the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Development and Comparison of Empirical Models for All-sky Downward Longwave Radiation Estimation at the Ocean Surface Using Long-term Observations
Abstract. The ocean-surface downward longwave radiation (Rl) is one of the most fundamental components of the radiative energy balance, and it has a remarkable influence on air–sea interactions. Because of various shortcomings and limits, a lot of empirical models were established for ocean-surface Rl estimation for practical applications. In this paper, based on comprehensive measurements collected from 65 moored buoys distributed across global seas from 1988 to 2019, a new model for estimating the all-sky ocean-surface Rl at both hourly and daily scales was built. The ocean-surface Rl was formulated as a nonlinear function of the screen-level air temperature, relative humidity, cloud fraction, total column cloud liquid, and ice water. A comprehensive evaluation of this new model relative to eight existing models was conducted under clear-sky and all-sky conditions at daytime/nighttime hourly and daily scales. The validation results showed that the accuracy of the newly constructed model is superior to other models, yielding overall RMSE values of 14.82 and 10.76 W/m2 under clear-sky conditions, and 15.95 and 10.27 W/m2 under all-sky conditions, at hourly and daily scales, respectively. Our analysis indicates that the effects of the total column cloud liquid and ice water on the ocean-surface Rl also need to be considered besides cloud cover. Overall, the newly developed model has strong potential to be widely used.
- Preprint
(2058 KB) - Metadata XML
- BibTeX
- EndNote
Status: open (extended)
-
RC1: 'Comment on amt-2024-85', Anonymous Referee #1, 21 Sep 2024
reply
This is well-written and a good presentation of a new model for downwelling long wave. As a reader I kept looking for but did not find the motivation for developing the model. I suggest it would improve the paper to explain the motivation. What is the need for a new model? Why not use satellite based long wave radiation at the surface (As Pinker et al describe - this seems to be more accurate than the model you developed.)? Why not use surface radiation from ERA5 reanalysis or from ECMWF model - you import cloud information from ERA5, so why not just take surface radiation from that model? Years ago, absent satellite or model based surface radiation, folks needed a model such as your to estimate surface long wave to force, for example, an ocean model. But now people use model or satellite fields. So will anybody utilize your new model? What was the purpose in developing it?
Citation: https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-2024-85-RC1 -
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jianghai Peng, 09 Oct 2024
reply
The comment was uploaded in the form of a supplement: https://amt.copernicus.org/preprints/amt-2024-85/amt-2024-85-AC1-supplement.pdf
-
AC1: 'Reply on RC1', Jianghai Peng, 09 Oct 2024
reply
Viewed
HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
240 | 60 | 15 | 315 | 11 | 12 |
- HTML: 240
- PDF: 60
- XML: 15
- Total: 315
- BibTeX: 11
- EndNote: 12
Viewed (geographical distribution)
Country | # | Views | % |
---|
Total: | 0 |
HTML: | 0 |
PDF: | 0 |
XML: | 0 |
- 1