<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">AMT</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Atmospheric Measurement Techniques</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">AMT</abbrev-journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Atmos. Meas. Tech.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">1867-8548</issn>
<publisher><publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>

    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/amt-9-6051-2016</article-id><title-group><article-title>Evaluating the influence of laser wavelength and detection stage geometry on optical detection efficiency
in a <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> single-particle mass spectrometer</article-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Evaluating the influence of laser wavelength and detection stage geometry}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{N. Marsden et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Marsden</surname><given-names>Nicholas</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6242-929X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Flynn</surname><given-names>Michael J.</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Taylor</surname><given-names>Jonathan W.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2120-186X</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1 aff2">
          <name><surname>Allan</surname><given-names>James D.</given-names></name>
          
        <ext-link>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6492-4876</ext-link></contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Coe</surname><given-names>Hugh</given-names></name>
          <email>hugh.coe@manchester.ac.uk</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution>Centre for Atmospheric Science, School of Earth, Atmospheric and
Environmental Sciences, <?xmltex \hack{\newline}?> University of Manchester, Manchester,
M13 9PL, UK</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution>National Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of
Manchester, Manchester, UK</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Hugh Coe (hugh.coe@manchester.ac.uk)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>15</day><month>December</month><year>2016</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>9</volume>
      <issue>12</issue>
      <fpage>6051</fpage><lpage>6068</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>29</day><month>April</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-request"><day>12</day><month>May</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>3</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>4</day><month>November</month><year>2016</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
<license license-type="open-access">
<license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</ext-link></license-p>
</license>
</permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016.html">This article is available from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016.html</self-uri>
<self-uri xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016.pdf</self-uri>


      <abstract>
    <p>Single-particle
mass spectrometry (SPMS) is a useful tool for the online
study of aerosols with the ability to measure size-resolved chemical
composition with a temporal resolution relevant to atmospheric processes. In
SPMS, optical particle detection is used for the effective temporal alignment
of an ablation laser pulse with the presence of a particle in the ion source,
and it gives the option of aerodynamic sizing by measuring the offset of
particle arrival times between two detection stages. The efficiency of the
optical detection stage has a strong influence on the overall instrument
performance.</p>
    <p>A custom detection laser system consisting of a high-powered fibre-coupled
Nd:YAG solid-state laser with a collimated beam was implemented in the
detection stage of a laser ablation aerosol particle time-of-flight (LAAP-TOF)
single-particle mass spectrometer without major
modifications to instrument geometry. The use of a collimated laser beam
permitted the construction of a numerical model that predicts the effects of
detection laser wavelength, output power, beam focussing characteristics,
light collection angle, particle size, and refractive index on the effective
detection radius (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the detection laser beam. We compare the model
predictions with an ambient data set acquired during the Ice in Clouds
Experiment – Dust (ICE-D) project.</p>
    <p>The new laser system resulted in an order-of-magnitude improvement in
instrument sensitivity to spherical particles in the size range 500–800 nm
compared to a focussed 405 nm laser diode system. The model demonstrates that
the limit of detection in terms of particle size is determined by the
scattering cross section (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as predicted by Mie theory. In addition,
if light is collected over a narrow collection angle, oscillations in the
magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to particle diameter result in a
variation in R, resulting in large particle-size-dependent variation in
detection efficiency across the particle transmission range. This detection
bias is imposed on the aerodynamic size distributions measured by the
instrument and accounts for some of the detection bias towards sea salt
particles in the ambient data set.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Ambient measurements of aerosol properties are required to further our
understanding of the role of aerosol in climate <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx3" id="paren.1"/> and the
detrimental effects on human health <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx39" id="paren.2"/>. The dynamic nature of
atmospheric processes make the online measurement of aerosol properties very
challenging, and the choice of techniques depends on the specific aerosol
property of interest and the temporal resolution required. In the field of
atmospheric science, the importance of refractory aerosols in atmospheric
processes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx12 bib1.bibx23" id="paren.3"/> has increased the demand for
online measurement of size-resolved composition at low number
concentrations.</p>
      <p>In single-particle mass spectrometry (SPMS), high-powered laser pulses are
used to vaporise and ionise ambient aerosols that have been focussed into a
narrow particle beam. The generated ions are usually analysed by
time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOF-MS), providing detailed composition
information on a particle-by-particle basis. This approach allows for aerosol
particle number concentrations to be evaluated by particle composition as
well as the probing of internal mixing state that cannot be done by bulk
analysis techniques <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx41 bib1.bibx57 bib1.bibx45" id="paren.4"><named-content content-type="pre">e.g.</named-content></xref>. The
type of material that can be analysed is determined by the power and
wavelength of the pulsed laser system, whilst the temporal resolution is
related to the probability that a particle will be coincident with the laser
pulse in the ion source, a phenomenon often referred to as hit rate. In many
systems, optical particle detection is incorporated into the instrument to
provide an external trigger to the pulsed laser – temporally aligning the
laser pulse with the presence of a particle in the ionisation region,
resulting in an increased hit rate.</p>
      <p>The incorporation of two optical detection stages into the instrument allows
the determination of particle velocity by measuring the time taken for
particles to travel the known distance between two detection stages. When
used with an aerodynamic lens inlet, particle velocity is a function of the
vacuum aerodynamic diameter, allowing for a particle size measurement to be
made in addition to the single-particle composition measurement made by the
TOF-MS. In some instruments, the optical detection stage has also been used
to optically size particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.5"/> and to directly measure
light-absorbing properties <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx32" id="paren.6"/> by calculating the scattering cross
section from the intensity of detected light. These tandem measurements of
single particles allow for the direct linking of composition with physical
properties such as size, shape, and density <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx35 bib1.bibx53" id="paren.7"/>.
The design of the optical detection stage has a strong influence on the
overall instrument performance and has been the focus of much research
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.8"/>. The features of SPMS instruments have previously been
described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx48" id="text.9"/>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx36" id="text.10"/>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="text.11"/>, and
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx21" id="text.12"/>.</p>
      <p>Optical particle detection techniques are well established for the
size-resolved counting of particles in optical particle counters
(OPCs) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.13"/>, which are similar in many respects to the optical
detection systems employed in SPMS. Particles are detected by collecting the
scattered light generated from the interaction of a particle beam with a
continuous-wave (cw) laser. When employed in SPMS, the scattering signals
need only exceed a certain threshold to register a particle event, unlike
standard OPCs, which optically size the particle based on the magnitude of
the scattering signal. Incorporating an optical system into the geometry of a
SPMS creates additional design challenges.</p>
      <p>Advances in laser technology have influenced the design and development of
the optical detection stage in SPMS. Early instruments utilised a helium–neon
gas laser with a wavelength of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>633</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> nm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx20 bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx34" id="paren.14"/> with an output in the range of 4–10 mW. The implementation of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>532</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> nm Nd:YAG solid-state lasers with an output in the range of 50–300 mW
greatly improved laser fluence and beam quality in later-generation
instrument <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx51 bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.15"/>. Other
groups have opted for newly developed laser diodes <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="paren.16"/>
that, while producing less output (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>40</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> mW), have shorter wavelengths
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>405</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> nm) and are relatively cheap and easy to implement. Shorter
wavelengths are desirable when sampling particles whose diameter (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>D</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is
smaller than the wavelength of the incident radiation as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
proportional to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">6</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in the Rayleigh regime.</p>
      <p>The most efficient particle detection systems use an elliptical mirror to
collect scattered light over a wide angle, thus maximising scattering signal
at the detector <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx55" id="paren.17"/>. However, the physical
dimensions of a standard elliptical mirror prevent the detection stage being
located within the ionisation region. Consequently, it must be located
upstream in the vacuum housing, and complex trigger circuits must be made
that produce a particle-size-dependent trigger delay <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx55" id="paren.18"/>.
Such systems have excellent particle detection efficiencies but have a
hit rate that is limited by the probability of hitting a detected particle
with the pulsed laser.</p>
      <p>Composition measurements with SPMS are usually considered qualitative due to
shot-to-shot variations in instrument function and a strong matrix effect
that influences the ionisation process <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx43 bib1.bibx59 bib1.bibx44" id="paren.19"/>. These phenomena result in ion signals that are not proportional
to the mass of the chemical species and a particle number counting bias with
respect to particle type. Numerous studies have reported quantitative or
semi-quantitative results by using relative sensitivity factors to account
for matrix effects <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx17" id="paren.20"/>, accounting for transmission and
hit rate bias <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx28" id="paren.21"/>, and calculating scaling functions by
referencing conventional particle counters <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx1" id="paren.22"/>. Quantification
of particle number concentrations by these methods requires large assumptions
to made about particle properties such as shape, density, and refractive
index, making the application to ambient aerosol difficult. For instruments
that utilise elliptical mirrors for particle detection, the optical particle
detection efficiency is usually only considered a limiting factor when
assessing the low particle size cut.</p>
      <p>Despite these limitations, SPMS has proven very useful in measuring relative
trends in particle number concentrations and chemical markers. A number of
custom-built instrument are in operation for laboratory, field-based, and
aircraft-based studies. In addition, the commercially available aerosol
time-of-flight mass spectrometer (ATOFMS) (model 3800, TSI Inc.) is operated by
several research groups worldwide. Recent examples of the application of this
instrument include source apportionment and mixing-state studies in urban
environments <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx18 bib1.bibx9 bib1.bibx16" id="paren.23"/>, the study of the
atmospheric ageing of mineral dust during long-range transport
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx49 bib1.bibx8 bib1.bibx11" id="paren.24"/>, and the characterisation of
particles of low number concentration in the Arctic <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx46" id="paren.25"/>. The
direct comparison of the response of single-particle instruments with different
designs <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx31 bib1.bibx22" id="paren.26"/> highlights the need to consider the
factors that affect particle counting statistics in SPMS.</p>
      <p>The laser ablation aerosol particle time-of-flight (LAAP-TOF) spectrometer is a type of
single-particle mass spectrometer manufactured by AeroMegt (GmbH) and is in
an early stage of commercial development. The instrument features an
aerodynamic lens inlet (model LPL-2.5, AeroMegt GmbH), a bipolar TOF
analyser (TOFWerks AG), a novel particle detection system based on 405 nm
laser diode technology, and a compact light collection optics assembly
consisting of fibre optic guides that collect scattered light over a narrow
scattering angle and is located directly in the ionisation region.</p>
      <p>We present an evaluation of the instrument performance with the original
instrument manufacturer (OEM) detection stage design that identified the
optical detection system as a limiting factor in instrument performance. The
instrument performance is compared with a customised detection system in
which the detection laser is replaced with a fibre-coupled 532 nm 1 W Nd:YAG
solid-state laser system with a collimated laser beam. The influence of
detection stage geometry is evaluated using the customised detection system
as the laser intensity distribution within a collimated beam is relatively
simple to model because, unlike a focused beam, there is no variation along
the beam axis due to depth of field.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <title>Description of instrumentation</title>
      <p>The instrument design has previously been described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.27"/>.
Here, we provide a brief overview of the instrument layout and describe the
modifications made to the optical detection system. A schematic layout of the
instrument is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F1"/>. Aerosol enters the
instrument via a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>100</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m critical orifice and passes through an
aerodynamic lens before beam expansion into the first low-pressure region of
the instrument. The particle beam passes through second and third
differentially pumped stages separated by skimmers that remove the majority
of the gas phase. Detection stage 1 is encountered in the third pumping stage
when the particles pass through a cw laser beam arranged orthogonally to the
axis of the particle beam. After passing a differentially pumped aperture
into the TOF vacuum region, the particles encounter detection stage 2, which
is located within the extraction optics of the TOF analyser. Detection stage 2
triggers an excimer laser (ArF <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">λ</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>193</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm, model EX5, GAM) to fire
an intense pulse in a direction that is co-axial but counter-propagate with
the particle beam. The cloud of ions generated by the interaction of the
material with the high-energy pulse is extracted into two linearly opposing
TOF analysers, for positive and negative ions respectively.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1"><caption><p>Schematic diagram of
the LAAP-TOF instrument.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>Instrument control is performed using IgorDAQ software (AeroMegt Gmbh) based
on IGOR (Wavemetrics), which incorporates TofDaq (TOFWerk AG) data
acquisition. The instrument can be operated in three modes:
<list list-type="bullet"><list-item><p>Auto-trigger. The excimer is set to fire at a user-defined
frequency (up to 100 Hz), and mass spectra will be generated at a rate that is
determined by the probability of a particle being synchronous with sufficient
energy from the 8 ns excimer pulse in the ionisation region.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Second laser only. The excimer laser will fire when it receives
a trigger signal (with a set delay) from the detection stage 2, increasing
the probability of generating a mass spectrum.</p></list-item><list-item><p>Both lasers. The instrument actively sizes particles, and a trigger
is required from both detection stage 1 and 2 in order to fire the excimer laser.</p></list-item></list></p>
      <p>The instrument features two optical particle detection stages which have very
similar designs. A high-powered cw laser beam, arranged in a vertical
orientation, passes through the instrument to a beam dump on the underside of
the vacuum chamber. The instrument is aligned so that the particles in the
particle beam interact with the detection laser radiation in a position where
scattered light can be collected by a set of 12 optical fibres, arranged in a
concentric pattern centred on the axis of the cw laser beam. The diameter of
the circle is defined by the naked fibre termini, and the position below the
axis of the particle beam is such that light is collected over an angle of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 13–15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to the incident laser radiation at detection
stage 1 and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to the incident laser radiation
at detection stage 2. The compact design of the collection optics allows the
detection of particles within the ionisation region of the mass spectrometer
which negates the requirement for size-dependent trigger delays that are a
feature of some systems.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Schematic
diagrams of the LAAP-TOF detection stages. <bold>(a)</bold> Detection system A featuring a
405 nm diode-based system with a focussed beam (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>51.2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and
a sheath type spatial filter. <bold>(b)</bold> Detection system B featuring a custom-built
532 nm Nd:YAG DPSS fibre-coupled system producing a collimated beam with a
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> waist diameter of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>330</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m, and spatial filtering outside the
vacuum housing. </p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p>The optical fibres for light collection are connected to two photomultiplier
tubes (PMTs) so that each PMT receives light from six fibres. A PMT signal pulse
height above a user-set threshold results in a transistor–transistor logic
(TTL) pulse from the discriminator to the microprocessor control unit (MCU)
in the timing electronics. A pulse is required from both PMTs in the
detections stage in order for the MCU to recognise the presence of a
particle. The thresholds are set experimentally by finding the minimum
threshold value at which false triggers (noise) are not created – resulting in
the discrimination between high-frequency noise and true particles, improving
the signal to noise performance of the detection system in a similar set-up
to that described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx52" id="text.28"/>.</p>
      <p>In this study, two different systems of laser delivery are evaluated:
detection system A, based on a laser diode emitting light at 405 nm that is
focussed by a lens with a long focal length and spatially filtered with a
sheath within the vacuum chamber, and detection system B, based on a custom-built
fibre-coupled system featuring a Nd:YAG diode-pumped solid-state laser
(DPSS), emitting at 532 nm that is collimated by a fiberport and spatially
filtered by an orifice outside the vacuum chamber. Schematic diagrams of
detection system A and detection system B are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a and b
respectively. A summary of the key characteristics of the laser systems is
given in Table <xref ref-type="table" rid="Ch1.T1"/>.</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1"><caption><p>Summary of the characteristics of the detection laser systems.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="3">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="left"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">System A</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">System B</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Laser type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Diode</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">DPSS</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Wavelength</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">405 nm</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">532 nm</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Max Power</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">450 mW</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">1 W</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Typical operating output<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">50 mW</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">300 mW</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beam type</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Focussed</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Collimated</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Beam width</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>51.2</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>330</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Spatial filter</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Sheath</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Orifice</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∗</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Typical operating power refers to the actual power delivered to the
detection stage at typical operating setting and after beam focussing and
filtering.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p>Laser type is a fundamental choice that has an effect on the implementation,
usability, and reliability of the system. Laser diodes have the advantage of
being relatively cheap and easy to implement. However, diodes have a
significantly shorter lifetime than a DPSS system especially if operated at
or close to maximum output power. Consequently, the laser diode in detection
system A is operated at a fraction of the maximum available output power
which is set by adjusting the drive to the diode. The output that is produced
by a set drive voltage deteriorates over an diode-specific timescale, and, as
the actual output can only be measuring with a laser power meter outside the
instrument, there is some uncertainty as to the actual diode power output if
the instrument is continually operated over a number of days or weeks.</p>
      <p>In contrast, the Nd:YAG DPSS laser is specified as having an mean time to
failure (MTTF) of &gt; 400 000 h at full power and automatically maintains
output power to the user-requested value. However the system is much larger
and more difficult to implement than the diode system, particularly in a
transportable instrument. A fibre coupling was chosen to transfer the beam
from the laser to the detection stage to eliminate the need for complex
optomechanics. The coupling of a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>3.3</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m single-mode fibre in this set-up
results in a power transmission efficiency of 40 %. The typical operation
condition of this system produces an output of 300 mW in a collimated beam
after spatial filtering.</p>
      <p>Overall, the extra power available from the fibre-coupled system allowed
for a larger detection beam width without significantly reducing the peak
intensity produced by the tightly focussed diode beam. A more detailed
description of the detection system designs can be found in Appendix B.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Methods</title>
      <p>A number of methodologies were used to evaluate the instrument performance.
The creation of aerosols in the laboratory was required for the instrument
set-up procedure, instrument sensitivity testing, and the subsequent
evaluation of performance of the particle detection system. Ambient sampling
was carried out to measure the sensitivity of the instrument in atmospheric
conditions and assess the suitability of the system for in situ measurement
of size-resolved chemical composition of atmospheric aerosols.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS1">
  <title>Laboratory experiments</title>
      <p>Monodisperse particles of polystyrene latex spheres (PSL) (Duke Scientific,
Inc.) were produced using an atomiser aerosol generator
(Topas GmbH, model ATM226) and a custom-built scanning
mobility particle sizer (SMPS). The SMPS comprised a differential mobility
analyser (DMA, TSI Inc., model 3081) and condensation particle counter (CPC,
TSI Inc., model 3786-LP). The flow was divided between the CPC and LAAP-TOF
after the DMA using an equal Y splitter and conductive tubing.</p>
      <p>A measurement of the particle beam density profile was made using the
detection laser to probe the particle density in a experiment similar to the
optical detection method described by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx38" id="text.29"/>. The optical
detection stages were aligned onto the particle beam which was placed in a
central position with respect to the instrument axis. The particle beam was
then traversed in the horizontal axis (orthogonal to the detection beam axis)
using the lens adjuster to pivot the inlet in the gimbal in 0.05 mm intervals.
The number of particle pulses was measured over a 1 min period at each
position using an oscilloscope. The lateral movement of the particle beam in
the plane of detection can be easily calculated with simple trigonometry. A
particle density profile was then constructed using the data.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS2">
  <title>Field deployment</title>
      <p>The instrument was deployed for ground-based ambient aerosol characterisation
during the Ice in Clouds Experiment – Dust (ICE-D) project in August 2015. ICE-D was
a multi-platform field campaign with the primary aims of studying
aerosol–cloud interactions during the evolution of towering cumulus clouds
over the sub-tropical Atlantic Ocean. The project had significant aircraft
and ground operations that involved the in situ characterisation of the
properties of mineral dust advected from the Sahara region.</p>
      <p>Ground-based aerosol characterisation took place at Praia International
Airport, Santiago Island, Cabo Verde, from 27 July to 23 August 2015. The
ground site comprised the Manchester aerosol container with a 30 m scaffold
tower for ambient aerosol sampling. The tower supported a pumped inlet that
was divided into heated lines inside the aerosol container, delivering
ambient aerosol to a host of instruments, including the LAAP-TOF and an
aerodynamic particle sizer (APS) (3321, TSI Inc.). The APS measures aerodynamic
particle diameters in the range 0.5–20 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m at a smpale flow rate of
1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Previous studies at this location have recorded a multi-modal aerosol size
distribution with number concentrations in the size range 0.5–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m of
between 2  and 100 cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for clean maritime conditions and dust
events respectively <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx27" id="paren.30"/>. With an inlet flow rate of
0.078 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, the LAAP-TOF was required to accumulate mass spectra for 1–10 % of
particles present during the ICE-D campaign in order to measure size-resolved
composition at a temporal resolution of several particles per minute.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS3">
  <title>Instrument performance definitions</title>
      <p>To characterise the instrument performance, we describe the elements that
contribute to the efficiency of the instrument in each acquisition mode. An
aerodynamic lens focusses particles of different size and shape with different
efficiency <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx29 bib1.bibx58" id="paren.31"/>. The transmission efficiency of the
aerodynamic lens (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Lens</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is defined as the proportion of spherical
particles with physical diameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that exit the expansion nozzle relative
to the number of particles that passed the critical orifice, i.e. a measure of
the losses that occur within the lens assembly and critical orifice holder.</p>
      <p>On supersonic expansion into the low vacuum of the instrument, a particle
beam is formed whose solid angle of divergence relative to the lens axis
defines a cross-sectional area at a set distance from the nozzle expansion.
This area has a 2-D Gaussian probability density function  (2DG-PDF)
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24" id="paren.32"/>. The probability of hitting a particle and obtaining a
mass spectrum within this 2DG-PDF is defined as the hit rate efficiency
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hit</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and is the product of the geometrical overlap of the excimer
laser focal point with the particle beam (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Geom</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), the temporal
overlap of the peak UV laser power with the presence of a particle in
ionisation the region (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Temp</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the ionisation efficiency of the UV
laser (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ion</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) with respect to the particle composition
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx10" id="paren.33"/>.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> The overlap of detection beam with a theoretical effective
detection radius (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 0.125 mm, with four normalised particle beams with
widths <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0625</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, 0.125, 0.25, and 0.5. <bold>(b)</bold> The relationship of
the effective detection radius (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) and detection efficiency (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>)
for a range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> values. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.125</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm is marked for reference.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016-f03.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The overall efficiency of the instrument to generate a mass spectrum from an
ambient aerosol population is acquisition mode specific. In the case of
“auto-trigger” mode, the probability that a mass spectrum will be generated
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AutoMS</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) is simply the product of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Lens</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hit</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.
The probability of hitting a particle and obtaining a mass spectrum in
“second-laser-only” mode includes an extra term relating to the
size-dependent optical detection efficiency (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The hit rate is
also modified with respect to free-firing mode because the term
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Temp</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is modified to a probability relating to the trigger delay and
the size-dependent particle velocity. In addition, the active area of the UV
ionisation is assumed to be larger than the active area of detection, so that
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Geom</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in this acquisition mode, providing the instrument is
correctly aligned. We defined the overall efficiency of second-laser-only
mode as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and using the definitions above it is defined by
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>). Note that all terms have a particle size dependence.

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E1" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Lens</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hit</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula></p>
      <p>The third acquisition mode, referred to as “both lasers” in the software,
involves the particle detection at both detection stage 1 and detection
stage 2 so that the aerodynamic size of a particle can be measurement before the
particle is ablated. The two detection stages will have different detection
efficiencies because of slightly different geometries and different particle
beam widths related to the down-stream distance from the nozzle of the
aerodynamic lens. We defined the sampling efficiency in both-lasers mode as
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SizedMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3.SS4">
  <title>Model of the optical detection geometry with a collimated detection beam</title>
      <p>The portion of the divergent particle beam sampled by the orthogonally
incident detection laser defines an active area of detection, where the
intensity of the radiation exceeds a minimum threshold (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) to produce
enough scattered light from the interaction of radiation with the particle
for the detection system to register a particle event. The resulting
efficiency of optical detection <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a function of the active area
of detection and the particle number density of the portion of the 2DG-PDF
particle beam that it covers, which have a size and shape dependence. For
simplicity, we modelled spherical particles, so the size dependence only was
considered.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><caption><p><bold>(a)</bold> Gaussian intensity distribution for collimated laser beams of
fixed power focussed to detection beam width (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 0.02, 0.0825,
and 0.165. <bold>(b)</bold> The relationship of the effective detection radius (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with
respect to detection beam width <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">detect</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>)</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of 0.5,
1.0, and 1.5 W mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. The beam widths shown in the left panel are marked for
reference.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=369.885827pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016-f04.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>It has been shown that a 1-D Gaussian model is sufficient to quantify the
amount of a particle beam blocked by a thin wire <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25 bib1.bibx24" id="paren.34"/>. In the case of optical particle detection by a collimated
detection laser, we assumed that the detection beam is perfectly centred on
the particle beam, so that the portion of the particle beam that was actively
detected is the portion covered by an effective detection radius (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the
radial direction (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the centre of the particle beam. The general
relationship between particle beam width (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) was used to quantify <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a certain
particle diameter <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E2" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msqrt><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:msqrt></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle><mml:munderover><mml:mo movablelimits="false">∫</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:munderover><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">erf</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msqrt><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msqrt><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is demonstrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F3"/> for several particle beam widths. An <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of close
to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> is achieved when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is equivalent to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> width. Note
that, when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, doubling the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has the effect of
halving the detection efficiency. This loss of detection efficiency with
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> diminishes when <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The laser beam power density profile is also described by a 2DG-PDF
orthogonal to the laser beam axis. As the particle beam is orthogonal to the
laser beam axis, a 1-D Gaussian PDF describes the laser beam intensity profile
that is encountered by particles as they cross the detection stage. The
effective detection radius (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) was modelled for a specific detection laser
beam width (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) by the relationship in
Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>).<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><?xmltex \hack{\noindent}?>

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E3" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">ln</mml:mi><mml:mfenced close=")" open="("><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msqrt><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">π</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mfenced><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msqrt></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          The effects of the relationship shown in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>) are two-fold.
Firstly, the choice of detection beam width determines the active area
of detection at a set <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Secondly, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a controlling
influence on the portion of the collimated beam that will be active. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> demonstrates
the relationship of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for
set values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. In these examples, the output power of the laser is
constant but collimated to a range of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> beam widths. For small
detection beam widths, there is a weak dependence on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> as most of the
density profile exceeds the threshold (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>a).
However, for larger detection beam widths, larger values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are produced at
the expense of greater <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>-dependent variability (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/>b). For example, with a detection beam width of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0825</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, the effective detection radius (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) at an intensity
threshold of 0.5 W mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>  is almost double that of an intensity threshold of
1.0 W mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> but will fail to detect particles with an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.25</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> W mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm.</p>
      <p>The magnitude of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is a function of the scattering cross section of
the particle <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a transfer function <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> that describes the
minimum amount of power transfer to the detector required, and it accounts for
the collection and transfer of light by the fibre optics, the radiant
sensitivity of the detector, and the characteristics of the electronics in
the trigger unit. The relationship between <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is
shown in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>). The transfer function is assumed to be
the same for all particles <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx26" id="paren.35"/>, while <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> has a strong
dependence on the size and refractive index of the material.

                <disp-formula id="Ch1.E4" content-type="numbered"><mml:math display="block"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mstyle displaystyle="true"><mml:mfrac style="display"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:mfrac></mml:mstyle></mml:mrow></mml:math></disp-formula>

          For a given wavelength of incident light, Mie theory provides an exact
solution to the scattering of light by a sphere of known size and refractive
index. The scattnlay algorithm <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx37" id="paren.36"/> was used to model <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for a variety of collection angles, particle sizes, and incident wavelengths.
Examples of how <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> varies with particle size and wavelengths are
demonstrated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>. In these examples, the light
collection is set at 10–12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> (representing detection stage 2), and the
refractive index is 1.59. The wavelengths of commercially available laser
systems are plotted.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5"><caption><p>Values of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> vs. particle diameter calculated from the scattnlay algorithm
for wavelengths used in commercially available lasers. Refractive
index: 1.59; collection angle:  10–12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>.  </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016-f05.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4">
  <title>Results</title>
      <p>In Sect. 4.1 we compare the results of laboratory measurements of the
instrument performance with detection system A and detection system B in
second-laser-only acquisition mode (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), which showed
an improvement in instrument performance when the detection system with the
collimated beam was implemented. Using these results, along with a
measurement of the particle beam width (Sect. 4.2), we calculated the value
for the transfer function (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) described in the model by the empirical
measurement of the required model parameters with a 600 nm PSL particle. The
method used for calculating the transfer function is described in Sect. 4.3.</p>
      <p>The input of the transfer function into the numerical model of the optical
detection geometry allowed the calculation of the effective detection radius
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with respect to particle diameter across the transmission range of the
instrument (0.2–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m). The results of modelling the effect of different
optical detection system design parameters on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> are presented in Sect. 4.4.
In Sect. 4.5 we use the modelled data to explain the differences
between particle size distributions measured by the LAAP-TOF and those
measured by the APS in ambient data.</p>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS1">
  <title>Instrument performance measurements</title>
      <p>We directly measured the instrument performance in second-laser-only
acquisition mode (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in the laboratory by comparing
size-selected number concentrations measured with a CPC with the number of
mass spectra (cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) generated by the LAAP-TOF. Results of
this measurement using detection system A are shown in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a. The data show a characteristically steep
drop-off in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for small particles described by others
for instruments operating in a similar acquisition mode <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx5 bib1.bibx6" id="paren.37"/>. The minimum-sized particles that could be detected with the
405 nm diode system were 350 nm, and the maximum efficiency achieved was a
little over <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>0.01</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> for <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. For
particle <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 600 nm, the efficiency decreases with increasing particle size
so that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>800</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.005</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This result is
in good agreement with LAAP-TOF detection efficiency data recently reported
by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.38"/>, who detected a minimum particle size of 350 nm, a
peak detection efficiency of 0.025 at 450 nm, and decrease in sensitivity to
particle with diameters of 800 nm.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F6"><caption><p>Instrument performance measurements in “second-laser-only”
acquisition mode (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). Measurements are the comparison of
number concentration obtained by the CPC with the number of mass spectra
(cm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) obtained by the LAAP-TOF when sampling size-selected
laboratory-generated PSL aerosol. The scattering cross section (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for the
respective wavelength is plotted for reference. <bold>(a)</bold> Detection system A with
the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile for 405 nm light. <bold>(b)</bold> Detection system B with the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> profile for 532 nm light. The detection efficiency <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of
detection stage 2 is also plotted in panel <bold>(b)</bold>, which represents the number of
trigger events generated by the optical detection system.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=207.705118pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016-f06.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>To analyse the contributing factors to the reported efficiency, we examined
the data for 600 nm spherical particles in more detail. It is well established
that an aerodynamic lens can achieve an efficiency close to unity for the
size range under examination here (20–600 nm) <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx24 bib1.bibx54" id="paren.39"/>; therefore, although the lens is uncharacterised, we assumed
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Lens</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. It was observed that the vast majority of PSL
particles that produced an optical trigger also produced a mass spectrum so
that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hit</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. With reference to Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E1"/>), we
concluded that as a first approximation the observed performance was limited
by the optical detection stage, i.e. <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>The calculated scattering cross section (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) for 405 nm light is
plotted against particle diameter for comparison with <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Triggerd</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.25em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">MS</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>a. At the small particle sizes (200–600 nm)
there is a correlation between the two curves, indicating that the low size
cut-off in the sampling efficiency, in this case 350 nm, is limited by the
scattering intensity of small particles. However, it is also clear that
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> function is non-monotonic and will also affect the detection
efficiency of larger particles, particularly in the region 700–900 nm as
suggested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx13" id="text.40"/> and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx15" id="text.41"/>.</p>
      <p><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of small particles (200–800 nm) at 532 nm also correlates with the
sampling efficiency curve measured with detection system B (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F6"/>b). This method of detection laser delivery results
in values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of an order of magnitude higher than detection
system A for particles larger than 500 nm. There is evidence that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hit</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
with this detection geometry as a significant number of optical triggers did
not produce a mass spectrum. For example <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and the
corresponding optical detection efficiency <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>,
indicating that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hit</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.79</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The shift in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
function with respect to particle size when changing laser wavelength
confirms that a more general case <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
for detection system A and that the observed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>800</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> is an optical detection effect and not a lens
transmission effect.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS2">
  <title>Particle beam width measurements</title>
      <p>Measurements of the particle beam width were made with a particle beam created
from the nebulisation of 600 nm sized PSLs using the optical characterisation
method. The resulting particle density profiles at detection stage 1 and
detection stage 2 are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F7"/>. Assuming the active
area of detection is very small compared to the beam cross-sectional area,
and that the focal point passes through the particle beam axis, a 1-D Gaussian
curve fit is a sufficient approximation <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx25" id="paren.42"/>. The beam width is
estimated to be <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.13</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm at detection stage 1 (125 mm from
the lens exit), and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm at detection stage 2 (240 mm
from the exit of the aerodynamic lens).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F7"><caption><p>Gaussian particle beam profiles obtained
using the optical characterisation method. Measurements were made using a beam
of 600 nm PSL at detection stage 1 and detection stage 2 at a distance of
125 and 240 mm from the aerodynamic lens nozzle respectively. Error bars are
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> standard errors, assuming Poisson statistics.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016-f07.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS3">
  <title>Derivation of the transfer function</title>
      <p>A collimated detection laser beam, whose full <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> width of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>330</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
(equivalent to <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0825</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm) exceeds <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, transecting a
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm wide particle beam would theoretically give an
optical detection efficiency <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.53</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(Eq. <xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>). This value is significantly higher than the measured
value of 0.19. The most likely explanation is that with 600 nm diameter
spherical particles the effective detection radius (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is significantly
less than the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> beam diameter because the intensity threshold of
detection is only exceeded by a portion of the Gaussian beam profile.</p>
      <p>We used the model of the optical detection geometry to calculate the transfer
function (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). Using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E2"/>) and the empirically derived
values <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.19</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mn>600</mml:mn><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.26</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, the
calculated value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msubsup><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">detect</mml:mi><mml:mn>600</mml:mn></mml:msubsup><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.057</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm. From Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>),
this value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> in a detection beam width <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0825</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm corresponds
to laser beam intensity (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of 1.1 W mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. Using Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E4"/>)
and a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value of 5.066 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> mm<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> derived
from a scattnlay calculation, the value of the transfer function (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) is
5.59 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> W.</p>
      <p>The calculation of the transfer function allows <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to be plotted as a
function of particle size across the particle transmission size range by
calculating <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for any particle diameter using the corresponding value
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in Eq. (<xref ref-type="disp-formula" rid="Ch1.E3"/>).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS4">
  <title>Estimations of the effective detection beam radius with selected wavelengths, collection angles, and signal-to-noise conditions.</title>
      <p>The model allows for the evaluation of the effective detection radius (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>)
with respect to particle size with selected optical detection stage design
parameters. Results of modelling the design parameters used in detection
system B with PSL particles across the theoretical transmission range of the
aerodynamic lens are represented by the solid green line in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a, b, and c.
The design parameters used are wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 532 nm, collection angle <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10–12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
detection beam width <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0825</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm, and a refractive index of 1.59 for PSL was used in the scattnlay
model for Mie scattering. The data predict a rapid drop-off in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> when the
particle diameter is less than <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo><mml:mn>550</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> nm. Oscillations of the
scattering phase function with respect to particle size impact <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> across the
transmission range, with distinct minima observed at 1 and 2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m
particle diameter.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F8" specific-use="star"><caption><p>Results of modelling the
optical detection geometry with selected design configurations, showing the
calculated effective detection radius (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) with respect to particle diameter
for PSL particles (refractive index <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.59). Profiles are modelled by
changing only one parameter with respect to the design of detection system B,
which is shown as a solid green line in each plot for reference. The
reference configuration of detection system B is <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>0.0825</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm,
wavelength <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>=</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 532 nm, and a light collection angle of 10–12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>. <bold>(a)</bold> The
effect of using detection laser wavelengths 405 and 808 nm, <bold>(b)</bold> the effect
of light collection angle of 13–15 and 10–170<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, <bold>(c)</bold> the
effect of improving the signal-to-noise ratio of detection system B twofold
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 2)
and 10-fold (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>×</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10).</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=341.433071pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016-f08.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The effect of changing the detection laser wavelength is demonstrated in
Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>a. The model predicts that using a detection system
laser wavelength of 405 nm results in a lower particle size cut-off (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) as
expected. In general, shorter wavelengths produce deeper oscillations at a
higher frequency than longer wavelengths. A wavelength of 808 nm produces the
most stable profile but comes at the expense of the small particle detection,
which drops-off at 700 nm.</p>
      <p>The effect of light collection angle was modelled by changing the input
parameters to the scattnlay algorithm. Light collected over 10–170<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
which is similar to the collection angle of some elliptical mirrors
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx42 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.43"/>, produces a smoother profile with a lower
particle size cut-off than the narrow angles represented by the LAAP-TOF
detection system (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b). This is because collecting
more light increases the integrated phase function and requires less
intensity in the detection beam in order to exceed <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. The variation
in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> stabilises near the maximum attainable value if the value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is close
to the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> detection beam width. Note that light collection at
detection stage 1 (front) in the LAAP-TOF, represented in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>b at an angle of 13–15<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>,
predicts blind spots in
the transmission range. This is not thought to be the actual case for the
system as the front optics have a lower background noise than the rear optics
and so will have a lower value of the transfer function, producing smaller
amplitude variation in the profile.</p>
      <p>Adjusting the value of the transfer function in the model allows for the
simulation of the impact of signal-to-noise ratio on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>. This is important as
signal-to-noise ratio can be affected by alignment of the system during set-up as
well as the design of the detection stage. Increasing the signal-to-noise
ratio by a factor of 2 and by a factor of 10 is simulated in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F8"/>c.
In general, a larger signal-to-noise ratio produces a
larger <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> over the transmission range and reduces the low particle cut-off
size. However, it does not reduce the amplitude of oscillation in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
function as much as changing the collection angle.</p>
      <p>The choice of optical lens determines the width of the beam waist of the
collimated beam. With a set laser power output, increasing the beam waist
width has the effect of reducing the intensity at a given radial distance
from the beam axis. Results of modelling of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F4"/> demonstrate that a common
maximum <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> does not exist for the variable <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. This indicates a particle
size dependence in the optimal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> value with this detection geometry.
This effect is quantified in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a, which shows the
variation in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> as a function of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and particle diameter. Small focal
points give the least variation with respect to particle size but produce a
relatively small effective beam radius (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">&lt;</mml:mi><mml:mn>0.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> mm). Values of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> can be produced
that exceed 0.6 mm but come at the expense of very high variation with respect
to particle size that causes blind areas at 1000 and 2000 nm particle
diameter due to an effective detection radius of 0 mm.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F9"><caption><p>Model of the effective detection beam radius as a function of
particle size and collimated beam waist size. <bold>(a)</bold> A detection system
comprising 300 mW and a wavelength of 532 nm, with light collection
10–12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>, and <bold>(b)</bold> a detection system comprising equally mixed 532 and
808 nm laser sources.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=184.942913pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016-f09.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4.SS5">
  <title>Comparison of the estimated effective beam radius with ambient measurements of particle size distributions</title>
      <p>The results of modelling the effective detection radius are compared to the
particle counting statistics from the measurement of polydisperse aerosol
populations at the ambient measurement site. The size-resolved composition
measurement of  99 463 particles obtained over a 7-day period were analysed
using the LAAP-TOF Data Analysis tool (v1.0.0, AeroMegt GmbH). In order to
analyse the particle counting statistics of the principal particle
composition types, the mass spectra were placed into six classes using the
fuzzy c-mean clustering algorithm provided in the software. An Epsilon target
value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and a fuzzyfier value of 1.2 were chosen. Mass spectra
representing the cluster centres of each class are shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>.</p>
      <p>The first class (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>a) is identified as
silicate and contains characteristic markers of sodium (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 23), aluminium
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 27), silicon (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 28), potassium (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 39), and iron (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 56) in
positive-ion and oxides of silicon (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>60 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> -76 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) in
negative-ion mode. In addition, there are markers for chlorine (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>37), nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>46), and sulphate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>97), indicating that these silicate
mineral particles are internally mixed with secondary species. The second
class (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>b) is dominated by the same
secondary species in negative-ion mode and shows the presence of ammonium
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 18), nitrate (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 30), and carbon clusters (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 12, 24, 36) in positive-ion mode. We
have designated the name carbonaceous/secondary to the second particle class.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F10"><caption><p>Representative spectral patterns of the cluster
centres <bold>(a–f)</bold> produced by fuzzy c-means cluster analysis of ambient data acquired at Praia,
Cabo Verde, during the ICE-D campaign in August 2015.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016-f10.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The remaining four particle classes (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F10"/>c–f)
are dominated by potassium (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 39), sodium (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 23), chlorine (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>35,
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>37), and sodium chloride clusters (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 81, 83 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cl</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>93, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>95
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NaCl</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). We identified these particles as sea salt class (1–4). The
presence of a peak at <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 24, 40, and 82 in sea salt class 3 and 4 is the
result of spectral peak broadening and peak position shift in the raw
positive-ion spectra. The presence of water in these particles (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>16 and
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>17, and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>m</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi>z</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> 62 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> and 63 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">OH</mml:mi><mml:msup><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mo>+</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) indicates that these particles
are likely to be aqueous droplets <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx7" id="paren.44"/>. As the differentiation of
these sea salt classes by the fuzzy clustering is likely to result from
changes in instrument function rather than compositional differences in the particle, we
combined all four classes into one sea salt class when considering particle
counting statistics.</p>
      <p>A 10 min averaged time series of the clustered particle number
concentrations over a 7-day period is shown in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/>
alongside number concentration reported by the APS system in the size range
0.5–2.46 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m aerodynamic diameter. The LAAP-TOF total number concentration
is approximately 2 order of magnitude lower than that reported by the APS.
The time series trends are generally well correlated over the first 4 days,
with divergence occurring after the arrival of silicate dust from the
Sahara around midnight on 11 August 2015, indicating that the
LAAP-TOF may be under-counting the silicate class of particles with respect
to the sea salt class of particle. Overall, the combined sea salt particles
class accounted for 86 % of the particles analysed by the LAAP-TOF during
this sampling period (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F11"/> inset).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F11"><caption><p>Time series of averaged number concentrations measured by the LAAP-TOF
and APS for a 7-day period at Praia, Cabo Verde, during the ICE-D campaign.
Concentrations are calculated from 10 min averaged number counts at a flow
rate of 0.078 and 1 L min<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> for the LAAP-TOF and APS respectively. The
calculated concentrations of sea salt, carbonaceous/secondary material, and
silicates (as determined by fuzzy c-means clustering) are stacked in the time
series so that total number concentration measured by the LAAP-TOF is
represented by the top of the filled area. The relative number concentrations
of the main particle classes are displayed in the inset pie chart.</p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=241.848425pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016-f11.png"/>

        </fig>

      <p>The dominance of the sea salt class of particle in the LAAP-TOF measurement
is also evident in the vacuum aerodynamic size distributions displayed in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>a. The size distribution of the sea salt class
accounts for most of the observed sized distribution of the LAAP-TOF total
number concentration, with the contribution from the silicate and
carbonaceous/secondary classes only significant <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 nm. The aerodynamic
size distribution reported by the APS shows a relatively broad mode centred
on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1200 nm that is more similar to the silicate and
carbonaceous/secondary particle classes than to the sea salt class. This
supports the hypothesis that the sea salt class is over-represented in the
relative particle number concentration measured by the LAAP-TOF, although
differences in the measurement techniques of the two instruments must be
considered.</p>
      <p>A significant difference in the size distributions is the local minimum at
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1000 nm in particle concentration observed in the silicate and
carbonaceous/secondary classes that are not present in the APS distribution.
Comparison with the modelled effective detection radius (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) in Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>b shows that this local minimum in the size distribution
coincides with a local minimum in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> profile. However, this minimum is not
observed in the size distribution for the sea salt class. The light-scattering
properties of marine aerosol are known to vary considerably with
composition and humidity <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx50" id="paren.45"/>. If the value of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to
particle diameter is modelled with a particle refractive index of an aqueous
sea salt particle (1.33), a significantly different <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> profile is predicted
that does not contain a local minimum at around 1000 nm (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F12"/>c).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{p}?><fig id="Ch1.F12"><caption><p>Particle size distributions measured by the LAAP-TOF and an
aerodynamic particle sizer (APS) at Praia, Cabo Verde, during the ICE-D
campaign. <bold>(a)</bold> The vacuum aerodynamic diameter size distribution of the total
number concentration and main particle composition classes measured by the
LAAP-TOF compared to the aerodynamic size distribution measured by the APS.
<bold>(b)</bold> The carbonaceous/secondary and silicate size distributions compared to
the modelled effective detection radius of optical detection stage 2
(refractive index: 1.59; collection angle: 10–12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). <bold>(c)</bold> The sea salt
size distributions compared to the modelled effective detection radius of the
second optical detection stage (refractive index: 1.33; collection angle:
10–12<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>). </p></caption>
          <?xmltex \igopts{width=227.622047pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://amt.copernicus.org/articles/9/6051/2016/amt-9-6051-2016-f12.png"/>

        </fig>

</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S5">
  <title>Discussion</title>
      <p>In the model of the optical detection geometry we describe the optical
detection efficiency in terms of the overlap of the detection beam with the
particle beam. The Gaussian profile of the detection laser beam results in a
particle-dependent variation in the effective beam width, which we term the
effective detection radius (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>). For a certain instrument design, <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> is a
function of the scattering cross section of the particle, resulting in a
particle size dependence. Instrument design parameters such as the detection
laser wavelength, the light collection angle, and the signal-to-noise level in
the detection stage have a strong influence on <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p>Ambient measurements demonstrate the impact that the variation in the
effective detection radius may have on the data. Comparison with the size
distribution measured with the APS suggests that a size-dependent detection bias is
imposed on the measured size distributions. Furthermore, the particle
refractive index appears to have a strong influence on this detection bias,
which further complicates the interpretation of size distributions. Overall,
the LAAP-TOF reports particle concentration in the size range 0.5–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m,
which is approximately 2 orders of magnitude lower than those reported by the
APS. Much of this deficit in particle counting may be accounted for by
composition-dependent ionisation efficiency on the ion source and a reduction
in optical detection efficiency due to particle beam divergence. However, the
optical detection efficiency must also be influenced by the size-dependent
variation in the effective detection radius. For example, the coincidence of
a maximum in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with the mode size of the sea salt class of particles will enhance
the number counting statistics of those particle types.</p>
      <p>Optical detection of particles in SPMS has been the focus of much research
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx33" id="paren.46"/>. Early instruments used fibre optics to guide scattered
light to PMTs for detection <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx40 bib1.bibx20" id="paren.47"/>. The introduction of an ion source extraction plate fashioned into
an elliptical mirror <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx34" id="paren.48"/> allowed light to be collected over a
wider solid angle within the ion source whilst maintaining relatively high
hit rates, but this approach is not amenable to a bipolar TOF analyser due to extraction
field distortion. The removal of the detection optics from the ion source
region permitted a more complete elliptical mirror to be used
<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx14" id="paren.49"/> but required a more complex trigger system to ensure the UV
ablation laser hits particles travelling at different velocities.</p>
      <p>The aim of using elliptical mirrors is to collect as much scattered light as
practicable over a wide solid angle. The benefit of this approach is
demonstrated in the model results that calculate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> to be close to the
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> width across much of the transmission range. Authors have
reported detection efficiencies of 0.5–1 for instruments using this type of
collection optics <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx47 bib1.bibx55 bib1.bibx56 bib1.bibx4" id="paren.50"/>
over selected size ranges, typically 200–600 nm. Hit rates are generally
lower with instruments that do not trigger in the ion source, and overall
sampling efficiency is rarely reported in the literature.</p>
      <p>An ideal instrument design would have optical detection in the ion source of
a bipolar TOF while maintaining the optical detection efficiency of an
elliptical mirror. This is very difficult to achieve in practice. The compact
design of the light collection optics in the LAAP-TOF allows for the
detection stage to be placed in the ion source but collects light over a very
narrow solid angle. Our initial laboratory studies with detection system A
showed a low detection efficiency in the size range 300–800 nm, which was a
limiting factor in the overall instrument performance.</p>
      <p>Laser diode light sources have relatively low power and produce a relatively
divergent beam that can be difficult to focus with a single lens. The
implementation of a 532 nm Nd:YAG laser with high pointing stability allowed
for single-mode fibre coupling and efficient collimation to a larger beam
waist diameter compared to the focal point of detection system A. The
implementation of detection system B resulted in over an order-of-magnitude
improvement in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> compared to detection system A, but it came at
the expense of a slightly larger particle size cut-off. Larger beam diameters
have the potential to increase the detection efficiency for some particle
sizes. However, modelling of the effective beam diameter shows that, for a set
laser power output, the optimum detection laser beam width is particle size
dependent (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>a). The particle size distribution of
the target application must be considered when choosing the output power and
focussing characteristics of the detection laser system if using light
collection optics with a narrow collection angle.</p>
      <p>Optical particle detection is an established technique in instruments
dedicated to measuring particle size distributions of ambient aerosol
populations <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx2" id="paren.51"/>. The smoothing of Mie scattering
oscillation is a design requirement when accurate particle size measurement
requires a near-monotonic response in pulse magnitude with respect to
particle diameter <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx30" id="paren.52"/>. Instruments utilising monochromatic
laser source require a wide collection angle, whereas a monotonic response
has been reported for a near-forward scattering instrument using an
incandescent (white-light) source <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="bib1.bibx19" id="paren.53"/>.</p>
      <p>A detection laser consisting of mixed wavelengths may be beneficial to the
near-forward light collection system utilised in the LAAP-TOF. The Mie theory
model (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F5"/>) indicates that 532 nm may complement 808 nm by
covering the deep oscillation in the profile. The mixing of light from two
distinct sources is possible with a fibre-coupled system. Figure <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F9"/>b shows an example of the modelled <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to
particle size and detection beam width using equal powered 532 and 808 nm
wavelength sources whilst maintaining the signal-to-noise characteristics of
detection system B. This model shows less variation in <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to
particle size and offers the possibility of using larger <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, which
would improve the overall sampling efficiency.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S6" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>A custom detection laser system consisting of a high-powered fibre-coupled
Nd:YAG solid-state laser with a collimated beam was implemented in a LAAP-TOF
single-particle mass spectrometer without major modifications to instrument
geometry. The new laser system resulted in an order-of-magnitude improvement
in sensitivity to spherical particles in the size range 500–800 nm compared to
a focussed 405 nm laser diode system. A numerical model is presented that
allows for a general evaluation of how beam width, wavelength, and light
collection geometry affect the particle detection efficiency of the optical
detection stage. We used the model to explain number counting bias in an
ambient data set.</p>
      <p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>The laser intensity encountered by a particle in a collimated laser beam is a
function of its position within the Gaussian intensity distribution with
respect to the laser beam axis. A transfer function was calculated in order
to quantify the minimum intensity requirement which defines an effective
detection radius (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>) that is a function of the scattering cross section
(<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) of the particle. The model predicts that <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> controls the
limit of the detection in terms of particle size as expected. However, if
light is collected over a narrow collection angle, Mie interference patterns
result in an oscillation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to particle size across the
transmission range (0.2–2.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) of the LAAP-TOF, resulting in large
particle-size-dependent variation in detection efficiency. We compare the
model prediction with an ambient data set acquired during the ICE-D
project, a multi-platform field campaign based at
the Cabo Verde islands in August 2015. The model is used to partly explain a
detection bias towards sea salt particles with an aerodynamic size mode of
<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>≈</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 1.5 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. We also show that the detection bias imposes itself on
the measured aerodynamic size distribution as determined by the instrument,
an effect that must be considered when interpreting the data.</p>
      <p>Modelling of the effective detection radius shows that for a set laser power
output the optimum detection laser beam width is also particle size
dependent. The particle size distribution of the target application must be
considered when choosing the output power and focussing characteristics of
the detection laser system if using light collection optics with a narrow
collection angle. Variations in the effective detection radius could be
minimised by collecting light over a wider angle or by mixing laser
wavelengths. The stabilisation of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> with respect to particle diameter would
result in more accurate aerodynamic size distribution measurements and reduce
the variation in particle number concentration measurements of different
particle size, shape, and refractive index. A more rigorous evaluation of the
effective of particle size and morphology on the overall sampling efficiency
of the instrument would require a model of the aerodynamic lens
characteristics in order to constrain particle beam divergence. The effect of
particle beam divergence on both the variation and absolute sampling
efficiency could be improved by reducing the length of the particle flight
path by shortening the vacuum housing.</p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S7">
  <title>Data availability</title>
      <p>Laboratory-acquired data
used to inform the model of the the effective beam radius are available from
the author by request.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><app-group>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S1">
  <title>List of symbols</title>
      <p><table-wrap id="Taba" position="anchor"><oasis:table><oasis:tgroup cols="2">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="left"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="142.26378pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">Symbol</oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Description</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>d</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particle diameter.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">p</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Particle beam width.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Detection beam width.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">sca</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Scattering cross section.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Active radius of detection.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Minimum intensity threshold required to produce enough scattered</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">light to register a particle event.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>K</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Transfer function of the optical detection stage.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Lens</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Transmission efficiency of the aerodynamic lens.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Hit</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Hit rate efficiency.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Detect</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">The particle detection efficiency of the optical detection stage.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Geom</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Geometric overlap of the excimer laser pulse with the particle beam.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Temp</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Temporal overlap of the excimer laser pulse with a particle in the</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">particle beam.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ion</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Ionisation efficiency of the excimer laser pulse with respect to the</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">particle composition.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AutoMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Instrument sampling efficiency in auto-triggering acquisition mode.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">The excimer laser is firing at a set repetition rate.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">TriggeredMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Instrument sampling efficiency in second-laser-only acquisition mode.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">The excimer laser is fired by a trigger from the second detection stage.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"><inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SizedMS</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Instrument sampling efficiency in both-lasers acquisition mode.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col1"/>  
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">The instrument actively sizes and requires a trigger from both detection  stages.</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table></table-wrap></p><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
</app>

<app id="App1.Ch1.S2">
  <title>Detailed description of detection systems</title>
      <p>Detection system A comprises a compact 450 mW Opnext diode module
(HL40023MG, Thorlabs) mounted in a threaded copper tube and fitted to an
adjuster assembly to produce a cw laser beam of 405 nm wavelength orthogonal
to the particle beam axis (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>a). The adjuster
assembly incorporates a focussing lens to create a beam with a <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">σ</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
(second moment width) focal point diameter of 51.2 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m measured with a
beam profiler at a focal length of 50 mm. The power output of the system can be
adjusted by varying the drive to the diode module. The position of the focal
point relative to the particle beam can be adjusted by moving the whole
adjuster assembly relative to the vacuum housing in the horizontal <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
and <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> directions and varying the focal length in the <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Z</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> direction.</p>
      <p>Detection system B comprises a 1 W GEM 532 nm Nd:YAG laser (Laser Quantum
Ltd) with divergence <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 0.8 mrad, pointing stability <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> 10 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>rad/<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a
beam quality factor (<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:msup><mml:mi>M</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup><mml:mo>)</mml:mo><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, enabling the beam to be efficiently
launched into a single-mode fibre and focussed into a collimated beam with
just one lens. An aspheric fiberport (model PAF-X-2A, Thorlabs) with an
output <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:msup><mml:mi>e</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> waist diameter of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>330</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m and a divergence of 1.75 mrad
was chosen to collimate the beam. A maximum waist distance of 96 mm ensured
the beam remained collimated at the light collection optics, thereby
reducing background noise. The fiberport lens has an input mode field
diameter (MFD) of <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>3.5</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m. The adjustable fiberport allows for precise
positioning of the lens for efficient collimation and allows the beam to be
steered through the spatial filters (Fig. <xref ref-type="fig" rid="Ch1.F2"/>b).
Spatial filtering is required to clean up the beam profile and reduce
background noise. A <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>500</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m orifice is placed at the bottom of the optical
stack, and the collimated beam can be accurately positioned through the pin
hole using the steering on the fiberport. Light scattering from the pin hole
is reduced by blackening the metallic orifice with Aquadag and introducing an
intermediate <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mn>400</mml:mn></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m orifice that is aligned to the beam axis beam using
an <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>X</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi>Y</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> translator. The optical stack can be aligned on the bench before being
fitted to the instrument and aligned to the lowest noise position. A N-BK7
coated laser window (Thorlabs) was used to seal the vacuum.</p><?xmltex \hack{\clearpage}?>
</app>
  </app-group><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p>This work was supported by a PhD studentship awarded to N. Marsden by the Natural
Environment Research Council (NERC). Field measurements made during the ICE-D campaign
were funded by NERC grant NE/M00195/1. We would like to thank Alisdair Macpherson
of the Photon Science Institute at the University of Manchester for his technical support.<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Edited by: J. Schneider<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>
Reviewed by: two anonymous referees</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bibx1"><label>Allen et al.(2000)Allen, Fergenson, Gard, Hughes, Morrical, Kleeman,
Gross, Gälli, Prather, and Cass</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, J. O., Fergenson, D. P., Gard, E. E., Hughes, L. S., Morrical, B. D.,
Kleeman, M. J., Gross, D. S., Gälli, M. E., Prather, K. A., and Cass,
G. R.: Particle detection efficiencies of aerosol time of flight mass
spectrometers under ambient sampling conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 211–217, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx2"><label>Baumgardner et al.(2011)Baumgardner, Brenguier, Bucholtz, Coe,
DeMott, Garrett, Gayet, Hermann, Heymsfield, Korolev, Krämer, Petzold,
Strapp, Pilewskie, Taylor, Twohy, Wendisch, Bachalo, and
Chuang</label><mixed-citation>Baumgardner, D., Brenguier, J., Bucholtz, A., Coe, H., DeMott, P., Garrett,
T.,
Gayet, J., Hermann, M., Heymsfield, A., Korolev, A., Krämer, M.,
Petzold, A., Strapp, W., Pilewskie, P., Taylor, J., Twohy, C., Wendisch, M.,
Bachalo, W., and Chuang, P.: Airborne instruments to measure atmospheric
aerosol particles, clouds and radiation: A cook's tour of mature and emerging
technology, Atmos. Res., 102, 10–29,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.06.021" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.06.021</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx3"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold,
Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens,
and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, P., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S,
K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and Aerosols,
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx4"><label>Brands et al.(2011)Brands, Kamphus, Böttger, Schneider,
Drewnick, Roth, Curtius, Voigt, Borbon, Beekmann, Bourdon, Perrin, and
Borrmann</label><mixed-citation>Brands, M., Kamphus, M., Böttger, T., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F.,
Roth,
A., Curtius, J., Voigt, C., Borbon, A., Beekmann, M., Bourdon, A., Perrin,
T., and Borrmann, S.: Characterization of a Newly Developed Aircraft-Based
Laser Ablation Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (ALABAMA) and First Field Deployment
in Urban Pollution Plumes over Paris During MEGAPOLI 2009, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 46–64, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.517813" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.517813</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx5"><label>Cziczo et al.(2003)Cziczo, DeMott, Brock, Hudson, Jesse, Kreidenweis,
Prenni, Schreiner, Thomson, and Murphy</label><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J., DeMott, P. J., Brock, C., Hudson, P. K., Jesse, B.,
Kreidenweis,
S. M., Prenni, A. J., Schreiner, J., Thomson, D. S., and Murphy, D. M.: A
Method for Single Particle Mass Spectrometry of Ice Nuclei, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 37, 460–470, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820300976" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820300976</ext-link>, 2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx6"><label>Cziczo et al.(2006)Cziczo, Thomson, Thompson, DeMott, and
Murphy</label><mixed-citation>Cziczo, D. J., Thomson, D. S., Thompson, T. L., DeMott, P. J., and Murphy,
D. M.: Particle analysis by laser mass spectrometry (PALMS) studies of ice
nuclei and other low number density particles, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 258, 21–29, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2006.05.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijms.2006.05.013</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx7"><label>Dall'Osto et al.(2004)Dall'Osto, Beddows, Kinnersley, Harrison,
Donovan, and Heal</label><mixed-citation>Dall'Osto, M., Beddows, D., Kinnersley, R. P., Harrison, R. M., Donovan,
R. J.,
and Heal, M. R.: Characterization of individual airborne particles by using
aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry at Mace Head, Ireland, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
109,  D21302, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004747" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2004JD004747</ext-link>,
2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx8"><label>Dall'Osto et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Dall'Osto, M., Harrison, R. M., Highwood, E. J., O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D.,
Querol, X., and Achterberg, E. P.: Variation of the mixing state of Saharan
dust particles with atmospheric transport, Atmos. Environ., 44,
3135–3146, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx9"><label>Dall'Osto et al.(2014)Dall'Osto, Hellebust, Healy, O'Connor,
Kourtchev, Sodeau, Ovadnevaite, Ceburnis, O'Dowd, and Wenger</label><mixed-citation>
Dall'Osto, M., Hellebust, S., Healy, R. M., O'Connor, I. P., Kourtchev, I.,
Sodeau, J. R., Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., O'Dowd, C. D., and Wenger,
J. C.: Apportionment of urban aerosol sources in Cork (Ireland) by
synergistic measurement techniques, Sci. Total Environ., 493,
197–208, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx10"><label>Erdmann et al.(2005)Erdmann, Dell'Acqua, Cavalli, Grüning,
Omenetto, Putaud, Raes, and Dingenen</label><mixed-citation>Erdmann, N., Dell'Acqua, A., Cavalli, P., Grüning, C., Omenetto, N.,
Putaud, J.-P., Raes, F., and Dingenen, R. V.: Instrument Characterization
and First Application of the Single Particle Analysis and Sizing System
(SPASS) for Atmospheric Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39,
377–393, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868290935696" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868290935696</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx11"><label>Fitzgerald et al.(2015)Fitzgerald, Ault, Zauscher, Mayol-Bracero, and
Prather</label><mixed-citation>
Fitzgerald, E., Ault, A. P., Zauscher, M. D., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., and
Prather, K. A.: Comparison of the mixing state of long-range transported
Asian and African mineral dust, Atmos. Environ., 115, 19–25, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx12"><label>Formenti et al.(2011)Formenti, Schütz, Balkanski, Desboeufs,
Ebert, Kandler, Petzold, Scheuvens, Weinbruch, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>Formenti, P., Schütz, L., Balkanski, Y., Desboeufs, K., Ebert, M.,
Kandler, K., Petzold, A., Scheuvens, D., Weinbruch, S., and Zhang, D.: Recent
progress in understanding physical and chemical properties of African and
Asian mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8231–8256,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8231-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-8231-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx13"><label>Gaie-Levrel et al.(2012)Gaie-Levrel, Perrier, Perraudin, Stoll,
Grand, and Schwell</label><mixed-citation>Gaie-Levrel, F., Perrier, S., Perraudin, E., Stoll, C., Grand, N., and
Schwell, M.: Development and characterization of a single particle laser
ablation mass spectrometer (SPLAM) for organic aerosol studies, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 5, 225–241, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-225-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-5-225-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx14"><label>Gard et al.(1997)Gard, Mayer, Morrical, Dienes, Fergenson, and
Prather</label><mixed-citation>Gard, E., Mayer, J. E., Morrical, B. D., Dienes, T., Fergenson, D. P., and
Prather, K. A.: Real-Time Analysis of Individual Atmospheric Aerosol
Particles: Design and Performance of a Portable ATOFMS, Anal. Chem., 69, 4083–4091, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac970540n" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac970540n</ext-link>, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx15"><label>Gemayel et al.(2016)Gemayel, Hellebust, Temime-Roussel, Hayeck, van
Elteren, Wortham, and Gligorovski</label><mixed-citation>Gemayel, R., Hellebust, S., Temime-Roussel, B., Hayeck, N., Van Elteren, J.
T., Wortham, H., and Gligorovski, S.: The performance and the
characterization of laser ablation aerosol particle time-of-flight mass
spectrometry (LAAP-ToF-MS), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1947–1959,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1947-2016" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-9-1947-2016</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx16"><label>Giorio et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Giorio, C., Tapparo, A., Dall'Osto, M., Beddows, D. C., Esser-Gietl, J. K.,
Healy, R. M., and Harrison, R. M.: Local and regional components of aerosol
in a heavily trafficked street canyon in central London derived from PMF and
cluster analysis of single-particle ATOFMS spectra, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 3330–3340, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx17"><label>Gross et al.(2000)Gross, Gälli, Silva, and Prather</label><mixed-citation>
Gross, D. S., Gälli, M. E., Silva, P. J., and Prather, K. A.: Relative
sensitivity factors for alkali metal and ammonium cations in single-particle
aerosol time-of-flight mass spectra, Anal. Chem., 72, 416–422,
2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx18"><label>Healy et al.(2012)Healy, Sciare, Poulain, Kamili, Merkel, Müller,
Wiedensohler, Eckhardt, Stohl, Sarda-Estève et al.</label><mixed-citation>Healy, R. M., Sciare, J., Poulain, L., Kamili, K., Merkel, M., Müller,
T., Wiedensohler, A., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Sarda-Estève, R.,
McGillicuddy, E., O'Connor, I. P., Sodeau, J. R., and Wenger, J. C.: Sources
and mixing state of size-resolved elemental carbon particles in a European
megacity: Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1681–1700,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1681-2012" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-12-1681-2012</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx19"><label>Heim et al.(2008)Heim, Mullins, Umhauer, and Kasper</label><mixed-citation>Heim, M., Mullins, B. J., Umhauer, H., and Kasper, G.: Performance
evaluation
of three optical particle counters with an efficient ”multimodal” calibration
method, J. Aerosol Sci., 39, 1019–1031,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.07.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.07.006</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx20"><label>Hinz and Kaufmann(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Hinz, K.-P. and Kaufmann, R.: Simultaneous Detection of Positive and
Negative
Ions From Single Airborne Particles by Real-time Laser Mass Spectrometry,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 24, 233–242, 1996.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx21"><label>Hinz and Spengler(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Hinz, K.-P. and Spengler, B.: Instrumentation , data evaluation and
quantification in on-line aerosol mass spectrometry, J. Mass Spectrom., 42, 843–860, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jms.1262" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/jms.1262</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx22"><label>Hinz et al.(2006)Hinz, Erdmann, Grüning, and
Spengler</label><mixed-citation>Hinz, K.-P., Erdmann, N., Grüning, C., and Spengler, B.: Comparative
parallel characterization of particle populations with two mass spectrometric
systems LAMPAS 2 and SPASS, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 258,
151–166, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2006.09.008" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijms.2006.09.008</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx23"><label>Hudson et al.(2011)Hudson, Noble, and Jha</label><mixed-citation>Hudson, J. G., Noble, S., and Jha, V.: On the relative role of sea salt
cloud
condensation nuclei (CCN), J. Atmos. Chem., 68, 71–88,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10874-011-9210-5" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10874-011-9210-5</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx24"><label>Huffman et al.(2005)Huffman, Jayne, Drewnick, Aiken, Onasch, Worsnop,
and Jimenez</label><mixed-citation>Huffman, J. A., Jayne, J. T., Drewnick, F., Aiken, A. C., Onasch, T.,
Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Design, Modeling, Optimization, and Experimental
Tests of a Particle Beam Width Probe for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass
Spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 1143–1163,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820500423782" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820500423782</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx25"><label>Jayne et al.(2000)Jayne, Leard, Zhang, Davidovits, Smith, Kolb, and
Worsnop</label><mixed-citation>Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. A., Kolb,
C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for
Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 49–70, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868200410840</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx26"><label>Jonsson et al.(1995)Jonsson, Wilson, and Brock</label><mixed-citation>Jonsson, H. H., Wilson, H. C., and Brock, R. G.: Performance of a focused
cavity aerosol spectrometer for measurements in the stratosphere of particle
size in the 0.06–2.0 <inline-formula><mml:math display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m diamater range, American Meteorological Society,
12, 115–129, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx27"><label>Kandler et al.(2011)Kandler, Lieke, Benker, Emmel, Küpper,
MÜller-Ebert, Ebert, Scheuvens, Schladitz, Schütz, and
Weinbruch</label><mixed-citation>Kandler, K., Lieke, K., Benker, N., Emmel, C., Küpper, M.,
MÜller-Ebert, D., Ebert, M., Scheuvens, D., Schladitz, A., Schütz,
L., and Weinbruch, S.: Ground-based off-line aerosol measurements at Praia,
Cape Verde, during the Saharan Mineral Dust Experiment: Microphysical
properties and mineralogy, Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 63, 459–474,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00546.x" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00546.x</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx28"><label>Kane and Johnston(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Kane, D. B. and Johnston, M. V.: Size and composition biases on the detection
of individual ultrafine particles by aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 4887–4893, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx29"><label>Liu et al.(1995)Liu, Ziemann, Kittelson, and McMurry</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, P., Ziemann, P. J., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.: Generating
particle beams of controlled dimensions and divergence: II. Experimental
evaluation of particle motion in aerodynamic lenses and nozzle expansions,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 22, 314–324, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx30"><label>McMurry(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
McMurry, P. H.: A review of atmospheric aerosol measurements , Atmos.
Environ., 34, 1959–1999, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx31"><label>Middlebrook et al.(2003)Middlebrook, Murphy, Lee, Thomson, Prather,
Wenzel, Liu, Phares, Rhoads, Wexler et al.</label><mixed-citation>Middlebrook, A. M., Murphy, D. M., Lee, S.-H., Thomson, D. S., Prather,
K. A.,
Wenzel, R. J., Liu, D.-Y., Phares, D. J., Rhoads, K. P., Wexler, A. S.,
et al.: A comparison of particle mass spectrometers during the 1999 Atlanta
Supersite Project, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8424, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000660" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2001JD000660</ext-link>,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx32"><label>Moffet and Prather(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Moffet, R. C. and Prather, K. A.: In-situ measurements of the mixing state
and
optical properties of soot with implications for radiative forcing
estimates, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 11872–11877, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900040106" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1073/pnas.0900040106</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx33"><label>Murphy(2007)</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M.: The Design of Single Particle Mass Spectrometers, Mass
Spectrom. Rev., 26, 150–165, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mas.20113" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/mas.20113</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx34"><label>Murphy and Thomson(1995)</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D. M. and Thomson, D. S.: Laser Ionization Mass Spectroscopy of
Single
Aerosol Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 22, 237–249,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786829408959743" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786829408959743</ext-link>, 1995.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx35"><label>Murphy et al.(2004)Murphy, Cziczo, Hudson, Schein, and
Thomson</label><mixed-citation>Murphy, D., Cziczo, D., Hudson, P., Schein, M., and Thomson, D.: Particle
density inferred from simultaneous optical and aerodynamic diameters sorted
by composition, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 135–139,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00386-0" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00386-0</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx36"><label>Nash et al.(2006)Nash, Baer, and Johnston</label><mixed-citation>Nash, D. G., Baer, T., and Johnston, M. V.: Aerosol mass spectrometry: An
introductory review, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 258, 2–12,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2006.09.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijms.2006.09.017</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx37"><label>Peña and Pal(2009)</label><mixed-citation>Peña, O. and Pal, U.: Scattering of electromagnetic radiation by a
multilayered sphere, Comput. Phys. Commun., 180, 2348–2354,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.07.010" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.cpc.2009.07.010</ext-link>,
2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx38"><label>Petrucci et al.(2000)Petrucci, Farnsworth, Cavalli, and
Omenetto</label><mixed-citation>Petrucci, G., Farnsworth, P., Cavalli, P., and Omenetto, N.: A
differentially
pumped particle inlet for sampling of atmospheric aerosols into a
time-of-flight mass spectrometer: Optical characterization of the particle
beam, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 105–121,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868200410877" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868200410877</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx39"><label>Pope and Dockery(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Pope, C. A. and Dockery, D. W.: Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air
Pollution : Lines that Connect, J. Air Waste Manage.,  56,  709–742,
2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx40"><label>Prather et al.(1994)Prather, Nordmeyer, and Salt</label><mixed-citation>Prather, K. A., Nordmeyer, T., and Salt, K.: Real-time Characterization of
Individual Aerosol Particles Using Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry,
Anal. Chem., 66, 1403–1407, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac00081a007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac00081a007</ext-link>, 1994.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx41"><label>Pratt and Prather(2010)</label><mixed-citation>Pratt, K. A. and Prather, K. A.: Aircraft measurements of vertical profiles
of
aerosol mixing states, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D11305,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013150" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2009JD013150</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx42"><label>Pratt et al.(2009)Pratt, Mayer, Holecek, Moffet, Sanchez, Rebotier,
Furutani, Gonin, Fuhrer, Su, Guazzotti, and Prather</label><mixed-citation>Pratt, K. A., Mayer, J. E., Holecek, J. C., Moffet, R. C., Sanchez, R. O.,
Rebotier, T. P., Furutani, H., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Su, Y., Guazzotti, S.,
and Prather, K. A.: Development and characterization of an aircraft aerosol
time-of-flight mass spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 81, 1792–1800,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac801942r" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac801942r</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx43"><label>Reilly et al.(2000)Reilly, Lazar, Gieray, Whitten, and
Ramsey</label><mixed-citation>Reilly, P. T. A., Lazar, A. C., Gieray, R. A., Whitten, W. B., and Ramsey,
J. M.: The Elucidation of Charge-Transfer-Induced Matrix Effects in
Environmental Aerosols Via Real-Time Aerosol Mass Spectral Analysis of
Individual Airborne Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 135–152,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868200410895" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868200410895</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx44"><label>Reinard and Johnston(2008)</label><mixed-citation>Reinard, M. S. and Johnston, M. V.: Ion formation mechanism in laser
desorption ionization of individual nanoparticles, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectr., 19, 389–399,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2007.11.017" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jasms.2007.11.017</ext-link>, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx45"><label>Reitz et al.(2011)Reitz, Spindler, Mentel, Poulain, Wex,
Mildenberger, Niedermeier, Hartmann, Clauss, Stratmann, Sullivan, DeMott,
Petters, Sierau, and Schneider</label><mixed-citation>Reitz, P., Spindler, C., Mentel, T. F., Poulain, L., Wex, H., Mildenberger,
K., Niedermeier, D., Hartmann, S., Clauss, T., Stratmann, F., Sullivan, R.
C., DeMott, P. J., Petters, M. D., Sierau, B., and Schneider, J.: Surface
modification of mineral dust particles by sulphuric acid processing:
implications for ice nucleation abilities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
7839–7858, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7839-2011" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-11-7839-2011</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx46"><label>Sierau et al.(2014)Sierau, Chang, Leck, Paatero, and
Lohmann</label><mixed-citation>Sierau, B., Chang, R. Y.-W., Leck, C., Paatero, J., and Lohmann, U.:
Single-particle characterization of the high-Arctic summertime aerosol,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7409–7430, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7409-2014" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-14-7409-2014</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx47"><label>Su et al.(2004)Su, Sipin, Furutani, and Prather</label><mixed-citation>Su, Y., Sipin, M. F., Furutani, H., and Prather, K. A.: Development and
Characterization of an Aerosol Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer with
Increased Detection Efficiency, Anal. Chem., 76, 712–719,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac034797z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac034797z</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx48"><label>Sullivan and Prather(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Sullivan, R. C. and Prather, K. A.: Recent advances in our understanding of
atmospheric chemistry and climate made possible by on-line aerosol analysis
instrumentation, Anal. Chem., 77, 3861–85,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac050716i" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1021/ac050716i</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx49"><label>Sullivan et al.(2007)Sullivan, Guazzotti, Sodeman, and
Prather</label><mixed-citation>Sullivan, R. C., Guazzotti, S. A., Sodeman, D. A., and Prather, K. A.: Direct
observations of the atmospheric processing of Asian mineral dust, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 7, 1213–1236, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1213-2007" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/acp-7-1213-2007</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx50"><label>Tang et al.(1997)Tang, Tridico, and Fung</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, I. N., Tridico, A. C., and Fung, K. H.: Thermodynamic and optical
properties of sea salt aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 23269–23275, 1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx51"><label>Thomson et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>Thomson, D. S., Schein, M. E., and Murphy, D. M.: Particle analysis by laser
mass spectrometry WB-57F instrument overview, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33,
153–169, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868200410903" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868200410903</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx52"><label>Trimborn et al.(2000)Trimborn, Hinz, and Spengler</label><mixed-citation>Trimborn, A., Hinz, K. P., and Spengler, B.: Online Analysis of Atmospheric
Particles with a Transportable Laser Mass Spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 191–201, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868200410921" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868200410921</ext-link>, 2000.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx53"><label>Vaden et al.(2011)Vaden, Imre, Beránek, and
Zelenyuk</label><mixed-citation>Vaden, T. D., Imre, D., Beránek, J., and Zelenyuk, A.: Extending the
Capabilities of Single Particle Mass Spectrometry: II. Measurements of
Aerosol Particle Density without DMA, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45,
125–135, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.526156" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786826.2010.526156</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx54"><label>Williams et al.(2013)Williams, Gonzalez, Peck, Trimborn, McInnis,
Farrar, Moore, Jayne, Robinson, Lewis, Onasch, Canagaratna, Trimborn, Timko,
Magoon, Deng, Tang, De La Rosa Blanco, Prévôt, Smith, and
Worsnop</label><mixed-citation>Williams, L. R., Gonzalez, L. A., Peck, J., Trimborn, D., McInnis, J.,
Farrar, M. R., Moore, K. D., Jayne, J. T., Robinson, W. A., Lewis, D. K.,
Onasch, T. B., Canagaratna, M. R., Trimborn, A., Timko, M. T., Magoon, G.,
Deng, R., Tang, D., de la Rosa Blanco, E., Prévôt, A. S. H., Smith,
K. A., and Worsnop, D. R.: Characterization of an aerodynamic lens for
transmitting particles greater than 1 micrometer in diameter into the
Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3271–3280,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3271-2013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/amt-6-3271-2013</ext-link>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx55"><label>Zelenyuk and Imre(2005)</label><mixed-citation>Zelenyuk, A. and Imre, D.: Single Particle Laser Ablation Time-of-Flight
Mass
Spectrometer: An Introduction to SPLAT, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39,
554–568, <ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868291009242" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/027868291009242</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx56"><label>Zelenyuk et al.(2009)Zelenyuk, Yang, Choi, and Imre</label><mixed-citation>Zelenyuk, A., Yang, J., Choi, E., and Imre, D.: SPLAT II: An Aircraft
Compatible, Ultra-Sensitive, High Precision Instrument for In-Situ
Characterization of the Size and Composition of Fine and Ultrafine
Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 411–424,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820802709243" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820802709243</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx57"><label>Zelenyuk et al.(2010)Zelenyuk, Ezell, Perraud, Johnson, Bruns, Yu,
Imre, Alexander, and Finlayson-Pitts</label><mixed-citation>Zelenyuk, A., Ezell, M. J., Perraud, V., Johnson, S. N., Bruns, E. A., Yu,
Y.,
Imre, D., Alexander, M. L., and Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Characterization of
organic coatings on hygroscopic salt particles and their atmospheric
impacts, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1209–1218,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.11.047" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.11.047</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx58"><label>Zhang et al.(2004)Zhang, Smith, Worsnop, Jimenez, Jayne, Kolb,
Morris, and Davidovits</label><mixed-citation>Zhang, X., Smith, K. A., Worsnop, D. R., Jimenez, J. L., Jayne, J. T., Kolb,
C. E., Morris, J., and Davidovits, P.: Numerical Characterization of
Particle Beam Collimation: Part II Integrated Aerodynamic-Lens–Nozzle
System, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38, 619–638,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820490479833" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1080/02786820490479833</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bibx59"><label>Zhou et al.(2006)Zhou, Rai, and Zachariah</label><mixed-citation>Zhou, L., Rai, A., and Zachariah, M. R.: Component and morphology biases on
quantifying the composition of nanoparticles using single-particle mass
spectrometry, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 258, 104–112,
<ext-link xlink:href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2006.07.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.ijms.2006.07.006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list><app-group content-type="float"><app><title/>

    </app></app-group></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Evaluating the influence of laser wavelength and detection stage geometry on optical detection efficiency in a  single-particle mass spectrometer</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p class="p">Single-particle
mass spectrometry (SPMS) is a useful tool for the online
study of aerosols with the ability to measure size-resolved chemical
composition with a temporal resolution relevant to atmospheric processes. In
SPMS, optical particle detection is used for the effective temporal alignment
of an ablation laser pulse with the presence of a particle in the ion source,
and it gives the option of aerodynamic sizing by measuring the offset of
particle arrival times between two detection stages. The efficiency of the
optical detection stage has a strong influence on the overall instrument
performance.</p><p class="p">A custom detection laser system consisting of a high-powered fibre-coupled
Nd:YAG solid-state laser with a collimated beam was implemented in the
detection stage of a laser ablation aerosol particle time-of-flight (LAAP-TOF)
single-particle mass spectrometer without major
modifications to instrument geometry. The use of a collimated laser beam
permitted the construction of a numerical model that predicts the effects of
detection laser wavelength, output power, beam focussing characteristics,
light collection angle, particle size, and refractive index on the effective
detection radius (<i>R</i>) of the detection laser beam. We compare the model
predictions with an ambient data set acquired during the Ice in Clouds
Experiment – Dust (ICE-D) project.</p><p class="p">The new laser system resulted in an order-of-magnitude improvement in
instrument sensitivity to spherical particles in the size range 500–800 nm
compared to a focussed 405 nm laser diode system. The model demonstrates that
the limit of detection in terms of particle size is determined by the
scattering cross section (<i>C</i><sub>sca</sub>) as predicted by Mie theory. In addition,
if light is collected over a narrow collection angle, oscillations in the
magnitude of <i>C</i><sub>sca</sub> with respect to particle diameter result in a
variation in R, resulting in large particle-size-dependent variation in
detection efficiency across the particle transmission range. This detection
bias is imposed on the aerodynamic size distributions measured by the
instrument and accounts for some of the detection bias towards sea salt
particles in the ambient data set.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>Allen et al.(2000)Allen, Fergenson, Gard, Hughes, Morrical, Kleeman,
Gross, Gälli, Prather, and Cass</label><mixed-citation>
Allen, J. O., Fergenson, D. P., Gard, E. E., Hughes, L. S., Morrical, B. D.,
Kleeman, M. J., Gross, D. S., Gälli, M. E., Prather, K. A., and Cass,
G. R.: Particle detection efficiencies of aerosol time of flight mass
spectrometers under ambient sampling conditions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 211–217, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>Baumgardner et al.(2011)Baumgardner, Brenguier, Bucholtz, Coe,
DeMott, Garrett, Gayet, Hermann, Heymsfield, Korolev, Krämer, Petzold,
Strapp, Pilewskie, Taylor, Twohy, Wendisch, Bachalo, and
Chuang</label><mixed-citation>
Baumgardner, D., Brenguier, J., Bucholtz, A., Coe, H., DeMott, P., Garrett,
T.,
Gayet, J., Hermann, M., Heymsfield, A., Korolev, A., Krämer, M.,
Petzold, A., Strapp, W., Pilewskie, P., Taylor, J., Twohy, C., Wendisch, M.,
Bachalo, W., and Chuang, P.: Airborne instruments to measure atmospheric
aerosol particles, clouds and radiation: A cook's tour of mature and emerging
technology, Atmos. Res., 102, 10–29,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.06.021" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosres.2011.06.021</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>Boucher et al.(2013)Boucher, Randall, Artaxo, Bretherton, Feingold,
Forster, Kerminen, Kondo, Liao, Lohmann, Rasch, Satheesh, Sherwood, Stevens,
and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Boucher, O., Randall, P., Artaxo, P., Bretherton, C., Feingold, G., Forster,
P., Kerminen, V., Kondo, Y., Liao, H., Lohmann, U., Rasch, P., Satheesh, S,
K., Sherwood, S., Stevens, B., and Zhang, X. Y.: Clouds and Aerosols,
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working
Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>Brands et al.(2011)Brands, Kamphus, Böttger, Schneider,
Drewnick, Roth, Curtius, Voigt, Borbon, Beekmann, Bourdon, Perrin, and
Borrmann</label><mixed-citation>
Brands, M., Kamphus, M., Böttger, T., Schneider, J., Drewnick, F.,
Roth,
A., Curtius, J., Voigt, C., Borbon, A., Beekmann, M., Bourdon, A., Perrin,
T., and Borrmann, S.: Characterization of a Newly Developed Aircraft-Based
Laser Ablation Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (ALABAMA) and First Field Deployment
in Urban Pollution Plumes over Paris During MEGAPOLI 2009, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45, 46–64, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.517813" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786826.2010.517813</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>Cziczo et al.(2003)Cziczo, DeMott, Brock, Hudson, Jesse, Kreidenweis,
Prenni, Schreiner, Thomson, and Murphy</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., DeMott, P. J., Brock, C., Hudson, P. K., Jesse, B.,
Kreidenweis,
S. M., Prenni, A. J., Schreiner, J., Thomson, D. S., and Murphy, D. M.: A
Method for Single Particle Mass Spectrometry of Ice Nuclei, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 37, 460–470, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820300976" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786820300976</a>, 2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>Cziczo et al.(2006)Cziczo, Thomson, Thompson, DeMott, and
Murphy</label><mixed-citation>
Cziczo, D. J., Thomson, D. S., Thompson, T. L., DeMott, P. J., and Murphy,
D. M.: Particle analysis by laser mass spectrometry (PALMS) studies of ice
nuclei and other low number density particles, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 258, 21–29, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2006.05.013" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2006.05.013</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>Dall'Osto et al.(2004)Dall'Osto, Beddows, Kinnersley, Harrison,
Donovan, and Heal</label><mixed-citation>
Dall'Osto, M., Beddows, D., Kinnersley, R. P., Harrison, R. M., Donovan,
R. J.,
and Heal, M. R.: Characterization of individual airborne particles by using
aerosol time-of-flight mass spectrometry at Mace Head, Ireland, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos.,
109,  D21302, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2004JD004747" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2004JD004747</a>,
2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>Dall'Osto et al.(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Dall'Osto, M., Harrison, R. M., Highwood, E. J., O'Dowd, C., Ceburnis, D.,
Querol, X., and Achterberg, E. P.: Variation of the mixing state of Saharan
dust particles with atmospheric transport, Atmos. Environ., 44,
3135–3146, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>Dall'Osto et al.(2014)Dall'Osto, Hellebust, Healy, O'Connor,
Kourtchev, Sodeau, Ovadnevaite, Ceburnis, O'Dowd, and Wenger</label><mixed-citation>
Dall'Osto, M., Hellebust, S., Healy, R. M., O'Connor, I. P., Kourtchev, I.,
Sodeau, J. R., Ovadnevaite, J., Ceburnis, D., O'Dowd, C. D., and Wenger,
J. C.: Apportionment of urban aerosol sources in Cork (Ireland) by
synergistic measurement techniques, Sci. Total Environ., 493,
197–208, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>Erdmann et al.(2005)Erdmann, Dell'Acqua, Cavalli, Grüning,
Omenetto, Putaud, Raes, and Dingenen</label><mixed-citation>
Erdmann, N., Dell'Acqua, A., Cavalli, P., Grüning, C., Omenetto, N.,
Putaud, J.-P., Raes, F., and Dingenen, R. V.: Instrument Characterization
and First Application of the Single Particle Analysis and Sizing System
(SPASS) for Atmospheric Aerosols, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39,
377–393, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868290935696" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/027868290935696</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>Fitzgerald et al.(2015)Fitzgerald, Ault, Zauscher, Mayol-Bracero, and
Prather</label><mixed-citation>
Fitzgerald, E., Ault, A. P., Zauscher, M. D., Mayol-Bracero, O. L., and
Prather, K. A.: Comparison of the mixing state of long-range transported
Asian and African mineral dust, Atmos. Environ., 115, 19–25, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>Formenti et al.(2011)Formenti, Schütz, Balkanski, Desboeufs,
Ebert, Kandler, Petzold, Scheuvens, Weinbruch, and Zhang</label><mixed-citation>
Formenti, P., Schütz, L., Balkanski, Y., Desboeufs, K., Ebert, M.,
Kandler, K., Petzold, A., Scheuvens, D., Weinbruch, S., and Zhang, D.: Recent
progress in understanding physical and chemical properties of African and
Asian mineral dust, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11, 8231–8256,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-8231-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-8231-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>Gaie-Levrel et al.(2012)Gaie-Levrel, Perrier, Perraudin, Stoll,
Grand, and Schwell</label><mixed-citation>
Gaie-Levrel, F., Perrier, S., Perraudin, E., Stoll, C., Grand, N., and
Schwell, M.: Development and characterization of a single particle laser
ablation mass spectrometer (SPLAM) for organic aerosol studies, Atmos. Meas.
Tech., 5, 225–241, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-225-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-5-225-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>Gard et al.(1997)Gard, Mayer, Morrical, Dienes, Fergenson, and
Prather</label><mixed-citation>
Gard, E., Mayer, J. E., Morrical, B. D., Dienes, T., Fergenson, D. P., and
Prather, K. A.: Real-Time Analysis of Individual Atmospheric Aerosol
Particles: Design and Performance of a Portable ATOFMS, Anal. Chem., 69, 4083–4091, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac970540n" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/ac970540n</a>, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>Gemayel et al.(2016)Gemayel, Hellebust, Temime-Roussel, Hayeck, van
Elteren, Wortham, and Gligorovski</label><mixed-citation>
Gemayel, R., Hellebust, S., Temime-Roussel, B., Hayeck, N., Van Elteren, J.
T., Wortham, H., and Gligorovski, S.: The performance and the
characterization of laser ablation aerosol particle time-of-flight mass
spectrometry (LAAP-ToF-MS), Atmos. Meas. Tech., 9, 1947–1959,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-9-1947-2016" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-9-1947-2016</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>Giorio et al.(2015)</label><mixed-citation>
Giorio, C., Tapparo, A., Dall'Osto, M., Beddows, D. C., Esser-Gietl, J. K.,
Healy, R. M., and Harrison, R. M.: Local and regional components of aerosol
in a heavily trafficked street canyon in central London derived from PMF and
cluster analysis of single-particle ATOFMS spectra, Environ. Sci. Technol., 49, 3330–3340, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>Gross et al.(2000)Gross, Gälli, Silva, and Prather</label><mixed-citation>
Gross, D. S., Gälli, M. E., Silva, P. J., and Prather, K. A.: Relative
sensitivity factors for alkali metal and ammonium cations in single-particle
aerosol time-of-flight mass spectra, Anal. Chem., 72, 416–422,
2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>Healy et al.(2012)Healy, Sciare, Poulain, Kamili, Merkel, Müller,
Wiedensohler, Eckhardt, Stohl, Sarda-Estève et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Healy, R. M., Sciare, J., Poulain, L., Kamili, K., Merkel, M., Müller,
T., Wiedensohler, A., Eckhardt, S., Stohl, A., Sarda-Estève, R.,
McGillicuddy, E., O'Connor, I. P., Sodeau, J. R., and Wenger, J. C.: Sources
and mixing state of size-resolved elemental carbon particles in a European
megacity: Paris, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12, 1681–1700,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-12-1681-2012" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-12-1681-2012</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>Heim et al.(2008)Heim, Mullins, Umhauer, and Kasper</label><mixed-citation>
Heim, M., Mullins, B. J., Umhauer, H., and Kasper, G.: Performance
evaluation
of three optical particle counters with an efficient ”multimodal” calibration
method, J. Aerosol Sci., 39, 1019–1031,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.07.006" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jaerosci.2008.07.006</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>Hinz and Kaufmann(1996)</label><mixed-citation>
Hinz, K.-P. and Kaufmann, R.: Simultaneous Detection of Positive and
Negative
Ions From Single Airborne Particles by Real-time Laser Mass Spectrometry,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 24, 233–242, 1996.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>Hinz and Spengler(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Hinz, K.-P. and Spengler, B.: Instrumentation , data evaluation and
quantification in on-line aerosol mass spectrometry, J. Mass Spectrom., 42, 843–860, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jms.1262" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/jms.1262</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>Hinz et al.(2006)Hinz, Erdmann, Grüning, and
Spengler</label><mixed-citation>
Hinz, K.-P., Erdmann, N., Grüning, C., and Spengler, B.: Comparative
parallel characterization of particle populations with two mass spectrometric
systems LAMPAS 2 and SPASS, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 258,
151–166, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2006.09.008" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2006.09.008</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>Hudson et al.(2011)Hudson, Noble, and Jha</label><mixed-citation>
Hudson, J. G., Noble, S., and Jha, V.: On the relative role of sea salt
cloud
condensation nuclei (CCN), J. Atmos. Chem., 68, 71–88,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10874-011-9210-5" target="_blank">doi:10.1007/s10874-011-9210-5</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>Huffman et al.(2005)Huffman, Jayne, Drewnick, Aiken, Onasch, Worsnop,
and Jimenez</label><mixed-citation>
Huffman, J. A., Jayne, J. T., Drewnick, F., Aiken, A. C., Onasch, T.,
Worsnop,
D. R., and Jimenez, J. L.: Design, Modeling, Optimization, and Experimental
Tests of a Particle Beam Width Probe for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass
Spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39, 1143–1163,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820500423782" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786820500423782</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>Jayne et al.(2000)Jayne, Leard, Zhang, Davidovits, Smith, Kolb, and
Worsnop</label><mixed-citation>
Jayne, J. T., Leard, D. C., Zhang, X., Davidovits, P., Smith, K. A., Kolb,
C. E., and Worsnop, D. R.: Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for
Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 49–70, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868200410840" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/027868200410840</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>Jonsson et al.(1995)Jonsson, Wilson, and Brock</label><mixed-citation>
Jonsson, H. H., Wilson, H. C., and Brock, R. G.: Performance of a focused
cavity aerosol spectrometer for measurements in the stratosphere of particle
size in the 0.06–2.0 µm diamater range, American Meteorological Society,
12, 115–129, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>Kandler et al.(2011)Kandler, Lieke, Benker, Emmel, Küpper,
MÜller-Ebert, Ebert, Scheuvens, Schladitz, Schütz, and
Weinbruch</label><mixed-citation>
Kandler, K., Lieke, K., Benker, N., Emmel, C., Küpper, M.,
MÜller-Ebert, D., Ebert, M., Scheuvens, D., Schladitz, A., Schütz,
L., and Weinbruch, S.: Ground-based off-line aerosol measurements at Praia,
Cape Verde, during the Saharan Mineral Dust Experiment: Microphysical
properties and mineralogy, Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 63, 459–474,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00546.x" target="_blank">doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00546.x</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>Kane and Johnston(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Kane, D. B. and Johnston, M. V.: Size and composition biases on the detection
of individual ultrafine particles by aerosol mass spectrometry, Environ. Sci. Technol., 34, 4887–4893, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>Liu et al.(1995)Liu, Ziemann, Kittelson, and McMurry</label><mixed-citation>
Liu, P., Ziemann, P. J., Kittelson, D. B., and McMurry, P. H.: Generating
particle beams of controlled dimensions and divergence: II. Experimental
evaluation of particle motion in aerodynamic lenses and nozzle expansions,
Aerosol Sci. Tech., 22, 314–324, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>McMurry(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
McMurry, P. H.: A review of atmospheric aerosol measurements , Atmos.
Environ., 34, 1959–1999, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>Middlebrook et al.(2003)Middlebrook, Murphy, Lee, Thomson, Prather,
Wenzel, Liu, Phares, Rhoads, Wexler et al.</label><mixed-citation>
Middlebrook, A. M., Murphy, D. M., Lee, S.-H., Thomson, D. S., Prather,
K. A.,
Wenzel, R. J., Liu, D.-Y., Phares, D. J., Rhoads, K. P., Wexler, A. S.,
et al.: A comparison of particle mass spectrometers during the 1999 Atlanta
Supersite Project, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 108, 8424, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2001JD000660" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2001JD000660</a>,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>Moffet and Prather(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Moffet, R. C. and Prather, K. A.: In-situ measurements of the mixing state
and
optical properties of soot with implications for radiative forcing
estimates, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106, 11872–11877, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900040106" target="_blank">doi:10.1073/pnas.0900040106</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>Murphy(2007)</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M.: The Design of Single Particle Mass Spectrometers, Mass
Spectrom. Rev., 26, 150–165, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mas.20113" target="_blank">doi:10.1002/mas.20113</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>Murphy and Thomson(1995)</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D. M. and Thomson, D. S.: Laser Ionization Mass Spectroscopy of
Single
Aerosol Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 22, 237–249,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786829408959743" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786829408959743</a>, 1995.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>Murphy et al.(2004)Murphy, Cziczo, Hudson, Schein, and
Thomson</label><mixed-citation>
Murphy, D., Cziczo, D., Hudson, P., Schein, M., and Thomson, D.: Particle
density inferred from simultaneous optical and aerodynamic diameters sorted
by composition, J. Aerosol Sci., 35, 135–139,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00386-0" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/S0021-8502(03)00386-0</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>Nash et al.(2006)Nash, Baer, and Johnston</label><mixed-citation>
Nash, D. G., Baer, T., and Johnston, M. V.: Aerosol mass spectrometry: An
introductory review, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 258, 2–12,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2006.09.017" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2006.09.017</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>Peña and Pal(2009)</label><mixed-citation>
Peña, O. and Pal, U.: Scattering of electromagnetic radiation by a
multilayered sphere, Comput. Phys. Commun., 180, 2348–2354,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpc.2009.07.010" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.cpc.2009.07.010</a>,
2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>Petrucci et al.(2000)Petrucci, Farnsworth, Cavalli, and
Omenetto</label><mixed-citation>
Petrucci, G., Farnsworth, P., Cavalli, P., and Omenetto, N.: A
differentially
pumped particle inlet for sampling of atmospheric aerosols into a
time-of-flight mass spectrometer: Optical characterization of the particle
beam, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 105–121,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868200410877" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/027868200410877</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>Pope and Dockery(2006)</label><mixed-citation>
Pope, C. A. and Dockery, D. W.: Health Effects of Fine Particulate Air
Pollution : Lines that Connect, J. Air Waste Manage.,  56,  709–742,
2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>Prather et al.(1994)Prather, Nordmeyer, and Salt</label><mixed-citation>
Prather, K. A., Nordmeyer, T., and Salt, K.: Real-time Characterization of
Individual Aerosol Particles Using Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry,
Anal. Chem., 66, 1403–1407, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac00081a007" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/ac00081a007</a>, 1994.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>Pratt and Prather(2010)</label><mixed-citation>
Pratt, K. A. and Prather, K. A.: Aircraft measurements of vertical profiles
of
aerosol mixing states, J. Geophys. Res., 115, D11305,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2009JD013150" target="_blank">doi:10.1029/2009JD013150</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>Pratt et al.(2009)Pratt, Mayer, Holecek, Moffet, Sanchez, Rebotier,
Furutani, Gonin, Fuhrer, Su, Guazzotti, and Prather</label><mixed-citation>
Pratt, K. A., Mayer, J. E., Holecek, J. C., Moffet, R. C., Sanchez, R. O.,
Rebotier, T. P., Furutani, H., Gonin, M., Fuhrer, K., Su, Y., Guazzotti, S.,
and Prather, K. A.: Development and characterization of an aircraft aerosol
time-of-flight mass spectrometer, Anal. Chem., 81, 1792–1800,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac801942r" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/ac801942r</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>Reilly et al.(2000)Reilly, Lazar, Gieray, Whitten, and
Ramsey</label><mixed-citation>
Reilly, P. T. A., Lazar, A. C., Gieray, R. A., Whitten, W. B., and Ramsey,
J. M.: The Elucidation of Charge-Transfer-Induced Matrix Effects in
Environmental Aerosols Via Real-Time Aerosol Mass Spectral Analysis of
Individual Airborne Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 135–152,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868200410895" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/027868200410895</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>Reinard and Johnston(2008)</label><mixed-citation>
Reinard, M. S. and Johnston, M. V.: Ion formation mechanism in laser
desorption ionization of individual nanoparticles, J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectr., 19, 389–399,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jasms.2007.11.017" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.jasms.2007.11.017</a>, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>Reitz et al.(2011)Reitz, Spindler, Mentel, Poulain, Wex,
Mildenberger, Niedermeier, Hartmann, Clauss, Stratmann, Sullivan, DeMott,
Petters, Sierau, and Schneider</label><mixed-citation>
Reitz, P., Spindler, C., Mentel, T. F., Poulain, L., Wex, H., Mildenberger,
K., Niedermeier, D., Hartmann, S., Clauss, T., Stratmann, F., Sullivan, R.
C., DeMott, P. J., Petters, M. D., Sierau, B., and Schneider, J.: Surface
modification of mineral dust particles by sulphuric acid processing:
implications for ice nucleation abilities, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 11,
7839–7858, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-11-7839-2011" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-11-7839-2011</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>Sierau et al.(2014)Sierau, Chang, Leck, Paatero, and
Lohmann</label><mixed-citation>
Sierau, B., Chang, R. Y.-W., Leck, C., Paatero, J., and Lohmann, U.:
Single-particle characterization of the high-Arctic summertime aerosol,
Atmos. Chem. Phys., 14, 7409–7430, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-7409-2014" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-14-7409-2014</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>Su et al.(2004)Su, Sipin, Furutani, and Prather</label><mixed-citation>
Su, Y., Sipin, M. F., Furutani, H., and Prather, K. A.: Development and
Characterization of an Aerosol Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer with
Increased Detection Efficiency, Anal. Chem., 76, 712–719,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac034797z" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/ac034797z</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>Sullivan and Prather(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Sullivan, R. C. and Prather, K. A.: Recent advances in our understanding of
atmospheric chemistry and climate made possible by on-line aerosol analysis
instrumentation, Anal. Chem., 77, 3861–85,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ac050716i" target="_blank">doi:10.1021/ac050716i</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>Sullivan et al.(2007)Sullivan, Guazzotti, Sodeman, and
Prather</label><mixed-citation>
Sullivan, R. C., Guazzotti, S. A., Sodeman, D. A., and Prather, K. A.: Direct
observations of the atmospheric processing of Asian mineral dust, Atmos.
Chem. Phys., 7, 1213–1236, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/acp-7-1213-2007" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/acp-7-1213-2007</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib50"><label>Tang et al.(1997)Tang, Tridico, and Fung</label><mixed-citation>
Tang, I. N., Tridico, A. C., and Fung, K. H.: Thermodynamic and optical
properties of sea salt aerosols, J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos., 102, 23269–23275, 1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib51"><label>Thomson et al.(2000)</label><mixed-citation>
Thomson, D. S., Schein, M. E., and Murphy, D. M.: Particle analysis by laser
mass spectrometry WB-57F instrument overview, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33,
153–169, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868200410903" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/027868200410903</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib52"><label>Trimborn et al.(2000)Trimborn, Hinz, and Spengler</label><mixed-citation>
Trimborn, A., Hinz, K. P., and Spengler, B.: Online Analysis of Atmospheric
Particles with a Transportable Laser Mass Spectrometer, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 33, 191–201, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868200410921" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/027868200410921</a>, 2000.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib53"><label>Vaden et al.(2011)Vaden, Imre, Beránek, and
Zelenyuk</label><mixed-citation>
Vaden, T. D., Imre, D., Beránek, J., and Zelenyuk, A.: Extending the
Capabilities of Single Particle Mass Spectrometry: II. Measurements of
Aerosol Particle Density without DMA, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 45,
125–135, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786826.2010.526156" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786826.2010.526156</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib54"><label>Williams et al.(2013)Williams, Gonzalez, Peck, Trimborn, McInnis,
Farrar, Moore, Jayne, Robinson, Lewis, Onasch, Canagaratna, Trimborn, Timko,
Magoon, Deng, Tang, De La Rosa Blanco, Prévôt, Smith, and
Worsnop</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, L. R., Gonzalez, L. A., Peck, J., Trimborn, D., McInnis, J.,
Farrar, M. R., Moore, K. D., Jayne, J. T., Robinson, W. A., Lewis, D. K.,
Onasch, T. B., Canagaratna, M. R., Trimborn, A., Timko, M. T., Magoon, G.,
Deng, R., Tang, D., de la Rosa Blanco, E., Prévôt, A. S. H., Smith,
K. A., and Worsnop, D. R.: Characterization of an aerodynamic lens for
transmitting particles greater than 1 micrometer in diameter into the
Aerodyne aerosol mass spectrometer, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3271–3280,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3271-2013" target="_blank">doi:10.5194/amt-6-3271-2013</a>, 2013.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib55"><label>Zelenyuk and Imre(2005)</label><mixed-citation>
Zelenyuk, A. and Imre, D.: Single Particle Laser Ablation Time-of-Flight
Mass
Spectrometer: An Introduction to SPLAT, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 39,
554–568, <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/027868291009242" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/027868291009242</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib56"><label>Zelenyuk et al.(2009)Zelenyuk, Yang, Choi, and Imre</label><mixed-citation>
Zelenyuk, A., Yang, J., Choi, E., and Imre, D.: SPLAT II: An Aircraft
Compatible, Ultra-Sensitive, High Precision Instrument for In-Situ
Characterization of the Size and Composition of Fine and Ultrafine
Particles, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 43, 411–424,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820802709243" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786820802709243</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib57"><label>Zelenyuk et al.(2010)Zelenyuk, Ezell, Perraud, Johnson, Bruns, Yu,
Imre, Alexander, and Finlayson-Pitts</label><mixed-citation>
Zelenyuk, A., Ezell, M. J., Perraud, V., Johnson, S. N., Bruns, E. A., Yu,
Y.,
Imre, D., Alexander, M. L., and Finlayson-Pitts, B. J.: Characterization of
organic coatings on hygroscopic salt particles and their atmospheric
impacts, Atmos. Environ., 44, 1209–1218,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.11.047" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.11.047</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib58"><label>Zhang et al.(2004)Zhang, Smith, Worsnop, Jimenez, Jayne, Kolb,
Morris, and Davidovits</label><mixed-citation>
Zhang, X., Smith, K. A., Worsnop, D. R., Jimenez, J. L., Jayne, J. T., Kolb,
C. E., Morris, J., and Davidovits, P.: Numerical Characterization of
Particle Beam Collimation: Part II Integrated Aerodynamic-Lens–Nozzle
System, Aerosol Sci. Tech., 38, 619–638,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02786820490479833" target="_blank">doi:10.1080/02786820490479833</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib59"><label>Zhou et al.(2006)Zhou, Rai, and Zachariah</label><mixed-citation>
Zhou, L., Rai, A., and Zachariah, M. R.: Component and morphology biases on
quantifying the composition of nanoparticles using single-particle mass
spectrometry, Int. J. Mass Spectrom., 258, 104–112,
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijms.2006.07.006" target="_blank">doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2006.07.006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
