the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
Using Low Cost Sensors to Measure Ambient Particulate Matter Concentrations and On-Road Emissions Factors
Abstract. Air quality is a growing public concern in both developed and developing countries, as is the public interest in having information on air pollutant concentrations within their communities. Quantifying the spatial and temporal variability of ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is of particular importance due to the well-defined health impacts associated with PM2.5. This work evaluates a number of select PM sensors (Shinyei: models PPD42NS, PPD20V, PPD60PV) under a variety of ambient conditions and locations including urban background and roadside sites in Atlanta, GA, as well as a location with substantially higher ambient concentrations in Hyderabad, India. Low cost sensor measurements were compared against reference monitors at all locations. On-road emissions factors were calculated at the Atlanta site by pairing PM2.5 and separately determined black carbon (BC) and carbon dioxide (CO2) measurements. On-road emission factors can vary in different locations and over time for a number of reasons, including vehicle fleet composition and driving patterns and behaviors, and current environmental policy. Emission factors can provide valuable information to inform researchers, citizens, and policy makers. The PPD20V sensors had the highest correlation with the reference environmental beta attenuation monitor (E-BAM) with R2 values above 0.80 at the India site while at the urban background site, the PPD60PV had the highest correlation with the tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) with an R2 value of 0.30. At the roadside site, only the PPD20V was used, with an R2 value against the TEOM of 0.18. Emissions factors at the roadside site were calculated as 0.39 ± 0.10 g PM2.5 per kg fuel and 0.11 ± 0.01g BC per kg fuel, which compare well with other studies and estimates based on other instruments. The results of this work show the potential usefulness of these sensors for high concentration applications in developing countries and for their use in generating emissions factors.
- Preprint
(810 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
-
RC1: 'Review of Johnson et al.', Anonymous Referee #3, 22 Feb 2016
- AC1: 'Response Reveiwer #3', Karoline Johnson, 27 May 2016
- AC2: 'Response to Reviewer #3', Karoline Johnson, 27 May 2016
-
RC2: 'Mspt 2015-331', Anonymous Referee #4, 24 Feb 2016
- AC4: 'Response to Reviewer #4', Karoline Johnson, 27 May 2016
-
RC3: 'amt-2015-331', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Mar 2016
- AC5: 'Response to Reviewer #1', Karoline Johnson, 27 May 2016
-
RC4: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #5, 06 Apr 2016
- AC6: 'Response to Reviewer #5', Karoline Johnson, 27 May 2016
- AC3: 'Revised Manuscript', Karoline Johnson, 27 May 2016
-
RC1: 'Review of Johnson et al.', Anonymous Referee #3, 22 Feb 2016
- AC1: 'Response Reveiwer #3', Karoline Johnson, 27 May 2016
- AC2: 'Response to Reviewer #3', Karoline Johnson, 27 May 2016
-
RC2: 'Mspt 2015-331', Anonymous Referee #4, 24 Feb 2016
- AC4: 'Response to Reviewer #4', Karoline Johnson, 27 May 2016
-
RC3: 'amt-2015-331', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Mar 2016
- AC5: 'Response to Reviewer #1', Karoline Johnson, 27 May 2016
-
RC4: 'Review', Anonymous Referee #5, 06 Apr 2016
- AC6: 'Response to Reviewer #5', Karoline Johnson, 27 May 2016
- AC3: 'Revised Manuscript', Karoline Johnson, 27 May 2016
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,893 | 3,414 | 117 | 5,424 | 135 | 149 |
- HTML: 1,893
- PDF: 3,414
- XML: 117
- Total: 5,424
- BibTeX: 135
- EndNote: 149
Cited
17 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Evaluation of Low-Cost Sensors for Ambient PM2.5 Monitoring M. Badura et al. 10.1155/2018/5096540
- Use of Low-Cost Air Quality Monitoring Devices for Assessment of Road Transport Related Emissions N. Celikkaya et al. 10.1016/j.trpro.2019.09.125
- Relationship Between the Concentrations Of PM2.5 Indoors Obtained by Using the Optical and Gravimetric Methods: Preliminary Analysis J. PASTUSZKA 10.21307/acee-2020-035
- Noise, Cognitive Function, and Worker Productivity J. Dean 10.1257/app.20220532
- Performance evaluation of MeteoTracker mobile sensor for outdoor applications F. Barbano et al. 10.5194/amt-17-3255-2024
- A Review of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors from the Developers’ Perspectives B. Alfano et al. 10.3390/s20236819
- Precision and Accuracy of a Direct-Reading Miniaturized Monitor in PM2.5 Exposure Assessment F. Borghi et al. 10.3390/s18093089
- Practical Particulate Matter Sensing and Accurate Calibration System Using Low-Cost Commercial Sensors H. Cho & Y. Baek 10.3390/s21186162
- Long-term field comparison of multiple low-cost particulate matter sensors in an outdoor urban environment F. Bulot et al. 10.1038/s41598-019-43716-3
- Regression methods in the calibration of low-cost sensors for ambient particulate matter measurements M. Badura et al. 10.1007/s42452-019-0630-1
- Application and evaluation of a low-cost PM sensor and data fusion with CMAQ simulations to quantify the impacts of prescribed burning on air quality in Southwestern Georgia, USA R. Huang et al. 10.1080/10962247.2021.1924311
- Combining Cluster Analysis of Air Pollution and Meteorological Data with Receptor Model Results for Ambient PM2.5 and PM10 H. Jorquera & A. Villalobos 10.3390/ijerph17228455
- Evaluation of particulate matter emissions from non-passenger diesel vehicles in Qatar H. Al-Thani et al. 10.1080/10962247.2019.1704939
- Concept Development and Field Testing of Wireless Outdoor Indicator System for Use in Monitoring Exposures at Work among Malaysian Traffic Police P. Mohamad Jamil et al. 10.3390/toxics11040385
- Evaluation of micro-well collector for capture and analysis of aerosolized Bacillus subtilis spores J. He et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0197783
- Electrostatic capillary collector for in-situ spectroscopic analysis of aerosols G. Mahamuni et al. 10.1080/02786826.2019.1600653
- Laboratory Comparison of Low-Cost Particulate Matter Sensors to Measure Transient Events of Pollution F. Bulot et al. 10.3390/s20082219