Journal cover Journal topic
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques An interactive open-access journal of the European Geosciences Union
Journal topic

Journal metrics

IF value: 3.668
IF3.668
IF 5-year value: 3.707
IF 5-year
3.707
CiteScore value: 6.3
CiteScore
6.3
SNIP value: 1.383
SNIP1.383
IPP value: 3.75
IPP3.75
SJR value: 1.525
SJR1.525
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 77
Scimago H
index
77
h5-index value: 49
h5-index49
Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-379
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2019-379
© Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

  30 Oct 2019

30 Oct 2019

Review status
This preprint was under review for the journal AMT but the revision was not accepted.

Comparison of RO tropopause height based on different tropopause determination methods

Ziyan Liu1,2,3, Weihua Bai1,2, Yueqiang Sun1,2, Junming Xia1,2, Guangyuan Tan1,2,3, Cheng Cheng4, Qifei Du1,2, Xianyi Wang1,2, Danyang Zhao1,2, Yusen Tian1,2,3, Xiangguang Meng1,2, Congliang Liu1,2, Yuerong Cai1,2, and Dongwei Wang1,2 Ziyan Liu et al.
  • 1National Space Science Centre, Chinese Academy of Sciences (NSSC/CAS), Beijing 100190, China
  • 2Beijing Key Laboratory of Space Environment Exploration, Beijing 100190, China
  • 3University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 4State Intellectual Property Office of the P.R.C, Beijing 100088, China

Abstract. Tropopause region is a significant layer among the earth's atmosphere, receiving increasing attention from atmosphere and climate researchers. To monitor global tropopause via radio occultation (RO) data, there are mainly two methods, one is the widely used temperature lapse rate method, and the other is bending angle covariance transform method. In this paper, we use FengYun3-C (FY3C) and Meteorological Operational Satellite Program (MetOp) RO data and European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis data to analyse the difference of RO tropopause height calculated by the two methods mentioned above. To give an objective and complete analysis, we first take ECMWF lapse rate tropopause (LRT) height (LRTH) as reference to discuss the absolute bias of RO LRTH and RO bending angle tropopause (BAT) height (BATH), and then give the comparison results between RO LRTH and corresponding RO BATH as supplement to analyse the difference between tropopause height derived from the above two methods. The results indicate that BATH show consistent 0.8–1.2 km positive bias over tropics and high latitude region compared with LRTH, and over mid latitude region, results of BATH show less stability. Besides, the mean bias between BATH and LRTH presents different symmetrical characteristic during 2017.12–2018.2 (DJF) and 2018.6–2018.8 (JJA). However, the mean value of both LRTH and BATH show the similar tropopause variation trend, indicating the availability of both two methods.

Ziyan Liu et al.

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Interactive discussion

Status: closed
Status: closed
AC: Author comment | RC: Referee comment | SC: Short comment | EC: Editor comment
Printer-friendly Version - Printer-friendly version Supplement - Supplement

Ziyan Liu et al.

Ziyan Liu et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 370 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
268 89 13 370 13 13
  • HTML: 268
  • PDF: 89
  • XML: 13
  • Total: 370
  • BibTeX: 13
  • EndNote: 13
Views and downloads (calculated since 30 Oct 2019)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 30 Oct 2019)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 226 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 224 with geography defined and 2 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Saved

No saved metrics found.

Discussed

No discussed metrics found.
Latest update: 23 Sep 2020
Publications Copernicus
Download
Short summary
This papr mainly gives the results, comparison and bias analysis about thermal tropopause height calculated by two mainstream determination method in terms of different latitude locations and seasons. The tropopause height results in this paper are derived from the data of two RO missions, China's FengYun-3 and Europe's MetOp. For lapse rate tropopause, MetOp and FY3C show defference over subtropics. The difference between bending angle tropopause and lapse rate tropopause varies with seasons.
This papr mainly gives the results, comparison and bias analysis about thermal tropopause height...
Citation