Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-6-7633-2013
https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-6-7633-2013
22 Aug 2013
 | 22 Aug 2013
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal AMT but the revision was not accepted.

Flask sample measurements for CO2, CH4 and CO using cavity ring-down spectrometry

J.-L. Wang, G. Jacobson, C. W. Rella, C.-Y. Chang, I. Liu, W.-T. Liu, C. Chew, C.-F. Ou-Yang, W.-C. Liao, and C.-C. Chang

Abstract. In recent years, cavity ring-down spectrometry (CRDS) has been demonstrated to be a highly sensitive, stable and fast analytical technique for real-time in situ measurements of greenhouse gases. In this study, we propose the technique (which we call flask-CRDS) of analyzing whole air flask samples for CO2, CH4 and CO using a custom gas manifold designed to connect to a CRDS analyzer. Extremely stable measurements of these gases can be achieved over a large pressure range in the flask, from 175 to 760 Torr. The wide pressure range is conducive to flask sample measurement in three ways: (1) flask samples can be collected in low-pressure environments (e.g. high-altitude locations); (2) flask samples can be first analyzed for other trace gases with the remaining low-pressure sample for CRDS analysis of CO2, CH4 and CO; and (3) flask samples can be archived and re-analyzed for validation. The repeatability of this method (1σ of 0.07 ppm for CO2, 0.4 ppb for CH4, and 0.5 ppb for CO) was assessed by analyzing five canisters filled with the same air sample to a pressure of 200 Torr. An inter-comparison of the flask-CRDS data with in-situ CRDS measurements at a high-altitude mountain baseline station revealed excellent agreement, with differences of 0.10 ± 0.09 ppm (1σ) for CO2 and 0.9 ± 1.0 ppb for CH4. This study demonstrated that the flask-CRDS method was not only simple to build and operate but could also perform highly accurate and precise measurements of atmospheric CO2, CH4 and CO in flask samples.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
J.-L. Wang, G. Jacobson, C. W. Rella, C.-Y. Chang, I. Liu, W.-T. Liu, C. Chew, C.-F. Ou-Yang, W.-C. Liao, and C.-C. Chang
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
J.-L. Wang, G. Jacobson, C. W. Rella, C.-Y. Chang, I. Liu, W.-T. Liu, C. Chew, C.-F. Ou-Yang, W.-C. Liao, and C.-C. Chang
J.-L. Wang, G. Jacobson, C. W. Rella, C.-Y. Chang, I. Liu, W.-T. Liu, C. Chew, C.-F. Ou-Yang, W.-C. Liao, and C.-C. Chang

Viewed

Total article views: 1,841 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,120 610 111 1,841 102 120
  • HTML: 1,120
  • PDF: 610
  • XML: 111
  • Total: 1,841
  • BibTeX: 102
  • EndNote: 120
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Aug 2013)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Aug 2013)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 18 May 2024