Volker Freudenthaler1 , Holger Linné2 , Anatoli Chaikovski3 , Dieter Rabus1,* , and Silke Groß1,a
Volker Freudenthaler et al.
Volker Freudenthaler1 , Holger Linné2 , Anatoli Chaikovski3 , Dieter Rabus1,* , and Silke Groß1,a
1 Meteorologisches Institut der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität, Munich, Germany 2 Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany 3 B.I. Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus a now at: Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany * retired
1 Meteorologisches Institut der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität, Munich, Germany 2 Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany 3 B.I. Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus a now at: Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany * retired
Hide
Received: 10 Nov 2017 – Accepted for review: 05 Dec 2017 – Discussion started: 03 Jan 2018
Abstract. This paper describes the EARLINET quality assurance (QA) check-up tools for the hardware of lidars, developed in the recent years to monitor and improve the quality of the lidar systems and of their products. These check-up tools are the trigger-delay test, the Rayleigh-fit, the lidar test-pulse generator, the dark measurement, the telecover test, and the polarisation calibration.
Volker Freudenthaler et al.
Interactive discussion
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC : Author comment | RC : Referee comment | SC : Short comment | EC : Editor comment
Interactive discussion
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC : Author comment | RC : Referee comment | SC : Short comment | EC : Editor comment
Volker Freudenthaler et al.
Volker Freudenthaler et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 1,860 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
BibTeX
EndNote
1,309
518
33
1,860
38
35
HTML: 1,309
PDF: 518
XML: 33
Total: 1,860
BibTeX: 38
EndNote: 35
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Jan 2018)
Month
HTML
PDF
XML
Total
Jan 2018
169
56
8
233
Feb 2018
33
18
7
58
Mar 2018
27
26
0
53
Apr 2018
27
10
1
38
May 2018
28
21
0
49
Jun 2018
15
17
0
32
Jul 2018
20
9
1
30
Aug 2018
25
13
0
38
Sep 2018
20
11
1
32
Oct 2018
32
11
1
44
Nov 2018
30
11
0
41
Dec 2018
25
11
1
37
Jan 2019
19
13
0
32
Feb 2019
13
14
0
27
Mar 2019
20
9
2
31
Apr 2019
36
29
1
66
May 2019
39
31
0
70
Jun 2019
18
18
0
36
Jul 2019
25
20
0
45
Aug 2019
16
13
0
29
Sep 2019
117
13
0
130
Oct 2019
105
25
0
130
Nov 2019
142
16
0
158
Dec 2019
86
11
0
97
Jan 2020
75
18
0
93
Feb 2020
11
16
0
27
Mar 2020
6
10
0
16
Apr 2020
10
8
2
20
May 2020
18
19
0
37
Jun 2020
14
0
14
Jul 2020
71
11
6
88
Aug 2020
15
6
2
23
Sep 2020
2
4
0
6
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Jan 2018)
Month
HTML views
PDF downloads
XML downloads
Jan 2018
169
56
8
Feb 2018
202
74
15
Mar 2018
229
100
15
Apr 2018
256
110
16
May 2018
284
131
16
Jun 2018
299
148
16
Jul 2018
319
157
17
Aug 2018
344
170
17
Sep 2018
364
181
18
Oct 2018
396
192
19
Nov 2018
426
203
19
Dec 2018
451
214
20
Jan 2019
470
227
20
Feb 2019
483
241
20
Mar 2019
503
250
22
Apr 2019
539
279
23
May 2019
578
310
23
Jun 2019
596
328
23
Jul 2019
621
348
23
Aug 2019
637
361
23
Sep 2019
754
374
23
Oct 2019
859
399
23
Nov 2019
1,001
415
23
Dec 2019
1,087
426
23
Jan 2020
1,162
444
23
Feb 2020
1,173
460
23
Mar 2020
1,179
470
23
Apr 2020
1,189
478
25
May 2020
1,207
497
25
Jun 2020
1,221
497
25
Jul 2020
1,292
508
31
Aug 2020
1,307
514
33
Sep 2020
1,309
518
33
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 1,619 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 1,597 with geography defined
and 22 with unknown origin.
Total:
0
HTML:
0
PDF:
0
XML:
0
Cited
Saved
Discussed
No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 23 Sep 2020
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
