Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2017-395
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2017-395
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
03 Jan 2018
| 03 Jan 2018
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal AMT. A revision for further review has not been submitted.
EARLINET lidar quality assurance tools
Abstract. This paper describes the EARLINET quality assurance (QA) check-up tools for the hardware of lidars, developed in the recent years to monitor and improve the quality of the lidar systems and of their products. These check-up tools are the trigger-delay test, the Rayleigh-fit, the lidar test-pulse generator, the dark measurement, the telecover test, and the polarisation calibration.
How to cite. Freudenthaler, V., Linné, H., Chaikovski, A., Rabus, D., and Groß, S.: EARLINET lidar quality assurance tools, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2017-395, in review, 2018.
Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Download & links
Download & links
- Preprint
(5411 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC1: 'Review of manuscript amt-2017-395', Anonymous Referee #3, 30 Jan 2018
-
RC2: 'Referee Comment', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Mar 2018
-
RC3: 'referee report', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Apr 2018
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC1: 'Review of manuscript amt-2017-395', Anonymous Referee #3, 30 Jan 2018
-
RC2: 'Referee Comment', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Mar 2018
-
RC3: 'referee report', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Apr 2018
Viewed
Total article views: 4,467 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Jan 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2,965 | 1,388 | 114 | 4,467 | 163 | 159 |
- HTML: 2,965
- PDF: 1,388
- XML: 114
- Total: 4,467
- BibTeX: 163
- EndNote: 159
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 4,170 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 4,145 with geography defined
and 25 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Latest update: 27 Nov 2025
Volker Freudenthaler
Meteorologisches Institut der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität, Munich, Germany
Holger Linné
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Anatoli Chaikovski
B.I. Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus
Dieter Rabus
Meteorologisches Institut der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität, Munich, Germany
retired
Silke Groß
Meteorologisches Institut der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität, Munich, Germany
now at: Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
Special issue