Articles | Volume 8, issue 5
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1951–1963, 2015

Special issue: Changes in the vertical distribution of ozone – the SI2N report...

Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1951–1963, 2015

Research article 06 May 2015

Research article | 06 May 2015

Using self-organising maps to explore ozone profile validation results – SCIAMACHY limb compared to ground-based lidar observations

J. A. E. van Gijsel1, R. Zurita-Milla2, P. Stammes1, S. Godin-Beekmann3, T. Leblanc4, M. Marchand3, I. S. McDermid4, K. Stebel5, W. Steinbrecht6, and D. P. J. Swart7 J. A. E. van Gijsel et al.
  • 1Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI), De Bilt, the Netherlands
  • 2University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
  • 4NASA/JPL/California Institute of Technology, Wrightwood, CA, USA
  • 5Norwegian Institute for Air Research (NILU), Oslo, Norway
  • 6German Weather Service (DWD), Hohenpeißenberg, Germany
  • 7National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, the Netherlands

Abstract. Traditional validation of atmospheric profiles is based on the intercomparison of two or more data sets in predefined ranges or classes of a given observational characteristic such as latitude or solar zenith angle. In this study we trained a self-organising map (SOM) with a full time series of relative difference profiles of SCIAMACHY limb v5.02 and lidar ozone profiles from seven observation sites. Each individual observation characteristic was then mapped to the obtained SOM to investigate to which degree variation in this characteristic is explanatory for the variation seen in the SOM map. For the studied data sets, altitude-dependent relations for the global data set were found between the difference profiles and studied variables. From the lowest altitude studied (18 km) ascending, the most influencing factors were found to be longitude, followed by solar zenith angle and latitude, sensor age and again solar zenith angle together with the day of the year at the highest altitudes studied here (up to 45 km). After accounting for both latitude and longitude, residual partial correlations with a reduced magnitude are seen for various factors. However, (partial) correlations cannot point out which (combination) of the factors drives the observed differences between the ground-based and satellite ozone profiles as most of the factors are inter-related. Clustering into three classes showed that there are also some local dependencies, with for instance one cluster having a much stronger correlation with the sensor age (days since launch) between 36 and 42 km. The proposed SOM-based approach provides a powerful tool for the exploration of differences between data sets without being limited to a priori defined data subsets.