<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-19-3193-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Comparative analysis of GOME and SCIAMACHY  reflectance over Pseudo-Invariant Calibration Sites:  implications for spectrometers cross-calibration</article-title><alt-title>Intercomparison of spectrometer reflectance and PICS stability</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Owda</surname><given-names>Abdalmenem</given-names></name>
          <email>abdalmenem.owda@dlr.de</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7758-533X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Lichtenberg</surname><given-names>Günter</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3335-2008</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Remote Sensing Technology Institute, German Aerospace Center (DLR), Weßling, Germany</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Abdalmenem Owda (abdalmenem.owda@dlr.de)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>May</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>10</issue>
      <fpage>3193</fpage><lpage>3211</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>22</day><month>September</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>6</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>13</day><month>February</month><year>2026</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>11</day><month>March</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Abdalmenem Owda</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e90">Accurate radiometric cross-calibration is essential for ensuring the consistency and interoperability of multi-sensor satellite observations. Vicarious calibration, a widely adopted approach, relies on the temporal stability of desert-based Pseudo-Invariant Calibration Sites (PICS). However, these sites are limited in spatial extent and have not been systematically examined for cross-calibration with larger pixels, whose dimensions exceed those of PICS. This study established a statistical framework to advance cross-calibration of spectrometers over PICS and their surrounding areas. The framework included performance comparisons of different satellite instruments and the identification of reference and constrained sensors. The temporal stability of PICS across various spectral bands was reassessed using observations from the reference sensor. Stability scores (SS) were derived from a combination of statistical indicators designed to capture temporal variability, distribution symmetry, the occurrence of anomalies, and long-term shifts in the observations.</p>

      <p id="d2e93">Decades of top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance data in the ultraviolet, visible, and near-infrared (UV/VIS/NIR) ranges, collected by the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) and Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometers for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) spectrometers over 20 PICS sites, were analyzed. The results revealed significant degradation in GOME, particularly in the UV band, during 2001 and toward the end of its mission, as evidenced by positively skewed, heavy-tailed distributions. In contrast, SCIAMACHY observations were more uniform and stationary, indicating their greater suitability for assessing PICS stability. The investigated sites were ranked based on the average of SS across the entire investigated spectrum as well as for each spectral band. The analysis revealed a wide range of SS among PICS, including intra-site variations across spectral bands. While some sites demonstrated consistently high stability, many were found to be 2–3 times less stable than the most stable sites. Among these robust sites, some have not been recommended by the calibration communities and should be given further consideration. In addition, the stability of the sites based on TOA reflectance showed a clear spectral band dependency, with enhanced stability in the NIR relative to the UV and VIS bands. These findings underscore the importance of regularly evaluating PICS and of considering spectral-band-specific performance when selecting calibration sites and performing the cross-calibration of spectrometers over PICS.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>European Space Agency</funding-source>
<award-id>4000128410/19/I-NS</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e105">In recent decades, the number of satellite missions has significantly increased, leading to a paradigm shift across various applications. This expansion has resulted in an abundance of remote sensing data and a rapid growth in data archives.  Long-term monitoring applications, such as those focused on atmospheric gases, require continuous time series data that often extend beyond the operational lifespan of individual satellite missions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.1"/>. Ensuring radiometric consistency among these datasets is critical for integrating observations from different satellite missions. Furthermore, it is fundamental for developing high data quality to perform quantitative remote sensing <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.2"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e114">Various calibration strategies can be used to ensure consistency across both temporal and spectral domains, ranging from pre-flight calibration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.3"/>, in-flight calibration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38 bib1.bibx36" id="paren.4"/>, and vicarious calibration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx44 bib1.bibx22 bib1.bibx6 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.5"/>. Notably, vicarious calibration is independent of the onboard calibration systems and provides an external means of validating and correcting satellite measurements.</p>
      <p id="d2e126">Pseudo-invariant Calibration Sites (PICS) are among the most widely utilized targets in vicarious calibration methods <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.6"/>, and absolute radiometric calibration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.7"/>. A set of 20 desert sites, each measuring <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> km<sup>2</sup>, was proposed across Africa and the Arabian Peninsula by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.8"/>. Several of these sites have been recommended as reference calibration and validation test sites by the Committee on Earth Observation Satellites (CEOS), specifically by the Working Group on Calibration and Validation (WGCV) and the Infrared and Visible Optical Sensors (IVOS) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx29" id="paren.9"/>.  As reported in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.10"/>, the reflectance across each site was spatially uniform, with relative variations better than 3 %. In contrast, the temporal analysis based on cloud-free multitemporal imagery revealed peak-to-peak reflectance variations of approximately 8 % to 15 %.</p>
      <p id="d2e166">PICS have been the subject of several recent studies <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.11"/>. These investigations confirmed that PICS remain relevant and reliable for radiometric calibration of optical remote sensing systems. Therefore, any radiometric deviations in the acquired scenes that exceed the expected temporal stability of PICS may suggest potential instrumental anomalies and necessitate further calibration or investigation – this principle forms the basis for employing PICS in radiometric calibration, sensor performance monitoring, and cross-calibration between different sensors.</p>
      <p id="d2e173">While PICS are well-established in the radiometric and cross-calibration of imagery sensors, their applications to spectrometer calibration remain largely unexplored. Spectrometer footprints typically have a much larger spatial extent than that of PICS. Therefore, the temporal stability of areas larger than the PICS domain should be assessed before their use in cross-calibration. To address this gap, this research paper aims to establish a foundation for spectrometer cross-calibration through two key objectives. The first objective is to develop a statistical framework for the comparative analysis of spectrometers, to monitor their performance throughout the mission lifetime, and to identify both the reference and the constrained sensor. The second objective is to assess the temporal stability of PICS and surrounding areas across the full spectrum.</p>
      <p id="d2e176">In this study, top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance observations from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME) and the Scanning Imaging Absorption Spectrometer for Atmospheric Chartography (SCIAMACHY) over selected PICS were analyzed. A decade of measurements was used to construct reflectance time series in three spectral regions: ultraviolet (UV), visible (VIS), and near-infrared (NIR). These time series form the basis for evaluating both sensor performance and site stability. Although the derived comparison metrics inherently include contributions from surface properties and atmospheric effects, the analysis focuses on relative temporal variability rather than absolute reflectance levels.</p>
      <p id="d2e179">Relative comparisons are particularly suitable over homogeneous desert regions, which are typically remote from coastlines and major emission sources. Under the assumption that atmospheric conditions are broadly comparable across the selected sites, variations in TOA reflectance are expected to be primarily governed by surface characteristics. Consequently, differences in temporal variability can be attributed mainly to site-specific properties or sensor behavior, enabling the identification of the most stable sites for cross-calibration.</p>
      <p id="d2e182">Within this framework, the study is guided by two main hypotheses. First, atmospheric contributions over the selected desert calibration sites are assumed to be temporally and spatially comparable. Under stable sensor operation, variability metrics should therefore be similar across sites. Second, the PICS themselves are expected to exhibit consistent temporal behavior due to their comparable environmental and meteorological settings, regardless of the observing sensor. Systematic deviations from this expected consistency may indicate site-specific effects or sensor-related instabilities.</p>
      <p id="d2e185">The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 describes the sensors and their data used in this investigation. Section 3 presents the geographical locations of the investigated PICS. The methods are presented in Sect. 4. Results and discussions are presented in Sects. 5 and 6. Finally, the conclusion and outlook in Sect. 7.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Sensor and data descriptions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>GOME</title>
      <p id="d2e203">GOME was a passive nadir-scanning UV/VIS spectrometer onboard ERS-2 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.12"/>. It provided observations of ozone, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, clouds, aerosols, and other atmospheric parameters with global coverage every 3 d. GOME had forward and backward scanning sequences with 4 pixels per scan. Forward scans included east, nadir, and west pixels <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.13"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>SCIAMACHY</title>
      <p id="d2e231">SCIAMACHY was a passive UV/VIS/NIR imaging spectrometer on ENVISAT <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.14"/>. It featured nadir, limb, and sun/moon occultation viewing. Limb and occultation modes were excluded in this study. SCIAMACHY retrieved trace gases, aerosols, radiation, and cloud properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.15"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e240">Further details on the characteristics information of each sensor, including the mission life, orbit, and spatial and spectral resolution, are illustrated in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T1"/>.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e248">Comparison of GOME and SCIAMACHY satellite instruments.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Item</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">GOME</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">SCIAMACHY</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mission life</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1995–2011</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2002–2012</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Orbit</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">sun-synchronous, 790 km</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">sun-synchronous, 799.8 km</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Overpassing time (local time)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10:30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">10:00</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Observation geometries</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Nadir</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Nadir, Limb, Occultation</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ground pixel size (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">320</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">32</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">233</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">26</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Number of detector channels</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Total spectral range (nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">237–793</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">212–2386</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UV channel range/resolution (nm/nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">311–405/0.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">300–412/0.26</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VIS channel range/resolution (nm/nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">405–611/0.29</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">383–628/0.44</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NIR channel range/resolution (nm/nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">595–793/0.33</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">595–812/0.48</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>GOME and SCIAMACHY data</title>
      <p id="d2e452">Fully calibrated Level-1 products from GOME (Level-1b version 5.2) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.16"/> and SCIAMACHY (Level-1c version 10) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.17"/> were used to derive TOA reflectance time series. Both GOME Level-1b and SCIAMACHY Level-1c datasets contained solar irradiance and radiance measurements required for reflectance computation. While cloud parameters were included in the GOME Level-1b files, they were not available in the SCIAMACHY Level-1c products. Consequently, cloud parameters for SCIAMACHY were obtained from the corresponding Level-2 products.</p>
      <p id="d2e461">The following is the main data from both sensors used: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e466">Reflectance: this parameter refers to the fraction of incoming radiation reflected toward the instruments. This consists of surface reflectance and atmospheric scattering. Reflectance serves as a fundamental parameter for the comparison between sensors and the study of the temporal variability of PICS. In this study, the term “reflectance” refers to TOA reflectance, unless stated otherwise.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e470">Cloud fraction (CF): this parameter ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates clear skies (no clouds) and 1 indicates full cloud cover. The cloud fraction is used to filter out data with a higher CF in the reflectance time series.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e474">Viewing geometry of spectrometers: the solar zenith angle (SZA) and viewing zenith angle (VZA) are geometric parameters that may influence the temporal variability of reflectance. SZA is the angle between the local vertical and the sun, and VZA is the angle between the local vertical and the satellite line of sight. The effects of different SZA and VZA were investigated for SCIAMACHY reflectance before computation SS in Sect. 5.4.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Study areas description</title>
      <p id="d2e486">The PICS proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9" id="text.18"/> are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1"/>. These sites, located primarily in desert regions, were chosen due to their minimal vegetation cover and stable surface reflectance characteristics. These features made them particularly suitable for satellite sensor intercomparison and cross-calibration. Further details on the geographical locations of the PICS are provided in Table S1 in the Supplement.</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e496">PICS in Africa and the Arabian Peninsula with the dimensions of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">km</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The sites with green dots were endorsed by the CEOS for cross-calibration purposes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.19"/>.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026-f01.png"/>

      </fig>


</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d2e537">This section outlines the methodological workflows, addressing the two key objectives of the study: (i) comparative assessment of GOME and SCIAMACHY across the PICS and investigated spectral ranges, and (ii) modeling stability score (SS) for each PICS based on derived metric parameters.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Comparative assessment of GOME and SCIAMACHY</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS1">
  <label>4.1.1</label><title>Computation of the reflectance</title>
      <p id="d2e554">The reflectance measurements from both sensors were computed with the assumption of a Lambertian surface. The reflectance from GOME (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">g</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and SCIAMACHY (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) were computed based on Eq. (1):

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M11" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>earth</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sun</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reflectance as a function of wavelength, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mtext>earth</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the calibrated radiance as measured by the instrument as a function of wavelength, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mi>o</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the solar zenith angle, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mtext>sun</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the solar irradiance as measured by the instrument.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS2">
  <label>4.1.2</label><title>Retrieving of time series of reflectance from GOME and SCIAMACHY data</title>
      <p id="d2e700">The reflectance data from the complete archival record of ESA's GOME and SCIAMACHY spectrometers over each PICS were retrieved. The retrieved reflectance data spanned spectral ranges in UV/VIS/NIR. The selected wavelength ranges and the corresponding number of spectral channels are presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>. In this paper, the term “spectral channel” referred to an individual spectral pixel of the detector, whereas “spectral band” denoted the detector channel. The selected wavelength ranges were identical to those used in the Fundamental Data Record for Atmospheric Composition (FDR4ATMOS) project for performing cross-calibration between GOME and SCIAMACHY <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx37" id="paren.20"/>. These spectral ranges contain absorption features of numerous atmospheric gases.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2" specific-use="star"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e711">Characteristics of the selected wavelength ranges for each spectral band, including the number of spectral channels corresponding to each band for the GOME and SCIAMACHY sensors.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Band</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Selected wavelength</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Number of spectral</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Number of spectral</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">range (nm)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">channels in GOME</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">channels in SCIAMACHY</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">UV</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">309.45–391.74</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">705</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">758</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">VIS</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">423.92–526.93</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">494</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">436</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NIR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">753.97–775.91</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">105</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">106</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e808">For each satellite overpass, reflectance values were extracted within a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.5</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> bounding box centered over the PICS. This area was chosen to be larger than the actual PICS extent because the GOME pixel size exceeded the PICS dimensions, resulting in only a single reflectance value per overpass. In contrast, SCIAMACHY could provide multiple reflectance values within the PICS, and their average was used for analysis.</p>
      <p id="d2e828">We applied a threshold of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>CF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>≤</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> to filter the time series of both sensors. This threshold was chosen to minimize the influence of cloud contamination on the observed reflectance values, as high CF could significantly alter the magnitude and variability of the measurements. As a result of applying the CF filtering, the number of samples was reduced by an average of 18 % and 8 % for GOME and SCIAMACHY, respectively. The original and filtered sample counts are reported in Table S1.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1.SSS3">
  <label>4.1.3</label><title>Deriving temporal stability metrics</title>
      <p id="d2e851">For each investigated PICS site (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and wavelength (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), we extracted a set of statistical and signal-based features that described the temporal variability of the reflectance time series. The extracted features offered a multidimensional representation of the reflectance dynamic for monitoring sensors' performance and identifying the stability of spectral channels and sites. The parameters were categorized into two different groups as follows: <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e874"><italic>Basic statistical parameters.</italic> These parameters include the mean (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), the standard deviation (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), the coefficient of variation (CV), and the interquartile range (IQR).</p>
      <p id="d2e893"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> describes the average reflectance over time (Eq. 2), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is used to describe the absolute temporal variability around the mean (Eq. 3), CV describes the degree of variability in the reflectance time series (Eq. 4). IQR measures the statistical dispersion in the middle range of 50 % of the dataset (Eq. 5).</p>
      <p id="d2e909">For each site <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from a sensor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at time <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the reflectance time series was denoted as <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula><disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M29" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>2</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E3"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>3</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E4"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>4</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>IQR</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of observations for each reflectance time series. The number of observations for each site is tabulated in Table S1. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the 75th percentile, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>Q</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the 25th percentile.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1310"><italic>Trend and shape parameters.</italic> These parameters include the slope (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>), the skewness (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the kurtosis (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the reflectance time series. The slope was estimated by fitting the reflectance to the linear regression model (Eqs. 6 and 7). It describes the long-term changes and trends in the reflectance over time. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detects asymmetry in the reflectance distribution and gives insights about the anomaly (Eq. 8). <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> measures the tailedness of the distribution (Eq. 9).<disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M38" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ε</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E7"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>7</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E8"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>8</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E9"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>9</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/><mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>n</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">μ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula></p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>Computing stability score</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS1">
  <label>4.2.1</label><title>Refinement reflectance observations</title>
      <p id="d2e1750">To ensure SS reliability represents the temporal variability of the sites, the following steps were applied: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1755"><italic>Exclusion of the O</italic><sub><italic>2</italic></sub> <italic>absorption bands.</italic> The spectral channels of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band (759–770 nm) are strongly influenced by atmospheric absorption; therefore, this range of spectral channels was excluded from the SS calculation.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1783"><italic>Linear angular correction of reflectance.</italic> This correction aimed to normalize the solar illumination and viewing geometry of the observations across all PICS to a common reference geometry. The correction was applied independently to each spectral channel to account for the sensitivity of reflectance to variations in SZA and VZA. By doing so, the angular-induced variability in TOA reflectance was reduced according to Eq. (10).<disp-formula id="Ch1.E10" content-type="numbered"><label>10</label><mml:math id="M41" display="block"><mml:mtable columnspacing="1em" class="aligned" rowspacing="0.2ex" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>corr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>SZA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SZA</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true" class="stylechange"/></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mspace width="1em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>VZA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mtext>VZA</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo mathsize="1.1em">)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mtext>corr</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> denotes the corrected TOA reflectance, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>t</mml:mi><mml:mi>n</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the original TOA reflectance prior to correction, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>a</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>b</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the sensitivities (slopes) of TOA reflectance with respect to SZA and VZA, respectively, and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>SZA</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mtext>VZA</mml:mtext><mml:mtext>ref</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the reference angles, set to 45 and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, respectively.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2.SSS2">
  <label>4.2.2</label><title>Parameterization of the stability score for each site</title>
      <p id="d2e2051">After retrieving the reflectance time series, heat maps were generated for the PICS. For each spectral channel, the corresponding parameters were derived and are presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/>. These parameters were selected to estimate the SS of each PICS (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>). The reasons for choosing these parameters are  given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/>. All selected parameters shared the same stability indicator, where lower values corresponded to higher temporal stability.</p>

<table-wrap id="T3" specific-use="star"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2063">Summary of statistical parameters used for temporal stability assessment of the PICS and their physical interpretation in evaluating the stability of reflectance time series.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameters</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Physical interpretation in reflectance time series</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Stability indicator</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">A high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates high temporal variability</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> more stable</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">A high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests an unstable pattern</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>CV</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> more stable</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>IQR</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">A high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>IQR</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> indicates high variability in the middle range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>IQR</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> more stable</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi>m</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> describes the stationary status of the reflectance time series</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> more stable (stationary)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">A high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> means more anomalies and asymmetry</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mspace width="0.33em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> more stable</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">A high <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> suggests frequent extreme changes (spikes)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/><mml:mo>→</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.33em"/></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> more stable</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e2545">Methodological framework outlining the key steps: retrieval of reflectance time series, derivation of temporal metric parameters for each spectral channel, computation of SS per channel, band_wise averaging of SS of spectral channels, and derivation of the final SS for each PICS site. The lower left block of the diagram shows the workflow of the SS computation for one spectral channel (spectral channel index 0). The process was iterative for all spectral channels. Later, the SS for bands and PICS were computed.</p></caption>
            <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026-f02.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p id="d2e2555">The selected parameters for each time series of a wavelength were normalized based on Min-Max scaling <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.21"/>, shown in Eq. (11). This normalization aims to prevent large numerical ranges from dominating the magnitude of SS. The scaled parameters were in the range of 0 to 1.

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><label>11</label><mml:math id="M67" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>max</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mtext>min</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to the statistical parameters in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T3"/>. For each spectral channel, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo mathvariant="normal" stretchy="false">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math></inline-formula> is the normalized parameter.</p>
      <p id="d2e2618">SS was computed based on Eq. (12), in which the weight of parameters was equal for all.

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><label>12</label><mml:math id="M70" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false" mathvariant="normal">̃</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mtext>with</mml:mtext><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>k</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mtext>and</mml:mtext><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.25em"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of features.</p>
      <p id="d2e2729">The overall SS of a PICS was represented by the average of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the whole spectrum (see the illustrative diagram in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2"/>).

              <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><label>13</label><mml:math id="M73" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow><mml:mo mathvariant="normal">‾</mml:mo></mml:mover><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:mi>j</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

            where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mi>j</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the number of spectral channels, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M75" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mtext>SS</mml:mtext><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="script">S</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>k</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the stability score of a spectral channel of a wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math id="M76" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <label>5</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <label>5.1</label><title>GOME and SCIAMACHY reflectance time series of PICS</title>
      <p id="d2e2869">The reflectance time series of the PICS were retrieved under conditions of CF less than 0.25. Libya 4, one of the PICS endorsed by CEOS, WGCV, and IVOS, has been extensively used in previous studies for long-term stability assessments and sensor calibration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27 bib1.bibx1 bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.22"/>. As a representative example, Libya 4 was selected for detailed visualization of the reflectance time series obtained from the GOME and SCIAMACHY sensors.</p>
      <p id="d2e2875">Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/> present the corresponding heatmaps of reflectance measurements from GOME and SCIAMACHY, respectively. At certain points in time for GOME (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/>), higher values of the reflectance were observed across the whole spectrum (horizontal bright lines). In the UV, the value of the reflectance exceeded the average value due to instrument degradation, particularly towards the end of the GOME mission in 2011. The VIS and NIR spectral ranges were more uniform. In the NIR spectral range, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band was visible with low reflectances around the center of the band. Similar behavior was observed for SCIAMACHY as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F4"/>. The main difference was the absence of larger variations over long periods in the UV, suggesting better degradation correction compared with GOME.</p>

      <fig id="F3" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2899">Heatmap of the GOME reflectance observations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M78" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">716</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) over Libya4. Three representative wavelengths from the UV, VIS, and NIR regions are highlighted with white dashed lines, and their time series are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F4" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2925">Same as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F3"/> but for SCIAMACHY reflectance observations (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M79" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">568</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and the time series of the selected wavelengths are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2950">To gain further insight into the variability of the reflectance time series observed in the heatmaps, three wavelengths were selected. These wavelengths, located approximately at 330 (UV), 450 (VIS), and 770 nm (NIR), were indicated by white dashed lines in the heatmaps. Figures <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/> show the corresponding reflectance time series at these wavelengths, derived from GOME and SCIAMACHY data, respectively.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e2959">The reflectance time series of the wavelengths: 329.96 nm in UV (blue), 449.98 nm in VIS (green), and 770.10 nm in NIR (orange) from GOME with (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">716</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e2982">The reflectance time series of the wavelengths 329.98 nm in UV (blue), 449.94 nm in VIS (green), and 770.04 nm in NIR (orange) from SCIAMACHY with (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">568</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3003">The reflectance time series at the UV wavelength of GOME at 329.5 nm exhibited significant fluctuations, with approximately 47 % of the observations within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of the average value. A noticeable increase in reflectance was observed in 2001 and toward the end of the GOME mission due to degradation effects (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F5"/>). Additionally, the reflectance time series exhibited three clearly separated clusters, likely resulting from the dependence of reflectance on VZA. In contrast, the selected wavelengths in the VIS (436.47 nm) and NIR (736.19 nm) regions demonstrated greater consistency, with 87 % and 96 % of the observations, respectively, remaining within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of their average values. Among them, the VIS wavelength showed a particularly more consistent pattern.</p>
      <p id="d2e3035">For SCIAMACHY, the average reflectance values at the corresponding wavelengths were comparable to those from GOME (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F6"/>). A similar fluctuation pattern was observed in the UV band (329.98 nm), about 58.3 % of observations were within <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Additionally, sinusoidal-like patterns were more apparent in the SCIAMACHY UV time series than in GOME. Unlike the GOME UV reflectance time series, the scatter distribution did not show distinct clustering. The reflectance time series for the selected VIS (449.94 nm) and NIR (770.04 nm) wavelengths appeared even more consistent than those of GOME, with no evident degradation effects over the mission period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <label>5.2</label><title>Temporal metrics from GOME and SCIAMACHY reflectance time series</title>
      <p id="d2e3061">The derived temporal metrics of the GOME and SCIAMACHY reflectance time series of each spectral channel from the investigated PICS are presented in Figs. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>. These results offered a comprehensive comparison of statistical features across the PICS sites and spectral channels.</p>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e3070">Temporal metrics of GOME reflectance time series of the investigated PICS include mean, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, interquartile range, slope, skewness, and kurtosis. Each subplot consists of three boxes, which refer to the wavelength ranges in UV/VIS/NIR.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <fig id="F8" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 8</label><caption><p id="d2e3081">Same as in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/> but for SCIAMACHY reflectance time series.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3093">The mean of the GOME reflectance time series in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>a demonstrated relatively low reflectance values in UV and VIS and higher reflectance values near the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption window (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band). The standard deviation in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>b and IQR in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>d showed higher UV variability for most sites. However, tighter spreads of the IQR were observed in VIS (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>d). The CV in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>c showed notably higher values and a wide range across spectral channels and sites. The CV values were suddenly increased in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M87" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band. This was likely due to the low mean reflectance value in the absorption window. The slope values in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>e showed a notable pattern of degradation across most of the sites, particularly for the short wavelengths in UV. Smaller degradation patterns were observed in the VIS and NIR ranges. GOME reflectance time series demonstrated large magnitudes of skewness in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>f and kurtosis in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F7"/>g, suggesting higher variability and asymmetry across the spectral channels, especially in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band in NIR, which could be due to the influence of the clouds and aerosols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.23"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3161">The mean reflectance values of SCIAMACHY were similar to GOME and showed similar patterns across all sites in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>a. There were relatively low reflectance values in UV and VIS and higher reflectance values in NIR near the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band. Low reflectance values were observed within the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band (759–770 nm), indicating strong atmospheric absorption.  The standard deviation in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>b and the IQR in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>d provided insights into the temporal variability of reflectance. Higher values in the UV range suggested greater fluctuations and noise, while lower values were in the VIS and on both sides of the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band in NIR. The CV in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>c revealed differing levels of stability across spectral bands and among the PICS sites. In the UV, CV tends to increase with wavelength, while in the VIS, it remains relatively consistent. High CV values in the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band in the NIR. Overall, the results suggested greater temporal stability in the VIS and spectral channels adjacent to the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band compared to the UV. CV values among the sites range between 0.05 (5 %) and 0.20 (20 %).  The slope values in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>e, especially in the UV, showed slight changes in the spectral signature of the sites. The oscillations in the slope of the UV channel were possibly caused by residual etalon variations. The dip around 350 nm was likely due to stronger degradation of the Band 2 detector, which was a known characteristic of the instrument. In contrast, many PICS sites exhibited slope values close to zero in the VIS and NIR, suggesting negligible long-term trends and stable reflectance behavior in these regions.  The skewness values in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>f varied among sites and bands but remained consistent, reflecting differing degrees of asymmetry in the reflectance distributions. The VIS region exhibited more symmetric reflectance distributions compared to the UV. In the NIR, the absorption feature caused noticeable disruptions in symmetry. Similarly, kurtosis values in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F8"/>g, especially in the UV and NIR, suggested the presence of occasional outliers or extreme values. The VIS region, in contrast, showed fewer such anomalies.</p>
      <p id="d2e3235">The comparative analysis of temporal metrics for GOME and SCIAMACHY reflectance revealed different sensor performances and varying patterns across both PICS sites and spectral bands. Before assessing the stability of PICS, it is essential to first identify the most stable sensor data to be used in the analysis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <label>5.3</label><title>GOME versus SCIAMACHY: a comparative analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e3246">The averages of the metric temporal parameters of each spectral band and site are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>. The average values were computed by taking the mean of the parameters across the wavelength ranges defined for each band in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T2"/>. Key findings from these temporal metrics for both sensors are presented in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="T4"/>. It presents the comparison of GOME and SCIAMACHY for each extracted parameter of each band.</p>

      <fig id="F9" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 9</label><caption><p id="d2e3257">Average of metric temporal parameters for the investigated PICS. For each PICS site and sensor, three bars represent the metric values in the UV, VIS, and NIR bands (blue, orange, and green, respectively). Solid bars denote SCIAMACHY results, while hatched bars denote GOME.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

<table-wrap id="T4" specific-use="star"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3269">Comparison of the average of metric temporal parameters for the investigated PICS.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="65mm"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="65mm"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameters</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">GOME</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">SCIAMACHY</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mean reflectance</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Consistent patterns across all the sites; higher in NIR than in UV and VIS.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Very similar to GOME, with closely matching mean values across all sites.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Standard deviation</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Higher variability in the UV band;  lower values in VIS and NIR across all sites.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Same overall pattern but with systematically lower variability  than GOME.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Interquartile range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Higher IQR in UV than in VIS and NIR across all sites.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Same spectral pattern as GOME, but with smaller IQR values.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Coefficient of variations</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Higher CV in UV than in VIS and NIR for most PICS,  indicating greater relative variability.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Matches GOME’s spectral pattern but with lower CV magnitudes  at all sites.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Skewness</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Generally positive skew across sites. For some sites, VIS shows the  largest skew compared to UV and NIR.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Lower skewness overall compared with GOME, indicating more symmetric reflectance distributions.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Kurtosis</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Pronounced peaks – especially in VIS of some sites – suggesting occasional  extreme reflectance events at some sites.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Flatter kurtosis curves (fewer extremes),  with values consistently lower than those of GOME.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Slope</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2" align="left">Shows larger slope magnitudes, suggesting possible sensor drift over time.</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3" align="left">Near-zero slopes except UV and very consistent across all sites, reflecting minimal long-term drift.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e3387">GOME and SCIAMACHY shared several characteristics, particularly in their mean reflectance profiles. Both sensors exhibited similar reflectance patterns across the spectral channels (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>a). While both sensors displayed high temporal variability in the UV band, they had less variability in VIS and the lowest in NIR (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>b and c).</p>
      <p id="d2e3394">However, GOME consistently displayed higher temporal variability and drift indicators than SCIAMACHY. Specifically, GOME's standard deviation, IQR, and CV were relatively higher (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>b–d); its slope values suggested greater sensor drift (Fig. 7e); skewness was more strongly positive across most sites (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>f); kurtosis revealed more frequent extreme reflectance events (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>g). Collectively, these findings recommend adopting SCIAMACHY as the primary reference sensor for PICS stability assessments.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <label>5.4</label><title>Reflectance correction for sun illumination and satellite viewing angles</title>
      <p id="d2e3412">To illustrate the effects of SZA and VZA on reflectance, the mean reflectance across all spectral channels was analyzed as an example. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>a and b present scatter plots of the mean reflectance of the whole spectrum as a function of SZA and VZA, respectively. The black dashed lines represent linear regression fits and illustrate the overall trends in the observations. Consistent positive slopes were observed for all sites with increasing SZA, indicating an increase in reflectance with SZA. In contrast, reflectance exhibited consistent negative slopes with increasing VZA.</p>

      <fig id="F10" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 10</label><caption><p id="d2e3419">Mean reflectance of the whole spectrum of the PICS observations with respect to SZA and VZA. The scatterplot of the mean reflectance versus <bold>(a)</bold> SZA, <bold>(b)</bold> VZA. The fitted linear regression equations for the samples are shown in the black dashed lines <bold>(c)</bold> the percentage of the changes in mean reflectance per 10° changes in SZA (blue bars) and VZA (orange bars).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3437">Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F10"/>c shows the percentage change in reflectance corresponding to a 10° change in the sun-illumination and viewing geometry. The mean reflectance typically varies by 0.5 % per 10° to 2.57 % per 10° increase in SZA, with some sites, such as Arabia1 and Niger1, showing lower sensitivity of approximately 0.5 %. The effect of VZA was more pronounced, exhibiting an inverse relationship with reflectance. The corresponding absolute variations in reflectance ranged from 2 % per 10° to 6 % per 10° change in viewing angle.</p>
      <p id="d2e3443">The regression analysis revealed a systematic dependence of mean reflectance on both solar illumination and satellite viewing geometry. The magnitude of changes in reflectance was not the same across the PICS. Consequently, the reflectance observations over the PICS were corrected for the effects of both SZA and VZA. To account for spectral variability, the regression was applied separately to each spectral channel, ensuring that angular dependencies were corrected on a channel-by-channel basis.</p>
      <p id="d2e3446">As an illustrative example, the reflectance differences for the Libya4 site (corrected – original) are provided in the Supplement (see Fig. S1). The effect of the correction was strongest in the UV spectral channels, weaker in the VIS channels, and smallest in the NIR region. The correction applied to the reflectance time series exhibited a clear seasonal dependence, with the largest correction values for the reflectance time series of the summer months (May–September).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS5">
  <label>5.5</label><title>Stability score for PICS</title>
      <p id="d2e3458">The SS for the PICS sites were computed based on corrected SCIAMACHY reflectance observations. The SS was calculated for each spectral channel, excluding the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band. The scores were normalized and visualized in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F11"/> with lower values indicating greater stability.</p>

      <fig id="F11" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 11</label><caption><p id="d2e3476">The heatmap of the SS of each spectral channel of UV, VIS, and NIR spectral channels. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band is excluded from SS computation and appears as a white rectangle in the NIR panel.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/3193/2026/amt-19-3193-2026-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e3496">Some sites demonstrated stable performance across nearly all spectral channels. With the most stable sites being Sudan1, Arabia2, and Libya4. In contrast, other sites showed differences when comparing the stability of the different spectral bands. For instance, Arabia3, Arabia2, Libya3, and Niger2 showed higher stability in the UV band compared to the VIS band. Conversely, sites such as Algeria1, Algeria2, Algeria3, Libya4, and Sudan1 demonstrated greater stability in the VIS band than in the UV. A few sites, including Mali1, Mauritania1, Mauritania2, and Niger1 displayed generally low stability across all spectral regions. Additionally, high SS values were observed across multiple sites, appearing as vertically homogeneous patterns. This effect was particularly pronounced in the UV spectral region, likely due to the strong sensitivity of UV bands to atmospheric influences, such as cloud contamination and aerosols.</p>
      <p id="d2e3500">Based on the band-wise ranking shown in Fig. S2, the SS values of the PICS span a wide range across the spectral domains. In the UV range, SS varies from 0.11 to 0.75, while in the VIS range, it lies between 0.25 and 0.70. The NIR range exhibits SS values between 0.16 and 0.78. On average, the SS values for the UV and VIS bands are 0.45 and 0.50, respectively, which are higher than the average value for the NIR band (0.40). This indicates that PICS stability exhibits a clear dependence on spectral band. As an illustrative example, the Libyan sites (Libya1, Libya2, Libya3, and Libya4) exhibit SS values of 0.50, 0.38, 0.36, and 0.33, respectively (see Fig. S3). The high SS of Libya1 can be attributed to its being relatively higher SS in the UV and VIS bands compared to the other Libyan sites, as the SS represents a combined measure across all spectral bands.</p>
      <p id="d2e3503">The influence of geographical proximity is linked to the high potential of similar surface characteristics, which is evident in the band-wise ranking of the PICS, particularly in the NIR band, excluding the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band. Several geographically close sites showed similar SS values, including Algeria3 and Algeria4, Arabia1 and Arabia2, Mauretania1 and Mauretania2, Libya4 and Egypt1, and Libya3 and Libya2 (see Fig. S2). These geographically driven groupings – most clearly observed in the NIR band – suggest that sites within similar regional and geomorphological settings tend to exhibit comparable temporal characteristics. In contrast, this clustering effect was less pronounced in the VIS and UV bands.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6">
  <label>6</label><title>Discussion</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS1">
  <label>6.1</label><title>Framework</title>
      <p id="d2e3533">To ensure the robustness and comprehensive assessment of the reflectance time series and the comparison between sensors, additional statistical descriptors were included. Besides the basic statistical parameters and CV, other parameters like IQR, slope, skewness, and kurtosis were included in the assessment. Skewness, kurtosis, and IQR parameters are used to identify the level of symmetry in the observations, reflect the presence of outliers, and quantify the spread of the central portion of the data. The slope serves as an indicator of the degradation in the sensor performance.</p>
      <p id="d2e3536">With only basic statistical parameters (mean, standard deviation, and CV), there were no significant differences observed for the spectrometer samples. When additional parameters such as slope, skewness, and kurtosis were considered, meaningful differences became apparent (see Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="F9"/>). These high-order statistical features provided greater sensitivity to distributional characteristics, subtle anomalies, and temporal trends, thereby offering a more robust basis for distinguishing the performance and stability of the spectrometers. This multi-parameter approach contributed to a more robust and resilient framework for sensor performance evaluation, radiometer drift monitoring, and identifying the constrained and reference sensors for cross-calibration.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS2">
  <label>6.2</label><title>Reflectance time series analysis</title>
      <p id="d2e3549">The derived indicators from the reflectance time series of GOME and SCIAMACHY revealed different statistical patterns among the PICS and across spectral channels. These differing patterns indicated that the initial hypothesis – that atmospheric conditions across the sites are relatively similar and that all PICS should exhibit similar behavior – may not hold in all cases. Therefore, PICS should be regularly investigated <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="paren.24"/>. This finding underscored the need to quantify and compare the stability of each PICS site individually and across different spectral bands. The metric parameters derived from reflectance observations from both sensors consistently showed that deviation, variation, asymmetry, and degradation were highest in the UV bands, lower in the VIS bands, and lowest in the NIR bands. These results were expected for the following reasons: (i) TOA reflectance was used, which includes contributions from both surface and atmospheric reflectance; (ii) the UV bands are highly sensitive to atmospheric processes and aerosols <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7 bib1.bibx28" id="paren.25"/>; (iii) the VIS bands are influenced by Rayleigh scattering and aerosol variability <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.26"/>; and (iv) the NIR bands (excluding the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band) are less affected by atmospheric processes and are more sensitive to surface reflectance; therefore, it serves as a baseline for atmospheric correction algorithms <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.27"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS3">
  <label>6.3</label><title>Comparative analysis of GOME versus SCIAMACHY</title>
      <p id="d2e3583">A comparative analysis of key statistical parameters revealed that SCIAMACHY exhibited more statistically uniform and stable reflectance measurements than GOME. These indicators suggested lower temporal variability and fewer extreme values in SCIAMACHY data, making it a more robust choice. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="text.28"/> investigated the degradation across the spectral channels of SCIAMACHY and found that even after reaching the nominal lifetime of the mission in 2007, the SCIAMACHY instrument was still in good condition. However, the same study demonstrated an increased degradation in UV channels.</p>
      <p id="d2e3589">The discrepancy in the derived statistical parameters between GOME and SCIAMACHY might be partly attributed to sensor degradation effects. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx8" id="text.29"/> referred to the severe degradation of the GOME instrument in the UV due to scan mirror degradation. Overall, SCIAMACHY's enhanced design and calibration capabilities resulted in better long-term radiometric stability compared to GOME. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="text.30"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="text.31"/> presented a degradation correction approach based on SCIAMACHY's internal white light measurements in combination with direct solar measurements. Consequently, SCIAMACHY was adopted as the reference sensor for evaluating the temporal stability of the PICS. Using SCIAMACHY observations in this paper ensured that the derived SS were based on a more stable and consistent dataset, enhancing the reliability of the site rankings and subsequent cross-calibration of both sensors by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.32"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS4">
  <label>6.4</label><title>Refinement reflectance observations for reliable estimation of the stability scores</title>
      <p id="d2e3612">The reflectance observations collected over PICS exhibited varying degrees of dependence on the SZA and VZA across the sites. An increase in SZA results in a longer atmospheric path length, leading to enhanced scattering and, consequently, TOA reflectance. This dependence on SZA is consistent with previous studies; for example, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.33"/> reported that reflectance tends to increase with both atmospheric aerosol optical depth and SZA. These findings indicated that a significant portion of the observed reflectance variability could be attributed to the sensitivity of TOA reflectance to changes in SZA. Differently, the reflectance time series as a function of VZA exhibited an inverse relationship, which may be attributed to degradation of the scan mirror angle over time, particularly in the UV band.</p>
      <p id="d2e3618">The correction applied to account for reflectance dependence on variations in SZA and VZA exhibited a clear seasonal pattern, with maximum corrections occurring during summer. Using a reference geometry with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>SZA</mml:mtext><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">45</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">°</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, the typically lower SZA values during summer led to increased reflectance after correction to the reference geometry compared with winter. The magnitude of the correction was wavelength dependent, with the largest corrections observed in the UV bands. This behavior was likely associated with enhanced atmospheric transport of aerosols and dust during summer. Previous studies reported a pronounced seasonal dust cycle, characterized by higher dust concentrations in the summer months <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.34"/>. Both the central Sahara Desert and the Arabian Peninsula experienced their highest aerosol optical depth during summer <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.35"/>. Accounting for these effects was therefore essential for modeling SS and for ensuring comparable values across sites, without the influence of differing illumination and viewing geometries.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6.SS5">
  <label>6.5</label><title>Stability of PICS</title>
      <p id="d2e3650">SS served as an indicator of temporal variability across the spectral channels. The SS for PICS were estimated based on groups of parameters that directly quantified variability, distribution, and temporal trends. The features describing temporal variability in reflectance were normalized to ensure comparability across sites. The SS was primarily determined by band characteristics. Overall, the values of SS were lower (more stable) in the NIR than in the VIS and UV bands. At longer wavelengths, contributions from surface properties – such as mineral composition, soil texture, surface roughness, and moisture – become increasingly significant <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.36"/>, increasing the sensitivity of the metric to surface homogeneity and underlying geophysical conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e3656">The band-wise ranking of the PICS showed strong clustering based on geographical proximity, which can be attributed to similar soil mineralogy and morphological conditions. In contrast, less clustering by geographic proximity was observed in the UV and VIS bands. This likely reflects regional differences in meteorological and atmospheric conditions, as these bands are more strongly influenced by atmospheric effects.</p>
      <p id="d2e3659">Overall, the results demonstrated a wide range of SS across spectral bands and sites. Our findings confirmed that Libya4 – one of the recommended sites for sensor cross-calibration – was among the most stable PICS. Some sites, such as Sudan1 and Arabia2, exhibited lower scores (more stable) than Libya4. These three sites are, therefore, recommended for further cross-calibration activities.</p>
      <p id="d2e3662">Differing SS across the PICS could refer to the following reasons: <list list-type="bullet"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3667"><italic>Surface characteristics.</italic> Site properties affect radiometric stability; PICS are not fully invariant. Relevant factors include sand topography, grain size <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.37"/>, composition, color, material type, and dune displacement <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.38"/>. The sun's azimuth relative to dune alignment influences reflectance, with mean values depending on the area size <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.39"/>.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3682"><italic>Meteorological conditions.</italic> Strong winds can transport dust over large areas. Saharan dust storms in June 2020 caused high aerosol optical depths to extend to the USA within 4 d  <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.40"/>. Such events particularly affect short wavelengths (blue/visible) due to aerosol scattering.</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e3691"><italic>Atmospheric conditions.</italic> The derived metrics used to compute the SS were based on TOA reflectance. Consequently, the SS remain influenced by atmospheric conditions, particularly in the UV and VIS spectral bands, where atmospheric scattering and absorption effects are more pronounced. Contributions from aerosols, molecular (Rayleigh) scattering, and trace gases can introduce additional variability in the TOA signal, which may not be fully separable from surface-related changes. As a result, the computed SS reflect the combined effects of surface properties and atmospheric variability rather than purely surface stability. Nevertheless, the analysis focuses on relative temporal behavior and inter-site comparisons, the impact of atmospheric effects is assumed to be comparable across the selected PICS, allowing meaningful assessment of their relative stability.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>7</label><title>Conclusion</title>
      <p id="d2e3705">This paper presented a statistical framework based on multiple indicators to compare different sensors, monitor sensor performance, identify sensor-related issues, determine reference and constrained sensors for cross-calibration, and investigate the temporal variability of spectral bands and PICS based on TOA reflectance. The framework incorporated a wide range of parameters, including traditional time series metrics such as the mean, standard deviation, and CV. In addition, it included additional indicators that provide insights into the distribution shape of observations, the presence of anomalies, and temporal trends.</p>
      <p id="d2e3708">The GOME and SCIAMACHY spectrometers were used in this study due to their similar sensor characteristics and mission objectives, as well as overlapping spectral coverage. Additionally, their missions provided approximately 10 years of overlapping observation data, with a temporal offset of about 30 min in their overpass times. A decade of reflectance measurements from both sensors was retrieved under nearly clear-sky conditions over PICS.</p>
      <p id="d2e3711">The results highlighted instrumental issues in GOME, including significant degradation observed in 2001 and irregular observation patterns toward the end of its operational life. These findings agreed with previous studies that reported pronounced degradation of GOME, particularly in the UV spectral band. Moreover, statistical indicators revealed high positive values of skewness and kurtosis, indicating an asymmetrical distribution and the presence of numerous outliers. In contrast, SCIAMACHY observations were found to be more uniform and stationary, with substantially lower trends compared to GOME. As a result, SCIAMACHY was considered the reference sensor in this study for assessing the stability of PICS.</p>
      <p id="d2e3714">In terms of site stability, areas larger than the spatial extension of PICS were considered due to the large footprint of the spectrometers. Furthermore, this study aimed to establish a foundation for spectrometer cross-calibration, for which the temporal stability of areas larger than the PICS is a critical factor. The analysis revealed considerable variation among the PICS. While some sites exhibited high temporal stability across all spectral channels, others showed inconsistent behavior across bands, and a subset of sites displayed significantly lower stability, up to two to three times less stable than the most consistent sites. Additionally, the SS exhibited a clear band-wise dependency, with higher stability observed in the NIR band (excluding the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> A-band) and lower stability in the VIS and UV bands. These findings emphasize the importance of selecting suitable PICS for radiometric calibration, taking into account the spectral band of interest.</p>
      <p id="d2e3729">The identification of the most stable PICS has broader implications for the satellite remote sensing community. Highly stable PICS can serve as reliable reference targets for monitoring long-term sensor performance, assessing radiometric consistency, and supporting cross-calibration activities. Improved radiometric stability at the calibration level directly propagates to higher-level satellite products. In particular, the retrieval of atmospheric trace gases depends critically on the accurate spectral structure of TOA reflectance. For example, Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS) retrievals typically require a relative point-to-point accuracy on the order of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This stringent requirement highlights the importance of carefully selecting stable reference sites for tracking sensor performance, radiometric calibration, and cross-calibration. Furthermore, periodic evaluation of these sites is crucial to ensure their long-term stability. The follow-up paper performs the cross-calibration of GOME and SCIAMACHY based on the most stable sites of this research paper <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.41"/>.</p>
      <p id="d2e3749">The findings of this study indicate that the initial hypothesis does not hold uniformly across all sites, as atmospheric conditions can vary significantly between desert regions. We recommend that future research focus on separating the atmospheric reflectance component from the TOA reflectance. Comparative statistical analyses of the NIR relative to the UV and VIS spectral ranges can provide insight into the stronger atmospheric influence in the UV and VIS. Under this framework, NIR observations may serve as a reference to correct UV and VIS reflectance. In addition, incorporating auxiliary parameters – such as aerosol optical depth and trace gas column densities derived from the corresponding Level-2 products – into the statistical analysis could further improve the robustness of the methodology.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e3756"><list list-type="bullet">
        <list-item>

      <p id="d2e3761">SCIAMACHY Level 1b: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5270/EN1-5eab12a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5270/EN1-5eab12a</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.42"/>;</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>

      <p id="d2e3773">SCIAMACHY 1c tool: <uri>https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/tools/scial1c-command-line-tool</uri> (last access: 27 March 2026);</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>

      <p id="d2e3782">GOME-1 Level 1b: <uri>https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/instruments/gome/products-information</uri> (last access: 27 March 2026);</p>
        </list-item>
        <list-item>

      <p id="d2e3791">FDR4ATMOS products: <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5270/ESA-852456e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5270/ESA-852456e</ext-link> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx11" id="paren.43"/>.</p>
        </list-item>
      </list></p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p id="d2e3803">The supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3193-2026-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3193-2026-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e3812">Abdalmenem Owda: Conceptualization, Methodology, Programming, Investigation, Writing – original draft. Günter Lichtenberg: Writing – review and editing.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e3818">The contact author has declared that neither of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e3825">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e3831">The FDR4ATMOS project, initiated by ESA, provides long-term records of Earth observation Level 1 parameters (radiance, irradiance, reflectance) to improve the performance of mission datasets (<uri>https://atmos.eoc.dlr.de/FDR4ATMOS/</uri>, last access: 20 September 2025).</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e3839">This research has been supported by the European Space Agency (grant no. 4000128410/19/I-NS).  The article processing charges for this open-access  publication were covered by the German Aerospace Center (DLR).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e3850">This paper was edited by Mark Weber and reviewed by Ralph Snel and one anonymous referee.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Barsi et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>Barsi, J. A., Alhammoud, B., Czapla-Myers, J., Gascon, F., Haque, M. O., Kaewmanee, M., Leigh, L., and Markham, B. L.: Sentinel-2A MSI and Landsat-8 OLI radiometric cross comparison over desert sites, Eur. J. Remote Sens., 51, 822–837, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2018.1507613" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/22797254.2018.1507613</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Bovensmann et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation> B ovensmann, H., Burrows, J., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Noel, S., Rozanov, V., Chance, K., and Goede, A.: SCIAMACHY: Mission objectives and measurement modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Burrows et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation> Burrows, J. P., Weber, M., Buchwitz, M., Rozanov, V., Ladstätter-Weißenmayer, A., Richter, A., DeBeek, R., Hoogen, R., Bramstedt, K., Eichmann, K.-U., Eisinger, M., and Perner, D.: The global ozone monitoring experiment (GOME): Mission concept and first scientific results, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 151–175, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Cabor et al.(1998)Cabor, Hagolle, Cosnefroy, and Briottet</label><mixed-citation>Cabor, F., Hagolle, O., Cosnefroy, H., and Briottet, X.: Inter-calibration using desertic sites as a reference target, in: IGARSS'98. Sensing and Managing the Environment. 1998 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Symposium Proceedings, no. 98CH36174, IEEE, 5, 2713–2715, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.1998.702327" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/IGARSS.1998.702327</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>CEOS(2026)</label><mixed-citation>CEOS: PICS: Pseudo-Invariant Calibration Sites, <uri>https://calvalportal.ceos.org/web/guest/pics_sites</uri> (last access: 27 March 2026), 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Chander et al.(2013)Chander, Hewison, Fox, Wu, Xiong, and Blackwell</label><mixed-citation>Chander, G., Hewison, T. J., Fox, N., Wu, X., Xiong, X., and Blackwell, W. J.: Overview of intercalibration of satellite instruments, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 1056–1080, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2228654" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2012.2228654</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Chatzopoulou et al.(2025)Chatzopoulou, Tourpali, Bais, and Braesicke</label><mixed-citation>Chatzopoulou, A., Tourpali, K., Bais, A., and Braesicke, P.: Effects of different aerosol types on surface UV radiation in the 21st century, Atmos. Environ., 362, 121595, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121595" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121595</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Coldewey-Egbers et al.(2008)Coldewey-Egbers, Slijkhuis, Aberle, and Loyola</label><mixed-citation>Coldewey-Egbers, M., Slijkhuis, S., Aberle, B., and Loyola, D.: Long-term analysis of GOME in-flight calibration parameters and instrument degradation, Appl. Optics, 47, 4749–4761, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.47.004749" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.47.004749</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Cosnefroy et al.(1996)Cosnefroy, Leroy, and Briottet</label><mixed-citation>Cosnefroy, H., Leroy, M., and Briottet, X.: Selection and characterization of Saharan and Arabian desert sites for the calibration of optical satellite sensors, Remote Sens. Environ., 58, 101–114, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(95)00211-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/0034-4257(95)00211-1</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>European Space Agency(2024a)</label><mixed-citation>European Space Agency: Envisat SCIAMACHY Level 1b [SCI_____1P], Version 10, Earth Online [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5270/EN1-5eab12a" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5270/EN1-5eab12a</ext-link>, 2024a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>European Space Agency(2024b)</label><mixed-citation>European Space Agency: FDR for Atmospheric Composition [ATMOS__L1B]. Version 1.0, Earth Online [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5270/ESA-852456e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5270/ESA-852456e</ext-link>, 2024b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>ESA(2025a)</label><mixed-citation>ESA: FDR L1b Products, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5270/ESA-852456e" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5270/ESA-852456e</ext-link>, 2025a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>ESA(2025b)</label><mixed-citation>ESA: GOME L1b, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5270/ER2-ua38y2m" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5270/ER2-ua38y2m</ext-link>, 2025b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>ESA(2025c)</label><mixed-citation>ESA: SCIAMACHY Instrument Overview, <uri>https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/instruments/sciamachy</uri> (last access: 27 March 2026), 2025c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Fajardo Rueda et al.(2021)Fajardo Rueda, Leigh, Teixeira Pinto, Kaewmanee, and Helder</label><mixed-citation>Fajardo Rueda, J., Leigh, L., Teixeira Pinto, C., Kaewmanee, M., and Helder, D.: Classification and Evaluation of Extended PICS (EPICS) on a Global Scale for Calibration and Stability Monitoring of Optical Satellite Sensors, Remote Sens.-Basel, 13, 3350, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173350" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs13173350</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Fang et al.(2018)Fang, Hong, Zhao, Kukolich, Yin, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Fang, Q., Hong, H., Zhao, L., Kukolich, S., Yin, K., and Wang, C.: Visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy for investigating soil mineralogy: A review, J. Spectrosc., 2018, 3168974, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3168974" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1155/2018/3168974</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Francis et al.(2020)Francis, Fonseca, Nelli, Cuesta, Weston, Evan, and Temimi</label><mixed-citation>Francis, D., Fonseca, R., Nelli, N., Cuesta, J., Weston, M., Evan, A., and Temimi, M.: The atmospheric drivers of the major Saharan dust storm in June 2020, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL090102, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090102" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020GL090102</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Govaerts(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Govaerts, Y. M.: Sand dune ridge alignment effects on surface BRF over the Libya-4 CEOS calibration site, Sensors, 15, 3453–3470, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/s150203453" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/s150203453</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Han et al.(2022)Han, Pei, and Tong</label><mixed-citation>Han, J., Pei, J., and Tong, H.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, <uri>https://books.google.de/books?id=NR1oEAAAQBAJ</uri> (last access: 27 March 2026), 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Hasan et al.(2019)Hasan, Shrestha, Leigh, and Helder</label><mixed-citation>Hasan, M. N., Shrestha, M., Leigh, L., and Helder, D.: Evaluation of an Extended PICS (EPICS) for calibration and stability monitoring of optical satellite sensors, Remote Sens.-Basel, 11, 1755, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11151755" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs11151755</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>He et al.(2021)He, Fang, Shoshanim, Brown, and Rudich</label><mixed-citation>He, Q., Fang, Z., Shoshanim, O., Brown, S. S., and Rudich, Y.: Scattering and absorption cross sections of atmospheric gases in the ultraviolet–visible wavelength range (307–725 nm), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14927–14940, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14927-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-14927-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Helder et al.(2013)Helder, Thome, Mishra, Chander, Xiong, Angal, and Choi</label><mixed-citation> Helder, D., Thome, K. J., Mishra, N., Chander, G., Xiong, X., Angal, A., and Choi, T.: Absolute radiometric calibration of Landsat using a pseudo invariant calibration site, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 1360–1369, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Hilbig et al.(2019)Hilbig, Bramstedt, Weber, Burrows, and Krijger</label><mixed-citation>Hilbig, T., Bramstedt, K., Weber, M., Burrows, J. P., and Krijger, M.: Optimised degradation correction for SCIAMACHY satellite solar measurements from 330 to 1600 nm by using the internal white light source, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3893–3907, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3893-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-13-3893-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Kabir et al.(2020)Kabir, Leigh, and Helder</label><mixed-citation>Kabir, S., Leigh, L., and Helder, D.: Vicarious methodologies to assess and improve the quality of the optical remote sensing images: A critical review, Remote Sens.-Basel, 12, 4029, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs12244029</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Khadka et al.(2021)Khadka, Teixeira Pinto, and Leigh</label><mixed-citation>Khadka, N., Teixeira Pinto, C., and Leigh, L.: Detection of change points in pseudo-invariant calibration sites time series using multi-sensor satellite imagery, Remote Sens.-Basel, 13, 2079, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs13112079</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Krijger et al.(2014)Krijger, Snel, Van Harten, Rietjens, and Aben</label><mixed-citation>Krijger, J. M., Snel, R., van Harten, G., Rietjens, J. H. H., and Aben, I.: Mirror contamination in space I: mirror modelling, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3387–3398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3387-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-3387-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Lacherade et al.(2013)Lacherade, Fougnie, Henry, and Gamet</label><mixed-citation>Lacherade, S., Fougnie, B., Henry, P., and Gamet, P.: Cross calibration over desert sites: Description, methodology, and operational implementation, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 1098–1113, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227061" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227061</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Li et al.(2012)Li, Li, and Mao</label><mixed-citation>Li, Q., Li, C., and Mao, J.: Evaluation of atmospheric aerosol optical depth products at ultraviolet bands derived from MODIS products, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 1025–1034, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.687475" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2012.687475</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Liang(2017)</label><mixed-citation> Liang, S.: Comprehensive remote sensing, Elsevier, ISBN 9780128032206, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Lichtenberg et al.(2006)Lichtenberg, Kleipool, Krijger, Van Soest, Van Hees, Tilstra, Acarreta, Aben, Ahlers, Bovensmann et al.</label><mixed-citation>Lichtenberg, G., Kleipool, Q., Krijger, J. M., van Soest, G., van Hees, R., Tilstra, L. G., Acarreta, J. R., Aben, I., Ahlers, B., Bovensmann, H., Chance, K., Gloudemans, A. M. S., Hoogeveen, R. W. M., Jongma, R. T. N., Noël, S., Piters, A., Schrijver, H., Schrijvers, C., Sioris, C. E., Skupin, J., Slijkhuis, S., Stammes, P., and Wuttke, M.: SCIAMACHY Level 1 data: calibration concept and in-flight calibration, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5347–5367, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5347-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-5347-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Logothetis et al.(2021)Logothetis, Salamalikis, Gkikas, Kazadzis, Amiridis, and Kazantzidis</label><mixed-citation>Logothetis, S.-A., Salamalikis, V., Gkikas, A., Kazadzis, S., Amiridis, V., and Kazantzidis, A.: 15-year variability of desert dust optical depth on global and regional scales, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16499–16529, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16499-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-16499-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Min et al.(2014)Min, Yin, Li, Berndt, Harrison, Joseph, Duan, and Kiedron</label><mixed-citation>Min, Q., Yin, B., Li, S., Berndt, J., Harrison, L., Joseph, E., Duan, M., and Kiedron, P.: A high-resolution oxygen A-band spectrometer (HABS) and its radiation closure, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1711–1722, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1711-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-1711-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Mishra et al.(2020)Mishra, Rathore, Misra, and Kumar</label><mixed-citation>Mishra, M. K., Rathore, P. S., Misra, A., and Kumar, R.: Atmospheric Correction of Multispectral VNIR Remote Sensing Data: Algorithm and Inter-sensor Comparison of Aerosol and Surface Reflectance Products, Earth and Space Science, 7, e2019EA000710, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019EA000710</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Niro et al.(2021)Niro, Goryl, Dransfeld, Boccia, Gascon, Adams, Themann, Scifoni, and Doxani</label><mixed-citation>Niro, F., Goryl, P., Dransfeld, S., Boccia, V., Gascon, F., Adams, J., Themann, B., Scifoni, S., and Doxani, G.: European Space Agency (ESA) calibration/validation strategy for optical land-imaging satellites and pathway towards interoperability, Remote Sens.-Basel, 13, 3003, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13153003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs13153003</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Noël et al.(2007)Noël, Bramstedt, Bovensmann, Burrows, Gottwald, and Krieg</label><mixed-citation>Noël, S., Bramstedt, K., Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Gottwald, M., and Krieg, E.: SCIAMACHY degradation monitoring results, in: Proceedings of the 2007 Envisat Symposium, Citeseer, <uri>https://elib.dlr.de/48296/</uri> (last access: 27 March 2026), 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Ono et al.(1996)Ono, Sakuma, Arai, Yamaguchi, Fujisada, Slater, Thome, Palluconi, and Kieffer</label><mixed-citation>Ono, A., Sakuma, F., Arai, K., Yamaguchi, Y., Fujisada, H., Slater, P., Thome, K., Palluconi, F. D., and Kieffer, H.: Preflight and in-flight calibration plan for ASTER, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 13, 321–335, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013&lt;0321:PAIFCP&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013&lt;0321:PAIFCP&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Owda et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>Owda, A., Coldewey-Egbers, M., Slijkhuis, S., Lichtenberg, G., and Aberle, B.: Reflectance-based cross-calibration of GOME and SCIAMACHY spectrometers enhanced by polarization monitoring devices data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 3213–3230, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3213-2026" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-19-3213-2026</ext-link>, 2026.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Pagano et al.(2003)Pagano, Aumann, Hagan, and Overoye</label><mixed-citation>Pagano, T. S., Aumann, H. H., Hagan, D. E., and Overoye, K.: Prelaunch and in-flight radiometric calibration of the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 41, 265–273, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.808324" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2002.808324</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Rezaei-Nokandeh et al.(2025)Rezaei-Nokandeh, Sabetghadam, Ahmadi-Givi, and Kaskaoutis</label><mixed-citation>Rezaei-Nokandeh, N., Sabetghadam, S., Ahmadi-Givi, F., and Kaskaoutis, D. G.: Aerosol optical depth trends and variability over the Middle East from MODIS, MISR, OMI, and AERONET observations, Sci. Rep.-UK, 15, 41908, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-25895-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/s41598-025-25895-4</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Thenkabail(2015)</label><mixed-citation>Thenkabail, P. S.: Remotely sensed data characterization, classification, and accuracies, CRC Press, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1201/b19294" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1201/b19294</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Tilstra and Stammes(2006)</label><mixed-citation>Tilstra, L. G. and Stammes, P.: Intercomparison of reflectances observed by GOME and SCIAMACHY in the visible wavelength range, Appl. Optics, 45, 4129–4135, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.45.004129" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/ao.45.004129</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Tuli et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>Tuli, F. T. Z., Pinto, C. T., Angal, A., Xiong, X., and Helder, D.: New approach for temporal stability evaluation of pseudo-invariant calibration sites (PICS), Remote Sens.-Basel, 11, 1502, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11121502" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs11121502</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Wang et al.(2022)Wang, Wang, Lyapustin, Hashimoto, Park, Michaelis, and Nemani</label><mixed-citation>Wang, W., Wang, Y., Lyapustin, A., Hashimoto, H., Park, T., Michaelis, A., and Nemani, R.: A novel atmospheric correction algorithm to exploit the diurnal variability in hypertemporal geostationary observations, Remote Sens.-Basel, 14, 964, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14040964" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs14040964</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Wu et al.(2020)Wu, Mu, Angal, and Xiong</label><mixed-citation>Wu, A., Mu, Q., Angal, A., and Xiong, X.: Assessment of MODIS and VIIRS calibration consistency for reflective solar bands calibration using vicarious approaches, in: Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XXIV, vol. 11530, SPIE, 235–246, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2573022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1117/12.2573022</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Ye et al.(2021)Ye, Ren, Liang, Zhu, Guo, Nie, Zeng, Zhao, and Qian</label><mixed-citation>Ye, X., Ren, H., Liang, Y., Zhu, J., Guo, J., Nie, J., Zeng, H., Zhao, Y., and Qian, Y.: Cross-calibration of Chinese Gaofen-5 thermal infrared images and its improvement on land surface temperature retrieval, Int. J. Appl. Earth. Obs., 101, 102357, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102357" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jag.2021.102357</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Comparative analysis of GOME and SCIAMACHY  reflectance over Pseudo-Invariant Calibration Sites:  implications for spectrometers cross-calibration</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Barsi et al.(2018)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Barsi, J. A., Alhammoud, B., Czapla-Myers, J., Gascon, F., Haque, M. O., Kaewmanee, M., Leigh, L., and Markham, B. L.: Sentinel-2A MSI and Landsat-8 OLI radiometric cross comparison over desert sites, Eur. J. Remote Sens., 51, 822–837, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2018.1507613" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2018.1507613</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Bovensmann et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
       B
ovensmann, H., Burrows, J., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Noel, S., Rozanov, V., Chance, K., and Goede, A.: SCIAMACHY: Mission objectives and measurement modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Burrows et al.(1999)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Burrows, J. P., Weber, M., Buchwitz, M., Rozanov, V., Ladstätter-Weißenmayer, A., Richter, A., DeBeek, R., Hoogen, R., Bramstedt, K., Eichmann, K.-U., Eisinger, M., and Perner, D.: The global ozone monitoring experiment (GOME): Mission concept and first scientific results, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 151–175, 1999.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Cabor et al.(1998)Cabor, Hagolle, Cosnefroy, and Briottet</label><mixed-citation>
       Cabor, F., Hagolle, O., Cosnefroy, H., and Briottet, X.: Inter-calibration using desertic sites as a reference target, in: IGARSS'98. Sensing and Managing the Environment. 1998 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing. Symposium Proceedings, no. 98CH36174, IEEE, 5, 2713–2715, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.1998.702327" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.1998.702327</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>CEOS(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
CEOS: PICS: Pseudo-Invariant Calibration Sites, <a href="https://calvalportal.ceos.org/web/guest/pics_sites" target="_blank"/> (last access: 27 March 2026), 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Chander et al.(2013)Chander, Hewison, Fox, Wu, Xiong, and Blackwell</label><mixed-citation>
       Chander, G., Hewison, T. J., Fox, N., Wu, X., Xiong, X., and Blackwell, W. J.: Overview of intercalibration of satellite instruments, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 1056–1080, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2228654" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2228654</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Chatzopoulou et al.(2025)Chatzopoulou, Tourpali, Bais, and Braesicke</label><mixed-citation>
       Chatzopoulou, A., Tourpali, K., Bais, A., and Braesicke, P.: Effects of different aerosol types on surface UV radiation in the 21st century, Atmos. Environ., 362, 121595, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121595" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2025.121595</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Coldewey-Egbers et al.(2008)Coldewey-Egbers, Slijkhuis, Aberle, and Loyola</label><mixed-citation>
       Coldewey-Egbers, M., Slijkhuis, S., Aberle, B., and Loyola, D.: Long-term analysis of GOME in-flight calibration parameters and instrument degradation, Appl. Optics, 47, 4749–4761, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.47.004749" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.47.004749</a>, 2008.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Cosnefroy et al.(1996)Cosnefroy, Leroy, and Briottet</label><mixed-citation>
       Cosnefroy, H., Leroy, M., and Briottet, X.: Selection and characterization of Saharan and Arabian desert sites for the calibration of optical satellite sensors, Remote Sens. Environ., 58, 101–114, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(95)00211-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(95)00211-1</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>European Space Agency(2024a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
European Space Agency: Envisat SCIAMACHY Level 1b [SCI_____1P], Version 10, Earth Online [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5270/EN1-5eab12a" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5270/EN1-5eab12a</a>, 2024a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>European Space Agency(2024b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
European Space Agency: FDR for Atmospheric Composition [ATMOS__L1B]. Version 1.0, Earth Online [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.5270/ESA-852456e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5270/ESA-852456e</a>, 2024b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>ESA(2025a)</label><mixed-citation>
      
ESA: FDR L1b Products, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5270/ESA-852456e" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5270/ESA-852456e</a>, 2025a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>ESA(2025b)</label><mixed-citation>
      
ESA: GOME L1b, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5270/ER2-ua38y2m" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5270/ER2-ua38y2m</a>, 2025b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>ESA(2025c)</label><mixed-citation>
      
ESA: SCIAMACHY Instrument Overview, <a href="https://earth.esa.int/eogateway/instruments/sciamachy" target="_blank"/> (last access: 27 March 2026), 2025c.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Fajardo Rueda et al.(2021)Fajardo Rueda, Leigh, Teixeira Pinto, Kaewmanee, and Helder</label><mixed-citation>
       Fajardo Rueda, J., Leigh, L., Teixeira Pinto, C., Kaewmanee, M., and Helder, D.: Classification and Evaluation of Extended PICS (EPICS) on a Global Scale for Calibration and Stability Monitoring of Optical Satellite Sensors, Remote Sens.-Basel, 13, 3350, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173350" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173350</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Fang et al.(2018)Fang, Hong, Zhao, Kukolich, Yin, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>
       Fang, Q., Hong, H., Zhao, L., Kukolich, S., Yin, K., and Wang, C.: Visible and near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy for investigating soil mineralogy: A review, J. Spectrosc., 2018, 3168974, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3168974" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/3168974</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Francis et al.(2020)Francis, Fonseca, Nelli, Cuesta, Weston, Evan, and Temimi</label><mixed-citation>
       Francis, D., Fonseca, R., Nelli, N., Cuesta, J., Weston, M., Evan, A., and Temimi, M.: The atmospheric drivers of the major Saharan dust storm in June 2020, Geophys. Res. Lett., 47, e2020GL090102, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090102" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090102</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Govaerts(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
       Govaerts, Y. M.: Sand dune ridge alignment effects on surface BRF over the Libya-4 CEOS calibration site, Sensors, 15, 3453–3470, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/s150203453" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/s150203453</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Han et al.(2022)Han, Pei, and Tong</label><mixed-citation>
      
Han, J., Pei, J., and Tong, H.: Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques, The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems, Morgan Kaufmann, <a href="https://books.google.de/books?id=NR1oEAAAQBAJ" target="_blank"/> (last access: 27 March 2026), 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Hasan et al.(2019)Hasan, Shrestha, Leigh, and Helder</label><mixed-citation>
       Hasan, M. N., Shrestha, M., Leigh, L., and Helder, D.: Evaluation of an Extended PICS (EPICS) for calibration and stability monitoring of optical satellite sensors, Remote Sens.-Basel, 11, 1755, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11151755" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11151755</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>He et al.(2021)He, Fang, Shoshanim, Brown, and Rudich</label><mixed-citation>
       He, Q., Fang, Z., Shoshanim, O., Brown, S. S., and Rudich, Y.: Scattering and absorption cross sections of atmospheric gases in the ultraviolet–visible wavelength range (307–725&thinsp;nm), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 14927–14940, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14927-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-14927-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Helder et al.(2013)Helder, Thome, Mishra, Chander, Xiong, Angal, and Choi</label><mixed-citation>
       Helder, D., Thome, K. J., Mishra, N., Chander, G., Xiong, X., Angal, A., and Choi, T.: Absolute radiometric calibration of Landsat using a pseudo invariant calibration site, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 1360–1369, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Hilbig et al.(2019)Hilbig, Bramstedt, Weber, Burrows, and Krijger</label><mixed-citation>
       Hilbig, T., Bramstedt, K., Weber, M., Burrows, J. P., and Krijger, M.: Optimised degradation correction for SCIAMACHY satellite solar measurements from 330 to 1600&thinsp;nm by using the internal white light source, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 13, 3893–3907, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3893-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-3893-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Kabir et al.(2020)Kabir, Leigh, and Helder</label><mixed-citation>
       Kabir, S., Leigh, L., and Helder, D.: Vicarious methodologies to assess and improve the quality of the optical remote sensing images: A critical review, Remote Sens.-Basel, 12, 4029, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12244029</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Khadka et al.(2021)Khadka, Teixeira Pinto, and Leigh</label><mixed-citation>
       Khadka, N., Teixeira Pinto, C., and Leigh, L.: Detection of change points in pseudo-invariant calibration sites time series using multi-sensor satellite imagery, Remote Sens.-Basel, 13, 2079, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13112079</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Krijger et al.(2014)Krijger, Snel, Van Harten, Rietjens, and Aben</label><mixed-citation>
       Krijger, J. M., Snel, R., van Harten, G., Rietjens, J. H. H., and Aben, I.: Mirror contamination in space I: mirror modelling, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3387–3398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3387-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3387-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Lacherade et al.(2013)Lacherade, Fougnie, Henry, and Gamet</label><mixed-citation>
       Lacherade, S., Fougnie, B., Henry, P., and Gamet, P.: Cross calibration over desert sites: Description, methodology, and operational implementation, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 51, 1098–1113, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227061" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227061</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Li et al.(2012)Li, Li, and Mao</label><mixed-citation>
       Li, Q., Li, C., and Mao, J.: Evaluation of atmospheric aerosol optical depth products at ultraviolet bands derived from MODIS products, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 46, 1025–1034, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.687475" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2012.687475</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Liang(2017)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liang, S.: Comprehensive remote sensing, Elsevier, ISBN 9780128032206, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>Lichtenberg et al.(2006)Lichtenberg, Kleipool, Krijger, Van Soest, Van Hees, Tilstra, Acarreta, Aben, Ahlers, Bovensmann et al.</label><mixed-citation>
       Lichtenberg, G., Kleipool, Q., Krijger, J. M., van Soest, G., van Hees, R., Tilstra, L. G., Acarreta, J. R., Aben, I., Ahlers, B., Bovensmann, H., Chance, K., Gloudemans, A. M. S., Hoogeveen, R. W. M., Jongma, R. T. N., Noël, S., Piters, A., Schrijver, H., Schrijvers, C., Sioris, C. E., Skupin, J., Slijkhuis, S., Stammes, P., and Wuttke, M.: SCIAMACHY Level 1 data: calibration concept and in-flight calibration, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 5347–5367, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5347-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-5347-2006</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Logothetis et al.(2021)Logothetis, Salamalikis, Gkikas, Kazadzis, Amiridis, and Kazantzidis</label><mixed-citation>
       Logothetis, S.-A., Salamalikis, V., Gkikas, A., Kazadzis, S., Amiridis, V., and Kazantzidis, A.: 15-year variability of desert dust optical depth on global and regional scales, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 16499–16529, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16499-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-16499-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Min et al.(2014)Min, Yin, Li, Berndt, Harrison, Joseph, Duan, and Kiedron</label><mixed-citation>
       Min, Q., Yin, B., Li, S., Berndt, J., Harrison, L., Joseph, E., Duan, M., and Kiedron, P.: A high-resolution oxygen A-band spectrometer (HABS) and its radiation closure, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1711–1722, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1711-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1711-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Mishra et al.(2020)Mishra, Rathore, Misra, and Kumar</label><mixed-citation>
       Mishra, M. K., Rathore, P. S., Misra, A., and Kumar, R.: Atmospheric Correction of Multispectral VNIR Remote Sensing Data: Algorithm and Inter-sensor Comparison of Aerosol and Surface Reflectance Products, Earth and Space Science, 7, e2019EA000710, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000710" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000710</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Niro et al.(2021)Niro, Goryl, Dransfeld, Boccia, Gascon, Adams, Themann, Scifoni, and Doxani</label><mixed-citation>
       Niro, F., Goryl, P., Dransfeld, S., Boccia, V., Gascon, F., Adams, J., Themann, B., Scifoni, S., and Doxani, G.: European Space Agency (ESA) calibration/validation strategy for optical land-imaging satellites and pathway towards interoperability, Remote Sens.-Basel, 13, 3003, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13153003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13153003</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Noël et al.(2007)Noël, Bramstedt, Bovensmann, Burrows, Gottwald, and Krieg</label><mixed-citation>
      
Noël, S., Bramstedt, K., Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Gottwald, M., and Krieg, E.: SCIAMACHY degradation monitoring results, in: Proceedings of the 2007 Envisat Symposium, Citeseer, <a href="https://elib.dlr.de/48296/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 27 March 2026), 2007.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Ono et al.(1996)Ono, Sakuma, Arai, Yamaguchi, Fujisada, Slater, Thome, Palluconi, and Kieffer</label><mixed-citation>
       Ono, A., Sakuma, F., Arai, K., Yamaguchi, Y., Fujisada, H., Slater, P., Thome, K., Palluconi, F. D., and Kieffer, H.: Preflight and in-flight calibration plan for ASTER, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 13, 321–335, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013&lt;0321:PAIFCP&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0426(1996)013&lt;0321:PAIFCP&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1996.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Owda et al.(2026)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Owda, A., Coldewey-Egbers, M., Slijkhuis, S., Lichtenberg, G., and Aberle, B.: Reflectance-based cross-calibration of GOME and SCIAMACHY
spectrometers enhanced by polarization monitoring devices data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 19, 3213–3230, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3213-2026" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-3213-2026</a>, 2026.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Pagano et al.(2003)Pagano, Aumann, Hagan, and Overoye</label><mixed-citation>
       Pagano, T. S., Aumann, H. H., Hagan, D. E., and Overoye, K.: Prelaunch and in-flight radiometric calibration of the Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS), IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 41, 265–273, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.808324" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2002.808324</a>, 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Rezaei-Nokandeh et al.(2025)Rezaei-Nokandeh, Sabetghadam, Ahmadi-Givi, and Kaskaoutis</label><mixed-citation>
       Rezaei-Nokandeh, N., Sabetghadam, S., Ahmadi-Givi, F., and Kaskaoutis, D. G.: Aerosol optical depth trends and variability over the Middle East from MODIS, MISR, OMI, and AERONET observations, Sci. Rep.-UK, 15, 41908, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-25895-4" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-25895-4</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Thenkabail(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Thenkabail, P. S.: Remotely sensed data characterization, classification, and accuracies, CRC Press, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1201/b19294" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1201/b19294</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Tilstra and Stammes(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
       Tilstra, L. G. and Stammes, P.: Intercomparison of reflectances observed by GOME and SCIAMACHY in the visible wavelength range, Appl. Optics, 45, 4129–4135, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.45.004129" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.45.004129</a>, 2006.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Tuli et al.(2019)</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tuli, F. T. Z., Pinto, C. T., Angal, A., Xiong, X., and Helder, D.: New approach for temporal stability evaluation of pseudo-invariant calibration sites (PICS), Remote Sens.-Basel, 11, 1502, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11121502" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11121502</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Wang et al.(2022)Wang, Wang, Lyapustin, Hashimoto, Park, Michaelis, and Nemani</label><mixed-citation>
       Wang, W., Wang, Y., Lyapustin, A., Hashimoto, H., Park, T., Michaelis, A., and Nemani, R.: A novel atmospheric correction algorithm to exploit the diurnal variability in hypertemporal geostationary observations, Remote Sens.-Basel, 14, 964, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14040964" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14040964</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Wu et al.(2020)Wu, Mu, Angal, and Xiong</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, A., Mu, Q., Angal, A., and Xiong, X.: Assessment of MODIS and VIIRS calibration consistency for reflective solar bands calibration using vicarious approaches, in: Sensors, Systems, and Next-Generation Satellites XXIV, vol. 11530, SPIE, 235–246, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2573022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2573022</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Ye et al.(2021)Ye, Ren, Liang, Zhu, Guo, Nie, Zeng, Zhao, and Qian</label><mixed-citation>
       Ye, X., Ren, H., Liang, Y., Zhu, J., Guo, J., Nie, J., Zeng, H., Zhao, Y., and Qian, Y.: Cross-calibration of Chinese Gaofen-5 thermal infrared images and its improvement on land surface temperature retrieval, Int. J. Appl. Earth. Obs., 101, 102357, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102357" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102357</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
