Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-195
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-195
15 Sep 2023
 | 15 Sep 2023
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal AMT.

TOLNet validation of satellite ozone profiles in the troposphere: impact of retrieval wavelengths

Matthew S. Johnson, Alexei Rozanov, Mark Weber, Nora Mettig, John Sullivan, Michael J. Newchurch, Shi Kuang, Thierry Leblanc, Fernando Chouza, Timothy A. Berkoff, Guillaume Gronoff, Kevin B. Strawbridge, Raul J. Alvarez, Andrew O. Langford, Christoph J. Senff, Guillaume Kirgis, Brandi McCarty, and Larry Twigg

Abstract. The Tropospheric Ozone Lidar Network (TOLNet) was applied to validate retrievals of ozone (O3) profiles in the troposphere from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) ultraviolet (UV), Cross-track Infrared Sounder (CrIS) infrared (IR), and a combined UV+IR wavelength retrieval from TROPOMI/CrIS. Observations from six separate ground-based lidar systems and various locations of ozonesondes distributed throughout North America and Europe were applied to quantify systematic bias and random errors for each satellite retrieval. Furthermore, TOLNet data were used to intercompare idealized UV, IR, and UV+IR convolved profiles of O3 in the troposphere during case studies representative of high O3 events. This study shows that the combination of wavelengths in satellite retrievals (i.e., UV+IR) increases the sensitivity and vertical resolution of the retrievals of O3 in the troposphere compared to single-wavelength products. The improved sensitivity and vertical resolution in UV+IR retrievals in the middle- and upper-troposphere resulted in tropospheric degree of freedom (DOF) values ~33 % higher compared to UV- and IR-only retrievals. The increased DOFs in the UV+IR retrievals allowed for improved reproduction of mid- and upper-tropospheric O3 enhancements, and to a lesser degree near-surface pollution enhancements, compared to single wavelength satellite products.

The validation of O3 profiles in the troposphere retrieved with the UV-only, IR-only, and UV+IR Tikhonov regularised Ozone Profile retrievAl with SCIATRAN (TOPAS) algorithm developed at the Institute for Environmental Physics, University of Bremen demonstrated the utility of using TOLNet as a satellite evaluation data set. TOPAS UV-only, IR-only, and UV+IR wavelength retrievals had systematic biases throughout the troposphere of 11.2 ppb (22.1 %), -1.7 ppb (-0.3 %), and 3.5 ppb (7.8 %), respectively, which meet the tropospheric systematic bias requirements of TROPOMI and CrIS. The primary drivers of systematic bias were determined to be the a priori vertical profile shape, solar zenith angle, and surface albedo. Random errors, representative of uncertainty in the retrievals, were large for all three retrievals with UV-only, IR-only, and UV+IR wavelength retrievals having root mean squared errors (RMSE) throughout the troposphere of 17.4 ppb (19.8 % of mean tropospheric column values), 10.5 ppb (12.6 % of mean tropospheric column values), and 14.0 ppb (14.6 % of mean tropospheric column values), respectively. TOPAS UV-only profiles did not meet the uncertainty requirements defined for TROPOMI for the troposphere; however, CrIS IR-only retrievals did meet the uncertainty requirements defined by this mission. The larger random biases reflect the challenge of retrieving daily O3 profiles due to the limited sensitivity and vertical resolution of these retrievals in the troposphere. Tropospheric systematic biases and random error were lower in IR-only and combined UV+IR retrievals compared to UV-only products due to the increased sensitivity in the troposphere allowing the retrievals to deviate further from the a priori profiles. Consistent daily observations from TOLNet demonstrated that the performance of the three satellite products varied by season and altitude in the troposphere. TOLNet was shown in this study to be a sufficient source of satellite O3 profile validation data in the troposphere which is critical as this data source is the primary product identified for the tropospheric O3 validation of the recently-launched Tropospheric Emissions: Monitoring of Pollution (TEMPO) mission.

Matthew S. Johnson, Alexei Rozanov, Mark Weber, Nora Mettig, John Sullivan, Michael J. Newchurch, Shi Kuang, Thierry Leblanc, Fernando Chouza, Timothy A. Berkoff, Guillaume Gronoff, Kevin B. Strawbridge, Raul J. Alvarez, Andrew O. Langford, Christoph J. Senff, Guillaume Kirgis, Brandi McCarty, and Larry Twigg

Status: final response (author comments only)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
  • RC1: 'Comment on amt-2023-195', Anonymous Referee #1, 14 Nov 2023
  • RC2: 'Comment on amt-2023-195', Anonymous Referee #2, 02 Jan 2024
  • RC3: 'Comment on amt-2023-195', Anonymous Referee #3, 03 Jan 2024
Matthew S. Johnson, Alexei Rozanov, Mark Weber, Nora Mettig, John Sullivan, Michael J. Newchurch, Shi Kuang, Thierry Leblanc, Fernando Chouza, Timothy A. Berkoff, Guillaume Gronoff, Kevin B. Strawbridge, Raul J. Alvarez, Andrew O. Langford, Christoph J. Senff, Guillaume Kirgis, Brandi McCarty, and Larry Twigg
Matthew S. Johnson, Alexei Rozanov, Mark Weber, Nora Mettig, John Sullivan, Michael J. Newchurch, Shi Kuang, Thierry Leblanc, Fernando Chouza, Timothy A. Berkoff, Guillaume Gronoff, Kevin B. Strawbridge, Raul J. Alvarez, Andrew O. Langford, Christoph J. Senff, Guillaume Kirgis, Brandi McCarty, and Larry Twigg

Viewed

Total article views: 446 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
351 75 20 446 27 14 14
  • HTML: 351
  • PDF: 75
  • XML: 20
  • Total: 446
  • Supplement: 27
  • BibTeX: 14
  • EndNote: 14
Views and downloads (calculated since 15 Sep 2023)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 15 Sep 2023)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 439 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 439 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 18 Feb 2024
Download
Short summary
Monitoring tropospheric ozone (O3), a harmful pollutant negatively impacting human health, is primarily done using ground-based measurements and ozonesondes. However, these observation types lack the coverage to fully understand tropospheric O3. Satellites can retrieve tropospheric ozone with near daily global coverage; however, are known to have biases and errors. This study uses ground-based lidars to validate multiple satellite’s ability to observe tropospheric O3.