Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2017-395
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2017-395
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
03 Jan 2018
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal AMT. A revision for further review has not been submitted.
EARLINET lidar quality assurance tools
Volker Freudenthaler
Meteorologisches Institut der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität, Munich, Germany
Holger Linné
Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
Anatoli Chaikovski
B.I. Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus
Dieter Rabus
Meteorologisches Institut der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität, Munich, Germany
retired
Silke Groß
Meteorologisches Institut der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität, Munich, Germany
now at: Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
Abstract. This paper describes the EARLINET quality assurance (QA) check-up tools for the hardware of lidars, developed in the recent years to monitor and improve the quality of the lidar systems and of their products. These check-up tools are the trigger-delay test, the Rayleigh-fit, the lidar test-pulse generator, the dark measurement, the telecover test, and the polarisation calibration.
How to cite. Freudenthaler, V., Linné, H., Chaikovski, A., Rabus, D., and Groß, S.: EARLINET lidar quality assurance tools, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2017-395, in review, 2018.
Download & links
Volker Freudenthaler et al.
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC1: 'Review of manuscript amt-2017-395', Anonymous Referee #3, 30 Jan 2018
-
RC2: 'Referee Comment', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Mar 2018
-
RC3: 'referee report', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Apr 2018
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC1: 'Review of manuscript amt-2017-395', Anonymous Referee #3, 30 Jan 2018
-
RC2: 'Referee Comment', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Mar 2018
-
RC3: 'referee report', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Apr 2018
Volker Freudenthaler et al.
Volker Freudenthaler et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 2,994 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Jan 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,947 | 992 | 55 | 2,994 | 76 | 57 |
- HTML: 1,947
- PDF: 992
- XML: 55
- Total: 2,994
- BibTeX: 76
- EndNote: 57
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,731 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,706 with geography defined
and 25 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
15 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Comparison of two automated aerosol typing methods and their application to an EARLINET station K. Voudouri et al. 10.5194/acp-19-10961-2019
- Interrelations between surface, boundary layer, and columnar aerosol properties derived in summer and early autumn over a continental urban site in Warsaw, Poland D. Wang et al. 10.5194/acp-19-13097-2019
- A semi-automated procedure for the emitter–receiver geometry characterization of motor-controlled lidars M. Di Paolantonio et al. 10.5194/amt-15-1217-2022
- Description and applications of a mobile system performing on-road aerosol remote sensing and in situ measurements I. Popovici et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4671-2018
- Development of an Automatic Polarization Raman LiDAR for Aerosol Monitoring over Complex Terrain L. Wang et al. 10.3390/s19143186
- Saharan dust and biomass burning aerosols during ex-hurricane Ophelia: observations from the new UK lidar and sun-photometer network M. Osborne et al. 10.5194/acp-19-3557-2019
- Are EARLINET and AERONET climatologies consistent? The case of Thessaloniki, Greece N. Siomos et al. 10.5194/acp-18-11885-2018
- First validation of GOME-2/MetOp absorbing aerosol height using EARLINET lidar observations K. Michailidis et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3193-2021
- Synergy processing of diverse ground-based remote sensing and in situ data using the GRASP algorithm: applications to radiometer, lidar and radiosonde observations A. Lopatin et al. 10.5194/amt-14-2575-2021
- Polarization Raman Lidar for Atmospheric Monitoring in the Vipava Valley L. Wang et al. 10.1051/epjconf/202023702029
- Polarization lidar for detecting dust orientation: system design and calibration A. Tsekeri et al. 10.5194/amt-14-7453-2021
- The Raman LIDAR for the pre-production phase of Cherenkov Telescope Array M. Iarlori et al. 10.1051/epjconf/201919702004
- Long-range-transported Canadian smoke plumes in the lower stratosphere over northern France Q. Hu et al. 10.5194/acp-19-1173-2019
- The Potential of GRASP/GARRLiC Retrievals for Dust Aerosol Model Evaluation: Case Study during the PreTECT Campaign D. Konsta et al. 10.3390/rs13050873
- Mobile On-Road Measurements of Aerosol Optical Properties during MOABAI Campaign in the North China Plain I. Popovici et al. 10.3390/atmos13010021
Latest update: 03 Jun 2023
Special issue