Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2017-395
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2017-395
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
03 Jan 2018
03 Jan 2018
Status: this preprint was under review for the journal AMT. A revision for further review has not been submitted.
EARLINET lidar quality assurance tools
- 1Meteorologisches Institut der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität, Munich, Germany
- 2Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
- 3B.I. Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus
- anow at: Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
- *retired
- 1Meteorologisches Institut der Ludwig–Maximilians–Universität, Munich, Germany
- 2Max Planck Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany
- 3B.I. Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus
- anow at: Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany
- *retired
Abstract. This paper describes the EARLINET quality assurance (QA) check-up tools for the hardware of lidars, developed in the recent years to monitor and improve the quality of the lidar systems and of their products. These check-up tools are the trigger-delay test, the Rayleigh-fit, the lidar test-pulse generator, the dark measurement, the telecover test, and the polarisation calibration.
How to cite. Freudenthaler, V., Linné, H., Chaikovski, A., Rabus, D., and Groß, S.: EARLINET lidar quality assurance tools, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss. [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2017-395, in review, 2018.
Download & links
Volker Freudenthaler et al.
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC1: 'Review of manuscript amt-2017-395', Anonymous Referee #3, 30 Jan 2018
-
RC2: 'Referee Comment', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Mar 2018
-
RC3: 'referee report', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Apr 2018
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
Status: closed (peer review stopped)
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
- Printer-friendly version
- Supplement
-
RC1: 'Review of manuscript amt-2017-395', Anonymous Referee #3, 30 Jan 2018
-
RC2: 'Referee Comment', Anonymous Referee #2, 28 Mar 2018
-
RC3: 'referee report', Anonymous Referee #1, 06 Apr 2018
Volker Freudenthaler et al.
Volker Freudenthaler et al.
Viewed
Total article views: 2,657 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 03 Jan 2018)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,779 | 831 | 47 | 2,657 | 66 | 52 |
- HTML: 1,779
- PDF: 831
- XML: 47
- Total: 2,657
- BibTeX: 66
- EndNote: 52
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Total article views: 2,397 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Thereof 2,372 with geography defined
and 25 with unknown origin.
| Country | # | Views | % |
|---|
| Total: | 0 |
| HTML: | 0 |
| PDF: | 0 |
| XML: | 0 |
- 1
1
Cited
15 citations as recorded by crossref.
- Comparison of two automated aerosol typing methods and their application to an EARLINET station K. Voudouri et al. 10.5194/acp-19-10961-2019
- Interrelations between surface, boundary layer, and columnar aerosol properties derived in summer and early autumn over a continental urban site in Warsaw, Poland D. Wang et al. 10.5194/acp-19-13097-2019
- A semi-automated procedure for the emitter–receiver geometry characterization of motor-controlled lidars M. Di Paolantonio et al. 10.5194/amt-15-1217-2022
- Description and applications of a mobile system performing on-road aerosol remote sensing and in situ measurements I. Popovici et al. 10.5194/amt-11-4671-2018
- Development of an Automatic Polarization Raman LiDAR for Aerosol Monitoring over Complex Terrain L. Wang et al. 10.3390/s19143186
- Saharan dust and biomass burning aerosols during ex-hurricane Ophelia: observations from the new UK lidar and sun-photometer network M. Osborne et al. 10.5194/acp-19-3557-2019
- Are EARLINET and AERONET climatologies consistent? The case of Thessaloniki, Greece N. Siomos et al. 10.5194/acp-18-11885-2018
- First validation of GOME-2/MetOp absorbing aerosol height using EARLINET lidar observations K. Michailidis et al. 10.5194/acp-21-3193-2021
- Synergy processing of diverse ground-based remote sensing and in situ data using the GRASP algorithm: applications to radiometer, lidar and radiosonde observations A. Lopatin et al. 10.5194/amt-14-2575-2021
- Polarization Raman Lidar for Atmospheric Monitoring in the Vipava Valley L. Wang et al. 10.1051/epjconf/202023702029
- Polarization lidar for detecting dust orientation: system design and calibration A. Tsekeri et al. 10.5194/amt-14-7453-2021
- The Raman LIDAR for the pre-production phase of Cherenkov Telescope Array M. Iarlori et al. 10.1051/epjconf/201919702004
- Long-range-transported Canadian smoke plumes in the lower stratosphere over northern France Q. Hu et al. 10.5194/acp-19-1173-2019
- The Potential of GRASP/GARRLiC Retrievals for Dust Aerosol Model Evaluation: Case Study during the PreTECT Campaign D. Konsta et al. 10.3390/rs13050873
- Mobile On-Road Measurements of Aerosol Optical Properties during MOABAI Campaign in the North China Plain I. Popovici et al. 10.3390/atmos13010021
Latest update: 20 Sep 2022
Special issue