the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
An iterative algorithm to simultaneously retrieve aerosol extinction and effective radius profiles using the CALIOP lidar
Liang Chang
Jingjing Ren
Changrui Xiong
Lu Zhang
Abstract. The Cloud-Aerosol Lidar with Orthogonal Polarization (CALIOP) onboard the Cloud-Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observation (CALIPSO) satellite has been widely used in climate and environment studies to obtain the vertical profiles of atmospheric aerosols. To retrieve the vertical profile of aerosol extinction, the CALIOP algorithm assumes column-averaged lidar ratios based on a clustering of aerosol optical properties measured at surface stations. On one hand, these lidar ratio assumptions may not be appropriate or representative at certain locations. One the other hand, the two-wavelength design of CALIOP has the potential to constrain aerosol size information, which has not been considered in the operational algorithm. In this study, we present a modified inversion algorithm to simultaneously retrieve aerosol extinction and effective radius profiles using two-wavelength elastic lidars such as the CALIOP. Specifically, a look-up table is built to relate the lidar ratio with the Ångström exponent calculated using aerosol extinction at the two wavelengths, and the lidar ratio is then determined iteratively without a priori assumption. The retrieved two-wavelength extinction at each layer is then converted to particle effective radius assuming a lognormal distribution. The algorithm is tested on synthetic data, Raman lidar measurements and then finally the real CALIOP backscatter measurements. Results show improvements over the CALIPSO operational algorithm by comparing with ground-based Raman lidar profiles.
- Preprint
(3693 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Liang Chang et al.
Status: open (until 28 Dec 2023)
-
RC1: 'Comment on amt-2023-223', Anonymous Referee #1, 13 Nov 2023
reply
Review of "An iterative algorithm to simultaneously retrieve aerosol extinction and effective radius profiles using the CALIOP lidar" by Liang Chang et al.
Recommendation: Minor Revisions
The manuscript "An iterative algorithm to simultaneously retrieve aerosol extinction and effective radius profiles using the CALIOP lidar" provides a modified two-wavelength lidar inversion algorithm to retrieve the vertical distribution of both aerosol extinction and particle effective radius. The study built a look-up table to relate the lidar ratio with the Ångström exponent calculated using aerosol extinction at the two wavelengths. In order to verify the accuracy of the algorithm, two different lidar data (ground-based Raman lidar and CALIOP) were used for the application and the results showed good agreement.
In general, the paper presented in a logical way, but lightly lacking in English expression. The algorithm has some prospects of practical application. I therefore recommend publication of this paper in Atmospheric Measurement Techniques after minor revisions. My comments are listed as follows:
Specific Comments:
- Table 1 shows the aerosols parameters of the look-up table. How were these parameters obtained? If derived from experimental or simulation results, please explain in the manuscript and provide references.
- In line 148 of the manuscript, it is mentioned “an initial guess”. How did this initial guess work out? Does the selection of values for the initial guess affect the final results obtained.
- In line 18 How are these four types of aerosols distinguished and determined? Please explain in the manuscript.
- Figure 5(d) shows the results of the aerosol effective radius profiles obtained from the inversion, but without corresponding comparative validation results. How can the accuracy of the algorithm be demonstrated?
- In Section 4, uncertainty analysis, the authors have only made a general analysis without giving specific values; various assumptions are used in the algorithm and the corresponding uncertainty analysis should be given.
Technical Corrections
- Line 32: The literature (Ipcc,2023) should be changed to (IPCC, 2023).
- Line 43: There should be a space between the number and the unit (532 nm) and line 179 (53 m)
- In Section 3.1, the unit “nm” has different fonts, please standardize the format.
- Line 125: “with some size distribution”, the word ‘some’ doesn't seem to fit here.
- Line 166: “To save space” can be removed. should be a space between the number and the unit (1 km)
- There is only one red line in figure 5(d), so the subtitle can be revised to “Particle radius profile”.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2023-223-RC1
Liang Chang et al.
Liang Chang et al.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
171 | 35 | 4 | 210 | 4 | 3 |
- HTML: 171
- PDF: 35
- XML: 4
- Total: 210
- BibTeX: 4
- EndNote: 3
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1