Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-223
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2022-223
 
22 Aug 2022
22 Aug 2022
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal AMT.

Quality control and error assessment of the Aeolus L2B wind results from the Joint Aeolus Tropical Atlantic Campaign

Oliver Lux1, Benjamin Witschas1, Alexander Geiß2, Christian Lemmerz1, Fabian Weiler1, Uwe Marksteiner1, Stephan Rahm1, Andreas Schäfler1, and Oliver Reitebuch1 Oliver Lux et al.
  • 1German Aerospace Center (Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e.V., DLR), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Oberpfaffenhofen 82234, Germany
  • 2Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Meteorological Institute, 80333 Munich, Germany

Abstract. Since the start of the European Space Agency’s Aeolus mission in 2018, various studies were dedicated to the evaluation of its wind data quality, and particularly to the determination of the systematic and random errors of the Rayleigh-clear and Mie-cloudy wind results provided in the Aeolus Level-2B (L2B) product. The quality control (QC) schemes applied in the analyses mostly rely on the estimated error (EE), reported in the L2B data, using different and often subjectively chosen thresholds for rejecting data outliers. This work gives insight into the calculation of the EE for the two receiver channels and reveals its limitations as a measure of the actual wind error. The spatial and temporal variability of the Rayleigh and Mie EE values, together with the inconsistency in the QC approaches, hampers the comparability of the results across different validation studies. It is demonstrated that a precise error assessment of the Aeolus winds necessitates a careful statistical analysis, including a rigorous screening for gross errors to be compliant with the error definitions formulated in the Aeolus mission requirements. To this end, the modified Z-score and normal quantile plots are shown to be useful statistical tools for effectively eliminating gross errors and for evaluating the normality of the wind error distribution in dependence on the applied QC scheme, respectively. The influence of different QC approaches and thresholds on key statistical parameters is discussed in the context of the Joint Aeolus Tropical Atlantic Campaign (JATAC), which was conducted in Cabo Verde in September 2021. Aeolus winds are compared against model background data from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) before assimilation of Aeolus winds and against wind data measured with the 2-µm heterodyne-detection Doppler wind lidar (DWL) onboard the Falcon aircraft. The two studies make evident that the error distribution of the Mie-cloudy winds is strongly skewed with a preponderance of positively biased gross errors distorting the statistics if not filtered out properly. Effective outlier removal is accomplished by applying a two-step QC based on the EE and the modified Z-score, thereby ensuring an error distribution with a high degree of normality while retaining a large portion of wind results from the original dataset. The same is true for the Rayleigh-clear winds, although the errors are more homogeneously distributed. After utilization of the described QC approach, the systematic errors of the L2B Rayleigh-clear and Mie-cloudy winds are determined to be below 0.3 m s-1 with respect to both the ECMWF model background and the 2-µm DWL. Differences in the random errors relative to the two reference datasets (Mie vs. model: 5.3 m s-1, Mie vs. DWL: 4.1 m s-1; Rayleigh vs. model: 7.8 m s-1; Rayleigh vs. DWL: 8.2 m s-1) are elaborated in the text.

Oliver Lux et al.

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on amt-2022-223', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Sep 2022
  • RC2: 'Comment on amt-2022-223', Anonymous Referee #2, 19 Sep 2022
  • RC3: 'Comment on amt-2022-223', Anonymous Referee #3, 24 Sep 2022

Oliver Lux et al.

Oliver Lux et al.

Viewed

Total article views: 220 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
162 48 10 220 1 1
  • HTML: 162
  • PDF: 48
  • XML: 10
  • Total: 220
  • BibTeX: 1
  • EndNote: 1
Views and downloads (calculated since 22 Aug 2022)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 22 Aug 2022)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 229 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 229 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 28 Sep 2022
Download
Short summary
The work discusses the influence of different quality control schemes on the results of Aeolus wind product validation and presents statistical tools for ensuring consistency and comparability among diverse validation studies with regards to the specific error characteristics of the Rayleigh-clear and Mie-cloudy winds. The developed methods are applied for the validation of Aeolus winds against ECMWF model background and airborne wind lidar data from the Joint Aeolus Tropical Atlantic Campaign.