References

AMT

Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

AMT

Atmos. Meas. Tech.

1867-8548

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/amt-3-655-2010

Ground-based observations for the validation of contrails and cirrus detection in satellite imagery

Mannstein

¹ Brömser

¹ ² Bugliaro

Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany

UBIMET GmbH, 1200 Wien, Austria

07 06 2010

3 3 655 669

2010

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/3/655/2010/amt-3-655-2010.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/3/655/2010/amt-3-655-2010.pdf

Contrails and additional cirrus clouds caused by air traffic have a potential warming effect due to their optical properties and their location in the upper troposphere. The effect of contrails is directly related to their coverage and optical properties, which both can be derived from satellite observations. However, considerable local and global uncertainties remain, as detection limits and efficiency are still unknown. A six months time series of the occurrence of high-level clouds and contrails was analysed visually using an all-sky camera situated at Oberpfaffenhofen (Southern Germany). It shows a contrail occurrence of 21% (fraction of time with visible contrails during one hour) which is nearly constant over daytime and a cirrus occurrence that increases from 27% in the morning to 48% in the evening, suggesting a possible influence of air traffic or, more probably, convective cloud formation. Furthermore, we compared selected all-sky camera images with data of the satellite instruments NOAA/AVHRR and MSG/SEVIRI. As expected, the fraction of contrails visible and detectable in satellite images depends strongly on their width. Of the contrails observed with the all-sky camera of 1–5 km width 60–65% are visually detectable in AVHRR data while only 17% are identified by an automated contrail detection algorithm (CDA). This means that the automated CDA detects approx. 28% of the contrails which are identified by visual inspection in AVHRR data alone. As far as SEVIRI is concerned, visual inspection yields 48% of the contrails of 1–5 km width, the CDA 19%. That means 40% of all contrails visually identifiable in SEVIRI data are found by the automated algorithm. As far as cirrus detection using SEVIRI data is concerned, an automated algorithm tends to overestimate cirrus occurrence but correctly measures cirrus changes during the day compared to visual inspection.

References 1

Appleman, H.: The formation of exhaust contrails by jet aircraft, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 34, 14–20, 1953.

Bakan, S., Betancor, M., Gayler, V., and Grassl, H.: Contrail frequency over Europe from NOAA-satellite images, Ann. Geophys., 12, 962–968, 1994.

Fichter, C., Marquart, S., Sausen, R., and Lee, D.: The impact of cruise altitude on contrails and related radiative forcing, Meteorol. Z., 14(4), 563–572, 2005.

Forster, P., Ramaswamy, V., Artaxo, P., Berntsen, T., Betts, R., Fahey, D., Haywood, J., Lean, J., Lowe, D., Myhre, G., Nganga, J., Prinn, R., Raga, G., Schulz, M., and Van Dorland, R.: Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing, in: Climate change 2007: The physical science basis, Technical Report 2007, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), IPCC Secretariat, c/o World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, <a href="http://www.ipcc.ch">http://www.ipcc.ch</a>, 2007.

Gierens, K. M., Kärcher, B., Mannstein, H., and Mayer, B.: Aerodynamic contrails: Phenomenology and flow physics, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 217–226, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2767.1, 2009.

Goodrum, G., Kidwell, K., and Winston, E. W.: N{OAA-KLM} user's guide, Technical report, NOAA/NESDIS, National Climatic Data Center, 151 Patton Ave., Asheville, NC 28801-5001, <a href="http://www2.ncdc.noaa.gov/docs/klm/index.htm">http://www2.ncdc.noaa.gov/docs/klm/index.htm</a>, 2003.

Hahn, C. and Warren, S.: A gridded climatology of clouds over land (1971–96) and ocean (1954–97) from surface observations worldwide, Numeric Data Package NDP-026E ORNL/CDIAC-153, CDIAC, Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, 2007.

Inoue, T.: On the temperature and effective emissivity determination of semi-transparent cirrus clouds by bi-spectral measurements in the 10 μm window region, J. Meteorol. Soc. Jpn., 63(1), 88–99, 1985.

IPCC: Climate change 2007: The scientific basis, Technical report, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), IPCC Secretariat, c/o World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2007.

Jin, Y., Rossow, W., and Wylie, D.: Comparison of the climatologies of high-level clouds from HIRS and ISCCP, J. Climate, 9, 2850–2879, 1996.

Krebs, W., Mannstein, H., Bugliaro, L., and Mayer, B.: Technical note: A new day- and night-time Meteosat Second Generation Cirrus Detection Algorithm MeCiDA, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 6145–6159, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-6145-2007, 2007.

Kärcher, B., Mayer, B., Gierens, K., Burkhardt, U., Mannstein, H., and Chatterjee, R.: Aerodynamic contrails: Microphysics and optical properties, J. Atmos. Sci., 66, 227–243, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2768.1, 2009.

Lee, D., Fahey, D., Forster, P., Newton, P., Wit, R., Lim, L., Owen, B., and Sausen, R.: Aviation and global climate change in the 21st century, Atmos. Environ., 53, 3520–3537, 2009.

Mannstein, H., Meyer, R., and Wendling, P.: Operational detection of contrails from NOAA-AVHRR-data, Int. J. Rem. Sens., 20(8), 1641–1660, 1999.

Marquart, S.: Klimawirkung von Kondensstreifen: Untersuchungen mit einem globalen atmosphärischen Zirkulationsmodell, Dissertation, Fakultät für Physik der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 2003.

Meerkötter, R., Schumann, U., Doelling, D. R., Minnis, P., Nakajima, T., and Tsushima, Y.: Radiative forcing by contrails, Ann. Geophys., 17, 1080–1094, 1999.

Meyer, R., Mannstein, H., Meerkötter, R., Schumann, U., and Wendling, P.: Regional radiative forcing by line-shaped contrails derived from satellite data, J. Geophys. Res., 107(D10), 4104, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000426, 2002.

Meyer, R., Buell, R., Leiter, C., Mannstein, H., Pechtl, S., Oki, T., and Wendling, P.: Contrail observations over Southern and Eastern Asia in NOAA/AVHRR data and comparisons to contrail simulations in a GCM, Int. J. Rem. Sens., 28(9), 2049–2069, 2007.

Minnis, P., Young, D., Garber, D., Nguyen, L., Smith Jr., W., and Palikonda, R.: Transformation of contrails into cirrus during SUCCESS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 25, 1157–1160, 1998.

Minnis, P., Ayers, J., Palikonda, R., and Phan, D.: Contrails, cirrus trends, and climate, J. Climate, 17, 1671–1685, 2004.

Minnis, P., Palikonda, R., Walter, B. J., Ayers, J. K., and Mannstein, H.: Contrail properties over the eastern North Pacific from AVHRR data, Meteorol. Z., 14(4), 515–523, https://doi.org/10.1127/0941–2948/2005/0056, 2005.

Sassen, K.: Contrail-cirrus and their potential for regional climate change, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 78, 1885–1903, 1997.

Sausen, R., Gierens, K., Ponater, M., and Schumann, U.: A diagnostic study of the global distribution of contrails: Part I: Present day climate, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 61, 127–141, 1998.

Schmetz, J., Pili, P., Tjemkes, S., Just, D., Kerkmann, J., Rota, S., and Ratier, A.: An introduction to Meteosat Second Generation (MSG), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83(7), 977–992, 2002.

Schmidt, E.: Die Entstehung von Eisnebel aus den Auspuffgasen von Flugmotoren, Schriften der Deutschen Akademie der Luftfahrtforschung, 44, 1–15, 1941.

Schumann, U.: On conditions for contrail formation from aircraft exhausts, Meteorol. Z., 5, 4–23, 1996.

Schumann, U.: Formation, Properties and climate effects of contrails , C. R. Phys., 6, 549–565, 2005.

Scott, N., Chèdin, A., Armante, R., Francis, J., Stubenrauch, C. J., Chaboureau, J.-P., Chevallier, F., Claud, C., and Chèruy, F.: Characteristics of the TOVS Pathfinder Path-B dataset, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 80, 2679–2701, 1999.

Seiz, G., Shields, J., Feister, U., Baltsavias, E., and Gruen, A.: Cloud mapping with ground-based photogrammetric cameras, Int. J. Rem. Sens., 28(9), 2001–2032, 2007.

Stordal, F., Myhre, G., Stordal, E. J. G., Rossow, W. B., Lee, D. S., Arlander, D. W., and Svendby, T.: Is there a trend in cirrus cloud cover due to aircraft traffic?, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5, 2155–2162, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2155-2005, 2005.

Stubenrauch, C., Chèdin, A., Rädel, G., Scott, N., and Serrar, S.: Cloud properties and their seasonal and diurnal variability from TOVS Path-B, J. Climate, 19, 5531–5553, 2006.

Stuber, N. and Forster, P.: The impact of diurnal variations of air traffic on contrail radiative forcing, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 3153–3162, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-3153-2007, 2007.

Trepte, S. and Winkler, P.: Langfristige meteorologische Veränderungen und UV-Strahlung, Ozonbulletin 81, Deutscher Wetterdienst, Offenbach am Main, 2001.

Wylie, D. and Wang, P.: Comparison of cloud frequency data from HIRS and SAGE II, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 29893–29900, 1997.

Wylie, D., Jackson, D., Menzel, W., and Bates, J.: Trends in global cloud cover in two decades of HIRS observations, J. Climate, 18, 3021–3031, 2005.

Zerefos, C. S., Eleftheratos, K., Balis, D. S., Zanis, P., Tselioudis, G., and Meleti, C.: Evidence of impact of aviation on cirrus cloud formation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 3, 1633–1644, https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-1633-2003, 2003.