the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Pico-Light H2O: Intercomparison of in situ water vapour measurements during the AsA 2022 campaign
Mélanie Ghysels
Georges Durry
Nadir Amarouche
Dale Hurst
Emrys Hall
Kensy Xiong
Jean-Charles Dupont
Jean-Christophe Samake
Fabien Frérot
Raghed Bejjani
Emmanuel Damien Riviere
Abstract. The mid-infrared lightweight stratospheric hygrometer, “Pico-Light H2O”, the successor of Pico-SDLA H2O, is presented and its performances are evaluated during the AsA 2022 balloon-borne intercomparison campaign conducted at the CNES Aire-sur-l'Adour (AsA) balloon launch facility and the Aeroclub d'Aire-sur-l'Adour. The Pico-Light instrument has primarily been developed for sounding of the upper troposphere and stratosphere. Though, during the AsA 2022 campaign we expand the range of comparison including the lower troposphere additionally. Three different types of hygrometers and two models of radiosondes were flown, operated by the French Space Agency (CNES) and the NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory (GML) scientific teams: Pico-Light H2O, the NOAA Frost Point Hygrometer (FPH), the micro hygrometer (in an early phase of development), M20 and iMet-4 sondes. The in situ monitoring of water vapour in the UT-LS keeps being very challenging from an instrumental point of view because of the very small amounts of water vapour to be measured in these regions of the atmosphere. Between the lapse rate tropopause (11 to 12.3 km) and 20 km, the mean relative difference between water vapour mixing ratio measurements by Pico-Light H2O and NOAA FPH was (4.2 ± 7.7) %, mean tropospheric difference is was (3.84 ± 23.64) %, with differences depending on the altitude range considered. In the troposphere, relative humidity over water (RH) comparisons leads to an agreement between both Pico-Light and NOAA FPH of -0.2 % on average, with excursions of about 30 % RH due to moisture variability. Expanding the comparison to meteorological sondes, the iMet-4 sondes agree well with both Pico-Light and FPH between ground and 7.5 km (within ± 3 % RH) and so does for M20 sondes, up to 13 km, which are wet biased by 3 % RH and dry biased by 20 % in case of saturation.
- Preprint
(1792 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Mélanie Ghysels et al.
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on amt-2023-191', Anonymous Referee #1, 10 Nov 2023
reply
Dear Melanie Ghysels,
You find my review in the attached pdf File.
The manuscript presents an impressive instrument development.
Best wishes
Mélanie Ghysels et al.
Mélanie Ghysels et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
171 | 43 | 5 | 219 | 4 | 4 |
- HTML: 171
- PDF: 43
- XML: 5
- Total: 219
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 4
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1