space Agency</funding-source>
<award-id>NA</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <?pagebreak page3694?><p id="d1e250">Atmospheric ammonia (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) is a reactive nitrogen compound that plays an important role in the global nitrogen cycle (Galloway et al., 2004). Its emissions to the atmosphere are destined to increase in the coming decades
primarily driven by agriculture emissions coming from the excess use of
nitrogen fertilizers (Fowler et al., 2013). Changes in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
have many negative environmental impacts, including the loss of biodiversity
(Erisman et al., 2013), the eutrophication of water bodies and the
acidification of terrestrial ecosystems (Paerl et al., 2014), and the change
in radiative forcing that affect global and local climate (Abbatt et al., 2006; Isaksen et al., 2009). In addition, ammonia reacts with acids (e.g., H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>SO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and produces ammonium-containing aerosols that degrade air quality (Seinfeld and Pandis, 2006). Monitoring the spatial
distribution and temporal variations of atmospheric NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is therefore
important for quantifying NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>'s emissions and depositions and
evaluating the strategies for managing anthropogenic sources of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e326">Over the past decade, spaceborne observations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> have provided
measurements with daily global coverage that greatly improve our
understanding of the sources, depositions, and variabilities of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
(e.g., Zhu et al., 2015; Warner et al., 2017; Van Damme et al., 2018, 2021). The
capability of using an infrared hyperspectral sounder to detect NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> was
first demonstrated using observations from the Tropospheric Emission
Spectrometer (TES; Beer et al., 2008; Shephard et al., 2011) and the
Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI; Clarisse et al., 2009,
2010; Coheur et al., 2009). In addition, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has been detected in the
Asian summer monsoon upper troposphere using the emission spectra from the
infrared limb sounder Michelson Interferometer for Passive Atmospheric
Sounding (MIPAS; Höpfner et al., 2016). Currently, long-term
measurements of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> are available from IASI (Van Damme et al., 2021),
the Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS; Shephard et al., 2020), the
Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS; Warner et al., 2016), and the Thermal
and Near-infrared Spectrometer for Observation-Fourier Transform
Spectrometer (TANSO-FTS; Someya et al., 2020). However, the above-mentioned
polar-orbiting satellites can only make up to two overpass measurements each
day over the same location. The diurnal cycle of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is therefore
under-constrained from polar-orbit observations. Since NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is a highly
reactive compound, it has a relatively short lifetime, ranging from a few
hours to days (Aneja et al., 2001). As a result, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> presents a large
spatial heterogeneity and temporal variability. The important information on
the diurnal cycle is therefore critical to constrain the emission,
deposition, and transport processes of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and the role of
meteorological conditions in driving these processes.</p>
      <p id="d1e411">The Geostationary Interferometric Infrared Sounder (GIIRS) on board the
FengYun-4B satellite (FY-4A/GIIRS) was launched in 2021 with improved sensitivity over its predecessor FY-4A/GIIRS launched in 2016 (Yang et al., 2017; Li et al., 2022). GIIRS was
designed to probe the three-dimensional water vapor and temperature profiles
for weather forecast purposes. With its high spectral resolution (0.625 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and sensitivity comparable to current low-Earth-orbit (LEO) satellites, FY-4B/GIIRS is suited for detecting the changes of various
atmospheric trace gases (e.g., Zeng et al., 2023). The strength of using
FY-4B/GIIRS lies in its capability to scan East Asia every 2 h with a
spatial resolution of 12 km, offering a unique opportunity to constrain the
diurnal cycles of critical atmospheric composition at high spatial
resolution. The application of GIIRS in detecting NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has been
successfully demonstrated using spectra collected by FY-4A based on an IASI
retrieval method (Clarisse et al., 2021). The study showed that the
unprecedented temporal sampling of GIIRS enables the measurement of diurnal
and nocturnal variations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. Since the retrieval method used in
Clarisse et al. (2021) is based on a hyperspectral radiance index (HRI) and a
trained neural network that relates the HRI to NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns (Whitburn et
al., 2016), the information content analysis for the GIIRS spectra was not fully
investigated.</p>
      <p id="d1e453">The optimal estimation method (Rodgers, 2000) that enables information content
analysis has been applied in previous studies on retrieving NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from
space (Clarisse et al., 2009, 2010; Shephard et al., 2011; Warner et al., 2016; Shephard et al., 2015; Someya et al., 2020). It was found that
the information available from the infrared sounder spectra for quantifying
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, especially its abundance in the planetary boundary
layer (PBL), strongly depends on the
thermal contrast (TC), which is defined as the temperature difference
between the surface skin and the lowest atmospheric layer. Because of its
short lifetime, NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is mostly concentrated in the PBL, and the peak sensitivity of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> detection from an infrared
sounder is also found to be close to the surface. Previous studies (e.g.,
Clarisse et al., 2010) concluded that the TC and its abundance are two
important factors that determine the intensity of the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> spectral
signature and hence the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> information content. In general, higher
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations and larger TC result in a more accurate estimate of
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from spaceborne measurements.</p>
      <p id="d1e530">In this study, we applied the FY-GeoAIR retrieval algorithm developed by
Zeng et al. (2023), based on the optimal estimation theory to retrieve
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from FY-4B/GIIRS. The primary goals are to quantify the information
content of FY-4B/GIIRS observations in constraining the diurnal cycle of
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns and to assess the impact of TC on the retrieval accuracy.
The retrieval algorithm uses the absorption features of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>'s <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
rotational–vibrational band centered around 10.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 950 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Our retrieval is implemented using the absorption
microwindow (955–975 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) that contains the strongest NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
absorption feature. A similar microwindow has been used to retrieve
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using IASI (Clarisse et al., 2010) and GOSAT (Someya et al., 2020),
while neural-network-based studies using the hyperspectral radiance index (HRI)
adopted a much wider window (e.g., Whitburn et al., 2016). The remainder of
the paper is organized as follows. The FY-4B/GIIRS observation mode and the
collected spectra are introduced in Sect. 2. In Sect. 3, the FY-GeoAIR
algorithm for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval is described. The retrieval results,
information content analysis, intercomparison with IASI NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> dataset,
and related discussion are presented in Sect. 4, followed by conclusions
in Sect. 5.</p>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page3695?><sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>GIIRS on board FengYun-4B</title>
      <p id="d1e658">FY-4B/GIIRS is an infrared Fourier transform spectrometer based on a
Michelson interferometer located at an altitude of 35 786 km above the
Equator at 133<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E. The primary goal is to probe the
three-dimensional atmospheric structure of temperature and water vapor over
East Asia for improving numerical weather forecast. Figure 1a shows the
coverage of FY-4B/GIIRS over East Asia and part of South Asia and Southeast
Asia in one measurement cycle which lasts 2 h. In each cycle, GIIRS makes
12 horizontal scans from north to south. Each scan sequence consists of 27
fields of regard (FORs) from west to east that collects upwelling infrared
radiation of Earth scenes (ESs), followed by one deep space (DS) and one
internal calibration target (ICT) measurement for ES radiometric
calibration. For each FOR, a 2-dimensional infrared plane array detector,
containing 16 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 8 pixels with a sparse arrangement, conducts the
measurement over the target region. The starting hours for the 12
measurement cycles in a day were 00:00, 02:00, 04:00,<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, 22:00 UTC,
respectively, and were changed to 01:00, 03:00, 05:00,<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">…</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, 23:00 UTC, respectively, after 6 September 2022. The observation domain, as shown in Fig. 1a, covers the two important NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission source regions in Asia: the North China Plain and North India, as indicated by the bottom-up
inventory map in Fig. 1b. The FY-4B/GIIRS observed spectra include a
longwave infrared band from 680 to 1130 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and a mid-wave infrared band from 1650 to 2250 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with a uniform spectral resolution of 0.625 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. With low instrument noise and a high spectral resolution
similar to current LEO infrared sounders, GIIRS is in principle capable of
measuring trace gases, including NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and carbon monoxide (Zeng et al., 2023), and providing full day–night diurnal cycle observations. The spatial footprint size of each pixel on the Earth's surface is about 12 km at Nadir, which is an improvement over FY-4A/GIIRS (16 km). Figure 1c shows an example of GIIRS spectra in the longwave band. Post-launch assessment of
the radiometric performances of FY-4B/GIIRS using a series of blackbody
calibration experiments showed that the noise-equivalent differential
radiance (NedR) on average in the longwave infrared 900–1000 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
bands, covering the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption channel, is about 0.1 mW (m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> sr cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> The corresponding noise-equivalent differential temperature (NedT) on average is about 0.1 K at 280 K blackbody. The low instrument noise for FY-4B/GIIRS, comparable to existing infrared sounders (e.g., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.2 K at 280 K for IASI and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.04 K at 280 K for CrIS; Van Damme et al., 2014; Shephard et al., 2020), makes it possible to accurately retrieve NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over East Asia.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e826"><bold>(a)</bold> GIIRS observation coverage color-shaded using the observed
radiance at 900 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> from FY-4B/GIIRS measurements at 12:00–13:00 Beijing time (BJT) on 7 July 2022. <bold>(b)</bold> Bottom-up NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> inventory emissions averaged
from July to December 2010. These are the total amount combining emissions from agricultural, industrial, power plant, residential, and transportation sectors. This emission inventory is adopted from the MIX dataset (Li et al., 2017). <bold>(c)</bold> Example of FY-4B/GIIRS-measured longwave spectra,
which cover the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption band centered around 950 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The
microwindow for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval is also shown by the red rectangle and as
an inset. The NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption features are shown in Fig. 2.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e906">Sensitivity experiment comparing absorptions of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O in the 955–975 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> microwindow used
for FY-4B/GIIRS NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval. The microwindow covers the strong
absorption features of the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>v</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vibrational–rotational band.
<bold>(a)</bold> The comparison of simulated spectra using the forward model with
three different NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations based on the a priori NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
profiles shown in Fig. 3. <bold>(b)</bold> The absorption difference between
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and important interference gases including CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and
H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O that have been perturbed by a certain factor.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1055">All cloud-screened FY-4B/GIIRS spectra acquired over land with a viewing
zenith angle less than 70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are used in the retrieval. To filter
out cloudy pixels, we use the higher-resolution (4 km) level-2 cloud mask
(CLM) data product from the Advanced Geostationary Radiation Imager (AGRI)
on board FY-4B. When at least 7 of the 9 collocating AGRI pixels are either
clear or probably clear, the GIIRS pixel is labeled as clear.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The FY-GeoAIR retrieval algorithm for NH${}_{{3}}$}?><title>The FY-GeoAIR retrieval algorithm for NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></title>
      <p id="d1e1084">The FengYun Geostationary satellite Atmospheric Infrared Retrieval
(FY-GeoAIR) algorithm was originally developed for retrieving carbon
monoxide from FY-4B/GIIRS spectra. The algorithm combines a forward
radiative transfer model to simulate upwelling thermal radiation and an
optimal estimation-based inverse model to retrieve trace gases and auxiliary
parameters from the observed spectra. Here, a brief introduction to
FY-GeoAIR is given with descriptions of changes needed to adapt it to
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval. More details about the FY-GeoAIR retrieval algorithm can
be found in Zeng et al. (2023).</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><title>The forward radiative transfer model for simulating observed spectra</title>
      <p id="d1e1103">An accurate radiative transfer (RT) model is an important component in the
inversion system for simulating upwelling thermal radiation that would be
observed by FY-4B/GIIRS when given the relevant atmospheric, surface, and
instrumental parameters as inputs. The upwelling spectral radiance is
computed following the radiative transfer theory for thermal radiation that
has been described in Clough et al. (2006) and Hurtmans et al. (2012). Under
clear-sky conditions, scattering by clouds and aerosols can be ignored. The
upwelling radiance received by FY-4B/GIIRS can be accurately approximated by
the sum of four main components, including the upwelling surface emission,
the upwelling atmospheric emission integrated from the bottom to the top of
the atmosphere, the surface-reflected downwelling atmospheric emission, and
the surface-reflected solar radiation. Although the last component is very
small in the longwave band, it is added here for completeness. The
absorption microwindow (955–975 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) used for retrieval is shown in
Fig. 2a. The microwindow contains strong NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption features that are distinguishable from important interference gases (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O) in the absorption window, as demonstrated in Fig. 2 from a sensitivity experiment that compares absorptions of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and
perturbed interference gases.</p>
      <p id="d1e1164">The atmospheric, surface, and instrumental parameters used to drive the
forward model are adopted from various sources. These parameters are the
atmospheric state such as the profiles of temperature, water vapor, and
atmospheric composition; the surface parameters such as the surface
emissivity; and the instrumental specifications such as instrument spectral
response function and observing geometries. Specifically, the atmospheric
temperature, H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data are extracted from European Centre
for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) Reanalysis v5 (ERA5) data
(Hersbach et al., 2020), and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is extracted from ECMWF Copernicus
Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS) global inversion-optimized greenhouse
gas fluxes and concentrations (ECMWF, 2022). For the surface land data, we
used the global infrared land surface emissivity database from the University of Wisconsin-Madison (UOW-M) (Seemann et al., 2008). The emissivity values at 925 and 1075 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> are used to estimate the a priori emissivity for the retrieval microwindow. Two factors (slope and curvature) are used in the state vector to scale the wavelength-dependent emissivity values; surface skin temperature and surface pressure are extracted from ERA5 hourly data on a single level (Hersbach et al., 2020). The absorption coefficient lookup tables for calculating gas absorption are built using the extensively validated<?pagebreak page3697?> Line-By-Line Radiative Transfer Model (LBLRTM v12.11; Clough et al., 2005).</p>
      <p id="d1e1206">Since the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is short-lived and highly concentrated in the PBL, we
therefore only retrieve the layers below 200 hPa. The forward model uses
fixed vertical grids with equally separated layers with similar thickness
(about 1 km for layers below 200 hPa and about 5 km for layers above), which
is close to the grid settings in Hurtmans et al. (2012) and Clough et al.
(2005). The thickness of the bottom layer is variable and determined by the
surface pressure of a specific location. The number of layers below 200 hPa
ranges from 7 (for high-altitude regions such as the Tibet Plateau) to 11
layers (for low-altitude regions such as the ocean).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>The retrieval algorithm in FY-GeoAIR based on optimal estimation theory</title>
      <p id="d1e1226">The goal of the retrieval algorithm for retrieving NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from FY-4B/GIIRS
based on optimal estimation theory is to find a solution for the state
vector, which consists of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profile and auxiliary parameters, such
that the simulated spectra from the RT forward model best fit the measured
spectra. The auxiliary parameters include the H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O profile, scale factors
for the columns of the remaining interference gases, the surface skin
temperature, and scale factors for the atmospheric temperature profile. The
solution from the retrieval algorithm is the state vector which minimizes
the spectral fitting error. The Levenberg–Marquardt modification of the
Gauss–Newton method is used to search the solution. The optimal estimation
method has been described thoroughly in Rodgers (2000) and applied in
several previous studies by the group (Zeng et al., 2017, 2021;
Natraj et al., 2022; Zeng et al., 2023). The parameters in the state vector
to be retrieved from the algorithm are listed in Table 1. Vertical profiles
of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O are retrieved, while for minor interference gases,
total columns are retrieved by scaling an a priori profile. Other parameters
to be retrieved include the surface skin temperature, a scaling factor for
the atmospheric temperature profile, and the slope and curve for the surface
emissivity. We only retrieve the layers below 200 hPa and use the a priori
profile for layers above to compute total columns.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d1e1277">Parameters in the state vector to be retrieved from the retrieval algorithm.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><?xmltex \begin{scaleboxenv}{.98}[.98]?><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Variables</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">No. of</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">A priori values</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">A priori</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Descriptions</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">variables</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">uncertainty</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">fixed</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">see Fig. 3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">derived from GEOS-CF simulations</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">11</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">30 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Interfering trace gases</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (ECMWF CAMS);</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">only profile scaling factors are</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CFC12,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(in total)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">O<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (ECMWF ERA5);</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">retrieved; a uniform 5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">CFC12 (LBLRTM standard profile);</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">uncertainty is assumed for these</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">HNO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (LBLRTM standard profile).</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">minor trace gases that have</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">very weak absorption features</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface skin temperature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ECMWF ERA5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">5 K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Air temperature profile</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">ECMWF ERA5</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.5 %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">only a profile scaling factor</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">is retrieved</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Surface emissivity slope</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">[0.0, 0.0]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">[0.1 %, 0.01 %]</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">the a priori surface emissivity</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">and curvature</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">data come from the University of</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Wisconsin-Madison</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(Seemann et al., 2008)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup><?xmltex \end{scaleboxenv}?></oasis:table><?xmltex \gdef\@currentlabel{1}?></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1635"><bold>(a)</bold> The a priori NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profile used for retrievals of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the FY-GeoAIR algorithm for FY-4B/GIIRS. This profile is computed from the GEOS-CF NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> simulations (Keller et al., 2021) in 2022 in representative land regions in East Asia (20–60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N,
110–120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) and South Asia (20–40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 70–100<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). The error bars represent 1 standard deviation for different layers from all NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles. <bold>(b)</bold> The a priori covariance matrix is constructed from the error estimate in the a priori profile and the correlation matrix with a correlation length of 3 km. See text for details.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1723">Two important metrics from the optical estimation method for interpreting the
retrieval results are the DOFS and averaging kernel (AK) matrix. The AK matrix
is a metric that quantifies the sensitivity of the retrieval to the true
state by the observing system. The full AK matrix (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M125" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:msup><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where each element <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">A</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the derivative of the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrieval at level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> truth at level <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The matrix dimension <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of atmospheric layers; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
Jacobian matrix, which is the first derivative of the forward model with
respect to the state vector; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the a priori covariance matrix for the state vector; and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measurement error covariance matrix, which is assumed to be a
diagonal matrix constructed using the spectra noise estimates. Note that
similar to the CO retrieval algorithm (Zeng et al., 2023), we have enlarged
the spectra noise by a factor of 2.0 such that the averaged reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value from the optimal estimation NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval is close to 1.0. This extra noise represents the unaccounted uncertainty from the forward
model and absorption spectroscopy by the original instrument noise alone.</p>
      <p id="d1e1915">A “perfect” observing system, which has sufficiently good sensitivity to
each element in the retrieval vector, would have an AK matrix close to an
identity matrix by theory. In reality, the detectivity is limited by various
factors including the spectral noise, a priori uncertainty, and the
sensitivity of the spectra to the geophysical variables in the state vector.
As a result, the AK can be very different from an identity matrix. In
general, the information from the true state is smoothed vertically over
different layers by the retrieval algorithm. In this case, the rows of AK
represent the smoothing functions. As described in Rodgers (2000), the trace
of the AK matrix is defined as the DOFS, which represents the number of
independent elements of information extracted from the spectra by the
retrieval algorithm for constraining NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. The DOFS is an important metric
that quantifies the vertical resolution of the retrieval profile. For example,
a DOFS of 1.0 means that, given the assumed <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, at
least one independent piece of information can be retrieved from the
spectral measurement to constrain the vertical distribution of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
Note that the DOFS is highly dependent on the magnitude of the assume
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, an indicator of the a priori knowledge. If
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="bold">S</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> characterizes a weaker constraint, indicating less
a priori knowledge, the DOFS will be higher as relatively more information
will be taken from the measurement.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <label>3.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{The a priori NH${}_{{3}}$ profile and covariance matrix}?><title>The a priori NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profile and covariance matrix</title>
      <p id="d1e1988">A fixed a priori profile is preferred for the purpose of this study for two reasons:
(1) a fixed a priori profile eases the interpretation of the results compared to a
time-varying a priori profile. Any changes seen in the spatial and temporal patterns
in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> relative to the a priori profile reflect the information gained from
the FY-4B/GIIRS spectra. (2) It is not applicable to get a reasonable a
priori estimate for all hours in a day from just the spectra (e.g., using
channel brightness temperature difference as in Shephard et al., 2011, and
Warner et al., 2016) without relying on model simulations because the
diurnal change of TC that affects geostationary (GEO) satellite observation is much more
complex than that in the two overpasses for LEO satellite each day. The
single a priori NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profile, as shown in Fig. 3a, for all retrievals in the retrieval algorithm is derived from NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> simulations from the Goddard Earth Observing System composition forecast (GEOS-CF; Keller et al., 2021) model developed by NASA's Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO). A year<?pagebreak page3698?> of simulation in 2022 is used to get the mean and standard deviation of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical distribution. To avoid oversampling of the background regions, only simulations in the representative land regions in East Asia (20–60<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 110–120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) and South Asia (20–40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 70–100<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) are used. The negative
value toward the lower end of the error bar does not have physical meaning;
it is caused by the large standard deviation derived from model simulations
that do not strictly follow a normal distribution. The a priori total
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> column is about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. To
construct the correlation matrix, we used a correlation length of 3 km based on our analysis of the GEOS-CF reanalysis. Most of the layers show
correlation lengths between 1 to 3 km, and we use an upper bound (3 km) to
increase the stability of the retrieval system. The covariance matrix
calculated based on the a priori error and the correlation matrix is shown
in Fig. 3b.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <label>3.4</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Post-filtering of NH${}_{{3}}$ retrievals}?><title>Post-filtering of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals</title>
      <p id="d1e2118">After cloud screening, there are 11.7 million clear-sky data
points in total for the 6 months from July to December 2022. In the post-processing, multiple filters are applied to ensure good retrieval quality. First, retrievals that fail to converge after 10 iterations are excluded. Second, retrievals with a goodness of fit, quantified by reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, of less than 1.5 are excluded. Lastly, retrievals with a RMSE of the fitting residual larger than 0.25 K are excluded. After post-filtering, about 10.5 million data points pass the filters. The histograms of the reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and spectral fitting residual are shown in<?pagebreak page3699?> Fig. S1 in the Supplement (after filtering) and Fig. S2 (before filtering). The average reduced <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">χ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> after post-filtering is 0.76, suggesting a satisfactory goodness of fit. In the following analysis, an extra filter based on DOFS may apply to exclude data with low DOFS and, therefore, low information content extracted from the observed spectra.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <label>3.5</label><title>Retrieval experiments for quantifying retrieval error</title>
      <p id="d1e2162">A synthetic experiment is carried out by (1) generating simulated synthetic spectra based on pre-determined NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles which can be regarded as
the “truth”, (2) adding assumed noise according to the spectra noise of
FY-4B/GIIRS, and (3) applying the FY-GeoAIR algorithm to retrieve NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>.
By comparing the retrieval to the “truth”, we can evaluate the performance
of the retrieval algorithm and its relationship with relevant driving
factors. In this experiment, the “truth” NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles are extracted
from the GEOS-CF model simulations on 6 representative days: 7 July,
5 August, 6 September, 10 October, 15 November, and 18 December 2022, when the available number of clear-sky observations is among the largest in
the specific month. By randomly sampling 500 data points for each
observation cycle from the FY-4B/GIIRS clear-sky observations, we carried
out 36 000 simulations in total. The retrieved NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns are finally
compared with the “truth” and correlated with the DOFS, as shown in Fig. 4.
Simulations with a DOFS less than 0.3 are not shown due to their high
uncertainty and low information content extracted from the spectra
measurement. The scatter plot suggests that the consistency between the
retrieval and the “truth” increases when the DOFS becomes larger. For
retrievals with a low DOFS, the retrieval values are close to the a priori
value, which is about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For the
several outliers that have a high DOFS but with poor retrieval, it is likely
because the “truth” NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profile structure is far away from the a
priori profile structure. For a DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the RMSE of the
retrieval is about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.67</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, while for DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the RMSE reduces to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, representing error for a single retrieval. Since the retrieved NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns have a monthly mean between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (as shown in Sect. 4.2), this synthetic experiment results indicate that the retrieval error is
on average between 23 % and 68 % for a single retrieval when
the DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. On the other hand, when an ensemble mean (e.g.,
monthly mean) of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns is derived, the resulting error for the
mean can be much smaller (reduced by a factor of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
number of observations) when a large number of observations is available.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e2406">Comparison of retrieval and the “truth” NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from
the synthetic experiment. The retrieved NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns are based on
simulated spectra generated based on pre-determined NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles
(“truth”). The data points have been filtered by DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
are color-coded by the corresponding DOFS value. The RMSE of the retrieved
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns relative to the “truth” is about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.67</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2536">In addition, two more experiments have been carried out to (1) compare the
difference in retrievals from a different microwindow (920–940 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
to investigate the possible impact of spectral noise and (2) investigate
the impact of the a priori NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical shape on the retrievals. The
details are described in Sects. S1 and S2 in the Supplement, respectively. The results show that the DOFS values show high consistencies, with
a correlation coefficient of 0.97, suggesting the two microwindows contain
similar information in capturing the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variabilities. The correlation
coefficient between the two retrieved NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> column datasets is 0.81, with
a root mean square error of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
suggesting the spectral noise is not causing large bias. The results show
that the mean and standard deviation of the fractional error are 1.0 % and 9.65 %, respectively, for the reduced PBL excess profile, and 0.9 % and 7.6 %, respectively, for the enhanced PBL excess profile. Fortunately, there is no large systematic bias, and the averaged error is within 10 % in our cases where profiles differ by a factor of 2.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results and discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Information content analysis based on the DOFS and the AK matrix</title>
      <p id="d1e2622">This section conducted information content analysis by investigating the
spatial and diurnal changes of DOFS from NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals and how the
DOFS changes are related to TC. In addition, we examine the diurnal changes
of the vertical sensitivity as quantified by AK matrix. In particular, we
focus on three representative regions including source regions in the North China Plain, North India, and a background region in Mongolia.</p>
      <?pagebreak page3700?><p id="d1e2634">The spatial maps of DOFS, as shown in Fig. 5, for different times in a day
clearly show the spatial gradient and diurnal change. In July and October,
the DOFS values in the afternoon are usually the highest and those in the evening
the lowest. In December, nighttime DOFS are significantly higher than other
seasons. Previous studies by Clarisse et al. (2010, 2021) and Bauduin et al. (2017) using IASI observations have shown that the DOFS is primarily driven
by the TC. When thermal contrast is close to zero, measurement sensitivity
is low, and the DOFS values are close to zero. Large positive TC increases sensitivity
and results in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> spectral signatures that are seen in absorption.
Large negative TC also allows for sensitive measurements, this time allowing
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> spectral signatures to be seen in emission. Negative TC corresponds
to the situation where the atmosphere is warmer than the surface, allowing
to decorrelate the surface layer with the rest of the lower troposphere. In
addition, higher concentration of target gases provides stronger detectivity
than lower concentration. The relationships between TC and the DOFS are
illustrated in Fig. 6 for the three representative regions, including (1) the North China Plain, which represents industrialized and agricultural regions with persistently high NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions; (2) North India, which represents another important NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source region in Asia; and (3) Mongolia, which represents a NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> background region. A typical “butterfly” shape can be seen in almost all cases, except for North India in July when there are much fewer observations due to clouds. In general, the DOFS increases when the TC becomes either more positive or more negative, consistent with results from Clarisse et al. (2010) and Bauduin et al. (2017) based on polar-orbiting satellites. In NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> source regions (e.g., the North China Plain and North India), the DOFS values are higher for the same TC compared with non-source region (e.g., Mongolia), suggesting the contribution from higher NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration to the total information content.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e2703">Distributions of the DOFS averaged for July (summer), October
(autumn), and December (winter), respectively, at 02:00–03:00, 08:00–09:00, 14:00–15:00, and 20:00–21:00 BJT to represent midnight, early morning,
afternoon, and early evening, respectively. The corresponding maps for TC
are presented in Fig. S3.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e2715">Scatter plots between TC and DOFS from NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals in the North China Plain, North India, and Mongolia, respectively, for July
(summer), October (autumn), and December (winter). The coverages of the
three representative regions are 32–40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 115–120<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E for the North China Plain; 22–27<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 77–87<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E for North India; and 40–50<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 100–110<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E for Mongolia.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2788">This strong correlation between DOFS and TC or NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> abundance is also
reflected in the spatial maps of DOFS values in Fig. 5 when analyzed with the
corresponding TC maps in Fig. S2. The source regions in the North China Plain and North India have higher DOFS values than other non-source regions, such as the Tibetan Plateau, although it has large TC. For the same region (e.g., the North China Plain), the higher DOFS is driven by the more positive TC in the afternoon in July, while at nighttime the TC is
closer to zero, which leads to a much lower DOFS. As it approaches the winter
season, from October to December, the diurnal cycle of TC, which shifts from
positive in the daytime to negative in the nighttime, gradually become
stronger. The changes are basically driven by the faster warming or cooling
properties of the land compared to the atmosphere. Fortunately, both
situations favor the detection of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using thermal infrared and lead
to the high DOFS values in both the daytime and nighttime in both October and
December.</p>
      <p id="d1e2809">As mentioned above, measurement sensitivity of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is driven by TC and
the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> abundance (Clarisse et al., 2010). This is also illustrated
in the Appendix Fig. A1a and b for a large positive and negative TC. As described above, while a positive TC leads to stronger absorption
features, a negative TC causes spectral emission features, allowing the
detection of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> also during the night (see also the example GIIRS
spectra shown in Clarisse et al., 2021). In both cases we see that the
averaging kernels peak at the surface, and the posteriori uncertainty in the
retrievals of the surface layer are largely reduced compared to the a priori
uncertainties. However, when the TC is small, as in the Appendix Fig. A1c, the DOFS values become smaller, and the AK peaks higher up in the atmosphere (in this case, in the second layer). The retrieved value remains close to the a priori value, and the posteriori error is almost the same as the a priori error, indicating low information content of the measurement. These examples illustrate the importance of TC for infrared sounding of boundary
layer NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>. An important advantage of GEO compared to LEO IR sounders is
that they make observations throughout the day, such that optimal
measurement conditions (large TC) can be found more readily. The diel
variations of TC and DOFS are illustrated in the Appendix Fig. A2 for the North China Plain and North India. LEO IR sounders like IASI with Equator
crossing times at 09:30 and 21:30 LT in general do not measure at the
time when measurement sensitivity (or DOFS) is largest. The optimal time is
found around noon.</p>
      <p id="d1e2848">The short lifetime of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> of hours to days means that the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentration is highly concentrated in the planetary boundary layer (PBL)
around the source region. This is also illustrated by the significant higher
concentration below 800 hPa in the a priori NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles (Fig. 3). As
a result, thermal infrared observation of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has high sensitivity
closer to the surface compared to relatively longer-lived air pollutant such
as carbon monoxide. The vertical sensitivities of FY-GeoAIR NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrievals are shown in Fig. 7 for the three representative regions using
the corresponding averaging kernel diagonal vectors, which are measures of
the DOFS for each vertical layer. We can see the diurnal AK values peak at
the surface layer for the North China Plain for all months, especially for
October and December, due to the high NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration and favorable
TC changes. In July, the nighttime sensitivity is significantly reduced in
the surface layers. In North India, the bottom layers' sensitivity is at its highest at midnight in October and December due to highly negative TC.
In July, the TC close to zero leads to much lower AK values in North
India. In Mongolia, the low background NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration means the AK
values are low over all vertical layers. The small changes in DOFS are
primarily driven by the diurnal change of TC in this case. Overall, the
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals using FY-GeoAIR algorithm from FY-4B/GIIRS observations
show high detectivity in the surface layer, especially for source regions in the North China Plain and North India.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e2926">Averaged averaging kernel diagonal vectors for the three
representative regions in the North China Plain, North India, and Mongolia for
July (summer, <bold>a</bold>), October (autumn, <bold>b</bold>), and December (winter, <bold>c</bold>). The averaging kernel rows are averaged for the 2 h duration in each measurement cycle. The coverages of the three representative regions are the same as in Fig. 6.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<?pagebreak page3702?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Spatial distribution and diurnal change of NH${}_{{3}}$ column from
FY-4B/GIIRS retrievals}?><title>Spatial distribution and diurnal change of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> column from
FY-4B/GIIRS retrievals</title>
      <p id="d1e2962">Spatial distribution maps of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns are averaged for every 4 h
period in a day and re-gridded into 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for every 2 months: July–August, September–October, and November–December. Before the aggregation, the post-filtered NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals are further screened by
the criteria of DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The screened NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals from
the two microwindows are further averaged for the mapping. The results are
shown in Figs. 8 and 9. The data gaps, especially in the Tibet Plateau,
result from data filtering due to the low DOFS. The cloud filtering has
considerably impacted data availability, in particular in North India in
July–August during the monsoon season. The nighttime data in summer have
been mostly filtered due to their low TC and as a result low DOFS. From
these maps, obvious diurnal cycle of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns can be seen from all
months. The North China Plain and North India, which are two agriculturally
intensive regions with irrigated crops and a high density of livestock, show
the highest values over the region. As explained in Wang et al. (2020), the
causes of high NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> loading in North India are due to the weak chemical
loss and weak horizontal diffusion in North India, which are slightly
different from those in the North China Plain.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e3048">Monthly maps of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns averaged for every 4 h (00:00–03:00, 04:00–07:00, and 08:00–11:00 BJT) and 2 months for July–August, September–October, and November–December of 2022. These NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals are further filtered by DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and then re-gridded into 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=441.017717pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e3114">Same as Fig. 8 but for 12:00–15:00, 16:00–19:00, and 20:00–23:00 BJT.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e3123">The general diurnal cycle of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns can be primarily explained by
three possible driving factors, as concluded in the summary in Clarisse et
al. (2021), including the day–night difference in agriculture activities as
a major source of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the temperature dependence of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions
driven by diurnal and seasonal temperature changes, and the conversion
between NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> gas and particulate driven by the day–night change of
meteorological conditions. These can be used to interpret the quantitative
analysis of the diurnal cycle as shown in Fig. 10 for the North China Plain
and North India. The corresponding diurnal changes of TC and DOFS are shown
in the Appendix Fig. A2. The day–night contrast of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from
IASI on board Metop-B is also indicated to check if the day–night gradients
between IASI and GIIRS are consistent. Specifically, the more significant
diurnal cycle in summer (July–August) in the North China Plain, captured by both
GIIRS retrievals, can be explained by the higher temperature-related
emissions from plants and soils and stronger daytime emissions from
agricultural activities (Meng et al., 2018). In addition, the relatively low
temperature and higher humidity in the nighttime, relative to the daytime,
contribute to the conversion from NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> to particulates, which leads to a
lower NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentration. In North India, unfortunately, insufficient
data are available in July–August after post-filtering. In September–October and November–December, the diurnal cycles become less significant compared to the summer months as the main driving factors become less important. Interestingly, the winter diurnal cycle in the North China Plain and North India show an opposite pattern to the diurnal cycle in summer. The slight increase in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns in the nighttime, captured by both GIIRS and IASI retrievals, may be due to the shallower nocturnal boundary layer that traps the surface emissions (Tevlin et al., 2017; Clarisse et al., 2021). To ensure the diurnal change is not affected greatly by data quality, we also compare the GIIRS results using data with a DOFS larger than 0.5 and 0.7, respectively, two thresholds that are high enough to<?pagebreak page3704?> ensure the quality of the retrievals. We can see that the difference in the diurnal cycle of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from FY-4B/GIIRS retrievals is not significant, and
therefore different data filters do not affect the general patterns of
NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> diurnal cycle. Note that the variability of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns within
the region is large as shown by the error bars (1 standard deviation).
This large variability is a result of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>'s short lifetime and the
spatial heterogeneity of its emissions. Moreover, when compared with the
averaged uncertainty of a single retrieval (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.37</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.67</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec. cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as derived from the retrieval
experiment in Sect. 3.5), the day–night contrast of the averaged diurnal
variations of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns as shown in Fig. 10 may not be significant
for the North China Plain in September–October and the North India in
November–December.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e3289">Diurnal cycle of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from FY-4B/GIIRS retrievals.
The NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns are from retrievals using the microwindows of 955–975 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the 2 h duration in each measurement cycle when at least 30 data points are available. The error bar represents 1 standard deviation. Diurnal cycles based on two different filtering criteria (DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) are shown simultaneously. The IASI NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
column retrievals (two overpass times a day) are averaged values in
the corresponding months. IASI NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals with uncertainty larger
than 50 % are not used. Data are averaged in 2-month periods, when at
least 10 data points are available. Note that the coverages of the North China
Plain (36–38<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 116–118<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) and North India
(26–28<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 78–80<inline-formula><mml:math id="M268" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) are smaller than in Fig. 6 to focus
on the central source regions.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Comparison with IASI NH${}_{{3}}$ retrievals}?><title>Comparison with IASI NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M269" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals</title>
      <p id="d1e3421">IASI on board Metop-B measures NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M270" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> two times a day at 09:30 and 21:30 LT (Equator crossing times), respectively, in the morning and evening.
The NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M271" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data from IASI are retrieved based on the hyperspectral radiance
index (HRI) and a trained neural network that relates the HRI to NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M272" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
distributions (Whitburn et al., 2016). Subsequent improvements to the
algorithm and data product are outlined in Van Damme et al. (2017, 2021). For the comparison, the latest version 4 (Clarisse et
al., 2023) of the IASI is used, with data originating from IASI/Metop-B from
July to December 2022. We filtered out the data with cloud cover larger
than 20 %. Note that the a priori vertical profile of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M273" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in IASI is
different from the a priori profiles for the FY-4B/GIIRS retrievals. The a
priori NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M274" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in IASI algorithm assumes a Gaussian shape, with a peak altitude set at
the surface over land. The width of the Gaussian shape is equal to the
boundary layer height. Two different comparisons are carried out, as
follows.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<?pagebreak page3705?><sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS1">
  <label>4.3.1</label><title>Comparison of spatial distribution on representative days</title>
      <p id="d1e3477">We first take a look at the spatial distribution of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M275" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns on 2 representative days: 7 July 2022 (summer, local daytime), when there was
mostly positive TC, and 18 December 2022 (winter, local nighttime), when
there was mostly negative TC. The retrievals are resampled on a
0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M276" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M277" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M278" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grid. The daily mean value for each grid cell is computed when at least three points are available. Only GIIRS retrievals with a DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M279" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IASI retrievals with a relative uncertainty below 50 % are used. The results are shown in Fig. 11. A
good agreement is found in general with fitted slopes close to unity, with a
larger scatter for the summer case. The IASI NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M280" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tends to be higher
than the GIIRS retrievals, especially for high values.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e3536">Gridded intercomparison between NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M281" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> column retrievals from GIIRS (first column) and IASI (second column) on two representative observations, 7 July 2022 daytime (upper panel, <bold>a</bold>) and 18 December 2022 nighttime (lower panel, <bold>b</bold>) retrievals. The observation hours of GIIRS are selected to be close to those of IASI; the observation hours are shown in Fig. S7. The scatter plots (third column) show the comparison of collocated GIIRS- and IASI-averaged column data in each grid. The retrievals are re-gridded into 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M282" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M283" display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M284" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> grids in the region. The daily mean value for each region is computed when at least three grid points are available.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f11.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3.SSS2">
  <label>4.3.2</label><title>Collocated point-by-point comparison</title>
      <p id="d1e3594">We further conduct a spatially and temporally collocated point-by-point
comparison between FY-4B/GIIRS and IASI NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M285" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals. The results are
shown in Figs. 12 and A3. Again, only GIIRS retrievals with a DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M286" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and IASI retrievals with a relative uncertainty below 50 % are used. We consider observations to be collocated when the distance between the centers of the pixels is less than 6 km (half of the FY-4B/GIIRS footprint size) and the observation time difference less than 1 h. All data points that meet these criteria are used for the comparison. The correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M287" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), root mean square error (RMSE) and the fitting slope are also indicated. We can see the comparison shows good agreement with a high correlation coefficient. The retrievals are highly consistent, especially for winter months. The nighttime data in July have mostly been screened due to the low DOFS. Except for the daytime data in summer (July and August), both retrievals agree within the estimated error as
quantified by RMSE in Sect. 3.5. The systematic bias in the daytime in
July and August is probably due to the different a priori value of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M288" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> used
in the algorithms. Since the IASI a priori profile changes with boundary
layer height, the a priori profiles have different vertical structure
depending on the time of the year, compared to the GIIRS a priori value which uses
a fixed average across the year. To test this hypothesis, we carry out an
experiment to generate a new set of GIIRS NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M289" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals in July
daytime that use the Gaussian shape a priori profiles following IASI
algorithm (Clarisse et al., 2023). We keep the total column for the new a
priori profile unchanged.<?pagebreak page3706?> The results are shown in the Appendix Fig. A4.
It shows that the agreement in NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M290" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> total column between IASI and GIIRS
has largely improved, especially for the retrievals that have
a DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M291" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The bias has significantly reduced. This result
demonstrates that the systematic bias between GIIRS and IASI is caused by
the difference in their a priori profile structure.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e3663">Intercomparison of collocated GIIRS and IASI NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M292" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns for July, October, and December. Observations are considered to be collocated when they are observed within 6 km and the time difference is smaller than 1 h. The correlation coefficient (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M293" display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), root mean square error (RMSE), and fitting slope are also indicated. Similar results for August, September, and November are shown in Appendix A.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f12.png"/>

          </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e3699">In this study, we present an NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M294" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval algorithm based on the optimal estimation method for FY-4B/GIIRS. The DOFS and AK matrix produced from the retrieval algorithm are examined to evaluate the information content and vertical sensitivities in constraining the diurnal cycle of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M295" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in East Asia. Our retrievals are carried out using the NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M296" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> microwindow (955–975 cm<inline-formula><mml:math id="M297" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). Retrieval results using FY-4B/GIIRS spectra from July to December 2022 show that (1) the detection sensitivity, as quantified by the AK matrix, peaks in the lowest 2 km atmospheric layers, which facilitates the observation of emission sources in the PBL; (2) the DOFS and TC are highly correlated, resulting in a typical “butterfly” shape, showing that the DOFS increases when the TC becomes either more positive or more negative; (3) the diurnal cycle of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M298" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns from FY-4B/GIIRS shows a significant diurnal cycle in summer (July–August) in the North China Plain, in good agreement with the day–night gradient from the collocated IASI retrievals. The weak and moderate diurnal cycles in two important source regions of the North China Plain and North India in September–October and November–December are also presented from both
FY-4B/GIIRS and IASI retrievals. This study demonstrates the capability of
GIIRS in observing the diurnal NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M299" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> changes in East Asia, making it a
unique dataset for quantifying NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M300" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions and depositions and
evaluating strategies for managing anthropogenic sources of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M301" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Asia.</p>
      <p id="d1e3778">As the world's first geostationary infrared sounder, GIIRS instruments
on board FY-4A and FY-4B provide unique hyperspectral thermal infrared
observations to quantify the diurnal change of atmospheric composition in
East Asia. Other<?pagebreak page3707?> existing geostationary missions and those in planning include
South Korea's Geostationary Environment Monitoring Spectrometer (GEMS)
launched in February 2020 to measure air quality in Asia using ultraviolet and visible bands (Kim et al., 2020), ESA's Sentinel-4 mission on board the
Meteosat Third Generation Sounder platform that consists of the thermal
Infrared Sounder (IRS) that will measure profiles of temperature, humidity,
and atmospheric composition, and the ultraviolet–visible–near-infrared (UVN)
spectrometer that will monitor air quality trace gases and aerosols in
Europe (Ingmann et al., 2012; Holmlund et al., 2021), and NASA's
Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO) that will observe
air quality in North America (Zoogman et al., 2017). These GEO missions form
a global network that enables diurnal observation to cover global important
emission sources, which will significantly enhance local and global air
quality and climate research.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<?pagebreak page3708?><app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <?xmltex \currentcnt{A}?><label>Appendix A</label><title> </title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F13"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A1</label><caption><p id="d1e3795">Examples of the a priori and retrieval NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M302" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles (upper panel) and the corresponding AK row vectors (second panel) for <bold>(a)</bold> positive TC with TC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M303" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.37</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K and DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M304" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.89</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from daytime measurement on 7 July 2022, <bold>(b)</bold> negative TC with TC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M305" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K and DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M306" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.91</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from nighttime measurement on 18 December 2022, and <bold>(c)</bold> weak TC with TC <inline-formula><mml:math id="M307" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.39</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K and DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M308" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.23</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> from early evening measurement on 6 July 2022.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f13.png"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F14"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A2</label><caption><p id="d1e3889">Associated figure for Fig. 10 on the diurnal change of TC and the DOFS for the North China Plain and North India. Different from Fig. 10, no extra filters have been applied.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f14.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F15"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A3</label><caption><p id="d1e3904">Collocation intercomparison of NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M309" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns between GIIRS- and IASI-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M310" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-retrieved columns, similar to Fig. 12 but for August, September, and November.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f15.png"/>

      </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?><?xmltex \floatpos{h!}?><fig id="App1.Ch1.S1.F16"><?xmltex \currentcnt{A4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure A4</label><caption><p id="d1e3936">Intercomparison of collocated GIIRS and IASI NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M311" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns for July daytime, similar to Fig. 12 but for a new set of GIIRS NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M312" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals that use the Gaussian shape a priori profiles following the IASI v4 algorithm (Clarisse et al., 2023), while keeping the total column for the new a priori profile unchanged. The first and the second columns are the comparisons using the original and the new set of GIIRS NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M313" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals, respectively. The comparisons by two data filtering criteria based on DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M314" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and DOFS <inline-formula><mml:math id="M315" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are shown in the first and second row, respectively.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \hack{\hsize\textwidth}?>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=312.980315pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/3693/2023/amt-16-3693-2023-f16.png"/>

      </fig>

</app>
  </app-group><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3998">The sample NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M316" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval data from FY-4B/GIIRS in this study are publicly available from the Peking University Open Research Data Platform at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18170/DVN/VJ4MLO" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18170/DVN/VJ4MLO</ext-link> (Zeng, 2023). The full retrieval dataset (total data size larger than 15 GB) is available from the corresponding author upon request. The data can be previewed at <uri>http://fengyun.pku.edu.cn/</uri> (FengYun Atmospheric Composition Data Portal, 2023). FY-4B/GIIRS Level 1 data are publicly available at <uri>http://satellite.nsmc.org.cn/portalsite/default.aspx</uri> (FengYun Satellite Data Center, 2023). The surface emissivity datasets can be downloaded from the Global Infrared Land Surface Emissivity:  <uri>https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/iremis/</uri> (UW-Madison Baseline Fit Emissivity Database, 2023). The ECMWF ERA5 reanalysis datasets are available at <uri>https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/</uri> (Copernicus Climate Data Store, 2023). The ECMWF atmospheric composition datasets are available at <uri>https://ads.atmosphere.copernicus.eu/</uri> (Copernicus Atmosphere Data Store, 2023). NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M317" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> simulation data from GEOS-CF can be downloaded from <uri>https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/weather_prediction/GEOS-CF/data_access/</uri> (Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, 2023). IASI is a joint mission of EUMETSAT and the Centre National d'Etudes Spatiales (CNES; France). The IASI NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M318" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> product is available from <uri>https://iasi.aeris-data.fr/nh3/</uri> (IASI AERIS database portal, 2023).</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\vspace*{128mm}}?><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d1e4055">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3693-2023-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3693-2023-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e4064">ZCZ designed the study, developed the forward model and retrieval codes, carried out the experiments and result analysis, and prepared the manuscript. LL and CQ provided guidance on using the FY-4B/GIIRS L1 spectra data and carried out experiments related to spectra uncertainty
analysis. LC and MVD provided IASI NH3 v4 data and guidance on comparing GIIRS and IASI data. All authors reviewed and proofread the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e4070">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e4076">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><?pagebreak page3711?><p id="d1e4082">Zhao-Cheng Zeng acknowledges funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, the National Key R&amp;D Program of China, and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities at Peking University. This work was also supported by the High-Performance Computing Platform of Peking University.
The authors also acknowledge the financial support of the National Satellite Meteorological Center (NSMC) of the China Meteorological Administration (CMA). Research in Belgium was co-funded by the Belgian State Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs (Prodex HIRS), the Air Liquide Foundation (TAPIR project), and ESA (CCI project focusing on short-lived greenhouse gases). This work is also partly supported by the FED-tWIN project ARENBERG (“Assessing the Reactive Nitrogen Budget and Emissions at Regional and Global Scales”), funded via the Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO). Lieven Clarisse is Research Associate supported by the Belgian F.R.S.–FNRS.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e4088">Zhao-Cheng Zeng has been supported by the funding from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42275142 and 12292981), the National Key R&amp;D Program of China (grant no. 2022YFA1003801), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities at Peking University (grant no. 7101302981).
Research at the National Satellite Meteorological Center (NSMC) was funded by NSMC of China Meteorological
Administration (CMA) under the program of Calibration Technology Development
and Level-1 Data Production for the Hyperspectral Imaging and Sounding
Instruments on board FY-3E and FY-4B Satellites (project no. FY-APP-2021.0507). Research
in Belgium was co-funded by the Belgian State Federal Office for Scientific,
Technical and Cultural Affairs (Prodex HIRS), the Air Liquide Foundation
(TAPIR project), and ESA (Short-lived greenhouse gases CCI project). This
work is also partly supported by the FED-tWIN project ARENBERG (“Assessing
the Reactive Nitrogen Budget and Emissions at Regional and Global Scales”),
funded via the Belgian Science Policy Office (BELSPO).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e4094">This paper was edited by Thomas von Clarmann and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Abbatt, J. P. D., Benz, S., Cziczo, D. J., Kanji, Z., Lohmann, U., and
Mohler, O.: Solid ammonium sulfate aerosols as ice nuclei: A pathway for
cirrus cloud formation, Science, 313, 1770–1773, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129726" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.1129726</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Aneja, V. P., Roelle, P. A., Murray, G. C., Southerland, J., Erisman, J. W.,
Fowler, D., Asman, W. A. H., and Patni, N.: Atmospheric nitrogen compounds:
II. Emissions, transport, transformation, deposition and assessment, Atmos.
Environ., 35, 1903–1911, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bauduin, S., Clarisse, L., Theunissen, M., George, M., Hurtmans, D.,
Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: IASI's sensitivity to near-surface carbon
monoxide (CO): Theoretical analyses and retrievals on test cases, J. Quant.
Spectrosc. Ra., 189, 428–440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.12.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.12.022</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Beer, R., Shephard, M. W., Kulawik, S. S., Clough, S. A., Eldering, A.,
Bowman, K. W., Sander, S. P., Fisher, B. M., Payne, V. H., Luo, M.,
Osterman, G. B., and Worden, J. R.: First satellite observations of lower
tropospheric ammonia and methanol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L09801, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033642" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008GL033642</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Clarisse, L., Clerbaux, C., Dentener, F., Hurtmans, D., and Coheur, P.-F.:
Global ammonia distribution derived from infrared satellite observations,
Nat. Geosci., 2, 479–483, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo551" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ngeo551</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Clarisse, L., Shephard, M., Dentener, F., Hurtmans, D., Cady-Pereira, K.,
Karagulian, F., Van Damme, M., Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: Satellite
monitoring of ammonia: A case study of the San Joaquin Valley, J. Geophys.
Res., 115, D13302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013291" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013291</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Clarisse, L., Van Damme, M., Hurtmans, D., Franco, B., Clerbaux, C., and
Coheur, P. F.: The diel cycle of NH3 observed from the FY-4A Geostationary
Interferometric Infrared Sounder (GIIRS), Geophys. Res. Lett., 48,
e2021GL093010, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2021GL093010</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Clarisse, L., Franco, B., Van Damme, M., Di Gioacchino, T., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Whitburn, S., Noppen, L., Hurtmans, D., Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P.: The IASI NH3 version 4 product: averaging kernels and improved consistency, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. [preprint], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-48" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-2023-48</ext-link>, in review, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Clough, S. A., Shephard, M. W., Mlawer, E. J., Delamere, J. S., Iacono, M. J., Cady-Pereira, K., Boukabara, S., and Brown, P. D.: Atmospheric radiative
transfer modeling: a summary of the AER codes, Short Communication, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 91, 233–244, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Clough, S. A., Shephard, M. W., Worden, J., Brown, P. D., Worden, H. M.,
Luo, M., Rodgers, C. D., Rinsland, C. P., Goldman, A., and Brown, L.:
Forward model and Jacobians for tropospheric emission spectrometer
retrievals, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 44, 1308–1323, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Coheur, P.-F., Clarisse, L., Turquety, S., Hurtmans, D., and Clerbaux, C.:
IASI measurements of reactive trace species in biomass burning plumes,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5655–5667, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5655-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-5655-2009</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Copernicus Atmosphere Data Store: <uri>https://ads.atmosphere.copernicus.eu/</uri>, last access: 1 May 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Copernicus Climate Data Store: <uri>https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/</uri>, last access: 1 May 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>ECMWF: CAMS global inversion-optimised greenhouse gas fluxes and
concentrations, ECMWF [data set], <uri>https://ads.atmosphere.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/cams-global-greenhouse-gas-inversion</uri> (last access: 1 May 2023), 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Erisman, J. W., Galloway, J. N., Seitzinger, S., Bleeker, A., Dise, N. B.,
Petrescu, A. M. R., Leach, A. M., and de Vries, W.: Consequences of human
modification of the global nitrogen cycle, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 368, 20130116, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0116" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rstb.2013.0116</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>FengYun Atmospheric Composition Data Portal: <uri>http://fengyun.pku.edu.cn/</uri>, last access: 1 August 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>FengYun Satellite Data Center: <uri>http://satellite.nsmc.org.cn/portalsite/default.aspx</uri>, last access: 1 May 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fowler, D., Coyle, M., Skiba, U., Sutton, M. A., Cape, J. N., Reis, S.,
Sheppard, L. J., Jenkins, A., Grizzetti, B., Galloway, J. N.<?pagebreak page3712?>, Vitousek, P.,
Leach, A., Bouwman, A. F., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Dentener, F., Stevenson, D.,
Amann, M., and Voss, M.: The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first
century, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 368, 20130164, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0164" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rstb.2013.0164</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R.
W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C. C., Green, P. A., and
Holland, E. A.: Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future, Biogeochemistry,
70, 153–226, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO): GEOS Composition Forecasts (GEOS-CF),  <uri>https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/weather_prediction/GEOS-CF/data_access/</uri>,  last access: 1 May 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D.,
Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P.,
Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková,
M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay,
P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5
global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Holmlund, K., Grandell, J., Schmetz, J., Stuhlmann, R., Bojkov, B., Munro,
R., Lekouara, M., Coppens, D., Viticchie, B., August, T., Theodore, B.,
Watts, P., Dobber, M., Fowler, G., Bojinski, S., Schmid, A., Salonen, K.,
Tjemkes, S., Aminou, D., and Blythe, P.: Meteosat Third Generation (MTG):
Continuation and innovation of observations from geostationary orbit, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 102, E990–E1015, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0304.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0304.1</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Höpfner, M., Volkamer, R., Grabowski, U., Grutter, M., Orphal, J., Stiller, G., von Clarmann, T., and Wetzel, G.: First detection of ammonia (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M319" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the Asian summer monsoon upper troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14357–14369, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14357-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-14357-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hurtmans, D., Coheur, P.-F., Wespes, C., Clarisse, L., Scharf, O., Clerbaux,
C., Hadji-Lazaro, J., George, M., and Turquety, S.: FORLI radiative transfer
and retrieval code for IASI, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 113, 1391–1408,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.02.036" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.02.036</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>IASI AERIS database portal: <uri>https://iasi.aeris-data.fr/nh3/</uri>, last access: 1 May 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ingmann, P., Veihelmann, B., Langen, J., Lamarre, D., Stark, H., and
Courrèges- Lacoste, G. B.: Requirements for the GMES atmosphere service and ESA's implementation concept: Sentinels-4/-5 and -5p, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 58–69, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.023</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Isaksen, I. S. A., Granier, C., Myhre, G., Berntsen, T. K., Dalsoren, S. B.,
Gauss, M., Klimont, Z., Benestad, R., Bousquet, P., Collins, W., Cox, T.,
Eyring, V., Fowler, D., Fuzzi, S., Jockel, P., Laj, P., Lohmann, U., Maione,
M., Monks, P., Prevot, A. S. H., Raes, F., Richter, A., Rognerud, B.,
Schulz, M., Shindell, D., Stevenson, D. S., Storelvmo, T., Wang, W. C., van
Weele, M., Wild, M., and Wuebbles, D.: Atmospheric composition change:
Climate-Chemistry interactions, Atmos. Environ., 43, 5138–5192,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.003</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Keller, C. A., Knowland, K. E., Duncan, B. N., Liu, J., Anderson, D. C.,
Das, S., Lucchesi, R. A., Lundgren, E. W., Nicely, J. M., Nielsen, E., Ott,
L. E., Saunders, E., Strode, S. A., Wales, P. A., Jacob, D. J., and Pawson,
S.: Description of the NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System
GEOS-CF v1.0, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2020MS002413,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002413" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020MS002413</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kim, J., Jeong, U., Ahn, M. H., Kim, J. H., Park, R. J., Lee, H., Song, C.
H., Choi, Y. S., Lee, K. H., Yoo, J. M., Jeong, M. J., Park, S. K., Lee, K.
M., Song, C. K., Kim, S. W., Kim, Y. J., Kim, S. W., Kim, M., Go, S., Liu,
X., Chance, K., Miller, C. C., Al-Saadi, J., Veihelmann, B., Bhartia, P. K.,
Torres, O., Abad, G. G., Haffner, D. P., Ko, D. H., Lee, S. H., Woo, J. H.,
Chong, H., Park, S. S., Nicks, D., Choi, W. J., Moon, K. J., Cho, A., Yoon,
J., Kim, S. kyun, Hong, H., Lee, K., Lee, H., Lee, S., Choi, M., Veefkind,
P., Levelt, P. F., Edwards, D. P., Kang, M., Eo, M., Bak, J., Baek, K.,
Kwon, H. A., Yang, J., Park, J., Han, K. M., Kim, B. R., Shin, H. W., Choi,
H., Lee, E., Chong, J., Cha, Y., Koo, J. H., Irie, H., Hayashida, S., Kasai,
Y., Kanaya, Y., Liu, C., Lin, J., Crawford, J. H., Carmichael, G. R.,
Newchurch, M. J., Lefer, B. L., Herman, J. R., Swap, R. J., Lau, A. K. H.,
Kurosu, T. P., Jaross, G., Ahlers, B., Dobber, M., McElroy, C. T. and Choi,
Y.: New era of air quality monitoring from space: Geostationary environment
monitoring spectrometer (GEMS), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E1–E22,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0013.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0013.1</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, J., Menzel, W. P., Schmit, T. J., and Schmetz, J.: Applications of
Geostationary Hyperspectral Infrared Sounder Observations: Progress, Challenges, and Future Perspectives, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 103, E2733–E2755, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0328.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0328.1</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Li, M., Zhang, Q., Kurokawa, J.-I., Woo, J.-H., He, K., Lu, Z., Ohara, T., Song, Y., Streets, D. G., Carmichael, G. R., Cheng, Y., Hong, C., Huo, H., Jiang, X., Kang, S., Liu, F., Su, H., and Zheng, B.: MIX: a mosaic Asian anthropogenic emission inventory under the international collaboration framework of the MICS-Asia and HTAP, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 935–963, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-935-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-935-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Meng, Z., Xu, X., Lin, W., Ge, B., Xie, Y., Song, B., Jia, S., Zhang, R., Peng, W., Wang, Y., Cheng, H., Yang, W., and Zhao, H.: Role of ambient ammonia in particulate ammonium formation at a rural site in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 167–184, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-167-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-167-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Natraj, V., Luo, M., Blavier, J.-F., Payne, V. H., Posselt, D. J., Sander, S. P., Zeng, Z.-C., Neu, J. L., Tremblay, D., Wu, L., Roman, J. A., Wu, Y.-H., and Dorsky, L. I.: Simulated multispectral temperature and atmospheric composition retrievals for the JPL GEO-IR Sounder, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1251–1267, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1251-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-15-1251-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Paerl, H. W., Gardner, W. S., McCarthy, M. J., Peierls, B. L., and Wilhelm,
S. W.: Algal blooms: Noteworthy nitrogen, Science, 346, 175–175, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.346.6206.175-a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1126/science.346.6206.175-a</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and
Practice, World Scientific, Singapore, ISBN: 978-98102-2740-1, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Seemann, S. W., Borbas, E. E., Knuteson, R. O., Stephenson, G. R., and
Huang, H.-L.: Development of a Global Infrared Land Surface Emissivity
Database for Application to Clea<?pagebreak page3713?>r Sky Sounding Retrievals from
Multi-spectral Satellite Radiance Measurements, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim.,
47, 108–123, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1590.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2007JAMC1590.1</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley, New York, ISBN: 978-1-118-94740-1, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shephard, M. W. and Cady-Pereira, K. E.: Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) satellite observations of tropospheric ammonia, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1323–1336, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1323-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-1323-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shephard, M. W., Cady-Pereira, K. E., Luo, M., Henze, D. K., Pinder, R. W., Walker, J. T., Rinsland, C. P., Bash, J. O., Zhu, L., Payne, V. H., and Clarisse, L.: TES ammonia retrieval strategy and global observations of the spatial and seasonal variability of ammonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10743–10763, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10743-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-10743-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Shephard, M. W., Dammers, E., Cady-Pereira, K. E., Kharol, S. K., Thompson, J., Gainariu-Matz, Y., Zhang, J., McLinden, C. A., Kovachik, A., Moran, M., Bittman, S., Sioris, C. E., Griffin, D., Alvarado, M. J., Lonsdale, C., Savic-Jovcic, V., and Zheng, Q.: Ammonia measurements from space with the Cross-track Infrared Sounder: characteristics and applications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2277–2302, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2277-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-2277-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Someya, Y., Imasu, R., Shiomi, K., and Saitoh, N.: Atmospheric ammonia retrieval from the TANSO-FTS/GOSAT thermal infrared sounder, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 309–321, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-309-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-309-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Tevlin, A. G., Li, Y., Collett, J. L., McDuffie, E. E., Fischer, E. V., and
Murphy, J. G.: Tall Tower Vertical Profiles and Diurnal Trends of Ammonia in
the Colorado Front Range, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 12468–12487,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026534" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017JD026534</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>UW-Madison Baseline Fit Emissivity Database: <uri>https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/iremis/</uri>, last access: 1 May 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., Heald, C. L., Hurtmans, D., Ngadi, Y., Clerbaux, C., Dolman, A. J., Erisman, J. W., and Coheur, P. F.: Global distributions, time series and error characterization of atmospheric ammonia (NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M320" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) from IASI satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2905–2922, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2905-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2905-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van Damme, M., Whitburn, S., Clarisse, L., Clerbaux, C., Hurtmans, D., and Coheur, P.-F.: Version 2 of the IASI NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M321" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> neural network retrieval algorithm: near-real-time and reanalysed datasets, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4905–4914, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4905-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-10-4905-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., Whitburn, S., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans, D.,
Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: Industrial and agricultural ammonia point
sources exposed, Nature, 564, 99–103, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0747-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41586-018-0747-1</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., Franco, B., Sutton, M. A., Erisman, J. W.,
Kruit, R. J. W., van Zanten, M., Whitburn, S., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans,
D., Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P. F.: Global, regional and national trends of
atmospheric ammonia derived from a decadal (2008–2018) satellite record,
Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 055017, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd5e0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/abd5e0</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, T., Song, Y., Xu, Z., Liu, M., Xu, T., Liao, W., Yin, L., Cai, X., Kang, L., Zhang, H., and Zhu, T.: Why is the Indo-Gangetic Plain the region with the largest NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M322" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> column in the globe during pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8727–8736, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8727-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-8727-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Warner, J. X., Wei, Z., Strow, L. L., Dickerson, R. R., and Nowak, J. B.: The global tropospheric ammonia distribution as seen in the 13-year AIRS measurement record, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5467–5479, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5467-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5467-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Warner, J. X., Dickerson, R. R., Wei, Z., Strow, L. L., Wang, Y., and Liang,
Q.: Increased atmospheric ammonia over the world's major agricultural areas
detected from space, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2875–2884,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl072305" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016gl072305</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Whitburn, S., Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., Bauduin, S., Heald, C. L.,
Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans, D., Zondlo, M. A., Clerbaux, C., and Coheur,
P.-F.: A flexible and robust neural network IASI-NH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M323" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval algorithm,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 6581–6599,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd024828" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016jd024828</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, J., Zhang, Z., Wei, C., Lu, F., and Guo, Q.: Introducing the new
generation of Chinese geostationary weather satellites, Fengyun-4, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 98, 1637–1658, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0065.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0065.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zeng, Z.-C.: Updated Ammonia (NH3) retrievals from GIIRS onboard FY-4B, Version V3, Peking University Open Research Data Platform [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.18170/DVN/VJ4MLO" ext-link-type="DOI">10.18170/DVN/VJ4MLO</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zeng, Z.-C., Zhang, Q., Natraj, V., Margolis, J. S., Shia, R.-L., Newman, S., Fu, D., Pongetti, T. J., Wong, K. W., Sander, S. P., Wennberg, P. O., and Yung, Y. L.: Aerosol scattering effects on water vapor retrievals over the Los Angeles Basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2495–2508, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2495-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-2495-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zeng, Z.-C., Natraj, V., Xu, F., Chen, S., Gong, F.-Y., Pongetti, T. J., Sung, K., Toon, G., Sander, S. P., and Yung, Y. L.: GFIT3: a full physics retrieval algorithm for remote sensing of greenhouse gases in the presence of aerosols, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6483–6507, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6483-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-14-6483-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zeng, Z.-C., Lee, L., and Qi, C.: Diurnal carbon monoxide observed from a geostationary infrared hyperspectral sounder: first result from GIIRS on board FengYun-4B, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3059–3083, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3059-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-16-3059-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhu, L., Henze, D., Bash, J., Jeong, G.-R., Cady-Pereira, K., Shephard, M., Luo, M., Paulot, F., and Capps, S.: Global evaluation of ammonia bidirectional exchange and livestock diurnal variation schemes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12823–12843, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12823-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-15-12823-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zoogman, P., Liu, X., Suleiman, R., Pennington, W., Flittner, D., Al-Saadi,
J., Hilton, B., Nicks, D., Newchurch, M., Carr, J., Janz, S., Andraschko,
M., Arola, A., Baker, B., Canova, B., Miller, C. C., Cohen, R., Davis, J.,
Dussault, M., Edwards, D., Fishman, J., Ghulam, A., Abad, G. G., Grutter,
M., Herman, J., Houck, J., Jacob, D., Joiner, J., Kerridge, B., Kim, J.,
Krotkov, N., Lamsal, L., Li, C., Lindfors, A., Martin, R., McElroy, C.,
McLinden, C., Natraj, V., Neil, D., Nowlan, C., O'Sullivan, E., Palmer, P.,
Pierce, R., Pippin, M., Saiz-Lopez, A., Spurr, R., Szykman, J., Torres, O.,
Veefkind, J., Veihelmann, B., Wang, H., Wang, J., and Chance, K.:
Tropospheric emissions: Monitoring of pollution (TEMPO), J. Quant.
Spectrosc. Ra., 186, 17–39, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.05.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.05.008</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Optimal estimation retrieval of tropospheric ammonia from the Geostationary Interferometric Infrared Sounder on board FengYun-4B</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Abbatt, J. P. D., Benz, S., Cziczo, D. J., Kanji, Z., Lohmann, U., and
Mohler, O.: Solid ammonium sulfate aerosols as ice nuclei: A pathway for
cirrus cloud formation, Science, 313, 1770–1773, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129726" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129726</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Aneja, V. P., Roelle, P. A., Murray, G. C., Southerland, J., Erisman, J. W.,
Fowler, D., Asman, W. A. H., and Patni, N.: Atmospheric nitrogen compounds:
II. Emissions, transport, transformation, deposition and assessment, Atmos.
Environ., 35, 1903–1911, 2001.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bauduin, S., Clarisse, L., Theunissen, M., George, M., Hurtmans, D.,
Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: IASI's sensitivity to near-surface carbon
monoxide (CO): Theoretical analyses and retrievals on test cases, J. Quant.
Spectrosc. Ra., 189, 428–440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.12.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.12.022</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Beer, R., Shephard, M. W., Kulawik, S. S., Clough, S. A., Eldering, A.,
Bowman, K. W., Sander, S. P., Fisher, B. M., Payne, V. H., Luo, M.,
Osterman, G. B., and Worden, J. R.: First satellite observations of lower
tropospheric ammonia and methanol, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L09801, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033642" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2008GL033642</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clarisse, L., Clerbaux, C., Dentener, F., Hurtmans, D., and Coheur, P.-F.:
Global ammonia distribution derived from infrared satellite observations,
Nat. Geosci., 2, 479–483, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo551" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo551</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clarisse, L., Shephard, M., Dentener, F., Hurtmans, D., Cady-Pereira, K.,
Karagulian, F., Van Damme, M., Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: Satellite
monitoring of ammonia: A case study of the San Joaquin Valley, J. Geophys.
Res., 115, D13302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013291" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013291</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clarisse, L., Van Damme, M., Hurtmans, D., Franco, B., Clerbaux, C., and
Coheur, P. F.: The diel cycle of NH3 observed from the FY-4A Geostationary
Interferometric Infrared Sounder (GIIRS), Geophys. Res. Lett., 48,
e2021GL093010, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093010</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clarisse, L., Franco, B., Van Damme, M., Di Gioacchino, T., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Whitburn, S., Noppen, L., Hurtmans, D., Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P.: The IASI NH3 version 4 product: averaging kernels and improved consistency, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. [preprint], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-48" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-48</a>, in review, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clough, S. A., Shephard, M. W., Mlawer, E. J., Delamere, J. S., Iacono, M. J., Cady-Pereira, K., Boukabara, S., and Brown, P. D.: Atmospheric radiative
transfer modeling: a summary of the AER codes, Short Communication, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 91, 233–244, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Clough, S. A., Shephard, M. W., Worden, J., Brown, P. D., Worden, H. M.,
Luo, M., Rodgers, C. D., Rinsland, C. P., Goldman, A., and Brown, L.:
Forward model and Jacobians for tropospheric emission spectrometer
retrievals, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 44, 1308–1323, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Coheur, P.-F., Clarisse, L., Turquety, S., Hurtmans, D., and Clerbaux, C.:
IASI measurements of reactive trace species in biomass burning plumes,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 5655–5667, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5655-2009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-5655-2009</a>,
2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Copernicus Atmosphere Data Store: <a href="https://ads.atmosphere.copernicus.eu/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 May 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Copernicus Climate Data Store: <a href="https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 May 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
ECMWF: CAMS global inversion-optimised greenhouse gas fluxes and
concentrations, ECMWF [data set], <a href="https://ads.atmosphere.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#!/dataset/cams-global-greenhouse-gas-inversion" target="_blank"/> (last access: 1 May 2023), 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Erisman, J. W., Galloway, J. N., Seitzinger, S., Bleeker, A., Dise, N. B.,
Petrescu, A. M. R., Leach, A. M., and de Vries, W.: Consequences of human
modification of the global nitrogen cycle, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 368, 20130116, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0116" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0116</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
FengYun Atmospheric Composition Data Portal: <a href="http://fengyun.pku.edu.cn/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 August 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
FengYun Satellite Data Center: <a href="http://satellite.nsmc.org.cn/portalsite/default.aspx" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 May 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fowler, D., Coyle, M., Skiba, U., Sutton, M. A., Cape, J. N., Reis, S.,
Sheppard, L. J., Jenkins, A., Grizzetti, B., Galloway, J. N., Vitousek, P.,
Leach, A., Bouwman, A. F., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Dentener, F., Stevenson, D.,
Amann, M., and Voss, M.: The global nitrogen cycle in the twenty-first
century, Philos. T. R. Soc. B, 368, 20130164, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0164" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0164</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Galloway, J. N., Dentener, F. J., Capone, D. G., Boyer, E. W., Howarth, R.
W., Seitzinger, S. P., Asner, G. P., Cleveland, C. C., Green, P. A., and
Holland, E. A.: Nitrogen cycles: past, present, and future, Biogeochemistry,
70, 153–226, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO): GEOS Composition Forecasts (GEOS-CF),  <a href="https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/weather_prediction/GEOS-CF/data_access/" target="_blank"/>,  last access: 1 May 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D.,
Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P.,
Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D.,
Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer,
A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R. J., Hólm, E., Janisková,
M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay,
P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5
global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Holmlund, K., Grandell, J., Schmetz, J., Stuhlmann, R., Bojkov, B., Munro,
R., Lekouara, M., Coppens, D., Viticchie, B., August, T., Theodore, B.,
Watts, P., Dobber, M., Fowler, G., Bojinski, S., Schmid, A., Salonen, K.,
Tjemkes, S., Aminou, D., and Blythe, P.: Meteosat Third Generation (MTG):
Continuation and innovation of observations from geostationary orbit, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 102, E990–E1015, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0304.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-19-0304.1</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Höpfner, M., Volkamer, R., Grabowski, U., Grutter, M., Orphal, J., Stiller, G., von Clarmann, T., and Wetzel, G.: First detection of ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) in the Asian summer monsoon upper troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 14357–14369, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14357-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-14357-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hurtmans, D., Coheur, P.-F., Wespes, C., Clarisse, L., Scharf, O., Clerbaux,
C., Hadji-Lazaro, J., George, M., and Turquety, S.: FORLI radiative transfer
and retrieval code for IASI, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 113, 1391–1408,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.02.036" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2012.02.036</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
IASI AERIS database portal: <a href="https://iasi.aeris-data.fr/nh3/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 May 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ingmann, P., Veihelmann, B., Langen, J., Lamarre, D., Stark, H., and
Courrèges- Lacoste, G. B.: Requirements for the GMES atmosphere service and ESA's implementation concept: Sentinels-4/-5 and -5p, Remote Sens. Environ., 120, 58–69, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.01.023</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Isaksen, I. S. A., Granier, C., Myhre, G., Berntsen, T. K., Dalsoren, S. B.,
Gauss, M., Klimont, Z., Benestad, R., Bousquet, P., Collins, W., Cox, T.,
Eyring, V., Fowler, D., Fuzzi, S., Jockel, P., Laj, P., Lohmann, U., Maione,
M., Monks, P., Prevot, A. S. H., Raes, F., Richter, A., Rognerud, B.,
Schulz, M., Shindell, D., Stevenson, D. S., Storelvmo, T., Wang, W. C., van
Weele, M., Wild, M., and Wuebbles, D.: Atmospheric composition change:
Climate-Chemistry interactions, Atmos. Environ., 43, 5138–5192,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.08.003</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Keller, C. A., Knowland, K. E., Duncan, B. N., Liu, J., Anderson, D. C.,
Das, S., Lucchesi, R. A., Lundgren, E. W., Nicely, J. M., Nielsen, E., Ott,
L. E., Saunders, E., Strode, S. A., Wales, P. A., Jacob, D. J., and Pawson,
S.: Description of the NASA GEOS Composition Forecast Modeling System
GEOS-CF v1.0, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sy., 13, e2020MS002413,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002413" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020MS002413</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kim, J., Jeong, U., Ahn, M. H., Kim, J. H., Park, R. J., Lee, H., Song, C.
H., Choi, Y. S., Lee, K. H., Yoo, J. M., Jeong, M. J., Park, S. K., Lee, K.
M., Song, C. K., Kim, S. W., Kim, Y. J., Kim, S. W., Kim, M., Go, S., Liu,
X., Chance, K., Miller, C. C., Al-Saadi, J., Veihelmann, B., Bhartia, P. K.,
Torres, O., Abad, G. G., Haffner, D. P., Ko, D. H., Lee, S. H., Woo, J. H.,
Chong, H., Park, S. S., Nicks, D., Choi, W. J., Moon, K. J., Cho, A., Yoon,
J., Kim, S. kyun, Hong, H., Lee, K., Lee, H., Lee, S., Choi, M., Veefkind,
P., Levelt, P. F., Edwards, D. P., Kang, M., Eo, M., Bak, J., Baek, K.,
Kwon, H. A., Yang, J., Park, J., Han, K. M., Kim, B. R., Shin, H. W., Choi,
H., Lee, E., Chong, J., Cha, Y., Koo, J. H., Irie, H., Hayashida, S., Kasai,
Y., Kanaya, Y., Liu, C., Lin, J., Crawford, J. H., Carmichael, G. R.,
Newchurch, M. J., Lefer, B. L., Herman, J. R., Swap, R. J., Lau, A. K. H.,
Kurosu, T. P., Jaross, G., Ahlers, B., Dobber, M., McElroy, C. T. and Choi,
Y.: New era of air quality monitoring from space: Geostationary environment
monitoring spectrometer (GEMS), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 101, E1–E22,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0013.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0013.1</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, J., Menzel, W. P., Schmit, T. J., and Schmetz, J.: Applications of
Geostationary Hyperspectral Infrared Sounder Observations: Progress, Challenges, and Future Perspectives, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 103, E2733–E2755, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0328.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-21-0328.1</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Li, M., Zhang, Q., Kurokawa, J.-I., Woo, J.-H., He, K., Lu, Z., Ohara, T., Song, Y., Streets, D. G., Carmichael, G. R., Cheng, Y., Hong, C., Huo, H., Jiang, X., Kang, S., Liu, F., Su, H., and Zheng, B.: MIX: a mosaic Asian anthropogenic emission inventory under the international collaboration framework of the MICS-Asia and HTAP, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 935–963, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-935-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-935-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Meng, Z., Xu, X., Lin, W., Ge, B., Xie, Y., Song, B., Jia, S., Zhang, R., Peng, W., Wang, Y., Cheng, H., Yang, W., and Zhao, H.: Role of ambient ammonia in particulate ammonium formation at a rural site in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 167–184, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-167-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-167-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Natraj, V., Luo, M., Blavier, J.-F., Payne, V. H., Posselt, D. J., Sander, S. P., Zeng, Z.-C., Neu, J. L., Tremblay, D., Wu, L., Roman, J. A., Wu, Y.-H., and Dorsky, L. I.: Simulated multispectral temperature and atmospheric composition retrievals for the JPL GEO-IR Sounder, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 15, 1251–1267, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1251-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-1251-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Paerl, H. W., Gardner, W. S., McCarthy, M. J., Peierls, B. L., and Wilhelm,
S. W.: Algal blooms: Noteworthy nitrogen, Science, 346, 175–175, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1126/science.346.6206.175-a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.346.6206.175-a</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rodgers, C. D.: Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and
Practice, World Scientific, Singapore, ISBN:&thinsp;978-98102-2740-1, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seemann, S. W., Borbas, E. E., Knuteson, R. O., Stephenson, G. R., and
Huang, H.-L.: Development of a Global Infrared Land Surface Emissivity
Database for Application to Clear Sky Sounding Retrievals from
Multi-spectral Satellite Radiance Measurements, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim.,
47, 108–123, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1590.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1590.1</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change, John Wiley, New York, ISBN:&thinsp;978-1-118-94740-1, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shephard, M. W. and Cady-Pereira, K. E.: Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) satellite observations of tropospheric ammonia, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1323–1336, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1323-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-1323-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shephard, M. W., Cady-Pereira, K. E., Luo, M., Henze, D. K., Pinder, R. W., Walker, J. T., Rinsland, C. P., Bash, J. O., Zhu, L., Payne, V. H., and Clarisse, L.: TES ammonia retrieval strategy and global observations of the spatial and seasonal variability of ammonia, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 10743–10763, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10743-2011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-10743-2011</a>, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Shephard, M. W., Dammers, E., Cady-Pereira, K. E., Kharol, S. K., Thompson, J., Gainariu-Matz, Y., Zhang, J., McLinden, C. A., Kovachik, A., Moran, M., Bittman, S., Sioris, C. E., Griffin, D., Alvarado, M. J., Lonsdale, C., Savic-Jovcic, V., and Zheng, Q.: Ammonia measurements from space with the Cross-track Infrared Sounder: characteristics and applications, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 2277–2302, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2277-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-2277-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Someya, Y., Imasu, R., Shiomi, K., and Saitoh, N.: Atmospheric ammonia retrieval from the TANSO-FTS/GOSAT thermal infrared sounder, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 309–321, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-309-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-309-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tevlin, A. G., Li, Y., Collett, J. L., McDuffie, E. E., Fischer, E. V., and
Murphy, J. G.: Tall Tower Vertical Profiles and Diurnal Trends of Ammonia in
the Colorado Front Range, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 122, 12468–12487,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026534" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JD026534</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
UW-Madison Baseline Fit Emissivity Database: <a href="https://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/iremis/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 1 May 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., Heald, C. L., Hurtmans, D., Ngadi, Y., Clerbaux, C., Dolman, A. J., Erisman, J. W., and Coheur, P. F.: Global distributions, time series and error characterization of atmospheric ammonia (NH<sub>3</sub>) from IASI satellite observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2905–2922, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2905-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2905-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Damme, M., Whitburn, S., Clarisse, L., Clerbaux, C., Hurtmans, D., and Coheur, P.-F.: Version 2 of the IASI NH<sub>3</sub> neural network retrieval algorithm: near-real-time and reanalysed datasets, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 10, 4905–4914, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4905-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-10-4905-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., Whitburn, S., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans, D.,
Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P.-F.: Industrial and agricultural ammonia point
sources exposed, Nature, 564, 99–103, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0747-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0747-1</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., Franco, B., Sutton, M. A., Erisman, J. W.,
Kruit, R. J. W., van Zanten, M., Whitburn, S., Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans,
D., Clerbaux, C., and Coheur, P. F.: Global, regional and national trends of
atmospheric ammonia derived from a decadal (2008–2018) satellite record,
Environ. Res. Lett., 16, 055017, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd5e0" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd5e0</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, T., Song, Y., Xu, Z., Liu, M., Xu, T., Liao, W., Yin, L., Cai, X., Kang, L., Zhang, H., and Zhu, T.: Why is the Indo-Gangetic Plain the region with the largest NH<sub>3</sub> column in the globe during pre-monsoon and monsoon seasons?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 8727–8736, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8727-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-8727-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Warner, J. X., Wei, Z., Strow, L. L., Dickerson, R. R., and Nowak, J. B.: The global tropospheric ammonia distribution as seen in the 13-year AIRS measurement record, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5467–5479, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5467-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5467-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Warner, J. X., Dickerson, R. R., Wei, Z., Strow, L. L., Wang, Y., and Liang,
Q.: Increased atmospheric ammonia over the world's major agricultural areas
detected from space, Geophys. Res. Lett., 44, 2875–2884,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl072305" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016gl072305</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Whitburn, S., Van Damme, M., Clarisse, L., Bauduin, S., Heald, C. L.,
Hadji-Lazaro, J., Hurtmans, D., Zondlo, M. A., Clerbaux, C., and Coheur,
P.-F.: A flexible and robust neural network IASI-NH<sub>3</sub> retrieval algorithm,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 121, 6581–6599,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd024828" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016jd024828</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, J., Zhang, Z., Wei, C., Lu, F., and Guo, Q.: Introducing the new
generation of Chinese geostationary weather satellites, Fengyun-4, B. Am.
Meteorol. Soc., 98, 1637–1658, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0065.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0065.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zeng, Z.-C.: Updated Ammonia (NH3) retrievals from GIIRS onboard FY-4B, Version V3, Peking University Open Research Data Platform [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.18170/DVN/VJ4MLO" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.18170/DVN/VJ4MLO</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zeng, Z.-C., Zhang, Q., Natraj, V., Margolis, J. S., Shia, R.-L., Newman, S., Fu, D., Pongetti, T. J., Wong, K. W., Sander, S. P., Wennberg, P. O., and Yung, Y. L.: Aerosol scattering effects on water vapor retrievals over the Los Angeles Basin, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 2495–2508, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2495-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-2495-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zeng, Z.-C., Natraj, V., Xu, F., Chen, S., Gong, F.-Y., Pongetti, T. J., Sung, K., Toon, G., Sander, S. P., and Yung, Y. L.: GFIT3: a full physics retrieval algorithm for remote sensing of greenhouse gases in the presence of aerosols, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 14, 6483–6507, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6483-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-14-6483-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zeng, Z.-C., Lee, L., and Qi, C.: Diurnal carbon monoxide observed from a geostationary infrared hyperspectral sounder: first result from GIIRS on board FengYun-4B, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 16, 3059–3083, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3059-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-16-3059-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhu, L., Henze, D., Bash, J., Jeong, G.-R., Cady-Pereira, K., Shephard, M., Luo, M., Paulot, F., and Capps, S.: Global evaluation of ammonia bidirectional exchange and livestock diurnal variation schemes, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 15, 12823–12843, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12823-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-12823-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zoogman, P., Liu, X., Suleiman, R., Pennington, W., Flittner, D., Al-Saadi,
J., Hilton, B., Nicks, D., Newchurch, M., Carr, J., Janz, S., Andraschko,
M., Arola, A., Baker, B., Canova, B., Miller, C. C., Cohen, R., Davis, J.,
Dussault, M., Edwards, D., Fishman, J., Ghulam, A., Abad, G. G., Grutter,
M., Herman, J., Houck, J., Jacob, D., Joiner, J., Kerridge, B., Kim, J.,
Krotkov, N., Lamsal, L., Li, C., Lindfors, A., Martin, R., McElroy, C.,
McLinden, C., Natraj, V., Neil, D., Nowlan, C., O'Sullivan, E., Palmer, P.,
Pierce, R., Pippin, M., Saiz-Lopez, A., Spurr, R., Szykman, J., Torres, O.,
Veefkind, J., Veihelmann, B., Wang, H., Wang, J., and Chance, K.:
Tropospheric emissions: Monitoring of pollution (TEMPO), J. Quant.
Spectrosc. Ra., 186, 17–39, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.05.008" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2016.05.008</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
