the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Optimized design of flux chambers for measurement of ammonia emission after field application of slurry with full-scale farm machinery
Abstract. Field applied liquid animal manure (slurry) is a significant source of ammonia (NH3) emission, which is harmful to the environment and human health. To evaluate mitigation options, reliable measurements of effects are needed. A new system of dynamic flux chambers (DFC) with high time resolution online measurements was developed. The system was investigated in silico with computational fluid dynamics and tested in three field trials, each trial assessing the variability after application with trailing hose at different scales: manual (handheld), 3-m experimental slurry boom, and 30-m farm-scale commercial slurry boom. For the experiments with machine application, parallel NH3 emission measurements were made using an inverse dispersion modelling method (backward Lagrangian stochastic modelling, bLS). The lowest coefficient of variation of replicate DFC measurements was obtained with manual application, followed by the 3-m slurry boom, and lastly the 30-m slurry boom. Conditions in DFCs resulted in a consistently higher NH3 flux than what was measured with the inverse dispersion technique but both methods showed a similar emission reduction by injection compared to trailing hose: 89 % by DFC and 97 % by bLS. The new measurement system facilitates NH3 emission measurement with replication after both manual and farm-scale slurry application with relatively high precision, with a coefficient of variation of 5 % among replicates with manual slurry application and 20 % for farm-scale slurry application.
- Preprint
(971 KB) - Metadata XML
-
Supplement
(1761 KB) - BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: final response (author comments only)
-
RC1: 'Comment on amt-2023-212', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Jan 2024
The paper titled " Optimized design of flux chambers for measurement of ammonia emission after field application of slurry with full-scale farm machinery" aimed to investigate a new design of dynamic flux chambers (DFC) for NH3 emission measurements. The DFC was studied before with computational fluid dynamics and then tested in three field trials, in comparison to wind tunnels and backward Lagrangian stochastic method.
The intention of the paper is good and interesting and the nature of the problem is well introduced.
Materials and methods provide detailed instructions.
I suggest introducing a little discussion of the results, as well as possible implications of them. My specific comments are listed below:
Paragraph 3.1: please could you better clarify the geometry of the deflector plate and its function.
Lines 309-311: please add some references to this section in order to enhance the discussion part related to the CFD.
Lines 318-319: when you wrote about the final inlet design, could you describe it?
Figure 4 C: please explain the reason why there are so many differences among DFC replicates in the last trial.
Line 408: When you wrote “During both trials with parallel bLS measurements, the ambient wind speed was relatively low” is it possible that the air speed inside the chambers did not fit the wind speed of the external environment at the same height? Maybe it is higher, that is why you may have an overestimation of the NH3 emissions?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-212-RC1 -
RC2: 'Comment on amt-2023-212', A. Sanz-Cobena, 11 Apr 2024
Dear authors,
I have had the pleasure to revise your MS entitled “Optimized design of flux chambers for measurement of ammonia emission after field application of slurry with full-scale farm machinery”. The MS is nicely written and well structured. I have not observed any major constraint in your work thus I can recommend its publication in Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, which I do think is a good target journal for the publication of such type of research.
In my view, only few minor changes are needed prior publication. These minor comments are stated below:
- Objectives of the work are presented at the end of the introduction but then a long statement on CFD (lines 50-60). Mybe better moving that text above thus clearly showing the objectives of the work for the readers.
- In subsection 2.1.1. the sentence “Inspired by the laboratory chambers used by Dominique et al. (2013) and Georgios et al. (2013)” is just a repetition of the first sentence in section 2. Please, try to modify it to avoid being redundant.
- Please, add the author/source of figure 1. Same for figure 2.
- Line 160: “Anaerobically digested slurry”, cow slurry?
- All tables. Please check and use the same type of letter than the full text.
- Line 234. Please, check if there is a grey area in the reference.
- Line 246. Please, check the size of the letter in the case of the reference.
- Line 279. The year is missing for the reference used.
- Reference list: be uniform with the style and size of letters for all references.
Yours sincerely,
Alberto Sanz-Cobeña
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-212-RC2
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | Supplement | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
234 | 60 | 13 | 307 | 20 | 12 | 11 |
- HTML: 234
- PDF: 60
- XML: 13
- Total: 307
- Supplement: 20
- BibTeX: 12
- EndNote: 11
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1