the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
STRAS: a new high time resolution aerosol sampler for PIXE analysis
Abstract. The joint use of hourly resolution sampling and analyses with accelerated ion beams such as Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) technique has allowed the measurement of hourly temporal patterns of particulate matter (PM) composition at many sites in different parts of the world. The demand within the scientific community for this type of analysis has been continuously increasing in recent years, but hourly resolution samplers suitable for PIXE analysis are now discontinued and/or suffer from some technical limitations. In this framework, a new hourly sampler, STRAS (Size and Time Resolved Aerosol Sampler), was developed for the collection of PM10, PM2.5 or PM1. It allows automatic sequential sampling of up to 168 hourly samples (1 week), it is mechanically robust, compact, and easily transportable. To increase PIXE sensitivity, each sample is concentrated on a small surface area on a polycarbonate membrane. The comparison between the elemental concentrations retrieved by STRAS samples and samples collected using a standard sequential sampler operated in parallel shows a very good agreement; indeed, if both the samplers use the same kind of membrane, the concentrations of all detected elements are in agreement within 10 %.
- Preprint
(2604 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 10 Dec 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on amt-2024-137', Anonymous Referee #1, 11 Nov 2024
reply
The manuscript titled “STRAS: a new high time resolution aerosol sampler for PIXE analysis” has developed a new hourly sampler, called STRAS, which can be used to automatically collect sequential samples of up to 168. Specially, a small surface area for depositing particles is designed for detecting elements using the Particle Induced X-ray Emission (PIXE) technique. Field measurements were conducted to perform comparison between STRAS and other sampling instruments. Overall, it is a good advancement of the sampling technique. There are several comments that need to be addressed as below.
The main issue is how to verify the accuracy and reproductivity of the newly invented sampler? The manuscript has compared the results between STRAS and Gemini, which both shared the same inlet, cabinet, pump, air flow control system as stated by the authors. As samplers are subject to various uncertainties and Gemini is not a reference sampler, the good consistency between STRAS and Gemini doesn’t guarantee the reliability of STRAS. It is essential to use standard particles with known concentrations and compositions for verifying a new instrument.  Â
Section 4.1, Since the authors have revealed the filter collection efficiency, is this collection efficiency robust or random? how to account for the loss of particles in the application?
Line 95 - 105: The description is not written in a scientific manner, it is more like a manual.
Line 288 – 289: I cannot foresee the application of STRAS in measurement of black carbon or brown carbon as aethalometer has advantages especially on its time resolution.
Â
Â
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-137-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
104 | 17 | 5 | 126 | 5 | 2 |
- HTML: 104
- PDF: 17
- XML: 5
- Total: 126
- BibTeX: 5
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1