the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Characterizing Urban Planetary Boundary Layer Dynamics Using 3-Year Doppler Wind Lidar Measurements in a Western Yangtze River Delta City, China
Abstract. Understanding the dynamics of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) is crucial for comprehending land-atmosphere interactions. This study utilizes three years of Doppler wind lidar measurements from June 2019 to June 2022 to investigate PBL dynamics over Hefei, a city in the Western Yangtze River Delta, China. We focus on the seasonal and diurnal variations in key characteristics, such as wind profiles, shear intensity, turbulent mixing, low-level jets (LLJs), and mixing layer heights (MLH). Results show that horizontal wind speeds accelerated more rapidly above 3 km, with the predominant westerly winds (270°±15°) in all seasons. The vertical depth of high wind zone (> 8 m s-1) during the day is found generally deeper than at night, particularly in winter. In Hefei, LLJs primarily form at sunset and dissipate by noon, typically at altitudes between 0.5 and 0.6 km throughout the year, except in July. LLJ occurrences are most frequent in spring (31.7 %), followed by summer (24.7 %), autumn (22.3 %), and winter (21.3 %). Summer LLJs are most intensified, extending up to 1.5 km. The larger wind gradient below the jets significantly enhances turbulence and shear intensity near the ground at night. The seasonal average MLH peaks between 2:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m., reaching approximately 1.2 km in spring and summer. Cloud cover raises MLH by about 100 m at night but decreases it by 200 m at the afternoon peak. This study provides insights into lidar-based PBL dynamics and highlights implications for local standards concerning low-altitude economic activities.
- Preprint
(3786 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 03 Jan 2025)
-
RC1: 'Comment on amt-2024-178', Anonymous Referee #1, 09 Dec 2024
reply
General Comments:
This manuscript presents a comprehensive analysis of planetary boundary layer (PBL) dynamics over Hefei, China, based on 3-years of Doppler wind lidar measurements. The study is well-structured and highlights critical aspects of urban PBL, such as low-level jets (LLJs), mixing layer height (MLH), wind shear intensity and turbulence kinetic energy dissipation rates (TKEDR). The use of long-term lidar data provides valuable insights into both scientific understanding and practical applications, including atmospheric modeling and low-altitude economic activities. Overall, the study is well-conducted and contributes to the understanding of urban PBL dynamics. However, the manuscript could benefit from improvements in the depth of analysis and clarity of presentation, as outlined below.Specific Comments:
- The key parameters of the lidar are currently provided in the Appendix. It is better to include them in Section 2.1 to improve accessibility for readers.
- The manuscript references a wide range of studies, but the connections between previous research and the current work are not always explicitly stated. For example, in the discussion of LLJs, more emphasis on their implications for urban pollution or low-altitude economic activities in similar East Asian climates would strengthen the relevance.
- Figure 5: The wind rose diagrams effectively summarize LLJ characteristics. Including a brief explanation of how these patterns relate to seasonal meteorological phenomena would enhance their interpretability.
- A figure of 500-hPa geopotential height is included in the Appendix but lacks sufficient explanation. If this figure is essential, consider elaborating on its implications for PBL dynamics and referencing related studies to support the discussion. Otherwise, it may be better to remove the figure to streamline the manuscript.
- While the manuscript is generally well-written, certain sections and sentences could be simplified to improve readability. Additionally, minor errors should be corrected, such as:
- Line 78: “which the CBL” (Repeated phrase).
- Line 194: Missing space after “0.02 m s-1.”
- Please review for consistency in terminology and formatting throughout the manuscript.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-178-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
112 | 25 | 5 | 142 | 7 | 6 |
- HTML: 112
- PDF: 25
- XML: 5
- Total: 142
- BibTeX: 7
- EndNote: 6
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1