References

AMT

Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

AMT

Atmos. Meas. Tech.

1867-8548

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/amt-7-2883-2014

Influence of changes in humidity on dry temperature in GPS RO climatologies

Danzer

¹ Foelsche

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9899-6453

² ¹ Scherllin-Pirscher

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4969-7462

¹ Schwärz

Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change (WEGC), University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Institute for Geophysics, Astrophysics, and Meteorology/Institute of Physics (IGAM/IP), University of Graz, Graz, Austria

09 09 2014

7 9 2883 2896

2014

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/7/2883/2014/amt-7-2883-2014.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/7/2883/2014/amt-7-2883-2014.pdf

Radio occultation (RO) data are increasingly used in climate research. Accurate phase (change) measurements of Global Positioning System (GPS) signals are the basis for the retrieval of near-vertical profiles of bending angle, microwave refractivity, density, pressure, and temperature. If temperature is calculated from observed refractivity with the assumption that water vapor is zero, the product is called "dry temperature", which is commonly used to study earth's atmosphere, e.g., when analyzing temperature trends due to global warming. Dry temperature is a useful quantity, since it does not need additional background information in its retrieval. However, it can only be safely used as proxy for physical temperature, where moisture is negligible. The altitude region above which water vapor does not play a dominant role anymore, depends primarily on latitude and season. In this study we first investigated the influence of water vapor on dry temperature RO profiles. Hence, we analyzed the maximum altitude down to which monthly mean dry temperature profiles can be regarded as being equivalent to physical temperature. This was done by examining dry temperature to physical temperature differences of monthly mean analysis fields from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF), studied from 2006 until 2010. We introduced cutoff criteria, where maximum temperature differences of −0.1, −0.05, and −0.02 K were allowed (dry temperature is always lower than physical temperature), and computed the corresponding altitudes. As an example, a temperature difference of −0.05 K in the tropics was found at an altitude of about 14 km, while at higher northern latitudes in winter it was found at an altitude of about 9–10 km, in summer at about 11 km. Furthermore, regarding climate change, we expect an increase of absolute humidity in the atmosphere. This possible trend in water vapor could yield a wrongly interpreted dry temperature trend. As a consequence, we performed a model study, investigating the increase in height of the transition region between moist and dry air. We used data from the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), analyzing again monthly mean dry temperature to physical temperature differences, now from the years 2006 to 2050. We used the highest emission scenario RCP8.5 (representative concentration pathway), studying all available models of the CMIP5 project, analyzing one internal run per model, with the goal to identify the altitude region where trends in dry temperature can be safely regarded as reflecting trends in physical temperature. From all models we therefore choose a selection of models ("max 8" CMIP5 models), which showed the largest trend differences. As a result, our trend study suggests that the lower boundary of the region where dry temperature is essentially equal to physical temperature rises about 150 m decade−1.

References 1

CLIVAR Exchanges: WCRP Coupled Model Intercomparison Project – Phase 5 – CMIP5, 16, 2011.

Danzer, J., Scherllin-Pirscher, B., and Foelsche, U.: Systematic residual ionospheric errors in radio occultation data and a potential way to minimize them, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2169–2179, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2169-2013">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2169-2013</a>, 2013.

Fjeldbo, G., Kliore, A. J., and Eshleman, V. R.: The neutral atmosphere of Venus as studied with the Mariner V radio occultation experiments, Astron. J., 76, 123–140, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/111096">https://doi.org/10.1086/111096</a>, 1971.

Foelsche, U., Borsche, M., Steiner, A. K., Gobiet, A., Pirscher, B., Kirchengast, G., Wickert, J., and Schmidt, T.: Observing upper troposphere lower stratosphere climate with radio occultation data from the CHAMP satellite, Clim. Dynam., 31, 49–65, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0337-7">https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0337-7</a>, 2008a.

Foelsche, U., Kirchengast, G., Steiner, A. K., Kornblueh, L., Manzini, E., and Bengtsson, L.: An observing system simulation experiment for climate monitoring with GNSS radio occultation data: setup and test bed study, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D11108, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009231">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009231</a>, 2008b.

Foelsche, U., Scherllin-Pirscher, B., Ladstädter, F., Steiner, A. K., and Kirchengast, G.: Refractivity and temperature climate records from multiple radio occultation satellites consistent within 0.05

Fritzer, J., Kirchengast, G., and Pock, M.: End-to-End Generic Occultation Performance Simulation and Processing System Version 5.5 (EGOPS5.5) Software User Manual, Tech. rep., University of Graz, Austria, WEGC and IGAM, WEGC–EGOPS–2009–TR01, 2009.

Godfrey, L. G.: Misspecification Tests in Econometrics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988.

Gorbunov, M. E.: Canonical transform method for processing radio occultation data in the lower troposphere, Radio Sci., 37, 1076, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000RS002592">https://doi.org/10.1029/2000RS002592</a>, 2002.

Hajj, G. A., Ao, C. O., Iijima, P. A., Kuang, D., Kursinski, E. R., Mannucci, A. J., Meehan, T. K., Romans, L. J., de la Torre Juarez, M., and Yunck, T. P.: CHAMP and SAC-C atmospheric occultation results and intercomparisons, J. Geophys. Res., 109, D06109, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003909">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003909</a>, 2004.

Hawkins, E. and Sutton, R.: The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 90, 1095–1107, 2009.

Healy, S. B. and Eyre, J. R.: Retrieving temperature, water vapour and surface pressure information from refractive-index profiles derived by radio occultation: a simulation study, Q. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 126, 1661–1683, 2000.

Ho, S.-P., Hunt, D., Steiner, A. K., Mannucci, A. J., Kirchengast, G., Gleisner, H., Heise, S., von Engeln, A., Marquardt, C., Sokolovskiy, S., Schreiner, W., Scherllin-Pirscher, B., Ao, C., Wickert, J., Syndergaard, S., Lauritsen, K. B., Leroy, S., Kursinski, E. R., Kuo, Y.-H., Foelsche, U., Schmidt, T., and Gorbunov, M.: Reproducibility of GPS radio occultation data for climate monitoring: profile-to-profile inter-comparison of CHAMP climate records 2002 to 2008 from six data centers, J. Geophys. Res., 117, D18111, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017665">https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017665</a>, 2012.

Jensen, A. S., Lohmann, M. S., Benzon, H.-H., and Nielsen, A. S.: Full spectrum inversion of radio occultation signals, Radio Sci., 38, 1040, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002RS002763">https://doi.org/10.1029/2002RS002763</a>, 2003.

Knutti, R. and Sedlacek, J.: Robustness and uncertainties in the new CMIP5 climate model projections, Nature Climate Change, 3, 369–373, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1716">https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1716</a>, 2013.

Kursinski, E. R., Hajj, G. A., Schofield, J. T., Linfield, R. P., and Hardy, K. R.: Observing Earth's atmosphere with radio occultation measurements using the Global Positioning System, J. Geophys. Res., 102, 23429–23465, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97JD01569">https://doi.org/10.1029/97JD01569</a>, 1997.

Lackner, B. C., Steiner, A. K., and Kirchengast, G.: Where to see climate change best in radio occultation variables – study using GCMs and ECMWF reanalyses, Ann. Geophys., 29, 2147–2167, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-2147-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-29-2147-2011</a>, 2011.

Leroy, S. S., Dykema, J. A., and Anderson, J. G.: Climate benchmarking using GNSS occultation, in: Atmosphere and Climate: Studies by Occultation Methods, edited by: Foelsche, U., Kirchengast, G., and Steiner, A. K., Springer, 287–302, 2006.

Meehl, G. A., Covey, C., Taylor, K. E., Delworth, T., Stouffer, R. J., Latif, M., McAvaney, B., and Mitchell, J. F. B.: The WCRP CMIP3 multimodel dataset: a new era in climate change research, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 1383–1394, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-88-9-1383</a>, 2007.

Pierce, D. W., Barnett, T. P., Santer, B. D., and Gleckler, P. J.: Selecting global climate models for regional climate change studies, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 8441–8446, 2009.

Prein, A., Gobiet, A., and Truhetz, H.: Analysis of uncertainty in large scale climate change projections over Europe, Meteorol. Z., 20, 383–395, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2011/0286">https://doi.org/10.1127/0941-2948/2011/0286</a>, 2011.

Ringer, M. A. and Healy, S. B.: Monitoring twenty-first century climate using GPS radio occultation bending angles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L05708, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032462">https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032462</a>, 2008.

Scherllin-Pirscher, B., Kirchengast, G., Steiner, A. K., Kuo, Y.-H., and Foelsche, U.: Quantifying uncertainty in climatological fields from GPS radio occultation: an empirical-analytical error model, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2019–2034, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2019-2011">https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2019-2011</a>, 2011.

Schmidt, T., Wickert, J., and Haser, A.: Variability of the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere observed with GPS radio occultation bending angles and temperatures, Adv. Space Res., 46, 150–161, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.01.021">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.01.021</a>, 2010.

Schreiner, W., Rocken, C., Sokolovskiy, S., Syndergaard, S., and Hunt, D.: Estimates of the precision of GPS radio occultations from the COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 mission, Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L04808, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027557">https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027557</a>, 2007.

Smith, E. and Weintraub, S.: The constants in the equation for atmospheric refractive index at radio frequencies, P. IRE, 41, 1035–1037, 1953.

Steiner, A. K., Kirchengast, G., Lackner, B. C., Pirscher, B., Borsche, M., and Foelsche, U.: Atmospheric temperature change detection with GPS radio occultation 1995 to 2008, Geophys. Res. Lett., 36, L18702, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039777">https://doi.org/10.1029/2009GL039777</a>, 2009.

Steiner, A. K., Hunt, D., Ho, S.-P., Kirchengast, G., Mannucci, A. J., Scherllin-Pirscher, B., Gleisner, H., von Engeln, A., Schmidt, T., Ao, C., Leroy, S. S., Kursinski, E. R., Foelsche, U., Gorbunov, M., Heise, S., Kuo, Y.-H., Lauritsen, K. B., Marquardt, C., Rocken, C., Schreiner, W., Sokolovskiy, S., Syndergaard, S., and Wickert, J.: Quantification of structural uncertainty in climate data records from GPS radio occultation, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1469–1484, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1469-2013">https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1469-2013</a>, 2013.

Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., and Meehl, G. A.: A summary of the CMIP5 experiment design, available at: <a href="http://cmip-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cmip5/experiment_design.html">http://cmip-pcmdi.llnl.gov/cmip5/experiment_design.html</a> (last access: March 2013), 2009.

Taylor, K. E., Stouffer, R. J., and Meehl, G. A.: An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 93, 485–489, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1">https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1</a>, 2011.

van Vuuren, D. P., Edmonds, J., Kainuma, M., Riahi, K., Thomson, A., Hibbard, K., Hurtt, G. C., Kram, T., Krey, V., Lamarque, J.-F., Masui, T., Meinshausen, M., Nakicenovic, N., Smith, S. J., and Rose S. K.: The representative concentration pathways: an overview, Climatic Change, 109, 5–31, 2011.

Vorob'ev, V. V. and Krasil'nikova, T. G.: Estimation of the accuracy of the atmospheric refractive index recovery from Doppler shift measurements at frequencies used in the NAVSTAR system, Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phy., 29, 602–609, 1994.

Xin, X., Wu, T., and Zhang, J.: Introduction of CMIP5 experiments carried out with the climate system models of Beijing climate center, Adv. Climate Change Res., 4, 41–49, 2013.