Measurements of ship emissions
Measurements of ship emissions
Editor(s): J. Hjorth and A. Richter
The contribution of ship emissions to global air pollution is becoming increasingly important as ship traffic is growing rapidly (annual growth rate in total seaborne trade was 5.2% per year from 2002 to 2007), and ship emissions tend to be less limited by regulations than land-based emissions. Ship emissions appear to have a strong impact of concentrations of pollutants over the oceans, but as about 70% of all ship traffic takes place within 400km from land, ship emissions also have a relevant impact on air pollution on land. Ship emissions of SO2 are particularly important, but studies have also shown an impact of ships on NOx and black carbon levels. The contribution to global anthropogenic CO2 emissions was 3.3% in 2007.

An international agreement, the MARPOL convention, will in the coming years reduce ship emissions of SO2 and NOx; the limit for sulfur content of ship fuels is planned to be reduced from the present 4.5% by weight to 3.5% in 2012 and then to 0.5% in 2020. In sulfur emission control areas (e.g. the Baltic Sea and the North Sea), the limit will be as low as 0.1%. Also NOx emission limits will be progressively reduced.

Experimental techniques for measurements of ship emissions have (at least) two principal scopes:

– provide reliable and comprehensive data on ship emissions in order to improve emission inventories;
– identify ships that do not comply with legal emission limits.

The special issue of AMT will present and discuss available techniques for observation of ship emissions, together with some information about the results they have provided. These techniques range from optical methods such as the UV camera, DOAS and lidar, to point measurements, where the so-called "sniffer" method is applied, and on-board measurements with sampling from the stack of a ship. With the "sniffer" method, air pollutants like SO2 or NOx are measured along with CO2 at a point within the plume of the stack emissions from a ship; knowing (approximately) the carbon content of the ship fuel, the emission factor for SO2, for example, can be estimated from the ratio between SO2 and CO2, when their background concentrations have been subtracted.

Another issue regarding measurements of ship emissions is the type of platform that is applied for the instruments. In the papers that are expected for this special issue, both shore-based and several types of mobile platforms, airborne as well as ship-borne, have been tested. Contributions from studies using these and other platforms, including satellites, are very welcome.

Download citations of all papers

19 Aug 2014
Field test of available methods to measure remotely SOx and NOx emissions from ships
J. M. Balzani Lööv, B. Alfoldy, L. F. L. Gast, J. Hjorth, F. Lagler, J. Mellqvist, J. Beecken, N. Berg, J. Duyzer, H. Westrate, D. P. J. Swart, A. J. C. Berkhout, J.-P. Jalkanen, A. J. Prata, G. R. van der Hoff, and A. Borowiak
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 2597–2613, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2597-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-2597-2014, 2014
03 Jul 2014
Airborne emission measurements of SO2 , NOx and particles from individual ships using a sniffer technique
J. Beecken, J. Mellqvist, K. Salo, J. Ekholm, and J.-P. Jalkanen
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1957–1968, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1957-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1957-2014, 2014
12 May 2014
Measuring SO2 ship emissions with an ultraviolet imaging camera
A. J. Prata
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 1213–1229, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1213-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-1213-2014, 2014
21 Jan 2014
Mobile measurements of ship emissions in two harbour areas in Finland
L. Pirjola, A. Pajunoja, J. Walden, J.-P. Jalkanen, T. Rönkkö, A. Kousa, and T. Koskentalo
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 7, 149–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-149-2014,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-7-149-2014, 2014
17 Dec 2013
Physical and chemical characterisation of PM emissions from two ships operating in European Emission Control Areas
J. Moldanová, E. Fridell, H. Winnes, S. Holmin-Fridell, J. Boman, A. Jedynska, V. Tishkova, B. Demirdjian, S. Joulie, H. Bladt, N. P. Ivleva, and R. Niessner
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 3577–3596, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3577-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-3577-2013, 2013
13 Aug 2013
Stack emission monitoring using non-dispersive infrared spectroscopy with an optimized nonlinear absorption cross interference correction algorithm
Y. W. Sun, C. Liu, K. L. Chan, P. H. Xie, W. Q. Liu, Y. Zeng, S. M. Wang, S. H. Huang, J. Chen, Y. P. Wang, and F. Q. Si
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1993–2005, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1993-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1993-2013, 2013
24 Jul 2013
Measurements of air pollution emission factors for marine transportation in SECA
B. Alföldy, J. B. Lööv, F. Lagler, J. Mellqvist, N. Berg, J. Beecken, H. Weststrate, J. Duyzer, L. Bencs, B. Horemans, F. Cavalli, J.-P. Putaud, G. Janssens-Maenhout, A. P. Csordás, R. Van Grieken, A. Borowiak, and J. Hjorth
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 6, 1777–1791, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1777-2013,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-6-1777-2013, 2013
15 May 2012
Ship emissions of SO2 and NO2: DOAS measurements from airborne platforms
N. Berg, J. Mellqvist, J.-P. Jalkanen, and J. Balzani
Atmos. Meas. Tech., 5, 1085–1098, https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1085-2012,https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-5-1085-2012, 2012
CC BY 4.0