References

AMT

Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

AMT

Atmos. Meas. Tech.

1867-8548

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/amt-7-1331-2014

Evaluation of SCIAMACHY Oxygen A band cloud heights using Cloudnet measurements

Wang

¹ Stammes

Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt, the Netherlands

19 05 2014

7 5 1331 1350

2014

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/7/1331/2014/amt-7-1331-2014.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/7/1331/2014/amt-7-1331-2014.pdf

Two SCIAMACHY (SCanning Imaging Absorption spectroMeter for Atmospheric CHartographY) O2 A band cloud height products are evaluated using ground-based radar/lidar measurements between January 2003 and December 2011. The products are the ESA (European Space Agency) Level 2 (L2) version 5.02 cloud top height and the FRESCO (Fast Retrieval Scheme for Clouds from the Oxygen A band) version 6 cloud height. The radar/lidar profiles are obtained at the Cloudnet sites of Cabauw and Lindenberg, and are averaged for 1 h centered at the SCIAMACHY overpass time. In total we have 217 cases of single-layer clouds and 204 cases of multilayer clouds. We find that the ESA L2 cloud top height has a better agreement with the Cloudnet cloud top height than the Cloudnet cloud middle height. The ESA L2 cloud top height is on average 0.4 km higher than the Cloudnet cloud top height, with a standard deviation of 3.1 km. The FRESCO cloud height is closer to the Cloudnet cloud middle height than the Cloudnet cloud top height. The mean difference between the FRESCO cloud height and the Cloudnet cloud middle height is −0.1 km with a standard deviation of 1.9 km. The ESA L2 cloud top height is higher than the FRESCO cloud height. The differences between the SCIAMACHY cloud (top) height and the Cloudnet cloud top height are linked to cloud optical thickness. The SCIAMACHY cloud height products are further compared to the Cloudnet cloud top height and the Cloudnet cloud middle height in 1 km bins. For single-layer clouds, the difference between the ESA L2 cloud top height and the Cloudnet cloud top height is less than 1 km for each cloud bin at 3–7 km. The difference between the FRESCO cloud height and the Cloudnet cloud middle height is less than 1 km for each cloud bin at 0–6 km. The results are similar for multilayer clouds, but the percentage of cases having a bias within 1 km is smaller than for single-layer clouds. We may conclude that the FRESCO cloud height is accurate for low and middle level clouds, whereas the ESA L2 cloud top height is more accurate for middle level clouds. Both products are less accurate for high clouds.

References 1

Anderson, G. P., Clough, S. A., Kneizys, F. X., Chetwynd, J. H., and Shettle, E. P.: AFGL atmospheric constituent profiles, Tech. Rep. AFGL-TR-86-0110, Air Force Geophys. Lab., Hanscom AFB, MA, 1986.

Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., and Brinksma, E. J.: Error analysis for tropospheric NO2 retrieval from space, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D04311, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003962">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003962</a>, 2004.

Bovensmann, H., Burrows, J. P., Buchwitz, M., Frerick, J., Noel, S., Rozanov, V. V., Chance, K. V., and Goede, A. P. H.: SCIAMACHY: mission objectives and measurement modes, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 127–150, 1999.

Bramstedt, K.: Calculation of SCIAMACHY M-Factors, Technical Note, IFE-SCIA-TN-2007-01-CalcMFactor, Issue: 1, available at: <a href="http://www.iup.uni-bremen.de/sciamachy/mfactors/">http://www.iup.uni-bremen.de/sciamachy/mfactors/</a> (last access: 10 January 2014), 2008.

Buchwitz, M., Rozanov, V. V., and Burrows, J. P.: A correlated k distribution scheme for overlapping gases suitable for retrieval of atmospheric constituents from moderate resolution radiance measurements in the visible/near-infrared spectral region, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 15247–15262, 2000.

Bucsela, E. J., Celarier, E. A., Wenig, M. O., Gleason, J. F., Veefkind, J. P., Boersma, K. F., and Brinksma, E. J.: Algorithm for NO2 vertical column retrieval from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote Sens., 44, 1245–1258, 2006.

De Haan, J. F., Bosma, P. B., and Hovenier, J. W.: The adding method for multiple scattering calculations of polarized light, Astron. Astrophys., 183, 371–391, 1987.

Desmons, M., Ferlay, N., Parol, F., Mcharek, L., and Vanbauce, C.: Improved information about the vertical location and extent of monolayer clouds from POLDER3 measurements in the oxygen A-band, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2221–2238, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2221-2013">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2221-2013</a>, 2013.

Feigelson, E. M. (Ed.): Radiation in a Cloudy Atmosphere, Gidrometeoizdat, Leningrad, 280 pp., 1981.

Ferlay, N., Thieuleux, F., Cornet, C., Davis, A. B., Dubuisson, P., Ducos, F., Parol, F., Riedi, J., and Vanbauce, C.: Toward new inferences about cloud structures from multidirectional measurements in the oxygen A band: middle-of cloud pressure and cloud geometrical thickness from POLDER-3/PARASOL, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 49, 2492–2507, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2550.1">https://doi.org/10.1175/2010JAMC2550.1</a>, 2010.

Hogan, R. J. and O'Connor, E. J.: Facilitating cloud radar and lidar algorithms: the Cloudnet Instrument Synergy/Target Categorization product, available at: <a href="http://www.met.rdg.ac.uk/ swrhgnrj/publications/categorization.pdf">http://www.met.rdg.ac.uk/ swrhgnrj/publications/categorization.pdf</a> (last access: 30 September 2013), 2004.

Illingworth, A. J., Hogan, R. J., O'Connor, E. J., Bouniol, D., Brooks, M. E., Delanoe, J., Donovan, D. P., Eastment, J. D., Gaussiat, N., Goddard, J. W. F., Haeffelin, M., Klein Baltink, H., Krasnov, O. A., Pelon, J., Piriou, J.-M., Protat, A., Russchenberg, H. W. J., Seifert, A., Tompkins, A. M., van Zadelhoff, G.-J., Vinit, F., Willen, U., Wilson, D. R., and Wrench, C. L.: Cloudnet – continuous evaluation of cloud profiles in seven operational models using ground-based observations, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 883–898, 2007.

Joiner, J., Vasilkov, A. P., Bhartia, P. K., Wind, G., Platnick, S., and Menzel, W. P.: Detection of multi-layer and vertically-extended clouds using A-train sensors, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 3, 233–247, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-233-2010">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-3-233-2010</a>, 2010.

Joiner, J., Vasilkov, A. P., Gupta, P., Bhartia, P. K., Veefkind, P., Sneep, M., de Haan, J., Polonsky, I., and Spurr, R.: Fast simulators for satellite cloud optical centroid pressure retrievals; evaluation of OMI cloud retrievals, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 529–545, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-529-2012">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-529-2012</a>, 2012.

Koelemeijer, R. B. A., Stammes, P., Hovenier, J. W., and de Haan, J. F.: A fast method for retrieval of cloud parameters using oxygen A band measurements from the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 3475–3490, 2001.

Kokhanovsky, A. A., Rozanov, V. V., Nauss, T., Reudenbach, C., Daniel, J. S., Miller, H. L., and Burrows, J. P.: The semianalytical cloud retrieval algorithm for SCIAMACHY I. The validation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1905–1911, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1905-2006">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1905-2006</a>, 2006.

Kokhanovsky, A. A., Nauss, T., Schreier, M., von Hoyningen-Huene, W., and Burrows, J. P.: The intercomparison of cloud parameters derived using multiple satellite instruments, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 45, 195–200, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.885019">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.885019</a>, 2007.

Krijger, J. M., van Weele, M., Aben, I., and Frey, R.: Technical Note: The effect of sensor resolution on the number of cloud-free observations from space, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2881–2891, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2881-2007">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2881-2007</a>, 2007.

Lelli, L., Kokhanovsky, A. A., Rozanov, V. V., Vountas, M., Sayer, A. M., and Burrows, J. P.: Seven years of global retrieval of cloud properties using space-borne data of GOME, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1551–1570, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1551-2012">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1551-2012</a>, 2012.

Lichtenberg, G.: Verification Report OL V 5.0, SCIAMACHY Level 1b to 2 processing, ENV-VPR-QWG-SCIA-0095, Issue 2, 15 June 2009, available at: <a href="http://atmos.caf.dlr.de/sciamachy/documents/level_1b_2/SCIAVerification_L12_OL5.pdf">http://atmos.caf.dlr.de/sciamachy/documents/level_1b_2/SCIAVerification_L12_OL5.pdf</a> (last access: 30 September 2013), 2009.

Lichtenberg, G.: SCIAMACHY Offline Processor Level1b-2 ATBD, Algorithm Theoretical Baseline Document (SGP OL Version 5), 23 March 2011, available at: <a href="http://atmos.caf.dlr.de/sciamachy/documents/level_1b_2/sciaol1b2_atbd_master.pdf">http://atmos.caf.dlr.de/sciamachy/documents/level_1b_2/sciaol1b2_atbd_master.pdf</a> (last access: 30 September 2013), 2011.

Loyola, D. G.: Automatic cloud analysis from polar orbiting satellites using neural network and data fusion techniques, IEEE T. Geosci. Remote, 4, 2530–2534, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2004.1369811">https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2004.1369811</a>, 2004.

Meringer, M.: ENVISAT SCIAMACHY Level 1b to 2 Off-line processing Input/Output data definition, Doc.No. ENV-ID-DLR-SCI-2200-4, Issue 5/A, Date 19 January 2010, available at: <a href="http://atmos.caf.dlr.de/sciamachy/documents/level_1b_2/ioddL12ol_5A.pdf">http://atmos.caf.dlr.de/sciamachy/documents/level_1b_2/ioddL12ol_5A.pdf</a> (last acess 8 January 2014), 2010.

Popp, C., Wang, P., Brunner, D., Stammes, P., Zhou, Y., and Grzegorski, M.: MERIS albedo climatology for FRESCO+ O2 A-band cloud retrieval, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 463–483, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-463-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-463-2011</a>, 2011.

Rothman, L. S., Gordon, I. E., Barbe, A., Benner, D. C., Bernath, P. F., Birk, M., Boudon, V., Brown, L. R., Campargue, A., Champion, J.-P., Chance, K., Coudert, L. H., Dana, V., Devi, V. M., Fally, S., Flaud, J.-M., Gamache, R. R., Goldman, A., Jacquemart, D., Kleiner, I., Lacome, N., Lafferty, W. J., Mandin, J.-Y., Massie, S. T., Mikhailenko, S. N., Miller, C. E., Moazzen-Ahmadi, N., Naumenko, O. V., Nikitin, A. V., Orphal, J., Perevalov, V. I., Perrin, A., Predoi-Cross, A., Rinsland, C. P., Rotger, M., Simeckova, M., Smith, M. A. H., Sung, K., Tashkun, S. A., Tennyson, J., Toth, R. A., Vandaele, A. C., and Vander Auwera, J.: The HITRAN 2008 molecular spectroscopic database, J. Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 110, 533–572, 2009.

Rozanov, V. V. and Kokhanovsky, A. A.: Semianalytical cloud retrieval algorithm as applied to the cloud top altitude and the cloud geometrical thickness determination from top-of-atmosphere reflectance measurements in the oxygen A band, J. Geophys. Res., 109, 5202, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004104">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD004104</a>, 2004.

Rozanov, V. V., Kokhanovsky, A. A., Loyola, D. G., Siddans, R., Latter, B., Stevens, A., and Burrows, J. P.: Intercomparison of cloud top altitudes as derived using GOME and ATSR-2 instruments onboard ERS-2, Remote Sens. Environ., 102, 186–193, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.825586">https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2004.825586</a>, 2006.

Sayer, A. M., Poulsen, C. A., Arnold, C., Campmany, E., Dean, S., Ewen, G. B. L., Grainger, R. G., Lawrence, B. N., Siddans, R., Thomas, G. E., and Watts, P. D.: Global retrieval of ATSR cloud parameters and evaluation (GRAPE): dataset assessment, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 3913–3936, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3913-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-3913-2011</a>, 2011.

Sneep, M., de Haan, J. F., Stammes, P., Wang, P., Vanbauce, C., Joiner, J., Vasilkov, A. P., and Levelt, P. F.: Three-way comparison between OMI and PARASOL cloud pressure products, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D15S23, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008694">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008694</a>, 2008.

Stammes, P.: Spectral radiance modeling in the UV-visible range, in: IRS 2000: Current Problems in Atmospheric Radiation, edited by: Smith, W. and Timofeyev, Y., A. Deepak, Hampton, Va., 385–388, 2001.

Stammes, P., Sneep, M., de Haan, J. F., Veefkind, J. P., Wang, P., and Levelt, P. F.: Effective cloud fractions from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: theoretical framework and validation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D16S38, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008820">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008820</a>, 2008.

Stubenrauch, C. J., Rossow, W. B., Kinne, S., Ackerman, S., Cesana, G., Chepfer, H., Di Girolamo, L., Getzewich, B., Guignard, A., Heidinger, A., Maddux, B., Menzel, P., Minnis, P., Pearl, C., Platnick, S., Poulsen, C., Riedi, J., Sun-Mack, S., Walther, A., Winker, D., Zeng, S., and Zhao, G.: Assessment of Global Cloud Datasets from Satellites: Project and Database Initiated by the GEWEX Radiation Panel, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94, 1031–1049, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00117.1">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-12-00117.1</a>, 2013.

Wang, P., Stammes, P., van der A, R., Pinardi, G., and van Roozendael, M.: FRESCO+: an improved O2 A-band cloud retrieval algorithm for tropospheric trace gas retrievals, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 6565–6576, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6565-2008">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-6565-2008</a>, 2008.

Wang, P., Tuinder, O. N. E., Tilstra, L. G., de Graaf, M., and Stammes, P.: Interpretation of FRESCO cloud retrievals in case of absorbing aerosol events, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 9057–9077, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9057-2012">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-9057-2012</a>, 2012.

Wielicki, B. A., Wong, T., Loeb, N., Minnis, P., Priestley, K., and Kande, R.: Changes in Earth's albedo measured by satellite, Science, 308, 5723, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1106484">https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1106484</a>, 2005.

Winker, D., Vaughan, M., Omar, A., Hu, Y., Powell, K., Liu, Z., Hunt, W., and Young, S.: Overview of the CALIPSO mission and CALIOP data processing algorithm, J. Atmos. Ocean. Tech., 26, 2310–2323, 2009.