the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Atmospheric propane (C3H8) column retrievals from ground-based FTIR observations at Xianghe, China
Abstract. Propane (C3H8) is an important trace gas in the atmosphere, as it is a proxy for oil and gas production and has a significant impact on atmospheric chemical reactions related to the hydroxyl radical and tropospheric ozone formation. In this study, solar direct absorption spectra near 2967 cm−1 recorded by a ground-based Fourier Transform InfraRed spectrometer (FTIR) are applied to retrieve C3H8 total columns between June 2018 and July 2022 at Xianghe in North China. The systematic and random uncertainties of the C3H8 column retrieval are estimated to be 18.2 % and 18.1 %, respectively. The mean and standard deviation of the C3H8 columns derived from the FTIR spectra at Xianghe are 1.80±0.81(1σ) × 1015 molecules / cm2. Good correlations are found between C3H8 and other non-methane hydrocarbons, such as C2H6 (R=0.84) and C2H2 (R=0.79), as well as between C3H8 and CO (R=0.72). However, the correlation between C3H8 and CH4 is relatively weak (R=0.45). The FTIR C3H8 measurements are also compared against two atmospheric chemical transport model simulations (the Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model (WACCM) and the Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service (CAMS)). We find that the C3H8 columns from both models have different seasonal variations as compared to the FTIR measurements. Moreover, the mean C3H8 columns derived from the WACCM and CAMS models are about 68 % larger than the FTIR retrievals. The new FTIR measurements at Xianghe provide us an insight into the C3H8 column variations and underlying processes in North China.
- Preprint
(2669 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 23 May 2024)
-
RC1: 'Comment on amt-2024-67', Anonymous Referee #1, 29 Apr 2024
reply
This study investigates the C3H8 retrieval from ground-based FTIR spectra at Xianghe, and discuss the C3H8 column variation in North China, based on these new FTIR measurements. The technical details and uncertainty discussion are generally well provided in current form, but the result part, such as data comparison and trend explanation, are somewhat less satisfactory. Overall, I suggest the publication on AMT after presenting more information for data interpretation. Specific suggestions are listed below.
- Method 2.3: Line 20-25: It is still not clear why perform a profile retrieval for H2O column concentration. Because each species could have large variability in vertical scale. Moreover, suggest providing more technical details about the how to perform a profile retrieval.
- Section 3.2: Since the large difference exists for seasonal variation of C3H8 column concentration between model and FTIR measurements, it would be better not present this comparison in the main text, unless the authors could provide more evidence or information to explain these differences. For example, the authors could collect some surface observation of C3H8 concentration in Xianghe or surrounding regions that used for comparison to FTIR retrieval near the surface.
- Section 3.3 Line 20-25: What is the significance by providing the ratio of ∆C2H6 to ∆C3H8? What does the trend of this ratio mean?
Section 3.4: The authors compare FTIR measurement to MkIV data here, but the basic information about MkIV measurement were not well described. Readers might be very interested about the principle of technique used for C3H8 measurement in MkIV and the accuracy of these data. Based on these information, we can rule out the systematic difference deviation between FTIR and MkIV.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-67-RC1
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
93 | 15 | 3 | 111 | 2 | 2 |
- HTML: 93
- PDF: 15
- XML: 3
- Total: 111
- BibTeX: 2
- EndNote: 2
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1