Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-8-8563-2015
https://doi.org/10.5194/amtd-8-8563-2015
10 Aug 2015
 | 10 Aug 2015
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal AMT but the revision was not accepted.

Space-borne observation of methane from atmospheric infrared sounder version 6: validation and implications for data analysis

X. Xiong, F. Weng, Q. Liu, and E. Olsen

Abstract. Atmospheric Methane (CH4) is generated as a standard product in recent version of the hyperspectral Atmospheric Infrared Sounder (AIRS-V6) aboard NASA's Aqua satellite at the NASA Goddard Earth Sciences Data and Information Services Center (NASA/GES/DISC). Significant improvements in AIRS-V6 was expected but without a thorough validation. This paper first introduced the improvements of CH4 retrieval in AIRS-V6 and some characterizations, then presented the results of validation using ~ 1000 aircraft profiles from several campaigns spread over a couple of years and in different regions. It was found the mean biases of AIRS CH4 at layers 343–441 and 441–575 hPa are −0.76 and −0.05 % and the RMS errors are 1.56 and 1.16 %, respectively. Further analysis demonstrates that the errors in the spring and in the high northern latitudes are larger than in other seasons or regions. The error is correlated with Degree of Freedoms (DOFs), particularly in the tropics or in the summer, and cloud amount, suggesting that the "observed" spatiotemporal variation of CH4 by AIRS is imbedded with some artificial impact from the retrieval sensitivity in addition to its variation in reality, so the variation of information content in the retrievals needs to be taken into account in data analysis of the retrieval products. Some additional filtering (i.e. rejection of profiles with obvious oscillation as well as those deviating greatly from the norm) for quality control is recommended for the users to better utilize AIRS-V6 CH4, and their implementation in the future versions of the AIRS retrieval algorithm is under consideration.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this preprint. The responsibility to include appropriate place names lies with the authors.
X. Xiong, F. Weng, Q. Liu, and E. Olsen
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
 
Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement
X. Xiong, F. Weng, Q. Liu, and E. Olsen
X. Xiong, F. Weng, Q. Liu, and E. Olsen

Viewed

Total article views: 2,157 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
1,407 646 104 2,157 100 99
  • HTML: 1,407
  • PDF: 646
  • XML: 104
  • Total: 2,157
  • BibTeX: 100
  • EndNote: 99
Views and downloads (calculated since 10 Aug 2015)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 10 Aug 2015)

Cited

Saved

Latest update: 21 Nov 2024