<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus GmbH</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-8-2801-2015</article-id><title-group><article-title>An automatic collector to monitor insoluble atmospheric deposition:
application for mineral dust deposition</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{An automatic collector to monitor insoluble atmospheric deposition}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{B.~Laurent et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Laurent</surname><given-names>B.</given-names></name>
          <email>benoit.laurent@lisa.u-pec.fr</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff4">
          <name><surname>Losno</surname><given-names>R.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0246-862X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Chevaillier</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Vincent</surname><given-names>J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff2">
          <name><surname>Roullet</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bon Nguyen</surname><given-names>E.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Ouboulmane</surname><given-names>N.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Triquet</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Fornier</surname><given-names>M.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff3">
          <name><surname>Raimbault</surname><given-names>P.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9466-6679</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Bergametti</surname><given-names>G.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Laboratoire Interuniversitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques (LISA), UMR7583 CNRS,<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Université Paris Diderot, Université Paris-Est Créteil, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>Ingénierie, Conseil, Assistance technique, Recherche, Etude (ICARE Ingénierie), Paris, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution>Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography (MIO), UMR7294 CNRS, UMR235 IRD, Université<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Aix-Marseille, Université du Sud Toulon-Var, France</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4"><label>a</label><institution>present address: Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP), UMR7154 CNRS, Sorbonne<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> Paris Cité, Université Paris Diderot, France</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">B. Laurent (benoit.laurent@lisa.u-pec.fr)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>16</day><month>July</month><year>2015</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>8</volume>
      <issue>7</issue>
      <fpage>2801</fpage><lpage>2811</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>23</day><month>December</month><year>2014</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>2</day><month>March</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>6</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>16</day><month>June</month><year>2015</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2801/2015/amt-8-2801-2015.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2801/2015/amt-8-2801-2015.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2801/2015/amt-8-2801-2015.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2801/2015/amt-8-2801-2015.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Deposition is one of the key terms of the mineral dust cycle. However, dust
deposition remains poorly constrained in transport models simulating the
atmospheric dust cycle. This is mainly due to the limited number of relevant
deposition measurements. This paper aims to present an automatic collector
(CARAGA), specially developed to sample the total (dry and wet) atmospheric
deposition of insoluble dust in remote areas. The autonomy of the CARAGA can
range from 25 days to almost 1 year depending on the programmed sampling
frequency (from 1 day to 2 weeks respectively). This collector is used to
sample atmospheric deposition of Saharan dust on the Frioul islands in the Gulf
of Lions in the Western Mediterranean. To quantify the mineral dust mass in
deposition samples, a weighing and ignition protocol is applied. Almost 2
years of continuous deposition measurements performed on a weekly sampling
basis on Frioul Island are presented and discussed with air mass
trajectories and satellite observations of dust. Insoluble mineral
deposition measured on Frioul Island was 2.45 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for February to
December 2011 and 3.16 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for January to October 2012. Nine major
mineral deposition events, measured during periods with significant MODIS
aerosol optical depths, were associated with air masses coming from the
southern Mediterranean Basin and North Africa.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Mineral dust particles emitted from the Sahara are a factor in excessive
daily air particles concentrations of PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula> (particulate matter less
than 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m in diameter) observed in the Mediterranean Basin and
southern Europe (Pey et al., 2013). In order to estimate these Saharan dust
outbreaks over this region, chemistry-transport models (CTM) could simulate
continuous and forecasted dust concentration fields. Simulations of mineral
dust are validated by comparing the simulated dust load with numerous
available data sets, for instance direct aerosol concentration
measurements and aerosol optical depth (AOD) derived from ground-based
and/or satellite observations. However, this remains insufficient to ensure the
consistency of regional or global dust simulations, because, due to the lack
of quantitative measurements, emission and deposition can be adjusted quite
freely to allow models to match observed atmospheric dust concentrations.
This means that at least one additional term, emission or deposition mass
flux, has to be measured to correctly constrain the simulated dust mass
concentration.</p>
      <p>Large uncertainties remain, for instance, on how dry and wet dust deposition
processes are modelled (Zhao et al., 2003; Textor et al., 2006; Jung and
Shao, 2006; Bergametti and Forêt, 2014). Few experimental field
measurements of dust deposition have been performed recently (Guieu et al.,
2010; López-Garcia et al., 2013; Heimburger et al., 2013; Osada et al.,
2014). Accurate measurements of dust mass fluxes remain scarce whereas they
should be conducted continuously and homogenously over regions impacted by
mineral dust in order to constrain model dust simulations. One of the
reasons why such a small number of field studies has been performed is the
heavy workload that both sampling and measurement of dust deposition
represent over long periods of time.</p>
      <p>This paper presents a new device designed to perform continuous dust
deposition measurements over long periods and a weighing and ignition
protocol to determine the total insoluble mineral dust mass deposited. This
automatic collector, named CARAGA (Collecteur Automatique de Retombées Atmosphériques insolubles à Grande Autonomie), has been specially developed to sample total
insoluble atmospheric particles deposition in remote areas and to insure
robust automatic sampling with a large autonomy and a minimum need of man
power. Since mid-2010, a collector sampling total (dry and wet) deposition
has be installed on Frioul Island (43.27<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; 5.29<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E),
which is located in the Gulf of Lions in the north-western Mediterranean
Sea, where Saharan dust outbreaks can be observed (see for example Ridame et
al., 1999). In the following sections, the in situ deposition sampling strategy is
presented as well as the lab protocol established to quantify mineral dust
deposition. Almost 2 years of mineral deposition measurements on Frioul
Island are discussed and open up the possibility to develop a CARAGA
sampling network of total insoluble deposition in remote
areas.<?xmltex \hack{\vspace{-3mm}}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Previous studies of dust deposition sampling</title>
      <p>Dry deposition mainly depends on sedimentation, interception, impaction and
Brownian diffusion processes (Slinn and Slinn, 1980; Wesely, 1989; Venkatram
and Pleim, 1999). Wet deposition processes correspond to the capture of
particles by droplets either inside or below the clouds (Dana and Hales,
1976; Slinn, 1984; Garcia Nieto et al., 1994). These deposition processes of
atmospheric particles are supposed to be well understood. However, most of
the theoretical understanding and parameterizations of deposition were based
on studies and measurements performed under controlled conditions, for
instance in wind tunnels (Chamberlain, 1967; Goossens, 2008) or towers and
laboratories (Wang and Pruppacher, 1977; Leong et al., 1982; Barlow and
Latham, 1983; Pranesha and Kamra, 1996).</p>
      <p>In situ dust deposition measurements of atmospheric particles are
technically difficult and have to be adapted depending on the aim of the
study: dry, wet or total deposition; soluble, insoluble or bulk deposition;
short- or long-term sampling, etc. Quantitative estimates of dust deposition
remain challenging (see for example Wiggs et al., 2002; Goossens and Rajot,
2008). Various techniques have been proposed to directly measure or to
estimate (from atmospheric concentrations) dry deposition of dust on
surfaces (Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998; Etyemezian et al., 2003; Goossens,
2005; Sow et al., 2006). Experimental studies usually show a wide range in
dry deposition values, depending on the sampling device (Goossens and Rajot,
2008). Even if wet deposition measurements are easier to perform, correctly
sampling the first millimetres of a precipitation event is crucial to precisely
measure wet deposition (Claassen and Halm, 1995). In the framework of this
study, the sampling of total (dry and wet) Saharan dust deposition is
investigated.</p>
      <p>Up to now, Saharan dust deposition sampling has required frequent human
intervention to be carried out. Most of the time, deposition collectors
consist of simple passive collecting systems: funnel capped bottles (Markaki
et al., 2010; Prospero et al., 2010), polyethylene bottles (Bonnet and
Guieu, 2006; Markaki et al., 2010), bags (Galy-Lacaux et al., 2009),
buckets (Prospero et al., 2010) or surfaces covered with glass marbles
(Kouvarakis et al., 2001; Sow et al., 2006). Similar collectors have been
used to sample mineral dust in other regions, for example in Asia by
Osada et al. (2014) or the Kerguelen islands in the Southern Ocean (Heimburger
et al., 2013). None of these collecting systems allows the automatical
sampling of dust deposition with sufficient autonomy in order to limit human
intervention after each sampling.</p>
      <p>In the Mediterranean Basin, Saharan dust deposition was sampled in Capo
Cavallo (NW Corsica) using a CRAPAL sampler (Bergametti, 1987; Remoudaki et al.,
1991), which is a hemispheric plexiglass collection device (0.1 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) with a 10 cm high neck covered by a 1 mm nylon mesh (Lambert and
Nezami, 1965). Its base is connected to an acid-cleaned polyethylene bucket
in which the atmospheric deposition is collected during precipitation and by
manual acid flushing at the end of a 1-week sampling period.
Loÿe-Pilot and Martin (1996) also collected Saharan dust deposition in
Corsica during an 11-year period (1984–1994) using a bulk plastic collector
(Standard Rain Gauge) which has a 400 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> aperture. Deposition
measurements were also performed on the two sides of the Ligurian Sea at the
Cap Ferrat site in 2004 and 2006 (Bonnet and Guieu, 2006; Pulido-Villena et
al., 2008) and in Corsica in 2003 and 2005 (Ternon et al., 2010) using the
same bulk plastic collector or a funnel and a polyethylene bottle. The most
comprehensive field study to assess the magnitude and the composition of
atmospheric deposition in the Mediterranean Basin was the ADIOS program,
during which atmospheric deposition was collected at 10 sampling sites
(Guieu et al., 2010; Markaki et al., 2010). The mass of deposited Saharan
dust was estimated from the measured Al amount. The sampling device
collected bulk samples (dry and wet deposition) using a 1 gallon Nalgene
high-density polyethylene bottle with a polyethylene funnel (0.011 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) attached at its top. The sampling duration was 1 month for each
sample and it required human intervention.</p>
      <p>Total dust deposition was also collected in the Sahelian region using a
CAPYR sampler (Orange et al., 1990; Herrmann, 1996; Rajot, 2001). The CAPYR is a 40 cm
high funnel-shaped sampler with a 0.25 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> horizontal inlet opening. It
was used to collect total dust deposition in Niger from 1996 to 1998 (Rajot,
2001). In Niger, a Frisbee sampler, which consists of a circular stainless steel
collecting bowl (0.07 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and 3.6 cm deep) surrounded by an
aerodynamically shaped aluminum deflector ring (Wiggs et al., 2002), was
also used to collect total dust deposition (Sow et al., 2006). This device
requires manual rinsing to collect total deposition.</p>
      <p>To collect dry and wet Saharan dust deposition separately, ARS MTX or Aerochem Metrics model 301 samplers were
used on the Eastern and Western Mediterranean coasts (Ozsoy, 2003;
Morales-Baquero et al., 2013) and on Canary Islands (López-Garcia et
al., 2013). To perform successive samples, the collect systems have to be
manually replaced. Wet deposition was also collected with wet-only
collectors in the Eastern Mediterranean (Theodosi et al., 2010), in Niger
(Galy-Lacaux et al., 2009) and Florida (Prospero et al., 2010). The
conservation of the deposition soluble fraction over time strongly limits
the autonomy of the sampling device.</p>
      <p>These various approaches (and associated samplers) have technical drawbacks
on the field that have limited their development in terms of sampling
network expansion or duration. This is especially due to a short autonomy,
as human intervention is required to replace the collect system after each
sampling period. Therefore, a robust automatic system is necessary to
achieve low costs in the long term and a wide area network survey
system.<?xmltex \hack{\vspace{-5mm}}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>New sampler and method to study mineral dust deposition</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>The CARAGA collector</title>
      <p>The existing deposition samplers are not automatized and/or not autonomous
over long periods. This constitutes a strong limitation to performing
continuous in situ measurements of atmospheric deposition in the long term
and in remote areas. The ICARE Ingénierie Company and the Laboratoire Interuniversitaire des Systèmes Atmosphériques (LISA) developed a collector to
automatically sample total insoluble deposition on filters over long periods
without any human intervention: the Collecteur Automatique de Retombées Atmosphériques insolubles à Grande Autonomie. It is used to estimate the mass of
deposited dust during a given time period in order to better constrain CTM
dust simulations. By focusing on the total insoluble mass of deposited dust,
the sampling device can be significantly simplified, which limits the issues
associated to the change and storage of the samples. In order to estimate
the deposited mass, collecting only the insoluble part of the dust
deposition is justified by the very large fraction (over 80 %) of
insoluble matter in the Saharan dust deposition in the Mediterranean Basin
(see for example Losno, 1989; Guerzoni et al., 1993; Avila et al., 2007).</p>
      <p>The CARAGA is composed of separate modules to facilitate its transport and in situ
implementation (see Supplement). An open circle funnel (0.2 m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>)
forms the top part of the CARAGA collector (Fig. 1). The collecting surface
ensures sufficient sampling during non-intense deposition events and avoids
the saturation of the collecting filter in case of intense deposition
events. Local soil dust contamination can be a problem for measurements,
especially during periods of high wind speed. In order to minimize this
contamination, the funnel is fixed on a steel structure and an adjustable
tripod 2.5 to 3 m above the ground (Fig. 1). A PTFE strainer is installed
in the funnel to limit the impact of large insects or vegetal debris (larger
than 2 mm) on the sampling. In order to diminish the risk of bird standing,
the top of the funnel is made thin and sharp. If the temperature drops down
to 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, the funnel walls are heated with heating tapes. The
funnel is connected by a short tube to a 25-hole carousel which carries
filters mounted in separate filter holders (Figs. 1 and S1 in the Supplement).</p>
      <p>Two hours and 1 h before the end of each sampling period, a device
vibrates the funnel walls and 100 mL of pure water, or a blend of 20 %
ethanol in pure water in case of frost, is sprayed to drive down the
atmospheric deposited particles and collect them on a 47 mm diameter
membrane filter. This sample procedure is identically reproduced for each
sample and does not require any operator intervention. Rain events are
directly collected by the funnel. The filtration is performed by gravity and
only the insoluble matter is collected on the filter; the remaining water
is eliminated. An electronic system can be adapted to control the water
level in the filter holder and periodically closes a pinch valve installed
on the tube at the bottom of the funnel if this level is too high. This
avoids overflow of the filter holder and the loss of a part of the wet
deposition in case of heavy rain.</p>
      <p>Twenty-five lab-prepared filters are installed in filter holders on the
motorized carousel (Fig. S1). A new filter is automatically set in the
sampling position for each new sampling period. The sampling duration can be
programmed and the autonomy of the instrument ranges from 25 days for daily
sampling to almost 1 year for sampling on a 2-week basis. For
post-control, an electronic recorder stores the date at which the rotating
unit has worked. A solar panel (20 W) connected to a battery (12 V, 7 Ah)
supplies the power.</p>
      <p>The CARAGA system is best suited for the collection of the non-soluble
fraction of dust, but it could also be used for evaluating other inorganic
or organic particles after adapting the sampling and lab protocols.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Schema of the CARAGA collector. Height of the collector can be
extended to 1 m more by adding a second pillar spacer.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2801/2015/amt-8-2801-2015-f01.pdf"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Filter choice</title>
      <p>The mass of mineral dust is considered to be dominated by large particles
(Whitby and Cantrell, 1976) contributing to PM concentrations in the
Mediterranean area (Pey et al., 2013). Sciare et al. (2005) presented
average concentrations for PM and chemical species at two sampling sites in
Eastern Mediterranean Sea during the MINOS campaign in August 2001. They
distinguished fine (&lt; 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and coarse (&gt; 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) particles, and showed that 90 to 95 % of dust
concentrations are in the coarse mode, while 84 to 87 % of the black carbon and
82 % of the organic carbon are in the fine mode.</p>
      <p>In order to choose the optimal filter for collecting dust deposition,
several tests were performed. Since filtration is gravity driven only, the
water flow through different filter membranes composed of polycarbonate,
quartz or cellulose were tested: (i) AOX Nuclepore<sup>©</sup>
polycarbonate filter (ø 47 mm, 0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m porosity), (ii) nylon filter
(ø 47 mm, 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m porosity), (iii) cellulose nitrate filter (ø
0.47 mm, 0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m porosity), (iv) AA Millipore<sup>©</sup>
cellulose ester filter (ø 47 mm, 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m porosity) and (v) QMA
Whatman<sup>©</sup> quartz fiber filter (ø 47 mm, 2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
porosity). The test consisted of determining the time required to drain 100
mL of pure water through the filter. The AA Millipore cellulose ester filter
with a 0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m porosity is the only filter type for which a reasonable
flow speed is obtained, about 20 mL min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Table 1). Moreover, Sheldon (1972) indicates that Millipore<sup>©</sup> cellulose ester filters,
with a porosity ranging from 0.45 to 8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, have high percentages of
retention of particles of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m ranging from 80 to 100 %.</p>
      <p>To test a possible mass loss by dissolution of the filter in water, six
cellulose ester blank filters were weighed before and after filtration of
250 mL of pure water. In this study, the weighings were conducted using a
Mettler<sup>©</sup> AE240 electronic microbalance (sensitivity
10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g). For the weighing of the filters, an aluminium crucible was
used to prevent electrostatic issues. Each sample was weighed until two
equal successive displayed values were obtained. After filtration, different
treatments were tested (1 h in an oven at 40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, 3 h in an oven at
40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, 17 h at ambient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C and 23 h at ambient <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C). The results show a mass variation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Weighing and ignition protocol</title>
      <p>To correctly quantify the deposited mass of mineral dust, an adapted
protocol has to be defined that accounts for the complex blending of
particles constituting the atmospheric particulate deposition.</p>
      <p>The weighing of the first in situ filters revealed specific constraints. The
particles can have a diameter up to 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m and therefore may not
strongly adhere to the filter. Loss of particles during filter handling is
possible, especially for filters highly loaded with particles. Furthermore,
the aim of the present study being to characterize the deposition mass of
Saharan dust, particles having a biogenic origin (e.g. organic aerosols) or
being derived from emissions of pollutants or biomass burning can affect the
estimate.</p>
      <p>In order to eliminate the organic fraction of a sample, ignition protocols
with temperatures ranging from 375 to 850<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C were
used in previous studies (Ball, 1964; Hoenig and Thomas, 2002; Sun et al.,
2009). This kind of protocol reduces the filter handling and eliminates the
deposited particles with medium to high volatility, as is the case for most
of organic aerosols.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Flow times to drain 100 mL water using various filter membranes.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Filter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">AOX</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Nylon</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Cellulose nitrate</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Cellulose esters</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Quartz</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.4 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.45 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">2.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Flow time (min)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">67</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">55</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">5</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">15</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Masses of crushed soil fraction (Douz in Tunisia and Cape Verde in
Senegal) deposited on cellulose ester filters and measured before and after
ignition at 350, 550 and 950 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Deposit (g)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Filter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> deposit (g)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Filter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> deposit (g)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Filter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> deposit (g)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Filter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> deposit (g)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">no ignition</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C ignition</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C ignition</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">950 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C ignition</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Douz 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.126</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.215</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.131</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.122</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.113</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Douz 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.134</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.217</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.137</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.128</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.119</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Douz 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.257</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.337</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.260</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.251</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.240</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cape Verde 1</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.095</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.018</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.012</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cape Verde 2</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.012</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.098</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.012</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Cape Verde 3</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.015</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.100</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.020</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.013</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.015</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>In the present study, we followed a weighing protocol after ignition of the
samples. First, blank filters were placed in ceramic crucibles with their
lids ajar in an ashing furnace (Naberthem<sup>©</sup> LT15/11). Various
programs of temperature increase to reach 350, 550
and 950 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C were tested. To prevent a flame that can lead to loss
of material during calcination, the tests point out the necessity to control
the temperature increase between 200 and 350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C at a
rate of 1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The residual ash mass of the filters was
weighed after different cycles of ignition at 350,
550 and 950 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The calcination of AA
Millipore<sup>©</sup> cellulose ester blank filters showed their
complete destruction between 350 and 550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Two
triplicates of this test were performed and consecutive weighings were
carried out to control the balance stability. There is no detectable residue
of the filter by weighing after ignition.</p>
      <p>Comparative tests between direct weighing and weighing after ignition at
350, 550 and 950 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C were performed using
(i) proxies of mineral dust prepared on filters by crushing a desert erodible
soil collected in Douz (Tunisia) and a loess soil collected on Sal Island
(Cape Verde), as well as (ii) the first filters collected at the Frioul
site. Each filter is first weighed alone, before and after sampling (after
sampling filters are dried 2 h up to 40 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C to limit remaining
humidity) and then in its crucible with lid before and after ignition.</p>
      <p>Three filters of the Douz crushed soil (0.126, 0.133 and 0.257 g) and
three filters of the Cape Verde crushed loess (0.012, 0.012 and 0.015 g)
were prepared after a passive filtration of the soil samples suspended in a
water solution. The results of direct weighing as well as weighing of the
samples after calcination at 350, 550 and 950 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C are presented in Table 2. At 350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C, filters
residues are still present and contribute to the mass of the sample. This is
no longer the case at 550 and 950 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. The masses of
the samples after ignition at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C are lower than the initial
masses (Douz 1: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>3.2 %, Douz 2: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>4.5 %, Douz 3: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>2.3 %; Cape Verde
1: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.3 %, Cape Verde 2: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>8.3 %, Cape Verde 3: <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>13.3 %). This tendency
is reinforced at 950 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Table 2). The same tests were conducted
for samples collected on Frioul Island (Table 3). For the three filters with
deposition masses varying over an order of magnitude (F7 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.011 g, F8 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.091 g and F9 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.145 g), a greater loss on ignition is observed at
550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (18.2, 9.9 and 9.6 % respectively) compared to
the samples from Douz and Cape Verde. For filters without high load of
particles, the loss is the same order of magnitude as the uncertainty on the
protocol. The six other filters showed no detectable deposition and are used
to test the repeatability and the uncertainty of the method used to
determine the mass of mineral deposit after ignition.</p>
      <p>These tests point out that a temperature of 550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C ensures the
loss on ignition of the filter and of the organic matter which is destroyed
below 450 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C (Hoenig and Thomas, 2002). Moreover, Sun et al. (2009) recorded only a small mass loss (lower than 0.2 %) for quartz,
feldspar, calcite and hematite during ignition at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Mass
losses between 1 and 2.5 % for smectite, chlorite, illite and goethite
and up to 18 % for kaolinite were observed (Sun et al., 2009). These
authors showed that the structural water loss for 17 soil samples ranges
from 0.56 to 2.45 % at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. This is consistent with the
mass loss results obtained for the Douz soil which contains a significant
proportion of quartz and calcite (Lafon et al., 2014). The larger mass loss
observed for the Cape Verde soil can be partly due to its composition of
quartz, potassic feldspars and an assemblage of illite–kaolinite–chlorite
(Rognon et al., 1996; Desboeufs et al., 1999). The larger loss on ignition
observed for the atmospheric deposition suggests a higher fraction of
volatile compounds in the Frioul samples than in the tested soils.</p>
      <p>A maximum temperature of 550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C was chosen for the ignition
protocol applied to the collected samples. To ensure a slow combustion of
the membrane filter and the destruction of the organics, heating was carried
out in four steps (Table 4): the first segment from 20 to
200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in 40 min, the second segment from 200 to
350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in 150 min, the third segment from 350 to
550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C in 45 min and the fourth segment stabilized at 550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C
during 120 min. Afterwards, the crucibles were cooled down inside the
furnace at ambient temperature.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T3" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Masses collected on cellulose ester filters on Frioul Island
before and after ignition at 350, 550 and
950 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="6">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="right"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Sample</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Deposit (g)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Filter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> deposit (g)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Filter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> deposit (g)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Filter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> deposit (g)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Filter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> deposit (g)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">no ignition</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C ignition</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C ignition</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">950 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C ignition</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Filter F7</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.011</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.089</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.017</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.009</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.009</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Filter F8</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.091</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.165</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.090</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.082</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.068</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Filter F9</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.145</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.221</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.139</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.131</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.106</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Filter F10</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.076</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Filter F11</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.075</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.007</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Filter F12</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.077</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.002</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Filter F13</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.077</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.000</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.000</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Filter F14</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.078</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.001</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Filter F15</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0.000<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">0.078</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">0.003</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">0.001</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">0.000</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> In situ control filter without any deposit.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Ignition gradient protocol.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="5">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="right"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="right"/>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> range</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">0–200 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">200–350 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">350–550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Time</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">40 min</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">150 min</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">45 min</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">120 min</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> gradient</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">4.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">–</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap>

      <p>Direct weighing of filters and their weighing after ignition lead to the
same level of accuracy (mass uncertainty less than 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g). However,
direct weighing of filters is more restrictive for samples containing large
amounts of coarse particles and organic residues. Weighing after ignition
limits filter manipulations and therefore the possible loss of a part of the
sample. Moreover, this protocol focuses on the mineral fraction of the
deposition, most of the organic particles being volatilized or oxidized when
the final temperature reaches 550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
      <p>Other insoluble aerosols from anthropogenic activities and biomass burning
are also present in the Mediterranean atmosphere and can affect the
deposition measurements. Field studies performed in the Eastern
Mediterranean Basin pointed out that these particles are mainly in the fine
submicron aerosol fraction (Lelieveld et al., 2002) and that their mean
mass concentrations are 1 order of magnitude lower than natural dust ones
(Sciare et al., 2005). From atmospheric measurements performed in Corsica
for elements indicating the major aerosol sources (natural and
anthropogenic), Bergametti et al. (1989) concluded that strong daily
variations of concentrations were mainly due to Saharan dusts inputs (for
the crustal elements) and to the removal of aerosols by precipitation
events. These results point out that anthropogenic aerosols and biomass
burning present in the Mediterranean atmosphere could constitute a
background deposition flux. However, mineral deposition sampled on filters
during Saharan dust outbreaks is mainly due to Saharan dust.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Deposition measurements on Frioul Island</title>
      <p>A CARAGA collector was installed mid-2010 on Frioul Island (43.27<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N;
5.29<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), situated in the Gulf of Lions off Marseille. One of the
main constraints with Saharan dust sampling is that their transport from
source regions towards the Mediterranean Sea and Europe is sporadic. The
sampling time needs to be short enough to catch dust transport events
individually but long enough to provide sufficient autonomy to the
CARAGA. Dust fallout events are brief and usually less than 3 days long
(Loÿe-Pilot and Martin, 1996). A sampling duration of 1 week is
adapted for collecting mineral particles corresponding to dust transport and
deposition over the Mediterranean Basin. This sampling frequency also
guaranties a large autonomy of the collector (up to 25 weeks depending on
the desired number of in situ blank filters).</p>
      <p>In order to collect the deposited particles on the filter, the funnel
vibrates and is rinsed with 100 mL of pure water twice (2 and 1 h
before the filter change). To bring back the samples to the laboratory, a
suitcase designed to keep 25 filter holders with their lids in an upright
position is used. Figure S2 visualizes the filters set collected on Frioul
Island between July and December 2011. The different colours of the filters
illustrate the variation in mass and the nature of the deposition from one
week to another. Insects, vegetal debris, pollens or other organic matters
collected on the filters are manually removed only if this manipulation does
not affect the sample. If the removal of these elements could damage the
sample, we leave them on the filter and the ignition of the samples at
550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C eliminates these organic matters. The mineral mass fluxes of the
weekly total (dry and wet) insoluble deposition for samples collected from
February 2011 to October 2012 are reported in Fig. 2. The precipitation
rates measured on Frioul Island are also presented in Fig. 2 in order to
point out the potential wet deposition occurring during precipitation
events.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Weekly total insoluble deposition (g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with an uncertainty
of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>±</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g) and weekly precipitation rate (mm) on Frioul
Island from February 2011 to October 2012. The filter was not automatically
changed between the end of October and mid-November 2011. The accumulated deposited
flux for this 3-week period is 0.26 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> and is not reported on the
figure (black crosses).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=475.161024pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2801/2015/amt-8-2801-2015-f02.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The insoluble mineral deposition measured on Frioul Island is 2.45 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for February to December 2011 and 3.16 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for January to
October 2012, which corresponds to low deposition amounts without very
strong dust events in this area of the Mediterranean Basin. Loÿe-Pilot
and Martin (1996) measured an average annual dust deposition flux of
12.5 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in Corsica for an 11-year period between 1984 and 1994,
with annual deposition fluxes varying from 4.0 to 26.2 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> yr<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.
They mentioned that high magnitude events drive the variability of dust
fallout at an annual and interannual scale. They also showed that most of
Saharan events in Corsica are associated to wet deposition. Ternon et al. (2010) found an average annual deposition value of 11.4 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> at Cap
Ferrat and Corsican sites between 2003 and 2006. Their measurements showed a
high range of frequency and intensity of Saharan dust deposition events:
very low (5 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) dust flux events occurred relatively often
(27 events in 4 years), and there was only one extreme event of 22 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> representing almost 90 % of the deposition in 2004.</p>
      <p>The weekly total insoluble deposition fluxes of mineral dust at the Frioul
site also exhibit a large variability ranging over 2 orders of magnitude,
from no noticeable deposition (in the range of the uncertainty) to
3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (Fig. 2). About 60 % of the measured deposition
fluxes at the Frioul site are lower than 5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. This
indicates that, most of the time, mineral deposition on Frioul Island can be
attributed to low deposition due to atmospheric particles background. Nine
major events with mineral deposition fluxes ranging from
1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> have been recorded on this site between
(a) 07 and 14 July 2011, (b) 20 and 27 October 2011, (c) 26 April and 03 May
2012, (d) 17 and 24 May 2012, (e) 14 and 21 June 2012, (f) 28 June and
5 July 2012, (g) 23 and 30 August 2012, (h) 30 August and 06 September 2012 and
(i) 27 September and 04 October 2012. In 2011 and 2012, major deposition
events occurred more frequently in late spring and summer. Precipitations
ranging from 1.0 to 80.8 mm were measured on Frioul Island for seven of
these event periods (a, b, c, d, g, h and i), precipitation data being
totally or partly missing for two event periods (e and f respectively).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3"><caption><p>Monthly average insoluble atmospheric deposition in mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
<bold>(a)</bold> measured at the Frioul site from February 2011 to October 2012 in the
framework of this study and <bold>(b)</bold> measured in Cap Ferrat and Corsica for
2003–2006 as presented in Ternon et al. (2010) (the scale for February, on
the right <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> axis of panel <bold>(b)</bold>, is different in order to take into account an extreme
Saharan event occurring in February 2004; Ternon et al., 2010). The
standard deviations of the mean monthly values are reported (bars) except
for January, November, and December because no measurements were performed in
2011 or 2012.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2801/2015/amt-8-2801-2015-f03.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p>HYSPLIT backward air mass trajectories computed for 72 h at
multiple locations in the surrounding of Frioul site for the nine main
deposition events recorded on Frioul Island: <bold>(a)</bold> 11 July 2011, 12:00 UTC, at 2500 m a.g.l.; <bold>(b)</bold> 25 October 2011, 00:00 UTC, at 2500 m a.g.l.;
<bold>(c)</bold> 30 April 2012, 12:00 UTC, at
2500 m a.g.l.; <bold>(d)</bold> 20 May 2012, 18:00 UTC, at 500 m a.g.l.; <bold>(e)</bold> 20 June 2012, 12:00 UTC, at
2500 m a.g.l.; <bold>(f)</bold> 01 July 2012, 12:00 UTC, at 2500 m a.g.l.; <bold>(g)</bold> 25 August 2012, 12:00 UTC, at
500 m a.g.l.; <bold>(h)</bold> 05 September 2012, 12:00 UTC, at 2500 a.g.l.; <bold>(i)</bold> 29 September
2012, 12:00 UTC, at 2500 m a.g.l.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=469.470472pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/8/2801/2015/amt-8-2801-2015-f04.pdf"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The monthly average insoluble deposition fluxes measured at the Frioul site
from February 2011 to October 2012 are presented in Fig. 3. The range of
these fluxes (from 100 to 470 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) is comparable to measurements
previously performed in Cap Ferrat (Bonnet and Guieu, 2006; Pulido-Villena
et al., 2008) in 2004 and 2006 and Corsica in 2003 and 2005 on both sides of
the Ligurian Sea (see more details in Ternon et al., 2010). The measurements
performed in Corsica between 1984 and 1994 by Loÿe-Pilot and Martin (1996) show higher
monthly deposition amounts ranging from about 200 to 2500 mg m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The monthly deposition measurements on Frioul Island show a
maximum in early spring (April–May) in agreement with the measurements of
Loÿe-Pilot and Martin (1996) in Corsica. Ternon et al. (2010) showed
maximum deposition in February 2004 due to a huge dust event and in late
spring (June). These seasonal differences can be explained by the large dust
deposition variability caused by intense sporadic events observed in the
northern Mediterranean Basin (Loÿe-Pilot and Martin, 1996; Ternon et
al., 2010).</p>
      <p>For the major deposition events measured at the Frioul site, AOD from MODIS AQUA and TERRA observations ranged from 0.3 to 0.7,
suggesting significant atmospheric loads in particulate matter. The origins
of the air masses reaching the Frioul site for the nine main deposition
events measured were analyzed using the HYSPLIT model backward trajectories
(<uri>https://ready.arl.noaa.gov/HYSPLIT.php</uri>) (Fig. 4). The HYSPLIT
trajectories computed for the major mineral deposition events (a, b, c, d,
e, f, g and i) indicate air masses originating from the southern
Mediterranean Basin and North Africa. For one event (h) the air mass
trajectories suggest a stagnant meteorological situation over the Gulf of
Lions and the Western Mediterranean Basin.<?xmltex \hack{\vspace{-3mm}}?></p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>An automatic collector (CARAGA) has been specially developed to sample total (dry
and wet) insoluble atmospheric deposition, and a protocol for the treatment
of the collected samples implying ignition and weighing has been tested.
This protocol enabled us to focus on the mineral fraction of the deposition,
most of the organic particles being volatilized or oxidized at
550 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C.</p>
      <p>The present study on the estimates of Saharan dust deposition on Frioul
Island, a site located in the Gulf of Lions, illustrates the use of a
CARAGA. The collector has worked continuously for almost 2 years and provided
weekly total deposition samples. Insoluble mineral deposition measured on
Frioul Island is 2.45 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for February to December 2011 and 3.16 g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for January to October 2012, which corresponds to low deposition
amounts without very strong dust deposition events in the north-western
Mediterranean Basin. The weekly deposits of insoluble mineral particles
range over 2 orders of magnitude. Nine major events with mineral deposition
ranging from 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> to 3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> g m<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> were recorded on
Frioul Island. During this period, the major deposition events occurred more
frequently during spring and summer. Precipitations, ranging from 1.0 to
80.8 mm, are associated to seven of these dust event periods, precipitation
data having not totally or partly being recorded for the two other dust
event periods. Nine main mineral deposition events are measured in periods
during which MODIS aerosol optical depth is high. Air masses passing over
the Frioul site during these periods came from the southern Mediterranean
Basin and North Africa. These elements strongly indicate that the higher
deposition events measured on Frioul Island are due to Saharan dust
transport associated to local precipitation.</p>
      <p>In order to improve Saharan dust deposition monitoring in the Mediterranean
Basin and the south of France, CARAGA collectors are now deployed over eight
stations located in France, Spain, Italy and Tunisia: Frioul
(43.27<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; 5.29<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Le Casset (44.99<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N;
6.47<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Montandon (47.28<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; 6.82<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Cap
Corse (43.00<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; 9.36<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Mallorca (39.27<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N;
3.05<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E), Sierra Nevada (36.95<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; 3.43<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W),
Lampedusa (35.52<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; 12.63<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E) and Medenine
(33.50<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> N; 10.64<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> E). These constitute an operating and
standardized network of total insoluble dust deposition. As such, it should
provide us with a promising basis to document the multiannual spatial and
temporal variability of mineral dust deposition and to constrain CTM dust
simulation over the Western Mediterranean region.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><p><bold>The Supplement related to this article is available online at <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-2801-2015-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">doi:10.5194/amt-8-2801-2015-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.</bold></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This study was funded by the PRIMEQUAL-ADEME program on “Pollution
atmosphérique longue distance” through the research project “Mesure du
dépôt atmosphérique et validation de sa représentation dans
les modèles régionaux” (DEMO project, contract no. 0962c0067). This project was supported by the Chemistry Aerosol
Mediterranean Experiment (ChArMEx project; <uri>http://charmex.lsce.ipsl.fr/</uri>) funded by CNRS/INSU, ADEME,
Météo-France and CEA in the framework of the program MISTRALS
(<uri>http://www.mistrals-home.org</uri>). The development of the CARAGA
collector was supported both by the Chemistry Faculty of Paris Diderot
University and the PRIMEQUAL-ADEME DEMO project. The authors would like to
thank M.-D. Loÿe-Pilot, F. Peters and an anonymous reviewer for their
insightful and helpful comments on the manuscript. We thank François Dulac for the research at a field site and support of the project
since initial discussions. We also thank the HYSPLIT teams for making the
backward air mass trajectories available.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: N. Mihalopoulos</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Avila, A., Alarcon, M., Castillo, S., Escudero, M., Garcıa Orellana, J.,
Masque, P., and Querol X.: Variation of soluble and insoluble calcium in red
rains related to dust sources and transport patterns from North Africa to
northeastern Spain, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D05210, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007153" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2006JD007153</ext-link>,
2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Ball, D. F.: Loss-on-ignition as an estimate of organic soils matter
and carbon in-non calcareous soils, J. Soil Sci., 15, 84-92, 1964.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Barlow, A. K. and Latham, J.: A laboratory study of the scavenging of
sub-micronaerosol by charged raindrops, Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc., 109, 763–770,
1983.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Bergametti, G.: Apports de matière par voie atmosphérique à la
Méditerranée Occidentale: aspects géochimiques et
météorologiques, Thèse d'état, Univ. Paris VII, France,
296 pp, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
Bergametti, G. and Forêt, G.: Dust deposition, in Mineral Dust: a Key
Player in the Earth System, edited by: Knippertz, P. and Stuut, J.-B. W.,
Springer, Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 179–200, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
Bergametti, G., Dutot, A. L., Buat-Ménard, P., Losno, R., and Remoudaki,
E.: Seasonal variability of the elemental composition of atmospheric aerosol
particles over the northwestern Mediterranean, Tellus, 41B, 353–361, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Bonnet, S. and Guieu, C.: Atmospheric forcing on the annual iron cycle in
the western Mediterranean Sea: A 1-year survey, J. Geophys. Res., 111,
C09010, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2005JC003213" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2005JC003213</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Chamberlain, A. C.: Transport of lycopodium spores and other small particles
to rough surfaces, P. Roy. Soc. Lond. A Mat., A296, 45–70, 1967.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Claassen, H. C. and Halm, D. R.: Performance characteristics of an automated
wet deposition collector and possible effect on computed annual deposition,
Atmos. Environ., 29, 1021–1026, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Dana, M. T. and Hales, J. M.: Statistical aspects of the washout of
polydisperse aerosols, Atmos. Environ., 10, 45–50, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Desboeufs, K., Losno, R., Vimeux, F., and Cholbi S.: The pH dependent
dissolution of wind transported Saharan dust, J. Geophys. Res., 104,
21287–21299, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Etyemezian, V., Gillies, J., Kuhns, H., Nikolic, D., Watson, J., Veranth,
J., Laban, R., Seshadri, G., and Gillette, D.: Field Testing and Evaluation
of Dust Deposition and Removal Mechanisms: Final Report, Desert Research
Institute, Las Vegas, NV, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Galy-Lacaux, C., Laouali, D., Descroix, L., Gobron, N., and Liousse, C.: Long
term precipitation chemistry and wet deposition in a remote dry savanna site
in Africa (Niger), Atmos. Chem. Phys., 9, 1579–1595,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-9-1579-2009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-9-1579-2009</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
Garcia Nieto, P. J., Arganza Garcia, B., Fernandez Diaz, J. M., and Rodriguez
Brana, M. A.: Parametric study of selective removal of atmospheric aerosol by
below-cloud scavenging, Atmos. Environ., 28, 2235–2342, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Goossens, D.: Quantification of the dry aeolian deposition of dust on
horizontal surfaces: an experimental comparison of theory and measurements,
Sedimentology, 52, 859–873, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>Goossens, D.: Relationships between horizontal transport flux and vertical
deposition flux during dry deposition of atmospheric dust particles, J.
Geophys. Res., 113, F02S13, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007JF000775" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007JF000775</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>Goossens, D. and Rajot, J. L.: Techniques to measure the dry aeolian
deposition of dust in arid and semi-arid landscapes: a comparative study in
West Niger, Earth Surf. Proc. Land., 33, 178–195, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.1533" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/esp.1533</ext-link>,
2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Guerzoni, S., Landuzzi, W., Lenaz, R., Quarantotto, G., Rampazzo, G.,
Molinaroli, E., Turetta, C., Visin, F., Cesari, G., and Cristini, S.: Fluxes
of soluble and insoluble metals and nutrients from the atmosphere to the
central Mediterranean Sea, Water Poll. Res. Rep., 30, 438–493, 1993.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Guieu, C., Loÿe-Pilot, M. D., Benyaya, L., and Dufour, A.: Spatial
variability of atmospheric fluxes of metals (Al, Fe, Cd, Zn and Pb) and
phosphorus over the whole Mediterranean from a one-year monitoring
experiment: Biogeochemical implications, Mar. Chem., 120, 165–179, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Heimburger, A., Losno, R., Triquet, S., and Bon Nguyen, E.: Atmospheric
deposition fluxes of 26 elements over the Southern Indian Ocean: time series
on Kerguelen and Crozet Islands, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 27, 440–449, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Herrmann, L.: Staubdeposition auf Böden West Afrikas, Eigenschaften und
Herkunftsgebiete der Stäube und ihr Einfluss auf Böden und
Standortseigenschaften, PhD Thesis, Hohenheim Bodenkundliche Hefte 36,
University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, Germany, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Hoenig, M. and Thomas, P.: Préparation d'échantillons de
l'environnement pour analyse minérale, Techniques de l'ingénieur
Analyses dans l'environnement, vol. TIB382DUO, ref. p4150, Edition T. I., Paris, France, 12 pp., 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Jung, E. and Shao, Y.: An intercomparison of four wet deposition schemes used
in dust transport modeling, Global Planet. Change, 52, 248–260, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Kouvarakis, G., Mihalopoulos, N., Tselepides, A., and Stavrakakis, S.: On the
importance of atmospheric inputs of inorganic nitrogen species on the
productivity of the eastern Mediterranean Sea; Global Biogeochem. Cy., 15,
805–817, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Lafon, S., Alfaro, S. C., Chevaillier, S., and Rajot, J. L.: A new generator
for mineral dust aerosol production from soil samples in the laboratory:
GAMEL, Aeolian Research, 15, 319–334, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Lambert, G. and Nezami, M.: Importance des retombées sèches dans le
bilan du plomb-210, Annal. Geophys., 21, 245–251, 1965.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Lelieveld, J., Berresheim, H., Borrmann, S., Crutzen, P. J., Dentener, F. J.,
Fischer, H., Feichter, J., Flatau, P. J., Heland, J., Holzinger, R.,
Korrmann, R., Lawrence, M. G., Levin, Z., Markowicz, K. M., Mihalopoulos, N.,
Minikin, A., Ramanathan, V., de Reus, M., Roelofs, G. J, Scheeren, H. A.,
Sciare, J., Schlager, H., Schultz, M., Siegmund, P., Steil, B., Stephanou, E.
G., Stier, P., Traub, M., Warneke, C.,Williams, J., and Ziereis, H.: Global
Air Pollution Crossroads over the Mediterranean, Science, 298, 794–799,
2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Leong, K. H., Beard, K. V., and Ochs III, H. T.: Laboratory measurements of
particle capture by evaporating cloud drops, J. Atmos. Sci., 39, 1130–1140,
1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
López-García, P., Gelado-Caballero, M. D., Santana-Castellano, D.,
Suárez de Tangil, M., Collado-Sánchez, C., and Hernández-Brito,
J. J.: A three-year time-series of dust deposition flux measurements in Gran
Canaria, Spain: A comparison of wet and dry surface deposition samplers,
Atmos. Environ., 79, 689–694, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Losno, R.: Chimie d'éléments minéraux en trace dans les pluies
Méditerranéennes, PhD Thesis, Université Paris7, France, 184 pp.,
1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Loÿe-Pilot, M. D. and Martin, J. M.: Saharan dust input to the Western
Mediterranean: an eleven years record in Corsica, in: The impact of desert
dust across the Mediterranean, edited by: Guerzoni, S. and Chester, R.,
Kluwer Acad. Publ., Dordrecht, the Netherlands, 191–199, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Markaki, Z., Loÿe-Pilot, M. D., Violaki, K., Benyahya, L., and
Mihalopoulos, N.: Variability of atmospheric deposition of dissolved nitrogen
and phosphorus in the Mediterranean and possible link to the anomalous
seawater N/P ratio, Mar. Chem., 120, 187–194, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>Morales-Baquero, R., Pulido-Villena, E., and Reche, I.: Chemical signature of
Saharan dust on dry and wet atmospheric deposition in the south-western
Mediterranean region, Tellus B, 65, 18720, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.18720" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.18720</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Orange, D., Gac, J. Y., Probst, J. L., and Tanre, D.: Mesure du dépôt
au sol des aérosols désertiques. Une méthode simple de
prélèvement: le capteur pyramidal, Comptes rendus de l'Académie
des Sciences Paris, 311, 167–172, 1990.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>Osada, K., Ura, S., Kagawa, M., Mikami, M., Tanaka, T. Y., Matoba, S., Aoki,
K., Shinoda, M., Kurosaki, Y., Hayashi, M., Shimizu, A., and Uematsu, M.: Wet
and dry deposition of mineral dust particles in Japan: factors related to
temporal variation and spatial distribution, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14,
1107–1121, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-1107-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-1107-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
Ozsoy, T.: Atmospheric wet deposition of soluble macro-nutrients in the
Cilician Basin, north-eastern Mediterranean sea, J. Environ. Monit., 5,
971–976, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>Pey, J., Querol, X., Alastuey, A., Forastiere, F., and Stafoggia, M.: African
dust outbreaks over the Mediterranean Basin during 2001–2011: PM<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mn>10</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula>
concentrations, phenomenology and trends, and its relation with synoptic and
mesoscale meteorology, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 13, 1395–1410,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-1395-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-13-1395-2013</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>Pranesha, T. S. and Kamra, A. K.: Scavenging of aerosol particles by large
water drops: 1. Neutral case, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 23373–23380,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/96JD01311" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/96JD01311</ext-link>, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>Prospero, J. M., Landing, W. M., and Schulz, M.: African dust deposition to
Florida: Temporal and spatial variability and comparisons to models, J.
Geophys. Res., 115, D13304, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD012773" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD012773</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>Pulido-Villena, E., Wagener, T., and Guieu, C.: Bacterial response to dust
pulses in the western Mediterranean: Implications for carbon cycling in the
oligotrophic ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 22, GB1020,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2007GB003091" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2007GB003091</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Rajot, J. L.: Wind-blown sediment mass budget of Sahelian village land units
in Niger, Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France, 172,
523–531, 2001.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Remoudaki, E., Bergametti, G., and Buat-Ménard, P.: Temporal variability
of atmospheric lead concentrations and fluxes over the Northwestern
Mediterranean Sea, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 1043–1055, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>Ridame, C., Guieu, C., and Loÿe-Pilot, M. D.: Trend in total atmospheric
deposition fluxes of aluminium, iron, and trace metals in the northwestern
Mediterranean over the past decade (1985–1997), J. Geophys. Res., 104,
30127–30138, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1999JD900747" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/1999JD900747</ext-link>, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Rognon, P., Coudé-Gaussen, G., Revel, M., Grousset, F. E., and Pedemay,
P.: Holocene saharan dust deposition on the Cape Verde Islands:
Sedimentological and Nd-Sr isotopic evidence, Sedimentology, 43, 359–366,
1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>Sciare, J., Oikonomou, K., Cachier, H., Mihalopoulos, N., Andreae, M. O.,
Maenhaut, W., and Sarda-Estève, R.: Aerosol mass closure and
reconstruction of the light scattering coefficient over the Eastern
Mediterranean Sea during the MINOS campaign, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 5,
2253–2265, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-5-2253-2005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-5-2253-2005</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Seinfeld, J. H. and Pandis, S. N.: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From
Air Pollution to Climate Change, J. Wiley, New York, USA, 136 pp., 1998.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Sheldon, R. W.: Size separation of marine seston by membrane and glass-fiber
filters, Limnol. Oceanogr., 17, 494–498, 1972.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>Slinn, S. A. and Slinn, W. G. N.: Predictions for particle deposition on
natural waters, Atmos. Environ., 14, 1013–1016, 1980. </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Slinn, W. G. N.: Precipitation scavenging, In Atmospheric Sciences and Power
Production, chapter 11, edited by: Randerson, D., 466–532, no. DOE/TIC-27601
(DE84005177), Office of Health and Environmental Research, Division of
Biomedical Environmental Research, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Washington, DC,
1984.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib50"><label>50</label><mixed-citation>
Sow, M., Goossens, D., and Rajot, J. L.: Calibration of the MDCO dust
collector and of four versions of the inverted frisbee dust deposition
sampler, Geomorphology, 82, 360–375, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib51"><label>51</label><mixed-citation>
Sun, H., Nelson, M., Chen, F., and Husch, J.: Soil mineral structural water
loss during loss on ignition analyses, Can. J. Soil Sci., 89, 603–610, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib52"><label>52</label><mixed-citation>Ternon, E., Guieu, C., Loÿe-Pilot, M.-D., Leblond, N., Bosc, E., Gasser,
B., Miquel, J.-C., and Martín, J.: The impact of Saharan dust on the
particulate export in the water column of the North Western Mediterranean
Sea, Biogeosciences, 7, 809–826, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/bg-7-809-2010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/bg-7-809-2010</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib53"><label>53</label><mixed-citation>Textor, C., Schulz, M., Guibert, S., Kinne, S., Balkanski, Y., Bauer, S.,
Berntsen, T., Berglen, T., Boucher, O., Chin, M., Dentener, F., Diehl, T.,
Easter, R., Feichter, H., Fillmore, D., Ghan, S., Ginoux, P., Gong, S.,
Grini, A., Hendricks, J., Horowitz, L., Huang, P., Isaksen, I., Iversen, I.,
Kloster, S., Koch, D., Kirkevåg, A., Kristjansson, J. E., Krol, M.,
Lauer, A., Lamarque, J. F., Liu, X., Montanaro, V., Myhre, G., Penner, J.,
Pitari, G., Reddy, S., Seland, Ø., Stier, P., Takemura, T., and Tie, X.:
Analysis and quantification of the diversities of aerosol life cycles within
AeroCom, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 6, 1777–1813, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-6-1777-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-6-1777-2006</ext-link>,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib54"><label>54</label><mixed-citation>
Theodosi, C., Markaki, Z., and Mihalopoulos, N.: Iron speciation, solubility
and temporal variability in wet and dry deposition in the Eastern
Mediterranean, Mar. Chem., 120, 100–107, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib55"><label>55</label><mixed-citation>
Venkatram, A. and Pleim, J.: The electrical analogy does not apply to
modeling dry deposition of particles, Atmos. Environ., 33, 3075–3076, 1999.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib56"><label>56</label><mixed-citation>
Wang, P. K. and Pruppacher, H. R.: An experimental determination of the
efficiency with which aerosol particles are collected by water drops in
subsaturated air, J. Atmos. Sci., 34, 1664–1669, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib57"><label>57</label><mixed-citation>
Wesely, M. L.: Parameterizations of surface resistance to gaseous dry
deposition in regional-scale numerical models, Atmos. Environ., 23,
1293–1304, 1989.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib58"><label>58</label><mixed-citation>
Whitby, K. T. and Cantrell, B. K.: Atmospheric Aerosols: Characteristics and
Measurement, International Conference on Environmental Sensing and Assessment
(ICESA), Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE),
14–19 September 1975, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 1976.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib59"><label>59</label><mixed-citation>
Wiggs, G. F. S., Leys, J., McTainsh, G. H., Heidenrich, S., and Strong, C.: A
wind tunnel study of the collection efficiency of an aerodynamically improved
“Frisbee” dust trap, Proc. ICAR5/GCTE-SEN Joint Conference, Int. Center for
Arid and Semiarid Land Studies, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA,
Publ. 02-2, 133–141, 2–25 July 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib60"><label>60</label><mixed-citation>Zhao, T. L., Gong, S. L., Zhang, X. Y., and McKendry, I. G.: Modeled
size-segregated wet and dry deposition budgets of soil dust aerosol during
ACE – Asia 2001: Implications for trans-Pacific transport, J. Geophys. Res.,
108, 8665, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2002JD003363" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2002JD003363</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    </article>
