<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-8-1519-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title><?xmltex \hack{\vspace{9mm}}?>An improved retrieval of tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from space <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> over polluted regions using an Earth radiance reference</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Earth radiance DOAS retrieval of tropospheric NO${}_{2}$}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{J.~S.~Anand et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Anand</surname><given-names>J. S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Monks</surname><given-names>P. S.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9984-4390</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Leigh</surname><given-names>R. J.</given-names></name>
          <email>rl40@le.ac.uk</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Earth Observation Science, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">R. J. Leigh (rl40@le.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>24</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>3</issue>
      <fpage>1519</fpage><lpage>1535</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>8</day><month>May</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>10</day><month>July</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>8</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>7</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015.html">This article is available from https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>A novel tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> DOAS retrieval algorithm optimised for a
nadir-viewing satellite instrument imaging polluted areas is proposed in this
work. Current satellite DOAS retrievals have relied on using a solar
reference spectrum to derive a total slant column, then using either model
assimilation or spatial filtering to derive the tropospheric component. In
the ERrs-DOAS (Earth radiance reference sector DOAS) algorithm, tropospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> slant columns are derived using spectra averaged from measurements
over unpolluted regions, thus removing the need for post-hoc separation
techniques, though some residual stratospheric biases may still remain. To
validate the ERrs-DOAS algorithm, DOAS retrievals were performed on modelled
spectra created by the radiative transfer model SCIATRAN, as well as L1B
Earth radiance data measured by the NASA/KNMI Ozone Monitoring Instrument
(OMI). It was found that retrievals using an Earth radiance reference produce
spatial distributions of tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over eastern China during June
2005 that highly correlate with those derived using existing retrieval
algorithms. Comparisons with slant columns retrieved by the operational
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval algorithm for OMI (OMNO2A) show that the ERrs-DOAS
algorithm greatly reduces the presence of artificial across-track biases
(stripes) caused by calibration errors, as well as the removal of path length
enhancement in off-nadir pixels. Analysis of Pacific SCDs suggests that the
algorithm also produces a 27 % reduction in retrieval uncertainty, though
this may be partially due to biases introduced by differences in the
retrieval algorithm settings. The ERrs-DOAS technique also reveals absorption
features over the Sahara and similar regions characteristic of sand and
liquid H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O absorption, as first discovered in the analysis of GOME-2
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrievals.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Background</title>
      <p>Anthropogenic emissions of nitrogen dioxide (NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) have been associated
with poor health in urban areas; both as a direct contributor to respiratory
conditions and as a source of secondary pollutants such as nitric acid <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx59" id="paren.1"/>. Additionally, tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> through
photolysis contributes to tropospheric ozone (O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>) production <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.2"/>. A significant proportion of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> also exists in the
stratosphere, where it is active in processes involved in the creation and
destruction of O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx16" id="paren.3"/>.</p>
      <p>Since the launch of the GOME instrument in 1996 <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.4"/>
satellite instruments have been employed to retrieve global tropospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> concentrations from Earth radiance spectra. The NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical
column densities (VCDs) derived from these measurements have been used for a
range of applications <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.5"/>, such as determining
pollution trends over megacities <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30 bib1.bibx26" id="paren.6"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, shipping emissions <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.7"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>,
and to validate air quality models <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.8"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.
Validation of tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> VCDs from these retrievals are primarily
performed through intercomparison campaigns with ground-based or airborne
instruments during satellite overpasses. During an overpass the satellite-derived tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> VCDs are compared with those derived by the
ground-based instruments in the ground pixel. Measurements of the ambient
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and aerosol profile are also used to validate the a priori
information used in the satellite VCD calculation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx23" id="paren.9"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. However, biases arising from factors such as ground pixel
coverage need to be accounted for in order to accurately quantify the
precision of the retrieval.</p>
      <p>A significant issue in retrieving tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from space is that of
separating the tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> VCD from the background stratospheric
contribution, which can be a significant source of error <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.10"/>. In order to remove the presence of stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
previous retrieval algorithms have relied on either spatial filtering of
averaged data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.11"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, or on model assimilation
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.12"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>.</p>
      <p>In the case of some push-broom instruments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.13"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g. OMI, </named-content></xref>
the retrieved slant columns also exhibit non-physical “stripes”, which
result from across-track biases caused by slight differences in wavelength
calibration between adjacent viewing angles. These biases need to be removed
by spatial filtering over several adjacent swaths <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx9" id="paren.14"/>.</p>
      <p>An implicit part of the DOAS retrievals from these UV/VIS instruments is that
the reference spectrum is normally a solar irradiance spectrum, used as a
measure of the incoming radiation before attenuation by the atmosphere. One
possible alternative would be to use Earth radiance spectra recorded over an
unpolluted region as a reference. This type of technique has previously been
employed in several DOAS retrievals of trace gases such as IO <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.15"/> and HCHO <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.16"/>. In both cases
averaged Earth radiance spectra over the remote Pacific were used, as the
background concentration of these gases are expected to be relatively low in
that region. Using an Earth radiance reference spectrum is advantageous, in
that it also reduces residual instrument noise occurring from differences
between spectra measured during the instrument's solar and terrestrial
viewing modes. In addition, the technique may help to mitigate the impact the
Ring effect <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.17"/> has on the retrieval, as the radiance
spectra have already been subject to some Ring absorption <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx45" id="paren.18"/>. However, this effect would be dependent on the magnitude of
Raman absorption attenuating the spectra measured over the reference and
observed regions, and would be the subject of further study beyond the scope
of this work.</p>
      <p>The objective of this work is to determine the efficacy of directly
retrieving the tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> slant column density using an unpolluted
Earth radiance measured over an unpolluted reference sector (the
“ERrs-DOAS” technique) with a reduced need for model assimilation or
spatial filtering, and to evaluate any practical benefits that arise from
doing so.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS1">
  <title>Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS)</title>
      <p>In general, UV/VIS NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval algorithms for spectra from grating
spectrometers <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx8" id="paren.19"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref> have
used the DOAS technique <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.20"/> to retrieve the slant
column densities (SCDs). In the absence of multiple scattering these can be
considered to be the integrated trace gas density along the instrument's
geometrical line of sight. The technique is based on the principle that a
wavelength-dependent absorption signal can be split into two components: the
low-frequency, broadband component (representative of features such as
aerosol scattering and surface albedo) that can be approximated by a
low-order polynomial, and a high-frequency component that is sensitive to
trace gas concentrations. In principle the DOAS fit is a least squares fit of
the logarithm of the reflectance spectrum (the ratio of the incident and
attenuated spectra) over a given wavelength range, using a modified form of
the Beer–Lambert law:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          In Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) the reference and object spectra are
represented by <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively, while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents
the SCD of trace gas <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. For satellite retrievals of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>I</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> would be
the measured Earth radiance spectra, while solar irradiance spectra measured
separately by the instrument would be used as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In this case the
retrieved SCD would be the total slant column density along the line of
sight.</p>
      <p>Limitations in the instrument design may result in the measured spectra
having improper spectral calibration, which can adversely affect the quality
of the fitted SCD. To remedy this, additional terms representing a necessary
shift and stretch in the wavelength grid can also be included in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>).
The resulting solution would then be found through
nonlinear least squares fitting of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="paren.21"/>.</p>
      <p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the absorption cross-section of the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>th trace
gas considered in this fit, while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents the low-order polynomial
used to account for the broadband structure in the spectra. Ideally, the
trace gas absorption cross-sections and wavelength ranges considered in the
fit should be such that the cross-sections are orthogonal to each other to
give the best result, though in practice this often does not occur, and can
be a large source of error in the fit.</p>
      <p>In DOAS retrievals of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from instruments measuring in the UV/Vis range
a fitting window is usually selected in the 400–500 nm range. Often used is
the 425–450 nm window, which minimises contamination from other species while
taking advantage of the distinct NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> spectral features present in this
region <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46 bib1.bibx48" id="paren.22"/>. For OMI measurements a wider
fit window of 405–465 nm is used to improve the signal-to-noise and therewith
improve the fit <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.23"/>. For GOME-2 spectra the
use of the window 425–497 nm has been tested successfully
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="paren.24"/>.</p>
      <p>In addition to NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, trace gas absorption cross-sections such as O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>,
H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> collision complex within the UV/Vis range
have also been included in the fit to account for other sources of absorption
in the spectra. Furthermore, a synthetic cross-section to account for
absorption caused by rotational Raman scattering <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.25"><named-content content-type="pre">the Ring effect;</named-content></xref> is also included in the fit.</p>
      <p>SCDs retrieved by DOAS still need to be weighted in order to account for
enhancement owing to factors such as optical path length, scattering from
clouds/aerosols, and surface albedo. To that end, the SCDs are divided by an
air mass factor (AMF) to convert them into VCDs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.26"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. The AMFs are in turn created by inputting forward model
parameters describing local conditions such as surface albedo, trace gas
profile information and cloud cover into a radiative transport model (RTM).
Quantifying the uncertainty in the forward model parameters is important for
determining the final retrieval error of the derived VCDs
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.27"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS2">
  <title>The Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI)</title>
      <p>Launched in 2004 onboard the NASA AURA satellite, the Ozone Monitoring
Instrument <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31" id="paren.28"><named-content content-type="pre">OMI,</named-content></xref> produces tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> VCDs at
a near-urban spatial resolution (nadir pixel size: 13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 24 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
though in its spatial zoom modes this can be reduced to 13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 12 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
or even 13 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 3 km<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, as discussed in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47" id="altparen.29"/>). As
a push-broom spectrometer, OMI has a swath width of 2600 km which is divided
into 60 across-track pixels. Each pixel corresponds to a separate viewing
angle. OMI follows a sun-synchronous orbit, with a local overpass time of
approximately 13:45. The instrument's visible channel has a 350–500 nm
spectral range, with an average spectral resolution of 0.63 nm.</p>
      <p>The process of deriving tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> VCDs from the Level 1B Earth
radiance data (OML1BRVG product, see Sect. 2) via DOAS is
briefly described   in this section. In the operational OMI DOAS slant column
retrieval algorithm  OMNO2A <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx51" id="paren.30"/>, the
Earth radiance reflectance spectra are fitted using a 405–465 nm fitting
window. The reflectance spectra are fitted with absorption cross-sections for
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, as well as a fifth-order polynomial to
account for broadband variations (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).</p>
      <p>In the OMNO2A algorithm the Ring effect is treated differently compared with
traditional DOAS retrievals. In this case the Ring effect is treated as a
source of photons, rather than a pseudo-absorber. Because of this, the
algorithm performs a nonlinear least squares fit using the following
equation:

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced><mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced close="]" open="["><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:munder><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∑</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:munder><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mtext>s</mml:mtext><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi>i</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mfenced></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E2"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RING</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RING</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            In Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> represents a fifth-order polynomial, while the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RING</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> term is the Ring radiance spectrum, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the measured solar
irradiance spectrum, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">RING</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the Ring absorption coefficient
determined by the fit.</p>
      <p>There are currently two operational algorithms that process the SCDs
retrieved by OMNO2A into tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> VCDs; brief descriptions of
each are given below.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS2.SSS1">
  <title>Standard Product (OMNO2, v 2.1, NASA)</title>
      <p>After an initial geometric AMF is applied to the SCD, the stratospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> VCD is estimated by first masking polluted regions and then
interpolating from known unpolluted regions to compute the smoothly varying
stratospheric background. After subtracting this component a tropospheric AMF
is calculated using profile data from the Global Monitoring Initiative (GMI)
Chemical Transport Model (CTM), along with scattering weights derived from
the TOMS radiative transfer model (TOMRAD) and terrain albedo derived from
OMI reflectance data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.31"/>. AMFs are weighted for
cloud cover using cloud fraction data from the OMI O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> cloud
algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.32"><named-content content-type="pre">OMCLDO2, </named-content></xref>. See
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx8" id="text.33"/>  and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12" id="text.34"/> for more
details.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS2.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Derivation of OMI Tropospheric NO${}_{{2}}$ Product (DOMINO, v 2.0, KNMI)}?><title>Derivation of OMI Tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> Product (DOMINO, v 2.0, KNMI)</title>
      <p>In the DOMINO algorithm the stratospheric SCD is derived by assimilating the
retrieved SCD in the TM4 global CTM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.35"/>. As in the
Standard Product, the resulting tropospheric VCD is calculated using an AMF
using similar data sets for terrain albedo, and cloud fractions, while the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> profiles and scattering weights are derived from TM4 model runs and
the DAK radiative transfer (RTM) model. The assimilated stratospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD has been validated by comparing assimilated data with
independent ground-based measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18" id="paren.36"/>. See
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4 bib1.bibx5" id="text.37"/> for more details.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S1.SS2.SSS3">
  <title>Across-track variability (“striping”)</title>
      <p>It has been previously noted that NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> VCDs retrieved by OMI show
systematic enhancements over specific viewing angles (“stripes”). These
stripes do not correspond to any known geophysical behaviour, and were found
to be a result of a combination of solar diffusor features and noise in solar
irradiance measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx53" id="paren.38"/>. These features result in
slight differences in wavelength calibration between the 60 across-track
viewing angles, which in turn result in unknown offsets in the DOAS fits
dependent on the viewing zenith angle (VZA). Therefore, these features need
to be empirically corrected after the retrieval. In order to suppress these
stripes the daily solar irradiance spectra used in the DOAS fit was instead
replaced with a composite of all solar irradiance measurements during 2005.
Additionally, current retrievals attempt to filter these defects by comparing
the background NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> field over several adjacent orbits <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.39"/>.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Method</title>
      <p>The QDOAS software package <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.40"><named-content content-type="pre">v 2.1,
<uri>http://uv-vis.aeronomie.be/software/QDOAS/</uri>, last access: 1 October 2013;</named-content></xref> was employed to perform the DOAS fits in this
investigation. This software package has typically been used in the past to
process spectral data from ground-based and airborne observations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx38" id="paren.41"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, as well as in retrievals using
satellite data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.42"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. A summary of all
absorption cross-sections used in this paper is included in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/> and Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>.</p>
      <p>As with the OMNO2A algorithm, the fitting window for all DOAS fits in this
work is expanded to 405–465 nm in order to minimise the effect of instrument
noise on the retrieval <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.43"/>. All DOAS retrievals
for this work were performed using optical density fitting, in which Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>)
was solved using a nonlinear least squares fit. In all fits
a second-order stretch function was applied to the spectra, along with a linear
wavelength shift. No further wavelength calibration was applied to the
reference spectra outside of the linear offset determined by the OMNO2A
algorithm (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS2"/>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>The absorption cross-sections used in this work
(see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Retrieval using modelled spectra</title>
      <p>The goal of this first effort was to demonstrate the
theoretical possibility of using an Earth radiance reference in the DOAS fit
and show in the absence of noise, aerosol and trace gas contamination that
the Earth radiance-retrieved SCD is the difference in NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between the
reference and observed region. In order to demonstrate the validity of using
Earth radiance reference spectra to retrieve tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, the
SCIATRAN RTM <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx44" id="paren.44"><named-content content-type="pre">v 3.1.27, </named-content></xref> was used to simulate
spectra that may typically be observed over the Pacific and China. Vertical
profile data for temperature, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O in these
scenarios was provided by the CAMELOT data set <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="paren.45"/>
and are summarised in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>. The Pacific is
relatively free of tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, which theoretically makes it
possible for spectra taken over this region to be used as an estimation of
the local stratospheric field over a given location.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Atmospheric volume mixing ratio (VMR) profiles used in the modelled
spectra retrieval for the polluted China (black) and the clean Pacific (red)
scenarios. The profiles were taken from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.46"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015-f02.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>An Earth radiance spectrum from the Pacific and polluted Chinese scenarios
was modelled, with absorption due to O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> provided by a profile
created by SCIATRAN from the pressure profile. Absorption from the Ring
effect was calculated by SCIATRAN using the algorithm developed by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.47"/>. While no aerosol information was included, the solar
zenith angle in either scenario was varied between 0–80<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in order to
demonstrate the retrieval's accuracy at different diurnal ranges. DOAS fits
were carried out on all spectra, using a solar irradiance spectrum as a
reference. For Chinese scenarios, the Pacific Earth radiance spectrum was
used as a reference as well. The results of this study are discussed in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS1"/>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Retrieval using OMI L1B spectral data</title>
      <p>In order to test the validity of the ERrs-DOAS
technique using operational satellite spectra, data from the OML1BRVG <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.48"><named-content content-type="pre">collection 3, </named-content></xref> product were used to provide the
calibrated, wavelength-corrected spectra for both the reference and object
spectra in the DOAS retrieval in this work. Data regarding the ground pixel
quality (e.g. cloud cover, surface albedo) were provided by the DOMINO (v.
2.0) product. Tropospheric SCDs retrieved by DOMINO were used to compare with
the retrieved NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, though these had to be reconstructed using the
“TroposphericVerticalColumn” and “AirMassFactorTropospheric” fields in
the DOMINO data product. Similarly, the tropospheric SCDs retrieved by OMNO2
were derived from the “ColumnAmountNO2Trop” and “AmfTrop” fields in the
OMNO2 data product, while the OMNO2A total SCDs were taken from the
“SlantColumnAmountNO2” field. For most of this work only data collected
before 2008 were considered, as this was largely before the emergence of the
“row anomaly” artefacts that have affected OMI data coverage since 2007
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.49"/>. All cross-sections used were convolved with the
OMI slit function prior to the DOAS fit <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.50"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The absorption cross-sections used in the DOAS fits for this work. N/A: not applicable.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Species</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Reference</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Reference</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Reference (OMI, Earth radiance</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(SCIATRAN, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(OMI, OMNO2A)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">reference, Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3"/>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (220 K)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.51"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.52"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49" id="text.53"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx6" id="text.54"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.55"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="text.56"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43" id="text.57"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.58"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42" id="text.59"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Ring</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx58" id="text.60"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.61"/>
                  </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="text.62"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Polynomial</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">3rd order</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">5th order</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3rd order</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (liquid)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N/A</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N/A</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="text.63"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sand</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">N/A</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">N/A</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">
                    <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.64"/>
                  </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Prior to the DOAS fit, the reference spectrum is interpolated onto the same
wavelength grid as the observed Earth radiance spectrum using the same
interpolation technique as used in <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="text.65"/>. The interpolated
reference spectrum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ES</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated using the
following equation:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ES</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>REF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>REF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ES</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          First, a high-resolution oversampled solar atlas that is convolved to the OMI
instrument line shape <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="paren.66"/> is interpolated onto both
the reference and radiance spectra wavelength grids (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>REF</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>F</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mtext>ES</mml:mtext><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> respectively) using cubic spline interpolation. The ratio
of these interpolated spectra is then multiplied by the intensity of the
solar irradiance, which therefore gives the desired interpolation.</p>
      <p>A wavelength correction is applied to the Earth radiance spectra before the
DOAS fit, in order to correct for shifts caused by cloudy scenes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.67"/>. The correction is performed as a single offset, calculated from
comparing the 408–423 nm spectral window to the high resolution solar atlas
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.68"/>. The offsets applied for each OMI ground pixel
can be found in the “WavelengthRegistrationCheck” field in the OMNO2
product. Additionally, spectral pixels flagged as being affected by
instrumental defects such as random telegraph signals or dark current
behaviour were removed prior to the DOAS fit <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.69"/>. In QDOAS
this removal can be performed by specifying gaps in the spectral window which
are then ignored in the analysis.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>ERrs-DOAS retrievals of modelled polluted Chinese spectra</title>
      <p>The results from the ERrs-DOAS fits of modelled
CAMELOT spectra (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S2.SS1"/>) are discussed herein. As
shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/>, for all solar zenith angles
considered the SCD retrieved by DOAS fitting spectra from the Chinese
scenario using a Pacific Earth radiance reference was near-identical to the
difference in the modelled total SCD between the two scenarios. From
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/> it appears that the difference in SCD is
largely due to differences in tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, though the difference in
stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between the two scenarios would also greatly
contribute to the retrieved SCD. Ideally, the reference spectra should be
collected from a region where the stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> is similar to the
target region to minimise this bias.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>The retrieved NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCDs from DOAS fitting spectra modelled using
SCIATRAN based on the Pacific and Chinese CAMELOT scenarios
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>) using a range of solar zenith angles
(SZA). The red curve indicates the difference between the total SCD of the
Pacific and Chinese scenarios directly modelled by SCIATRAN, while the other
curves show the SCDs retrieved by using a solar or Earth radiance reference
spectrum in the DOAS fit.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Residual bias in QDOAS retrieval estimation using OMI spectra</title>
      <p>Prior to comparing tropospheric SCDs in satellite data, it is essential to
determine any inherent biases present in the retrieval algorithm, as QDOAS
performs DOAS fits differently to OMNO2A. QDOAS performs a nonlinear DOAS fit
by solving a variant of Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), in which the Ring is
treated as a pseudo-absorber like other trace gases, and no treatment of
elastic scattering is considered. To determine the magnitude of possible
biases resulting from these differing assumptions a comparison exercise was
established. As with the OMNO2A retrieval, a composite set of solar
irradiance reference spectra derived from OMI irradiance data <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.70"><named-content content-type="pre">OML1BIRR, collection 3, </named-content></xref> taken during 2005 were used in this
initial test. These were used to retrieve total NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCDs in cloud-free
regions (i.e. pixel cloud fraction &lt; 25 %) over the whole globe
during June 2005, using the retrieval parameters shown in
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>, as care was taken to ensure that the
cross-sections, interpolation method and retrieval settings employed were a
close approximation to those used in the current OMNO2A retrieval
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.71"><named-content content-type="pre">v2006;</named-content></xref>. The resulting SCDs and uncertainties
were then compared with those retrieved by OMNO2A, as shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Average total NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD bias between the QDOAS-based solar
reference retrieval and the OMNO2A algorithm for cloud-free (cloud fraction
&lt; 25 %) scenes during June 2005.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The results show an almost constant negative SCD bias between the QDOAS-based
retrieval and OMNO2A over all regions (average SCD bias <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>1.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).
There appear to be no geospatial
features other than a slightly stronger bias over mountainous regions,
potentially due to possible retrieval sensitivity to surface albedo. The lack
of spatial features suggests that this bias is the result of some flaw in the
retrieval algorithm, rather than any unforeseen geophysical process. A
similar bias has previously been reported in other comparisons between OMNO2A
and QDOAS-based retrievals, which appears to be resolved in part through
better wavelength and slit function calibration <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51" id="paren.72"/>.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>Additionally, the bias also exhibits a strong across-track variation, as
shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. The reason for this effect is
currently unknown. One possible cause could be how QDOAS treats spectral
pixels flagged for removal due to random telegraph signals or dark current
behaviour <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.73"/>; the number of pixels that need to be
removed from the DOAS fit for this reason varies between across-track pixels,
which may add to the bias caused by the retrieval algorithm differences.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>The normalised magnitude of the bias between the total NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD
retrieved using the OMNO2A algorithm and the QDOAS-based solar reference
retrieval. Cloud-free pixels (cloud fraction &lt; 25 %) were compared.
The Earth radiance L1B data was taken from orbit no. 06644. (OML1BRVG).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>As a result, comparisons between the retrievals covered in this paper with
existing retrievals were conducted using only ground pixels in which the
QDOAS-based retrieval using solar reference spectra produced total SCDs that
were within 5 % of the total SCDs produced by OMNO2A. It was assumed that
ERrs-DOAS retrievals of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over such pixels using the QDOAS software
would be representative of what would be retrieved if the ERrs-DOAS fits were
performed using the OMNO2A algorithm, as they would be relatively free from
this bias.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>DOAS retrieval using Earth radiance reference spectra</title>
      <p>The cross-sections used in this study are identical
to those used in the OMNO2A retrieval (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).
Following preliminary testing over the Sahara desert (see Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2"/>),
cross-sections for sand and liquid H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O were also
included in the ERrs-DOAS fit.</p>
      <p>For the first phase of this study Earth radiance spectra recorded during
June 2005 were considered. Daily Earth radiance data from a Pacific reference
sector (125–180<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–60<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) over this month
were binned into a set of 60 reference spectra for each OMI viewing angle, as
the stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> present in the observed spectrum will be highly
dependent on the scattering path length, and so the viewing geometry.
Consequently, all DOAS retrievals were performed using reference spectra
measured at the same viewing angle as the observed radiance spectra. To
account for latitudinal gradient in stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and SZA the
spectra were also binned into 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> latitude bins, such that DOAS
retrievals of Earth radiance spectra observed over the rest of the planet
made use of the reference spectra obtained from the closest latitude bin.</p>
      <p>Using a latitudinal reference sector also resolves potential biases resulting
from changes in SZA between the reference and observed region. Observations
made with high SZAs will be more sensitive to the stratosphere due to an
increase the mean scattering height <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx39" id="paren.74"/>, which may result in unforseen stratospheric contamination in
the SCDs retrieved with this method. However, as OMI follows a
sun-synchronous orbit, the ground pixel SZA is dependent on latitude and
season. As a result, using a daily, latitudinally binned reference spectrum
means that the difference in SZA between the reference and observed region
will be negligible, so this effect will be negated.</p>
      <p>The choice of reference sector and frequency of data collection will result
in unknown uncertainties affecting the overall retrieval accuracy. For
instance, pollution transport events (e.g. outflow from the mainland) will
result in a negative bias exhibited in the retrieved SCDs. The static
reference sector used in this work was to maximise the number of usable
spectra which could be binned at all latitudes. Similarly, the temporal
frequency of the binned reference spectra will also contribute to the
retrieval uncertainty (e.g. accounting for seasonal variation in the
stratospheric field). An operational algorithm will therefore need to
automatically select remote regions which are assumed to be free of such
contamination; possible selection methods are discussed in Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S4"/>.</p>
      <p>It was determined that only spectra that were measured over largely
cloud-free scenes (i.e. cloud fraction &lt; 25 %) would be binned to
this data set. Scattering from clouds would lead to inhomogeneous illumination
of the OMI entrance slit, which in turn leads to a change in the position and
shape of the instrument slit function. The change in the slit function then
results in an observed shift in the wavelength mapping of the Fraunhofer
lines on the detector <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.75"/>. As the DOAS fit depends on
good wavelength calibration, cloudy pixels would need to be avoided to obtain
the best possible result in this work. As well as this, using cloudy scenes
would otherwise introduce a cloud height dependence on the inherent
stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieved.</p>
      <p>As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a and b the ERrs-DOAS retrieval shows
good agreement with tropospheric SCDs retrieved by DOMINO, particularly
showing good spatial similarity with megacities and regions with known
anthropogenic activity (e.g. mining), as well as possible biomass burning
over central Africa. Overall, the retrieved SCDs highly correlate with those
retrieved by the operational DOMINO product (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.85</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), particularly over
heavily polluted regions such as China (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.96</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.99 for SCDs
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>16</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p>However, the retrieval produces significant, broad negative biases over
remote regions such as Tibet, particularly at higher northern latitudes over
land. This is potentially due to undersampling of reference spectra in the
Pacific reference sector resulting from excessive cloud cover at those
latitudes, which would result in a degradation in the quality of the DOAS fit
and an underestimation of the local stratospheric field; both factors would
result in lower SCDs retrieved.</p>
      <p>As well as this, Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>d shows that the stratospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> field varies considerably with longitude at the latitudes where this
bias appears. This variation is especially pronounced in the Pacific
reference sector, which has higher stratospheric SCDs compared with other
longitudes. The increased NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption present in the reference sector
would therefore lead to lower tropospheric SCDs retrieved over other areas.</p>
      <p>One particularly significant positive bias appears over the region
(70<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–160<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E, 16–22<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) and the Southern Atlantic Ocean,
in which the retrieval overestimates the magnitude and spatial spread of the
tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> band that is detected in the DOMINO retrieval
(Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b). According to the assimilated stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
available from DOMINO (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>d) these regions had
considerable longitudinal variation in stratospheric fields compared with the
Pacific reference sector, which would result in the Pacific reference sector
being an underestimate of the local stratospheric field. Both of these cases
show the need to accurately estimate the stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> field and to
have enough cloud-free measurements in the reference sector in order for this
type of retrieval to be successful.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison of average tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD retrieved during
June 2005 using the ERrs-DOAS technique with DOMINO. <bold>(a)</bold> Average
tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD retrieved using an Earth radiance reference.
<bold>(b)</bold> Average bias between Earth radiance retrieval and DOMINO
tropospheric SCD. <bold>(c)</bold> Average tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD retrieved by
DOMINO. <bold>(d)</bold> Average stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD retrieved by DOMINO.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS1">
  <title>Effect of cloud screening on retrieval performance</title>
      <p>The 25 % cloud fraction threshold for the reference spectra binning in this
work was chosen as a compromise between ensuring maximum data availability
over the Pacific and minimising cloud contamination. However, cloud cover at
this threshold may still be a significant contaminant, and so may still
affect the ERrs-DOAS retrieval accuracy.</p>
      <p>To investigate the effect of a more restrictive reference sector cloud
threshold, a comparison exercise was performed. SCDs retrieved using the
ERrs-DOAS algorithm over China (15–55<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 100–135<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E)
were compared with those retrieved when the reference sector cloud
threshold was set to 10 %. It was found that reducing the cloud threshold
resulted in a mean rms rise of 6.9 %, and a mean SCD rise of 4.0 %. However,
no significant spatial variation in the tropospheric field was observed by
this change, which suggests that no further information over polluted regions
is gained by choosing a smaller cloud threshold.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3.SSS2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Existence of sand and liquid H${}_{{2}}$O absorption features}?><title>Existence of sand and liquid H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O absorption features</title>
      <p>Preliminary DOAS fits using only the existing OMNO2A
cross-sections and fifth-order polynomial (see column 2 of
Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>) revealed that using an Earth radiance reference
produces anomalously high root mean square (rms) error values over regions
such as the Sahara and Namibian deserts, as well as the Atlantic and Pacific
oceans. The fine structure present in the residual spectra retrieved over
these regions suggested that another absorber unaccounted for by the DOAS fit
may be present over these regions. The spatial ranges of these anomalous
regions appear to be similar to those encountered by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.76"/>
when investigating improvements to the GOME-2 tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrieval.</p>
      <p>The ERrs-DOAS retrieval adds a liquid H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and sand (empirically measured
using GOME-2 spectra, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="altparen.77"/>) absorption cross-section to
the DOAS fit and reduces the polynomial order from 5 to 3. It was found
that this change in retrieval settings reduced the rms over deserts and
oceans to background values. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/> shows that these
absorption cross-sections are sufficiently different from purely polynomial
functions, and so may not be accounted for by the polynomial term used in the
fit.</p>
      <p>To illustrate this effect tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCDs were retrieved from OMI
spectra recorded over the Sahara desert during June 2005 using an Earth
radiance reference with these added cross-sections. The rms of the ERrs-DOAS
fits were compared with those resulting from DOAS fits with an Earth radiance
reference, but using only the same cross-sections and fifth-order polynomial
used in OMNO2A (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>). As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>,
the addition of the sand and liquid H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O
cross-sections and reduction in polynomial order resulted in a reduction in
rms over the whole region. Overall, the addition of the liquid H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and
sand cross-sections and reducing the polynomial order lead to an 11 %
decrease in the rms and a corresponding 6.3 % rise in NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD over the
Sahara.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>The change in rms resulting from adding the sand and liquid H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O
absorption cross-sections to the Earth radiance reference DOAS fit. DOAS fits
for OMI spectra measured over the Sahara desert during June 2005 were
performed using a Pacific Earth radiance reference with and without the sand
and liquid H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O absorption cross-section included (see Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>).</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015-f07.png"/>

          </fig>

      <p>It is possible that at least part of this rms decrease could be attributed to
the change in polynomial order. To determine this, another comparison
exercise was performed over the Sahara to determine the impact in reducing
the polynomial order from 5 to 3. The ERrs-DOAS retrievals were compared with
those made using the same cross-sections, only with the polynomial order set
to 5. It was found that only reducing the polynomial order resulted in an rms
increase of 6.7 %, and an NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD increase of 5 %. No change in the
spatial distribution of the sand, liquid H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCDs were
observed because of this change, suggesting that the polynomial order does
not affect the retrieval sensitivity to local features.</p>
      <p>The mean ERrs-DOAS retrieved liquid H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and sand fit coefficients during
June 2005 are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>. These plots show a
remarkable spatial similarity with the GOME-2 retrieval results of
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.78"/>, which suggests that accounting for this
contamination will need to be addressed in future instrument and retrieval
designs. Despite this similarity, there are also anomalously high liquid
H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O and sand fit coefficients retrieved over extreme northern latitudes.
As with the negative NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> bias at these latitudes this could potentially
be the result of artefacts introduced by having undersampled reference
spectra at the corresponding Pacific reference sectors.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Average tropospheric sand (left) and liquid H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O (right) fit
coefficient retrieved using Earth radiance reference DOAS during June 2005.
Note that only positive SCDs have been plotted, and have been scaled to
arbitrary values.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015-f08.png"/>

          </fig>

<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Urban transect comparison</title>
      <p>In order to determine the sensitivity of this retrieval to the relative
difference in NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> between urban and rural areas a comparison exercise
was undertaken between the ERrs-DOAS, OMNO2  and DOMINO retrievals. As shown
in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>, the mean tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCDs retrieved
during June 2005 are selected over a latitudinal transect across China, from
Hong Kong to Inner Mongolia (20–50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 114<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). The
average tropospheric SCD retrieved using an Earth radiance reference spectrum
during June 2005 is compared with that retrieved by the DOMINO and OMNO2
algorithms.</p>
      <p>The Earth radiance reference retrieval demonstrates sensitivity to NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
enhancement over urban areas, as the latitudinal variation is very similar to
that exhibited by the DOMINO and OMNO2 transects. Over the Pearl River Delta
(23<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N) the SCDs retrieved by all three algorithms appear to be nearly
identical, while enhancement over other urban areas is also detected by the
Earth radiance retrieval and shows good agreement with the other algorithms.
However, further along the transect there is a consistent negative offset
associated with the Earth radiance retrieval, particularly over Inner
Mongolia (45–50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N), though this bias appears to be largely
within the mean uncertainty of the DOAS fit as reported by QDOAS. The
residual bias is likely the result of longitudinal differences in
stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over the Pacific reference sector and China, which
could not be accounted for when collecting reference spectra. Residual biases
arising from differences between the OMNO2A and QDOAS algorithms would also
contribute to the discrepancy. Despite the presence of such biases, the
sensitivity to tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> variability demonstrates that this
technique could be used to retrieve spatially resolved tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
over urban areas.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9" specific-use="star"><caption><p>The mean tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD retrieved over the transect
(20–50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 114<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) during June 2005. The mean
tropospheric SCD retrieved by DOMINO (left, also showing the transect
coordinates) was compared with that retrieved using the OMNO2 algorithm and
the Earth radiance reference method (right). The error bars are the mean
uncertainty of the SCDs retrieved using an Earth radiance reference, as
calculated by QDOAS <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx22" id="paren.79"/>.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS5">
  <title>Retrieval using local reference sector over South Africa</title>
      <p>A significant issue when using reference spectra from a single location is
that differences in the local tropospheric and stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> field
can lead to substantial biases in estimating tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over other
longitudes. One possible solution is to use reference spectra from an area
closer to the region of interest in order to provide a better representation
of the local stratospheric field. Such regions may also be comparatively
cloud-free, which would lead to better sampling of reference spectra. To
determine the validity of this technique a comparison exercise is set up over
a region covering South Africa. This region is particularly interesting as
South Africa has the largest industrialised economy in Africa, with major
cities and anthropogenic activities such as mining and agriculture primarily
centred around Bushveld and Highveld. Because of this, these regions are
considered to be air quality hotspots, and have been the subject of several
studies to determine the impact emissions from these regions have on ambient
air quality <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28 bib1.bibx32 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.80"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. The
region is an ideal candidate for determining the impact of this technique on
retrieval accuracy, as it is distant from other NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> sources which allows
for both point sources and pollution transport to be clearly visible.</p>
      <p>For this study Earth radiance spectra measured during June 2005 are analysed
over the region (20–40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–80<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). Here,
the Earth radiance reference spectra are instead collected from the South
Atlantic (20–40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 0<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) for use in the
DOAS fit. The reference region was chosen as it was close to the region of
interest, while still being distant enough to avoid tropospheric
contamination from pollution transport. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/> shows a
comparison between tropospheric SCDs retrieved using this reference sector,
the Pacific reference sector and the DOMINO product. Using a nearby reference
sector improves correlation with the DOMINO results, while removing the
longitudinal bias present beyond <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 23<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison of tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCDs retrieved over South Africa
(20–40<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S, 50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W–80<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) using Pacific and South
Atlantic reference spectra with DOMINO. <bold>(a)</bold> Average tropospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD retrieved using a S. Atlantic Earth radiance reference.
<bold>(b)</bold> Average bias between S. Atlantic Earth radiance retrieval and
DOMINO tropospheric SCD. <bold>(c)</bold> Average tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD
retrieved using a Pacific Earth radiance reference spectrum. <bold>(d)</bold>
Average bias between Pacific Earth radiance retrieval and DOMINO tropospheric
SCD.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS6">
  <title>Improvement in striping reduction</title>
      <p>In order to determine the impact the ERrs-DOAS technique has on removing
across-track striping, all retrievals in a single OMI swath from a region in
the Pacific deemed to be distant from tropospheric pollution sources and the
reference sector (30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S–5<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N, 90–130<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W) are
analysed. All SCDs retrieved using the multiple Earth radiance reference
algorithms over this region for each viewing angle are averaged to form a
single data set. The mean is then subtracted in order to determine the
across-track variability between pixels. This is then repeated with
corresponding data from DOMINO and OMNO2.</p>
      <p>As shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>, the reduction in across-track
variability when using multiple Earth radiance reference spectra is greater
than the existing destriping algorithms used by OMNO2 and DOMINO, suggesting
that this technique could be used to account for biases resulting from
instrument design without post hoc filtering. The flat curve of the ERrs-DOAS
data also shows that   using an Earth radiance reference removes the
geometric enhancement of the SCD introduced by off-nadir viewing geometry
which is still present in the other curves. The latitudinal reference sector
and viewing angle binning ensures that the reference and observed spectra
have been measured in similar viewing geometries. Therefore, the enhancement
due to path length difference should be nearly identical and so is inherently
removed from the retrieved SCD. Traditionally, this enhancement is removed as
part of the AMF computation, so VCD estimation based on the ERrs-DOAS
technique may require AMFs to only be computed assuming nadir viewing
conditions because of this effect.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>Deviations from the across-track mean NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD retrieved by the
Earth radiance reference algorithm and the OMNO2 and DOMINO algorithms. The
Earth radiance L1B and OMNO2/DOMINO L2 data were taken from orbit no. 04741.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS7">
  <title>SCD uncertainty estimation</title>
      <p>In order to determine the effect of random
noise on the retrievals a statistical approach similar to those conducted by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.81"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.82"/> is adopted. An area over the Pacific
that was assumed to be relatively unpolluted is chosen (100–120<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) and the tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrieved during June 2005 is analysed. It is assumed that the stratospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over this region and timescale is both temporally and spatially
invariant, so that the spread in these measurements would primarily originate
from the inherent accuracy of the retrieval. To measure this spread the SCDs
retrieved over this region using the Earth radiance reference, and OMNO2A
algorithms are scaled with a geometric AMF, in order to account for
variability introduced by the changing SZA and viewing geometry over this
area and period. The resulting VCDs are then binned to
2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> boxes, from which the deviation from the mean for
each SCD is recorded. These deviations are subsequently binned to a histogram
to determine the spread of the measurements. It was found that these
histograms could be modelled as Gaussian functions, so the retrieval error
can represented by the standard deviation, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, of the distribution.</p>
      <p>The OMNO2A SCDs has a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 1.1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>15</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
value is similar to that derived from the total SCDs retrieved by emulating
the OMNO2A algorithm using QDOAS. The Earth radiance retrieval, however,
produces a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> of 8.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
corresponds to a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 % reduction in random error using this retrieval.
While this may be indicative of improved retrieval sensitivity this reduction
is also the result of additional factors, such as the addition of the sand
and liquid H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O cross-sections, differences between the QDOAS and OMNO2A
treatment of the DOAS fit, and reduction in the across-track striping.
Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/> shows the distribution and the fitted Gaussian function
for the ERrs-DOAS retrievals.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><caption><p>The distribution of the deviations of OMI NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCDs from the
box-mean (2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) values in the equatorial Pacific region
(100–120<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W, 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N–10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> S) for June 2005. The
SCDs were derived by DOAS fitting OMI spectra using an Earth radiance
reference. The red line shows the fitted Gaussian function.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>This analysis was carried out over all pixels retrieved over the specified
region between 2005–2008, with the resulting time series shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>. Both the Earth radiance and solar retrieval
uncertainties appear to be subject to an annual cycle, with peak values
occurring around June. From regression analysis it was determined that the
best fit of the data was achieved when accounting for this cycle (up to the
second harmonic in a Fourier series) in addition to a linear trend. This cycle
could potentially be related to the periodicity of the insolation observed
over the area during the year, though the physical meaning behind the second
harmonic is currently unknown. This model also does not fit the solar
retrieval uncertainty trends as well as the Earth radiance retrieval,
suggesting that DOAS fits using a solar reference are subject to some
other factor, such as changes in the solar irradiance reference spectrum.
Such changes over time would not be accounted for, as both the OMNO2A and
QDOAS solar retrievals only use the composite irradiance reference spectra
measured in 2005 previously described in this work.</p>
      <p>In addition to the annual cycle there appears to be a statistically
significant positive trend for all three time series, which may be the result
of instrument degradation during this time period. The trend for the Earth
radiance retrieval uncertainty (1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
is much lower than that of the solar retrieval uncertainty,
(5.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn>13</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> month<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>), potentially
demonstrating this technique's resilience to spectral degradation.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F13"><caption><p>Time series of the monthly mean OMI NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> uncertainty between
2005 and 2008 calculated using the box-mean technique in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>. The dotted line represents the linear trend and seasonal
cycle fitted using regression.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://www.atmos-meas-tech.net/8/1519/2015/amt-8-1519-2015-f13.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Limitations to operationalisation</title>
      <p>Despite the enhanced retrieval accuracy the ERrs-DOAS algorithm can be
subject to a number of uncertainties which can limit its operational
efficacy. For instance, the selection of the reference sector and binning
period can introduce biases from tropospheric pollution which can add a
negative bias to the retrieved SCDs. To remedy this the reference sector
selection could be improved through a priori information provided by a
chemical transport model (CTM), which would identify regions where high
pollution would be expected. This approach would be similar to the
stratosphere–troposphere separation performed by previous iterations of the
OMNO2 retrieval algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx8" id="paren.83"/>, in which the stratospheric VCD
was inferred from regions where GEOS-CHEM predicted low annual tropospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> columns.</p>
      <p>Transient pollution trends that may contaminate the reference spectra will
need to be empirically detected. One potential method for doing so would be
to preliminarily select a small longitude range in the Pacific as the
reference sector and then use the reference spectra to retrieve SCDs over the
rest of the Pacific. While decreased in magnitude, contamination from
transport events should still be observable. Through iterating the
longitudinal range and masking polluted regions, it should be possible to
identify the optimum reference sector for a global retrieval.</p>
      <p>While binning reference spectra over longer timescales would increase the
number of cloud-free measurements available, the temporal resolution of the
reference spectra can also influence the retrieval uncertainty. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F13"/>
shows a seasonal variation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.0</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mn>14</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> molec cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the retrieval uncertainty, which suggests that using an
annual reference spectrum would produce a similar bias in the retrieval. This
uncertainty would also be exacerbated by seasonal variations in the observed
Pacific stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> column. For shorter timescales, the number of
cloud-free scenes available in the reference sector will affect the retrieval
quality, which may only be partially mitigated by improving the instrument
spatial resolution. For regions such as the Intertropical Convergence Zone
(ITCZ) and high latitudes, excessive cloud cover means that a daily reference
cannot always be taken. For such regions it may instead be prudent to use a
several-day average spectrum to compensate for this effect. Because of these
factors it is likely that using daily-to-weekly reference spectra would
minimise retrieval uncertainty caused by the temporal frequency of the
reference measurements. For a single instrument, a daily reference would be
the best possible choice, while using a constellation of instruments would
also help to account for the diurnal cycle as well.</p>
      <p>While optimised for retrieving trace gas slant columns, the ERrs-DOAS
algorithm cannot adequately retrieve other parameters such as cloud pressure
and surface albedo, which are essential to retrieving the vertical columns.
The cloud fraction is a particularly important parameter, as it is required
to identify usable reference spectra to bin, and requires the measurement of
the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> total SCD <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.84"/>. Similarly, surface
albedo retrievals typically require the measurement of the top of atmosphere
reflectance <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29" id="paren.85"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. Such measurements require a
solar reference spectrum, and so cannot be made using an instrument optimised
for nadir viewing only. The solar reference spectrum is also critical to
spectral and wavelength calibration as it is not subject to any atmospheric
attenuation. Because of these issues, the ERrs-DOAS technique is unlikely to
be applicable for near-real-time retrievals, and would instead be suited to
reanalysis of operational satellite data sets.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Summary and conclusions</title>
      <p>This work has shown that Earth radiance reference spectra from the remote
Pacific in a satellite NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> DOAS fit can be used to retrieve tropospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCDs over polluted regions with minimal need for model assimilation
or spatial filtering. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> shows that the
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD derived from using an Earth radiance reference is (within
retrieval error) equivalent to the difference between the total NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> SCD
retrieved over the reference region and the region of interest. The NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
profile can be partitioned into clearly defined tropospheric and
stratospheric components, which makes this technique ideal for tropospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval provided that the stratospheric component is the same over
both the reference region and the region of interest. As shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>d the stratospheric field is not longitudinally
homogeneous, particularly at extreme latitudes. These variations can result
in significant biases in tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieved with this method
compared with the model-assimilated DOMINO SCDs. One possible method in
resolving these biases would be to use reference spectra from regions closer
to the observation, though this limits the efficacy of this retrieval
technique to coastal regions or other areas close to regions where
tropospheric contamination could be minimised (e.g. deserts).</p>
      <p>Despite the magnitude of the biases compared with DOMINO, the Earth radiance
reference retrieval appears to give spatially consistent results. As shown in
the urban transect comparison (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>) the retrieval shows
sensitivity to the tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> enhancement owing to anthropogenic
activity, as the average transect for all three retrieval algorithms show
good correlation. The bias in the Earth radiance reference retrieval appears
as a near-consistent offset, potentially due to differences in the OMNO2A and
QDOAS retrieval algorithms. However, the bias also appears to increase over
the comparatively unpolluted Inner Mongolia region, which suggests that
residual biases owing to the longitudinal variation in stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
or temperature have a significant impact over remote unpolluted regions.</p>
      <p>Using the uncertainty derivation technique defined by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.86"/>
it was found that the ERrs-DOAS fits produced <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 27 % reduction in
retrieval uncertainty, though this may be the result of a number of factors,
such as the addition of other cross-sections and differences in the OMNO2A
and QDOAS algorithms. Time series analysis shows that the retrieval
uncertainty owing to instrument degradation may be much less when using an
Earth radiance reference. The retrieval technique also largely resolves the
biases resulting from across-track striping with a minimal need for a
posteriori corrections.</p>
      <p>However, the benefits using the ERrs-DOAS technique have only been defined
for cloud-free scenes. In cloudier scenes the photons will be scattered more,
which will result in greater retrieval uncertainty. In the case of using
Earth radiance reference spectra this issue is exacerbated by the influence
cloud top height may have on the assumed stratospheric component. The
wavelength shifts caused by cloud cover <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx57" id="paren.87"/> are also an
issue when selecting Earth radiance spectra, and need to be empirically
corrected before binning. Future satellite instruments that would utilise
this technique will therefore need to have a robust wavelength calibration.
Despite the issues in wavelength calibration, there is some potential in
using the cloud layer to determine the free tropospheric amount of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
based on the established cloud-slicing technique used in some cases to
retrieve tropospheric O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15 bib1.bibx60" id="paren.88"/>.</p>
      <p>It was noted that the retrieval shows sensitivity to absorption from sand and
liquid H<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>O, as shown by the spatial distributions retrieved in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/> and the reduction in rms in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>
when these absorbers were included in the fit. The
spatial similarity of the features retrieved with those found by
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41" id="text.89"/> suggest that these features are the result of real
absorption rather than an instrument-specific defect, and should be included
in future retrieval algorithms. Previously <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.90"/> discussed
potential correlations between O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption and sand, as both
cross-sections have distinct peaks at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 477 nm. Currently the fitting
window employed by OMNO2A does not extend to this wavelength, as absorption
from O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>–O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> has no impact on retrieval accuracy <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx4" id="paren.91"/>. This algorithm could potentially utilise a larger fitting
window to identify absorption from both species and to retrieve aerosol
information based on their absorption.</p>
      <p>This work has only covered derivation of the tropospheric SCD, while an
operational version of this technique will need to consider an appropriate
AMF derivation. In the DOMINO algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5" id="paren.92"/> the
tropospheric AMF is calculated after the stratospheric component has been
subtracted from the total VCD. In this scenario, however, only a differential
SCD has been measured, where the stratospheric column has been implicitly
defined, rather than explicitly measured. A similar scenario is found in
aircraft DOAS measurements <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="paren.93"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>, in which the
reference spectrum is also taken from measurements over a region that is
assumed to be unpolluted. The tropospheric VCD calculation therefore has to
estimate the VCD of the reference region, such as using a reference
climatology. However, in regions such as the remote Pacific the tropospheric
contribution is likely to be negligible, so such a correction would only be
required if a reference region close to the observation is chosen.</p>
      <p>The retrieval impact on Ring absorption has not been investigated in this
work. It is possible that the reduced retrieval uncertainty observed in
Sect. <xref ref-type="sec" rid="Ch1.S3.SS7"/> may be partially the result of Ring
structures in the reference and observed spectra cancelling out. However, the
magnitude of this effect will be dependent on the degree of Ring absorption
in both spectra. While the reference sector binning method used in this work
will ensure that the geometric path length is near-identical in both cases,
differences in the light paths caused by factors such as cloud cover and
aerosol loading will need to be explicitly accounted for. The impact of
vibrational Raman scattering on the DOAS fit <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35" id="paren.94"><named-content content-type="pre">VRS, </named-content></xref> will also need to be accounted for, as the reference
spectra is primarily measured over the Pacific Ocean. Accounting for these
effects may further improve the ERrs-DOAS performance.</p>
      <p>While unsuitable for operationalisation, the ERrs-DOAS technique detailed in
this work could potentially be used to create alternative tropospheric
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> data sets over urban regions, and potentially retrieve information
about other tropospheric species. The reduced across-track variability (as
shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>) and viewing angle dependence allows for
clearer mapping of pollution fields. The observed reduction in SCD
uncertainty and resilience to instrument degradation also potentially
demonstrates a resilience to instrumental defects, which may allow for more
accurate retrievals to be made, particularly over longer mission lifetimes.
However, further work is required to explore the full benefits of this
technique, particularly to resolve the inherent biases introduced by
differences between the QDOAS and OMNO2A retrieval software.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This research was financially supported as part of a PhD studentship provided
by the UK Centre for Earth Observation and Instrumentation (CEOI). We
acknowledge the use of OMI L1B and L2 data made available from the NASA
MIRADOR (<uri>http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/Aura/data-holdings/OMI</uri>) and KNMI TEMIS
(<uri>http://www.temis.nl</uri>) services. The QDOAS software package and continued
support were kindly provided by M. van Roozendael, C. Fayt, and the DOAS
group of BIRA/IASB. We are grateful for the assistance KNMI have provided us
in understanding the OMNO2A retrieval algorithm, particularly F. Boersma,
J. van Geffen, M. Sneep  and P. Veefkind. We are also grateful to J. Remedios
(University of Leicester) for his helpful comments.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: R. Schofield</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Acarreta et al.(2004)Acarreta, De Haan, and Stammes</label><mixed-citation>Acarreta, J. R., De Haan, J. F., and Stammes, P.: Cloud pressure retrieval
using the O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>-O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> absorption band at 477 nm, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 109, D05204,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003915" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003915</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Bass and Johnsten(1975)</label><mixed-citation>
Bass and Johnsten: WMO Annual Report, World Meteorological Organisation
(WMO), 1975.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Boersma et al.(2004)Boersma, Eskes, and Brinksma</label><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., and Brinksma, E. J.: Error analysis for
tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval from space, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
109, D04331,<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2003JD003962" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JD003962</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Boersma et al.(2007)Boersma, Eskes, Veefkind, Brinksma, van der A,
Sneep, van den Oord, Levelt, Stammes, Gleason, and Bucsela</label><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Veefkind, J. P., Brinksma, E. J., van der A, R.
J., Sneep, M., van den Oord, G. H. J., Levelt, P. F., Stammes, P., Gleason,
J. F., and Bucsela, E. J.: Near-real time retrieval of tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from
OMI, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 7, 2103–2118, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-2103-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-2103-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Boersma et al.(2011)Boersma, Eskes, Dirksen, van der A, Veefkind,
Stammes, Huijnen, Kleipool, Sneep, Claas, Leitão, Richter, Zhou, and
Brunner</label><mixed-citation>Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Dirksen, R. J., van der A, R. J., Veefkind, J.
P., Stammes, P., Huijnen, V., Kleipool, Q. L., Sneep, M., Claas, J., Leitão,
J., Richter, A., Zhou, Y., and Brunner, D.: An improved tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
column retrieval algorithm for the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 4, 1905–1928, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1905-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Bogumil et al.(1999)Bogumil, Orphal, Voigt, Bovensmann, Fleischmann,
Hartmann, Homann, Spietz, Vogel, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>
Bogumil, K., Orphal, J., Voigt, S., Bovensmann, H., Fleischmann, O., Hartmann,
M., Homann, T., Spietz, P., Vogel, A., and Burrows, J.: Reference spectra of
atmospheric trace gases measured with the SCIAMACHY PFM satellite
spectrometer, Proc. 1st Europ. Sympos. Atmos. Meas. from Space (ESAMS-99), 2,
443–447, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Braak(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Braak, R.: Row Anomaly Flagging Rules Lookup Table, KNMI Technical Document,
TN-OMIE-KNMI-950, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Bucsela et al.(2006)Bucsela, Celarier, Wenig, Gleason, Veefkind,
Boersma, and Brinksma</label><mixed-citation>Bucsela, E., Celarier, E., Wenig, M., Gleason, J., Veefkind, J., Boersma, K.,
and Brinksma, E.: Algorithm for NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> vertical column retrieval from the
ozone monitoring instrument, Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Trans.,
44, 1245–1258, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2005.863715" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2005.863715</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Bucsela et al.(2013)Bucsela, Krotkov, Celarier, Lamsal, Swartz,
Bhartia, Boersma, Veefkind, Gleason, and Pickering</label><mixed-citation>Bucsela, E. J., Krotkov, N. A., Celarier, E. A., Lamsal, L. N., Swartz, W.
H., Bhartia, P. K., Boersma, K. F., Veefkind, J. P., Gleason, J. F., and
Pickering, K. E.: A new stratospheric and tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> retrieval
algorithm for nadir-viewing satellite instruments: applications to OMI,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 2607–2626, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-2607-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Burrows et al.(1999)Burrows, Weber, Buchwitz, Rozanov,
Ladstätter-Weißenmayer, Richter, Debeek, Hoogen, Bramstedt,
Eichmann, Eisinger, and Perner</label><mixed-citation>Burrows, J. P., Weber, M., Buchwitz, M., Rozanov, V.,
Ladstätter-Weißenmayer, A., Richter, A., Debeek, R., Hoogen,
R., Bramstedt, K., Eichmann, K.-U., Eisinger, M., and Perner, D.:
The Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME): Mission Concept and First
Scientific Results, J. Atmos. Sci., 56, 151–175,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;0151:TGOMEG&gt;2.0.CO;2" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1175/1520-0469(1999)056&lt;0151:TGOMEG&gt;2.0.CO;2</ext-link>,   1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Celarier et al.(2008)Celarier, Brinksma, Gleason, Veefkind, Cede,
Herman, Ionov, Goutail, Pommereau, Lambert, van Roozendael, Pinardi,
Wittrock, Schönhardt, Richter, Ibrahim, Wagner, Bojkov, Mount, Spinei, Chen,
Pongetti, Sander, Bucsela, Wenig, Swart, Volten, Kroon, and
Levelt</label><mixed-citation>Celarier, E. A., Brinksma, E. J., Gleason, J. F., Veefkind, J. P., Cede, A.,
Herman, J. R., Ionov, D., Goutail, F., Pommereau, J.-P., Lambert, J.-C., van
Roozendael, M., Pinardi, G., Wittrock, F., Schönhardt, A., Richter, A.,
Ibrahim, O. W., Wagner, T., Bojkov, B., Mount, G., Spinei, E., Chen, C. M.,
Pongetti, T. J., Sander, S. P., Bucsela, E. J., Wenig, M. O., Swart, D.
P. J., Volten, H., Kroon, M., and Levelt, P. F.: Validation of Ozone
Monitoring Instrument nitrogen dioxide columns, J. Geophys.
Res.-Atmos., 113, D15S15, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008908" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008908</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Celarier et al.(2013)Celarier, Gleason, Bucsela, Boersma, Brinksma,
Veefkind, and Levelt</label><mixed-citation>Celarier, E. A., Gleason, J. F., Bucsela, E. J., Boersma, K. F., Brinksma, E.,
Veefkind, J. P., and Levelt, P.: OMNO2 README file, technical report, NASA
Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md,
available at: <uri>http://disc.sci.gsfc.nasa.gov/Aura/data-holdings/OMI/documents/v003/OMNO2_readme_v003.pdf</uri>
(last access: 1 October 2014), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Chameides et al.(1992)Chameides, Fehsenfeld, Rodgers, Cardelino,
Martinez, Parrish, Lonneman, Lawson, Rasmussen, Zimmerman, Greenberg,
Mlddleton, and Wang</label><mixed-citation>Chameides, W. L., Fehsenfeld, F., Rodgers, M. O., Cardelino, C., Martinez, J.,
Parrish, D., Lonneman, W., Lawson, D. R., Rasmussen, R. A., Zimmerman, P.,
Greenberg, J., Mlddleton, P., and Wang, T.: Ozone precursor relationships in
the ambient atmosphere, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 97,
6037–6055, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/91JD03014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/91JD03014</ext-link>, 1992.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Chance and Spurr(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Chance, K. V. and Spurr, R. J. D.: Ring effect studies: Rayleigh scattering,
including molecular parameters for rotational Raman scattering, and the
Fraunhofer spectrum, Appl. Opt., 36, 5224–5230,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.005224" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.36.005224</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Choi et al.(2014)Choi, Joiner, Choi, Duncan, and
Bucsela</label><mixed-citation>Choi, S., Joiner, J., Choi, Y., Duncan, B. N., Vasilkov, A., Krotkov, N., and
Bucsela, E.: First estimates of global free-tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> abundances
derived using a cloud-slicing technique applied to satellite observations
from the Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
10565–10588, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-10565-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-10565-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Crutzen(1979)</label><mixed-citation>Crutzen, P. J.: The Role of NO and NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Chemistry of the Troposphere and
Stratosphere, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 7, 443–472,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ea.07.050179.002303" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1146/annurev.ea.07.050179.002303</ext-link>, 1979.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>De Smedt et al.(2008)De Smedt, Müller, Stavrakou, van der A, Eskes,
and Van Roozendael</label><mixed-citation>De Smedt, I., Müller, J.-F., Stavrakou, T., van der A, R., Eskes, H., and Van
Roozendael, M.: Twelve years of global observations of formaldehyde in the
troposphere using GOME and SCIAMACHY sensors, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8,
4947–4963, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-4947-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-4947-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Dirksen et al.(2011)Dirksen, Boersma, Eskes, Ionov, Bucsela, Levelt,
and Kelder</label><mixed-citation>Dirksen, R. J., Boersma, K. F., Eskes, H. J., Ionov, D. V., Bucsela, E. J.,
Levelt, P. F., and Kelder, H. M.: Evaluation of stratospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrieved from the Ozone Monitoring Instrument: Intercomparison, diurnal
cycle, and trending, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmospheres, 116, D08305,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014943" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2010JD014943</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Dobber et al.(2005)Dobber, Dirksen, Voors, Mount, and
Levelt</label><mixed-citation>Dobber, M., Dirksen, R., Voors, R., Mount, G. H., and Levelt, P.: Ground-based
zenith sky abundances and in situ gas cross sections for ozone and nitrogen
dioxide with the Earth Observing System Aura Ozone Monitoring Instrument,
Appl. Opt., 44, 2846–2856, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.44.002846" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.44.002846</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Dobber et al.(2008a)Dobber, Kleipool, Dirksen, Levelt,
Jaross, Taylor, Kelly, Flynn, Leppelmeier, and Rozemeijer</label><mixed-citation>Dobber, M., Kleipool, Q., Dirksen, R., Levelt, P., Jaross, G., Taylor, S.,
Kelly, T., Flynn, L., Leppelmeier, G., and Rozemeijer, N.: Validation of
Ozone Monitoring Instrument level 1b data products, J. Geophys.
Res., 113, D15S06, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JD008665" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JD008665</ext-link>,
2008a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Dobber et al.(2008b)Dobber, Voors, Dirksen, Kleipool,
and Levelt</label><mixed-citation>Dobber, M., Voors, R., Dirksen, R., Kleipool, Q., and Levelt, P.: The
High-Resolution Solar Reference Spectrum between 250 and 550 nm and its
Application to Measurements with the Ozone Monitoring Instrument, Solar
Phys., 249, 281–291, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11207-008-9187-7" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s11207-008-9187-7</ext-link>,
2008b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Fayt et al.(2013)Fayt, De Smedt, Letocart, Merlaud, Pinardi, and
Van Roozendael</label><mixed-citation>Fayt, C., De Smedt, I., Letocart, V., Merlaud, A., Pinardi, G., and
Van Roozendael, M.: QDOAS Software user manual, BIRA-IASB,
<uri>http://uv-vis.aeronomie.be/software/QDOAS/index.php</uri> (last access: 1 October 2014), 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Hains et al.(2010)Hains, Boersma, Kroon, Dirksen, Cohen, Perring,
Bucsela, Volten, Swart, Richter, Wittrock, Schoenhardt, Wagner, Ibrahim, van
Roozendael, Pinardi, Gleason, Veefkind, and Levelt</label><mixed-citation>Hains, J. C., Boersma, K. F., Kroon, M., Dirksen, R. J., Cohen, R. C., Perring,
A. E., Bucsela, E., Volten, H., Swart, D. P. J., Richter, A., Wittrock, F.,
Schoenhardt, A., Wagner, T., Ibrahim, O. W., van Roozendael, M., Pinardi, G.,
Gleason, J. F., Veefkind, J. P., and Levelt, P.: Testing and improving OMI
DOMINO tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using observations from the DANDELIONS and
INTEX-B validation campaigns, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
115, D05301, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012399" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012399</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Hendrick et al.(2004)Hendrick, Barret, Van Roozendael, Boesch, Butz,
De Mazière, Goutail, Hermans, Lambert, Pfeilsticker, and
Pommereau</label><mixed-citation>Hendrick, F., Barret, B., Van Roozendael, M., Boesch, H., Butz, A., De
Mazière, M., Goutail, F., Hermans, C., Lambert, J.-C., Pfeilsticker, K., and
Pommereau, J.-P.: Retrieval of nitrogen dioxide stratospheric profiles from
ground-based zenith-sky UV-visible observations: validation of the technique
through correlative comparisons, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 4, 2091–2106,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-4-2091-2004" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-4-2091-2004</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Hewson et al.(2013)Hewson, Bösch, Barkley, and
De Smedt</label><mixed-citation>Hewson, W., Bösch, H., Barkley, M. P., and De Smedt, I.: Characterisation of
GOME-2 formaldehyde retrieval sensitivity, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 371–386,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-371-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-371-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Hilboll et al.(2013)Hilboll, Richter, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Hilboll, A., Richter, A., and Burrows, J. P.: Long-term changes of
tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> over megacities derived from multiple satellite instruments,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 4145–4169, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-4145-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-4145-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Huijnen et al.(2010)Huijnen, Eskes, Poupkou, Elbern, Boersma,
Foret, Sofiev, Valdebenito, Flemming, Stein, Gross, Robertson, D'Isidoro,
Kioutsioukis, Friese, Amstrup, Bergstrom, Strunk, Vira, Zyryanov, Maurizi,
Melas, Peuch, and Zerefos</label><mixed-citation>Huijnen, V., Eskes, H. J., Poupkou, A., Elbern, H., Boersma, K. F., Foret,
G., Sofiev, M., Valdebenito, A., Flemming, J., Stein, O., Gross, A.,
Robertson, L., D'Isidoro, M., Kioutsioukis, I., Friese, E., Amstrup, B.,
Bergstrom, R., Strunk, A., Vira, J., Zyryanov, D., Maurizi, A., Melas, D.,
Peuch, V.-H., and Zerefos, C.: Comparison of OMI NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> tropospheric columns
with an ensemble of global and European regional air quality models, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 10, 3273–3296, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-3273-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-3273-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Josipovic et al.(2010)Josipovic, Annegarn, Kneen, Pienaar, and
Piketh</label><mixed-citation>Josipovic, M., Annegarn, H., Kneen, M., Pienaar, J., and Piketh, S.:
Concentrations, distributions and critical level exceedance assessment of
SO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>, NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> and O<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> in South Africa, Environ. Monitor.
Assess., 171, 181–196, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-009-1270-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10661-009-1270-5</ext-link>,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Kleipool et al.(2008)Kleipool, Dobber, de Haan, and
Levelt</label><mixed-citation>Kleipool, Q. L., Dobber, M. R., de Haan, J. F., and Levelt, P. F.: Earth
surface reflectance climatology from 3 years of OMI data, J.
Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 113, D18308,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2008JD010290" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2008JD010290</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>Konovalov et al.(2010)Konovalov, Beekmann, Richter, Burrows, and
Hilboll</label><mixed-citation>Konovalov, I. B., Beekmann, M., Richter, A., Burrows, J. P., and Hilboll, A.:
Multi-annual changes of NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in megacity regions: nonlinear trend
analysis of satellite measurement based estimates, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10,
8481–8498, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-10-8481-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-10-8481-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Levelt et al.(2006)Levelt, Van den Oord, Dobber, Malkki, Visser,
de Vries, Stammes, Lundell, and Saari</label><mixed-citation>Levelt, P., Van den Oord, G. H. J., Dobber, M., Malkki, A., Visser, H.,
de Vries, J., Stammes, P., Lundell, J., and Saari, H.: The ozone monitoring
instrument, Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Trans., 44,
1093–1101, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.872333" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2006.872333</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Lourens et al.(2011)Lourens, Beukes, van Zyl, Fourie, Burger,
Pienaar, Read, and Jordaan</label><mixed-citation>Lourens, A., Beukes, J., van Zyl, P., Fourie, G., Burger, J., Pienaar, J.,
Read, C., and Jordaan, J.: Spatial and temporal assessment of gaseous
pollutants in the Highveld of South Africa, South Afr. J.
Sci., 107, 1–8, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v107i1/2.269" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4102/sajs.v107i1/2.269</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Merlaud et al.(2012)Merlaud, Van Roozendael, van Gent, Fayt, Maes,
Toledo-Fuentes, Ronveaux, and De Mazière</label><mixed-citation>Merlaud, A., Van Roozendael, M., van Gent, J., Fayt, C., Maes, J.,
Toledo-Fuentes, X., Ronveaux, O., and De Mazière, M.: DOAS measurements of
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from an ultralight aircraft during the Earth Challenge expedition, Atmos.
Meas. Tech., 5, 2057–2068, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2057-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-2057-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Monks and Beirle(2011)</label><mixed-citation>Monks, P. S. and Beirle, S.: Applications of Satellite Observations of
Tropospheric Composition, in: The Remote Sensing of Tropospheric Composition
from Space, edited by: Burrows, J. P., Borrell, P., and Platt, U., Physics of
Earth and Space Environments,  365–449, Springer Berlin Heidelberg,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14791-3_8" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/978-3-642-14791-3_8</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Peters et al.(2014)Peters, Wittrock, Richter, Alvarado, Rozanov, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Peters, E., Wittrock, F., Richter, A., Alvarado, L. M. A., Rozanov, V. V.,
and Burrows, J. P.: Liquid water absorption and scattering effects in DOAS
retrievals over oceans, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 4203–4221,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-4203-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-7-4203-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Platt and Stutz(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Platt, U. and Stutz, J.: Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS),
Principle and Applications, Springer Verlag, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Pope and Fry(1997)</label><mixed-citation>Pope, R. M. and Fry, E. S.: Absorption spectrum (380–700 nm) of pure water. II.
Integrating cavity measurements, Appl. Opt., 36, 8710–8723,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.36.008710" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.36.008710</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Popp et al.(2012)Popp, Brunner, Damm, Van Roozendael, Fayt, and
Buchmann</label><mixed-citation>Popp, C., Brunner, D., Damm, A., Van Roozendael, M., Fayt, C., and Buchmann,
B.: High-resolution NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> remote sensing from the Airborne Prism EXperiment
(APEX) imaging spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 2211–2225,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-2211-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-2211-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Preston et al.(1997)Preston, Jones, and Roscoe</label><mixed-citation>Preston, K. E., Jones, R. L., and Roscoe, H. K.: Retrieval of NO2 vertical
profiles from ground-based UV-visible measurements: Method and validation,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 19089–19097,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/97JD00603" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/97JD00603</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Richter and Burrows(2002)</label><mixed-citation>Richter, A. and Burrows, J. P.: Tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> from GOME
measurements, Adv. Space Res., 29, 1673–1683,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00100-X" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00100-X</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Richter et al.(2011)Richter, Begoin, Hilboll, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Richter, A., Begoin, M., Hilboll, A., and Burrows, J. P.: An improved NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
retrieval for the GOME-2 satellite instrument, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4,
1147–1159, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1147-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1147-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Rothman et al.(2005)Rothman, Jacquemart, Barbe, Benner, Birk, Brown,
Carleer, Jr., Chance, Coudert, Dana, Devi, Flaud, Gamache, Goldman, Hartmann,
Jucks, Maki, Mandin, Massie, Orphal, Perrin, Rinsland, Smith, Tennyson,
Tolchenov, Toth, Auwera, Varanasi, and Wagner</label><mixed-citation>Rothman, L., Jacquemart, D., Barbe, A., Benner, D. C., Birk, M., Brown, L.,
Carleer, M., Jr., C. C., Chance, K., Coudert, L., Dana, V., Devi, V., Flaud,
J.-M., Gamache, R., Goldman, A., Hartmann, J.-M., Jucks, K., Maki, A.,
Mandin, J.-Y., Massie, S., Orphal, J., Perrin, A., Rinsland, C., Smith, M.,
Tennyson, J., Tolchenov, R., Toth, R., Auwera, J. V., Varanasi, P., and
Wagner, G.: The HITRAN 2004 molecular spectroscopic database, J.
Quant. Spectr. Ra., 96, 139–204,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.10.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2004.10.008</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Rothman et al.(2009)Rothman, Gordon, Barbe, Benner, Bernath, Birk,
Boudon, Brown, Campargue, Champion, Chance, Coudert, Dana, Devi, Fally,
Flaud, Gamache, Goldman, Jacquemart, Kleiner, Lacome, Lafferty, Mandin,
Massie, Mikhailenko, Miller, Moazzen-Ahmadi, Naumenko, Nikitin, Orphal,
Perevalov, Perrin, Predoi-Cross, Rinsland, Rotger, Šimečková, Smith, Sung,
Tashkun, Tennyson, Toth, Vandaele, and Auwera</label><mixed-citation>Rothman, L., Gordon, I., Barbe, A., Benner, D., Bernath, P., Birk, M., Boudon,
V., Brown, L., Campargue, A., Champion, J.-P., Chance, K., Coudert, L., Dana,
V., Devi, V., Fally, S., Flaud, J.-M., Gamache, R., Goldman, A., Jacquemart,
D., Kleiner, I., Lacome, N., Lafferty, W., Mandin, J.-Y., Massie, S.,
Mikhailenko, S., Miller, C., Moazzen-Ahmadi, N., Naumenko, O., Nikitin, A.,
Orphal, J., Perevalov, V., Perrin, A., Predoi-Cross, A., Rinsland, C.,
Rotger, M., Šimečková, M., M., Smith, M., Sung, K., Tashkun, S., Tennyson, J.,
Toth, R., Vandaele, A., and Auwera, J. V.: The HITRAN 2008 molecular
spectroscopic database, J. Quant. Spectr. Ra., 110, 533–572, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jqsrt.2009.02.013</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Rozanov et al.(2005)Rozanov, Rozanov, Buchwitz, Kokhanovsky, and
Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Rozanov, A., Rozanov, V., Buchwitz, M., Kokhanovsky, A., and Burrows, J.:
SCIATRAN 2.0 – A new radiative transfer model for geophysical applications
in the 175–2400 nm spectral region, Adv. Space Res., 36,
1015–1019, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.asr.2005.03.012</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Schönhardt et al.(2008)Schönhardt, Richter, Wittrock, Kirk,
Oetjen, Roscoe, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Schönhardt, A., Richter, A., Wittrock, F., Kirk, H., Oetjen, H., Roscoe, H.
K., and Burrows, J. P.: Observations of iodine monoxide columns from
satellite, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 8, 637–653, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-8-637-2008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-8-637-2008</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Sierk et al.(2006)Sierk, Richter, Rozanov, Savigny, Schmoltner,
Buchwitz, Bovensmann, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Sierk, B., Richter, A., Rozanov, A., Savigny, C., Schmoltner, A., Buchwitz, M.,
Bovensmann, H., and Burrows, J.: Retrieval And Monitoring of Atmospheric
Trace Gas Concentrations in Nadir and Limb Geometry Using the Space-Borne
Sciamachy Instrument, Environ. Monitor. Assess., 120, 65–77,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-9049-9" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10661-005-9049-9</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Valin et al.(2011)Valin, Russell, Bucsela, Veefkind, and
Cohen</label><mixed-citation>Valin, L. C., Russell, A. R., Bucsela, E. J., Veefkind, J. P., and Cohen, R.
C.: Observation of slant column NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> using the super-zoom mode of AURA-OMI,
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1929–1935, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1929-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1929-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Valks et al.(2011)Valks, Pinardi, Richter, Lambert, Hao, Loyola,
Van Roozendael, and Emmadi</label><mixed-citation>Valks, P., Pinardi, G., Richter, A., Lambert, J.-C., Hao, N., Loyola, D., Van
Roozendael, M., and Emmadi, S.: Operational total and tropospheric NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> column
retrieval for GOME-2, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 1491–1514,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1491-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-1491-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Vandaele et al.(1998)Vandaele, Hermans, Simon, Carleer, Colin, Fally,
Mérienne, Jenouvrier, and Coquart</label><mixed-citation>Vandaele, A., Hermans, C., Simon, P., Carleer, M., Colin, R., Fally, S.,
Mérienne, M., Jenouvrier, A., and Coquart, B.: Measurements of the NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
absorption cross-section from 42 000 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 10 000 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
(238–1000 nm) at 220 K and 294 K, J. Quant. Spectrosc.
Ra., 59, 171–184,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(97)00168-4" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-4073(97)00168-4</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Van den Oord et al.(2006)Van den Oord, Rozemeijer, Schenkelaars,
Levelt, Dobber, Voors, Claas, de Vries, ter Linden, De Haan, and Van de
Berg</label><mixed-citation>Van den Oord, G. H. J., Rozemeijer, N., Schenkelaars, V., Levelt, P., Dobber,
M., Voors, R., Claas, J., de Vries, J., ter Linden, M., De Haan, C., and
Van de Berg, T.: OMI level 0 to 1b processing and operational aspects,
Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Trans., 44, 1380–1397,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2006.872935" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1109/TGRS.2006.872935</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>van Geffen et al.(2014)van Geffen, Boersma, Van Roozendael, Hendrick,
Mahieu, De Smedt, Sneep, and Veefkind</label><mixed-citation>van Geffen, J. H. G. M., Boersma, K. F., Van Roozendael, M., Hendrick, F.,
Mahieu, E., De Smedt, I., Sneep, M., and Veefkind, J. P.: Improved spectral
fitting of nitrogen dioxide from OMI in the 405–465 nm window, Atmos. Meas.
Tech. Discuss., 7, 10619–10671, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amtd-7-10619-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amtd-7-10619-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Veefkind(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Veefkind, J. P.: CAMELOT Executive Summary, RP-CAM-KNMI-051,
<uri>http://www.knmi.nl/cms/mmbase/attachments/91603/tsr_67_rpcamknmi050_camelot_final_report_i1.pdf</uri>
(last access: 1 October 2014), 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Veihelmann and Kleipool(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Veihelmann, B. and Kleipool, Q.: Reducing Along-Track Stripes in OMI-Level 2
Products, KNMI Technical Document, TN-OMIE-KNMI-785, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Venter et al.(2012)Venter, Vakkari, Beukes, van Zyl, Laakso, Mabaso,
Tiitta, Josipovic, Kulmala, Pienaar, and Laakso</label><mixed-citation>Venter, A. D., Vakkari, V., Beukes, J. P., van Zyl, P. G., Laakso, H., Mabaso,
D., Tiitta, P., Josipovic, M., Kulmala, M., Pienaar, J. J., and Laakso, L.:
An air quality assessment in the industrialised western Bushveld Igneous
Complex, South Africa, South Afr. J. Sci., 108, 1–10,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajs.v108i9/10.1059" ext-link-type="DOI">10.4102/sajs.v108i9/10.1059</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Vinken et al.(2014)Vinken, Boersma, van Donkelaar, and
Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Vinken, G. C. M., Boersma, K. F., van Donkelaar, A., and Zhang, L.:
Constraints on ship NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> emissions in Europe using GEOS-Chem and OMI satellite
NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> observations, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 1353–1369,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1353-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1353-2014</ext-link>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Vlemmix et al.(2011)Vlemmix, Piters, Berkhout, Gast, Wang, and
Levelt</label><mixed-citation>Vlemmix, T., Piters, A. J. M., Berkhout, A. J. C., Gast, L. F. L., Wang, P.,
and Levelt, P. F.: Ability of the MAX-DOAS method to derive profile
information for NO<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>: can the boundary layer and free troposphere be
separated?, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 4, 2659–2684, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2659-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-4-2659-2011</ext-link>,
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Voors et al.(2006)Voors, Dobber, Dirksen, and Levelt</label><mixed-citation>Voors, R., Dobber, M., Dirksen, R., and Levelt, P.: Method of calibration to
correct for cloud-induced wavelength shifts in the Aura satellite's Ozone
Monitoring Instrument, Appl. Opt., 45, 3652–3658,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/AO.45.003652" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1364/AO.45.003652</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Vountas et al.(1998)Vountas, Rozanov, and Burrows</label><mixed-citation>Vountas, M., Rozanov, V., and Burrows, J.: Ring effect: Impact of rotational
Raman scattering on radiative transfer in Earth’s atmosphere, J.
Quant. Spectrosc. Ra., 60, 943–961,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-4073(97)00186-6" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0022-4073(97)00186-6</ext-link>, 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>WHO(2003)</label><mixed-citation>
WHO: World Health Organization (WHO): Health aspects of air pollution with
particulate matter, ozone and nitrogen dioxide. Report on a WHO Working
Group, Report on a WHO Working Group, Regional Office for Europe, Bonn,
Germany, 13–15 January 2003, EUR/03/5042688, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx60"><label>Ziemke et al.(2001)Ziemke, Chandra, and Bhartia</label><mixed-citation>Ziemke, J. R., Chandra, S., and Bhartia, P. K.: “Cloud slicing”: A new
technique to derive upper tropospheric ozone from satellite measurements,
J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 106, 9853–9867,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900768" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2000JD900768</ext-link>, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
