Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-6-4577-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-6-4577-2013
23 May 2013
 | 23 May 2013
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal AMT but the revision was not accepted.

Validation of the Suomi NPP Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite total column ozone using Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometers

K. Bai, C. Liu, R. Shi, and W. Gao

Abstract. This study mainly focuses on the validation of total column (TC) ozone data derived from the Ozone Mapping and Profiler Suite (OMPS) on board the NASA's Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership satellite (NPP). OMPS is an advanced suite of three hyperspectral instruments that maps global ozone on a daily basis and extends the more than 30 yr total ozone and ozone profile records. The algorithm used to derive OMPS TC ozone is adapted from the heritage of Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer (TOMS) Version 7 algorithm but with a number of enhancements. Validation is primarily performed through comparisons with an ensemble of 74 global distributed Brewer and Dobson spectrophotometers measurements. Linear regression performs fair agreement between OMPS TC ozone and ground-based TC ozone measurements with root mean square error (RMSE) around of 3% (10 DU). Comparison shows that OMPS TC ozone estimates 0.21% higher than Brewer measurements average, with station-to-station standard deviation of 3.14%. As comparing with Dobson measurements, OMPS TC ozone averages 0.86% higher than the station average with standard deviation of 3.05%. The relative differences between OMPS and ground TC ozone were analysed varying with latitude and time as well as viewing geometry respectively. Comparisons show relative differences within 2% over most of latitude and viewing conditions. Only comparing with Brewer measurements did it show an OMPS TC ozone dependent error, large negative bias was observed as OMPS TC ozone below 220 DU and positive bias shown above 460 DU.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
K. Bai, C. Liu, R. Shi, and W. Gao
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
K. Bai, C. Liu, R. Shi, and W. Gao
K. Bai, C. Liu, R. Shi, and W. Gao

Viewed

Total article views: 1,812 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,105 575 132 1,812 116 115
  • HTML: 1,105
  • PDF: 575
  • XML: 132
  • Total: 1,812
  • BibTeX: 116
  • EndNote: 115
Views and downloads (calculated since 23 May 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 23 May 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 21 Nov 2024