<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/nlm-dtd/publishing/3.0/journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0" article-type="research-article">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-19-389-2026</article-id><title-group><article-title>Hygroscopic growth characteristics of anthropogenic aerosols over central China revealed by lidar observations</article-title><alt-title>Hygroscopic growth characteristics of anthropogenic aerosols</alt-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Jing</surname><given-names>Dongzhe</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1971-5757</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>He</surname><given-names>Yun</given-names></name>
          <email>heyun@whu.edu.cn</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1119-6016</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Yin</surname><given-names>Zhenping</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3270-534X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff4">
          <name><surname>Müller</surname><given-names>Detlef</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Huang</surname><given-names>Kaiming</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2 aff3">
          <name><surname>Yi</surname><given-names>Fan</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8368-5081</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>School of Earth and Space Science and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy, Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430072, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>State Observatory for Atmospheric Remote Sensing, Wuhan 430072, China</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>4</label><institution>School of Remote Sensing and Information Engineering, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Yun He (heyun@whu.edu.cn)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>19</day><month>January</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>19</volume>
      <issue>2</issue>
      <fpage>389</fpage><lpage>403</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>7</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>16</day><month>October</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>December</month><year>2025</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>13</day><month>January</month><year>2026</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2026 Dongzhe Jing et al.</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/389/2026/amt-19-389-2026.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/389/2026/amt-19-389-2026.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/389/2026/amt-19-389-2026.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/389/2026/amt-19-389-2026.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>

      <p id="d2e146">Lidar-derived particle backscatter coefficient is commonly used to assess air pollution levels; however, hygroscopic growth can amplify particle backscatter and hinder accurate assessment of particle concentration. This study investigated the hygroscopic growth characteristics of urban anthropogenic aerosols in Wuhan (30.5° N, 114.4° E), central China, using ground-based 532 nm polarization lidar observations during 2010–2024. A total of 192 cases were identified based on the following criteria: (1) the presence of a layer thicker than 300 m; (2) a lidar-derived backscatter coefficient that increases monotonically with simultaneously-measured relative humidity (RH) from radiosonde, and (3) limited variations in key meteorological parameters, including water vapor mixing ratio, potential temperature, and wind speed and direction. Using the Hänel parameterization method, the hygroscopic growth parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was estimated as 0.62 (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>±</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.24</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), corresponding to a backscatter coefficient enhancement factor of 2.36 at 85 % RH. No evident differences in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were observed between the boundary layer (0.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25) and free troposphere (0.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24). The annual mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increased from 0.49 in 2015 to 0.63 in 2017 and stabilized within 0.6–0.7 after 2018, closely following the evolution of the annual mean NO<sub>2</sub>-to-SO<sub>2</sub> concentration ratio. The minimum seasonal average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> occurred in winter (0.56), while the maximum was observed in autumn (0.64). These results provide a comprehensive characterization of the long-term and seasonal hygroscopicity of pollutants over central China, enhancing our understanding of the influence of hygroscopic growth on lidar-observed particle backscatter coefficients and offering valuable insights for urban air pollution control strategies.</p>
  </abstract>
    
<funding-group>
<award-group id="gs1">
<funding-source>National Natural Science Foundation of China</funding-source>
<award-id>42575138</award-id>
<award-id>42005101</award-id>
<award-id>42575141</award-id>
<award-id>42205130</award-id>
</award-group>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d2e229">Atmospheric aerosols impact global climate directly by scattering or absorbing solar radiation (Liu and Matsui, 2021), and indirectly via aerosol-cloud interactions by acting as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) or ice-nucleating particles (INP) (Rosenfeld et al., 2014; He et al., 2021, 2022). In the atmosphere, soluble aerosols can take up water vapor under high relative humidity (RH) conditions, causing them to grow in size through so-called hygroscopic growth (Hänel, 1976). This process alters aerosols' optical and microphysical properties, thus changing their impact on climate. Ji et al. (2025) found that the aerosol infrared radiation effect in the Arctic is 1.45 W m<sup>−2</sup> under dry atmospheric conditions, which increases 7-fold when RH is between 60 %–80 % and even up to 20 times when RH exceeds 80 %. In addition, aerosol hygroscopicity plays a vital role in activating cloud droplets, with activation efficiencies of 0 %–34 % for low hygroscopicity particles and 57 %–83 % for high hygroscopicity particles, respectively (Väisänen et al., 2016). Furthermore, in urban environments, when aerosols take up water vapor and grow, the atmospheric visibility could significantly reduce, leading to severe haze events (Liu et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2019). Aerosol hygroscopicity also affects the deposition efficiency in the respiratory tract and influences human health (Sorooshian et al., 2012).</p>
      <p id="d2e244">The hygroscopic enhancement factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> quantitatively describes aerosol hygroscopicity, defined as the ratio of the particle scatter or backscatter coefficient (Granados-Muñoz et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2024) or particle diameter (Zieger et al., 2013) at a given RH to the corresponding values under dry conditions (typically <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 40 %) (Hänel, 1976; Titos et al., 2016). To determine this factor, in-situ measurements commonly use humidified nephelometers (Zieger et al., 2010, 2013) and humidified tandem differential mobility analyzer (HTDMA) (Deshmukh et al., 2025; Yu et al., 2025). These instruments first dry the collected aerosol samples and then re-humidify them to a target RH, enabling comparisons of scatter coefficients or particle diameters under dry versus humid conditions. This approach provides general insights into the hygroscopicity of different aerosol types. However, this process can be affected by particle sampling losses (Titos et al., 2016) and by variations in aerosol size or scatter coefficient (e.g., deliquescent aerosols, Zieger et al., 2016). In addition, accurately determining hygroscopic enhancement factors at RH above 90 % remains challenging for both nephelometers and HTDMA (Lv et al., 2017).</p>
      <p id="d2e268">In addition to in situ measurements, lidar also has the capability to measure aerosol hygroscopicity, a technique first demonstrated by Ferrare et al. (1998). From then on, lidar-based experiments have been widely used to derive the hygroscopic particle backscatter coefficient enhancement factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, (Granados-Muñoz et al., 2015; Haarig et al., 2017, 2025; Sicard et al., 2022; Miri et al., 2024; Veselovskii et al., 2025; Zhang et al., 2025), defined as the ratio of the particle backscatter coefficient at a given RH to that under dry conditions (e.g., 40 %). Unlike in situ measurements, lidar observations provide hight-resolved particle backscatter coefficient with high vertical resolution, and thus, enable the estimation of aerosol hygroscopicity under real atmospheric environments and within the entire atmospheric column, instead of in controlled laboratory settings. However, lidar-based studies of aerosol hygroscopic growth require simultaneous profiles of meteorological parameters as input (Granados-Muñoz et al., 2015); as a result, most existing lidar studies have focused on individual case analyses rather than long-term monitoring. At our observatory in Wuhan (30.5° N, 114.4° E), a megacity in central China, continuous (24/7 and regardless of bad weather conditions), long-term (except for the time of hardware maintenance) lidar observations have been conducted since 2010 (Yin et al., 2021; He et al., 2024; Jing et al., 2024, 2025). This dataset, spanning more than a decade, provides a solid basis for a statistical analysis of the hygroscopicity growth characteristic of urban anthropogenic aerosols.</p>
      <p id="d2e288">Due to the rapid urbanization and industrialization in China since the early 21st century, high aerosol loading and complex pollutants have attracted increasing attention (Xie et al., 2016). In response, the Chinese government has implemented a series of emission control policies. Our earlier study showed that annual variations in the anthropogenic aerosol optical depth (AOD) at 532 nm over Wuhan during the past 15 years can be divided into two stages: a rapid decline with a rate of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.068</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<sup>−1</sup> from 2010 to 2017, followed by a fluctuation period from 2018 to 2024 (Jing et al., 2025). These findings highlight that emission control policies were highly effective in the first stage, whereas their impact weakened in the second stage. We also identified an imbalance in SO<sub>2</sub> and NO<sub>2</sub> emission reductions, with the NO<sub>2</sub>-to-SO<sub>2</sub> concentration ratio rising sharply from 1.8 in 2014 to 5.3 in 2017 (Jing et al., 2025). This shift likely promoted the formation of secondary aerosols (e.g., particulate nitrate) and partly explained the cessation of the declining trend in the second stage (Liu et al., 2018). Therefore, it is essential to investigate how aerosol hygroscopicity responds to changes in pollutant components, for interpreting the long-term AOD patterns.</p>
      <p id="d2e351">In this study, we statistically analyze the hygroscopic growth characteristics of anthropogenic aerosols from 2010 to 2024 using ground-based polarization lidar observations over Wuhan, together with associated radiosonde and reanalysis meteorological data. This paper is organized as follows. Section 2 briefly describes the adopted instruments and data processing methods. Section 3 presents a case study illustrating the identification of aerosol hygroscopic growth cases and the estimation of the hygroscopic growth parameter. Section 4 offers a statistical analysis of the hygroscopic growth parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for anthropogenic aerosols over Wuhan. The last section summarizes the main findings and presents the conclusions.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Instrumentation and data</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <label>2.1</label><title>Study area</title>
      <p id="d2e376">Wuhan (30.5° N, 114.4° E) is a major industrial city in central China with a population of over 13 million, producing abundant urban anthropogenic emissions from sources such as vehicle exhaust and industrial fossil fuel combustion (Zhang et al., 2015a). The city lies in the subtropical monsoon region and experiences four distinctive seasons. In winter, the northeast monsoon brings cold, relatively dry weather (Wu and Wang, 2002). Frequent temperature inversions in the lower troposphere suppress vertical convection and often lead to severe air pollution (Zhang et al., 2021). In summer, the southeast and southwest monsoons cause high temperatures and heavy rainfall, creating favorable conditions for pollution dispersion (Ding et al., 2015). Spring and autumn are the transition phases between these two regimes. Additionally, regional air mass transport also plays a significant role in aerosol loading over Wuhan. In spring and winter, mineral dust from deserts in north and northwest China as well as in Mongolia is frequently long-range transported to Wuhan (He and Yi, 2015; Jing et al., 2024). In summer and autumn, agricultural biomass burning in neighboring provinces sometimes contributes to the poor air quality and severe haze events over Wuhan (Zhang et al., 2014; Jing et al., 2025).</p>

      <fig id="F1" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d2e381">Location of Wuhan and our lidar site (Map data © 2025 Google).</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/389/2026/amt-19-389-2026-f01.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e390">Among the major aerosol types in Wuhan, mineral dust is generally considered hydrophobic. In contrast, all the non-dust components are classified as anthropogenic aerosols, which exhibit varying degrees of hygroscopicity due to the inclusion of water-soluble inorganic ions and organic matter. Our lidar site is located in central Wuhan, an area surrounded by an extensive water network (the Yangtze River and numerous urban lakes; Fig. 1), which creates a humid atmospheric environment that facilitates aerosol water uptake. Therefore, particle hygroscopic growth may contribute to the lidar-derived particle backscatter coefficients. In this study, all lidar-derived aerosol optical properties discussed, including the particle backscatter coefficient, extinction coefficient, and AOD, are attributed exclusively to anthropogenic aerosols.</p>

<table-wrap id="T1" specific-use="star"><label>Table 1</label><caption><p id="d2e397">Specifications of the polarization lidar system at Wuhan University (He et al., 2024).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left" colsep="1"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry namest="col1" nameend="col2" align="center" colsep="1">Transmitter </oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry namest="col3" nameend="col4" align="center">Receiver </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Laser</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Continuum Inlite II-20</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Telescope</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">300 mm Cassegrain</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wavelength</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">532 nm</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Diameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">300 mm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Energy/pulse</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">120</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mJ</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Field of view</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1 mrad</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Repetition rate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">20 Hz</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">PMT</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Hamamatsu 5783P</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Pulse duration</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6 ns</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Digitizer</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Licel TR40-160</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <label>2.2</label><title>Polarization lidar and data processing</title>
      <p id="d2e521">Height-resolved aerosol optical properties over Wuhan have been observed using a 532 nm ground-based polarization lidar since October 2010 (Yin et al., 2021; He et al., 2024; Jing et al., 2024, 2025). Detailed specifications of the lidar system were provided in Kong and Yi (2015). In 2017, a transparent waterproof window was installed on top of the lidar container, enabling uninterrupted lidar operations regardless of rainy or snowy weather conditions (Yi et al., 2021). Raw data are stored with a time resolution of 1 min and a vertical resolution of 30 m. The lowermost height with complete field-of-view (FOV) observation is 0.3 km. Specifications of the polarization lidar system are listed in Table 1.</p>
      <p id="d2e524">The volume depolarization ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (VDR) is defined as the ratio of perpendicular- to parallel-oriented signals, multiplied by the gain ratio between the two polarized channels, and is used to derive the particle depolarization ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (PDR) (Freudenthaler et al., 2009). The particle backscatter coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and particle extinction coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are retrieved using the Fernald method (Fernald, 1984), assuming a fixed lidar ratio of 50 sr (Wang et al., 2016). In addition, the non-dust particle backscatter coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated using the polarization-lidar photometer networking (POLIPHON) method as follows (Tesche et al., 2009; Mamouri and Ansmann, 2014):

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><label>1</label><mml:math id="M27" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the altitude; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.31</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.05</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the particle depolarization ratios for dust and non-dust, respectively. For each profile, we set <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> if <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Mamouri and Ansmann, 2014). As noted in the previous section, the non-dust component primarily corresponds to anthropogenic aerosols over Wuhan; thus, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represent the optical properties of anthropogenic aerosols. Table 2 lists the uncertainties in the lidar-derived aerosol optical property parameters.</p>

<table-wrap id="T2"><label>Table 2</label><caption><p id="d2e824">Estimated uncertainties of the lidar-derived optical properties at 532 nm (Jing et al., 2025).</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Parameter</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Uncertainty</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Volume depolarization ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">v</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Particle depolarization ratio <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 %–10 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Particle backscatter coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Particle extinction coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Non-dust backscatter coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">10 %–30 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Non-dust extinction coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">30 %–40 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p id="d2e1000">Cloud-free profiles with signal accumulation times of 30–80 min are obtained using a cloud screening algorithm (Yin et al., 2021). For each cloud-free profile, the particle backscatter coefficient (i.e., total, dust, and non-dust components), and both volume and particle depolarization ratios are retrieved. We utilize the same methodology as Yin et al. (2021) and extend the aerosol profiles to September 2024 (Jing et al., 2025). A total of 24 910 cloud-free profiles are identified from 2139 observational days between October 2010 and September 2024. To avoid potential contamination from severe haze or fog, cloud-free profiles containing one or more vertical bins with extinction coefficients exceeding 1.5 km<sup>−1</sup> are excluded. In total, 676 (2.7 % of all) cloud-free profiles are removed from the analysis. This mature dataset is used to further investigate hygroscopic growth.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <label>2.3</label><title>HYSPLIT model</title>
      <p id="d2e1023">The Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT), developed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Air Resources Laboratory (NOAA ARL), was used to simulate both forward and backward air mass trajectories (HYSPLIT, 2025). These simulations are driven by meteorological field data from the GDAS archive (Kanamitsu, 1989) and require initialization parameters such as start time, altitude, and geographical location (Draxler and Rolph, 2003; Stein et al., 2015). In this study, three backward trajectories arriving at Wuhan at different altitudes were simulated to trace the potential origins of aerosols at those altitudes.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS4">
  <label>2.4</label><title>Radiosonde data</title>
      <p id="d2e1034">Two radiosonde launches were conducted daily at 08:00 local time (LT) and 20:00 LT, at 30.6° N, 114.1° E, approximately 24 km away from our lidar site. The sondes measured vertical profiles of temperature, pressure, relative humidity (RH), water vapor mixing ratio, and wind speed/direction from the surface to up to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 30 km altitude. The measurement error for temperature is less than 1 °C, and the uncertainty in RH is below 5 % when the temperature exceeds <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> °C (Nash et al., 2011). The potential temperature <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as (Bolton, 1980):

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><label>2</label><mml:math id="M50" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.286</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the temperature (K), <inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the atmospheric pressure (hPa), and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the reference pressure of 1000 hPa. In this study, radiosonde data were interpolated to match the corresponding altitude bins of the lidar profiles using a cubic spline interpolation method. This interpolation ensured consistent alignment between radiosonde and lidar measurements, facilitating our analysis of aerosol hygroscopic growth.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS5">
  <label>2.5</label><title>ERA5 reanalysis data</title>
      <p id="d2e1124">The European Center for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis version 5 (ERA5) (Copernicus Climate Change Service, 2025) provides global atmospheric reanalysis data from January 1940 onward. ERA5 combines model outputs with worldwide observations into a globally consistent and physically constrained dataset (Hersbach et al., 2020). It offers hourly estimates of atmospheric, land, and oceanic climate variables. The boundary layer height (BLH) is the depth of the boundary layer (BL) directly affected by dynamic, thermal, and other surface interactions (Peng et al., 2023). Above the BL is the free troposphere (FT), where aerosols primarily originate from non-local sources (Bourgeois et al., 2018). In this study, ERA5 hourly BLH data (Hersbach et al., 2023) for Wuhan were used to distinguish respective hygroscopic growth cases occurring in the BL and FT. Considering the presence of an aerosol residual layer, the diurnal maximum BLH from ERA5 was adopted as the boundary between the BL and FT.</p>

      <fig id="F2" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d2e1129">Time-height contour plots of <bold>(a)</bold> range-corrected signal (RCS) and <bold>(b)</bold> volume depolarization ratio (VDR) measured by polarization lidar over Wuhan at 18:00–20:00 local time (LT) on 19 July 2019. Profiles of <bold>(c)</bold> backscatter coefficient and relative humidity (RH), <bold>(d)</bold> particle depolarization ratio (PDR), <bold>(e)</bold> water vapor mixing ratio (WVMR) and potential temperature, <bold>(f)</bold> wind speed and direction. The lidar-derived profiles in <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> are obtained during 18:30–19:00 LT. All the meteorological parameter profiles are obtained from the radiosonde launched at around 20:00 LT on the same day. The grey-shaded areas around the lidar profiles in <bold>(c)</bold> and <bold>(d)</bold> denote the uncertainty of lidar-derived optical properties.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/389/2026/amt-19-389-2026-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Methodology of estimating the hygroscopic growth parameter</title>
      <p id="d2e1178">Veselovskii et al. (2009) established a methodology to quantitatively estimate aerosol hygroscopicity from lidar measurements under conditions of increasing particle backscatter coefficient with altitude and a constant water vapor mixing ratio, which has been applied and refined in subsequent studies (Granados-Muñoz et al., 2015; Navas-Guzmán et al., 2019; Sicard et al., 2022). In this study, dust and non-dust (anthropogenic) aerosols are assumed to be externally mixed, with their optical properties considered relatively independent. Accordingly, the variation of the anthropogenic particle backscatter coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with RH can be analyzed separately. The particle backscatter coefficient enhancement factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is defined as the ratio of particle backscatter coefficient at a given RH to that under dry conditions (Hänel, 1976):

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><label>3</label><mml:math id="M56" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        Lidar-derived cloud-free profiles within 2 h before or after the radiosonde launches (around 08:00 or 20:00 LT) were selected (Sicard et al., 2022). To estimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, we identified the aerosol layers exceeding 300 m thickness and fulfilling the criterion that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> increase monotonically with simultaneously measured radiosonde RH within the layer. The analysis was limited to altitudes below 7 km. The minimum <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> within an identified aerosol layer was required to exceed 0.5 Mm<sup>−1</sup> sr<sup>−1</sup> to reduce interference from low signal-to-noise ratios. In addition, the maximum variations in radiosonde meteorological parameters within the identified aerosol layer were constrained as follows to ensure analysis under well-mixed atmospheric conditions (Sicard et al., 2022): <list list-type="order"><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1313"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> water vapor mixing ratio (WVMR) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> g kg<sup>−1</sup>;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1345"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> potential temperature (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M66" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M67" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> K;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1372"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M68" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind speed (WS) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M69" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> m s<sup>−1</sup>;</p></list-item><list-item>
      <p id="d2e1404"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M71" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> wind direction (WD) <inline-formula><mml:math id="M72" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>°.</p></list-item></list> These criteria ensure that the observed increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M73" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was solely due to particle growth through hygroscopic water uptake, rather than additional emissions or changes in aerosol composition (Granados-Muñoz et al., 2015).</p>

      <fig id="F3"><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d2e1437">HYSPLIT three two-day backward trajectories starting from Wuhan (30.5° N, 114.4° E) at 19:00 LT on 19 July 2019 at altitudes of 0.5, 0.8, and 1.2 km. The solid dots represent 00:00 LT for each day.</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/389/2026/amt-19-389-2026-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e1446">Figure 2 shows an aerosol hygroscopic growth case observed at 18:30–19:00 LT on 19 July 2019. As altitude increased from 0.4  to 1.2 km, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M74" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nd</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> rose from 2.4  to 3.6 Mm<sup>−1</sup> sr<sup>−1</sup>, while RH increased from 54 % to 82 %. In contrast, the PDR gradually decreased from 0.07 to 0.04, indicating that the particles became more spherical due to water uptake (Miri et al., 2024). The maximum variations in WVMR, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M77" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, WS, and WD were 0.64 g kg<sup>−1</sup>, 0.28 K, 1.06 m s<sup>−1</sup>, and 9.49°, respectively, reflecting a homogeneous aerosol layer under well-mixed atmospheric conditions. Three two-day backward trajectories, initialized at 19:00 LT on 19 July at altitudes of 0.5, 0.8, and 1.2 km, all traced back to the coastal region northeast of Wuhan (Fig. 3), suggesting a similar aerosol source across these altitudes. This case is therefore considered representative of the hygroscopic growth behavior of anthropogenic aerosols over Wuhan.</p>
      <p id="d2e1517">For the selected case, the particle backscatter coefficient enhancement factors <inline-formula><mml:math id="M80" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for each altitude bin were calculated using Eq. (3), with a minimum RH (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M81" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 54 %, as shown by the black dots in Fig. 4. To obtain <inline-formula><mml:math id="M82" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for any RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M83" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, parameterization of the relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math id="M84" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and RH is required. Titos et al. (2016) evaluated 11 parameterization fitting methods based on nephelometer measurements and found that, for ambient aerosols, the differences among fitting curves were small, with most showing good agreement with measurements. Among them, the Hänel parameterization has been proved to be feasible and is now widely applied to estimate aerosol hygroscopic growth using lidar and radiosonde data (Veselovskii et al., 2009; Granados-Muñoz et al., 2015; Pérez-Ramirez et al., 2021; Sicard et al., 2022). To ensure comparability, we adopted the Hänel parameterization to fit <inline-formula><mml:math id="M85" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> starting from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M86" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as given by Hänel (1976):

          <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><label>4</label><mml:math id="M87" display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M88" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the hygroscopic growth parameter that characterizes aerosol hygroscopicity. In this case, the fitting yielded an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M89" display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>-square of 0.99, indicating excellent agreement with the observations (black line in Fig. 4). The derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M90" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.48 suggests that the particles are moderately hygroscopic, typical of urban pollution (Bedoya-Velázquez et al., 2018). This result further indicates that although the trajectory traced back to coastal regions, marine aerosols (e.g., sea salt) have been largely removed by sedimentation, leaving an extremely limited influence of sea salt in Wuhan.</p>
      <p id="d2e1708">Although <inline-formula><mml:math id="M91" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is independent of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M92" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M93" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> depends on the specific <inline-formula><mml:math id="M94" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> chosen in each case. To ensure comparability and consistency, we define <inline-formula><mml:math id="M95" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as the particle backscatter coefficient enhancement factor referenced to a unified RH value (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M96" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Both <inline-formula><mml:math id="M97" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and its parameterized fitting  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M98" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> can be extrapolated from <inline-formula><mml:math id="M99" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M100" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> using the following equations (Sicard et al., 2022):

              <disp-formula specific-use="gather" content-type="numbered"><mml:math id="M101" display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E5"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>5</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E6"><mml:mtd><mml:mtext>6</mml:mtext></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mstyle class="stylechange" displaystyle="true"/><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">100</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

        where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M102" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><mml:math id="M103" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M104" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> was set to 1. This assumption may underestimate <inline-formula><mml:math id="M105" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by up to 25 % for highly hygroscopic aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M106" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and by 10 %–15 % for moderately hygroscopic aerosols (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M107" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) (Titos et al., 2016). Moreover, the uncertainty in the particle backscatter coefficient enhancement factor can reach 38 % at RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M108" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">95</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Adam et al., 2012). The resulting <inline-formula><mml:math id="M109" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is shown in Fig. 4 by the blue dashed curve. At RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M110" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M111" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is 1.93, indicating that the backscatter coefficient increases by a factor of 1.93 compared to dry conditions as RH increases from 40 % to 85 %.</p>

      <fig id="F4"><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d2e2202">The particle backscatter coefficient enhancement factors between RH values of 54 % and 82 % (black dots) and the corresponding Hänel fit (black line). The extrapolated particle backscatter coefficient enhancement factors and Hänel fit referenced to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M112" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are also shown (blue dots and dashed line).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/389/2026/amt-19-389-2026-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d2e2229">In this study, only anthropogenic aerosols were considered, while the influence of natural aerosols, such as mineral dust or sea salt, was excluded. Hygroscopic growth parameters for mineral dust are known to be very low, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M113" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.20 at 355 nm and 0.12 at 1064 nm (Navas-Guzmán et al., 2019). For marine aerosols, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M114" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> has been estimated as 1.49 for pure sea salt (Haarig et al., 2017) and 1.1 for a mixture of sulfate and sea salt (Granados-Muñoz et al., 2015). As Wuhan is an inland city far from the ocean, the impact of marine aerosols is minimal; therefore, cases with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M115" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><mml:math id="M116" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were treated as outliers and excluded from the analysis.</p>

      <fig id="F5" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d2e2272">Probability density distribution of the particle backscatter coefficient enhancement factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M117" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of <bold>(a)</bold> 192 selected hygroscopic growth cases describing the aerosol conditions in the low and middle troposphere (0–7 km); <bold>(b)</bold> 106 cases in the boundary layer; <bold>(c)</bold> 86 cases in the free troposphere during 2010–2024. The Hänel fits (blue solid line) were calculated with the mean hygroscopic growth parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M118" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.62</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The shaded area represents the standard deviation of the Hänel fit line. <bold>(d)</bold> Bar plot of the annual mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M119" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> during 2010–2024. The case number for each year is presented at the top of each bar. The red dashed line represents the evolution of the annual mean NO<sub>2</sub>-to-SO<sub>2</sub> concentration ratio during 2014–2024 (Jing et al., 2025).</p></caption>
        <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/389/2026/amt-19-389-2026-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <label>4</label><title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <label>4.1</label><title>Statistics of hygroscopic growth parameter</title>
      <p id="d2e2364">Figure 5 presents the probability density distribution of the particle backscatter coefficient enhancement factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M122" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for 192 identified cases from lidar observations during 2010–2024. The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M123" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 0.91 indicates a good fit with the Hänel parameterization for most cases. The average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M124" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value was 0.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M125" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24, represented by the blue curve and shaded area, corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M126" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 2.36, with a range of 1.69–3.29 when including the standard deviation. The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M127" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value in the BL (0.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M128" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25) was comparable to that in the FT (0.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M129" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24). The mean RH in the lower and middle troposphere was 71.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M130" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.5 % (68.4 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M131" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.0 % in the BL and 75.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M132" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12.1 % in the FT), corresponding to the highest probability density area (in yellow). This suggests that most hygroscopic growth of urban anthropogenic aerosols in Wuhan occurred under high RH conditions of around 60 %–80 %. The particle backscatter coefficient enhancement factor <inline-formula><mml:math id="M133" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> exhibited a broad distribution from 1.32 to 4.53, corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M134" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.20–1.09, likely reflecting the diverse hygroscopicity properties of urban particles in Wuhan. Rapid urbanization over the past decades has exposed the city to numerous pollutants, including various water-soluble inorganic ions, elemental carbon, and organic matter, etc. (Zhang et al., 2015a). Both chemical composition and particle size significantly influence aerosol hygroscopicity characteristics (Zieger et al., 2010, 2013), resulting in a variety of hygroscopic aerosol types.</p>
      <p id="d2e2500">In the previous section, dust and anthropogenic aerosols are assumed to be externally mixed. However, the internally mixing conditions are unavoidable for East Asian dust events (Xu et al., 2020), which may lead to misclassification of “coated dust” as “anthropogenic” by the POLIPHON method. To assess the potential influence of internally mixed dust, a sensitivity analysis was conducted. Given that the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M135" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> during dust events over Wuhan varies between 0.1 and 0.3 (Jing et al., 2024), the threshold value for pure dust <inline-formula><mml:math id="M136" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (in Eq. 1) was reduced to lower values of 0.10–0.25, thereby making the extraction of “anthropogenic aerosols” more conservative. As a result, the <inline-formula><mml:math id="M137" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases only slightly by 0.02 (0.62 to 0.64). Moreover, approximately 54.7 % cases in this study show no dust interference, and for the remaining cases the dust optical depth (DOD) does not exceed 0.05. It can be concluded that the error introduced by potential misclassification is limited.</p>
      <p id="d2e2532">The annual mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M138" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from 2010–2024 is presented in Fig. 5d, with the number of identified cases for each year indicated at the top of each bar. The annual mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M139" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> generally ranged from 0.5 to 0.7. Notably, the annual mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M140" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> sharply increased from 0.49 in 2015 to 0.63 in 2017, and stabilized high between 0.6 and 0.7 after 2018. The evolution of the annual mean NO<sub>2</sub>-to-SO<sub>2</sub> concentration ratio in Wuhan from 2014 to 2024 is also presented in figure 5d (red dashed broken line), which closely follows the trend of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M143" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The NO<sub>2</sub>-to-SO<sub>2</sub> concentration ratio increased sharply from 1.8 in 2014 to 5.3 in 2017, and varied between 4 and 6 during 2018–2024, suggesting that the disparity in emission control measures for these two gaseous precursors, i.e., favoring more particulate nitrate formation, likely contributes to the increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M146" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> after 2017. Chen et al. (2019) reported that a higher nitrate fraction in an aerosol mixture enhances aerosol hygroscopicity under the same RH conditions. In addition, our previous study showed that the anthropogenic AOD at 532 nm over Wuhan declined during 2010–2017 due to strict emissions control policies, but this downward trend ceased from 2018 onwards (Jing et al., 2025). The relatively higher <inline-formula><mml:math id="M147" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values post-2017 result in a larger backscatter coefficient enhancement factor, indicating that AOD values after 2017 contain more contributions from hygroscopic growth effect, which partly offsets the effectiveness of emission control policies.</p>

      <fig id="F6" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 6</label><caption><p id="d2e2617">Probability density distribution of the particle backscatter coefficient enhancement factors (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M148" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of selected hygroscopic growth cases in <bold>(a)</bold> spring, <bold>(b)</bold> summer, <bold>(c)</bold> autumn, and <bold>(d)</bold> winter. The Hänel fits (blue solid curve) were calculated with the mean hygroscopic growth parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M149" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for each season. The shaded areas represent the standard deviation of Hänel fits.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/389/2026/amt-19-389-2026-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p id="d2e2664">Figure 6 presents the seasonal variation of the particle backscatter coefficient enhancement factors, derived from the 192 identified cases. Seasons are defined as spring (March–April–May), summer (June–July–August), autumn (September–October–November), and winter (December–January–February). Most cases occurred in summer (80) and autumn (81), as dust is commonly present in spring and winter (Jing et al., 2024) and was therefore excluded from the analysis. There is no significant seasonal difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M150" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, with a maximum of 0.64 in autumn and a minimum of 0.56 in winter, corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M151" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 2.43 and 2.17, respectively, i.e., a difference of approximately 11 %. Urban pollutants emitted from human activities do not vary substantially with seasons, except for nitrate, which shows the highest fraction in PM<sub>2.5</sub> during winter (Zhang et al., 2015a).</p>
      <p id="d2e2703">To explain why the fraction of nitrate in Wuhan is the highest in winter, while <inline-formula><mml:math id="M153" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the lowest (0.56), the mean layer heights (MLH) for cases in the four seasons are presented in Fig. 6. The MLH in winter is 2.5 km, higher than the 1.4–1.5 km observed in other seasons, likely due to frequent dust intrusions below 1.5 km in winter (Jing et al., 2024). However, anthropogenic aerosols in winter are usually concentrated below 1.5 km (Jing et al., 2025). Therefore, the winter analyzed here represents hygroscopic growth effect at higher altitudes in the free troposphere, where the atmosphere is relatively clean, rather than surface-level pollution. Chen et al. (2019) reported an extremely low <inline-formula><mml:math id="M154" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.1 under clean conditions, revealing that the hygroscopicity of clean air is lower than that of polluted air. Similarly, Sicard et al. (2022) found only slight seasonal variation in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M155" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values in Barcelona, with a maximum of 0.58 in summer and a minimum of 0.53 in autumn. They interpreted this season-independent <inline-formula><mml:math id="M156" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as recirculation layers of pollutants above the BL, caused by strong insolation, weak synoptic forcing, sea breezes, and mountain-induced winds (Pérez et al., 2004).</p>
      <p id="d2e2734">Table 3 summarizes hygroscopic growth parameters from this study in Wuhan and from the existing literature measured elsewhere. A variety of aerosol mixtures was examined, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M157" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values varying from 0.24 for mixtures dominated by hydrophobic particles, such as dust, to 1.1 for highly hygroscopic aerosols (e.g., marine aerosols and inorganic salts). To analyze the causes of the lidar-observed aerosol hygroscopic growth, many studies indirectly inferred the aerosol composition through backward trajectories and optical properties (e.g., Ångström exponent, complex refractive index, depolarization ratio) (Veselovskii et al., 2009; Granados-Muñoz et al., 2015; Sicard et al., 2022; Haarig et al., 2025). Miri et al. (2024) introduced fluorescence capacity, which was not affected by water vapor, to distinguish aerosol components (with biological aerosols exhibiting higher fluorescence, and pure dust or urban aerosols demonstrating lower fluorescence). Ground-based aerosol chemical speciation monitor (ACSM) was also used to explain the hygroscopic growth behavior of aerosols through ground-level chemical composition analysis (Lv et al., 2017; Bedoya-Velásquez et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2019; Wu et al., 2020). Pérez-Ramirez et al. (2021) provided the first airborne in situ measurements for chemical composition determination, confirming that sulfates and water-soluble organic carbon are the main contributors to the aerosol hygroscopic growth observed by lidar, with <inline-formula><mml:math id="M158" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 0.38–0.39. In addition, Laly et al. (2025) combined lidar-based hygroscopic growth estimation with chemical species data from the Copernicus atmospheric monitoring service (CAMS), showing that <inline-formula><mml:math id="M159" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was significantly higher in regional pollution cases affected by sea salt (0.87 and 1.52) compared with those without sea salt influence (0.30–0.75).</p>
      <p id="d2e2758">The <inline-formula><mml:math id="M160" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value from this study (0.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M161" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24) is slightly higher than that reported by Sicard et al. (2022) (0.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M162" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.23), who conducted a statistical analysis of hygroscopic growth parameters for local/regional pollutants and sea salt aerosols without dust interference in Barcelona, Spain. Several factors may explain this difference. First, although sea salt was not considered in the present study, we speculate that the diverse inorganic salts emitted from extensive human activities in Wuhan probably contributed significantly to the observed strong hygroscopicity. Liu et al. (2014) found that the fractions of ammonium, nitrates, and sulfate are strongly correlated with aerosol hygroscopicity. Similarly, He et al. (2016) identified a region of high hygroscopic growth in Eastern China, corresponding to large-scale industrial districts with substantial emissions of inorganic salts, such as sulfates and nitrates. Wu et al. (2020) also measured a <inline-formula><mml:math id="M163" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 1.14 for fine-mode inorganic salts in urban pollution over Beijing. Second, both Sicard et al. (2022) and this study are based on lidar observations within two hours before and after the radiosonde launches (00:00 and 12:00 UTC). During this period, Barcelona corresponds to noon or midnight (UTC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M164" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1 in winter and UTC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M165" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 during daylight saving time). In contrast, Wuhan (UTC<inline-formula><mml:math id="M166" display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8) experienced the morning and evening rush hours, which contribute substantially to traffic emitted NO<sub>2</sub>. Zhang and Cao (2015b) found two NO<sub>2</sub> emission peaks in Chinese megacities (Beijing, Shanghai, and Guangzhou, which have traffic patterns similar to Wuhan) between 07:00–10:00 and 19:00–22:00 local time. As discussed previously, higher NO<sub>2</sub> emissions favor the formation of hygroscopic nitrate particles, contributing to the larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M170" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values observed in Wuhan.</p>

<table-wrap id="T3" specific-use="star"><label>Table 3</label><caption><p id="d2e2849">Comparisons of the 532 nm lidar-estimated hygroscopic growth parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M171" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><mml:math id="M172" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ref</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, obtained using the Hänel fitting method for pollutants or aerosol mixtures. The results from this study alongside those reported in previous studies are provided.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Research type</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Location</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Instrument</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Aerosol mixture</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M173" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Reference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Statistics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Wuhan, China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">polarization lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Local/regional pollution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M174" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">This study</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(192 cases)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(30.5° N, 114.4° E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Statistics</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Barcelona, Spain</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">multi-wavelength lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Local pollution, sea salt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.55 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M175" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.23</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Sicard et al. (2022)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">(76 cases)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(41.2° N, 2.1° E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">micro-pulse lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Local/regional pollution,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">sea salt</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Granada, Spain</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">multi-wavelength</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Marine aerosols, sulfates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Granados-Muñoz</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(37.2° N, 3.6° E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Raman lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Marine aerosols, sulfates,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">smoke, dust</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Granada, Spain</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">multi-wavelength</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Smoke, urban pollution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Bedoya-Velásquez</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(37.2° N, 3.6° E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Raman lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">et al. (2018)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Baltimore–Washington DC,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">multiwavelength</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sulfate</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Veselovskii et al. (2009)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">USA  (38.99° N, 76.84° W)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mie–Raman lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Baltimore–Washington DC,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">multiwavelength</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sulfate, water-vapor-soluble</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.39</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Pérez-Ramirez et</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">USA  (38.99° N, 76.84° W)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mie–Raman lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">organic carbon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">al. (2021)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">(more organic content)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sulfate, water-vapor-soluble</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.38</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">organic carbon</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Xingtai, China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Raman lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Organics, nitrates, sulfates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.65</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Chen et al. (2019)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(37° N, 114° E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Clean condition</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Xinzhou, China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">three-wavelength Mie</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Dust, organic, inorganic salts</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.24</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Lv et al. (2017)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(38.4° N, 112.7° E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">polarization Raman lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Anthropogenic aerosol, organic,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">inorganic salts</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Beijing, China</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">micro-pulse lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Dust, organic, inorganic salts</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.30</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Wu et al. (2020)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(39.5° N, 116.2 ° E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Raman lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Organic, inorganic salts</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1.14</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Leipzig, Germany</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Raman–polarization</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Continental aerosol</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Haarig et al. (2025)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(51.3° N, 12.3° E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Cabauw, Netherlands</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">multi-wavelength</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Organics, nitrates,</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.88</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Fernández et al. (2015)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(52.0° N, 4.9° E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Raman lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4">marine aerosols</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Organics, nitrates</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.59</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Lille, France</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Mie–Raman–</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Urban pollution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.47</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Miri et al. (2024)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(50.6° N, 3.1° E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">fluorescence lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Smoke</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Case study</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Saclay, France</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Water Vapour and</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Regional pollution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.30–0.75</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Laly et al. (2025)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col2">(48.7° N, 2.1° E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Aerosols Lidar</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col4"/>
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Paris, France</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Sea salts, regional</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.87, 1.52</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(48.8° N, 2.3° E)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">pollution</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6"/>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <fig id="F7" specific-use="star"><label>Figure 7</label><caption><p id="d2e3725">A case to illustrate the difference of hygroscopic parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M176" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between using a fixed LR and a variable LR over Wuhan at 18:30–19:00 LT on 19 July 2019. Profiles of <bold>(a)</bold> lidar ratio and RH, <bold>(b)</bold> backscatter coefficient; <bold>(c)</bold> the particle backscatter coefficient enhancement factors calculated by the Hänel method are presented. The black and red lines represent profiles derived by a fixed LR of 50 sr and variable LR, respectively.</p></caption>
          <graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/19/389/2026/amt-19-389-2026-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <label>4.2</label><title>The uncertainty introduced by assuming a fixed lidar ratio</title>
      <p id="d2e3758">In Sect. 2, the backscatter coefficient <inline-formula><mml:math id="M177" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is retrieved by the Fernald method with a fixed lidar ratio (LR) of 50 sr (Fernald, 1984). However, the hygroscopic growth process can lead to an increase in LR under high RH conditions in previous studies: Veselovskii et al. (2025) found that during the hygroscopic growth, the extinction increases more rapidly than the backscatter; Haarig et al. (2025) estimated the LR enhancement factor of 1.43 when RH <inline-formula><mml:math id="M178" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">90</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. While the polarization lidar cannot measure the LR for specific cases like the Raman lidar. Zhao et al. (2017) have estimated a relational expression between LR and RH through 532 nm micro-pulsed lidar and Mie model:

            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><label>7</label><mml:math id="M179" display="block"><mml:mtable rowspacing="0.2ex" class="split" displaystyle="true" columnalign="right left"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LR</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mtd><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close="" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.92</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.3</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced close=")" open=""><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RH</mml:mi><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

          where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M180" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the LR under dry conditions. The fixed LR of 50 sr represents an average value derived from combined lidar and sun photometer measurements in the ambient troposphere (Takamura et al., 1994). Based on radiosonde data, the average RH in the lower troposphere over Wuhan is approximately 40 %–70 % (Guo et al., 2023). Accordingly, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M181" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">LR</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">dry</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">47</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> sr in Eq. (7) was set, such that an LR of 50 sr corresponds to RH values of approximately 50 %–55 %. It should be mentioned that our analysis focuses on the variation of LR within the identified particle-hygroscopic-growth layers. Taking the case from 19 July  2019, presented in Sect. 3 as an example, Fig. 7 illustrates the influence of variable LR on hygroscopic parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M182" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. The LR increases with rising RH, and the derived backscatter coefficient (in red curve) shows a slight deviation from the original profile (in black curve). The derived <inline-formula><mml:math id="M183" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increases by 2.1 % from 0.48 to 0.49. Furthermore, Table 4 summarizes 10 cases covering RH ranges of 40 %–100 %. The variable LR generally causes an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M184" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M185" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the largest increase up to 12.5 % under high RH conditions. The uncertainty introduced by assuming a fixed LR becomes more pronounced under higher RH conditions.</p>

<table-wrap id="T4" specific-use="star"><label>Table 4</label><caption><p id="d2e3955">Comparisons of hygroscopic growth parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M186" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>: fixed LR versus variable LR.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Date</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">RH range</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M187" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by fixed LR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M188" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> by variable LR</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M189" display="inline"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="false"><mml:mfrac style="text"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2013.07.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">71 %–84  %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.42</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.46</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">9.5  %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2018.08.21</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">84 %–95  %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.54</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">12.5 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2018.10.17</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">65 %–80  %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.56</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5.7 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2019.07.19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">54 %–82  %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.48</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.1 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2019.08.09</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72 %–96  %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.45</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.50</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">11.1 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2020.08.15</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">72 %–89  %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.41</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">10.8 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2021.10.03</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">42 %–58  %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.70</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.72</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">2.9 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2022.10.01</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">68 %–89  %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.63</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.66</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.8 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2022.11.10</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">53 %–68  %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.22</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2024.01.04</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">59 %–77  %</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.49</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.53</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">8.2 %</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>5</label><title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p id="d2e4240">In this study, we analyzed the statistical characteristics of the hygroscopic growth parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M190" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over Wuhan during 2010–2024. The dataset is based on 532 nm ground-based polarization lidar observations, meteorological data from radiosonde measurements, and ERA5 reanalysis. Simultaneous lidar-derived particle backscatter coefficients and radiosonde RH profiles were matched, and the use of meteorological parameters allowed the application of stringent constraints to the dataset. This approach identified 192 suitable cases for our analysis. The Hänel parameterization method was employed to estimate the hygroscopic growth parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M191" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. A representative case observed on 19 July 2019 is presented to illustrate the methodology for identifying hygroscopic growth cases and estimating the hygroscopic growth parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M192" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this case, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M193" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was 0.48, suggesting moderately hygroscopic particles, typical of urban pollution. The corresponding <inline-formula><mml:math id="M194" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value was 1.93, showing that the backscatter coefficient increases by a factor of 1.93 as RH rose from 40 % (dry condition) to 85 %.</p>
      <p id="d2e4291">For the statistical characteristics, the average and standard deviations of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M195" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> were 0.62 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M196" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24, corresponding to an <inline-formula><mml:math id="M197" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 2.36, with a range of 1.69–3.29 when incorporating the standard deviation. All identified cases were classified by altitudes into the boundary layer and free troposphere clusters. No significant difference in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M198" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> was observed between the BL (0.63 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M199" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.25) and FT (0.60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M200" display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.24). The hygroscopic growth of anthropogenic aerosols in Wuhan generally occurred under high RH conditions around 60 %–80 %. The annual mean <inline-formula><mml:math id="M201" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> increased sharply from 0.49 in 2015 to 0.63 in 2017 and stabilized between 0.6 and 0.7 after 2018. This trend closely matches the evolution of the annual mean NO<sub>2</sub>-to-SO<sub>2</sub> concentration ratio, which rose from 1.8 in 2014 to 5.3 in 2017 and was situated between 4 and 6 after 2018. These results indicate that the presence of nitrates in the aerosol mixture enhanced hygroscopicity under similar RH conditions (Chen et al., 2019). Regarding seasonal variation, most cases occurred in summer (80) and autumn (81). The seasonal average <inline-formula><mml:math id="M204" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> showed minimal variation, with a minimum in winter (0.56) and a maximum in autumn (0.64), corresponding to <inline-formula><mml:math id="M205" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mtext>ref-Hänel</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">85</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">%</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values of 2.17 and 2.43, respectively, i.e., a difference of approximately 11 %. The lower  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M206" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> (0.56) in winter is due to the higher MLH of 2.4 km compared with other seasons, indicating that the winter analyzed cases reflect hygroscopic growth effect of relatively clean aerosols at higher altitudes rather than severe surface-level pollution. Finally, we tried to estimate the error introduced by a fixed LR. The incorporation of variable LR generally causes an increase in <inline-formula><mml:math id="M207" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M208" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">%</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, with the largest increase reaching up to 12.5 % under high RH conditions.</p>
      <p id="d2e4430">Leveraging long-term polarization lidar observations, we characterize the hygroscopicity of local/regional pollutants over Wuhan. The hygroscopic growth parameter in this study demonstrates how RH amplifies lidar-derived backscatter coefficients and implies the potential influence on long-term AOD variation. In our previous work (Jing et al., 2025), long-term lidar observations over Wuhan from 2010 to 2024 revealed a two-stage evolution of anthropogenic aerosols: a rapid decline from 2010 to 2017, followed by a fluctuating period during 2018–2024. The larger <inline-formula><mml:math id="M209" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values after 2017 may have amplified the hygroscopic growth effect on the backscatter coefficient, and thus also the integrated AOD, which may partially offset the efforts of emission control policies and contribute to the cessation of the AOD decline post-2018. Furthermore, AOD is a major source of uncertainty in estimates of direct aerosol radiative forcing (DARF) (Elsey et al., 2024); in future work, we will assess the influence of particle hygroscopic growth on DARF. However, polarization lidar cannot distinguish aerosol chemical composition in urban environments. To better assess the hygroscopic parameter <inline-formula><mml:math id="M210" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">γ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> for specific aerosol types, it would be beneficial to combine HYSPLIT trajectory simulations, chemical analysis instruments, satellite data, and Raman lidar observations. In addition, radiosondes are launched approximately 24 km away from our lidar site at 08:00 and 20:00 LT, limiting the availability of co-located and simultaneous meteorological data (He et al., 2023). Raman lidar can provide real-time and co-located, height-resolved measurements of temperature and RH (Liu et al., 2019; Dawson et al., 2020; Pan et al., 2020; Yi et al., 2021), enabling a more accurate analysis of aerosol hygroscopicity property over Wuhan.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d2e4451">ERA5 reanalysis data can be obtained from <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</ext-link> (Copernicus Climate Change Service, Climate Data Store, 2025). The radiosonde data can be obtained from <uri>https://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.shtml</uri> (University of Wyoming Atmospheric Science Radiosonde Archive, 2025). The HYSPLIT model is available at <uri>https://www.arl.noaa.gov</uri> (HYSPLIT, 2025). Lidar data used to generate the results of this paper are available from the authors upon request (e-mail: yf@whu.edu.cn).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d2e4466">YH, DJ, and ZY analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. ZY, DM, and KH participated in scientific discussions and reviewed and proofread the manuscript. YH and FY conceived the research and acquired the research funding. FY led the study.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d2e4472">The contact author has declared that none of the authors has any competing interests.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="disclaimer"><title>Disclaimer</title>

      <p id="d2e4478">Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. The authors bear the ultimate responsibility for providing appropriate place names. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d2e4484">The authors thank the colleagues who participated in the operation of the lidar system at our site. We also acknowledge the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) for ERA5 reanalysis data, the University of Wyoming for radiosonde data, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Air Resources Laboratory (ARL) for the HYSPLIT model.</p></ack><notes notes-type="financialsupport"><title>Financial support</title>

      <p id="d2e4489">This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 42575138, 42005101, 42575141, and 42205130), Hubei Provincial Special Project for Central Government Guidance on Local Science and Technology Development (2025CFC003), and the Meridian Space Weather Monitoring Project (China).</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d2e4495">This paper was edited by Daniel Perez-Ramirez and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Adam, M., Putaud, J. P., Martins dos Santos, S., Dell'Acqua, A., and Gruening, C.: Aerosol hygroscopicity at a regional background site (Ispra) in Northern Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5703–5717, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5703-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-5703-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Bedoya-Velásquez, A. E., Navas-Guzmán, F., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Titos, G., Román, R., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Ortiz-Amezcua, P., Benavent-Oltra, J. A., de Arruda Moreira, G., Montilla-Rosero, E., Hoyos, C. D., Artiñano, B., Coz, E., Olmo-Reyes, F. J., Alados-Arboledas, L., and Guerrero-Rascado, J. L.: Hygroscopic growth study in the framework of EARLINET during the SLOPE I campaign: synergy of remote sensing and in situ instrumentation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7001–7017, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7001-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7001-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Bolton, D.: The computation of equivalent potential temperature, Mon. Weather. Rev., 108, 1046–1053, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108&lt;1046:TCOEPT&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108&lt;1046:TCOEPT&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1980.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Bourgeois, Q., Ekman, A. M. L., Renard, J.-B., Krejci, R., Devasthale, A., Bender, F. A.-M., Riipinen, I., Berthet, G., and Tackett, J. L.: How much of the global aerosol optical depth is found in the boundary layer and free troposphere?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7709–7720, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7709-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-7709-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Chen, J., Li, Z., Lv, M., Wang, Y., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Yan, X., Sun, Y., and Cribb, M.: Aerosol hygroscopic growth, contributing factors, and impact on haze events in a severely polluted region in northern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1327–1342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1327-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-1327-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Copernicus Climate Change Service, Climate Data Store: ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS), [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Dawson, K. W., Ferrare, R. A., Moore, R. H., Clayton, M. B., Thorsen, T. J., and Eloranta, E. W.: Ambient aerosol hygroscopic growth from combined Raman lidar and HSRL, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031708, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031708" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2019JD031708</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Deshmukh, S., Poulain, L., Wehner, B., Henning, S., Petit, J.-E., Fombelle, P., Favez, O., Herrmann, H., and Pöhlker, M.: External particle mixing influences hygroscopicity in a sub-urban area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 741–758, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-741-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-741-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Ding, L., Zhao, W., Huang, Y., Cheng, S., and Liu, C.: Research on the coupling coordination relationship between urbanization and the air environment: A case study of the area of Wuhan, Atmosphere, 6, 1539–1558, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos6101539" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos6101539</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Draxler, R. and Rolph, G.: HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model, Air Resources Laboratory, NOAA, Silver Spring, Md, USA, <uri>https://www.ready.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php</uri> (last access: 12 April 2025), 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Elsey, J., Bellouin, N., and Ryder, C.: Sensitivity of global direct aerosol shortwave radiative forcing to uncertainties in aerosol optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4065–4081, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4065-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-4065-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Fernald, F. G.: Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments, Appl. Opt., 23, 652–653, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.23.000652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.23.000652</ext-link>, 1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Fernández, A. J., Apituley, A., Veselovskii, I., Suvorina, A., Henzing, J., Pujadas, M., and Artíñano, B.: Study of aerosol hygroscopic events over the Cabauw experimental site for atmospheric research (CESAR) using the multi-wavelength Raman lidar Caeli, Atmos. Environ., 120, 484–498, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.079" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.079</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Ferrare, R. A., Melfi, S. H., Whiteman, D. N., Evans, K. D., Poellot, M., and Kaufman, Y. J.: Raman lidar measurements of aerosol extinction and backscattering: 2. Derivation of aerosol real refractive index, single-scattering albedo, and humidification factor using Raman lidar and aircraft size distribution measurements, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 10, 19673–19689, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01647" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/98JD01647</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>Freudenthaler, V., Esselborn, M., Wiegner, M., Heese, B., Tesche, M., Ansmann, A., Müller, D., Althausen, D., Wirth, M., Fix, A., Ehret, G., Knippertz, P., Toledano, C., Gasteiger, J., Garhammer, M., and Seefeldner, M.: Depolarization ratio profiling at several wavelengths in pure Saharan dust during SAMUM2006, Tellus B, 61, 165–179, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00396.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00396.x</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Navas-Guzmán, F., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Lyamani, H., Valenzuela, A., Titos, G., Fernández-Gálvez, J., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Hygroscopic growth of atmospheric aerosol particles based on active remote sensing and radiosounding measurements: selected cases in southeastern Spain, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 705–718, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-705-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-705-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Guo, X., Huang, K., Fang, J., Zhang, Z., Cao, R., and Yi, F.: Seasonal and Diurnal Changes of Air Temperature and Water Vapor Observed with a Microwave Radiometer in Wuhan, China, Remote Sens., 15, 5422, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225422" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs15225422</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>Haarig, M., Ansmann, A., Gasteiger, J., Kandler, K., Althausen, D., Baars, H., Radenz, M., and Farrell, D. A.: Dry versus wet marine particle optical properties: RH dependence of depolarization ratio, backscatter, and extinction from multiwavelength lidar measurements during SALTRACE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14199–14217, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14199-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-14199-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>Haarig, M., Engelmann, R., Baars, H., Gast, B., Althausen, D., and Ansmann, A.: Discussion of the spectral slope of the lidar ratio between 355 and 1064 nm from multiwavelength Raman lidar observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7741–7763, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7741-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-7741-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> Hänel, G.: The properties of atmospheric aerosol particles as functions of the relative humidity at thermodynamic equilibrium with the surrounding moist air, in: Advances in Geophysics, edited by: Landsberg, H. E. and Mieghem, J. V., Elsevier, 73–188, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>He, Q., Zhou, G., Geng, F., Gao, W., and Yu, W.: Spatial distribution of aerosol hygroscopicity and its effect on PM<sub>2.5</sub> retrieval in East China, Atmos. Res., 170, 161–167, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.011</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>He, Y. and Yi, F.: Dust aerosols detected using a ground-based polarization lidar and CALIPSO over Wuhan (30.5 ° N, 114.4 ° E), China. Adv. Meteorol., 2015, 536762, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/536762" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1155/2015/536762</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>He, Y., Yi, F., Yi, Y., Liu, F., and Zhang, Y.: Heterogeneous nucleation of midlevel cloud layer influenced by transported Asian dust over Wuhan (30.5°N, 114.4°E), China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033394, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033394" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2020JD033394</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>He, Y., Yi, F., Liu, F., Yin, Z., and Zhou, J.: Ice nucleation of cirrus clouds related to the transported dust layer observed by ground-based lidars over Wuhan, China. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 39, 2071–2086, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1192-x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s00376-021-1192-x</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>He, Y., Jing, D., Liu, Q., Liu, F., and Yi, F.: Atmospheric refraction delay toward millimeter-level lunar laser ranging: Correcting the temperature-induced error with real-time and Co-located lidar measurements, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos, 128, e2023JD039579, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039579" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2023JD039579</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>He, Y., Jing, D., Yin, Z., Ohneiser, K., and Yi, F.: Long-term (2010–2021) lidar observations of stratospheric aerosols in Wuhan, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11431–11450, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11431-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-11431-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G., Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G., Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes, R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R.J., Hólm, E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C., Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 146, 1999–2049, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/qj.3803</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I., Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set], <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" ext-link-type="DOI">10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>HYSPLIT: Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory, NOAA, <uri>https://www.arl.noaa.gov/</uri> (last access: 2 May 2025), 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>Ji, D., Palm, M., Buschmann, M., Ebell, K., Maturilli, M., Sun, X., and Notholt, J.: Hygroscopic aerosols amplify longwave downward radiation in the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3889–3904, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3889-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-3889-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>Jing, D., He, Y., Yin, Z., Liu, F., and Yi, F.: Long-term characteristics of dust aerosols over central China from 2010 to 2020 observed with polarization lidar, Atmos. Res., 297, 107129, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.107129" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.107129</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>Jing, D., He, Y., Yin, Z., Huang, K., Liu, F., and Yi, F.: Evolution of tropospheric aerosols over central China during 2010–2024 as observed by lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 17047–17067, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17047-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-17047-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Kanamitsu, M.: Description of the NMC global data assimilation and forecast system, Weather Forecast., 4, 335–342, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:DOTNGD&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:DOTNGD&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>Kong, W. and Yi, F.: Convective boundary layer evolution from lidar backscatter and its relationship with surface aerosol concentration at a location of a central China megacity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120, 7928–7940, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023248" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2015JD023248</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Laly, F., Chazette, P., Totems, J., Crenn, V., Ledur, D., and Marpillat, A.: How does humidity affect lidar-derived aerosol optical properties, and how do they compare with CAMS?, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 7629–7649, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-7629-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-18-7629-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>Liu, X., Gu, J., Li, Y., Cheng, Y., Qu, Y., Han, T., Wang, J., Tian, H., Chen, J., and Zhang, Y.: Increase of aerosol scattering by hygroscopic growth: Observation, modeling, and implications on visibility, Atmos. Res., 132, 91–101, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.04.007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.04.007</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Liu, H. J., Zhao, C. S., Nekat, B., Ma, N., Wiedensohler, A., van Pinxteren, D., Spindler, G., Müller, K., and Herrmann, H.: Aerosol hygroscopicity derived from size-segregated chemical composition and its parameterization in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2525–2539, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2525-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-2525-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Liu, M. and Matsui, H.: Aerosol radiative forcings induced by substantial changes in anthropogenic emissions in China from 2008 to 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5965–5982, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5965-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-5965-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Liu, M., Huang, X., Song, Y., Xu, T., Wang, S., Wu, Z., Hu, M., Zhang, L., Zhang, Q., Pan, Y., Liu, X., and Zhu, T.: Rapid SO2 emission reductions significantly increase tropospheric ammonia concentrations over the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17933–17943, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17933-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-18-17933-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Liu, F., Yi, F., Zhang, Y., and Yi, Y.: Double-receiver-based pure rotational Raman LiDAR for measuring atmospheric temperature at altitudes between near ground and up to 35 km, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 57, 10301–10309, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2933461" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2019.2933461</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>Lv, M., Liu, D., Li, Z. Q., Mao, J. T., Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. Z., Wang, Y. J., and Xie, C. B.: Hygroscopic growth of atmospheric aerosol particles based on lidar, radiosonde, and in situ measurements: Case studies from the Xinzhou field campaign, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 188, 60–70, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.12.029" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.12.029</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>Mamouri, R. E. and Ansmann, A.: Fine and coarse dust separation with polarization lidar, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3717–3735, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3717-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-3717-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Miri, R., Pujol, O., Hu, Q., Goloub, P., Veselovskii, I., Podvin, T., and Ducos, F.: Innovative aerosol hygroscopic growth study from Mie–Raman–fluorescence lidar and microwave radiometer synergy, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3367–3375, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3367-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-17-3367-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>Nash, J., Oakley, T., Vömel, H., and Li, W.: WMO Intercomparison of High Quality Radiosonde Systems, Yangjiang, China, 107, Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization, Instruments and Observing Methods, <uri>https://library.wmo.int/idurl/4/50499</uri> (last access: 19 January 2026), 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Navas-Guzmán, F., Martucci, G., Collaud Coen, M., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Hervo, M., Sicard, M., and Haefele, A.: Characterization of aerosol hygroscopicity using Raman lidar measurements at the EARLINET station of Payerne, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11651–11668, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11651-2019" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-19-11651-2019</ext-link>, 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>Pan, X., Yi, F., Liu, F., Zhang, Y., and Yan, Y.: Diurnal temperature variations in the lower troposphere as measured by an all-day-operational pure rotational Raman lidar, Appl. Opt., 59, 8688–8696, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.394484" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.394484</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>Peng, S., Yang, Q., Shupe, M. D., Xi, X., Han, B., Chen, D., Dahlke, S., and Liu, C.: The characteristics of atmospheric boundary layer height over the Arctic Ocean during MOSAiC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8683–8703, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8683-2023" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-23-8683-2023</ext-link>, 2023.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Pérez, C., Sicard, M., Jorba, O., Comerón, A., and Baldasano, J. M.: Summertime re-circulations of air pollutants over the northeastern Iberian coast observed from systematic EARLINET lidar measurements in Barcelona, Atmos. Environ., 38, 3983–4000, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.04.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.04.010</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>Pérez-Ramírez, D., Whiteman, D. N., Veselovskii, I., Ferrare, R., Titos, G., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Sánchez-Hernández, G., and Navas-Guzmán, F.: Spatiotemporal changes in aerosol properties by hygroscopic growth and impacts on radiative forcing and heating rates during DISCOVER-AQ 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12021–12048, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12021-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-12021-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>Rosenfeld, D., Andreae, M.O., Asmi, A., Chin, M., de Leeuw, G., Donovan, D.P., Kahn, R., Kinne, S., Kivekäs, N., Kulmala, M., Lau, W., Schmidt, K. S., Suni, T., Wagner, T., Wild, M., and Quaas, J.: Global observations of aerosol-cloud- precipitation-climate interactions, Rev. Geophys., 52, 750–808, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000441" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2013RG000441</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>Sicard, M., Fortunato dos Santos Oliveira, D. C., Muñoz-Porcar, C., Gil-Díaz, C., Comerón, A., Rodríguez-Gómez, A., and Dios Otín, F.: Measurement report: Spectral and statistical analysis of aerosol hygroscopic growth from multi-wavelength lidar measurements in Barcelona, Spain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7681–7697, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7681-2022" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-22-7681-2022</ext-link>, 2022.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Sorooshian, A., Csavina, J., Shingler, T., Dey, S., Brechtel, F. J., Sáez, A. E., and Betterton, E. A.: Hygroscopic and chemical properties of aerosols collected near a copper smelter: implications for public and environmental health, Environ. Sci. Tech., 46, 9473–9480, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es302275k" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/es302275k</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J., Cohen, M. D., and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>Takamura, T., Sasano, Y., and Hayasaka, T.: Tropospheric aerosol optical properties derived from lidar, sun photometer, and optical particle counter measurements, Appl. Opt., 33, 7132–7140, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.007132" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.33.007132</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>Tesche, M., Ansmann, A., Müller, D., Althausen, D., Engelmann, R., Freudenthaler, V., and Groß, S.: Vertically resolved separation of dust and smoke over Cape Verde using multiwavelength Raman and polarization lidars during Saharan mineral dust experiment 2008, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D13202, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011862" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD011862</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>Titos, G., Cazorla, A., Zieger, P., Andrews, E., Lyamani, H., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Olmo, F. J., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Effect of hygroscopic growth on the aerosol light-scattering coef?cient: A review of measurements, techniques and error sources, Atmos. Environ., 141, 494–507, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.021</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>University of Wyoming Atmospheric Science Radiosonde Archive: Radiosonde data, <uri>https://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.shtml</uri> (last access: 25 December 2025), 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>Väisänen, O., Ruuskanen, A., Ylisirniö, A., Miettinen, P., Portin, H., Hao, L., Leskinen, A., Komppula, M., Romakkaniemi, S., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Virtanen, A.: In-cloud measurements highlight the role of aerosol hygroscopicity in cloud droplet formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10385–10398, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10385-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-16-10385-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>Veselovskii, I., Whiteman, D. N., Kolgotin, A., Andrews, E., and Korenskii, M.: Demonstration of aerosol property profiling by multiwavelength lidar under varying relative humidity conditions, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 1543–1557, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1254.1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/2009JTECHA1254.1</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Veselovskii, I., Hu, Q., Goloub, P., Podvin, T., Dubois, G., Kolgotin, A., and Korenskii, M.: Impact of water uptake on fluorescence of atmospheric aerosols: insights from Mie–Raman–fluorescence lidar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 6039–6051, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6039-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-18-6039-2025</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>Wang, W., Gong, W., Mao, F., Pan, Z., and Liu, B.: Measurement and study of lidar ratio by using a Raman lidar in central China, Int. J. Environ. Res. Pub. Health., 13, 508, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050508" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/ijerph13050508</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>Wu, B. and Wang, J.: Winter Arctic oscillation, Siberian High and East Asian winter monsoon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 3–1, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015373" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002GL015373</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>Wu, T., Li, Z., Chen, J., Wang, Y., Wu, H., Jin, X., Liang, C., Li, S., Wang, W., and Cribb, M.: Hygroscopicity of different types of aerosol particles: Case studies using multi-instrument data in megacity Beijing, China, Remote Sens., 12, 785, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050785" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/rs12050785</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>Xie, R., Sabel, C.E., Lu, X., Zhu, W., Kan, H., Nielsen, C. P., and Wang, H.: Long-term trend and spatial pattern of PM<sub>2.5</sub> induced premature mortality in China, Environ. Int., 97, 180–186, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.09.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.envint.2016.09.003</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>Xu, L., Fukushima, S., Sobanska, S., Murata, K., Naganuma, A., Liu, L., Wang, Y., Niu, H., Shi, Z., Kojima, T., Zhang, D., and Li, W.: Tracing the evolution of morphology and mixing state of soot particles along with the movement of an Asian dust storm, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14321–14332, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14321-2020" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-20-14321-2020</ext-link>, 2020.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>Yi, Y., Yi, F., Liu, F., Zhang, Y., Yu, C., and He, Y.: Microphysical process of precipitating hydrometeors from warm-front mid-level stratiform clouds revealed by ground-based lidar observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17649–17664, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17649-2021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-21-17649-2021</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>Yin, Z., Yi, F., Liu, F., He, Y., Zhang, Y., Yu, C., and Zhang, Y.: Long-term variations of aerosol optical properties over Wuhan with polarization lidar, Atmos. Environ., 259, 118508, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118508" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118508</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>Yu, A., Shen, X., Ma, Q., Lu, J., Hu, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, Q., Liang, L., Liu, L., Liu, S., Tong, H., Che, H., Zhang, X., and Sun, J.: Size-resolved hygroscopicity and volatility properties of ambient urban aerosol particles measured by a volatility hygroscopicity tandem differential mobility analyzer system in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3389–3412, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3389-2025" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-25-3389-2025</ext-link>, 2025. </mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, M., Ma, Y., Gong, W., and Zhu, Z: Aerosol optical properties of a haze episode in Wuhan based on ground-based and satellite observations, Atmosphere, 5, 699–719, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos5040699" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos5040699</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, F., Wang, Z., Cheng, H., Lv, X., Gong, W., Wang, X., and Zhang, G.: Seasonal variations and chemical characteristics of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Wuhan, central China, Sci. Total Environ., 518–519, 97–105, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.054" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.054</ext-link>, 2015a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y. L. and Cao, F.: Fine particulate matter (PM<inline-formula><mml:math id="M214" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2.5</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in China at a city level, Sci. Rep., 5, 14884, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14884" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep14884</ext-link>, 2015b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Yu, C., and Yi, F.: Evolution of aerosols in the atmospheric boundary layer and elevated layers during a severe, persistent haze episode in a central China megacity, Atmosphere, 12, 152, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020152" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/atmos12020152</ext-link>, 2021.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, L., Segal-Rozenhaimer, M., Che, H., Dang, C., Sun, J., Kuang, Y., Formenti, P., and Howell, S. G.: Aerosol hygroscopicity over the southeast Atlantic Ocean during the biomass burning season – Part 1: From the perspective of scattering enhancement​​​​​​​, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13849–13864, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13849-2024" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-24-13849-2024</ext-link>, 2024.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, B., Fan G., Zhang, T., and Xiang, Y.: Detection of aerosol hygroscopic growth in Tibetan Plateau by LiDAR, Laser Infrared, 55, 215–225, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.2025.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.2025.009</ext-link>, 2025.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, G., Zhao, C., Kuang, Y., Tao, J., Tan, W., Bian, Y., Li, J., and Li, C.: Impact of aerosol hygroscopic growth on retrieving aerosol extinction coefficient profiles from elastic-backscatter lidar signals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12133–12143, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12133-2017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-17-12133-2017</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>Zieger, P., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Gysel, M., Ström, J., Henne, S., Yttri, K. E., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering in the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3875–3890, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3875-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3875-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>Zieger, P., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering: results from different European sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10609–10631, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>Zieger, P., Väisänen, O., Corbin, J. C., Partridge, D. G., Bastelberger, S., Mousavi-Fard, M., Rosati, B., Gysel, M., Krieger, U. K., Leck, C., Nenes, A., Piipinen, I., Virtanen, A., and Salter, M. E.: Revising the hygroscopicity of inorganic sea salt particles, Nat. Commun., 8, 15883, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15883" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/ncomms15883</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Hygroscopic growth characteristics of anthropogenic aerosols over central China revealed by lidar observations</article-title-html>
<abstract-html/>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
      
Adam, M., Putaud, J. P., Martins dos Santos, S., Dell'Acqua, A., and Gruening, C.: Aerosol hygroscopicity at a regional background site (Ispra) in Northern Italy, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 5703–5717, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5703-2012" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-5703-2012</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bedoya-Velásquez, A. E., Navas-Guzmán, F., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Titos, G., Román, R., Casquero-Vera, J. A., Ortiz-Amezcua, P., Benavent-Oltra, J. A., de Arruda Moreira, G., Montilla-Rosero, E., Hoyos, C. D., Artiñano, B., Coz, E., Olmo-Reyes, F. J., Alados-Arboledas, L., and Guerrero-Rascado, J. L.: Hygroscopic growth study in the framework of EARLINET during the SLOPE I campaign: synergy of remote sensing and in situ instrumentation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7001–7017, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7001-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7001-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bolton, D.: The computation of equivalent potential temperature, Mon.
Weather. Rev., 108, 1046–1053,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108&lt;1046:TCOEPT&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1980)108&lt;1046:TCOEPT&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1980.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
      
Bourgeois, Q., Ekman, A. M. L., Renard, J.-B., Krejci, R., Devasthale, A., Bender, F. A.-M., Riipinen, I., Berthet, G., and Tackett, J. L.: How much of the global aerosol optical depth is found in the boundary layer and free troposphere?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 7709–7720, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7709-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-7709-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
      
Chen, J., Li, Z., Lv, M., Wang, Y., Wang, W., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Yan, X., Sun, Y., and Cribb, M.: Aerosol hygroscopic growth, contributing factors, and impact on haze events in a severely polluted region in northern China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 1327–1342, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1327-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-1327-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
      
Copernicus Climate Change Service, Climate Data Store: ERA5 hourly data on
single levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S)
Climate Data Store (CDS), [data set], <a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
      
Dawson, K. W., Ferrare, R. A., Moore, R. H., Clayton, M. B., Thorsen, T. J.,
and Eloranta, E. W.: Ambient aerosol hygroscopic growth from combined Raman
lidar and HSRL, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 125, e2019JD031708,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031708" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD031708</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
      
Deshmukh, S., Poulain, L., Wehner, B., Henning, S., Petit, J.-E., Fombelle, P., Favez, O., Herrmann, H., and Pöhlker, M.: External particle mixing influences hygroscopicity in a sub-urban area, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 741–758, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-741-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-741-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ding, L., Zhao, W., Huang, Y., Cheng, S., and Liu, C.: Research on the coupling
coordination relationship between urbanization and the air environment: A
case study of the area of Wuhan, Atmosphere, 6, 1539–1558,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos6101539" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos6101539</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
      
Draxler, R. and Rolph, G.: HYSPLIT (Hybrid Single-Particle Lagrangian
Integrated Trajectory) Model, Air Resources Laboratory, NOAA, Silver Spring,
Md, USA, <a href="https://www.ready.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php" target="_blank"/> (last access: 12 April
2025), 2003.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
      
Elsey, J., Bellouin, N., and Ryder, C.: Sensitivity of global direct aerosol shortwave radiative forcing to uncertainties in aerosol optical properties, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 4065–4081, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4065-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-4065-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fernald, F. G.: Analysis of atmospheric lidar observations: some comments,
Appl. Opt., 23, 652–653, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.23.000652" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.23.000652</a>, 1984.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
      
Fernández, A. J., Apituley, A., Veselovskii, I., Suvorina, A., Henzing,
J., Pujadas, M., and Artíñano, B.: Study of aerosol hygroscopic
events over the Cabauw experimental site for atmospheric research (CESAR)
using the multi-wavelength Raman lidar Caeli, Atmos. Environ., 120,
484–498, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.079" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2015.08.079</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ferrare, R. A., Melfi, S. H., Whiteman, D. N., Evans, K. D., Poellot, M.,
and Kaufman, Y. J.: Raman lidar measurements of aerosol extinction and
backscattering: 2. Derivation of aerosol real refractive index,
single-scattering albedo, and humidification factor using Raman lidar and
aircraft size distribution measurements, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 10,
19673–19689, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01647" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/98JD01647</a>, 1998.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
      
Freudenthaler, V., Esselborn, M., Wiegner, M., Heese, B., Tesche, M.,
Ansmann, A., Müller, D., Althausen, D., Wirth, M., Fix, A., Ehret, G.,
Knippertz, P., Toledano, C., Gasteiger, J., Garhammer, M., and Seefeldner,
M.: Depolarization ratio profiling at several wavelengths in pure Saharan
dust during SAMUM2006, Tellus B, 61, 165–179,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00396.x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2008.00396.x</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
      
Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Navas-Guzmán, F., Bravo-Aranda, J. A., Guerrero-Rascado, J. L., Lyamani, H., Valenzuela, A., Titos, G., Fernández-Gálvez, J., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Hygroscopic growth of atmospheric aerosol particles based on active remote sensing and radiosounding measurements: selected cases in southeastern Spain, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 705–718, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-705-2015" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-705-2015</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
      
Guo, X., Huang, K., Fang, J., Zhang, Z., Cao, R., and Yi, F.: Seasonal and
Diurnal Changes of Air Temperature and Water Vapor Observed with a Microwave
Radiometer in Wuhan, China, Remote Sens., 15, 5422,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225422" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15225422</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haarig, M., Ansmann, A., Gasteiger, J., Kandler, K., Althausen, D., Baars, H., Radenz, M., and Farrell, D. A.: Dry versus wet marine particle optical properties: RH dependence of depolarization ratio, backscatter, and extinction from multiwavelength lidar measurements during SALTRACE, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 14199–14217, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14199-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-14199-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
      
Haarig, M., Engelmann, R., Baars, H., Gast, B., Althausen, D., and Ansmann, A.: Discussion of the spectral slope of the lidar ratio between 355 and 1064 nm from multiwavelength Raman lidar observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 7741–7763, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7741-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-7741-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hänel, G.: The properties of atmospheric aerosol particles as functions
of the relative humidity at thermodynamic equilibrium with the surrounding
moist air, in: Advances in Geophysics, edited by: Landsberg, H. E. and
Mieghem, J. V., Elsevier, 73–188, 1976.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, Q., Zhou, G., Geng, F., Gao, W., and Yu, W.: Spatial distribution of
aerosol hygroscopicity and its effect on PM<sub>2.5</sub> retrieval in East China,
Atmos. Res., 170, 161–167, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.011" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2015.11.011</a>,
2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, Y. and Yi, F.: Dust aerosols detected using a ground-based polarization
lidar and CALIPSO over Wuhan (30.5 ° N, 114.4 ° E),
China. Adv. Meteorol., 2015, 536762, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/536762" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/536762</a>,
2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, Y., Yi, F., Yi, Y., Liu, F., and Zhang, Y.: Heterogeneous nucleation of
midlevel cloud layer influenced by transported Asian dust over Wuhan
(30.5°N, 114.4°E), China, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 126, e2020JD033394,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033394" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033394</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, Y., Yi, F., Liu, F., Yin, Z., and Zhou, J.: Ice nucleation of cirrus
clouds related to the transported dust layer observed by ground-based lidars
over Wuhan, China. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 39, 2071–2086, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1192-x" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1192-x</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, Y., Jing, D., Liu, Q., Liu, F., and Yi, F.: Atmospheric refraction delay
toward millimeter-level lunar laser ranging: Correcting the
temperature-induced error with real-time and Co-located lidar
measurements, J. Geophys. Res. Atmos, 128, e2023JD039579,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039579" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD039579</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
      
He, Y., Jing, D., Yin, Z., Ohneiser, K., and Yi, F.: Long-term (2010–2021) lidar observations of stratospheric aerosols in Wuhan, China, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 11431–11450, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11431-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-11431-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Hirahara, S., Horányi, A., Muñoz-Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R.,
Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Abdalla, S., Abellan, X., Balsamo, G.,
Bechtold, P., Biavati, G., Bidlot, J., Bonavita, M., De Chiara, G.,
Dahlgren, P., Dee, D., Diamantakis, M., Dragani, R., Flemming, J., Forbes,
R., Fuentes, M., Geer, A., Haimberger, L., Healy, S., Hogan, R.J., Hólm,
E., Janisková, M., Keeley, S., Laloyaux, P., Lopez, P., Lupu, C.,
Radnoti, G., de Rosnay, P., Rozum, I., Vamborg, F., Villaume, S., and
Thépaut, J.-N.: The ERA5 global reanalysis, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc.,
146, 1999–2049, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3803</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
      
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A.,
Muñoz Sabater, J., Nicolas, J., Peubey, C., Radu, R., Rozum, I.,
Schepers, D., Simmons, A., Soci, C., Dee, D., and Thépaut, J.-N.: ERA5
hourly data on single levels from 1940 to present, Copernicus Climate Change
Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) [data set],
<a href="https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.adbb2d47</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
      
HYSPLIT: Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory, NOAA, <a href="https://www.arl.noaa.gov/" target="_blank"/> (last access: 2 May 2025), 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
      
Ji, D., Palm, M., Buschmann, M., Ebell, K., Maturilli, M., Sun, X., and Notholt, J.: Hygroscopic aerosols amplify longwave downward radiation in the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3889–3904, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3889-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3889-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jing, D., He, Y., Yin, Z., Liu, F., and Yi, F.: Long-term characteristics of
dust aerosols over central China from 2010 to 2020 observed with
polarization lidar, Atmos. Res., 297, 107129,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.107129" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.107129</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
      
Jing, D., He, Y., Yin, Z., Huang, K., Liu, F., and Yi, F.: Evolution of tropospheric aerosols over central China during 2010–2024 as observed by lidar, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 17047–17067, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17047-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-17047-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kanamitsu, M.: Description of the NMC global data assimilation and forecast
system, Weather Forecast., 4, 335–342,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:DOTNGD&gt;2.0.CO;2" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0434(1989)004&lt;0335:DOTNGD&gt;2.0.CO;2</a>, 1989.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
      
Kong, W. and Yi, F.: Convective boundary layer evolution from lidar
backscatter and its relationship with surface aerosol concentration at a
location of a central China megacity, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 120,
7928–7940, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023248" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JD023248</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
      
Laly, F., Chazette, P., Totems, J., Crenn, V., Ledur, D., and Marpillat, A.: How does humidity affect lidar-derived aerosol optical properties, and how do they compare with CAMS?, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 7629–7649, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-7629-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-7629-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, X., Gu, J., Li, Y., Cheng, Y., Qu, Y., Han, T., Wang, J., Tian, H.,
Chen, J., and Zhang, Y.: Increase of aerosol scattering by hygroscopic
growth: Observation, modeling, and implications on visibility, Atmos. Res.,
132, 91–101, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.04.007" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.04.007</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, H. J., Zhao, C. S., Nekat, B., Ma, N., Wiedensohler, A., van Pinxteren, D., Spindler, G., Müller, K., and Herrmann, H.: Aerosol hygroscopicity derived from size-segregated chemical composition and its parameterization in the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 2525–2539, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2525-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-2525-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, M. and Matsui, H.: Aerosol radiative forcings induced by substantial changes in anthropogenic emissions in China from 2008 to 2016, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 5965–5982, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5965-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-5965-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, M., Huang, X., Song, Y., Xu, T., Wang, S., Wu, Z., Hu, M., Zhang, L., Zhang, Q., Pan, Y., Liu, X., and Zhu, T.: Rapid SO2 emission reductions significantly increase tropospheric ammonia concentrations over the North China Plain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 18, 17933–17943, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17933-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-18-17933-2018</a>, 2018.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
      
Liu, F., Yi, F., Zhang, Y., and Yi, Y.: Double-receiver-based pure
rotational Raman LiDAR for measuring atmospheric temperature at altitudes
between near ground and up to 35 km, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 57,
10301–10309, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2933461" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2019.2933461</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
      
Lv, M., Liu, D., Li, Z. Q., Mao, J. T., Sun, Y. L., Wang, Z. Z., Wang, Y.
J., and Xie, C. B.: Hygroscopic growth of atmospheric aerosol particles
based on lidar, radiosonde, and in situ measurements: Case studies from the
Xinzhou field campaign, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 188, 60–70,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.12.029" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2015.12.029</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
      
Mamouri, R. E. and Ansmann, A.: Fine and coarse dust separation with polarization lidar, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 3717–3735, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3717-2014" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-3717-2014</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
      
Miri, R., Pujol, O., Hu, Q., Goloub, P., Veselovskii, I., Podvin, T., and Ducos, F.: Innovative aerosol hygroscopic growth study from Mie–Raman–fluorescence lidar and microwave radiometer synergy, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 17, 3367–3375, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3367-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-17-3367-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
      
Nash, J., Oakley, T., Vömel, H., and Li, W.: WMO Intercomparison of High
Quality Radiosonde Systems, Yangjiang, China, 107, Geneva, Switzerland:
World Meteorological Organization, Instruments and Observing Methods, <a href="https://library.wmo.int/idurl/4/50499" target="_blank"/> (last access: 19 January 2026), 2011.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
      
Navas-Guzmán, F., Martucci, G., Collaud Coen, M., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Hervo, M., Sicard, M., and Haefele, A.: Characterization of aerosol hygroscopicity using Raman lidar measurements at the EARLINET station of Payerne, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 19, 11651–11668, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11651-2019" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-19-11651-2019</a>, 2019.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pan, X., Yi, F., Liu, F., Zhang, Y., and Yan, Y.: Diurnal temperature
variations in the lower troposphere as measured by an all-day-operational
pure rotational Raman lidar, Appl. Opt., 59, 8688–8696,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.394484" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.394484</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
      
Peng, S., Yang, Q., Shupe, M. D., Xi, X., Han, B., Chen, D., Dahlke, S., and Liu, C.: The characteristics of atmospheric boundary layer height over the Arctic Ocean during MOSAiC, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 23, 8683–8703, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8683-2023" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-8683-2023</a>, 2023.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pérez, C., Sicard, M., Jorba, O., Comerón, A., and Baldasano, J. M.:
Summertime re-circulations of air pollutants over the northeastern Iberian
coast observed from systematic EARLINET lidar measurements in Barcelona,
Atmos. Environ., 38, 3983–4000,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.04.010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.04.010</a>, 2004.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
      
Pérez-Ramírez, D., Whiteman, D. N., Veselovskii, I., Ferrare, R., Titos, G., Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Sánchez-Hernández, G., and Navas-Guzmán, F.: Spatiotemporal changes in aerosol properties by hygroscopic growth and impacts on radiative forcing and heating rates during DISCOVER-AQ 2011, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 12021–12048, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12021-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-12021-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
      
Rosenfeld, D., Andreae, M.O., Asmi, A., Chin, M., de Leeuw, G., Donovan,
D.P., Kahn, R., Kinne, S., Kivekäs, N., Kulmala, M., Lau, W., Schmidt,
K. S., Suni, T., Wagner, T., Wild, M., and Quaas, J.: Global observations of
aerosol-cloud- precipitation-climate interactions, Rev. Geophys., 52,
750–808, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000441" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000441</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sicard, M., Fortunato dos Santos Oliveira, D. C., Muñoz-Porcar, C., Gil-Díaz, C., Comerón, A., Rodríguez-Gómez, A., and Dios Otín, F.: Measurement report: Spectral and statistical analysis of aerosol hygroscopic growth from multi-wavelength lidar measurements in Barcelona, Spain, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 7681–7697, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7681-2022" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-7681-2022</a>, 2022.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>
      
Sorooshian, A., Csavina, J., Shingler, T., Dey, S., Brechtel, F. J.,
Sáez, A. E., and Betterton, E. A.: Hygroscopic and chemical properties
of aerosols collected near a copper smelter: implications for public and
environmental health, Environ. Sci. Tech., 46, 9473–9480,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/es302275k" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/es302275k</a>, 2012.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>
      
Stein, A. F., Draxler, R. R., Rolph, G. D., Stunder, B. J., Cohen, M. D.,
and Ngan, F.: NOAA's HYSPLIT atmospheric transport and dispersion modeling
system, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 96, 2059–2077,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-14-00110.1</a>, 2015.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
      
Takamura, T., Sasano, Y., and Hayasaka, T.: Tropospheric aerosol optical
properties derived from lidar, sun photometer, and optical particle counter
measurements, Appl. Opt., 33, 7132–7140,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.007132" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.33.007132</a>, 1994.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
      
Tesche, M., Ansmann, A., Müller, D., Althausen, D., Engelmann, R.,
Freudenthaler, V., and Groß, S.: Vertically resolved separation of dust
and smoke over Cape Verde using multiwavelength Raman and polarization
lidars during Saharan mineral dust experiment 2008, J. Geophys. Res., 114,
D13202, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011862" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011862</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
      
Titos, G., Cazorla, A., Zieger, P., Andrews, E., Lyamani, H.,
Granados-Muñoz, M. J., Olmo, F. J., and Alados-Arboledas, L.: Effect of
hygroscopic growth on the aerosol light-scattering coef?cient: A review of
measurements, techniques and error sources, Atmos. Environ., 141, 494–507,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.07.021</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
      
University of Wyoming Atmospheric Science Radiosonde Archive: Radiosonde
data, <a href="https://weather.uwyo.edu/upperair/sounding.shtml" target="_blank"/> (last
access: 25 December 2025), 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
      
Väisänen, O., Ruuskanen, A., Ylisirniö, A., Miettinen, P., Portin, H., Hao, L., Leskinen, A., Komppula, M., Romakkaniemi, S., Lehtinen, K. E. J., and Virtanen, A.: In-cloud measurements highlight the role of aerosol hygroscopicity in cloud droplet formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 16, 10385–10398, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10385-2016" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-10385-2016</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
      
Veselovskii, I., Whiteman, D. N., Kolgotin, A., Andrews, E., and Korenskii,
M.: Demonstration of aerosol property profiling by multiwavelength lidar
under varying relative humidity conditions, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26,
1543–1557, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1254.1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JTECHA1254.1</a>, 2009.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>
      
Veselovskii, I., Hu, Q., Goloub, P., Podvin, T., Dubois, G., Kolgotin, A., and Korenskii, M.: Impact of water uptake on fluorescence of atmospheric aerosols: insights from Mie–Raman–fluorescence lidar measurements, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 18, 6039–6051, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6039-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-18-6039-2025</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib61"><label>61</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wang, W., Gong, W., Mao, F., Pan, Z., and Liu, B.: Measurement and study of
lidar ratio by using a Raman lidar in central China, Int. J. Environ. Res.
Pub. Health., 13, 508, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050508" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13050508</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib62"><label>62</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, B. and Wang, J.: Winter Arctic oscillation, Siberian High and East
Asian winter monsoon, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 3–1,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015373" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015373</a>, 2002.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib63"><label>63</label><mixed-citation>
      
Wu, T., Li, Z., Chen, J., Wang, Y., Wu, H., Jin, X., Liang, C., Li, S.,
Wang, W., and Cribb, M.: Hygroscopicity of different types of aerosol
particles: Case studies using multi-instrument data in megacity Beijing,
China, Remote Sens., 12, 785, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050785" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12050785</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib64"><label>64</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xie, R., Sabel, C.E., Lu, X., Zhu, W., Kan, H., Nielsen, C. P., and Wang, H.:
Long-term trend and spatial pattern of PM<sub>2.5</sub> induced premature
mortality in China, Environ. Int., 97, 180–186,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.09.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2016.09.003</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib65"><label>65</label><mixed-citation>
      
Xu, L., Fukushima, S., Sobanska, S., Murata, K., Naganuma, A., Liu, L., Wang, Y., Niu, H., Shi, Z., Kojima, T., Zhang, D., and Li, W.: Tracing the evolution of morphology and mixing state of soot particles along with the movement of an Asian dust storm, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 20, 14321–14332, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14321-2020" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-20-14321-2020</a>, 2020.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib66"><label>66</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yi, Y., Yi, F., Liu, F., Zhang, Y., Yu, C., and He, Y.: Microphysical process of precipitating hydrometeors from warm-front mid-level stratiform clouds revealed by ground-based lidar observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 21, 17649–17664, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17649-2021" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-21-17649-2021</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib67"><label>67</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yin, Z., Yi, F., Liu, F., He, Y., Zhang, Y., Yu, C., and Zhang, Y.:
Long-term variations of aerosol optical properties over Wuhan with
polarization lidar, Atmos. Environ., 259, 118508,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118508" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118508</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib68"><label>68</label><mixed-citation>
      
Yu, A., Shen, X., Ma, Q., Lu, J., Hu, X., Zhang, Y., Liu, Q., Liang, L., Liu, L., Liu, S., Tong, H., Che, H., Zhang, X., and Sun, J.: Size-resolved hygroscopicity and volatility properties of ambient urban aerosol particles measured by a volatility hygroscopicity tandem differential mobility analyzer system in Beijing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 25, 3389–3412, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3389-2025" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-3389-2025</a>, 2025.


    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib69"><label>69</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, M., Ma, Y., Gong, W., and Zhu, Z: Aerosol optical properties of a
haze episode in Wuhan based on ground-based and satellite observations,
Atmosphere, 5, 699–719, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos5040699" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos5040699</a>, 2014.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib70"><label>70</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, F., Wang, Z., Cheng, H., Lv, X., Gong, W., Wang, X., and Zhang, G.:
Seasonal variations and chemical characteristics of PM<sub>2.5</sub> in Wuhan,
central China, Sci. Total Environ., 518–519, 97–105,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.054" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.054</a>, 2015a.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib71"><label>71</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y. L. and Cao, F.: Fine particulate matter (PM<sub>2.5</sub>) in China at
a city level, Sci. Rep., 5, 14884, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14884" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14884</a>, 2015b.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib72"><label>72</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, Y., Zhang, Y., Yu, C., and Yi, F.: Evolution of aerosols in the
atmospheric boundary layer and elevated layers during a severe, persistent
haze episode in a central China megacity, Atmosphere, 12, 152,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020152" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos12020152</a>, 2021.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib73"><label>73</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, L., Segal-Rozenhaimer, M., Che, H., Dang, C., Sun, J., Kuang, Y., Formenti, P., and Howell, S. G.: Aerosol hygroscopicity over the southeast Atlantic Ocean during the biomass burning season – Part 1: From the perspective of scattering enhancement​​​​​​​, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 24, 13849–13864, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13849-2024" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-24-13849-2024</a>, 2024.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib74"><label>74</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhang, B., Fan G., Zhang, T., and Xiang, Y.: Detection of aerosol hygroscopic
growth in Tibetan Plateau by LiDAR, Laser Infrared, 55, 215–225,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.2025.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-5078.2025.009</a>, 2025.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib75"><label>75</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zhao, G., Zhao, C., Kuang, Y., Tao, J., Tan, W., Bian, Y., Li, J., and Li, C.: Impact of aerosol hygroscopic growth on retrieving aerosol extinction coefficient profiles from elastic-backscatter lidar signals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 17, 12133–12143, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12133-2017" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-12133-2017</a>, 2017.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib76"><label>76</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zieger, P., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Gysel, M., Ström, J., Henne, S., Yttri, K. E., Baltensperger, U., and Weingartner, E.: Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering in the Arctic, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 3875–3890, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3875-2010" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3875-2010</a>, 2010.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib77"><label>77</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zieger, P., Fierz-Schmidhauser, R., Weingartner, E., and Baltensperger, U.: Effects of relative humidity on aerosol light scattering: results from different European sites, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 10609–10631, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-10609-2013</a>, 2013.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib78"><label>78</label><mixed-citation>
      
Zieger, P., Väisänen, O., Corbin, J. C., Partridge, D. G.,
Bastelberger, S., Mousavi-Fard, M., Rosati, B., Gysel, M., Krieger, U. K.,
Leck, C., Nenes, A., Piipinen, I., Virtanen, A., and Salter, M. E.: Revising
the hygroscopicity of inorganic sea salt particles, Nat. Commun., 8, 15883,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15883" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15883</a>, 2016.

    </mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
