Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-7-12719-2014
https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-7-12719-2014
18 Dec 2014
 | 18 Dec 2014
Status: this preprint has been withdrawn by the authors.

GPS radio occultation with TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X: sensitivity of lower troposphere sounding to the Open-Loop Doppler model

F. Zus, G. Beyerle, S. Heise, T. Schmidt, and J. Wickert

Abstract. The Global Positioning System (GPS) radio occultation (RO) technique provides valuable input for numerical weather prediction and is considered as a data source for climate related research. Numerous studies outline the high precision and accuracy of RO atmospheric soundings in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere. In this altitude region (8–25 km) RO atmospheric soundings are considered to be free of any systematic error. In the tropical (30° S–30° N) Lower (<8 km) Troposphere (LT), this is not the case; systematic differences with respect to independent data sources exist and are still not completely understood. To date only little attention has been paid to the Open Loop (OL) Doppler model. Here we report on a RO experiment carried out on-board of the twin satellite configuration TerraSAR-X and TanDEM-X which possibly explains to some extent biases in the tropical LT. In two sessions we altered the OL Doppler model aboard TanDEM-X by not more than ±5 Hz with respect to TerraSAR-X and compare collocated atmospheric refractivity profiles. We find a systematic difference in the retrieved refractivity. The bias mainly stems from the tropical LT; there the bias reaches up to ±1%. Hence, we conclude that the negative bias (several Hz) of the OL Doppler model aboard TerraSAR-X introduces a negative bias (in addition to the negative bias which is primarily caused by critical refraction) in our retrieved refractivity in the tropical LT.

This preprint has been withdrawn.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
F. Zus, G. Beyerle, S. Heise, T. Schmidt, and J. Wickert

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
F. Zus, G. Beyerle, S. Heise, T. Schmidt, and J. Wickert
F. Zus, G. Beyerle, S. Heise, T. Schmidt, and J. Wickert

Viewed

Total article views: 1,629 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,121 413 95 1,629 89 88
  • HTML: 1,121
  • PDF: 413
  • XML: 95
  • Total: 1,629
  • BibTeX: 89
  • EndNote: 88
Views and downloads (calculated since 18 Dec 2014)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 18 Dec 2014)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 13 Dec 2024
Download

This preprint has been withdrawn.