<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-16-4757-2023</article-id><title-group><article-title>Effect of land–sea air mass transport on spatiotemporal  distributions of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing <?xmltex \hack{\break}?>ratios over the southern Yellow Sea</article-title><alt-title>Effect of air mass transport on distribution of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="bold">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Effect of air mass transport on distribution of CO${}_{\mathbf{2}}$ and CH${}_{\mathbf{4}}$}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J. Li et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Li</surname><given-names>Jiaxin</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Zang</surname><given-names>Kunpeng</given-names></name>
          <email>zangkunpeng@zjut.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lin</surname><given-names>Yi</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chen</surname><given-names>Yuanyuan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Liu</surname><given-names>Shuo</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Qiu</surname><given-names>Shanshan</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Kai</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Qing</surname><given-names>Xuemei</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Xiong</surname><given-names>Haoyu</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Hong</surname><given-names>Haixiang</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff2 aff4">
          <name><surname>Fang</surname><given-names>Shuangxi</given-names></name>
          <email>fangsx@zjut.edu.cn</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Xu</surname><given-names>Honghui</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff5">
          <name><surname>Jiang</surname><given-names>Yujun</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>College of Environmental and Resources Sciences, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Zhejiang Carbon Neutral Innovation Institute, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>National Marine Environmental Monitoring Center, Dalian, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters (CIC-FEMD),<?xmltex \hack{\break}?> Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff5"><label>5</label><institution>Zhejiang Meteorological Science Institute, Hangzhou, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Kunpeng Zang (zangkunpeng@zjut.edu.cn) and Shuangxi Fang (fangsx@zjut.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>20</day><month>October</month><year>2023</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>16</volume>
      <issue>20</issue>
      <fpage>4757</fpage><lpage>4768</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>13</day><month>January</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>15</day><month>May</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>17</day><month>August</month><year>2023</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>29</day><month>August</month><year>2023</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2023 </copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2023</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d1e258">To reveal the spatiotemporal distributions of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios and regulation mechanisms over the China shelf sea, two field surveys were conducted in the southern Yellow Sea in China in November 2012 and June 2013, respectively. The results observed showed that mean background atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were 403.94 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppm and 1924.8 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppb in November 2012 and 395.90 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppm and 1918.0 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppb in June 2013, respectively. An improved data-filtering method was optimised and established to flag atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emission from different sources in the survey area. We found that the spatiotemporal distributions of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios over the southern Yellow Sea were dominated by land–sea air mass transport, which was mainly driven by seasonal monsoon, while the influence of air–sea exchange was negligible. In addition, atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios over the southern Yellow Sea could be elevated remarkably at a distance of approximately 20 km offshore by land-to-sea air mass transportation from the Asian continent during the early-winter monsoon.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Key Research and Development Program of China</funding-source>
<award-id>2020YFA0607501</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs2">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42275113</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs3">
<funding-source>Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province</funding-source>
<award-id>LZJMZ23D050002</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs4">
<funding-source>Key Laboratory of Global Change and Marine-Atmospheric Chemistry</funding-source>
<award-id>GCMAC2001</award-id>
</award-group>
<award-group id="gs5">
<funding-source>Basic Public Welfare Research Program of Zhejiang Province</funding-source>
<award-id>LGF22D050004</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

      <?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e404">Carbon dioxide (CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) and methane (CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) are the two most important greenhouse gases, playing critical roles in Earth's radiation balance (NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, 2014; WMO, 2022). Since the Industrial Revolution era (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mo lspace="0mm">∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1750), atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios have been increasing, reaching their highest values of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">415.7</mml:mn><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm and 1908 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppb in 2021, which were about 149 % and 262 % of the preindustrial levels (WMO, 2022). Increasing atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were unequivocally attributed to anthropogenic emissions, e.g. industrial production, deforestation, fossil fuel consumption (Huang et al., 2003; Peters et al., 2012) and natural source–sink processes (Zang et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e491">For decades, spatiotemporal distributions of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios have attracted more and more attention from the science community. Shipborne observation was considered as one of six common and important methods for observing greenhouse gases (Matsueda et al., 1996; Daube et al., 2002; Dlugokencky et al., 2005; Crosson, 2008; Fang et al., 2015). Based on discrete shipborne sampling and measurement, the latitudinal distribution of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios with a sharp drop in the area of 20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N in marine boundary air of the North Pacific Ocean was reported and was mainly influenced by air mass transportation driven by both<?pagebreak page4758?> the winter monsoon and trade winds (Matsueda et al., 1996; Dlugokencky et al., 2005). In the coastal area of the Bohai Sea, seasonal variations in atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O mixing ratios were mainly influenced by land–sea air mass transportation based on discrete sampling observation (Kong et al., 2010). Moreover, periodically observed CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in marine boundary air were also used to improve the accuracy of calculated air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux in the northern South China Sea and the Luzon Strait (Zhai, 2015) and assess impacts of several episodic oil and gas spill events on abnormal air–sea CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux in the Bohai Sea (Zhang et al., 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e594">In recent years, a high-accuracy and high-resolution continuous shipborne observation method has been developed and applied to observe greenhouse gases in marine boundary air (Nara et al., 2014; Zang et al., 2017; Riddick et al., 2019), which could reveal more detailed information associated with their source–sink processes. Latitudinal distributions of both CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the China shelf sea boundary air in early spring were observed and were similar to those in the North Pacific Ocean (Matsueda et al., 1996; Zang et al., 2017) and mainly impacted by atmospheric chemical processes, air–sea interaction in the Yangtze River estuary area and land–sea air mass transportation (Zang et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018). Meanwhile, peak values of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the downwind area of offshore oil and gas platforms, which were recognised as hotspot sources of greenhouse gases, were observed by continuous shipborne measurement systems in the North Sea, the South China Sea and the Bohai Sea. Combined with the Gaussian plume model, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions could be quantified via a “top-down” approach (Nara et al., 2014; Riddick et al., 2019; Zang et al., 2020).</p>
      <p id="d1e642">Monsoons are a kind of climatic phenomenon in which the dominant wind system changes with seasons (Lyu et al., 2021). The East Asian Monsoon (EAM), comprising the East Asian Summer Monsoon (EASM) and East Asian Winter Monsoon (EAWM), is an important component of the Earth's climate system and significantly influences the socioeconomic, agricultural and cultural development of East Asia (Huang, 1985; Zou et al., 2018; Lyu et al., 2021). Previous studies have shown that the East Asian Monsoon played an important role in global and regional climate variability (Huang, 1985; Chang et al., 2000; Ding et al., 2007; Zhan and Li, 2008). On the one hand, spatiotemporal distributions of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in marine boundary air were influenced by multiple processes, such as land–sea air mass transport (Bartlett et al., 2003; Zang et al., 2017), ship emission (Warneke et al., 2005; Law et al., 2013; Bouman et al., 2017; Ding et al., 2018), and oil and gas platforms (Nara et al., 2014; Reddick et al., 2019; Zang et al., 2020). On the other hand, greenhouse gases have been observed and studied in East Asia and the Pacific Ocean based on land (island)-based stations (Fang et al., 2015, 2017) and ship and plane observation platforms for many years (Matsueda et al., 1996; Bartlett et al., 2003; Dlugokencky et al., 2005). However, as an important pathway of atmospheric-component transportation between the Asian continent and Pacific Ocean, spatiotemporal distributions and regulation mechanisms of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the China shelf sea boundary air were still rare (Zhang et al., 2007; Zang et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e682">In this study, atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in boundary air of the southern Yellow Sea (SYS) were simultaneously observed by a self-assembled shipborne CRDS (cavity ring-down spectroscopy; Picarro G2301, USA) system in November 2012 and June 2013, typical periods of the EASM and the EAWM. The major objectives of this work were (1) to optimise an improved data-filtering approach for continuous mobile shipborne observation of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios, (2) to investigate the influence of air–sea exchange on the spatiotemporal distributions of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios, and (3) to reveal the regulating mechanisms of the seasonal monsoon on spatiotemporal distributions of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in marine boundary air of the SYS during the field surveys.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Method and materials</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Observation area</title>
      <p id="d1e773">The Yellow Sea is a semi-enclosed marginal sea, located on the western part of the Pacific Ocean, adjacent to China to the north and west and the Korean Peninsula to the east (Zhang and Chu, 2018; Wang  and Zhai, 2021). It is a main pathway of air mass transport between the Asian continent and Pacific Ocean and can be divided into two basins: the northern Yellow Sea (NYS) and the SYS (Lyu et al., 2021). The SYS covers an area of about <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10.8</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, with an average depth of 44 m, and is strongly influenced by the EAM system (Zou et al., 2018). As shown in Fig. 1, to study the distributions of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios and their regulation mechanisms, two campaigns were conducted from 2 to 8 November 2012 and from 22 to 29 June 2013, respectively, the typical periods of the EAM (including the summer monsoon and winter monsoon). In order to ensure the comparability of observations, parallel observed CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data from the three land (island)-based stations (LAN: Lin'an station; JGS: Jeju Gosan station; TAP: Tae-ahn Peninsula station) located in the vicinity are presented and studied in this study.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e839">Observation area in the SYS. The thick solid black lines represent cruise tracks in November 2012 <bold>(a)</bold> and June 2013 <bold>(b)</bold>. Symbols represent the Tae-ahn Peninsula station (TAP; 36.73<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 126.13<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 20 m a.s.l.), Jeju Gosan station (JGS; 33.30<inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 126.20<inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 25 m a.s.l.) and Lin'an station (LAN; 30.18<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 119.44<inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E; 138 m a.s.l.), respectively (<uri>https://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/dv/site/site_table.html</uri>, last access: 26 October 2022). ECS represents the East China Sea. The red crosses represent the beginning locations of each natural day.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/4757/2023/amt-16-4757-2023-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Measurement of atmospheric CO${}_{{2}}$ and CH${}_{{4}}$ mixing ratios}?><title>Measurement of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios</title>
      <p id="d1e939">As shown in Fig. 2a, during the field surveys, the air inlet was fixed at the highest point of the bow, about 10 m a.s.l. (above sea level), and near the meteorological sensors to avoid anthropogenic contamination (Zang et al., 2017). Atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M70" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were measured by using a self-assembled Picarro system (G2301, Picarro Inc., USA). The<?pagebreak page4759?> Picarro analyser, which can acquire one measurement every 5 s and correct the measurements influenced by water vapour (Rella et al., 2013), has been proven to be excellent for measuring CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> with high precision and accuracy (Crosson, 2008; Fang et al., 2013).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e980">The RV <italic>Dongfanghong II</italic> <bold>(a)</bold>. Schematic diagram of the shipborne Picarro system for observing atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=355.659449pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/4757/2023/amt-16-4757-2023-f02.jpg"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1016">As shown in Fig. 2b, ambient air was pumped via the dedicated tube by an external vacuum pump and passed through a membrane filter (1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, Whatman Inc., USA), a drying tube filled with magnesium perchlorate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ClO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and another filter, respectively, to remove particles and water vapour. Then, it was regulated by valve sequence setting with a dry and clean air sample as well as the standard gases flowed into the CRDS analyser through an eight-port, multi-position valve (Valco Instruments Co. Inc. USA) with a flow rate of 200 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> controlled by a mass flow controller (Beijing Seven-star electronics Co. LTD. China). Before and after each campaign, the CRDS analyser was calibrated to guarantee its normal operation status. During field surveys, three standard gases were automatically measured in sequence each day, which was regulated by the CRDS analyser. Linear functions were yielded based on measurement results and standard values of three standard gases, i.e. 254.53 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppm, 365.14 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.06</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppm and 569.99 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.08</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppm for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and 1601.0 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppb, 1925.5 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppb and 2317.7 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppb for CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively, which were used to calibrate the observed data. The standard gases used were propagated from the WMO primary standards (World Meteorological Organization, WMO, Global Atmospheric Watch, GAW, 2004 scale for CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, 2007 scale for CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) to guarantee the consistency, traceability and international comparability of observed data (Dlugokencky et al., 2005).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>Meteorological data</title>
      <p id="d1e1171">Both of the campaigns were conducted by a ship named  RV <italic>Dongfanghong II</italic>, which was designed for research in multiple disciplines in marine environments with a ship-based atmospheric science lab. Meteorological data, including time, latitude, longitude, cruising speed and direction, wind speed, wind direction, relative humidity, air pressure, and temperature, were observed by the meteorological sensors (RM Young, USA) with a resolution of 10 s and were used to filter and flag the observed CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios and verify simulated wind fields.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Air mass transport model</title>
      <p id="d1e1203">HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory model) was developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Air Resources Laboratory (NOAA-ARL) and the Bureau of Meteorology of Australia and can simulate the air mass transportation combined with the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) reanalysis data. The principle of simulating the air mass transportation path is as follows: assuming that particles in the air are floating in the wind, their moving trajectory is the integral of their position vectors in time and space (Zhang et al., 2011; Xia et al., 2018). Backward trajectory analysis uses the mixed single-particle Lagrangian integral transport and diffusion model to calculate the transport route of air<?pagebreak page4760?> particles, analyse the influence of air mass transportation on the spatial and temporal distribution of atmospheric components in the observation area by tracking the transport path, and infer their potential sources. The main parameters required to calculate the backward trajectory are the altitude, latitude and longitude of the starting point. Generally, the calculation is carried for 72 h (Zhan et al., 2009; Zhang et al., 2017, 2019).</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <label>3.1</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Atmospheric CO${}_{{2}}$ and CH${}_{{4}}$ mixing ratios}?><title>Atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios</title>
      <p id="d1e1241">Generally, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios decrease with increasing altitude and distance away from continent and decreasing latitude (Matsueda et al., 1996; Bartlett et al., 2003; Zang et al., 2017). Spatiotemporal distributions of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in shelf seas suggest not only natural characteristics, but also multiple anthropogenic processes, such as marine oil and gas exploration (Nara et al., 2014; Zang et al., 2020), land–sea air mass transportation (Kong et al., 2010; Liu et al., 2018), and malfunction of observation instruments (Zang et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e1280">During the two field surveys, atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios ranged from 392.75 to 688.10 ppm in November 2012 (Fig. 3a and b) and ranged from 389.28 to 967.60 ppm in June 2013 (Fig. 3c and d), respectively. Atmospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios ranged from 1870.6 to 1986.0 ppb in November 2012 (Fig. 4a and b) and ranged from 1820.8 to 2179.0 ppb in June 2013 (Fig. 4c and d), respectively. Atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were comparable with the historical observation results of the Northern Hemisphere (Matsueda et al., 1996; Zang et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018). Abnormally high observation values were attributed to exhaust gases of ships or anthropogenic interference of analysers.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e1321">Temporal <bold>(a, c)</bold> and spatial <bold>(b, d)</bold> distribution of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M101" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in November 2012 and June 2013 in the SYS.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/4757/2023/amt-16-4757-2023-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e1348">Temporal <bold>(a, c)</bold> and spatial <bold>(b, d)</bold> distribution of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in November and June in the SYS.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/4757/2023/amt-16-4757-2023-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <label>3.2</label><title>Wind data</title>
      <?pagebreak page4761?><p id="d1e1380">Observed wind data were averaged to hourly data for subsequent analysis. As shown in Fig. 5a, during the survey of November 2012, hourly mean wind speed ranged from 0.05 to 20.46 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average value of 8.09 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.17</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The dominant wind direction was from the north and north-east, indicating that the air masses flowed from the Asian continent to the Pacific Ocean. As shown in Fig. 5c, during the survey of June 2013, hourly mean wind speed ranged from 0.08 to 9.42 m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an average value of 4.72 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) m s<inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Conversely, the predominant wind direction turned into south or south-east, which promoted air masses flowing from the Pacific Ocean to the Asian continent. In addition, the observed dominant wind directions (Fig. 5a and c) were consistent with the simulated wind fields (Fig. 5b and d), suggesting typical features of the winter and summer monsoon, which were ideal cases to study the effects of land–sea air mass transportation on the spatiotemporal variations in CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the MBL (marine boundary layer) of the SYS.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e1472">Observed wind direction and speed <bold>(a, c)</bold> and simulation of wind fields <bold>(b, d)</bold> over the SYS. The simulated wind fields were plotted based on the ERA5 hourly data on pressure levels provided by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) (<uri>https://cds.climate.copernicus.eu/cdsapp#\!/dataset/reanalysis-era5-pressure-levels?tab=form</uri>, last access: 4 November 2022).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/4757/2023/amt-16-4757-2023-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Data-filtering approach</title>
      <p id="d1e1507">Although some empirically based data processes have been reported (Zang et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018), a specific data-filtering approach for continuous shipborne observation needs to be optimised and established to distinguish impacts of multiple source–sink processes on observed shipborne atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios along the cruise tracks, especially in the shelf seas.</p>
      <p id="d1e1528">Firstly, observed atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios along the cruise tracks in November 2012 and June 2013 were calibrated by a linear function, averaged every 1 min and named “raw data” for the subsequent process.</p>
      <p id="d1e1549">Secondly, according to the voyage record, the abnormal values caused by malfunction of the instrument and impacted by manually refilling the drying tube were flagged (Zang et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e1552">Thirdly, when the ship stopped for oceanography investigation at discrete stations or cruised downwind with speeds lower than the wind speed, observed atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios might be impacted by the ship's exhaust gas and human activities (Zang et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018). Previous studies empirically considered 3 kn as the criterion to flag data influenced by the ship's exhaust gas and human activities (Zang et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018).</p>
      <p id="d1e1574">In this study, two station measurements are taken as examples, as shown in Fig. 6a and b; when the ship speed slowed down from a normal cruising speed of 11 kn to less than 3 kn, the observed CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio varied from a smooth pattern with a SD (standard deviation) value less than 0.10 ppm to an intensive fluctuation pattern with a SD value greater than 1.20 ppm due to influences of ship emissions and human activities. According to the quality control criteria of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> ppm), which was recommended by the WMO GAW (WMO, 2007), 3 kn was recognised as the threshold. Results showed that 15.5 % and 21.9 % of total observed data in November 2012 and June 2013, respectively, were flagged in this step.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><?xmltex \currentcnt{6}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d1e1607">Variations in observed CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M120" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios and ship speed from 20:40 (UTC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M121" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; applies to all the figures and text) on 28 June 2013 to 06:40 on 29 June 2013 <bold>(a)</bold> and 03:30 to 05:30 on 3 November 2012 <bold>(b)</bold>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/4757/2023/amt-16-4757-2023-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1641">Finally, the Pauta criterion (“3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>” method), a widely used data quality control approach in atmospheric greenhouse gas observation (Zhang et al., 2007; Fang et al., 2015; Zang et al., 2017), was introduced to filter and flag the non-background-measurement results. To optimise this process, observation data covered periods of 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 h as calculated, respectively. Any deviation between observed results and average values lying outside <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> SD was considered to be non-background data and should be flagged. This procedure was repeated until no outliers were identified (Zhang et al., 2007). The results showed that data calculated hourly<?pagebreak page4762?> were optimal because not only could dispersed values be flagged, but the data could also be kept smooth.</p>
      <p id="d1e1661">As shown in Fig. 7, based on the optimised approach, observed data could be filtered and flagged. The remaining data accounted for 79.5 % and 75.7 % of raw data in November 2012 and June 2013, respectively, and were considered to be background and used for further analysis.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{7}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d1e1666">Filtered results of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a, b)</bold> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(c, d)</bold> mixing ratios in November 2012 and June 2013. The ordinates of <bold>(a)</bold> and <bold>(b)</bold> are broken in the range of 450 to 1050 ppm. Black points represent the background data (Background). Blue points represent data influenced by replacing the dry tube that were manually flagged (Manual). Grey points represent the data influenced by ship emissions at low speed (less than 3 kn). Red points represent the data filtered out by the Pauta criterion (3<inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/4757/2023/amt-16-4757-2023-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e1714">Observed mean CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were 403.94 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">13.77</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppm and 395.90 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppm in November 2012 and June 2013, respectively, which were slightly lower than previous studies' mean values of 405 and 410 ppm in the SYS and ECS in March 2013 and March 2017, respectively (Zang et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018). Moreover, the observed mean atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio was almost equal to results observed at the TAP (401.37 ppm) and JGS (403.77 ppm) stations, but approximately 9 ppm higher than the MBL CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reference (394.41 to 394.78 ppm in the latitude zone of 30 to 37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) (<uri>https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/mbl/data.php</uri>, last access: 10 October 2022) in November 2012 and almost equal to results observed at the LAN (396.43 ppm) and JGS (398.10 ppm) stations and the MBL CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> reference (397.38 to 397.92 ppm in the latitude zone of 30 to 37<inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) in June 2013.</p>
      <p id="d1e1795">Observed mean CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were 1924.8 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">27.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppb and 1918.0 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">25.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) ppb in November 2012 and June 2013, respectively, which were slightly higher than historical data of 1915.5 ppb in the SYS in March 2013 (Zang et al., 2017) and higher than the MBL CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> references of November 2012 (1869.5 to 1880.3 ppb) and June 2013 (1835.3 to 1846.6 ppb).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Influence of air--sea exchange on distribution of atmospheric CO${}_{{2}}$ and CH${}_{{4}}$ mixing ratios}?><title>Influence of air–sea exchange on distribution of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios</title>
      <p id="d1e1863">Air–sea exchange is a dynamic process in which CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M141" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M142" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> molecules diffuse via the interface of surface seawater and overlying atmosphere. Sources and sinks of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M144" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mean they were emitted from or absorbed by seawater. In fact, the magnitude of air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M145" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange varied dramatically in spatial and temporal scale in coastal shallow seas (Yang et al., 2016; Gao et al., 2019). Generally, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emitted from the seawater into the air were difficult to trace by atmospheric measurements because they could dilute sharply (Schmale et al., 2005; Kourtidis et al., 2006; Zhai et al., 2014); only shallow seep areas and coastal regions could influence mixing ratios of local atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> directly and be measured (Leifer et al., 2006; Luo et al., 2015). Even though the dissolved CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M152" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were not observed in our field surveys, the published data showed that sea-to-air CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes were 6.0 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in November 2012 and 2.6 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) mmol m<inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> d<inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in June 2011 (Wang and Zhai, 2021), and sea-to-air CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes were 6.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in November 2002 and 15.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in June 2006 (Zhang et al., 2008), respectively, in the SYS.</p>
      <p id="d1e2119">To estimate the effects of air–sea exchange on mixing ratios of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, we used a simple method described by Kourtidis et al. (2006) and optimised by Zang et al. (2020): assuming a box located above the survey area with a ceiling of 10 m, corresponding to the height of the air inlet in our field surveys. The contents of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were only impacted by air–sea exchange. When CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M167" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M168" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were vented into or absorbed from the box, their mixing ratios would increase or decrease homogeneously, caused by the mean calculated results of sea-to-air CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M169" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes.</p>
      <p id="d1e2195">Generally, coastal shallow seas are sources of atmospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, accounting for approximately 75 % of global ocean emissions (Bange et al., 1994). However, according to the calculation formula given by Zang et al. (2020), a sea-to-air CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> flux of 50.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> could result in an increase of 2 ppb in the atmospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio in the MBL. Thus, the impacts of the reported mean sea-to-air CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes (6.4 and 15.7 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">mol</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in November 2002 and June 2006) on the atmospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> would not exceed 1 ppb (Zhang et al., 2008). In addition, based on the same method, the impacts of the reported mean sea-to-air CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes (Wang and Zhai, 2021) on the atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M179" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were calculated and were no more than 14.1 ppb. Thus, it was reasonable to conclude that influences of air–sea exchange on the distribution of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were low or negligible compared to the observed variability in atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (Figs. 3 and 4).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <label>4.3</label><?xmltex \opttitle{Influences of land--sea air mass transportation on spatiotemporal
distribution of atmospheric CO${}_{{2}}$ and CH${}_{{4}}$ mixing ratios}?><title>Influences of land–sea air mass transportation on spatiotemporal distribution of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios</title>
      <?pagebreak page4763?><p id="d1e2382">The EAWM is closely related to atmospheric-compound transportation from the Asian continent to the western Pacific (Yu et al., 2014). Since two surveys were conducted in November 2012 and June 2013, when the typical winter and summer monsoon seasons were in their early phases, respectively (Lyu et al., 2021), the observation data could give us an ideal opportunity to study the impacts of land-to-sea air mass transportation on spatiotemporal distribution of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios over the SYS. Observed atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were higher in November 2012 (Fig. 8) than in July 2013 (Fig. 9). Except for the Section 1 (S1) and the right end of Section 2 (S2), the spatial distributions showed a decreasing trend with the increase in offshore distance. (Fig. 8).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{8}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d1e2423">Spatial distributions of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the survey area in November 2012.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/4757/2023/amt-16-4757-2023-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{9}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d1e2453">Spatial distributions of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the survey area in July 2013.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/4757/2023/amt-16-4757-2023-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d1e2480">In-situ-observed data demonstrated that the dominant wind directions were W–NW–NNW for Sections S2, S3, S4 and S5 in November 2012, suggesting that the air masses were transported from the Asian continent to the Pacific Ocean (Fig. 5). Generally, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were higher on the continent than those of the MBL (Zhang et al., 2007; Zang et al., 2017; Liu et al., 2018). Land-to-sea air mass transportation driven by the EAWM could result in the horizontal transmission of greenhouse gases. Due to the subsequent mixing and dilution, CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios would decline along the route of wind transport (Bartlett et al., 2003; Kourtidis et al., 2006; Liu et al., 2018). Meanwhile, the mixing ratios of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> were low and homogeneous in Section S1 and the right end of Section 2 because the dominant wind directions were ENE–SE–S, indicating that air masses were transported from the open Pacific Ocean with low CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> content (Matsueda et al., 1996; Bartlett et al., 2003; Zang et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e2556">Furthermore, back-trajectory analysis showed that almost all the transport tracks originated from the Asian continent in November 2012 and the South China Sea and the western Pacific Ocean in July 2013 (typical characteristics of the early-summer monsoon) (Fig. 10), which resulted in higher atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M202" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M203" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in November 2012 (Fig. 8) than in July 2013 (Fig. 9). Seasonal variations in atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios were consistent with the variations in atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the western Pacific Ocean, where atmospheric-component distributions were dominated by maritime air masses from the Pacific Ocean and polluted air masses from the Asian continent (Matsueda et al., 1996; Zhang et al., 2007; Liu et al., 2018).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{10}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d1e2606">The 3 d air back trajectories of two typical locations <bold>(a)</bold> 35.00<inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 123.41<inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, and <bold>(b)</bold> 32.53<inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 125.22<inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/4757/2023/amt-16-4757-2023-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <label>4.4</label><title>Estimated distance of land-to-sea air mass transportation</title>
      <p id="d1e2666">As shown in Fig. 11, atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M211" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M212" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios observed in November 2012 showed the same fluctuating feature versus wind direction, indicating that their variations were dominated by the land-to-sea air mass transportation, which was in agreement with previous studies (Zhang et al., 2007; Zang et al., 2017, 2020; Liu et al., 2018).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><?xmltex \currentcnt{11}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d1e2689">Relationship between wind direction and atmospheric mixing ratios of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M213" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively. Error bars indicate standard deviations in each wind direction.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/4757/2023/amt-16-4757-2023-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <?pagebreak page4764?><p id="d1e2716">Simulation studies of gas seeps in the Black Sea and the Nord Stream pipeline gas leaks in the Baltic Sea showed that the atmospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M215" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratio could be enhanced by the upwind emission source at a distance of 5 to 30 km (Kourtidis et al., 2006; Jia et al., 2022). The NOAA's MBL CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M216" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MBL CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M217" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> references were 394.56 ppm and 1875.4 ppb, respectively, in the same latitude zone as the survey area in November 2012. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M218" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M219" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represented deviations between observed atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M220" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M221" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios and MBL CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M222" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and MBL CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M223" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> references. As shown in Fig. 12, we assumed that the effects of mixing and dilution during the transportation were linear (Kourtidis et al., 2006). The further away the observation site is from the continent, the lower the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M224" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M225" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values are in each survey section. According to the calculated slope values, the gradient would be gradual at 123.30, 123.50 and 123.40<inline-formula><mml:math id="M226" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E for Section S3, S4 and S5, respectively. Moreover, the offshore distances away from the continent could be calculated as approximately 27.0, 26.3 and 11.7 km, respectively, with a mean value of 21.7 km. Thus, spatial distributions of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M227" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M228" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios in the China shelf sea could be impacted remarkably by land-to-sea air mass transportation during the early phase of the EAWM.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><?xmltex \currentcnt{12}?><?xmltex \def\figurename{Figure}?><label>Figure 12</label><caption><p id="d1e2870">The average value of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M229" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(a)</bold> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M230" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <bold>(b)</bold> per 0.1<inline-formula><mml:math id="M231" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (black) or 0.5<inline-formula><mml:math id="M232" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> longitude (red) in November 2012.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/16/4757/2023/amt-16-4757-2023-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<?pagebreak page4765?><sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e2941">Based on the continuously observed shipborne atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M233" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M234" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios and meteorological parameters over the SYS in November 2012 and June 2013, a data-filtering method was optimised and established, which could be used to flag CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M235" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M236" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios influenced by multiple natural processes and human activities. Spatial and seasonal variations in atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M237" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M238" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios over the SYS were mainly regulated by the EAM, while the influence of air–sea exchange was low or negligible. The summer monsoon resulted in relatively low atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M239" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M240" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios with a gradient increasing from south-east to north-west. Conversely, the winter monsoon enhanced land-to-sea air mass transportation with high atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M241" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M242" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios, which induced decreasing patterns with increasing distance offshore. The effect of land-to-sea air mass transportation on enhanced CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M243" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M244" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mixing ratios was estimated with a distance of approximately 20 km offshore during the early period of the EAWM.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="codeavailability"><title>Code availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3058">The code that is used for figure plotting (Python) can be provided upon request from the corresponding authors (zangkunpeng@zjut.edu.cn, fangsx@zjut.edu.cn).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e3064">The ERA5 hourly data on pressure levels are provided at <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.bd0915c6</ext-link> (Hersbach et al., 2023). The simulated MBL values are produced by the NOAA (<uri>https://gml.noaa.gov/aftp/data/trace_gases/</uri>, NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, 2022).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e3076">JL prepared the main part of the paper and performed the corresponding analyses. KZ provided the original data that are used within this study and helped with the data analyses and the preparation of the paper. YL, YC, SL, HoX and YJ provided valuable comments on data processing as well as help in the drawing of Fig. 5. SF, SQ and KJ made suggestions for revising the paper and further standardised the paper. HaX, XQ and HH helped download the MBL reference data.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e3082">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d1e3088">Publisher’s note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3094">This article is part of the special issue “Profiling the atmospheric boundary layer at a European scale (AMT/GMD inter-journal SI)”. It is not associated with a conference.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e3100">The authors wish to thank the crew of the RV <italic>Dongfanghong II</italic> for their assistance on board. We also thank Edward J. Dlugokencky and colleagues from the Tae-ahn Peninsula station, Jeju Gosan station and Lin'an station. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (project no. 2020YFA0607501); the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project no. 42275113); the Special Support Plan for High-level Talents in Zhejiang Province (project no. 2021R542048); the Joint Funds of the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. LZJMZ23D050002; the Fund of the Key Laboratory of Global Change and Marine-Atmospheric Chemistry, MNR (project no. GCMAC2001); and the Basic Public Welfare Research Program of Zhejiang Province (project no. LGF22D050004).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d1e3109">This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (project no. 2020YFA0607501), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (project no. 42275113), the Special Support Plan for High-level Talents in Zhejiang province (project no. 2021R542048), the Joint funds of the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China under grant no. LZJMZ23D050002, the Fund of Key Laboratory of Global Change and Marine-Atmospheric Chemistry, MNR (project no. GCMAC2001) and the Basic Public Welfare Research Program of Zhejiang Province (project no. LGF22D050004).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e3115">This paper was edited by Anca Nemuc and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bange, H. W., Bartell, U. H., Rapsomanikis, S., and Andre, M. O.: Methane in the Baltic and North Seas and a Reassessment of the Marine Emissions of Methane, Global Biogeochem Cy., 8, 465–480, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.02.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2008.02.005</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bartlett, K. B., Sachse, G. W., Slate, T., Harward, C., and Blake, D. R.: Large-scale distribution of CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M245" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the western North Pacific: Sources and transport from the Asian continent, J. Geophys. Res-Atmos., 108, 8807, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003076" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003076</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Bouman, E. A., Lindstad, E., Rialland, A. I., and Stomman, A. H.: State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping-A review, Transport. Res. D-Tr. E., 52, 408–421, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Chang, C., Yi, L., and Chen, G. T.: A numerical simulation of vortex development during the 1992 east Asian summer monsoon onset using the navy's regional model, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 1604–1631, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128&lt;1604:ANSOVD&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128&lt;1604:ANSOVD&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Crosson, E. R.: A cavity ring-down analyzer for measuring atmospheric levels of methane, carbon dioxide, and water vapor, App. Phys. B-Lasers O., 92, 403–408, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-008-3135-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00340-008-3135-y</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Daube, B. C., Boering, K. A., Andrews, A. E., and Wofsy, S. C.: A high-precision fast-response airborne CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M246" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> analyzer for in situ sampling from the surface to the middle stratosphere, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 19, 1532–1543, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Ding, J., Van Der A, R. J., Mijling, B., Jalkanen, J. P., Johansson, L., and Levelt, P. F.: Maritime NO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M247" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions over Chinese Seas derived from satellite observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 2031–2037, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076788" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2017GL076788</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Ding, Y. H., Liu, J. J., Sun, Y., Liu, Y., He, J., and Song, Y.: A study of the synoptic-climatology of the Meiyu system in East Asia, Chinese Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, 31, 1082–1101, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Dlugokencky, E. J., Myers, R. C., Lang, P. M., Masarie, K. A., Crotwell, A. M., Thoning, K. W., Hall, B. D., Elkins, J. W., and Steele, L. P.: Conversion of NOAA atmospheric dry air CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M248" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mole fractions to a gravimetrically prepared standard scale, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D18306, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006035" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JD006035</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fang, S., Tans, P. P., Yao, B., Luan, T., Wu, Y., and Yu, D.: Study of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M249" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M250" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> at Longfengshan WMO/GAW regional station: The variations, trends, influence of local sources/sinks, and transport, Sci. China Earth Sci., 60, 1886–1895, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fang, S. X., Zhou, L. X., Masarie, K. A., Xu, L., and Rella, C. W.: Study of atmospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M251" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mole fractions at three WMO/GAW stations in China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 4874–4886, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50284" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jgrd.50284</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Fang, S. X., Tans, P. P., Steinbacher, M., Zhou, L. X., and Luan, T.: Comparison of the regional CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M252" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> mole fraction filtering approaches at a WMO/GAW regional station in China, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 5301–5313, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5301-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-5301-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4767?><ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Gao, Z. M., Liu, H. P., and Mcfarland, D. P.: Mechanistic links between underestimated CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M253" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes and non-closure of the surface energy balance in a semi-arid sagebrush ecosystem, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 1748–9326, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab082d" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1088/1748-9326/ab082d</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on pressure levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.bd0915c6</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Huang, R. H.: The influence of the heat source anomaly over Tibetan Plateau on the northern hemispheric circulation anomalies, Acta. Meteorol. Sin., 43, 208–220, 1985.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Huang, R. H., Zhou, L. T., and Chen, W.: The progresses of recent studies on the variabilities of the East Asian monsoon and their causes, Adv. Atmos. Sci., 20, 55–69, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Jia, M., Li, F., Zhang, Y. Z., Wu, M. S., Li, Y. S., Feng, S. Z., Wang, H. M., Chen, H. L., Ju, W. M., Lin, J., Cai, J. W., Zhang, Y. G., and Jiang, F.: The Nord Stream pipeline gas leaks released approximately 220,000 tonnes of methane into the atmosphere, Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 12, 2666–4984, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2022.100210" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ese.2022.100210</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kong, S., Lu, B., Han, B., Bai, Z. P., Xu, Z., You, Y., Jin, L. M., Guo, X. Y., and Wang, R.: Seasonal variation analysis of atmospheric CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M254" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M255" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M256" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in Tianjin offshore area, Sci. China Earth Sci., 53, 1205–1215, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-010-3065-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11430-010-3065-5</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kourtidis, K., Kioutsioukis, I., McGinnis, D. F., and Rapsomanikis, S.: Effects of methane outgassing on the Black Sea atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5173–5182, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5173-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-5173-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Law, C. S., Brévière, E., De Leeuw, G., Garçon, V., Guieu, C., Kieber, D. J., Kontradowitz, S., Paulmier, A., Quinn, P. K., Saltzman, E. S., Stefels, J., and Von Glasow, R.: Evolving research directions in Surface Ocean-Lower Atmosphere (SOLAS) science, Environ. Chem., 10, 1–16, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN12159" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1071/EN12159</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Liu, Y. S., Zhou, L. X., Tans, P. P., Zang, K. P., and Cheng, S. Y.: Ratios of greenhouse gas emissions observed over the Yellow Sea and the East China Sea, Sci. Total Environ., 33, 1022–1031 <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.250" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.250</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Luo, X. F., Wei, H., Liu, Z., and Zhao, L.: Seasonal variability of air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M257" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> fluxes in the Yellow and East China Seas: A case study of continental shelf sea carbon cycle model, Cont. Shelf Res., 107, 69–78, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2015.07.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2015.07.009</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lyu, W. Z., Fu, T. F., Hu, Z. X., Tang, Y. Z., Chen, G. Q., Xu, X. Y., Chen, Y. P., and Chen, S. L.: Sedimentary dynamics of the central South Yellow Sea revealing the relation between east Asian Summer and Winter Monsoon over the past 6000 years, Front. Earth Sci., 9, 689508, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.689508" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3389/feart.2021.689508</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Matsueda, H., Inoue, H. Y., Ishii, M., and Nogi, Y.: Atmospheric methane over the North Pacific from 1987 to 1993, Geochem. J., 30, 1–15, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Nara, H., Tanimoto, H., Tohjima, Y., Mukai, H., Nojiri, Y., and Machida, T.: Emissions of methane from offshore oil and gas platforms in Southeast Asia, Sci. Rep.-UK, 4, 6503, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06503" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep06503</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory: The NOAA annual greenhouse gas index (AGGI), NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA, <uri>https://esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/aggi.html</uri> (last access: 20 October 2022), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory (GML): Simulated MBL values, NOAA GML [data set], <uri>https://gml.noaa.gov/aftp/data/trace_gases/</uri>, last access: 10 October 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Peters, G., Marland, G., Le Quéré, C., Boden, T., Canadell, J. G., and Raupach, M. R.: Rapid growth in CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M258" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis, Nat. Clim. Change., 2, 2–4, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1332" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/nclimate1332</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rella, C. W., Chen, H., Andrews, A. E., Filges, A., Gerbig, C., Hatakka, J., Karion, A., Miles, N. L., Richardson, S. J., Steinbacher, M., Sweeney, C., Wastine, B., and Zellweger, C.: High accuracy measurements of dry mole fractions of carbon dioxide and methane in humid air, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 837–860, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-837-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-837-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Riddick, S. N., Mauzerall, D. L., Celia, M., Harris, N. R. P., Allen, G., Pitt, J., Staunton-Sykes, J., Forster, G. L., Kang, M., Lowry, D., Nisbet, E. G., and Manning, A. J.: Methane emissions from oil and gas platforms in the North Sea, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9787–9796, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9787-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-9787-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Schmale, O., Greinert, J., and Rehder, G.: Methane emission from high-intensity marine gas seeps in the Black Sea into the atmosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L07609, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021138" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004GL021138</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Wang, S. Y. and Zhai, W. D.: Regional differences in seasonal variation of air–sea CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M259" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> exchange in the Yellow Sea, Cont. Shelf Res., 218, 104393, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2021.104393" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.csr.2021.104393</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Warneke, T., de Beek, R., Buchwitz, M., Notholt, J., Schulz, A., Velazco, V., and Schrems, O.: Shipborne solar absorption measurements of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M260" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M261" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, N<inline-formula><mml:math id="M262" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and CO and comparison with SCIAMACHY WFM-DOAS retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2029–2034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2029-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-2029-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> WMO: 14th WMO/IAEA Meeting of experts on carbon dioxide, other greenhouse gases and related tracers measurement techniques, Helsinki, Finland, 10–13 September 2007, GAW Report No. 186, 18 pp., 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>WMO: Greenhouse Gas Bulletin  (GHG Bulletin): The state of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere based on global observations through 2021, No. 18, <uri>https://gaw.kishou.go.jp/publications/bulletin</uri> (last access: 15 October 2022), 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Xia, L. J., Liu, L. X., Li, B. Z., and Zhou, L. X.: Spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of atmospheric CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M263" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in central China, China Environmental Science, 38, 2811–2819, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.2018.0294" ext-link-type="DOI">10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.2018.0294</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yang, M., Bell, T. G., Hopkins, F. E., Kitidis, V., Cazenave, P. W., Nightingale, P. D., Yelland, M. J., Pascal, R. W., Prytherch, J., Brooks, I. M., and Smyth, T. J.: Air–sea fluxes of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M264" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and CH<inline-formula><mml:math id="M265" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from the Penlee Point Atmospheric Observatory on the south-west coast of the UK, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5745–5761, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5745-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-5745-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Yu, G., Chen, Z., Piao, S. L., Peng, C. H., Ciais, P., Wang, Q. F., Li, X. R., and Zhu, X. J.: High carbon dioxide uptake by subtropical forest ecosystems in the East Asian monsoon region, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 4910–4915, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317065111" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.1317065111</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zang, K. P., Zhou, L. X., and Wang, J. Y.: Carbon Dioxide and Methane in the China Sea Shelf Boundary Layer observed by Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 34, 2233–2244, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0217.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0217.1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page4768?><ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zang, K. P., Zhang, G., Xu, X. M., and Yao, Z. W.: Impact of air-sea exchange on the spatial distribution of atmospheric methane in the Dalian Bay and adjacent coastal area, China, Chemosphere, 251, 126412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126412" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126412</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhai, W. D.: Sea surface partial pressure of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M266" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and its controls in the northern south China Sea in the non-bloom period in spring, Haiyang Xuebao, 37, 31–40, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2015.06.004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2015.06.004</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhai, W. D., Chen, J. F., Jin, H. Y., Li, H. L., Liu, J. W., He, X. Q., and Bai, Y.: Spring carbonate chemistry dynamics of surface waters in the northern East China Sea: Water mixing, biological uptake of CO<inline-formula><mml:math id="M267" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, and chemical buffering capacity, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 5638–5653, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Zhan, M. J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, X. C., Nie, H., Deligeer, Kivekas, N., and Lihavainen, H.: The influence of air mass sources on the particle number concentration and the size distribution at Mt. Waliguan, Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 31, 659–663, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhan, R. F. and Li, J. P.: Influence of atmospheric heat sources over the Tibetan Plateau and the tropical western North Pacific on the inter-decadal variations of the stratosphere-troposphere exchange of water vapor, Sci. China Earth Sci., 51, 1179–1193, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-008-0082-8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11430-008-0082-8</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, G. L., Zhang, J., Ren, J. L., Li, J. B., and Liu, S. M.: Distributions and sea-to-air fluxes of methane and nitrous oxide in the North East China Sea in summer, Mar. Chem., 110, 42–55, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.02.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.marchem.2008.02.005</ext-link>, 2008. </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, F., Chen, Y. J., Tian, C. G., Wang, X. P., Huang, G. P., Fang, Y., and Zong, Z.: Identification and quantification of shipping emissions in Bohai Rim, China, Sci. Total Environ., 497–498, 570–577, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.016</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, J. Y., Song, S. H., Xu, R., and Wen, J. H.: Source of airborne particulate matter in Guilin based on backward trajectory model, Environmental Monitoring in China, 33, 42–46, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.19316/j.issn.1002-6002.2017.02.07" ext-link-type="DOI">10.19316/j.issn.1002-6002.2017.02.07</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Zhang, S. P., Liu, J. W., Xie, S. P., and Meng, X. G.: The formation of a surface anticyclone over the Yellow and East China Seas in spring, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., Ser. II, 89, 119–131, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation> Zhang, X. I. A., Nakazawa, T., Ishizawa, M., Aoki, S., Nakaoka, S. I., Sugawara, S., Maksyutov, S., Saeki T., and Hayasaka, T.: Temporal variations of atmospheric carbon dioxide in the southernmost part of Japan, Tellus B, 59, 654–663, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Deng, F., Man, H., Fu, M., Lv, Z., Xiao, Q., Jin, X., Liu, S., He, K., and Liu, H.: Compliance and port air quality features with respect to ship fuel switching regulation: a field observation campaign, SEISO-Bohai, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4899–4916, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4899-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-4899-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zhang, Z. P. and Chu, Z. X.: Modern variations in clay minerals in mud deposits of the Yellow and East China Seas and their geological significance, Holocene, 28, 386–395, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683617729446" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1177/0959683617729446</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Zou, L., Hu, B., Li, J., Dou, Y. G., Xie, L. H., and Dong, L.: Middle Holocene Organic Carbon and biomarker records from the South Yellow Sea: relationship to the East Asian Monsoon, J. Ocean U. China, 17, 823–834, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-018-3521-y" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11802-018-3521-y</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Effect of land–sea air mass transport on spatiotemporal  distributions of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> mixing ratios over the southern Yellow Sea</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bange, H. W., Bartell, U. H., Rapsomanikis, S., and Andre, M. O.: Methane in
the Baltic and North Seas and a Reassessment of the Marine Emissions of
Methane, Global Biogeochem Cy., 8, 465–480,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.02.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.02.005</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bartlett, K. B., Sachse, G. W., Slate, T., Harward, C., and Blake, D. R.:
Large-scale distribution of CH<sub>4</sub> in the western North Pacific: Sources and
transport from the Asian continent, J. Geophys. Res-Atmos., 108, 8807,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003076" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003076</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bouman, E. A., Lindstad, E., Rialland, A. I., and Stomman, A. H.:
State-of-the-art technologies, measures, and potential for reducing GHG
emissions from shipping-A review, Transport. Res. D-Tr. E., 52, 408–421,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chang, C., Yi, L., and Chen, G. T.: A numerical simulation of vortex development during the 1992 east Asian summer monsoon onset using the navy's
regional model, Mon. Weather Rev., 128, 1604–1631,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128&lt;1604:ANSOVD&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(2000)128&lt;1604:ANSOVD&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 2000.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Crosson, E. R.: A cavity ring-down analyzer for measuring atmospheric levels
of methane, carbon dioxide, and water vapor, App. Phys. B-Lasers O., 92,
403–408, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-008-3135-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00340-008-3135-y</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Daube, B. C., Boering, K. A., Andrews, A. E., and Wofsy, S. C.: A high-precision fast-response airborne CO<sub>2</sub> analyzer for in situ
sampling from the surface to the middle stratosphere, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 19, 1532–1543, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, J., Van Der A, R. J., Mijling, B., Jalkanen, J. P., Johansson, L., and
Levelt, P. F.: Maritime NO<sub><i>x</i></sub> emissions over Chinese Seas derived from
satellite observations, Geophys. Res. Lett., 45, 2031–2037,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076788" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL076788</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, Y. H., Liu, J. J., Sun, Y., Liu, Y., He, J., and Song, Y.: A study of
the synoptic-climatology of the Meiyu system in East Asia, Chinese Journal
of Atmospheric Sciences, 31, 1082–1101, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dlugokencky, E. J., Myers, R. C., Lang, P. M., Masarie, K. A., Crotwell, A.
M., Thoning, K. W., Hall, B. D., Elkins, J. W., and Steele, L. P.: Conversion of NOAA atmospheric dry air CH<sub>4</sub> mole fractions to a gravimetrically prepared standard scale, J. Geophys. Res., 110, D18306, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006035" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JD006035</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fang, S., Tans, P. P., Yao, B., Luan, T., Wu, Y., and Yu, D.: Study of
atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> at Longfengshan WMO/GAW regional station: The variations, trends, influence of local sources/sinks, and transport, Sci. China Earth Sci., 60, 1886–1895, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fang, S. X., Zhou, L. X., Masarie, K. A., Xu, L., and Rella, C. W.: Study of
atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub> mole fractions at three WMO/GAW stations in China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 118, 4874–4886, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50284" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50284</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fang, S. X., Tans, P. P., Steinbacher, M., Zhou, L. X., and Luan, T.: Comparison of the regional CO<sub>2</sub> mole fraction filtering approaches at a WMO/GAW regional station in China, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 5301–5313, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5301-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-5301-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Gao, Z. M., Liu, H. P., and Mcfarland, D. P.: Mechanistic links between
underestimated CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes and non-closure of the surface energy balance in a semi-arid sagebrush ecosystem, Environ. Res. Lett., 14, 1748–9326,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab082d" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab082d</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on pressure levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, R. H.: The influence of the heat source anomaly over Tibetan Plateau
on the northern hemispheric circulation anomalies, Acta. Meteorol. Sin., 43,
208–220, 1985.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Huang, R. H., Zhou, L. T., and Chen, W.: The progresses of recent studies
on the variabilities of the East Asian monsoon and their causes, Adv. Atmos.
Sci., 20, 55–69, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jia, M., Li, F., Zhang, Y. Z., Wu, M. S., Li, Y. S., Feng, S. Z., Wang, H.
M., Chen, H. L., Ju, W. M., Lin, J., Cai, J. W., Zhang, Y. G., and Jiang,
F.: The Nord Stream pipeline gas leaks released approximately 220,000 tonnes
of methane into the atmosphere, Environmental Science and Ecotechnology, 12,
2666–4984, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2022.100210" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2022.100210</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kong, S., Lu, B., Han, B., Bai, Z. P., Xu, Z., You, Y., Jin, L. M., Guo, X.
Y., and Wang, R.: Seasonal variation analysis of atmospheric CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and CO<sub>2</sub> in Tianjin offshore area, Sci. China Earth Sci., 53, 1205–1215, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-010-3065-5" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-010-3065-5</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kourtidis, K., Kioutsioukis, I., McGinnis, D. F., and Rapsomanikis, S.: Effects of methane outgassing on the Black Sea atmosphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5173–5182, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5173-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5173-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Law, C. S., Brévière, E., De Leeuw, G., Garçon, V., Guieu, C.,
Kieber, D. J., Kontradowitz, S., Paulmier, A., Quinn, P. K., Saltzman, E.
S., Stefels, J., and Von Glasow, R.: Evolving research directions in Surface
Ocean-Lower Atmosphere (SOLAS) science, Environ. Chem., 10, 1–16,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1071/EN12159" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1071/EN12159</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, Y. S., Zhou, L. X., Tans, P. P., Zang, K. P., and Cheng, S. Y.: Ratios
of greenhouse gas emissions observed over the Yellow Sea and the East China
Sea, Sci. Total Environ., 33, 1022–1031 <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.250" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.250</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
Luo, X. F., Wei, H., Liu, Z., and Zhao, L.: Seasonal variability of air–sea
CO<sub>2</sub> fluxes in the Yellow and East China Seas: A case study of continental
shelf sea carbon cycle model, Cont. Shelf Res., 107, 69–78,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2015.07.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2015.07.009</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lyu, W. Z., Fu, T. F., Hu, Z. X., Tang, Y. Z., Chen, G. Q., Xu, X. Y., Chen,
Y. P., and Chen, S. L.: Sedimentary dynamics of the central South Yellow Sea
revealing the relation between east Asian Summer and Winter Monsoon over the
past 6000 years, Front. Earth Sci., 9, 689508, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.689508" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2021.689508</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
Matsueda, H., Inoue, H. Y., Ishii, M., and Nogi, Y.: Atmospheric methane
over the North Pacific from 1987 to 1993, Geochem. J., 30, 1–15, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nara, H., Tanimoto, H., Tohjima, Y., Mukai, H., Nojiri, Y., and Machida, T.:
Emissions of methane from offshore oil and gas platforms in Southeast Asia,
Sci. Rep.-UK, 4, 6503, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06503" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06503</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory: The NOAA annual greenhouse gas index (AGGI), NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, Colorado, USA, <a href="https://esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/aggi.html" target="_blank"/> (last access: 20 October 2022), 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory (GML): Simulated MBL values, NOAA GML [data set], <a href="https://gml.noaa.gov/aftp/data/trace_gases/" target="_blank"/>, last access: 10 October 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peters, G., Marland, G., Le Quéré, C., Boden, T., Canadell, J. G.,
and Raupach, M. R.: Rapid growth in CO<sub>2</sub> emissions after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis, Nat. Clim. Change., 2, 2–4,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1332" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1332</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rella, C. W., Chen, H., Andrews, A. E., Filges, A., Gerbig, C., Hatakka, J., Karion, A., Miles, N. L., Richardson, S. J., Steinbacher, M., Sweeney, C., Wastine, B., and Zellweger, C.: High accuracy measurements of dry mole fractions of carbon dioxide and methane in humid air, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 837–860, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-837-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-837-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Riddick, S. N., Mauzerall, D. L., Celia, M., Harris, N. R. P., Allen, G., Pitt, J., Staunton-Sykes, J., Forster, G. L., Kang, M., Lowry, D., Nisbet, E. G., and Manning, A. J.: Methane emissions from oil and gas platforms in the North Sea, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 9787–9796, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9787-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-9787-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Schmale, O., Greinert, J., and Rehder, G.: Methane emission from
high-intensity marine gas seeps in the Black Sea into the atmosphere,
Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L07609, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021138" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021138</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, S. Y. and Zhai, W. D.: Regional differences in seasonal variation of
air–sea CO<sub>2</sub> exchange in the Yellow Sea, Cont. Shelf Res., 218, 104393,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2021.104393" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csr.2021.104393</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Warneke, T., de Beek, R., Buchwitz, M., Notholt, J., Schulz, A., Velazco, V., and Schrems, O.: Shipborne solar absorption measurements of CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, N<sub>2</sub>O and CO and comparison with SCIAMACHY WFM-DOAS retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2029–2034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2029-2005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2029-2005</a>, 2005.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
WMO: 14th WMO/IAEA Meeting of experts on carbon dioxide, other greenhouse gases and related tracers measurement techniques, Helsinki, Finland, 10–13 September 2007, GAW Report No. 186, 18 pp., 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
WMO: Greenhouse Gas Bulletin  (GHG Bulletin): The state of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere based on global observations through 2021, No. 18, <a href="https://gaw.kishou.go.jp/publications/bulletin" target="_blank"/> (last access: 15 October 2022), 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xia, L. J., Liu, L. X., Li, B. Z., and Zhou, L. X.: Spatial and temporal
distribution characteristics of atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> in central China, China
Environmental Science, 38, 2811–2819, <a href="https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.2018.0294" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.19674/j.cnki.issn1000-6923.2018.0294</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yang, M., Bell, T. G., Hopkins, F. E., Kitidis, V., Cazenave, P. W., Nightingale, P. D., Yelland, M. J., Pascal, R. W., Prytherch, J., Brooks, I. M., and Smyth, T. J.: Air–sea fluxes of CO<sub>2</sub> and CH<sub>4</sub> from the Penlee Point Atmospheric Observatory on the south-west coast of the UK, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 5745–5761, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5745-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-5745-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, G., Chen, Z., Piao, S. L., Peng, C. H., Ciais, P., Wang, Q. F., Li, X.
R., and Zhu, X. J.: High carbon dioxide uptake by subtropical forest ecosystems in the East Asian monsoon region, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 4910–4915, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317065111" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317065111</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zang, K. P., Zhou, L. X., and Wang, J. Y.: Carbon Dioxide and Methane in the
China Sea Shelf Boundary Layer observed by Cavity Ring-Down Spectroscopy, J.
Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 34, 2233–2244, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0217.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0217.1</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zang, K. P., Zhang, G., Xu, X. M., and Yao, Z. W.: Impact of air-sea
exchange on the spatial distribution of atmospheric methane in the Dalian
Bay and adjacent coastal area, China, Chemosphere, 251, 126412,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126412" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126412</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhai, W. D.: Sea surface partial pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> and its controls in the
northern south China Sea in the non-bloom period in spring, Haiyang Xuebao,
37, 31–40, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2015.06.004" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.0253-4193.2015.06.004</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhai, W. D., Chen, J. F., Jin, H. Y., Li, H. L., Liu, J. W., He, X. Q., and Bai, Y.: Spring carbonate chemistry dynamics of surface waters in the northern East China Sea: Water mixing, biological uptake of CO<sub>2</sub>, and chemical buffering capacity, J. Geophys. Res.-Oceans, 119, 5638–5653, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhan, M. J., Sun, J. Y., Zhang, Y. M., Zhang, X. C., Nie, H., Deligeer,
Kivekas, N., and Lihavainen, H.: The influence of air mass sources on the
particle number concentration and the size distribution at Mt. Waliguan,
Journal of Glaciology and Geocryology, 31, 659–663, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhan, R. F. and Li, J. P.: Influence of atmospheric heat sources over the
Tibetan Plateau and the tropical western North Pacific on the inter-decadal
variations of the stratosphere-troposphere exchange of water vapor, Sci.
China Earth Sci., 51, 1179–1193, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-008-0082-8" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-008-0082-8</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, G. L., Zhang, J., Ren, J. L., Li, J. B., and Liu, S. M.:
Distributions and sea-to-air fluxes of methane and nitrous oxide in the
North East China Sea in summer, Mar. Chem., 110, 42–55,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.02.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2008.02.005</a>, 2008.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, F., Chen, Y. J., Tian, C. G., Wang, X. P., Huang, G. P., Fang, Y.,
and Zong, Z.: Identification and quantification of shipping emissions in
Bohai Rim, China, Sci. Total Environ., 497–498, 570–577,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.08.016</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, J. Y., Song, S. H., Xu, R., and Wen, J. H.: Source of airborne
particulate matter in Guilin based on backward trajectory model, Environmental Monitoring in China, 33, 42–46,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.19316/j.issn.1002-6002.2017.02.07" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.19316/j.issn.1002-6002.2017.02.07</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, S. P., Liu, J. W., Xie, S. P., and Meng, X. G.: The formation of a surface anticyclone over the Yellow and East China Seas in spring, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., Ser. II, 89, 119–131, 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, X. I. A., Nakazawa, T., Ishizawa, M., Aoki, S., Nakaoka, S. I., Sugawara, S., Maksyutov, S., Saeki T., and Hayasaka, T.: Temporal variations of atmospheric carbon dioxide in the southernmost part of Japan, Tellus B, 59, 654–663, 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y., Deng, F., Man, H., Fu, M., Lv, Z., Xiao, Q., Jin, X., Liu, S., He, K., and Liu, H.: Compliance and port air quality features with respect to ship fuel switching regulation: a field observation campaign, SEISO-Bohai, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 4899–4916, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4899-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-4899-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Z. P. and Chu, Z. X.: Modern variations in clay minerals in mud
deposits of the Yellow and East China Seas and their geological significance, Holocene, 28, 386–395, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683617729446" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1177/0959683617729446</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zou, L., Hu, B., Li, J., Dou, Y. G., Xie, L. H., and Dong, L.: Middle
Holocene Organic Carbon and biomarker records from the South Yellow Sea:
relationship to the East Asian Monsoon, J. Ocean U. China, 17, 823–834,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-018-3521-y" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11802-018-3521-y</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
