<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-8-2183-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>Estimating reflectivity values from wind turbines for analyzing <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>the potential impact on weather radar services</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Reflectivity values from wind turbines for weather radar services}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{I.~Angulo et~al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Angulo</surname><given-names>I.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Grande</surname><given-names>O.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Jenn</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Guerra</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>de la Vega</surname><given-names>D.</given-names></name>
          <email>david.delavega@ehu.es</email>
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4811-4173</ext-link></contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Bilbao,
Spain</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, USA</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">D. de la Vega (david.delavega@ehu.es)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>27</day><month>May</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>5</issue>
      <fpage>2183</fpage><lpage>2193</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>16</day><month>January</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>3</day><month>February</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>28</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>30</day><month>April</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2183/2015/amt-8-2183-2015.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2183/2015/amt-8-2183-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2183/2015/amt-8-2183-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2183/2015/amt-8-2183-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) has repeatedly expressed concern
over the increasing number of impact cases of wind turbine farms on weather
radars. Current signal processing techniques to mitigate wind turbine
clutter (WTC) are scarce, so the most practical approach to this issue is
the assessment of the potential interference from a wind farm before it is
installed. To do so, and in order to obtain a WTC reflectivity model, it is
crucial to estimate the radar cross section (RCS) of the wind turbines to be
built, which represents the power percentage of the radar signal that is
backscattered to the radar receiver.</p>
    <p>For the proposed model, a representative scenario has been chosen in which
both the weather radar and the wind farm are placed on clear areas; i.e.,
wind turbines are supposed to be illuminated only by the lowest elevation
angles of the radar beam.</p>
    <p>This paper first characterizes the RCS of wind turbines in the weather radar
frequency bands by means of computer simulations based on the physical optics theory and then proposes a simplified model to estimate wind turbine
RCS values. This model is of great help in the evaluation of the potential
impact of a certain wind farm on the weather radar operation.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>The potential impact of wind turbines on weather radar performance has been
extensively studied in the last few years, with several evidences of wind
turbine clutter observations in meteorological radar applications (Isom et
al., 2008; Gallardo-Hernando et al., 2011; Norin and Haase, 2012; Vogt
et al., 2011; WMO, 2005, 2010). The main objective of these studies is to
characterize and try to mitigate the so-called wind turbine clutter (WTC),
mainly by means of digital signal processing such as clutter-filtering
techniques.</p>
      <p>Unfortunately, these solutions are not widely available yet. Meanwhile, the
most practical approach to this issue is the prediction of the potential
impact on a certain weather radar service before installing a wind farm. In
most cases, the identification of a potential impact allows the planning of
alternative solutions in order to guarantee the coexistence of wind energy
and meteorological radar services.</p>
      <p>Wind turbine clutter reflectivity depends on many factors including wind
turbine dimensions, wind direction and velocity, angle of incidence and
radar frequency (Gallardo-Hernando et al., 2011; Norin and Haase, 2012; Norin, 2015). In order to measure how efficiently radar pulses are
backscattered by wind turbines, existing models of wind turbine clutter and
weather radar recommendations rely on the turbines' radar cross section (RCS)
(Tristant, 2006; ITU-R, 2009; Norin and Haase, 2012). The RCS is the
projected area required to intercept and isotropically radiate the same
power as the target scatters toward the receiver, and thus it is normally
expressed in decibels with respect to a square meter (dBsm) (Skolnik, 2008; Rinehart, 1997).</p>
      <p>In this context, the goal of this paper is to propose simplified formulae
for the estimation of reflectivity values from wind turbines at frequencies
used by weather radars. These formulae aim at being easily implementable in
software tools for estimating the potential impact of wind farms on weather
radars.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>For this purpose, first RCS patterns for different working conditions of the
wind turbines are obtained by means of physical optics (PO) simulations and
subsequently analyzed. Additionally, separate RCS patterns of the parts of
the turbine are also calculated in order to compare the relative
contribution of each component. Based on these simulations, a simple
algorithm to evaluate the potential impact of a wind farm on a nearby
weather radar is proposed.</p>
      <p>It should be mentioned that similar studies for characterizing RCS of wind
turbines have been carried out for evaluating the impact on different
services such as maritime radars (Grande et al., 2014) or television (Angulo
et al., 2011). However, as scattering is very dependent on working frequency
and illumination conditions, results cannot be extrapolated. Moreover,
preliminary results of the analysis presented in this paper are included in
a previous communication from the authors (Grande et al., 2015). Those
results correspond to a single wind turbine model and a single working
frequency. In the present paper, results are extended to three wind turbine
models of different size and the three frequency bands assigned to weather
radar services; besides, based on the obtained results, a novel formulation
for estimating the WTC reflectivity values for weather radar applications is
proposed. This work aims at making studies for the prediction of potential
impacts between weather radar services and wind farm deployments easier to
conduct.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Impact of wind farms on weather radars</title>
      <p>In weather radars, wind turbines may lead to misidentification of
precipitation features and to erroneous characterization of meteorological
phenomena. These errors may be due to clutter caused by signal echoes from
the wind turbines; signal blockage, as the physical size of the wind turbine
creates a shadow zone behind them of diminished detection capacity; and
interference to the Doppler mode of the radar, on account of frequency
shifted echoes from the rotating blades (Angulo et al., 2014; Norin and
Haase, 2012; Belmonte and Fabregas, 2010).</p>
      <p>The clutter from wind turbines is due to radar echoes coming from a turbine
and reaching the radar with a power level higher than the radar detection
threshold, preventing the radar from correctly detecting the precipitation level in
the affected area. Although most of current radars include signal processing
techniques that remove static scattering from turbine masts, the scattered
energy will increase the effective noise floor of the radar receiver, which
degrades the detection capacity and therefore the data quality obtained by
the radar. Detection of precipitation requires a signal that exceeds the
noise floor by at least the signal-to-noise ratio. Energy scattered from
wind turbines results in the occurrence of increased noise that might cause
desired targets to be undetected. Although the signal processing techniques
may mitigate the display of false targets generated by the stationary
clutter from a wind farm, it will not eliminate effects that raise the noise
floor of the radar (Tristant, 2006; Lemmon et al., 2008).</p>
      <p>Regarding the Doppler mode of the radar, as it is aimed at detecting moving
targets, only the scattering from the blades should be considered in order to determine the influence of a wind turbine on this
operation mode.</p>
      <p>Therefore, both the clutter phenomenon and the interference to the Doppler
mode depend on the scattering characteristics of wind turbines. By contrast,
as the blocking of the radar beam is due to the physical obstruction of the
radar beam by the wind turbine, the methodology to estimate a potential
impact of a wind farm due to signal blockage is not related to the RCS of
wind turbines but to the percentage of the beam section blocked by the wind
turbine structure (Tristant, 2006; Belmonte and Fabregas, 2010).
Consequently, this paper does not focus on addressing the signal blockage
estimates.</p>
      <p>As the RCS of a wind turbine depends both on fixed parameters, such as the
dimensions and materials of each component of the wind turbine, and on
variable parameters, such as position of the rotating blades and rotor
orientation with respect to the radar, RCS values may vary drastically
according to wind turbine working regimes and illumination conditions
(Angulo et al., 2011; Grande et al., 2014).</p>
      <p>The calculation of RCS values by conventional prediction methods, such as
the method of moments (MoM) or the finite difference time domain (FDTD)
method, provides accurate results but relies upon extremely detailed
representations of the turbine, which requires significant modeling and
complex calculations with great computational effort. Consequently, these
RCS prediction methods cannot be easily implemented in computer simulation
tools for analyzing the potential impact of a specific wind farm.</p>
      <p>On the contrary, and due to the absence of simplified formulation, some
published guidelines for analyzing the impact of wind turbines on radar
services use typical fixed RCS values, disregarding the particular features
of each installation (ITU-R, 2009; Tristant, 2006). This is a very simple
way to deal with wind turbine scattering, but its main disadvantage is that
the proposed RCS values do not take into account the characteristics of the
real scenario under analysis: wind turbine dimensions, angle of incidence
and working frequency, amongst others. As a result, these proposed typical
constant RCS values may lead to important estimation errors.</p>
      <p>In this paper, a simplified formulation for determining accurate WTC
reflectivity values is proposed. The presented method requires neither
complex calculations nor the use of a simulation tool, whereas it provides
RCS values adapted to the particular features of the case under analysis:
dimensions of the wind turbine models, illumination conditions and working
frequency.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Spherical coordinate system used in the RCS calculations. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
represents radar location.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=156.490157pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2183/2015/amt-8-2183-2015-f01.pdf"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methodology</title>
      <p>The main objective of this paper is to develop an estimation model of wind
turbine reflectivity values for weather radars that consists in a simplified
formulation, is easy to apply in the development of the impact studies, and
does not require a complex software tool or a high amount of resources.</p>
      <p>The estimation model should fulfill the following conditions.
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Despite being a simplified formulation, the model should provide accurate radar cross-section values, which are directly translated into reflectivity values.</p></list-item><list-item><p>The model should consider the variability of the RCS values generated by the rotor
orientation and the blades rotation, because the RCS values are very dependent on the specific
relative positions of the different components of the turbine with respect to the radar.</p></list-item><list-item><p>The model should be applicable to turbine models of different size, different working
frequencies and different radar illumination conditions.</p></list-item></list></p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Simulation conditions</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS1">
  <title>Simulation tool and wind turbine models</title>
      <p>The present study is based on the accurate assessment of RCS values of wind
turbines by applying the PO theory. The PO theory is a
high-frequency approximation method that provides accurate results for
electrically large objects (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and for observation points
near the specular direction. More precisely, the software tool POfacets
(Jenn, 2005) has been used to calculate RCS patterns of three different wind
turbine models. To do so, detailed facet-based representations of these
wind turbine models have been prepared for the application of numerical
solutions of the PO method for RCS estimations. The software tool does not
include the effect of multiple reflections, diffraction or surface waves.
More in depth descriptions of the physical optics method and the simulation
tool can be found in Jenn (2005), Grande et al. (2014, 2015).</p>
      <p>It should be noted that this tool provides accurate RCS values for a
specific rotor orientation and blade position but at the expense of having
to design rigorous representations of the wind turbine models. Hence,
estimations of RCS values for each specific position of the blades must be
conducted and therefore hundreds of RCS simulations are required in order
to obtain a detailed characterization of the RCS patterns for different
working conditions. The analysis of this huge set of RCS values is the basis
of the proposed simplified model to be integrated in the prediction tools
for potential interference from a wind farm. In fact, the main motivation of
the proposed simplified model is precisely avoiding the need of such a
simulation effort in future cases under study.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Wind turbine models selected for the simulations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="4">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Model 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Model 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Model 3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mast height</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">78 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">100 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">119 m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mast upper radius</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.15 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1.80 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">2.40 m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Mast lower radius</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">1.75 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.70 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.60 m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rotor diameter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">87 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">90 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">112 m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Blade length</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">42.50 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">44.00 m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">54.65 m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Rated power</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">2.0 MW</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">2.0 MW</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3.3 MW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>As mentioned in Sect. 1, three commercial wind turbine models were chosen
for the analysis, which constitutes a representative selection of the wind
turbines that are usually installed. Typical horizontal-axis wind turbines
are composed of a mast or supporting tower, commonly made from tubular
steel; a nacelle that holds all the turbine machinery and rotates to follow
the wind direction; and a rotor with three blades of complex aerodynamic
surface, being the rotor shaft tilted above the horizontal to enable greater
clearance between the blades and the mast. Characteristics of the selected
models are summarized in Table 1. It should be noted that upper and lower
radii of the masts are different because the geometry of the supporting
tower of the wind turbines is not a perfect right circular cylinder but a
tapered cylinder.</p>
      <p>Figure 1 shows the reference coordinate system for the analysis. The wind
turbine rotor is supposed to be oriented towards the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> refers to
the radar position. As shown in the figure, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the angle from the
zenith that defines the radar position in the vertical plane, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> specifies
the horizontal position of the radar with respect to the rotor orientation,
i.e., with respect to the rotor shaft axis.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1.SSS2">
  <title>Simulation precision</title>
      <p>The analysis is based on the assessment of backscattering patterns for a set
of elevation angles (variation in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as detailed in Sect. 3.2,
and different conditions of rotor orientation with respect to the radar
(variation in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> from 0 to 185<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) and blades position
(rotating blades).</p>
      <p>Calculations with particularly high resolution have been conducted for RCS
vertical patterns (resolution of 0.001<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, as great
variability is expected in this plane. The effect of the rotating blades has
been analyzed by simulations with a difference of 15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  in the
rotation angle of the blades. In addition, these estimated RCS values have
been obtained for different positions of the rotor with respect to the
incident signal in the horizontal plane (aspect angles separated
1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><caption><p>Vertical sections of RCS patterns (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for wind turbine models 1 to 3 at frequency 2.80 GHz. Rotor position is
indicated in the lowest right corner.</p></caption>
            <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2183/2015/amt-8-2183-2015-f02.pdf"/>

          </fig>

      <p>In order to evaluate the relative significance of the signal backscattered
by the different parts of the wind turbine, separated RCS patterns of the
mast, nacelle and single blades have been obtained and compared with the RCS
pattern of the whole wind turbine, as described in Sect. 4 and shown in
Figs. 2 to 7.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Considerations of the analysis</title>
      <p>The case under analysis is a wind farm located within the detection volume
of a weather radar. When this situation occurs, some specific conditions are
applicable. The thorough outline of these conditions allows the clear
delimitation of the scenario under analysis:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p><italic>Monostatic backscattering</italic>. Weather radars only receive monostatic
backscattered signals, so monostatic RCS values are analyzed in this paper.</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>Frequency bands</italic>. The analysis is conducted for the frequency bands
assigned to weather radar operation: 2700–2900 MHz in S band, 5250–5725 MHz
(mainly 5600–5650 MHz) in C band and 9300–9500 GHz in X band (ITU-R, 2008). In
weather radars, S band is well suited for detecting heavy rain at very long ranges,
up to 300 km; C band represents a good compromise between range and reflectivity and cost,
and they can provide rain detection up to 200 km; and X band weather radars
are used only for short range weather observations up to a range of 50 km (ITU-R and WMO, 2008).</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>Materials</italic>. The metallic mast can be considered as perfect electric
conductor. Although modern blades are made of composite materials which are
difficult to characterize, blades in the simulations are supposed to be metallic
in order to consider the worst-case assumption for this component of the turbine.</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>Relative location of weather radar and wind turbine, and corresponding elevation angles.</italic> As a proof of concept for the proposed model, a representative scenario
has been chosen. This scenario considers that weather radars are usually located
in open places that allow unobstructed scanning of a wide area, up to 300 km. Wind
farms are also placed on clear areas, where potential wind energy is higher. As weather
radar beams use quite directive lobes (usually 1<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> beam width), wind turbines are
illuminated only when radar transmission is pointing to the wind farm. Therefore, the
scenario that must be analyzed is the potential incidence of the lowest elevation angles
of the radar beam on the wind turbines. Lowest elevation angles of the scanning routine
are usually transmitted just above horizon for radar located in flat areas or slightly
below the horizon for radars located on top of the hills. Accordingly, a reasonable
range of the lowest elevation angles where the radar beam can illuminate a wind turbine
is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2 to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to the horizon (WMO, 2014) (Grande et al., 2015).
The previous assumption leads to incidence angles on the wind turbine nearly perpendicular
to the vertical axis of the mast, in particular within the range <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mn>88</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mn>94</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item><list-item><p><italic>Reflectivity model</italic>. The calculation of the reflectivity value from
a wind turbine is based on considering line of sight (LoS) propagation. In real
scenarios, interactions from the ground and terrain should be taken into account, e.g.,
potential shadowing effects (Norin and Haase, 2012). Moreover, it is assumed that the
wind turbine is being illuminated by the main lobe of the radiation pattern of the radar.</p></list-item></list></p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Simulation results and analysis</title>
      <p>As mentioned in Sect. 3.2, simulations have been carried out for three
frequencies representative of the different weather radar frequency bands
(2.80, 5.65 and 9.40 GHz) and three wind turbine models based on
actual commercial turbines.</p>
      <p>As an example, Figs. 2 to 4 show the vertical variation of the RCS
patterns of wind turbine models 1 to 3 for a specific rotor orientation for
the three frequencies under analysis. It can be observed that the RCS
patterns show great variability and a very directive main lobe is
noticeable in all cases.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Vertical sections of RCS patterns (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for wind turbine models 1 to 3 at frequency 5.65 GHz. Rotor position is
indicated in the lowest right corner.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2183/2015/amt-8-2183-2015-f03.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>This maximum value of the RCS corresponds to an illumination direction of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>89.56</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to the zenith in case of WT
model 1, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>89.48</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in case of WT model 2, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>89.42</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for WT model 3. Taking into account the slant surface
of the masts, these directions correspond to the direction normal to the
mast surface of each wind turbine model. As expected, the maximum RCS value
is larger for the tallest wind turbine. Moreover, when comparing Fig. 2 to
Fig. 4, it is clearly observed that the main lobe is both higher and
narrower as the frequency increases. This maximum value of the RCS in the
vertical pattern is maintained for all the azimuth values due to the
symmetry of the mast in the horizontal plane.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4"><caption><p>Vertical sections of RCS patterns (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for wind turbine models 1 to 3 at frequency 9.40 GHz. Rotor position is
indicated in the lowest right corner.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2183/2015/amt-8-2183-2015-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>In order to identify the contribution of the blades and nacelle, for the
highest frequency and a specific rotor orientation, the RCS of WT model 3 is
depicted in Fig. 5 for different positions of the blades (every
30<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in the rotation movement). The RCS pattern of the isolated
mast is also depicted in Fig. 5. As observed in the figure, whereas the
contribution from the blades varies in amplitude and position with the
rotation movement, the maximum RCS of the wind turbine is constant and it is
clearly generated by the mast. Figure 5 also shows that the main contribution
from the rotor is due to a blade being in vertical position (see curves
related to P000 and P060 in Fig. 5).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Vertical sections of RCS patterns (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for
wind turbine model 3 at frequency 9.40 GHz. Legend entries starting with
PXXX indicate the position of the upper blade (being P000 vertical right
position and P090 horizontal position).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2183/2015/amt-8-2183-2015-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>As it can be expected, the contribution from the blades is strongly
dependent on the rotor orientation with respect to the incident radar
signal, whereas the contribution from the mast remains invariable in the
horizontal plane due to its symmetry with respect to the vertical axis of
the mast. This statement is confirmed by Fig. 6, in which the vertical RCS
patterns of WT model 2 are compared for different illumination directions in
the horizontal plane (different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> values).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Vertical sections of RCS patterns (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>80</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>176</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>177</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:mn>184</mml:mn><mml:mo>,</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn>185</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for
wind turbine model 2 at frequency 5.65 GHz and rotor position P000.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2183/2015/amt-8-2183-2015-f06.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>A first important conclusion obtained from the extensive set of simulations
carried out is that the main scatterer of the wind turbine for the different
frequency bands used for weather radar is the supporting mast. Moreover, the
main feature of the scattering pattern of the mast is a main lobe normal to
the slant surface, extremely directive in the vertical plane and
omnidirectional in the horizontal plane. The scattering from the mast can be
approximated by the RCS of a right circular cylinder, which will be the
basis of the proposed model for calculating the wind turbine RCS values, as
later described in Sect. 5.1.</p>
      <p>The blades, by contrast, provide variable levels of signal scattering
depending on the rotor orientation and blade positions. Despite the
variability of the scattering from the blades, their contribution to the
total RCS of the wind turbine is always significantly lower than the
amplitude of the main lobe due to the mast. Therefore, in order to provide a
worst-case assumption with respect to the signal scattered by the blades,
the proposed scattering model will provide an upper limit to the RCS values
from the blades, as will be shown in Sect. 5.2.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Proposed model</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS1">
  <title>Scattering from the mast</title>
      <p>As demonstrated in the previous section, the mast is the main scatterer of
the wind turbine due to its large dimensions, as it generates the maximum
value of the RCS pattern.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Geometry for the RCS calculation of the mast.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=156.490157pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2183/2015/amt-8-2183-2015-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The geometry of the mast can be approximated by a right cylinder because for commercial
wind turbine models the half cone angle <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that defines the slant surface of the mast is small (see Fig. 7):
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>tan⁡</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          For example, for the three models under analysis, the half cone angle is
smaller than 0.6<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Therefore, a perfectly conducting right
cylinder tilted at an angle <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is used to assess the backscattered
RCS of the mast based on the PO theory.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8"><caption><p>RCS pattern obtained by simulation vs. RCS values obtained by the
proposed simplified model for the mast of wind turbine model 1 and frequency
5.65 GHz.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2183/2015/amt-8-2183-2015-f08.pdf"/>

        </fig>

      <p>In Siegel et al. (1955) the RCS pattern of an elliptic cylinder is obtained
as a function of its dimensions and the angular positions of the transmitter
and receiver in both the vertical and the horizontal planes. The expression
proposed in (Siegel et al., 1995) was adapted to a circular cylinder and
simplified to avoid indeterminate forms as described in Appendix A of
Angulo et al. (2013). As for radar applications only backscattering is of
interest, the formulae in Angulo et al. (2013) for a circular cylinder can
be further simplified assuming that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and expressed as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>cylinder</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wavelength of the radar transmission, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the aspect angle as defined in Fig. 7, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the cylinder radius and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
cylinder height.</p>
      <p>In order to adapt the previous expression to the actual geometry of the
mast, two approximations are considered.
<list list-type="order"><list-item><p>In (Skolnik, 2008), it is stated that Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) may be used to estimate
the RCS of a truncated right circular cone if the radius <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is replaced by the
mean radius of the cone and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is replaced by the length of the slanted
surface.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Taking into account the results of the previous section, it is clear
that the backscattering pattern of the mast is extremely directive in the
direction perpendicular to the slanted surface of the mast. Therefore, Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) should be slightly modified in order to account for the half cone angle
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p></list-item></list>
<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
According to the above-mentioned considerations, the proposed model to
calculate the RCS of the wind turbine mast is given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mast</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wavelength of the radar transmission, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is
the aspect angle as defined in Fig. 7, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the half cone angle as
given by Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mean radius of the truncated cone
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>L</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the length of the slanted surface of the mast
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E5" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          In order to prove the validity of the proposed model, the obtained results
are compared to the simulation values presented in the previous section. For
all the analyzed cases, i.e., for the three wind turbine models and three
working frequencies under consideration, the mean error between the
simulation values and the values obtained according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) is lower than
0.85 dB. An example to demonstrate that simulation and modeling values are
very well aligned is shown in Fig. 8.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS2">
  <title>Scattering from the blades</title>
      <p>From the results of simulations of the RCS patterns, it is clearly shown
that the scattering from the blades is significantly lower than the
scattering from the mast. Moreover, it should be considered that, as shown
in Figs. 5 and 6, the scattering from the blades is strongly dependent
on the position of the rotor with respect to the radar. In order to analyze
a potential impact situation, therefore, a detailed representation of the
blades and all the possible movements of the wind turbine should be needed.
However, obtaining detailed representations of actual wind turbine blades is
quite difficult, as the blade design is property of the wind turbine
manufacturer, and the analysis of hundreds of different combinations of
rotor orientation and blades position requires a huge amount of time and
effort.</p>
      <p>Therefore, instead of obtaining a complete scattering model for the blades,
a simpler approach to this issue is characterizing the maximum value of the
scattering from the blades. To do so, the maximum RCS value due to the
blades for each wind turbine model will be obtained. In fact, as commented
before and shown in Fig. 5, the maximum RCS due to the blades corresponds to
the contribution of a single blade in vertical position.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Maximum RCS values from the mast and blades for the wind turbine models selected for the
simulations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="12">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4">WT model 1 </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col6" nameend="col8">WT model 2 </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col10" nameend="col12">WT model 3 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Mast</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Blade</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Difference</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mast</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Blade</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Difference</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Mast</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Blade</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Difference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(dBsm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(dBsm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(dB)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(dBsm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(dBsm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(dB)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(dBsm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">(dBsm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">(dB)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2.80 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GHz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">55.97</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">45.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">61.38</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">46.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14.57</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">64.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">48.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">15.19</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5.65 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GHz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">59.95</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">49.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.53</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">64.32</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">49.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14.58</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">67.03</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">52.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">14.93</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">GHz</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">62.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">51.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">10.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">66.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">52.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">14.45</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">69.14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">54.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">14.92</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>From the set of simulations carried out in this analysis, the maximum RCS
values from the mast and blades are shown in Table 2. As shown in Sect. 4
when comparing Figs. 2, 3 and 4, these maximum RCS values are
frequency dependent. However, if the relation between the maximum RCS from
the mast and the maximum RCS from the blades is obtained, it can be observed
that this relation remains almost constant for the different frequency
bands.</p>
      <p>Although their complex geometry prevents us from obtaining simple RCS models to
characterize the scattering from the blades, the relation between the
maximum RCS from the mast and the maximum RCS from the blades must be
proportional to their corresponding dimensions, as the RCS of an object
generally depends upon its physical size when its orientation relative to
the LoS to the radar is such that a significant area of the object is
illuminated (Knott, 2006; Skolnik, 2008).</p>
      <p>As a very simple approach, the blade can be represented by a triangle.
However, in real blade designs, the profile of the blade rotates from hub
toward to the blade tip in order to maintain the angle of attack (Gipe,
2004). Considering this twist angle of the blades, the area of the triangle
will be never completely facing the radar. In Spera and Sengupta (1994) it
is empirically obtained that the signal scattering efficiency of a blade
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is dependent on the blade twist according to
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E6" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">η</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>exp</mml:mtext><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>2.30</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">β</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the total blade twist from root to tip (rad).
This total twist depends on the blade length and design. In commercial wind
turbines, total blade twist is typically about 20<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. For example, a
Vestas V27 model has a total blade twist of 13<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Gipe, 2004), which
provides scattering efficiency values around 0.45–0.60.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3"><caption><p>Relation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> between the relative scattering area of the mast
and blades for the wind turbine models selected for the simulations.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">WT model 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">WT model 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">WT model 3</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9.90 dB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">12.65 dB</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">13.38 dB</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>As a rough approach, we will consider a scattering efficiency of 50 % for
the wind turbine blade. As later shown in Tables 2 and 3, this
assumption leads to a good approximation of the signal scattered by the
blades. Therefore, the relative scattering area from the blades
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>blades</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is calculated as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E7" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>blades</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.5</mml:mn><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>w</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the maximum blade width and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the blade length.</p>
      <p>The mast, by contrast, will be constantly facing the radar with an area that
can be approximated by a trapezoid:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E8" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mast</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the upper and lower radii of the mast,
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the mast height.</p>
      <p>Thus, the relation <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in dB between the relative scattering area of
the mast and blades can be obtained as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E9" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          According to the wind turbine characteristics gathered in Table 1, these
relations are calculated and shown in Table 3. If values in Tables 2 and 3 are compared, it can be stated that the relation in dB between the
relative scattering area of the mast and blades can be considered a good
approximation of the difference in dB between the maximum RCS from the mast
and the maximum RCS from the blades. Taking this into account, the maximum
RCS from the blades (dBsm) can be obtained as

                <disp-formula specific-use="align" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mtable displaystyle="true"><mml:mlabeledtr id="Ch1.E10"><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>blades</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mo>max⁡</mml:mo><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">{</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mast</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo mathvariant="italic">}</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Δ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mlabeledtr><mml:mtr><mml:mtd/><mml:mtd><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mtd></mml:mtr></mml:mtable></mml:math></disp-formula>

            A comparison of the maximum RCS of the blades from PO simulations and the
maximum RCS values calculated according to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E10"/>) is shown in Table 4. As
shown in the table, the difference between the values provided by the
simulations and the values calculated according to the proposed model are
lower than 2 dB for all the analyzed cases.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Comparison of the maximum RCS of the blades from PO simulations and
the maximum RCS values calculated according to the proposed model. The third
column shows the difference in dB between the values obtained in the
simulations and the values calculated according to the proposed model.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="10">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="center"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="center"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col2" nameend="col4">WT model 1 </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col5" nameend="col7">WT model 2 </oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry rowsep="1" namest="col8" nameend="col10">WT model 3 </oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Simulation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Model</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Difference</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Simulation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Model</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Difference</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Simulation</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Model</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Difference</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">(dBsm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">(dBsm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">(dB)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">(dBsm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">(dBsm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">(dB)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">(dBsm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">(dBsm)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">(dB)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2.80 GHz</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">45.92</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">46.08</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.16</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">46.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">48.72</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">48.81</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">50.62</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.82</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">5.65 GHz</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">49.42</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">50.05</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.63</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">49.74</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">51.67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.93</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">52.10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">53.65</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">9.4 GHz</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">51.61</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">52.52</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.91</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">52.00</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">53.80</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.79</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">54.22</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">55.77</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.55</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Vertical sections of RCS patterns (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
6, 80, 176, 177, 184 and 185<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) for
wind turbine model 1 (Frequency 5.65 GHz, Rotor position P000) and result of
the proposed model (black line).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2183/2015/amt-8-2183-2015-f09.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS3">
  <title>Converting RCS values to WTC reflectivity values</title>
      <p>In order to model wind turbine clutter, the RCS of a wind turbine must be
converted to the equivalent radar reflectivity factor.</p>
      <p>The weather radar equation, for distributed targets such as rain, is given
by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E11" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1024</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the power received back by radar, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the power
transmitted by radar, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> are the elevation and
azimuth beamwidths, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the speed of light, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the radar pulse
length, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is the complex index of refraction of the
hydrometeor, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the wavelength of the radar pulse, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the
distance to the target and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the radar reflectivity factor (ITU-R, 2009;
Rinehart, 1997; Norin and Haase, 2012). The radar reflectivity factor
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, normally expressed in decibels of reflectivity (dBZ), is the quantity that
is used to obtain the rain rate:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E12" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mn>1024</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi>c</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          The radar equation for a point target, such as distant
wind turbine contained within a range resolution cell, is given by
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E13" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">r</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">t</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>64</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the RCS of the wind turbine (Knott, 2006).</p>
      <p>Assuming that the wind turbine is entirely included within the beam cell
resolution of the weather radar, we can compare Eqs. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E11"/>) and (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E13"/>) and
then obtain the radar reflectivity factor as
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E14" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>,</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>
          where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a constant that depends on the parameters of the radar
system:
            <disp-formula id="Ch1.E15" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:mo>.</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5.SS4">
  <title>Complete model for estimating WTC reflectivity in weather radar bands</title>
      <p>Results obtained in the previous subsections are the basis of the complete
model to characterize the signal scattering from wind turbines in the
weather radar bands proposed in this paper. The proposed simplified model
for estimating WTC reflectivity in weather radar bands is summarized in
Table 5.</p>

<table-wrap id="Ch1.T5" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Simplified model for estimating WTC reflectivity in weather radar bands.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="1">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Model for calculating wind turbine clutter reflectivity</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">1. Wind turbine RCS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mast</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mi>sin⁡</mml:mi><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (dBsm) for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mast</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>blades</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[14.226378pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>blades</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi></mml:mfrac><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn>10</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi>log⁡</mml:mi><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>w</mml:mi><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mi>l</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (dBsm) for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mast</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>blades</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       <?xmltex \interline{[8.535827pt]}?></oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Where: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mtext>arctan</mml:mtext><mml:mfenced open="(" close=")"><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mi>H</mml:mi></mml:mfrac></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>L</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi>H</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi>cos⁡</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">2. Wind turbine clutter reflectivity</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>z</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:mn>16</mml:mn><mml:mi>ln⁡</mml:mi><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>c</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">ϕ</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">τ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mfrac><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>|</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is the RCS in linear values (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>First, based on the specific characteristics of the wind turbine and the
working frequency, the RCS pattern of the mast near the direction normal to
the slant surface is obtained. The RCS from the mast is used to determine
the main lobe of the RCS pattern of the whole wind turbine.</p>
      <p>Then, the maximum RCS value from the blades is calculated, as the maximum
RCS value of the mast minus the relation in dB between the relative
scattering areas of the mast and blades. This maximum RCS value from the
blades establishes an upper bound, in such a way that all the possible
orientations of the nacelle and blades are considered.</p>
      <p>In order to combine both patterns and obtain the simplified RCS pattern of
the whole wind turbine, the RCS values from the mast are used for angles
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> near the incidence normal to the slanted surface of the mast, i.e.,
for  <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>values such that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>mast</mml:mtext></mml:msub><mml:mo>≥</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mtext>blades</mml:mtext></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This way, the main lobe of the RCS pattern of the whole wind
turbine is estimated. For incidence angles off the main lobe due to the
mast, and up to the limiting angles <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> due to the illumination
characteristics of weather radars, the maximum RCS value from the blades is
applied.</p>
      <p>An example of the results of this proposed RCS model is shown in Fig. 9,
together with the simulated results of the RCS pattern for different rotor
orientations. In the figure, it can be seen that the maximum RCS of the mast
is well approximated by the model, and the mask established off the main
lobe covers the scattering from the blades for different rotor orientations.</p>
      <p>Once the RCS pattern is completed for a specific illumination condition and
configuration of the radar, the estimation of the RCS of the wind turbine is
obtained.</p>
      <p>Finally, assuming that the whole wind turbine is included within the beam
cell resolution of the radar, the corresponding reflectivity value is
calculated as described in Table 5.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>In order to estimate the potential impact of a wind farm on a weather radar
service, one of the main issues to be analyzed is wind turbine clutter
reflectivity, which is directly related to the radar cross section of wind
turbines.</p>
      <p>A preliminary study about possible interference problems is the most
appropriate way to proceed in order to make the coexistence of wind energy
and meteorological services possible. To do so, an estimation of the RCS of
the wind turbines to be installed is a must. Although it is possible to
obtain RCS values by conventional methods such as MoM and FDTD, they require
detailed representations of the wind turbines' design and complex
calculations, which are too time consuming and difficult to obtain. On the
contrary, typical values that do not take into account the particular
features of the case under analysis may lead to significant errors in the
impact analysis.</p>
      <p>In this paper, the RCS patterns of wind turbines for the weather radar
working frequencies have been analyzed. From the obtained results, it can be
concluded that the mast is the main scatterer of the wind turbine, featuring
a very directive lobe in the direction perpendicular to the slanted surface
of the mast. The blades, by contrast, contribute to the total RCS of the
wind turbine with secondary lobes that depend on the rotor orientation with
respect to the illumination direction and the blades' position.</p>
      <p>Based on the above-mentioned conclusions, a simple RCS model to characterize
backscattering from wind turbines in the weather radar bands has been
proposed. This model takes the RCS from the mast as a reference to estimate
the maximum value of the RCS pattern of the whole wind turbine and then
calculates the maximum RCS from the blades taking into account the actual
dimensions of the wind turbine model. Finally, and assuming that the whole
wind turbine is included within the beam cell resolution of the radar, the
WTC reflectivity can be directly obtained.</p>
      <p>The proposed RCS model can be used to estimate the maximum clutter due to
the presence of a wind turbine, estimating the scattered power from the
mast. However, even if the Doppler radar under study uses a
clutter filter that suppresses stationary objects, the rotating blades of a
wind turbine might still be detected. As proved in Norin (2015), weather
information from radar cells affected by a wind turbine is not always lost.
In fact, when precipitation gives rise to reflectivity values stronger than
those due to wind turbines, radar data could still be used. Therefore, the
reflectivity model proposed in this paper is of interest not only to assess
a potential detrimental impact on the performance of a weather radar but
also to evaluate to which extent this degradation might exist if
reflectivity values from precipitation and wind turbine blades are compared.</p>
      <p>This simple WTC reflectivity model aims at being implemented in software
planning tools and is expected to make the preliminary impact studies of
wind farms on weather radar services easier.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>A special note of thanks to José Miguel Gutiérrez (AEMet, Spanish
Weather Agency) and Lars Norin (SMHI, Swedish Weather Agency), who provided
insight and expertise from the perspective of a weather operator.</p><p>This work has been partially supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy
and Competitiveness (Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, project
TEC2012-32370) and the University of the Basque Country (Euskal Herriko
Unibertsitatea, program for the specialization of the postdoctoral
researcher staff).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: G. Vulpiani<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?></p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation> Angulo, I., de La Vega, D., Rodríguez, O., Grande, O., Guerra, D., and
Angueira, P.: Analysis of the Mast Contribution to the Scattering Pattern of Wind Turbines in the
UHF Band, 5th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP),
2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation> Angulo, I., Montalban, J., Canizo, J., Wu, Y., de la Vega, D., Guerra, D., Angueira, P.,
and Arrinda, A.: A measurement-based multipath channel model for signal propagation in presence of
wind farms in the UHF band, IEEE T. Commun., 61, 4788–4798, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Angulo, I., de la Vega, D., Cascón, I., Cañizo, J., Wu, Y., Guerra,
D., and Angueira, P.: Impact analysis of wind farms on telecommunication
services. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Volume 32, April 2014,
Pages 84-99, ISSN 1364-0321, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Belmonte, A. and Fabregas, X.: Analysis of Wind Turbines Blockage on Doppler
Weather Radar Beams, IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, 9,
670–673, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Gallardo-Hernando, B., Muñoz-Ferreras, J. M., Pérez-Martínez,
F., and Aguado-Encabo, F.: Wind Turbine Clutter Observations and Theoretical
Validation for Meteorological Radar Applications, Radar, Sonar &amp;
Navigation, IET, 5, 111–117, Feb. 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Gipe, P.: Wind Power: Renewable Energy for Home, Farm, and Business, 2nd
edition, Chelsea Green Publishing, April 1, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Grande, O., Cañizo, J., Angulo, I., Jenn, D., Danoon, L. R., Guerra, D., and de la
Vega, D.: Simplified formulae for the estimation of offshore wind turbines clutter on marine
radars, The Scientific World Journal,
982508, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/982508" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1155/2014/982508</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Grande, O., Angulo, I., Jenn, D., Aguado, F., Guerra, D., and de la Vega,
D.: Analysis of Wind Turbines Radar Cross Section for Analyzing the
Potential Impact on Weather Radars, 2015 9th European Conference on Antennas
and Propagation (EUCAP), 12–17 April 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation> IEEE Std 211-1997: IEEE Standard Definitions of Terms For Radio Wave Propagation,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Isom, B. M., Palmer, R. D., Secrest, G. S., Rhoton, R. D., Saxion, D.,
Allmon, T. L. , Reed, J., Crum, T., Vogt, R., Detailed Observations of Wind
Turbine Clutter with Scanning Weather Radars, J. Atmos. Ocean. Techn., 26, 894–910, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation> ITU-R (International Telecommunication Union): Technical and Operational Aspects of
Ground-Based Meteorological Radars, Recommendation ITU-RM.1849; International Telecommunication
Union, Geneva, Switzerland, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation> ITU-R and WMO (International Telecommunication Union and World Meteorological
Organization): Handbook, Use of Radio Spectrum for Meteorology: Weather, Water and Climate
Monitoring and Prediction, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation> Jenn, D. C.: Radar and Laser Cross Section Engineering, 2nd Edn., Education Series,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, USA, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation> Knott, E. F.: Radar Cross Section Measurements, SciTech Publishing, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation> Lemmon, J. J, Carroll, J. E., Sanders, F. H., and Turner, D.: Assessment of the Effects
of Wind Turbines on Air Traffic Control radars, NTIA Technical Report TR-08-454,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Norin, L. and Haase, G.: Doppler Weather Radars and Wind Turbines, Doppler Radar
Observations – Weather Radar, Wind Profiler, Ionospheric Radar, and Other Advanced Applications,
edited by: Bech, J., InTech,
doi:<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/39029">10.5772/39029</ext-link>, available at:
<ext-link xlink:href="http://www.intechopen.com/books/doppler-radar-observations-weather-radar-wind-profiler-ionospheric-radar-and-other-advanced-applications/doppler-weather-radars-and-wind-turbines">http://www.intechopen.com/books/doppler-radar-observations-weather-radar-wind-profiler-ionospheric-radar-and-other-advanced-applications/doppler-weather-radars-and-wind-turbines</ext-link> (last access: 2 February 2015), 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Norin, L.: A quantitative analysis of the impact of wind turbines on
operational Doppler weather radar data, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 593–609,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-593-2015" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-8-593-2015</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation> Rinehart, R. E.: RADAR for Meteorologists, 3rd edn., Rinehart Pub, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation> Siegel, K. M., Alperin, H. A., Bonkowski, R. R., Crispin, J. W., Maffett, A. L.,
Schensted, C. E., and Schensted, I. V.: Bistatic radar cross sections of surfaces of revolution,
J. Appl. Phys., 26, 297 pp., 1955.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation> Skolnik, M.: Radar Handbook, 3rd Edn., Mc-Graw-Hill, New York, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>Spera, D. A. and Sengupta, D. L.: Equations for Estimating the Strength of TV
Signals Scattered by Wind Turbines, NASA Contractor Report 194468, May 1994.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation> Tristant, P.: Impact of Wind Turbines on Weather Radars Band, World Meteorological
Organization, CBS/SG-RFC 2006/Doc. 3.1, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation> Van Lil, E., Trappeniers, D., De Bleser, J., and Van de Capelle, A.: Computations of
radar returns of wind turbines, in: Proceedings of the 3rd European Conference on Antennas and
Propagation (EUCAP), Berlin, Germany, 23–27 March 2009, 3852–3856, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation> Van Lil, E., Trappeniers, D., De Bleser, J., and Van de Capelle, A.: Computation of
false echo zones and shadowing for aeronautical and weather radars, in: Proceedings of the 4th
European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), Barcelona, Spain, 12 April 2010, 1–5,
2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation> Vogt, R. J., Crum, T. D., Greenwood, W., Ciardi, E. J., and Guenther, R. G.: Recent
Efforts to Improve Estimates of and Mitigation of Wind Turbine Clutter Impacts on the WSR-88D,
Preprints, 27th Int. Conf. on Interactive Information Processing Systems (IIPS) for Meteorology,
Oceanography, and Hydrology, Seattle, WA, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Paper 3A.1, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation> WMO (World Meteorological Organization): Impact of Wind Turbines on Weather Radars
Band, CBS/SG-RFC 2006/Doc. 3.1(6), 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation> WMO (World Meteorological Organization): Commission for Instruments and Methods of
Observation – Fifteenth Session, WMO-No. 1064, Helsinki, 2–8 September, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>WMO Radar Database: WMO Radar Database, available at: <uri>http://wrd.mgm.gov.tr/</uri>
(last access: 15 December 2014), 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
