Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-12
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-12
 
24 Mar 2022
24 Mar 2022
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal AMT.

Passive ground-based remote sensing of radiation fog

Heather Guy1,2, David D. Turner3, Von P. Walden4, Ian M. Brooks2, and Ryan R. Neely1,2 Heather Guy et al.
  • 1National Centre for Atmospheric Science, Leeds, U.K.
  • 2School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, U.K.
  • 3Global Systems Laboratory, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Boulder, CO, USA
  • 4Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Laboratory for Atmospheric Research, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA

Abstract. Accurate boundary layer temperature and humidity profiles are crucial for successful forecasting of fog, and accurate retrievals of liquid water path are important for understanding the climatological significance of fog. Passive ground-based remote sensing systems such as microwave radiometers (MWRs) that have multiple channels between 22–31 GHz and 51–59 GHz, and infrared spectrometers such as the Atmospheric Emitted Radiance Interferometer (AERI) which measures spectrally resolved infrared radiation (3.3 to 19.2 μm) can retrieve both thermodynamic profiles and liquid water path. Both instruments are capable of long-term unattended operation and have the potential to support operational forecasting. Here we compare physical retrievals of boundary layer thermodynamic profiles and liquid water path during 13 cases of supercooled radiation fog from a MWR and an AERI collocated in central Greenland. We compare both sets of retrievals to in-situ measurements from radiosondes and surface-based temperature and humidity sensors. The retrievals based on AERI observations accurately capture shallow surface-based temperature inversions (0–10 m a.g.l) with lapse rates of up to -1.2 °C m−1, whereas the strength of the surface-based temperature inversions retrieved from MWR observations are uncorrelated with in-situ measurements. For all but one case study, the retrievals based on AERI observations detect fog onset (defined by a threshold in liquid water path) earlier than those based on MWR observations by up to 4 hours. We propose that due to the high sensitivity of the AERI instrument to near-surface temperature and small changes in liquid water path, the AERI (or an equivalent infrared spectrometer) could be a useful instrument for improving fog monitoring and nowcasting.

Heather Guy et al.

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on amt-2022-12', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Mar 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on amt-2022-12', Anonymous Referee #2, 12 Apr 2022
  • RC3: 'Comment on amt-2022-12', Anonymous Referee #3, 22 Apr 2022

Heather Guy et al.

Heather Guy et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 319 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
238 68 13 319 3 4
  • HTML: 238
  • PDF: 68
  • XML: 13
  • Total: 319
  • BibTeX: 3
  • EndNote: 4
Views and downloads (calculated since 24 Mar 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 24 Mar 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 309 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 309 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 24 May 2022
Download
Short summary
Fog formation is highly sensitive to the near-surface temperature and humidity profile. Instruments that monitor downwelling microwave radiation provide continuous measurements of the vertical temperature and humidity profile that can improve fog forecasts. Here we show that a similar instrument that monitors infrared radiation is more sensitive to the development of the near-surface temperature profile during fog events and is better suited to detecting and characterising fog.