the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
An Improvement of the One-dimensional Ocean Wave Description based on SWIM Observations
Abstract. The one-dimensional ocean wave spectra (1D spectra) describing the total energy of the ocean waves are vital for providing ocean surface roughness information in remote sensing simulations. Most existing wave spectrum models deviate from real ocean surface descriptions due to limitations of observation methods and approximation in theories applied to generating them. In this research, the widely applied Goda and Elfouhaily spectra in their 1-D form are compared with the remote sensing products from the Surface Waves Investigation and Monitoring instrument (SWIM) on-board the China France Oceanography Satellite (CFOSAT). Differences between models and the measurements are addressed, then the causes are analyzed and concluded in terms of sea states. Then, a Combined spectrum (C spectrum) considering varied sea states is proposed as a closer model to the observations of the real sea, where parameterization of the spectral peak enhancement factor (γ) is achieved by the inverse wave age and wave steepness for multiple sea states. Then the specific values of the all-state sea are obtained from SWIM observations. The validation of the C spectrum is achieved by comparisons with SWIM measurements not utilized during the model establishment, and with buoy measurements. The difference index (DI) and the R-squared (R2), are calculated for evaluation of the results, indicating that the C spectrum demonstrates closer fitting to the SWIM and buoy measurements than both Goda and Elfouhaily spectra. The DI and R2 for the C spectrum are compared to the Goda spectrum, which is closer to SWIM measurements than E spectrum, and values are 0.780 and 0.909 respectively. Results suggest the C spectrum is suitable for providing information required for remote sensing applications. Further research would be focusing on implementing description in different azimuthal directions.
- Preprint
(2068 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (until 31 Dec 2024)
-
CC1: 'Comment on amt-2024-75', Wenming Lin, 07 Jul 2024
reply
This paper combines the widely used Goda and Elfouhaily spectra in order to improve the one-dimensional wave spectrum. The SWIM data are used for both model development and result verification. The NDBC buoy data is used for validation as well. Based on the evaluation of DI and R2 parameters, it shows that the proposed spectrum (C spectrum) generally performs better than G/E spectrum in term of characterizing the wave energy distribution. The contents of this paper are clear, and the steps of the methodologies are well described. The manuscript is generally well written, though the English is not native and needs polishing.
- Title: “An Improved One-dimensional Ocean Wave Description based on SWIM Observations” may be more concise
- Structure:
a). Keep concise on the description of G/E spectra, and highlight the C spectrum. Particularly, please clarify how you fit the (23)-(24) and (26) – (28).
b). in the result section, you may present the case study (3.4.2) firstly and then illustrate the general verifications.
- Regarding the combination of C spectrum, it’s not a surprise that C spectrum generally agrees better with G spectrum than E spectrum. Is there any case showing that the old G/E spectra may be superior to C spectrum? Why?
Minor comments:
- Do you fit the model using SWIM data, and then calculate R2 and DI for the same wavelength bin as SWIM? Please clarify the effective range of SWIM wavelength in the text, as well the range of integration in Eqs. (21) – (23).
- Page 1, lines 15-16: two “then” appears in the two sentences.
- Page 1, lines 22-23: “The DI and R2 for the C …. 0.909 respectively”. It is not necessary to introduce the detailed numbers here. Lines 24-25, “Further research would … directions.” Remove this sentence.
- Introduction, there are many other wave spectra not reviewed in this section, such as Huang’s model.
- Page 2, lines 57-58, “validation of the C spectrum … of the sea surface.” Conclusion should go to the conclusion section.
- Page 3, lines 73-74: “… describing the inverted transfer of wave …”. This sentence is vague, please rephrase.
- Page 5, lines 127-132. “In comparsion …. observations well.” Are the descriptions the results of this manuscript or previous studies?
- Page 7, line 185, “the Surface Waves Investigation and Monitoring (SWIM) carried”. Not necessary to write abbreviation again here. BTW, which version of SWIM data is used in this study.
- Page 8, lines 200 – 201, informal numbers in the text.
- You may use SWH instead of H1/3 in the text.
- Page 11, figure 4, I don’t see the variation of H1/3 in the caption or in this figure. Please clarify.
- Remove “This is” in the captions of Figures 7-10.
- Page 15, line 325, this sentence is vague, please rephrase.
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-75-CC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on CC1', Xingou Xu, 13 Aug 2024
reply
Thanks for the comments and suggestions!
Please see the attached file for the replies. The revised manuscript will be provided later, following the revision procedures.
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
227 | 67 | 28 | 322 | 22 | 20 |
- HTML: 227
- PDF: 67
- XML: 28
- Total: 322
- BibTeX: 22
- EndNote: 20
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1